Abstract
In response to climate change, the nature of endophytes and their applications in sustainable agriculture have attracted the attention of academics and agro-industries. This work focused on the endophytic halophiles of the endangered Taiwanese salt marsh plant, Bolboschoenus planiculmis, and evaluated the functions of these isolates through in planta salinity stress alleviation assay using Arabidopsis. The endophytic strain Priestia megaterium BP01R2, which can promote plant growth and salinity tolerance, was further characterized through multi-omics approaches. The transcriptomics results suggested that BP01R2 could function by tuning hormone signal transduction, energy-producing metabolism, multiple stress responses, etc. In addition, the cyclodipeptide cyclo(L-Ala-Gly), which was identified by metabolomics analysis, was confirmed to contribute to the alleviation of salinity stress in stressed plants via exogenous supplementation. In this study, we used multi-omics approaches to investigate the genomics, metabolomics, and tropisms of endophytes, as well as the transcriptomics of plants in response to the endophyte. The results revealed the potential molecular mechanisms underlying the occurrence of biostimulant-based plant-endophyte symbioses with possible application in sustainable agriculture.
Keywords: endophyte, cyclic dipeptide, molecular plant–microbe interactions (MPMI), symbiosis
Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract.

Introduction
Climate change and projected world population growth are challenging for our food supply systems [1, 2]. To ensure adequate food security and sustainability, it is crucial to develop new technologies for growing crops efficiently in extreme environments [3]. In addition to traditional breeding and precision genetic technologies, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) and endophytes have also been implemented to enhance crop nutrient and water absorption, hormone signal transduction, stress adaptation, etc. [4, 5]. Among them, endophytes that live inside plants (in the endosphere) are attracting increased attention due to their in planta colonization properties and specific effects on host plants for growth promotion and tolerance to both abiotic and biotic stresses [6–9]. Various endophytes isolated from diverse origins have been demonstrated to exhibit positive effects by producing bioactive metabolites known as biostimulants [10–15].
Endophytes isolated from saline habitats, such as salt marshes or alkaline lakes, may be promising candidates for endophyte-assisted agriculture in saline or overfertilized fields. For the isolation of such endophytic halophiles, plants growing in conditions with continuously high salinity and periodic hypoxia are suitable sources [16–18]. Salt marsh plants often face multiple stresses, but many wetland-related studies have been limited to microbe-assisted phytoremediation [19–22]. Therefore, understanding the strategies used by these unique plant-associated microbes living in stressful environments through symbiotic mechanisms may provide novel knowledge and tools for future applications.
In previous studies, endophytic strains were isolated from various natural habitats and used to construct synthetic plant-endophyte symbiosis systems for plant cultivation under biotic or abiotic stress conditions [5, 23–26]. On the other hand, several specific metabolites, such as pyrroloquinoline quinone and cyclodipeptides (CDPs), have been identified as potential biostimulants [23, 27–30], and some CDPs have also been reported as agricultural agents that can protect crops against biotic and abiotic stresses [31–35]. Although some of them had been patented for applications more than three decades ago [36], the molecular bases of the role of CDPs in moderating plant stresses and in plant–microbe interactions remain to be elucidated.
In this study, halotolerant and PGP endophytes were isolated and characterized from endangered salt marsh plants in Taiwan. The complete genome and metabolome of Priestia megaterium BP01R2 (previously also known as BP-R2), along with its in planta regulations on host transcriptome, were further investigated to reveal the molecular mechanism involved in such symbiotic relationships. In addition, the CDP cyclo(L-Ala-Gly) was identified as a novel CDP biostimulant for plant salinity stress alleviation. The results of this study facilitate our understanding of the enigmatic cross-kingdom host–microbe interactions and unveil promising endophytic biostimulants for sustainable agriculture.
Materials and methods
Plant materials and sampling
The plant material (Bolboschoenus planiculmis) for endophyte isolation was collected from a tidal marsh in Taichung, Taiwan (Fig. 1A). The seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia (Col-0) were retrieved from Chieh-Chen Huang Lab’s stock.
Figure 1.
Typical habitat and identification of bacterial endophytes in Bolboschoenus planiculmis; A typical niche, tidal marsh in Taichung, Taiwan at low- (left) and high-tide (right); I and II show two corresponding locations in two different photographs; the pseudo-colour marks indicate a channel visible in the low-tide; B endophytic microbiome; bacterial endophytes isolated from different plant tissues (endosphere); the last rinsing solution used for surface sterilization was set as control checks (episphere); C unrooted 16S rRNA gene-based maximum likelihood phylogeny of eleven bacterial candidates; all internal nodes received >85% bootstrap support based on 1000 re-samplings; the roman numerals indicate that the groups belong to different genera; the groups containing isolates BP01R2 and BP02R8, which were further focused on in this work, are shown in blue and red, respectively; D in vitro salinity stress tolerance test of endophytes.
Endophyte isolation, characterization, and 16S ribosomal RNA gene-based phylogeny
Endophytic bacteria were isolated and maintained as described in our previous works [23, 26]. In brief, the endosphere fluids of surface-sterilized plant tissues were subjected to endophyte isolation and incubation using Luria-Bertani (LB) agar or broth at 37°C for 24–48 h. Isolates were first picked based on their different morphologies, and a preliminary taxonomic check was conducted via 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene-based phylogeny. Bacterial indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production was examined as described by Hwang et al. [26]. The 16S rRNA genes were amplified using the primer set E8F/U1510R as previously described [5, 26]. Multiple sequence alignments of 16S rRNA genes were performed using MUSCLE v3.8.31 [37]. Maximum likelihood phylogenies were inferred using PhyML v3.3 [38] and visualized using FigTree v1.4.4. PHYLIP v3.697 [39] was used for bootstrap analysis.
Plant-endophyte symbiosis and biostimulant assays
Unless otherwise stated, Arabidopsis plants were grown according to previously described methods [26, 40]. In short, seeds were germinated on Murashige and Skoog (MS) plates supplemented with NaCl (ranging from 0 to 170 mM) under a 10/14 h day/night cycle at 25°C. Endophytes were incubated and inoculated to the plants as described in our previous work [26]. Briefly, strains BP01R2 and BP02R8 were adjusted on OD600 = 0.8, ≈ 3.5 × 107 and 9.4 × 108 CFU/ml, respectively, and the strains were serially diluted into OD600 = 0.4 and 0.04 as the relatively high concentration inocula (HCI) and low concentration inocula (LCI) for the symbiosis assays. The biostimulant cyclo(L-Ala-Gly) (SS-2476, Combi-Blocks; San Diego, CA, USA) was purchased from UNI-ONWARD Corp (New Taipei City, Taiwan) and was prepared for the plant experiments.
Plant total RNA extraction and transcriptomic analysis
Arabidopsis seedlings grown on MS plates supplemented with 100 mM NaCl and inoculated with or without strain BP01R2 (OD600 = 0.8 ≈ 3.5 × 107 CFU/ml; prepared as above mentioned) were harvested 15 days after inoculation (DAI); those grown on MS plates without NaCl supplementation were used as controls. Samples were homogenized with a mortar and pestle using liquid nitrogen; the total RNA was extracted from the mixtures of five seedlings in each treatment using TRIzol reagent. All procedures were performed following Welgene Biotech's in-house pipeline and our previous works on plant transcriptomics [41, 42]; all kits were used according to the manufacturer's instructions, and all bioinformatics tools were used with the default settings.
Briefly, library construction was carried out with Agilent's SureSelect Strand-Specific RNA Library Preparation Kit with poly-A and size selection using oligo(dT) beads and AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter; Chaska, MN, USA), respectively. The 75 bp single-end sequencing was performed on the Illumina Solexa platform. The Illumina program bcl2fastq v2.20 was used for basecalling, and low-quality reads were trimmed off based on Q20 accuracy using Trimmomatic v0.36 [43]. The resultant sequence was mapped to the TAIR10 genome [44] using HISAT2 aligner [45, 46], and the differential expression analysis was performed using StringTie v2.1.4 [47, 48] and DEseq2 v1.28.1 [49] with genome bias detection/correction and Welgene Biotech's in-house pipeline. The transcript per million (TPM) method was used for normalization, and genes with low expression levels (TPM <0.3) in either or both of the treated and control samples were excluded from the analysis [50]. Genes with 2.0-fold TPM differences and a probability of at least 0.95 were defined as differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Gene set enrichment analysis [51] was carried out for the enrichment analysis, and the DEGs were subjected to Gene Ontology (GO) [52] and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) [53] database for metabolic pathway prediction.
Bacterial metabolomics
The strain BP01R2 was cultured on LB agar plates with or without NaCl, as mentioned above. Five agar plates were collected for each sample, and metabolites were extracted with ethyl acetate two times. The extracts were re-dissolved in methanol and adjusted to 10 mg/ml. All samples were analysed using the linear ion trap mass spectrometer system (LTQ XL, Thermo Fisher Scientific; San Jose, California, USA) with direct injection at positive ion mode. The mass range was from m/z 100–1500. MS raw data files were converted to mzXML format using MSConvert [54]. Metabolite peak detection was performed using MZmine version 2.53 [55], and the pre-processed data were conducted by R program (version 4.0.3) [56]. The pre-processed MS feature table and unknown metabolites were searched and annotated against referenced metabolites of the AntiMarin database [57] by exact molecular mass to identify the molecular formula and for annotation of discriminating features.
Bacterial genome sequencing, assembly, and annotation
The procedures for genome sequencing and analysis were based on those described in our previous work on bacterial genomes [29, 58]. All kits used were the same as previously described and were used according to the manufacturer’s protocols, and all bioinformatics tools were used with the default settings unless stated otherwise. Briefly, the total DNA of strain BP01R2 was extracted and then sequenced via Illumina NovaSeq 6000 2 × 150 bp paired-end and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) MinION platforms. Further filtering was conducted to remove ONT reads shorter than 12 000 bp. A hybrid de novo assembly was produced using Unicycler v0.4.9-beta [59]. For validation, the Illumina and ONT raw reads were mapped to the assembly using BWA v0.7.17 [60] and Minimap2 v2.15 [61], respectively. The results were programmatically checked with SAMtools v1.9 [62] and manually inspected using IGV v2.11.1 [63]. For assembly completeness evaluation, benchmarking universal single-copy orthologous (BUSCO v5.1.2) analysis, referenced to the Bacillales dataset, was executed on gVolante [64, 65]. The finalized assembly was submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and annotated using the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) [66]. KofamKOALA [67] was used to examine putative metabolic pathways.
Bacterial comparative genomics
All BioProject and BioSample records of P. megaterium accessible on NCBI as of 28 February 2022 were retrieved for comparative analysis with BP01R2 (Table S1). FastANI v1.1 [68] was used for whole-genome comparison to calculate the proportion of genomic segments mapped and the average nucleotide identity (ANI). Homologous gene clusters were identified using OrthoMCL [69] for gene content analysis. Genes associated with plant growth-promoting (PGP) traits and rhizosphere competence were identified according to previous works on P. megaterium [70] and bacterial endophytes [71]; genes associated with salinity stress [72–74] and autotrophs [75–78] were also identified. Multiple sequence alignments of homologous genes, maximum likelihood phylogenies, and bootstrap analysis were conducted based on the methods described for 16S rRNA gene phylogeny.
Bacterial tropism analysis
Anaerobic cultivation was performed according to the instructions of the Leibniz Institute DSMZ [79]. The Hungate anaerobic culture tube and Coy anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratory Products, USA) were used in this experiment. BP01R2 was precultured in M9 minimal medium (248510; Becton Dickinson, USA) for 24 h, and then washed three times using the same method before use as an inoculant. The inoculant density was set at OD600 = 0.01; the cultivation volume was 5 ml, and the culture was carried out by shaking at 120 rpm and 37°C. M9 minimal medium supplemented with 2 mM MgSO4 (131-00405; FUJIFILM Wako, Japan), 0.1 mM CaCl2 (21 075; Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 10 mM NaNO3 (195-02545; FUJIFILM Wako, Japan), and 0.01% L-tryptophan (A10230; Alfa Aesar, USA) was prepared as a general incubation medium. Extra glucose was tested as an organic carbon resource at concentrations (w/v) of 0.4%, 0.2%, 0.04%, and 0%; the tube headspace gas was composed of either sterile air or 90% H2 plus 10% CO2 (N2). Growth curves were measured at OD595 using the PARADIG detection platform (Beckman, USA) or a Sunrise absorbance microplate reader (Tecan, Austria).
Statistics
Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s tests were used to check the normal distribution of variables and homoscedasticity. A parametric one-way analysis of variance analysis with Tukey's post hoc honestly significant difference (HSD) test or non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn's post hoc test was then applied to evaluate statistical significance. Data analysis was performed using the Real Statistics Resource Pack v9.0 [80]. For all experiments, at least five independent biological replicates were tested, and the data are shown as mean ± SEM unless otherwise stated. For all data points, the different letters indicate statistical significance between the samples at *P ≤ 0.05 level; otherwise, not significant.
Results
Isolation of halotolerant bacterial endophytes
In total, 128 and 519 colony-forming units (CFUs) were isolated from the endospheres of roots and shoots, respectively; however, the microbiome composition in the shoots was less diverse (Fig. 1B). Among the picked isolates, 11 endophytes consisted of six genera: Priestia, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, Bacillus, Acinetobacter, and Rossellomorea (ordered from high to low enrichment) (Fig. 1C). A Priestia sp. strain (designated as strain BP01R2) and a Pseudomonas sp. strain (designated as strain BP02R8) were chosen for the following experiments due to their enriched distribution and presence of beneficial endophytes affiliated with these genera [70, 81, 82]. According to the results of the halotolerance test, both strains tolerate 7.0% NaCl supplementation, and BP01R2 can even survive at an extremely high concentration of 11% NaCl, which was therefore identified as a halophile (Fig. 1D).
Plant-endophyte symbiosis benefits in planta salinity stress alleviation
The symbiosis assay was first tested without salinity stress. Both BP01R2 and BP02R8 presented plant-growth-promotion characteristics when prepared as either LCI or HCI (Fig. 2A). Both strains induced the formation of plant lateral roots under HCI (Fig. 2A and D), and BP01R2 caused more root hairs and fresh weight under LCI (Fig. 2C). Besides, the main root length was also determined at 4, 8, and 15 DAI. The results showed that BP02R8 significantly increased the main root length at 15 DAI either under LCI or HCI, while BP01R2 contributed to the main root elongation at all time points under HCI with statistical significance (Fig. 2B). The main root length was thus considered a leading indicator to evaluate the endophytic contribution and was then focused on in the following experiments. These results echoed previous observations of the ability of these strains to promote plant growth [26] and highlighted their potential benefits for rhizosphere competence.
Figure 2.
Endophytes promote host plant growth; A plant growth promotion differs with inoculation concentration and type of endophyte; the upper five panels illustrate the plant growth patterns under treatment with different inocula, and the lower five panels provide a close-up view of the roots; CK: control check; DAI: days after inoculation; B the main root length, C fresh weight, and D lateral root number of different inoculum-treated plants; the data are presented as mean ± SEM; N = 5; the different letters indicate statistical significance between samples (*P < 0.05); otherwise, not significant.
The seedlings of A. thaliana were subsequently grown in MS media supplemented with 85 or 170 mM NaCl for 15 days to mimic salinity stress. BP01R2 and BP02R8 promoted plant growth on shoots, roots, and fresh weight, similar to the findings under stress-free conditions (Fig. 3). Phenotypes of chlorotic and adaxial-curled leaves, fewer lateral roots and shorter main root length observed in control plants (CK) under 170 mM NaCl stress were mitigated through endophyte inoculation (Fig. 3A). For instance, the main root length decreasing percentage was recovered from 56.2% (CK) to 15.2% (BP01R2) and 17.9% (BP02R8), respectively (Fig. 3E). Both endophytes significantly increased the main root length and fresh weight at 15 DAI under 170 mM NaCl stress, and BP01R2 also contributed the same under 85 mM NaCl stress with statistical significance (Fig. 3C–E).
Figure 3.
Endophytes alleviate salinity stress in host plants; A plant growth under endophytic inoculation and salinity stress; the upper three panels illustrate the plant growth patterns with different inocula under salinity stress, and the lower three panels show close-up images of the roots; CK: control check; DAI: days after inoculation; B endophyte reisolation; C, D the fresh weight (15 DAI), and E main root length (04 and 15 DAI) of plants treated with different inocula under salinity stress; the data are presented as mean ± SEM; N = 5; the different letters indicate statistical significance between samples (*P < 0.05); otherwise, not significant.
Cyclo(L-ala-Gly) improves plant growth and alleviates in planta salinity stress
To investigate which metabolites contribute to the salinity stress alleviation in hosts, a linear ion trap mass spectrometer system was used to analyse the metabolomics of BP01R2 under NaCl-present and NaCl-absent incubation conditions. In total, 191 compounds were identified specifically under the NaCl-present condition, and 249 compounds were found to be shared by NaCl-present and NaCl-absent conditions (Fig. 4A and Tables S4 and S5). Among the profiles, 18 cyclic dipeptides, also known as 2,5-diketopiperazines and CDPs, were identified (Table S6). These CDPs could be classified into proline-based (including hydroxyproline) and non-proline-based groups, and nine were observed only under the NaCl-present condition. CDPs have been reported to act as biostimulants against biotic and abiotic stresses in plants [31–35], and many proline- and hydroxyproline-based CDPs have been shown to induce resistance in plants against abiotic stresses [36]. However, the understanding of those non-proline-based CDPs and their roles in molecular plant–microbe interactions (MPMI) is limited. Therefore, the only non-proline-based CDP, cyclo(L-Ala-Gly), produced by BP01R2 under NaCl-present condition, was targeted for the follow-up biostimulants assays.
Figure 4.
Metabolomic analysis of BP01R2 and the biostimulant candidate for mitigating in planta salinity stress; A Cyclo(L-Ala-Gly) was identified under NaCl-specific bacterial growth conditions; B plant growth with BP01R2 and cyclo(L-Ala-Gly) inoculations under salinity stress; the lower and upper four panels are the plants grown with 50 or 0 mM NaCl, respectively; CK: control check; DAI: days after inoculation; C main root length; the dotted, dashed, and solid lines indicate 03, 12, and 21 DAI, respectively; D lateral root emergence ratio between 03, 12, and 21 DAI; the open and closed circles and squares indicate the control, BP01R2, cyclo(L-Ala-Gly) 10 ppm and cyclo(L-Ala-Gly) 100 ppm, respectively; E the quant and length distribution of lateral roots at different phases; a greater circle size indicates a greater lateral root number; lateral root developmental phases I, II, and III indicate the lateral root lengths <0.5 cm, between 0.5 and 1.0 cm, and > 1.0 cm, respectively, and correspond to the colour keys; the data were collected from five independent seedlings with three technical repeats and are presented as mean ± SEM; the different letters indicate statistical significance between samples (*P < 0.05); otherwise, not significant.
After 3 weeks of exogenous application of cyclo(L-Ala-Gly) to plants (i.e. 21 DAI to BP01R2), the 10 ppm (C10) or 100 ppm (C100) supplementation contributed to main root elongation and lateral root development but not to shoot growth. Still, apparent contributions to the alleviation of salinity stress (i.e. vigorous growth of seedlings and the alleviation of leaf chlorosis and adaxial curling) were observed under 50 mM NaCl conditions (Fig. 4B). The decrease in plant main root length was attenuated by BP01R2, C10, and C100 application under 50 and 100 mM NaCl. BP01R2 and C10 benefited the main root elongation under 0 mM NaCl. All treatments had similar effects under 100 mM NaCl conditions (Fig. 4C). Furthermore, the lateral root formation rate (number of plants with lateral roots/number of plants without lateral roots), number, and length were calculated to estimate the salinity stress alleviation by the treatments. BP01R2 and C100 showed greater lateral root formation rates than CK under 0 mM NaCl. All treatments led to greater lateral root formation than CK under 50 mM NaCl. Only BP01R2 had greater lateral root formation than CK and maintained a 100% lateral root formation rate under 100 mM NaCl (Fig. 4D). More lateral roots were observed in all the treatments than in the CK under 0 and 50 mM NaCl conditions, and only BP01R2 maintained this advantage under 100 mM NaCl condition (Fig. 4E, shown as circular sizes).
For lateral root length, all samples were classified by length to represent three different developmental phases (phases PI, PII, and PIII indicate the lateral root lengths <0.5 cm, between 0.5 and 1.0 cm, and > 1.0 cm, respectively) (Fig. 4E, referred as colour keys). The results showed that the PII and the PIII of C100 were longer than CK under 0 mm NaCl. Both C10 and C100 increased the lateral root length at different phases under 50 mM NaCl. No obvious contributions were found from C10 or C100 under 100 nM NaCl (Fig. 4E). Overall, C10 and C100 contributed to plant growth and stress alleviation by promoting lateral root formation and elongation as observed under 0 and 50 mM NaCl conditions. These results suggested that cyclo(L-Ala-Gly), along with other metabolites, may contribute to BP01R2 in alleviating in planta salinity stress and improving plant growth. This indicated its nature as a novel biostimulant, which has already been patented (Taiwan Intellectual Property Office assigned number I684411).
Plant transcriptomics in response to endophytic symbiosis
Given the characteristics of BP01R2 in alleviating salinity stress in plants presented in previous [26] and this work (Figs 3 and 4), we subsequently collected the plant RNA from the above experimental batches to study the potential molecular regulations of BP01R2 to host plants underlying the salinity stress. A total of 30 956 567 (~2.3 Gb), 34 330 286 (~2.6 Gb), 31 539 938 (~2.4 Gb), and 32 554 093 (~2.4 Gb) trimmed reads were generated for CK, BP01R2, CK_NaCl, and BP01R2_NaCl, respectively. The sequence mapping rate against the Arabidopsis reference genome ranged from 98.41% to 99.23%. Strikingly, the expression pattern of the CK was intermediate to the samples that suffered from salinity stress, and the BP01R2_NaCl showed a higher similarity to the CK instead of the CK_NaCl (Fig. 5A), which may result from the alleviation contributed by the symbiosed endophyte as seen in the phenotypic data (Fig. 4B–E).
Figure 5.
Transcriptomic analysis; A principal component analysis for transcriptomic datasets; B Venn diagram of DEGs comparison between samples with or without salinity stress.
When the symbiosis occurred without salinity stress, a total of 658 DEGs among the 21 028 genes were identified (Fig. S1A), and the GO analysis revealed the corresponding enrich-regulated terms of biological processes (plant epidermal and root cell differentiation and root morphogenesis), cellular component (chromosome, cytoskeleton, transferase, and cytoplasmic vesicle), and molecular function (oxygen binding, ATPase activity, helicase activity, and ligase activity) (Figs S2 and S3). Consistent with the GO enrichment results, several PGP-related pathways (e.g. glycolysis and gluconeogenesis, oxidative phosphorylation, plant hormone signal transduction, etc.) were also shown to be enrich-regulated within KEGG analysis results (Figs S4–S7). These enriched gene regulations well explained the phenotypes observed in the symbiosis assays (i.e. the growth improvement traits such as main root elongation, lateral root induction, fresh weight accumulation, etc.) (Figs 2 and 3A and C–E).
When the symbiosis occurred under salinity stress, a total of 1029 DEGs were identified among the 20 937 genes (Fig. S1B). The cell death, hypersensitive response, jasmonic acid biosynthesis and response, ethylene response, MAPK signalling, and glutathione metabolism, among others, were up-regulated (Figs S8–S13), with results usually opposite compared with those of the CK_NaCl and CK comparisons (Figs S14–S17). Moreover, the plant hormone signal transduction and ribosome-related pathways were consistently up-regulated, similar to what was observed in symbiosis without the salinity stress. Furthermore, the simultaneously up- (co-up-DEGs) and down-regulated DEGs (co-down-DEGs) between samples with and without salinity stress were also examined. A total of 202 co-DEGs were universally up- or down-regulated, regardless of salinity stress or not (Fig. 5B). Among them, the 48 co-up-DEGs were found to be involved in plant-type cell wall organization or biogenesis, xyloglucan:xyloglucosyl transferase activity, peroxidase activity, oxidoreductase activity, antioxidant activity, etc. (Table S2); the 154 co-down-DEGs were enriched in response to hypoxia, jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, abscisic acid, oxidoreductase, oxidative stress, and related metabolism (Table S3). In summary, the transcriptome data are consistent with the observed phenotypes and explain at the molecular level how BP01R2 symbiosis alleviates in planta salinity stress and promotes the host plant growth.
Genome assembly and comparative genomics of BP01R2 and its relatives
The genome of strain BP01R2 was sequenced to investigate the key genes for its functional characterization and evolution. In total, 2 × 6486 500 (∼2.0 Gb) of Illumina and 26 722 (~0.4 Gb; N50: 13469 bp) of trimmed ONT raw reads were obtained for hybrid de novo genome assembly. The Illumina and ONT reads provided 349.5X and 66.7X coverage, respectively. The assembly result indicated that BP01R2 has one circular chromosome (5228 948 bp) with 38.1% GC content and six plasmids with sizes ranging from 5296 to 134 664 bp. For the completeness evaluation, 449 complete BUSCOs (99.8%), one fragmented BUSCO (0.2%), and no missing BUSCOs (0.0%) were found within this assembly, which is consistent with the expectation that circular chromosomal contig represents the complete genome assembly. The annotation contains 15 complete sets of rRNA genes and two additional 5S rRNA genes, 157 tRNA genes, eight non-coding RNAs, 5551 protein-coding genes, and 91 pseudogenes (Table 1). To investigate the genes associated with the molecular plant–endophyte interactions (MPEI), genes involved in (a) plant growth promotion and rhizosphere competence, (b) salinity stress alleviation, and (c) carbon and oxygen limitation adaptation were identified and further discussed for their potential contribution to the symbiotic relationships (Figs 6, 7, and S19).
Table 1.
Genomic features of P. megaterium strain BP01R2.
| Features | Chromosome | pBP01R2a | pBP01R2b | pBP01R2c | pBP01R2d | pBP01R2e | pBP01R2f |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accession | CP092387.1 | CP092388.1 | CP092389.1 | CP092390.1 | CP092391.1 | CP092392.1 | CP092393.1 |
| Size (bp) | 5228 948 | 134 664 | 133 343 | 50 994 | 39 414 | 12 668 | 5296 |
| GC content (%) | 38 | 34 | 34.5 | 35.5 | 36.5 | 34 | 36 |
| Protein-coding genes | 5231 | 108 | 119 | 44 | 31 | 10 | 8 |
| Pseudogenes | 82 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Ribosome RNA genes | 40 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Transfer RNA genes | 121 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| Non-coding RNA genes | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Figure 6.
Evolutionary relationships among Priestia megaterium BP01R2 and its relatives; A source origin distribution of all available Priestia megaterium genomes; B phylogeny of strain BP01R2 and its relatives; the maximum likelihood phylogeny is based on the concatenated alignment of 2155 single-copy genes shared by all strains analysed (147 671 aligned amino acid sites); the bootstrap values of those three internal nodes with <99% were labelled; Priestia flexa NBRC 15715T is included as the outgroup; the superscripts “T” and “R” following the strain names indicate type strains and strains assigned as NCBI representative genomes, respectively; strains with complete genomes are presented in bold, and the strain BP01R2 reported in this work is highlighted in blue; information to the right of the phylogenic tree shows the grouping of genomes according to different cut-off values of genome-wide ANI; C gene content analysis; the empty box and box with numbers inside indicate single-copy and multiple-copy of the targeted genes, respectively; the different genes are clustered in groups: A, nitrogen assimilation and reduction (nasA-E); B, phosphate solubilization and mineralization (gcd, phoP, phoR, phoAB, phoD and ppx); C, L-tryptophane and indole synthesis (trpA-F); D, IAA synthesis and transporter (gatA and an AEC family transporter encoding gene); E, acetoin and butanediol synthesis (alsD, alsS, ilvH, and ilvG); F, spermidine synthesis (speAB and speDE); G, superoxide dismutase and catalase (sodACF and cat); H, ferredoxin (fer) related; the gene locus accession details are provided in Table S7; the icons were created with BioRender.com.
Figure 7.
Tropism analyses on BP01R2; A simplified autotrophic (orange and purple panels)- and anaerobic (green panel)-related metabolism identified within the BP01R2 genome; all of the gene names and locus accession details are listed in Table S7; the carbon dioxide (CO2) influx and the number of carbon atoms in each molecule are highlighted in blue; the reactions involved in energy generation are marked as red arrows; B, D bacterial growth curves under different carbon sources (G0, G10, G50, and G100 indicate 0%, 0.04%, 0.2%, and 0.4% glucose, respectively) and tube headspace gas compositions (A, C, and N indicate sterilized air, 90% H2 plus 10% CO2, and 90% H2 plus 10% N2, respectively); C coefficient relationship between carbon resources and bacterial growth under anaerobic conditions; X-axis, glucose content; Y-axis, the maxima (indicated by the fluorescent green arrows) of the bacterial growth curves in B; all the data points were collected from three independent biological replicates and shown as mean ± SEM.
For the species assignment, we calculated the genome-wide ANI of BP01R2 and its relatives (Table S1). Additionally, 2155 single-copy genes shared by all strains were identified and used to produce a concatenated alignment containing 147 671 aligned amino acid sites for maximum likelihood phylogeny construction. The results showed that BP01R2 is closely related to P. megaterium NCT-2, and all of the ingroup genomes share >95% ANI threshold recommended for bacterial species delineation [68] (Fig. 6B). Based on this, strain BP01R2 was identified as P. megaterium. The BioProject and BioSample records of all P. megaterium available from NCBI were also examined and checked for their source origin distribution. As results show, over half of P. megaterium were isolated from plant-associated or environmental sources (Fig. 6A). Many of them were reported as beneficial endophytes, PGP bacteria, or originally inhabited in alkaline and hypersaline environments (e.g. salt marshes, alkaline lakes, potash salt dumps, etc.), suggesting their immense potential in dealing with such abiotic stresses [83–85].
For focused gene content investigations, the genes related to MPMI and salinity stress alleviation (Fig. 6C) were further examined. BP01R2 encodes 180 proteins commonly associated with nutrient acquisition, phytohormone production, rhizosphere competence, and the ability against abiotic stress in host plants (Fig. S19 and Table S7). Genes encoding ABC transporters (Fig. S20) and two-component systems (Fig. S21) are enriched in the BP01R2 genome and likely related to the processing of environmental information. For rhizosphere competence, five of the nar, nas, and nir genes related to nitrogen assimilation and reduction [86, 87], as well as a gcd gene, a ppx gene, and nine pho genes regulating phosphate solubilization, transport, and assimilation [88, 89] were found. Additionally, a total of 30 protein-encoding genes associated with flagellar biosynthesis and assembly (i.e. flh, fli, flg, and mot genes), eight che genes related to bacterial chemotaxis, and three als, three ilv, and six bdh genes related to bacterial PGP volatiles (e.g. acetoin and butanediol) [90–92] are present within this genome (Table S7).
For plant growth improvement, 11 genes were found to be involved in the indole-3-acetamide pathway for IAA biosynthesis from tryptophan [91, 93], which was consistent with the metabolomic results for IAA production. Moreover, four auxin efflux carrier (AEC) family transporter protein-encoding genes [94, 95] and 10 genes encoding siderophore synthesis/Fe-uptake proteins possibly making BP01R2 capable of producing siderophores that could assist host plants in chelating ferric ions under iron starvation [87, 96] were identified (Fig. 6C and Table S7). Concerning the usual hypoxia and hyper-alkaline/saline conditions in a typical niche of BP01R2 and its plant host, abundant genes involved in the reductive tricarboxylic acid (rTCA) pathway [76, 77], the reductive glycine (rGly) pathway [78], and anaerobic respiration metabolism were characterized (Fig. S19 and Table S7). Additionally, four sod genes encoding superoxide dismutase family proteins, five cat genes encoding catalase proteins, and nine spe genes involved in spermidine synthesis related to in planta salinity stress alleviation [97] were also found in this genome (Fig. 6C and Table S7).
Identification of mixotrophic characteristics
The BP01R2 genome contains the general nitrite reductase genes nirBD, which are required for nitrate ammonification [98], the lactate dehydrogenase gene ldh, which primarily mediates NAD+ regeneration during lactate fermentation [99]; and the required genes involved in the other conversion processes, such as the pyruvate-acetoin-2,3-butanediol and the pyruvate-acetyl-CoA-acetate reaction [75, 100] (Figs 7A and S19 and Table S7). Moreover, the anaerobic regulation related resA-E operon encoded [101, 102] and the fnr gene were also found [103] (Table S7). Notably, two nonspontaneous bacterial carbon fixation machineries, the rGly pathway [78] and the rTCA cycle [76, 77], are present in this genome (Figs 7A and S19, and Table S7). Furthermore, except for three industrial isolates, genes encoding the key enzymes of these systems (e.g. gcvHT for the rGly pathway and korAB for the rTCA cycle) were also found within all the examined Bacillus megaterium genomes (including the type strain), suggesting the potentials for trophic flexibility in this species to assimilate inorganic carbon sources from the environment. To estimate the anaerobic and autotrophic availability of BP01R2, it was incubated under oxygen and carbon resource starvation conditions by mimicking the original habitat of its photoautotrophic host. The results showed that BP01R2 is able to grow under anaerobic conditions (Fig. 7B), and a high correlation (R2 = 0.95) was found between the extra glucose supplementation and the maximum bacterial growing capability (Fig. 7C), indicating the ability of BP01R2 to acquire organic carbon resources for growth under anaerobic conditions.
Furthermore, we were interested in whether BP01R2 uses CO2 as a sole carbon resource to grow under anaerobic respiration conditions as a chemolithoautotroph (H2 as an electron donor, NaNO3 as an electron acceptor, and CO2 as a carbon source). The tested glucose concentrations were 0.04% and 0%, and N2 was used to replace the CO2 in anaerobic gas. The results confirmed that BP01R2 can use CO2 for growth either with or without extra 0.04% glucose (Fig. 7D). Interestingly, the bacteria grew significantly better with CO2 than N2 on the third day (CG0 vs NG0, P = 0.05; CG10 vs NG10, P = 0.03), and this advantage was maintained when the bacteria were growing without glucose until the 16th day. A similar pattern was found under the 0.04% glucose conditions before the ninth day, and a greater growth rate was observed in the CO2 treatments; however, no significant difference was found in the maximum bacterial growing capacity compared with that under N2 conditions after then. Accordingly, BP01R2 was identified as a facultative aerobic mixotroph that can use organic (glucose) or inorganic (CO2) carbon resources to grow.
Discussion
BP01R2 and cyclo(L-Ala-Gly) as versatile endophytic biostimulants
Auxin is well known as a crucial instructor of root/shoot morphogenesis and development by converging multiple phytohormones and signalling pathways in plants [104–106]. In this work, several IAA-producing genes and AEC family transporter genes were identified within the genome of BP01R2 (Table S7), and its IAA production was also confirmed either at NaCl-absent (Fig. S18 and Table S5) or NaCl-present conditions (Table S4) [26]. In addition, several PGP bacterial volatiles and (lateral) root-inducing biostimulants (Tables S4 and S5) and more than 40 genes related to bacterial flagella and chemotaxis (Table S7) were identified in the BP01R2 genome. Some endophytes have bacterial flagella and produce biostimulants, which cause different repulsive or attractive compounds and quorum sensing. The contact between endophytes and plant exudates occurs accordingly, and chemotaxis driven by flagella also plays an important role in colonization [96, 107–109].
The resulting root structure changes to maintain morphological plasticity, preventing the salt accumulation of plants from saline environments [110, 111]. In addition to phytohormones, multiple pathways, such as glutathione metabolism and ribosome biosynthesis, respond in an opposite pattern to those without stress [112–114]. Similar phenomena were also found for BP01R2 inoculated plants (Figs 3 and S10–S17), suggesting its ability to alleviate in planta salinity stress. While investigating bacterial metabolomics under salinity stress, several cyclic dipeptide signals were identified, and cyclo(L-Ala-Gly) was later confirmed to function like BP01R2 in plants (Fig. 4). In contrast to our previous work describing the PGP traits and application [26], in this study, we deciphered the genome and metabolome of BP01R2, and examined the plant transcriptome to reveal the molecular mechanisms of its roles in MPMI and in planta stress alleviation. Taken together, the findings suggest that BP01R2 improves plant growth and alleviates salinity stress with beneficial biostimulants and transcriptomic regulations in host plants (Fig. 8A).
Figure 8.
Schematic illustration of MPEI among wetland biomes; A integrated multi-omics perspective on the symbiotic relationships of wetland plants and endophytes; the green cells indicate enriched phenotypic and transcriptomic regulations within the plant contributed by the endophyte; the orange cells were generated based on metabolomic and genomic data analyses in this work; B the dynamic carbon resource acquisition switch of the endophyte may constitute a niche for host-symbiosis under hypoxia and sugar starvation; for simplicity, the black arrow represents any carbon flux from organic (sugar) or inorganic (CO2) carbon sources; both dashed lines and transparent marks indicate a decreasing level of suitability or availability; phases I, II, III, and IV indicate four timepoints among the tidal dynamics of the wetland biome, and the diagrams below indicate the timepoint-specific MPEI accordingly; the blue and red marks highlight the plant growth promotion and abiotic stress alleviation effects on the plant host, respectively; the brightly coloured symbols indicate the corresponding beneficial metabolites mentioned in the orange cell of A; icons were created with BioRender.com.
Although the potential of CDPs as stress-mitigating biostimulants, especially cyclo(L-Ala-Gly), was revealed in this work, further investigations are required to decipher their molecular roles in plants. The functions and the molecular mechanisms of these compounds in plants have yet to be elucidated; one of the reasons is that developing an efficient and specific method for detecting their in planta amount and distribution is technically difficult. In summary, this work facilitates our understanding of CDPs and highlights the importance of these potent small compounds, which deserve additional attention.
Taxonomy of Priestia species
Based on information available for the strains with NCBI BioProject/BioSample information, >70% of P. megaterium strains are associated with plants or are environmental microbes (Fig. 6A), and all of these strains have abundant PGPR and stress abatement-related genetic components (Fig. 6C), suggesting the potential of this species for agricultural applications. Based on genome-wide ANI analysis and the molecular phylogeny of conserved single-copy genes, some of the characterized strains may be misclassified. Notably, our results showed that the type strain of P. aryabhattai shares >95% ANI with P. megaterium (Fig. 6B). To clarify the species assignments, we backtracked the supporting information described for the delineation of these species [115]. However, two conserved signature indels reported by Gupta et al. [115] were absent in neither the type strain of P. megaterium nor P. aryabhattai (Fig. S22), suggesting that these markers are not reliable. Based on the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (Principle 8, “Each order or taxon of a lower rank with a given circumscription, position, and rank can bear only one correct name, i.e. the earliest that is in accordance with the Rules of this Code”) [116], we recommend rejecting the name Priestia aryabhattai (Basonym: Bacillus aryabhattai [117]) and temporarily replacing it with Priestia megaterium (Basonym: B. megaterium [118]). This taxonomic reclassification coincides with the synonymy suggestion by Narsing Rao et al. [119]. Moreover, further confirmation of the correctness and suitability of the name Priestia gen. nov. is required to avoid incorrect use.
Insights into symbiosis among wetland MPEI
As mentioned, BP01R2 originally inhabited salt marsh plants that grow under continuous high salinity and periodic hypoxia (Fig. 1A). When plants experience abiotic stress, e.g. salinity stress, drought stress, and osmotic stress, the transmissible sugars in plants tend to accumulate in the vacuole for water pressure manipulation or be recycled into stored forms of sugar (e.g. starch, cellulose, lignin, etc.), and microorganisms living in the plant endosphere may thus suffer in planta carbon resource starvation [120–122]. There is consensus that efficient carbon resource transmission (i.e. sugars, amino acids, other organic matters, etc.) from plant phloem and root exudates to symbionts is important [123, 124]. Therefore, addressing these routine multi-stress conditions is crucial for maintaining such symbiosis among the endosphere. The genomic analysis (Figs 7A and S19 and Table S7) and tropism analysis (Fig. 7B–D) of BP01R2 revealed its availability on anaerobic and autotrophic metabolisms and mixotrophic traits, allowing it to grow under conditions in vitro mimicking wetland plants suffering the multi-stress of sugar starvation and hypoxia.
Overall, we infer that the anaerobic and autotrophic characteristics of the endophyte may reduce the carbon source demand from the host under hypoxia stress, such as during the high-tide period in wetlands (from Phase I to Phase III, Fig. 8B), i.e. the pathway by which strains gain energy might be able to be switched from consuming sugar and the TCA cycle to anaerobic carbon fixation, such as the rTCA cycle, and fermentation (Phase III, Fig. 8B). These may constitute a strategy and a niche for symbionts to increase their competitiveness for host symbiosis under multiple stresses or within extreme biomes. Based on multi-omics investigations and dynamic switching of carbon resources and energy acquisition of P. megaterium BP01R2, a novel perspective on MPEI in the wetland biome is proposed (Fig. 8). However, the coordination of carbon resource acquisition (organic and inorganic) and trophic patterns (heterotrophic and autotrophic) among such MPEI has not been fully elucidated. Research on multi-dimensional regulations in plant–microbe interactions [125–127] and tracing fluxes of carbon resources among bacteria and plant hosts [128] are necessary for future work.
Conclusions
Beyond uncovering the versatile potential of P. megaterium BP01R2 and cyclo(L-Ala-Gly) for agricultural purposes, the multi-omics and bacterial tropism results presented in this work provide new insights into the unclear mechanism of trophic homeostasis among MPEI. Multitudes of microorganisms colonize diverse compartments of healthy plants, and their importance in the modulation of commensal or mutual relationships has been widely discussed [124, 129, 130]. Nevertheless, how bacterial tropism shapes the autotrophic and energy metabolisms of endophytes, either through transcriptomic or metabolic dynamics, to maintain their competitiveness among host–microbe symbiosis systems remains obscure. The symbiosis of mixotrophs and photoautotrophs reported herein provides a preliminary but novel perspective and untapped opportunities to understand the enigmatic plant–endophyte symbiotic relationships.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
The Illumina library preparation and sequencing services of the bacterial genome were provided by the Genomics BioSci & Tech Co., Ltd. (Taipei, Taiwan) and Genomic Technology Core (Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica); the ONT sequencing services were provided by the Inong Agriculture Co., Ltd. (Taipei, Taiwan). The RNAseq services were provided by Welgene Biotech Co., Ltd. (Taipei, Taiwan). We also thank the support from the Taichung District Agricultural Research and Extension Station, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan of Taiwan.
Contributor Information
Shih-Hsun Walter Hung, Department of Life Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan; Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115201, Taiwan; Advanced Plant and Food Crop Biotechnology Center, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan.
Pin-Hsien Yeh, Department of Life Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan.
Tsai-Ching Huang, Department of Life Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan.
Shao-Yu Huang, Department of Life Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan.
I-Chen Wu, Department of Life Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan.
Chia-Ho Liu, Department of Life Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan.
Yu-Hsi Lin, Department of Life Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan.
Pei-Ru Chien, Department of Life Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan.
Fan-Chen Huang, Department of Life Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan.
Ying-Ning Ho, Institute of Marine Biology, College of Life Science, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 202301, Taiwan; Centre of Excellence for the Oceans, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 202301, Taiwan; Taiwan Ocean Genome Center, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 202301, Taiwan.
Chih-Horng Kuo, Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115201, Taiwan; Biotechnology Center, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan.
Hau-Hsuan Hwang, Department of Life Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan; Advanced Plant and Food Crop Biotechnology Center, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan; Innovation and Development Center of Sustainable Agriculture, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan.
En-Pei Isabel Chiang, Advanced Plant and Food Crop Biotechnology Center, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan; Innovation and Development Center of Sustainable Agriculture, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan; Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan.
Chieh-Chen Huang, Department of Life Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan; Advanced Plant and Food Crop Biotechnology Center, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan; Innovation and Development Center of Sustainable Agriculture, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402202, Taiwan.
Conflicts of interest
The concepts of the paper are shared with a patent filed by the National Chung Hsing University: Taiwan Patent No. I684411, on which P.-H.Y., Y.-N.H., and C.-C.H. are named inventors.
Funding
The funding for this project was provided by the National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan (MOST 109–2321-B-005-025; MOST 110–2321-B-005-008), the Ministry of Agriculture of Taiwan (110AS-1.6.1-BQ-B3; 111AS-1.6.1-ST-a7), and the Ministry of Education of Taiwan (The Higher Education Sprout Project) to Chieh-Chen Huang, and Academia Sinica to Chih-Horng Kuo. The funders of this work had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision for publication.
Data availability
The complete genome sequence of Priestia megaterium BP01R2 has been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers CP092387 (chromosome) and CP092388–93 (plasmids). The genome and RNA sequencing project and the associated raw reads were deposited in the NCBI under BioProject PRJNA806882 and PRJNA818431, respectively.
References
- 1. Policy Institute IF . 2022 Global Food Policy Report: Climate Change and Food Systems [Internet]. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2022. [cited 2022 Jul 9]. Available from: https://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll2/id/135889 [Google Scholar]
- 2. Stads GJ, Wiebe KD, Nin-Pratt A, et al. Research for the Future: Investments for Efficiency, Sustainability, and Equity [Internet]. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2022. [cited 2022 Jul 9]. Available from: https://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll2/id/135885 [Google Scholar]
- 3. Swinnen J, Arndt C, Vos R. Climate Change and Food Systems: Transforming Food Systems for Adaptation, Mitigation, and Resilience [Internet]. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2022. [cited 2022 Jul 9]. Available from: https://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll2/id/135884 [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ha-Tran DM, Nguyen TTM, Hung SH et al. Roles of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in stimulating salinity stress defense in plants: a review. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:3154. 10.3390/ijms22063154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Hung SHW, Huang TC, Lai YC et al. Endophytic biostimulants for smart agriculture: Burkholderia seminalis 869T2 benefits heading leafy vegetables in-field management in Taiwan. Agronomy 2023;13:967. 10.3390/agronomy13040967 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Rosenblueth M, Martínez-Romero E. Bacterial endophytes and their interactions with hosts. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 2006;19:827–37. 10.1094/MPMI-19-0827 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. White JF, Kingsley KL, Zhang Q et al. Review: endophytic microbes and their potential applications in crop management. Pest Manag Sci 2019;75:2558–65. 10.1002/ps.5527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Elsheikh EAE, El-Keblawy A, Mosa KA et al. Role of endophytes and rhizosphere microbes in promoting the invasion of exotic plants in arid and semi-arid areas: a review. Sustain For 2021;13:13081. 10.3390/su132313081 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Solanki MK. Phytobiomes: Current Insights and Future Vistas [Internet]. Kashyap PL, Kumari B, editors. Toronto, ON: Springer Nature; 2021. [cited 2022 Jul 9]. Available from: https://www.chapters.indigo.ca/en-ca/books/phytobiomes-current-insights-and-future/9789811531538-item.html, 10.1007/978-981-15-3151-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Johnston-Monje D, Raizada MN. Conservation and diversity of seed associated endophytes in Zea across boundaries of evolution, ethnography and ecology. PLoS One 2011;6:e20396. 10.1371/journal.pone.0020396 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Cipriano MAP, de P Freitas-Iório R, Dimitrov MR et al. Plant-growth Endophytic bacteria improve nutrient use efficiency and modulate foliar N-metabolites in sugarcane seedling. Microorganisms 2021;9:479. 10.3390/microorganisms9030479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. García-Latorre C, Rodrigo S, Santamaria O. Effect of fungal endophytes on plant growth and nutrient uptake in Trifolium subterraneum and Poa pratensis as affected by plant host specificity. Mycol Progress 2021;20:1217–31. 10.1007/s11557-021-01732-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Mishra S, Priyanka SS, Sharma S. Metabolomic insights into endophyte-derived bioactive compounds. Front Microbiol 2022;13:835931. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.835931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Verma SK, Sahu PK, Kumar K et al. Endophyte roles in nutrient acquisition, root system architecture development and oxidative stress tolerance. J Appl Microbiol 2021;131:2161–77. 10.1111/jam.15111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Verma H, Kumar D, Kumar V et al. The potential application of endophytes in Management of Stress from drought and salinity in crop plants. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1729. 10.3390/microorganisms9081729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Davy AJ, Brown MJH, Mossman HL et al. Colonization of a newly developing salt marsh: disentangling independent effects of elevation and redox potential on halophytes: elevation and redox potential effects on halophytes. J Ecol 2011;99:1350–7. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01870.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Janousek CN, Folger CL. Variation in tidal wetland plant diversity and composition within and among coastal estuaries: assessing the relative importance of environmental gradients. Halvorsen R, editor. J Veg Sci 2014;25:534–45. 10.1111/jvs.12107 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Veldhuis ER, Schrama M, Staal M et al. Plant stress-tolerance traits predict salt marsh vegetation patterning. Front Mar Sci 2019;5:501. 10.3389/fmars.2018.00501 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Syranidou E, Christofilopoulos S, Gkavrou G et al. Exploitation of endophytic bacteria to enhance the phytoremediation potential of the wetland helophyte Juncus acutus. Front Microbiol 2016;07:1016. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Chandra R, Singh K. Phytoremediation of environmental pollutants. In: Chandra R, Dubey NK, Kumar V, editors. Phytoremediation of Environmental Pollutants [Internet]. 1st ed. NY, USA: Taylor & Francis, CRC Press; 2017. p. 42. Available from: 10.1201/9781315161549-12/endophytic-bacterial-diversity-roots-wetland-plants-potential-enhancing-phytoremediation-environmental-pollutants-ram-chandra-kshitij-singh [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ashraf S, Afzal M, Rehman K et al. Enhanced remediation of tannery effluent in constructed wetlands augmented with endophytic bacteria. dwt 2018;102:93–100. 10.5004/dwt.2018.21860 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Singh T, Awasthi G, Tiwari Y. Recruiting endophytic bacteria of wetland plants to phytoremediate organic pollutants. Int J Environ Sci Technol 2022;19:9177–88. 10.1007/s13762-021-03476-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Ho YN, Chiang HM, Chao CP et al. In planta biocontrol of soilborne Fusarium wilt of banana through a plant endophytic bacterium, Burkholderia cenocepacia 869T2. Plant Soil 2015;387:295–306. 10.1007/s11104-014-2297-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Nguyen BAT, Hsieh JL, Lo SC et al. Biodegradation of dioxins by Burkholderia cenocepacia strain 869T2: role of 2-haloacid dehalogenase. J Hazard Mater 2021;401:123347. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123347 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Hwang HH, Chien PR, Huang FC et al. A plant endophytic bacterium, Burkholderia seminalis strain 869T2, promotes plant growth in Arabidopsis, Pak Choi, Chinese amaranth, lettuces, and other vegetables. Microorganisms 2021;9:1703. 10.3390/microorganisms9081703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Hwang HH, Chien PR, Huang FC et al. A plant endophytic bacterium Priestia megaterium strainBP-R2 isolated from the halophyte Bolboschoenus planiculmis enhances plant growth under salt and drought stresses. Microorganisms. 2022;10:2047. 10.3390/microorganisms10102047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Otieno N, Lally R, Kiwanuka S et al. Plant growth promotion induced by phosphate solubilizing endophytic pseudomonas isolates. Front Microbiol 2015;6:745. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Wang X, Li Y, Zhang X et al. Structural diversity and biological activities of the cyclodipeptides from fungi. Molecules 2017;22:2026. 10.3390/molecules22122026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Hung SHW, Chiu MC, Huang CC et al. Complete genome sequence of Curtobacterium sp. C1, a beneficial endophyte with the potential for in-plant salinity stress alleviation. MPMI 2022;35:731–5. 10.1094/MPMI-01-22-0027-A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Lo SC, Tsai SY, Chang WH et al. Characterization of the pyrroloquinoline quinone producing Rhodopseudomonas palustris as a plant growth-promoting bacterium under photoautotrophic and photoheterotrophic culture conditions. Int J Mol Sci 2023;24:14080. 10.3390/ijms241814080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Degrassi G, Aguilar C, Bosco M et al. Plant growth-promoting pseudomonas putida WCS358 produces and secretes four cyclic dipeptides: cross-talk with quorum sensing bacterial sensors. Curr Microbiol 2002;45:250–4. 10.1007/s00284-002-3704-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Kumar NS, Mohandas C. Antimycobacterial activity of cyclic dipeptides isolated from bacillus sp. N strain associated with entomopathogenic nematode. Pharm Biol 2014;52:91–6. 10.3109/13880209.2013.815635 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Ortiz A, Sansinenea E. Cyclic dipeptides: secondary metabolites isolated from different microorganisms with diverse biological activities. Curr Med Chem 2017;24:2773–80. 10.2174/0929867324666170623092818 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Prasad C. Bioactive cyclic dipeptides. Peptides 1995;16:151–64. 10.1016/0196-9781(94)00017-Z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Wattana-Amorn P, Charoenwongsa W, Williams C et al. Antibacterial activity of cyclo(L-pro-L-Tyr) and cyclo(D-pro-L-Tyr) fromStreptomycessp.Strain 22-4 against phytopathogenic bacteria. Nat Prod Res 2016;30:1980–3. 10.1080/14786419.2015.1095747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Kurohashi M, Nakamura K, Ienaga K. Agricultural and Horticultural Compositions Inducing Resistance in Plants against Salt- and Water-Stresses [Internet]. European Patent Office; EP0331641A2, 1989 [cited 2022 Jul 10]. Available from: https://patents.google.com/patent/EP0331641A2/en [Google Scholar]
- 37. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:1792–7. 10.1093/nar/gkh340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Guindon S, Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Rannala B, editor. Syst Biol 2003;52:696–704. 10.1080/10635150390235520 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP - phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 1989;5:164–6 [Google Scholar]
- 40. Rivero L, Scholl R, Holomuzki N, Crist D, Grotewold E, Brkljacic J. Handling Arabidopsis plants: Growth, preservation of seeds, transformation, and genetic crosses. In: Sanchez-Serrano JJ, Salinas J, editors. Arabidopsis Protocols [Internet]. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2014. [cited 2022 Jul 10]. p. 3–25. Available from: 10.1007/978-1-62703-580-4_1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Tsai YH. Transcriptomic Analysis on Adaptive Immunity of Pei-Chiao (Musa Spp., Cavendish AAA) against Fusarium Wilt Caused by Fusarium Oxysporum f. Sp. Cubense Tropical race4 [MS thesis]. Taichung, Taiwan: National Chung Hsing University, 2019 [Google Scholar]
- 42. Yu MY. A Study of Pyrroloquinoline Quinone on Pei-Chiao (Musa Spp.) Growth and Biocontrol Improvement [MS thesis]. Taichung, Taiwan: National Chung Hsing University, 2019 [Google Scholar]
- 43. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014;30:2114–20. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Berardini TZ, Reiser L, Li D et al. The arabidopsis information resource: making and mining the “gold standard” annotated reference plant genome: Tair: making and mining the “gold standard”. Plant Genome genesis 2015;53:474–85. 10.1002/dvg.22877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods 2015;12:357–60. 10.1038/nmeth.3317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C et al. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol 2019;37:907–15. 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Pertea M, Pertea GM, Antonescu CM et al. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat Biotechnol 2015;33:290–5. 10.1038/nbt.3122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Pertea M, Kim D, Pertea GM et al. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT. StringTie and Ballgown Nat Protoc 2016;11:1650–67. 10.1038/nprot.2016.095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 2014;15:550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Wagner GP, Kin K, Lynch VJ. Measurement of mRNA abundance using RNA-seq data: RPKM measure is inconsistent among samples. Theory Biosci 2012;131:281–5. 10.1007/s12064-012-0162-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:15545–50. 10.1073/pnas.0506580102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Mi H, Muruganujan A, Ebert D et al. PANTHER version 14: more genomes, a new PANTHER GO-slim and improvements in enrichment analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 2019;47:D419–26. 10.1093/nar/gky1038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:27–30. 10.1093/nar/28.1.27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Chambers MC, Maclean B, Burke R et al. A cross-platform toolkit for mass spectrometry and proteomics. Nat Biotechnol 2012;30:918–20. 10.1038/nbt.2377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Pluskal T, Castillo S, Villar-Briones A et al. MZmine 2: modular framework for processing, visualizing, and analyzing mass spectrometry-based molecular profile data. BMC Bioinformatics 2010;11:395. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Verkh Y, Rozman M, Petrovic M. Extraction and cleansing of data for a non-targeted analysis of high-resolution mass spectrometry data of wastewater. MethodsX 2018;5:395–402. 10.1016/j.mex.2018.04.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Blunt JW, Munro MHG, Laatsch H. AntiMarin Database. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand; University of Gottingen, Gottingen, Germany [Internet]. 2006. Available from: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=AntiMarin+Database&publication_year=2006& (17 Jun 2022, date last accessed).
- 58. Hung SHW, Wu IC, Huang CC, Kuo CH. Complete genome sequence of Erythrobacteraceae bacterium WH01K, a strain isolated from corals (Acropora sp.) in Taiwan. Microbiology Resource Announcements 2023;0(0):e00830–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL et al. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 2017;13:e1005595. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with burrows-wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2009;25:1754–60. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Li H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Birol I, editor. Bioinformatics 2018;34:3094–100. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 2009;25:2078–9. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Winckler W et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol 2011;29:24–6. 10.1038/nbt.1754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Nishimura O, Hara Y, Kuraku S. Evaluating genome assemblies and gene models using gVolante. Methods Mol Biol 2019;1962:247–56 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Manni M, Berkeley MR, Seppey M et al. BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol Biol Evol 2021;38:4647–54. 10.1093/molbev/msab199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44:6614–24. 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Aramaki T, Blanc-Mathieu R, Endo H et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG Ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics 2020;36:2251–2. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM et al. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 2018;9:5114. 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Li L, Stoeckert CJ, Roos DS. OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res 2003;13:2178–89. 10.1101/gr.1224503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Dahmani MA, Desrut A, Moumen B et al. Unearthing the plant growth-promoting traits of bacillus megaterium RmBm31, an Endophytic bacterium isolated from root nodules of Retama monosperma. Front Plant Sci 2020;11:124. 10.3389/fpls.2020.00124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Santoyo G, Moreno-Hagelsieb G, Orozco-Mosqueda Mdel C et al. Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes. Microbiol Res 2016;183:92–9. 10.1016/j.micres.2015.11.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Du CX, Fan HF, Guo SR et al. Applying spermidine for differential responses of antioxidant enzymes in cucumber subjected to short-term salinity. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 2010;135:18–24. 10.21273/JASHS.135.1.18 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Li S, Fan C, Li Y et al. Effects of drought and salt-stresses on gene expression in Caragana korshinskii seedlings revealed by RNA-seq. BMC Genomics 2016;17:200. 10.1186/s12864-016-2562-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Saibi W, Brini F. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) and abiotic stress tolerance in plants: An overview. In: Magliozzi S, editor. Superoxide Dismutase: Structure, Synthesis and Applications [Internet]. Hauppauge, NY, USA: Nova Science; 2018. p. 101–42. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Faical-Brini/publication/322551748_Superoxide_dismutase_SOD_and_abiotic_stress_tolerance_in_plants_An_overview/links/5a605d21a6fdcc21f487c424/Superoxide-dismutase-SOD-and-abiotic-stress-tolerance-in-plants-An-overview.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 75. Cruz Ramos H, Hoffmann T, Marino M et al. Fermentative metabolism of Bacillus subtilis : physiology and regulation of gene expression. J Bacteriol 2000;182:3072–80. 10.1128/JB.182.11.3072-3080.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Mall A, Sobotta J, Huber C et al. Reversibility of citrate synthase allows autotrophic growth of a thermophilic bacterium. Science 2018;359:563–7. 10.1126/science.aao2410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Nunoura T, Chikaraishi Y, Izaki R et al. A primordial and reversible TCA cycle in a facultatively chemolithoautotrophic thermophile. Science 2018;359:559–63. 10.1126/science.aao3407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Sánchez-Andrea I, Guedes IA, Hornung B et al. The reductive glycine pathway allows autotrophic growth of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Nat Commun 2020;11:5090. 10.1038/s41467-020-18906-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Cultivation of Anaerobes [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 30]. Available from: https://www.dsmz.de/fileadmin/Bereiche/Microbiology/Dateien/Kultivierungshinweise/englAnaerob.pdf
- 80. Zaiontz C. Real Statistics Resource Pack Software [Internet]. 2020. Available from: www.real-statistics.com (23 February 2024, date last accessed).
- 81. Lally RD, Galbally P, Moreira AS et al. Application of Endophytic Pseudomonas fluorescens and a bacterial consortium to Brassica napus can increase plant height and biomass under greenhouse and field conditions. Front Plant Sci 2017;8:2193. 10.3389/fpls.2017.02193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Tamošiūnė I, Stanienė G, Haimi P et al. Endophytic bacillus and pseudomonas spp. modulate apple shoot growth, cellular redox balance, and protein expression under in vitro conditions. Front Plant Sci 2018;9:889. 10.3389/fpls.2018.00889 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Vílchez JI, Tang Q, Kaushal R et al. Complete genome sequence of bacillus megaterium strain TG1-E1, a plant drought tolerance-enhancing bacterium. Baltrus DA, editor. Microbiol Resour Announc 2018;7:e00842–18. 10.1128/MRA.00842-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Yao J, Wang L, Zhang W et al. Effects of bacillus megaterium on growth performance, serum biochemical parameters, antioxidant capacity, and immune function in suckling calves. Open Life Sci 2020;15:1033–41. 10.1515/biol-2020-0106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Naumovich NI, Akhremchuk AE, Valentovich LN et al. Molecular-genetic characterization of halotolerant strain Priestia megaterium BIM B-1314D. Dokl Akad Nauk 2022;66:55–64. 10.29235/1561-8323-2022-66-1-55-64 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Ogawa K, Akagawa E, Yamane K et al. The nasB operon and nasA gene are required for nitrate/nitrite assimilation in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 1995;177:1409–13. 10.1128/jb.177.5.1409-1413.1995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Walker V, Bruto M, Bellvert F et al. Unexpected Phytostimulatory behavior for Escherichia coli and agrobacterium tumefaciens model strains. MPMI 2013;26:495–502. 10.1094/MPMI-12-12-0298-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Zeng Q, Wu X, Wang J et al. Phosphate solubilization and gene expression of phosphate-solubilizing bacterium Burkholderia multivorans WS-FJ9 under different levels of soluble phosphate. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2017;27:844–55. 10.4014/jmb.1611.11057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Dai Z, Liu G, Chen H et al. Long-term nutrient inputs shift soil microbial functional profiles of phosphorus cycling in diverse agroecosystems. ISME J 2020;14:757–70. 10.1038/s41396-019-0567-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Ryu CM, Farag MA, Hu CH et al. Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:4927–32. 10.1073/pnas.0730845100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Bruto M, Prigent-Combaret C, Muller D et al. Analysis of genes contributing to plant-beneficial functions in plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and related Proteobacteria. Sci Rep 2014;4:6261. 10.1038/srep06261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Petrova P, Velikova P, Petrov K. Genome sequence of bacillus velezensis 5RB, an overproducer of 2,3-Butanediol. Dunning Hotopp JC, editor. Microbiol Resour Announc 2019;8:e01475–18. 10.1128/MRA.01475-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Spaepen S, Vanderleyden J. Auxin and plant-microbe interactions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2011;3:a001438. 10.1101/cshperspect.a001438 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Ma Q, Zhang X, Qu Y. Biodegradation and biotransformation of indole: advances and perspectives. Front Microbiol 2018;9:2625. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Rai N, Kumar V, Sharma M et al. Auxin transport mechanism of membrane transporter encoded by AEC gene of bacillus licheniformis isolated from metagenome of Tapta Kund Hotspring of Uttrakhand, India. Int J Biol Macromol 2021;185:277–86. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.06.097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Maymon M, Martínez-Hidalgo P, Tran S et al. Mining the phytomicrobiome to understand how bacterial coinoculations enhance plant growth. Front Plant Sci 2015;6:784. 10.3389/fpls.2015.00784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Matteoli FP, Passarelli-Araujo H, Reis RJA et al. Genome sequencing and assessment of plant growth-promoting properties of a Serratia marcescens strain isolated from vermicompost. BMC Genomics 2018;19:750. 10.1186/s12864-018-5130-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Heylen K, Keltjens J. Redundancy and modularity in membrane-associated dissimilatory nitrate reduction in bacillus. Front Microbiol 2012;3:371. 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Farhana A, Lappin SL. Biochemistry, lactate dehydrogenase. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. [cited 2022 Jul 10]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557536/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Shin BS, Choi SK, Park SH. Regulation of the Bacillus subtilis Phosphotransacetylase gene. J Biochem 1999;126:333–9. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022454 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Choi SK, Saier MHJ. Mechanism of CcpA-mediated glucose repression of the resABCDE operon of Bacillus subtilis. MIP 2006;11:104–10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Duport C, Jobin M, Schmitt P. Adaptation in Bacillus cereus: from stress to disease. Front Microbiol 2016;7:1550. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Cruz Ramos H, Boursier L, Moszer I et al. Anaerobic transcription activation in Bacillus subtilis: identification of distinct FNR-dependent and -independent regulatory mechanisms. EMBO J 1995;14:5984–94. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00287.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Yin H, Li M, Lv M et al. SAUR15 promotes lateral and adventitious root development via activating H + -ATPases and auxin biosynthesis. Plant Physiol 2020;184:837–51. 10.1104/pp.19.01250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Sharma M, Singh D, Saksena HB et al. Understanding the intricate web of Phytohormone signalling in modulating root system architecture. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:5508. 10.3390/ijms22115508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Zhao Y. Auxin biosynthesis and its role in plant development. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2010;61:49–64. 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Bais HP, Weir TL, Perry LG et al. The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2006;57:233–66. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Rudrappa T, Czymmek KJ, Paré PW et al. Root-secreted malic acid recruits beneficial soil bacteria. Plant Physiol 2008;148:1547–56. 10.1104/pp.108.127613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Lo KJ, Lin SS, Lu CW et al. Whole-genome sequencing and comparative analysis of two plant-associated strains of Rhodopseudomonas palustris (PS3 and YSC3). Sci Rep 2018;8:12769. 10.1038/s41598-018-31128-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Wang Y, Zhang W, Li K et al. Salt-induced plasticity of root hair development is caused by ion disequilibrium in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Plant Res 2008;121:87–96. 10.1007/s10265-007-0123-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Schleiff U. Why root morphology is expected to Be a key factor for crop salt tolerance? In: Pessarakli M, editor. Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress. Fourth edition. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2020, p. 27. 10.1201/9781351104609-48 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Zhu JK. Abiotic stress Signaling and responses in plants. Cell 2016;167:313–24. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Yu P, Jiang N, Fu W et al. ATP hydrolysis determines cold tolerance by regulating available energy for glutathione synthesis in Rice seedling plants. Rice (N Y) 2020;13:23. 10.1186/s12284-020-00383-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Aslam S, Gul N, Mir MA et al. Role of Jasmonates, calcium, and glutathione in plants to combat abiotic stresses through precise Signaling Cascade. Front Plant Sci 2021;12:668029. 10.3389/fpls.2021.668029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Gupta RS, Patel S, Saini N et al. Robust demarcation of 17 distinct bacillus species clades, proposed as novel Bacillaceae genera, by phylogenomics and comparative genomic analyses: description of Robertmurraya kyonggiensis sp. nov. and proposal for an emended genus bacillus limiting it only to the members of the subtilis and cereus clades of species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020;70:5753–98. 10.1099/ijsem.0.004475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. International code of nomenclature of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019;69:S1–111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Shivaji S, Chaturvedi P, Begum Z et al. Janibacter hoylei sp. nov., bacillus isronensis sp. nov. and bacillus aryabhattai sp. nov., isolated from cryotubes used for collecting air from the upper atmosphere. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009;59:2977–86. 10.1099/ijs.0.002527-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Bary A. Vergleichende Morphologie Und Biologie der Pilze, Mycetozoen Und Bacterien. Leipzig, Germany: Engelmann; 1884, p. 586. 10.5962/bhl.title.45509 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Narsing Rao MP, Dong ZY, Liu GH et al. Reclassification of bacillus aryabhattai Shivaji et al. 2009 as a later heterotypic synonym of bacillus megaterium de Bary 1884 (approved lists 1980). FEMS Microbiol Lett 2019;366:fnz258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Silva P, Gerós H. Regulation by salt of vacuolar H+ -ATPase and H+ −pyrophosphatase activities and Na+/H+ exchange. Plant Signal Behav 2009;4:718–26. 10.4161/psb.4.8.9236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Ahmad P, Azooz MM, Prasad MNV. Ecophysiology and Responses of Plants under Salt Stress [Internet]. NY, USA: Springer New York; 2013. cited 2022 Jul 10. Available from: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4747-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Sellami S, Le Hir R, Thorpe MR et al. Salinity effects on sugar homeostasis and vascular anatomy in the stem of the Arabidopsis Thaliana inflorescence. IJMS 2019;20:3167. 10.3390/ijms20133167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Sasse J, Martinoia E, Northen T. Feed your friends: do Plant exudates shape the root microbiome? Trends Plant Sci 2018;23:25–41. 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Trivedi P, Leach JE, Tringe SG et al. Plant–microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nat Rev Microbiol 2020;18:607–21. 10.1038/s41579-020-0412-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Nobori T, Velásquez AC, Wu J et al. Transcriptome landscape of a bacterial pathogen under plant immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2018;115:E3055–64. 10.1073/pnas.1800529115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Nobori T, Cao Y, Entila F et al. Dissecting the cotranscriptome landscape of plants and their microbiota. EMBO Rep 2022;23:e55380. 10.15252/embr.202255380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Nobori T, Wang Y, Wu J et al. Multidimensional gene regulatory landscape of a bacterial pathogen in plants. Nat Plants 2020;6:883–96. 10.1038/s41477-020-0690-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Leake JR, Ostle NJ, Rangel-Castro JI et al. Carbon fluxes from plants through soil organisms determined by field 13CO2 pulse-labelling in an upland grassland. Appl Soil Ecol 2006;33:152–75. 10.1016/j.apsoil.2006.03.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Hacquard S, Spaepen S, Garrido-Oter R et al. Interplay between innate immunity and the plant microbiota. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2017;55:565–89. 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Khare E, Mishra J, Arora NK. Multifaceted interactions between endophytes and plant: developments and prospects. Front Microbiol 2018;9:2732. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02732 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The complete genome sequence of Priestia megaterium BP01R2 has been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers CP092387 (chromosome) and CP092388–93 (plasmids). The genome and RNA sequencing project and the associated raw reads were deposited in the NCBI under BioProject PRJNA806882 and PRJNA818431, respectively.








