Skip to main content
Journal of Surgical Case Reports logoLink to Journal of Surgical Case Reports
. 2024 May 4;2024(5):rjae290. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjae290

An unusual presentation of penile fracture with complete transection of urethra: a case report

Vasanth Dunna 1, Srinivasa Rao Giduturi 2, K S N Chary 3, L V Simhachalam Kutikuppala 4, Anna Mary Jose 5, Varshitha Golla 6,✉
PMCID: PMC11069018  PMID: 38706488

Abstract

Penile fracture is one such urologic emergency that occurs when the penis is struck bluntly during sexual activity, and in less than 5–10% of cases, the concurrent urethral damage is evident, but complete transection is very rare. A 37-year-old male presented with a history of ‘snap’ sound and immediate detumescence of penis during intercourse, when he fell and hit the pubic bone of his partner. There was acute retention of urine, an attempt to pass a catheter failed and the patient underwent supra-pubic catheterization. On examination, there was classical ‘eggplant deformity’ of the penis with blood at the tip of the meatus. MRI showed a tunical tear on both sides at the penoscrotal junction with indistinct urethra and extensive hematoma in the proximal penile shaft. Surgical management was successfully done by anastomotic urethroplasty and cavernosal repair.

Keywords: complete transection of urethra, penile fracture, urological emergency

Introduction

Penile fracture is one such urologic emergency that is characterized by traumatic rupture of the tunica albuginea along with corpora cavernosa [1]. It occurs when the penis is struck bluntly during sexual activity and in less than 5–10% of cases, the concurrent urethral damage is evident, but complete transection is very rare [2]. An intra-corporeal pressure of 1500 mmHg or more is needed during erection to tear tunica albuginea [3]. Due to potential complications, such as the development of strictures and extravasation of urine, it is essential to investigate the degree of urethral damage in the penile fracture as soon as possible [3, 4]. We present a case report of penile fracture with complete urethral transection and its successful surgical outcome. We describe the presentation, diagnostic workup and management of a patient who presented with a fractured penis with complete transection of the urethra.

Case presentation

A 37-year-old male presented with a history of a ‘snap’ sound and immediate detumescence of penis during intercourse, when he fell and hit the pubic bone of his partner. There was generalized swelling and pain in the penis. There was acute retention of urine, an attempt to pass a catheter failed and the patient underwent supra-pubic catheterization. On examination, there was classical ‘eggplant deformity’ of the penis with blood at the tip of the meatus. MRI showed a tunical tear on both sides at the penoscrotal junction with indistinct urethra and extensive hematoma in the proximal penile shaft (Fig. 1). With the diagnosis of a fractured penis and possible urethral injury, after proper counselling, the patient was taken up for surgery. On the table, a retrograde urethrogram (RGU) was done showing evidence of partial urethral disruption. On exploration with penoscrotal vertical incision, there was total transection of proximal penile urethra, and a 1.5 cm tunical injury of corpus cavernosum on both sides ventrally (Fig. 2). There was extensive hematoma. Corpora sutured with 4.0 prolene after reconstructing the midline septum. Urethral ends mobilized and anastomosed with 3.0 vicryl in a single layer with minimal spatulation (Fig. 3). The patient was discharged on the 5th post-operative day; Foley catheter was removed on day 21. Follow-up RGU done after 3 months showed no evidence of stricture (Fig. 4).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

An MRI with (1) left corporeal tear on the left side with surrounding hematoma and (2) right corporeal tear with hematoma and disruption of urethra.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(1) On table RGU showing evidence of partial urethral disruption and (2) total transection of proximal urethra on exploration with penoscrotal vertical incision.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Reconstruction of midline septum with mobilized and anastomosed penile urethral ends.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Follow-up RGU done after 3 months showing no evidence of stricture.

Discussion

Penile fracture is an uncommon urological emergency that occurs when the tunica albuginea in an erect penis rupture due to excessive external bending stress during sexual activity and the injury is most caused at the time of coitus [1, 2]. Other less common causes are masturbation and the practice of Taqaandaan [3, 4]. In most cases, a penile fracture results in a cracking sound, fast detumescence, abrupt enlargement and ecchymosis of the penis, which gives it the appearance known as ‘eggplant deformity’ [5]. The rupture occurs more often in the proximal shaft and is located ventrally in coital injuries. In our case, there was a bilateral corporal tear. Literature states that bilateral corporal ruptures are often accompanied by urethral injury [6]. Urethral rupture, although infrequent, has an incidence that varies between 1 and 38%. This rupture may be partial or complete [7, 8]. Blood in the meatus, hematuria and voiding symptoms are highly indicative of urethral rupture, but the absence of these findings does not exclude urethral lesions [9]. Our patient presented with swelling, pain and acute retention of urine, which was followed by a failed attempt at urethral catheterization and on examination of the penis, we found blood at the tip of the meatus. All these findings yielded a high suspicion of urethral injury and we decided to perform an RGU. In suspected cases of urethral injury, RGU may demonstrate contrast leakage at the lesion site and reveal the exact point of urethral injury. However, RGU can show false negative results in up to 28.5% of cases [10]. In this case report, RGU could only show evidence of a partial rupture but, intraoperatively, there was found to be a complete transection of the proximal penile urethra. Compared to the traditional non-operative options, surgical restoration of the tear has proven to provide patients with the greatest results in terms of both sexual function, cosmetic appearance and fewer complications [9, 11, 12]. Penile degloving using a circumferential or subcoronal incision is the most used technique followed by penoscrotal and longitudinal incisions directly over the hematoma. The sub-coronal degloving incision is useful in cases with significant penile swelling or extensive hematomas, as well as in cases where the location of tunical rupture cannot be determined clinically or radiographically, or when the rupture is located dorsally [13]. Major disadvantages of the sub coronal degloving incision are the extensive dissection of Buck’s fascia and its risk of distal penile/preputial skin necrosis. In this case, we performed a penoscrotal incision. We chose this technique because it gives easy exposure to the base of the corpora cavernosa where fractures tend to occur more often and in addition would give us direct access to the urethral transection. With the penoscrotal incision, we have the flexibility of extending the incision and can also avoid futile dissection in the buck’s fascia [13]. We reconstructed the midline septum and closed the corpora using 4.0 prolene. Urethral ends were mobilized and anastomosed with 3.0 vicryl in a single layer with minimal spatulation. The patient was discharged on the 5th postoperative day, and the Foley catheter was removed on day 21. A follow-up RGU performed after 3 months showed no evidence of stricture.

Conclusion

Complete transection of the urethra in a case of penile fracture is an infrequent presentation. Evaluation by history, presenting symptoms, imaging and retrograde urethrography can establish the diagnosis. Surgical management can be successfully done by anastomotic urethroplasty and cavernosal repair, with better outcomes and minimal complications.

Contributor Information

Vasanth Dunna, Department of Urology, Citizens Speciality Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana 500019, India.

Srinivasa Rao Giduturi, Department of Urology, NRI Medical College and General HospitalChinakakani, Andhra Pradesh 522503, India.

K S N Chary, Department of Urology, Citizens Speciality Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana 500019, India.

L V Simhachalam Kutikuppala, Department of General Surgery, Dr YSR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh 520008, India.

Anna Mary Jose, Department of Surgery, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, Maharashtra 442004, India.

Varshitha Golla, Department of Surgery, International School of Medicine (ISM), Bishkek 750065, Kyrgyzstan.

Conflict of interest statement

None to disclose.

Funding

None to disclose.

Ethics statement

Informed consent was taken from the patient for publication of the case report.

References

  • 1. Sharma AP, Narain TA, Devana SK, et al.  Clinical spectrum, diagnosis, and sexual dysfunction after repair of fracture penis: is no news good news?  Indian J Urol  2020;36:117–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Bali RS, Rashid A, Mushtaque M, et al.  Penile fracture: experience from a third world country. Adv Urol  2013;2013:708362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. El Atat R, Sfaxi M, Benslama MR, et al.  Fracture of the penis: management and long-term results of surgical treatment. Experience in 300 cases. J Trauma  2008;64:121–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Zargooshi J. Sexual function and tunica albuginea wound healing following penile fracture: an 18-year follow-up study of 352 patients from Kermanshah, Iran. J Sex Med  2009;6:1141–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Koifman L, Cavalcanti AG, Manes CH, et al.  Penile fracture -experience in 56 cases. Int Braz J Urol  2003;29:35–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Hoag NA, Hennessey K, So A. Penile fracture with bilateral corporeal rupture and complete urethral disruption: case report and literature review. Can Urol Assoc J  2011;5:E23–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Derouiche A, Belhaj K, Hentati H, et al.  Management of penile fractures complicated by urethral rupture. Int J Impot Res  2008;20:111–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Muentener M, Suter S, Hauri D, Sulser T. Long-term experience with surgical and conservative treatment of penile fracture. J Urol  2004;172:576–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Amer T, Wilson R, Chlosta P, et al.  Penile fracture: a meta-analysis. Urol Int  2016;96:315–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Mydlo JH, Hayyeri M, Macchia RJ. Urethrography and cavernosography imaging in a small series of penile fractures: a comparison with surgical findings. Urology  1998;51:616–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ibrahiem el-HI, el-Tholoth HS, Mohsen T, et al.  Penile fracture: long-term outcome of immediate surgical intervention. Urology  2010;75:108–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Zargooshi J. Penile fracture in Kermanshah, Iran: report of 172 cases. J Urol  2000;164:364–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Minor TX, Brant WO, Rahman NU, Lue TF. Approach to management of penile fracture in men with underlying Peyronie’s disease. Urology  2006;68:858–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Surgical Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES