Abstract
Macrophages are innate immune cells that contribute to classical immune functions and tissue homeostasis. Ubiquitin-specific protease 2 (USP2) controls cytokine production in macrophages, but its organ-specific roles are still unknown. In this study, we generated myeloid-selective Usp2 knockout (msUsp2KO) mice and specifically explored the roles of testicular macrophage-derived USP2 in reproduction. The msUsp2KO mice exhibited normal macrophage characteristics in various tissues. In the testis, macrophage Usp2 deficiency negligibly affected testicular macrophage subpopulations, spermatogenesis, and testicular organogenesis. However, frozen–thawed sperm derived from msUsp2KO mice exhibited reduced motility, capacitation, and hyperactivation. In addition, macrophage Usp2 ablation led to a decrease in the sperm population exhibiting high intracellular pH, calcium influx, and mitochondrial membrane potential. Interrupted pronuclei formation in eggs was observed when using frozen–thawed sperm from msUsp2KO mice for in vitro fertilization. Administration of granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), whose expression was decreased in testicular macrophages derived from msUsp2KO mice, restored mitochondrial membrane potential and total sperm motility. Our observations demonstrate a distinct role of the deubiquitinating enzyme in organ-specific macrophages that directly affect sperm function.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (10.1007/s00018-020-03683-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: USP, Granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor, Myeloid cells, Capacitation, Male sterility
Introduction
Macrophages belong to the myeloid lineage of hematopoietic cells and have a wide variety of roles in maintaining homeostasis in various tissues [1–3]. Macrophages can be classified based on functional properties and the expression pattern of surface markers. Classically activated M1 macrophages exhibit a proinflammatory phenotype, while alternatively activated M2 macrophages have an anti-inflammatory phenotype, and they are characterized by the surface markers CD206−/CD163−/CD11c+/Ly6chigh/inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)+/arginase− and CD206+/CD163+/CD11c−/Ly6cint/iNOS−/arginase+, respectively [4–6]. In the testis, macrophages comprise one of the major cellular populations in the interstitial regions, almost one-fourth the number of Leydig cells [7]. Most testicular macrophages display the M2-type phenotype and contribute to the maintenance of the immune-privileged tissue environment and the elimination of apoptotic cells [7, 8]. De Falco et al. have demonstrated that testicular macrophages can be categorized into two distinct populations according to location and surface markers [9]. Interstitial macrophages, located adjacent to Leydig cells in the interstitial regions between seminiferous tubules, intensely express colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) and MER receptor tyrosine kinase [9, 10]. In contrast, peritubular macrophages line seminiferous walls and abundantly express major histocompatibility complex class II (MHCII) [9]. Interstitial macrophages are derived from both the yolk sac and bone marrow, while peritubular macrophages are specifically derived from bone marrow [10]. Despite these pioneer studies, the detailed functions of interstitial and peritubular macrophages have not yet been fully elucidated.
In addition to the phagocytosis of cellular debris and foreign substances, macrophages also secrete various humoral factors that modulate immune responses, tissue development, tissue remodeling, and disease progression [11]. In the testis, macrophages participate in steroidogenesis and spermatogenesis, possibly via the production of several mediators. Deprivation of macrophages caused by liposome-entrapped dichloromethylene diphosphonate administration or macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) deficiency can lead to developmental defects in Leydig cells and/or reduced spermatogenesis [12–14]. In addition, the diphtheria-inducible transient deletion of testicular macrophages using the Cx3Cr1-Cre; Rosa-iDTR system resulted in a substantial decrease in the number of spermatogonial precursors [9]. To date, various studies have identified that cytokines mediate signals from testicular macrophages to other gonadal cells (e.g., spermatocytes, Leydig cells, and Sertoli cells), especially in the context of inflammation. For instance, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) from activated testicular macrophages modulate steroidogenesis in Leydig cells and spermatogenic cell differentiation [15, 16]. Other reports have sought to identify the function of testicular macrophage-derived factors in the testis during steady-state. For instance, M-CSF, which stimulates self-renewal of spermatogonial stem cells [17], is expressed in both interstitial and peritubular macrophages, as well as in other cell types, including myoid cells and vascular smooth muscle cells [9]. Moreover, the same report also indicated that testicular macrophages express two essential enzymes for retinoic acid synthesis, namely aldehyde dehydrogenase 1a2 (ALDH1A2) and retinol dehydrogenase 10 (RDH10) [9]. Further, other groups have demonstrated that rat testicular macrophages highly express granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) [18], which has been found to maintain the motility of frozen–thawed sperm [19].
Mammalian fertilization is an intricate process, where male gametes undergo maturation and activation in anatomically distinct locations. Sperm gain the capacity for activation processes in the male genital tract, but the activation processes themselves, namely capacitation, hyperactive motility, and the acrosome reaction, occur in the female genital tract. To perform the well-organized activation process, sperm gain energy from ATP, which is produced by both glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). Therefore, intracellular ATP content can be considered a determinant of sperm activation [20]. OXPHOS has been shown to be responsible for total sperm motility, while glycolysis predominantly contributes to hyperactive progressive motility, capacitation, and the acrosome reaction [20]. Fueled by local glycolytic ATP production in the principal piece, hyperactive sperm are characterized by high amplitude and asymmetrical flagellar bending, with curvilinear motility [20, 21]. Capacitation and hyperactivation are initiated by cholesterol efflux at the plasma membrane, and are followed by intracellular alkalization [22]. Intracellular alkalization opens the CatSper, a sperm-specific calcium channel, which evokes transient calcium ion influx [22]. Moreover, calcium from intracellular organelles has also been postulated to participate in sperm hyperactivation [20–23]. Calcium is necessary for fertilization, as evidenced by a study showing that missense mutations of the CatSper genes result in infertility caused by aberrant sperm activation [23].
Ubiquitination and deubiquitination are reversible processes that affect the digestion and functional modulation of a target protein [24]. The degree of ubiquitination on target proteins is determined by the balance of ubiquitin ligase activity and ubiquitin protease activity. Ubiquitin-specific protease 2 (USP2), which is expressed in a wide variety of cells, has regulatory roles in various cellular functions, such as cell cycle progression [25] and cell death [26, 27]. USP2 has also been postulated to be a key modulator of higher-order functions in mammals, such as the maintenance of energy homeostasis [28–31] and special memory retrieval [32]. Our team and others have previously demonstrated that macrophage USP2 modulates the production of various cytokines [29, 33–35]. In bacterial lipopolysaccharide-activated macrophages, USP2 attenuates the production of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α, by controlling the DNA binding ratio of the homeodomain proteins Oct-1 to Oct-2 to the respective cis-regulating elements of the cytokine gene [34]. In normal culture conditions, USP2 also modulates the production of several chemokines, such as the CC chemokine ligands 2, 4, and 24 in macrophage-like HL-60 cells [29]. These observations imply that USP2 is a regulatory molecule that maintains tissue homeostasis through cytokine production.
USP2 is believed to have a crucial role in spermatogenesis because it is exclusively expressed in late elongating spermatids [36]. In agreement with this idea, a previous report has demonstrated that Usp2 knockout (KO) mice exhibited male sterility, with the Usp2KO sperm displaying severe defects in motility [37]. However, the biological role of USP2 in other testicular cells has not been investigated. In light of the critical role of testicular macrophages in male fertility, we used a myeloid-specific gene knockout mouse model in the present study to evaluate the modulatory roles of macrophage USP2 in testicular function.
Materials and methods
Mice
C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Japan SLC (Hamamatsu, Japan). B6.129P2-Lyzstm1(cre)Ifo (LyzM-Cre) mice and C57BL/6N-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1(CAG−EGFP,tdsRed)Utr/Rbrc (R26GRR) mice were obtained from the RIKEN BioResource Research Center (Tsukuba, Japan) [38, 39]. For the construction of Usp2fl/fl mice, the loxP-Neo-Usp2 exon 3–4-loxP cassette was inserted into the C57BL/6-derived embryonic stem cell genome. R26GRR/LyzM-Cre mice were generated by crossing R26GRR mice with LyzM-Cre mice. For the generation of myeloid-selective Usp2 knockout (msUsp2KO) mice, we first mated Usp2fl/fl mice with LyzM-Cre mice. Subsequently, we crossed Usp2fl/+/LyzM-Cre offspring with Usp2fl/fl mice to generate Usp2fl/fl/LyzM-Cre mice (msUsp2KO). The mice were housed under conventional conditions at 24 ± 2 °C on a 12-h light–dark cycle (lights on from 8:00–20:00) and were given free access to food and water. Male mice aged 8–14 weeks were used for analyses. For tissue sampling, mice were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (200 mg/kg ip) and then killed by cervical dislocation.
Genotyping
The macrophage-abundant peritoneal cell fraction was prepared according to a previous manual [40]. Total RNA isolated with RNAiso plus (Takara Bio, Otsu, Japan) was subjected to reverse transcription using M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manual. Genomic DNA was isolated using the KAPA Mouse Genotyping kit (KAPA Biosystems, Woburn, MA, USA). Subsequently, cDNA and genomic DNA were subjected to PCR analysis using GoTaq (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and the primers as shown in Supplementary Table 1.
Histological analyses
To prepare cryosections, tissues were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde overnight and then immersed in 30% sucrose. The tissues were then embedded in O.C.T. compound (Sakura Finetek, Tokyo, Japan) in liquid nitrogen and sectioned into 14 μm-thick slices. After removing the O.C.T. compound with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), the tissue sections from R26GRR/ LyzM-Cre mice were subjected to microscopic observation using a FV1000 confocal microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
For immunohistochemical staining of the cryosections (Figs. 2d–g, 3a, 7g, and Supplementary Fig. 6), the goat serum-blocked cryosections were reacted with the primary antibodies listed in Supplementary Table 2, followed by incubation with biotin-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA, USA). Subsequently, the sections were reacted with the avidin–peroxidase complex (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan). To detect antigen–antibody reactions, the sections were treated with 0.01% 3,3′-diaminobenzidine and 0.001% hydrogen peroxide in 10 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 7.6) and viewed using a BX-51 microscope connected to the DP27 camera (Olympus).
For immunofluorescent imaging of the cryosections (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Figs.1b–e, 4 and 5), 10% non-immunized goat serum-blocked cryosections were reacted overnight with the primary antibodies listed in Supplementary Table 2 overnight at 4 °C. Subsequently, the sections were reacted with either the Cy3-conjugated anti-rat IgG, Cy5-conjugated anti-rat IgG (Jackson Immunoresearch), or Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at room temperature for 2 h. The nuclei were stained with SYTOX-Green (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The sections were afterward observed using an FV1000 microscope.
For immunohistochemical or immunofluorescent imaging of GM-CSF and macrophage markers in paraffin sections (Fig. 7c, Supplementary Figs. 10a, b, 11a, b, c), tissues were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at 4 °C overnight, embedded in paraffin wax according to the standard procedure, and sectioned at 3 µm. After deparaffinization, the sections were immersed in HistoVT One solution (Nacalai, Kyoto, Japan) at 90 °C for 20 min. To inactivate endogenous peroxidase, some sections were incubated in 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 20 min. The sections were then treated with Blocking One Histo (Nacalai) at room temperature for 10 min and reacted with biotin-conjugated rat anti-mouse F4/80 antibody (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) or rabbit anti-mouse GM-CSF antibody (Abcam) in 0.2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) containing PBS or Can Get Signal immunostain solution (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) at 4 °C overnight. For immunofluorescent detection of GM-CSF and macrophage markers, the sections were treated with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated streptavidin (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and mounted with Prolong Diamond with DAPI (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The sections were viewed using a C2 laser confocal microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). For chromogenic detection of GM-CSF, the GM-CSF antigen–antibody immunocomplex was visualized using the Histofine Simple Stain kit (Nichirei Bioscience), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The chromogenic signal was monitored using a BX50 microscope (Olympus). To determine the specificity of the anti-GM-CSF antibody, we preincubated the antibody with an excess amount of recombinant GM-CSF (GeneTex, Irvine, CA, USA) in Can Get Signal immunostain solution at 4 °C overnight, and then applied the solution to the section as the first antibody.
Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis of macrophage subpopulations
The testicular adherent cell fraction was prepared as previously described [41]. Briefly, the testis was cut into small pieces in a buffer containing 0.4 mg/mL collagenase (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MI, USA) and 6 U/mL DNase I (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) and then incubated under vigorous agitation at 37 °C for 20 min. Cells attached to the dishes were subjected to FACS analysis. Splenocytes were prepared as previously described [42]. The cells were blocked with TruStain FcX (Biolegend) and labeled with the fluorescent dye-conjugated antibodies listed in Supplementary Table 2 at 4 °C for 1 h. After washing with PBS, the cells were monitored using FACSVerse (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). FACS data were further analyzed using FlowJo software (FlowJo, Ashland, OR, USA).
Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis
cDNA was synthesized using M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Nippon Gene). A quantitative PCR was performed with the KAPA SYBR Fast qPCR kit (KAPA Biosystems) using an ECO qPCR system (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The sequences of primers and hydrolysis probes used are listed in Supplementary Table 1. In some experiments, we performed cluster analysis using qRT-PCR data and generated heatmaps using the ClustVis program (https://biit.cs.ut.ee/clustvis/) [43]. Unit variance scaling, but not row centering, was applied to the heatmap rows.
Testosterone concentration
The concentration of testosterone in serum and the testis was measured using a competitive double-antibody enzyme immunoassay that was described in a previous paper, with some modifications for testosterone [44]. Five µL of serum or frozen testis homogenate was diluted with 20 times volume of assay buffer (145 mM NaCl, 40 mM Na2HPO4, 0.1% BSA, pH 7.2). The diluent was then extracted using 20 times volume of diethyl-ether, and reconstituted with 100 µL of the assay buffer. Then, 20 µL samples were incubated with a 50 µL mixture of anti-testosterone-3E-CMO-BSA (FKA102; Cosmo Bio, Tokyo, Japan) and horseradish peroxidase-labeled testosterone (Sigma-Aldrich), in an anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch)-coated 96-well plate, for 16–18 h at 4 °C. After washing with 0.05% Tween 80, the plate was incubated with 150 µL of tetramethylbenzidine solution (1 mM 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine, 5 mM citric acid, 50 mM Na2HPO4, 500 mM urea hydrogen peroxide, 2% dimethyl sulfoxide) for 40 min at 37 °C. The chromogenic reaction was stopped with 50 µL of 4 N H2SO4. Absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a Model550 plate reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The detection limit was 19.5 pg/mL, and the intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 4.8% and 13.0%, respectively.
Preparation of epididymal sperm
Sperm samples were isolated from the epididymis of msUsp2KO mice and Usp2fl/fl mice. In some experiments, recombinant mouse GM-CSF (5 nM; GeneTex) or vehicle (0.4% BSA-containing PBS) was supplemented to the sperm in FERTIUP preincubation medium (Kyudo, Saga, Japan) for 30 min before freezing in liquid nitrogen until use. Before analysis, sperm (~ 5 × 106 per mouse) were incubated in 0.4% BSA-containing HTF medium for 60 min.
Sperm morphology and viability
Sperm were stained with 0.3% eosin Y solution (Muto, Tokyo, Japan) and 0.3% nigrosine solution (Wako) at room temperature for 1 min and smeared on a slide. The stained (dead) sperm were counted using the IX-71 microscope (Olympus); live sperm remained unstained. More than 200 total sperm were counted per individual. Mean sperm viability was calculated as the proportion of live sperm in total sperm from 4–5 mice.
Computer-assisted sperm motility analysis (CASA)
Computer-assisted sperm motility analysis (CASA) was performed as previously described [45]. The freshly isolated or frozen–thawed collected sperm was subjected to an assessment of sperm motility using the SMAS system (DITECT, Tokyo, Japan). The SMAS system automatically calculated several kinetic parameters of the sperm. Sperm moving at more than 25 μm/s were regarded as “progressive motile” sperm. The number of sperm analyzed per sample was at least 300, including immotile sperm. To evaluate hyperactive sperm, we further analyzed the CASA data by K-means clustering, as described in a previous report [45]. Briefly, sperm was classified into four clusters using the K-means method, based on straight-line velocity (VSL) and curvilinear velocity (VCL). Clustering analysis was performed using the JMP14 software package (SAS institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA). The cluster containing sperm with high VCL and low linearity (LIN; determined by VSL/VCL) was defined as the hyperactive sperm cluster.
Chlortetracycline (CTC) assay
Capacitation was evaluated using an established CTC staining method, with minor modifications [46]. Briefly, sperm (5 × 105) from each mouse were prepared in 100 µL of modified Brackett–Oliphant medium and treated with bisbenzimide 33,258 (final concentration, 5 µg/mL) for 3 min. The sperm sample was then layered onto ten times volume of 3% polyvinylpyrrolidone (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS and then centrifuged at 500×g for 5 min. The sperm were resuspended with 20 µL of CTC solution (375 µM CTC, 2.5 mM cysteine, 65 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.8) and fixed with Tris–HCl-buffered (pH 7. 4) 1% paraformaldehyde. The sperm were smeared on a glass slide and viewed using an IX-71 microscope connected to the DP73 camera (Olympus). The heads of non-capacitated sperm were uniformly stained, while capacitated sperm exhibited restricted staining over the post-acrosome region. All reactions were performed at room temperature. A total of 200 sperm per mouse were used for CTC analysis.
Intracellular ATP content
After the sperm (~ 10,000 per mouse) were incubated in 50 µL of HTF medium at 37 °C for 90 min, an equal volume of the ATP measurement solution (Toyo B-Net, Tokyo, Japan) was applied to the sperm culture. After vigorous mixing and further incubation at room temperature for 10 min, the chemiluminescent signal was measured using a Luminescencer JNRII plate reader (Atto, Tokyo, Japan).
Intracellular glucose and lactate assays
Frozen–thawed sperm (~ 5 × 106 sperm per mouse) were incubated in 50 µL of HTF medium for 30 min. The sperm (25,000 per each sample) were then resuspended in 0.1% Triton X-100 containing 0.3 mL of water and centrifuged at 15,000×g for 10 min at 4 °C. Intracellular glucose and lactate content were determined from the resulting supernatant, using glucose and lactate assay kits (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan). Absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a VICTOR Nivo multimode microplate reader (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA).
FACS analysis of sperm
To detect mitochondrial membrane potential, the sperm (1 × 105 sperm per mouse) were stained with tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester (TMRM; 20 nM; Setaresh Biotech, Eugene, OR, USA). The intracellular pH and calcium ion levels of the sperm were evaluated using the respective chemical probes, BCECM-AM (3 μM; Dojindo) and Calbryte-520AM (10 μg/mL; AAT Bioquest, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). After pre-culture in HTF medium at 37 °C for 30 min, the sperm were stained with one of the aforementioned dyes at 37 °C for 15 min. After excluding the dead sperm with 7-amino-actinomycin D staining (Biolegend), the fluorescence signals of ~ 25,000 live sperm were monitored using FACSVerse (BD Biosciences).
In vitro fertilization (IVF)
Ova were isolated from adult female C57BL/6 mice (SLC) that were pre-treated with 7.5U pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (Asuka Animal Health, Tokyo, Japan) and 7.5U human chorionic gonadotropin (Asuka Animal Health). The sperm were introduced into the ~ 60 ovum suspension at 4 × 105 total live sperm/mL. After 4 h of incubation in HTF medium or PBS at 37 °C, the ova were transferred to a potassium simplex-optimized medium supplemented with 4 mg/mL BSA and further incubated for up to 1 day. The ova were observed using an IX71 microscope.
Immunocytochemistry and quantitative-fluorescent in situ hybridization (Q-FISH) analyses
The testis or epididymis was cut into small pieces and treated with collagenase (2 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich) and DNase I (4 U/mL, New England Biolab) in Tyrode solution at 37 °C for 20 min with vigorous mixing. The cell suspension was filtered with a cell strainer (BD Biosciences), applied to three times the volume of NycoPrep 1.077 (Axis-Shield, Oslo, Denmark), and then centrifuged at 2500×g for 25 min. The interphase was collected and washed extensively with PBS. The cells (~ 50,000 per mouse) were resuspended in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 10% FCS and then added to a well of a Biocoat fibronectin-coated high content imaging plate (Corning, Bedford, MA, USA). After incubation at 37 °C for 24 h, floating cells were removed by extensive washing with RPMI1640 medium. The remaining cells were subjected to immunocytochemistry and/or Q-FISH analyses.
For immunocytochemistry, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS at room temperature for 10 min, and then treated with 0.3% Triton X in PBS for 15 min. The cells were then labeled with rabbit anti-mouse/human GM-CSF antibody (Abcam, 1/200-fold dilution) and biotinylated rat anti-mouse/human CD11b antibody (Biolegend, 1/200-fold dilution) at room temperature overnight. After washing with PBS, the immunocomplexes were visualized with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (Abcam, 1/1,000-fold dilution) and Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated streptavidin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 1/1,000-fold dilution) at room temperature for 1 h. Fluorescent images were captured using a Nikon C2 laser confocal microscope and analyzed using ImageJ software [47].
Q-FISH analysis was performed using the ViewRNA Cell assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), using synthetic probes for Csf2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After the Q-FISH reaction, the sections were further subjected to immunofluorescent staining as described above, with anti-CD11b antibodies. To quantify Csf2 expression, the number of CD11b+ cells was counted in > 10 microscope fields of 60 × magnification per sample. Then, the number of dots representing Csf2 mRNA was counted, and the ratios of Csf2 mRNA signals per CD11b+ cells were calculated. More than 100 CD11b+ cells per mouse were analyzed.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using either Student’s t test or one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey’s test, in the KaleidaGraph software package (Hulinks, Tokyo, Japan).
Results
Myeloid-selective Usp2 knockout does not vitally affect macrophage subpopulations in the testis
To evaluate whether the myeloid-selective LyzM promoter selectively drives macrophages of the testis, we crossed LyzM-Cre mice with R26GRR reporter mice. Cells from the myeloid lineage in the R26GRR/LyzM-Cre mice exhibited red fluorescence, while all other cells had green fluorescence (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Red fluorescent signals were observed in macrophage-like cells in the spleen, lung, jejunum, mesenteric lymph node, and liver (Supplementary Fig. 1b, c). In the testis, red fluorescent cells were observed in the interstitial and peritubular regions, where macrophages are known to be localized (Supplementary Fig. 1d). Most red fluorescent cells expressed the mouse macrophage marker F4/80, and red fluorescent signals were absent in other cell types, including Leydig cells, Sertoli cells, and the male germinative cell lineage. Similar findings were obtained in the epididymis; red fluorescence co-localized in F4/80+ myeloid cells, which extruded processes from the peritubular region to the apical region (Supplementary Fig. 1e). After establishing that the LyzM promoter is exclusively activated in testicular macrophages, we next obtained myeloid-selective Usp2KO (msUsp2KO) mice by crossing LyzM-Cre mice with Usp2fl/fl mice, and then crossing the Usp2fl/+/LyzM-Cre offspring with Usp2fl/fl mice (Fig. 1a). Cre was selectively expressed in the testis and the peritoneal macrophages in msUsp2KO mice, but not Usp2fl/fl mice (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Genomic PCR confirmed that the deletion of exons 3 and 4 of the Usp2 gene occurred in the testis and in peritoneal macrophages of msUsp2KO mice, but not in Usp2fl/fl mice (Supplementary Fig. 2b).
Since macrophages can be classified by surface marker patterns, we characterized the testicular macrophages derived from msUsp2KO mice. As shown in Fig. 1b, the proportion of F4/80+, CD11b+ macrophages in msUsp2KO mice was almost identical to that in Usp2fl/fl mice (Fig. 1b). Similarly, the proportion of F4/80+, CD11b+ macrophages was not modified in the spleen of msUsp2KO mice (Supplementary Fig. 3a). On the other hand, F4/80+, CD11b+ macrophages were slightly increased in the peritoneal cavity of msUsp2KO mice (Supplementary Fig. 3b). Usp2 deficiency did not substantially affect localization of F4/80+ macrophages in the spleen, liver, mesenteric lymph nodes, and intestine (Supplementary Fig. 4a–d).
Since the immunosuppressive M2 macrophage population is dominant in the testis [7], we examined the M1/M2 subclassification of the macrophages using FACS. In the testis of Usp2fl/fl mice, a large population of F4/80+, CD11b+ cells were Ly6cint, CD206+ M2-like macrophages (Fig. 1c). A similar proportion of Ly6cint, CD206+ cells were also observed in msUsp2KO mice. On the other hand, the proportion of Ly6chigh, CD206− M1-like macrophages in the population of F4/80+, CD11b+ cells was remarkably low (~ 0.6%) in both Usp2fl/fl mice and msUsp2KO mice, although this proportion was slightly smaller in msUsp2KO mice than in Usp2fl/fl mice. Therefore, Usp2 deficiency does not practically affect the dominance of M2 macrophages in the testis. Additionally, the ratio of M1 to M2 macrophages was not influenced by macrophage-selective Usp2 deficiency in the spleen and peritoneal cavity (Supplementary Fig. 3c, d). Thus, USP2 does not determine the direction of M1 and M2 predominance in the tissues, including the testis.
Because testicular macrophages can be classified into two subpopulations based on localization [9], we measured the proportion of interstitial and peritubular macrophages. Histological analysis demonstrated that interstitial and peritubular macrophages could be observed in both msUsp2KO mice and Usp2fl/fl mice (Fig. 1d). The presence of interstitial and peritubular macrophages in the testis of both strains was further confirmed with the detection of CSF1R+ cells and MHCII+ cells in the respective areas (Supplementary Fig. 5). A similar proportion of interstitial CSF1R+ MHCII− and peritubular CSF1R− MHCII+ macrophages were observed in the msUsp2KO mice and Usp2fl/fl mice (Fig. 1e). Thus, Usp2 deficiency does not affect the testicular macrophage subpopulations.
Testicular macrophage USP2 does not affect the structure of the testis
Because testicular macrophages are crucial for the organogenesis of testis [12], we assessed the effect of macrophage Usp2KO on testicular morphology. As shown in Fig. 2a, b, the size and weight of the testis were hardly distinguishable between msUsp2KO mice and Usp2fl/fl mice. Additionally, msUsp2KO mice did not show alterations in the outer diameter and wall thickness of seminiferous tubes, both of which are indices for spermatogenesis (Fig. 2c). We further assessed the number and localization of several testicular cells using immunohistochemical techniques. An intense Ki67 immunological signal was evident in the spermatogonia and primary spermatocytes of Usp2fl/fl mice (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 6). A similar staining pattern of Ki67 was also observed in msUsp2KO mice. Moreover, msUsp2KO mice did not show any morphological changes in DEAD-box helicase (DDX) 4-positive spermatocytes compared to Usp2fl/fl mice (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Fig. 6). Similarly, monocarboxylate transporter (MCT) 1-positive Leydig cells and sex-determining region Y-box transcription factor (Sox) 9-positive Sertoli cells showed a principally similar staining pattern in msUsp2KO mice and Usp2fl/fl mice (Figs. 2f, g and Supplementary Fig. 6). Taken together, macrophage USP2 has been shown to be dispensable for spermatogenesis and testicular organogenesis.
Testicular macrophage USP2 does not modulate testosterone and retinoic acid synthesis
Although msUsp2KO mice did not manifest changes in the number of Leydig cells (Fig. 2f), Usp2 ablation in testicular macrophages might affect testosterone signal. In mice, 3-β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD3B) 1 and 6 are key enzymes of testosterone production. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 7a-(i), the gene expression of Hsd3b1and Hsd3b6 was not influenced in msUsp2KO mice. Accordingly, blood and testicular testosterone levels were negligibly affected in msUsp2KO mice (Supplementary Fig. 7b). Moreover, msUsp2KO mice did not manifest changes in the expression of the luteinizing hormone receptor (Lhcgr) and androgen receptor (Ar), which were a releasing stimulant and a testosterone receptor in the testis, respectively [Supplementary Fig. 7a-(ii)].
Numerous studies have shown that retinoic acid, which has been postulated to be produced in testicular macrophages [9], plays a crucial role in spermatogenesis [48]. Thus, we measured the level of Aldh1a2 and Rdh10 expression, both of which encode enzymes involved in retinoic acid synthesis. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 7a-(iii), no changes in Aldh1a1 or Rdh10 expression were observed in the testis of msUsp2KO mice. There were also no differences in the level of retinoic acid 8 (Stra8) expression, a typical retinoic acid-responsive gene [49], in the testis between msUsp2KO mice and Usp2fl/fl mice [Supplementary Fig. 7a-(iv)]. Taken together, macrophage USP2 does not have a significant impact on testosterone or retinoic acid synthesis in the testis.
Testicular macrophage USP2 did not affect the morphology, viability, motility, and capacitation of freshly isolated sperm
We next studied the characteristics of mature sperm in msUsp2KO mice. As shown in Fig. 3a, b, the morphology of sperm in the testis and epididymis was not different between msUsp2KO mice and Usp2fl/fl mice. Moreover, the density of the epididymal sperm in msUsp2KO mice was almost identical to that of Usp2fl/fl mice (Fig. 3c). Similarly, sperm viability was barely modified in msUsp2KO mice (Fig. 3d). Thus, macrophage USP2 was not a prerequisite for the generation, viability, and morphogenesis of sperm.
A previous study demonstrated that Usp2KO mice exhibited decreased sperm motility [37]. We therefore assessed sperm motility in msUsp2KO mice and Usp2fl/fl mice, and found no differences in the proportion of total motile sperm in msUsp2KO mice compared to Usp2fl/fl mice (Fig. 3e). Moreover, progressive motility, which is characterized by markedly fast rectilinear motility and hyperactive curvilinear motility, was observed in the msUsp2KO mice (Fig. 3f). After sperm preincubation in PBS instead of HTF medium, macrophage-selective Usp2 deficiency did not influence total and progressive motility of sperm (data not shown). We further performed CTC staining to examine the rate of sperm capacitation. Capacitated sperm showed scarce staining in the postacrosomal area (Fig. 3g). We found that capacitation in msUsp2KO mouse sperm was comparable to that of Usp2fl/fl mouse sperm. Collectively, macrophage USP2 does not influence the morphology, viability, motility, and hyperactivation of freshly isolated sperm.
Testicular macrophage USP2 promotes motility, hyperactivation, and capacitation of frozen–thawed sperm
Frozen–thawed sperm is widely applied in the treatment of infertility, generation of livestock animals, and conservation management of endangered species [50–52]. To investigate whether macrophage USP2 modifies sperm cryopreservation, we compared several characteristics of the frozen–thawed sperm from msUsp2KO mice and Usp2fl/fl mice. As with freshly isolated sperm, the morphology of the frozen–thawed sperm was indistinguishable between the strains (Fig. 4a). The freezing and thawing evenly promoted cell death from 91 to 49% and from 96 to 42% in msUsp2KO mice and Usp2fl/fl mice, respectively (Figs. 3d, 4b). Thus, macrophage USP2 is dispensable in maintaining morphology and viability during manipulation with freezing and thawing. In marked contrast, the proportion of total motile sperms was decreased by approximately one-fourth in msUsp2KO mice compared to Usp2fl/fl mice (Fig. 4c). Furthermore, progressive motile sperm were more severely decreased in msUsp2KO mice (Fig. 4c). Similarly, msUsp2KO mouse-derived sperm showed significant defects in VSL, VCL, and amplitude of lateral head displacement (ALH), whereas beat-cross frequency (BCF) tended to be attenuated (P = 0.053, n = 6). Thus, macrophage USP2 could maintain motility of frozen–thawed sperm.
We also analyzed CASA data, using the K-means clustering method, to evaluate the proportion of hyperactive motile sperm [45]. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 8, the frozen–thawed sperm could be classified into four clusters based on VSL and VCL. Sperm belonging to Cluster #2 exhibited progressive curvilinear motion, which indicated hyperactivation. The proportion of hyperactive sperm was ~ 79% lower in msUsp2KO mice than in Usp2fl/fl mice (Fig. 4d), suggesting that macrophage USP2 preserves the capacity for hyperactivation after exposure to the freeze–thaw process.
We next examined the effects of macrophage Usp2 deficiency on capacitation rate in the frozen–thawed sperm. Approximately, 8.5% of frozen–thawed sperm from Usp2fl/fl mice were capacitated in HTF medium after incubation for 30 min (Fig. 4e). On the other hand, capacitation occurred in only ~ 4.8% of msUsp2KO mouse sperm. Taken together, our results show that macrophage USP2 potentiates motility, hyperactivation, and capacitation of frozen–thawed sperm.
We further investigated several biochemical and physiological indices that are associated with hyperactive motility and capacitation in sperm. Because sperm activation is highly dependent on ATP supply [20], we measured the intracellular ATP level of the frozen–thawed sperm. The ATP level of msUsp2KO mouse-derived sperm was ~ 74% of the Usp2fl/fl mouse-derived sperm (Fig. 5a), indicating that macrophage Usp2 deletion inhibits the ATP supply in sperm.
Because glycolysis is necessary for hyperactive sperm motility and capacitation, we measured glycolytic activity by quantifying intracellular lactate and glucose content in sperm. However, we found no differences in either intracellular lactate or glucose levels between sperm from Usp2fl/fl mice and sperm from msUsp2KO mice (Fig. 5b, c), which indicate that macrophage USP2 is not vital for the maintenance of glycolysis in frozen–thawed sperm.
In contrast to hyperactive motility and capacitation, total sperm motility is highly associated with OXPHOS [20], whose activity can be evaluated by measuring mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP). Although both high- and low-MMP subpopulations were detected in the Usp2fl/fl mice, the high-MMP sperm population was smaller or negligible in the msUsp2KO mice (Fig. 5d). Therefore, our results suggest that macrophage USP2 potentiates mitochondrial integrity, but not glycolysis, in a fraction of sperm, which contributed to greater ATP accumulation in the cells.
Sperm undergo alkalization upon the induction of capacitation, especially in the head and principal piece [53]. Alkalization in the principal piece has also been shown to initiate hyperactive motility [53]; therefore, we investigated whether macrophage USP2 influenced sperm alkalization by monitoring the intracellular pH using a pH-sensitive probe. After incubation in HTF medium for 30 min, Usp2fl/fl mouse-derived sperm comprised a dominant population with relatively low pH and a smaller alkalized population (17.2 ± 6.4%, n = 5, Fig. 5e). This proportion of alkalized sperm was significantly decreased in the msUsp2KO mouse-derived sperm compared to Usp2fl/fl mouse-derived sperm. Therefore, macrophage USP2 sustains hyperactivation-associated alkalization in frozen–thawed sperm.
CatSper is a sperm-specific calcium channel that mediates high pH-evoked calcium influx, which triggers sperm hyperactivation [22, 23]. We therefore investigated the intracellular calcium levels in sperm using a calcium probe (Fig. 5f). FACS analysis revealed relatively low fluorescence in 89.2% of live sperm from Usp2fl/fl mice, while a > tenfold signal was observed in the remaining 10.8% of sperm, indicating that ~ 11% of total sperm from Usp2fl/fl mice displayed an extreme calcium influx. In contrast, only 2.2% of sperm from msUsp2KO mice showed a similar degree of calcium influx. Therefore, the results suggest that macrophage USP2 potentiates calcium influx in frozen–thawed sperm, which may elicit sperm hyperactivation.
Because inhibition of alkalization and intracellular calcium ion accumulation were observed in the sperm from msUsp2KO mice, we used qRT-PCR to measure the mRNA expression levels of canonical ion channels and pumps in the testis. Macrophage Usp2 deficiency did not modify the expression of the spermatic channels and pumps that participate in alkalization, such as voltage-gated hydrogen channel 1 (Hvnc1) and solute carrier family 9 member C1 (Slc9c1) (Supplementary Fig. 9). Similarly, the expression of CatSper subunits was negligibly affected in the sperm of msUsp2KO mice. Therefore, macrophage USP2 controls sperm hyperactivation independently of changes in the expression of the spermatic channels and pumps that we examined.
Testicular macrophage USP2 increases the in vitro fertilizing capacity of frozen–thawed sperm
Decreased motility, capacitation, and hyperactivation of the frozen–thawed sperm from msUsp2KO mice might affect fertility. To examine this, we performed IVF using frozen–thawed sperm from msUsp2KO mice and Usp2fl/fl mice. The sperm of both strains evenly induced dispersion of the cumulus (Fig. 6a). Subsequently, ~ 40,000 sperm from Usp2fl/fl mice caused at least one polar body in 55.4 ± 16.8% of ova from C57BL/6 mice after 4 h of incubation (Fig. 6b, c). Almost the same number of sperm from msUsp2KO mice formed polar bodies, at a comparable proportion (51.5 ± 17.1%, P = 0.674 vs Usp2fl/fl mice, n = 7). On the other hand, the formation of pronuclei was dramatically repressed in the ova that were incubated with sperm from msUsp2KO mice, compared to those of Usp2fl/fl mice (msUsp2KO mice, 5.93 ± 6.8%; Usp2fl/fl mice, 20.8 ± 13.8%: P = 0.025, n = 7: Fig. 6b, d). Therefore, frozen–thawed sperms from msUsp2KO mice had lower IVF efficiency.
USP2 sustains GM-CSF expression in testicular interstitial macrophages
Cumulative evidence indicates that USP2 regulates inflammatory cytokine production in macrophages [29, 33–35]. Since several cytokines modify sperm motility [54], we compared the expression of 43 cytokine genes as well as that of Serpine1 and Serpine2 in the testis of msUsp2KO mice and Usp2fl/fl mice. qRT-PCR analysis demonstrated that the expression levels of inflammatory cytokines such as Il1b, Il6 and Tnf were not distinguishable between the strains (Fig. 7a). Similarly, most cytokines which we examined did not show significant changes in the testis after Usp2 ablation (Fig. 7a). Conversely, transcripts for Csf2 (encoding GM-CSF) were significantly (0.46-fold, P = 0.0028, n = 6) decreased in the testis of msUsp2KO mice compared with Usp2fl/fl mice (Fig. 7a, b). Moreover, Serpine 1 was slightly, but significantly (0.79-fold, P = 0.0090, n = 6) downregulated in the testis of msUsp2KO mice (Fig. 7a). Therefore, macrophage USP2 may have some influence overexpression of Csf2 and Serpine 1 in testis. Because Csf2 is known to potentiate total motility and hyperactive motility of frozen–thawed ovine sperm [19], we further investigated the roles of GM-CSF in macrophage USP2-mediated sperm regulation.
To verify the sources of GM-CSF in the testis, we performed an immunofluorescent analysis using C57BL/6 mouse testis. An immunoreactive signal for GM-CSF was especially apparent in some parts of F4/80+ cells in the interstitial region (Fig. 7c), and this signal disappeared when the anti-GM-CSF antibody was pre-incubated with an excess amount of recombinant GM-CSF (Supplementary Fig. 10a). Therefore, interstitial macrophages appear to produce GM-CSF in the testis. In further agreement with our data, immunoreactivity against GM-CSF was also observed in isolated CD11b+ testicular macrophages (Fig. 7d). Incubation with pre-adsorbed anti-GM-CSF antibody, or the secondary antibody without the anti-CD11b antibody, did not generate any signal (Supplementary Fig. 10b, c), leading us to conclude that the immunoreactive signals for GM-CSF and CD11b were specific. Furthermore, Q-FISH analysis detected signals corresponding to Csf2 mRNA in certain populations of C57BL/6 mouse-derived testicular macrophages, which were not observed without the Csf2 probe (Supplementary Fig. 10d). qRT-PCR analysis (Fig. 7a) further detailed that the mean number of Csf2 fluorescent dots was decreased by ~ 37% in msUsp2KO mouse-derived testicular macrophages, compared to those of Usp2fl/fl mice (Fig. 7e, f). Collectively, our data suggest that testicular macrophages have the potential to produce GM-CSF, and that Usp2 potentiates Csf2 expression in testicular macrophages.
Sperm undergo posttesticular maturation in the epididymis, in preparation for capacitation in the female reproductive tract [55]. In the epididymis, myeloid cells extrude projections to the adluminal site of the epididymal duct [56–58]. Thus, macrophages in the epididymis may contribute to priming sperm for hyperactivation and capacitation. To clarify whether USP2 modulates GM-CSF production in epididymal macrophages, we first evaluated the expression of GM-CSF in the epididymis. Immunoreactive signals for GM-CSF was apparent in the supranuclear region of principal epithelial cells [Supplementary Fig. 11a, b-(i)] and in intraluminal clear epithelial cells [Supplementary Fig. 11a, b-(ii)] in the corpus of the epididymis of C57BL/6 mice, corroborating a recent report on boar epididymis [59]. In addition, intense GM-CSF signals were detected in vesicles in the lumen [Supplementary Fig. 11a, b-(iii)]. GM-CSF was also present in peritubular cells with slender dendrites extending toward the luminal region [Supplementary Fig. 11a, b-(iv)]. GM-CSF+ peritubular cells were also F4/80-positive, suggesting that epididymal macrophages produce GM-CSF (Supplementary Fig. 11c). To confirm GM-CSF expression in epididymal macrophages, we examined GM-CSF immunoreactivity in isolated epididymal CD11b+ macrophages. As observed in the testis, GM-CSF immunoreactive signals were observed in CD11b+ cells, which were dampened when incubated with anti-GM-CSF antibody that was pre-adsorbed with recombinant GM-CSF (data not shown). Together, these results indicate that macrophages are a source of GM-CSF in the epididymis, but the degree of their contribution is still unclear.
We next investigated the role of macrophage USP2 in Csf2 expression in the epididymis. Compared to Usp2fl/fl mice, the level of epididymal Csf2 mRNA was 32% lower in msUsp2KO mice (Supplementary Fig. 11d). Furthermore, Q-FISH analysis demonstrated that the mean number of Csf2 mRNA dots in CD11b+ cells were significantly decreased in msUsp2KO mouse-derived epididymal macrophages than that of Usp2fl/fl-derived macrophages (Supplementary Fig. 11e, 11f). Therefore, USP2 potentiates Csf2 expression in epididymal macrophages.
We also investigated the expression of the GM-CSF receptor in testicular cells, and found that C57BL/6 mice expressed the CSF2 receptor α chain (CSF2R α) in both sperm and testicular interstitial cells (Fig. 7g). Taken together with previous papers [19], our results indicate that sperm are responsive to GM-CSF from testicular macrophages and/or epididymal cells.
GM-CSF restored macrophage Usp2 knockout-elicited aberrant mitochondrial membrane potential and total sperm motility
GM-CSF promotes the cryoprotection of sperm resulting in the restoration of total sperm motility [19]. We thus assessed whether GM-CSF could overcome the aberrant total motility of the frozen–thawed sperm from msUsp2KO mice. During the freezing and thawing process, the sperm from msUsp2KO mice and Usp2fl/fl mice were treated with GM-CSF. After thawing, the GM-CSF pre-treatment elevated the total sperm motility of msUsp2KO mice, while it marginally potentiated that of Usp2fl/f mice (Fig. 8a). As a result, the difference in total sperm motility between the strains was diminished by GM-CSF treatment.
Since total sperm motility is dominantly regulated by OXPHOS [20], we next examined whether GM-CSF recovered the mitochondrial membrane functionality of the frozen–thawed sperm. As shown in Fig. 8b, GM-CSF negligibly modulated the fraction of the sperm population in Usp2fl/fl mice with high MPP. In contrast, GM-CSF increased the number of sperm with high MPP in msUsp2KO mice (Fig. 8b). Similarly, GM-CSF treatment restored the aberrant accumulation of ATP in the msUsp2KO mouse sperm (Fig. 8c). Collectively, these experiments showed that the lack of GM-CSF might be attributed to defects in total motility and malfunction of mitochondrial activity in msUsp2KO mouse sperm.
GM-CSF failed to restore progressive motility, capacitation, hyperactivation, and in vitro fertilization efficacy of the sperm from macrophage-selective Usp2 knockout mice
We next assessed the effect of GM-CSF on progressive sperm motility in msUsp2KO mice and Usp2fl/fl mice. As shown in Fig. 8d, GM-CSF increased the number of progressively motile sperm in Usp2fl/fl mice, whereas the increase in progressively motile msUsp2KO sperm was marginal. Thus, GM-CSF did not significantly influence macrophage USP2-sustained progressive sperm motility.
The proportion of hyperactive sperm in progressive motile sperm is higher than that of total motile sperm. Because GM-CSF failed to restore progressive motility, but not total motility (Fig. 8a, d), GM-CSF might not contribute to sperm hyperactivation. To this end, we investigated the effect of GM-CSF on the size of the cluster that encompasses hyperactive sperm (Supplementary Fig. 12). GM-CSF did not mitigate a decrement of hyperactive sperm in msUsp2KO mice (Fig. 8e) and failed to rescue the defective capacitation in msUsp2KO sperm. In contrast, GM-CSF tended to promote capacitation in Usp2fl/fl sperm (Fig. 8f). Therefore, GM-CSF is not responsible for macrophage USP2-dependent hyperactivation or capacitation of frozen–thawed sperm.
Since alkalization is vital for hyperactivation and capacitation of sperm [20], we examined whether GM-CSF could modify the intracellular pH level of msUsp2KO mouse sperm. FACS analysis of BCECM-AM-loaded sperm showed that GM-CSF did not affect the pH level of sperm from both msUsp2KO mice and Usp2fl/fl mice (Fig. 8g). Furthermore, the proportion of alkalized sperm was significantly smaller in msUsp2KO mice than in Usp2fl/fl mice, regardless of GM-CSF treatment (Fig. 8g). Similarly, GM-CSF did not alter the calcium influx in both msUsp2KO mice and Usp2fl/fl mice (Fig. 8h). Therefore, the difference in intracellular calcium content was still evident between the strains after GM-CSF treatment.
Finally, we investigated the effect of GM-CSF on the IVF efficacy of msUsp2KO sperm. As shown in Fig. 8i and Supplementary Fig. 13, GM-CSF did not rectify ova generation when incubated with msUsp2KO sperm, but tended to increase the number of pronuclei in ova when incubated with Usp2fl/fl sperm. These results indicate that GM-CSF was unable to restore macrophage USP2-potentiated hyperactivation, capacitation, and IVF efficacy of sperm.
Discussion
Testicular macrophages are indisputably important in maintaining testicular function. For instance, elimination of testicular macrophages by liposome-entrapped dichloromethylene diphosphonate affected the proliferation and differentiation of Leydig cells during prepubertal development [14] and decreased testosterone synthesis by Leydig cells [13]. Additionally, both types of testicular macrophages significantly express enzymes for the biosynthesis of retinoic acid, which is crucial for spermatogenesis [9]. The necessity of testicular macrophage presence in spermatogenesis was also proven by the observation that the depletion of macrophages led to a disruption in spermatogonia development [9] and to significant sperm reduction in seminal fluid [12]. In the present study, the morphological changes in spermatogonia as well as Leydig cells were not apparent in msUsp2KO mice. Moreover, changes in testosterone levels were negligible in both the serum and testis. Therefore, macrophage USP2 seemed to be dispensable for spermatogenesis.
Usp2KO mice manifested male subfertility and abnormal aggregates consisting of sperm and multinucleated cells in seminiferous tubules [37]. Although the morphology of sperm in the epididymis was normal in Usp2KO mice, the sperm exhibited remarkable motility defects [37]. Because late-stage spermatids exclusively express USP2 [36], USP2 deficiency likely contributes to male subfertility in Usp2KO mice. The present study sheds new light on the roles of macrophage USP2 in sperm motility. Notably, the beneficial effects of macrophage USP2 are more prominent in frozen–thawed sperm than in freshly isolated sperm. Since frozen–thawed sperm are widely used in infertility treatments, genetic manipulation of livestock, and conservation management of endangered animals, our study may provide important knowledge that is relevant to the medical and industrial fields [50–52].
Sperm motility can be classified into total and hyperactive motility [21]. Total motility is highly dependent on OXPHOS at the midpiece of sperm, while hyperactive motility dominantly utilizes ATP produced by glycolysis at the head and principal piece [20]. We demonstrated that macrophage USP2 maintained both total and hyperactive sperm motility. This observation implies that testicular macrophages modified both sperm motilities, regardless of the effects on morphological changes. Given that the total and hyperactive motilities are driven by distinct mechanisms, USP2 in testicular macrophages might function as a common regulator for both types.
Our current results demonstrated that macrophage-selective Usp2 knockout did not cause significant changes in the expression of 19 canonical channels and pumps, all of which are postulated to have crucial roles in intracellular alkalization and calcium ion influx [21–23]. However, we were unable to exclude the possibility that macrophage USP2 modulates the expression of channels that were not examined in this study. Alternatively, macrophage USP2 may exert control over the expression of these membrane proteins at the post-transcriptional and/or translational level.
In IVF experiments, frozen–thawed sperm of msUsp2KO mice caused normal polar body formation in the ova and dispersion of the ovarian cumulus. In sharp contrast, the sperm of msUsp2KO mice had defects in the generation of ova pronuclei, indicating that msUsp2KO mouse sperm lowered fertilization efficiency. Since hyperactive motility is believed to determine fertilization efficiency [21, 60], the inefficient IVF of msUsp2KO mouse sperm is attributable to the decrease in hyperactive motile sperm. In the present study, macrophage-selective Usp2 deficiency caused a reduction of the sperm population with high alkalization and high calcium influx. Given that alkalization-induced calcium influx confers hypermobility to sperm during capacitation [21, 23], macrophage USP2 might promote capacitation and hyperactivation of the frozen–thawed sperm, thereby leading to high IVF efficacy.
Previous evidence has indicated that testicular macrophage-derived cytokines modulate spermatogenesis [61]. Moreover, several cytokines also modify sperm functions, such as motility, chemotaxis, and the acrosome reaction [62–65]. In the present study, we found decreased Csf2 expression in the testicular macrophages of msUsp2KO mice. This observation is congruent with the results from a previous study that showed high levels of GM-CSF expression in testicular macrophages [18]. The finding that GM-CSF can access spermatogonial cells through the blood–testis barrier, which is formed by Sertoli cells and physically protects spermatogonial cells from systemic circulation [66], suggests that macrophage-derived GM-CSF can directly modulate the function of male gamete cells.
It has already been demonstrated that GM-CSF potentiates glucose uptake of sperm, possibly through the induction of glucose transporters [67], resulting in the promotion of motility of bovine sperm [68]. In our preliminary experiment, GM-CSF did not cause changes in the expression of glucose transporters in the sperm of msUsp2KO mice and Usp2fl/fl mice. Nevertheless, application of GM-CSF during the freezing and thawing process reverted total sperm motility, mitochondrial membrane potential, as well as the intracellular ATP level. In this study, we did not uncover molecular mechanisms underlying GM-CSF promotion of mitochondrial integrity in sperm. Some heat shock proteins maintain mitochondrial membrane integrity [69, 70]. They are regulated by STAT3 [71], which GM-CSF activates [72]. Thus, macrophage USP2 might control mitochondrial integrity through the induction of chaperone proteins such as heat shock proteins by GM-CSF production.
In contrast to MMP and total sperm motility, GM-CSF failed to rescue defects in capacitation, hyperactivation, and subsequent IVF efficiency, all of which are predominantly fueled by glycolysis [20]. Our preliminary study showed that GM-CSF did not affect the intracellular content of glucose and lactate in either msUsp2KO sperm or Usp2fl/fl sperm, indicating that glycolytic activity is not a prerequisite for USP2-modulated sperm activation. Capacitation and hyperactivation are initiated by changes in plasma membrane characteristics, including cholesterol efflux [22], which are reflected in the pattern of CTC staining [73]. Therefore, the impairment of changes in CTC staining that was observed msUsp2KO sperm in this study suggests that macrophage USP2 maintains the initial stages of the capacitation process.
In addition to Csf2, we found that macrophage-specific Usp2 deficiency led to a slight downregulation in Serpine 1 expression in the testis. The Serpine 1 gene encodes plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1), which inhibits plasminogen activators and encumbers plasmin production [74]. Because PAI-1 and plasminogen activator receptor bind to the sperm plasma membrane, the quantitative ratio of these counteracting proteins affects the proteolytic activity of the sperm membrane, as well as the modulation of capacitation efficiency [74]. Accordingly, the concentration of tissue-type plasminogen activator in spermatozoa has been shown to be higher in cases of human subfertility, which suggests that excessive activation of plasminogen activators contribute to sterility [75]. Therefore, although it is still unclear whether macrophage PAI-1 can reach sperm and/or spermatocytes through the blood–testis barrier, blunted PAI-1expression in testicular macrophages may participate in defective sperm hyperactivation in msUsp2KO mice.
Compared to Usp2fl/fl sperm, total sperm motility in msUsp2KO mice was decreased to 28.6% (Fig. 4c), whereas ATP accumulation was only reduced by 25.4% (Fig. 5a). The presence of immotile sperm, which still contain ATP at a significant level [76], may account for the discrepancy between these indices. Thus, the reduction in ATP may in fact be relatively mild compared to the decrease in total sperm motility. Conversely, the mechanisms driving the differences between the changes observed in intracellular pH (~ 46.4% decrease, Fig. 5e) and that of progressive motility (~ 97.0% decrease, Fig. 4c) appear to be convoluted. After intracellular alkalization, several coordinated biochemical and physiological cellular events, such as calcium influx, protein kinase A activation, and tyrosine phosphorylation, occur during hyperactivation [21–23]. Therefore, macrophage USP2-mediated regulation of sperm function may involve multiple molecular targets.
In a previous study, we performed comprehensive qRT-PCR for cytokines and growth factors using USP2 knockdown (KD) human macrophage-like HL-60 cells [29]. USP2KD HL-60 cells showed an increased expression of nine chemokines compared with parental HL-60 cells. Moreover, bacterial lipopolysaccharide provoked the expression of 25 of 104 cytokines in USP2KD HL-60 cells [34]. These results indicate that USP2 attenuated the induction of a relatively wide variety of proinflammatory cytokine genes. On the other hand, the testis of msUsp2KO mice showed a decreased expression of only Csf2 among 43 cytokines. This limited change in cytokine expression might be accounted for by technical issues. In the testis, the proportion of macrophages is limited, although they are the second most abundant cellular population after Leydig cells in the interstitial space [77]. Since a significant amount of cytokines is produced in other testicular cells [61, 78, 79], this might offset aberrant cytokine expression in macrophages. Alternatively, the differences in characteristics between HL-60 cells/peritoneal macrophages and testicular macrophages might yield differences in their USP2-modulated cytokine expression profiles. Differentiated HL-60 and peritoneal macrophages have the property of M1 macrophages, since their dominant population express CD11c, an M1 macrophage marker [29, 80, 81]. Since testicular macrophages contain an M2-dominant population [10], USP2 might have different effects on cytokine production between M1 and M2 macrophages.
In this study, we still did not evaluate molecular mechanisms underlying USP2-modulated Csf2 expression. Although little is known about the mechanisms for Csf2 induction in testicular macrophages, several signal cascades are believed to participate in Csf2 induction in various type of cells [82, 83]. NF-κB is known to activate the Csf2 promoter in various types of cells such as T-lymphocytes, macrophages and bladder carcinoma cells [83–85]. Previously, it has been shown that TNF-α-elicited NF-κB signaling is enhanced by USP2 [35]. On the other hand, we also showed that USP2 regulates the expression of various cytokines by modulating poly-ubiquitination of Oct 1 [34]. Further studies are required to identify USP2-targeting molecules that are responsible for Csf2 expression in testicular macrophages. Such information might be helpful in understanding the molecular basis of communications between testicular macrophages and sperm.
Various types of myeloid cells, including macrophages and dendritic cells, exist in the interstitial and peritubular regions of the epididymis [58, 86]. The myeloid cells are postulated to maintain immune privilege in the epididymis; they play a role in pathogen defense and also maintain immune tolerance toward sperm antigens [58, 87]. In addition, epididymal myeloid cells eliminate apoptotic epithelial cells after unilateral efferent duct ligation [56], suggesting that they may also sustain epithelial integrity at a steady state, and can directly communicate with sperm via cell processes that project into the lumen of the epididymal duct [58, 87]. In this study, we observed GM-CSF expression in macrophages in epididymal sections and in isolated epididymal macrophages, which suggests that macrophages may regulate sperm function via GM-CSF secretion. In contrast to the testis, GM-CSF appears to be produced in various epididymal cell types, including principal and clear epithelial cells, both of which directly affect sperm on the luminal side. A previous report also demonstrated intense GM-CSF immunoreactivity in vesicles, which were suggested to have been released from principal epithelial cells [59]. Future study might clarify whether macrophage USP2 is involved in GM-CSF production in the epididymal epithelial cells via macrophage-to-epithelial communication.
To perform myeloid-selective Usp2 knockout, we employed the LyzM-Cre cassette. The LyzM-Cre-dependent conditional knockout mouse strains have been widely used to evaluate in vivo roles of various molecules expressed in cells of myeloid lineage, including macrophages [88–90]. Another study demonstrated that the LyzM promoter is also active in neural brain cells [91]. Thus, we could not exclude the possibility that neural USP2 maintained the testicular function of msUsp2KO mice through the hypothalamus–testis axis. However, our preliminary study indicated that neuron-selective Usp2KO mice yielded changes in neither Csf2 expression nor sperm motility in testicular macrophages. We therefore conclude that macrophage USP2 is a positive regulator of Csf2 expression and activation of frozen–thawed sperm.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr. Keiji Ueno, Mr. Takeshi Ishino, Ms. Misato Amagasa, Ms. Aya Iida, and Ms. Marina Tanaka from Rakuno Gakuen University, and Dr. Yuko Okamatsu from Hokkaido University. The authors also acknowledge the editing services provided by Uni-edit.
Abbreviations
- ALDH1A2
Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1a2
- ALH
Amplitude of lateral head displacement
- Ar
Androgen receptor
- BCF
Beat-cross frequency
- BSA
Bovine serum albumin
- CASA
Computer-assisted sperm motility analysis
- CSF1R
Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor
- CSF2Rα
Colony-stimulating factor 2 receptor α chain
- CTC
Chlortetracycline
- DDX
DEAD-box helicase
- FACS
Fluorescence-activated cell sorting
- GM-CSF
Granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor
- HSD3B
3-β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase
- Hvcn1
Voltage-gated hydrogen channel1
- IL
Interleukin
- iNOS
Inducible nitric oxide synthase
- IVF
In vitro fertilization
- KD
Knockdown
- KO
Knockout
- Lhcgr
Luteinizing hormone receptor
- LyzM-Cre
B6.129P2-Lyzstm1(cre)Ifo
- M-CSF
Macrophage-colony stimulating factor
- MCT
Monocarboxylate transporter
- MHCII
Major histocompatibility complex class II
- MMP
Mitochondrial membrane potential
- OXPHOS
Oxidative phosphorylation
- PI
Propidium iodide
- Q-FISH
Quantitative-fluorescent in situ hybridization
- qRT-PCR
Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
- R26GRR
C57BL/6 N-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1(CAG−EGFP,tdsRed)Utr/Rbrc
- RDH10
Retinol dehydrogenase 10
- Slc9c1
Solute carrier family 9 member C1
- Sox
Sex-determining region Y-box transcription factor
- Stra8
Stimulated by retinoic acid 8
- TMB
3,3′,5,5′-Tetramethylbenzidine
- TNF
Tumor necrosis factor
- TREM
Tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester
- USP
Ubiquitin-specific protease
- VCL
Curvilinear velocity
- VSL
Straight-line velocity
Author contributions
MH and SK performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote and revised the manuscript. CK, YY, TW, and ET performed the experiments. JO revised the manuscript. MN designed and performed the experiments and revised the manuscript. HK designed and performed the experiments, analyzed data, and wrote and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (15K06805 and 18K06035) and the Rakuno Gakuen University Research Fund (No. 2018-02, 2019-03, and 2020-04).
Availability of data and material
The datasets in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Code availability
All software used in this study was obtained legally, and custom code is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest/competing interests to declare.
Ethical approval
All animal experiments were approved by the Ethical Review Committee for Animal Experimentation of Rakuno Gakuen University (Approval Numbers VH15A30, VH16A25, VH17A1). We made all efforts to reduce the number of animals used, and to alleviate their suffering.
Consent to participate/Consent for publication
Consent to participate/consent for publication is not applicable to this study.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Kharraz Y, Guerra J, Mann CJ, et al. Macrophage plasticity and the role of inflammation in skeletal muscle repair. Mediat Inflamm. 2013;2013:491497. doi: 10.1155/2013/491497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lavine KJ, Pinto AR, Epelman S, et al. The Macrophage in cardiac homeostasis and disease: JACC macrophage in CVD series (part 4) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:2213–2230. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.2149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rosin JM, Kurrasch DM. Emerging roles for hypothalamic microglia as regulators of physiological homeostasis. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2019;54:100748. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2019.100748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Benoit M, Desnues B, Mege J-L. Macrophage polarization in bacterial infections. J Immunol. 2008;181:3733–3739. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.6.3733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kitamura H, Naoe Y, Kimura S, et al. Beneficial effects of Brazilian propolis on type 2 diabetes in ob/ob mice. Adipocyte. 2013;2:227–236. doi: 10.4161/adip.25608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Xiao-Ming M, Shiu-Kwong MT, Lan H-Y. Macrophages in renal fibrosis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1165:285–303. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-8871-2_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Meinhardt A, Wang M, Schulz C, Bhushan S. Microenvironmental signals govern the cellular identity of testicular macrophages. J Leukoc Biol. 2018;104:757–766. doi: 10.1002/JLB.3MR0318-086RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gaytan F, Bellido C, Morales C, et al. Response to Leydig cell apoptosis in the absence of testicular macrophages. J Reprod Immunol. 1995;29:81–94. doi: 10.1016/0165-0378(95)00934-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.DeFalco T, Potter SJ, Williams AV, et al. Macrophages contribute to the spermatogonial niche in the adult testis. Cell Rep. 2015;12:1107–1119. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.07.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mossadegh-Keller N, Gentek R, Gimenez G, et al. Developmental origin and maintenance of distinct testicular macrophage populations. J Exp Med. 2017;214:2829–2841. doi: 10.1084/jem.20170829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wynn TA, Chawla A, Pollard JW. Macrophage biology in development, homeostasis and disease. Nature. 2013;496:445–455. doi: 10.1038/nature12034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cohen PE, Chisholm O, Arceci RJ, et al. Absence of colony-stimulating factor-1 in osteopetrotic (csfmoP/csfmOP) mice results in male fertility defects. Biol Reprod. 1996;55:310–317. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod55.2.310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bergh A, Damber JE, Van Rooijen N. Liposome-mediated macrophage depletion: an experimental approach to study the role of testicular macrophages in the rat. J Endocrinol. 1993;136:407–413. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1360407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gaytan F, Bellido C, Aguilar E, Van Rooijen N. Requirement for testicular macrophages in Leydig cell proliferation and differentiation during prepubertal development in rats. J Reprod Fertil. 1994;102:393–399. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.1020393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hales DB. Testicular macrophage modulation of Leydig cell steroidogenesis. J Reprod Immunol. 2002;57:3–18. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0378(02)00020-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hedger MP, Meinhardt A. Cytokines and the immune-testicular axis. J Reprod Immunol. 2003;58:1–26. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0378(02)00060-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Oatley JM, Oatley MJ, Avarbock MR, et al. Colony stimulating factor 1 is an extrinsic stimulator of mouse spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal. Development. 2009;136:1191–1199. doi: 10.1242/dev.032243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kern S, Robertson SA, Mau VJ, Maddocks S. Cytokine secretion by macrophages in the rat testis1. Biol Reprod. 1995;53:1407–1416. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod53.6.1407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rodríguez-Gil JE, Silvers G, Flores E, et al. Expression of the GM-CSF receptor in ovine spermatozoa: GM-CSF effect on sperm viability and motility of sperm subpopulations after the freezing-thawing process. Theriogenology. 2007;67:1359–1370. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Du Plessis SS, Agarwal A, Mohanty G, Van Der Linde M. Oxidative phosphorylation versus glycolysis: what fuel do spermatozoa use? Asian J Androl. 2015;17:230–235. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.135123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Suarez SS. Control of hyperactivation in sperm. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14:647–657. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmn029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jin SK, Yang WX. Factors and pathways involved in capacitation: how are they regulated? Oncotarget. 2017;8:3600–3627. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lishko PV, Kirichok Y, Ren D, et al. The control of male fertility by spermatozoan ion channels. Annu Rev Physiol. 2012;74:453–475. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-020911-153258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Song L, Luo ZQ. Post-translational regulation of ubiquitin signaling. J Cell Biol. 2019;218:1776–1786. doi: 10.1083/JCB.201902074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shan J, Zhao W, Gu W. Suppression of cancer cell growth by promoting cyclin D1 degradation. Mol Cell. 2009;36:469–476. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.10.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gewies A, Grimm S. UBP41 is a proapoptotic ubiquitin-specific protease. Cancer Res. 2003;63:682–688. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Priolo C, Tang D, Brahamandan M, et al. The isopeptidase USP2a protects human prostate cancer from apoptosis. Cancer Res. 2006;66:8625–8632. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Molusky MM, Li S, Ma D, et al. Ubiquitin-specific protease 2 regulates hepatic gluconeogenesis and diurnal glucose metabolism through 11b -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 1. Diabetes. 2012;61:1025–1035. doi: 10.2337/db11-0970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kitamura H, Kimura S, Shimamoto Y, et al. Ubiquitin-specific protease 2–69 in macrophages potentially modulates metainflammation. FASEB J. 2013;27:4940–4953. doi: 10.1096/fj.13-233528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hashimoto M, Saito N, Ohta H, et al. Inhibition of ubiquitin-specific protease 2 causes accumulation of reactive oxygen species, mitochondria dysfunction, and intracellular ATP decrement in C2C12 myoblasts. Physiol Rep. 2019;7:1–14. doi: 10.14814/phy2.14193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Saito N, Kimura S, Miyamoto T, et al. Macrophage ubiquitin-specific protease 2 modifies insulin sensitivity in obese mice. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2017;9:322–329. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2017.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Li C, Zhang J, Xu H, et al. Retigabine ameliorates acute stress-induced impairment of spatial memory retrieval through regulating USP2 signaling pathways in hippocampal CA1 area. Neuropharmacology. 2018;135:151–162. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.02.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.He X, Li Y, Li C, et al. USP2a negatively regulates IL-1β- and virus-induced NF-κB activation by deubiquitinating TRAF6. J Mol Cell Biol. 2013;5:39–47. doi: 10.1093/jmcb/mjs024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kitamura H, Ishino T, Shimamoto Y, et al. Ubiquitin-specific protease 2 modulates the lipopolysaccharide-elicited expression of proinflammatory cytokines in macrophage-like HL-60 cells. Mediat Inflamm. 2017;2017:6909415. doi: 10.1155/2017/6909415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Metzig M, Nickles D, Falschlehner C, et al. An RNAi screen identifies USP2 as a factor required for TNF-α-induced NF-κB signaling. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:607–618. doi: 10.1002/ijc.26124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lin H, Keriel A, Morales CR, et al. Divergent N-terminal sequences target an inducible testis deubiquitinating enzyme to distinct subcellular structures. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:977–977. doi: 10.1128/mcb.21.3.977-977.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bedard N, Yang Y, Gregory M, et al. Mice lacking the USP2 deubiquitinating enzyme have severe male subfertility associated with defects in fertilization and sperm motility. Biol Reprod. 2011;85:594–604. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.110.088542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hasegawa Y, Daitoku Y, Sekiguchi K, et al. Novel ROSA26 Cre-reporter knock-in C57BL/6N mice exhibiting green emission before and red emission after Cre-mediated recombination. Exp Anim. 2013;62:295–304. doi: 10.1538/expanim.62.295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Clausen BE, Burkhardt C, Reith W, et al. Conditional gene targeting in macrophages and granulocytes using LysMcre mice. Transgenic Res. 1999;8:265–277. doi: 10.1023/A:1008942828960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhang X, Goncalves R, Mosser DM. The isolation and characterization of murine macrophages. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2008 doi: 10.1002/0471142735.im1401s83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bryniarski K, Szczepanik M, Maresz K, et al. Subpopulations of mouse testicular macrophages and their immunoregulatory function. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2004;52:27–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2004.00178.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Handel-Fernandez ME, Ilkovitch D, Iragavarapu-Charyulu V, et al. Decreased levels of both Stat1 and Stat3 in T lymphocytes from mice bearing mammary tumors. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:2051–2058. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Metsalu T, Vilo J. ClustVis: a web tool for visualizing clustering of multivariate data using principal component analysis and heatmap. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:W566–W570. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yanagawa Y, Matsuura Y, Suzuki M, et al. Accessory corpora lutea formation in pregnant hokkaido sika deer (Cervus nippon yesoensis) investigated by examination of ovarian dynamics and steroid hormone concentrations. J Reprod Dev. 2015;61:61–66. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2014-076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kanno C, Sakamoto KQ, Yanagawa Y, et al. Comparison of sperm subpopulation structures in first and second ejaculated semen from Japanese black bulls by a cluster analysis of sperm motility evaluated by a CASA system. J Vet Med Sci. 2017;79:1359–1365. doi: 10.1292/jvms.17-0012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wang WH, Abeydeera LR, Fraser LR, Niwa K. Functional analysis using chlortetracycline fluorescence and in vitro fertilization of frozen–thawed ejaculated boar spermatozoa incubated in a protein-free chemically defined medium. J Reprod Fertil. 1995;104:305–313. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.1040305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Peer NR, Law SM, Murdoch B, et al. Germ cell–specific retinoic acid receptor a functions in germ cell organization, meiotic integrity, and spermatogonia. Endocrinology. 2018;159:3403–3420. doi: 10.1210/en.2018-00533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Vernet N, Dennefeld C, Guillou F, et al. Prepubertal testis development relies on retinoic acid but not rexinoid receptors in Sertoli cells. EMBO J. 2006;25:5816–5825. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Abram McBride J, Lipshultz L. Male fertility preservation. Curr Urol Rep. 2018;19:49. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0803-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Morrell JM, Mayer I. Reproduction biotechnologies in germplasm banking of livestock species: a review. Zygote. 2017;25:545–557. doi: 10.1017/S0967199417000442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Comizzoli P. Biobanking efforts and new advances in male fertility preservation for rare and endangered species. Asian J Androl. 2015;17:640–645. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.153849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Matamoros-Volante A, Treviño CL. Capacitation-associated alkalization in human sperm is differentially controlled at the subcellular level. J Cell Sci. 2020;133:jcs238816. doi: 10.1242/jcs.238816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gruschwitz MS, Brezinschek R, Brezinschek HP. Cytokine levels in the seminal plasma of infertile males. J Androl. 1996;17:158–163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bernabò N, Di AR, Ordinelli A, et al. The maturation of murine spermatozoa membranes within the epididymis, a computational biology perspective. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2016;62:299–308. doi: 10.1080/19396368.2016.1205679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Smith TB, Cortez-Retamozo V, Grigoryeva LS, et al. Mononuclear phagocytes rapidly clear apoptotic epithelial cells in the proximal epididymis. Andrology. 2014;2:755–762. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-2927.2014.00251.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Da Silva N, Smith TB. Exploring the role of mononuclear phagocytes in the epididymis. Asian J Androl. 2015;17:591–596. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.153540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Shum WW, Smith TB, Cortez-Retamozo V, et al. Epithelial basal cells are distinct from dendritic cells and macrophages in the mouse epididymis. Biol Reprod. 2014;90:1–10. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.113.116681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Padilla L, Martínez-Hernández J, Barranco I, et al. Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is fully expressed in the genital tract, seminal plasma and spermatozoa of male pigs. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70302-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Turner RM. Moving to the beat: a review of mammalian sperm motility regulation. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2006;18:25–38. doi: 10.1071/RD05120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Loveland KL, Klein B, Pueschl D, et al. Cytokines in male fertility and reproductive pathologies: immunoregulation and beyond. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2017;8:1–16. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Eisermann J, Register K, Strickler R, Collins J. The Effect of tumor necrosis factor on human sperm motility in vitro. J Androl. 1989;10:270–274. doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1989.tb00100.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ganaiem M, AbuElhija M, Lunenfeld E, et al. Effect of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist gene deletion on male mouse fertility. Endocrinology. 2009;150:295–303. doi: 10.1210/en.2008-0848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Isobe T, Minoura H, Tanaka K, et al. The effect of RANTES on human sperm chemotaxis. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1441–1446. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.6.1441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Naz R, Kaplan P. Interleukin-6 enhances the fertilizing capacity of human sperm by increasing capacitation and acrosome reaction. J Androl. 1994;15:228–233. doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1994.tb00438.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.McLay RN, Banks WA, Kastin AJ. Granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor crosses the blood-testis barrier in mice. Biol Reprod. 1997;57:822–826. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod57.4.822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Zambrano A, Noli C, Rauch MC, et al. Expression of GM-CSF receptors in male germ cells and their role in signaling for increased glucose and vitamin C transport. J Cell Biochem. 2001;80:625–634. doi: 10.1002/1097-4644(20010315)80:4<625::AID-JCB1017>3.0.CO;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Vilanova LT, Rauch MC, Mansilla A, Werner E. Expression of granulocyte–macrophage colony stimulating factor ( GM-CSF ) in male germ cells : GM-CSF enhances sperm motility. Theriogenology. 2003;60:1083–1095. doi: 10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00106-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Leu JIJ, Barnoud T, Zhang G, et al. Inhibition of stress-inducible HSP70 impairs mitochondrial proteostasis and function. Oncotarget. 2017;8:45656–45669. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Calle-Guisado V, Bragado MJ, García-Marín LJ, González-Fernández L. HSP90 maintains boar spermatozoa motility and mitochondrial membrane potential during heat stress. Anim Reprod Sci. 2017;187:13–19. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Al-Shami A, Mahanna W, Naccache PH. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-activated signaling pathways in human neutrophils. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:1058–1063. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.2.1058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Stephanou A, Latchman DS. Transcriptional regulation of the heat shock protein genes by STAT family transcription factors. Gene Exp. 1999;7:311–319. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ward CR, Storey BT. Determination of the time course of capacitation in mouse spermatozoa using a chlortetracycline fluorescence assay. Dev Biol. 1984;104:287–296. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90084-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Liu YX. Involvement of plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 in spermatogenesis, sperm capacitation, and fertilization. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2007;33:29–40. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-958459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ebisch IMW, Steegers-Theunissen RPM, Sweep FCGJ, et al. Possible role of the plasminogen activation system in human subfertility. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:619–626. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Cabrillana ME, Monclus MDLÁ, Lancellotti TES, et al. Thiols of flagellar proteins are essential for progressive motility in human spermatozoa. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2017;29:1435–1446. doi: 10.1071/RD16225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Dirami G, Poulter LW, Cooke BA. Separation and characterization of Leydig cells and macrophages from rat testes. J Endocrinol. 1991;130:357–365. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1300357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Cudicini C, Lejeune H, Gomez E, et al. Human leydig cells and sertoli cells are producers of interleukins-1 and-6. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82:1426–1433. doi: 10.1210/jcem.82.5.3938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Gérard N, Syed V, Bardin W, et al. Sertoli cells are the site of interleukin-1α synthesis in rat testis. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1991;82:13–16. doi: 10.1016/0303-7207(91)90019-O. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Bou Ghosn EE, Cassado AA, Govoni GR, et al. Two physically, functionally, and developmentally distinct peritoneal macrophage subsets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:2568–2573. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0915000107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.White SL, Belov L, Barber N, et al. Immunophenotypic changes induced on human HL60 leukaemia cells by 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and 12-O-tetradecanoyl phorbol-13-acetate. Leuk Res. 2005;29:1141–1151. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2005.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Cockerill GW, Bert AG, Ryan GR, et al. Regulation of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and E- selectin expression in endothelial cells by cyclosporin A and the T-cell transcription factor NFAT. Blood. 1995;86:2689–2698. doi: 10.1182/blood.v86.7.2689.2689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Schreck R, Baeuerle PA. NF-kB inducible transcriptional activator of the granulocyte- macrophage colony-stimulating factor gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1990;10:1281–1286. doi: 10.1128/MCB.10.3.1281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Ghiorzo P, Musso M, Mantelli M, et al. C-Rel and p65 subunits bind to an upstream NF-κB site in human granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor promoter involved in phorbol ester response in 5637 cells. FEBS Lett. 1997;418:215–218. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(97)01387-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Yang TC, Chang PY, Kuo TL, Lu SC. Electronegative L5-LDL induces the production of G-CSF and GM-CSF in human macrophages through LOX-1 involving NF-κB and ERK2 activation. Atherosclerosis. 2017;267:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Seiler P, Cooper TG, Yeung CH, Nieschlag E. Regional variation in macrophage antigen expression by murine epididymal basal cells and their regulation by testicular factors. J Androl. 1999;20:738–746. doi: 10.1002/j.1939-4640.1999.tb03379.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Da Silva N, Barton CR. Macrophages and dendritic cells in the post-testicular environment. Cell Tissue Res. 2016;363:97–104. doi: 10.1007/s00441-015-2270-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Ge W, Yue Y, Xiong S. POM121 inhibits the macrophage inflammatory response by impacting NF-κB P65 nuclear accumulation. Exp Cell Res. 2019;377:17–23. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Wang Y, Dong G, Jeon HH, et al. FOXO1 mediates RANKL-induced osteoclast formation and activity. J Immunol. 2015;194:2878–2887. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1402211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Zhang Y, Xu S, Li K, et al. mTORC1 inhibits NF-κB/NFATc1 signaling and prevents osteoclast precursor differentiation, in vitro and in mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32:1829–1840. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Orthgiess J, Gericke M, Immig K, et al. Neurons exhibit Lyz2 promoter activity in vivo: Implications for using LysM-Cre mice in myeloid cell research. Eur J Immunol. 2016;46:1529–1532. doi: 10.1002/eji.201546108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
All software used in this study was obtained legally, and custom code is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.