Skip to main content
Annals of Botany logoLink to Annals of Botany
. 2024 Feb 15;133(7):953–968. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcae023

Analyses of high spatial resolution datasets identify genes associated with multi-layered secondary cell wall thickening in Pinus bungeana

Yu Guo 1,2, Lichao Jiao 3,4, Jie Wang 5,6, Lingyu Ma 7,8, Yang Lu 9,10, Yonggang Zhang 11,12, Juan Guo 13,14,, Yafang Yin 15,16,
PMCID: PMC11089263  PMID: 38366549

Abstract

Background and Aims

Secondary cell wall (SCW) thickening is a major cellular developmental stage determining wood structure and properties. Although the molecular regulation of cell wall deposition during tracheary element differentiation has been well established in primary growth systems, less is known about the gene regulatory processes involved in the multi-layered SCW thickening of mature trees.

Methods

Using third-generation [long-read single-molecule real-time (SMRT)] and second-generation [short-read sequencing by synthesis (SBS)] sequencing methods, we established a Pinus bungeana transcriptome resource with comprehensive functional and structural annotation for the first time. Using these approaches, we generated high spatial resolution datasets for the vascular cambium, xylem expansion regions, early SCW thickening, late SCW thickening and mature xylem tissues of 71-year-old Pinus bungeana trees.

Key Results

A total of 79 390 non-redundant transcripts, 31 808 long non-coding RNAs and 5147 transcription factors were annotated and quantified in different xylem tissues at all growth and differentiation stages. Furthermore, using this high spatial resolution dataset, we established a comprehensive transcriptomic profile and found that members of the NAC, WRKY, SUS, CESA and LAC gene families are major players in early SCW formation in tracheids, whereas members of the MYB and LBD transcription factor families are highly expressed during late SCW thickening.

Conclusions

Our results provide new molecular insights into the regulation of multi-layered SCW thickening in conifers. The high spatial resolution datasets provided can serve as important gene resources for improving softwoods.

Keywords: Pinus bungeana, secondary cell wall thickening, wood anatomy, wood formation, high spatial resolution, RNA sequencing, regulation network, transcription factor, cambium cell, mature wood

INTRODUCTION

Wood is the most abundant plant biomass, an important carbon reservoir, indispensable to modern human existence. It is a natural renewable resource widely used in papermaking, construction, furniture, tools, biofuels and wood-based chemicals (Chen et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2023). Depending on its distinctive anatomical features, wood can be divided into softwoods, consisting mostly of conifers, or hardwoods, consisting mostly of angiosperm trees (Donaldson et al., 2017). To improve the processing and utilization of timber and to breed trees with tailored structure and desired properties, it is essential to understand the complex cellular processes by which is formed.

Wood formation is an ordered developmental process involving proliferation of vascular cambium, the differentiation of secondary tissues, cell expansion, secondary cell wall (SCW) thickening and programmed cell death (Mélanie et al., 2014). The cell types of wood and its volume fractions vary widely in different tree species. Hardwood consists mainly of vessels, fibres and parenchyma. In contrast, softwood features a simpler microstructure, and tracheids are the major cell types (≥90 %) of growth (Donaldson, 2019; Chen et al., 2020). Variations in the lumen diameter and cell wall thickness affect the function and properties of wood (Prendin et al., 2017). Tracheids with larger lumen diameters and thinner walls are largely responsible for water transport, whereas those with smaller lumen diameters and thicker walls have higher strength and density (Cuny et al., 2015; Beeckman, 2016). The typical structure of xylem SCW, comprising S1, S2 and S3 layers, and the chemical organization, involving cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin (Yin et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2023), are mainly based on tracheids of softwood. Thus, SCW thickening of xylem cells is a key developmental stage that determines wood properties and behaviour (Donaldson, 2019; Zhu and Li, 2021).

Molecular characterization of SCW thickening is fundamental to understanding how wall-thickened structures are formed and to suggest possible strategies by which the properties of wood might be improved by genetic modification of trees. Recently, numerous studies have revealed the molecular mechanisms underlying all the stages of SCW thickening in the xylem tissue of angiosperm trees and found that it is a highly regulated process that is strictly controlled by multi-layered transcriptional networks (Fromm, 2013; Eduardo et al., 2019; Zhu and Li, 2021). The top layer of regulatory networks is composed of wood-associated NAC domain (WND) transcription factors (TFs), which function as molecular switches that can activate or repress third-layer TFs and SCW biosynthesis genes by controlling the second layer of regulatory networks composed of MYB TFs (Akiyoshi et al., 2021; Ohtani et al., 2021). In addition, WNDs can directly regulate third-layer TFs and their downstream genes (Zhong et al., 2010; Ye and Zhong, 2015). However, owing to the large genome sizes and complex gene annotation of conifers (Nystedt et al., 2013; Niu et al., 2022), the molecular mechanisms that regulate SCW thickening in conifers have not been studied extensively. This is unfortunate because conifers are the largest timber tree species used for producing biofuels, chemicals and construction materials and play important economic and ecological roles (Terrett et al., 2019).

Previous research on Pinus abies involving high spatial resolution RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) (Giacomello et al., 2019) revealed that homologous genes of CesA stimulate SCW formation (Jokipii-Lukkari et al., 2017). In Pinus taeda, MYB1/8 was reported specifically to regulate SCW deposition (Bomal et al., 2008). Small RNA and degradome sequencing revealed that the targets of microRNA (novel_16) encoded MYB domain proteins and regulated SCW thickening in Pinus massoniana (Shen et al., 2021).

SCW thickening is a complex development process that involves the formation of S1, S2 and S3 layers, multi-layered structures that differ in the orientation of cellulose microfibrils and chemical composition (Richter et al., 2011; Terrett et al., 2019). The S1 and S3 layers have a high microfibril angle, which prevents outwards swelling of the cell wall and shrinkage of the cell lumen, whereas the S2 layer has a low microfibril angle and is not highly birefringent, as viewed through a polarizing microscope (Stamm, 1964; Reis and Vian, 2004; Peng et al., 2020; Kirui et al., 2022). In addition, the degree of lignification of these multi-layered structures increases sequentially across S2, S1 and S3 layers (Donaldson et al., 2017). Given this complexity, diverse molecular processes are expected to be involved in the development of these multi-layered structures.

In this study, we selected three 71-year-old Pinus bungeana trees growing in natural field conditions, which is a species that has good wood development and utilization value (Jiang et al., 2010; Qi et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2022). However, to date, there are no genetic and functional genomic data available. Our goal was to identify the genes associated with multi-layered SCW thickening. A reference transcriptome resource with comprehensive functional and structural annotation of P. bungeana was produced, for the first time, by using second- and third-generation sequencing technologies. Based on this new resource, we generated high spatial resolution RNA sequencing data spanning the phloem (P), vascular cambium (CZ), zone of xylem expansion (EX), early SCWs (ES; S1 layer formation), late SCWs (LS; S2 and S3 layer formation), mature xylem (MX) and the latewood of the previous year (LW). By combining these datasets with the anatomical data obtained from the corresponding tissue, we identified 21 co-expression modules and a thickness module (tM) using weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA). Further comparative analysis of the high spatial resolution transcriptomic profile identified key transcriptional regulatory genes involved in ES and LS formation. The novel reference transcriptome resource presented here can serve as an important gene resource for further RNA-Seq analysis of P. bungeana and might provide phylogenetic insights into other coniferous species. The newly developed higher spatial resolution dataset will help to facilitate our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying multi-layered SCW thickening in P. bungeana.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant materials and growth conditions

Samples of 71-year-old P. bungeana were obtained from a primary clonal seed orchard at the Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing, China (40.01°N, 116.25°E, 59 m above sea level). The cone, bark, phloem, cambium, xylem, needle and strobili tissues of P. bungeana were sampled from three independent trees on 9 June 2022, a time when new earlywood formation was ongoing and cambium cell activity was high. These samples were collected and stored at −80 °C, and they were used for PacBio long-read RNA sequencing.

Three wooden blocks containing bark, phloem, cambium and xylem tissues were collected at 1.5 m from the bottom of the tree trunk, a region without branches and resin canals. Each block was then cut into small pieces measuring 8 mm × 8 mm × 5 mm (tangential × longitudinal × radial); specific developmental zones from the P, CZ, EX, ES, LS, MX and LW were obtained by tangential cryosectioning. The samples for use in high spatial resolution RNA-Seq and analysis of anatomical features were stored at −80 and 4 °C, respectively. All samples were collected at noon.

Long-read single-molecule real-time sequencing and data processing

Total RNA was extracted using QIAzol Lysis Reagent (Qiagen). The RNA from the cone, bark, phloem, cambium, xylem, needle and strobili tissues of P. bungeana was mixed together in equal amounts. After synthesizing and constructing a complementary DNA (cDNA) library for PacBio long-read RNA-Seq, the mRNA was enriched using oligo (dT) magnetic beads. The mixed RNA sample was used to synthesize cDNA using the HiScript III 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit. PCR amplification was performed using the KAPA HiFi HotStart PCR Kit, and a large PCR was selected to construct the SMRTbell library. Long-read single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing was performed using a PacBio Sequel System (Annoroad, Beijing, China).

To obtain accurate and authentic sequencing information, raw reads were processed using the software SMRTLink v.5.0.1 (Wang et al., 2016). Initially, circular consensus sequence (CCS) data were generated from a subreads file in the conditions of full passes ≥ 3 and a Q-value of >0.9. CCS can be divided into full-length non-chimeras (FLNC), full-length chimeras (FLC), non-full-length (NFL) and short reads (SR). Polished consensus was obtained by iterative clustering and error correction and Quiver software polishing (error rate <1 %), and clean reads obtained from the same samples were used to correct low-quality isoforms by LoRDEC v.0.8 (Salmela and Rivals, 2014). Finally, after corrections and filtering, full-length transcripts were generated from these polished consensuses (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

(A) Samples used for PacBio long-read RNA sequencing. Numbers 1–6 indicate needles (1), block (2) [phloem, cambium and xylem], strobili (3), bark (4), cone (5) and branch (6) tissues of P. bungeana.

Overview of Pinus bungeana long-read transcriptome sequencing. (A) Samples used for PacBio long-read RNA sequencing. Number 1–6 indicate needles (1), block [phloem, cambium and xylem] (2), strobili (3), bark (4), cone (5) and branch (6), cone (7) and branch (8) tissues of P. bungeana. (B) Length distribution of circular consensus sequencing (CCS) reads. (C) Data processing: 1 283 714 CCS reads were generated from subreads, then classified to full-length non-chimera (FLNC), full-length chimera (FLC), non-full-length (NFL) and short reads (SR). After correction, polishing and clustering, 81 239 full-length transcripts were generated. (D) Classification of CCS reads. (E) Unigene length distribution.

Functional and structural annotation of the full-length transcripts

To generate authentic annotation information, the software ANGEL was used to determine the open reading frames (ORFs), and ten public databases [NR, NT, Swiss-Prot, KOG, eggNOG, gene ontology (GO), TmHMM, Pfam, KEGG and SignalP] were used to annotate the gene functional annotation information. Additionally, TFs in P. bungeana were predicted using the PlantTFDB database. Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) analysis was performed using the Coding Potential Calculator (CPC), Coding-NonCoding Identifying Tool (CNCI) and Coding Potential Assessing Tool (CPAT) databases. Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) were explored using ssr.pl software.

Sectioning and analysis of anatomical features

The samples used for investigating anatomical traits were first fixed for 12 h in formaldehyde (3.7 %)–acetic acid (5 %)–ethanol (50 %) fixative solution at 4 °C, then transferred to pure paraffin. Developing early wood was microtomed into 10-μm-thick sections using a HistoCore AUTOCUT (LECIA RM 2265). The cross-sections were then stained with Astra Blue and Basic Fuchsin solutions as previously described (Kraus et al., 1998), and the images were examined under a light microscope (OLYMPUS DP71).

The samples used for scanning electron microscopy observation were separated into smaller pieces and fixed in glutaraldehyde fixative solution (2.5 %) at 4 °C for 12 h. The cells were then transferred into PBS (0.1 mol L−1), osmic acid (1 %) or different ethanol concentrations. After drying (Leica EM CPD300, Germany) and sputtering with gold–palladium, the samples were examined using a scanning electron microscope (ZEISS Gemini SEM 300, Germany) operating at 2.0 kV.

Determination of the thickness of the radial double wall and diameter of the radial lumen

The wood blocks were sampled from naturally growing trees. Three biological replicates were used for each experiment. Tissue fixation and embedding were performed as previously described. Sections of developing secondary xylem were cut into 10 μm thick using a HistoCore AUTOCUT (LECIA RM 2265) and observed by light microscopy (OLYMPUS DP71). Statistical software was used to quantify the thickness of the radial double wall and diameter of the radial lumen.

High spatial resolution transcriptome sequencing and analysis

The high spatial resolution sections (tangential, 25 µm thick) were produced using a cryo-ultramicrotome (Leica CM3050 S) and used for high spatial resolution RNA-Seq. Simultaneously, the cross-sections were cut and stained to ascertain the positions of the tissues at different developmental stages. Total RNA was extracted from P, CZ, EX, EX, LS, MX and LW tissue sections, and three biological replicates were performed for each tissue (Supplementary Data Table S1). The RNA quality and integrity were assessed using Aligent 2100, an RNA library was constructed, and raw data were analysed as previously described (Du et al., 2022). Finally, the libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 PE150 platform (Annoroad, Beijing, China).

To analyse the high spatial resolution RNA sequencing data further, adapters and lower QC reads were removed to obtain higher QC reads (Clean Reads) using fastp v.0.18.0 software. After alignment in the ribosome RNA database, clean reads that did not match were mapped to the reference transcriptome of P. bungeana using HISAT2 v.2.1.0 (Kim et al., 2015). The mapped reads of each sample were assembled by using StringTie v.1.3.1 (Pertea et al., 2016). Only perfectly mapped reads were used for in-depth analysis. The fragment per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM) values were calculated using the software RSEM v.1.3.1 (Li and Dewey, 2011).

The R package ‘WGCNA’ was used to identify correlations between high spatial resolution gene expression profiles and the traits of tracheids and to determine biologically significant modules. Genes with high connectivity might have important functions. The networks visualization was performed using Cytoscape v.3.3.0 software.

Phylogenetic tree building

All the NAC protein sequences in Populus tomentosa were downloaded from the JGI Phytozome v.13 (https://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov/). Phylogenic trees were constructed by MEGA v.7.0 software based on the neighbour-joining method. In the Phylogeny Test menu, we selected ‘Bootstrap method’ with a value of 1000. After selecting the default parameters from the dropdown menus, we completed construction of the phylogenetic tree. The phylogenetic tree was visualized using iTOL v.6 (https://itol.embl.de/itol.cgi).

Identification of differentially expressed genes and RT-qPCR analysis

We used feature Counts software and the R package ‘edgeR’ to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Genes were identified as DEGs when the fold-change ratio was higher than two and the adjusted P-value was <0.05 (Smyth, 2010; Liao et al., 2014). DEGs were clustered by the software Short Time-series Expression Miner (STEM) v.1.3.13 (Ernst and Bar-Joseph, 2006), setting the clustering algorithm (STEM clustering method), the maximum number of model profiles (30), fold-change ratio (2) and P-value (0.05). The DEGs were mapped to a GO annotation database of P. bungeana with a threshold of false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 (Ye et al., 2018). Real-time qPCR was performed as previously described (Guo et al., 2021). Each analysis was based on three replicates, and a relative quantification method was used. The specific primers used in this study are listed in the Supplementary Data (Table S2).

RESULTS

Overview of transcriptome sequencing and data processing in P. bungeana

Full-length transcriptomes of P. bungeana from different tissues (cone, bark, phloem, cambium, xylem, needle and strobili) were obtained using PacBio long-read RNA sequencing (Rhoads and Au, 2015;Boldogkői et al., 2019), generating ~178.56 Gb of raw sequencing data (Fig. 1A). After quality control, we obtained 1 283 714 polymerase reads and 112 574 744 subreads with N50 (The length of the contig for which 50% of all bases in the final contigs was longer than, or equal to, this value) values of 203 159 bp and 1696 bp, respectively (Supplementary Data Table S3). Based on the conditions that full passes were ≥ 3 and that Q-value was >0.9, 1 283 714 CCS reads were identified, with a mean read lengths of 1637 bp (Fig. 1B, C; Supplementary Data Fig. S1). The CCS reads consisted mainly of FLNC, FLC, NFL, and SR; 1 264 567 sequences were identified as FLNC reads (Fig. 1D). Based on iterative clustering and error correction and Quiver algorithms for clustering and polishing, 102 779 high-quality polished full-length consensus isoforms were obtained with an accuracy of >0.99 and mean lengths of 1692 bp (Fig. 1E; Supplementary Data Table S3). Short-read RNA-Seq generated 0.52–0.55 billion clean reads for each xylem tissue (Supplementary Data Table S4) to correct the polished consensus isoforms. Then, merging the redundant sequences of high-quality isoforms using the cd-hit software, 81 239 non-redundant transcripts were obtained and served as a reference transcriptome for subsequent analysis (Fig. 1C).

Functional and structural annotation of the reference transcriptome

To obtain a high-quality and complete functional annotation from the reference transcripts of P. bungeana, all the 81 239 non-redundant transcripts were aligned and annotated with NR (NCBI non-redundant protein sequences), NT (NCBI nucleotide sequence), Swiss-Prot (Protein knowledgebas), KOG (euKaryotic orthologous groups), eggNOG (evolutionary genealogy of genes: Non-supervised Orthologous Groups), GO, TmHMM (Prediction of transmembrane helices in proteins), Pfam (Protein families database of alignments and hidden Markov models), KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) and SignalP (Signal peptide and cleavage sites) databases. As a result, 97.72 % (79 390 transcripts) of the non-redundant transcripts obtained the functional annotation successfully (E-value < 1 × 10−5) (Fig. 2A; Supplementary Data Table S5). A total of 95.44 % (75 768 transcripts) of the annotated transcripts had the best hits for Pinaceae, whereas 48.64 % (38 613 transcripts) were unknown functional proteins (Supplementary Data Figs S2 and S3).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Functional annotation for the Pinus bungeana transcriptome. (A) Upset diagram of distinct intersections from ten functional annotation databases. Bars represent the numbers of non-redundant transcripts with significant hits from these databases. (B) Gene ontology (GO) classification of the non-redundant transcripts. The parallel axis indicates the number of transcripts.

According to the GO annotation, ‘cellular process’, ‘metabolic process’ and ‘single-organism process’ took the top three spots in the biological process category, ‘cell part’, ‘organelle’ and ‘organelle part’ were the most enriched GO terms of the cellular component category, and ‘binding’, ‘catalytic’ and ‘transporter’ had the largest number of transcripts in the molecular function category (Fig. 2B). In the KOG database, 62.65 % (49 793 transcripts) of transcripts were annotated and divided into 25 categories. The ‘general function prediction only’ (9740 transcripts), ‘posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones’ (7087 transcripts), ‘signal transduction mechanisms’ (4266 transcripts), ‘carbohydrate transport and metabolism’ (3712 transcripts) and ‘translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis’ (3232 transcripts) were the top five spots in the functional categories (Supplementary Data Fig. S4). The KEGG classification results showed that 42 pathways were annotated from 31 548 transcripts, and the top three pathways were ‘carbohydrate metabolism’, ‘signal transduction’ and ‘translation’ (Supplementary Data Fig. S5).

Using TransDecoder, 86 844 ORFs were predicted, and the number and length distribution of the complete coding protein sequences were calculated (Fig. 3A). A total of 31 808 putative non-redundant TFs distributed across 513 families were identified (Supplementary Data Fig. S6). The most abundant TF categories were bHLH (3505 transcripts), MYB (3026 transcripts), B3 (1970 transcripts), NAC (1806 transcripts) and WRKY (1570 transcripts).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Structural analysis for the Pinus bungeana transcriptome. (A) Length distribution of open reading frames (ORFs). (B) Venn diagram of long non-coding RNA transcripts from Coding Potential Assessing Tool (CPAT), Coding-NonCoding Identifying Tool (CNCI) and Coding Potential Calculator (CPC) analyses. (C) Distribution of simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in P. bungeana-expressed sequence tags (ESTs).

SSRs have a minimum repeat unit size of five (for tri- to hexa-nucleotides) or six (for dinucleotides). Based on our analysis of non-redundant transcripts, we identified 9198 tetra-nucleotide repeats (78.3 %) and 2549 tri-nucleotides repeats (21.7 %) (Fig. 3C). Additionally, the CPC, CNCI and CPAT databases were combined to distinguish lncRNA candidates. Analyses of the CPC, CNCI and CPAT databases revealed 11 718, 15 180 and 9873 lncRNA candidates, respectively. Finally, 5147 lncRNA transcripts were identified (Fig. 3B).

High spatial resolution RNA-Seq analysis for the P. bungeana xylem SCW thickening

To explore dynamic gene expression profiles during SCW thickening, blocks were sampled from the tree trunks of three independent P. bungeana trees. At the same time, according to the anatomical features of transections in the P. bungeana developing xylem, we generated high spatial resolution tangential cryogenic sections spanning the P, CZ, EX, ES, LS, MX and LW tissues (Fig. 4A) and used them for high spatial resolution RNA sequencing (Supplementary Data Table S1). Each xylem tissue sample retained >65 million clean reads for further analysis (Supplementary Data Table S4), and Pearson’s correlation was performed to evaluate the biological replicates. Although high spatial resolution RNA was obtained from orchard-grown P. bungeana trees, the relationship coefficients among the biological replicates were >0.8, except in the LW tissues.

Fig. 4.

(A) Representative microscopy images of transections of the P. bungeana xylem at different developmental stages. P, CZ, EX, ES, LS, MX and LW indicate phloem, vascular cambium, xylem expansion, early SCWs (S1 layer formation), late SCWs (S2 and S3 layer formation), mature xylem and latewood of the previous year, respectively. Scale bars = 10 μm.

High spatial resolution RNA-Seq analysis of the secondary cell wall thickening during Pinus bungeana xylem formation. (A) Representative microscopy images of transections of the P. bungeana xylem at different developmental stages. P, CZ, EX, ES, LS, MX and LW indicate phloem, vascular cambium, xylem expansion, early SCWs (S1 layer formation), late SCWs (S2 and S3 layer formation), mature xylem and latewood of the previous year, respectively. Scale bars = 10 μm. (B) Temporally dynamic clusters of high spatial resolution RNA-Seq data across the different tissues. Grey and black lines indicate the expression dynamics and profile, respectively. The number of genes is shown in each cluster. (C) GO terms identified in clusters W1–W10 of P. bungeana. The depth of red colour represents −log10(P-value).

Based on the expression patterns in which the fold-change was higher than two and the P-value was <0.05, 30 temporally dynamic clusters were identified, and only ten gene clusters (6164 genes, W1–W10 clusters) corresponded to the different developmental stages of SCW thickening (Fig. 4B). The gene expression trends at W5 and W10 were the same in ES and LS tissues, and the genes at W5 and W10 exhibited continuous upregulation and downregulation, respectively. GO analyses were performed to understand the molecular events associated with the expression clusters. The genes in W1–W10 were mainly categorized as being involved in cell differentiation, primary metabolism, growth and development, secondary metabolism, microstructure formation, cell–cell junctions, signal transduction, developmental maturation, programmed cell death and cell death (Fig. 4C). Most of these genes were associated with wood formation, and some genes in W1 and W4 were involved in formation of cell wall microstructure. Notably, genes in W1, W4 and W7 were concentrated in the cell death category, indicating that LW tissues grown in the previous year might remain transcriptionally active.

To determine the key TFs involved in SCW thickening of P. bungeana xylem, a total of 1410 TFs were identified in ten clusters. Important TFs in the multi-layered transcriptional networks of SCW thickening, such as NAC, MYB, WRKY, ERF and C3H, were found in all ten temporally dynamic clusters (Fig. 5A). Members of MYB, NAC and ERF TFs were significantly enriched in W2, W8 and W7, respectively. In addition, 18 PbNACs of the 140 TFs in W7 had the highest enrichment, indicating that NAC was the top layer of the regulatory network of SCW thickening, corresponding to its role in poplar. Hence, we also examined these 18 NAC-domain TFs in W7 and compared them with the 136 PtNACs (Fig. 5B). The results showed that these 18 PbNACs were distributed in four groups (B, I, K and L), which were involved in SCW thickening during formation of xylem in P. bungeana.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Transcription factors (TFs) involved in secondary cell wall thickening during formation of Pinus bungeana xylem. (A) Distribution of TF families in temporally dynamic clusters (W1–W10) in P. bungeana. The two heatmaps present TF families enriched in ten clusters and expression patterns of PbNACs in W7, respectively. Important TFs found in all ten of these temporally dynamic clusters are marked in red. (B) Phylogenetic tree of NAC domain TFs from P. bungeana and Populus tomentosa.

Dynamic variations in anatomical traits of the cell wall of tracheids during xylem formation in P. bungeana

The formation of P. bungeana wood follows a sequential cell-developmental process (Zhang et al., 2012; Kumar et al., 2016). Once the final size and shape of the tracheids are achieved, the thickness of the cell wall begins to increase (Dai et al., 2022). To evaluate the wood density and hydraulic features of P. bungeana, we examined the cell anatomical characteristics (double wall thickness and lumen diameter) of the tracheids in the wood using light microscopy and verified the results using scanning electron microscopy (Fig. 6A). The average thickness of the radial double wall increased from the CZ to the LS in the developing xylem, and that of the tangential double wall increased from the EX to the LS (Fig. 6B). In addition, the average diameter of the tangential lumen was expanded continuously in the developing xylem, whereas that of the radial lumen remained almost the same (Fig. 6B). The average thickness of the double wall increased rapidly from the ES, where the S1 and S2 layers were formed. These results suggest that cell wall thickness is determined mostly by the S1 and S2 layers in P. bungeana tracheids.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Anatomical analysis of the cell walls of tracheids during formation of xylem in Pinus bungeana. (A) Representative microscopy images of transections of the xylem at different developmental stages. Scale bars = 10 μm for light microscopy and 1 μm for scanning electron micrographs. (B) The thickness of radial/tangential cell wall and diameter of radial/tangential lumen in tracheids. Small open circles represent individual values. Means with the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to the least significant difference (LSD) test. CZ, EX, ES, LS, MX and LW indicate vascular cambium, xylem expansion, early SCWs (S1 layer formation), late SCWs (S2 and S3 layer formation), mature xylem and latewood of the previous year, respectively.

Spatiotemporal co-expression network of highly expressed genes involved in SCW thickening of P. bungeana

To evaluate the high spatial resolution dataset containing genes and traits and to identify the hub genes involved in SCW thickening, a total of 17 581 genes (FPKM ≥ 0.5, with annotation information) from 15 independent samples (three replicates, five xylem tissues covering CZ, EX, ES, LS and MX; Supplementary Data Table S1; Fig. S7) were analysed using WGCNA. All samples were clustered according to their expression patterns, and 21 modules were obtained using this clustering relationship (Fig. 7A). The similarity of genes in each module is presented at the network topology level (Fig. 7B). The thickness of the radial/tangential double wall and the diameter of the radial/tangential lumen were determined to analyse the relationships in the trait modules. We found that wM2, wM13 and wM16 were positively correlated with the cell wall thickness. In contrast, wM8, wM11, wM12 and wM19 were negatively correlated (Fig. 7C). The tM13 module was the most highly correlated with cell wall thickness, and its hub genes had high gene significance (|GS| ≥ 0.3) with anatomical characteristics and high module membership (|MM| ≥ 0.8) with module eigengenes (Fig. 7D; Supplementary Data Table S6). We constructed a gene regulatory network using the top 60 genes in the tM13 module (Fig. 7E). Significantly, some hub genes (members of the NAC, MYB, WRKY, ARF, SUS, LAC and CESA gene families) involved in SCW thickening were strongly co-expressed. These results indicate that several genes associated with SCW thickening might be regulated by TFs in the secondary xylem during early wood formation.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Weighted correlation network analysis of expression patterns of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) at different developmental stages of Pinus bungeana xylem. (A) Hierarchical cluster dendrogram of genes in co-expression modules. Different colours indicate different modules. (B) Network heatmap plot of genes in the co-expression modules. The progressively saturated red colours represent higher connectivity. (C) Correlations between module eigengenes and anatomical analysis for the thickness and diameter. The numbers indicate correlations and P-values for the module–trait associations based on Pearson’s correlation coefficients. Red and blue represent positive and negative correlation, respectively. (D) Correlation scatter plots of module membership vs. gene significance for the radial cell wall with tM13 (red), tangential cell walls with tM13 (blue) and tangential cell wall with tM1 (grey). (E) The gene regulatory network of the tM13 module genes, which was positively correlated with radial/tangential wall thickness. The hub gene families in the tM13 module are highlighted in purple. RW, TW, RL and TL indicate the radial cell wall, tangential cell wall, radial lumen and tangential lumen, respectively.

Identification of the core TFs that regulate formation of the multi-layered structure during the SCW thickening of tracheids

To explore the potential regulators involved in the formation of multi-layered structures (S1, S2 and S3 layers) during tracheid SCW thickening, we compared the whole-transcriptome profiles of developing xylem tissues among EX, ES and LS. Three biological replicates were performed for each tissue, and these nine RNA libraries generated ≥0.69 billion raw reads; after filtering, ~0.68 billion clean reads were obtained (Supplementary Data Table S4). Sequences that could not be aligned to the reference transcriptome of P. bungeana were removed, and only those that were perfectly mapped were analysed further. When the fold-change ratio was higher than two and the adjusted P-value was <0.05, we successfully identified 2356 DEGs between the EX and ES (Supplementary Data Table S7) and 2157 DEGs in the ES and LS (Supplementary Data Table S8).

In comparison to EX, 1169 upregulated genes and 1187 downregulated genes were identified in ES (Fig. 8A). We then performed GO analysis to calculate the molecular processes of these DEGs. These results indicated that the upregulated DEGs were enriched in biological processes (GO: 0008150, P = 9.1 × 10–1), cellular processes (GO: 0009987, P = 2.1 × 10–2), metabolic processes (GO: 0008152, P = 1.9 × 10–1), organic substance metabolic processes (GO: 0071704, P = 5.6 × 10–3), single-organism processes (GO: 0044699, P = 2.0 × 10–1), cellular metabolic processes (GO: 0044237, P = 1.0 × 10–1) and primary metabolic processes (GO: 0044238, P = 1.2 × 10–2). In comparison to the ES group, 998 upregulated genes and 1159 downregulated genes were identified in the LS group (Fig. 8B). The GO analysis in biological processes indicated that the upregulated DEGs were enriched in cellular processes (GO: 0009987, P = 9.0 × 10–1), metabolic processes (GO: 0008152, P = 7.1 × 10–1), response to stimulus (GO: 0050896, P = 1.1 × 10–3), biological regulation (GO: 0065007, P = 4.8 × 10–1), regulation of biological processes (GO: 0050789, P = 7.9 × 10–1), developmental processes (GO: 0032502, P = 3.3 × 10–1) and growth (GO: 0040007, P = 1.5 × 10–1).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Identification of the hub genes associated with the formation of S1 during Pinus bungeana SCW thickening of tracheids. (A) Volcano plot visualizing differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in EX and ES. (B) Volcano plot visualizing DEGs in ES and LS. (C) Identification of common genes between the tM13 module and DEGs (EX vs. ES) by overlapping them. The five hub genes in the tM13 module were also DEGs in EX and ES. (D) Identification of common genes between the tM13 module and DEGs (ES vs. LS) by overlapping them. The five hub genes in the tM13 module were also DEGs in ES and LS. EX, ES and LS indicate xylem expansion, early SCWs (S1 layer formation) and late SCWs (S2 and S3 layer formation), respectively.

To identify the core genes associated with formation of the multi-layered structure, we overlapped genes in the tM13 module and DEGs between EX and ES using a Venn diagram and found that NAC45, WRKY1, LAC9, SUS2 and CESA8 mainly contributed to ES formation (Fig. 8C; Supplementary Data Fig. S8). Interestingly, NAC45 and WRKY1 were also found among the DEGs between ES and LS, and NAC73, MYB8 and LBD1 appeared in these DEGs and the tM13 module (Fig. 8D; Supplementary Data Fig. S8). These results show that the NAC-domain TFs are key players in the P. bungeana SCW thickening of the tracheids.

DISCUSSION

Here, we present full-length and high spatial resolution analyses of the transcriptome, covering comprehensive growth and differentiation stages of the developing earlywood of P. bungeana. Based on the association analysis between anatomical traits and transcriptomes at different xylem developmental stages, we found that 17 581 genes were clustered into 21 modules, and the gene expression pattern in the tM13 module was associated with SCW thickening in P. bungeana (Fig. 7).

In our study, we used the second- and third-generation joint sequencing techniques to generate a P. bungeana reference transcriptome dataset for the first time, which provides transcriptome resources for investigating the anatomical traits associated with SCW thickening in P. bungeana xylem. Merging anatomical traits with the aid of RNA-Seq methods, such as high spatial resolution transcriptomic analyses (Sundell et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2020) and WGCNA, has provided an excellent methodology for establishing the entire high spatial resolution database in the sequential developmental process of multi-layered structures (Wang et al., 2022). Besides the 21 clusters identified above, the associated analysis of other anatomical traits obtained from the same tissue could reveal the modes of accumulation in the new gene regulatory networks. Thus, gene expression information is now available at a higher resolution for further trait–gene association analysis and provides a richer transcriptome resource for further studies of gene regulatory networks during earlywood formation in P. bungeana.

Over the past 20 years, wood formation studies on conifer trees have largely been limited to genomic information and growth cycles, which makes it difficult effectively to identify genes that control a trait, because they might be expressed in juvenile wood but not in mature wood. Because the high spatial resolution RNA-Seq method covers the entire growth and differentiation stages of secondary xylem formation (Supplementary Data Table S9), it can be used independently to determine new regulatory networks in mature trees growing in natural conditions (Jokipii-Lukkari et al., 2017) or in combination with other trait data. Using the high spatial resolution transcriptome dataset, we constructed a comprehensive gene expression profile across the vascular cambium and developing xylem during the earlywood growth of P. bungeana, yielding novel insights, including significant differences in gene expression between EX and SCW tissues (Fig. 8; Supplementary Data Tables S7 and S8). In addition, many TFs, such as NAC, MYB, WRKY, LBD and LAC, were associated with SCW thickening (Fig. 7). High spatial resolution RNA-Seq datasets were obtained from a tangential cryogenic section (cryosection) series covering the whole xylem development zone, which captured nearly real spatial information. Integrating spatial transcriptomic data with trait data (Rao et al., 2021) provides a valuable transcriptome resource for exploring the gene regulation networks in earlywood formation in P. bungeana.

Using the high spatial resolution RNA-Seq datasets, we confirmed the previously known TFs and found new gene regulation networks involved in the consecutive developmental process of SCW thickening (Supplementary Data Table S10). Previous studies in Populus have demonstrated that WNDs can regulate the promoters of MYB3 and MYB20 (Zhong et al., 2011); MYB21 and MYB20 (the homologous genes of AtMYB46 and AtMYB83) were also activated by WNDs, which regulated the cell wall biosynthesis (McCarthy et al., 2010; Zhong et al., 2013). Moreover, PdMYB199 (Tang et al., 2020), PttMYB21a (Karpinska et al., 2004), PdMYB221 (Tang et al., 2015), PtoMYB156 (Yang et al., 2017) and PtrMYB189 (Jiao et al., 2019) have been identified in Populus as negative factors in SCW thickening. In this study, we found that PbNAC45 and PbWRKY1 regulated genes involved in the entire developmental stage of SCW thickening. PbNAC45 also activated the expression of PbCESA8, PbSUS2 and PbLAC9 to regulate ES formation, whereas PbNAC73, PbMYB8 and PbLBD1 contributed specifically to LS formation (Fig. 8). These findings provide theoretical support for improving the wood structure and properties, especially for the multi-layered structures.

In summary, we initially established a high-quality reference transcriptome resource with a comprehensive functional and structural annotation of P. bungeana and combined it with high spatial resolution RNA-Seq datasets spanning comprehensive growth and differentiation stages in developing earlywood of P. bungeana. We adopted two approaches to analyse the transcriptome data: (1) association analysis of genes with anatomical traits (WGCNA); and (2) comparative analysis of DEGs at different developmental stages. Using these approaches, we found that PbNAC45 and PbWRKY1 were involved in the entire developmental stage of SCW thickening and also regulated the individual stages of the consecutive developmental processes of multi-layered structures. Furthermore, we identified specific regulatory genes involved in ES (PbCESA8, PbSUS2 and PbLAC9) and LS formation (PbNAC73, PbMYB8 and PbLBD1). These results regarding the molecular regulation of complex cell development processes, such as xylem formation and the multi-layered SCW thickening, in P. bungeana will help to improve the properties and behaviour of wood.

Conclusion

The stem differentiation system realistically reflects the entire process of xylem SCW thickening in mature trees, particularly in the formation of a multi-layered structure. In our study, we explored an excellent transcriptome resource that can serve as a reference transcriptome for future RNA-Seq experiments in P. bungeana and provide important genetic information for the transcriptome analysis of different xylem tissues. Further analysis of a high spatial resolution dataset produced a useful genetic resource to screen the genes associated with multi-layered SCW thickening in P. bungeana. Using these transcriptome resources, we identified new genes involved in wood formation that provided new insights into the different developmental stages of xylem formation in P. bungeana. In addition, the use of this analytical strategy in other conifer species will significantly aid in comprehending the molecular regulation of multi-layered SCW thickening in softwoods.

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Supplementary data are available at Annals of Botany online and consist of the following.

Figure S1: quality of circular consensus sequencing (CCS) reads. Figure S2: phylogram of the 12 Pinopsida, 4 Magnoliopsida and other species. Figure S3: summary of BLASTx matches to the annotated transcripts. Number of best BLASTx matches of transcripts grouped by genus. Figure S4: EuKaryotic orthologous groups (KOG) functional classification of Pinus bungeana unigenes. Figure S5: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) classification of Pinus bungeana unigenes. Figure S6: distribution of transcription factor families. Figure S7: global transcriptome analysis in different developmental stages of Pinus bungeana xylem. (A) Representative transverse section stained with Astra Blue and Basic Fuchsin from the stem of tree 1. (B) The number of transcription factor (TF) genes and non-TF protein-coding (mRNA) genes expressed in different developmental stages. (C) Proportions of expressed genes with low levels (FPKM < 2), medium levels (2 ≤ FPKM < 10) and high levels (FPKM ≥ 10) in different developmental stages. (D) Heatmaps of co-expressed upregulated (red) and downregulated (green) differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (FPKM > 0.5, with annotation information) involved in earlywood formation. Three replicates and six xylem tissues covering the CZ, EX, ES, LS, MX and LW. Figure S8: validation of hub genes in the transcriptional level. qRT-PCR (left vertical axis) and RNA-Seq (right vertical axis). Error bars represent the s.e.m. of three independent experiments. CZ, EX, ES, LS and MX indicate the vascular cambium, xylem expansion, early SCWs (S1 layer formation), late SCWs (S2 and S3 layer formation) and mature xylem, respectively. Table S1: cryosections in different tissue types, and information of pooling for RNA-Seq analysis. Table S2: oligos used as primers in the experiment. Table S3: summary of the transcriptome data for Pinus bungeana using PacBio Iso-Seq. Table S4: summary of reads sequenced from Pinus bungeana stem using Illumina RNA-Seq. Table S5: summary of annotations on unigene from Pinus bungeana against public databases. Table S6: hub genes of the tM13 module, which was positively correlated with cell wall thickness. Table S7: 2356 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between EX and ES. Table S8: 2157 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between ES and LS. Table S9: the expression levels of all Pinus bungeana genes in various tissues. Table S10: the cell wall-related genes and their expression in various samples. Table S11: summary of abbreviations.

mcae023_suppl_Supplementary_Materials

Contributor Information

Yu Guo, Wood Anatomy and Utilization Department, Research Institute of Wood Industry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China; Wood Specimen Resource Center (WOODPEDIA) of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China.

Lichao Jiao, Wood Anatomy and Utilization Department, Research Institute of Wood Industry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China; Wood Specimen Resource Center (WOODPEDIA) of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China.

Jie Wang, Wood Anatomy and Utilization Department, Research Institute of Wood Industry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China; Wood Specimen Resource Center (WOODPEDIA) of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China.

Lingyu Ma, Wood Anatomy and Utilization Department, Research Institute of Wood Industry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China; Wood Specimen Resource Center (WOODPEDIA) of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China.

Yang Lu, Wood Anatomy and Utilization Department, Research Institute of Wood Industry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China; Wood Specimen Resource Center (WOODPEDIA) of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China.

Yonggang Zhang, Wood Anatomy and Utilization Department, Research Institute of Wood Industry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China; Wood Specimen Resource Center (WOODPEDIA) of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China.

Juan Guo, Wood Anatomy and Utilization Department, Research Institute of Wood Industry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China; Wood Specimen Resource Center (WOODPEDIA) of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China.

Yafang Yin, Wood Anatomy and Utilization Department, Research Institute of Wood Industry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China; Wood Specimen Resource Center (WOODPEDIA) of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing 100091, China.

FUNDING

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 32071691) and the Department of Science and Technology, National Forestry and Grassland Administration (2020132601).

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Y.G., J.G. and Y.Y. designed the research; Y.G., L.C.J., J.W., L.M., Y.L. and Y.Z. performed the research and discussion; Y.G. analysed the data; Y.G. and Y.Y. wrote the article.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The RNA-Seq data were available at GSA BioProject with accession number PRJCA016348 (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsub/submit/bioproject/subPRO024298).

ABBREVIATIONS

All the abbreviations are listed in the Supplementary Data (Table S11).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Akiyoshi N, Ihara A, Matsumoto T, et al. 2021. Functional analysis of poplar sombrero-type NAC transcription factors yields a strategy to modify woody cell wall properties. Plant & Cell Physiology 62: 1963–1974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beeckman H. 2016. Wood anatomy and trait-based ecology. IAWA Journal 37: 127–151. [Google Scholar]
  3. Boldogkői Z, Moldován N, Balázs Z, Snyder M, Tombácz D.. 2019. Long-read sequencing – a powerful tool in viral transcriptome research. Trends in Microbiology 27: 578–592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bomal C, Bedon F, Caron S, et al. 2008. Involvement of Pinus taeda MYB1 and MYB8 in phenylpropanoid metabolism and secondary cell wall biogenesis: a comparative in planta analysis. Journal of Experimental Botany 59: 3925–3939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen C, Kuang Y, Zhu S, et al. 2020. Structure–property–function relationships of natural and engineered wood. Nature Reviews Materials 5: 642–666. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cuny HE, Rathgeber CB, Frank D, et al. 2015. Woody biomass production lags stem-girth increase by over one month in coniferous forests. Nature Plants 1: 15160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dai L, Wang J, Liu X-E, et al. 2022. In-situ visualizing selective lignin dissolution of tracheids wall in reaction wood. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 222: 691–700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Donaldson LA. 2019. Wood cell wall ultrastructure The key to understanding wood properties and behaviour. IAWA Journal 40: 645–672. [Google Scholar]
  9. Donaldson L, Nanayakkara B, Harrington J.. 2017. Wood growth and development. Encyclopedia of Applied Plant Sciences 1: 203–210. [Google Scholar]
  10. Du Q, Lv W, Guo Y, Yang J, Wang S, Li WX.. 2022. MIR164b represses iron uptake by regulating the NAC domain transcription factor5-Nuclear Factor Y, Subunit A8 module in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 189: 1095–1109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eduardo LO, Camargo RP, Hua CW, Fabien M, Jacqueline GP.. 2019. Digging in wood: new insights in the regulation of wood formation in tree species. Advances in Botanical Research 89: 201–233. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ernst J, Bar-Joseph Z.. 2006. STEM: a tool for the analysis of short time series gene expression data. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fromm J. 2013. Xylem development in trees: from cambial divisions to mature wood cells. In: Fromm J, ed. Cellular Aspects of Wood Formation. Plant Cell Monographs 20. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. [Google Scholar]
  14. Giacomello S, Delhomme N, Niittylä T, Tuominen H, Street NR.. 2019. High spatial resolution profiling in tree species. Annual Plant Reviews Online 2: 329–360. doi: 10.1002/9781119312994.apr0688 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Guo Y, Hu Y, Chen H, et al. 2021. Identification of traits and genes associated with lodging resistance in maize. The Crop Journal 9: 1408–1417. [Google Scholar]
  16. Jiang XM, Chen YM, Yin YF.. 2010. The structure feature, physical & mechanical and working properties and utilization of gymnosperms woods in China. In: Atlas of gymnosperms woods of China. Beijing: Science Press, 269. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jiao B, Zhao X, Lu W, Guo L, Luo K.. 2019. The R2R3 MYB transcription factor MYB189 negatively regulates secondary cell wall biosynthesis in Populus. Tree Physiology 39: 1187–1200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jokipii-Lukkari S, Sundell D, Nilsson O, Hvidsten TR, Street NR, Tuominen H.. 2017. NorWood: a gene expression resource for evo-devo studies of conifer wood development. The New Phytologist 216: 482–494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Karpinska B, Karlsson M, Srivastava M, et al. 2004. MYB transcription factors are differentially expressed and regulated during secondary vascular tissue development in hybrid aspen. Plant Molecular Biology 56: 255–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL.. 2015. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nature Methods 12: 357–360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kirui A, Zhao W, Deligey F, et al. 2022. Carbohydrate-aromatic interface and molecular architecture of lignocellulose. Nature Communications 13: 538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kraus JE, de Sousa HC, Rezende MH, Castro NM, Vecchi C, Luque R.. 1998. Astra blue and basic fuchsin double staining of plant materials. Biotechnic and Histochemistry 73: 235–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kumar M, Campbell L, Turner S.. 2016. Secondary cell walls: biosynthesis and manipulation. Journal of Experimental Botany 67: 515–531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li B, Dewey CN.. 2011. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12: 323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W.. 2014. featureCounts: an efficient general-purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30: 923–930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu Y, Yang M, Deng Y, et al. 2020. High-spatial-resolution multi-omics sequencing via deterministic barcoding in tissue. Cell 183: 1665–1681.e18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. McCarthy RL, Zhong R, Fowler S, et al. 2010. The poplar MYB transcription factors, PtrMYB3 and PtrMYB20, are involved in the regulation of secondary wall biosynthesis. Plant and Cell Physiology 51: 1084–1090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mélanie M, Le Provost G, Rozenberg P, et al. 2014. Wood formation in trees. In: Ramawat KG, Merillon JM, Ahuja MR, eds. Tree biotechnology. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 656. [Google Scholar]
  29. Niu S, Li J, Bo W, et al. 2022. The Chinese pine genome and methylome unveil key features of conifer evolution. Cell 185: 204–217.e14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nystedt B, Street NR, Wetterbom A, et al. 2013. The Norway spruce genome sequence and conifer genome evolution. Nature 497: 579–584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ohtani M, Kotake T, Mortimer JC, Demura T.. 2021. The mechanics and biology of plant cell walls: resilience and sustainability for our future society. Plant & Cell Physiology 62: 1787–1790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Peng H, Salmén L, Jiang JL, Lu JX.. 2020. Contribution of lignin to the stress transfer in compression wood viewed by tensile FTIR loading. Holzforschung 74: 459–467. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pertea M, Kim D, Pertea GM, Leek JT, Salzberg SL.. 2016. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown. Nature Protocols 11: 1650–1667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Prendin AL, Petit G, Carrer M, Fonti P, Björklund J, von Arx G.. 2017. New research perspectives from a novel approach to quantify tracheid wall thickness. Tree Physiology 37: 976–983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Qi M, Xie CX, Chen QW, Yu ZD.. 2021. Pestalotiopsis trachicarpicola, a novel pathogen causes twig blight of Pinus bungeana (Pinaceae: Pinoideae) in China. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 114: 1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rao A, Barkley D, França GS, Yanai I.. 2021. Exploring tissue architecture using spatial transcriptomics. Nature 596: 211–220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Reis D, Vian B.. 2004. Helicoidal pattern in secondary cell walls and possible role of xylans in their construction. Comptes Rendus Biologies 327: 785–790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rhoads A, Au KF.. 2015. PacBio sequencing and its applications. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 13: 278–289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Richter S, Müssig J, Gierlinger N.. 2011. Functional plant cell wall design revealed by the Raman imaging approach. Planta 233: 763–772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Salmela L, Rivals E.. 2014. LoRDEC: accurate and efficient long read error correction. Bioinformatics 30: 3506–3514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Shen T, Xu M, Qi H, Feng Y, Yang Z, Xu M.. 2021. Uncovering miRNA-mRNA regulatory modules in developing xylem of Pinus massoniana via small RNA and degradome sequencing. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22: 10154–10171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Smyth GK. 2010. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26: 139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Stamm AJ. 1964. Wood and cellulose science. New York: Ronald Press. [Google Scholar]
  44. Sundell D, Street NR, Kumar M, et al. 2017. AspWood: high-spatial-resolution transcriptome profiles reveal uncharacterized modularity of wood formation in Populus tremula. Plant Cell 29: 1585–1604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Tang X, Zhuang Y, Qi G, et al. 2015. Poplar PdMYB221 is involved in the direct and indirect regulation of secondary wall biosynthesis during wood formation. Scientific Reports 5: 12240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tang X, Wang D, Liu Y, et al. 2020. Dual regulation of xylem formation by an auxin-mediated PaC3H17-PaMYB199 module in Populus. The New Phytologist 225: 1545–1561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Terrett OM, Lyczakowski JJ, Yu L, et al. 2019. Molecular architecture of softwood revealed by solid-state NMR. Nature Communications 10: 4978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wang B, Tseng E, Regulski M, et al. 2016. Unveiling the complexity of the maize transcriptome by single-molecule long-read sequencing. Nature Communications 7: 11708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang R, Shu P, Zhang C, et al. 2022. Integrative analyses of metabolome and genome-wide transcriptome reveal the regulatory network governing flavor formation in kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis). The New Phytologist 233: 373–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wang J, Ma LY, Guo J, et al. 2023. Microstructure and lignification of axial tracheids and ray cells during xylem differentiation of Pinus bungeana. Chinese Journal of Wood Science and Technology 37: 16–24. [Google Scholar]
  51. Yang L, Zhao X, Ran L, Li C, Fan D, Luo K.. 2017. PtoMYB156 is involved in negative regulation of phenylpropanoid metabolism and secondary cell wall biosynthesis during wood formation in poplar. Scientific Reports 7: 41209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Yang J, Masoudi A, Li H, et al. 2022. Microbial community structure and niche differentiation under different health statuses of Pinus bungeana in the Xiong’an New Area in China. Frontiers in Microbiology 13: 913349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Ye Z, Zhong R.. 2015. Molecular control of wood formation in trees. Journal of Experimental Botany 66: 4119–4131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ye J, Zhang Y, Cui H, et al. 2018. WEGO 2.0: a web tool for analyzing and plotting GO annotations, 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Research 46: W71–W75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Yin Y, Berglund L, Salmén L.. 2011. Effect of steam treatment on the properties of wood cell walls. Biomacromolecules 12: 194–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhang Z, Ma J, Ji Z, Xu F.. 2012. Comparison of anatomy and composition distribution between normal and compression wood of Pinus bungeana Zucc. revealed by microscopic imaging techniques. Microscopy and Microanalysis 18: 1459–1466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhong R, Lee C, Ye Z.. 2010. Functional characterization of poplar wood-associated NAC domain transcription factors. Plant Physiology 152: 1044–1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhong R, McCarthy RL, Lee C, Ye Z.. 2011. Dissection of the transcriptional program regulating secondary wall biosynthesis during wood formation in poplar. Plant Physiology 157: 1452–1468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zhong R, McCarthy RL, Haghighat M, Ye Z.. 2013. The poplar MYB master switches bind to the SMRE site and activate the secondary wall biosynthetic program during wood formation. PLoS One 8: e69219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhu Y, Li L.. 2021. Multi-layered regulation of plant cell wall thickening. Plant & Cell Physiology 62: 1867–1873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mcae023_suppl_Supplementary_Materials

Data Availability Statement

The RNA-Seq data were available at GSA BioProject with accession number PRJCA016348 (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsub/submit/bioproject/subPRO024298).


Articles from Annals of Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES