In the fifth paragraph of In-season mesocycle analysis subsection of Discussion, there is an error in the sixth sentence. The correct sentence is: In addition, when we compared the distance covered in high-speed high-speed distance (>19 km/h) during in-season mesocycle analysis to positions played, a significant difference was found between positions only for M1 when comparing CD vs WD and WD vs WM.
In the last paragraph of In-season mesocycle analysis subsection of Discussion, there is an error in the first sentence. The correct sentence is: As suggested by Clemente et al. (2017) study, we also correlated HI scores with s-RPE and external TL variables, and some correlations could be observed: stress and total distance in M1 (-6.34, p < 0.01); fatigue and s-RPE in M8 (0.589, p < 0.05); muscle soreness and s-RPE in M8 (0.487, p < 0.05); fatigue and s-RPE in M10 (0.469, p < 0.05); and HI total score and total distance in M10 (0.489, p < 0.05).
In Fig 3, the legend is incomplete. Please see the correct and complete legend of Fig 3 here.
In Fig 4, the image for Hopper Index did not match with the results. Please see the correct Fig 4 here.
Reference
- 1.Oliveira R, Brito JP, Martins A, Mendes B, Marinho DA, Ferraz R, et al. (2019) In-season internal and external training load quantification of an elite European soccer team. PLoS ONE 14(4): e0209393. 10.1371/journal.pone.0209393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]