Vol. 221, No. 6 | https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20232387 | April 2, 2024
The authors regret that Fig. 2, Fig. 3, and Table 2 contained errors in the originally published article. In Fig. 2 (g-j), an open square in the graph key identifying “fLUC” samples has been removed because these panels contain no data representing fLUC samples. In the Fig. 3 (a-f) bar graph key, the open square was erroneously labeled; this has been corrected to “fLUC,” and the label “WT” has been added to identify the black bars. In Table 2, “T” has been changed to “Y” in line 9 of the “Ultra-rare or rare Predicted GoF” row in the “(CADD)” column. The corrected figures and table are shown here, with the table correction indicated in red text. These corrections do not change the original conclusions of the article, and the figure legends remain unchanged. The errors appear in PDFs downloaded before April 30, 2024.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Table 2.
In silico prediction of GoF activity in JAK1 variants
