Skip to main content
Ecology and Evolution logoLink to Ecology and Evolution
. 2024 May 13;14(5):e11343. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11343

Histologic, metabolomic, and transcriptomic differences in fir trees from a peri‐urban forest under chronic ozone exposure

Verónica Reyes‐Galindo 1,2,, Juan P Jaramillo‐Correa 1,, Svetlana Shishkova 3, Estela Sandoval‐Zapotitla 4, César Mateo Flores‐Ortiz 5, Daniel Piñero 1, Lewis G Spurgin 6, Claudia A Martin 6,7, Ricardo Torres‐Jardón 8, Claudio Zamora‐Callejas 9, Alicia Mastretta‐Yanes 10,11,
PMCID: PMC11091488  PMID: 38746548

Abstract

Urbanization modifies ecosystem conditions and evolutionary processes. This includes air pollution, mostly as tropospheric ozone (O3), which contributes to the decline of urban and peri‐urban forests. A notable case are fir (Abies religiosa) forests in the peripheral mountains southwest of Mexico City, which have been severely affected by O3 pollution since the 1970s. Interestingly, some young individuals exhibiting minimal O3—related damage have been observed within a zone of significant O3 exposure. Using this setting as a natural experiment, we compared asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals of similar age (≤15 years old; n = 10) using histologic, metabolomic, and transcriptomic approaches. Plants were sampled during days of high (170 ppb) and moderate (87 ppb) O3 concentration. Given that there have been reforestation efforts in the region, with plants from different source populations, we first confirmed that all analyzed individuals clustered within the local genetic group when compared to a species‐wide panel (Admixture analysis with ~1.5K SNPs). We observed thicker epidermis and more collapsed cells in the palisade parenchyma of needles from symptomatic individuals than from their asymptomatic counterparts, with differences increasing with needle age. Furthermore, symptomatic individuals exhibited lower concentrations of various terpenes (ß‐pinene, ß‐caryophylene oxide, α‐caryophylene, and ß‐α‐cubebene) than asymptomatic trees, as evidenced through GC–MS. Finally, transcriptomic analyses revealed differential expression for 13 genes related to carbohydrate metabolism, plant defense, and gene regulation. Our results indicate a rapid and contrasting phenotypic response among trees, likely influenced by standing genetic variation and/or plastic mechanisms. They open the door to future evolutionary studies for understanding how O3 tolerance develops in urban environments, and how this knowledge could contribute to forest restoration.

Keywords: Abies religiosa, natural settings, ozone pollution, terpenes, transcriptomics


Urbanization alters ecosystems and evolutionary processes. Processes like air pollution by tropospheric ozone contribute to the decline of urban and peri‐urban ecosystems, such as Abies religiosa forests in the peripheral mountains southwest of Mexico City. Despite ozone exposure, some young individuals present minimal damage, suggesting contrasting phenotypic responses that may be influenced by genetic variations and/or plastic mechanisms, opening new perspectives for evolutionary studies on ozone tolerance and forest restoration.

graphic file with name ECE3-14-e11343-g005.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Rapid urbanization has severely disturbed entire ecosystems since the beginning of the industrial age (Bai et al., 2017), raising the important questions of how species cope with human‐transformed environments and which molecular, evolutionary, and ecological processes are involved (Rivkin et al., 2019). It is regularly thought that for species to persist in urban areas, they must adapt rapidly (Johnson & Munshi‐South, 2017). However, for adaptation to occur, selection needs to operate on heritable variation, which can determine whether a species persists or disappears from urban areas. Rapid adaptation seems particularly important for pollution tolerance, one of the strongest and most abrupt challenges that an urban species may face (Santangelo et al., 2018). This is especially challenging for long‐lived species, such as forest trees, implying that adaptation must occur within a few generations or be complemented by plastic responses (Müller‐Starck & Schubert, 2001). The genetic basis and plastic responses to pollution have been studied using a plethora of methods, from traditional provenance trials to genomic and transcriptomic analyses (Papadopulos et al., 2020; Whitehead et al., 2017). However, most research has been done under controlled conditions, meaning that studies in natural settings are needed for exploring the differential phenotypic responses in putatively tolerant versus sensitive individuals, and verifying if the same genes and pathways pinpointed in controlled studies can also be detected in the field.

One of the most common and harmful urban pollutants is tropospheric ozone (O3), which is generated by photochemical reactions that involve byproducts of fossil fuel burning (Churkina et al., 2017). Ozone is toxic to plants and has caused significant damage to forest ecosystems in and around heavily polluted cities (Ashmore, 2005; Cho et al., 2011). Given the key role that urban forests perform as providers of ecosystem services, understanding how O3 tolerance operates in trees is a pivotal step for informing conservation and reforestation programs of degraded (peri‐)urban forests. This requires field studies with an urban‐ecology perspective, aiming to understand how O3 tolerance develops and operates in natural settings, where tree responses to O3 are also expected to be more complex and entangled with other sources of stress (Nunn et al., 2006).

In plants, O3 damage, and the molecular mechanisms underlying the response to O3 exposure, has been studied for over 20 years, using both field and laboratory experiments with controlled conditions (Felzer et al., 2007; Hayes et al., 2020). O3 enters the plant through the stomata and triggers the formation of different reactive oxygen species (ROS), causing metabolic stress and resulting in cellular death, as ROS travel through the apoplast (Tausz et al., 2007). Several candidate genes have been postulated to cope with O3‐mediated metabolic stress (e.g., Hayes et al., 2020). However, strategies seem to differ between species and among populations within species (Baier et al., 2005; Hasan et al., 2021; Ludwików & Sadowski, 2008). For instance, differential sensitivity to ozone has been documented between poplars from more polluted and less polluted areas in the USA, according to both common garden and field experiments (Berrang et al., 1991). Furthermore, differential foliar damage (related to O3 exposure) has been observed among sacred fir (Abies religiosa) provenances in central Mexico (Hernández‐Tejeda & Benavides‐Meza, 2015).

More than 5 million vehicles circulate daily in Mexico City (CDMX; INEGI, 2018), making it one of the most air‐polluted cities in the world (ONU, 2018). Its geographic location, mostly enclosed within a high‐elevation valley, and the high fossil fuel consumption generates perfect conditions for tropospheric O3 formation and accumulation (Bravo‐Alvarez & Torres‐Jardón, 2002; Molina et al., 2019). For instance, while O3 concentration in unpolluted air ranges between 20 and 50 ppb (Seinfeld, 1989), daily levels in CDMX continuously reached 200 ppb during the 1990s (Secretaría del Medio Ambiente, 2020; Figure 1a). Such elevated values still persist as isolated peaks (reaching up to 180 ppb by 2017; Secretaría del Medio Ambiente, 2020; Figure 1a), particularly between March and June, when temperatures in CDMX are the highest and precipitation the lowest (CONANP, 2006). Given that days with good air quality (i.e., <70 ppb) are still scarce (Figure 1a) and that O3 maxima are still well above the tolerable thresholds for human and ecosystem health (NOM‐020‐SSA1‐2104; Secretaría del Medio Ambiente, 2017), a constant selective force with strong episodic peaks, that coincide with the start of the growing season for most local plant species, is assumed to occur within the peri‐urban forests of CDMX.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Change of O3 concentration in the Mexico City (CDMX) metropolitan area since 1990 (a) Air quality is represented by colors: green: good (0–70 ppb); yellow: regular (71–95 ppb); orange: bad (96–154 ppb); red: very bad (155–204 ppb), and purple: extremely bad (> = 205). Modified of Secretaría del Medio Ambiente (2020) (b) average O3 concentration during the study period (April and May, 2017). Black circles show collection days. (c) O3 concentration as measured at the nearby station to the sampling site (PEDREGAL) during the sampling period. Modified of SEDEMA (2018) (d) wind direction and O3 concentration in CDMX at 6:00 a.m. (~50 ppb; left) and at 3:00 pm (~130 ppb; middle; see colorimetric scale at right) on a regular day between April and May 2017. Blue boxes indicate the location of the study site. Arrow size indicates wind speed; vector at right (below colored bar) shows 5 m/s.

Atmospheric drainage in CDMX mostly occurs between the southwestern mountains, which are dominated by sacred fir forests (Figure 1d; Alvarado‐Rosales et al., 2017). There is an ongoing decline of these forests, associated with the detrimental effects of O3 (de Bauer & Hernández‐Tejeda, 2007), inadequate management, excessive water extraction, and recurrent forest fires (Alvarado, 1989; Macías‐Sámano & Cibrían‐Tovar, 1989). Firs within these forests exhibit O3 damage in the form of reddish needles, which are rich in phenolic compounds and have degraded vacuoles and disintegrated spongy and palisade parenchyma (Alvarado‐Rosales & Hernández‐Tejeda, 2002; Alvarez et al., 1998). Damage becomes visible in 1‐year‐old needles, which die after the third year of exposure. When compared to unpolluted areas of the species' range, such damage often leads to decreased vigor and increased susceptibility to several pests (Alvarado‐Rosales & Hernández‐Tejeda, 2002; Hernández‐Tejeda & Benavides‐Meza, 2015).

Although previous studies have described O3 damage symptoms and pointed to this pollutant as the main cause for fir forest decline in CDMX (Alvarado, 1989; Alvarado‐Rosales & Hernández‐Tejeda, 2002; de Bauer & Hernández‐Tejeda, 2007), little attention has been paid to phenotypic differences for O3‐related symptoms until recently (Hernández‐Tejeda & Benavides‐Meza, 2015), when some apparently healthy young plants were observed within a heavily damaged stand. Complementing these observations in one of the most polluted cities of the world with methodological approaches to examine the effect of O3 on plants can improve our understanding of how O3 tolerance develops and operates in natural settings. For instance, at the histologic level, we could expect more cellular damage in symptomatic trees than in asymptomatic individuals. Similarly, a deficient regulatory response to the oxidative stress caused by O3 could be translated in the differential accumulation of certain metabolites, like some specific terpenes that have been observed in asymptomatic plants from various species after ozone exposure (Kopaczyk et al., 2020; Miyama et al., 2019). Lastly, transcriptomic analyses can help to narrow down the number of genes involved in the response to O3 exposure and to examine plastic responses in gene expression under varying levels of O3 (DeBiasse & Kelly, 2016).

Here, we explored the differential histologic, metabolomic (terpene), and transcriptomic responses to ozone pollution within a natural peri‐urban forest dominated by A. religiosa. Given that previous reforestation attempts have been carried out in this zone, we first determined the geographic origin of individuals and then looked for differentially expressed genes between asymptomatic and symptomatic trees during days of high and relatively low ozone concentrations. This study represents a first step to guide peri‐urban forest management from an eco‐evolutionary perspective.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Study area and sampling

The study site is located near CDMX, in one of the most exposed areas to tropospheric ozone, the “Cruz de Coloxtitla” ravine, in the village of Santa Rosa Xochiac, next to the “Desierto de los Leones” National Park (Alvarado‐Rosales et al., 2017; Figure 1d). We traced a quadrant of 80 × 137 m (19.285 N, −99.301 E; Figure 2a) within this zone and focused on young (10–15 years old) Abies religiosa ([Kunth] Schlechtendahl et Chamisso) trees. We chose five plants exhibiting large numbers of reddish needles, indicative of damage by O3 (Miller et al., 1994; hereafter referred to as “symptomatic” trees), as described elsewhere (Alvarado‐Rosales & Hernández‐Tejeda, 2002; Alvarez et al., 1998). Additionally, we selected five apparently healthy individuals, which had no visible damage in any branch (“asymptomatic” trees from hereon; Figure 2b, Appendix S1). Symptomatic and asymptomatic trees (n = 10) were distributed heterogeneously within the zone and were separated by at least 5 m from each other (Figure 2a). Needle samples were collected for each tree in three time points with contrasting O3 concentration: moderate (April 15, 2017; 87 ppb), intermediate (May 13–14, 2017, 120–94 ppb), and high (May 17, 2017; 170 ppb; Figure 1b,c), according to daily measurements from the nearest (PEDREGAL, PE) atmospheric station (available at http://www.aire.cdmx.gob.mx/default.php?opc=%27a8BhnmI=%27&opcion=Zg==). Needles were preserved in RNA Later and stored at −70°C until processing. The first sampling period roughly coincided with the start of the bud burst period for this population (personal observations). Sampling took place between 1:30 p.m. and 3:30 p.m. (Figure 1c); needles were selected from three sections of the same branch, in six branches per individual. Each branch section corresponded to a particular growth period (i.e., 2015, 2016, and 2017; Figure 2b). No symptomatic individual had leaves more than 3 years old.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Distribution of focus trees (asymptomatic in green: T1–5; symptomatic in red: D1–5) within the study site, and location of the study site in Mexico (a) Transverse histological sections of needles from asymptomatic (top) and symptomatic (bottom) sacred fir individuals (Abies religiosa) for three growth periods (2015, 2016, and 2017) (b) Bars =250 and 50 μm. PP, palisade parenchyma; SP, spongy parenchyma.

2.2. Genotyping and geographic origin of tolerant trees

Reforestation efforts in the study zone have involved germplasm from foreign provenances (Hernández‐Tejeda & Benavides‐Meza, 2015). To verify that sampled plants originated locally, from natural regeneration, we employed previously published SNP data for 318 individuals from 19 populations of A. religiosa distributed across its natural range (Giles‐Pérez et al., 2022). This data were used to assign the collected individuals to previously reported genetic clusters (Figure 3a). To do so, we used 80 mg of needle tissue for DNA extraction using liquid nitrogen and the QUIAGEN DNeasy® Plant Mini Kit (cat. No. 69104), following the manufacturer's protocol. DNA integrity was checked in 1% agarose gel, and its concentration quantified with a Qubit™ v 3.0. Libraries were prepared following the protocol from Poland and Rife (2012) after digestion with restriction enzymes MspI (C | CGG) and PstI (TGCA | G); a Pippin prep (SAGE sciences) was used to select the adequate fragment size before PCR amplification and sequencing. DNA sequencing was conducted in an Illumina‘s HiSeq2500 SE100 lane (100 bp) and in a Nextseq lane (100 bp) at the Institute of Integrative Biology and Systems at Université Laval, Canada (http://www.ibis.ulaval.ca/en/services‐2/genomic‐analysis‐platform/). Read quality was examined using FastQC (http://www.bioinformatics.braham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) before and after demultiplexing and quality filtering. Reads were assembled de novo, and ipyrad was used for SNP calling (Eaton, 2014). Parameters used were as follows: mindepth_statistical 8, mindepth_majrule 100,000, and clust_threshold 0.9. To optimize SNP calling, we followed the recommendations from Mastretta‐Yanes et al. (2015), modified for ipyrad. We aimed keeping SNPs genotyped in at least 90% of individuals and with minor allele frequencies (MAF) above 0.05. Individuals with more than 10% missing data were discarded with PLINK1.9 (Purcell et al., 2007), and additional random individuals were removed until retaining only 3–5 trees of each population, along with the 10 focus individuals of this study.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Assignment of studied individuals to the species genetic clusters based on admixture results (derived from 1550 SNPs). (a) Geoographic distribution of population samples included in the analyses. (b) Clustering of individuals as inferred with admixture when assuming between two and five genetic clusters (k = 2 to k = 5). Symptomatic trees indicated in red below figure and asymptomatic trees in green. Plots are shown for k = 2 to k = 5, all of which denote identical cluster assignments for both types of trees. Individuals (n = 88) are shown as vertical bars colored in proportion to their estimated ancestry for each cluster. Black lines separate populations listed from West to East along the species distribution (a).

Pairwise relatedness between each pair of individuals within populations was calculated using PLINK 1.9 (Chang et al., 2015), as closely related individuals could bias further analyses, including population structure and assignment (Sethuraman, 2018). Only one of the focus (symptomatic) individuals was randomly discarded because of high relatedness (r > .25) with another symptomatic tree (Appendix S3). ADMIXTURE v 1.3.0 (Bhatta et al., 2019) was used to infer population structure by supposing between 1 and 5 genetic clusters (K); optimal K was assumed to be the one with smallest cross validation error (CV).

2.3. Anatomical analyses

Transverse histologic sections were prepared for five needles per branch from three branches of each tree, all sampled during the high O3 concentration periods. Following sampling, needles were embedded in distilled water according to Sandoval et al. (2005) and cut in 7–10 mm sections. Sections were immersed overnight in a fixative solution composed of 50% ethanol, 10% formaldehyde, 35% double distilled water, and 5% glacial acetic acid (FAA). After washing with distilled water and dehydration in a graded terbutylic alcohol series, the sections were embedded in Paraplast™, by adding 12–15 flakes every 30 min in an oven at 58°C, until doubling the alcohol volume. Sections were stored at 56°C for 3 weeks until forming solid blocks (inclusion cubes), which were further sectioned with a rotating microtome (American Optical 820; 12 μm). Ten to 15 transversal tissue sections were obtained per needle. The sections were first hydrated and dyed with safranin, then dehydrated within a graded ethanol series, and then stained with dye fast green (FCF), using a previously standardized method for sacred fir (Sandoval et al., 2005). Afterward, they were mounted on slides and dried for 15 days in an oven at 56°C. We looked for cell structures previously reported as symptoms of O3 damage (Appendix S2; Gimeno & Ibars, 2009). Samples were photographed in an Axioskope Car Zeiss photomicroscope for examining tissue‐level damage, compared to a reference description of A. religiosa (Alvarez et al., 1998).

2.4. Terpenes analysis

Two‐ and 3‐year‐old needles (corresponding to the growth years of 2015 and 2016) collected during moderate (87 ppb) and high (170 ppb) O3 concentration periods were used to quantify relative terpene abundances (Ibrahim et al., 2019). Approximately 80–95 mg (fresh weight) tissue preserved in liquid nitrogen was macerated with a mortar and pestle with 2 mL of dichloromethane, transferred to microtubes, and centrifuged (within tubes) for 1 min at 14,000 rpm. The supernatant was recovered and dried with compressed air, and the pellet was resuspended in 450 μL of dichloromethane and 50 μL of 1 mg/mL 1‐isopropylphenol (as internal standard). After homogenization, 2 μL were injected into a gas chromatograph with a Split/splitless injector (Agilent Technologies 6850 Network GC System) coupled to a mass spectrometer (5975C VL MSD with Triple‐Axis Detector) and a Xylan (Quadrex) 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm capillary column. Analyses were performed at 230°C in the splitless mode (3 min). The initial temperature was set at 70°C for 2 min, then increased to 230°C at a rate of 20°C/min, and maintained for 5 min. Helium (i.e., carrier gas) was injected at a rate of 1 mL/min; the temperatures of the transfer line, ionization source, and quadrupole analyzer were 280, 230, and 150°C, respectively. Analyses were performed by electronic impact at 70 eV using the full spectrum scan mode (SCAN). For relative quantification, peak areas were integrated and normalized to the internal standard. Each peak (associated to a specific metabolite) was validated according to its retention time and mass spectrum based on the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) library.

Only terpenes with similar fragmentation patterns or retention times (TR), observed in at least 60% of the samples and with at least 80% identification probability were retained. A matrix of relative abundance per 100 g of tissue was then generated for comparison between tree conditions (asymptomatic vs. symptomatic), periods (high and moderate O3), and needle age (2015, 2016; Figure 1) through a linear model using R (R Core Team, 2021), assuming a Gamma distribution. We compared the goodness of fit of the models with the Akaike's information criterion. The better model was Metabolites Concentration ∼ Condition * Period. We performed non‐paired comparisons, with Wilcoxon tests (Appendix S7), to explore variations in metabolite composition between asymptomatic and symptomatic groups, between periods (87 ppb vs. 170 ppb) and needle ages (1 year vs. 2 years). Analyses were performed in the stats package 4.1.2 (R Core Team, 2021) and results were visualized with ggplot2 3.3.5 (Wickham, 2016).

2.5. Differential expression analyses

One‐ and 2‐year‐old needles (2015 and 2016) sampled during the moderate (87 ppb) and high (170 ppb) O3 concentration periods were further analyzed for differential expression through RNA sequencing. Total RNA was isolated using a Spectrum RNA Plant™ kit (cat. No. STRN50, SIGMA) from 40 to 45 mg of tissue. RNA integrity was evaluated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, and its quality and purity were determined using NanoDrop (ultradifferential spectrophotometer) according to the 260/280 and 260/230 ratios. RNA concentration was quantified with a Qubit™ RNA IQ assay (Invitrogen). The 18 sequencing libraries from poly(A) + enriched RNA (Appendix S8) were prepared, and then sequenced in a Hi‐Seq 4000 in a 150PE sequencing lane at the University of Berkeley, USA (https://www.berkeley.edu/).

Demultiplexing was performed by the sequencing service. We performed quality checks with FastQC and removed adapters and low‐quality reads with Trimmomatic (Bolger et al., 2014) using the following parameters: ‐phred33, ILLUMINA CLIP: TruSeq3‐PE‐2.fa: 2: 30: 10, LEADING: 3, TRAILING: 3, SLIDING WINDOW: 10 MINLEN: 50. Reads were mapped to the Abies balsamea transcriptome (Van Ghelder et al., 2019; Bioproject PRJNA437248 in Genbank) with BWA‐MEM (Li & Durbin, 2009). Once the reads were mapped, we quantified the transcript abundance by counting the mapped reads per transcript for each sample (Appendix S9). Differential expression analyses were performed with DESeq2 (Love et al., 2014) and edgeR (Robinson et al., 2010) in R for the following comparisons: (1) symptomatic versus asymptomatic individuals during the high O3 concentration period (170 ppb); (2) asymptomatic trees during the moderate (87 ppb) versus high O3 concentration (170 ppb) periods; and (3) symptomatic individuals during the moderate (87 ppb) versus high O3 concentration (170 ppb) periods.

Transcripts with p‐values lower than .005, after fold change correction (Benjamini et al., 2001), were considered differentially expressed. Only those transcripts detected by both methods were retained and analyzed for identifying the most likely open reading frames. They were then annotated with TRAPID 2.0 (Van Bel et al., 2013) and BLASTx (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) using the nonredundant database (nr); we retained the first five hits for each transcript. For those transcripts that could not be annotated, we performed BLASTx searches against the Gymnosperm transcriptomes available at the Congenie database (congenie.org). Proteins of annotated transcripts were finally assigned to their respective metabolic pathways using KOALA (KEGG Orthology And Links Annotation) (Kanehisa et al., 2016).

3. RESULTS

3.1. Genotyping and geographic origin of trees

After de novo assembly and filtering, 1550 SNPs were genotyped for the 88 retained A. religiosa individuals distributed along most of its range (Giles‐Pérez et al., 2022), and for the 10 focus samples of this study. Although the optimal number of genetic clusters (K) for the Admixture analysis was 2, a higher value (K = 5) had a better resolution for differentiating groups in the eastern and western parts of the species distribution, allowing individual assignment. Both the symptomatic and asymptomatic trees of this study were assigned to the central‐Mexico cluster, to which trees from neighboring populations, such as Ajusco and Nevado de Toluca also belong (Figure 3). This result indicates that only local germplasm was included in our study.

3.2. Anatomical differentiation

Tissue differences were found between symptomatic and asymptomatic trees and among growth years (i.e., needles developed in 2015 and 2016 and sampled in 2017) within individuals (Figure 2b, Appendix S2). Needles of symptomatic trees exhibited a thicker epidermis and more collapsed cells than those of the asymptomatic ones, mainly within the palisade parenchyma (Figure 2b). In contrast, the spongy parenchyma, resin channels, and vascular tissues looked similar in the needles of symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Cell collapse became more evident with needle age in symptomatic trees (i.e., higher for 2015 than for 2016 needles), while asymptomatic individuals showed less cell collapse in the 2‐year‐old needles (2015) than in the 1‐year‐old needles (2016; Figure 2b).

3.3. Terpenes analysis

Compounds identified in all extracts included: ∂‐cadinene, α‐cubebene, ß‐cubebene, α‐caryophyllene, ß‐caryophyllene oxide, L‐α‐bornyl acetate, and ß‐pinene (Figure 4). The best model for explaining the differences in concentration of these shared terpenes (Nagelkerke's R 2 = .645), indicated an association with the tree's condition (symptomatic and asymptomatic) and the period of exposition (87 ppb vs. 170 ppb), with needle age being less relevant. Indeed, concentrations of all shared terpenes exhibited significant differences (p < .001, p < .01, or .05, Figure 4) between symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals during the period of moderate ozone concentration. In addition, there were statistical differences in the terpene concentrations of asymptomatic trees between periods (87 ppb vs. 170 ppb), but no differences were found between periods for the symptomatic trees or between needle ages (1 or 2 years).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Relative sesquiterpene concentrations (mg/100 g dry weight) in needles from symptomatic (red) and asymptomatic (green) sacred fir (Abies religiosa) individuals during two periods with contrasting O3 concentration (87 ppb and 170 ppb). Measures taken from 1‐ (continuous line) and 2‐year old (dashed line) needles. Bars show variability in comparison to the IQR. See Table S4 to consult the statistical analyzes of interactions.

3.4. Differential expression analyses (RNA‐seq)

After quality filtering, 605,147,387 paired reads were retained for 18 samples, with an average of 33,619,299 reads per sample. The percent of reads mapped to the reference transcriptome (A. balsamea) ranged between 84.5% and 96.7% per sample (Appendix S9), indicating excellent transcript coverage. Eleven differentially expressed transcripts were identified in the needles of the symptomatic and asymptomatic trees (fold change) during the high O3 concentration period using both the DESeq2 and edgeR methods (Figure 5a). Five of them were upregulated and six were downregulated in asymptomatic individuals. Six of these transcripts could be annotated (Appendix S4) and were involved in carbohydrate metabolism, gene regulation, and defense, according to KOALA. All these transcripts belong to gene families whose members are involved in different aspects of abiotic and biotic stress response (see Appendix S4 for details), four of which have been previously associated with O3 response in controlled experiments with plants: LRR receptor‐like protein kinases (two annotated transcripts), an L‐type lectin‐domain containing receptor kinase, and a chitinase (Appendix S4).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Differential expression analysis of RNA transcripts with two methods (DESeq2 in blue; edgeR in yellow; retained transcripts were those detected by both methods, in purple; p < .005). Volcano plots for asymptomatic versus symptomatic trees during the high O3 period (a); high versus moderate O3 concentration periods for symptomatic individuals (b); and high versus moderate O3 concentration periods for asymptomatic trees (c). Differentially expressed transcripts were selected with thresholds of fold change >2 (represented by two dotted black vertical lines) and p < .005 (represented by dotted black horizontal lines).

When comparing transcript expression between trees with the same phenotype collected during low and high O3 concentration periods, we observed six and 22 differentially expressed transcripts for the symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals, respectively; 17 of which could be annotated (Figure 5b,c, Appendices S5 and S6). Remarkably, the number of differentially expressed transcripts in the asymptomatic plants was almost four times higher than that in symptomatic trees.

Among the five upregulated transcripts differentially expressed between periods in the symptomatic individuals, two transcripts were involved in the regulation of gene expression (encoding a NAC transcription factor and histone 1.3 variant) and one was involved in cell wall remodeling (encoding a xyloglucan endotransglucosylase). The only downregulated transcript for these symptomatic trees encoded an enzyme from the UDP‐glucosyl transferase family involved in various metabolic processes, including flavanol, tetrapyrrole, and terpene biosynthesis (Appendix S5). Homologs in other plant species for four of the upregulated transcripts have been previously associated with ozone response, including the abovementioned NAC transcription factor and UDP‐glucosyl transferase (Appendix S5).

For the asymptomatic trees, 16 of the 22 differentially expressed transcripts between periods could be annotated (Appendix S6). For two of them, no homologous amino acid sequences were found, but the results of BLASTn performed in the Congenie database suggest that these could, respectively, represent a conifer specific noncoding RNA, and a conifer‐specific peptide or protein. As for the annotated transcripts of these symptomatic individuals, they belong to gene families involved in response to abiotic and biotic stress, and the regulation of gene expression, four of these transcripts have been reported in controlled O3 experiments in plants (Appendix S6). Interestingly, these include the linker histone H1, which was also upregulated in the symptomatic trees during the high O3 concentration period.

4. DISCUSSION

In this study, we explored the histologic, metabolomic, and transcriptomic changes between symptomatic and asymptomatic fir trees within a natural population that has been heavily exposed to tropospheric O3 for over 40 years. According to our genetic ancestry analysis, all the studied individuals belong to the local gene pool, which suggests that the observed differences are the likely result of intrinsic evolutionary processes within this population. Such differences include histologic traits whose disparity increases with needle age, and contrasting terpene composition and gene expression. Our results illustrate how signals of O3 tolerance can arise in a natural population after a few decades of frequent exposure and shed light on the metabolic and gene regulation mechanisms involved in conifers.

4.1. Asymptomatic trees have a local genetic origin

Comparing the genetic ancestry of our focus trees with other populations allowed us to confidently assign them to the previously reported central‐Mexican genetic cluster (Giles‐Pérez et al., 2022; Figure 3b). This is important given that various reforestation efforts with foreign germplasm have been performed in the study zone and that some provenances have shown differential sensitivity to O3 (Hernández‐Tejeda & Benavides‐Meza, 2015). Given that reforested trees have still not reached reproductive maturity, O3 tolerance at the study site is the likely product of local processes, based on either plasticity or standing genetic variation (see below). Should genetic factors be involved, we hypothesize that only a relatively large effective population size could allow for the rapid evolutionary changes that are necessary to respond to such a strong environmental pressure in such a short term (1–2 generations if we consider a generation time of 25 years for sacred fir). Detailed quantitative and population genomics studies are thus necessary to evaluate tolerance heritability, estimate demographic parameters, and pinpoint the genomic bases of such putative adaptation.

4.2. Histologic O3 damage begins after only a few days of exposure

Overall, the symptoms observed herein were similar to those reported for other plants experimentally exposed to O3 under controlled conditions, at both the macroscopic and histologic levels (Chaudhary & Rathore, 2021; Moura et al., 2022). Such symptoms are different from those expected from other possible stresses, such as drought or disease, which produce yellowish needles and a more homogeneously affected foliage (including needle loss; Chastagner, 2001; Johnson et al., 2005). In contrast, in this study, the reddish needle symptoms indicative of O3 damage were first observed in 2‐year‐old needles, and foliage loss was limited to 3‐year‐old or older needles.

At the histologic level, the needles of all individuals bore signs of damage, albeit to a much lower degree for the asymptomatic trees than for the symptomatic individuals (Figure 2b, Appendix S2). This suggests a multivariate response to O3 exposure that results in a continuous rather than in a discrete phenotype, likely controlled by polygenic or epigenetic factors. Our data further shows that O3 damage begins at the tissue level during the first 30 days after bud burst (2017 buds; Figure 2b), even if symptoms are still not noticeable macroscopically. Such precocious signs have been described for other conifers, for which they could appear as early as the fifth day of exposure (Evans & Fitzgerald, 1993). Both the visible and histologic damages in firs aggravate with needle age (Figure 2), which indicates a cumulative and irreversible effect of O3 exposure (Schraudner et al., 1998), similar to that reported in controlled experiments in other plant species (Lee et al., 2020).

Cell collapse was particularly important within the palisade parenchyma (Figure 2b, Appendix S2; Alvarez et al., 1998; Evans & Fitzgerald, 1993; Terrazas & Bernal‐Salazar, 2002), which has been attributed to oxidizing agents that act on the middle lamella of the cell wall and promote its degradation (Gimeno & Ibars, 2009). Such degradation increases intercellular spaces and leads to cell death (Alvarez et al., 1998), and it is often accompanied by the accumulation of phenolic and tannin compounds that produce the characteristic reddish coloration of O3 damage (Figure 2b, Appendix S2; Gostin, 2010).

Symptomatic individuals had thicker epidermis than asymptomatic individuals (Ep; Figure 2b). Such thickening has already been associated with O3 response in conifers (Kivimäenpää et al., 2017) and might indicate increased synthesis of cell wall components under O3 stress (Sandermann et al., 1997). Interestingly, we did not find any differences in cuticle and resin duct structure between symptomatic and asymptomatic trees (Figure 2b, Appendix S2), which was reported as a recurrent sign of O3 damage in pines (Vollenweider et al., 2003). This suggests that either firs have a greater tolerance to O3 than pines or that such symptoms can only be observed when comparing individuals unexposed and exposed to O3 (which was impossible to settle in our study, because there are no zero‐exposure periods in the study site). However, our own casual field observations suggest that pines (i.e., Pinus ayacahuite, P. hartwegii, and P. veitchii) growing in the study site seem to be more affected than firs in terms of mortality, needle loss, and needle coloration.

4.3. Asymptomatic trees produce terpenes related to response to biotic and abiotic stress and recovery after stress

Changes in cell structure in ozone‐damaged plants may result from rampant oxidative stress (Baier et al., 2005; Iriti & Faoro, 2008). These may be produced by a deficient regulatory response, which results in the differential accumulation of certain metabolites, including terpenes (Kopaczyk et al., 2020; Miyama et al., 2019). Although we observed no clear anatomical differences in the resin ducts between symptomatic and asymptomatic trees, which could have indicated contrasting metabolite accumulation (Figure 4), there were significant differences in terpene composition, particularly sesquiterpenes, between asymptomatic and symptomatic phenotypes during the moderate O3 period. This is particularly compelling because sesquiterpenes, which were also found to increase their concentration in angiosperms when exposed to O3 (Kanagendran et al., 2018; Pellegrini et al., 2012), have been shown to degrade reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reduce cellular damage (Loreto & Fares, 2007; Vickers et al., 2009).

In our study, sesquiterpenes such as β‐pinene, δ‐cadinene, and β‐caryophyllene were observed at higher concentrations in the asymptomatic than the symptomatic trees prior to the high O3 concentration period (Figure 4a). Such compounds have been associated with antioxidant and larvicidal functions in several plant species, including pines (Govindarajan et al., 2016; Kanagendran et al., 2018; Loreto et al., 2004; Ortiz de Elguea‐Culebras et al., 2017). These terpenes could be allowing the asymptomatic trees to better cope with biotic and abiotic stresses once O3 exposure increases (Pellegrini et al., 2012). The whole biosynthetic pathway leading to these compounds should be of particular interest for future functional and evolutionary studies in firs and other plants. However, given that insects often attack already weakened trees (like those exposed to O3), such studies should also focus on disentangling the metabolic response to ozone exposure and insect defense.

Asymptomatic trees further produced a larger quantity of metabolites related to recovery after stress than symptomatic plants when we compared the metabolite composition between moderate and high O3 periods (Figure 4). Particularly β‐pinene, which has been previously related to the plant recovery after a high O3 exposure in Nicotiana tabacum (Kanagendran et al., 2018). This reinforces the idea that O3 exposure is the main cause of forest degradation at our study site.

The members of the family of UDP‐glycosyltransferase (UGT) enzymes participate in terpene biosynthesis (AB_008838_T.1; Appendix S5). The lower concentration of terpenes during the high O3 period (Figure 4) may be associated with the downregulation of these transcripts in symptomatic trees when comparing the low (87 ppb) and high (170 ppb) O3 concentration periods (Appendix S5). However, our study should be complemented by examining the concentration of other metabolites, like flavonoids or tannins, in the future. Indeed, our results indicated that the expression of transcripts involved in the flavonoid metabolic pathway could exhibit considerable differences compared with those found for terpene metabolism, as demonstrated by the transcriptomic data (AB_000811_T.1; Appendix S4). In any case, the metabolic signatures reported here could already be used to identify trees that are not adequately recovering after O3 exposure in affected forests.

4.4. Transcripts related to stomatal opening and response to stress are upregulated in asymptomatic trees

To further examine the molecular basis of O3 response, we performed a differential transcript expression analysis (DTE). We found differentially expressed transcripts when comparing asymptomatic and symptomatic trees during the high O3 concentration period (Appendix S4, Figure 5a) and when independently comparing concentration periods for individuals with the same phenotype (Appendices S5 and S6, Figure 5b,c). Homologs of several of these transcripts have been previously reported as differentially expressed in controlled O3 exposure experiments in angiosperms (Natali et al., 2018; Tammam et al., 2019; Waldeck et al., 2017), which suggests that the molecular mechanisms underlying response to O3 are conserved on a large evolutionary timescale.

The differentially expressed transcripts during high O3 concentration periods were associated with defense against pathogens and stomata opening, and included transcripts related to chitinases and LRR protein kinases. These proteins are known to play important roles in recognizing and responding to pathogens in plants (Vaghela et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2023), and their differential expression suggests either a response to an unaccounted pathogen attack (e.g., fungi) or that this signaling pathway is activated under both O3 exposure and other stressors. Again, this indicates the need for further studies to disentangling the response to O3 and biotic stress defense. Interestingly, some members of the LRR kinases gene family are also associated with the initial physiologic reaction of plants to O3 exposure, which involves stomatal closure (Hasan et al., 2021). Thus, studying stomata closure, and its underlying genes, should be a priority for future studies in natural plant populations affected by O3 pollution.

Comparing transcriptional profiles among trees with the same phenotype, asymptomatic or symptomatic, also showed differential responses to increased O3 concentration. In other words, the upregulated and downregulated transcripts belong to different GO categories. Among the upregulated transcripts in symptomatic individuals during the moderate O3 period (Figure 5b, Appendix S5), a homolog of the xyloglucan endo‐transglycosylase and a non‐apical meristem (NAM) transcription factor from the large NAC family stand out, as some of their homologs have been shown to play a key role in cell repair after O3 exposure (Zhang et al., 2017) and are activated by O3 during apoplastic ROS signaling (De Clercq et al., 2013). The activation of these pathways in symptomatic trees when O3 concentration is low, and might be indicative of decreased sensitivity to this pollutant when compared to the asymptomatic trees.

During the high O3 period, asymptomatic individuals upregulated some transcripts (Figure 5c, Appendix S6) related to plant resistance (NB‐ARC‐domain proteins), plant defense (peroxidases), and the flavonoid biosynthesis (chalcones) pathway (Dao et al., 2011; Krasensky et al., 2017). In other words, when O3 concentration increases, asymptomatic trees may be activating mechanisms related to stress response. Moreover, transcripts encoding for UDP‐glycosyltransferase (UGT) family members (Figure 5b, Appendix S5), which are essential components of the plant secondary metabolism pathway that helps detoxify harmful compounds (Pan et al., 2019), are downregulated in asymptomatic trees. UGTs are also essential for regulating various aspects of plant growth and development (Mateo‐Bonmatí et al., 2021).

All in all, the variety of pathways differentially activated between symptomatic and asymptomatic trees highlights the complexity of studying plant transcriptomic responses in natural conditions (Nunn et al., 2006). Indeed, several sources of stress are expected to act at the same time in degraded forests subjected to air pollution. To disentangle the various mechanisms involved, it is advisable to use controlled experiments, such as ozone top chambers (Abeyratne & Ileperuma, 2006; Palomäki et al., 1998), in combination with in situ studies in natural settings to understand how plants respond to stress under real‐life scenarios. However, although several sources of stress are at play in the peri‐urban forests of Mexico City, our histologic, metabolic, and transcriptomic analyses confirm that O3 pollution is an important stressor that triggers a rapid and differential phenotypic response in firs, likely modeled by standing genetic variation and/or plastic mechanisms. The evolutionary basis of such differences remains open to be explored. Since epigenetic variation is related to gene activity and expression (Richards et al., 2017; Srikant & Drost, 2021), and can accumulate faster than DNA mutations, their role in the phenotypic response to O3 pollution must be a priority for future studies.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Juan P. Jaramillo‐Correa: Conceptualization (equal); funding acquisition (equal); methodology (equal); project administration (equal); resources (equal); supervision (equal); writing – original draft (equal). Verónica Reyes‐Galindo: Conceptualization (equal); data curation (lead); formal analysis (lead); methodology (equal); writing – original draft (equal). Svetlana Shishkova: Formal analysis (equal); methodology (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Estela Sandoval‐Zapotitla: Methodology (equal); resources (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). César Mateo Flores‐Ortiz: Methodology (equal); resources (equal). Daniel Piñero: Resources (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Lewis G. Spurgin: Methodology (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Claudia A. Martin: Methodology (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Ricardo Torres‐Jardón: Methodology (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Claudio Zamora‐Callejas: Resources (equal). Alicia Mastretta‐Yanes: Conceptualization (equal); formal analysis (equal); funding acquisition (equal); methodology (equal); project administration (equal); resources (equal); software (equal); supervision (equal); writing – original draft (equal).

OPEN RESEARCH BADGES

This article has earned an Open Data badge for making publicly available the digitally‐shareable data necessary to reproduce the reported results. The data is available at ASRA NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/) deposited under the PRJNA1100728 Bioproject and the Dryad repository https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.wpzgmsbw9.

Supporting information

Appendices S1‐S9

ECE3-14-e11343-s001.zip (18.7MB, zip)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Héctor Mario Benavides‐Meza, INIFAP, and the community of Bienes Comunales Santa Rosa Xochiac, Mexico, for field assistance. We are grateful to T. Garrido‐Garduño and A. Guerra for laboratory assistance. Analyses were carried out on CONABIO's computing cluster, supported by Ernesto Campos Murillo and the “Subcoordinación de Soporte Informático.” This project was financially supported by grants from the “Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología” (CONACyT; National Problems‐247730 to AM‐Y; CB‐2016‐284457 and COOB2016‐01‐278987 to JPJ‐C), the “Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico” at UNAM (PAPIIT IN224723) and the internal budget of IE‐UNAM, both to JPJ‐C. This work is part of the MSc thesis of VR‐G at the “Programa de Maestría en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México” who further thanks the support of Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología through a MSc Scholarship (CVU no. 714560).

Reyes‐Galindo, V. , Jaramillo‐Correa, J. P. , Shishkova, S. , Sandoval‐Zapotitla, E. , Flores‐Ortiz, C. M. , Piñero, D. , Spurgin, L. G. , Martin, C. A. , Torres‐Jardón, R. , Zamora‐Callejas, C. , & Mastretta‐Yanes, A. (2024). Histologic, metabolomic, and transcriptomic differences in fir trees from a peri‐urban forest under chronic ozone exposure. Ecology and Evolution, 14, e11343. 10.1002/ece3.11343

Contributor Information

Verónica Reyes‐Galindo, Email: veronica.rg.pb@gmail.com.

Juan P. Jaramillo‐Correa, Email: jaramillo@ecologia.unam.mx.

Alicia Mastretta‐Yanes, Email: amastretta@iecologia.unam.mx.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Histologic images and processed terpenes, genotype (vcf files) and transcriptomic (expression tables) data are available at the Dryad repository https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.wpzgmsbw9. Pipelines and code for all analyses are available at the Github repository (https://github.com/VeroIarrachtai/Abiesreligiosa_vs_ozone). Transcriptome raw reads are available in the SRA NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/) deposited under the PRJNA1100728 BioProject. Demultiplexed sequencing GBS data, including those samples previously analyzed in a phylogenetic survey (i.e., 80 samples, Giles‐Pérez et al., 2022), were deposited in NCBI with the Bioproject ID: PRJNA856692.

REFERENCES

  1. Abeyratne, V. D. , & Ileperuma, O. (2006). Open‐top chamber method to assess the potential visible symptoms on foliage of Annual crop plants exposed to ozone. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/OPEN‐TOP‐CHAMBER‐METHOD‐TO‐ASSESS‐THE‐POTENTIAL‐ON‐Abeyratne‐Ileperuma/44bfd89191b2009351802b8bd3b1460fb8283722
  2. Alvarado, R. D. (1989). Declinación y muerte del bosque de oyamel (Abies religiosa) en el sur del Valle de México. Colegio de Posgraduados, Campus Montecillo (México). Institución de Enseñanaza e Investigación en Ciencias Agrícolas. Centro de Fitopatología. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alvarado‐Rosales, D. , & Hernández‐Tejeda, T. (2002). Decline of sacred fir in the Desierto de los Leones National Park. 243–260.
  4. Alvarado‐Rosales, D. , Saavedra‐Romero, L. D. , Hernández‐Tejeda, T. , Cox, R. W. , & Malcolm, J. W. (2017). Concentraciones in situ de ozono en bosques de la Cuenca de México e influencia de la altitud. Revista Mexicana de ciencias forestales, 8(44), 29–54. [Google Scholar]
  5. Alvarez, D. , Laguna, G. , & Rosas, I. (1998). Macroscopic and microscopic symptoms in Abies religiosa exposed to ozone in a forest near Mexico City. Environmental Pollution, 103(2), 251–259. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ashmore, M. (2005). Assessing the future global impacts of ozone on vegetation. Plant Cell and Environment, 28(8), 949–964. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bai, X. , McPhearson, T. , Cleugh, H. , Nagendra, H. , Tong, X. , Zhu, T. , & Zhu, Y.‐G. (2017). Linking urbanization and the environment: Conceptual and empirical advances. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42(1), 215–240. [Google Scholar]
  8. Baier, M. , Kandlbinder, A. , Golldack, D. , & Dietz, K.‐J. (2005). Oxidative stress and ozone: Perception, signalling and response. Plant, Cell & Environment, 28(8), 1012–1020. [Google Scholar]
  9. Benjamini, Y. , Drai, D. , Elmer, G. , Kafkafi, N. , & Golani, I. (2001). Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behavioural Brain Research, 125(1–2), 279–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Berrang, P. , Karnosky, D. F. , Bennett, J. P. , & Bennett, J. P. (1991). Natural selection for ozone tolerance in Populus tremuloides: An evaluation of nationwide trends. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 21(7), 1091–1097. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bhatta, M. , Morgounov, A. , Belamkar, V. , Wegulo, S. N. , Dababat, A. A. , Erginbas‐Orakci, G. , Bouhssini, M. E. , Gautam, P. , Poland, J. , Akci, N. , Demir, L. , Wanyera, R. , & Baenziger, P. S. (2019). Genome‐wide association study for multiple biotic stress resistance in synthetic hexaploid wheat. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(15), 3667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bolger, A. M. , Lohse, M. , & Usadel, B. (2014). Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 30(15), 2114–2120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bravo‐Alvarez, H. , & Torres‐Jardón, R. (2002). Air pollution levels and trends in the Mexico city metropolitan area. In Fenn M. E., de Bauer L. I., & Hernández‐Tejeda T. (Eds.), Urban air pollution and forests: Resources at risk in the Mexico City Air Basin (pp. 121–159). Springer. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chang, Y.‐C. , Lo, H.‐H. , Hsieh, H.‐Y. , & Chang, S.‐M. (2015). Identification, epidemiological relatedness, and biofilm formation of clinical Chryseobacterium indologenes isolates from central Taiwan. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology, and Infection = Wei Mian Yu Gan Ran Za Zhi, 48(5), 559–564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chastagner, G. A. (2001). Susceptibility of intermountain Douglas‐fir to Rhabdocline needle cast when grown in the Pacific northwest. Plant Health Progress, 2(1), 2. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chaudhary, I. J. , & Rathore, D. (2021). Micro‐morphological and anatomical response of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars to ground‐level ozone. Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology, 9(4), 137–150. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cho, K. , Tiwari, S. , Agrawal, S. B. , Torres, N. L. , Agrawal, M. , Sarkar, A. , Shibato, J. , Agrawal, G. K. , Kubo, A. , & Rakwal, R. (2011). Tropospheric ozone and plants: Absorption, responses, and consequences. In Whitacre D. M. (Ed.), Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology (Vol. 212, pp. 61–111). Springer. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Churkina, G. , Kuik, F. , Bonn, B. , Lauer, A. , Grote, R. , Tomiak, K. , & Butler, T. M. (2017). Effect of VOC emissions from vegetation on air quality in Berlin during a heatwave. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(11), 6120–6130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. CONANP . (2006). Programa de Conservacion y Manejo Parque Nacional Desierto de los (Leones. ed.). Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dao, T. T. H. , Linthorst, H. J. M. , & Verpoorte, R. (2011). Chalcone synthase and its functions in plant resistance. Phytochemistry Reviews, 10(3), 397–412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. de Bauer, M. L. , & Hernández‐Tejeda, T. (2007). A review of ozone‐induced effects on the forests of central Mexico. Environmental Pollution, 147(3), 446–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. De Clercq, I. , Vermeirssen, V. , Van Aken, O. , Vandepoele, K. , Murcha, M. W. , Law, S. R. , Inzé, A. , Ng, S. , Ivanova, A. , Rombaut, D. , van de Cotte, B. , Jaspers, P. , Van de Peer, Y. , Kangasjärvi, J. , Whelan, J. , & Van Breusegem, F. (2013). The membrane‐bound NAC transcription factor ANAC013 functions in mitochondrial retrograde regulation of the oxidative stress response in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 25(9), 3472–3490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. DeBiasse, M. B. , & Kelly, M. W. (2016). Plastic and evolved responses to global change: What can we learn from comparative transcriptomics? Journal of Heredity, 107(1), 71–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Eaton, D. A. R. (2014). PyRAD: Assembly of de novo RADseq loci for phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics, 30(13), 1844–1849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Evans, L. S. , & Fitzgerald, G. A. (1993). Histological effects of ozone on slash pine (Pinus elliotti var. Densa). Environmental and Experimental Botany, 33(4), 505–513. [Google Scholar]
  26. Felzer, B. S. , Cronin, T. , Reilly, J. M. , Melillo, J. M. , & Wang, X. (2007). Impacts of ozone on trees and crops. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 339(11–12), 784–798. [Google Scholar]
  27. Giles‐Pérez, G. I. , Aguirre‐Planter, E. , Eguiarte, L. E. , & Jaramillo‐Correa, J. P. (2022). Demographic modelling helps track the rapid and recent divergence of a conifer species pair from Central Mexico. Molecular Ecology, 31(19), 5074–5088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gimeno, D. L. , & Ibars, A. M. (2009). Impacto del ozono troposférico sobre la anatomía foliar de Abies pinsapo Boiss. I: Estudio de la distribución de daños. Acta Botanica Malacitana, 34, 175–188. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gostin, I. (2010). Structural changes in silver fir needles in response to air pollution. Analele Unive rsităţii Din Oradea, 17(2), 300–305. [Google Scholar]
  30. Govindarajan, M. , Rajeswary, M. , & Benelli, G. (2016). Chemical composition, toxicity and non‐target effects of Pinus kesiya essential oil: An eco‐friendly and novel larvicide against malaria, dengue and lymphatic filariasis mosquito vectors. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 129, 85–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hasan, M. , Hasan, M. , Rahman, A. , Rahman, A. , Atikur Rahman, M. , Skalicky, M. , Alabdallah, N. M. , Waseem, M. , Waseem, M. , Jahan, M. S. , Ahammed, G. J. , El‐Mogy, M. M. , El‐Yazied, A. A. , Ibrahim, M. F. M. , Fang, X.‐W. , & Fang, X.‐W. (2021). Ozone induced stomatal regulations, MAPK and phytohormone signaling in plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(12), 6304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hayes, F. , Harmens, H. , Sharps, K. , & Radbourne, A. (2020). Ozone dose‐response relationships for tropical crops reveal potential threat to legume and wheat production, but not to millets. Scientific African, 9, e00482. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hernández‐Tejeda, T. , & Benavides‐Meza, H. M. (2015). Sensitivity of 20 provenances of pine and Sacred fir to photochemical oxidants. Environmental Science, 6(30), 32–51. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ibrahim, E. A. , Wang, M. , Radwan, M. M. , Wanas, A. S. , Majumdar, C. G. , Avula, B. , Wang, Y.‐H. , Khan, I. A. , Chandra, S. , Lata, H. , Hadad, G. M. , Abdel Salam, R. A. , Ibrahim, A. K. , Ahmed, S. A. , & ElSohly, M. A. (2019). Analysis of terpenes in Cannabis sativa L. using GC/MS: Method development, validation, and application. Planta Medica, 85(5), 431–438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. INEGI . (2018). https://www.inegi.org.mx
  36. Iriti, M. , & Faoro, F. (2008). Oxidative stress, the paradigm of ozone toxicity in plants and animals. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 187(1), 285–301. [Google Scholar]
  37. Johnson, G. R. , Grotta, A. T. , Gartner, B. L. , & Downes, G. (2005). Impact of the foliar pathogen Swiss needle cast on wood quality of Douglas‐fir. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35(2), 331–339. [Google Scholar]
  38. Johnson, M. T. J. , & Munshi‐South, J. (2017). Evolution of life in urban environments. Science, 358(6363), 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kanagendran, A. , Pazouki, L. , Li, S. , Liu, B. , Kännaste, A. , & Niinemets, Ü. (2018). Ozone‐triggered surface uptake and stress volatile emissions in Nicotiana tabacum ‘Wisconsin’. Journal of Experimental Botany, 69(3), 681–697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kanehisa, M. , Sato, Y. , Kawashima, M. , Furumichi, M. , & Tanabe, M. (2016). KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Research, 44(D1), D457–D462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kivimäenpää, M. , Sutinen, S. , Valolahti, H. , Häikiö, E. , Riikonen, J. , Kasurinen, A. , Ghimire, R. , Holopainen, J. , & Holopainen, T. (2017). Warming and elevated ozone differently modify needle anatomy of Norway spruce (Picea abies) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 47, 488–499. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kopaczyk, J. M. , Warguła, J. , & Jelonek, T. (2020). The variability of terpenes in conifers under developmental and environmental stimuli. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 180, 104197. [Google Scholar]
  43. Krasensky, J. , Carmody, M. , Sierla, M. , & Kangasjärvi, J. (2017). Ozone and Reactive Oxygen Species. In eLS. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [Google Scholar]
  44. Lee, J. K. , Woo, S. Y. , Kwak, M. J. , Park, S. H. , Kim, H. D. , Lim, Y. J. , Park, J. H. , & Lee, K. A. (2020). Effects of elevated temperature and ozone in Brassica juncea L.: Growth, physiology, and ROS accumulation. Forests, 11(1), 1. [Google Scholar]
  45. Li, H. , & Durbin, R. (2009). Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows‐Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 25(14), 1754–1760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Loreto, F. , & Fares, S. (2007). Is ozone flux inside leaves only a damage indicator? Clues from volatile isoprenoid studies. Plant Physiology, 143(3), 1096–1100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Loreto, F. , Pinelli, P. , Manes, F. , & Kollist, H. (2004). Impact of ozone on monoterpene emissions and evidence for an isoprene‐like antioxidant action of monoterpenes emitted by Quercus ilex leaves. Tree Physiology, 24(4), 361–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Love, M. I. , Huber, W. , & Anders, S. (2014). Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA‐seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology, 15(12), 550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Ludwików, A. , & Sadowski, J. (2008). Gene networks in plant ozone stress response and tolerance. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 50(10), 1256–1267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Macías‐Sámano, J. , & Cibrían‐Tovar, J. (1989). Evaluación mediante fotografía aérea infrarroja de la mortalidad de Abies religiosa en el parque Desierto de los Leones. IV Simposio Nacional sobre Parasitología forestal. [Google Scholar]
  51. Mastretta‐Yanes, A. , Arrigo, N. , Alvarez, N. , Jorgensen, T. H. , Piñero, D. , & Emerson, B. C. (2015). Restriction site‐associated DNA sequencing, genotyping error estimation and de novo assembly optimization for population genetic inference. Molecular Ecology Resources, 15(1), 28–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Mateo‐Bonmatí, E. , Casanova‐Sáez, R. , Šimura, J. , & Ljung, K. (2021). Broadening the roles of UDP‐glycosyltransferases in auxin homeostasis and plant development. New Phytologist, 232(2), 642–654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Miller, P. R. , de Lourdes de la Isla de Bauer, M. , Quevedo‐Nolasco, A. , Nolasco, A. Q. , & Tejeda, T. H. (1994). Comparison of ozone exposure characteristics in forested regions near Mexico City and Los Angeles. Atmospheric Environment, 28(1), 141–148. [Google Scholar]
  54. Miyama, T. , Tobita, H. , Uchiyama, K. , Yazaki, K. , Ueno, S. , Uemura, A. , Matsumoto, A. , Kitao, M. , & Izuta, T. (2019). Seasonal changes in interclone variation following Ozone exposure on three major gene pools: An analysis of Cryptomeria Japonica Clones. Atmosphere, 10(11), Article 11. [Google Scholar]
  55. Molina, L. , Velasco, E. , Retama, A. , & Zavala, M. (2019). Experience from integrated air quality management in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area and Singapore. Atmosphere, 10(9), 512. [Google Scholar]
  56. Moura, B. B. , Paoletti, E. , Badea, O. , Ferrini, F. , & Hoshika, Y. (2022). Visible foliar injury and ecophysiological responses to ozone and drought in oak seedlings. Plants, 11(14), 14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Müller‐Starck, G., & Schubert, R. (Eds.). (2001). Genetic response of forest systems to changing environmental conditions (Vol. 70). Springer Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  58. Natali, L. , Vangelisti, A. , Guidi, L. , Remorini, D. , Cotrozzi, L. , Lorenzini, G. , Nali, C. , Pellegrini, E. , Trivellini, A. , Vernieri, P. , Landi, M. , Cavallini, A. , & Giordani, T. (2018). How Quercus ilex L. saplings face combined salt and ozone stress: A transcriptome analysis. BMC Genomics, 19(1), 872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Nunn, A. J. , Weiser, G. , Reiter, I. M. , Häberle, K.‐H. , Grote, R. , Havranek, W. M. , & Matyssek, R. (2006). Testing the unifying theory of ozone sensitivity with mature trees of Fagus sylvatica and Picea abies . Tree Physiology, 26(11), 1391–1403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. ONU . (2018). https://www.un.org/es/
  61. Ortiz de Elguea‐Culebras, G. , Sánchez‐Vioque, R. , Berruga, M. I. , Herraiz‐Peñalver, D. , & Santana‐Méridas, O. (2017). Antifeedant effects of common terpenes from Mediterranean aromatic plants on Leptinotarsa decemlineata . Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2, 475–485. [Google Scholar]
  62. Palomäki, V. , Hassinen, A. , Lemettinen, M. , Oksanen, T. , Helmisaari, H.‐S. , Holopainen, J. , Kellomäki, S. , Holopainen, T. , Lemettinen, A. , & Holopainen, K. (1998). Open‐top chamber fumigation system for exposure of field grown Pinus sylvestris to elevated carbon dioxide and ozone concentration. Silva Fennica, 32, 205–214. [Google Scholar]
  63. Pan, Y. , Xu, P. , Zeng, X. , Liu, X. , Shang, Q. , & Shang, Q.‐L. (2019). Characterization of UDP‐glucuronosyltransferases and the potential contribution to nicotine tolerance in Myzus persicae . International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(15), 3637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Papadopulos, A. S. T. , Helmstetter, A. J. , Osborne, O. G. , Comeault, A. A. , Wood, D. P. , Straw, E. A. , Mason, L. , Fay, M. F. , Parker, J. , Dunning, L. T. , Foote, A. D. , Smith, R. J. , & Lighten, J. (2020). Rapid parallel adaptation to anthropogenic heavy metal pollution. bioRxiv. 10.1101/2020.08.12.248328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Pellegrini, E. , Cioni, P. , Francini, A. , Lorenzini, G. , Nali, C. , & Flamini, G. (2012). Volatiles emission patterns in poplar clones varying in response to ozone. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 38, 924–932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Poland, J. A. , & Rife, T. W. (2012). Genotyping‐by‐sequencing for plant breeding and genetics. The Plant Genome, 5(3), 92–102. [Google Scholar]
  67. Purcell, S. , Neale, B. , Todd‐Brown, K. , Thomas, L. , Ferreira, M. A. R. , Bender, D. , Maller, J. , Sklar, P. , de Bakker, P. I. W. , Daly, M. J. , & Sham, P. C. (2007). PLINK: A tool set for whole‐genome association and population‐based linkage analyses. American Journal of Human Genetics, 81(3), 559–575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. R Core Team . (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Fundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R‐project.org/ [Google Scholar]
  69. Richards, C. L. , Alonso, C. , Becker, C. , Bossdorf, O. , Bucher, E. , Colomé‐Tatché, M. , Durka, W. , Engelhardt, J. , Gáspár, B. , Gogol‐Döring, A. , Grosse, I. , van Gurp, T. , Heer, K. , Kronholm, I. , Lampei, C. , Latzel, V. , Mirouze, M. , Opgenoorth, L. , Paun, O. , … Verhoeven, K. J. F. (2017). Ecological plant epigenetics: Evidence from model and non‐model species, and the way forward. Ecology Letters, 20(12), 1576–1590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Rivkin, L. R. , Santangelo, J. S. , Alberti, M. , Aronson, M. F. J. , de Keyzer, C. W. , Diamond, S. E. , Fortin, M.‐J. , Frazee, L. J. , Gorton, A. J. , Hendry, A. P. , Liu, Y. , Losos, J. B. , MacIvor, J. S. , Martin, R. A. , Martin, R. , McDonnell, M. J. , Miles, L. S. , Munshi‐South, J. , Ness, R. W. , … Johnson, M. T. J. (2019). A roadmap for urban evolutionary ecology. Evolutionary Applications, 12(3), 384–398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Robinson, M. D. , McCarthy, D. J. , & Smyth, G. K. (2010). edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 26(1), 139–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Sandermann, H., Wellburn, A. R., & Heath, R. L. (Eds.). (1997). Forest decline and ozone: Synopsis. In Forest decline and ozone: A comparison of controlled chamber and field experiments (Vol. 127). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [Google Scholar]
  73. Sandoval, Z. E. , Rojas, A. , Guzmán, C. , Carmona, L. , Ponce, M. , León, C. , Loyola, C. , Vallejo, A. , & Medina, A. (2005). Técnicas aplicadas al estudio de la anatomía Vegetal (Vol. 38). Instituto de Biología, UNAM. [Google Scholar]
  74. Santangelo, J. S. , Rivkin, L. R. , & Johnson, M. T. J. (2018). The evolution of city life. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1884), 20181529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Schraudner, M. , Moeder, W. , Wiese, C. , Camp, W. V. , Inzé, D. , Langebartels, C. , & Sandermann, H. (1998). Ozone‐induced oxidative burst in the ozone biomonitor plant, tobacco Bel W3. The Plant Journal: For Cell and Molecular Biology, 16(2), 235–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Secretaría del Medio Ambiente (SEDEMA) . (2017). Calidad del aire. http://www.aire.cdmx.gob.mx/default.php?opc=%27ZaBhnmI=%27
  77. Secretaría del Medio Ambiente (SEDEMA) . (2020). Calidad del aire. http://www.aire.cdmx.gob.mx/descargas/estadisticas/indicadores/mosaicos/mosaico_ozono_indice_aire_salud_1h.pdf
  78. SEDEMA . (2018). Calidad del aire en la Ciudad de México. Informe Anual.
  79. Seinfeld, J. H. (1989). Urban air pollution: State of the science. Science, 243(4892), 745–752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Sethuraman, A. (2018). Estimating genetic relatedness in admixed populations. G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 8(10), 3203–3220. 10.1534/g3.118.200485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Srikant, T. , & Drost, H.‐G. (2021). How stress facilitates phenotypic innovation through epigenetic diversity. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 606800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Tammam, A. , Badr, R. , Abou‐Zeid, H. , Hassan, Y. , & Bader, A. (2019). Nickel and ozone stresses induce differential growth, antioxidant activity and mRNA transcription in Oryza sativa cultivars. Journal of Plant Interactions, 14(1), 87–101. [Google Scholar]
  83. Tausz, M. , Grulke, N. E. , & Wieser, G. (2007). Defense and avoidance of ozone under global change. Environmental Pollution, 147(3), 525–531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Terrazas, T. , & Bernal‐Salazar, S. (2002). Histological symptoms of air pollution injury in foliage, bark, and xylem of Abies religiosa in the Basin of Mexico. In Fenn M. E., de Bauer L. I., & Hernández‐Tejeda T. (Eds.), Urban air pollution and forests. Ecological studies (Vol. 156). Springer. 10.1007/978-0-387-22520-3_11 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  85. Vaghela, B. , Vashi, R. , Rajput, K. , & Joshi, R. (2022). Plant chitinases and their role in plant defense – A comprehensive review. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 159, 110055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Van Bel, M. , Proost, S. , Van Neste, C. , Deforce, D. , Van de Peer, Y. , & Vandepoele, K. (2013). TRAPID: An efficient online tool for the functional and comparative analysis of de novo RNA‐seq transcriptomes. Genome Biology, 14, R134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Van Ghelder, C. , Parent, G. J. , Rigault, P. , Prunier, J. , Giguère, I. , Caron, S. , Stival Sena, J. , Deslauriers, A. , Bousquet, J. , Esmenjaud, D. , & MacKay, J. (2019). The large repertoire of conifer NLR resistance genes includes drought responsive and highly diversified RNLs. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 11614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Vickers, C. E. , Possell, M. , Cojocariu, C. I. , Velikova, V. B. , Laothawornkitkul, J. , Ryan, A. , Mullineaux, P. M. , & Nicholas Hewitt, C. (2009). Isoprene synthesis protects transgenic tobacco plants from oxidative stress. Plant, Cell & Environment, 32(5), 520–531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Vollenweider, P. , Ottiger, M. , & Günthardt‐Goerg, M. S. (2003). Validation of leaf ozone symptoms in natural vegetation using microscopical methods. Environmental Pollution, 124, 101–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Waldeck, N. , Burkey, K. , Carter, T. , Dickey, D. , Song, Q. , & Taliercio, E. (2017). RNA‐seq study reveals genetic responses of diverse wild soybean accessions to increased ozone levels. BMC Genomics, 18(1), 498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Wang, X. , Xu, Y. , Fan, H. , Cui, N. , Meng, X. , He, J. , Ran, N. , & Yang, Y. (2023). Research progress of plant nucleotide‐binding leucine‐rich repeat protein. Horticulturae, 9, 122. [Google Scholar]
  92. Whitehead, A. , Clark, B. W. , Reid, N. M. , Hahn, M. E. , & Nacci, D. (2017). When evolution is the solution to pollution: Key principles, and lessons from rapid repeated adaptation of killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus) populations. Evolutionary Applications, 10(8), 762–783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis [Software]. Springer‐Verlag. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org [Google Scholar]
  94. Zhang, L. , Zhang, L. , Xu, B. , Xu, B. , Wu, T. , Wen, M. , Fan, L. , Feng, Z. , & Paoletti, E. (2017). Transcriptomic analysis of Pak Choi under acute ozone exposure revealed regulatory mechanism against ozone stress. BMC Plant Biology, 17(1), 236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendices S1‐S9

ECE3-14-e11343-s001.zip (18.7MB, zip)

Data Availability Statement

Histologic images and processed terpenes, genotype (vcf files) and transcriptomic (expression tables) data are available at the Dryad repository https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.wpzgmsbw9. Pipelines and code for all analyses are available at the Github repository (https://github.com/VeroIarrachtai/Abiesreligiosa_vs_ozone). Transcriptome raw reads are available in the SRA NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/) deposited under the PRJNA1100728 BioProject. Demultiplexed sequencing GBS data, including those samples previously analyzed in a phylogenetic survey (i.e., 80 samples, Giles‐Pérez et al., 2022), were deposited in NCBI with the Bioproject ID: PRJNA856692.


Articles from Ecology and Evolution are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES