Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 May 7;19(5):e0302447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302447

Importance of small vessel disease as a possible cause of sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Chul Young Yoon 1,2, Junhun Lee 1,2, Tae Hoon Kong 1,2,3, Young Joon Seo 1,3,*
Editor: Manoj Diwakar4
PMCID: PMC11075872  PMID: 38713651

Abstract

Objective

Vascular disease like small-vessel disease (SVD) is the most likely cause among the potential causes of Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). Understanding the relationship between SVD and SSNHL is crucial for developing effective prevention and treatment strategies. To confirm the relationship between SVD and SSNHL, the effect of SVD is confirmed by focusing on the duration and recurrence of SSNHL.

Methods

This article reports a retrospective observational study that investigated the relationship between SVD and SSNHL using the South Korea Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) database from 2010 to 2020. This retrospective observational study included 319,569 SSNHL patients between 2010 and 2020.

Results

Participant demographics were controlled using Propensity Score Matching. The hazard ratios (HR) for the effect of SVD on the duration of SSNHL were 1.045 for the group with SVD before the onset of SSNHL and 1.234 for the group with SVD after the onset of SSNHL. SVD was statistically significant for the recurrence of SSNHL, with an odds ratio of 1.312 in the group with SVD compared to the group without SVD. The HR for the period until a recurrence in the group with SVD was 1.062.

Conclusions

The study identified SVD as a possible cause of SSNHL and found that the duration of SSNHL increased only in the presence of SVD. SVD also affected the recurrence of SSNHL, with the recurrence rate being 1.312 times higher in the group with SVD.

Introduction

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is defined as a difference of at least 30 dB in three consecutive frequencies within 3 days, and 90% of SSNHL cases are idiopathic [1]. The incidence of SSNHL is difficult to determine with certainty because of the low treatment persistence. The incidence of SSNHL is 11–77 per 100,000 per year [2]. SSNHL occurs regardless of sex and age and shows various severities [3]. Although the spontaneous recovery rate of SSNHL is as high as 32–65%, the cause and pathogenesis of SSNHL are still unknown [4]. Furthermore, there have been reports suggesting that the spontaneous recovery rate of SSNHL has recently been exaggerated [1]. SSNHL can cause permanent damage if treatment is delayed. Despite the need to recognize the disease and take immediate action, the etiology of SSNHL is ambiguous. Previous studies have suggested possible causes of SSNHL, including vascular, ear & endocrinal disorder, infection, autoimmune, cancer, trauma, and drugs adverse effect [1, 58].

Among the potential causes of SSNHL, vascular disease is the most likely. According to a 2012 review by Lin et al., acquired and hereditary cardiovascular factors are associated with an increased risk of developing SSNHL [7]. Small-vessel disease (SVD) refers to the narrowing or blockage of small blood vessels that supply vital organs such as the heart, brain, and ears.

Although the exact pathophysiology of SSNHL has not yet been elucidated, understanding the relationship between SVD and SSNHL is crucial for developing effective prevention and treatment strategies. Therefore, we defined vascular disease as SVD, based on previous studies. Vascular disease was investigated as a risk factor for SSNHL from 2010 to 2020 using SSNHL patient data extracted from the HIRA (Health Insurance Review and Assessment service) database. By exploring the potential mechanisms and risk factors underlying these conditions, we hope to shed light on the pathogenesis of SVD and improve clinical outcomes in patients.

Materials and methods

Data collection

South Korea’s National Health Insurance (NHI) covers 98% of the population. Citizens who subscribe to the NHI are guaranteed expenditure coverage whenever they visit a hospital. Records of hospital visits are sent to the HIRA for review [9]. The HIRA data includes personal information, diagnosis information, and treatment information of the patients who visited the hospital [10]. The HIRA data used in this study were SSNHL patient data (H91.2, ICD-10; International Classification of Diseases-10), which were opened at the request of the researcher, and they include diagnosis records, medication information, and treatment information of SSNHL patients from 2010 to 2020. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University Wonju Severance Christian Hospital (Wonju, South Korea) (CR321316). We obtained data access permission from HIRA, and the period during which we could use the data was from 2022-08-04 to 2022-12-31. The approval numbers for this study obtained from HIRA are M20210430249 and M20221005002.

Operational definition and study participant

SVD is a collection of the vascular diseases defined in this study. Each vascular disease was defined according to the rules defined in the study that analyzed the diseases (Table 1). Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia, which are the most common vascular diseases, as well as vascular diseases previously defined in South Korea’s health insurance data, were included. Applicable vascular diseases include myocardial infarction, angina, transient ischemic attack, peripheral artery disease, thromboembolism, heart failure, stroke, ischemic stroke, cerebral infarction, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), cerebral arterial stenosis (CASTN), cerebral arterial dissection, vasculitis, cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL), sickle cell disorder, retinal vein occlusion, diabetic retinopathy, and chronic kidney disease. SSNHL was defined based on previous studies and the conditions were a H91.2 diagnosis code (ICD-10), one or more steroid drug codes, and two or more pure tone audiometry test codes. The Drug/Procedure codes in Table 1 can be found in the S1S5 Tables.

Table 1. Operational definitions for small vessel disease and sudden sensorineural hearing loss selected in our study.

Small vessel disease
Disease ICD-10 Drug / Procedure Etc
Hypertension [4] I10, I11, I12, I13, I15 Drug code Admission ≥1 or outpatient department ≥2
OR
At least once a year
Diabetes mellitus [4] E10, E11, E13, E14 Drug code Admission ≥1 or outpatient department ≥2
OR
At least once a year
Dyslipidemia [4] E78 Drug code Admission ≥1 or outpatient department ≥2
OR
At least once a year
Myocardial infarction [11] I21.0, I21.1, I21.2, I21.3, I21.4, I21.9, I22.0, I22.1, I22.8, I22.9, I23.0, I23.1, I23.2, I23.3, I23.4, I23.5, I23.6, I23.8, I24.1, I25.2
Angina (both stable and unstable) [12] I20.0, I20.1, I20.8, I20.9
Transient ischemic attack [12] G45.0, G45.1, G45.2, G45.3, G45.8, G45.9, G46.0, G46.1, G46.2 Admission or outpatient department ≥1
Peripheral artery disease [12] I65.0, I65.1, I65.2, I65.3, I65.8, I65.9, I66.0, I66.1, I66.2, I66.3, I66.4, I66.8, I66.9, I70.0, I70.1, I70.2, I70.8, I70.9, I73.9, I74.0, I74.1, I74.2, I74.3, I74.4, I74.5, I74.8, I74.9 Procedure code Hospitalization ≥1 or outpatient department ≥2
Thromboembolism [4] I74 Hospitalization or outpatient department ≥1
Heart failure [13] I11.0, I50, I97.1 Hospitalization ≥1 or outpatient department ≥2
Stroke [14] I60-I63
Ischemic stroke [14] I63, I64 Brain imaging (CT or MRI) ≥1 Hospitalization ≥1
Cerebral infarction [14] I63 Diagnostic imaging within 7 days (CT, MRA, MRI)
  1. ≥3 days of hospitalization or death within 3 days of hospitalization

  2. Exclude other causes of brain injury

Intracerebral hemorrhage [13] I60–I62, I64-6 Brain imaging (CT or MRI) ≥1 Hospitalization ≥1
Cerebral arterial stenosis [14] I65 or I66
Cerebral arterial dissection [4] I720, I725, I726, I670, or I671
Primary or secondary vasculitis [4] I68, L93, L95, M05, M30-32, M35, or D57
CADASIL [4] I673
Sickle cell disorder [4] D57
Retina vein occlusion [15] H34.1, H34.8
Diabetic retinopathy [16] E11.319 Fundus photography
Chronic kidney disease [4] N18, N19 Hospitalization ≥1 or outpatient department ≥2
Sudden sensorineural hearing loss
Sudden sensorineural hearing loss [10] H91.2 Steroid drugs code ≥1
Pure tone audiometry test code ≥2

CADASIL: cerebral arterial dissection, vasculitis, cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy ICD-10: International classification of diseases-10, CT: Computed tomography, MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging, MRA: Magnetic resonance angiography

When these conditions were applied, the number of patients diagnosed with SSNHL between 2010 and 2020 was 319,569. Diagnosis of SVD was confirmed in 126,836 patients.

Experimental design and statistics

This study aimed to confirm the role of SVD as a risk factor of SSNHL. Therefore, we conducted the study by setting subjects based on various risk factors (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Flowchart of the article.

Fig 1

First, we extracted SSNHL patients from the HIRA database and defined SVD. The extracted patients numbered 319,569, with 123,832 having a history of SVD. Since both SSNHL and SVD, which are the focus of our study, are conditions heavily influenced by age, it was necessary to control for demographic characteristics. Therefore, we controlled for gender and age through Propensity Score Matching (PSM, Table 2). However, as the target groups varied depending on the subject, PSM was conducted for each subject. In Subject 1, we compare the ratio of SVD between the entire population of South Korea and the SSNHL patient group from 2010 to 2020. In Subject 2, we examine the impact of the duration of the disease on SVD among SSNHL patients. Subject 3 investigates the influence of SVD on SSNHL recurrence, while Subject 4 explores the impact of SVD on the time until SSNHL recurrence.

Table 2. Result of PSM for each subject’s data.

(A) The results of conducting PSM on Subject 1
Subject 1 Before matching After matching
In SSNHL Nationwide p In SSNHL Nationwide p
Sex Male 0.449 0.498 < .0001 0.498 0.498 0.9684
Female 0.551 0.502 0.502 0.502
Age 0~19 0.050 0.172 < .0001 0.171 0.172 0.9792
20~29 0.112 0.132 0.133 0.132
30~39 0.171 0.132 0.132 0.132
40~49 0.240 0.159 0.158 0.159
50~59 0.279 0.166 0.166 0.166
60~ 0.148 0.239 0.239 0.239

SSNHL: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss

SVD: Small-vessel disease, SSNHL: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss

SVD: Small-vessel disease

Regarding Subject 1, PSM was conducted with the SSNHL patient group and the population in South Korea (Table 2A). In Subject 1, we compared the ratio of SVD between the overall population and the SSNHL patient group through chi-square analysis. However, due to insufficient computing power to extract all patients with SVD from the entire HIRA dataset, we instead examined the ratios for each vessel disease included within SVD. Regarding Subject 2, patients were divided into a group with SVD before onset of SSNHL, a group with SVD after onset of SSNHL, and a group without SVD, and PSM was performed (Table 2B). The duration of SSNHL was defined as the difference between the last diagnosis date and the first diagnosis date. To prevent inclusion of recurrent cases, only cases with a difference of 365 days or less between the diagnosis dates were considered. The first diagnosis date of SSNHL was set as the event point for survival analysis. For Subject 3, PSM was performed by categorizing the entire population into groups with and without SVD (Table 2C). Recurrence in SSNHL was defined when the difference between diagnosis dates was 365 days or more. Logistic regression was conducted to examine the presence of SVD between groups with and without recurrence. In Subject 4, the recurrence group was further divided into groups with and without SVD, and PSM was conducted (Table 2D). The time until recurrence was defined as the difference between the first recurrence diagnosis date and the previous diagnosis date. The recurrence date of SSNHL was set as the event point for survival analysis. PSM was applied to all groups corresponding to each participant to control for demographic characteristics (sex and age), with the effects of sex and age removed from all groups. The statistical program used for the analysis was SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Compare the ratio of SVD between the entire population and the SSNHL patient (Subject 1)

Table 3 shows the results of the confidence interval estimation of SVD in the total population of South Korea as a proportion of SVD in the SSNHL group. It is possible to verify each SVD individually in the NHI database, but it is not possible to identify duplicate patients. Therefore, the expression is presented as a ratio for each SVD condition. Based on the estimated results, two conditions were selected as the exclusion criteria. The conditions were: (1) statistical insignificance between the SVD ratio in the national record and SSNHL and (2) an insufficient the number of participants. Diseases excluded using these conditions included ICH, CADASIL, and sickle cell disorder. These diseases were not analyzed further. The proportion of ICH did not differ between the SSNHL group and the total population. However, there were no sufficient cases of CADASIL and sickle cell disorder for the study.

Table 3. Comparison of SVD disease in patients with SSNHL and in the population of South Korea.

Small Vessel Disease SVD ratio in National record SVD ratio and confidence interval in SSNHL
Hypertension* 0.133 0.151 (0.1483, 0.1532)
Diabetes mellitus* 0.069 0.029 (0.0279, 0.0301)
Dyslipidemia* 0.044 0.204 (0.2008, 0.2063)
Myocardial infarction* 0.003 0.01 (0.0094, 0.0108)
Angina (both stable and unstable) * 0.014 0.088 (0.0858, 0.0896)
Transient ischemic attack* 0.003 0.032 (0.0308, 0.0332)
Peripheral artery disease* 0.009 0.003 (0.0023, 0.003)
Thromboembolism* 0.000 0.005 (0.0048, 0.0058)
Heart failure* 0.005 0.036 (0.0344, 0.0369)
Stroke* 0.012 0.038 (0.0364, 0.039)
Ischemic stroke* 0.010 0.016 (0.0153, 0.017)
Cerebral infarction* 0.010 0.009 (0.0082, 0.0094)
Intracerebral hemorrhage 0.002 0.003 (0.00204, 0.0031)
Retina vein occlusion* 0.001 0.007 (0.006, 0.0071)
Diabetic retinopathy* 0.001 0.007 (0.006, 0.007)
Cerebral arterial stenosis * 0.003 0.022 (0.0212, 0.0232)
Cerebral arterial dissection* 0.002 0.012 (0.0113, 0.0128)
Primary or secondary vasculitis* 0.005 0.02 (0.0186, 0.0205)
CADASIL** 0.000 0 (0.0001, 0.0003)
Sickle cell disorder** 0.000 0 (0.0001, 0.0003)
Chronic kidney disease* 0.000 0.018 (0.0175, 0.0193)

SVD: Small-vessel disease, SSNHL: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss, CADASIL: cerebral arterial dissection, vasculitis, cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy

* Statistically significant (p < 0.0001)

** The number of participants is insufficient

The influence of SVD on the SSNHL group (Subjects 2, 3, and 4)

The effect of SVD on the duration of SSNHL (Subject 2) was also investigated. Using the group without SVD as a reference, the hazard ratio (HR) of the group with SVD before the onset of SSNHL was 1.045, and the HR of the group with SVD after the onset of SSNHL was 1.234. The differences among the three groups were significant, but the HR for the group with previous SVD in the SSNHL group was not statistically significant (Table 4, Fig 2A).

Table 4. Results of analysis of the effect of SVD on the treatment period of SSNHL.

The treatment period of SSNHL N % Censored (%) Log Rank HR 95% CI p-value
With Not SVD 5,788 41.80 0.09 < .0001 Ref - - -
With before SVD 2,754 19.89 0.36 1.045 0.999 1.094 0.056
With after SVD 5,305 38.31 0.18 1.234 1.188 1.281 < .0001

SVD: Small-vessel disease, SSNHL: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss, HR: Hazard ratio, CI: Confidence Interval

Fig 2. Kaplan-Meier estimation of SSNHL duration and recurrence duration according to SVD.

Fig 2

We examined the effect of SVD on the recurrence of SSNHL (Subjects 3 and 4). In the logistic regression analysis, which confirmed the effect of SVD on the recurrence of SSNHL in the entire population, SVD was statistically significant. The odds ratio for recurrence was 1.312 in the group with SVD compared with the group without SVD (Table 5A). Survival analysis to examine the effect of SVD on the period until recurrence in the group with SSNHL recurrence and Cox regression showed that the HR of the group with SVD was 1.062, with the group without SVD used as the reference (Table 5B, Fig 2B).

Table 5. Result of analysis of the effect of SVD on the recurrence of SSNHL.

(A) Result of subject 3
Recurrence N % p-value Variable OR 95% CI p-value
No 104,826 75 < .0001 Not SVD Ref - - -
Yes 34,942 100 - With SVD 1.312 1.281 1.345 < .0001
(B) Result of subject 4
Time to recurrence N % Censored (%) Time (month) Log Rank HR 95% CI p-value
Mean Median
Not SVD 4,093 41.80 0.42 35.84 29 0.0007 Ref - - -
With SVD 15,848 19.89 0.44 37.41 30 1.062 1.026 1.099 0.0006

OR: Odds ratio, CI: Confidence Interval

SVD: Small-vessel disease, HR: Hazard ratio, CI: Confidence Interval

Discussion

The exact pathophysiology of SVD in SSNHL is not fully understood; however, several mechanisms have been proposed. The anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) branches from the basilar artery and supplies blood from the anterior to the middle cerebellum. It is the sole vascular supply for the labyrinth, cochlea, and vestibular organs. Given that the labyrinthine artery is the end artery of the AICA, it is plausible that differences in the anatomical variations of the AICA result in the clinical findings of SSNHL. One possible mechanism is that SVD in the inner ear can lead to decreased blood flow and ischemia, which can damage the hair cells and neural structures responsible for hearing [17]. Another proposed mechanism is that SVD can cause inflammation and oxidative stress in the inner ear, leading to further damage to the hearing structures [18]. Studies have also suggested that SVD in the inner ear may be a manifestation of a more generalized vascular pathology that affects multiple organs, including the brain and heart [19]. This may explain the observed association between SSNHL and other cardiovascular diseases such as myocardial infarction and stroke. Overall, the pathophysiology of SVD in SSNHL is likely multifactorial, involving complex interactions between the vascular, inflammatory, and oxidative stress pathways. SVD has been linked to several other diseases that share characteristics with SSNHL, including stroke and dementia. SVD in the brain can cause lacunar infarcts, which are small, deep brain strokes that result from the occlusion of small blood vessels [20]. Strokes can lead to cognitive impairments, including memory loss, executive dysfunction, and language deficits, which are also observed in SSNHL [21]. In addition, studies have found that patients with SSNHL are at an increased risk of stroke and transient ischemic attack [22], suggesting a shared underlying vascular pathology. Similarly, SVD in the brain has been linked to the development of dementia, particularly vascular dementia, which is caused by a series of small strokes and microinfarcts [23]. The cognitive symptoms of vascular dementia, such as impaired memory and attention, are similar to those seen in SSNHL [24]. Furthermore, studies have found that patients with SSNHL are at increased risk of developing dementia, particularly vascular dementia [25], further suggesting a shared vascular mechanism.

The HIRA database offers several advantages. The HIRA data were obtained from South Korea’s NHI database. Since South Korea’s NHI covers 98% of the population, it has a great quantitative advantage over data from a single center [10]. However, it is difficult to access all data for the entire period when the NHI existed in South Korea, owing to limitations in hardware, time, and money for analysis. Nevertheless, we assessed data on the SSNHL group during the 2010–2020 period. Because the HIRA database contains information on tests, procedures, and medications, including diagnostic codes, there is sufficient information to define the disease. Therefore, it is desirable to design a study using the appropriate criteria. We have defined the corresponding diseases in Table 1 and using supplementary material. While efforts were made to define the duration of SSNHL and recurrence as objectively as possible, bias inevitably arises due to the researcher’s influence. Recurrence was defined as cases where the time between diagnoses was within 365 days; however, in some instances, patients may seek hospital care for the management of SSNHL beyond the 365 days after the initial diagnosis, indicating a conceptual challenge in defining recurrence.

Table 3 presents a comparison of the SVD ratios between the entire South Korean population and patients with SSNHL in Subject 1. The ratios and confidence intervals demonstrate notable differences in the prevalence of various vascular conditions between the general population and SSNHL patients. The analysis in Table 4 investigates the effect of SVD on the duration of SSNHL in Subject 2. The HR suggest that, compared to the group without SVD, the group with SVD before and after SSNHL onset exhibits significant differences. However, the HR for the group with previous SVD in the SSNHL group does not reach statistical significance. In Table 5, the logistic regression analysis for Subject 3 shows a statistically significant odds ratio for SSNHL recurrence in the group with SVD compared to the group without SVD. For Subject 4, the Cox regression analysis demonstrates a significant hazard ratio for time to recurrence in the group with SVD compared to the reference group. The results underscore the importance of understanding the association between SVD and SSNHL, suggesting potential avenues for prevention and intervention. The observed variations in SVD prevalence between the general population and SSNHL patients could prompt further investigation into the role of vascular factors in SSNHL development. In our study, SVD (excluding ICH, CADASIL, and sickle cell disorder) clearly differed in proportion in the SSNHL-affected population. SVD affects the duration of SSNHL, whether before or after its onset, and this effect indicates an increase in disease duration. In particular, the risk of developing SVD after SSNHL onset reached 1.234, which was statistically significant. The effect of SVD on SSNHL recurrence was statistically significant, and recurrence occurred 1.312 times more frequently in the group with SVD than in the group without SVD. An investigation of the period until SSNHL recurrence showed that there was a statistically significant difference in the period until recurrence in the presence or absence of SVD in the group with recurrence, with a risk of 1.062.

The clinical implications of the association between SVD and SSNHL are significant, as they suggest that prevention, early detection, and treatment of vascular risk factors may help reduce the risk of SSNHL. One potential avenue for prevention is management of hypertension, which is a major risk factor for SVD [20]. Several studies have found an association between hypertension and SSNHL, and it has been suggested that controlling blood pressure may reduce the risk of SSNHL [22, 26] (3). Lifestyle modifications such as exercise and a healthy diet may also help reduce the risk of hypertension and SVD. Early detection of SVD may be possible through imaging studies, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT). These techniques can reveal signs of SVD in the brain, which may be early indicators of vascular pathology in other organs, including the inner ear [27]. Early detection could allow the implementation of interventions to slow the progression of SVD and reduce the risk of SSNHL. The treatment of SVD may involve a combination of lifestyle modifications and medication. Blood pressure-lowering medication, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers, may help prevent or slow the progression of SVD. Antiplatelet therapies, such as aspirin, may also be used to reduce the risk of thrombotic events associated with SVD. In addition, lifestyle modifications such as exercise, healthy diet, and smoking cessation may help reduce the risk of SVD and associated conditions such as SSNHL.

Limitation

In defining SVD, our approach relied on established parameters from previous studies, allowing for comprehensive comparisons within the SSNHL population. However, it is essential to acknowledge certain limitations pertaining to the analysis of specific vascular diseases, including ICH, CADASIL, and Sickle Cell Disorder. The dataset’s insufficient representation of these conditions restricted their detailed examination within the context of SVD and SSNHL. Moreover, the utilization of the HIRA database, while advantageous in its coverage of 98% of the South Korean population, is not without drawbacks. Notably, the absence of detailed test results poses a challenge in refining criteria, particularly in cases like pure tone audiometry tests. While the presence or absence of a test is recorded, the lack of result documentation limits our ability to establish criteria based on specific hearing thresholds at different frequencies. Consequently, this impediment precluded the application of a precise clinical definition. These methodological considerations underscore the need for cautious interpretation and highlight the inherent limitations in our study design. While the HIRA database provides a valuable resource for population-level analyses, future research efforts should address these constraints to enhance the comprehensiveness and accuracy of investigations into the relationship between vascular diseases and SSNHL.

Conclusion

We identified SVD as a possible cause of SSNHL. Previous studies have defined SVD as a condition that includes various vascular diseases. Using the ratio of each vascular disease, SVD was redefined as any vascular disease with a greater influence on the SSNHL group. The SVD group created in this manner showed various influences within the SSNHL group, and it was confirmed that the duration of SSNHL increased only in the presence of SVD. In particular, HR was higher in the group that developed SVD after the onset of SSNHL. SVD also affected the recurrence of SSNHL, and the recurrence rate was 1.312 times higher in the group with SVD. An analysis confirming the time to recurrence showed that recurrence occurred more rapidly in the SVD group. The findings highlight the intricate relationship between SVD and SSNHL, emphasizing the potential impact of vascular factors on SSNHL duration and recurrence. Further research, especially considering the limitations, is warranted to unravel the underlying mechanisms and explore clinical interventions for SSNHL patients with associated vascular conditions.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Classification codes of anti-hypertensive drugs.

(PDF)

pone.0302447.s001.pdf (304KB, pdf)
S2 Table. Classification codes of diabetes mellitus drugs.

(PDF)

pone.0302447.s002.pdf (305.3KB, pdf)
S3 Table. Classification codes of dyslipidemia drugs.

(PDF)

pone.0302447.s003.pdf (306.5KB, pdf)
S4 Table. Procedure code in small-vessel disease.

(PDF)

pone.0302447.s004.pdf (306.5KB, pdf)
S5 Table. Drug code & procedure code in sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

(PDF)

pone.0302447.s005.pdf (306.5KB, pdf)

Data Availability

For privacy protection reasons and in accordance with domestic laws in Korea, registration of health insurance data is restricted. Therefore, we obtained authorization to use third-party data, specifically health insurance data, to conduct our research. As a result, we request an exemption from the data registration process. Data cannot be shared publicly because of National health insurance data from Korea. Data are available from the National health insurance service Institutional Data Access / Ethics Committee (contact via https://nhiss.nhis.or.kr/bd/ay/bdaya001iv.do) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Funding Statement

The present study was grant-funded by three institutions supported by the Korean government. - "Regional Innovation Strategy (RIS)" through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE) (2022RIS-005) - the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2020R1A2C1009789) - The Korean Fund for Regenerative Medicine (21C0721L1) - The Commercialization Promotion Agency for R&D Outcomes (2023, 1711199152) The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Chandrasekhar SS, Tsai Do BS, Schwartz SR, Bontempo LJ, Faucett EA, Finestone SA, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline: Sudden Hearing Loss (Update). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;161(1_suppl):S1–S45. doi: 10.1177/0194599819859885 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alexander TH, Harris JP. Incidence of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34(9):1586–9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000222 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Trevino Gonzalez JL EVN S, Miroslava Perez Pena A, Gonzalez-Gonzalez RH, Garza Osoria CA. Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss:An Updated Review. Am J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;2(6):1056. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kim JY, Hong JY, Kim DK. Association of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss With Risk of Cardiocerebrovascular Disease: A Study Using Data From the Korea National Health Insurance Service. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;144(2):129–35. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2017.2569 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vasama JP, Linthicum FH. Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: temporal bone histopathologic study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000;109(6):527–32. doi: 10.1177/000348940010900601 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Merchant SN, Adams JC, Nadol JB. Pathology and pathophysiology of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Otol Neurotol. 2005;26(2):151–60. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200503000-00004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lin RJ, Krall R, Westerberg BD, Chadha NK, Chau JK. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk factors for sudden sensorineural hearing loss in adults. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(3):624–35. Epub 20120117. doi: 10.1002/lary.22480 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tripathi P, Deshmukh P. Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Review. Cureus. 2022;14(9):e29458. Epub 20220922. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29458 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kim JA, Yoon S, Kim LY, Kim DS. Towards Actualizing the Value Potential of Korea Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA) Data as a Resource for Health Research: Strengths, Limitations, Applications, and Strategies for Optimal Use of HIRA Data. J Korean Med Sci. 2017;32(5):718–28. Epub 2017/04/06. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.5.718 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yoon CY, Kong TH, Lee J, Seo YJ, Ahn JJ. Epidemiology of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss in the era of big data. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022. Epub 20221014. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07693-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kim SY, Sim S, Kim HJ, Choi HG. Sudden sensory neural hearing loss is not predictive of myocardial infarction: A longitudinal follow-up study using a national sample cohort. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):946. Epub 20180117. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19404-z . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim H, Kim S, Han S, Rane PP, Fox KM, Qian Y, et al. Prevalence and incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and its risk factors in Korea: a nationwide population-based study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1112. Epub 20190814. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7439-0 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Choi EK. Cardiovascular Research Using the Korean National Health Information Database. Korean Circ J. 2020;50(9):754–72. Epub 20200520. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2020.0171 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lee SU, Kim T, Kwon OK, Bang JS, Ban SP, Byoun HS, et al. Trends in the Incidence and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Diseases in Korea: Part II. Cerebral Infarction, Cerebral Arterial Stenosis, and Moyamoya Disease. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2020;63(1):69–79. Epub 20190508. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2018.0182 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim JY, Ko I, Kim DK. Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss May Increase the Risk of Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10(2). Epub 20220221. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020408 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shin YU, Park SH, Chung JH, Lee SH, Cho H. Diabetic Retinopathy and Hearing Loss: Results from the Fifth Korean National Health and Nutrition Survey. J Clin Med. 2021;10(11). Epub 20210528. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112398 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rauch SD. Clinical practice. Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(8):833–40. Epub 2008/08/22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0802129 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yamada S, Kita J, Shinmura D, Nakamura Y, Sahara S, Misawa K, et al. Update on Findings about Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Insight into Its Pathogenesis. J Clin Med. 2022;11(21). Epub 2022/11/12. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216387 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Aimoni C, Bianchini C, Borin M, Ciorba A, Fellin R, Martini A, et al. Diabetes, cardiovascular risk factors and idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a case-control study. Audiol Neurootol. 2010;15(2):111–5. Epub 2009/08/07. doi: 10.1159/000231636 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pantoni L. Cerebral small vessel disease: from pathogenesis and clinical characteristics to therapeutic challenges. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9(7):689–701. Epub 2010/07/09. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70104-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Formby C, Sherlock LP, Gold SL. Adaptive plasticity of loudness induced by chronic attenuation and enhancement of the acoustic background. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003;114(1):55–8. Epub 2003/07/26. doi: 10.1121/1.1582860 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lin HC, Chao PZ, Lee HC. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss increases the risk of stroke: a 5-year follow-up study. Stroke. 2008;39(10):2744–8. Epub 2008/06/28. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.519090 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Roman GC, Erkinjuntti T, Wallin A, Pantoni L, Chui HC. Subcortical ischaemic vascular dementia. Lancet Neurol. 2002;1(7):426–36. Epub 2003/07/10. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(02)00190-4 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gates GA, Anderson ML, McCurry SM, Feeney MP, Larson EB. Central auditory dysfunction as a harbinger of Alzheimer dementia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;137(4):390–5. Epub 2011/04/20. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2011.28 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lin FR, Metter EJ, O’Brien RJ, Resnick SM, Zonderman AB, Ferrucci L. Hearing loss and incident dementia. Arch Neurol. 2011;68(2):214–20. Epub 2011/02/16. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.362 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Silva VAR, Pauna HF, Lavinsky J, Hyppolito MA, Vianna MF, Leal M, et al. Task force Guideline of Brazilian Society of Otology ‒ hearing loss in children—Part I ‒ Evaluation. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2023;89(1):159–89. Epub 2022/12/19. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.11.002 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kapeller P, Barber R, Vermeulen RJ, Ader H, Scheltens P, Freidl W, et al. Visual rating of age-related white matter changes on magnetic resonance imaging: scale comparison, interrater agreement, and correlations with quantitative measurements. Stroke. 2003;34(2):441–5. Epub 2003/02/08. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000049766.26453.e9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Abdullah M Mutawa

12 Jan 2024

PONE-D-23-35617Importance of Small Vessel Disease as a possible cause of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing LossPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Seo,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 26 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Abdullah M. Mutawa, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Note from Emily Chenette, Editor in Chief of PLOS ONE, and Iain Hrynaszkiewicz, Director of Open Research Solutions at PLOS: Did you know that depositing data in a repository is associated with up to a 25% citation advantage (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230416)? If you’ve not already done so, consider depositing your raw data in a repository to ensure your work is read, appreciated and cited by the largest possible audience. You’ll also earn an Accessible Data icon on your published paper if you deposit your data in any participating repository (https://plos.org/open-science/open-data/#accessible-data).

3. In the online submission form, you indicated that "Data cannot be shared publicly because of National health insurance data from Korea. Data are available from the National health insurance service Institutional Data Access / Ethics Committee (contact via https://nhiss.nhis.or.kr/bd/ay/bdaya001iv.do) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data."

All PLOS journals now require all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript to be freely available to other researchers, either 1. In a public repository, 2. Within the manuscript itself, or 3. Uploaded as supplementary information.

This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If your data cannot be made publicly available for ethical or legal reasons (e.g., public availability would compromise patient privacy), please explain your reasons on resubmission and your exemption request will be escalated for approval.

4. We note you have included a table to which you do not refer in the text of your manuscript. Please ensure that you refer to Table 2 in your text; if accepted, production will need this reference to link the reader to the Table.

5. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In their paper “Importance of Small Vessel Disease as a possible cause of Sudden Sensorineural

Hearing Loss”, the authors have attempted to describe the frequency and possible causes of postoperative bleeding after endoscopic nasal and sinus surgery. Though the attempt is laudable, I have several issues with the paper.

1- In the introduction, authors noted the spontaneous recovery rate 32–65% for SSNHL. In Clinical Practice Guideline: Sudden Hearing Loss (2019), it is noticed that Clinical experience shows that these numbers may be an overestimation.

2- Following paragraph, especially ref 13 is unnecessary:

In 2018, a study investigating the relationship between ischemic stroke and SSNHL was conducted8. In 2020, a study was conducted to investigate the relationship between plasma serotonin elevation, metabolic syndrome, and SSNHL9, 10. In 2021, a study was conducted to investigate the relationship between stroke, atherosclerosis, and SSNHL11. In 2022, a study investigating the relationship between cardiovascular risk factors and SSNHL was conducted12. South Korea's Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) collects claims data generated when citizens visit medical institutions in accordance with their health insurance system13. The HIRA database is available to researchers on a limited basis. Korean researchers are continuously conducting research on vascular diseases using the HIRA database4, 14-19. However, no study has confirmed the extent to which vascular diseases cause SSNHL.

3- Self-citations of authors could be observed in ref 13, 28, 29, 30, and 31.

4- This sentence is unclear: “This study was conducted with data access permission from HIRA from 2022-08-04 to 2022-12-31.”

5- What is answer of the first aim? According to Figure 1, 123832 out of 319569 patients with SSNHL (38.7%) have SVD. Which proportion of general population have SVD.

6- The second aim isn’t logical.

“Subject 2. To determine the effect of SVD on illness duration in patients with SSNHL” Therefore, In Table 4 and Figure 2, results are not realistic. We know at least one thirds of patients don’t recover. But we observe that approximate zero percent of patients have SSNHL after 100 days in Figure 2. Also, it is expected HR in patients with SVD before onset of SSNHL is more than patients with SVD after onset of SSNHL. In table 2, the HRs are depicted 1.045 and 1.234, respectively.

7- The definition of duration of treatment for SSNHL is not correct.

8- Table 2 is vague. Table 3 is unnecessary.

9- Why total number of patients in table 2 and 3 is less than 319569.

10- Table 5, data in unclear. How many patients with or without SVD had recurrence? We could consider number of patients with recurrence in patients with and without SVD to be 4093 and 15848, respectively; and number of patients without recurrence in patients with and without SVD to be 34942 and 104826, respectively. Then OR would be 1.34 (95%CI 1.29-1.39).

11- What was the mean and median time to recurrence? In figure 2-B, we expect upward sloping of Kaplan-Meier curve with time.

12- Discussion is weak. The first paragraph is unnecessary and references 28-31 are irrelevant.

13- Omit the duplicated sentences in the manuscript.

14- Interpret results in the discussion part.

15- Specify limitation of this study.

Reviewer #2: This is an interesting paper on the impact of SVD on SSNHL using national scale data. There have been many studies suggesting that vascular problems play a significant role in the onset of SSNHL, a point with which I agree. However, I would like to make a few suggestions and ask some questions about this study.

<introduction>

"Previous studies have suggested possible causes of SSNHL, including vascular disorders, viral infections, and bacterial infections(1,5-7)"

In the introduction, it would be beneficial to suggest a broader range of causes of SSNHL. Autoimmune diseases could be a prime example.

<method>

"This study was conducted with data access permission from HIRA from 2022-08-04 to 2022-12-31"

As far as I know, HIRA requires you to specify the research approval number in the study paper. Please include research number of HIRA here.

Duration -

Could the duration vary more depending on the unique treatment style of each hospital? Given that this is a nationwide data, could the tendencies of physicians or the routine treatment policies of institutions act as a bias?

"the difference between each diagnosis date was less than 365 days. Recurrence of SSNHL was defined as a difference of > 365 days from the date of diagnosis,"

How do you filter out someone who has a follow-up at the same institution after a year with 91.2 code? Did you only use cases that satisfied the same operational definition for the recurring SSNHL(91.2)?

"The statistical program used for the analysis was SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA)."

Please create a separate subsection and write more about the statistical processing techniques.

What is Propensity Score Matching and why was it implemented? It should be specified in the statistical analysis methodology. It needs to be mentioned for those who are not familiar with statistical methodologies, including the reviewer.

Table 1

Please spell out the abbreviations in the table description.

Operational definition section

What is the reason for using only the diagnosis code in certain diseases and conditions other than drugs code or other features ?

<results>

How about listing the demographics of actual SSNHL patients to Table 2 or a new table?

Were there no demographic features to write other than the male-female ratio?

Table 3

"SVD ratio in National record"

Is this data newly extracted for each diagnosis name between 2010 and 2020? When was the targeted national population? And this content did not seem to be specified in the method section

"Confidence Interval of SVD ratio in SSNHL"

Is it correct to only write CI? Shouldn't you also write the Ratio value?

Did you calculate SVD regardless of before and after the onset of SSNHL here?

Table 5

Isn't the recurrence higher than the generally known recurrence rate of sudden sensorineural hearing loss?

"Ko HY, Nam HJ, Kim MH. A Nationwide Population-Based Study for the Recurrence and Comorbidities in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Laryngoscope. 2023 Sep 22."

In "time to recurrence", shouldn't the sum of N be 34,942? "(4093+15848 =????)"</results></method></introduction>

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 May 7;19(5):e0302447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302447.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


30 Jan 2024

Response to Reviewer 1 Comments

We have restructured the 'MATERIALS and METHODS' and 'RESULTS' sections based on common feedback from reviewers. In the 'MATERIALS and METHODS' section, the experimental procedure, utilized statistics, flowchart, and Table 2 have been revised to provide a clearer presentation of how the experiment was conducted. The 'RESULTS' section has been labeled according to subjects.

1- In the introduction, authors noted the spontaneous recovery rate 32–65% for SSNHL. In Clinical Practice Guideline: Sudden Hearing Loss (2019), it is noticed that Clinical experience shows that these numbers may be an overestimation.

� We added the point that there is a report on overestimation.

2- Following paragraph, especially ref 13 is unnecessary:

In 2018, a study investigating the relationship between ischemic stroke and SSNHL was conducted8. In 2020, a study was conducted to investigate the relationship between plasma serotonin elevation, metabolic syndrome, and SSNHL9, 10. In 2021, a study was conducted to investigate the relationship between stroke, atherosclerosis, and SSNHL11. In 2022, a study investigating the relationship between cardiovascular risk factors and SSNHL was conducted12. South Korea's Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) collects claims data generated when citizens visit medical institutions in accordance with their health insurance system13. The HIRA database is available to researchers on a limited basis. Korean researchers are continuously conducting research on vascular diseases using the HIRA database4, 14-19. However, no study has confirmed the extent to which vascular diseases cause SSNHL.

� We deleted.

3- Self-citations of authors could be observed in ref 13, 28, 29, 30, and 31.

� Ref 10 refers to our previous study, essential for defining SSNHL within big data. Therefore, self-citation was unavoidable. The remaining references have been removed.

4- This sentence is unclear: “This study was conducted with data access permission from HIRA from 2022-08-04 to 2022-12-31.”

� We added this sentence: “We obtained data access permission from HIRA, and the period during which we could use the data was from 2022-08-04 to 2022-12-31. The approval numbers for this study obtained from HIRA are M20210430249 and M20221005002.”

5- What is answer of the first aim? According to Figure 1, 123832 out of 319569 patients with SSNHL (38.7%) have SVD. Which proportion of general population have SVD.

� The results for Subject 1 (first aim) can be found in Table 3. The paragraph above contains the following information: “It is possible to verify each SVD individually in the NHI database, but it is not possible to identify duplicate patients. Therefore, the expression is presented as a ratio for each SVD condition.”

6- The second aim isn’t logical.

“Subject 2. To determine the effect of SVD on illness duration in patients with SSNHL”

Therefore, In Table 4 and Figure 2, results are not realistic. We know at least one thirds of patients don’t recover. But we observe that approximate zero percent of patients have SSNHL after 100 days in Figure 2. Also, it is expected HR in patients with SVD before onset of SSNHL is more than patients with SVD after onset of SSNHL. In table 2, the HRs are depicted 1.045 and 1.234, respectively.

� Our definition of the treatment period for our patients is from the first diagnosis date to the last diagnosis date. Therefore, the results in Figure 2A signify that the respective patient is no longer under observation. In our data, this implies that the patient did not seek further hospital visits with the H91.2 code within one year. Typically, within 3 months, a patient's treatment concludes, transitioning into a phase of management. Furthermore, as we also address the keyword 'recurrence,' instances where the gap between H91.2 codes is more than one year are separately classified as recurrences, and subsequent outcomes are excluded from Subject 2.

7- The definition of duration of treatment for SSNHL is not correct.

� Retrospectively collected data, especially health insurance data, has the advantage of being able to consider a vast amount of information. However, a drawback is that it often lacks the opportunity to utilize the clinical definitions commonly used in the field. If the 'duration of treatment for SSNHL' is meant to represent what we defined as 'the first diagnosis date to the last diagnosis date within 365 days,' then our definition attempts to align with the available resources in the data as consistently as possible.

8- Table 2 is vague. Table 3 is unnecessary.

� We have revised Table 2, and Table 3 presents the results for Subject 1.

9- Why total number of patients in table 2 and 3 is less than 319569.

� Since PSM was conducted for each subject separately, the number of patients varies by subject, as described in the 'MATERIALS and METHODS' section.

10- Table 5, data in unclear. How many patients with or without SVD had recurrence? We could consider number of patients with recurrence in patients with and without SVD to be 4093 and 15848, respectively; and number of patients without recurrence in patients with and without SVD to be 34942 and 104826, respectively. Then OR would be 1.34 (95%CI 1.29-1.39).

� Due to the matching results, the number of patients varies for each subject. In Subject 3, there are 34,942 patients with recurrence regardless of SVD, and 104,826 patients without recurrence. We utilized third-party data, and we no longer have access to it. Therefore, we do not know the number of patients with SVD regardless of recurrence in that particular dataset. The original number of patients before PSM is as follows, as shown in the table below.

SVD Yes No

Recurrence Yes 15,848 19,094

No 110,963 173,664

11- What was the mean and median time to recurrence? In figure 2-B, we expect upward sloping of Kaplan-Meier curve with time.

� In SVD, Mean time: 37.407month, Median time: 30 month. In No SVD, Mean time: 35.836month, Median time: 29 month. We have incorporated it into Table 5-B.

12- Discussion is weak. The first paragraph is unnecessary and references 28-31 are irrelevant.

� We deleted and strengthening the discussion.

13- Omit the duplicated sentences in the manuscript.

14- Interpret results in the discussion part.

15- Specify limitation of this study.

� We checked it.

Response to Reviewer 2 Comments

We have restructured the 'MATERIALS and METHODS' and 'RESULTS' sections based on common feedback from reviewers. In the 'MATERIALS and METHODS' section, the experimental procedure, utilized statistics, flowchart, and Table 2 have been revised to provide a clearer presentation of how the experiment was conducted. The 'RESULTS' section has been labeled according to subjects.

"Previous studies have suggested possible causes of SSNHL, including vascular disorders, viral infections, and bacterial infections (1,5-7)"

In the introduction, it would be beneficial to suggest a broader range of causes of SSNHL. Autoimmune diseases could be a prime example.

� We added this sentence: “Previous studies have suggested possible causes of SSNHL, including vascular, ear & endocrinal disorder, infection, autoimmune, cancer, trauma, and drugs adverse effect”

� We added this reference: Tripathi P, Deshmukh P. Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Review. Cureus. 2022 Sep 22;14(9):e29458. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29458. PMID: 36299969; PMCID: PMC9587755.

"This study was conducted with data access permission from HIRA from 2022-08-04 to 2022-12-31"

As far as I know, HIRA requires you to specify the research approval number in the study paper. Please include research number of HIRA here.

� We added this sentence: “We obtained data access permission from HIRA, and the period during which we could use the data was from 2022-08-04 to 2022-12-31. The approval numbers for this study obtained from HIRA are M20210430249 and M20221005002.”

Duration -

Could the duration vary more depending on the unique treatment style of each hospital? Given that this is a nationwide data, could the tendencies of physicians or the routine treatment policies of institutions act as a bias?

� We agree with that perspective. However, given the nationwide data, the unique treatment styles of each hospital and the preferences of individual doctors are expected to regress to the national average.

"the difference between each diagnosis date was less than 365 days. Recurrence of SSNHL was defined as a difference of > 365 days from the date of diagnosis,"

How do you filter out someone who has a follow-up at the same institution after a year with 91.2 code? Did you only use cases that satisfied the same operational definition for the recurring SSNHL (91.2)?

� The recurrence was defined as cases where the time between the last treatment and the subsequent diagnosis (previous H91.2 code and the next H91.2 code) exceeded 365 days, even if it was within the same institution.

When defining recurrence, we did not consider a recurrence if the next follow-up of SSNHL care occurred after 1 year. We will summarize these limitations in the discussion regarding recurrence: “While efforts were made to define the duration of SSNHL and recurrence as objectively as possible, bias inevitably arises due to the researcher's influence. Recurrence was defined as cases where the time between diagnoses was within 365 days; however, in some instances, patients may seek hospital care for the management of SSNHL beyond the 365 days after the initial diagnosis, indicating a conceptual challenge in defining recurrence.”

� Recurrent SSNHL adhered to the same definition across all instances.

"The statistical program used for the analysis was SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA)."

Please create a separate subsection and write more about the statistical processing techniques.

What is Propensity Score Matching and why was it implemented? It should be specified in the statistical analysis methodology. It needs to be mentioned for those who are not familiar with statistical methodologies, including the reviewer.

� Due to common feedback from reviewers, I have restructured the organization of the methods and results sections in the main text. To enhance clarity in study design, I moved the results of Propensity Score Matching (PSM) to the methods section. Detailed explanations and outcomes of PSM can be found in the "Experimental Design and Statistics" section.

Table 1

Please spell out the abbreviations in the table description.

� We checked it.

Operational definition section

What is the reason for using only the diagnosis code in certain diseases and conditions other than drugs code or other features?

� I'm not sure if I understood the question correctly. When defining all diseases in our study, we took into account disease codes, prescription histories, and medical test records. The reason for not considering test results or other conditions in the clinical definition is that the health insurance data did not include such information. This limitation stems from the absence of these test results or conditions in the health insurance data, and it represents a constraint in conducting retrospective studies utilizing big data.

How about listing the demographics of actual SSNHL patients to Table 2 or a new table?

Were there no demographic features to write other than the male-female ratio?

� When examining the results of Propensity Score Matching (PSM), we opted not to include demographic statistics as the most crucial aspect was demonstrating a lack of significant differences in proportions between the two groups. Aside from gender and age, no additional significant features were identified.

Table 3

"SVD ratio in National record"

Is this data newly extracted for each diagnosis name between 2010 and 2020? When was the targeted national population? And this content did not seem to be specified in the method section

� We have revised the 'Methods' and 'Results' sections. The target population consists of the entire population from 2010 to 2020. Figure 1 has been added to the revised 'Methods' section. Here is an excerpt: 'In Subject 1, we compare the ratio of SVD between the entire population of South Korea and the SSNHL patient group from 2010 to 2020.'

"Confidence Interval of SVD ratio in SSNHL"

Is it correct to only write CI? Shouldn't you also write the Ratio value?

Did you calculate SVD regardless of before and after the onset of SSNHL here?

� We have included the ratio and calculated SVD regardless of pre- and post-correlation.

Table 5

Isn't the recurrence higher than the generally known recurrence rate of sudden sensorineural hearing loss?

"Ko HY, Nam HJ, Kim MH. A Nationwide Population-Based Study for the Recurrence and Comorbidities in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Laryngoscope. 2023 Sep 22."

� The definition of recurrence in retrospective data varies depending on the perspective of viewing episodes. In our study, we conservatively defined recurrence, considering an ongoing episode if the distance between diagnoses was within one year. Therefore, we deemed a recurrence to occur only if the H91.2 code was not observed for more than one year. Additionally, the method of defining SSNHL may differ. While considering diagnosis codes, pure-tone audiometry tests, and steroid prescriptions, the inclusion criteria for pure-tone audiometry codes or the extent of including steroid codes can impact the patient count. Even the inclusion of years in the analysis can lead to variations in results.

In "time to recurrence", shouldn't the sum of N be 34,942? "(4093+15848 =????)"

� Since PSM was conducted for each subject separately, the number of patients varies by subject, as described in the 'MATERIALS and METHODS' section.

Attachment

Submitted filename: (PONE-D-23-35617)Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0302447.s006.docx (28.1KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Manoj Diwakar

4 Apr 2024

Importance of Small vessel disease as a possible cause of Sudden sensorineural hearing loss

PONE-D-23-35617R1

Dear Dr. Seo,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Manoj Diwakar

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Although Reviewer 1 recommended amendment of the tables and figures, I feel the manuscript is suitable to proceed without further amendment.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: As the reviewer, I have thoroughly examined the revised version of your manuscript. I am pleased to see that you have carefully addressed and incorporated all the points I mentioned in my previous review. The modifications you have made have significantly improved the clarity, coherence, and overall quality of the paper.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Classification codes of anti-hypertensive drugs.

    (PDF)

    pone.0302447.s001.pdf (304KB, pdf)
    S2 Table. Classification codes of diabetes mellitus drugs.

    (PDF)

    pone.0302447.s002.pdf (305.3KB, pdf)
    S3 Table. Classification codes of dyslipidemia drugs.

    (PDF)

    pone.0302447.s003.pdf (306.5KB, pdf)
    S4 Table. Procedure code in small-vessel disease.

    (PDF)

    pone.0302447.s004.pdf (306.5KB, pdf)
    S5 Table. Drug code & procedure code in sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

    (PDF)

    pone.0302447.s005.pdf (306.5KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: (PONE-D-23-35617)Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0302447.s006.docx (28.1KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    For privacy protection reasons and in accordance with domestic laws in Korea, registration of health insurance data is restricted. Therefore, we obtained authorization to use third-party data, specifically health insurance data, to conduct our research. As a result, we request an exemption from the data registration process. Data cannot be shared publicly because of National health insurance data from Korea. Data are available from the National health insurance service Institutional Data Access / Ethics Committee (contact via https://nhiss.nhis.or.kr/bd/ay/bdaya001iv.do) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES