Abstract
These medication errors have occurred in health care facilities at least once. They will happen again—perhaps where you work. Through education and alertness of personnel and procedural safeguards, they can be avoided. You should consider publishing accounts of errors in your newsletters and/or presenting them at your inservice training programs.
Your assistance is required to continue this feature. The reports described here were received through the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) Medication Errors Reporting Program. Any reports published by ISMP will be anonymous. Comments are also invited; the writers' names will be published if desired. ISMP may be contacted at the address shown below.
Errors, close calls, or hazardous conditions may be reported directly to ISMP through the ISMP Web site (www.ismp.org), by calling 800-FAIL-SAFE, or via e-mail at ismpinfo@ismp.org. ISMP guarantees the confidentiality and security of the information received and respects reporters' wishes as to the level of detail included in publications.
Methylene Blue is A Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitor
Due to the unavailability of the marker dye indigo carmine, which until now has been used mainly in cystoscopy, ureteral operative procedures, and other procedures, some facilities have begun to use methylene blue as a replacement. So this is a good time to remind people that methylene blue is a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) that can interact with serotonergic drugs.
Our colleagues at ISMP Canada recently received a report of serotonin syndrome experienced by a patient who was taking paroxetine and then received methylene blue during a procedure. As a result of the interaction between the 2 products, the patient required intubation and admission to an intensive care unit. ISMP Canada points out that it is not widely known that methylene blue is an MAOI that can react with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (eg, paroxetine) and serotonin nor-epinephrine reuptake inhibitors (eg, venlafaxine). The elevated levels of serotonin can result in serotonin syndrome. ISMP Canada cautioned facilities and practitioners to treat methylene blue as a medication, specifically by writing orders for its use and entering these orders into the pharmacy computer system to allow potential drug interactions to be identified.
In addition, operating room staff and other practitioners without order entry systems or traditional pharmacy support should incorporate drug interaction checks for methylene blue within their existing processes. Ultimately, it is critical that all patients receiving methylene blue have a complete and up-to-date medication history to be used in assessing the risk for serotonin syndrome as well as a process for treating patients who might develop the condition.
In 2011, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Drug Safety Communication, “Serious CNS reactions possible when methylene blue is given to patients taking certain psychiatric medications,” which includes a list of drugs with serotonergic activity (http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm263190.htm). More recently, the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation published an analysis of this issue (http://www.apsf.org/newsletters/html/2015/June/02blue.htm).
Severe Harm and Death Associated with Low-Dose Methotrexate
For patients with severe, disabling rheumatoid arthritis (RA), oral methotrexate is often the preferred disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, unless it is specifically contraindicated.1–3 Compared to dosing for antineoplastic indications, methotrexate for RA is administered once weekly as low-dose therapy. 3 According to official prescribing information, the recommended starting dose is a single oral dose of 7.5 mg once weekly or divided oral doses of 2.5 mg every 12 hours for 3 doses per week. The dosing schedule may be adjusted to achieve optimal response, with doses up to about 25 mg weekly.
Since early 1996 and as recently as May 2015, harmful or fatal errors with low-dose oral methotrexate have been reported to ISMP and published in more than 50 ISMP newsletters. Most errors involved accidental daily dosing of oral methotrexate that was intended for weekly administration. In 2004, we published a study of methotrexate errors over a 4-year period that resulted in 25 deaths and 48 serious outcomes, many due to daily dosing. 4 Our sister organization, ISMP Canada, has also received multiple reports of severe harm or death in patients taking low-dose methotrexate for RA and other autoimmune diseases. Two of the 3 recent incidents highlighted in the September 30, 2015, ISMP Canada Safety Bulletin 5 involved patients who were taking no more than 20 mg of methotrexate weekly, yet they died of severe methotrexate toxic effects due to other risk factors, including drug interactions that increased the serum concentration of methotrexate. The third event is very similar to many other methotrexate errors, with patients taking the medication daily instead of weekly. The findings and recommendations from these 3 selected recent cases reported to ISMP Canada are shared here to highlight system-based opportunities to further improve safety with low-dose methotrexate therapy.
Medication Incidents
Incident 1. A patient with renal dysfunction and hypoalbuminemia was experiencing worsening RA symptoms. To address these symptoms, the patient decided to double his weekly methotrexate dose from 10 mg to 20 mg, a change that happened to coincide with the end of a treatment course of amoxicillin for an infection. The next day, the rheumatologist prescribed an additional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, lefunomide. Within a week, the patient was admitted to the hospital with pancytopenia. Despite aggressive treatment, he died. The patient's baseline risk factors for methotrexate toxicity, the intentional doubling of the methotrexate dose by the patient without the prescriber's knowledge, and drug interactions related to the concomitant use of amoxicillin and leflunomide with methotrexate, all contributed to the development of severe toxic effects.
Incident 2. An elderly patient with RA was admitted to the hospital for treatment of a fracture caused by a fall. While in the hospital, the patient's weekly dose of methotrexate 20 mg was continued and diclofenac was started. The patient developed renal failure (possibly precipitated by diclofenac use) and pancytopenia, and subsequently died. It was later determined that the known severe interaction between methotrexate and diclofenac was not addressed when diclofenac was initiated, possibly because of the lack of interaction specificity (ie, presence of numerous alerts including noncritical interactions) when the order was initially entered, and an incorrect assumption that the patient had been taking diclofenac at home prior to hospitalization. The patient died as a result of methotrexate toxicity.
Incident 3. Methotrexate 15 mg once weekly was prescribed for treatment of an autoimmune disorder in an elderly patient. The community pharmacy dispensed a 3-month quantity of medication, but provided instructions on the label to take 15 mg (6 × 2.5 mg tablets) once daily. The error was discovered during patient counseling with a pharmacist when the patient requested a refill 3 weeks later. The error resulted in severe harm, which led to a long hospital stay, including treatment with the rescue agent leucovorin calcium.
Background
Some of the most common toxic effects with a low-dose regimen of methotrexate are gastrointestinal, hematological, and hepatic. 6 Severe adverse effects are more common with the higher doses of methotrexate used for antineoplastic indications. However, hematological toxicity is reported to occur in up to 3% of patients treated with long-term, low-dose methotrexate for RA and other autoimmune disorders. 7 Severe toxic effects, such as myelosuppression, pulmonary complications, central nervous system toxicity, hepatotoxicity, and mucositis, have led to hospital admissions and even death. 8 Prescribing guidelines recommend obtaining a complete blood count (CBC), creatinine levels, and liver enzymes before methotrexate is initiated.1,2 In addition, it is recommended that measurement of these parameters be repeated at regular intervals for the duration of therapy 2 and that practitioners address any rapid, unusual changes in these parameters, as well as any consistent upward or downward trends. 9
Hypoalbuminemia, renal dysfunction, and certain concomitant medications, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and proton pump inhibitors, all increase a patient's risk of developing toxic effects from methotrexate. 8 Interacting medications are often prescribed with methotrexate and can be used together safely, provided regular monitoring takes place. To reduce gastrointestinal and hepatic toxic effects, folate supplementation may be recommended for patients who are receiving low-dose methotrexate. 10
ISMP has identified methotrexate as a high-alert medication 11 in both hospital and community settings, even when used for nononcologic purposes such as RA. As with all high-alert medications, there is a heightened risk of significant patient harm when this drug is used in error. ISMP and ISMP Canada have both previously published concerns about inadvertent daily, rather than weekly, administration of methotrexate.12–14 Since 2014, a bundle of 3 strategies to help prevent these types of errors have been highly promoted as one of the ISMP Targeted Medication Safety Best Practices for Hospitals: using a weekly dosage regimen default when oral methotrexate orders are entered, requiring a hard stop verification of an appropriate oncologic reason for all daily oral methotrexate orders, and educating patients and/or family members prior to discharge. These practices were updated for 2016–2017. 15 Although we have seen some significant gains with implementing these strategies since 2014, less than half of hospitals participating in a recent survey reported full compliance.
Recommendations
The following considerations are suggested for drug-related computer software administrators, prescribers, pharmacists, and nurses to reduce the risk of incidents similar to those described above.
Computer System Administrators
-
•
Design the computer order entry system for both pharmacy and physicians to default to a weekly (rather than daily) dosing schedule for oral methotrexate orders. 15
-
•
Require a hard stop verification and mandatory entry of an appropriate oncologic indication when the clinician selects a daily schedule for oral methotrexate orders. 15
-
•
In hospital systems and electronic medication administration records (eMARs), link methotrexate order entry and verification to laboratory results (eg, CBC, serum creatinine, liver enzymes) to prompt review of renal function and other monitoring parameters by pharmacists, nurses, and prescribers.
-
•
Include a robust drug-drug and drug-disease interaction module for methotrexate, with links to laboratory results where possible, so prescribers and pharmacists can effectively evaluate the potential for toxic effects.
-
•
For computer systems lacking some of the above functionalities, work with the software vendors to implement these safety features.
Prescribers
-
•
Before initiating oral methotrexate therapy, screen for risk factors by obtaining baseline values, including CBC, chest radiograph, and indicators of liver and renal function, to identify patients for whom methotrexate is not a safe therapy; an electronic health record (EHR) that prompts for this information is an asset.
-
•
Repeat CBC, liver function (especially albumin level), and serum creatinine every 2 to 4 weeks for 3 months after initiating methotrexate and every 8 to 12 weeks thereafter for patients with RA. 2
-
•
Screen for Hepatitis B and C and, in high-risk patients, test for HIV as recommended in some guidelines, prior to initiating methotrexate. 1
-
•
Consider folate supplementation for patients starting methotrexate therapy.
-
•
When prescribing methotrexate for weekly administration, specify a particular day of the week in the directions to reduce the risk that the patient will receive instructions for daily use. Avoid Monday as the day to take the weekly dose, since this might be misread as “morning.”
-
•
Limit the prescription quantity to be dispensed to a 4-week (28-day) supply.
-
•
Ask patients about their use of specific prescription and over-the-counter medications that could increase the risk for methotrexate toxicity.
-
•
When a dosing error is discovered, ensure the patient receives immediate medical attention. Although serum levels of methotrexate can be measured, they are not an accurate predictor of either the degree of toxicity or the outcome for the patient, because of the drug's pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties.8,16
Pharmacists
-
•
Create a forcing function to ensure that every oral methotrexate prescription is reviewed with the patient or a family member prior to discharge from the hospital and when a prescription is presented or refills are processed in a community pharmacy.
-
•
If folate has not been prescribed, follow up with the prescriber to suggest initiation of this supplement.
-
•
Ensure that any drug interaction alerts generated during order entry and verification are communicated to and resolved with the prescriber and/or the patient when indicated.
-
•
When possible, dispense only a 4-week supply of methotrexate at a time.
-
•
When available, dispense low-dose methotrexate for nononcologic indications as a dose pack (eg, Rheumatrex), which helps guide patients to take the proper dose weekly. (Such manufacturer's packaging should be required.)
Nurses and Pharmacists
-
•
Ensure that every patient receives education or counseling when discharged on oral methotrexate or when filling a prescription for oral methotrexate.
-
•
Double-check all printed medication lists and discharge instructions to ensure that they indicate the correct dosage regimen for oral methotrexate prior to providing them to the patient.
-
•
Ensure that the process for providing education or counseling for oral methotrexate includes clear verbal and written instructions. Ideally, EHRs should automatically generate this written information upon discharge for patients receiving oral methotrexate.
-
•
Specifically review the dosing schedule with patients, explain that taking extra doses is dangerous, and discuss that the medication is not to be used “as needed” for symptom control.
-
•
Have the patient repeat back the instructions to validate that he or she understands the dosing schedule and toxicities of the medication if taken more frequently than prescribed.
-
•
Provide all patients with a copy of the free ISMP high-alert medication consumer leaflet on oral methotrexate (www.ismp.org/AHRQ/default.asp). 17
-
•
Emphasize the need to adhere to the prescribed dose and to obtain all the monitoring tests ordered by the prescriber as scheduled.
-
•
Ask the patient or caregivers about the use of specific prescription and over-the-counter medications that may interact with methotrexate.
Conclusion
It is important to conduct an initial screening for risk factors and ongoing monitoring for methotrexate toxicity, even when this drug is prescribed at low doses. Methotrexate is a high-alert drug, and extra safeguards are needed whenever it is prescribed, dispensed, and administered, regardless of the setting, dose, or indication for use. Severe harm and fatalities have occurred during hospitalization, but many of the adverse outcomes have occurred after discharge. It is important for hospitals not only to ensure that the proper dosage regimen is administered during hospitalization, but also to implement effective proactive strategies so that the proper dosage regimen is maintained after discharge. Likewise, it is imperative for outpatient pharmacists to ensure correct instructions are on the label of methotrexate prescription bottles, that patients are counseled, and that patients understand the directions for use. Health care providers are urged to implement these recommended system safeguards to improve the safety of low-dose methotrexate therapy.
ISMP gratefully acknowledges ISMP Canada for providing this article, which was adapted from the September 30, 2015, article in the ISMP Canada Safety Bulletin. 5
Potentially Dangerous Mix-Up Between Cancer Drugs
ISMP has been alerted to a potentially serious error involving look-alike vials of the cancer drugs cytarabine 100 mg/5 mL and vinorelbine 50 mg/5 mL ( Figure 1 ). Both are manufactured by Hospira. The vials have the same green-colored cap, the same label color, and are also the same size. A vial that is partially turned in such a way as to expose only the final syllable of the name, “bine,” which is common to both, can further increase the risk of confusion (although practitioners should read the full label on all vials). Since cytarabine is approved for intrathecal use, the risk to patients if an accidental mix-up happened would be enormous. It is likely to be a fatal event since vinorelbine is a vinca alkaloid, similar to vincristine and vinblastine. The product carries a label statement that it is intended “For IV Use.” These products were originally manufactured by Mayne Pharma, which Hospira purchased in 2007. We have received 2 reports, one from a health care professional and another posted on a clinical pharmacy listserv. If you happen to have both of these products, it is unsafe to keep them near one another. Consider isolating one of them until a secondary supply can be obtained from a different manufacturer. The use of barcode scanning verification when preparing the medications can also help avert these types of mix-ups. Hospira has been notified and has promised to look into the matter immediately.
Figure 1.

Look-alike vials of cytarabine and vinorelbine.
References
- 1.Bykerk V.P., Akhavan P., Hazlewood G.S. et al. Canadian Rheumatology Association recommendations for pharmacological management of rheumatoid arthritis with traditional and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. J Rheumatol. 2012; 39(8): 1559–1582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Saag K.G., Teng G.G., Patkar N.M. et al. American College of Rheumatology 2008 recommendations for the use of nonbiologic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 59(6): 762–784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Singh J.A., Furst D.E., Bharat A. et al. 2012 update of the 2008 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommendations for the use of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and biologics in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Arthritis Care Res. 2012; 64(5): 625–639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Moore T.J., Walsh C.S., Cohen M.R. Reported medication errors associated with methotrexate. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004; 61(13): 1380–1384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.ISMP Canada. Severe harm and deaths associated with incidents involving low-dose methotrexate. ISMP Canada Safety Bulletin. 2015; 15(9): 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Salliot C., van der Heijde D. Long-term safety of methotrexate monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic literature research. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009; 68(7): 1100–1104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lim A.Y., Gaffney K., Scott D.G. Methotrexate-induced pancytopenia: Serious and under-reported? Our experience of 25 cases in 5 years. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005; 44(8): 1051–1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kivity S., Zafrir Y., Loebstein R., Pauzner R., Mouallem M., Mayan H. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for low dose methotrexate toxicity: A cohort of 28 patients. Autoimmun Rev. 2014; 13(11): 1109–1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chakravarty K., McDonald H., Pullar T. et al. BSR/BHPR guideline for disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy in consultation with the British Association of Dermatologists. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008; 47(6): 924–925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shea B., Swinden M.V., Ghogomu E.T. et al. Folic acid and folinic acid for reducing side effects in patients receiving methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2014; 41(6): 1049–1060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Institute for Safe Medication Practices. ISMP high-alert medications—Acute care settings, community and ambulatory healthcare settings. 2011 and 2014. www.ismp.org/sc?id=624
- 12.ISMP Canada. Incidents of inadvertent daily administration of methotrexate. ISMP Canada Safety Bulletin. 2008; 8(2): 1–3. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Blinova E., Volling J., Koczmara C., Greenall J. Oral methotrexate: Preventing inadvertent daily administration. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2008; 61(4): 275–277. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Institute for Safe Medication Practices. Small effort, big payoff… Automated maximum dose alerts with hard stops. ISMP Medication Safety Alert! 2013; 18(19): 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Institute for Safe Medication Practices. 2014–2015 Targeted Medication Safety Best Practices for Hospitals. 2014. www.ismp.org/sc?id=625
- 16.Inoue K., Yuasa H. Molecular basis for pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis therapy. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2014; 29(1): 12–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Institute for Safe Medication Practices. Read this important information before taking: Methotrexate. 2012. www.ismp.org/sc?id=626
