Abstract
Cell- and antibody-based CD19-directed therapies have demonstrated great potential for treating B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). However, all these approaches suffer from limited response rates and considerable toxicity. Until now, therapy decisions have been routinely based on histopathological CD19 staining of a single lesion at initial diagnosis or relapse, disregarding heterogeneity and temporal alterations in antigen expression. To visualize in vivo CD19 expression noninvasively, we radiolabeled anti-human CD19 monoclonal antibodies with copper-64 (64Cu-αCD19) for positron emission tomography (CD19-immunoPET). 64Cu-αCD19 specifically bound to subcutaneous Daudi xenograft mouse models in vivo. Importantly, 64Cu-αCD19 did not affect the anti-lymphoma cytotoxicity of CD19 CAR-T cells in vitro. Following our preclinical validation, 64Cu-αCD19 was injected into four patients with follicular lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or mantle zone lymphoma. We observed varying 64Cu-αCD19 PET uptake patterns at different lymphoma sites, both within and among patients, correlating with ex vivo immunohistochemical CD19 expression. Moreover, one patient exhibited enhanced uptake in the spleen compared to that in patients with prior B-cell-depleting therapy, indicating that 64Cu-αCD19 is applicable for identifying B-cell-rich organs. In conclusion, we demonstrated the specific targeting and visualization of CD19+ B-NHL in mice and humans by CD19-immunoPET. The intra- and interindividual heterogeneous 64Cu-αCD19 uptake patterns of lymphoma lesions indicate variability in CD19 expression, suggesting the potential of CD19-immunoPET as a novel tool to guide CD19-directed therapies.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40364-024-00595-9.
Keywords: CD19, Positron emission tomography, Imaging biomarker, Theranostics, CAR-T cells, Molecular imaging, B-cell non-hodgkin lymphoma
To the editor
CD19-directed therapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, the Fc receptor-optimized monoclonal antibody (mAb) Tafasitamab-cxix or the mAb-drug conjugate Loncastuximab tesirine, have emerged as relevant treatment alternatives for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). While some patients achieve complete and durable remission, the overall response rate of ∼ 50% falls considerably below that observed in Pro-B-ALL patients. Furthermore, 70% of B-NHL patients fail to achieve long-term survival, exposing them to significant toxicity, particularly neurotoxicity or cytokine release syndrome [1–5].
In contrast to single-cell leukemia targeting, challenges such as impaired lymphoma cell accessibility, a complex immunosuppressive microenvironment, inter- and intraindividual alterations in CD19 expression, CD19 epitope loss or downregulation following CD19-directed therapy, and unreliable immunohistochemical CD19 staining limit accurate patient stratification and therapeutic success in B-NHL patients [6–9]. Beyond histopathological assessment, there is currently no target-specific approach available that can be used for patient stratification and treatment decision-making in B-NHL.
Positron emission tomography (PET) with radiolabeled antibodies (immunoPET) enables whole-body visualization and quantification of specific target expression over time, therapeutic drug biodistribution, and tumor accessibility [10]. Recently, we revealed heterogeneous GD2-derived uptake patterns and distinct alterations during targeted therapy in pediatric patients with metastatic neuroblastoma and sarcoma using a radiolabeled anti-GD2-mAb [11, 12]. In this study, we developed a copper-64 (64Cu)-radiolabeled mAb directed against human CD19 for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and demonstrated, for the first time, the specific in vivo targeting and noninvasive visualization of CD19+ lymphoma lesions in experimental lymphoma-bearing mice and four human B-NHL subjects.
Radiolabeling of the αCD19-mAb (64Cu-αCD19) yielded a stable radioimmunoconjugate with minimal dimerization, high radiochemical (> 95%) and radionuclidic purity (≥ 99.9%), and an immunoreactivity of 57% (Fig. S1a, b). In vivo PET/MR and ex vivo biodistribution demonstrated significantly greater 64Cu-αCD19 uptake in subcutaneous Daudi lymphoma xenografts compared to a 64Cu-αB7-H3 control tracer (Fig. 1a, b; Fig. S1c). Importantly, the αCD19-mAb impaired αCD19-CAR-T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro only at concentrations ∼ 1000 times greater than the applied dose for PET imaging (Fig. 1c).
First-in-human PET/MRI scans were conducted ∼ 24 h after 64Cu-αCD19 injection in four B-NHL patients to evaluate eligibility for CD19-directed therapies (Fig. 2). As expected from previous therapeutic applications in childhood B-ALL patients treated with substantially higher mAb doses, all patients tolerated the 64Cu-αCD19 injections without any obvious clinical signs of toxicity.
Patient 1, with double-hit follicular lymphoma, exhibited remarkable tracer uptake in the cervical, abdominal, and singular bone lymphoma manifestations (Fig. 2a-c; average standardized uptake value, SUVavg 7.7–8.5). Interestingly, all lesions could be better differentiated by CD19-immunoPET than by [18F]FDG-PET/CT conducted 90 days before (Fig. S2a-c). Immunohistochemistry of a previously extirpated cervical lymph node revealed moderate CD19 protein expression. In contrast, the abdominal lymphoma bulk, irradiated by a total fractionated dose of 30 Gy with palliative intent shortly before, yielded little tracer accumulation (Fig. S2b; SUVavg < 1.5), suggesting residual necrotic/avital tissue.
In Patient 2, who suffered from refractory DLBCL, the thoracic (Fig. 2d) and abdominal lymphoma manifestations (Fig. 2d-f) indicated the strongest 64Cu-αCD19 accumulation among all the subjects (SUVavg up to 27.7). Likewise, intense histological CD19 expression was found in the resectate of a peritoneal lymphoma conglomerate. Furthermore, we detected markedly greater tracer uptake in the spleen (SUVavg 21.7) than in the other three patients (SUVavg 5.1–8.5). Notably, Patient 2 was the only subject who did not receive the B-cell-depleting αCD20-mAb rituximab within the last 6 months prior to CD19-immunoPET, indicating that 64Cu-αCD19 is applicable for detecting physiological B cells in lymphatic organs.
We further revealed pronounced tracer accumulation in the bone marrow of Patient 3 with DLBCL (Fig. 2h) compared to the other B-NHL patients (SUVavg 12.7 vs. 5.0, Patient 1). Interestingly, a subsequent bone marrow biopsy showed 99% B-NHL infiltration with intense CD19 expression, demonstrating the ability of CD19-ImmunoPET to differentiate CD19+ lymphoma lesions. However, we detected faint uptake in the known retrosternal and iliacal lesions (Fig. 2g, i) of Patient 3, which were highly suspicious of vital lymphoma according to [18F]FDG-PET/CT (Fig. S5d, f).
Moreover, in line with the low histological CD19 expression in an extirpated cervical lymph node from initial diagnosis, Patient 4, with marginal zone lymphoma, exhibited slight 64Cu-αCD19 uptake in the margin of a large pulmonary lymphoma bulk (Fig. 2j) and no relevant PET-derived signal in the retroperitoneal manifestations (Fig. 2l).
In conclusion, for the first time, we demonstrated the feasibility of detecting CD19+ lymphoma lesions noninvasively by CD19-immunoPET in B-NHL patients, which is fully consistent with the findings of our preclinical mouse studies. This innovative imaging approach may improve both patient stratification and therapeutic surveillance by detecting heterogeneous CD19 expression or antigen downregulation during CD19-directed therapies.
Furthermore, the noninvasive visualization of endogenous B cells holds great promise in multiple sclerosis [13] or for targeting tumor-associated tertiary lymphatic structures [14]. Finally, prospective clinical studies are needed to validate the optimal tracer dose, the accuracy of 64Cu-αCD19 uptake, the influence of physiological B cells on the PET uptake, potential tracer-related toxicities, and the superiority of this approach over conventional CD19 histopathology.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
We thank Natalie Hermann, Linda Schramm, Maren Harant, Sandro Aidone, Matthias Kuntzsch and Ramona Stumm for excellent technical assistance. We acknowledge Lothar Kanz for supporting clinical PET/MR investigations as a referring oncologist and Hans-Jörg Bühring for providing the B7-H3 antibody sequence.
Abbreviations
- 64Cu
copper-64
- B-NHL
B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma
- CD19
cluster of differentiation 19
- CT
computed tomography
- DLBCL
diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
- FDG
< Superscript>18</Superscript> F-fluorodeoxyglucose
- mAb
monoclonal antibody
- MRI
magnetic resonance imaging
- PET
positron emission tomography
- SUVavg
average standardized uptake value
Author contributions
DS, JSchm, RH, MK, ClF, and BP conceived and designed the research. DS, SB, and JSchm conducted the preclinical experiments and analyzed the data. AM, WE, and GR performed the radiolabeling. MR and JSk generated the KO cell lines. GJ, PL, and RH developed the GMP-αCD19-mAb. JSchw, and ClF performed the clinical imaging. SK and CS conducted the cytotoxicity assay. FF contributed to the CD19 immunohistochemistry. MK, GR, RH, ClF, and BP supervised the study and interpreted the results. DS, SB, JSchw, AM, MK, ClF, and BP wrote the manuscript. All the authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
The Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy - EXC 2180 - 390900677) and the Swiss Werner Siemens Foundation funded these experiments. The Förderverein und Stiftung für krebskranke Kinder Tübingen, Aktion Erna and Hilfe für krebskranke Kinder Frankfurt e.V. are gratefully acknowledged for their financial support in the GMP production of the αCD19-mAb.
Data availability
For original data, please contact Dominik.Sonanini@med.uni-tuebingen.de (preclinical data) or Christian.laFougere@med.uni-tuebingen.de (clinical data).
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All subjects provided written consent according to national regulations and the Declaration of Helsinki. The evaluation of patient data was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Tübingen (533/2021BO2).
Consent for publication
All authors agreed on the publication of the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare that no conflicts of interest exist.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Christian la Fougère and Bernd J. Pichler contributed equally to this work.
References
- 1.Salaroli A, Spilleboudt C, Bron D, Lewalle P. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell lymphoma immunotherapy: the next questions. Curr Opin Oncol. 2020;32(5):434–41. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Salles G, Duell J, González Barca E, Tournilhac O, Jurczak W, Liberati AM, et al. Tafasitamab plus Lenalidomide in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (L-MIND): a multicentre, prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(7):978–88. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30225-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Viardot A, Goebeler ME, Hess G, Neumann S, Pfreundschuh M, Adrian N, et al. Phase 2 study of the bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) antibody blinatumomab in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2016;127(11):1410–6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-06-651380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cappell KM, Kochenderfer JN. Long-term outcomes following CAR T cell therapy: what we know so far. Nat Reviews Clin Oncol. 2023;20(6):359–71. doi: 10.1038/s41571-023-00754-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Caimi PF, Ai W, Alderuccio JP, Ardeshna KM, Hamadani M, Hess B, et al. Loncastuximab tesirine in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (LOTIS-2): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(6):790–800. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00139-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Reiss DJ, Do T, Kuo D, Gray VE, Olson NE, Lee C-W, et al. Multiplexed immunofluorescence (IF) analysis and gene expression profiling of biopsies from patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with Lisocabtagene Maraleucel (liso-cel) in Transcend NHL 001 reveal patterns of Immune Infiltration Associated with durable response. Blood. 2019;134(Supplement1):202. doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-127683. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Galon J, Rossi J, Turcan S, Danan C, Locke FL, Neelapu SS, et al. Characterization of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell-mediated tumor microenvironment immune gene profile in a multicenter trial (ZUMA-1) with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel, KTE-C19) J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(15suppl):3025. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.3025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Villasboas BJC, Ansell S. Heterogeneity of the Tumor Microenvirontment in diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma revealed by deep phenotyping using Mass Cytometry (CyTOF) Blood. 2016;128(22):2941. doi: 10.1182/blood.V128.22.2941.2941. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Majzner RG, Mackall CL. Tumor Antigen escape from CAR T-cell therapy. Cancer Discov. 2018;8(10):1219. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schwenck J, Sonanini D, Cotton JM, Rammensee HG, la Fougère C, Zender L, Pichler BJ. Advances in PET imaging of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2023;23(7):474–90. doi: 10.1038/s41568-023-00576-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schmitt J, Schwenck J, Maurer A, Przybille M, Sonanini D, Reischl G, et al. Translational immunoPET imaging using a radiolabeled GD2-specific antibody in neuroblastoma. Theranostics. 2022;12(13):5615–30. doi: 10.7150/thno.56736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Trautwein NF, Schwenck J, Seitz C, Seith F, Calderón E, von Beschwitz S, et al. A novel approach to guide GD2-targeted therapy in pediatric tumors by PET and [(64)Cu]Cu-NOTA-ch14.18/CHO. Theranostics. 2024;14(3):1212–23. doi: 10.7150/thno.92481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Stevens MY, Cropper HC, Lucot KL, Chaney AM, Lechtenberg KJ, Jackson IM, et al. Development of a CD19 PET tracer for detecting B cells in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. J Neuroinflammation. 2020;17(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-01880-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Helmink BA, Reddy SM, Gao J, Zhang S, Basar R, Thakur R, et al. B cells and tertiary lymphoid structures promote immunotherapy response. Nature. 2020;577(7791):549–55. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1922-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
For original data, please contact Dominik.Sonanini@med.uni-tuebingen.de (preclinical data) or Christian.laFougere@med.uni-tuebingen.de (clinical data).