Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2024 Apr 11;16(4):e58036. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58036

Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Access for Coronary Interventions

Farooq Ahmad 1,2, Ikram Ullah 3,, Sher W Khan 4
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC11088474  PMID: 38738053

Abstract

Background

Transradial access (TRA) is a medical procedure primarily used for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and cardiac catheterization. Based on the recently published Minimizing Adverse Haemorrhagic Events by Transradial Access Site and Systemic Implementation of AngioX (MATRIX) trial, TRA is being used more frequently than transfemoral access (TFA) since it has reduced rates of bleeding and fatality. A structural complication of TRA is radial artery occlusion (RAO), which may cause temporary pain to limit TRA in the future.

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the onset and risk factors of RAO following TRA for coronary interventions.

Material and methods

An observational study was conducted at Fauji Foundation Hospital in Peshawar, Pakistan. The study included 1,680 patients recruited between April 2021 to December 2023. Fifty-eight patients were lost to follow-up, while another 95 patients did not come for a visit within the study period. The final study, therefore, included 1,527 patients.

Results

The mean age of patients was 58.09 ± 8.07 years. Patients were divided into two age groups (greater or less than 60 years). Diagnostic angiograms were completed for 955 patients, while 572 also underwent PCI. The overall RAO onset was 81 (5.3%). There was a significantly higher RAO onset in patients over 60 years old (7.1 vs 3.8%, p = 0.003).

Conclusion

Overall, the risk of RAO is low following TRA. The risk of RAO is significantly higher in people aged over 60 years.

Keywords: coronary diagnostics, cardiology research, coronary interventions, transradial approach, radial artery occlusion

Introduction

Transradial access (TRA), or transradial angiography or transradial catheterization, is a diagnostic procedure for various cardiac disorders. During the procedure, a catheter is inserted into a radial artery. This procedure was first introduced by Campeau et al. in 1989. Numerous studies have shown that TRA is beneficial since it maintains a high procedural success rate, a comparatively low possibility of access site bleeding, and high patient satisfaction [1]. Over the past decade, TRA has become much more common for all types of acute coronary attacks and immediate coronary procedures. Research indicates that TRA is associated with a notable decrease in access site bleeding issues and increased survival rates for patients receiving percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome [2]. TRA can result in hematoma or perforation, but the radial artery spasm and radial artery occlusion (RAO) rates are low.

RAO is one of the complications after TRA that occurs in 1-10% of patients. Hand ischemia, although rare, is a severe problem that can occur after RAO [3] and makes it impossible to use the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafts or arteriovenous fistula formation in the future. It has been shown that the risk of RAO can be lowered by using perfect hemostasis, a higher amount of anticoagulation, and faster compression after surgery [4,5]. Before a patient is discharged, their radial artery should be checked to ensure it is open. New research and methods are needed to identify how to reduce the risk of RAO [6]. A previous study examined the risk factors for RAO, finding that women and patients with diabetes are more likely to have acute RAO. The long time of high-pressure compression hemostasis after surgery, the amount of heparin used in the process, the type and size of the sheath, and the compression time after surgery are all risk factors for RAO [7].

This study aimed to determine RAO risk factors following TRA in coronary interventions. The risk factors of RAO resulting from TRA in Pakistani patients, especially in the province of KPK, had not been studied in detail before. Thus, the present study aims to fill this gap in the literature.

Materials and methods

Study design

This study used a prospective cross-sectional approach. The study was conducted at Fauji Foundation Hospital in Peshawar, Pakistan. Ethical approval to conduct the study was obtained from Fauji Foundation Hospital (reference 6039/Adm). All patients were also informed about the purpose of the research and consented to participate. The patients’ data were kept confidential as their personal information was not shared with anyone other than the researchers.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Patients of any age and gender undergoing coronary diagnostic and therapeutic procedures through a TRA at Fauji Foundation Hospital in Peshawar were included in the study. Patients with a poor pulse, who switched to transfemoral access (TFA), whose sheath was not removed immediately after the procedure (as it can result in loss of radial pulsation which can be a bias), or with a history of previous transradial interventions were excluded from the study. All procedures were done by an interventional cardiologist, and it included all single, double, and triple vessel PCI.

Data collection

A total of 1,680 patients were included in the study, which took place between April 2021 and December 2023. Fifty-eight patients were lost to follow-up, while another 95 patients did not come for a visit within the study time. The final analyses, therefore, included data from 1,527 patients. All patients received unfractionated heparin (2500 IU) and 200 mcg of nitroglycerin following a 6F-sheath insertion. The sheath was removed immediately after the procedure, and manual pressure followed by band ligation was applied for hemostasis. Patients’ radial artery patency was reviewed by the radial pulse by a consultant cardiologist two weeks after the index procedure. Patients without a palpable pulse were labeled as having RAO. The patients were assessed in a clinical setup without the use of any gadgets such as Doppler. Thus, assessing vessel patency was the most accurate and convenient method.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using the statistical analysis program Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 23; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY). Frequencies and percentages were recorded for qualitative variables, including gender, cardiovascular risk factors, medications, and RAO. Means and standard deviations were calculated for age and BMI. A chi-square test was applied to find the relationship between the onset of RAO and age, gender, medical procedure, and co-morbidities. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The mean age of the study population was 58.09 ± 8.07 years. There were 580 (38%) females in this study. The most common cardiovascular risk factor was hypertension 1,236 (81%), followed by diabetes mellitus (363, 23.8%) and dyslipidemia (320, 21%). There were 626 (41%) patients reported to have the habit of smoking. Patients were divided into two age groups: 839 (54.9%) patients were aged less than 60 years and 688 (45.1%) were aged 60 and above. Diagnostic angiograms were only completed for 955 (62.5%) patients, while 572 (37.5%) underwent PCI. Patient data are summarized in Table 1

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of patients.

The data are presented in the form of frequency (n) and percentage (%).

Age (Mean ± SD) 58.09 ± 8.07
Female n(%) 580 (38%)
Body Mass Index (Mean ± SD) 26.7 ± 4.3
Cardiovascular Risk Factors
Hypertension n(%) 1236 (81%)
Dyslipidaemia n(%) 320 (21%)
Diabetes Mellitus n(%) 363 (23.8%)
Current Smoking n(%) 290 (19%)
Previous MI n(%) 626 (41%)
Medication Use
Aspirin n(%) 1482 (97.1%)
Thienopyridine n(%) 1354 (88.7%)
Statins n(%) 1114 (73%)
Beta Blockers n(%) 1498 (97.1%)
ACE Inhibitors n(%) 1192 (78.1%)
ARBs n(%) 250 (16.4%)
Nitrates n(%) 1439 (94.3%)
Ranolazine n(%) 658 (43.1%)

Overall, the onset of RAO was found to be only in 81 (5.3%) patients. Pearson correlation tests and chi-square tests were performed to find the association of the onset of RAO with age, gender, medical procedure, and comorbidities. There was a significantly higher RAO rate in patients aged over 60 years (60.5% vs 39.5%, p = 0.003). There were also higher RAO rates with PCI compared to angiography (53.1% vs 46.9%, p = 0.071) and female compared to male patients (45.7% vs 54.3%, p = 0.143); however, the effects of both these variables were not significant (Table 2).

Table 2. Association of radial artery occlusion (RAO) with demographic variables.

Variables RAO n(%) p-value Chi-square value
Age  
< 60 years 32 (39.5%) 0.003 8.235
> 60 years 49 (60.5%)
Gender  
Male 44 (54.3%) 0.143 2.151
Female 37 (45.7%)
Medical Procedure  
PCI 38 (46.9%) 0.071 3.264
Angiography 43 (53.1%)
Diabetes Mellitus  
Yes 20(24.7%) 0.912 0.12
No 61(75.3%)
Hypertension  
Yes 69(85.2%) 0.233 1.424
No 12 (14.8%)

Discussion

In this study, the aim was to identify the onset rate and risk factors of RAO. The general rate of RAO onset was found to be 5.3%. Older patients (60 years and above ) were much more likely to have RAO than younger patients. Additionally, no significant association was found between RAO, gender, and high blood pressure. A previous study was conducted at the Ch. Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology in Multan included 180 patients who underwent TRA. The study group's age range was 18-70 years. Of the patients, 14 (7.8%) had RAO. There was no significant variation in RAO between age groups and genders [8]. Another study with 125 patients was conducted in Multan; results showed that the average age of patients was 65.22 ± 11.54 years. The patients' average body mass index was 29.93 ± 4.87 kg/m2. After 24 hours of surgery, five (4.0%) individuals presented with RAO [9]. The findings are similar to those of the current study, but the sample size of these studies was relatively small. In a prospective trial following TRA, 563 patients with a normal Allen test were assessed for radial artery patency and function using physical and ultrasound examinations at discharge and a one-month follow-up. Thirty patients (5.3%) had clinical signs of RAO at discharge. Sixteen patients (2.8%) had chronic RAO at follow-up. The study found that the risk factors of RAO following TRA were minimal [10]. In another study, there were 7,215 TRI patients, of which 68 (0.95%) had acute RAO. In the RAO group, there were more female patients with diabetes mellitus than in the standard group [11]. This highly variable rate of RAO is due to the difference in patient demographics, the methods used to achieve hemostasis, and the method used to assess radial artery patency after the TRA. Most studies estimate that early RAO occurs in less than 5% of cases, and the estimated incidence of RAO is 5-10%. Most studies check the pulse to assess radial artery patency before hospital discharge. In the United States, 20% will determine RAO incidence with echo-Doppler or oximetry/plethysmography testing [12,13].

TRA is a convenient option for patients with low rates of radial artery occlusion when performed by experienced operators. The use of technology can further improve outcomes.

Limitations

This was a single-center study, and patients with previous radial artery procedures were excluded. All patients included in the study were undergoing elective procedures; therefore, patients needing emergency catheterization procedures were excluded. Furthermore, echo-Doppler ultrasound can be used for radial artery assessment. This ultrasound can better define the artery and help in cannulation and assessment of RAO, which was not used in this study, because of the clinical gadget limitations. In addition, patients who switched to TFA and those who did not have the sheath removed immediately after the procedure were not studied.

Conclusions

In summary, the incidence of RAO, following transradial percutaneous interventions, was shown to be minimal among the selected patient population. Notably, age was found to be a significant risk factor, with patients 60 years of age and older having a higher incidence of RAO. Gender, comorbidities, and the particular operation type (angiography or PCI) did not show any discernible correlations with the incidence of RAO. More research is necessary in diverse Pakistani locations to confirm these results and guarantee their generalizability to larger populations. These initiatives will help us understand RAO risk factors better and improve TRA procedure prevention tactics.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Farooq Ahmad , Ikram Ullah, Sher W. Khan

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Farooq Ahmad , Sher W. Khan

Drafting of the manuscript:  Farooq Ahmad , Sher W. Khan

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Ikram Ullah, Sher W. Khan

Supervision:  Ikram Ullah

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Fauji Foundation Hospital, Peshawar, issued approval 6039/Adm

Animal Ethics

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

References

  • 1.Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the national cardiovascular data registry (2007-2012) Feldman DN, Swaminathan RV, Kaltenbach LA, et al. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.112.000536. Circulation. 2013;127:2295–2306. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Contemporary arterial access in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Sandoval Y, Burke MN, Lobo AS, et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.058. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:2233–2241. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Arterial access site utilization in cardiogenic shock in the United Kingdom: is radial access feasible? Mamas MA, Anderson SG, Ratib K, et al. Am Heart J. 2014;167:900–908. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabrò P, et al. Lancet. 2015;385:2465–2476. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome) study. Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2481–2489. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.The prevalence and outcomes of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: analysis from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007 to 2011) Baklanov DV, Kaltenbach LA, Marso SP, et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.10.032. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:420–426. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.10.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Woodhead JM. Wellington, New Zealand: Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington; 2008. Comparison of Radial and Femoral Approaches for Coronary Angiography With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Relation to Vascular Access Site Complications. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR. Am Heart J. 2009;157:132–140. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction systematic overview and meta-analysis. Vorobcsuk A, Kónyi A, Aradi D, Horváth IG, Ungi I, Louvard Y, Komócsi A. Am Heart J. 2009;158:814–821. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.08.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Radial artery occlusion after percutaneous coronary interventions - an underestimated issue. Sławin J, Kubler P, Szczepański A, Piątek J, Stępkowski M, Reczuch K. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2013;9:353–361. doi: 10.5114/pwki.2013.38865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization. Avdikos G, Karatasakis A, Tsoumeleas A, Lazaris E, Ziakas A, Koutouzis M. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017;7:305–316. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.03.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.The frequency of radial artery occlusion following cardiac catheterization with the use of transradial pneumatic compression band. Hashmi KA, Iqbal Z, Hashmi AA, et al. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13:486. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05323-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Frequency of radial artery occlusion in patients undergoing percutaneous cardiac catheterization by radial access. Butt UM, Abu Bakar M, iqbal MK, Shoukat S, Khan RS, Ali M. Pak Heart J. 2021;54:230–234. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES