Skip to main content
PMC home page
PhytoKeys logoLink to PhytoKeys
. 2024 Apr 25;241:155–168. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.241.117734

Carexqingyuanensis (Cyperaceae), a new species from Guangdong, China

Ya-Li Li 1,2, Shuang-Wen Deng 1, Jin-Chu Luo 1, Ming-Xia Li 1,3, Li-Ting Zou 1, Qiu-Gen Zeng 4, Hong-Feng Chen 1,✉
PMCID: PMC11066503  PMID: 38706583

Abstract

Carexqingyuanensis, a new species of Cyperaceae from Guangdong Province, China, is described and illustrated. The new species is morphologically similar to Carexpeliosanthifolia F. T. Wang & Tang ex P. C. Li, but it can be distinguished by the racemose inflorescence branches appearing single (rarely binate or ternate) (vs. binate or ternate), one (rarely two or three) (vs. 1–3) spiked, male part of linear-cylindrical spikes much longer than the female part (vs. just male part short-cylindrical and slightly longer than female part), style base thickened (vs. not thickened) and perigynium horizontally patent with a short (vs. long and excurved) beak. Phylogenetic analysis, based on the two nuclear DNA regions (ETS 1f and ITS) and three chloroplast DNA regions (matK, ndhF and rps16), suggests that the new species belongs to sect. Siderostictaes.s. of subg. Siderosticta and shows a closer phylogenetic relationship to Carexscaposa C. B. Clarke.

Key words: Carex sect. Siderostictaes.s., morphology, new species, taxonomy

Introduction

Carex Linnaeus with ca. 2000 species, is one of the largest angiosperm genera and is distributed almost globally (Dai et al. 2000; Frodin 2004; Global Carex Group 2016). The rapid advancement of sequencing technology has significantly enhanced our comprehension of the relationships within Carex. According to the latest phylogenetic study, Villaverde et al. (2020) demonstrated there were six main lineages in Carex, identified as the Siderostictae, Schoenoxiphium, Unispicate, Uncinia, Vignea and Core Carex clades. Despite advancements, the phylogenetic relationships in Carex are not yet sufficient clear for a global reclassification of the genus within a Linnean infrageneric (sectional) framework. Because of this, the Global Carex Group (2021) employed a hybrid approach, utilizing both informally named clades and formally named sections. Their classification system represents the currently understood diversity of Carex lineages, encompassing six subgenera, 62 formally designated Linnean sections, and 49 informal groups. In the recently published volume of the Flora of China (Dai et al. 2010), a total of 527 species were documented. Since then, nearly 40 new species and two subspecies have been described from China (Jin et al. 2004; Song et al. 2008; Jin 2009; Su 2009a, 2009b; Weng et al. 2009; Jin and Zheng. 2010; Jin et al. 2011, 2012a, 2012b; Zhao et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2012; Yu et al. 2012; Deng 2014; Yang et al. 2014; Jin and Chen 2015; Yang et al. 2015a, 2015b; Yang et al. 2016; Jin 2017; Yang et al. 2017; Lu and Jin 2018; Zhang et al. 2018; Lu et al. 2020; Yang and Liu 2020; Zhang et al. 2021; Li et al. 2022; Lu and Jin 2022; Lu et al. 2022). The new species were mainly discovered in the Provinces of Zhejiang, Guangxi and Anhui.

Many studies provide substantial evidence supporting Carexsubg.Siderosticta as the sister lineage to the remaining taxa within Carex (Waterway et al. 2009; Starr et al. 2015; Global Carex Group 2016, 2019; Uzma Jiménez-Mejías et al. 2019; Villaverde et al. 2020). The clade exhibits considerable variability and has a narrow distribution confined primarily to East and Southeast Asia (Global Carex Group 2021).

Carexsect.Siderostictaes.s. includes 27 species, in three traditional sections: Hemiscaposae (12 species), Siderostictaes.l. (13 species) and Surculosae (2 species). However, these sections are not supported by the latest phylogenetic hypotheses (Global Carex Group 2021). All species in the traditional sect. Siderostictaes.l. and some species in the traditional sect. Hemiscaposae are pink-red at the base of the plant, leaves or bracts (Global Carex Group 2021). Carexsect.Hemiscaposae is unique in Carex for its androgynous inflorescence units, leafless pseudolateral culms and pseudopetiolate leaves. The leaves of these species are much wider (up to 12 cm) and show high similarities to Curculigo Gaertn (Hypoxidaceae) (Starr et al. 2015; Ford et al. 2017). Moreover, the section is noted especially for its unprecedented variety of inflorescences, ranging from simple to compound (Ford et al. 2017). Eight species have been described within sect. Hemiscaposae, primarily found in broadleaf evergreen forests in southern-central and southeast China (including Taiwan) (Nelmes 1955; Raymond 1959; Yang and Chen 2005; Lunkai et al. 2010). Despite the relatively small number of species, their classification is challenging due to subtle characteristic differences (Ford et al. 2017). Carexsect.Siderostictaes.s. is differentiated from the closely related sect. Hypolytroides by the presence of bisexual spikes and leafless fertile culms that seem to emerge laterally from leaf rosettes (Global Carex Group 2021).

During a botanical survey of Bijia Mountain Forest Farm which is located in Qingxin District, Qingyuan City, Guangdong Province, China, covering an area of 2646.11 ha, with an approximate elevation of 1000 m, a new species of Carex in sect. Siderostictaes.s. (traditionally placed in sect. Hemiscaposae) (subg. Siderosticta) was discovered in the forest on slopes. A detailed description of the species is provided below.

Materials and methods

The material of this new species was collected during the botanical survey conducted at Bijia Mountain Forest Farm. In order to conduct a thorough morphological comparison and phylogenetic analysis, samples of similar species Carexpeliosanthifolia and Carexscaposa were collected from Shangguchen, Jinxiu County, Guangxi Province, China (110°8′36.69″E, 23°53′42.15″N).

A total of 21 samples representing two sections and three clades were used for molecular phylogenetic analysis, based on the updated infrageneric classification of Carex (Global Carex Group 2021) and the sequencing available on GenBank. These sections and clades included Sect. Siderostictaes.s. (13 species), Sect. Hypolytroides (two species), Setigera Clade (two species), Decora Clade (two species), Esquiroliana Clade (one species), and Eriophorumvaginatum (Table 1). Additionally, this study provided 15 new sequences, which included three species: C.qingyuanensis, C.peliosanthifolia and C.scaposa. The remaining sequences were obtained from the GenBank public database at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Genbank numbers for samples used and in combined ITS, ETS 1f, matK, ndhF, and rps16 analyses.

Sect. Species ITS ETS 1f matK ndhF rps16
Sect. Siderostictaes.s. Carexadrienii KP273628 KP273594 KP273663 KP273717 KP273771
Sect. Siderostictaes.s. Carexgeographica KX722473 / KX722479 KX722485 KX722491
Sect. Siderostictaes.l. Carexglossostigma MN762656 / KP273686 KP273740 /
Sect. Siderostictaes.l. Carexgrandiligulata MW459022 MW458991 MW459089 / /
Sect. Siderostictaes.s. Carexkucyniakii KP273651 KP273617 KP273695 KP273749 KP273805
Sect. Siderostictaes.s. Carexpachygyna DQ998936 DQ998882 MW459090 / /
Sect. Siderostictaes.s. Carexpeliosanthifolia OR450685 OR463437 OR464515 OR464518 OR464521
Sect. Siderostictaes.s. Carexqingyuanensis OR450686 OR463436 OR464514 OR464517 OR464520
Sect. Siderostictaes.s. Carexscaposa OR450687 OR463438 OR464516 OR464519 OR464522
Sect. Siderostictaes.l. Carexsiderosticta KP273658 KP273624 KJ513592 KJ513499 KP273817
Sect. Siderostictaes.s. Carexthinii KX722474 KX722468 KX722480 KX722486 KX722492
Sect. Siderostictaes.s. Carextsiangii KU496610 KU377556 KU496590 / /
Sect. Siderostictaes.l. Carexwuyishanensis MW459024 MW458993 MW459091 / /
sect. Hypolytroides Carexhypolytroides KP273647 KP273612 KP273690 KP273744 KP273800
sect. Hypolytroides Carexmoupinensis KP273653 KP273619 KP273699 KP273753 KP273809
Setigera Clade Carexbaccans KP273632 KP273598 KP273669 KP273723 KP273778
Setigera Clade Carexmyosurus KP273654 KP273620 KP273700 KP273754 KP273810
Decora Clade Carexcruciata KP273637 KP273603 KP273676 KP273730 KP273787
Decora Clade Carexfilicina KP273642 KP273608 KP273682 KP273736 KP273793
Esquiroliana Clade Carexesquiroliana MN762053 MN761064 MN763585 / /
Outgroup Eriophorumvaginatum AH012952.2 AH012952.2 KJ513615 KJ513522 KP273830
Open in a new tab

Two nuclear DNA regions (ETS 1f and ITS) and three chloroplast DNA regions (matK, ndhF and rps16) (at least three genes) were used for the phylogenetic analysis. The amplified primers followed Starr et al. (2003) for ETS 1f, White et al. (1990) and Blattner (1999) for ITS, Gilmour et al. (2013) for matK and ndhF and Starr et al. (2015) for rps16.

The sequences were aligned using the online version of MAFFT (Katoh et al. 2019). The ETS 1f, ITS, matK, ndhF and rps16 were combined in eight Sequence Matrix (combined nDNA-cpDNA; combined nDNA; combined cpDNA; ETS 1f; ITS; matK; ndhF; and rps16). PhyloSuite (Zhang et al. 2020) software was used to generate the Maximum Likelihood (ML) tree and Bayesian (BI) trees, with Eriophorumvaginatum set as the outgroup (Starr et al. 2015). ML analysis was conducted using IQ-TREE (Nguyen et al. 2015) with 5000 standard non-parametric bootstrap replicates. BI analysis was performed using MrBayes 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012), two independent parallel chains and 5,000,000 generations with sampling once every 100 generations. The first 25% of trees from all runs were discarded as burn-in. Finally, ITOL (Ivica and Peer 2019) software was used for tree visualisation and refinement.

Taxonomic treatment

. Carex qingyuanensis

Y.L. Li & H.F. Chen sp. nov.

B20A9870-240D-50CC-B3F4-2FF3385CFFB6

urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:77340693-1

Type.

China. Guangdong Province, Qingyuan City, Qingxin District, Bijia Mountain Forest Farm, 23°49′45″N, 113°03′07″E, 600 m elev., in the forest, on the rocks, 18 November 2022, Li Yali & Chen Hongfeng LYL0012 (holotype: IBSC; isotype: IBSC) (Figs 1, 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

ACarexqingyuanensisB abaxial and adaxial surface of leaf blade C culm D, E spikes F adaxial surface of pistillate glume G abaxial surface of pistillate glume H adaxial surface of staminate glume I abaxial surface of staminate glume J, K staminate flower L anther M perigynium N stigmas O, P nutlets Q the transection of nutlet. Drawn by Mrs. Liu Yunxiao based on Li Yali & Chen Hongfeng LYL0012.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

A habitat of CarexqingyuanensisB infructescence of C.qingyuanensisC infructescence of C.peliosanthifoliaD inflorescence of C.qingyuanensisE inflorescence of C.peliosanthifoliaF spikes of C.qingyuanensisG spike of C.peliosanthifoliaH short beak of C.qingyuanensisI long beak of C.peliosanthifoliaJ immature nutlets + base thickened style of C.qingyuanensisK immature nutlets + unthickened style of C.peliosanthifolia.

Diagnosis.

The new species is similar to Carexpeliosanthifolia F. T. Wang & Tang ex P. C. Li, but differs by having inflorescence branches racemose, single (rarely binate or ternate), one (rarely two or three) spiked, (vs. binate or ternate, one-three spiked), male part of spikes short-cylindrical or linear-cylindrical and slightly or much longer than female part (vs. just male part short-cylindrical and slightly longer than female part); style base thickened (vs. not thickened); beak short and slightly curved (vs. long and excurved).

Description.

Perennial herbs. Rhizome stoloniferous, woody. Culms lateral, trigonous, loosely pubescent, base with brown sheaths, 15–60 cm tall. Leaves basal and cauline; basal leaves 1(2–3) tufted on rhizome node; petiole 15–25 cm long, folded, glabrous; blades narrowly elliptical, 18–30 × 2.5–5 cm, glabrous or scabrid on abaxial veins, replicate, base attenuate, apex acuminate; cauline leaves pale greenish-white with dense brown spots and short lines, spathe-like, pubescent. Involucral bracts spathe-like. Panicle compound; inflorescence branches racemose, 5–8 branched, single (rarely binate or ternate), 1 (rarely 2 or 3) spiked; peduncles of inflorescence branches tenuous, 0.5–8 cm long, densely pubescent; bractlets glume-like, ovate-oblong, ca. 3.5 mm long. Spikes bisexual, densely flowered, androgynous; spikes 6–15 mm long, male part short-cylindrical to linear-cylindrical, slightly or much longer than female part, with ca. 15–40 staminate flowers; female part with 6–25 pistillate flowers. Staminate glumes pale yellow laterally with dense spots and short lines, pale green at middle, ovate–lanceolate, ca. 3 mm long, membranous, 3–veined, apex acuminate; pistillate glumes similar to staminate glumes. stamens 3, filaments basally connate, 0.5–3 mm long, longer or remarkably shorter than staminate glumes; anther yellow, 1 × 0.2 mm, pollen 0.2 mm wide; perigynium pale yellowish-white with brown spots and short lines, horizontally patent, elliptical, trigonous, 2.6–3.3 mm long, membranous, glabrous, with many raised veins, base subrounded, apex attenuate into a slightly curved beak, ca. 0.5 mm long. Nutlets brown at maturity, tightly enveloped, elliptical, trigonous or base obliquely truncate, 1–2 mm long; style suberect, base thickened; stigmas 3.

Phenology.

Flowering from August to November. Fruiting from December to February.

Etymology.

The term “qingyuanensis” originates from the location where the type specimen was collected.

Distribution and habitat.

Carexqingyuanensis is known only from Bijia Mountain Forest Farm, Qingxin District, Qingyuan City, Guangdong Province, China. It grows on rocky terrain within the forest at an elevation of 600 m (Fig. 2A).

Conservation status.

Currently, Carexqingyuanensis is only known from its type locality, Bijia Mountain Forest Farm, Qingxin District, Qingyaun City, Guangdong Province, China, which covers an area of 2646.11 ha. Based on the IUCN Red List Criteria (IUCN 2022), the species could be assessed as Endangered (EN) or Vulnerable (VU). However, at present, it is more appropriate to classify it as Data Deficient (DD) due to the absence of field surveys conducted on the populations of this species.

Additional specimens examined.

China. Guangdong: Qingyuan City, Qingxin District, Bijia Mountain Forest Farm, 18 November 2022, Li Yali & Chen Hongfeng LYL0013 (IBSC); Qingyuan City, Qingxin District, Bijia Mountain Forest Farm, 1 December 2022, Li Yali & Chen Hongfeng LYL0014 (IBSC).

Results

The phylogenetic trees inferred from ML and BI shared an identical topology, while BI showed higher support values. Matrices of combined nDNA-cpDNA (Fig. 3) and combined nDNA (Suppl. material 1: fig. S1) yielded similar topologies, but slight differences in phylogenetic relationships within the sect. Siderostictaes.s. and the relationship between sect. Hypolytroides and sect. Siderostictaes.s.. Except for combined cpDNA (Suppl. material 1: fig. S4), matK (Suppl. material 1: fig. S5), and ndhF (Suppl. material 1: fig. S6) matrices, species within sect. Siderostictaes.s. consistently formed a single clade (Fig. 1, Suppl. material 1: figs S1–S3, S7). As indicated by the study conducted by Villaverde et al. (2020) and Global Carex Group (2021), analyses performed on the combined nDNA-cpDNA matrices effectively illustrate the phylogenetic relationship among 21 species (Fig. 3). Carexbaccans, C.myosurus, C.cruciata, C.filicina, and C.esquiroliana are part of the core Carex Clade, while species in sect. Hypolytroides and sect. Siderostictaes.s. (Global Carex Group 2021) are categorized under the Siderosticta clade according to Villaverde et al. (2020). The phylogenetic trees (Fig. 3) strongly reinforce the intrageneric relationships within Siderosticta clade and core Carex Clade. Furthermore, sect. Hypolytroides is identified as sister group to sect. Siderostictaes.s. (Fig. 3) remains consistent with the findings of both Villaverde et al. (2020) and Global Carex Group (2021) studies. Based on the topology, among the 13 species within sect. Siderostictaes.s., C.qingyuanensis shows closer phylogenetic relationship to C.scaposa rather than to C.peliosanthifolia.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Phylogenetic relationships of 21 species by combined nDNA-cpDNA matrices. Eriophorumvaginatum was set as outgroup. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by MrBayes (BI). The bootstrap values are represented at nodes, red circles indicate bootstrap values of 90–100%, while the rest are marked with numbers.

Discussion

According to the classification by Dai et al. (2000) and Global Carex Group (2021), Carexqingyuanensis belongs to sect. Siderostictaes.s. (traditionally placed in sect. Hemiscaposae) (subg. Siderosticta). Morphologically, it shares similarities with C.peliosanthifolia in having basal leaves tufted, fan-shaped; panicle compound, branches not only single and perigynium with many raised veins, but differs by having inflorescence branches racemose, single (rarely binate or ternate), one (rarely two or three) spiked, (vs. binate or ternate, 1–3-spiked), male part of spikes short-cylindrical or linear-cylindrical and slightly or much longer than the female part (vs. just male part short-cylindrical and slightly longer than female part); style base thickened (vs. not thickened) and beak short and slightly curved (vs. long and excurved) (Dai et al. 2000, 2010). Morphological comparisons of C.qingyuanensis and C.peliosanthifolia are summarised in Table 2. Furthermore, an updated identification key to Chinese species in the traditionally sect. Hemiscaposae is provided below.

Table 2.

Morphological comparison among Carexqingyuanensis, Carexpeliosanthifolia, and Carexscaposa.

Character C.qingyuanensis C.peliosanthifolia C.scaposa
Inflorescence branches Single (rarely binate or ternate), one (rarely two or three) spiked Binate or ternate, one-three spiked; Panicle compound
Spikes Long, male part short-cylindrical or linear-cylindrical and slightly or much longer than female part Short, male part short-cylindrical and slightly longer than female part Male part of spike linear-lanceolate, usually shorter than female part
Pistil Style base thickened Style base not thickened Style base not or slightly thickened
Perigynium Apex attenuate into a slightly curved short beak Apex attenuate into an excurved long beak Apex contracted gradually into beak of medium length
Open in a new tab

Key to the species of Carexsect.Siderostictaes.s. (traditional in sect. Hemiscaposae) in China

1 Ten or more spikes on each branch; leaves flat; perigynium with 2 lateral veins on adaxial surface 2
– Fewer than 10 spikes on each branch; leaves fan-shaped; perigynium with many raised veins 7
2 Panicle compound, several branched; culms rigid 3
– Panicle simple, only one terminal branched or 1–2 lateral branched; culms flaccid 6
3 Inflorescence branches paniculate, 10–20 spikes; male part of spikes oblong-cylindrical C.scaposa
– Inflorescence branches subcorymbose, a few spikes; male part of spike circular or oblong 4
4 Leaves linear or linear-oblanceolate; perigynium ovate, beak ca. 1/4 length of perigynium C.liouana
– Leaves narrowly elliptical to elliptical-linear; perigynium elliptical, beak slightly shorter than 1/2 length of perigynium 5
5 Leaves margin glabrous, scabrid abaxially; petiole glabrous; nutlets ovate C.adrienii
– Leaves margin densely ciliate, glabrous on both surfaces or scabrid or densely hairy abaxially; petiole hairy; nutlets elliptical C.densifimbriata
6 Leaves narrowly elliptical to linear-elliptical, margins densely replicate; male part of spike circular to oblong, 2.5–4 mm long, ca. 3 mm wide; culms loosely hairy C.lingii
– Leaves band shape, margins flat; male part of spikes circular-cylindrical, 3–5 mm long, ca. 1 mm wide; culms loosely hairy and then glabrescent C.ypsilandrifolia
7 Branches single, rarely binate; basal leaf single C.kucyniakii
– Branches not only single; basal leaves 1–3 tufted 8
8 Branches binate or ternate. male part of spikes short-cylindrical C.peliosanthifolia
– Branches single (binate or ternate). Male part of spikes short-cylindrical or linear-cylindrical C.qingyuanensis
Open in a new tab

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Carex qingyuanensis

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to Hongying Zhou of Liangtian Agriculture and Forestry Technology Co., LTD, Qingyuan, Guangdong, China and Zhongcai Fan (IBSC), for their assistance in the plant management of Carexqingyuanensis. We appreciate the facilitation provided by the National Wild Plant Germplasm Resource Center. We also extend our appreciation to Rimei Zeng, Weifang Lu and Zhaosheng Pang for their collaboration in the field investigation of Carexpeliosanthifolia and Carexscaposa. Additionally, we would like to thank Dr. Yunfei Deng (IBSC) for reviewing the article and Mrs. Yunxiao Liu (IBSC) for preparing the line drawing.

Citation

Li Y-L, Deng S-W, Luo J-C, Li M-X, Zou L-T, Zeng Q-G, Chen H-F (2024) Carex qingyuanensis (Cyperaceae), a new species from Guangdong, China. PhytoKeys 241: 155–168. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.241.117734

Funding Statement

The Key Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2020B1111530004); The Guangzhou Science and Technology Project

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Funding

This study received financial support from the Key Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2020B1111530004) and the Guangzhou Science and Technology Project.

Author contributions

Hong-Feng Chen & Ya-Li Li: Conceptualization, Methodology; Hong-Feng Chen, Ya-Li Li, Jin-Chu Luo, Li-Ting Zou, Ming-Xia Li & Qiu-Gen Zeng: Field investigation, Materials collection; Ya-li Li : Data analyses and visualization; Ya-li Li: manuscript preparation; Shuang-Wen Deng & Hong-feng Chen: manuscript revision. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Author ORCIDs

Ya-Li Li https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4667-5241

Shuang-Wen Deng https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1595-2974

Hong-Feng Chen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8415-3260

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1

Phylogenetic relationships

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Ya-Li Li, Shuang-Wen Deng, Jin-Chu Luo, Ming-Xia Li, Li-Ting Zou, Qiu-Gen Zeng, Hong-Feng Chen

Data type

pdf

Explanation note

fig. S1. Phylogenetic relationships of 21 species by combined nDNA matrices. Eriophorumvaginatum was set as the outgroup. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by MrBayes (BI). The bootstrap values are represented at nodes, red circles indicate bootstrap values of 90–100, while the rest are marked with numbers. The species marked in yellow belong to the Decora Clade, the ones in pink belong to the Esquiroliana Clade, the ones in green belong to the Setigera Clade, the ones in purple belong to sect. Hypolytroides, and those in blue belong to sect. Siderostictaes.s.. The ones highlighted in red belong to sect. Siderostictaes.s. and share similar morphological characteristics. fig. S2. Phylogenetic relationships of 19 species by ETS matrices. The notes are same as fig. S1. fig. S3. Phylogenetic relationships of 21 species by ITS matrices. The notes are same as fig. S1. fig. S4. Phylogenetic relationships of 21 species by combined cpDNA matrices. The notes are same as fig. S1. fig. S5. Phylogenetic relationships of 21 species by matK matrices. The notes are the same as fig. S1. fig. S6. Phylogenetic relationships of 16 species by ndhF matrices. The notes are the same as fig. S1. fig. S7. Phylogenetic relationships of 15 species by rps16 matrices. The notes are the same as fig. S1.

References

  1. Blattner FR. (1999) Direct amplification of the entire ITS region from poorly preserved plant material using recombinant PCR. Biotechniques 27(6): 1180–1186. 10.2144/99276st04 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dai LK, Liang SY, Li PC, Tang YC. (2000) Carex (Cyperaceae-Caricoideae). In: Dai LK, Liang SY. (Eds) Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae 12.Science Press, Beijing, 56–528.
  3. Dai LK, Liang SY, Zhang SR, Tang YC, Koyama T, Tucker GC. (2010) Carex Linnaeus. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DY. (Eds) Flora of China 23.Science Press, Beijing& Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, 285–461.
  4. Deng YF. (2014) Carexlongicolla (Cyperaceae), a new sedge from China. Phytotaxa 178(3): 181–188. 10.11646/phytotaxa.178.3.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ford BA, Starr JR, Thanh NT, Tài VA. (2017) Two extraordinary new pseudopetiolate Carex Species from Vietnam (sect. Hemiscaposae, Cyperaceae). Systematic Botany 42(3): 402–417. 10.1600/036364417X695998 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Frodin DG. (2004) History and concepts of big plant genera. Taxon 3(3): 753–776. 10.2307/4135449 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Global Carex Group (2016) Megaphylogenetic specimenlevel approaches to the Carex (Cyperaceae) phylogeny using ITS, ETS, and matK sequences: implications for classification. Systematic Botany 41(3): 500–518. 10.1600/036364416X692497 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Global Carex Group (2019) A tale of worldwide success: Behind the scenes of Carex (Cyperaceae) biogeography and diversification. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 57(6): 695–718. 10.1111/jse.12549 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Global Carex Group (2021) A framework infrageneric classification of Carex (Cyperaceae) and its organizing principles. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 59(4): 726–762. 10.1111/jse.12722 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gilmour CN, Starr JR, Naczi RFC. (2013) Calliscirpus, a new genus for two narrow endemics of the California Floristic Province, C.criniger and C.brachythrix sp. nov. (Cyperaceae). Kew Bulletin 68(1): 85–105. 10.1007/s12225-012-9420-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. IUCN (2022) Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 15.1. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee. IUCN Red List of Threatened Speciess. [accessed on July 2022]
  12. Ivica L, Peer B. (2019) Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: Recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Research 47(W1): W256–259. 10.1093/nar/gkz239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  13. Jin XF. (2009) Carexyunyiana sp. nov. (Cyperaceae) from zhejiang, China. Nordic Journal of Botany 27(4): 344–347. 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2009.00452.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jin XF. (2017) Taxonomic revision of Carexchungii (Cyperaceae; sect. Mitratae) and allied species. Phytotaxa 317(1): 029–041. 10.11646/phytotaxa.317.1.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jin XF, Chen WJ. (2015) Carexhuangshanica (sect. Rhomboidales, Cyperaceae), a new species from anhui, eastern China. Phytotaxa 233(3): 281–287. 10.11646/phytotaxa.233.3.5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jin XF, Zheng CZ. (2010) Carexyandangshanica sp. nov. (Cyperaceae; C.sect.Rhomboidales) from Zhejiang, China. Nordic Journal of Botany 28: 709–712. 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2010.00817.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jin XF, Zheng CZ, Ding BY. (2004) New taxa of Carex (Cyperaceae) from Zhejiang, China. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 42(6): 541–550. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jin XF, Zhao YJ, Zheng CZ, Zhang HW. (2011) Carexzhejiangensis sp. nov. (Cyperaceae) from Zhejiang, eastern China. Nordic Journal of Botany 29(1): 63–70. 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2010.00977.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jin SH, Zhao YJ, Shen TT, Wu DF, Jin XF. (2012a) Carextenuirostrata (Cyperaceae), a new species of section Confertiflorae from Zhejiang, China. Brittonia 64(3): 325–329. 10.1007/s12228-012-9236-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jin XF, Simpson DA, Zheng CZ, Sun L, Zhang HW. (2012b) Carexparacheniana (Carexsect.Rhomboidales, Cyperaceae), a new species from Guangxi and Guizhou, China. Systematic Botany 37(4): 929–937. 10.1600/036364412X656617 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. (2019) MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Briefings in Bioinformatics 20(4): 1160–1166. 10.1093/bib/bbx108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Li YY, Chen YP, Jiang LQ, Liu ED, Luo Y, Peng H. (2022) Carexmalipoensis (Cyperac-eae), a new species from southeast Yunnan, China. PhytoKeys 188: 19–29. 10.3897/phytokeys.188.75401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lu YF, Jin XF. (2018) Notes on Carex (Cyperaceae) from China (V): new species, combination and subspecies from Zhejiang. Phytotaxa 372(3): 203–211. 10.11646/phytotaxa.372.3.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lu YF, Jin XF. (2022) Notes on Carex (Cyperaceae) from China (VIII): Five new species and a new variety from southern and south-western China. PhytoKeys 188: 31–47. 10.3897/phytokeys.188.77776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lu ZC, Su YL, Lu YF, Jin XF. (2020) Carexpingleensis (Carexsect.Mitratae), a new species of Cyperaceae from Guangxi, China. Taiwania 65(3): 391–395. 10.6165/tai.2020.65.391 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lu YF, Jin XF, Yu MJ. (2022) Carexborealifujianica (Cyperaceae), a new species of the core Carex clade from Fujian, southeastern China. PLoS ONE 17(3): e0264419. 10.1371/journal.pone.0264419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  27. Lunkai D, Liang S, Liang SJ, Zhang S, Tang Y, Tang YC, Koyama T, Tucker GC. (2010) Carex. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DY. (Eds) Flora of China vol.23. Science Press and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Beijing, 285–461.
  28. Nelmes E. (1955) The genus Carex in Indo-China including Thailand and Lower Burma. M’emoires du Mus’eum national d’histoire naturelle. S’erie B. Botanique 4: 83–182. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/283006 [Google Scholar]
  29. Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, Haeseler A, Minh BQ. (2015) IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32(1): 268–274. 10.1093/molbev/msu300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Raymond M. (1959) Carices Indochinenses necnon Siamenses. M’emoires de Jardin Botanique de Montr’eal 53: 1–125. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ronquist FM, Teslenko P, van der Mark DL, Ayres A, Darling S, Höhna B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. (2012) MRBAYES 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic infe-rence and model selection across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Song C, Wang H, Jin XF. (2008) A new subspecies of Carexarisanensis (Cyperaceae) from zhejiang, China. Annales Botanici Fennici 45(2): 156–158. 10.5735/085.045.0212 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Starr JR, Harris SA, Simpson DA. (2003) Potential of the 5′ and 3′ Ends of the Intergenic Spacer (IGS) of rDNA in the Cyperaceae: New Sequences for Lower‐Level Phylogenies in Sedges with an Example from Uncinia Pers. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164(2): 213–227. 10.1086/346168 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Starr JR, Janzen FH, Ford BA. (2015) Three new, early diverging Carex (Cariceae, Cyper-aceae) lineages from East and Southeast Asia with important evolutionary and biogeo-graphic implications. Molecular Phylogenet Evolution 88: 105–120. 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Su SW. (2009a) Additional notes on the genus Carex Linn. from Anhui, China. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University 36: 557–563. 10.13610/j.cnki.1672-352x.2009.04.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Su SW. (2009b) Carexkobresiformis, a particular species of Carex from China. Journal of Anhui University 33(6): 83–86. [Google Scholar]
  37. Uzma Jiménez-Mejías P, Amir R, Hayat MQ, Hipp AL. (2019) Timing and ecological prio-rity shaped the diversification of sedges in the Himalayas. PeerJ 7: e6792. 10.7717/peerj.6792 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  38. Villaverde T, Jiménez‐Mejías P, Luceño M, Waterway MJ, Kim S, Lee B, Rincón‐Barrado M, Hahn M, Maguilla E, Roalson EH, Hipp AL. (2020) A new classification of Carex subgenera supported by a HybSeq backbone phylogeny. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 194(2): 141–163. 10.1093/botlinnean/boaa042 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang QL, Yang HB, Deng YF, Wang ZN, Liu GD. (2012) Carexlongipetiolata (Cyperaceae), a new sedge from Hainan, China. Phytotaxa 75(1): 65–69. 10.11646/phytotaxa.75.1.6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Waterway MJ, Hoshino T, Masaki T. (2009) Phylogeny, species richness, and ecological specialization in Cyperaceae tribe Cariceae. Botanical Review 75(1): 138–159. 10.1007/s12229-008-9024-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Weng DM, Zhang HW, Xu SF, Jin XF. (2009) Carexqingliangensis sp. nov. (Cyperaceae) from zhejiang, eastern china. Nordic Journal of Botany 27(1): 7–10. 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2009.00394.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor WJ, Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky J. (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and amplifications, 315–322. 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 [DOI]
  43. Yang SZ, Chen CF. (2005) Carexscaposa C. B. Clarke (Cyperaceae): A new record to the flora of Taiwan. Taiwania 50(3): 227–233. 10.1016/S0011-2240(05)00046-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yang HB, Liu GD. (2020) Carexledongensis (Cyperaceae), a new sedge from Hainan Isl. of South China. Phytotaxa 461(2): 72–78. 10.11646/phytotaxa.461.2.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yang HB, Wang QL, Bai CJ, Li XX, Liu GD. (2014) Carexdiaoluoshanica (Carexsect.Lageniformes, Cyperaceae), a New Species from Hainan, China. PLoS ONE 9(6): e97658. 10.1371/journal.pone.0097658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  46. Yang HB, Li XX, Chang JB, Wang WQ, Wang QL, Yu DG, Dong RS, Liu GD. (2015a) Carexprocumbens (Carexsect.Rhomboidales, Cyperaceae), a new species from Hainan, China. Phytotaxa 201(3): 207–213. 10.11646/phytotaxa.201.3.4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Yang HB, Li XX, Wang WQ, Bai CJ, Liu GD. (2015b) Carexjianfengensis (Carexsect.Rhomboidales, Cyperaceae), a new species from Hainan, China. PLoS ONE 10(9): e0136373. 10.1371/journal.pone.0136373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  48. Yang HB, Li XX, Bai CJ, Wang WQ, Liu GD. (2016) Carexconcava (Carexsect.Rhomboidales, Cyperaceae), a new species from Hainan, China. Phytotaxa 283(2): 155–162. 10.11646/phytotaxa.283.2.4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Yang HJ, Xu H, Deng YF, Li YD. (2017) Carexxueyingiana (Cyperaceae), a new species from Hainan Island, China. Phytotaxa 308(2): 239–248. 10.11646/phytotaxa.308.2.5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Yu LY, Huang YF, Xu WB, Deng YF. (2012) Carextrongii K. K. Nguyen, a newly recorded species of Cyperaceae from China. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany 20(4): 403–406. 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3395.2012.04.014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang SR, Zhang J, Liu ZY, Qu S, Han RG. (2018) Carexnodosa (Cyperaceae), a new species of C.sect.Occlusae from southwest China. Nordic Journal of Botany 36(8): 1–5. 10.1111/njb.01900 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhang D, Gao F, Jakovlić I, Zou H, Zhang J, Li WX, Wang G. (2020) PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Molecular Ecology Resources 20(1): 348–355. 10.1111/1755-0998.13096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang XX, Yao ZM, Meng HL, Deng YF. (2021) Carexmaolanensis (Cyperaceae), a new species from Guizhou, China. Phytotaxa 525(2): 137–146. 10.11646/phytotaxa.525.2.4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhao YJ, Shen TT, Zheng Y, Chen ZL, Jin XF. (2011) Carexdapanshanica sp. nov. (C.sect.Mitratae, Cyperaceae) from Zhejiang, China. Nordic Journal of Botany 29(6): 670–673. 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2011.01132.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Carex qingyuanensis
phytokeys.241.117734-treatment1.xml (13.8KB, xml)
Supplementary material 1

Phylogenetic relationships

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Ya-Li Li, Shuang-Wen Deng, Jin-Chu Luo, Ming-Xia Li, Li-Ting Zou, Qiu-Gen Zeng, Hong-Feng Chen

Data type

pdf

Explanation note

fig. S1. Phylogenetic relationships of 21 species by combined nDNA matrices. Eriophorumvaginatum was set as the outgroup. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by MrBayes (BI). The bootstrap values are represented at nodes, red circles indicate bootstrap values of 90–100, while the rest are marked with numbers. The species marked in yellow belong to the Decora Clade, the ones in pink belong to the Esquiroliana Clade, the ones in green belong to the Setigera Clade, the ones in purple belong to sect. Hypolytroides, and those in blue belong to sect. Siderostictaes.s.. The ones highlighted in red belong to sect. Siderostictaes.s. and share similar morphological characteristics. fig. S2. Phylogenetic relationships of 19 species by ETS matrices. The notes are same as fig. S1. fig. S3. Phylogenetic relationships of 21 species by ITS matrices. The notes are same as fig. S1. fig. S4. Phylogenetic relationships of 21 species by combined cpDNA matrices. The notes are same as fig. S1. fig. S5. Phylogenetic relationships of 21 species by matK matrices. The notes are the same as fig. S1. fig. S6. Phylogenetic relationships of 16 species by ndhF matrices. The notes are the same as fig. S1. fig. S7. Phylogenetic relationships of 15 species by rps16 matrices. The notes are the same as fig. S1.

phytokeys-241-155_article-117734__-s001.pdf (1.5MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

Articles from PhytoKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES