Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2024 May 10;14:10729. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61400-z

Superconductivity of thulium substituted clathrate hexahydrides at moderate pressure

Hongyu Huang 1, Chao Deng 1, Hao Song 1, Mingyang Du 1,, Defang Duan 2, Yanhui Liu 1, Tian Cui 1,2,
PMCID: PMC11087549  PMID: 38730055

Abstract

Due to the BCS theory, hydrogen, the lightest element, would be the prospect of room-temperature superconductor after metallization, but because of the difficulty of the hydrogen metallization, the theory about hydrogen pre-compression was proposed that the hydrogen-rich compounds could be a great option for the high Tc superconductors. The superior properties of TmH6, YbH6 and LuH6 indicated the magnificent potential of heavy rare earth elements for low-pressure stability. Here, we designed XTmH12 (X = Y, Yb, Lu, and La) to obtain higher Tc while maintaining low pressure stability. Most prominently, YbTmH12 can stabilize at a pressure of 60 GPa. Compared with binary TmH6 hydride, its Tc was increased to 48 K. The results provide an effective method for the rational design of moderate pressure stabilized hydride superconductors.

Keywords: Hydrides, High pressure, Superconductivity, First principles calculation

Subject terms: Superconducting properties and materials, Superconducting properties and materials

Introduction

Since Kamerlingh Onnes discovered that mercury (Hg) suddenly starts carrying a current without resistance at an extremely low temperature in 19111,2, the achievement of room temperature superconductor is a dream for the superconductivity research. The theory that hydrogen can be metallized at high pressure was developed in 1935 and was proposed by Winger and Huntington3. According to the theory of superconductivity proposed by Bardeen, Cooper and Schrieffer in 1957, the transition temperature of superconductivity is proportional to the Debye temperature4. Due to this theory, hydrogen, the lightest element, would be the prospect of room-temperature superconductor after metallization5, but because of the difficulty of the hydrogen metallization6,7, the theory about hydrogen pre-compression was proposed by Ashcroft that the hydrogen-rich compounds could be a great option for the high Tc superconductors8,9. The theory of chemical pre-compression refers to the addition of other elements to the synthesized hydrogen-rich compounds at a lower pressure than synthesizing pure hydrogen10. Based on this conclusion, many great hydrogen-rich compounds have been designed and predicted to be potential superconductors with high Tc1113. The first successful predictions were H3S and LaH10 with high Tc exceeding 200 K1416, and these predictions were successfully confirmed by experiment soon1720.

Over these years, with the efforts of our researchers, almost all binary hydrides were explored, people commence the study of ternary hydride formed by adding a new element into binary hydrides. In 2019, Li2MgH16 with the highest Tc to date (473 K at 250 GPa), designed by filling the anti-bonding orbital of the H2 molecular unit of MgH16 with the element Li21. H–C–S compounds and Lu–N–H compounds have been widely studied for some time due to the claimed observation of room temperature superconductivity. However, there are still some controversial issues about the stoichiometry and the crystal structure2225. Recently, a new kind of fluorite-type clathrate ternary hydrides AXH8 (A = Ca, Sr, Y, La, X = B, Be, Al) in the main chain of hydrogen alloys has been predicted26. The most prominent, LaBeH8, is dynamically stable down to 20 GPa and has a high Tc up to 185 K. The exciting thing is that the cubic clathrate superhydrides LaxY1-xH6,10 have been experimentally synthesized by laser heating of yttrium-lanthanum alloys, which exhibited a maximum critical temperature Tc of 253 K without increasing pressure27. According this experiment, it is practicable to incorporate a metal element in the clathrate hydride to keep the compounds steadily.

It is a widespread attention about the prominent superconductivity of the clathrate hydrides. Clathrate hexahydrides Im-3 m-XH6 (X = Mg, Ca, Sc, Y, La, Tm, Yb, Lu) are widespread in alkaline earth and rare earth metal superhydrides16,2832. In this structure, there is a body-centered cube (bcc) with center occupied by a metal atom, and there is a H24 cage of hydrogen atoms in the void of the bcc lattice. CaH6 and YH6 have been experimentally synthesized with high Tcs of 215 K at 172 GPa33,34 and 227 K at 166 GPa, respectively35. Theoretically predicted Tcs of MgH6, ScH6 and LaH6 are 260 K at 300 GPa, 147 K at 285 GPa and174 K at 100 GPa, respectively. YbH6 and LuH6 in full 4f.-orbital shells are predicted to exhibit high Tc superconductivity at relatively low pressures (145 K, 70 GPa vs. 273 K, 100 GPa, respectively)32. With unfilled 4f. orbitals, TmH6 is stable at 50 GPa, but has a relatively low Tc at 25 K. There was a report that the structures of superhydrides at low pressure could keep stable by f electrons, such as lanthanide clathrate hydrides CeH936, PrH937 and NdH938. Although the filling of the metal atoms’ f orbital could make the structure more stable at low pressure, according to current research results, the Tcs of hydrides with unfilled 4f. orbitals are mostly very low.

The properties of TmH6, YbH6 and LuH6 indicated the magnificent potential of such structures for low-pressure stability. In alkaline earth and rare earth metals hydrides Im-3 m-XH6 are common, such as CaH628, MgH629, YH615,16,30, ScH631, (Tm/Yb/Lu)H632. The structure can also be extended into the ternary structure Pm-3 m-ABH12, such as (Y,Ca)H63941, (Mg,Ca)H642, (Sc,Ca)H643, (La,Y)H644, (Ca/Sc/Y,Yb/Lu)H645. In recent years, based on this sodalite-like clathrate structure, we have designed a series of high-temperature superconductors that can be stable under moderate pressures by adding heavy rare earth elements Yb/Lu to sodalite-like clathrate hydrides45. Among them, Y3LuH24 and YLu3H24 are the room-temperature superconductors with the lowest stabilizing pressure predicted by current theory (283 K, 120 GPa and 288 K, 110 GPa, respectively). This result shows that room-temperature superconductivity of hydrogen-based superconductors is possible at medium pressure.

In this work, we designed XTmH12 (X = Y, Yb, Lu, and La) to obtain higher Tc while maintaining low pressure stability. Most prominently, YbTmH12 can stabilize at 60 GPa. Compared with binary TmH6 hydride, its Tc was increased to 48 K. The results provide an effective method for the rational design of moderate pressure stabilized hydride superconductors.

Results

First, we designed a series of ternary clathrate hydrides YTmH12 based on the sodalite-like clathrate structure YLuH1245. The crystal structure of Pm-3 m-YLuH12 is shown in Fig. 1. The atoms Y, Tm, and H occupy the 1b (0.5, 0.5, 0.5), 1a (0, 0, 0), and 12 h (0.25322, 0, 0) Wyckoff positions in the crystal structure. In this structure, there are a bcc lattice of metal atoms and a H24 cage which is formed by the hydrogen atom occupying all the tetrahedral void of the lattices, as shown in Fig. 1, and the H24 cage is formed by six H-square and eight H-hexagon rings, with two classes of unequal H atoms. In many alkaline earth metals and rare earth metal hydrides there are this kind of structure consisting of metal atom and H24 cage. There are two H2 accepting electrons from the central metal atoms to form an H4 unit, which serves as the cornerstone for the construction of a three-dimensional sodalite gabion and thus makes the structure stable. This unique structure partially occupies the degenerate orbit at the center of the region. The resulting dynamic Jahn–Teller effect contributes to enhanced electron–phonon coupling and leads to high Tc superconductivity.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Crystal structures of Pm-3 m-XTmH12 at 150 GPa, superconducting critical temperature Tc dynamically stability of compounds XTmH12 (X = Y, Yb, Lu and La).

As is well-known, the impact of the electron correlation effects is particularly significant for 4f. systems. In our previous work, we calculated the equation of state (EOS) for YbH2 and compared it with the experimental EOS to assess the reliability of our DFT calculations32. One can see that there is a good agreement between the theory and experiment for the high-pressure phase P63/mmc of YbH2. The authors of previous work concerned with ytterbium hydrides46, used a Hubbard U = 5 eV for lower pressure phases and U = 0 eV for high-pressure phases to reproduce available experimental data, in clear agreement with our results. Therefore, in this work, we select GGA and U = 0 eV for calculation of 4f systems.

Next, we try to extend YTmH12 to more compounds. In the designed XTmH12 structure, at least one of the “pre-compressor” metal atoms is heavy rare earth element Tm, and the other element has a similar radius with Tm, including Na, K, Mg, Ca, Sr, Sc, Y, Yb, Lu, La. Then we calculated the phonon dispersion for all possible components in the pressure range of 50–200 GPa. The stability of the replaced structure is reflected in Fig. 1, we determined that only Y, Yb, Lu and La can stabilize dynamically this ternary sodalite-like clathrate structure.

To determine the thermodynamic stability of these structures, we performed structure searches at a pressure of 100–200 GPa, focusing on XTmH12 (X = Y, Yb, Lu and La) compositions with 1 to 2 formula units. As shown in Fig. 2, None of the structures Pm-3 m-XTmH12 have the lowest enthalpy values, which means they are all metastable phases. The enthalpy of Pm-3 m-YTmH12 and Pm-3 m-LaTmH12 are higher than that of binary hydrides YH6 + TmH6 and LaH6 + TmH6, respectively. Pm-3 m-YbTmH12 and Pm-3 m-LuTmH12 are stable compared to the binaries YbH6 + TmH6 and LuH6 + TmH6, respectively, but their enthalpy are higher than that of the other ternary hydrides, such as C2/c-YbTmH12 and Fd-3 m-LuTmH12. This means that some difficulties need to be overcome in the experiment to synthesize these structures. However, metastable stable phases can also be synthesized experimentally and even dominate over thermodynamically stable phases47,48.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Calculated enthalpies per (a) YTmH12, (b) YbTmH12, (c) LuTmH12, (d) LaTmH12 as the function of pressure.

We calculated their electronic band structures and projected density of states (PDOS). It can be clearly seen that the DOS value of the s electron of H near the Fermi surface is higher than that of the p and d electrons of the metal element. This is because H does not exist in molecular form, but forms a H24 cage. However, compared to other high-Tc hydrides with H24 cage, such as CaH6, YH6, and LuH6, the DOS values of H's s electrons near the Fermi plane in these structures are not high enough, which is not good news for searching for high-temperature superconductors in hydrides. Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that the DOS of XTmH12 has extremely high peaks near the Fermi surface. This is mainly due to the 4f orbitals from heavy rare earth elements form a set of localized and almost non-dispersive bands in XTmH12. These bands will appear in different positions depending on the outermost electrons of the element. The bands from Tm atom with unfilled 4f orbitals appear at the Fermi level in YTmH12 (see Fig. 3a), and the bands from Yb atom with full-filled 4f orbitals appear about 1 eV below the Fermi level (see Fig. 3b). The bands from Tm atom with unfilled 4f orbitals also appear at the Fermi level in LaTmH12 (see Fig. 3c), this means that the species of the other metal element has almost no effect on the energy level at which the 4f electron appears. The bands from Lu atom appear about 6 eV below the Fermi level (see Fig. 3d) because of full-filled 4f orbitals and an extra 5d electron. The f electrons can enhance the chemical compression effects from metallic elements, helping to stabilize the structure at lower pressures.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Calculated electronic band structures and projected density of states for (a) YTmH12, (b) YbTmH12, (c) LuTmH12, (d) LaTmH12.

To make the prediction more reliable, evaluation of the impact of the electron correlation effects is desired. Therefore, we calculated the band structure using U = 5 eV to figure out how Hubbard-U may modify the band structure (see Fig. S1 in Supplementary Material). After considering U = 5 eV, one flat band is lifted up into the unoccupied regime. This means that the occupation of 4f states is changed, that could have substantial impact on the electron–phonon coupling physics. Future studies will focus on the impact of U to pairing strength.

Discussion

Then, we have compared the electronic density of states at the Fermi level (NEf) in YTmH12, YbTmH12, LuTmH12 and LaTmH12 and binary hexahydrides, including YH6, TmH6, YbH6, LuH6, LaH6, as shown in Table 1. Benefit by 4f electrons from heavy rare earth elements Tm, large electronic density of states at the Fermi level in the XTmH12 is observed, much higher than that of the binary hexahydrides. The large H-derived electronic density of states at the Fermi level is beneficial for strong electron–phonon coupling (EPC) parameter λ. Generally speaking, NEf indicates all of the candidate electrons to form Cooper pairs. It is clear that the large NEf plays a positive role in enhancing the EPC λ. However, from the aspect of partial DOS, the contribution from H to the electronic density of states at the Fermi level in XTmH12 is not higher than the cases in binary hexahydrides. This suggests that the 4f electrons will play no role in superconductivity. The contrasting EPC λ in these clathrate hexahydrides is mainly attributed to the disparate intensity of H electrons interacting with optic phonons, rather than the contributions from global electronic structures. Papaconstantopoulos et al. apply the Gaspari-Gyorffy theory to determine that, in CaH6, the acoustic modes associated with Ca contribute only 7% to the total value of λ, in contrast to the optic modes associated with hydrogen which contribute 93% for the H49. And in LaH10, La has only a 2% contribution50.

Table 1.

The calculated electron–phonon coupling (EPC) parameter λ, logarithmic average phonon frequency ωlog, electron density of states at the Fermi level (NEf, states/spin/Ry/cell), angular momentum components of the DOS at the Fermi level, superconducting critical temperature Tc for compounds YTmH12, YbTmH12, LuTmH12 and LaTmH12 and binary hexahydrides, including YH6, TmH6, YbH6, LuH6, LaH6.

Compounds Pressure (GPa) λ ωlog (K) NEf States/spin/Ry/cell Tc (K)
X-d X-f Tm-d Tm-f H–s
YTmH12 80 1.09 583 32.4 2.1 0 1.3 24.6 4.4 40–46
YbTmH12 60 1.04 657 37.6 1.2 1.5 0.7 31.6 2.6 42–48
LuTmH12 70 1.10 596 32.4 2.2 0 1.4 22.6 6.2 42–48
LaTmH12 170 0.79 530 30.2 1.7 0 1.2 23.0 4.3 19–24
YH6 120 3.06 829 4.7 2.0 0 2.2 251–26430
TmH6 50 0.72 612 29.6 0.7 27.4 1.3 19–2532
YbH6 70 2.22 652 8.4 1.0 4.3 2.7 121–13132
LuH6 100 3.60 751 4.8 0.1 0 4.5 227–24332
LaH6 100 1.83 1244 4.5 0.8 0 3.6 156–17416

The calculated Tcs by the Allen-Dynes modified McMillan equation51 are shown in Table 1. LaTmH12 has a Tc of 19–24 K at 170 GPa. This is not only much higher than the minimum stabilization pressure of 50 GPa for TmH6, but also higher than the pressure of 100 GPa for LaH6. LaTmH12 requires higher pressures to remain stable, probably due to the excessive gap between the properties of La and Tm. This type of ternary clathrate structure requires the two metal elements to be close in radius and other properties to ensure H cage stability. Thus, YTmH12 is able to stabilize at 80 GPa and exhibited Tc of 40–46 K. Both the minimum stabilization pressure and Tc are intermediate between the binary hydrides YH6 and TmH6. Yb and Lu, which are also heavy rare earth elements adjacent to Tm, have f electrons that can similarly enhance chemical pre-compression, so the stabilization pressure of their doped structures can be reduced even further, and YbTmH12 and LuTmH12 can be stabilized at 60 and 70 GPa, respectively, and exhibited Tc of 42–48 K. Their minimum stabilizing pressures and Tc also show a pattern intermediate to that of the binary hydrides.

Charge transfer has an important effect on the structure and properties of hydrides. Table 2 shows charges transferred for all thulium substituted clathrate hexahydrides. The e represents the total remaining electrons. Negative δ mean loss of electrons, positive δ mean gain of electrons. It can be seen that La is a very good electron donor and is able to provide sufficient electrons to the surrounding H. In LaTmH12, each La atom can provide 2.25 electrons, ultimately making 0.21 electrons available for each H on average. However, the provision of sufficient electrons does not necessarily mean that superconductivity is favored, and may even create factors that are detrimental to superconductivity. In terms of charge transfer, the ability of Tm to provide electrons is stronger than that of Y and Yb, but unfortunately, the presence of f electrons severely constrains higher Tc in thulium substituted clathrate hexahydrides.

Table 2.

Charges transferred for compounds (a) YTmH12, (b) YbTmH12, (c) LuTmH12, (d) LaTmH12.

Compounds Pressure (GPa) δ(X) δ(Tm) δ(H)
YTmH12 80  − 1.09  − 1.19 0.19
YbTmH12 60  − 0.83  − 1.09 0.16
LuTmH12 70 0.94  − 2.54 0.13
LaTmH12 170  − 2.25  − 0.25 0.21
YH6 120  − 1.38  −  0.23
TmH6 50  − 0.91 0.15
YbH6 70  − 0.96 0.16
LuH6 100  − 0.66 0.11
LaH6 100  − 1.44 0.24

Negative δ mean loss of electrons, positive δ mean gain of electrons.

To determine the origin of the superconductivity in these superconductors, we calculated their phonon spectrum, projected phonon density of state (PHDOS), integral EPC parameter λ and Eliashberg spectral function α2F(ω). The superconductivity of superconductors comes mainly from strong electron–phonon coupling (EPC). So, we can look for the frequency range in which the EPC parameter λ grows rapidly, and vibration modes in this frequency range are the key to the superconductivity of this structure. As can be easily seen in Fig. 4, λ grows rapidly in two regions: the low-frequency region and the mid-frequency region. For example, in LuTmH12, λ grows rapidly to 0.25 in the frequency range of 0–150 cm−1 and then grows slowly until the frequency range of 400–1000 cm−1, where λ grows rapidly to 1.1, and then grows hardly at all (see Fig. 4a). In YbTmH12, λ also grows rapidly in the frequency range of 500–1000 cm−1 (see Fig. 4b). By comparing the PHDOS of different elements, we can find the reason for the rapid growth of λ. The rapid growth of λ is mainly due to the vibrations of metal atoms in the low-frequency region (red and black peaks in PHDOS), while in the mid-frequency region it is due to the vibrations of hydrogen atoms (blue peaks in PHDOS). This corresponds to the two main sources of superconductivity in such clathrate hydrides: hydrogen on the hydrogen cage and the central metallic atom. In addition to this, it can be seen in Fig. 4c that the λ of YTmH12 grows rapidly when the frequency is 300 cm−1. On the phonon dispersion, there are soft phonon patterns near the R direction in this frequency range. This suggests that the softening of the optical branch of the phonon spectrum is also an important source of electron–phonon coupling. In LuTmH12, λ grows rapidly to 0.25 in the frequency range of 0–150 cm−1 consistent with YTmH12 (see Fig. 4d). However, in higher frequency range, λ grows much slower than that in YTmH12, which leads to the low Tc in LaTmH12.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The calculated phonon band structure, PHDOS, electron–phonon coupling (EPC) parameter λ, and Eliashberg spectral function α2F(ω) of (a) LuTmH12, (b) YbTmH12, (c) YTmH12, (d) LaTmH12.

In this work, we introduce other elements to improve the superconductivity of TmH6, allowing the newly formed thulium substituted clathrate hexahydrides XTmH12 (X = Y, Yb, Lu and La) to have the higher Tc while maintaining low-pressure stability. Most prominently, YbTmH12 can be stabilized at a pressure of 60 GPa. Its Tc is elevated compared to the binary TmH6, reaching 48 K. The results provide an effective method for the successful design of hydride superconductors at moderate pressures.

Computational methods

The candidate phases of XTmH12 (X = Y, Yb, Lu, and La) are predicted using the ab initio Random Structure search (AIRSS) technique52,53. The selected cut-off energy of the projected augmented wave (PAW)54 is 400 eV. The sampling density of the Brillouin district is 2π × 0.07 Å−1.The ultra-soft potentials is dynamically generated by the method of pseudo-potentials. The valence electrons in the electronic states of Y, Tm, Yb, Lu and La atoms are 4s24p65s24d1, 4f135s25p66s2, 4f145s25p66s2, 4f145p65d16s2, 5s25p65d16s2, respectively.

Structural relaxation, calculations of enthalpies, band structures, density of states and charge transfer of XTmH12 (X = Y, Yb, Lu and La) at different pressures were calculated by the Cambridge Serial Total Energy Package (CASTEP)55. We use the generalized gradient approximation (GGA)56 with the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerh of (PBE) parametrization57 as the exchange–correlation function. For the plane wave, we chose a cut-off energy of 800 eV. The sampling density of the Brillouin region is 2π × 0.03 Å−1. The pseudo-potential is dynamically generated by the ultra-soft potential.

Phonon dispersion, electron–phonon coupling and Eliashberg spectral function α2F(ω) of XTmH12 (X = Y, Yb, Lu and La) were calculated by the Quantum-ESPRESSO (Open-Source Package for Research in Electronic Structure, Simulation, and Optimization)58. With an ultra-soft potential and a cut off energy of 90 Ry, all XTmH12 (X = Y, Yb, Lu, La) in the first Brillouin region have a k-point grid of 12 × 12 × 12 and a q-point grid of 4 × 4 × 4, respectively. The superconducting transition temperatures of XTmH12 (X = Y, Yb, Lu and La) are estimated through the Allen−Dynes-modified McMillan equation (A-D-M) with correction factors51,59:

Tc=f1f2ωlog1.2exp-1.041+λλ-μ1+0.62λ

λ and ωlog are given by:

λ=20α2F(ω)ωdω and ωlog=exp2λ0dωωα2F(ω)lnω

f1 and f2 are given by:

f1=1+λ2.46(1+3.8μ)323 and f2=1+ω2ωlog-1λ2λ2+1.82(1+6.3μ)ω¯2ωlog

average frequencies ω¯2 is given by:

ω¯2=2λ0dωωα2F(ω)ωdω

The typical value of Coulomb pseudo-potential μ* was set as 0.1–0.13.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figure S1. (167.7KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 52072188, No. 12122405 and No. 12274169), Program for Science and Technology Innovation Team in Zhejiang (Grant No. 2021R01004), Jilin Provincial Science and Technology Development Project (20210509038RQ), Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (Grants No. LQ24A040001) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang (SJLY2023003).

Author contributions

T.C. initiated the project. M.D. and H.H. performed the most of the theoretical calculations and contributed to the data interpretation and writing the manuscript. C.D. and H.S. contributed to the theoretical calculations. All authors contributed to the discussion and the final version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Mingyang Du, Email: dumingyang@nbu.edu.cn.

Tian Cui, Email: cuitian@nbu.edu.cn.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-61400-z.

References

  • 1.Liu T, et al. Shockwave-loading-induced enhancement of Tc in superconducting Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:6710. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06887-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Deng L, et al. Pressure-induced high-temperature superconductivity retained without pressure in FeSe single crystals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2021;118:e2108938118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2108938118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wigner E, Huntington HB. On the possibility of a metallic modification of hydrogen. J. Chem. Phys. 1935;3:764–770. doi: 10.1063/1.1749590. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bardeen J, Cooper LN, Schrieffer JR. Microscopic theory of superconductivity. Phys. Rev. 1957;106:162–164. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.106.162. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ashcroft NW. Metallic hydrogen: A high-temperature superconductor? Phys. Rev. Lett. 1968;21:1748. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.21.1748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dias RP, Silvera IF. Observation of the Wigner-Huntington transition to metallic hydrogen. Science. 2017;355:715–718. doi: 10.1126/science.aal1579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Loubeyre P, Occelli F, Dumas P. Synchrotron infrared spectroscopic evidence of the probable transition to metal hydrogen. Nature. 2020;577:631. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1927-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Quan Y, Ghosh SS, Pickett WE. Compressed hydrides as metallic hydrogen superconductors. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;100:184505. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.184505. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen X-J. Exploring high-temperature superconductivity in hard matter close to structural instability. Matter. Radiat. Extremes. 2020;5:068102. doi: 10.1063/5.0033143. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ashcroft NW. Hydrogen dominant metallic alloys: High temperature superconductors? Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004;92:4. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.187002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Du M, Zhao W, Cui T, Duan D. Compressed superhydrides: the road to room temperature superconductivity. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2022;34:173001. doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/ac4eaf. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Duan DF, et al. Structure and superconductivity of hydrides at high pressures. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2017;4:121–135. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nww029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gor'kov LP, Kresin VZ. Colloquium: High pressure and road to room temperature superconductivity. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2018;90:16. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.011001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Duan DF, et al. Pressure-induced metallization of dense (H2S)(2)H-2 with high-T-c superconductivity. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:6. doi: 10.1038/srep06968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu HY, Naumov I, Hoffmann R, Ashcroft NW, Hemley RJ. Potential high-T-c superconducting lanthanum and yttrium hydrides at high pressure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:6990–6995. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704505114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Peng F, et al. Hydrogen clathrate structures in rare earth hydrides at high pressures: possible route to room-temperature superconductivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;119:6. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.107001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Drozdov AP, Eremets MI, Troyan IA, Ksenofontov V, Shylin SI. Conventional superconductivity at 203 kelvin at high pressures in the sulfur hydride system. Nature. 2015;525:73. doi: 10.1038/nature14964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Einaga M, et al. Crystal structure of the superconducting phase of sulfur hydride. Nat. Phys. 2016;12:835–838. doi: 10.1038/nphys3760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Drozdov AP, et al. Superconductivity at 250 K in lanthanum hydride under high pressures. Nature. 2019;569:528. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1201-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Somayazulu M, et al. Evidence for superconductivity above 260 K in Lanthanum superhydride at megabar pressures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;122:6. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.027001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sun Y, Lv J, Xe Y, Lu HY, Ma YM. Route to a superconducting phase above room temperature in electron-doped hydride compounds under high pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019;123:5. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.097001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang T, et al. Absence of conventional room-temperature superconductivity at high pressure in carbon-doped H3S. Phys. Rev. B. 2021;104:064510. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.064510. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gubler M, Flores-Livas JA, Kozhevnikov A, Goedecker S. Missing theoretical evidence for conventional room-temperature superconductivity in low-enthalpy structures of carbonaceous sulfur hydrides. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2022;6:014801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.014801. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Du M, Zhang Z, Cui T, Duan D. Pressure-induced superconducting CS2H10 with an H3S framework. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021;23:22779. doi: 10.1039/D1CP03270D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Huo Z, et al. First-principles study on the conventional superconductivity of N-doped fcc-LuH3. Matter. Radiat. Extremes. 2023;8:038402. doi: 10.1063/5.0151844. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang Z, et al. Design principles for high-temperature superconductors with a hydrogen-based alloy backbone at moderate pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022;128:047001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.047001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Semenok DV, et al. Superconductivity at 253 K in lanthanum–yttrium ternary hydrides. Mater. Today. 2021;48:18–28. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2021.03.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang H, Tse JS, Tanaka K, Iitaka T, Ma Y. Superconductive sodalite-like clathrate calcium hydride at high pressures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:6463. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118168109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Feng X, Zhang J, Gao G, Liu H, Wang H. Compressed sodalite-like MgH6 as a potential high-temperature superconductor. RSC Adv. 2015;5:59292–59296. doi: 10.1039/C5RA11459D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li Y, et al. Pressure-stabilized superconductive yttrium hydrides. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:9948. doi: 10.1038/srep09948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Abe K. Hydrogen-rich scandium compounds at high pressures. Phys. Rev. B. 2017;96:144108. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.144108. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Song H, et al. High Tc superconductivity in heavy rare earth hydrides. Chin. Phys. Lett. 2021;38:107401. doi: 10.1088/0256-307x/38/10/107401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ma L, et al. High-temperature superconducting phase in clathrate calcium hydride CaH6 up to 215 K at a pressure of 172 GPa. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022;128:167001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.167001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Li Z, et al. Superconductivity above 200 K discovered in superhydrides of calcium. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:2863. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30454-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Troyan IA, et al. Anomalous high-temperature superconductivity in YH6. Adv. Mater. 2021;33:2006832. doi: 10.1002/adma.202006832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chen W, et al. High-temperature superconducting phases in cerium superhydride with a Tc up to 115 K below a pressure of 1 megabar. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2021;127:117001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.117001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhou D, et al. Superconducting praseodymium superhydrides. Sci. Adv. . 2020;6:6849. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax6849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhou D, et al. High-pressure synthesis of magnetic neodymium polyhydrides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:2803–2811. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b10439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Xie H, et al. High-temperature superconductivity in ternary clathrate YCaH12 under high pressures. J. Phys. Condes. Matter. 2019;31:7. doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/ab09b4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Liang X, et al. Potential high-Tc superconductivity in CaYH12 under pressure. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;99:100505. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.100505. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhao W, et al. Pressure-induced high-Tc superconductivity in the ternary clathrate system Y-Ca-H. Phys. Rev. B. 2022;106:014521. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.014521. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sukmas W, Tsuppayakorn-aek P, Pinsook U, Bovornratanaraks T. Near-room-temperature superconductivity of Mg/Ca substituted metal hexahydride under pressure. J. Alloy. Compd. 2020;849:156434. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156434. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shi L-T, et al. Prediction of pressure-induced superconductivity in the novel ternary system ScCaH2n (n = 1–6) J. Mater. Chem. C. 2021;9:7284–7291. doi: 10.1039/D1TC00634G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Song P, et al. High-Tc superconducting hydrides formed by LaH24 and YH24 cage structures as basic blocks. Chem. Matter. 2021;33:9501–9507. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c02371. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Du M, Song H, Zhang Z, Duan D, Cui T. Room-temperature superconductivity in Yb/Lu substituted clathrate hexahydrides under moderate pressure. Research. 2022;2022:9784309. doi: 10.34133/2022/9784309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Klotz S, Casula M, Komatsu K, Machida S, Hattori T. High-pressure structure and electronic properties of YbD2 to 34 GPa. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;100:020101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.020101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Flores-Livas JA, et al. Interplay between structure and superconductivity: Metastable phases of phosphorus under pressure. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2017;1:024802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.024802. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sun W, et al. The thermodynamic scale of inorganic crystalline metastability. Sci. Adv. 2016;2:e1600225. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Papaconstantopoulos DA, Mehl MJ, Economou EN. High-temperature superconductivity in the Ca-Sc-H system. Phys. Rev. B. 2023;108:224508. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.224508. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Papaconstantopoulos DA, Mehl MJ, Chang PH. High-temperature superconductivity in LaH10. Phys. Rev. B. 2020;101:060506. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.060506. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Allen PB, Dynes RC. Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors reanalyzed. Phys. Rev. B. 1975;12:905–922. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.12.905. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pickard CJ, Needs RJ. High-pressure phases of silane. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006;97:4. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.045504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pickard CJ, Needs RJ. Ab initio random structure searching. J. Phys. Condes. Matter. 2011;23:23. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/23/5/053201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kresse G, Joubert D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B. 1999;59:1758–1775. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Clark SJ, et al. First principles methods using CASTEP. Z. Kristall. 2005;220:567–570. doi: 10.1524/zkri.220.5.567.65075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ceperley DM, Alder B. Ground state of the electron gas by a stochastic method. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1980;45:566. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.566. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996;77:3865. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Giannozzi P, et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: A modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys.-Condes. Matter. 2009;21:19. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.McMillan WL. Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors. Phys. Rev. 1968;167:331. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.167.331. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure S1. (167.7KB, docx)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES