Abstract
The complexity of cancer chemotherapy requires pharmacists be familiar with the complicated regimens and highly toxic agents used. This column reviews various issues related to preparation, dispensing, and administration of antineoplastic therapy, and the agents, both commercially available and investigational, used to treat malignant diseases.
Drug name: Trabectedin
Synonyms: Yondelis; Ecteinascidin-743; ET-743
Mechanism of Action
Trabectedin is a tetrahydroisoquinolone alkaloid that binds to N2 amino groups of guanine in the DNA minor groove, with a portion of the molecule protruding and interacting with proteins such as transcription factors and DNA repair proteins. In low concentrations, trabectedin inhibits in vitro production of CCL2 and interleukin-6, inhibiting macrocyte recruitment at the tumor and tumor growth. 1
Pharmacokinetics
For a 24-hour infusion of 0.9 mg/m2 to 1.5 mg/m2, the mean time to maximum concentration (Tmax) is 16.5 hours to 17.2 hours; the maximum concentration (Cmax) was 652 pg/mL to 2,070 pg/mL; the half-life (T½) is 124 to 221 hours; the 1 hour, 48 hour, and overall area under the time versus concentration curve (AUC) is 46.9 to 96.3 ng•h/mL, 33.3 to 52.4 ng•h/mL, and 74.9 to 132 ng•h/mL, respectively. The steady state volume of distribution (Vd ss) is 2,030 to 2,470 L/m2 and 3,380 to 3,800 L. Clearance is 11.6 to 18.7 L/h/m2 and 21 to 31.4 L/h. 2
For 1.5 mg/m2 given over 24 hours, the mean AUC is 40.0 ng•h/mL, the mean clearance is 35.6 L/h/m2, and mean Cmax is 1.04 ng/mL. 3 The manufacturer reports the protein binding is 97%. The Vd ss is greater than 5,000 L; clearance is 31.5 L/h; T½ is 175 hours. The drug is metabolized in the liver, primarily by CYP3A. Following a 3-hour or 24-hour infusion, 64% of the drug is excreted within 24 days, with 58% excreted in the feces and 6% in the urine. 4
Doses of 0.46 to 0.7 mg/m2 given as a 1-hour infusion have a Cmax of 3.91 ng/mL to 16.6 ng/mL, AUC of 7.78 ng•h/mL to 72.6 ng•h/mL, clearance of 49.3 L/h to 135.8 L/h, a Vd ss of 1,434 L to 3,025 L, and a T½ of 17.2 hours to 100.1 hours. 5
Doses of 0.3 to 0.65 mg/m2 given as a 3-hour infusion are reported to have a Cmax of 0.72 ng/mL to 4.87 ng/mL, AUC of 4.94 ng•h/mL to 20.05 ng•h/mL, clearance of 51.9 L/h to 102.3 L/h, a Vd ss of 2,658 L to 3,704 L, and a T½ of 39.5 hours to 64.6 hours. 5
In pediatric patients given 1.1 mg/m2 over 24 hours, the T½ was 94.8 hours; the 8 hour and overall AUC were 23.5 ng•h/mL and 28.8 ng•h/mL, respectively. The Vd ss was 3,010 L/m2. Clearance was 38 L/h/m2. For 1.5 mg/m2 over 24 hours, the T½ was 83.2 to 104.3 hours; the 8 hour and overall AUC were 29.3 to 48.9 ng•h/mL and 28.8 to 60.4 ng•h/mL, respectively. The Vd ss was 1,880 to 4,020 L/m2. Clearance was 24.8 to 40.5 L/h/m2. 6
For 1.3 mg/m2 given as a 3-hour infusion, the mean Cmax is 3.98 to 6.1 ng/mL; the Tmax is 2.8 to 2.9 hours, the 48 hour and overall AUC are 17 to 31.6 ng•h/mL and 32.6 ng•h/mL, respectively. The Vd is 5,462 L, and the clearance is 20.3 to 39.6 L/h. 7
No significant differences in pharmacokinetics or antitumor activity in patients with mild to severe hepatic dysfunction given 0.75 to 1.3 mg/m2 as a 3-hour infusion. 8
Selected therapeutic regimens of trabectedin appear in Table 1 .
Table 1.
Selected therapeutic regimens of trabectedin
| Daily dose | Route of administration | Administered on day(s) | Cycle length | Total dose/cycle | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1–hour infusion | |||||
| 0.46 to 0.8 mg/m2 | IV | 1 | 3 weeks | 0.46 to 0.8 mg/m2 | 5 |
| 3-hour infusion | |||||
| 0.3 to 0.65 mg/m2 | IV | 1 | 3 weeks | 0.3 to 0.65 mg/m2 | 5 |
| 0.58 mg/m2 | IV | 1 | 3 weeks | 0.58 mg/m2 | 9 - 11 |
| 0.58 mg/m2 | IV | 1 | 3 or 4 weeks | 0.58 mg/m2 | 1 |
| 0.58 mg/m2 | IV | 1, 8, 15 | 3 weeks | 1.74 mg/m2 | 13 |
| 0.75 mg/m2 | IV | 1 | 3 weeks | 0.75 mg/m2 | 8 |
| 0.9 mg/m2 | IV | 1 | 3 weeks | 0.9 mg/m2 | 8 |
| 1.1 mg/m2 | IV | 1 | 3 weeks | 1.1 mg/m2 | 6, 8, 14 |
| 1.3 mg/m2 | IV | 1 | 3 weeks | 1.3 mg/m2 | 7, 10, 12, 14–20 |
| 1.65 mg/m2 | IV | 1 | 3 weeks | 1.65 mg/m2 | 6, 14, 19 |
| 24–hour infusion | |||||
| 0.9 mg/m2 | CIVI | 1 | 3 weeks | 0.9 mg/m2 | 2 |
| 0.9 to 1.5 mg/m2 | CIVI | 1 | 3 weeks | 0.9 to 1.5 mg/m2 1.1 mg/m2 | 22 |
| 1.1 mg/m2 | CIVI | 1 | 3 weeks | 1.1 mg/m2 | 6, 23 |
| 1.2 mg/m2 | CIVI | 1 | 3 weeks | 1.2 mg/m2 | 2, 11, 24 |
| 1.3 mg/m2 | CIVI | 1 | 3 weeks | 1.3 mg/m2 | 23, 25 |
| 1.5 mg/m2 a | CIVI | 1 | 3 weeks | 1.5 mg/m2 | 2–4, 6, 9–11, 16, 19, 21, 23, 25–37 |
| 1.7 mg/m2 | CIVI | 1 | 3 weeks | 1.7 mg/m2 | 6 |
Note: CIVI = 24-hour continuous infusion; IV = intravenous.
Conforms to dosing information listed in the manufacturer's labeling.
Preparation
-
1.
Follow institutional policies for preparation of hazardous medications when preparing trabectedin.
-
2.
Use trabectedin powder for injection.
-
3.
Reconstitute the drug to a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL with sterile water for injection.
-
4.
Dilute in 500 mL 0.9% sodium chloride (NS) or 5% dextrose in water (D5W).
Stability
Reconstituted vials and solutions for infusion are stable for 30 hours from reconstitution of the vial.
Administration
-
1.
Trabectedin is administered as a 1-hour, 5 3-hour,1,5–21 or 24-hour infusion.2–4,6,9–11,16,19,21–37
-
2.
The manufacturer recommends infusion through a 0.2 micron polyethersulfone filter “to reduce the risk of exposure to adventitious pathogens that may be introduced during solution preparation.” 4
-
3.
If the solution is prepared by a competent pharmacist or technician, using accepted standards of practice in conformance with USP Chapter <797>, use of an inline filter is unnecessary.
Toxicities
Most of the toxicities listed below are presented according to their degree of severity. Higher grades represent more severe toxicities. Although there are several grading systems for cancer chemotherapy toxicities, all are similar. One of the frequently used systems is the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_8.5x11.pdf). Oncologists generally do not adjust doses or change therapy for grade 1 or 2 toxicities, but make, or consider, dosage reductions or therapy changes for grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Incidence values are rounded to the nearest whole percent unless incidence was less than or equal to 0.5%.
1.3 mg/m2 – 3-hour infusion
-
A.
Cardiovascular: Deep venous thrombosis (grade 3 or 4) 5% 14 ; dehydration (grade 3 or 4) 4% 21 ; phlebitis (grade 1) 2%, 16 (grade 1 or 2) 11%, 18 (grade 2) 11%, 16 (grade 3 or 4) 6% 18 ; unspecified “cardiac disorders” (grade 3 or 4) 7%. 22
-
B.
Central Nervous System: Headache 44%. 12
-
C.
Constitutional: Asthenia 50% to 56%,12,17 (grade 1) 27%, 15 (grade 2) 6% to 44%,15,16 (grade 3) 2% to 14%,15–17 (grade 3 or 4) 13%, 7 (grade 4) 2%16,17; fatigue 34% to 44%,12,17 (grade 1) 15%, 16 (grade 1 or 2) 39% to 57%,10,14,18,20 (grade 2) 23%, 16 (grade 3) 7% to 13%,10,16,17,19,20 (grade 3 or 4) 2% to 20%,12,14,18,22 (grade 4) 0.4% to 2%10,16; fever (grade 1) 8%, 15 (grade 1 or 2) 38%, 14 (grade 3) 2%, 16 (grade 3 or 4) 28%. 12
- D.
-
E.
Endocrine/Metabolic: Increased creatine phosphokinase (CPK) (grade 1 or 2) 26%, 20 (grade 3) 6%, 20 (grade 4) 3% to 4%17,20; hyperglycemia (grade 3) 2% 17 ; hyperkalemia (grade 3) 2% 17 ; hypoglycemia (grade 4) 2% 17 ; hypokalemia (grade 3) 4% 17 ; hyponatremia (grade 3) 6%, 17 (grade 3 or 4) 4%. 22
-
F.
Gastrointestinal: Anorexia (grade 1) 11%, 16 (grade 1 or 2) 18% to 57%,14,20 (grade 2) 6% 16 ; constipation 48%, 12 (grade 1) 11%, 16 (grade 1 or 2) 10% to 26%,14,19 (grade 2) 13%, 16 (grade 3) 2% to 5%16,19; diarrhea (grade 1) 8%, 16 (grade 1 or 2) 14%, 14 (grade 2) 2% 16 ; dysgeusia (grade 1) 6%, 16 (grade 2) 2% 16 ; dyspepsia (grade 1 or 2) 10% 14 ; nausea 56% to 62%,12,17 (grade 1) 30%, 16 (grade 1 or 2) 39% to 62%,10,14,18,20 (grade 2) 32%, 16 (grade 3) 3% to 13%,10,16,18,19 (grade 3 or 4) 5% to 7%,14,21 (grade 4) 13% 19 ; nausea and vomiting (grade 1) 39%, 15 (grade 2) 34%, 15 (grade 3) 5% 15 ; stomatitis (grade 1) 8%, 16 (grade 1 or 2) 14%, 14 (grade 2) 4% 16 ; vomiting 20% to 42%,12,17 (grade 1) 19%, 16 (grade 1 or 2) 16% to 62%,10,14,18,20 (grade 2) 21%, 16 (grade 3) 4% to 9%,10,16 (grade 3 or 4) 6% to 13%,7,14,18,21 (grade 4) 0.4% 10 ; weight loss (grade 1 or 2) 13%. 20
-
G.
Hematologic: Anemia (grade 1 or 2) 72% to 81%,14,18,20 (grade 3) 5% to 6%,17,20 (grade 3 or 4) 9% to 17%,7,14,18,21 (grade 4) 5% to 13%19,20; febrile neutropenia (grade 3) 5%, 20 (grade 3 or 4) 13% to 25%,7,14,21 (grade 3 or 4) 5% 20 ; leukopenia (grade 1 or 2) 33% to 42%,18,20 (grade 3) 13% to 34%,7,19,20 (grade 3 or 4) 1% to 33%,12,18,21 (grade 4) 11% 20 ; lymphopenia (grade 1 or 2) 34% to 44%,18,20 (grade 3) 38% to 45%,19,20 (grade 3 or 4) 13% to 28%,18,22 (grade 4) 8% 20 ; neutropenia 34% to 40%,12,17 (grade 1) 17%, 15 (grade 1 or 2) 11% to 47%,10,14,18,20 (grade 2) 27%, 15 (grade 3) 8% to 37%,10,15,17,19,20 (grade 3 or 4) 6% to 46%,7,12,14,17,18,21 (grade 4) 4% to 41%10,15,17,20; thrombocytopenia (grade 1) 20%, 15 (grade 1 or 2) 24% to 33%,10,12,18,20 (grade 2) 3%, 15 (grade 3) 5% to 13%,10,15,17,20 (grade 3 or 4) 2% to 40%,7,12,14,18,21 (grade 4) 3% to 11%.10,15,20
-
H.
Hepatic: “Abnormal hepatic function” (grade 3 or 4) 25% to 40%7,12; increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) 40% to 68%,12,17 (grade 1 or 2) 29% to 53%,10,12,18,20 (grade 3) 6% to 51%,10,17,19 (grade 3 or 4) 15% to 67%,12,14,18,20,21 (grade 4) 2% to 17%10,15,17,19,20; increased alkaline phosphatase (AP) 36% to 44%,12,17 (grade 1 or 2) 38% to 91%,10,14,20 (grade 3) 2% to 3%,10,20 (grade 3 or 4) 10%, 14 (grade 4) 0.4% 10 ; increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 40%, 12 (grade 1 or 2) 43% to 66%,10,14,20 (grade 3) 18% to 44%,10,17,19,20 (grade 3 or 4) 3% to 57%,12,14,21 (grade 4) 2% to 5%10,17; increased bilirubin (grade 1 or 2) 12% to 68%,10,14,15,20 (grade 3) 2% to 13%,10,17,19,20 (grade 3 or 4) 5% 14 ; increased gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) (grade 3 or 4) 2% to 39%12,21; unspecified hepatotoxicity (grade 3) 2%. 14
-
I.
Hypersensitivity: Injection site reactions (grade 1) 6%, 16 (grade 2) 2%, 16 (grade 3) 2%. 16
-
J.
Infection: Cellulitis (grade 1 or 2) 6%, 18 (grade 3 or 4) 6% 18 ; unspecified (grade 3 or 4) 5% to 13%.14,21
-
K.
Musculoskeletal: Myalgia (grade 1) 4%, 16 (grade 1 or 2) 29%, 14 (grade 2) 4%, 16 (grade 3 or 4) 5%. 14
-
L.
Neurologic: Paresthesia (grade 1) 8%, 16 (grade 1 or 2) 13% 20 ; peripheral sensory neuropathy (grade 1) 4%, 16 (grade 2) 6%. 16
-
M.
Pain: Abdominal 40%, 12 (grade 1) 4%, 16 (grade 1 or 2) 11% 20 ; skeletal 20%, 12 (grade 3) 6%. 17
-
N.
Pulmonary: Dyspnea 28%, 12 (grade 1 or 2) 8%, 20 (grade 2) 9%, 16 (grade 3) 3% to 4%,17,20 (grade 3 or 4) 9%, 21 (grade 4) 2%. 16
-
O.
Renal: “Abnormal renal function” (grade 3) 6%, 17 (grade 4) 2% 16 ; increased creatinine (grade 3) 4% 17 ; unspecified “renal and urinary disorders” (grade 3 or 4) 7%. 21
1.5 mg/m2 – 24-hour infusion
-
A.
Cardiovascular: Arrhythmia (grade 3 or 4) 5% 37 ; heart failure (grade 3 or4) 4% 37 ; myocardial infarction (grade 4) 20% 11 ; phlebitis (grade 1) 2%, 16 (grade 2) 6%, 16 (grade 3) 2% 16 ; pulmonary edema (grade 3) 20% 11 ; pulmonary emboli (grade 4) 5% 37 ; unspecified (grade 1 or 2) 2%, 36 (grade 3) 5% 33 ; venous thrombosis (grade 3) 20%, 11 (grade 3 or 4) 4%. 37
-
B.
Central Nervous System: Headache (grade 1) 4%, 26 (grade 1 or 2) 13%, 35 (grade 2) 4%, 26 (grade 3) 1% to 7%.26,36
-
C.
Constitutional: Asthenia 80%, 27 (grade 2) 2% 16 ; fatigue (grade 1) 10% to 40%,16,28,30,33,34 (grade 1 or 2) 35% to 59%,10,11,32,35,36 (grade 2) 7% to 44%,16,28,30,33,34 (grade 3) 5% to 20%,10,11,16,28,30,34,36 (grade 3 or 4) 4% to 17%,11,21,27,32,35,37 (grade 4) <1% to 4%10,28,30,34,36; fever (grade 1) 4% to 7%,16,26 (grade 1 or 2) 7%, 35 (grade 2) 2% to 4%16,26; flu-like syndrome (grade 2) 5% 33 ; lethargy (grade 1) 26%, 26 (grade 2) 41%, 26 (grade 3) 7% 26 ; unspecified (grade 1) 15%. 33
-
D.
Dermatologic: Alopecia 4%, 27 (grade 1) 7%, 16 (grade 1 or 2) 2%,35,36 (grade 4) 1% 36 ; unspecified reactions (grade 1) 20%, 33 (grade 2) 10%. 33
-
E.
Endocrine/Metabolic: Increased CPK (grade 1) 17%, 28 (grade 1 or 2) 25% to 36%,32,35,36 (grade 2) 6%, 28 (grade 3) 3%,28,36 (grade 3 or 4) 4% to 9%,32,35 (grade 4) 2% 36 ; unspecified metabolic reactions (grade 1) 25%, 33 (grade 2) 20%, 33 (grade 3) 15%. 33
-
E.
Gastrointestinal: Anorexia 20%, 27 (grade 1) 9% to 22%,16,26 (grade 1 or 2) 23% to 30%,11,35 (grade 2) 4% to 7%,16,26 (grade 3) 1% to 2%,16,26 (grade 3 or 4) 2%27,35; constipation (grade 1) 8% to 13%,16,34 (grade 1 or 2) 14% to 20%,11,32,35 (grade 2) 3% to 11%,16,34 (grade 3) 1% to 2%,16,34 (grade 3 or 4) 3%, 32 (grade 4) <1% 34 ; diarrhea 6%, 27 (grade 1) 2% to 22%,16,26,30 (grade 1 or 2) 16%, 35 (grade 2) 4%,16,26 (grade 3) 4% to 20%11,26; dysgeusia (grade 1) 2%, 16 (grade 1 or 2) 7%, 35 (grade 2) 6% 16 ; increased lipase (grade 3) 20% 11 ; intestinal occlusion (grade 3 or 4) 4%, 37 nausea 80%, 27 (grade 1) 16% to 55%,16,26,28,33,34 (grade 1 or 2) 55% to 69%,10,11,32,35,36 (grade 2) 6% to 52%,16,26,28,33,34 (grade 3) 3% to 14%,10,16,26,28,29,34,36 (grade 3 or 4) 2% to 12%,21,27,32,35 (grade 4) 0.2% 10 ; nausea or vomiting (grade 3 or 4) 9% to 13% 31 ; stomatitis 9%, 27 (grade 1) 4% to 7%,16,26,30 (grade 1 or 2) 2% to 5%,35,36 (grade 2) 2% to 15%,16,26 (grade 3 or 4) 2% 35 ; vomiting 59%, 27 (grade 1) 8% to 50%,16,26,28,30,33,34 (grade 1 or 2) 21% to 43%,10,11,32,35,36 (grade 2) 1% to 24%,16,26,28,30,33,34 (grade 3) 1% to 20%,10,11,16,26,28,30,34,36 (grade 3 or 4) 2% to 10%,11,21,27,29,32,35 (grade 4) 0.5% to 4%10,30,34; weight loss (grade 1 or 2) 5%, 35 (grade 3 or 4) 2%. 35
-
F.
Hematologic: Anemia 76%, 27 (grade 1) 4% to 59%,26,30,33,34 (grade 1 or 2) 75% to 89%,32,35,36 (grade 2) 7% to 52%,26,28,30,33,34 (grade 3) 4% to 5%,26,33,34,36 (grade 3 or 4) 3% to 22%,21,27,29,31,32,35 (grade 4) 1% to 7%26,28,34,36; coagulopathies (grade 1) 5%, 33 febrile neutropenia (grade 3) 7% to 20%,11,26 (grade 3 or 4) 2% to 9%,27,29,35 (grade 4) 1% 36 ; hemorrhage (grade 1 10%, 33 leukopenia 85%, 27 (grade 1) 33%, 26 (grade 1 or 2) 49% to 55%,11,32,35 (grade 2) 30% to 35%,26,28,33 (grade 3) 15% to 50%,26,28,33 (grade 3 or 4) 24% to 46%,11,21,27,29,32,35 (grade 4) 3% to 7%26,28,33; lymphopenia (grade 1 or 2) 35% to 48%,11,32 (grade 3 or 4) 12% to 40%11,21,32; neutropenia 81%, 27 (grade 1) 3% to 15%,26,30,34 (grade 1 or 2) 25% to 41%,10,11,32,35,36 (grade 2) 6% to 22%,26,28,30,33,34 (grade 3) 8% to 55%,10,26,28,30,33,34,36 (grade 3 or 4) 9% to 61%,11,21,27,29,31,32,34,37 (grade 4) 8% to 33%10,26,28,30,34,36; thrombocytopenia 37%, 27 (grade 1) 3% to 20%,26,30,33,34 (grade 1 or 2) 25% to 43%,10,11,32,35,36 (grade 2) 2% to 11%,26,30,34 (grade 3) 4% to 15%,10,11,33,34,36 (grade 3 or 4) 5% to 19%,11,21,27,29,31,32,35,37 (grade 4) 2% to 6%.10,26,30,34,36,37
-
G.
Hepatic: Increased ALT 100%, 27 (grade 1) 4% to 41%,26,28,30,34 (grade 1 or 2) 40% to 69%,10,11,32,35,36 (grade 2) 4% to 33%,26,28,30,34 (grade 3) 10% to 56%,10,26,28,30,34,36 (grade 3 or 4) 7% to 53%,27,29,31,32,35,37 (grade 4) 1% to 15%10,26,28,30,34,36,37; increased AP 65%,27 (grade 1) 5% to 67%,26,28,30,33,34 (grade 1 or 2) 40% to 57%,10,11,35,36 (grade 2) 4% to 22%,28,30,34 (≥grade 2) 18%, 29 (grade 3) 1% to 3%,10,34,36 (grade 3 or 4) 5% to 22%,11,21,35 (grade 4) 0.4% to <1%10,34; increased AST 98%, 27 (grade 1) 4% to 31%,26,28,30,33,34 (grade 1 or 2) 38% to 62%,10,11,32,35,36 (grade 2) 3% to 28%,26,28,30,33,34 (grade 3) 4% to 62%,10,26,28,30–34,36,37 (grade 3 or 4) 20% to 57%,11,21,27,29,35 (grade 4) 1% to 30%10,26,28,30,34,37; increased bilirubin 37%, 27 (grade 1) 5% to 18%,26,28,33 (grade 1 or 2) 17% to 23%,10,32,35,36 (grade 2) 7%, 30 (≥grade 2) 18%, 29 (grade 3) 1% to 4%,10,30,36 (grade 3 or 4) 2% to 7%,32.35 (grade 4) 7% 26 ; increased GGT (grade 1) 7%, 30 (grade 1 or 2) 55% to 75%,11,32 (grade 2) 30%, 30 (grade 3) 44%, 30 (grade 3 or 4) 2% to 49%,11,21,31,32 (grade 4) 4% 30 ; unspecified hepatotoxicity (grade 2) 2%, 16 (grade 3) 7%. 16
-
H.
Hypersensitivity: Injection site reactions (grade 1) 6%, 16 (grade 2) 6%, 16 (grade 3) 2% 16 ; unspecified allergy 2%, 27 (grade 1) 7%. 26
-
I.
Infection: Pneumonia (grade 3 or 4) 4% 37 ; unspecified 4%, 27 (grade 2) 10% to 11%,26,33 (grade 3) 5%, 33 (grade 3 or 4) 7% to 10%.21,26
-
J.
Musculoskeletal: Myalgia (grade 1) 2% to 11%,16,26 (grade 2) 2% 16 ; unspecified (grade 1) 20%, 33 (grade 2) 5%. 33
-
K.
Neurologic: Paresthesia (grade 1) 9% 16 ; peripheral sensory neuropathy (grade 1) 4% to 10%,16,33 (grade 2) 2% 16 ; unspecified (grade 1) 20%. 33
- L.
-
M.
Pain: Abdominal (grade 1) 2%, 16 (grade 1 or 2) 10%, 35 (grade 2) 4% to 7%,16,26 (grade 3) 2% to 4%,16,26 (grade 3 or 4) 2% 35 ; unspecified (grade 1) 50%, 33 (grade 2) 10%, 33 (grade 3 or4) 5%. 37
-
N.
Pulmonary: Dyspnea (grade 3) 2% to 20%,11,16 (grade 3 or 4) 2% 21 ; unspecified reaction (grade 1) 20%, 33 (grade 2) 5%. 33
-
O.
Renal: Increased creatinine (grade 1) 18%, 26 (grade 1 or 2) 17% to 35%,32,35,36 (≥grade 2) 13%, 29 (grade 3 or 4) 3% to 5%,32,35 (grade 4) 2% 36 ; unspecified (grade 1) 5%. 33
Dose Adjustment
- A.
-
B.
Renal: No information available. 4
Drug name: Trifluridine-Tipiracil
Synonyms: Lonsurf; TAS-102
Comment
Trifluridine-tipiracil is a combination of 2 agents that have complementary mechanisms of action.
Mechanism of Action
Trifluridine is a pyrimidine antimetabolite that inhibits DNA synthesis by impeding the activity of thymidylate synthetase.38–40 Trifluridine is also incorporated into DNA, resulting in single strand breaks. 41 Tipiracil is a thymidine phosphoralase inhibitor that has some intrinsic antiangiogenic activity, 42 but also enhances the bioavailability of trifluridine by inhibiting its metabolism in the liver and intestines by thymidine phosphorylase.43,44
Pharmacokinetics
In doses of 50 to 100 mg/m2/day given orally, on day 1 trifluridine has a mean Cmax of 8,140 to 13,050 ng/mL and a mean Tmax of 0.5 to 0.75 hours. The 24-hour AUC is 15,938 to 27,118 ng•h/mL, and Vd is 0.174 to 0.187 L/kg. The clearance is 0.0763 to 0.0985 L/h/kg, with a T½ of 1.37 to 1.57 hours. In 24 hours, 1% to 5.7% of a dose is excreted in the urine. 44
On day 14, the Cmax is 8,938 to 12,500 ng/mL, and the Tmax is 0.85 to 1.33 hours. The 24-hour AUC is 30,248 to 73,874 ng•h/mL, and Vd is 0.0719 to 0.117 L/kg. The clearance is 0.0303 to 0.0424 L/h/kg, with a T½ of 1.55 to 2.51 hours. By day 14, 9.3% to 16.7% is excreted in the urine. 44
In doses of 50 to 100 mg/m2/day given orally, on day 1 trifluridine has a mean Cmax of 212 to 246 ng/mL and a mean Tmax of 1.55 to 2.0 hours. The 24-hour AUC is 774 to 1,075 ng•h/mL, and Vd is 3.1 to 11.8 L/kg. The clearance is 0.786 to 1.14 L/h/kg, with a T½ of 3.05 to 6.68 hours. In 24 hours, 2.46% to 50.4% of a dose is excreted in the urine. 44
On day 14, the Cmax is 167 to 223 ng/mL, and the Tmax is 1.75 to 2.0 hours. The 24-hour AUC is 661 to 719 ng•h/mL, and Vd is 3.46 to 9.53 L/kg. The clearance is 0.884 to 1.6 L/h/kg, with a T½ of 1.5 to 7.46 hours. By day 14, 10.2 % to 24.8 % is excreted in the urine. 44
Following administration of 35 mg/m2 twice daily, the mean t1/2 of trifluridine was 1.4 hours and of tipiracil was 2.1 hours following a single dose. At steady state, the mean elimination t1/2 of trifluridine was 2.1 hours and of tipiracil was 2.4 hours. Following a single oral administration of 35 mg/m2, the mean Tmax of trifluridine was around 2 hours.
Trifluridine is highly (>96%) protein bound; while tipiracil binding is less than 8%.
Trifluridine metabolized by thymidine phosphorylase to 5-(trifluoromethyl) uracil (FTY) and inactive metabolite. Following a single 60-mg dose, the mean 48-hour cumulative urinary excretion was 1.5% for unchanged trifluridine, 19.2% for FTY, and 29.3% for unchanged tipiracil. 45
Selected therapeutic regimens of trifluridine-tipiracil appear in Table 2 .
Table 2.
Selected therapeutic regimens of trifluridine-tipiracil
| Daily dose (based on trifluridine) | Route of administration | Administered on day(s) | Cycle length | Total dose/cycle | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 mg/m2 twice daily | 1,2,3,4,5 | 28 days | 500 mg/m2 | 50 | |
| PO | 8,9,10,11,12 | ||||
| 30 mg/m2 twice daily | 1,2,3,4,5 | 28 days | 600 mg/m2 | 47 | |
| PO | 8,9,10,11,12 | ||||
| 35 mg/m2 twice daily a | 1,2,3,4,5 | 28 days | 700 mg/m2 | 45, 47- 49 | |
| PO | 8,9,10,11,12 | ||||
| 40 mg/m2 twice daily | 1,2,3,4,5 | 28 days | 800 mg/m2 | 50 | |
| PO | 8,9,10,11,12 | ||||
| 60 mg/m2 daily b | 1,2,3,4,5 | 28 days | 600 mg/m2 | 46, 51 | |
| PO | 8,9,10,11,12 | ||||
| 70 mg/m2 daily b | 1,2,3,4,5 | 28 days | 700 mg/m2 | 46, 51 | |
| PO | 8,9,10,11,12 | ||||
| 80 mg/m2 daily b | 1,2,3,4,5 | 28 days | 800 mg/m2 | 51 | |
| PO | 8,9,10,11,12 | ||||
| 100 mg/m2 | PO | 1 through 14 | 28 days | 1,400 mg/m2 | 44 |
Note: PO = oral.
Conforms to dosing information listed in the manufacturer's labeling.
Given in divided doses 3 times a day.
Preparation
Trifluridine-tipiracil is available as tablets containing:
-
A.
15 mg/6.14 mg of trifluridine and tipiracil, respectively
-
B.
20 mg/8.19 mg of trifluridine and tipiracil, respectively
Stability
-
A.
Trifluridine-tipiracil should be stored at 20°C to 25°C (68°F to 77°F).
-
B.
Brief (less than 24 hours) exposure to temperatures up to 30°C (86°F) is acceptable.
Administration
-
A.
Trifluridine-tipiracil is administered orally, twice a day.
-
B.
The medication should be taken within 1 hour of eating.
-
C.
Doses are based on the trifluridine content and should be rounded to the nearest 5 mg.
Toxicities
Most of the toxicities listed below are presented according to their degree of severity. Higher grades represent more severe toxicities. Although there are several grading systems for cancer chemotherapy toxicities, all are similar. One of the frequently used systems is the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_8.5x11.pdf). Oncologists generally do not adjust doses or change therapy for grade 1 or 2 toxicities; but make, or consider, dosage reductions or therapy changes for grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Incidence values are rounded to the nearest whole percent unless incidence was less than or equal to 0.5%.
-
A.
Cardiovascular: Cardiac ischemia (grade 3 or 4) <1%. 46
-
B.
Constitutional: Asthenia 18%, 46 (grade 3 or 4) 3% 46 ; fatigue 35% to 58%,46,47 (grade 3 or 4) 4% to 6%46,47; fever 19%, 46 (grade 3 or 4) 1%. 46
-
C.
Gastrointestinal: Anorexia 39% to 62%,46,47 (grade 3 or 4) 4%46,47; diarrhea 32% to 38%,46,47 (grade 3 or 4) 3% to 6%46,47; nausea 48% to 65%,46.47 (grade 3 or 4) 2% to 4%46,47; stomatitis 8%, 46 (grade 3 or 4) <1% 46 ; vomiting 28% to 34%,46,47 (grade 3 or 4) 2% to 4%.46,47
-
D.
Hematologic: Anemia 73% to 77%,46,47 (grade 3 or 4) 17% to 18%46,47; febrile neutropenia (grade 3) 11%, 48 (grade 3 or 4) 4%46,47; leucopenia 76% to 77%,46,47 (grade 3 or 4) 21% to 28%46,47; lymphopenia 35%, (grade 3 or 4) 10% 47 ; neutropenia 67% to 72%, 47 (grade 3) 58%, 48 (grade 3 or 4) 38% to 50%46,47; thrombocytopenia 39% to 42%,46,47 (grade 3 or 4) 4% to 5%.46,47
-
E.
Hepatic: Increased ALT 24%, 46 (grade 3 or 4) 2% 46 ; increased AST 30%, 46 (grade 3 or 4) 4% 46 ; increased AP 39%, 46 (grade 3 or 4) 8% 46 ; increased bilirubin 36%, 46 (grade 3 or 4) 9%. 46
-
F.
Neurologic: Hand-foot syndrome 2%. 46
- G.
- H.
Dose Adjustment
-
A.
Hepatic 45
-
1.
Total bilirubin less than or equal to the ULN and AST greater than ULN, no adjustment required.
-
2.
Total bilirubin less than 1.5 times the ULN, and any AST, no adjustment required.
-
3.
Total bilirubin greater than 1.5 to 3 times ULN and any AST, no information available.
-
4.
Total bilirubin greater than 3 times ULN and any AST, no information available.
-
1.
-
B.
Renal 45
-
1.
Creatinine clearance (CLcr) greater than or equal to 30 mL/min and less than or equal to 89 mL/min, no adjustment required.
-
2.
Moderate renal impairment, dose adjustment may be required to minimize toxicity.
-
3.
CLcr less than 30 mL/min, no information available.
-
1.
References
- 1.D'Incalci M., Galmarini C.M. A review of trabectedin (ET-743): A unique mechanism of action. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010; 9(8): 2157–2163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ueda T., Kakunaga S., Ando M. et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of trabectedin, a DNA minor groove binder, administered as a 24-h continuous infusion in Japanese patients with soft tissue sarcoma. Invest New Drugs. 2014; 32(4): 691–699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Garcia-Carbonero R., Supko J.G., Manola J. et al. Phase II and pharmacokinetic study of ecteinascidin 743 in patients with progressive sarcomas of soft tissues refractory to chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(8): 1480–1490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yondelis [prescribing information]. Horsham, PA: Janssen Products, LP; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Forouzesh B., Hidalgo M., Chu Q. et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of trabectedin as a 1- or 3-hour infusion weekly in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2009; 15(10): 3591–3599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chuk M.K., Aikin A., Whitcomb T. et al. A phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of a 24-hour infusion of trabectedin (Yondelis®, ET-743) in children and adolescents with relapsed or refractory solid tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012; 59(5): 865–869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Machiels J.P., Staddon A., Herremans C. et al. Impact of cytochrome P450 3A4 inducer and inhibitor on the pharmacokinetics of trabectedin in patients with advanced malignancies: Open-label, multicenter studies. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014; 74(4): 729–737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pardo B., Salazar R., Ciruelos E. et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of trabectedin 3-hour infusion every three weeks in patients with advanced cancer and alteration of hepatic function. Med Oncol. 2012; 29(3): 2240–2250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Demetri G.D., Chawla S.P., von Mehren M. et al. Efficacy and safety of trabectedin in patients with advanced or metastatic liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma after failure of prior anthracyclines and ifosfamide: Results of a randomized phase II study of two different schedules. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(25): 4188–4196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Le Cesne A., Yovine A., Blay J.Y. et al. A retrospective pooled analysis of trabectedin safety in 1,132 patients with solid tumors treated in phase II clinical trials. Invest New Drugs. 2012; 30(3): 1193–1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Michaelson M.D., Bellmunt J., Hudes G.R. et al. Multicenter phase II study of trabectedin in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012; 23(5): 1234–1240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Goldstein L.J., Gurtler J., Del Prete S.A. et al. Trabectedin as a single-agent treatment of advanced breast cancer after anthracycline and taxane treatment: A multicenter, randomized, phase II study comparing 2 administration regimens. Clin Breast Cancer. 2014; 14(6): 396–404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Krasner C.N., McMeekin D.S., Chan S. et al. A phase II study of trabectedin single agent in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer previously treated with platinum-based regimens. Br J Cancer. 2007; 97(12): 1618–1624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Paz-Ares L., Rivera-Herreros F., Díaz-Rubio E. et al. Phase II study of trabectedin in pretreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2007; 6(7): 522–528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sessa C., De Braud F., Perotti A. et al. Trabectedin for women with ovarian carcinoma after treatment with platinum and taxanes fails. J Clin Oncl. 2005; 23(9): 1867–1874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Del Campo J.M., Roszak A., Bidzinski M. et al. Phase II randomized study of trabectedin given as two different every 3 weeks dose schedules (1.5 mg/m2 24 h or 1.3 mg/m2 3 h) to patients with relapsed, platinum-sensitive, advanced ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol. 2009; 20(11): 1794–1802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.McMeekin D.S., Lisyanskaya A., Crispens M. et al. Single-agent trabectedin as second-line therapy of persistent or recurrent endometrial cancer: Results of a multicenter phase II study. Gynecol Oncol. 2009; 114(2): 288–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Massuti B., Cobo M., Camps C. et al. Trabectedin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with XPG and/or ERCC1 overexpression and BRCA1 under-expression and pretreated with platinum. Lung Cancer. 2012; 76(3): 3543–3561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Paz-Ares L., López-Pousa A., Poveda A. et al. Trabectedin in pre-treated patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: A phase II study evaluating co-treatment with dexamethasone. Invest New Drugs. 2012; 30(2): 729–740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Delaloge S., Wolp-Diniz R., Byrski T. et al. Activity of trabectedin in germline BRCA1/2-mutated metastatic breast cancer: Results of an international first-in-class phase II study. Ann Oncol. 2014; 25(6): 1152–1158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bui-Nguyen B., Butrynski J.E., Penel N. et al. A phase IIb multicentre study comparing the efficacy of trabectedin to doxorubicin in patients with advanced or metastatic untreated soft tissue sarcoma: The TRUSTS trial. Eur J Cancer. 2015; 51(10): 1312–1320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Roylance R., Seddon B., McTiernan A. et al. Experience of the use of trabectedin (ET-743, Yondelis) in 21 patients with pre-treated advanced sarcoma from a single centre. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2007; 19(8): 572–576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sanfilippo R., Grosso F., Jones R.L. et al. Trabectedin in advanced uterine leiomyosarcomas: A retrospective case series analysis from two reference centers. Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 123(3): 553–556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kawai A., Araki N., Sugiura H., Trabectedin monotherapy after standard chemotherapy versus best supportive care in patients with advanced, translocation-related sarcoma: A randomised, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16(4): 406–416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Baruchel S., Pappo A., Krailo M. et al. A phase 2 trial of trabectedin in children with recurrent rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma and non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas: A report from the Children's Oncology Group. Eur J Cancer. 2012; 48(4): 579–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Blay J.Y., Le Cesne A., Verweij J. et al. A phase II study of ET-743/trabectedin (“Yondelis”) for patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2004; 40(9): 1327–1331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yovine A., Riofrio M., Blay J.Y. et al. Phase II study of ecteinascidin-743 in advanced pretreated soft tissue sarcoma patients. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(5): 890–899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Garcia-Carbonero R., Supko J.G., Maki R.G. et al. Ecteinascidin-743 (ET-743) for chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas: Multicenter phase II and pharmacokinetic study. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(24): 5484–5492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Le Cesne A., Blay J.Y., Judson I. et al. Phase II study of ET-743 in advanced soft tissue sarcomas: A European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) soft tissue and bone sarcoma group trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(3): 576–584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zelek L., Yovine A., Brain E. et al. A phase II study of Yondelis (trabectedin, ET-743) as a 24-h continuous intravenous infusion in pretreated advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2006; 94(11): 1610–1614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fayette J., Boyle H., Chabaud S. et al. Efficacy of trabectedin for advanced sarcomas in clinical trials versus compassionate use programs: Analysis of 92 patients treated in a single institution. Anticancer Drugs. 2010; 21(1): 113–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gronchi A., Bui B.N., Bonvalot S. et al. Phase II clinical trial of neoadjuvant trabectedin in patients with advanced localized myxoid liposarcoma. Ann Oncol. 2012; 23(3): 771–776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Monk B.J., Blessing J.A., Street D.G. et al. A phase II evaluation of trabectedin in the treatment of advanced, persistent, or recurrent uterine leiomyosarcoma: A gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012; 124(1): 48–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Samuels B.L., Chawla S., Patel S. et al. Clinical outcomes and safety with trabectedin therapy in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas following failure of prior chemotherapy: Results of a worldwide expanded access program study. Ann Oncol. 2013; 24(6): 1703–1709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Blay J.Y., Leahy M.G., Nguyen B.B. et al. Randomised phase III trial of trabectedin versus doxorubicin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in translocation-related sarcomas. Eur J Cancer. 2014; 50(6): 1137–1147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Blay J.Y., Casali P., Nieto A. et al. Efficacy and safety of trabectedin as an early treatment for advanced or metastatic liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma. Future Oncol. 2014; 10(1): 59–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Le Cesne A., Blay J.Y., Domont J. et al. Interruption versus continuation of trabectedin in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (T-DIS): A randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16(3): 312–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Reyes P., Heidelberger C. Fluorinated pyrimidines. XXVI. Mammalian thymidylate synthetase: Its mechanism of action and inhibition by fluorinated nucleotides. Mol Pharmacol. 1965; 1(1): 14–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Santi D.V., Sakai T.T. Thymidylate synthetase. Model studies of inhibition by 5-trifluoromethyl-2′ - deoxyuridylic acid. Biochemistry. 1971; 10(19): 3598–3607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Temmink O.H., Comijn E.M., Fukushima M. et al. Intra-cellular thymidylate synthase inhibition by trifluorothymidine in FM3A cells. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2004; 23(8–9): 1491–1494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fujiwara Y., Heidelberger C. Fluorinated pyrimidines. 38. The incorporation of 5-trifluoromethyl-2′ - deoxyuridine into the deoxyribonucleic acid of vaccinia virus. Mol Pharmacol. 1970; 6(3): 281–291. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Matsushita S., Nitanda T., Furukawa T. et al. The effect of a thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor on angiogenesis and apoptosis in tumors. Cancer Res. 1999; 59(8): 1911–1916. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Fukushima M., Suzuki N., Emura T. et al. Structure and activity of specific inhibitors of thymidine phosphorylase to potentiate the function of antitumor 2′ - deoxyribonucleosides. Biochem Pharmacol. 2000; 59(10): 1227–1236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hong D.S., Abbruzzese J.L., Bogaard K. et al. Phase I study to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of oral administration of TAS-102 in patients with solid tumors. Cancer 2006; 107(6): 1383–1390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lonsurf [prescribing information]. Princeton, NJ: Taiho Oncology, Inc. (U.S.); 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Doi T., Ohtsu A., Yoshino T. et al. Phase I study of TAS-102 treatment in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumours. Br J Cancer. 2012; 107(3): 429–434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Patel M.R., Bendell J.C., Mayer R.J. et al. A phase I dose-escalation study of TAS-102 in patients (pts) with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) [abstract 3631]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2012. http://meetinglibrary.asco.org/print/565697. Accessed November 3, 2015.
- 48.Yoshino T., Mizunuma N., Yamazaki K. et al. TAS-102 monotherapy for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase II trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13(10): 993–1001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mayer R.J., Van Cutsem E., Falcone A. et al. Randomized trial of TAS-102 for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(20): 1909–1919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Green M.C., Pusztai L., Theriault L.R. et al. Phase I study to determine the safety of oral administration of TAS-102 on a twice daily (BID) schedule for five days a week (wk) followed by two days rest for two wks, every (Q) four wks in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract 10576]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2006. http://meeting.ascopubs.org/cgi/content/abstract/24/18_suppl/10576?sid=-91d048f7-f9be-4816-9089-f2c4e97547a6. Accessed November 3, 2015.
- 51.Overman M.J., Kopetz S., Varadhachary G. et al. Phase I clinical study of three times a day oral administration of TAS-102 in patients with solid tumors. Cancer Invest. 2008; 26(8): 794–799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
