Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2023 Oct 11;145(42):22878–22884. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c08098

Rapid Biomolecular Trifluoromethylation Using Cationic Aromatic Sulfonate Esters as Visible Light-Triggered Radical Photocages

Nicholas J Kuehl a, Michael T Taylor b,*
PMCID: PMC11076010  NIHMSID: NIHMS1987965  PMID: 37819426

Abstract

Described here is a photo-decaging approach to radical trifluoromethylation of biomolecules. This was accomplished by designing a quinolinium sulfonate ester that, upon absorption of visible light, achieves decaging via photolysis of the sulfonate ester to ultimately liberate free trifluoromethyl radicals that are trapped by π-nucleophiles in biomolecules. This photo-decaging process enables protein and protein-interaction mapping experiments using trifluoromethyl radicals that require only one second reaction times and low photocage concentrations. In these experiments, aromatic side chains are labelled in an environmentally dependent fashion, with selectivity observed for tryptophan (Trp), followed by histidine (His) and tyrosine (Tyr). Scalable peptide trifluoromethylation through photo-decaging is also demonstrated, where bespoke peptides harboring trifluoromethyl groups at tryptophan residues can be synthesized with five to seven minute reaction times and good yields.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1987965-f0001.jpg


Owing to its biological orthogonality, nuclear spin, and the radioactivity of its isotopes, the incorporation of fluorine and fluorinated functional groups into biomolecular structure has found widespread applications in structural biochemistry and imaging1. Moreover, fluorinated functional groups, including the trifluoromethyl group, have become privileged moieties in medicinal chemistry; a result of the combination of hydrophobicity, relatively minimal steric profile, and strong electron-withdrawing properties2. Owing to these qualities, the incorporation of trifluoromethyl groups into peptides and proteins at specific sites is of interest as it can enable precision alteration of physiochemical properties with minimal steric perturbations3. Many elegant approaches have been developed for trifluoromethylation of small molecule organics, yet many of these lack biocompatibility4. By comparison, there are relatively few approaches compatible with biomolecular structures, which revolve around electrophilic trifluoromethylation or use of genetic code expansion to incorporate trifluoromethylated unnatural amino acids5.

Alternatively, radical-based approaches have been used to achieve biomolecular trifluoromethylation (Figure 1A,B). The use of Langlois’s reagent to access trifluoromethyl radicals under either oxidizing or photo-oxidizing conditions6 has been adapted by Gross7a, Krska7b, Davis and Gouverneur7c,d, and Correa7e, as well as others5a, for radical trifluoromethylation in peptides and proteins with wide variations in chemoselectivity. Davis and Gouverneur have also reported similar radical difluoroalkylations of proteins through photocatalyzed activation of sulfonyl pyridines8a,b. Recently, hypervalent iodine reagents were shown by Beier8c and Kukačka and Novák8d to enable radical biomolecular perfluoroalkylation under photochemical8c or reducing conditions8d. Perfluoroalkyl iodides have also enabled radical fluoroalkylation of protected peptides5a via a halogen-bonding mechanism8e. A particular attraction to protein trifluoromethylation with trifluoromethyl radicals stems from the ultra-rapid kinetics of radical trapping by π-based nucleophiles; with rate constants of 107-8 M−1s−1 measured for trapping with styrene derivatives9 (Figure 1A). This voracious electrophilicity, combined with its small size (~59 Å3), imbue the trifluoromethyl radical with ideal characteristics as a probe for protein footprinting analyses7a,f,g. Additionally, the ability to harness the rapid kinetics of trifluoromethyl radical trapping to rapidly synthesize fluorinated peptides and proteins could enable applications in (1) drug discovery via structural diversification efforts (2) structural biology by enabling facile access to fluorinated proteins and (3) in positron emission tomography using 18F-labelled radioligands; an application in which fast reaction kinetics are essential for success1-3.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(A) Applications of radical trifluoromethylation of biomolecules. (B) Current approaches to generate fluoroalkyl radicals for biomolecular perfluoroalkylation. (C) Photochemistry of aromatic, sulfonate esters. (D) Cationic, aromatic sulfonate esters as photocages for trifluoromethyl radicals.

We propose that a photo-decaging approach in which trifluoromethyl radicals are released from a thermally stable precursor molecule (defined here as a photocage) in situ through an optically triggered, unimolecular process could enable us to exploit the rapid kinetics of radical addition to π-nucleophiles under mild conditions and with spatiotemporal control. We posited that this could be achieved by using aromatic-sulfonate esters as a photocage for trifluoromethyl radicals. Aromatic sulfonate esters possess a weak S─OAr bond that homolytically cleaves upon photoexcitation to generate a sulfonyl- and aryloxy radical pair that can recombine in a photo-Fries type rearrangement10. Alternatively, the radical pair intermediate can decompose to liberate free sulfonyl- and phenoxy radicals that lead to the formation of sulfonic acids and other byproducts (Figure 1C). Exploiting this mechanistic regime for the purpose of generating trifluoromethyl radicals could be realized using aryl trifluoromethanesulfonate (triflate) esters that, upon photolysis, generate a sulfonyl radical that desulfonylates to liberate a trifluoromethyl radical10. We expanded this hypothesis by proposing that a cationic, aromatic chromophore would encourage photolysis by further weakening the photolabile S─OAr bond whilst also exploiting polar effects11 to encourage radical pair dissociation (both radicals are electron-deficient); ultimately leading to the efficient liberation of free trifluoromethyl radicals for trapping with peptides and proteins (Figure 1D). However, it was recognized that this design results in an electron-deficient aryl triflate that may be prone to hydrolysis, and any practical design should ensure good thermal stability in aqueous buffer.

We therefore synthesized photocages 1-5 via a simple triflation of a pyridone or quinolone precursor with trifluoromethanesulfonic anhydride, followed by assessments of each’s absorption properties and hydrolytic stability in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4 in D2O). While pyridinium triflate 1 possesses little absorption beyond 300 nm and modest stability, the additional conjugation in quinolinium salts 2-3 results in a bathochromic shift of absorption to the UVA-optical window. However, these compounds were found to be highly unstable, with t1/2≤ 0.5 hrs in both instances (Figure 2B). Installation of a dimethylamino group in the 7-position of the quinolinium scaffold in analog 4 significantly tempered the electrophilicity of the quinolinium-triflate and extended the half-life to 2 hrs whilst also shifting absorbance into the visible spectrum (λmax= 453 nm). Installation of a methyl group in the 3-position in 5 produces a marked enhancement in half-life, with t1/2=8 hrs whilst further shifting absorbance to the visible (λmax= 463 nm). DFT calculations suggest the S─OAr bond in 5 is weakened by 36 kcal/mol compared to triflic acid and should therefore be sufficiently weak enough to be cleaved upon photoexcitation whilst TDDFT calculations (CAMB3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) SMD=H2O level of theory) support a significant charge-transfer component to photoexcitation.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(A) Synthesis of photocages 1-5. (B) Assessment of thermal stability and absorption properties. (C) Key structural properties of 5. aMeasured in 20 mM Na2HPO4 (pH 7.4) buffered D2O. bAverage value from DFT calculations using three different theories.

With a stable photocage in hand, we then demonstrated the viability of 5 as a radical photocage by irradiating a solution of model protein lysozyme (10 μM), reactive oxygen species scavenger 4,5-dihydroxy-1,3-benzenedisulfonic acid (Tiron) (50 μM), and 5 (100 μM) in pH 7.4 phosphate buffer using a Kessil PR-160 456 nm LED in a Hepatochem reactor for one second (Figure 3A, refer to figure S3 for optimization parameters). Intact protein analysis of the crude reaction mixture using mass spectrometry indicated up to three trifluoromethyl groups were incorporated into lysozyme with a net 66% conversion of unmodified lysozyme to trifluoromethylated protein. A peptide mapping workflow was performed to identify modification sites and to estimate through semi-quantitation the extent of modification at different residues7a. This workflow allowed us to identify three modifications on lysozyme, with W62 being the primary modification site along with minor modification levels observed on W63 and W123. We next explored labelling of Myoglobin, a 16.9 kDa, heme-containing protein possessing 2 Trp, 2 Tyr, and 11 His residues. Irradiation at 456 nm of myoglobin (10 μM) in the presence of 5 (80 μM) for 1 second resulted in the formation of Myoglobin-CF3 conjugates harboring up to 4 trifluoromethyl groups. Peptide mapping revealed H119 to be the primary site of modification, followed by W14, H24, and W7. H119 participates in H-bonding with H2412, and the high abundance of trifluoromethylation at H119 suggests that H-bonding may enhance the nucleophilicity of H119. The influence of higher order structure on protein trifluoromethylation was assessed against carbonic anhydrase II (CAII). CAII has 7 Trp, 8 Tyr, and 11 His residues, but most of these are buried within the protein’s tertiary structure. Thus, trifluoromethylation of CAII with 5 (100 μM) and Tiron (20 μM) resulted in lower levels of labelling, with only a single modification site at W234 identifiable by peptide mapping. Conversion of CAII could be pushed to higher levels by either adding a larger excess of 5 or unfolding the protein (Figure S21). Taken together, these experiments indicated that radical trifluoromethylation with 5 displays chemoselectivity for nucleophilic and electron-rich aromatic residues.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

(A) Protein footprinting with 5. (B) Preparative scale synthesis of trifluoromethylated peptides with 5. aIntact mass of experiment using 50 μM Tiron, peptide mapping performed using 20 mM Tiron. bIsolated yields that are validated by qNMR. cIsomer ratios were assigned via 19F-NMR and are listed in the following order: C2:C4:C7:+2 CF3. drate of addition 0.3 eq. 5/min. BRSM=based on recovered starting material.

We next sought to develop a procedure for radical trifluoromethylation of aromatic amino acid-containing peptides on a preparative scale using 5 (Figure 3b). In order to avoid the pitfalls associated with generating high concentrations of radicals, we developed a process in which a solution containing 5 and tiron (2.5:1 ratio) in 20% CH3CN:H2O is added at a rate of 0.5 equivalents 5/min via syringe pump to a buffered, 2 mM solution of peptide substrate that is under constant irradiation with 456 nm light in a Hepatochem reactor. This process was applied to the trifluoromethylation of peptide hormone Somatostatin. Conversion vs. equivalents of 5 added was monitored as shown in the plot in Figure 3B; which revealed that maximal +1 CF3 modification occurs after the addition of three equivalents of 5. Using this information, we performed a 5 mg scale trifluoromethylation reaction of Somatostatin with the addition of three equivalents of 5 over a six-minutes plus one additional minute of irradiation. Somatostatin-CF3 adducts were then purified by HPLC and resulted in a total of 25% isolated yield of Somatostatin-CF3 conjugates with trifluoromethylation observed at Trp. We also observed regioisomers of trifluoromethylation products, with the predominant isomer occurring at the indole C2 position of Trp. Minor isomers harboring trifluoromethyl groups at C4 and C7, as well as low levels (<3%) of +2 CF3 modified Trp were also isolated. Extension of this method to other peptides, including Gly-Trp (0.2 kDa, 1 Trp residue, 5 minute reaction time), Leuprolide (1.2 kDa, 1 His, 1 Tyr, 1 Trp, 7 minute reaction time), and Tetracosactide (2.9 kDa, 2 Tyr, 1 His, 1 Phe, 1 Trp, 7 minute reaction time), smoothly afforded trifluoromethylated conjugates in 20-40% isolated yields; with Trp being the primary site of modification in all instances (Figure 3b). This approach is also amenable to larger scales and variation in addition rates of 5: trifluoromethylation of leuprolide on a 20 mg scale at 0.3 eq. equivalents 5/min resulted in a 33% isolated yield (38% BRSM) of trifluoromethylated leuprolide.

Next, we sought to validate mechanistic aspects of trifluoromethylation with 5. We propose that trifluoromethylation is achieved via two mechanistic manifolds as shown in Figures 1D and S24 and includes: (1) optically-triggered photolysis of a labile S─OAr bond to form a quinoloxy-sulfonyl radical pair and (2) following cage escape, thermal extrusion of SO2 and radical alkylation of π-nucleophiles with free trifluoromethyl radicals. Evidence supporting a free radical labelling mechanism includes: (1) the observation of regioisomers of trifluoromethylated Trp-conjugates in Figure 3B6b,c,7b-d (2) the inhibition of trifluoromethylation of myoglobin with 5 when the reaction is co-incubated with TEMPO9 (Figure 4A, entry 4) and (3) by observing trifluoromethanesulfinate anion by 19F-NMR and isolating sulfonylated and trifluoromethylated quinolone adducts from high-concentration photo-decaging reactions (Figure 4B). The observed sulfonylated quinolone adducts are potentially radical-pair recombination products10. Isolation of these byproducts from the 20 mg-scale leuprolide labelling reaction from Figure 3B, a reaction that uses a high [5], revealed that these are minor byproducts (3% total isolated yield). One-second reaction times for protein labelling were validated through a trapping experiment wherein TEMPO (500 μM) that was added to the reaction at 1 second of irradiation did not significantly perturb reaction conversion (Figure 4A, entry 5). The vigorous reactivity of 5 was further validated through a 1:1 stoichiometry reaction between Myoglobin (10 μM) and 5 (10 μM), which produced a significant 22% conversion with a 1 second irradiation time (Figure 4A, entry 3). We investigated the pH dependence on reactivity; which indicated that 5 robustly decages to label myoglobin at biologically relevant pH’s (pH=5-8) (Figure S20). Finally, the requirement for optical triggering was validated by incubation of Myoglobin with 5 in the absence of light (Figure 4A, entry 2) and quantified by estimating a quantum yield of Φconversion =0.18±0.02 for the consumption of 5 during lysozyme labelling (Figure 4C).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

(A) Additive and condition studies. (B) Reaction byproducts observed or isolated from trifluoromethylation at high concentration. (C) Quantum yield of consumption of 5. aEstimated by TIC. bIsolated yield. cIsolated or observed by 19F-NMR.

Using 5 as a photocage offers a mild and mechanistically distinct approach to protein labelling with electrophilic radicals. We therefore posited that 5 may be useful in peptide mapping experiments of protein-ligand and protein-protein interactions, wherein labelling outcomes correlate to changes biomolecular environments13 (Figure 5A). Based upon our observation of labelling of Trp-62 in lysozyme’s active site, we opted to establish a proof-of-concept by mapping the binding interaction between lysozyme and tri-saccharide NAG3; an interaction that was elegantly mapped by Vachet using high concentrations of Trp-selective bioconjugation reagent dimethyl(2-hydroxy-5-nitrobenzyl)sulfonium bromide (HNSB)14a. Thus, increasing concentrations of NAG3 ligand were titrated into a solution of 10 μM lysozyme, 100 μM 5, and 50 μM Tiron, followed by irradiation with 456 nm light for 1 second (Figure 5B). Plotting the change in labelling conversion vs. NAG3 concentration enabled the estimation of the binding affinity of NAG3 to lysozyme (Kd= 35.9 μM); which agrees well with previously reported values (6-60 μM)14.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

(A) A photo-decaging approach to protein interaction footprinting with 5. (B) Mapping of the interaction of lysozyme with NAG3 using radical trifluoromethylation with 5. (C) Mapping of the calmodulin-M13 complex using 5.

Finally, we investigated the mapping of protein-peptide interactions in a representative system. We selected the calmodulin-myosin light chain kinase interaction to provide a platform to assess this possibility and to explore complementarity with current approaches13,15. We took both bovine Calmodulin and the peptide sequence of the myosin light chain that actively binds to Calmodulin (M13 peptide). The M13 peptide sequence features a single Trp (W4) and two Phe residues. Binding of M13 to calmodulin results in a ternary structure of the two biomolecules in which the M13-W4 residue is buried and should be shielded from CF3 radicals16. Bovine calmodulin features three Tyr and His residues: Y100, Y139 and H108. Each peptide was individually treated with 5 (100 μM), Tiron (20 μM), and CaCl2 (100 μM) in pH 7.4 PBS and one second of irradiation with 456 nm light (Figure 5C). Trifluoromethylation of M13 peptide under these conditions led to robust labelling exclusively at W4, whilst labelling of unbound calmodulin yielded low levels of modification on Y100 and Y139. M13 and calmodulin were then complexed in 1:1 stoichiometry, followed by trifluoromethylation under identical conditions. Intact protein analysis and peptide mapping indicated a dramatic loss of W4-trifluoromethylation whilst calmodulin modification remained similar (Figure 5C, inset). Taken together, protein mapping with 5 enables the facile exploration of changes in environments to aromatic amino acid residues; wherein the ability to use low concentrations of proteins and 5, as well as short reaction times, minimize the risk of non-specific interactions obfuscating results. Aromatic residues have a wide range of functions in proteins and protein interactions, and the ability to probe for context-dependent reactivity is an increasingly appreciated approach for revealing amino acid function and new sites for drug design17.

In summary, we have developed cationic, quinolinium scaffold 5 as a photocage that enables trifluoromethyl radical release through optical triggering with visible light. Mechanistic analyses indicate that 5 enables ultra-rapid protein labelling via a photolysis of a labile S─O bond followed by liberation of a free trifluoromethyl radical. We show that 5 is adaptable toward multiple workflows, including protein and protein-interaction mapping, as well as for preparative scale trifluoromethylation of peptides.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information_radicalCF3

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We thank the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35 GM143120) for financial support.

Footnotes

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting information includes experimental procedures for photocage synthesis, protein trifluoromethylation, preparative scale peptide trifluoromethylation, mechanistic studies, computational analysis, and small molecule characterization.

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website.

No competing financial interests have been declared.

REFERENCES

  • (1).(a) Danielson MA; Falke JJ Use of 19F-NMR to Probe Protein Structure and Conformational Changes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct 1996, 25, 163–195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Tirotta I; Dichiarante V; Pigiacelli C; Cavallo G; Terraneo G; Bombelli FB; Metrangolo R; Resnati G 19F- Magnetic Resonance, Imaging (MRI): From Design of Materials to Clinical Applications. Chem. Rev 2015, 115, 1106–1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Arnston KE; Pomerantz WCK Protein-Observed Fluorine NMR: A bioorthogonal Approach for Small Molecule Discovery. J. Med. Chem 2016, 59, 5158–5171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Lee S; Xie J; Chen X Peptide-Based Probes for Targeted Molecular Imaging. Biochemistry, 2010, 49, 1364–1376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Vallabhajosula S. 18F-Labeled Positron Emission Tomographic Radiopharmaceuticals in Oncology: An Overview of Radiochemistry and Mechanisms of Tumor Localization. Semin. Nucl. Med 2007, 37, 400–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Fani M; Maecke HR Radiopharmaceutical development of radiolabelled peptides. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2012, 39, S11–S30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).(a) Yale HL The Trifluoromethyl Group in Medicinal Chemistry. J. Med. Chem 1959, 1, 121–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Monkovic JM; Gibson H; Sun JW; Montclare JK Fluorinated Protein and Peptide materials for Biomedical Applications. Pharmaceuticals, 2022, 15, 1201–1237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Hagmann WK The Many Roles for Fluorine in Medicinal Chemistry. J. Med. Chem 2008, 51, 4359–4369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Zhou Y; Wang J; Gu Z; Wang S; Zhu W; Aceña JL; Soloshonok VA; Izawa K; Liu H Next Generation of Fluorine-Containing Pharmaceuticals, Compounds Currently in Phase II-II Clinical Trials of Major Pharmaceutical Companies: New Structural Trends and Therapeutic Areas. Chem. Rev, 2016, 116, 422–518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).(a) Marsh ENG Fluorinated Proteins: From Design and Synthesis to Structure and Stability. Acc. Chem. Res 2014, 47, 2878–2886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Abula A; Xu Z; Zhu Z; Peng C; Chen Z; Zhu W; Aisa HA Substitution Effect of the Trifluoromethyl Group on the Bioactivity in medicinal Chemistry: Statistical Analysis and Energy Calculation. J. Chem. Inf. Model 2020, 60, 6242–6250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Miller MA; Sletten EM Perfluorocarbons in Chemical Biology. ChemBioChem. 2020, 21, 3451–3462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).(a) Studer A. A “Renaissance” in Radical Trifluoromethylation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, 2012, 51, 8950–8958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Charpentier J; Früh N; Togni A Electrophilic Trifluoromethylation by Use of Hypervalent Iodine Reagents. Chem. Rev 2015, 115, 650–682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Barata-Vallejo S; Lantaño B; Postigo A Electrophilic Trifluoromethylating Reagents. Chem. Eur. J 2014, 20, 16806–16829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Mandal D; Maji S; Pal T; Sinha SK; Maiti D Recent advances in transition metal-mediated trifluoromethylation reactions. Chem. Commun 2022, 58, 10442–10468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Tomashenko OA; Grushin VV Aromatic Trifluoromethylation with metal Complexes. Chem. Rev 2011, 111, 4475–4521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Liu X; Xu C; Wang M; Liu Q Trifluoromethyltrimethylsilane: Nucleophilic Trifluoromethylation and Beyond. Chem. Rev 2015, 115, 683–730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Furuya T; Kamlet AS; Ritter T Catalysis for fluorination and trifluoromethylation. Nature. 2011, 473, 470–477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (h) Alonso C; de Marigorta EM; Rubiales G; Palacios F Carbon Trifluoromethylation Reactions of Hydrocarbon Derivatives and Heteroarenes. Chem. Rev 2015, 115, 1847–1935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).(a) For a recent review on trifluoromethylation of peptides: Guerrero I; Correa A Site-Selective Trifluoromethylation Reactions of Oligopeptides. Asian J. Org. Chem 2020, 9, 898–909. [Google Scholar]; (b) For genetic-code expansion approaches: Wang Y-S; Fang X; Chen H-Y; Wu B; Wang ZU; Hilty C; Liu WR Genetic Incorporation of Twelve meta-Substituted Phenylalanine Derivatives Using a Single Pyrrolysyl-tRNA Synthetase Mutant. ACS. Chem. Biol 2013, 8, 405–415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Mehl RA; Jackson JC Site-Specific Incorporation of a 19F-Amino Acid into Proteins as an NMR Probe for Characterizing Protein Structure and Reactivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2007, 129, 1160–1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).(a) Langlois BR; Laurent E, Roidot N Trifluoromethylation of Aromatic Compounds with Sodium Trifluoromethanesulfinate under oxidative conditions. Tetrahedron Letters. 1991, 32, 51, 7525–7528. [Google Scholar]; (b) Fujiwara Y; Dixon JA; O’Hara F; Funder ED; Dixon DD; Rodriguez RA; Baxter RD; Herle B; Sach N; Collins MR; Ishihara Y; Baran PS Practical and innate C-H functionalization of heterocycles. Nature. 2012, 492(7427), 95–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Nagib DA; MacMillan DWC Trifluoromethylation of arenes and heteroarenes by means of photoredox catalysis. Nature. 2011, 480, 224–228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).(a) Cheng M; Zhang B; Cui W; Gross ML Laser-Initiated Radical Trifluoromethylation of peptides and Proteins: Application to Mass-Spectrometry-Based Protein Footprinting. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 14007–14010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Ichiishi N; Caldwell JP; Lin M; Zhong W; Zhu X; Streckfuss E; Kim H; Parish CA; Krska SW Protecting group free radical C-H trifluoromethylation of peptides. Chem. Sci 2018, 9, 4168–4175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Imiołek M; Karunanithy G; Ng W; Baldwin AJ; Gouverneur V; Davis BG Selective Radical Trifluoromethylation of Native Residues in Proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 1568–1571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Kee CW; Tack O; Guibbal F; Wilson TC; Isenegger PG; Imiołek M; Verhoog S; Tilby M; Boscutti G; Ashworth S; Chupin J; Kashani R; Poh AWJ; Sosabowski JK; Macholl S; Plisson C; Cornelissen B; Willis MC; Passchier J; Davis BG; Gouverneur V 18F-Trifluoromethanesulfinate Enables Direct C-H 18F-Trifluoromethylation of Native Aromatic Residues in Peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142, 1180–1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Guerrero I; Correa A Cu-Catalyzed Site-Selective C(sp2)–H Radical Trifluoromethylation of Tryptophan-Containing Peptides. Org. Lett 2020, 5, 1754–1759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Cheng M; Asuru A; Kiselar J; Mathai G; Chance MR; Gross ML Fast Protein Footprinting by X-ray mediated Radical Trifluoromethylation. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom 2020, 31, 5, 1019–1024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Jain R; Dhillon NS; Farquhar ER; Wang B; Li X; Kiselar J; Chance MR Multiplex Chemical Labeling of Amino Acids for Protein Footprinting Structure Assessment. Anal. Chem 2022, 94, 9819–9825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).(a) Josephson B; Fehl C; Isenegger PG; Nadal S; Wright TH; Poh AWJ; Bower BJ; Giltrap AM; Chen L; Batchelor-McAuley C; Roper G; Arisa O; Sap JBI; Kawamura A; Baldwin AJ; Mohammed S; Compton RG; Gouverneur V; Davis BG Light-driven post-translational installation of reactive protein side chains. Nature. 2020, 585, 530–537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Imiołek M; Isenegger PG; Ng W-L; Khan A; Davis BG Residue-Selective Protein C-Formylation via Sequential Difluoroalkylation-Hydrolysis. ACS. Cent. Sci 2021, 7, 145–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Rahimidashaghoul K; Klimánková I; Hubálek M; Matousek V; Filgas J; Slavícek P; Slanina T; Beier P Visible-Light-Driven Fluoroalkylation of Tryptophan Residues in Peptides. ChemPhotoChem. 2021, 5, 43–50. [Google Scholar]; (d) Fojtík L; Fiala J; Pompach P; Chmelík J; Matousek V; Beier P; Kukacka Z; Novák P Fast Fluoroalkylation of Proteins Uncovers the Structure and Dynamics of Biolo9gical Macromolecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2021, 143, 20670–20679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Wang Y; Wang J; Li G-X; Chen G Halogen-Bond-Promoted Photoactivation of Perfluoroalkyl Iodides: A Photochemical Protocol for Perfluoroalkylation Reactions. Org. Lett 2017, 19, 1442–1445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Hartmann M; Li Y; Studer A Determination of rate constants for trifluoromethyl radical addition to various alkenes via a practical method. Org. Biomol. Chem 2016, 14, 206–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).(a) Stratenus JL; Havinga E Photoreactions of Aromatic Compounds IX. Rec. Trav. Chim 1966, 85, 434–436. [Google Scholar]; (b) Andraos J; Barclay GG; Medeiros DR; Baldovi MV; Scaiano JC; Sinta R Model Studies on the Photochemistry of Phenolic Sulfonate Photoacid Generators. Chem. Mater 1998, 10, 1694–1699. [Google Scholar]; (c) Kageyama Y; Ohshima R; Sakurama K; Fujiwara Y; Tanimoto Y; Yamada Y; Aoki S Photochemical Cleavage Reactions of 8-Quinolinyl Sulfonates in Aqueous Solution. Chem. Pharm. Bull 2009, 57, 1257–1266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Zeppuhar AN; Wolf SM; Falvey DE Photoacid Generators Activated through Sequential Two-Photon Excitation: 1-Sulfonatoxy-2-alkoxyanthraquinone Derivatives. J. Phys. Chem. A 2021, 125, 5227–5236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).(a) Walling C. Free Radicals in Solution, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, 1957. [Google Scholar]; (b) Fisher H; Radom L Factors Controlling the Addition of Carbon-Centered Radicals Alkenes-An Experimental and Theoretical Perspective. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2001, 40, 1340–1371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Chu K; Vojtechovský J; McMahon BH; Sweet RM; Brendzen J; Schlichting. Structure of a ligand-binding intermediate in wild-type carbonmonoxy myoglobin. Nature. 2000, 403, 921–923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Liu XR; Zhang MM; Gross ML Mass Spectrometry-Based Protein Footprinting for Higher-Order Structure Analysis: Fundamentals and Applications. Chem. Rev 2020, 120, 4355–4454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).(a) Liu T; Marcinko TM; Vachet RW Protein-Ligand Affinity Determinations Using Covalent Labeling-Mass Spectrometry. J. Am. Mass. Spectrom 2020, 31, 1544–1553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhang T; Wei T; Han Y; Ma H; Samieegohar M; Chen P-W; Lian I; Lo Y-H Protein–Ligand Interaction Detection with a Novel Method of Transient Induced Molecular Electronic Spectroscopy (TIMES): Experimental and Theoretical Studies. ACS Cent. Sci 2016, 2, 834–842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Zhang H; Gau BC; Jones LM; Vidavsky I; Gross ML Fast Photochemical Oxidation of Proteins for Comparing Structures of Protein-Ligand Complexes: The Calmodulin-Peptide Model System. Anal. Chem 2011, 83, 311–318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Ikura M; Clore CM; Gronenborn GZ; Klee CB; Bax A Solution Structure of a Calmodulin-Target Peptide Complex by Multidimensional NMR. Science. 1992, 256, 632–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).(a) Ma B; Nussinov R Trp/Met/Phe Hot Spots in Protein-Protein Interactions: Potential Targets in Drug Discovery. Curr. Top. Med. Chem 2007, 7, 999–1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Liao S-M; Du Q-D; Meng J-Z; Pang Z-W; Huang R-B The multiple roles of histidine in protein interactions. Chem. Cent. J 2013, 7, article number 44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Spradlin JN; Zhang E; Nomura DK Reimagining Druggability Using Chemoproteomic Platforms. Acc. Chem. Res 2021, 54, 1801–1813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information_radicalCF3

RESOURCES