Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 Feb 16;153(5):1169–1180. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.02.004

Epithelial-neuronal-immune cell interactions: implications for immunity, inflammation, and tissue homeostasis at mucosal sites

Elizabeth Emanuel a,b,, Mohammad Arifuzzaman a,, David Artis a,b,c,d,e,*
PMCID: PMC11070312  NIHMSID: NIHMS1969752  PMID: 38369030

Abstract

The epithelial lining of the respiratory tract and intestine provides a critical physical barrier to protect host tissues against environmental insults including dietary antigens, allergens, chemicals, and microorganisms. In addition, specialized epithelial cells directly communicate with hematopoietic and neuronal cells. These epithelial-immune and epithelial-neuronal interactions control host immune responses and have important implications for inflammatory conditions associated with defects in the epithelial barrier, including asthma, allergy, and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). In this review, we discuss emerging research that identifies the mechanisms and impact of epithelial-immune and epithelial-neuronal crosstalk in regulating immunity, inflammation, and tissue homeostasis at mucosal barrier surfaces. Understanding the regulation and impact of these pathways could provide new therapeutic targets for inflammatory diseases at mucosal sites.

Keywords: epithelium, airway inflammation, intestinal inflammation, neuroimmunity, immune regulation, asthma, allergy, mucosal immunity

Introduction

Epithelial cells at mucosal sites act as a protective physical barrier against the external environment. In the airway and gastrointestinal tracts, epithelial cells selectively allow gaseous exchange and nutrient absorption, respectively, while they are in constant contact with diverse external environmental stimuli including dietary antigens, allergens, chemicals, and/or commensal and pathogenic microorganisms. Therefore, the functions of epithelial cells at these tissue sites are critical, and defects in epithelial barrier functions are associated with multiple infectious and inflammatory diseases including asthma (15), allergy (1,57), and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) (810). In addition to promoting barrier functions, epithelial cells are also important sensors of the environment, recognizing signals from commensal and pathogenic microbes, food, pollutants, and other particles (5,6,11,12). The ability of epithelial cells to sense, integrate, and respond to internal signals from the immune and nervous systems has also become appreciated (1318). In this review we discuss emerging insights into how epithelial cells communicate with immune cells and the nervous system to regulate immunity, inflammation, and tissue homeostasis in the airway and intestine. Specifically, we provide an overview of the structure and functions of epithelial cells in the lung and intestine followed by a discussion on how epithelial cells regulate barrier immune responses. Lastly, we elaborate on recent findings regarding how immune cells and neurons regulate epithelial cell function at mucosal sites.

Structure and function of the epithelial lining

The epithelial lining of the respiratory and intestinal tracts is composed of a single layer of cells bound by tight junctions to form a physical barrier surface to the external environment (6,10,19). The respiratory tract is comprised of multiple airway passages including the nasal cavity, trachea, and lungs (20,21). In the lungs, alveoli comprise a layer of epithelial cells and an extracellular matrix surrounded by capillaries, forming the respiratory membrane for the exchange of gases (22). In the small intestine, epithelial cells form the crypt-villus axis and facilitate nutrient absorption, whereas the epithelium in the cecum and large intestine lacks villi and are critical in water absorption and other physiologic functions (23,24). Notably, epithelial cells at different regional tissue sites of either the lung or intestine express specific transcriptional gene signatures, supporting their specialized functions in different organs (2529). Further, as discussed below, airway and gut epithelial cells in distinct tissue microenvironment are heterogeneous, exhibiting specialized functions.

Intestinal epithelial cell subsets

In the intestine, most epithelial cells can be broadly characterized as absorptive, having the capacity to absorb luminal contents, or secretory, releasing cytokines, chemokines, growth factors and other molecules specific to their functions. Pluripotent epithelial stem cells lie at the base of the crypts, giving rise to transit-amplifying cells that migrate up the crypt-villus axis and differentiate into distinct specialized cell types before eventually being exuded into the lumen (24). The majority of gut epithelial cells are enterocytes, which control water and nutrient absorption (6,10). Other specialized cell types include secretory cells such as Paneth cells and goblet cells. Paneth cells remain at the base of the crypts in the small intestine, surrounding the stem cell niche and secreting antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), while goblet cells produce mucins and other bioactive molecules, contributing to the luminal mucosal barrier that protects the epithelial cells from microbial penetration (30,31). Goblet cells can also produce AMPs and deliver antigen to dendritic cells (30,3235). Other intestinal epithelial cell subsets include enteroendocrine cells (EECs), a heterogenous cell population that secrete hormones, neuropeptides, and neurotransmitters and that is known to interact with gut-innervating neurons (3639). In contrast, chemosensory tuft cells, which recognize environmental cues via taste and other G-protein-coupled receptors, are important in sensing dietary contents and microbiota-derived products and can promote type 2 inflammation following helminth infection via their production of IL-25 and eicosanoids (4044). Lastly, microfold (M) cells located on Peyer’s patches take up luminal antigens and deliver them to specialized dendritic cells (4547).

Airway epithelial cell subsets

In the airway, epithelial cells also form a major barrier surface between the host and outside environment (3,48,49). The epithelial cells that line the alveoli are divided into two subtypes, type 1 pneumocytes and type 2 pneumocytes. Type 1 pneumocytes are flat in shape and thin, involved in gas exchange between the alveoli and the capillaries (22). Type 2 pneumocytes are cuboidal in shape and secrete pulmonary surfactant which reduce surface tension in the alveoli (22). Goblet cells are also present in the airway, where they secrete mucins to trap environmental molecules including dust particles and microbes that enter the respiratory tract (3,49). Ciliated epithelial cells are a dominant respiratory epithelial cell subset, controlling mucociliary clearance that is essential for expelling microbes and particles (21,48,50). Other airway epithelial cell subsets include stem-cell–like progenitor cells known as basal cells (51); pulmonary neuroendocrine cells (PNECs), innervated cells known to produce neuropeptides (52); ionocytes, a newly-identified cell type that highly express cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator and respond to osmotic stress (53); and chemosensory tuft cells, also known as brush cells or solitary chemosensory cells in the airway. Described in further detail below, airway tuft cells, which are found in the trachea and nasal airways but not the lungs at steady state, also express immune molecules such as IL-25 and eicosanoids (20).

The epithelial cell subsets present in the intestine and lung maintain barrier homeostasis by integrating signals from the external environment as well as signals from other cell types, including immune cells and neurons that underlie the epithelial layer. In both the intestine and the lungs, epithelial cells possess an array of pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) including Toll-like receptors (TLRs), NOD-like receptors (NLRs), and RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs) that can detect pathogen- or danger-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs/DAMPs) which has been reviewed elsewhere (6,54,55). In this review, we focus on new paradigms on epithelial regulation of immune cells, followed by immune and neuronal regulation of epithelial cells.

Epithelial regulation of immune responses

As described above, the airways and intestinal tract contain a variety of heterogenous epithelial cell types that can enact immune functions. This section will briefly discuss our current understanding of how non-specialized epithelial cells such as enterocytes and airway epithelial cells communicate with immune cells, followed by newly discovered mechanisms of how specialized epithelial cells including tuft cells and PNECs can directly modulate immune cells at mucosal barrier sites, shaping protective and pathologic responses.

Epithelial cell regulation of immunity and inflammation

Epithelial cells can secrete various cytokines to activate innate and adaptive immune cells in the context of modular type 1, type 2, and type 3 immune responses. Some common type 1/type 3 cytokines produced by epithelial cells during infection and tissue damage include Interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-8, IL-18, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα), and transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) (5663). These cytokines play crucial roles in activating stromal cells and recruiting immune cells including neutrophils and monocytes, conferring protection against pathogens and contributing to tissue inflammation and repair (5659,61,63),. During tissue damage elicited by allergens or helminth parasite infections, epithelial cells promote type 2 responses through production of chemokines, cytokines, and alarmins, including thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), IL-25, and IL-33 (also produced by stromal cells (6466)). These factors can recruit immune cells, such as group 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s) and eosinophils, contributing to allergic inflammation or anti-helminth immunity and tissue repair (4042,6773).

Recent studies have shown that in addition to cytokines, vitamins such as retinoic acid (RA) produced from epithelial cells can also play critical role in immune cell homeostasis (74). For example, survival of intestinal eosinophils is directly enhanced by epithelial-derived RA (Figure 1A), an important immunomodulatory molecule known to regulate immune tolerance (7476). Interestingly, this process is additionally regulated by the microbiota, as the bacterial species F. rodentium can suppress RA, contributing to the maintenance of normal eosinophil levels. However, whether F. rodentium controls epithelial RA production via metabolite release or directly interacting with epithelial cells remains unknown.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Epithelial-immune cell interactions at gastrointestinal and respiratory barrier sites. (A) ILC3 production of IL-22 can enhance secretory epithelial lineages including goblet cells in vitro. Goblet cells in turn can further boost IL-22 from ILC3s, driven by goblet cell expression of Dll1 and Dll4 acting on the Notch1 receptor on T-bet+ NKp46+ ILC3s. In the small intestines, ILC2-derived IL-9 promotes Paneth cell metaplasia and the accumulation of secretory cells such as goblet cells and tuft cells. Epithelial-derived retinoic acid enhances the survival of eosinophils. Eosinophils, in turn, can negatively regulate epithelial proliferation and MHC class II expression. This process is in part mediated by eosinophils suppressing intraepithelial lymphocyte expression of IFN-γ, which promotes epithelial proliferation and MHC class II expression. Commensal bacteria such as F. rodentium also regulate this eosinophil-epithelial circuit by suppressing RA to negatively regulate eosinophil survival. (B) Pulmonary tuft cells expand in response to viral infection, although the function of this is unknown. Airway tuft cells also produce immunomodulatory factors in response to aeroallergens, leading to the expansion of goblet cells, type 2 cytokine-producing ILC2s, eosinophils, and CD103+ dendritic cells. Also in the airway, eosinophil extracellular traps promote epithelial cell production of the alarmins TSLP and IL-33 as well as PNEC production of CGRP, which activates ILC2 cytokine production, and GABA, which induces goblet cell hyperplasia during early postnatal OVA administration. Early life myeloid cell-derived IL-1β leads to increased expression of markers associated with basal cell differentiation.

Intestinal tuft cells in anti-helminth immunity and food allergy

In addition to the immunoregulatory functions of epithelial cells, specialized epithelial cells have distinct mechanisms of controlling immune cells. Found at mucosal sites, including the gastrointestinal and airway tracts, and identified by their long, blunt microvilli, tuft cells express taste receptor machinery (77,78), but their functions were poorly characterized until recently. Seminal studies in 2016 identified that intestinal tuft cells produce IL-25, which activates ILC2 function, resulting in goblet cell hyperplasia that can contribute to expulsion of helminth parasites (4042). While the function of tuft cells in anti-helminth immunity is now established, recent studies also identified a role of tuft cell-secreted IL-25 in allergic reactions. In a model of tape stripping-induced food allergy in mice where systemic IL-33 released from injured skin promotes allergic responses in the intestine (79), it was recently shown that tuft cell-derived IL-25 synergized with keratinocyte-derived IL-33 to expand and activate intestinal ILC2s (80). In this model, tape stripping of the skin led to an increase in small intestinal tuft cells and epithelial Il25 expression, of which tuft cells are the dominant source (41). Furthermore, conditional knockout of intestinal epithelial IL-25 or ILC2-expressed IL-25 receptor (Il17rb) abolished the tape stripping-induced increase in small intestinal ILC2s and ILC2-derived Il4 and Il13 expression (80). ILC2-derived IL-4/13 signaling contributes to a feed-forward circuit to further promote intestinal tuft cells (41), and furthermore, ILC2-derived IL-4 promoted mast cell responses in the intestine, leading to food anaphylaxis responses (80). Together, these studies show that intestinal tuft cells can be primed by distal injury or inflammation, such as skin barrier damage, contributing to food allergy pathogenesis in the intestine.

Functions of airway tuft cells during asthma and viral infection

Other recent advances in how tuft cells can alter immune responses have focused on airway tissues. In the healthy airway, tuft cells can be found in the nasopharynx tissues and trachea, but are rare or absent in the lungs (43,81,82). Similar to the intestine, nasal and tracheal tuft cells can produce cysteinyl leukotrienes (cysLTs), IL-25, and prostaglandin E2 in response to airway inflammation (8385) (Figure 1B). Activation of these airway tuft cells via inhalation of the aeroallergen Alternaria was found to lead to the accumulation of CD103+ dendritic cells, type 2 cytokine-producing ILC2s, eosinophils and goblet cells in the lung (84). These responses were abrogated in mice deficient in tuft cells or with a tuft cell-specific depletion of Ltc4s, the enzyme responsible for LTC4 production, indicating that tuft cells can mediate type 2 immune responses via lipid mediator signaling (84).

While tuft cells are rare in the lung at steady state, the accumulation of tuft cells has been identified following viral infections, including H1N1 (81), influenza A (IAV) (82,86), and rhinovirus (RV) (87) (Figure 1B), as well as after bleomycin-induced injury (86). In the context of IAV, tuft cell expansion occurred independently of IL-25 and IL-4/13 signaling (86), suggesting an alternative pathway to tuft cell differentiation. Whether airway tuft cells have any direct role in antiviral immunity during pulmonary viral infection remains unclear, as the absence of tuft cells did not affect disease parameters including weight loss, goblet cell differentiation, or Krt5+ epithelial remodeling (86,88). However, tuft cell responses during acute viral infections can have implications for development of allergy. For example, a recent study has shown that during RV infection, tuft cell deficiency led to reduced type 2 cytokine expression and mucus metaplasia, which later blocked the development of type 2 inflammatory responses in mice post-infection (87), building on previous work showing that tuft cells are involved in allergic airway diseases following Alternaria exposure (83,84). However, more work is needed to establish the functions, if any, of tuft cells during acute and chronic viral infections.

PNEC and goblet cell regulation of ILCs

PNECs have also been implicated in the pathogenesis of airway disease (52,89). Lung tissues from human asthma patients exhibit increased densities of PNECs, particularly calcitonin gene related peptide-expressing (CGRP+) PNECs (89). Furthermore, mice deficient in PNECs exhibit reduced type 2 inflammatory responses in a model of early postnatal ovalbumin (OVA) administration (89). This was shown to be mediated by PNEC production of both CGRP, which promoted ILC2 cytokine production, and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), which induced goblet cell hyperplasia (89) (Figure 1B). Together, these data suggest that PNECs are important regulators of type 2 inflammation in the airways.

A recent study also implicates intestinal goblet cells in the regulation of group 3 innate lymphoid cell (ILC3) responses (90). Intestinal organoids enriched in goblet cells promoted IL-22 production by ILC3s compared to baseline organoids or organoids enriched in Paneth cells. This increased production of IL-22 by ILC3s was shown to be driven by goblet cell expression of the Notch ligands Delta-Like-Canonical-Notch-Ligand (Dll) 1 and Dll4 acting on Notch1 receptor on ILC3s (90) (Figure 1A). Considering that the dysregulation of ILC3 responses is associated with IBD (91), this pathway could act as a potential therapeutic target for management of intestinal inflammation.

To summarize, epithelial regulation of immune cells plays an important role in immune cell regulation, inflammation, and tissue repair in the airway and intestine.

Immune regulation of epithelial cell responses

While epithelial cells can regulate diverse immune cell types (14,6,10,12,19,9295), several innate immune cells have been shown to directly regulate the activation or regeneration of the epithelial cells. Here we discuss recent findings on how innate immune cells regulate epithelial cell development and function.

Regulation of epithelial cells by ILCs

ILCs are lymphocytes that lack antigen-specific receptors and act as important regulators of immunity, inflammation, tissue homeostasis, repair, and regeneration (96,97). The ILC family is composed of T-bet+ group 1 ILCs (ILC1s), natural killer (NK) cells, GATA3+ ILC2s, and RORγt+ ILC3s (9699). ILC2s are associated with type 2 immune responses against exposure to helminths and allergens, producing type 2 cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 to drive intestinal epithelial cell proliferation, goblet and tuft cell differentiation, and mucus secretion at mucosal sites (4042,96,98,100,101). Alarmin-activated ILC2s also produce amphiregulin, which promotes colonic mucus production and epithelial integrity after helminth infection, dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced colitis, or influenza virus infection (102104). Further, following allergens or helminth infection, tuft cell-derived IL-25 promotes ILC2 responses (4042). Recently, it has also been shown that ILC2s can also modulate Paneth cell responses (105). In a murine model of chronic myelogenous leukemia (106), ILC2s produced IL-9 that promoted the Paneth cell metaplasia and the accumulation of secretory cells including goblet cells and tuft cells in the small intestine (105). This pathway also led to changes in epithelial cell function, including increased production of IL-33 (105). While Paneth cell metaplasia has been shown in human diseases including IBD (107) and colorectal cancer (108), whether this ILC2–IL-9–epithelial cell circuit is clinically relevant in these conditions remains to be determined.

ILC3 regulation of epithelial cells also plays a critical role in regulating intestinal damage, inflammation, and tissue repair. For example, ILC3-derived IL-22 has previously been shown to increase the antimicrobial and tissue-protective functions of the intestinal epithelium via the activation of STAT3 to promote intestinal stem cell regeneration, the mucus barrier, and AMP production (109116). While ILC3-derived IL-22 can promote intestinal stem cell regeneration (111,112), a recent study also found that this signaling pathway can also promote differentiation of secretory epithelial cell lineages (90). In a small intestinal epithelial organoid co-culture system, ILC3s were shown to promote the differentiation of intestinal epithelial secretory cells, amplifying gene expression associated with goblet and Paneth cells compared to organoids without ILC3s (90) (Figure 1A). Notably, translational studies identified a link between dysregulated secretory epithelial cell responses and inflammatory diseases such as IBD, including a reduction in the proportion of secretory cells such as goblet cells or their progenitors (117,118). While further studies are needed to confirm the mechanisms that regulate these responses in vivo, these findings highlight a signaling axis between ILC3s and intestinal epithelial cells that could have implications in IBD and other chronic inflammatory diseases at mucosal barrier sites.

Myeloid cell regulation of pulmonary epithelial cell development

In addition to ILCs, myeloid cells can also regulate epithelial cell development and responses. After injury, monocytes and macrophages secrete mediators such as TGF-β and IL-10 to suppress inflammation and enhance the wound repair response (119,120), while during helminth infection, IL-4- and IL-13-activated macrophages are important for the resolution of inflammation and tissue repair (119121). In the steady state adult lung, alveolar macrophages and epithelial cells regulate each other to inhibit the development of unwanted inflammation (94). Recently, gene expression profiling of immune cells in fetal human lungs using single cell RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry revealed an enrichment of myeloid cells in direct contact with or in close proximity to SOX9+ epithelial progenitor cells in the distal epithelial tips, which can differentiate into all other airway lineages (122,123). Ex vivo culture of dendritic cells and macrophages isolated from human fetal lungs found that these cells produced a variety of cytokines, including IL-1β, and in vitro stimulation of epithelial organoids derived from the fetal lung tissue with IL-1β for 14 days led to increased expression of markers associated with airway epithelial differentiation, specifically that of basal cells but not secretory cells (122). Overall, while not directly shown, this study suggests that myeloid-specific IL-1β can control fetal lung epithelial cell differentiation in humans (Figure 1B). Notably, this study also highlighted that IL-13 stimulation led to a distinct effect on epithelial cell differentiation, which could have implications for IL-13–producing immune cells such as ILC2s in airway development.

Eosinophil regulation of epithelial cells

Intestinal eosinophil responses are typically associated type 2 inflammation following exposure to allergens or helminth infections (121,124,125). In addition to their production of IL-5 and other bioactive molecules that can promote type 2 inflammation (121,124,125), eosinophils have recently been found to negatively regulate intestinal epithelial cell turnover and MHC class II expression, thus regulating inflammatory and tissue injury responses (Figure 1A) (74). Eosinophil-deficient PHIL mice exhibited increased intestinal epithelial turnover and MHC class II expression compared to wild type mice, suggesting that eosinophils negatively regulate epithelial cell proliferation and activation (74). Further, in an anti-CD3 antibody-mediated model of inflammation and epithelial damage, PHIL mice developed worse intestinal damage compared to wild type mice, indicating that the lack of eosinophil regulation of epithelial cells leads to improper recovery from injury (74). This pathway was also shown to be mediated by eosinophil-mediated suppression of intraepithelial lymphocyte production of IFN-γ, which is known to induce intestinal epithelial cell proliferation (126) and MHC class II expression (127). Whether eosinophils regulate epithelial cell proliferation or MHC II expression during type 2 inflammation, such as during helminth infection or allergen exposure, remains to be investigated.

Eosinophils have also been shown to regulate epithelial cell function in the lung. Eosinophil extracellular traps and eosinophil peroxidase were found to promote epithelial production of alarmins such as IL-33 and TSLP, as well as activate PNEC production of CGRP and GABA to amplify allergic immune responses, including goblet cell hyperplasia, enhanced mucus production, and increased of type 2 cytokines from the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) (128,129) (Figure 1B). Considering that eosinophil extracellular traps from the BALF are associated with the severity of asthma in human patients (128,129), this mechanism indicates a possible pulmonary immuno-epithelial circuit in the context of type 2 inflammation in the airways. Overall, these studies identify innate and adaptive immune cells as important for regulators of the epithelial cell response to infection, injury, and environmental insults.

Neuronal regulation of epithelial cell function

Epithelial cell activation can be mediated by signals beyond the immune system including other neighboring cell types such as neurons. Extrinsic and intrinsic nerves innervate the intestinal epithelium (130), with EECs (36,37,131) and tuft cells (132134) known to have direct interactions with and/or be in close proximity to nerves. The respiratory tract is also innervated by afferent and efferent nerves that travel along the vagus nerve (135,136). As in the GI tract, airway tuft cells (137,138) and PNECs (13) are also known to contact nerve fibers directly. Previous studies reported that neurons can support intestinal epithelial cell responses, including enhancing the expression of genes associated with intestinal stem and transit-amplifying cells, while reducing the expression of genes associated with absorptive, goblet, and Paneth cells in vitro (139). Neuronal signals can also support intestinal tuft cell survival in vitro and in vivo (140). As outlined below, recent work has revealed that neuronal signals can regulate specific epithelial cell subsets, including goblet cells, tuft cells, EECs, and PNECs as well as promote the regeneration of epithelial cells.

Neuronal regulation of goblet and secretory cell-associated antigen passages

Intestinal secretory cells such as goblet cells have been shown to form goblet and secretory cell-associated antigen passages (GAPs/SAPs), wherein epithelial cells can deliver luminal antigens to lamina propria immune cells (32,33,141). GAP/SAP formation can contribute to the maintenance of tolerance to dietary antigen (32,33,142) as well as promote IgE-mediated food-induced anaphylaxis (141). In addition, the neurotransmitter acetylcholine (ACh) plays an important role in the formation of GAPs at steady state (142). Recent studies revealed that Ach-mAChR4 signaling in the small intestine and ACh-mAChR3 signaling in the distal colon specifically regulate the steady state formation of GAPs, but not mucus secretion, another major function of goblet cells that can be induced by ACh signaling (34,143) (Table I, Figure 2A). Notably, supraphysiologic ACh signaling using carbamylcholine (CCh), an ACh analogue, induced both GAP formation and mucus secretion, both mediated by mAChR1 in the small and large intestine (34). Together, these studies identify one mechanism in which the neurotransmitter ACh can regulate luminal antigen delivery by epithelial cells to immune cells.

Table I:

Neuronal regulators of mucosal epithelial cells

Signal Tissue Signal target Effect Reference
ACh Mouse SI Goblet cell mAChR4, mAChR1 Promotes steady state GAP formation 34,142
Mouse distal colon Goblet cell mAChR3, mAChR1 Promotes steady state GAP formation 34
Mouse SI Goblet cell mAChR1, mAChR3 Mucus secretion 34,143
Mouse colon Goblet cell mAChR1 Mucus secretion 34
Drosophila midgut Epithelial cell nAChRβ3 Regulates Ca2+ levels following DSS-induced injury to promote epithelial maturation and ion balance, facilitating intestinal epithelial recovery 160
Drosophila midgut Enterocyte nAChR Promotes epithelial barrier function 162
CGRP Mouse SI M cells Limits the density of M cells in Peyer’s patch FAE during Salmonella infection, controlling susceptibility to Salmonella 150
Mouse colon Goblet cell RAMP1/CALCRL Promotes colonic mucus production, protecting against DSS-induced colitis pathology 158
IL-18 Mouse colon Unknown Protects against bacterial infection by driving goblet cell-derived AMP expression 151
NT4 Mouse lung PNECs Promotes PNEC innervation at steady state and after allergen exposure and, with GABA, promotes mucus production after OVA challenge 159
GABA Mouse lung Goblet cells Induces goblet cell hyperplasia 89, 159
Norepinephrine Mouse SI ILC3 Adrb1/2 Promotes ILC3 production of IL-22 to indirectly enhance epithelial proliferation 163
Mouse SI Epithelial cell Adra2a In vitro, promotes mouse intestinal organoid growth and epithelial stem cell gene expression; in vivo, increases SI crypt depth and villus height and facilitates anastomotic wound healing 164

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Epithelial-neuronal interactions at gastrointestinal and respiratory barrier sites. (A) While ACh signaling via epithelial mAChR4 in the small intestines or mAChR3 in the large intestines regulates the formation of GAPs but not mucus secretion, ACh signaling via epithelial mAChR1 promotes both GAP formation and mucus secretion. Nociceptor-derived CGRP acts directly on goblet cells to increase mucus release in the colon, protecting mice from DSS-inducted damage. During DSS-induced intestinal damage, ACh from ARCENs signal on intestinal epithelial cells via nAChRβ3 to promote epithelial maturation and repair. Norepinephrine from adrenergic nerves promotes small intestinal epithelial recovery after IR-induced injury by inducing IL-22 from ILC3s. Adrenergic signaling directly on epithelial cells also boosts epithelial proliferation. (B) On Peyer’s patches, nociceptor-derived CGRP inhibits the expansion of M cells in the ileum, protecting mice from STm infection. (C) In the lungs, PNECs regulate local innervation and goblet cell mucus secretion via NT4 and GABA.

Although the sources of ACh inducing intestinal GAP formation have not been determined, it was reported that sensory neurons mediate GAP formation in the conjunctival epithelial layer in response to pollen and soluble antigens (144). While topical application of OVA with ragweed pollen shells to the conjunctiva elicited eosinophilic conjunctivitis, topical lidocaine to inhibit axonal electrical transmission significantly diminished GAP formation and antigen uptake (144). Unlike intestinal GAP formation, however, mAChR signaling was not essential for conjunctival GAP formation, as blocking mAChR signaling using atropine, a pan-mAChR antagonist, did not significantly alter the number of GAPs, and CCh only marginally increased the number of GAPs (144). Instead, ablation of trigeminal nerves using electrocoagulation almost completely abrogated GAP formation, suggesting that another sensory neuron-derived factor may induce GAP formation in the conjunctiva.

Neuronal regulation of epithelial cell defense against pathogens

CGRP, a nociceptive neuropeptide, is another neuronal signal that has been shown to regulate immune responses (145149) and directly act on epithelial cells to influence immunity against enteric infections. For example, small intestinal pain-sensing neurons, nociceptors, release CGRP in response to bacterial infection of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (STm) to limit the density of M cells in Peyer’s patch follicle-associated epithelium (FAE) which protects against infections (150) (Table I, Figure 2B). Ablation of Nav1.8+ or TRPV1+ nociceptors led to an increase in the frequency of GP2+ M cells, which are required for Salmonella infection, resulting in an increase in STm burden (150). TRPV1+ neurons also were shown to directly respond to STm by releasing CGRP (150). Further, deletion of the CGRPα isoform of CGRP in Calca−/− mice exhibited increased levels of ileal M cells and STm burden, suggesting that nociceptor-derived CGRPα regulates M cell frequency to control susceptibility to STm, although the mechanism of how CGRP impacts M cells remains unclear. Of note, IL-18 has also been shown to be an enteric nervous system-derived protein that indirectly leads to epithelial changes to protect against STm infection by promoting goblet cell expression of AMPs (151) (Table I). Considering that intestinal neurons can also produce other neuropeptides such as neuromedin U (NMU) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), which promote ILC2 type 2 cytokine production (152157) that can control epithelial cell proliferation and differentiation (4042,96,98,100,101), there are several pathways by which intestinal-innervating nerves can drive epithelial changes to promote immunity.

Neuronal regulation of epithelial cell function in inflammation

Beyond mediating defense against bacterial pathogens, nociceptor-derived CGRP can directly regulate goblet cell responses, which express the CGRP receptor comprised of the components RAMP1 and CALCRL (158). Nav1.8+ nociceptor ablation, Calca deficiency, or intestinal epithelial cell-specific Ramp1 deficiency led to reduced colonic mucus thickness in mice (158) (Table I, Figure 2A). Alternatively, chemogenetic activation of nociceptors or administration of exogenous CGRP led to an increase in mucus layer thickness (158). Further, while nociceptor ablation or epithelial cell-specific Ramp1 deficiency conferred susceptibility to DSS-induced colitis, CGRP administration rescued nociceptor-ablated mice from exacerbated DSS-induced intestinal pathology, suggesting the nociceptor signaling to epithelial cells is necessary for host protection against gut inflammation (158).

In the lung, PNECs can control mucus production in the context of early life allergen exposure (159). Mice deficient in the PNEC-derived growth factor neurotrophin 4 (NT4) did not exhibit an OVA-induced increase in mucus production despite an otherwise normal immune response to neonatal OVA sensitization and challenge (Table I, Figure 2C). NT4-deficient mice also had reduced levels of innervated PNECs at steady state and after allergen exposure (159). After culturing various NT4−/− lung samples with OVA plus another neurotransmitter, only stimulation with GABA, previously shown to induce goblet cell hyperplasia (89), rescued Muc5ac production (159). In addition, PNEC-specific deletion of Gad1, an enzyme involved in GABA production, or Slc32a1, a GABA vesicular transporter, in mice resulted in reduced OVA-induced mucus production, similar to outcomes reported in NT4-deficient mice (159). Overall, this paper showed that NT4 and GABA from PNECs are necessary for mucus overproduction and PNEC hyperinnervation after early life allergen exposure. While the authors argue that the PNEC release of GABA is controlled by the neurons, further investigation is warranted to confirm this mechanism.

Direct neuronal regulation of intestinal epithelial cell recovery and repair

A number of studies recently established different mechanisms through which neuronal signals can support epithelial cell regeneration after injury. Using the Drosophila midgut as a model, a pathway in which cholinergic neurons control epithelial recovery after colitis-like injury was identified (160) (Table I, Figure 2A). Following DSS-induced intestinal damage in Drosophila, epithelial cells downregulated the expression of acetylcholinesterase, an enzyme that breaks down the neurotransmitter ACh, and upregulated the expression of nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor β3 (nAChRβ3), an ACh receptor. Furthermore, Ca2+ levels that are known to be regulated by ACh signaling (161) were increased in ex vivo epithelial cells following injury or ACh administration compared to during homeostasis in an nAChRβ3-dependent manner (160). This signaling axis promoted epithelial maturation and ion balance, contributing to intestinal epithelium recovery. Depleting choline acetyltransferase (ChAT, the enzyme responsible for ACh production) from Drosophila enteric neurons, but not epithelial or immune cell lineages, led to increased proliferation of epithelial cells during recovery from injury and increased inflammatory cytokine expression (160). Related to these findings, ACh could also promote epithelial barrier function via enterocyte nAChR signaling in Drosophila (162) (Table I). Together, these data suggest that intestinal neurons, specifically termed anti-inflammatory recovery-regulating cholinergic enteric neurons (ARCENs), control epithelial repair via a bioelectric pathway mediated by Ca2+ and ACh signaling.

Other neuronal signals can also support epithelial barrier repair. Following irradiation (IR)-induced injury in mice, the density of gut-innervating adrenergic nerves in the small intestine was increased and promoted ILC3 production of IL-22 via norepinephrine signaling to indirectly enhance epithelial recovery (163) (Table I, Figure 2A). Denervating these adrenergic nerves led to reduced ILC3-derived IL-22, mediated by Adrb1/2 signaling, resulting in impaired epithelial proliferation (163). While this work did not address whether adrenergic nerves can directly affect intestinal epithelial cells, another study reported that the adrenergic receptor isoform α2A (Adra2a) is broadly expressed in mouse and human intestinal epithelial cells, suggesting that this pathway could occur (Table I, Figure 2A) (164). Indeed, organoids stimulated with norepinephrine or the α2-AR agonist UK 14,304 grew larger in size and exhibited increased expression of genes associated with intestinal stem cells and decreased expression of genes associated with differentiated cell types (164). In vivo gavage of the α2-AR agonist UK 14,304 also led to increased small intestinal crypt depth and villus height, further suggesting that α2-AR signaling controls stem cell function (164). In addition, in a model of anastomotic wound healing in mice, sympathetic denervation led to worse epithelial recovery from injury (164). However, further studies are required to confirm the direct epithelial-specific effects of α2-AR signaling.

Altogether, these studies demonstrate that neurons innervate or are in close proximity to mucosal epithelial cells, and the crosstalk between these cells can control host homeostasis.

Concluding remarks

As the physical barrier between the outside world and the cells within the body, epithelial cells in the intestine and lung play an active role in sensing signals from both the external environment and adjacent internal cells and tissues to control physiological responses at steady state and following exposure to infection, injury, and repair processes. Different epithelial cell subsets can respond to these signals by releasing various effector molecules, engaging in a crosstalk with host immune cells and neurons. Further, while epithelial-immune-neuron interactions are pivotal in touch and pain sensation in the skin (165168), recent studies described in this review have begun to illuminate the significance of this signaling axis at mucosal sites. Given the importance of proper epithelial barrier maintenance for diseases such as asthma (15), allergy (1,57), and IBD (810) and the ability of immune cells and neurons to regulate barrier integrity, the crosstalk of epithelial cells with immune cells and neurons likely plays a major clinical role in the context of inflammatory diseases. Furthermore, the ability of immune cells and neurons to regulate the function of specific epithelial cell subsets such as goblet cell mucus release or tuft cell prostaglandin and leukotriene production could have implications for type 2 inflammation-mediated diseases. While further studies are required to identify the different functions of neuronal signaling on mucosal epithelial cells during infection, injury, and inflammation, these findings are promising avenues for future therapeutic intervention strategies.

Advances in organoid technology will help further our understanding of airway and intestinal epithelial crosstalk with other cell types, as various groups develop organoid co-culture systems with immune cells (122,169172) and neurons (173,174) to complement in vivo studies. These 3D in vitro systems will also be useful for screening potential therapeutic targets for translational research in inflammatory diseases associated with disrupted mucosal barrier function, such as IBD, allergies, and asthma, as discussed earlier. In addition, elucidation and functional characterization of how epithelial-immune and epithelial-neuronal interactions are regulated in different organs, within the same organ, and between organ systems could offer valuable new insights.

Given that mucosal epithelial cells can express a variety of receptors recognizing different microbiota-derived signals (6,12,21,23,28,44,48,54), and microbial-derived metabolites themselves are known to influence immune responses (175178), future studies are needed to determine how the microbiota and/or microbiota-derived products influence the crosstalk between epithelial cells with neurons or immune cells, which could aid in the development of therapeutic strategies against acute and chronic inflammatory diseases in the gut and lung. Deepening our knowledge of the fundamental processes of how mucosal epithelial cells regulate and are regulated by other immune cells and neurons will be essential for informing translational research in this field.

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Artis laboratory for discussion and critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation (851136 to M.A.), CURE for IBD, the Jill Roberts Institute for Research in IBD, Kenneth Rainin Foundation, the Sanders Family Foundation and Rosanne H. Silbermann Foundation, the Glenn Greenberg and Linda Vester Foundation, the Allen Discovery Center program, a Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group advised program of the Paul G. Allen Family Foundation (all to D.A.), and the National Institutes of Health (K99AI173660 to M.A. and DK126871, AI151599, AI095466, AI095608, AR070116, AI172027, DK132244 all to D.A.).

Abbreviations used:

IBD

inflammatory bowel disease

AMPs

antimicrobial peptides

EEC

enteroendocrine cell

PNEC

pulmonary neuroendocrine cell

PRR

pattern-recognition receptor

TLR

Toll-like receptor

NLR

NOD-like receptor

RLR

RIG-I-like receptor

PAMP

pathogen-associated molecular patterns

DAMP

danger-associated molecular patterns

IL

interleukin

TNF-α

tumor necrosis factor-α

TGFβ

transforming growth factor-β

TSLP

thymic stromal lymphopoietin

ILC

innate lymphoid cell

ILC2

group 2 innate lymphoid cell

RA

retinoic acid

cysLTs

cysteinyl leukotrienes

IAV

influenza A

RV

rhinovirus

CGRP

calcitonin gene related peptide

OVA

ovalbumin

GABA

γ-aminobutyric acid

ILC3

group 3 innate lymphoid cell

Dll

Delta-Like-Canonical-Notch-Ligand

ILC1

group 1 innate lymphoid cell

NK

natural killer

DSS

dextran sodium sulfate

BALF

bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

GAP

goblet cell-associated antigen passage

SAP

secretory cell-associated antigen passages

ACh

acetylcholine

FAE

follicle-associated epithelium

NMU

neuromedin U

VIP

vasoactive intestinal peptide

NT4

neurotrophin 4

ARCEN

anti-inflammatory recovery-regulating cholinergic enteric neuron

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest

D.A. has contributed to scientific advisory boards at Pfizer, Takeda, FARE, and the KRF. E.R.E. and M.A. have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Saenz SA, Taylor BC, Artis D. Welcome to the neighborhood: epithelial cell-derived cytokines license innate and adaptive immune responses at mucosal sites. Immunol Rev. 2008. Dec;226:172–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Xiao C, Puddicombe SM, Field S, Haywood J, Broughton-Head V, Puxeddu I, et al. Defective epithelial barrier function in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011. Sep 1;128(3):549–556.e12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lambrecht BN, Hammad H. The airway epithelium in asthma. Nat Med. 2012. May;18(5):684–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Heijink IH, Kuchibhotla VNS, Roffel MP, Maes T, Knight DA, Sayers I, et al. Epithelial cell dysfunction, a major driver of asthma development. Allergy. 2020. Aug;75(8):1898–913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Celebi Sozener Z, Ozdel Ozturk B, Cerci P, Turk M, Gorgulu Akin B, Akdis M, et al. Epithelial barrier hypothesis: Effect of the external exposome on the microbiome and epithelial barriers in allergic disease. Allergy. 2022. May;77(5):1418–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Peterson LW, Artis D. Intestinal epithelial cells: regulators of barrier function and immune homeostasis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014. Mar;14(3):141–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Steelant B, Farré R, Wawrzyniak P, Belmans J, Dekimpe E, Vanheel H, et al. Impaired barrier function in patients with house dust mite–induced allergic rhinitis is accompanied by decreased occludin and zonula occludens-1 expression. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016. Apr 1;137(4):1043–1053.e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Grigg JB, Sonnenberg GF. Host-microbiota interactions shape local and systemic inflammatory diseases. J Immunol Baltim Md 1950. 2017. Jan 15;198(2):564–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rankin LC, Artis D. Beyond Host Defense: Emerging Functions of the Immune System in Regulating Complex Tissue Physiology. Cell. 2018. Apr 19;173(3):554–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Martini E, Krug SM, Siegmund B, Neurath MF, Becker C. Mend Your Fences: The Epithelial Barrier and its Relationship With Mucosal Immunity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017. Jul 1;4(1):33–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Artis D Epithelial-cell recognition of commensal bacteria and maintenance of immune homeostasis in the gut. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008. Jun;8(6):411–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Larsen SB, Cowley CJ, Fuchs E. Epithelial cells: liaisons of immunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2020. Feb;62:45–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cutz E, Pan J, Yeger H, Domnik NJ, Fisher JT. Recent advances and contraversies on the role of pulmonary neuroepithelial bodies as airway sensors. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2013. Jan 1;24(1):40–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chesné J, Cardoso V, Veiga-Fernandes H. Neuro-immune regulation of mucosal physiology. Mucosal Immunol. 2019. Jan 1;12(1):10–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kabata H, Artis D. Neuro-immune crosstalk and allergic inflammation. J Clin Invest. 2019. Apr 1;129(4):1475–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Huh JR, Veiga-Fernandes H. Neuroimmune circuits in inter-organ communication. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020. Apr;20(4):217–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kaelberer MM, Rupprecht LE, Liu WW, Weng P, Bohórquez DV. Neuropod Cells: Emerging Biology of the Gut-Brain Sensory Transduction. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2020. Jul 8;43:337–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wolterink RGJK, Wu GS, Chiu IM, Veiga-Fernandes H. Neuroimmune Interactions in Peripheral Organs. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2022. Jul 8;45:339–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hellings PW, Steelant B. Epithelial barriers in allergy and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020. Jun 1;145(6):1499–509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Montoro DT, Haber AL, Biton M, Vinarsky V, Lin B, Birket S, et al. A revised airway epithelial hierarchy includes CFTR-expressing ionocytes. Nature. 2018. Aug;560(7718):319–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Davis JD, Wypych TP. Cellular and functional heterogeneity of the airway epithelium. Mucosal Immunol. 2021. Sep;14(5):978–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Guillot L, Nathan N, Tabary O, Thouvenin G, Le Rouzic P, Corvol H, et al. Alveolar epithelial cells: Master regulators of lung homeostasis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2013. Nov 1;45(11):2568–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Haber AL, Biton M, Rogel N, Herbst RH, Shekhar K, Smillie C, et al. A single-cell survey of the small intestinal epithelium. Nature. 2017. Nov;551(7680):333–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Beumer J, Clevers H. Cell fate specification and differentiation in the adult mammalian intestine. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021. Jan;22(1):39–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang Y, Song W, Wang J, Wang T, Xiong X, Qi Z, et al. Single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals differential nutrient absorption functions in human intestine. J Exp Med. 2019. Nov 21;217(2):e20191130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Deprez M, Zaragosi LE, Truchi M, Becavin C, Ruiz García S, Arguel MJ, et al. A Single-Cell Atlas of the Human Healthy Airways. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020. Dec 15;202(12):1636–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Busslinger GA, Weusten BLA, Bogte A, Begthel H, Brosens LAA, Clevers H. Human gastrointestinal epithelia of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum resolved at single-cell resolution. Cell Rep. 2021. Mar 9;34(10):108819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Burclaff J, Bliton RJ, Breau KA, Ok MT, Gomez-Martinez I, Ranek JS, et al. A Proximal-to-Distal Survey of Healthy Adult Human Small Intestine and Colon Epithelium by Single-Cell Transcriptomics. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022. Feb 15;13(5):1554–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hickey JW, Becker WR, Nevins SA, Horning A, Perez AE, Zhu C, et al. Organization of the human intestine at single-cell resolution. Nature. 2023. Jul;619(7970):572–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gallo RL, Hooper LV. Epithelial antimicrobial defence of the skin and intestine. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012. Jul;12(7):503–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Clevers HC, Bevins CL. Paneth Cells: Maestros of the Small Intestinal Crypts. Annu Rev Physiol. 2013;75(1):289–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.McDole JR, Wheeler LW, McDonald KG, Wang B, Konjufca V, Knoop KA, et al. Goblet cells deliver luminal antigen to CD103+ dendritic cells in the small intestine. Nature. 2012. Mar 14;483(7389):345–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kulkarni DH, Gustafsson JK, Knoop KA, McDonald KG, Bidani SS, Davis JE, et al. Goblet Cell Associated Antigen Passages Support the Induction and Maintenance of Oral Tolerance. Mucosal Immunol. 2020. Mar;13(2):271–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gustafsson JK, Davis JE, Rappai T, McDonald KG, Kulkarni DH, Knoop KA, et al. Intestinal goblet cells sample and deliver lumenal antigens by regulated endocytic uptake and transcytosis. Ten Hagen KG, Malhotra V, editors. eLife. 2021. Oct 22;10:e67292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gustafsson JK, Johansson MEV. The role of goblet cells and mucus in intestinal homeostasis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022. Dec;19(12):785–803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bohórquez DV, Chandra R, Samsa LA, Vigna SR, Liddle RA. Characterization of basal pseudopod-like processes in ileal and colonic PYY cells. J Mol Histol. 2011. Feb;42(1):3–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bohórquez DV, Shahid RA, Erdmann A, Kreger AM, Wang Y, Calakos N, et al. Neuroepithelial circuit formed by innervation of sensory enteroendocrine cells. J Clin Invest. 2015. Feb 2;125(2):782–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gribble FM, Reimann F. Enteroendocrine Cells: Chemosensors in the Intestinal Epithelium. Annu Rev Physiol. 2016;78(1):277–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gribble FM, Reimann F. Function and mechanisms of enteroendocrine cells and gut hormones in metabolism. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019. Apr;15(4):226–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Howitt MR, Lavoie S, Michaud M, Blum AM, Tran SV, Weinstock JV, et al. Tuft cells, taste-chemosensory cells, orchestrate parasite type 2 immunity in the gut. Science. 2016. Mar 18;351(6279):1329–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.von Moltke J, Ji M, Liang HE, Locksley RM. Tuft-cell-derived IL-25 regulates an intestinal ILC2-epithelial response circuit. Nature. 2016. Jan 14;529(7585):221–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gerbe F, Sidot E, Smyth DJ, Ohmoto M, Matsumoto I, Dardalhon V, et al. Intestinal epithelial tuft cells initiate type 2 mucosal immunity to helminth parasites. Nature. 2016. Jan 14;529(7585):226–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kotas ME, O’Leary CE, Locksley RM. Tuft Cells: Context- and Tissue-Specific Programming for a Conserved Cell Lineage. Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis. 2023;18(1):311–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Silverman JB, Vega PN, Tyska MJ, Lau KS. Intestinal Tuft Cells: Morphology, Function, and Implications for Human Health. Annu Rev Physiol. 2023. Oct 20; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mabbott NA, Donaldson DS, Ohno H, Williams IR, Mahajan A. Microfold (M) cells: important immunosurveillance posts in the intestinal epithelium. Mucosal Immunol. 2013. Jul 1;6(4):666–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kurashima Y, Kiyono H. Mucosal Ecological Network of Epithelium and Immune Cells for Gut Homeostasis and Tissue Healing. Annu Rev Immunol. 2017;35(1):119–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dillon A, Lo DD. M Cells: Intelligent Engineering of Mucosal Immune Surveillance. Front Immunol. 2019. Jul 2;10:1499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Leiva-Juárez MM, Kolls JK, Evans SE. Lung epithelial cells: therapeutically inducible effectors of antimicrobial defense. Mucosal Immunol. 2018. Jan;11(1):21–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Whitsett JA, Alenghat T. Respiratory epithelial cells orchestrate pulmonary innate immunity. Nat Immunol. 2015. Jan;16(1):27–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hewitt RJ, Lloyd CM. Regulation of immune responses by the airway epithelial cell landscape. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021. Jun;21(6):347–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ruysseveldt E, Martens K, Steelant B. Airway Basal Cells, Protectors of Epithelial Walls in Health and Respiratory Diseases. Front Allergy. 2021. Nov 19;2:787128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Branchfield K, Nantie L, Verheyden JM, Sui P, Wienhold MD, Sun X. Pulmonary neuroendocrine cells function as airway sensors to control lung immune response. Science. 2016. Feb 12;351(6274):707–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Yuan F, Gasser GN, Lemire E, Montoro DT, Jagadeesh K, Zhang Y, et al. Transgenic ferret models define pulmonary ionocyte diversity and function. Nature. 2023. Sep;621(7980):857–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Constant DA, Nice TJ, Rauch I. Innate immune sensing by epithelial barriers. Curr Opin Immunol. 2021. Dec 1;73:1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Rakoff-Nahoum S, Paglino J, Eslami-Varzaneh F, Edberg S, Medzhitov R. Recognition of commensal microflora by toll-like receptors is required for intestinal homeostasis. Cell. 2004. Jul 23;118(2):229–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Andrews C, McLean MH, Durum SK. Cytokine Tuning of Intestinal Epithelial Function. Front Immunol. 2018. Jun 5;9:1270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Scarpa M, Kessler S, Sadler T, West G, Homer C, McDonald C, et al. The Epithelial Danger Signal IL-1α Is a Potent Activator of Fibroblasts and Reactivator of Intestinal Inflammation. Am J Pathol. 2015. Jun;185(6):1624–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Eckmann L, Kagnoff MF, Fierer J. Epithelial cells secrete the chemokine interleukin-8 in response to bacterial entry. Infect Immun. 1993. Nov;61(11):4569–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Knodler LA, Vallance BA, Celli J, Winfree S, Hansen B, Montero M, et al. Dissemination of invasive Salmonella via bacterial-induced extrusion of mucosal epithelia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010. Oct 12;107(41):17733–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Haller D, Bode C, Hammes W, Pfeifer A, Schiffrin E, Blum S. Non-pathogenic bacteria elicit a differential cytokine response by intestinal epithelial cell/leucocyte co-cultures. Gut. 2000. Jul;47(1):79–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Roulis M, Armaka M, Manoloukos M, Apostolaki M, Kollias G. Intestinal epithelial cells as producers but not targets of chronic TNF suffice to cause murine Crohn-like pathology. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011. Mar 29;108(13):5396–401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Takahashi Y, Sato S, Kurashima Y, Lai CY, Otsu M, Hayashi M, et al. Reciprocal Inflammatory Signaling Between Intestinal Epithelial Cells and Adipocytes in the Absence of Immune Cells. EBioMedicine. 2017. Aug 2;23:34–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wang H, Rogers TJ, Paton JC, Paton AW. Differential Effects of Escherichia coli Subtilase Cytotoxin and Shiga Toxin 2 on Chemokine and Proinflammatory Cytokine Expression in Human Macrophage, Colonic Epithelial, and Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cell Lines. Infect Immun. 2014. Sep;82(9):3567–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ebina-Shibuya R, Leonard WJ. Role of thymic stromal lymphopoietin in allergy and beyond. Nat Rev Immunol. 2023. Jan;23(1):24–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Mahlakõiv T, Flamar AL, Johnston LK, Moriyama S, Putzel GG, Bryce PJ, et al. Stromal Cells Maintain Immune Cell Homeostasis in Adipose Tissue via Production of Interleukin-33. Sci Immunol. 2019. May 3;4(35):eaax0416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Cayrol C, Girard JP. Interleukin-33 (IL-33): A critical review of its biology and the mechanisms involved in its release as a potent extracellular cytokine. Cytokine. 2022. Aug 1;156:155891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Salimi M, Barlow JL, Saunders SP, Xue L, Gutowska-Owsiak D, Wang X, et al. A role for IL-25 and IL-33–driven type-2 innate lymphoid cells in atopic dermatitis. J Exp Med. 2013. Dec 16;210(13):2939–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Neill DR, Wong SH, Bellosi A, Flynn RJ, Daly M, Langford TKA, et al. Nuocytes represent a new innate effector leukocyte that mediates type-2 immunity. Nature. 2010. Apr 29;464(7293):1367–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Noti M, Tait Wojno ED, Kim BS, Siracusa MC, Giacomin PR, Nair MG, et al. TSLP-elicited basophil responses can mediate the pathogenesis of eosinophilic esophagitis. Nat Med. 2013. Aug;19(8):1005–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Noti M, Kim BS, Siracusa MC, Rak GD, Kubo M, Moghaddam AE, et al. Exposure to food allergens through inflamed skin promotes intestinal food allergy via the TSLP-basophil axis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014. May;133(5):1390–1399.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Halim TYF, Steer CA, Mathä L, Gold MJ, Martinez-Gonzalez I, McNagny KM, et al. Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells Are Critical for the Initiation of Adaptive T Helper 2 Cell-Mediated Allergic Lung Inflammation. Immunity. 2014. Mar 20;40(3):425–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kleer IM de, Kool M, Bruijn MJW de, Willart M, Moorleghem J van, Schuijs MJ, et al. Perinatal Activation of the Interleukin-33 Pathway Promotes Type 2 Immunity in the Developing Lung. Immunity. 2016. Dec 20;45(6):1285–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kohanski MA, Workman AD, Patel NN, Hung LY, Shtraks JP, Chen B, et al. Solitary Chemosensory Cells are a Primary Epithelial Source of Interleukin-25 in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018. Aug;142(2):460–469.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Cao YG, Bae S, Villarreal J, Moy M, Chun E, Michaud M, et al. Faecalibaculum rodentium remodels retinoic acid signaling to govern eosinophil-dependent intestinal epithelial homeostasis. Cell Host Microbe. 2022. Sep 14;30(9):1295–1310.e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Hall JA, Grainger JR, Spencer SP, Belkaid Y. The Role of Retinoic Acid in Tolerance and Immunity. Immunity. 2011. Jul 22;35(1):13–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hall JA, Cannons JL, Grainger JR, Dos Santos LM, Hand TW, Naik S, et al. Essential Role for Retinoic Acid in the Promotion of CD4+ T Cell Effector Responses via Retinoic Acid Receptor Alpha. Immunity. 2011. Mar 25;34(3):435–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Bezençon C, le Coutre J, Damak S. Taste-signaling proteins are coexpressed in solitary intestinal epithelial cells. Chem Senses. 2007. Jan;32(1):41–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kaske S, Krasteva G, König P, Kummer W, Hofmann T, Gudermann T, et al. TRPM5, a taste-signaling transient receptor potential ion-channel, is a ubiquitous signaling component in chemosensory cells. BMC Neurosci. 2007. Jul 4;8:49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Galand C, Leyva-Castillo JM, Yoon J, Han A, Lee MS, McKenzie ANJ, et al. IL-33 promotes food anaphylaxis in epicutaneously sensitized mice by targeting mast cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016. Nov 1;138(5):1356–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Leyva-Castillo JM, Galand C, Kam C, Burton O, Gurish M, Musser MA, et al. Mechanical skin injury promotes food anaphylaxis by driving intestinal mast cell expansion. Immunity. 2019. May 21;50(5):1262–1275.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Rane CK, Jackson SR, Pastore CF, Zhao G, Weiner AI, Patel NN, et al. Development of solitary chemosensory cells in the distal lung after severe influenza injury. Am J Physiol - Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2019. Jun 1;316(6):L1141–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Roach SN, Fiege JK, Shepherd FK, Wiggen TD, Hunter RC, Langlois RA. Respiratory Influenza Virus Infection Causes Dynamic Tuft Cell and Innate Lymphoid Cell Changes in the Small Intestine. J Virol. 2022. Apr 21;96(9):e00352–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ualiyeva S, Hallen N, Kanaoka Y, Ledderose C, Matsumoto I, Junger WG, et al. Airway brush cells generate cysteinyl leukotrienes through the ATP sensor P2Y2. Sci Immunol. 2020. Jan 17;5(43):eaax7224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ualiyeva S, Lemire E, Aviles EC, Wong C, Boyd AA, Lai J, et al. Tuft cell–produced cysteinyl leukotrienes and IL-25 synergistically initiate lung type 2 inflammation. Sci Immunol. 2021. Dec 24;6(66):eabj0474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kotas ME, Moore CM, Gurrola JG, Pletcher SD, Goldberg AN, Alvarez R, et al. IL-13–programmed airway tuft cells produce PGE2, which promotes CFTR-dependent mucociliary function. JCI Insight. 2022. Jul 8 [cited 2024 Jan 19];7(13). Available from: https://insight.jci.org/articles/view/159832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Barr J, Gentile ME, Lee S, Kotas ME, Fernanda de Mello Costa M, Holcomb NP, et al. Injury-induced pulmonary tuft cells are heterogenous, arise independent of key Type 2 cytokines, and are dispensable for dysplastic repair. Noble PW, De Langhe S, Rajagopal J, Stripp BR, editors. eLife. 2022. Sep 8;11:e78074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Li Y, Han M, Singh S, Breckenridge HA, Kreger JE, Stroupe CC, et al. Tuft cells are required for a rhinovirus-induced asthma phenotype in immature mice. JCI Insight. 2023. Dec 7; Available from: https://insight.jci.org/articles/view/166136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Roach SN, Fiege JK, Shepherd FK, Wiggen TD, Hunter RC, Langlois RA. Respiratory Influenza Virus Infection Causes Dynamic Tuft Cell and Innate Lymphoid Cell Changes in the Small Intestine. J Virol. 96(9):e00352–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Sui P, Wiesner DL, Xu J, Zhang Y, Lee J, Van Dyken S, et al. Pulmonary neuroendocrine cells amplify allergic asthma responses. Science. 2018. Jun 8;360(6393):eaan8546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Read E, Peña-Cearra A, Coman D, Jowett GM, Chung MWH, Coales I, et al. Bi-directional signaling between the intestinal epithelium and type-3 innate lymphoid cells regulates secretory dynamics and interleukin-22. Mucosal Immunol. 2023. Nov 10 [cited 2023 Dec 18]; Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1933021923000855 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Zeng B, Shi S, Ashworth G, Dong C, Liu J, Xing F. ILC3 function as a double-edged sword in inflammatory bowel diseases. Cell Death Dis. 2019. Apr 8;10(4):1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Roan F, Obata-Ninomiya K, Ziegler SF. Epithelial cell–derived cytokines: more than just signaling the alarm. J Clin Invest. 129(4):1441–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Han H, Roan F, Ziegler SF. The atopic march: current insights into skin barrier dysfunction and epithelial cell-derived cytokines. Immunol Rev. 2017. Jul;278(1):116–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Bissonnette EY, Lauzon-Joset JF, Debley JS, Ziegler SF. Cross-Talk Between Alveolar Macrophages and Lung Epithelial Cells is Essential to Maintain Lung Homeostasis. Front Immunol. 2020. Oct 15;11:583042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Guenin-Mace L, Konieczny P, Naik S. Immune-Epithelial Cross Talk in Regeneration and Repair. Annu Rev Immunol. 2023;41(1):207–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Vivier E, Artis D, Colonna M, Diefenbach A, Santo JPD, Eberl G, et al. Innate Lymphoid Cells: 10 Years On. Cell. 2018. Aug 23;174(5):1054–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Artis D, Spits H. The biology of innate lymphoid cells. Nature. 2015. Jan;517(7534):293–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Klose CSN, Artis D. Innate lymphoid cells as regulators of immunity, inflammation and tissue homeostasis. Nat Immunol. 2016. Jul;17(7):765–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Barlow JL, McKenzie ANJ. Innate Lymphoid Cells of the Lung. Annu Rev Physiol. 2019. Feb 10;81:429–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Hammad H, Lambrecht BN. Barrier Epithelial Cells and the Control of Type 2 Immunity. Immunity. 2015. Jul 21;43(1):29–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Spits H, Mjösberg J. Heterogeneity of type 2 innate lymphoid cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2022;22(11):701–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Monticelli LA, Sonnenberg GF, Abt MC, Alenghat T, Ziegler CGK, Doering TA, et al. Innate lymphoid cells promote lung tissue homeostasis following acute influenza virus infection. Nat Immunol. 2011. Nov;12(11):1045–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Monticelli LA, Osborne LC, Noti M, Tran SV, Zaiss DMW, Artis D. IL-33 promotes an innate immune pathway of intestinal tissue protection dependent on amphiregulin-EGFR interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015. Aug 25;112(34):10762–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Turner JE, Morrison PJ, Wilhelm C, Wilson M, Ahlfors H, Renauld JC, et al. IL-9–mediated survival of type 2 innate lymphoid cells promotes damage control in helminth-induced lung inflammation. J Exp Med. 2013. Dec 16;210(13):2951–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Yuan C, Rayasam A, Moe A, Hayward M, Wells C, Szabo A, et al. Interleukin-9 production by type 2 innate lymphoid cells induces Paneth cell metaplasia and small intestinal remodeling. Nat Commun. 2023. Dec 2;14:7963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Koschmieder S, Göttgens B, Zhang P, Iwasaki-Arai J, Akashi K, Kutok JL, et al. Inducible chronic phase of myeloid leukemia with expansion of hematopoietic stem cells in a transgenic model of BCR-ABL leukemogenesis. Blood. 2005. Jan 1;105(1):324–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Simmonds N, Furman M, Karanika E, Phillips A, Bates AW. Paneth cell metaplasia in newly diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease in children. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014. May 15;14:93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Wada R, Yamaguchi T, Tadokoro K. Colonic Paneth cell metaplasia is pre-neoplastic condition of colonic cancer or not? J Carcinog. 2005. Feb 12;4:5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Sonnenberg GF, Monticelli LA, Elloso MM, Fouser LA, Artis D. CD4+ lymphoid tissue inducer cells promote innate immunity in the gut. Immunity. 2011. Jan 28;34(1):122–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Sonnenberg GF, Monticelli LA, Alenghat T, Fung TC, Hutnick NA, Kunisawa J, et al. Innate Lymphoid Cells Promote Anatomical Containment of Lymphoid-Resident Commensal Bacteria. Science. 2012. Jun 8;336(6086):1321–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Aparicio-Domingo P, Romera-Hernandez M, Karrich JJ, Cornelissen F, Papazian N, Lindenbergh-Kortleve DJ, et al. Type 3 innate lymphoid cells maintain intestinal epithelial stem cells after tissue damage. J Exp Med. 2015. Oct 19;212(11):1783–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Lindemans CA, Calafiore M, Mertelsmann AM, O’Connor MH, Dudakov JA, Jenq RR, et al. Interleukin-22 promotes intestinal-stem-cell-mediated epithelial regeneration. Nature. 2015. Dec 24;528(7583):560–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Goto Y, Obata T, Kunisawa J, Sato S, Ivanov II, Lamichhane A, et al. Innate lymphoid cells regulate intestinal epithelial cell glycosylation. Science. 2014. Sep 9;345(6202):1254009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Pickert G, Neufert C, Leppkes M, Zheng Y, Wittkopf N, Warntjen M, et al. STAT3 links IL-22 signaling in intestinal epithelial cells to mucosal wound healing. J Exp Med. 2009. Jul 6;206(7):1465–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Colonna M Interleukin-22-Producing Natural Killer Cells and Lymphoid Tissue Inducer-like Cells in Mucosal Immunity. Immunity. 2009. Jul 17;31(1):15–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Kirchberger S, Royston DJ, Boulard O, Thornton E, Franchini F, Szabady RL, et al. Innate lymphoid cells sustain colon cancer through production of interleukin-22 in a mouse model. J Exp Med. 2013. Apr 15;210(5):917–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Li G, Zhang B, Hao J, Chu X, Wiestler M, Cornberg M, et al. Identification of Novel Population-Specific Cell Subsets in Chinese Ulcerative Colitis Patients Using Single-Cell RNA Sequencing. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021. Feb 2;12(1):99–117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Smillie CS, Sauk J, Gevers D, Friedman J, Sung J, Youngster I, et al. Strain Tracking Reveals the Determinants of Bacterial Engraftment in the Human Gut Following Fecal Microbiota Transplantation. Cell Host Microbe. 2018. Feb 14;23(2):229–240.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Brazil JC, Quiros M, Nusrat A, Parkos CA. Innate immune cell–epithelial crosstalk during wound repair. J Clin Invest. 2019. Aug 1;129(8):2983–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Wynn TA, Vannella KM. Macrophages in tissue repair, regeneration, and fibrosis. Immunity. 2016. Mar 15;44(3):450–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Gieseck RL, Wilson MS, Wynn TA. Type 2 immunity in tissue repair and fibrosis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018. Jan;18(1):62–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Barnes JL, Yoshida M, He P, Worlock KB, Lindeboom RGH, Suo C, et al. Early human lung immune cell development and its role in epithelial cell fate. Sci Immunol. 2023. Dec 15;8(90):eadf9988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Nikolić MZ, Caritg O, Jeng Q, Johnson JA, Sun D, Howell KJ, et al. Human embryonic lung epithelial tips are multipotent progenitors that can be expanded in vitro as long-term self-renewing organoids. Bronner M, editor. eLife. 2017. Jun 30;6:e26575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Klion AD, Ackerman SJ, Bochner BS. Contributions of eosinophils to human health and disease. Annu Rev Pathol. 2020. Jan 24;15:179–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Siddiqui S, Bachert C, Bjermer L, Buchheit KM, Castro M, Qin Y, et al. Eosinophils and tissue remodeling: Relevance to airway disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023. Oct 1;152(4):841–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Nava P, Koch S, Laukoetter MG, Lee WY, Kolegraff K, Capaldo CT, et al. Interferon-γ Regulates Intestinal Epithelial Homeostasis through Converging β-Catenin Signaling Pathways. Immunity. 2010. Mar 26;32(3):392–402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Skoskiewicz MJ, Colvin RB, Schneeberger EE, Russell PS. Widespread and selective induction of major histocompatibility complex-determined antigens in vivo by gamma interferon. J Exp Med. 1985. Nov 1;162(5):1645–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Lu Y, Huang Y, Li J, Huang J, Zhang L, Feng J, et al. Eosinophil extracellular traps drive asthma progression through neuro-immune signals. Nat Cell Biol. 2021. Oct;23(10):1060–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Choi Y, Kim YM, Lee HR, Mun J, Sim S, Lee DH, et al. Eosinophil extracellular traps activate type 2 innate lymphoid cells through stimulating airway epithelium in severe asthma. Allergy. 2020;75(1):95–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.ten Hove AS, Seppen J, de Jonge WJ. Neuronal innervation of the intestinal crypt. Am J Physiol-Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2021. Feb;320(2):G193–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Kaelberer MM, Buchanan KL, Klein ME, Barth BB, Montoya MM, Shen X, et al. A gut-brain neural circuit for nutrient sensory transduction. Science. 2018. Sep 21;361(6408):eaat5236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Morroni M, Cangiotti AM, Cinti S. Brush cells in the human duodenojejunal junction: an ultrastructural study. J Anat. 2007. Jul;211(1):125–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Bezençon C, Fürholz A, Raymond F, Mansourian R, Métairon S, Le Coutre J, et al. Murine intestinal cells expressing Trpm5 are mostly brush cells and express markers of neuronal and inflammatory cells. J Comp Neurol. 2008;509(5):514–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Cheng X, Voss U, Ekblad E. Tuft cells: Distribution and connections with nerves and endocrine cells in mouse intestine. Exp Cell Res. 2018. Aug 1;369(1):105–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Mazzone SB, Undem BJ. Vagal Afferent Innervation of the Airways in Health and Disease. Physiol Rev. 2016. Jul;96(3):975–1024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Kistemaker LEM, Prakash YS. Airway Innervation and Plasticity in Asthma. Physiology. 2019. Jul 1;34(4):283–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Finger TE, Böttger B, Hansen A, Anderson KT, Alimohammadi H, Silver WL. Solitary chemoreceptor cells in the nasal cavity serve as sentinels of respiration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003. Jul 22;100(15):8981–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Saunders CJ, Christensen M, Finger TE, Tizzano M. Cholinergic neurotransmission links solitary chemosensory cells to nasal inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014. Apr 22;111(16):6075–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Workman MJ, Mahe MM, Trisno S, Poling HM, Watson CL, Sundaram N, et al. Engineered human pluripotent-stem-cell-derived intestinal tissues with a functional enteric nervous system. Nat Med. 2017. Jan;23(1):49–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Westphalen CB, Asfaha S, Hayakawa Y, Takemoto Y, Lukin DJ, Nuber AH, et al. Long-lived intestinal tuft cells serve as colon cancer–initiating cells. J Clin Invest. 2014. Mar 3;124(3):1283–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Noah TK, Knoop KA, McDonald KG, Gustafsson JK, Waggoner L, Vanoni S, et al. IL-13-induced Intestinal secretory epithelial cell antigen passages are required for IgE-mediated food-induced anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019. Oct;144(4):1058–1073.e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Knoop KA, McDonald KG, McCrate S, McDole JR, Newberry RD. Microbial sensing by goblet cells controls immune surveillance of luminal antigens in the colon. Mucosal Immunol. 2015. Jan 1;8(1):198–210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Dolan B, Ermund A, Martinez-Abad B, Johansson MEV, Hansson GC. Clearance of small intestinal crypts involves goblet cell mucus secretion by intracellular granule rupture and enterocyte ion transport. Sci Signal. 2022. Sep 20;15(752):eabl5848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Kimura M, Ando T, Kume Y, Fukase S, Matsuzawa M, Kashiwagi K, et al. A nerve-goblet cell association promotes allergic conjunctivitis through rapid antigen passage. JCI Insight. 2023. Nov 8 [cited 2023 Dec 23];8(21). Available from: https://insight.jci.org/articles/view/168596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Baral P, Udit S, Chiu IM. Pain and immunity: implications for host defence. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019. Jul;19(7):433–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Pinho-Ribeiro FA, Baddal B, Haarsma R, O’Seaghdha M, Yang NJ, Blake KJ, et al. Blocking Neuronal Signaling to Immune Cells Treats Streptococcal Invasive Infection. Cell. 2018. May 17;173(5):1083–1097.e22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Nagashima H, Mahlakõiv T, Shih HY, Davis FP, Meylan F, Huang Y, et al. Neuropeptide CGRP Limits Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cell Responses and Constrains Type 2 Inflammation. Immunity. 2019. Oct 15;51(4):682–695.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Wallrapp A, Burkett PR, Riesenfeld SJ, Kim SJ, Christian E, Abdulnour REE, et al. Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Negatively Regulates Alarmin-Driven Type 2 Innate Lymphoid Cell Responses. Immunity. 2019. Oct 15;51(4):709–723.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Xu H, Ding J, Porter CBM, Wallrapp A, Tabaka M, Ma S, et al. Transcriptional Atlas of ntestinal Immune Cells Reveals that Neuropeptide α-CGRP Modulates Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cell Responses. Immunity. 2019. Oct 15;51(4):696–708.e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Lai NY, Musser MA, Pinho-Ribeiro FA, Baral P, Jacobson A, Ma P, et al. Gut-Innervating Nociceptor Neurons Regulate Peyer’s Patch Microfold Cells and SFB Levels to Mediate Salmonella Host Defense. Cell. 2020. Jan 9;180(1):33–49.e22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Jarret A, Jackson R, Duizer C, Healy ME, Zhao J, Rone JM, et al. Enteric Nervous System-Derived IL-18 Orchestrates Mucosal Barrier Immunity. Cell. 2020. Jan 9;180(1):50–63.e12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Talbot S, Abdulnour REE, Burkett PR, Lee S, Cronin SJF, Pascal MA, et al. Silencing Nociceptor Neurons Reduces Allergic Airway Inflammation. Neuron. 2015. Jul 15;87(2):341–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Nussbaum JC, Van Dyken SJ, von Moltke J, Cheng LE, Mohapatra A, Molofsky AB, et al. Type 2 innate lymphoid cells control eosinophil homeostasis. Nature. 2013. Oct;502(7470):245–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Cardoso V, Chesné J, Ribeiro H, García-Cassani B, Carvalho T, Bouchery T, et al. Neuronal regulation of type 2 innate lymphoid cells via neuromedin U. Nature. 2017. Sep;549(7671):277–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Wallrapp A, Riesenfeld SJ, Burkett PR, Abdulnour REE, Nyman J, Dionne D, et al. The neuropeptide NMU amplifies ILC2-driven allergic lung inflammation. Nature. 2017. Sep;549(7672):351–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Klose CSN, Mahlakõiv T, Moeller JB, Rankin LC, Flamar AL, Kabata H, et al. The neuropeptide neuromedin U stimulates innate lymphoid cells and type 2 inflammation. Nature. 2017. Sep;549(7671):282–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Tsou AM, Yano H, Parkhurst CN, Mahlakõiv T, Chu C, Zhang W, et al. Neuropeptide regulation of non-redundant ILC2 responses at barrier surfaces. Nature. 2022. Nov;611(7937):787–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Yang D, Jacobson A, Meerschaert KA, Sifakis JJ, Wu M, Chen X, et al. Nociceptor neurons direct goblet cells via a CGRP-RAMP1 axis to drive mucus production and gut barrier protection. Cell. 2022. Oct 27;185(22):4190–4205.e25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Barrios J, Patel KR, Aven L, Achey R, Minns MS, Lee Y, et al. Early life allergen-induced mucus overproduction requires augmented neural stimulation of pulmonary neuroendocrine cell secretion. FASEB J Off Publ Fed Am Soc Exp Biol. 2017. Sep;31(9):4117–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Petsakou A, Liu Y, Liu Y, Comjean A, Hu Y, Perrimon N. Cholinergic neurons trigger epithelial Ca2+ currents to heal the gut. Nature. 2023. Nov;623(7985):122–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Hirota CL, McKay DM. Cholinergic regulation of epithelial ion transport in the mammalian intestine. Br J Pharmacol. 2006;149(5):463–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Katheder NS, Browder KC, Chang D, Maziere AD, Kujala P, Dijk S van, et al. eLife. eLife Sciences Publications Limited; 2023. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor signaling maintains epithelial barrier integrity. Available from: https://elifesciences.org/articles/86381/figures [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Wang P, Kljavin N, Nguyen TTT, Storm EE, Marsh B, Jiang J, et al. Adrenergic nerves regulate intestinal regeneration through IL-22 signaling from type 3 innate lymphoid cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2023. Sep 7;30(9):1166–1178.e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.ten Hove AS, Mallesh S, Zafeiropoulou K, de Kleer JWM, van Hamersveld PHP, Welting O, et al. Sympathetic activity regulates epithelial proliferation and wound healing via adrenergic receptor α2A. Sci Rep. 2023. Oct 20;13:17990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Roosterman D, Goerge T, Schneider SW, Bunnett NW, Steinhoff M. Neuronal Control of Skin Function: The Skin as a Neuroimmunoendocrine Organ. Physiol Rev. 2006. Oct;86(4):1309–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Wang F, Kim BS. Itch: A Paradigm of Neuroimmune Crosstalk. Immunity. 2020. May 19;52(5):753–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Tamari M, Ver Heul AM, Kim BS. Immunosensation: Neuroimmune Cross Talk in the Skin. Annu Rev Immunol. 2021;39(1):369–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Feuillet V, Ugolini S, Reynders A. Differential regulation of cutaneous immunity by sensory neuron subsets. Trends Neurosci. 2023. Aug 1;46(8):640–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Bar-Ephraim YE, Kretzschmar K, Clevers H. Organoids in immunological research. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020. May;20(5):279–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Hentschel V, Seufferlein T, Armacki M. Intestinal organoids in coculture: redefining the boundaries of gut mucosa ex vivo modeling. Am J Physiol-Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2021. Dec;321(6):G693–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Jose SS, De Zuani M, Tidu F, Hortová Kohoutková M, Pazzagli L, Forte G, et al. Comparison of two human organoid models of lung and intestinal inflammation reveals Toll-like receptor signalling activation and monocyte recruitment. Clin Transl Immunol. 2020. May 5;9(5):e1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Bosáková V, De Zuani M, Sládková L, Garlíková Z, Jose SS, Zelante T, et al. Lung Organoids-The Ultimate Tool to Dissect Pulmonary Diseases? Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:899368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Sedrani C, Gomez-Giro G, Grandmougin L, Schwamborn JC, Wilmes P. A Gut-on-a-Chip Model to Study the Gut Microbiome-Nervous System Axis. JoVE J Vis Exp. 2023. Jul 28;(197):e64483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.de Hoyos-Vega JM, Yu X, Gonzalez-Suarez AM, Chen S, Mercado-Perez A, Krueger E, et al. Modeling gut neuro-epithelial connections in a novel microfluidic device. Microsyst Nanoeng. 2023. Nov 14;9(1):1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Belkaid Y, Hand T. Role of the Microbiota in Immunity and inflammation. Cell. 2014. Mar 27;157(1):121–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Lavelle A, Sokol H. Gut microbiota-derived metabolites as key actors in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020. Apr;17(4):223–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Krautkramer KA, Fan J, Bäckhed F. Gut microbial metabolites as multi-kingdom intermediates. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021. Feb;19(2):77–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Arifuzzaman M, Collins N, Guo CJ, Artis D. Nutritional regulation of microbiota-derived metabolites: Implications for immunity and inflammation. Immunity. 2024. Jan 9;57(1):14–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES