Abstract
AIM
To evaluate the clinical efficacy of small-diameter acellular porcine corneal stroma (SAPS) for the treatment of peripheral corneal ulceration (PCU).
METHODS
This retrospective clinical study included 18 patients (18 eyes) with PCU between April 2018 and December 2020. All patients had PCU and underwent lamellar keratoplasty with SAPS. Observation indicators included preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and transparency of SAPS. The infection control rate in the surgical eye-lesion area was also calculated.
RESULTS
Eighteen patients underwent lamellar keratoplasty with SAPS to treat PCU. None of the patients experienced rejection after 6mo (18/18) and 12mo (16/16) of follow-up. The BCVA (0.47±0.30) at the 6mo follow-up after operation was significantly improved compared with the baseline (0.99±0.80), and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-3.415, P<0.05). The BCVA at the 12mo follow-up after operation was not statistically significant compared to the 6mo (Z=0, P=1). With time, the SAPS graft gradually became transparent. At the 6mo (18/18) and 12mo (16/16) follow-up, none of the patients had recurrent corneal infection.
CONCLUSION
SAPS is clinically effective in the treatment of PCU, improving the patient's BCVA and reducing the incidence of rejection after keratoplasty.
Keywords: acellular porcine corneal stroma, lamellar keratoplasty, infectious corneal ulcer
INTRODUCTION
Infectious corneal ulcer is the most common blinding eye disease worldwide[1]. Bacteria, fungi, viruses, and Acanthamoeba spp. are the most common causes of infectious keratitis[2]. Northwestern China is dominated by resource-based industries and traditional agricultural practices. Corneal trauma is the most common type of ocular trauma caused by the activities of daily living. In addition, patients neglect the disease and abuse of antibiotics are often accompanied by fungal and bacterial infections upon visiting a doctor. Patients with infectious corneal ulcers caused by the above pathogens who do not respond well to pharmacological treatment require corneal transplantation at a later stage. However, there is a serious shortage of corneal donor materials in our country, and the patient's treatment cannot be delayed[3]–[4]. The emergence of acellular porcine corneal stroma has partially resolved this problem[5]–[6]. According to our study, as the diameter of the acellular porcine corneal stroma increases, the incidence of complications such as rejection after keratoplasty will also increase[7]. Therefore, for peripheral corneal ulcerations, we used small-diameter acellular porcine corneal stroma as a donor for transplantation to avoid the interference of the patient's postoperative optical zone and effectively improve their vision.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Ethical Approval
This study was approved by Xi'an No.1 Hospital Ethics Committee (Approval No.2023-11) and followed up the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Eighteen patients (18 eyes) with peripheral corneal ulceration treated at the Xi'an No.1 Hospital from April 2018 to December 2020 were selected. Among them, 8 were males and 10 were females, aged 22-70y (mean: 53.50±12.26y). After the patient was admitted to hospital, broad-spectrum antibiotic eye drops were administered. After the results of the corneal microbial culture and drug sensitivity test were reported, the relevant drugs were adjusted, and sensitive antibiotics were used for treatment. After one week of medication, none of the patients showed any significant improvement or underwent surgical treatment.
Inclusion criteria: 1) patients with fungal and bacterial corneal ulcers; 2) infectious corneal ulcers that are peripheral and do not invade the pupil area at the center of 3 mm; 3) corneal ulcer reaches the stromal layer but does not penetrate the Descemet's membrane; 4) the diameters of the acellular porcine corneal stroma are <5 mm; 5) conventional medications are ineffective.
Exclusion criteria: 1) Other eye diseases (such as glaucoma and uveitis) for which other eye operations have been received; 2) patients with hypophasis, corneal neurotrophic disorder, severe dry eye, and fundus diseases; 3) a medical history of ocular surface burns caused by acids, alkalis, heat, etc.; 4) viral keratitis.
The final follow-up for all patients was >6mo postoperatively.
Preoperative Situation
Corneal confocal microscopy, corneal scraping, and pathogen culture in the lesion area were grouped according to the infectious pathogen. Nine patients had fungal keratitis and nine patients had bacterial keratitis. The depth of the lesion accounted for 30%-70% of the total corneal thickness in the lesion area in 14 cases and more than 70% in four cases. Among them, one patient had a hypopyon, which was infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The hypopyon disappeared after the patient received antibiotics before surgery (Table 1).
Table 1. Preoperative data of peripheral corneal ulceration.
| Patient No. | Sex | Age of surgery, y | Surgical eye | Inducement | Pathogen type | Visual acuity (logMAR) | Depth of lesion (µm) | Total corneal thickness of the lesion area (µm) | Proportion of the thickness of the lesion area (%) | Hypopyon |
| 1 | M | 64 | Left | Branch scratches | Alternaria | 1.5 | 269 | 522 | 0.51 | None |
| 2 | M | 70 | Left | None | Pseudomonas aeruginosa | 2.3 | 391 | 607 | 0.64 | Yes |
| 3 | F | 37 | Right | None | Staphylococcus epidermidis | 0.6 | 408 | 829 | 0.49 | None |
| 4 | F | 49 | Right | Corn leaves scratches | Fusarium | 1 | 165 | 485 | 0.34 | None |
| 5 | M | 56 | Right | None | Fusarium solani | 0.4 | 573 | 758 | 0.76 | None |
| 6 | M | 58 | Right | Branch scratches | Aspergillus | 0.3 | 544 | 729 | 0.75 | None |
| 7 | F | 62 | Left | None | Staphylococcus epidermidis | 2.2 | 207 | 413 | 0.5 | None |
| 8 | M | 58 | Right | None | Staphylococcus aureus | 0.7 | 253 | 680 | 0.37 | None |
| 9 | F | 69 | Right | Foreign body (inaccurate nature) | Actinomycetes | 0.5 | 457 | 509 | 0.9 | None |
| 10 | F | 48 | Right | None | Fusarium | 0.4 | 341 | 642 | 0.53 | None |
| 11 | M | 55 | Left | None | Staphylococcus aureus | 0.1 | 311 | 655 | 0.47 | None |
| 12 | F | 64 | Right | None | Staphylococcus aureus | 2.3 | 623 | 953 | 0.65 | None |
| 13 | F | 54 | Left | Branch scratches | Fusarium | 0.4 | 162 | 654 | 0.25 | None |
| 14 | F | 48 | Right | Branch scratches | Staphylococcus aureus | 0.8 | 491 | 916 | 0.54 | None |
| 15 | M | 37 | Right | None | Fusarium | 0.1 | 416 | 702 | 0.59 | None |
| 16 | M | 22 | Right | Spikes into the cornea when drilling wood | Aspergillus | 0.5 | 804 | 1146 | 0.70 | None |
| 17 | F | 62 | Right | Corn leaves scratches | Fusarium | 2.2 | 324 | 729 | 0.44 | None |
| 18 | F | 50 | Left | Branch scratches | Fusarium | 1.6 | 457 | 743 | 0.61 | None |
Observation Indicators
A slit-lamp microscope was used to check the postoperative anterior chamber, corneal transparency, and whether was rejection after keratoplasty or other complications. A standard logarithmic visual acuity chart was used to measure best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) preoperatively and postoperatively. logMAR visual acuity was used for statistical analysis. logMAR visual acuity 2.2 is count fingers; 2.3 is hand movement; 2.5 is light perception; and 3.0 is no light perception[8].
Corneal graft transparency was scored according to the following criteria: 0, the graft is completely transparent; 1, a slight clouding is visible, and the texture of the iris can be seen through the corneal graft; 2, the pannus can be seen, the iris tissue can be seen through the corneal graft, and the texture cannot be seen clearly; 3, corneal leukoplakia and the iris tissue cannot be seen through the corneal graft.
Corneal Donor Materials
Acellular porcine corneal stroma (produced by SHENZHEN AINEAR CORNEA ENGINEERING Co., Ltd., China) is a porcine derived decellularized corneal stroma that can be used for the lamellar keratoplasty of infectious corneal ulcers[9]. During the operation, the thickness was selected according to the depth of the corneal lesions. Specifications (300, 400, and 450 µm).
Surgical Methods
Lamellar keratoplasty was performed by an experienced surgeon (Cheng Y). After retrobulbar anesthesia with equal volumes of 2% lidocaine and 0.75% bupivacaine, open eyelid surgery was performed. The recipient bed was prepared by trephination using a trephine (all <5 mm in diameter) of appropriate diameter, according to the location and size of the corneal lesion. A scalpel was used to cut the ulcerated tissue layer-by-layer along the trephine scratch until the lesion was completely removed. Acellular porcine corneal stromal grafts were rehydrated in 0.9% sterile saline for 1min until they were soft. The acellular porcine corneal stroma was then treated at the same size. The graft was fixed to the recipient bed using interrupted 10‐0 nylon sutures. No gas, effusion, or blood was observed between the layers. Tobramycin and dexamethasone ointments were applied to the conjunctival sac of the surgical eye, and pressure bandages were applied.
Statistical Methods
The relevant data are described by mean±standard deviation, and the infection control rate of the lesion area are counted. The BCVA was recorded using the logMAR visual acuity, which was also used for statistical analysis. The comparison of BCVA before and after surgery was performed using a non-parametric test of paired samples, and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS25.0 statistical software. P<0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference. The BCVA was divided into groups according to <0.02, 0.02-0.1, 0.12-0.25, 0.3-0.5, >0.5, and Graph Pad Prism 8 was used to compare the preoperative and postoperative visual acuity.
RESULTS
Anterior Segment Performance
Eighteen patients underwent small-diameter acellular porcine corneal stromal transplantation for the treatment of infectious corneal ulcers. Postoperative drug therapy included topical medication for preoperative infection with microorganisms, including antibiotics or antifungal therapy, combined with 0.5% tacrolimus anti-rejection therapy and artificial tears to improve the ocular surface environment. Patients were instructed to avoid using glucocorticoid eye drops within 3wk after surgery and use low-concentration glucocorticoids locally if there was no recurrent fungal or bacterial infection after 3wk of reexamination. We observed that the corneal epithelium healed after surgery, and all the patients' symptoms improved significantly through fluorescein staining of the cornea under a slit-lamp microscope. During follow-up for more than 6mo, no cases of corneal graft rejection, corneal graft dissolution, corneal opacity, edema, or ingrowth of new blood vessels occurred. At the 12-month of follow-up, two patients were lost to follow-up, and the others had no rejection reaction.
BCVA Before and After Surgery
The preoperative and 6-month follow-up logMAR BCVA of 18 patients who underwent small-diameter acellular porcine corneal stroma transplantation for the treatment of infectious corneal ulcers were subjected to a paired sample non-parametric test, and the difference was statistically significant (Z=-3.415, P<0.05). The BCVA (0.47±0.30) at the 6-month postoperative follow-up was significantly improved compared with the preoperative (0.99±0.80). The BCVA at the 12-month follow-up after operation was not statistically significant compared to the 6-month (Z=0, P=1; Table 2).
Table 2. Comparison of BCVA before and after surgery of small diameter peripheral acellular porcine corneal stroma transplantation.
| BCVA | <0.02 | 0.02-0.1 | 0.12-0.25 | 0.3-0.5 | >0.5 | Total |
| Preoperative | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 18 |
| Postoperative 6mo | 0 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 18 |
| Postoperative 12mo | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 16 |
BCVA: Best corrected visual acuity.
Transparency After Acellular Porcine Corneal Stroma Transplantation
As shown in Table 3, 18 patients underwent small-diameter acellular porcine corneal stroma transplantation for the treatment of infectious corneal ulcers, and 72.22% of the patients had a corneal transparency score of 2 at 3d after surgery. The corneal grafts gradually became transparent, and 83.33% of the patients scored 1 at the 6mo after surgery. And 27.78% of patients scored 0 and 50% scored 1 at the 12mo follow-up. Therefore, with a longer follow-up time, the small-diameter acellular porcine corneal grafts gradually became increasingly transparent. Anterior segment photographs of the patients before and after surgery are shown in Figures 1 and 2.
Table 3. Corneal transparency score after small diameter decent acellular porcine corneal stroma transplantation.
| Transparency score | 3d | 10d | 1mo | 3mo | 6mo | 12mo |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 (27.78) |
| 1 | 5 (27.78) | 11 (61.11) | 12 (66.67) | 15 (83.33) | 15 (83.33) | 9 (50) |
| 2 | 13 (72.22) | 7 (38.89) | 6 (33.33) | 3 (16.67) | 3 (16.67) | 2 (11.11) |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 18 (100) | 18 (100) | 18 (100) | 18 (100) | 18 (100) | 16 (89) |
n (%)
Figure 1. Preoperative and postoperative photographs of small-diameter acellular porcine corneal stroma for peripheral corneal ulceration in a left eye.
A: An infection focus of about 2 mm on the cornea at 1:00-2:00 before surgery diagnosed fungal corneal ulcer of the left eye, and drug treatment was ineffective; B: Mild edema of corneal graft 3d after surgery; C: One month after surgery, edema of corneal graft gradually diminished, and the sutures were tightened without loosening; D: The corneal graft is translucent 3mo after the operation; E: All sutures have been removed 6mo after operation, and the corneal graft is transparent; F: The corneal graft was transparent 12mo after surgery.
Figure 2. Preoperative and postoperative photographs of small-diameter acellular porcine corneal stroma for peripheral corneal ulceration in a right eye.
A: The corneal infection lesions at 7:00-8:00 before the operation diagnosed bacterial corneal ulcer of the right eye, and drug treatment was ineffective; B: Mild edema of corneal graft 3d after surgery; C: One month after surgery, the corneal graft edema was diminished, and the sutures were tightened without loosening; D: The corneal sutures have been removed 3mo after the surgery, and the graft is slightly edematous; E: All sutures have been removed 6mo after surgery, and the corneal graft is transparent; F: The corneal graft was transparent 12mo after surgery.
Infection Control Rate of the Lesion Area
At the 6-month follow-up, the corneal infection in all patients was effectively controlled without recurrence, and the infection control rate was 100% (18/18). The results of corneal confocal microscope and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) before and after surgery in one patient showed that the control of postoperative infection and the growth of corneal graft in this type of patient are shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3. Corneal confocal microscope and anterior segment OCT before and after surgery of a small-diameter acellular porcine corneal stroma for peripheral corneal ulceration.
A, B, and C: The preoperative corneal confocal microscope of the case in Figure 2, showed the infiltration of inflammatory cells in the corneal epithelial layer, stromal layer and endothelium; D, E and F: Photos of 12mo after surgery, all layers of inflammation were controlled; H: Preoperative anterior segment OCT showed corneal ulcers infiltrating into the corneal stroma layer; I: Twelve months after surgery, the anterior section OCT showed the position of the corneal graft and the recipient bed, and the corneal surface was smooth. OCT: Optical coherence tomography.
DISCUSSION
Corneal diseases are one of the main causes of vision loss, damage due to corneal infection, or changes in appearance, and the best surgical treatment to restore vision is full-thickness or lamellar allogeneic corneal transplantation[10]. However, there is a severe shortage of corneal donors worldwide, resulting in an increasing number of patients with untreated curable corneal blindness[3]–[4]. The emergence of acellular porcine corneal stroma as an alternative material to allogeneic corneas has alleviated this situation[11]–[12]. This phenomenon can be traced back to 2003. Using in vitro corneal tissue engineering, Amano et al[13]. confirmed that porcine-derived corneal stroma had low immunogenicity. Animal experiments have proven that this material can be used as a graft to transparently heal the cornea. Therefore, it is an ideal replacement for an allogeneic cornea. The decellularized cornea completely replicates the complex structure and composition of the cornea, and produces an acellular scaffold composed of stroma[14]. The corneal stroma, as a mesh material, is beneficial for the growth of mesenchymal cells in the cornea and provides a relatively healthy microenvironment of the corneal stroma, which is beneficial for the growth of corneal epithelial cells[15]–[16].
The acellular porcine corneal stroma lamellar transplantation can not only maintain the integrity of the eyeball, but also retain the original light transmittance of the cornea[17]. Wang et al[18] analyzed the immunogenicity of the three-layer porcine cornea and found that the stromal layer of the cornea was the lowest in both cellular immunity and humoral immunity, followed by the epithelial layer and the highest in the endothelial layer. However, lamellar keratoplasty has the following advantages: because the Descemet's membrane is not breached during surgery, the risk of postoperative intraocular infection is low[19]–[20], and uveitis is also mild; in lamellar keratoplasty, only the stromal layer of the cornea is sutured and fixed, and only the stromal layer is retained after decellularization of the acellular porcine corneal stroma. Therefore, endothelial cell transplantation was not performed, and corneal graft rejection was significantly reduced after surgery. Zhang et al[21] observed 47 patients with fungal corneal ulcers who underwent lamellar keratoplasty with porcine-derived acellular matrix material. After six months of observation, the infection was controlled in all patients, and no patients had serious adverse reactions or transplant rejection. Only four patients had different degrees of graft dissolution during follow-up, and 34 eyes showed more than two lines of improvement in postoperative visual acuity.
The acellular porcine corneal stroma is less immunogenic than the decellularized stromal components. However, postoperative corneal transplant rejection occurs frequently in clinical practice. According to our previous clinical studies, this may be related to T cell-mediated cellular immunity and hypersensitivity to xenogeneic antigens[22]. For the surgical design of peripheral corneal ulcers, we chose small-diameter grafts and used fewer grafts compared to transpupillary grafts, which further reduced rejection after transplantation[23]–[25]. In this study, the trephine diameter was ≤5 mm. According to our follow-up of 18 patients with peripheral corneal ulceration treated with small-diameter acellular porcine corneal stroma, the corneal epithelium was completely covered on the graft after surgery. The graft gradually became transparent 3mo after surgery. The patient's vision significantly improved. During the 6-month follow-up, corneal infection was effectively controlled without recurrence, and the infection control rate was 100% (18/18). No postoperative rejection was observed. At the 12-month of follow-up, two patients were lost to follow-up, and the others had no rejection reaction and no keratitis recurrence.
For patients with corneal ulcers infected by fungi, bacteria, and amoebae, if the treatment is not performed timely or the effect of drug treatment is invalid, the lesions will further expand both in scope and depth, causing endophthalmitis and corneal perforation. Once the lesion expands or deepens, the graft diameter during surgery increases accordingly, which significantly increases the possibility of postoperative graft rejection and recurrence. Therefore, the timing of surgery in such patients is crucial. We believe that surgery should be actively considered if the lesion accumulates the deep stromal layer of the cornea and does not improve significantly after sensitive anti-infective therapy[26]. The purpose of early intervention is to remove the source of infection and inflammatory tissue to accelerate healing through complete debridement when the corneal ulcer is small. In addition, it can prevent the further expansion of the infection. If conservative treatment fails to cause severe ulcers and surgery is performed, the possibility of postoperative recurrence and rejection increases simultaneously. In contrast, for infectious corneal ulcers with a small peripheral diameter, early intervention can effectively prevent the disease from extending to the visual axis of the cornea, and the prognosis of vision is more secure.
It is reported that corneal nerve fibers grow into the graft after 6mo of bioengineered keratoplasty[27]–[30]. Before this process, graft rejection may still occur, even if the corneal epithelium is completely healed. We observed no postoperative rejection or recurrence of keratitis in 16 patients 12mo after surgery. Therefore, the transplantation of small-diameter acellular porcine corneal stroma is safe and effective for treating corneal ulcers. Faced with a shortage of human corneal donors, acellular porcine corneal stroma is an ideal alternative for treating an increasing number of patients with corneal blindness. We will continue to observe corneal changes in these patients in the future.
Footnotes
Foundation: Supported by Key R&D Plan of Shaanxi Province (No.2021SF-331).
Conflicts of Interest: Liang T, None; Wang X, None; Wu J, None; Cheng Y, None.
REFERENCES
- 1.Whitcher JP, Srinivasan M, Upadhyay MP. Prevention of corneal ulceration in the developing world. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2002;42(1):71–77. doi: 10.1097/00004397-200201000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dong P, Hang D, Duong N, Lien M, Chen A, Aldave A. Infectious keratitis in Vietnam: etiology, organisms, and management at Vietnam National Eye Hospital. Int J Ophthalmol. 2022;15(1):128–134. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.01.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wong KH, Kam KW, Chen LJ, Young AL. Corneal blindness and current major treatment concern-graft scarcity. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017;10(7):1154–1162. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.07.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Williams AM, Muir KW. Awareness and attitudes toward corneal donation: challenges and opportunities. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:1049–1059. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S142702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zheng Q, Zhang Y, Ren Y, Zhao Z, Hua S, Li J, Wang H, Ye C, Kim AD, Wang L, Chen W. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with cross-linked acellular porcine corneal stroma to manage fungal keratitis. Xenotransplantation. 2021;28(2):e12655. doi: 10.1111/xen.12655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shi WY, Xie LX. Focus on the clinical application of the first artificial bioengineered cornea in China. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2016;52(3):161–163. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2016.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chatterjee S, Agrawal D. Recurrence of infection in corneal grafts after therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty for microbial keratitis. Cornea. 2020;39(1):39–44. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liu WG, Merrett K, Griffith M, Fagerholm P, Dravida S, Heyne B, Scaiano JC, Watsky MA, Shinozaki N, Lagali N, Munger R, Li FF. Recombinant human collagen for tissue engineered corneal substitutes. Biomaterials. 2008;29(9):1147–1158. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li Q, Wang HM, Dai ZY, Cao YC, Jin CY. Preparation and biomechanical properties of an acellular porcine corneal stroma. Cornea. 2017;36(11):1343–1351. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li SQ, Li M, Gu L, Peng LL, Deng YQ, Zhong J, Wang BW, Wang Q, Xiao YC, Yuan J. Risk factors influencing survival of acellular porcine corneal stroma in infectious keratitis: a prospective clinical study. J Transl Med. 2019;17(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-02192-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vabres B, Vanhove B, Blancho G. Corneal xenotransplantation: anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Methods Mol Biol. 2020;2110:245–251. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0255-3_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mehta JS, Kocaba V, Soh YQ. The future of keratoplasty: cell-based therapy, regenerative medicine, bioengineering keratoplasty, gene therapy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2019;30(4):286–291. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Amano S, Shimomura N, Kaji Y, Ishii K, Yamagami S, Araie M. Antigenicity of porcine cornea as xenograft. Curr Eye Res. 2003;26(6):313–318. doi: 10.1076/ceyr.26.5.313.15440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lagali N. Corneal stromal regeneration: current status and future therapeutic potential. Curr Eye Res. 2020;45(3):278–290. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2019.1663874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhu J, Zhang K, Sun Y, Gao X, Li YC, Chen ZJ, Wu XY. Reconstruction of functional ocular surface by acellular porcine cornea matrix scaffold and limbal stem cells derived from human embryonic stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013;19(21-22):2412–2425. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tran TM, Hou JH. Clinical applications of bioengineered tissue-cellular products for management of corneal diseases. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2023;34(4):311–323. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kim MK, Park CG. Invited commentary on Deep Anterior lamellar keratoplasty with Cross-linked Acellular Porcine Corneal Stroma to Manage Fungal Keratitis. Xenotransplantation. 2021;28(2):e12682. doi: 10.1111/xen.12682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang ZC, Ge J, Xu JT, Chen JQ. Relative quantitative analysis of corneal immunogenicity. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2002;38(9):535–538. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen YX, Zhang LL, Liu ZL, Liu QM, Gao MH. Efficacy of lamellar keratoplasty with acellular porcine corneal stroma in treatment for infectious central and peripheral corneal ulcers. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2021;17:623–634. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S309742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zheng J, Huang XD, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Qin QY, Lin L, Jin XM, Lam C, Zhang JN. Short-term results of acellular porcine corneal stroma keratoplasty for herpes simplex keratitis. Xenotransplantation. 2019;26(4):e12509. doi: 10.1111/xen.12509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhang MC, Liu X, Jin Y, Jiang DL, Wei XS, Xie HT. Lamellar keratoplasty treatment of fungal corneal ulcers with acellular porcine corneal stroma. Am J Transplant. 2015;15(4):1068–1075. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cheng Y, Wu J, Zhu H, Hui L, Hao M. Clinical and immunopathological study of rejection after bioengineered keratoplasty: a report of 5 cases. Guoji Yanke Zazhi (Int Eye Sci) 2021;21(9):1661–1664. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rovere MR, Ouilhon C, Salmon D, Haftek M, Damour O, Auxenfans C. Development and characterization of Lyophilized Transparized Decellularized stroma as a replacement for living cornea in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cell Tissue Bank. 2019;20(1):49–59. doi: 10.1007/s10561-018-9742-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yu AC, Spena R, Pellegrini M, Bovone C, Busin M. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: current status and future directions. Cornea. 2022;41(5):539–544. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Di Zazzo A, Varacalli G, De Gregorio C, Coassin M, Bonini S. Therapeutic corneal transplantation in acanthamoeba keratitis: penetrating versus lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea. 2021;41(3):396–401. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Group of keratology, Society of Ophthalmology, Chinese Medical Association. Infective corneal disease clinical diagnosis and treatment expert consensus (2011) Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2012;13(1):72–75. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang S, Zhang Y, Li J, Yu X, Dou X, Wang L. Clinical effect of bioengineered cornea and in vivo confocal microscopy observation after human lamellar keraplasty. Chin J Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;34(2):144–149. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li SQ, Deng YQ, Tian BS, Huang HX, Zhang HN, Yang RH, Zhong J, Wang BW, Peng LL, Yuan J. Healing characteristics of acellular porcine corneal stroma following therapeutic keratoplasty. Xenotransplantation. 2020;27(2):e12566. doi: 10.1111/xen.12566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Xiao YT, Zhao XY, Liu X, Xie HT, Zhang MC. Ten-year follow-up of lamellar keratoplasty treatment with acellular porcine corneal stroma: a case report. Cornea. 2022;41(5):623–626. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hao M, Cheng Y, Wu J, Cheng Y, Wang J. Clinical observation of recombinant human nerve growth factor in the treatment of neurotrophic keratitis. Int J Ophthalmol. 2023;16(1):60–66. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.01.09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



