Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2024 Apr 19;146(17):11702–11710. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c14177

Formation of Chromophores from cis-Pinonaldehyde Aged in Highly Acidic Conditions

Cynthia Wong 1, Jessica E Pazienza 1, Scott D Rychnovsky 1, Sergey A Nizkorodov 1,*
PMCID: PMC11066867  PMID: 38640258

Abstract

graphic file with name ja3c14177_0008.jpg

Sulfuric acid in the atmosphere can participate in acid-catalyzed and acid-driven reactions, including those within secondary organic aerosols (SOA). Previous studies have observed enhanced absorption at visible wavelengths and significant changes in the chemical composition when SOA was exposed to sulfuric acid. However, the specific chromophores responsible for these changes could not be identified. The goals of this study are to identify the chromophores and determine the mechanism of browning in highly acidified α-pinene SOA by following the behavior of specific common α-pinene oxidation products, namely, cis-pinonic acid and cis-pinonaldehyde, when they are exposed to highly acidic conditions. The products of these reactions were analyzed with ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with photodiode array spectrophotometry and high-resolution mass spectrometry, UV–vis spectrophotometry, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. cis-Pinonic acid (2) was found to form homoterpenyl methyl ketone (4), which does not absorb visible radiation, while cis-pinonaldehyde (3) formed weakly absorbing 1-(4-(propan-2-ylidene)cyclopent-1-en-1-yl)ethan-1-one (5) and 1-(4-isopropylcyclopenta-1,3-dien-1-yl)ethan-1-one (6) via an acid-catalyzed aldol condensation. This chemistry could be relevant for environments characterized by high sulfuric acid concentrations, for example, during the transport of organic compounds from the lower to the upper atmosphere by fast updrafts.

Introduction

Organic compounds make up a substantial portion of mass within atmospheric particulate matter, ranging from 20 to 90%.1−3 A subset of these organics known as “brown carbon” comprises compounds capable of absorbing near-UV and visible radiation.4 These light-absorbing compounds directly and indirectly impact the radiative energy budget in the Earth’s atmosphere, resulting in diminished visibility, worsening air quality, and negative impacts on regional climate.4−7 However, the mechanisms of formation and the structures of these compounds remain poorly defined.

Brown carbon aerosols can be of primary origin, such as those directly emitted from fossil fuels and biomass burning.4 Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) produced by the oxidation of aromatic compounds also contributes to brown carbon.4 SOA produced by the oxidation of biogenic organics generally does not absorb visible radiation.8,9 However, biogenic SOA can produce brown carbon by multiphase aging processes occurring during atmospheric transport.4,10−16 These processes, which can take days under ambient atmospheric conditions, alter both the chemical composition and optical properties of organic aerosol particles.17−20 Of particular interest to this work is the formation of brown carbon promoted by particle acidity, which typically ranges between pH −1 to 5 in atmospheric particles.21 Previous studies have observed brown carbon resulting from reactions of organic compounds in acidic solutions and acid-catalyzed reactions in aqueous solutions.14,22−30 However, the structures of these compounds and their formation mechanisms remain unknown.

One of the largest contributors to SOA is α-pinene (1, Figure 1), with estimated emissions of ∼66 Tg/year.31 Both (+) and (−) enantiomers of α-pinene are emitted by vegetation.32 Once emitted, α-pinene can react with O3, •OH, or •NO3, which leads to the production of multifunctional organic compounds containing carbonyl, carboxyl, hydroxyl, peroxide, and other functional groups. cis-Pinonic acid (2, Figure 1) and cis-pinonaldehyde (3, Figure 1) are two major products occurring from ozonolysis and •OH-oxidation of α-pinene (1).33,34cis-Pinonic acid (2) is a C10 ketocarboxylic acid with a rigid, four-membered carbon ring decorated by an acetyl and a carboxyl group on opposing ends of the cyclobutane core, as shown in Figure 1. cis-Pinonaldehyde (3) has a similar structure but with a formyl group in place of the carboxyl group, making it a ketoaldehyde. These molecules are both semivolatile compounds that can exist in either the gas or particle phase (with lower temperature and higher particulate matter concentrations favoring the particle phase).35 The properties and atmospheric fates of cis-pinonic acid and cis-pinonaldehyde have been studied extensively.36−42

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Structures of (−)-α-pinene (1), cis-pinonic acid (2), cis-pinonaldehyde (3), and homoterpenyl methyl ketone (4).

Previous work explored chemical changes that may occur upon exposure of α-pinene SOA to highly acidic conditions. One study found that the evaporation of bulk biogenic and anthropogenic SOA solutions, including that of α-pinene derived SOA, in the presence of sulfuric acid, resulted in enhanced mass-normalized absorption coefficient at visible wavelengths and significant changes in the chemical composition, including organosulfate formation.11,43 Work by Wong et al. offered a more careful control of pH and reported facile formation of light-absorbing compounds and organosulfates at highly acidic conditions (pH −0.86 and pH −1.08) from α-pinene ozonlysis.30 However, these studies could not identify the specific chromophores responsible for the enhanced light absorption. The aim of this work is to determine the mechanism of browning in highly acidified α-pinene SOA by following the behavior of specific common α-pinene oxidation products, namely, cis-pinonic acid and cis-pinonaldehyde, when they are exposed to highly acidic conditions. Our results suggest that cis-pinonic acid undergoes an acid-catalyzed isomerization when aged in highly acidic conditions, and the products do not absorb visible radiation. In contrast, cis-pinonaldehyde reacts with the acid to form two chromophores via intramolecular aldol condensation. These chromophores may be responsible for the browning of acid-aged SOA observed in previous studies.

Experimental Methods and Materials

Aging in Sulfuric Acid

For the initial tests, cis-pinonic acid and cis-pinonaldehyde were each dissolved in 10 M H2SO4, resulting in an effective pH of −1.08, with dissolution in water serving as a control. The pH values cited in this work correspond to the negative logarithm of the molality of H+, which is estimated using the extended aerosol inorganic model I (E-AIM).44−46 Once it was confirmed that there were significant changes in the composition and optical properties of the acidified sample, additional experiments were performed at varying acidities. In all cases, an aliquot of the stock cis-pinonic acid or cis-pinonaldehyde with a concentration of 2000 μg/mL was added to a 4 mL aqueous solution containing H2SO4 (Table S1), resulting in a mass concentration of 35–70 μg/mL. To conduct NMR analysis, it was necessary to scale up the reaction to generate sufficient material for purification and subsequent analysis, as explained in detail in the SI. All samples were neutralized with sodium carbonate before disposal.

Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Thermo Scientific Vanquish Horizon ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) instrument coupled to a Vanquish Horizon photodiode array (PDA) spectrophotometer and a Thermo Scientific Q Exactive Plus Orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometer were used to examine the chemical composition of the solution before and after aging. UPLC separation was carried out on a Waters HSS T3 column, 150 × 2.1 mm, with 1.8 μm particles, with the column temperature set to 30 °C and a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. The mobile phase consisted of water (eluent A) and acetonitrile (eluent B), each containing 0.1% formic acid. The gradient elution was programmed as follows: 0–3 min 95% eluent A; 3–14 min linear ramp to 95% eluent B; 14–16 min hold at 95% eluent B, 16–22 min return to 95% eluent A. The sample injection volume was 10 μL. It should be noted that repeated injections of these highly acidic samples led to a degradation of the UPLC column, but we intentionally did not neutralize the samples before the injection to avoid altering the chemistry. The mass spectrometer had an electrospray ionization (ESI) operated in either positive (+) or negative (−) ion mode with a spray voltage of 2.5 kV and a resolving power of m/Δm = 1.4 × 105.

Spectroscopic Measurements

A UV–vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-2450) was used to record absorption spectra over the 200–700 nm range with 1 nm resolution to monitor the formation of light-absorbing compounds over time. Aliquots of the samples were added to a 1 cm quartz cuvette and then capped to prevent evaporation. The spectrophotometer was programmed to collect a spectrum every 15 min for 24 h.

Results and Discussion

Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography

The total ion chromatograms (TIC) and PDA (190–690 nm) chromatograms of cis-pinonic acid aged for 2 days in H2O (control, pH 4.3) and 0.52 mM H2SO4 (pH 3.00) are shown in Figure S1, while the data for the samples aged in 5.6 M H2SO4 (pH −0.86), and 10 M H2SO4 (pH −1.08) are shown in Figure 2. A single major peak at 8.96 min was detected in the PDA (Figure S1a,d), negative ion mode TIC (Figure S1b,e), and positive ion mode TIC (Figure S1c,f) chromatograms of cis-pinonic acid aged in H2O (pH 4.3) and 0.52 mM H2SO4 (pH 3.00). The PDA signal corresponds to weak absorption of cis-pinonic acid due to the n → π* and π → π* transitions in the carbonyl group. The TIC signal is dominated by protonated (positive ion mode) or deprotonated (negative ion mode) cis-pinonic acid. The nearly identical chromatograms of cis-pinonic acid aged in H2O (pH 4.3) and 0.52 mM H2SO4 (Figure S1) indicate that it does not undergo acid-catalyzed reactions under moderately acidic conditions (pH 3.0).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

UPLC chromatograms of cis-pinonic acid aged in 5.6 M H2SO4 (pH −0.86) and 10 M H2SO4 (pH −1.08) for 2 days observed in the ESI(−) mode (b,e), ESI(+) mode (c,f), and with the PDA (a,d). Panels b–f also show SIC for m/z 183.1028 and m/z 185.1177, respectively. The PDA chromatograms were shifted 0.06 min to account for the time delay between the PDA and MS detectors. All chromatograms were normalized based on the maximum peak intensity of their respective data set.

However, when cis-pinonic acid was aged in highly acidic conditions, the chromatograms revealed chemical changes driven by acid catalysis, in agreement with previous observations by Arcus and Bennett.47 In Figure 2a, which shows the PDA chromatograms of cis-pinonic acid aged in 5.6 M H2SO4 (pH −0.86), there are two peaks at 8.95 and 9.06 min. The negative ion mode TIC and selected ion chromatogram (SIC) for m/z 183.1028 in Figure 2b also have two peaks at these elution times. The peak at 9.06 min is likely trans-pinonic acid, as cited in Arcus and Bennett,47 who observed that cis-pinonic acid can isomerize to trans-pinonic acid under highly acidic conditions. The two isomers also appear in positive ion modes TIC and SIC for m/z 185.1177 (Figure 2c). However, the positive ion mode chromatograms also have an additional peak that elutes at 8.78 min. This can be assigned to the homoterpenyl methyl ketone (4, Figure 1).47−49 When cis-pinonic acid is aged in 10 M H2SO4 (pH −1.08), Figure 2f shows that all of the initial starting material has been converted to a homoterpenyl methyl ketone.

Experiments were then repeated for cis-pinonaldehyde. Positive ion mode ESI proved to be more useful at detecting changes in chemical composition as opposed to negative ion mode, which is better suited for carboxylic acids. From here on out, the data described in the text refer to the positive ion mode.

Samples in which cis-pinonaldehyde was aged in H2O (control, pH 4.3), 0.52 mM H2SO4 (pH 3.00), and 1.0 M H2SO4 (pH −0.01) each had two dominant peaks, as shown in Figure S2. The smaller peak at 8.94 min corresponds to cis-pinonic acid, an impurity that stems from the synthesis of cis-pinonaldehyde, while the peak at 9.77 min corresponds to cis-pinonaldehyde. The same peaks occur in the 0.52 mM H2SO4 (pH 3.00), and 1.0 M H2SO4 (pH −0.01) samples, and there are no additional peaks, which indicates that aging the starting material at these conditions does not promote acid-catalyzed reactions.

However, the TIC (Figure 3a) of the sample in which cis-pinonaldehyde was aged in highly acidic conditions (10 M H2SO4) implies alternate chemical pathways. There are four significant peaks under these aging conditions at retention times (RTs) of 8.77, 11.85, 12.07, and 12.22 min. Additionally, in this chromatogram, the peak corresponding to cis-pinonaldehyde is absent, indicating that all cis-pinonaldehyde was consumed. The peak at 8.77 min corresponds to the acid-catalyzed isomerization product of the cis-pinonic acid impurity, homoterpenyl methyl ketone (4). The remaining three peaks correspond to the same dominant ion in the mass spectrum (m/z 151.1117, C10H15O+), suggesting that these compounds are isomers (Figure 3c). The same peaks appear in the PDA chromatogram of the sample, shown in Figure 3b, which shows that these compounds are the chromophores of interest.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

UPLC chromatograms of cis-pinonaldehyde aged in 10 M H2SO4 observed in the ESI(+) mode for TIC (a), PDA (b), and SIC (m/z 151.1117) (c). The PDA chromatogram was shifted by 0.06 min to account for the time delay between the PDA and MS detectors.

Kinetic Analysis

The absorption spectra of solutions of cis-pinonic acid and cis-pinonaldehyde were recorded with the UV–vis spectrophotometer every 15 min over 24 h under various aging conditions. As no measurable absorbance evolved in the near-UV and visible ranges, the absorption spectra of cis-pinonic acid are only discussed in the SI section (Figure S3 and adjacent text).

The absorption spectra of cis-pinonaldehyde aged in 5.6 M (pH −0.86) and 10 M (pH −1.08) H2SO4 are shown in Figure 4. In Figure 4a, two dominant peaks increase as a function of time at 246 and 355 nm. Additionally, the absorption spectrum of cis-pinonaldehyde aged in 10 M (pH −1.08) H2SO4 shows five main peaks (Figure 4b) at 215, 251, 370, 415, and 500 nm. The effective lifetime of browning for each peak within these samples was calculated by assuming pseudo-first-order reactions in the time series fits for each peak, which are outlined in Table 1. At pH −1.08, the effective browning lifetime is on the order of 1 h.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Absorption spectra of cis-pinonaldehyde aged in (a) 5.6 M (pH −0.86) and (b) 10 M (pH −1.08) H2SO4. Each spectrum was collected every 15 min over 24 h.

Table 1. Effective Lifetimes of Browning for cis-Pinonaldehyde Aged in 5.6 M (pH −0.86) and 10 M (pH −1.08) H2SO4, Calculated by Assuming Pseudo-First-Order Reactions in the Time Series Fits for Each Peak.

sample peak of interest (nm) lifetime of browning (h)
pH −0.86 246 18 ± 3
355 69 ± 1
pH −1.08 215 0.47 ± 0.03
251 0.04 ± 0.03
370 0.31 ± 0.03
415 0.69 ± 0.03
500 2.4 ± 0.2
Open in a new tab

The general shape of the absorption spectrum of aged cis-pinonaldehyde is similar to that observed during the aging of α-pinene SOA under the same highly acidic conditions, as shown in Figure 5.30 This implies that cis-pinonaldehyde should play a major role in the mechanism of browning of acidified α-pinene SOA. The subtle differences between the aged cis-pinonaldehyde and α-pinene SOA spectra likely arise from other compounds in the α-pinene SOA that may also produce light-absorbing products upon aging. It is also noted that the absorption of the products of cis-pinonaldehyde aged in 10 M H2SO4 (pH −1.08) reaches a maximum and then starts to decay the longer it ages, indicating that other reactions could take place that consume the chromophore of interest.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Comparison of the absorption spectra of cis-pinonaldehyde (3) and SOA prepared by ozonolysis of α-pinene (1) after being aged for 2 days in (a) 5.6 M (pH −0.86) and (b) 10 M (pH −1.08) H2SO4. The SOA data are from Wong et al.30

Product Identification

Purification and Separation of Chromophores

In brief, a crude solution of cis-pinonaldehyde aged in 10 M H2SO4 (pH −1.08) was subjected to aqueous extraction and purification via flash chromatography. Three UV active peaks were observed during column chromatography and are believed to be the three chromophores of interest. The most and least polar of the three were isolated as reasonably pure samples. The second compound could not be isolated owing to its negligible mass fraction of the mixture. The two isolates were analyzed via 1D and 2D nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, infrared (IR) spectroscopy, and high-resolution mass spectroscopy (HRMS). Additional hydrogenation experiments were also conducted to better determine the atom connectivity in these compounds.

Note that during the purification and separation process, NaHCO3 was added to neutralize the acid and allow for the isolation of the chromophores. It is worth noting that trace amounts of cis-pinonic acid were detected in the sample of cis-pinonaldehyde, which explains the observed formation of the homoterpenyl methyl ketone. Furthermore, it is plausible that a reaction takes place during the aging process of cis-pinonaldehyde, resulting in the generation of cis-pinonic acid, which can contribute to the increased abundance of homoterpenyl methyl ketone. We also emphasize that the purification and analysis of the compounds were challenging because of their relatively low yield and poor stability. The chromophores of interest make up only 3% and 8% of the overall mixture and are prone to decomposition at high concentrations and in the presence of oxygen. The following is a summary of the proposed structural information determined by the analysis described below.

NMR Analysis and Plausible Mechanism

NMR analysis was performed to determine the structural information for chromophores 5 and 6. Diagnostic 2D cross peaks that informed our assignment are shown in Figure 6b.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

(a) Structure of cis-pinonaldehyde (3) and (b) structures and diagnostic 2D NMR cross peaks of chromophores 5 and 6.

Compound 5 (Figure 6b) was isolated as a light-yellow oil. Its HRMS spectrum gave the molecular formula C10H14O, indicating four degrees of unsaturation. Its 1H and 13C-DEPTQ NMR spectra revealed the existence of two double bonds: one tetrasubstituted (δC 133.1 (C3), 140.5 (C9)) and one monosubstituted (δH 7.16 (H1); δC 140.9 (C1), 146.3 (C5)). One of these alkenes is part of an enone. Further resonances of three methyl singlets were observed (δH 2.33 (H8), 1.87 (H11), and 1.74 (H10)), one of which corresponds to a methyl ketone (δC 197.1 (C6), H8). Two methylenes account for the total 14 protons (δH = 2.63 (H2), 2.53 (H4)). In addition to the carbon signals assigned to the alkenes, the 13C-DEPTQ NMR spectra revealed an additional five carbons: three CH3 groups (δC 26.7 (C8), 22.0 (H10), 21.5(H11)) and two CH2 groups (δC 29.3 (C2), 27.8 (C4)). The aforementioned functionalities—an alkene and an enone—account for three out of the four degrees of unsaturation. Therefore, the fourth hinted at the presence of a ring in this compound. The spatial relationships between all of these fragments were determined with 2D NMR spectroscopy. Cross-peaks in the 1H–1H correlated spectroscopy (COSY) and heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC) spectra showed a structural segment of} −CH22–CH1=C5–C6(O)–CH38. These fragments exhausted the information in the 2D NMR spectra, so we turned to mechanistic insight to inform our analysis of how they are interconnected.

Scheme 1 shows a possible mechanism for the formation of compound 5. Under highly acidic aging conditions, ketone 3 likely exists in its protonated form 7. This catalyzes a ring opening of the strained cyclobutane core to form the tertiary carbocation 8. Elimination of the neighboring methine proton would furnish olefin 9. Cyclopentene 5 could then be formed by an acid-catalyzed intramolecular aldol condensation. Turning to the literature, we found that compound 5 is a known terpene oxidation product, though without consistent and complete spectroscopic characterization reported.50,51 Supported by spectroscopic, mechanistic, and literature evidence, we assigned the structure of compound 5 (Figure 6b).

Scheme 1. Mechanism of Formation of Compounds 5 and 6.

Scheme 1

Open in a new tab

For detailed mechanisms of the acid-catalyzed aldol condensation, refer to Schemes S2 and S3 in the Supporting Information.

Compound 6 (Figure 6b), obtained as an orange oil, was deduced to have an identical molecular formula to that of compound 5 according to HRMS. The 1D NMR data also closely resembled that of compound 5, indicating that these two compounds are constitutional isomers. With the scaffold of compound 5 in mind, the following deductions were made. A methyl ketone was observed in both the 1H and 13C NMR (δC = 193.7 (C6), 26.0 (C8); δH = 2.33–2.30 (H8). The NMR spectra also showed an isopropyl group (δC 30.3 (C9) 22.8 (C10,11); δH 2.72 (H9), 1.14 (H10,11), which we presume was a substituent on the five-membered ring.

The 13C spectra of 6 indicated the presence of two alkenes (δC 145.0 (C1), 143.9 (C2), 125.0 (C3), and 166.1 (C4)), with one of them belonging to an enone. The 1H NMR revealed two alkene protons (δH 7.24 (H2), 6.26–6.16 (H3). These two olefinic proton resonances could correspond to either: one 1,2-disubstituted alkene and one tetrasubstituted alkene, or two trisubstituted alkenes.

From the HMBC and COSY spectra, an enone and a vinylic isopropyl group were pieced together. Unfortunately, at this point, NMR spectroscopy became ambiguous as to the substitution pattern, either 1,2- or 1,3-, around the five-membered ring. However, we reasoned that hydrogenation of this adduct would allow us to differentiate between the two possibilities, given that one hydrogenation adduct is reported in the literature.52 Hydrogenation of 6 resulted in a 1:1 mixture of diastereomers that were different from those reported by Hoveyda and co-workers. Therefore, we concluded that the third chromophore with a molecular formula of C10H14O was the 1,3-disubstituted cyclopentadiene 6 (Figure 6b), which is formed through a mechanism nearly identical to that of chromophore 5 (Scheme 1).

A plausible mechanism is shown in Scheme 1. Ring-opening of 3 gives common cation intermediate 8. Here, the mechanism diverges from that of 5 with a 1,2-hydride shift to afford 11. Elimination affords ketoaldehyde 12, which undergoes a similar aldol condensation as seen in the mechanism for compound 5 to afford compound 6. Alternatively, acid-catalyzed equilibration between intermediates 10 and 12 and compounds 5 and 6 is possible, but we have not demonstrated this additional mechanism.

Conclusions and Implications

The composition and optical properties of organic aerosols can undergo significant changes due to acid-catalyzed and acid-driven reactions. The impacts of highly acidic conditions on cis-pinonic acid and cis-pinonaldehyde, known products of α-pinene oxidation in the atmosphere, were explored by aging these compounds in bulk sulfuric acid solutions with atmospherically relevant acidities. It was found that cis-pinonic acid formed homoterpenyl methyl ketone (4) while cis-pinonaldehyde formed 1-(4-(propan-2-ylidene)cyclopent-1-en-1-yl)ethan-1-one (5) and 1-(4-isopropylcyclopenta-1,3-dien-1-yl)ethan-1-one (6) under highly acidic conditions. Compounds 5 and 6 are stronger light absorbers than cis-pinonaldehyde due to their extended bond conjugation. This will affect the attenuation of incoming sunlight by atmospheric organics, especially in the ultraviolet range. Additionally, they are expected to have higher volatility than pinonaldehyde, so the gas-particle partitioning of organics could be affected, as well.

These findings could be relevant in the context of the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS). Aerosols in UTLS are composed of sulfuric acid (40–80 wt %), but they also contain significant amounts of organic compounds.25,53−55 Strong updrafts can occasionally transport biogenic organics and their oxidation products into the UTLS, where they can partition into highly acidic aerosol particles and undergo reactions similar to those described in this work. This chemistry could also be relevant in the lower atmosphere, especially in areas characterized by high emissions of SO2 (e.g., from burning high-sulfur fuels) and high photochemical activity. Field studies have reported highly acidic aerosols (with negative pH values) in Southeastern Asia, the eastern United States, China, and many other locations.56−59 Under these conditions, certain organic compounds, such as cis-pinonaldehyde can transform into light-absorbing products.

As sulfuric acid clouds occur on other planets, most famously on Venus,60 related chemical processes could occur to aldehydes and carboxylic acids should they exist in the Venusian atmosphere. While the presence of organic molecules on Venus is a matter of hot debate, nucleic acids have been shown to withstand the harsh conditions of the upper Venusian atmosphere.61 Furthermore, simple organic molecules can be produced in the sulfuric acid aerosol droplets from photochemically generated formaldehyde, and give rise to larger molecular weight species capable of absorbing visible radiation.62

The findings from this work further our understanding of the chemical reactions between sulfuric acid and organic compounds. Additional work should be done with other biogenic and anthropogenic SOA to identify whether acidic aging is a large driver in these systems. We also suggest that this chemistry should be examined at lower temperatures characteristic of UTLS as well as higher temperatures characteristic of the Venusian atmosphere because the temperature dramatically affects the rates of chemical processes and phase states of aerosol particles.63

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Dr. Lisa Wingen, Sarah E. Bredenkamp, and Matthew R. Duong for engaging and enlightening discussions. They also acknowledge Matthew R. Duong for aiding in conducting NMR experiments.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.3c14177.

  • Description of synthesis of pinonaldehyde, additional information on conditions of aging experiments, kinetic analysis, HRMS analysis and NMR analysis, and a compilation of NMR spectra of synthesized reactants and separated products of aging (PDF)

Author Contributions

‡ C.W. and J.E.P. contributed equally to this work.

The UCI team acknowledges financial support from NSF grant AGS-1853639. C.W. acknowledges support from the Ridge to Reef NSF Research Traineeship, award DGE-1735040. The high-resolution mass-spectrometer instrument used in this work was purchased with the U.S. National Science Foundation grant CHE-1920242.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ja3c14177_si_001.pdf (1.8MB, pdf)

References

  1. Murphy D. M.; Cziczo D. J.; Froyd K. D.; Hudson P. K.; Matthew B. M.; Middlebrook A. M.; Peltier R. E.; Sullivan A.; Thomson D. S.; Weber R. J. Single-Particle Mass Spectrometry of Tropospheric Aerosol Particles. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 2006, 111 (D23), 23–32. 10.1029/2006JD007340. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang Q.; Jimenez J. L.; Canagaratna M. R.; Allan J. D.; Coe H.; Ulbrich I.; Alfarra M. R.; Takami A.; Middlebrook A. M.; Sun Y. L.; Dzepina K.; Dunlea E.; Docherty K.; DeCarlo P. F.; Salcedo D.; Onasch T.; Jayne J. T.; Miyoshi T.; Shimono A.; Hatakeyama S.; Takegawa N.; Kondo Y.; Schneider J.; Drewnick F.; Borrmann S.; Weimer S.; Demerjian K.; Williams P.; Bower K.; Bahreini R.; Cottrell L.; Griffin R. J.; Rautiainen J.; Sun J. Y.; Zhang Y. M.; Worsnop D. R. Ubiquity and Dominance of Oxygenated Species in Organic Aerosols in Anthropogenically-Influenced Northern Hemisphere Midlatitudes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2007, 34 (13), L13801. 10.1029/2007GL029979. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jimenez J. L.; Canagaratna M. R.; Donahue N. M.; Prevot A. S. H.; Zhang Q.; Kroll J. H.; DeCarlo P. F.; Allan J. D.; Coe H.; Ng N. L.; Aiken A. C.; Docherty K. S.; Ulbrich I. M.; Grieshop A. P.; Robinson A. L.; Duplissy J.; Smith J. D.; Wilson K. R.; Lanz V. A.; Hueglin C.; Sun Y. L.; Tian J.; Laaksonen A.; Raatikainen T.; Rautiainen J.; Vaattovaara P.; Ehn M.; Kulmala M.; Tomlinson J. M.; Collins D. R.; Cubison M. J.; Dunlea E. J.; Huffman J. A.; Onasch T. B.; Alfarra M. R.; Williams P. I.; Bower K.; Kondo Y.; Schneider J.; Drewnick F.; Borrmann S.; Weimer S.; Demerjian K.; Salcedo D.; Cottrell L.; Griffin R.; Takami A.; Miyoshi T.; Hatakeyama S.; Shimono A.; Sun J. Y.; Zhang Y. M.; Dzepina K.; Kimmel J. R.; Sueper D.; Jayne J. T.; Herndon S. C.; Trimborn A. M.; Williams L. R.; Wood E. C.; Middlebrook A. M.; Kolb C. E.; Baltensperger U.; Worsnop D. R. Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the Atmosphere. Science 2009, 326 (5959), 1525–1529. 10.1126/science.1180353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Laskin A.; Laskin J.; Nizkorodov S. A. Chemistry of Atmospheric Brown Carbon. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115 (10), 4335–4382. 10.1021/cr5006167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Myhre G.; Myhre C. E. L.; Samset B. H.; Storelvmo T. Aerosols and Their Relation to Global Climate and Climate Sensitivity. Nat. Sci. Educ. 2013, 4 (5), 7. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hyslop N. P. Impaired Visibility: The Air Pollution People See. Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43 (1), 182–195. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Shiraiwa M.; Ueda K.; Pozzer A.; Lammel G.; Kampf C. J.; Fushimi A.; Enami S.; Arangio A. M.; Fröhlich-Nowoisky J.; Fujitani Y.; Furuyama A.; Lakey P. S. J.; Lelieveld J.; Lucas K.; Morino Y.; Pöschl U.; Takahama S.; Takami A.; Tong H.; Weber B.; Yoshino A.; Sato K. Aerosol Health Effects from Molecular to Global Scales. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 13545–13567. 10.1021/acs.est.7b04417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu P. F.; Abdelmalki N.; Hung H. M.; Wang Y.; Brune W. H.; Martin S. T. Ultraviolet and Visible Complex Refractive Indices of Secondary Organic Material Produced by Photooxidation of the Aromatic Compounds Toluene and M-Xylene. Atmos Chem. Phys. 2015, 15 (3), 1435–1446. 10.5194/acp-15-1435-2015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Romonosky D. E.; Ali N. N.; Saiduddin M. N.; Wu M.; Lee H. J.; Aiona P. K.; Nizkorodov S. A. Effective Absorption Cross Sections and Photolysis Rates of Anthropogenic and Biogenic Secondary Organic Aerosols. Atmos. Environ. 2016, 130, 172–179. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.10.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Song C.; Gyawali M.; Zaveri R. A.; Shilling J. E.; Arnott W. P. Light Absorption by Secondary Organic Aerosol from α-Pinene: Effects of Oxidants, Seed Aerosol Acidity, and Relative Humidity. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 2013, 118 (20), 11741–11749. 10.1002/jgrd.50767. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nguyen T. B.; Lee P. B.; Updyke K. M.; Bones D. L.; Laskin J.; Laskin A.; Nizkorodov S. A. Formation of Nitrogen- and Sulfur-Containing Light-Absorbing Compounds Accelerated by Evaporation of Water from Secondary Organic Aerosols. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 2012, 117 (D1), 1207. 10.1029/2011JD016944. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Updyke K. M.; Nguyen T. B.; Nizkorodov S. A. Formation of Brown Carbon via Reactions of Ammonia with Secondary Organic Aerosols from Biogenic and Anthropogenic Precursors. Atmos. Environ. 2012, 63, 22–31. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sareen N.; Schwier A. N.; Shapiro E. L.; Mitroo D.; McNeill V. F. Secondary Organic Material Formed by Methylglyoxal in Aqueous Aerosol Mimics. Atmos Chem. Phys. 2010, 10 (3), 997–1016. 10.5194/acp-10-997-2010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Shapiro E. L.; Szprengiel J.; Sareen N.; Jen C. N.; Giordano M. R.; Mcneill V. F. Light-Absorbing Secondary Organic Material Formed by Glyoxal in Aqueous Aerosol Mimics. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2009, 9, 2289–2300. 10.5194/acp-9-2289-2009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nozière B.; Dziedzic P.; Córdova A. Products and Kinetics of the Liquid-Phase Reaction of Glyoxal Catalyzed by Ammonium Ions (NH4+). J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113 (1), 231–237. 10.1021/jp8078293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. He Q.; Tomaz S.; Li C.; Zhu M.; Meidan D.; Riva M.; Laskin A.; Brown S. S.; George C.; Wang X.; Rudich Y. Optical Properties of Secondary Organic Aerosol Produced by Nitrate Radical Oxidation of Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55 (5), 2878–2889. 10.1021/acs.est.0c06838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee H. J.; Aiona P. K.; Laskin A.; Laskin J.; Nizkorodov S. A. Effect of Solar Radiation on the Optical Properties and Molecular Composition of Laboratory Proxies of Atmospheric Brown Carbon. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48 (17), 10217–10226. 10.1021/es502515r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dasari S.; Andersson A.; Bikkina S.; Holmstrand H.; Budhavant K.; Satheesh S.; Asmi E.; Kesti J.; Backman J.; Salam A.; Singh Bisht D.; Tiwari S.; Hameed Z.; Gustafsson Ö. Photochemical Degradation Affects the Light Absorption of Water-Soluble Brown Carbon in the South Asian Outflow. Sci.Adv. 2019, 5, eaau8066 10.1126/sciadv.aau8066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kasthuriarachchi N. Y.; Rivellini L. H.; Chen X.; Li Y. J.; Lee A. K. Y. Effect of Relative Humidity on Secondary Brown Carbon Formation in Aqueous Droplets. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54 (20), 13207–13216. 10.1021/acs.est.0c01239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wong J. P. S.; Nenes A.; Weber R. J. Changes in Light Absorptivity of Molecular Weight Separated Brown Carbon Due to Photolytic Aging. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51 (15), 8414–8421. 10.1021/acs.est.7b01739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pye H. O. T.; Nenes A.; Alexander B.; Ault A. P.; Barth M. C.; Clegg S. L.; Collett J. L.; Fahey K. M.; Hennigan C. J.; Herrmann H.; Kanakidou M.; Kelly J. T.; Ku I.-T.; Mcneill V. F.; Riemer N.; Schaefer T.; Shi G.; Tilgner A.; Walker J. T.; Wang T.; Weber R.; Xing J.; Zaveri R. A.; Zuend A. The Acidity of Atmospheric Particles and Clouds. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2020, 20, 4809–4888. 10.5194/acp-20-4809-2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Bones D. L.; Henricksen D. K.; Mang S. A.; Gonsior M.; Bateman A. P.; Nguyen T. B.; Cooper W. J.; Nizkorodov S. A.; Bones D. L.; Henricksen D. K.; Mang S. A.; Gonsior M.; Bateman A. P.; Nguyen T. B.; Cooper W. J.; Nizkorodov S. A. Appearance of Strong Absorbers and Fluorophores in Limonene-O3 Secondary Organic Aerosol Due to NH4+-Mediated Chemical Aging over Long Time Scales. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 2010, 115 (D5), 5203. 10.1029/2009JD012864. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nozière B.; Esteve W. Light-Absorbing Aldol Condensation Products in Acidic Aerosols: Spectra, Kinetics, and Contribution to the Absorption Index. Atmos. Environ. 2007, 41 (6), 1150–1163. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Han Y.; Stroud C. A.; Liggio J.; Li S.-M. The Effect of Particle Acidity on Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation from α-Pinene Photooxidation under Atmospherically Relevant Conditions. Atmos Chem. Phys. 2016, 16, 13929–13944. 10.5194/acp-16-13929-2016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Van Wyngarden A. L.; Pérez-Montaño S.; Bui J. V. H.; Li E. S. W.; Nelson T. E.; Ha K. T.; Leong L.; Iraci L. T. Complex Chemical Composition of Colored Surface Films Formed from Reactions of Propanal in Sulfuric Acid at Upper Troposphere/Lower Stratosphere Aerosol Acidities. Atmos Chem. Phys. 2015, 15, 4225–4239. 10.5194/acp-15-4225-2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chan K. M.; Huang D. D.; Li Y. J.; Chan M. N.; Seinfeld J. H.; Chan C. K. Oligomeric Products and Formation Mechanisms from Acid-Catalyzed Reactions of Methyl Vinyl Ketone on Acidic Sulfate Particles. J. Atmos Chem. 2013, 70 (1), 1–18. 10.1007/s10874-013-9248-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Casale M. T.; Richman A. R.; Elrod M. J.; Garland R. M.; Beaver M. R.; Tolbert M. A. Kinetics of Acid-Catalyzed Aldol Condensation Reactions of Aliphatic Aldehydes. Atmos. Environ. 2007, 41 (29), 6212–6224. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nozière B.; Esteve W. Organic Reactions Increasing the Absorption Index of Atmospheric Sulfuric Acid Aerosols. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2005, 32 (3), 1–5. 10.1029/2004GL021942. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lin Y. H.; Budisulistiorini S. H.; Chu K.; Siejack R. A.; Zhang H.; Riva M.; Zhang Z.; Gold A.; Kautzman K. E.; Surratt J. D. Light-Absorbing Oligomer Formation in Secondary Organic Aerosol from Reactive Uptake of Isoprene Epoxydiols. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48 (20), 12012–12021. 10.1021/es503142b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wong C.; Liu S.; Nizkorodov S. A. Highly Acidic Conditions Drastically Alter the Chemical Composition and Absorption Coefficient of α-Pinene Secondary Organic Aerosol. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2022, 6 (12), 2983–2994. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.2c00249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Guenther A. B.; Jiang X.; Heald C. L.; Sakulyanontvittaya T.; Duhl T.; Emmons L. K.; Wang X. The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature Version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): An Extended and Updated Framework for Modeling Biogenic Emissions. Geosci. Model. Dev. 2012, 5 (6), 1471–1492. 10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Williams J.; Yassaa N.; Bartenbach S.; Lelieveld J. Mirror Image Hydrocarbons from Tropical and Boreal Forests. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2006, 6, 9583–9602. 10.5194/acpd-6-9583-2006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jang M.; Kamens R. M. Newly Characterized Products and Composition of Secondary Aerosols from the Reaction Of-Pinene with Ozone. Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 459–474. 10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00222-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Larsen Bo. R.; Di Bella D.; Glasius M.; Winterhalter R.; Jensen N. R.; Hjorth J. Gas-Phase OH Oxidation of Monoterpenes: Gaseous and Particulate Products. J. Atmos Chem. 2001, 38 (3), 231–276. 10.1023/A:1006487530903. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yu J.; Cocker D. R. III; Griffin R. J.; Flagan R. C.; Seinfeld J. H. Gas-Phase Ozone Oxidation of Monoterpenes: Gaseous and Particulate Products. J. Atmos Chem. 1999, 34 (2), 207–258. 10.1023/A:1006254930583. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hyvärinen A. P.; Lihavainen H.; Gaman A.; Vairila L.; Ojala H.; Kulmala M.; Viisanen Y. Surface Tensions and Densities of Oxalic, Malonic, Succinic, Maleic, Malic, and Cis-Pinonic Acids. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2006, 51 (1), 255–260. 10.1021/je050366x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lignell H.; Epstein S. A.; Marvin M. R.; Shemesh D.; Gerber B.; Nizkorodov S. Experimental and Theoretical Study of Aqueous Cis-Pinonic Acid Photolysis. J. Phys. Chem. A 2013, 117 (48), 12930–12945. 10.1021/jp4093018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Müller L.; Reinnig M. C.; Naumann K. H.; Saathoff H.; Mentel T. F.; Donahue N. M.; Hoffmann T. Formation of 3-Methyl-1,2,3-Butanetricarboxylic Acid via Gas Phase Oxidation of Pinonic Acid - A Mass Spectrometric Study of SOA Aging. Atmos Chem. Phys. 2012, 12 (3), 1483–1496. 10.5194/acp-12-1483-2012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Glasius M.; Calogirou A.; Jensen N. R.; Hjorth J.; Nielsen C. J. Kinetic Study of Gas-Phase Reactions of Pinonaldehyde and Structurally Related Compounds. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1997, 29, 527–533. . [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Liggio J.; Li S. M. Reactive Uptake of Pinonaldehyde on Acidic Aerosols. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 2006, 111 (D24), 24303. 10.1029/2005JD006978. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Liggio J.; Li S. M. Organosulfate Formation during the Uptake of Pinonaldehyde on Acidic Sulfate Aerosols. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2006, 33 (13), 13808. 10.1029/2006GL026079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nozière B.; Barnes I.; Becker K. H. Product Study and Mechanisms of the Reactions of α-Pinene and of Pinonaldehyde with OH Radicals. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 1999, 104 (D19), 23645–23656. 10.1029/1999JD900778. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Fleming L. T.; Ali N. N.; Blair S. L.; Roveretto M.; George C.; Nizkorodov S. A. Formation of Light-Absorbing Organosulfates during Evaporation of Secondary Organic Material Extracts in the Presence of Sulfuric Acid. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2019, 3 (6), 947–957. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Carslaw K. S.; Clegg S. L.; Brimblecombe P. A Thermodynamic Model of the System HCl-HNO3-H2SO4-H2O, Including Solubilities of HBr, from < 200 to 328 K. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99 (29), 11557–11574. 10.1021/j100029a039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Massucci M.; Clegg S. L.; Brimblecombe P. Equilibrium Partial Pressures, Thermodynamic Properties of Aqueous and Solid Phases, and Cl2 Production from Aqueous HCl and HNO3 and Their Mixtures. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103 (21), 4209–4226. 10.1021/jp9847179. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Clegg S. L.; Brimblecombe P.; Wexler A. S.. Extended AIM Aerosol Thermodynamics Model http://www.aim.env.uea.ac.uk/aim/aim.php.
  47. Arcus C. L.; Bennett G. J. The Mechanism of the Rearrangement of Pinonic Acid into Homoterpenyl Methyl Ketone. J. Chem. Soc. 1955, 28, 2627–2632. 10.1039/jr9550002627. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Claeys M.; Iinuma Y.; Szmigielski R.; Surratt J. D.; Blockhuys F.; Van Alsenoy C.; Böge O.; Sierau B.; Gómez-González Y.; Vermeylen R.; Van Der Veken P.; Shahgholi M.; Chan A. W. H.; Herrmann H.; Seinfeld J. H.; Maenhaut W. Terpenylic Acid and Related Compounds from the Oxidation of α-Pinene: Implications for New Particle Formation and Growth above Forests. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43 (18), 6976–6982. 10.1021/es9007596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Leviss D. H.; Van Ry D. A.; Hinrichs R. Z. Multiphase Ozonolysis of Aqueous α-Terpineol. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50 (21), 11698–11705. 10.1021/acs.est.6b03612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Thomas A. F.; Perret C. 4-(1-Hydroperoxy-1-Methylethyl)-1,3-Cyclopentadienyl Methyl Ketone: Its Formation from α-Terpineol and Behaviour as a Dimethylfulvene Epoxide. Tetrahedron 1986, 42 (12), 3311–3321. 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)87395-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Bozzato G.; Bachmann J. P.; Pesaro M. Stereoselective Addition of Methylcuprates to a 2-Formyl-Cyclohexa-2,5-Dienone System. A Stereoselective Total Synthesis of Racemic β-Vetivone. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1974, 23, 1005–1006. 10.1039/C39740001005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Degrado S. J.; Mizutani H.; Hoveyda A. H. Efficient Cu-Catalyzed Asymmetric Conjugate Additions of Alkylzincs to Trisubstituted Cyclic Enones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124 (45), 13362–13363. 10.1021/ja021081x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Tabazadeh A.; Toon O. B.; Clegg S. L.; Hamill P. A New Parameterization of H2SO4/H2O Aerosol Composition: Atmospheric Implications. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1997, 24 (15), 1931–1934. 10.1029/97GL01879. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Froyd K. D.; Murphy D. M.; Sanford T. J.; Thomson D. S.; Wilson J. C.; Pfister L.; Lait L. Aerosol Composition of the Tropical Upper Troposphere. Atmos Chem. Phys. 2009, 9 (13), 4363–4385. 10.5194/acp-9-4363-2009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Murphy D. M.; Cziczo D. J.; Hudson P. K.; Thomson D. S. Carbonaceous Material in Aerosol Particles in the Lower Stratosphere and Tropopause Region. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 2007, 112, D04203. 10.1029/2006JD007297. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Battaglia M. A.; Douglas S.; Hennigan C. J. Effect of the Urban Heat Island on Aerosol PH. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51 (22), 13095–13103. 10.1021/acs.est.7b02786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Guo H.; Sullivan A. P.; Campuzano-Jost P.; Schroder J. C.; Lopez-Hilfiker F. D.; Dibb J. E.; Jimenez J. L.; Thornton J. A.; Brown S. S.; Nenes A.; Weber R. J. Fine Particle PH and the Partitioning of Nitric Acid during Winter in the Northeastern United States. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 2016, 121 (17), 10355–10376. 10.1002/2016JD025311. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Guo H.; Xu L.; Bougiatioti A.; Cerully K. M.; Capps S. L.; Hite J. R.; Carlton A. G.; Lee S. H.; Bergin M. H.; Ng N. L.; Nenes A.; Weber R. J. Fine-Particle Water and PH in the Southeastern United States. Atmos Chem. Phys. 2015, 15 (9), 5211–5228. 10.5194/acp-15-5211-2015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Cheng C.; Wang G.; Meng J.; Wang Q.; Cao J.; Li J.; Wang J. Size-Resolved Airborne Particulate Oxalic and Related Secondary Organic Aerosol Species in the Urban Atmosphere of Chengdu. China. Atmos Res. 2015, 161–162, 134–142. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.04.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Titov D. V.; Ignatiev N. I.; McGouldrick K.; Wilquet V.; Wilson C. F. Clouds and Hazes of Venus. Space Sci. Rev. 2018, 214, 126. 10.1007/s11214-018-0552-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Seager S.; Petkowski J. J.; Seager M. D.; Grimes J. H.; Zinsli Z.; Vollmer-Snarr H. R.; Abd El-Rahman M. K.; Wishart D. S.; Lee B. L.; Gautam V.; Herrington L.; Bains W.; Darrow C. Stability of Nucleic Acid Bases in Concentrated Sulfuric Acid: Implications for the Habitability of Venus’ Clouds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2023, 120 (25), e2220007120 10.1073/pnas.2220007120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Spacek J.; Rimmer P.; Owens G. E.; Cady S. R.; Sharma D.; Benner S. A. Production and Reactions of Organic Molecules in Clouds of Venus. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2024, 8 (1), 89–98. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.3c00261. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Reid J. P.; Bertram A. K.; Topping D. O.; Laskin A.; Martin S. T.; Petters M. D.; Pope F. D.; Rovelli G. The Viscosity of Atmospherically Relevant Organic Particles. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1–14. 10.1038/s41467-018-03027-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ja3c14177_si_001.pdf (1.8MB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of the American Chemical Society are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES