Skip to main content
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: CMLS logoLink to Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: CMLS
. 2021 Feb 12;78(8):3969–3986. doi: 10.1007/s00018-021-03762-5

Mitochondrial dynamics, positioning and function mediated by cytoskeletal interactions

Mitali Shah 1, Leeba Ann Chacko 1, Joel P Joseph 1, Vaishnavi Ananthanarayanan 1,2,
PMCID: PMC11071877  PMID: 33576841

Abstract

The ability of a mitochondrion to undergo fission and fusion, and to be transported and localized within a cell are central not just to proper functioning of mitochondria, but also to that of the cell. The cytoskeletal filaments, namely microtubules, F-actin and intermediate filaments, have emerged as prime movers in these dynamic mitochondrial shape and position transitions. In this review, we explore the complex relationship between the cytoskeleton and the mitochondrion, by delving into: (i) how the cytoskeleton helps shape mitochondria via fission and fusion events, (ii) how the cytoskeleton facilitates the translocation and anchoring of mitochondria with the activity of motor proteins, and (iii) how these changes in form and position of mitochondria translate into functioning of the cell.

Keywords: Mitochondrial dynamics, Cytoskeleton, Microtubules, Molecular motors, Mitochondria

Introduction

Mitochondria are double-membraned organelles that are involved in a multitude of processes including generation of adenosine triphosphate (ATP), thermogenesis, intra-cellular Ca2+ homeostasis, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, apoptosis and stem cell differentiation [16]. The outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) is a relatively smooth lipid bilayer, whereas the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) folds inward to form structures known as cristae [7, 8]. The region between the two mitochondrial membranes is the intermembrane space [7]. The OMM allows the exchange of metabolites between the intermembrane space and the cytosol while the IMM contains the electron transport chain (ETC) proteins, and encloses the mitochondrial matrix, where signalling processes including the Kreb’s cycle, β-oxidation and ROS production take place [9, 10].

In living cells, mitochondria appear as tubular, interconnected networks, which change shape by undergoing fission and fusion (Fig. 1). These fission–fusion dynamics are crucial to the maintenance of mitochondrial quality and energy production in the cell. OMM fusion is regulated by mitofusin 1 and mitofusin 2 (MFN1 and MFN2) while fission is mediated by the dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) [11, 12]. MID49, MID51 and mitochondrial fission factor (MFF) recruit DRP1 to the OMM [13]. In budding yeast, the OMM protein, Fis1p promotes mitochondrial fission by recruiting the DRP1 homolog Dnm1p to mitochondria [14]. Human Fis1 (hFis1/Fis1) also binds DRP1 with ER proteins at the mitochondria-ER interface during mitochondrial fission [15]. hFis1 binds to and inhibits the GTPase activity of MFN1, MFN2, and the IMM fusion regulator optic atrophy 1 (OPA1) thereby giving rise to a more fragmented mitochondrial network [16]. hFis1 induces DRP1-dependent mitochondrial fission by forming mitochondria-ER contacts that trigger mitochondrial calcium influx [17]. Intriguingly, in absence of the hFis1 domain responsible for mitochondria-ER tethering, mitochondria cluster near the nucleus, indicating that hFis1 potentially maintains mitochondrial organisation by also modulating mitochondrial transport [16].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Overview of the players involved in effecting mitochondrial dynamics. Mitochondrial fission is mediated by DRP1, which is recruited by MFF, MID49 and MID51. Fission is inhibited when mitochondria are associated with microtubules. Mitochondrial fusion is brought about by L-OPA1, MFN1 and MFN2. F-actin and its associated proteins enable mitochondrial fission. S-OPA1 and MTP18 induce mitochondrial fission

IMM fusion and fission are carried out by two different forms of OPA1. Two IMM peptidases namely OMA1 and YME1L1 proteolytically cleave OPA1 to form the long, transmembrane form and short, soluble forms of OPA1 (L-OPA1 and S-OPA1, respectively) and this aids the membrane fusion activity of Opa1 [1820]. The membrane anchoring of L-OPA1 to the mitochondria-specific lipid cardiolipin is sufficient for IMM fusion [21]. Stoichiometric levels of S-OPA1 mediate fast membrane fusion [20] thus, loss of OPA1 function results in fragmentation of the mitochondrial network [22]. Interestingly, increased levels of S-OPA1 downregulates fusion, however, the precise mechanism through which this occurs remains unknown [20, 23]. Another IMM protein, MTP18 fragments mitochondria when over-expressed, and results in hyperfusion of mitochondria when depleted [24]. The expression of MTP18 correlates with DRP1-mediated fission. While MTP18 is present at the IMM, it lacks conserved IMM motifs or domains. Thus, the role of MTP18 as a ubiquitous IMM fission protein has not been fully established.

The functional requirements of a cell correlate with changes in mitochondrial dynamics, form and positioning. For instance, brown adipocytes display fragmented mitochondrial networks through the activity of DRP1 and cleavage of OPA1 in response to adrenergic stimulation to enable the transition from nutrient oxidation to thermogenesis [25]. On the contrary, maintenance of tubular networks of mitochondria by astrocytes during neuroinflammation is necessary for astrocyte survival [26]. Dividing cells exhibit fragmented mitochondria, with the increase in mitochondrial number reducing partitioning error during independent segregation of mitochondria into daughter cells [27, 28]. Additionally, during meiotic cell division, mitochondria are anchored to the poles of Schizosaccharomyces pombe zygotes to enable uniparental inheritance of mitochondria [29]. The transport and accumulation of mitochondria to specific compartments in neurons is crucial for their functioning [3034]. Thus, variability in mitochondrial form and localisation in response to the function or metabolic state of the cell maintains mitochondrial and cellular health [35, 36].

Recent research has demonstrated that the cytoskeleton regulates mitochondrial dynamics, positioning and function within the cell. The cytoskeleton in eukaryotic cells consists of actin filaments (F-actin), microtubules, intermediate filaments and septins. F-actin is assembled from G-actin and is mediated by actin nucleators and crosslinkers such as formins, fascin and Arp2/3 [37]. F-actin can form higher order flexible structures that organise into linear bundles, two-dimensional networks and three-dimensional gels [34]. F-actin is widely distributed throughout cells, forming a range of cytoskeletal structures of varying functions. Specifically, actin filaments nucleated from inverted formin-2 (INF2) facilitate mitochondrial fission, while fascin-bound actin filaments form filopodia which a cell uses to probe its environment [38, 39]. Actin networks shape the surface of the cell, provide mechanical stability to the cell and participate in cytokinesis and help in cell locomotion [4042].

Myosins are F-actin-based motor proteins important for their role in muscle contraction and responsible for actin-based motility through ATP hydrolysis [43]. F-actin is involved in regulating mitochondrial fission, positioning and ROS production, and non-muscle myosin II has been implicated in mitochondrial fission [4452].

Microtubules are dynamic, hollow filaments which help direct intracellular transport, form the mitotic spindle during cell division, and direct the position of organelles within the cell [5355]. Microtubules typically emerge from the microtubule-organising centre (MTOC), where their minus-ends are capped. Microtubules require the minus and plus-end directed motor proteins, cytoplasmic dynein (henceforth dynein) and kinesin, respectively, to generate forces and move cargo along cytoskeletal tracks [43]. Microtubules inhibit fission of associated mitochondria and act as tracks for mitochondrial transport and anchorage [27, 5661].

Intermediate filaments (IFs) are non-polar structures that provide mechanical strength to a cell and anchor organelles [62, 63]. IFs also affect mitochondrial morphology, organisation, membrane potential and lipid composition [6469]. The three cytoskeletal filaments—F-actin, microtubules and the IFs are crosslinked by plectin [70, 71]. Plectin alters mitochondrial size and ROS production [72, 73]. Septins are a unique component of the cytoskeleton that assemble into non-polar filaments forming bundles, rings and cage-like structures that aid in the organisation of compartments inside cells [74]. Septins have also been observed to alter mitochondrial form [75].

The cytoskeleton is a key determinant of mitochondrial dynamics

Mitochondrial fission and fusion dynamics play an essential role in maintaining mitochondrial health and survival. Mitochondrial fission is proposed to help remove damaged mitochondria through mitophagy, stimulate mitochondrial DNA replication and biogenesis, while mitochondrial fusion aids the spread of metabolites, enzymes and mitochondrial gene products within the mitochondrial network as well as dilutes the effects of damaged mitochondria during ageing [7678]. During the early stages of Drosophila oogenesis, a reduction of MFN induces mitochondrial fragmentation which aids the removal of damaged mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) by mitophagy proteins [77, 78]. On the other hand, mitochondrial fusion safeguards differentiated skeletal muscles from accumulation of mtDNA point mutations and deletions [78]. Deletion of MFN1 and MFN2 leads to severe depletion of mtDNA in skeletal muscles and causes muscle atrophy in mice [78]. Taken together, the maintenance of fission–fusion balance is important for mitochondrial function and thereby cell survival. Here, we describe how the cytoskeleton facilitates, and in some instances, dictates mitochondrial fission–fusion dynamics.

F-actin facilitates mitochondrial fission

F-actin plays a key role in mitochondrial fission by aiding the activity of DRP1 (Fig. 2) [39]. Mitochondrial fission occurs when DRP1 oligomers form ring-like structures around the OMM, leading to constriction and eventual fission of the mitochondrion [79]. However, mitochondrial circumferences are often wider than the diameter of DRP1 rings [80]. Thus, F-actin enables the pre-constriction of mitochondria at mitochondria-ER contacts, thereby decreasing the mitochondrial cross-sectional diameter and enabling DRP1-mediated scission [44, 45]. The presence of F-actin is sufficient to increase DRP1 activity in vitro, possibly, because F-actin aids the maturation of DRP1 oligomers to form functional rings around the mitochondria [46]. Thus, deletion of the actin-depolymerising protein, cofilin1 leads to accumulation of DRP1, which then induces mitochondrial fragmentation [81]. However, another study showed that while the downregulation of cofilin through RNAi resulted in increased accumulation and association of DRP1 with mitochondria, it led to elongated mitochondria, likely due to the abrogation of DRP1-independent steps in mitochondrial fission [82].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

The cytoskeleton and its associated proteins regulate mitochondrial dynamics. DRP1-mediated mitochondrial fission is inhibited when mitochondria are bound to microtubules via Mmb1p and vimentin. DRP1 binds directly to Sept2 and other recruitment factors at mitochondrial fission sites. F-actin aids mitochondrial fission at mitochondria-ER contact sites along with INF2, Spire1C and myosin II. Cofilin inhibits F-actin-mediated mitochondrial fission. DRP1-independent IMM constriction is enhanced through increased supply of calcium from the ER to the mitochondrial matrix via the VDAC and MCU. Arp2/3-mediated branched actin clouds also induce mitochondrial fission independent of the ER

Mitochondrial morphology and dynamics are also regulated by actin-associated proteins. The depletion of the actin-nucleating protein INF2 leads to the loss of F-actin, and results in increased mitochondrial lengths [83]. Subsequent work showed that another actin nucleator, Spire1C and INF2 together form short actin filaments that localise at mitochondria-ER contacts [84]. These short filaments generate forces required to tighten ER tubules around the mitochondrial circumference [85]. The actin-based motor proteins non-muscle myosin II (myosin IIA and myosin IIB) are likely responsible for this tightening since they localise to mitochondria-ER sites, and upon depletion lead to longer mitochondria [52]. Recently, the non-muscle myosin isoform IIC (NMIIC) was also implicated in aiding mitochondrial fission [86]. A mutation in the gene that encodes for NMIIC hinders mitochondrial fission and alters the organisation of the mitochondrial genome [86]. This mutation is also linked to peripheral neuropathy and hearing loss, suggesting a possible role for aberrant mitochondrial dynamics in these disease states [86]. INF2-mediated actin polymerisation enhances the percentage of mitochondria-ER contacts about two-fold upon ionomycin stimulation, which increases the supply of calcium from ER stores to the mitochondrial matrix through the voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) and mitochondrial calcium uniporter (MCU) [87]. This in turn activates IMM constriction through ETC activity in a DRP1-independent manner [87].

Actin has also been implicated in mediating stress-induced mitochondrial fission through the transient assembly of F-actin on hyperfused regions of the OMM aided by the actin branching protein, Arp2/3 [82]. The actin assembly promotes DRP1 recruitment followed by rapid fission over 3–5 min [88]. The ability of Arp2/3 to form these transient actin structures possibly aids the rapid increase in mitochondrial fission observed during mitotic prophase [82].

Attachment of mitochondria to microtubules inhibits mitochondrial fission

In eukaryotic cells, microtubules and mitochondria physically associate with each other [27, 57, 89, 90]. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that α- and β-tubulin localise to mitochondrial membranes and immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed that they specifically associate with the VDACs on the OMM [91]. Since then, the importance of microtubules and associated proteins in maintaining mitochondrial morphology, dynamics, and health has been explored in more detail.

Disruption of microtubule assembly decreases mitochondrial motility, thereby affecting mitochondrial fission and fusion [92]. In Dictyostelium discoideum cells, depolymerisation of microtubules using the drug nocodazole reduces both mitochondrial fission and fusion [56]. In S. pombe, depolymerisation or destabilisation of microtubules amplifies mitochondrial fragmentation due to an increase in the rate of mitochondrial fission [27, 5759]. Conversely, reduction in the frequency of microtubule catastrophe results in longer microtubules and thereby, longer mitochondria due to decreased mitochondrial fission rates [27].

Recent studies have identified how microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) modulate mitochondrial form and dynamics. One such example is the microtubule-associated tumour suppressor 1 (MTUS1), which normally localises to the OMM via MFN1 and MFN2 [93]. The depletion of MTUS1 results in shorter and more rounded mitochondria, indicating a role for this MAP in maintaining the fission–fusion equilibrium [93]. In S. pombe, deletion of the microtubule–mitochondria linker protein, Mmb1p results in unopposed mitochondrial fission indicating that the attachment of mitochondria to microtubules is important in inhibiting Dnm1-(yeast DRP1) mediated fission [27].

Intermediate filaments and other cytoskeletal proteins participate in mitochondrial dynamics

Fluorescence microscopy, subcellular fractionation and immunoprecipitation assays revealed that the IF vimentin directly binds to mitochondria [64]. Depletion of vimentin results in mitochondrial swelling and fragmentation [64]. Interestingly, this depletion also significantly reduces levels of α-tubulin in the mitochondrial fraction, indicating that vimentin possibly mediates the interaction of mitochondria with microtubules [64].

Septins and other cytoskeleton-associated proteins such as plectins also cause alterations to the mitochondrial morphology [72, 75]. In skeletal myoblasts, one of the four plectin isoforms namely, P1b, links IFs to mitochondria [72]. Loss of P1b upregulates MFN2, thereby causing a substantial increase in the width of mitochondrial z-disk wrapping [72]. However, whether P1b directly associates with MFN2 and the mechanism through which P1b alters mitochondrial morphology remain unknown.

A member of the septin family, Septin 2 (Sept2) binds directly to DRP1 and localises to a subset of mitochondrial constriction sites. Depletion of Sept2 decreases DRP1 localisation to the OMM resulting in hyperfused mitochondria [75]. Silencing another member of the septin family, Septin 7 (Sept7) also resulted in the formation of hyperfused mitochondria possibly because depletion of Sept7 co-depletes Sept2 [75]. The precise mechanism through which these septins promote the recruitment of DRP1 to fission sites remains elusive.

The cytoskeleton is required for mitochondrial transport and anchorage

Mitochondrial positioning typically involves immobilisation of mitochondria at specific sites by attachment to either the cytoskeleton or membranes via anchor proteins. Prior to immobilisation, mitochondria are often actively transported to the sites of anchorage by motor proteins on polar cytoskeletal tracks. In addition to fission–fusion dynamics, regulated positioning plays a central role in maintaining the organisation and functioning of the mitochondrial network.

Dynamic mitochondrial organisation is crucial in highly active cells such as neurons, muscle cells, and secretory cells, and during events with high energy demands such as cell division, migration, injury, and differentiation [27, 29, 9499]. Triggered by intracellular cues, mitochondrial transport and anchorage in concert likely help achieve the required organisation of the mitochondrial network to provide energy that drives these cellular functions and events. Denser populations of mitochondria within a cell maintain elevated ATP to ADP ratios [96]. Thus, mitochondrial positioning shapes energy gradients within the cell to meet localised energy demands. Concurrently, high energy consumption results in increased local ADP levels and facilitates mitochondrial transport to these sites [100]. Similarly, Ca2+-sensing proteins regulate mitochondrial positioning and motility in regions of high Ca2+−signalling activity to buffer calcium levels in the cell.

Actin-based transport of mitochondria is predominantly observed in several plant cells, and some fungi and insects [62, 101, 102]. Microtubule-based movement, on the other hand, is the main mode of mitochondrial transport in cells of protists and animals such as D. discoideum, D. melanogaster, and mammals [56, 60, 103, 104]. In addition to microtubule-based, long-range transport of mitochondria, neurons of several organisms employ actin-based transport for short-range movement and docking of mitochondria at pre-synaptic terminals [47, 48, 105107]. Anchorage of mitochondria is also brought about by association with microtubules and IFs in various organisms. Here, we detail how the cytoskeleton and its associated proteins maintain mitochondrial organisation in the cell by mediating mitochondrial transport and anchorage.

Mitochondria rely on F-actin and associated proteins for their organisation

While most mammalian cells rely on actin filaments for mitochondrial anchorage, actin dynamics has been implicated in the movement of mitochondria during interphase and mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [108, 109]. The myosin type V motor Myo2 associates with mitochondria through adaptor proteins to effect mitochondrial movement on actin cables [110113] (Fig. 3a). Independent of motors, Arp2/3-mediated actin dynamics also aids the transport of mitochondria to the bud [108]. Mitochondrial recruitment of Arp2/3 proteins initiates F-actin assembly to provide forces for transport of mitochondria towards the bud [108, 114116] (Fig. 3a). The plant myosin XI family is closely related to the fungal and metazoan myosin V family, and its members transport mitochondria on F-actin tracks [117, 118]. The unconventional myosin Myo19 has been proposed to play a role in transporting mitochondria on F-actin, as Myo19 overexpression increases mitochondrial velocities [119] (Fig. 3b). Myo19 localises to mitochondria by association with atypical mitochondrial Rho GTPases (Miro proteins), or independently by virtue of the motor’s tail domain [120122].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

F-actin and myosin motors participate in mitochondrial transport and anchoring. a The motor protein Myo2 and Arp2/3-mediated actin dynamics help transport mitochondria into the bud in S. cerevisiae. Mitochondria are additionally tethered along the cortex via anchor proteins. b In addition to the microtubule-based machinery, actin-based motors also participate in mitochondrial distribution. Myo19 associates with mitochondria either directly or via Miro proteins to organise mitochondria at the cell periphery and transport mitochondria on F-actin. Myosin VI is recruited onto mitophagy-destined mitochondria by ubiquitin, in order to isolate damaged mitochondria by triggering the formation of actin-cages around them. c Myosin V and VI have been implicated in activity-dependent anchorage of axonal mitochondria

In addition to mitochondrial transport, Myo19 is likely involved in actin-based mitochondrial docking [119, 123, 124] (Fig. 3b). Myo19 is required to form starvation-induced filopodia in cultured cells, with the motor subsequently localising to mitochondria enriched at these filopodia [123]. Depletion or overexpression of Myo19 causes perinuclear aggregation of mitochondria, indicating a role for Myo19 in organising the mitochondrial network [121]. Metaphase and anaphase organisation of mitochondria is also dependent on Myo19, with loss of Myo19 resulting in failure of cytokinesis [125].

Myosin V and VI possess calmodulin-binding domains and have been proposed to promote mitochondrial docking in mammalian cells as they oppose microtubule-based transport of mitochondria in cultured neurons [106] (Fig. 3c). Additionally, myosin VI motors are recruited to ubiquitin on damaged mitochondria directed for mitophagy by Parkin, via myosin’s ubiquitin-binding domain [126]. These motors in turn trigger the regulated assembly of actin filaments to form cages around the damaged mitochondria, likely to prevent their movement and fusion with other mitochondria [126] (Fig. 3b).

The role of F-actin in maintaining mitochondrial organisation is apparent in neurons and muscle cells. F-actin-mediated anchorage prevents the movement of a third of the stationary axonal mitochondria in neurons [48]. Stimulation of axons with nerve growth factor (NGF) is correlated with mitochondrial transport to NGF foci, and subsequent F-actin-dependent docking of mitochondria [47]. F-actin associated proteins have been implicated in maintaining mitochondrial organisation in fly and worm muscle cells [127129]. Cofilin and regulated Arp2/3 activity are also involved in maintaining mitochondrial arrangement in these cells [129131].

Mitochondria are transported by kinesins and dyneins, and anchored by tether proteins on microtubules

Microtubule plus-end directed transport of mitochondria is enabled by the kinesin-1 (KIF5) family of motor proteins [60]. On the other hand, dyneins drive minus-end directed mitochondrial transport [60]. Adaptor proteins Milton and Miro, first discovered in Drosophila, link these motors to mitochondria to regulate their bidirectional transport on microtubules [132, 133]. Milton interacts with Miro, which localises to the OMM through its single-pass, C-terminal transmembrane domain [104, 134, 135]. The N-terminal coiled-coil domain of Milton interacts with kinesin-1 heavy chain, thereby recruiting the motor to mitochondria by the Miro-Milton association [104].

Vertebrates have two Milton and Miro orthologues each—trafficking kinesin protein (TRAK) 1, TRAK2, and Miro1, Miro2, respectively [60, 136]. In neurons, TRAK1 binds to both kinesin-1 and the motor-adaptor complex dynein–dynactin, and mainly localises to axons [137]. On the other hand, TRAK2 predominantly localises to dendrites and binds to the dynein–dynactin complex as it adopts a conformation which precludes kinesin-1 binding [137]. TRAK2 requires Miro1 to enable minus-end directed transport of mitochondria in fibroblasts, but can also regulate plus-end directed transport in the absence of Miro1 when KIF5C is overexpressed [120]. Interestingly, TRAK1 and TRAK2 localise to mitochondria even in the absence of Miro1 and Miro2 [120].

Miro1 associates with dynein to facilitate redistribution of mitochondria towards the repositioned MTOC in response to immune-cell activation [138]. Miro1 also associates with kinesin-1 to transport mitochondria on astral microtubules to the cytokinetic furrow during late anaphase [103] (Fig. 4a). However, in late cytokinesis, mitochondria are passively transported along growing microtubule tips in a motor-independent process due to the association of Miro with the + TIP protein CENP-F (Fig. 4b) [139, 140]. Mitochondrial localisation of CENP-F is enhanced by the overexpression of Miro1 [140]. Expression of truncated CENP-F defective for mitochondrial localisation increases perinuclear aggregation of mitochondria, indicating a role for the Miro-CENP-F association in distributing mitochondria within the cell [141].

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Role of microtubules and intermediate filaments in the transport and anchorage of mitochondria. a Kinesin-1 transports mitochondria by the Miro-TRAK association on astral microtubules to the cytokinetic furrow during late anaphase. b Miro associates with CENP-F to transport mitochondria along growing microtubule plus-ends during late cytokinesis. c Dendritic mitochondria are predominantly transported on microtubules by the dynein–dynactin motor-adaptor complex which is recruited to mitochondria by the Miro1-TRAK2 association. d Axonal mitochondria are transported by both kinesin-1 and the dynein–dynactin complex, which are recruited to mitochondria predominantly by the Miro1-TRAK1 complex. e Syntabulin is an adaptor protein which recruits kinesin-1 to axonal mitochondria. f MFN1 recruits TRAK proteins to regulate mitochondrial transport on microtubules. g Syntaphilin anchors axonal mitochondria to microtubules in response to elevated Ca2+-levels by inhibiting kinesin-1 activity. h Increased glucose levels inhibit kinesin-1-dependent mitochondrial transport in neurons due to the activity of O-GlcNAc transferase on TRAK proteins. i Neurofilament and vimentin are the intermediate filaments involved in anchoring and organising mitochondria in neurons

Mitochondrial motility in both axons and dendrites is unaltered in the absence of Miro2, but is reduced with the loss of Miro1 [142] (Fig. 4c, d). However, about a third of microtubule-dependent mitochondrial transport is preserved in the absence of both Miro1 and Miro2 [120, 142]. Together, these studies underscore the importance of Miro in regulating bidirectional mitochondrial transport, but also hint at the existence of Miro-independent mechanisms of mitochondrial motility and TRAK recruitment (Fig. 4e, f). So far, these mechanisms have been found to involve kinesin-1 adaptor syntabulin and mitochondrial fusion proteins. Syntabulin associates with mitochondria via its C-terminal domain to regulate mitochondrial organisation in a Miro/TRAK-independent manner [143, 144] (Fig. 4e). Acute loss of syntabulin lowers mitochondrial densities in distal processes, reduces anterograde mitochondrial motility, and impairs synaptic transmissions and presynaptic short-term plasticity in neurons [144, 145].

Co-immunoprecipitation experiments evinced that MFN2 interacts with Miro and TRAK proteins to maintain mitochondrial motility [146]. MFN1 recruits TRAK proteins to mitochondria in fibroblasts lacking Miro proteins [147] (Fig. 4f). Conversely, microtubule-based transport is likely necessary for fission–fusion dynamics of mitochondria [94]. Could the ‘tug-of-war' interaction between kinesin and dynein motors attached to the same mitochondrion lead to opposing forces that constrict the mitochondrion? This constriction could then enable the recruitment of DRP1 to the OMM in a mechanism similar to that of actin-mediated constriction and fission.

Microtubules are not only necessary for long-range transport, but also for activity-dependent anchorage of mitochondria. About two-thirds of axonal mitochondria are immotile and stably associated with microtubules [48, 148, 149]. The microtubule-mitochondria linker protein Mmb1p suppresses microtubule dynamicity and stably tethers mitochondria to microtubules in S. pombe [57]. Microtubules are essential for the maintenance of mitochondrial organisation in human cardiomyocytes [150]. The Ca2+-sensing EF-hand domains of Miro proteins make them particularly important for activity-dependent reorganisation of the mitochondrial network. Mutations in the EF-hand domain of Miro1 result in a loss of activity-dependent anchorage of mitochondria in neuronal and astrocytic processes [151, 152].

Syntaphilin, a microtubule-binding protein, associates with mitochondria through two C-terminal, OMM-targeting domains [149]. Axonal mitochondria are anchored to microtubules by syntaphilin when Ca2+ binding by Miro triggers syntaphilin to bind to KIF5 and displaces the motor from the Miro-TRAK complex [149, 153] (Fig. 4g). Mitochondrial enrichment at growth cones is also dependent on syntaphilin-mediated docking [154]. Demyelinated neurons have more stationary mitochondria docked with syntaphilin, to cope with the increased energy demand associated with the loss of saltatory conduction [155]. Loss of mitochondrial immobilisation in the absence of syntaphilin in these demyelinated neurons increases the likelihood of axonal degeneration [155]. Several non-neuronal tissues express a shorter syntaphilin isoform, called short-syntaphilin (S-SNPH), which localises to mitochondria. Hypoxic stress lowers S-SNPH levels in some cancer cell lines which increases their invasiveness due to abrogation of docking and enhanced mitochondrial trafficking to the cell periphery [156].

Microtubule-dependent mitochondrial organisation is determined by post-translational modifications of tubulin, and microtubule-associated proteins

Microtubule stability, governed by MAPs and post-translational modifications (PTMs) of tubulin, impacts mitochondrial transport and distribution. Other molecules including glucose and cytoskeleton interactors such as ADP-ribosylation factors (ARFs), their activators, and adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), have also been reported to mediate mitochondrial transport by interacting with mitochondrial trafficking complexes [97, 157, 158]. However, in most reported instances, the precise mechanism of transport regulation is yet to be uncovered.

Cortisol-mediated destabilisation of microtubules reduces mitochondrial localisation at the cell periphery though detachment of kinesin-1 from microtubules [159]. MAP7 family members not only stabilise microtubules and recruit kinesin-1 to microtubules in vitro, but are also sufficient to enable kinesin-1-dependent mitochondrial transport in the cell [160, 161]. Stable expression of the longest isoform of human tau, a neuronal, microtubule-stabilising protein, leads to aggregations of mitochondria near the MTOC and reduced mitochondrial transport to the cell periphery [162]. Parkin, an E3 ubiquitin ligase which promotes tubulin degradation and mitophagy, is also a MAP which binds to and stabilises microtubules [163, 164]. Mitochondrial transport is perturbed in the absence of Parkin, and is rescued by treatment with microtubule-stabilising drugs [165].

Mitochondrial transport is additionally affected by mutations and PTMs of tubulin. Motor binding to microtubules is impaired and mitochondrial transport is reduced in cells expressing mutant TUB4A isoforms associated with disorders of the nervous system [166]. Tubulin nitration in microtubules arrests anterograde mitochondrial transport [167]. Hyperglutamylation of tubulin upon loss of cytosolic carboxypeptidase 1 (CCP1) reduces microtubule stability and axonal mitochondrial motility in mice [168]. Other studies found that in the absence of CCP1 or both CCP1 and CCP6, neurons display a ~ 50% reduction in the motile mitochondrial population [169, 170]. Thus, polyglutamylation of tubulin correlates with mitochondrial halting on microtubule tracks.

The ARF family of GTPases is known to regulate vesicular trafficking, phospholipid metabolism, and modulate actin dynamics in the cell [171]. ARF-activators maintain mitochondrial distribution by associating with Miro proteins or by limiting the Miro-TRAK association to inhibit dynein–driven mitochondrial transport towards the MTOC [157, 158]. APC stabilises microtubules and is required for a variety of cellular processes such as spindle formation, cellular migration and chromosome segregation [172]. Cancer-associated mutations hamper the ability of APC to bind to the Miro1/TRAK-2 complex, and reduce the frequency of initiation of anterograde mitochondrial transport [97].

Finally, glucose, a crucial nutrient for ATP generation in cells can dictate mitochondrial organisation. Glucose levels regulate synaptic activity and PTMs of the mitochondrial transport machinery, which in turn affect mitochondrial localisation by reducing motility [173, 174]. Glucose levels also regulate the activity of the enzyme O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) [174]. O-glycosylation of Milton, induced by overexpression of OGT or increased extracellular glucose levels, inhibits bidirectional mitochondrial motility [173]. Furthermore, TRAK1 and TRAK2 are targets of nucleocytoplasmic OGT, which forms a ternary complex with KIF5C and either TRAK [175, 176]. This complex partially limits KIF5C-TRAK1/2-mediated mitochondrial redistribution to the cell periphery [176] (Fig. 4h).

Since microtubules serve as the tracks for a bulk of mitochondrial transport in the cell, it is not unexpected that that microtubule stability impacts mitochondrial transport. To reiterate, destabilisation of microtubules increases mitochondrial fission in S. pombe, mitochondrial fission and fusion proteins are involved in tethering mitochondria to other organelles in the cell, and mitochondrial fusion proteins too regulate mitochondrial transport [17, 27, 147, 177, 178]. These results suggest a close nexus between mitochondrial organisation and dynamics, and the microtubule cytoskeleton, with more diverse functions exhibited by the mitochondrial proteins than suggested by current research. In neurons, shorter mitochondria have been observed to be more motile than longer mitochondria [148, 179]. The close association between the mitochondrial fission/fusion proteins and microtubule-based transport is likely a regulatory mechanism that primes mitochondria for effective delivery to destinations within the cell.

Mitochondrial positioning in muscle cells and neurons is mediated by intermediate filaments and associated proteins

Mitochondria associate with the IFs desmin and vimentin, and the linker protein plectin [64, 73]. Desmin is present at sarcoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria-associated membranes and interacts with several mitochondrial proteins in muscle cells [180]. In the absence of desmin, mitochondria are clumped and disorganised [65, 180]. Depletion or mutations of desmin and desmin-binding proteins plectin and myotubularin are accompanied with aberrant mitochondrial organisation, which results in muscle-degeneration [65, 73, 180184]. Keratin-19 is another IF which promotes proper mitochondrial organisation in muscle cells [67].

Neuronal organisation of mitochondria is dependent on their interactions with IFs vimentin, neurofilament light and associated proteins (Fig. 4i). Vimentin phosphorylation regulates anchorage of mitochondria to these filaments [66, 185, 186]. Vimentin expression, controlled by microRNA-124, regulates mitochondrial localisation and motility in neurons [187]. Complete loss of the IF neurofilament light increases neuronal mitochondrial motility [188, 189]. While, disease linked aggregations of IFs caused due to mutations in neuronal IFs or associated proteins reduce mitochondrial motility [188, 190]. Thus, intermediate filaments anchor mitochondria either by direct interaction or via IF-associated proteins to regulate intracellular mitochondrial organisation.

Mitochondrial function is modulated by the cytoskeleton

The effect of cytoskeletal organisation on mitochondrial dynamics and organisation influences mitochondrial function and thereby impacts cellular health. Based on changes in the cellular milieu, the cytoskeleton and associated proteins position mitochondria at regions where their function is required. Although the interactions of the cytoskeleton with mitochondria have been found to alter mitochondrial function, the molecular mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are largely unknown [191]. In other words, studies that have investigated the effect of cytoskeletal changes on mitochondrial function have gathered correlative evidence. The cytoskeleton influences mitochondrial quality control and turnover, ATP production and calcium homeostasis [192]. These effects have been particularly evident in cells with high energy demands such as neurons and cardiomyocytes, as detailed below. These changes may be caused by the alteration in mitochondrial fission–fusion dynamics, which is caused by the assembly and disassembly of cytoskeletal proteins. Further studies are required to establish the mechanisms that cause these functional changes.

Mitochondrial membrane potential and ROS production are regulated by F-actin

Abrogation of F-actin depolymerisation in budding yeast results in reduced mitochondrial membrane potential, increased ROS production and reduced lifespan, all of which are hallmarks of apoptosis initiated by mitochondria [49, 50]. On the contrary, a mutation which increases F-actin depolymerisation decreases ROS production and thereby increases the mother-cell-specific lifespan of yeast cells [51]. F-actin depolymerisation induced by oxidative stress leads to mitochondrial fission and thereby causes ischemia reperfusion injury in endothelial cells [193].

In neurons, axonal branching is prevented upon inhibition of cellular respiration, but proceeds at regions enriched with stationary mitochondria in the presence of NGF [194]. F-actin-mediated stalling of mitochondria and translational machinery in specific regions of sensory axons leads to ATP production, and consequently local translation of axonal mRNA to synthesize proteins required for axonal guidance [192, 194]. Inhibition of polymerisation of actin associated with mitochondria isolated from mouse brain increases mitochondrial oxygen consumption rate and cytochrome c oxidase activity [195].

Taken together, perturbation of F-actin dynamics increases the production of mitochondrial ROS and thereby induces oxidative stress in cells.

Microtubules and associated proteins alter mitochondrial function

Stationary mitochondria form local sources of ATP, which are critical for various neuronal functions including local protein translation, axonal branching, synaptic transmission, and driving sodium/potassium pump activity [192, 196].

Clusters of mitochondria positioned by microtubules or F-actin provide energy for local protein translation in dendrites during synaptic plasticity [33, 192]. This could affect the memory of an individual because modification of proteins synthesized by local translation during synaptic plasticity drives memory formation [33]. Mitochondria transported along microtubules and immobilised in the axons by F-actin also play a critical role in the translation of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial mRNAs (mtRNAs), with dysfunctional axonal translation triggering neurodegeneration [197]. It has been proposed that mtRNAs hitchhike on moving mitochondria for subcellular trafficking and arrive at stationary mitochondria, where they are translated [198, 199].

In cardiomyocytes, a change in the microtubule arrangement alters mitochondrial organisation, and leads to defects in calcium release upon nanomechanical stimulus [150]. Destabilisation of microtubules by aberrant phosphorylation of MAP4 leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis [200202]. Hypoxia induces the phosphorylation of three key serine residues of MAP4, which leads to its dissociation from tubulin and translocation to mitochondria [203205]. This in turn results in the opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP), mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis [200]. Inhibition of MTUS1 in endothelial cells also increases mitochondrial ROS production [93].

Tubulin interacts with VDAC to regulate channel permeability and thereby control cellular respiration in muscle cells [206]. Dimeric tubulin increases the voltage sensitivity of VDAC in vitro at physiological salt conditions and regulates membrane permeability, limiting the ATP/ADP flux of mitochondria [206]. It has also been hypothesized that the tubulin-VDAC interaction is the molecular basis for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy [207]. In Duchenne muscular dystrophy, low expression of dystrophin, a cytoskeletal protein that binds to tubulin, leads to increased ROS production and reduced mitochondrial Ca2+ levels and thereby affects the ETC in mitochondria [208210].

In all, microtubule destabilisation blocks mitochondrial transport and thereby hampers local protein translation in neurons, which could lead to neurodegeneration. It also possibly induces apoptosis in cardiac muscles and degeneration of skeletal muscles by bringing about mitochondrial defects.

Mitochondrial function and lipid composition are determined by IFs

Several reports indicate that IFs alter mitochondrial positioning and function, particularly in muscle cells [211]. Maximal respiration rates are significantly reduced in the mitochondria of cardiac and soleus muscles of desmin-null mice in situ [65]. Cardiac muscle architecture is severely disrupted, causing muscle degeneration, necrosis and calcification of myocardium in these mice [212]. This results in the development of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and heart failure, which are also characterised by mitochondrial defects [213, 214].

Physical association of mitochondria with vimentin IFs increases mitochondrial membrane potential [66]. Vimentin also reduces the sensitivity of mitochondria to oxidative stress by preventing the formation of mPTP [215]. This is possibly because vimentin interacts with OMM-localised mPTP regulators [215].

Keratin IFs regulate lipid composition in mitochondria, which leads to increased oxygen consumption and ATP production. In keratinocytes lacking type I Keratin (Krt9 through Krt20), expression of proteins belonging to respiratory complexes I and IV is elevated, and the cardiolipin and phosphatidylethanolamine content in the mitochondria is increased [68]. Krt6 or Krt16 null keratinocytes show increased mitochondrial ROS production, decreased mitochondrial membrane potential and reduced mitochondrial respiration [69]. Mutations in Krt6, Krt16 or Krt17 perturb mitochondrial quality control including mitophagy and lysosomal degradation [216].

The cytoskeleton-associated protein plectin also influences mitochondrial function. Loss of plectin leads to degeneration of striated muscles like cardiac and soleus muscles [72]. Cardiac and skeletal muscle cells devoid of plectin isoforms P1b or P1d alter permeability of the OMM, which is evidenced by a decrease in maximal respiration rate [72].

Taken together, mitochondrial association with IFs alters mitochondrial membrane potential, oxygen consumption rate and energy production.

Future perspectives

In summary, the cytoskeleton and associated proteins play a crucial role in regulating mitochondrial dynamics, organisation, and function. While cytoskeletal interactions with mitochondria are well-characterised, the molecular mechanisms underlying these interactions remain elusive in several cases.

As a number of organelles, namely ER, lysosomes and Golgi-derived vesicles have been implicated in mitochondrial fission, it will be interesting to see how the cytoskeleton-dependent positioning of these organelles is co-ordinated to bring about fission [44, 177, 217]. Mechanical forces have been shown to be sufficient to trigger mitochondrial fission [218]. Therefore, the activity of two opposing families of motor proteins attached to a single mitochondrion might also cause mitochondrial constriction and eventual fission.

The intercellular transport of mitochondria via tunnelling nanotubes is also dependent on the cytoskeleton and is observed in a variety of animal tissue systems, typically as a response to cellular stress [61, 219222]. However, the mechanisms and the importance of this transport and its regulation are yet to be uncovered.

The cell cycle proceeds with cytoskeletal reorganisation, which in turn affects mitochondrial anchorage [95, 103, 139]. In the few mitochondrial anchors identified thus far, uncovering how these anchors are spatiotemporally regulated in dividing cells, and if those mechanisms are different in post-mitotic cells like neurons, will further our understanding about mitochondrial positioning and the role of the cytoskeleton in this process.

Disruption of the proper form and functioning of the cytoskeleton correlates with severe health implications including muscle degeneration, heart failure and neurodegeneration [223225]. Changes in mitochondrial morphology, dynamics, motility and function also affect the health of the system [226, 227]. In future, it will be interesting to explore whether a causal relationship exists between cytoskeletal disruption and mitochondrial dysfunction observed in these pathologies.

Acknowledgements

We thank N. A. Tirumala and H. Kumar for constructive comments on the manuscript.

Funding

VA was supported by extramural funding from the Welcome Trust/Department of Biotechnology–India Alliance (grant IA/18/1/503607), the Women Excellence Award from the Science and Engineering Research Board, India, intramural funding from the Indian Institute of Science, and the RI Mazumdar Young Investigator Award.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with the contents of this article.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Kühlbrandt W. Structure and function of mitochondrial membrane protein complexes. BMC Biol. 2015;13:89. doi: 10.1186/s12915-015-0201-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lee JH, Park A, Oh KJ, et al. The role of adipose tissue mitochondria: regulation of mitochondrial function for the treatment of metabolic diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 doi: 10.3390/ijms20194924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Duchen MR. Mitochondria and calcium: from cell signalling to cell death. J Physiol. 2000;529:57–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00057.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Murphy MP. How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species. Biochem J. 2009;417:1–13. doi: 10.1042/BJ20081386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang C, Youle RJ. The role of mitochondria in apoptosis*. Annu Rev Genet. 2009;43:95–118. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang H, Menzies KJ, Auwerx J (2018) The role of mitochondria in stem cell fate and aging. Dev. 145(8):143420. 10.1242/dev.143420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 7.Palade GE. An electron microscope study of the mitochondrial structure. J Histochem Cytochem. 1953;1:188–211. doi: 10.1177/1.4.188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sjostrand FS. Electron microscopy of mitochondria and cytoplasmic double membranes. Nature. 1953;171:30–31. doi: 10.1038/171030a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ernster L, Schatz G. Mitochondria: a historical review. J Cell Biol. 1981;91:227s–255s. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.3.227s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Green DE. The cyclophorase complex of enzymes. Biol Rev. 1951;26:410–453. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1951.tb01205.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schrepfer E, Scorrano L (2016) Mitofusins, from Mitochondria to Metabolism. Molecular Cell. 61: 683-694. 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.02.022 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 12.Pagliuso A, Cossart P, Stavru F. The ever-growing complexity of the mitochondrial fission machinery. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75:355–374. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2603-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liu R, Chan DC. The mitochondrial fssion receptor Mff selectively recruits oligomerized Drp1. Mol Biol Cell. 2015;26:4466–4477. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E15-08-0591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mozdy AD, McCaffery JM, Shaw JM. Dnm1p GTPase-mediated mitochondrial fission is a multi-step process requiring the novel integral membrane component Fis1p. J Cell Biol. 2000;151:367–379. doi: 10.1083/jcb.151.2.367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shen Q, Yamano K, Head BP, et al. Mutations in Fis1 disrupt orderly disposal of defective mitochondria. Mol Biol Cell. 2014;25:145–159. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E13-09-0525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yu R, Jin S, Lendahl U, et al. Human Fis1 regulates mitochondrial dynamics through inhibition of the fusion machinery. EMBO J. 2019 doi: 10.15252/embj.201899748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Iwasawa R, Mahul-Mellier A-L, Datler C, et al. Fis1 and Bap31 bridge the mitochondria-ER interface to establish a platform for apoptosis induction. EMBO J. 2011;30:556–568. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2010.346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Head B, Griparic L, Amiri M, et al. Inducible proteolytic inactivation of OPA1 mediated by the OMA1 protease in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol. 2009;187:959–966. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200906083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mishra P, Carelli V, Manfredi G, Chan DC. Proteolytic cleavage of Opa1 stimulates mitochondrial inner membrane fusion and couples fusion to oxidative phosphorylation. Cell Metab. 2014;19:630–641. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.MacVicar T, Langer T. OPA1 processing in cell death and disease - the long and short of it. J Cell Sci. 2016;129:2297–2306. doi: 10.1242/jcs.159186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ban T, Kohno H, Ishihara T, Ishihara N. Relationship between OPA1 and cardiolipin in mitochondrial inner-membrane fusion. Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2018;1859:951–957. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2018.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Olichon A, Baricault L, Gas N, et al. Loss of OPA1 perturbates the mitochondrial inner membrane structure and integrity, leading to cytochrome c release and apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:7743–7746. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C200677200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ge Y, Shi X, Boopathy S, et al. Two forms of opa1 cooperate to complete fusion of the mitochondrial inner-membrane. Elife. 2020 doi: 10.7554/eLife.50973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tondera D, Czauderna F, Paulick K, et al. The mitochondrial protein MTP18 contributes to mitochondrial fission in mammalian cells. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:3049–3059. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wikstrom JD, Mahdaviani K, Liesa M, et al. Hormone-induced mitochondrial fission is utilized by brown adipocytes as an amplification pathway for energy expenditure. EMBO J. 2014;33:418–436. doi: 10.1002/embj.201385014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Motori E, Puyal J, Toni N, et al. Inflammation-induced alteration of astrocyte mitochondrial dynamics requires autophagy for mitochondrial network maintenance. Cell Metab. 2013;18:844–859. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mehta K, Chacko LA, Chug MK, et al. Association of mitochondria with microtubules inhibits mitochondrial fission by precluding assembly of the fission protein Dnm1. J Biol Chem. 2019;294:3385–3396. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mishra P, Chan DC. Mitochondrial dynamics and inheritance during cell division, development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15:634–646. doi: 10.1038/nrm3877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chacko LA, Mehta K, Ananthanarayanan V. Cortical tethering of mitochondria by the anchor protein Mcp5 enables uniparental inheritance. J Cell Biol. 2019;218:3560–3571. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201901108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chang DTW, Honick AS, Reynolds IJ. Mitochondrial trafficking to synapses in cultured primary cortical neurons. J Neurosci. 2006;26:7035–7045. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1012-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ohno N, Kidd GJ, Mahad D, et al. Myelination and axonal electrical activity modulate the distribution and motility of mitochondria at CNS nodes of Ranvier. J Neurosci. 2011;31:7249–7258. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0095-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rangaraju V, Calloway N, Ryan TA. Activity-driven local ATP synthesis is required for synaptic function. Cell. 2014;156:825–835. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rangaraju V, Lauterbach M, Schuman EM, et al. Spatially stable mitochondrial compartments fuel local translation during plasticity article spatially stable mitochondrial compartments fuel local translation during plasticity. Cell. 2019;176:73–84.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lees RM, Johnson JD, Ashby MC. Presynaptic boutons that contain mitochondria are more stable. Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2020;11:37. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2019.00037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sprenger HG, Langer T. The good and the bad of mitochondrial breakups. Trends Cell Biol. 2019;29:888–900. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2019.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Misgeld T, Schwarz TL. Mitostasis in neurons: maintaining mitochondria in an extended cellular architecture. Neuron. 2017;96:651–666. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.09.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Pollard TD. Regulation of actin filament assembly by Arp2/3 complex and formins. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2007;36:451–477. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.35.040405.101936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vignjevic D, Kojima SI, Aratyn Y, et al. Role of fascin in filopodial protrusion. J Cell Biol. 2006;174:863–875. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200603013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hatch AL, Gurel PS, Higgs HN. Novel roles for actin in mitochondrial fission. J Cell Sci. 2014;127:4549–4560. doi: 10.1242/jcs.153791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wegner A, Isenberg G. 12-fold difference between the critical monomer concentrations of the two ends of actin filaments in physiological salt conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983;80:4922–4925. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.16.4922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pollard TD, Cooper JA. Actin, a central player in cell shape and movement. Science. 2009;326:1208–1212. doi: 10.1126/science.1175862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Heng YW, Koh CG. Actin cytoskeleton dynamics and the cell division cycle. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2010;42:1622–1633. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2010.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lee Sweeney H, Holzbaur ELF. Motor proteins. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2018 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a021931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Friedman JR, Lackner LL, West M, et al. ER tubules mark sites of mitochondrial division. Science. 2011;334:358–362. doi: 10.1126/science.1207385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lee JE, Westrate LM, Wu H, et al. Multiple dynamin family members collaborate to drive mitochondrial division. Nature. 2016;540:139–143. doi: 10.1038/nature20555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ji WK, Hatch AL, Merrill RA, et al. Actin filaments target the oligomeric maturation of the dynamin GTPase Drp1 to mitochondrial fission sites. Elife. 2015 doi: 10.7554/eLife.11553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chada SR, Hollenbeck PJ. Nerve growth factor signaling regulates motility and docking of axonal mitochondria. Curr Biol. 2004;14:1272–1276. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gutnick A, Banghart MR, West ER, Schwarz TL. The light-sensitive dimerizer zapalog reveals distinct modes of immobilization for axonal mitochondria. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21:768–777. doi: 10.1038/s41556-019-0317-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Boldogh IR, Pon LA. Interactions of mitochondria with the actin cytoskeleton. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1763:450–462. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gourlay CW, Carpp LN, Timpson P, et al. A role for the actin cytoskeleton in cell death and aging in yeast. J Cell Biol. 2004;164:803–809. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200310148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Breitenbach M, Laun P, Gimona M. The actin cytoskeleton, RAS-cAMP signaling and mitochondrial ROS in yeast apoptosis. Trends Cell Biol. 2005;15:637–639. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Korobova F, Gauvin TJ, Higgs HN. A role for myosin II in mammalian mitochondrial fission. Curr Biol. 2014;24:409–414. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Franker MAM, Hoogenraad CC. Microtubule-based transport -basic mechanisms, traffic rules and role in neurological pathogenesis. J Cell Sci. 2013;126:2319–2329. doi: 10.1242/jcs.115030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Forth S, Kapoor TM. The mechanics of microtubule networks in cell division. J Cell Biol. 2017;216:1525–1531. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201612064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tolić-Nørrelykke IM (2008) Push-me-pull-you: How microtubules organize the cell interior. Eur Biophys J 37:1271–1278. 10.1007/s00249-008-0321-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 56.Woods LC, Berbusse GW, Naylor K. Microtubules are essential for mitochondrial dynamics-fission, fusion, and motility-in Dictyostelium discoideum. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2016 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2016.00019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Fu C, Jain D, Costa J, et al. mmb1p binds mitochondria to dynamic microtubules. Curr Biol. 2011;21:1431–1439. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.07.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Li T, Zheng F, Cheung M, et al. Fission yeast mitochondria are distributed by dynamic microtubules in a motor-independent manner. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11023. doi: 10.1038/srep11023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Jourdain I, Gachet Y, Hyams JS. The dynamin related protein Dnm1 fragments mitochondria in a microtubule-dependent manner during the fission yeast cell cycle. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2009;66:509–523. doi: 10.1002/cm.20351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Melkov A, Abdu U. Regulation of long-distance transport of mitochondria along microtubules. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2018;75:163–176. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2590-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Shen J, Zhang J-H, Xiao H, et al. Mitochondria are transported along microtubules in membrane nanotubes to rescue distressed cardiomyocytes from apoptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:81. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0145-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hermann GJ, Shaw JM. Mitochondrial dynamics in yeast. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 1998;14:265–303. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.14.1.265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Schwarz N, Leube R. Intermediate filaments as organizers of cellular space: how they affect mitochondrial structure and function. Cells. 2016;5:30. doi: 10.3390/cells5030030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Tang HL, Lung HL, Wu KC, et al. Vimentin supports mitochondrial morphology and organization. Biochem J. 2008;146:141–146. doi: 10.1042/BJ20071072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Milner DJ, Mavroidis M, Weisleder N, Capetanaki Y. Desmin cytoskeleton linked to muscle mitochondrial distribution and respiratory function. J Cell Biol. 2000;150:1283–1297. doi: 10.1083/jcb.150.6.1283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Chernoivanenko IS, Matveeva EA, Gelfand VI, Goldman RD. Mitochondrial membrane potential is regulated by vimentin intermediate filaments. FASEB J. 2015;29:820–827. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-259903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Stone MR, O'Neill A, Lovering RM, et al. Absence of keratin 19 in mice causes skeletal myopathy with mitochondrial and sarcolemmal reorganization. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:3999–4008. doi: 10.1242/jcs.009241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kumar V, Bouameur JE, Bär J, et al. A keratin scaffold regulates epidermal barrier formation, mitochondrial lipid composition, and activity. J Cell Biol. 2015;211:1057–1075. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201404147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Steen K, Chen D, Wang F, et al (2019) A role for keratins in supporting mitochondrial organization and function in skin keratinocytes. Mol Biol Cell 31:1103-1111. 10.1091/mbc.E19-10-0565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 70.Wiche G. Role of plectin in cytoskeleton organization and dynamics. J Cell Sci. 1998;111:2477–2486. doi: 10.1242/jcs.111.17.2477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wiche G, Winter L. Plectin isoforms as organizers of intermediate filament cytoarchitecture. Bioarchitecture. 2011;1:14–20. doi: 10.4161/bioa.1.1.14630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Winter L, Kuznetsov AV, Grimm M, et al. Plectin isoform P1b and P1d deficiencies differentially affect mitochondrial morphology and function in skeletal muscle. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24:4530–4544. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Reipert S, Steinböck F, Fischer I, et al. Association of mitochondria with plectin and desmin intermediate filaments in striated muscle. Exp Cell Res. 1999;252:479–491. doi: 10.1006/excr.1999.4626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mostowy S, Cossart P. Septins: the fourth component of the cytoskeleton. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13:183–194. doi: 10.1038/nrm3284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Pagliuso A, Tham TN, Stevens JK, et al. A role for septin 2 in Drp1-mediated mitochondrial fission. EMBO Rep. 2016;17:858–873. doi: 10.15252/embr.201541612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Twig G, Shirihai OS. The interplay between mitochondrial dynamics and mitophagy. Antioxidants Redox Signal. 2011;14:1939–1951. doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lieber T, Jeedigunta SP, Palozzi JM, et al. Mitochondrial fragmentation drives selective removal of deleterious mtDNA in the germline. Nature. 2019;570:380–384. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1213-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Chen H, Vermulst M, Wang YE, et al. Mitochondrial fusion is required for mtdna stability in skeletal muscle and tolerance of mtDNA mutations. Cell. 2010;141:280–289. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Smirnova E, Griparic L, Shurland DL, Van der Bliek AM. Dynamin-related protein Drp1 is required for mitochondrial division in mammalian cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2001;12:2245–2256. doi: 10.1091/mbc.12.8.2245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Legesse-Miller A, Massol RH, Kirchhausen T. Constriction and Dnm1p recruitment are distinct processes in mitochondrial fission. Mol Biol Cell. 2003;14:1953–1963. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E02-10-0657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Rehklau K, Hoffmann L, Gurniak CB, et al. Cofilin1-dependent actin dynamics control DRP1-mediated mitochondrial fission. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e3063. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Li S, Xu S, Roelofs BA, et al. Transient assembly of F-actin on the outer mitochondrial membrane contributes to mitochondrial fission. J Cell Biol. 2015;208:109–123. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201404050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Korobova F, Ramabhadran V, Higgs HN. An actin-dependent step in mitochondrial fission mediated by the ER-associated formin INF2. Science. 2013;339:464–467. doi: 10.1126/science.1228360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Manor U, Bartholomew S, Golani G, et al. A mitochondria-anchored isoform of the actin-nucleating spire protein regulates mitochondrial division. Elife. 2015 doi: 10.7554/eLife.08828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Curchoe CL, Manor U. Actin cytoskeleton-mediated constriction of membrane organelles via endoplasmic reticulum scaffolding. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2017;3:2727–2732. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Almutawa W, Smith C, Sabouny R, et al. The R941L mutation in MYH14 disrupts mitochondrial fission and associates with peripheral neuropathy. EBioMedicine. 2019;45:379–392. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.06.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Chakrabarti R, Ji WK, Stan RV, et al. INF2-mediated actin polymerization at the ER stimulates mitochondrial calcium uptake, inner membrane constriction, and division. J Cell Biol. 2018;217:251–268. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201709111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Moore AS, Wong YC, Simpson CL, Holzbaur ELF. Dynamic actin cycling through mitochondrial subpopulations locally regulates the fission-fusion balance within mitochondrial networks. Nat Commun. 2016;7:1–13. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Lewis MR, Lewis WH. Mitochondria (and other cytoplasmic structures) in tissue cultures. Am J Anat. 1915;17:339–401. doi: 10.1002/aja.1000170304. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Martz D, Lasek RJ, Brady ST, Allen RD. Mitochondrial motility in axons: Membranous organelles may interact with the force generating system through multiple surface binding sites. Cell Motil. 1984;4:89–101. doi: 10.1002/cm.970040203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Carré M, André N, Carles G, et al. Tubulin is an inherent component of mitochondrial membranes that interacts with the voltage-dependent anion channel. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:33664–33669. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203834200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ligon LA, Steward O. Role of microtubules and actin filaments in the movement of mitochondria in the axons and dendrites of cultured hippocampal neurons. J Comp Neurol. 2000;427:351–361. doi: 10.1002/1096-9861(20001120)427:3<351::AID-CNE3>3.0.CO;2-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Wang Y, Huang Y, Liu Y, et al. Microtubule associated tumor suppressor 1 interacts with mitofusins to regulate mitochondrial morphology in endothelial cells. FASEB J. 2018;32:4504–4518. doi: 10.1096/fj.201701143RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Porat-Shliom N, Harding OJ, Malec L, et al. mitochondrial populations exhibit differential dynamic responses to increased energy demand during exocytosis in vivo. iScience. 2019;11:440–449. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2018.12.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Chung JY-M, Steen JA, Schwarz TL. Phosphorylation-induced motor shedding is required at mitosis for proper distribution and passive inheritance of mitochondria. Cell Rep. 2016;16:2142–2155. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.07.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Schuler M-H, Lewandowska A, Di CG, et al. Miro1-mediated mitochondrial positioning shapes intracellular energy gradients required for cell migration. Mol Biol Cell. 2017;28:2159–2169. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e16-10-0741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Mills KM, Brocardo MG, Henderson BR. APC binds the Miro/Milton motor complex to stimulate transport of mitochondria to the plasma membrane. Mol Biol Cell. 2015;27:466–482. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e15-09-0632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Zhou B, Yu P, Lin M-Y, et al. Facilitation of axon regeneration by enhancing mitochondrial transport and rescuing energy deficits. J Cell Biol. 2016;214:103–119. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201605101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Luchsinger LL, de Almeida MJ, Corrigan DJ, et al. Mitofusin 2 maintains haematopoietic stem cells with extensive lymphoid potential. Nature. 2016;529:528–531. doi: 10.1038/nature16500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Mironov SL. ADP regulates movements of mitochondria in neurons. Biophys J. 2007;92:2944–2952. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.092981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Van Gestel K, Köhler RH, Verbelen J. Plant mitochondria move on F-actin, but their positioning in the cortical cytoplasm depends on both F-actin and microtubules. J Exp Bot. 2002;53:659–667. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/53.369.659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Sturmer K, Baumann O, Walz B. Actin-dependent light-induced translocation of mitochondria and ER cisternae in the photoreceptor cells of the locust Schistocerca gregaria. J Cell Sci. 1995;108:2273–2283. doi: 10.1242/jcs.108.6.2273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Lawrence EJ, Boucher E, Mandato CA. Mitochondria-cytoskeleton associations in mammalian cytokinesis. Cell Div. 2016;11:3. doi: 10.1186/s13008-016-0015-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Glater EE, Megeath LJ, Stowers RS, Schwarz TL. Axonal transport of mitochondria requires milton to recruit kinesin heavy chain and is light chain independent. J Cell Biol. 2006;173:545–557. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200601067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Morris RL, Hollenbeck PJ. Axonal transport of mitochondria along microtubules and F-actin in living vertebrate neurons. J Cell Biol. 1995;131:1315–1326. doi: 10.1083/jcb.131.5.1315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Pathak D, Sepp KJ, Hollenbeck PJ. Evidence that myosin activity opposes microtubule-based axonal transport of mitochondria. J Neurosci. 2010;30:8984–8992. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1621-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Venkatesh K, Mathew A, Koushika SP. Role of actin in organelle trafficking in neurons. Cytoskeleton. 2020;77:97–109. doi: 10.1002/cm.21580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Boldogh IR, Yang HC, Dan Nowakowski W, et al. Arp2/3 complex and actin dynamics are required for actin-based mitochondrial motility in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:3162–3167. doi: 10.1073/pnas.051494698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Senning EN, Marcus AH. Actin polymerization driven mitochondrial transport in mating S cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107:721–725. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908338107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Itoh T, Watabe A, Toh-E A, Matsui Y. Complex formation with Ypt11p, a rab-type small GTPase, is essential to facilitate the function of Myo2p, a class V myosin, in mitochondrial distribution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22:7744–7757. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.22.7744-7757.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Itoh T, Toh-E A, Matsui Y. Mmr1p is a mitochondrial factor for Myo2p-dependent inheritance of mitochondria in the budding yeast. EMBO J. 2004;23:2520–2530. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Altmann K, Frank M, Neumann D, et al. The class V myosin motor protein, Myo2, plays a major role in mitochondrial motility in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol. 2008;181:119–130. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200709099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Lewandowska A, MacFarlane J, Shaw JM. Mitochondrial association, protein phosphorylation, and degradation regulate the availability of the active Rab GTPase Ypt11 for mitochondrial inheritance. Mol Biol Cell. 2013;24:1185–1195. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E12-12-0848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Fehrenbacher KL, Boldogh IR, Pon LA. A role for Jsn1p in recruiting the Arp2/3 complex to mitochondria in budding yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:5094–5102. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-06-0590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Fehrenbacher KL, Yang HC, Gay AC, et al. Live cell imaging of mitochondrial movement along actin cables in budding yeast. Curr Biol. 2004;14:1996–2004. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.García-Rodríguez LJ, Gay AC, Pon LA. Puf3p, a Pumilio family RNA binding protein, localizes to mitochondria and regulates mitochondrial biogenesis and motility in budding yeast. J Cell Biol. 2007;176:197–207. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200606054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Haraguchi T, Ito K, Duan Z, et al. Functional diversity of class XI myosins in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018;59:2268–2277. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcy147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Peremyslov VV, Prokhnevsky AI, Avisar D, Dolja VV. Two class XI myosins function in organelle trafficking and root hair development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2008;146:1109–1116. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.113654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Quintero OA, DiVito MM, Adikes RC, et al. Human Myo19 is a novel myosin that associates with mitochondria. Curr Biol. 2009;19:2008–2013. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.10.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.López-Doménech G, Covill-Cooke C, Ivankovic D, et al. Miro proteins coordinate microtubule- and actin-dependent mitochondrial transport and distribution. EMBO J. 2018;37:321–336. doi: 10.15252/embj.201696380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Oeding SJ, Majstrowicz K, Hu X-P, et al. Identification of Miro1 and Miro2 as mitochondrial receptors for myosin XIX. J Cell Sci. 2018 doi: 10.1242/jcs.219469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Bocanegra JL, Fujita BM, Melton NR, et al. The MyMOMA domain of MYO19 encodes for distinct Miro-dependent and Miro-independent mechanisms of interaction with mitochondrial membranes. Cytoskeleton. 2020;77:149–166. doi: 10.1002/cm.21560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Shneyer BI, Ušaj M, Henn A. Myo19 is an outer mitochondrial membrane motor and effector of starvation-induced filopodia. J Cell Sci. 2016;129:543–556. doi: 10.1242/jcs.175349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Hawthorne JL, Mehta PR, Singh PP, et al. Positively charged residues within the MYO19 MyMOMA domain are essential for proper localization of MYO19 to the mitochondrial outer membrane. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 2016;73:286–299. doi: 10.1002/cm.21305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Rohn JL, Patel JV, Neumann B, et al. Myo19 ensures symmetric partitioning of mitochondria and coupling of mitochondrial segregation to cell division. Curr Biol. 2014;24:2598–2605. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Kruppa AJ, Kishi-Itakura C, Masters TA, et al. Myosin VI-dependent actin cages encapsulate parkin-positive damaged mitochondria. Dev Cell. 2018;44:484–499.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Elhanany-Tamir H, Yu YV, Shnayder M, et al. Organelle positioning in muscles requires cooperation between two KASH proteins and microtubules. J Cell Biol. 2012;198:833–846. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201204102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Hedgecock EM, Nichol Thomson J. A gene required for nuclear and mitochondrial attachment in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Cell. 1982;30:321–330. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90038-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Starr DA, Han M. Role of ANC-1 in tethering nuclei to the actin cytoskeleton. Science. 2002;298:406–409. doi: 10.1126/science.1075119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Ono S, Baillie DL, Benian GM. UNC-60B, an ADF/Cofilin family protein, is required for proper assembly of actin into myofibrils in Caenorhabditis elegans body wall muscle. J Cell Biol. 1999;145:491–502. doi: 10.1083/jcb.145.3.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Schultz J, Lee SJ, Cole T, et al. The secreted MSP domain of C. elegans VAPB homolog VPR-1 patterns the adult striated muscle mitochondrial reticulum via SMN-1. J Cell Sci. 2017;130:2175–2186. doi: 10.1242/dev.152025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Russo GJ, Louie K, Wellington A, et al. Drosophila Miro is required for both anterograde and retrograde axonal mitochondrial transport. J Neurosci. 2009;29:5443–5455. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5417-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Melkov A, Baskar R, Alcalay Y, Abdu U. A new mode of mitochondrial transport and polarized sorting regulated by Dynein, Milton and Miro. Development. 2016;143:4203–4213. doi: 10.1242/dev.138289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Fransson Å, Ruusala A, Aspenström P. Atypical Rho GTPases have roles in mitochondrial homeostasis and apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:6495–6502. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M208609200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Giot L, Bader JS, Brouwer C, et al. A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster. Science. 2003;302:1727–1736. doi: 10.1126/science.1090289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Brickley K, Stephenson FA. Trafficking kinesin protein (TRAK)-mediated transport of mitochondria in axons of hippocampal neurons. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:18079–18092. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.236018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.van Spronsen M, Mikhaylova M, Lipka J, et al. TRAK/Milton motor-adaptor proteins steer mitochondrial trafficking to axons and dendrites. Neuron. 2013;77:485–502. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.11.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Morlino G, Barreiro O, Baixauli F, et al. Miro-1 links mitochondria and microtubule dynein motors to control lymphocyte migration and polarity. Mol Cell Biol. 2014;34:1412–1426. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01177-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Kanfer G, Courthéoux T, Peterka M, et al. Mitotic redistribution of the mitochondrial network by Miro and Cenp-F. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8015. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Kanfer G, Peterka M, Arzhanik VK, et al. CENP-F couples cargo to growing and shortening microtubule ends. Mol Biol Cell. 2017;28:2400–2409. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e16-11-0756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Peterka M, Kornmann B. Miro-dependent mitochondrial pool of CENP-F and its farnesylated C-terminal domain are dispensable for normal development in mice. PLOS Genet. 2019;15:e1008050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.López-Doménech G, Higgs NF, Vaccaro V, et al. Loss of dendritic complexity precedes neurodegeneration in a mouse model with disrupted mitochondrial distribution in mature dendrites. Cell Rep. 2016;17:317–327. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Su Q, Cai Q, Gerwin C, et al. Syntabulin is a microtubule-associated protein implicated in syntaxin transport in neurons. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:941–953. doi: 10.1038/ncb1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Cai Q, Gerwin C, Sheng Z-H. Syntabulin-mediated anterograde transport of mitochondria along neuronal processes. J Cell Biol. 2005;170:959–969. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200506042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Ma H, Cai Q, Lu W, et al. KIF5B motor adaptor syntabulin maintains synaptic transmission in sympathetic neurons. J Neurosci. 2009;29:13019–13029. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2517-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Misko A, Jiang S, Wegorzewska I, et al. Mitofusin 2 is necessary for transport of axonal mitochondria and interacts with the Miro/Milton complex. J Neurosci. 2010;30:4232–4240. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6248-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Lee CA, Chin L-S, Li L. Hypertonia-linked protein Trak1 functions with mitofusins to promote mitochondrial tethering and fusion. Protein Cell. 2018;9:693–716. doi: 10.1007/s13238-017-0469-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Misgeld T, Kerschensteiner M, Bareyre FM, et al. Imaging axonal transport of mitochondria in vivo. Nat Methods. 2007;4:559–561. doi: 10.1038/nmeth1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Kang JS, Tian JH, Pan PY, et al. Docking of axonal mitochondria by syntaphilin controls their mobility and affects short-term facilitation. Cell. 2008;132:137–148. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Miragoli M, Sanchez-Alonso JL, Bhargava A, et al. Microtubule-dependent mitochondria alignment regulates calcium release in response to nanomechanical stimulus in heart myocytes. Cell Rep. 2016;14:140–151. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Macaskill AF, Rinholm JE, Twelvetrees AE, et al. Miro1 is a calcium sensor for glutamate receptor-dependent localization of mitochondria at synapses. Neuron. 2009;61:541–555. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Stephen T-L, Higgs NF, Sheehan DF, et al. Miro1 regulates activity-driven positioning of mitochondria within astrocytic processes apposed to synapses to regulate intracellular calcium signaling. J Neurosci. 2015;35:15996–16011. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2068-15.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Chen Y, Sheng Z-H. Kinesin-1-syntaphilin coupling mediates activity-dependent regulation of axonal mitochondrial transport. J Cell Biol. 2013;202:351–364. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201302040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Verreet T, Weaver CJ, Hino H, et al. Syntaphilin-mediated docking of mitochondria at the growth cone is dispensable for axon elongation in vivo. eneuro. 2019;6:ENEURO.0026-19.2019. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0026-19.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Ohno N, Chiang H, Mahad DJ, et al. Mitochondrial immobilization mediated by syntaphilin facilitates survival of demyelinated axons. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111:9953–9958. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1401155111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Caino MC, Seo JH, Wang Y, et al. Syntaphilin controls a mitochondrial rheostat for proliferation-motility decisions in cancer. J Clin Invest. 2017;127:3755–3769. doi: 10.1172/JCI93172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Walch L, Pellier E, Leng W, et al. GBF1 and Arf1 interact with miro and regulate mitochondrial positioning within cells. Sci Rep. 2018;8:17121. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35190-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Onodera Y, Nam J-M, Horikawa M, et al. Arf6-driven cell invasion is intrinsically linked to TRAK1-mediated mitochondrial anterograde trafficking to avoid oxidative catastrophe. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2682. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05087-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Choi GE, Oh JY, Lee HJ, et al. Glucocorticoid-mediated ER-mitochondria contacts reduce AMPA receptor and mitochondria trafficking into cell terminus via microtubule destabilization. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:1137. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-1172-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Hooikaas PJ, Martin M, Mühlethaler T, et al. MAP7 family proteins regulate kinesin-1 recruitment and activation. J Cell Biol. 2019 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201808065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Pan X, Cao Y, Stucchi R, et al. MAP7D2 localizes to the proximal axon and locally promotes kinesin-1-mediated cargo transport into the axon. Cell Rep. 2019;26:1988–1999.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Ebneth A, Godemann R, Stamer K, et al. Overexpression of Tau protein inhibits kinesin-dependent trafficking of vesicles, mitochondria, and endoplasmic reticulum: implications for Alzheimer ’s disease. J Cell Biol. 1998;143:777–794. doi: 10.1083/jcb.143.3.777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Ren Y, Zhao J, Feng J. Parkin binds to α/β tubulin and increases their ubiquitination and degradation. J Neurosci. 2003;23:3316–3324. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-08-03316.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Yang F, Jiang Q, Zhao J, et al. Parkin stabilizes microtubules through strong binding mediated by three independent domains. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:17154–17162. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500843200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Cartelli D, Amadeo A, Calogero AM, et al. Parkin absence accelerates microtubule aging in dopaminergic neurons. Neurobiol Aging. 2018;61:66–74. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Vulinovic F, Krajka V, Hausrat TJ, et al. Motor protein binding and mitochondrial transport are altered by pathogenic TUBB4A variants. Hum Mutat. 2018;39:1901–1915. doi: 10.1002/humu.23602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Stykel MG, Humphries K, Kirby MP, et al. Nitration of microtubules blocks axonal mitochondrial transport in a human pluripotent stem cell model of Parkinson’s disease. FASEB J. 2018;32:5350–5364. doi: 10.1096/fj.201700759RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Gilmore-Hall S, Kuo J, Ward JM, et al. CCP1 promotes mitochondrial fusion and motility to prevent Purkinje cell neuron loss in pcd mice. J Cell Biol. 2019;218:206–219. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201709028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Magiera MM, Bodakuntla S, Žiak J, et al. Excessive tubulin polyglutamylation causes neurodegeneration and perturbs neuronal transport. EMBO J. 2018;37:e100440. doi: 10.15252/embj.2018100440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Bodakuntla S, Schnitzler A, Villablanca C, et al. Tubulin polyglutamylation is a general traffic-control mechanism in hippocampal neurons. J Cell Sci. 2020;133:jcs241802. doi: 10.1242/jcs.241802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Jackson CL, Bouvet S. Arfs at a Glance. J Cell Sci. 2014;127:4103–4109. doi: 10.1242/jcs.144899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Aoki K, Taketo MM. Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC): a multi-functional tumor suppressor gene. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:3327–3335. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Pekkurnaz G, Trinidad JC, Wang X, et al. Glucose regulates mitochondrial motility via Milton modification by O-GlcNAc transferase. Cell. 2014;158:54–68. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Taylor RP, Geisler TS, Chambers JH, McClain DA. Up-regulation of O-GlcNAc transferase with glucose deprivation in HepG2 cells is mediated by decreased hexosamine pathway flux. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:3425–3432. doi: 10.1074/jbc.m803198200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Iyer SPN, Akimoto Y, Hart GW. Identification and cloning of a novel family of coiled-coil domain proteins that interact with O-GlcNAc transferase. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:5399–5409. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209384200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Brickley K, Pozo K, Stephenson FA. N-acetylglucosamine transferase is an integral component of a kinesin-directed mitochondrial trafficking complex. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1813:269–281. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2010.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Wong YC, Ysselstein D, Krainc D. Mitochondria–lysosome contacts regulate mitochondrial fission via RAB7 GTP hydrolysis. Nature. 2018;554:382–386. doi: 10.1038/nature25486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.de Brito OM, Scorrano L. Mitofusin 2 tethers endoplasmic reticulum to mitochondria. Nature. 2008;456:605–610. doi: 10.1038/nature07534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Schwarz TL. Mitochondrial trafficking in neurons. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2013;5:a011304–a011304. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a011304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Diokmetzidou A, Soumaka E, Kloukina I, et al. Desmin and αB-crystallin interplay in the maintenance of mitochondrial homeostasis and cardiomyocyte survival. J Cell Sci. 2016;129:3705–3720. doi: 10.1242/jcs.192203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Winter L, Wittig I, Peeva V, et al. Mutant desmin substantially perturbs mitochondrial morphology, function and maintenance in skeletal muscle tissue. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;132:453–473. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1592-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Hnia K, Tronchère H, Tomczak KK, et al. Myotubularin controls desmin intermediate filament architecture and mitochondrial dynamics in human and mouse skeletal muscle. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:70–85. doi: 10.1172/JCI44021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Smolina N, Khudiakov A, Knyazeva A, et al. Desmin mutations result in mitochondrial dysfunction regardless of their aggregation properties. Biochim Biophys acta Mol basis Dis. 2020;1866:165745. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.165745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Joubert R, Vignaud A, Le M, et al. Site-specific Mtm1 mutagenesis by an AAV-Cre vector reveals that myotubularin is essential in adult muscle. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22:1856–1866. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Matveeva EA, Venkova LS, Chernoivanenko IS, Minin AA. Vimentin is involved in regulation of mitochondrial motility and membrane potential by Rac1. Biol Open. 2015;4:1290–1297. doi: 10.1242/bio.011874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Nekrasova OE, Mendez MG, Chernoivanenko IS, et al. Vimentin intermediate filaments modulate the motility of mitochondria. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22:2282–2289. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-09-0766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Yardeni T, Fine R, Joshi Y, et al. High content image analysis reveals function of miR-124 upstream of Vimentin in regulating motor neuron mitochondria. Sci Rep. 2018;8:59. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17878-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Gentil BJ, Minotti S, Beange M, et al. Normal role of the low-molecular-weight neurofilament protein in mitochondrial dynamics and disruption in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. FASEB J Off Publ Fed Am Soc Exp Biol. 2012;26:1194–1203. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-196345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Perrot R, Julien J-P. Real-time imaging reveals defects of fast axonal transport induced by disorganization of intermediate filaments. FASEB J. 2009;23:3213–3225. doi: 10.1096/fj.09-129585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Israeli E, Dryanovski DI, Schumacker PT, et al. Intermediate filament aggregates cause mitochondrial dysmotility and increase energy demands in giant axonal neuropathy. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25:2143–2157. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Rappaport L, Oliviero P, Samuel JL. Cytoskeleton and mitochondrial morphology and function. Mol Cell Biochem. 1998;184:101–105. doi: 10.1023/A:1006843113166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Mandal A, Drerup CM. Axonal transport and mitochondrial function in neurons. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13:1–11. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Zhou H, Wang J. BI1 alleviates cardiac microvascular ischemia—reperfusion injury via modifying mitochondrial fission and inhibiting XO/ROS/F - actin pathways. J Cell Physiol. 2018 doi: 10.1002/jcp.27308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Spillane M, Ketschek A, Merianda TT, et al. Mitochondria coordinate sites of axon branching through localized intra-axonal protein synthesis. Cell Rep. 2013;5:1564–1575. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.022.Mitochondria. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Takahashi K, Miura Y, Ohsawa I, et al. In vitro rejuvenation of brain mitochondria by the inhibition of actin polymerization. Sci Rep. 2018;8:2–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34006-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Sheng Z-H, Cai Q. Mitochondrial transport in neurons: impact on synaptic homeostasis and neurodegeneration. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13:77–93. doi: 10.1038/nrn3156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Aschrafi A, Kar AN, Gale J, et al. A heterogeneous population of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial mRNAs is present in the axons of primary sympathetic neurons. Mitochondrion. 2016;30:18–23. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2016.06.002.A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Pushpalatha KV, Besse F. Local translation in axons: when membraneless RNP granules meet membrane-bound organelles. Front Mol Biosci. 2019;6:1–12. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2019.00129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Jansen R-P, Niessing D, Baumann S, Feldbrugge M. mRNA transport meets membrane traffic. Trends Genet. 2014;30:408–417. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Hu J, Chu Z, Han J, et al. Phosphorylation-dependent mitochondrial translocation of MAP4 is an early step in hypoxia-induced apoptosis in cardiomyocytes. Cell Death Differ. 2014;5:1–11. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Li L, Zhang Q, Zhang X, et al. Microtubule associated protein 4 phosphorylation leads to pathological cardiac remodeling in mice. EBioMedicine. 2018;37:221–235. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.10.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Li L, Zhang J, Zhang Q, et al. Cardiac proteomics reveals the potential mechanism of microtubule associated mitochondrial dysfunction. Burn Trauma. 2019;7:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s41038-019-0146-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Chu JHZ, Han J. The p38/MAPK pathway regulates microtubule polymerization through phosphorylation of MAP4 and Op18 in hypoxic cells. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2010;67:321–333. doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-0187-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Kitazawa H, Iida J, Uchida A, et al. Ser787 in the proline-rich region of human MAP4 is a critical phosphorylation site that reduces its activity to promote tubulin polymerization. Cell Struct Funct. 2000;25:33–39. doi: 10.1247/csf.25.33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Srsen V, Kitazawa H, Sugita M, et al. Serum dependent phosphoryation of human MAP4 at Ser696 in cultured mammalian cells. Cell Struct Funct. 1999;24:321–327. doi: 10.1247/csf.24.321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Rostovtseva TK, Sheldon KL, Hassanzadeh E, et al. Tubulin binding blocks mitochondrial voltage-dependent anion channel and regulates respiration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:18746–18751. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806303105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Rovini A. Tubulin-VDAC interaction : molecular basis for mitochondrial dysfunction in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Front Physiol. 2019;10:1–8. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Prins KW, Humston JL, Mehta A, et al. Dystrophin is a microtubule-associated protein. J Cell Biol. 2009;186:363–369. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200905048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Kuznetsov AV, Winkler K, Wiedemann FR, et al. Impaired mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in skeletal muscle of the dystrophin-deficient mdx mouse. Mol Cell Biochem. 1998;183:87–96. doi: 10.1023/A:1006868130002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Allen DG, Whitehead NP, Froehner SC. Absence of Dystrophin disrupts skeletal muscle signaling: roles of Ca2+, reactive oxygen species, and nitric oxide in the development of muscular dystrophy. Physiol Rev. 2016;96:253–305. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00007.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Capetanaki Y. Desmin cytoskeleton: a potential regulator of muscle mitochondrial behavior and function. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2002;12:339–348. doi: 10.1016/S1050-1738(02)00184-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Milner DJ, Weitzer G, Tran D, et al. Disruption of muscle architecture and myocardial degeneration in mice lacking desmin. J Cell Biol. 1996;134:1255–1270. doi: 10.1083/jcb.134.5.1255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Capetanaki Y, Bloch RJ, Kouloumenta A, et al. Muscle intermediate filaments and their links to membranes and membranous organelles. Exp Cell Res. 2007;3:2063–2076. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Milne DJ, Taffet GE, Wang X, et al. The absence of desmin leads to cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and cardiac dilation with compromised systolic function. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1999;31:2063–2076. doi: 10.1006/jmcc.1999.1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Matveeva EA, Chernoivanenko IS, Minin AA. Vimentin intermediate filaments protect mitochondria from oxidative stress 1. Biochem Suppl Ser A Membr Cell Biol. 2010;4:471–481. doi: 10.1134/S199074781004001X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Lehmann SM, Leube RE, Schwarz N. Keratin 6a mutations lead to impaired mitochondrial quality control. Br J Dermatol. 2019 doi: 10.1111/bjd.18014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Nagashima S, Tábara L-C, Tilokani L, et al. Golgi-derived PI(4)P-containing vesicles drive late steps of mitochondrial division. Science. 2020;367:1366–1371. doi: 10.1126/science.aax6089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Helle SCJ, Feng Q, Aebersold MJ, et al. Mechanical force induces mitochondrial fission. Elife. 2017;6:e30292. doi: 10.7554/eLife.30292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Dilsizoglu Senol A, Pepe A, Grudina C, et al. Effect of tolytoxin on tunneling nanotube formation and function. Sci Rep. 2019;9:5741. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42161-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Keller KE, Bradley JM, Sun YY, et al. Tunneling nanotubes are novel cellular structures that communicate signals between trabecular meshwork cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58:5298–5307. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-22732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.He K, Shi X, Zhang X, et al. Long-distance intercellular connectivity between cardiomyocytes and cardiofibroblasts mediated by membrane nanotubes. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;92:39–47. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvr189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Burt R, Dey A, Aref S, et al. Activated stromal cells transfer mitochondria to rescue acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells from oxidative stress. Blood. 2019;134:1415–1429. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019001398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Dubey J, Ratnakaran N, Koushika SP. Neurodegeneration and microtubule dynamics: death by a thousand cuts. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:1–15. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Sequeira V, Nijenkamp LLAM, Regan JA, Van Der Velden J. The physiological role of cardiac cytoskeleton and its alterations in heart failure. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1838:700–722. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Clarkson E, Costa CF, Machesky LM. Congenital myopathies: diseases of the actin cytoskeleton. J Pathol. 2004;204:407–417. doi: 10.1002/path.1648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Wang Y, Xu E, Musich PR, Lin F. Mitochondrial dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases and the potential countermeasure. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2019;25:816–824. doi: 10.1111/cns.13116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Siasos G, Tsigkou V, Kosmopoulos M, et al. Mitochondria and cardiovascular diseases—from pathophysiology to treatment. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6:256. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.06.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences: CMLS are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES