Skip to main content
World Journal of Oncology logoLink to World Journal of Oncology
. 2024 May 7;15(3):432–453. doi: 10.14740/wjon1845

Epidemiology of Adenosquamous Carcinomas

Matthew GK Benesch a,g,h, Vicente O Ramos-Santillan a,g, Colin J Rog a, Erek D Nelson a, Kazuaki Takabe a,b,c,d,e,f,h
PMCID: PMC11092416  PMID: 38751700

Abstract

Background

Adenosquamous carcinomas (ASCs) are a very rare histology containing cancer cells with both glandular-like (adeno) and squamous cell histologies, comprising typically a fraction of a percent of all solid tumors. The bulk of the literature on ASCs is comprised of case reports and small series, with the general finding that ASCs tend to have worse outcomes than either of their parent histologies. However, there is a lack of pan site-comparative studies in the literature that compare ASC clinicodemographic and survival outcomes with those of conventional adenocarcinomas (ACs) and squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs).

Methods

In this study, we summarize these outcomes in eight primary sites, comprising 92.7% of all ASC cases diagnosed from 1975 to 2020 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

Results

Lung ASCs comprise 51.5% of all ASC cases, accounting for 1.1% of all lung cancer cases, followed by uterine/cervical cancers at 29.7% of all ASC cases, translating into 1.8% of all cancers in this site. In descending order, the remaining 20% of ASCs arise in pancreatic, oral cavity, biliary, esophageal, colorectal, and gastric sites, comprising between 0.1% and 0.7% of all cancers in these sites. Apart from pancreatic and oral cavity cancers, ASC tumors tended to favor higher rates of regional or distant disease at presentation with poor tumor differentiation compared to either AC or SCC histologies. After multivariable analysis, adjusting for age, sex, detection stage, grade differentiation, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, except for oral cavity cancers, ASCs tended to have worse overall survivals compared to ACs (hazard ratios: 1.1 - 1.6) and SCC (1.0 - 1.3), with colorectal ASCs having the worse overall survival compared to colorectal ACs, with a hazard ratio of 1.4 (95% confidence interval: 1.3 - 1.6).

Conclusions

Overall, these results suggest that ASC outcomes are site specific, and in general, tend to have worse outcomes than nonvariant ACs and SCCs even after correction for common clinical and epidemiological factors. These cancers have a poorly understood but unique tumor biology that warrants further characterization.

Keywords: Cancer, Chemotherapy, Demographics, Histopathology, Outcomes, Radiotherapy, Surgery

Introduction

Adenosquamous carcinomas (ASCs) are a rare histological class of cancer that contain both squamous cells and glandular-like (adeno) cells [1, 2]. In certain cancers, this histology has been associated with more aggressive disease than either parent histology [3]. These cancers are recognized by the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD)-0-3 classification as a unique entry (8560/3) under the broader umbrella of Complex Epithelial Neoplasms [4]. The World Health Organization varies the formal definition of ASCs slightly based on tumor site, where for lungs, each of the squamous and adenocarcinoma components must constitute at least 10% of the tumor, and for gastrointestinal malignancies, the squamous component constitutes at least 25% of the tumor [1, 2].

Given that these cancers comprise less than 1% of all total carcinomas, most of the literature on ASCs is limited to case reports or small series [5, 6]. There are no studies that systematically and robustly compare ASCs to nonvariant histologies, which limits the ability of researchers and clinicians to make meaningful comparisons to conventional adenocarcinomas (ACs) and squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) [7]. The systematic examination and characterization of the epidemiological and clinical behavior of this histology requires the resources only available through a population-level database [8].

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database is an amalgamation of population-based cancer registries maintained by the National Cancer Institute, encompassing 47.9% of the United States population with its most recent release [9]. As one of the oldest population-level cancer registries, it is a well-respected resource for investigating correlations between histopathological data with patient outcomes across all cancer sites with nearly 50 years of data capture [10]. In this site-stratified analysis, we use the SEER database to overcome the limitations imposed by cancer rarity to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of ASCs compared to nonvariant ACs and SCCs across all major locations. This investigation provides a thorough epidemiological description and characterization of this poorly understood rare cancer histology.

Materials and Methods

Patient selection

The National Cancer Institute’s SEER database composed from 18 SEER cancer registries was employed using data from 1975 to 2020, as previously described [11-17]. Data release from the SEER database does not require informed patient consent or review by an institutional review board. The SEER database was accessed and searched in compliance with signed user agreements [17]. A complete outline of exclusion criteria and its effects on case counts is presented here (Supplementary Material 1, www.wjon.org). Definitions of variables analyzed are presented here (Supplementary Material 2, www.wjon.org). We limited our analysis to sites with at least 400 cases of undifferentiated carcinomas, which captures 92.7% of all cases (Supplementary Material 3, www.wjon.org). We compared demographic and outcomes data for ASCs to site-matched ACs and SCCs. All cases listed in SEER have at least a tissue biopsy reviewed by a pathologist to confirm the histological diagnosis [17].

Statistical analysis

All selected data from 18 SEER cancer registries were imported into Stata 15.1 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA) for statistical analysis following case listing downloading using SEER*Stat 8.4.2 (Surveillance Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Calverton, MD, USA). A complete case analysis was completed after variable definition, as previously described (Supplementary Material 1, 2, www.wjon.org) [11-17].

Baseline patient characteristics were compared with the t and Chi-squared tests for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to determine the association of mortality with cancer histology type, adjusting for age, sex, race, detection stage, grade differentiation, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. All hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Use of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy as treatment variables were binary. All P values were two-sided, with a threshold of 0.05 to determine statistical significance. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method, with P values for survival curves generated by the log rank test. Graphs were plotted using Origin Pro 2022 (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA). Using SEER 18 (2000 - 2020) data with SEER*Stat 8.4.2, incidence rates were calculated and age-adjusted to the 2000 United States standard population with the age variable recode < 1-year-olds. Cause-specific survival and relative survival were calculated with the same dataset and software and were both age standardized to the International Cancer Survival Standard 1-Age 15+ variable via the actuarial method, and Ederer II cumulative expected method for relative survival.

Results

Analysis of ASCs by anatomical site

Subsections are presented in order of anatomical site by the percentage of ASC cases in that site relative to all cases of ASC presented (92.7% of all cases of ASC in the SEER database) (Fig. 1). Within each subsection, we first present a demographics table with all included cancer cases for that site, followed by nonvariant AC and SCC cases, and then the ASC cases. The second table presents both univariate and multivariable HRs for cause-specific mortality according to the same demographic, histopathological, and treatment variables as the first table, comparing ASCs to the other cancer categories.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Distribution of cancers in SEER, 1975 - 2020 for sites analyzed. Distribution of adenosquamous carcinoma cases in all major sites examined (total of 26,525 cases (92.7% of all adenosquamous carcinoma cases in SEER)) (left). Distribution of all conventional adenocarcinoma cases in sites examined (total of 1,535,527 cases) (middle). Distribution of all conventional squamous cell carcinoma cases in sites examined (total of 588,802 cases) (right).

To provide a visual overview across all cancer sites, Kaplan-Meier survival curves with 95% confidences intervals are also presented (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing overall survival of adenosquamous carcinomas patients to those with either conventional adenocarcinomas or squamous cell carcinomas. The black line represents a comparative survival curve for all malignancies within that site. (a) Lung cancer. (b) Uterine/cervical cancer. (c) Pancreatic cancer. (d) Oral cavity cancer. (e) Biliary cancer. (f) Esophageal cancer. (g) Colorectal cancer. (h) Gastric cancer. All survival curves are shown with 95% confidence interval. Among subtypes, pairwise statistical comparisons by the log-rank test are shown relative to adenosquamous carcinomas.

Lung cancer

ASC comprised a minority of lung cancer cases at 1.1% but represented just over half (51.5%) of all ASC tumors (Table 1, Fig. 1). Age of diagnosis was overall similar among all cancer subtypes in the 68 - 70 years old range (Table 1). Compared to males, female cases were slightly lower for ASC (44.3%) and SCC (35.9%), but the same for AC (50%). ASC tended to be diagnosed at an earlier stage (26.1%), in contrast to AC (19.9%) but very similar to SCC (24.5%). Notably, ASC tumors were more frequently poorly differentiated (44.9%) compared to AC (26.1%) and SCC (32.8%). About half of the ASC patients underwent surgical resection, contrasted with about a quarter for both AC and SCC. Furthermore, patients with AC and SCC underwent chemotherapy (41.0% and 35.4%, respectively) and radiotherapy more frequently (39.4% and 46.7%, respectively) than patients with ASC (34.3% for chemotherapy and 53.9% for radiotherapy). Survival was significantly better at all points for ASC patients. Median survival was 16.6 months compared to 13.7 months for AC and 13.5 months for SCC (Table 1). In comparison to AC and SCC lung cancers, ASC had an unadjusted HR of 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.85 - 0.89) to AC and 0.84 (0.82 - 0.86) to SCC, but after multivariable analysis correcting for age, sex, race, detection stage, grade, and use of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, the HRs were 1.14 (1.11 - 1.16), and 1.08 (1.05 - 1.10), respectively (Table 2).

Table 1. Demographics and Clinical Characteristics for Lung Cancer by Histology.

Lung All Adenocarcinoma Squamous Adenosquamous P value
N (%) 1,124,192 (100) 357,273 (31.8) 226,774 (20.2) 12,498 (1.1)
Age (years) (%)
  0 - 14 180 (< 1) 5 (< 1) 2 (< 1) 0 (0.0) < 0.001
  15 - 29 1,393 (0.1) 248 (0.1) 86 (< 1) 10 (0.1)
  30 - 49 48,725 (4.3) 18,354 (5.1) 5,840 (2.6) 540 (4.3)
  50 - 69 496,997 (44.2) 166,617 (46.6) 96,877 (42.7) 5,489 (43.9)
  70 - 89 576,897 (51.3) 172,049 (48.2) 123,969 (54.7) 6,459 (51.7)
  Mean (SD) 69.0 (10.7) 68.2 (10.8) 69.9 (9.6) 68.9 (10.4) < 0.001
  Median 70 69 71 70
Sex (%)
  Male 603,851 (53.7) 178,466 (50.0) 145,474 (64.1) 6,960 (55.7) < 0.001
  Female 520,341 (46.3) 178,807 (50.0) 81,300 (35.9) 5,538 (44.3)
Race (%)
  White 938,501 (83.5) 288,603 (80.8) 190,397 (84.0) 10,391 (83.1) < 0.001
  Black 111,668 (9.9) 37,065 (10.4) 24,883 (11.0) 1,216 (9.7)
  Other 74,023 (6.6) 31,605 (8.8) 11,494 (5.1) 891 (7.1)
Detection stage (%)
  Localized 222,677 (19.8) 71,010 (19.9) 55,571 (24.5) 3,265 (26.1) < 0.001
  Regional 260,684 (23.2) 73,042 (20.4) 75,034 (22.1) 4,127 (22.0)
  Distant 573,501 (51.0) 202,024 (56.5) 86,151 (38.0) 4,844 (38.8)
  Unstaged 67,330 (6.0) 11,191 (3.1) 10,018 (4.4) 262 (2.1)
Grade differentiation (%)
  Well 49,946 (4.4) 20,356 (5.7) 5,284 (2.3) 124 (1.0) < 0.001
  Moderate 151,654 (13.5) 63,230 (17.7) 57,028 (25.1) 2,445 (19.6)
  Poor 310,089 (27.6) 93,380 (26.1) 74,361 (32.8) 5,614 (44.9)
  Unknown 612,503 (54.5) 180,307 (50.5) 90,101 (39.7) 4,315 (34.5)
Surgery (%)
  Yes 260,926 (23.2) 92,593 (25.9) 62,602 (27.6) 6,247 (50.0) < 0.001
  No 863,266 (76.8) 264,680 (74.1) 164,172 (72.4) 6,251 (50.0)
Chemotherapy (%)
  Yes 433,894 (38.6) 146,491 (41.0) 80,278 (35.4) 4,284 (34.3) < 0.001
  No 690,298 (61.4) 210,782 (59.0) 146,496 (64.6) 8,214 (65.7)
Radiotherapy (%)
  Yes 430,333 (38.3) 140,587 (39.4) 106,011 (46.7) 4,491 (35.9) < 0.001
  No 693,859 (61.7) 216,686 (60.6) 120,763 (53.3) 8,007 (64.1)
Incidence rate (95% CI) -
  All 565 (564 - 566) 179 (178 - 180) 109.5 (109.0 - 110.0) 5.9 (5.8 - 6.0)
  Male 675 (673 - 677) 198 (197 - 199) 155.6 (154.8 - 156.5) 7.4 (7.2 - 7.6)
  Female 482 (481 - 484) 165 (164 - 166) 73.2 (72.7 - 73.8) 4.8 (4.7 - 5.0)
CSS (95% CI) -
  1-year 47.8 (47.6 - 47.9) 52.9 (52.7 - 53.1) 52.8 (52.5 - 53.1) 57.6 (56.4 - 58.7)
  2-year 33.6 (33.5 - 33.8) 38.7 (38.5 - 38.9) 37.3 (37.1 - 37.6) 42.7 (41.5 - 43.8)
  5-year 21.7 (21.6 - 21.9) 24.0 (23.8 - 24.2) 24.2 (24.0 - 24.5) 30.0 (28.9 - 31.2)
  10-year 16.1 (16.0 - 16.3) 17.1 (16.9 - 17.3) 17.4 (17.2 - 17.7) 22.4 (21.2 - 23.5)
  Median (months) 10.9 13.7 13.5 16.6
RS (95% CI) -
  1-year 44.2 (44.1 - 44.3) 50.0 (49.8 - 50.2) 48.7 (48.5 - 49.0) 54.4 (53.3 - 55.5)
  2-year 29.7 (29.6 - 29.8) 35.3 (35.1 - 35.5) 32.4 (32.2 - 32.7) 38.6 (37.5 - 39.7)
  5-year 16.8 (16.7 - 16.9) 19.5 (19.4 - 19.7) 17.5 (17.3 - 17.8) 23.2 (22.2 - 24.2)
  10-year 9.5 (9.4 - 9.5) 11.0 (10.8 - 11.1) 8.4 (8.2 - 8.6) 13.0 (12.1 - 13.9)
  Median (months) 9.4 12.0 11.4 14.3

P < 0.05 for all comparisons between adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinoma comparisons. Incidence rates were expressed per 100,000. CSS: cause-specific survival; RS: relative survival; CI: confidence interval; SD: standard deviation.

Table 2. Univariate and Multivariable Cox-Proportional Hazard Ratios (HRs) of Mortality for Lung Cancer.

Lung Adenosquamous vs. adenocarcinoma
Adenosquamous vs. squamous
Univariate, HR (95% CI) Multivariable, HR (95% CI) Univariate, HR (95% CI) Multivariable, HR (95% CI)
Adenosquamous histology 0.87 (0.85 - 0.89) 1.14 (1.11 - 1.16) 0.84 (0.82 - 0.86) 1.08 (1.05 - 1.10)
Age (per 10 years) 1.051 (1.047 - 1.055) 1.067 (1.062 - 1.071) 1.08 (1.07 - 1.09) 1.05 (1.04 - 1.06)
Sex
  Female 0.78 (0.77 - 0.79) 0.81 (0.80 - 0.82) 0.87 (0.86 - 0.88) 0.88 (0.87 - 0.89)
Race
  Black 1.08 (1.07 - 1.10) 0.97 (0.96 - 0.99) 1.16 (1.14 - 1.18) 1.00 (0.99 - 1.02)a
  Other 0.93 (0.91 - 0.94) 0.77 (0.76 - 0.78) 1.10 (1.08 - 1.13) 0.95 (0.93 - 0.97)
Detection stage
  Regional 2.16 (2.13 - 2.19) 2.28 (2.25 - 2.32) 2.00 (1.97 - 2.03) 2.03 (2.00 - 2.06)
  Distant 6.05 (5.97 - 6.13) 4.79 (4.72 - 4.86) 4.76 (4.69 - 4.83) 3.65 (3.59 - 3.71)
  Unstaged 3.56 (3.47 - 3.52) 2.31 (2.25 - 2.37) 2.96 (2.86 - 3.04) 1.84 (1.79 - 1.89)
Grade differentiation
  Moderate 1.42 (1.39 - 1.45) 1.36 (1.32 - 1.39) 0.87 (0.84 - 0.90) 0.96 (0.93 - 1.00)a
  Poor 2.46 (2.41 - 2.51) 1.73 (1.69 - 1.77) 1.05 (1.01 - 1.09) 1.04 (1.00 - 1.07)
  Unknown 3.26 (3.19 - 3.33) 1.41 (1.38 - 1.44) 1.48 (1.43 - 1.53) 0.93 (0.90 - 0.97)
Surgery (yes) 0.244 (0.241 - 0.247) 0.395 (0.389 - 0.400) 0.267 (0.263 - 0.270) 0.319 (0.314 - 0.324)
Chemotherapy (yes) 1.33 (1.32 - 1.34) 0.635 (0.629 - 0.641) 1.16 (1.15 - 1.18) 0.66 (0.65 - 0.67)
Radiotherapy (yes) 1.45 (1.44 - 1.46) 1.03 (1.02 - 1.04) 1.42 (1.41 - 1.44) 0.89 (0.88 - 0.90)

P < 0.05 relative to reference unless noted by aP ≥ 0.05. Reference categories: sex (Male), race (White), detection stage (Localized), grade differentiation (Well), surgery (no), radiotherapy (no), and chemotherapy (no). CI: confidence interval.

Uterine/cervical cancer

ASC represented 1.8% of uterine/cervical cancer cases and 29.7% of all ASC cases (Table 3, Fig. 1). The mean age at presentation for ASC was 55.7 years old, which was 4.7 years older compared to SCC but 5.1 years younger than AC (Table 3). ASC tended to be detected at a localized stage more frequently than SCC (52.1% vs. 46.5%, respectively), but less often when compared to AC (74.6%). Further, ASC presented with distant disease more frequently (14.9%) than AC and SCC (7.7% and 11.3%, respectively). Notably, ASC tumors were more frequently poorly differentiated (44.0%) compared to AC (17.3%) and SCC (28.6%). Seventy-eight percent of ASC patients underwent surgical resection, contrasting with 85.6% for AC and 54.2% for SCC. Patients with ASC and SCC underwent chemotherapy (26.0% and 37.0%, respectively) and radiotherapy more frequently (56.0% and 57.1%, respectively) compared to individuals diagnosed with AC, where the rates were lower (9.1% for chemotherapy and 32.2% for radiotherapy). ASC survival rates closely matched SCC rates, which at 10 years was significantly worse compared to AC patients (about 66% vs. about 78%, respectively) (Table 3). In comparison to AC and SCC uterine/cervical cancers, ASC had a HR of 1.06 (1.01 - 1.11) and 1.18 (1.13 - 1.23), respectively, after multivariate analyses (Table 4).

Table 3. Demographics and Clinical Characteristics for Uterine/Cervical Cancer by Histology.

Uterus/cervix All Adenocarcinoma Squamous Adenosquamous P value
N (%) 400,543 (100.0) 74,765 (18.7) 64,391 (16.1) 7,206 (1.8)
Age (years) (%)
  0 - 14 43 (< 1) 1 (< 1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) < 0.001
  15 - 29 7,539 (1.9) 886 (1.2) 4,034 (6.3) 217 (3.0)
  30 - 49 83,563 (20.9) 14,070 (18.8) 29,498 (45.8) 2,345 (32.5)
  50 - 69 209,049 (52.2) 39,016 (52.2) 22,344 (34.7) 3,174 (44.0)
  70 - 89 100,349 (25.1) 20,792 (27.8) 8,515 (13.2) 1,470 (20.4)
  Mean (SD) 59.6 (13.9) 60.8 (13.5) 50.4 (15.3) 55.7 (15.1) < 0.001
  Median 60 62 49 56
Race (%)
  White 326,288 (81.5) 65,547 (87.7) 48,509 (75.3) 5,945 (82.5) < 0.001
  Black 37,776 (9.4) 3,891 (5.2) 9,112 (14.2) 568 (7.9)
  Other 36,479 (9.1) 5,327 (7.1) 6,770 (10.5) 693 (9.6)
Detection stage (%)
  Localized 258,276 (64.5) 55,762 (74.6) 29,930 (46.5) 3,752 (52.1) < 0.001
  Regional 83,626 (20.9) 9,809 (13.1) 24,731 (38.4) 2,156 (29.9)
  Distant 42,433 (10.6) 5,786 (7.7) 7,266 (11.3) 1,077 (14.9)
  Unstaged 16,208 (4.0) 3,408 (4.6) 2,464 (3.8) 221 (3.1)
Grade differentiation (%)
  Well 115,050 (28.7) 28,758 (38.5) 3,556 (5.5) 568 (7.9) < 0.001
  Moderate 98,038 (24.5) 22,567 (30.2) 17,940 (27.9) 1,886 (26.2)
  Poor 91,240 (22.8) 12,950 (17.3) 18,407 (28.6) 3,203 (44.4)
  Unknown 96,215 (24.0) 10,490 (14.0) 24,488 (38.0) 1,549 (21.5)
Surgery (%)
  Yes 333,390 (83.2) 63,980 (85.6) 34,884 (54.2) 5,678 (78.8) < 0.001
  No 67,153 (16.8) 10,785 (14.4) 29,507 (45.8) 1,528 (21.2)
Chemotherapy (%)
  Yes 83,350 (20.8) 6,778 (9.1) 23,795 (37.0) 1,872 (26.0) < 0.001
  No 317,193 (79.2) 67,987 (90.0) 40,596 (63.0) 5,334 (74.0)
Radiotherapy (%)
  Yes 136,342 (34.0) 24,045 (32.2) 36,777 (57.1) 4,037 (56.0) < 0.001
  No 264,201 (66.0) 50,720 (67.8) 27,614 (42.9) 3,169 (44.0)
Incidence rate (95% CI) -
  All 175 (174 - 176) 17.1 (17.0 - 17.4) 26.6 (26.4 - 26.8) 2.27 (2.20 - 2.35)
  Female 331 (330 - 332) 32.6 (32.2 - 33.0) 51.7 (51.3 - 52.2) 4.39 (4.26 - 4.53)
CSS (95% CI) -
  1-year 91.3 (91.2 - 91.4) 90.4 (90.1 - 90.8) 88.3 (88.0 - 88.6) 87.0 (85.9 - 88.1)
  2-year 85.9 (85.7 - 86.0) 85.7 (85.3 - 86.2) 79.5 (79.1 - 79.9) 78.8 (77.4 - 80.1)
  5-year 79.0 (78.9 - 79.2) 80.4 (79.9 - 80.9) 70.7 (70.2 - 71.1) 69.5 (67.9 - 71.1)
  10-year 75.6 (75.4 - 75.8) 77.7 (77.2 - 78.2) 67.0 (66.5 - 67.5) 65.9 (64.2 - 67.6)
  Median (months) - - - -
RS (95% CI) -
  1-year 89.6 (89.5 - 89.7) 88.4 (88.0 - 88.8) 86.7 (86.4 - 87.0) 85.8 (84.6 - 86.9)
  2-year 83.1 (83.0 - 83.3) 82.6 (82.2 - 83.1) 76.8 (76.4 - 77.3) 76.6 (75.1 - 77.9)
  5-year 73.3 (73.1 - 73.4) 74.2 (73.6 - 74.7) 65.5 (65.0 - 66.0) 64.9 (63.2 - 66.5)
  10-year 63.9 (63.7 - 64.1) 65.6 (65.0 - 66.2) 57.9 (57.3 - 58.4) 56.8 (55.0 - 58.5)
  Median (months) - - - -

P < 0.05 for all comparisons between adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinoma comparisons. Incidence rates were expressed per 100,000. CSS: cause-specific survival; RS: relative survival; CI: confidence interval; SD: standard deviation.

Table 4. Univariate and Multivariable Cox-Proportional Hazard Ratios (HRs) of Mortality for Uterine/Cervical Cancer.

Uterus/cervix Adenosquamous vs. adenocarcinoma
Adenosquamous vs. squamous
Univariate, HR (95% CI) Multivariable, HR (95% CI) Univariate, HR (95% CI) Multivariable, HR (95% CI)
Adenosquamous histology 1.99 (1.90 - 2.08) 1.06 (1.01 - 1.11) 1.02 (0.97 - 1.06)a 1.18 (1.13 - 1.23)
Age (per 10 years) 1.36 (1.34 - 1.38) 1.34 (1.32 - 1.35) 1.29 (1.28 - 1.30) 1.12 (1.11 - 1.14)
Race
  Black 2.56 (2.43 - 2.70) 1.49 (1.41 - 1.57) 1.36 (1.31 - 1.41) 1.20 (1.15 - 1.24)
  Other 1.04 (0.98 - 1.10)a 1.00 (0.94 - 1.06)a 0.89 (0.85 - 0.93) 0.82 (0.78 - 0.86)
Detection stage
  Regional 5.11 (4.91 - 5.32) 3.02 (2.89 - 3.16) 4.93 (4.75 - 5.12) 3.24 (3.10 - 3.39)
  Distant 19.5 (18.7 - 20.2) 8.79 (8.38 - 9.22) 16.8 (16.1 - 17.5) 10.6 (10.1 - 11.1)
  Unstaged 4.35 (4.07 - 4.65) 2.07 (1.92 - 2.22) 4.85 (4.53 - 5.20) 2.96 (2.75 - 3.18)
Grade differentiation
  Moderate 2.43 (2.31 - 2.56) 1.77 (1.68 - 1.87) 1.77 (1.64 - 1.92) 1.26 (1.16 - 1.36)
  Poor 7.76 (7.39 - 8.15) 3.50 (3.31 - 3.69) 2.57 (2.38 - 2.77) 1.56 (1.45 - 1.69)
  Unknown 4.71 (4.45 - 4.97) 2.21 (2.08 - 2.34) 1.51 (1.40 - 1.64) 1.12 (1.04 - 1.21)
Surgery (yes) 0.162 (0.156 - 0.167) 0.35 (0.34 - 0.37) 0.233 (0.227 - 0.240) 0.44 (0.43 - 0.46)
Chemotherapy (yes) 5.15 (4.97 - 5.34) 1.25 (1.20 - 1.31) 2.24 (2.17 - 2.30) 0.84 (0.82 - 0.87)
Radiotherapy (yes) 2.41 (2.33 - 2.48) 1.04 (1.00 - 1.07) 3.13 (3.03 - 3.23) 1.02 (0.98 - 1.06)

P < 0.05 relative to reference unless noted by aP ≥ 0.05. Reference categories: race (White), detection stage (Localized), grade differentiation (Well), surgery (no), radiotherapy (no), and chemotherapy (no). CI: confidence interval.

Pancreatic cancer

ASC histology constituted 0.5% of all pancreatic cancers and 5.2% of all ASCs (Table 5, Fig. 1). Age of presentation was similar among ASC, AC, or SCC (about 68 years old), as well as sex distribution (about 52% males) (Table 5). ASC tumors were less likely to present as distant disease (49.6%) than either AC or SCC (57.9% vs. 62.1%, respectively). However, these tumors presented with higher rates of poor grade differentiation than either AC or SCC (33.7%, vs. 15.0% and 30.8%, respectively). ASC patients had significantly higher surgery rates at 36.2% compared to AC at 13.3% and SCC at 8.3%. Median survival for ASC and AC patients was similar at just under 6 months, compared to about 4 months for SCC patients (Table 5). In comparison to AC, ASC had an equivalent unadjusted HR of 0.97 (0.91 - 1.03) to AC and 0.77 (0.68 - 0.86) to SCC, but after multivariable analysis, the HRs were 1.25 (1.18 - 1.34), and 1.16 (1.02 - 1.31), respectively (Table 6).

Table 5. Demographics and Clinical Characteristics for Pancreatic Cancer by Histology.

Pancreas All Adenocarcinoma Squamous Adenosquamous P value
N (%) 250,034 (100.0) 149,409 (59.8) 530 (0.2) 1,273 (0.5)
Age (years) (%)
  0 - 14 94 (< 1) 1 (< 1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0.66
  15 - 29 696 (0.3) 94 (0.1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
  30 - 49 14,416 (5.8) 7,915 (5.3) 33 (6.2) 70 (5.5)
  50 - 69 105,829 (42.3) 68,078 (45.6) 220 (41.5) 564 (44.3)
  70 - 89 128,999 (51.6) 73,321 (49.1) 277 (52.3) 639 (50.2)
  Mean (SD) 68.9 (11.8) 68.4 (11.1) 68.6 (11.5) 68.4 (10.5) 0.91
  Median 70 69 70 70
Sex (%)
  Male 128,060 (51.2) 77,717 (52.0) 282 (53.2) 671 (52.7) 0.76
  Female 121,974 (48.8) 71,692 (48.0) 248 (46.8) 602 (47.3)
Race (%)
  White 203,422 (81.4) 121,475 (81.3) 403 (76.0) 1,027 (80.7) 0.032
  Black 26,897 (10.8) 16,531 (11.1) 74 (14.0) 140 (11.0)
  Other 19,715 (7.9) 11,403 (7.6) 53 (10.0) 106 (8.3)
Detection stage (%)
  Localized 26,418 (10.6) 11,737 (7.9) 30 (5.7) 112 (8.8) < 0.001
  Regional 68,912 (27.6) 43,426 (29.1) 133 (25.1) 488 (38.3)
  Distant 129,160 (51.7) 86,543 (57.9) 329 (62.1) 632 (49.6)
  Unstaged 25,544 (10.2) 7,703 (5.2) 38 (7.2) 41 (3.2)
Grade differentiation (%)
  Well 14,289 (5.7) 5,895 (3.9) 14 (2.6) 6 (0.5) < 0.001
  Moderate 31,406 (12.6) 19,930 (13.3) 42 (7.9) 148 (11.6)
  Poor 34,609 (13.8) 22,413 (15.0) 163 (30.8) 429 (33.7)
  Unknown 169,730 (67.9) 101,171 (67.7) 311 (58.7) 690 (54.2)
Surgery (%)
  Yes 44,939 (18.0) 19,802 (13.3) 45 (8.5) 461 (36.2) < 0.001
  No 205,095 (82.0) 129,607 (86.7) 485 (91.5) 812 (63.8)
Chemotherapy (%)
  Yes 105,126 (42.0) 75,021 (50.2) 219 (41.3) 703 (55.2) < 0.001
  No 144,908 (58.0) 74,388 (49.2) 311 (58.7) 570 (44.8)
Radiotherapy (%)
  Yes 34,417 (13.8) 24,021 (16.1) 86 (16.2) 207 (16.3) 0.98
  No 215,617 (86.2) 125,388 (83.9) 444 (83.8) 1,066 (83.7)
Incidence rate (95% CI) -
  All 123.6 (123.1 - 124.1) 71.2 (70.9 - 71.7) 0.23 (0.21 - 0.25) 0.63 (0.59 - 0.66)
  Male 140.3 (139.4 - 141.1) 82.1 (81.5 - 82.8) 0.28 (0.24 - 0.32) 0.73 (0.67 - 0.79)
  Female 109.7 (109.1 - 110.4) 62.3 (61.8 - 62.8) 0.19 (0.16 - 0.22) 0.54 (0.50 - 0.59)
CSS (95% CI) -
  1-year 32.0 (31.8 - 32.2) 28.0 (27.7 - 28.3) 17.7 (13.5 - 22.4) 27.7 (24.7 - 30.8)
  2-year 17.6 (17.4 - 17.8) 11.5 (11.3 - 11.7) 7.2 (4.5 - 10.7) 13.4 (11.1 - 16.0)
  5-year 9.6 (9.4 - 9.7) 3.9 (3.8 - 4.0) 3.3 (1.6 - 6.2) 6.7 (4.9 - 8.8)
  10-year 7.3 (7.1 - 7.4) 2.6 (2.5 - 2.7) 3.3 (1.6 - 6.2) 4.7 (3.0 - 7.0)
  Median (months) 5.9 5.7 3.7 5.9
RS (95% CI) -
  1-year 30.3 (30.0 - 30.5) 26.6 (26.3 - 26.9) 16.4 (12.5 - 20.9) 26.5 (23.6 - 29.5)
  2-year 16.1 (16.0 - 16.3) 10.5 (10.4 - 10.7) 6.4 (4.0 - 9.7) 12.4 (10.2 - 14.8)
  5-year 8.1 (7.9 - 8.2) 3.3 (3.1 - 3.4) 2.7 (1.2 - 5.2) 5.7 (4.1 - 7.6)
  10-year 5.1 (5.0 - 5.3) 1.7 (1.6 - 1.9) 2.7 (1.2 - 5.2) 3.2 (1.9 - 5.1)
  Median (months) 5.4 5.4 3.6 5.7

P < 0.05 for all comparisons between adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinoma comparisons. Incidence rates were expressed per 100,000. CSS: cause-specific survival; RS: relative survival; CI: confidence interval; SD: standard deviation.

Table 6. Univariate and Multivariable Cox-Proportional Hazard Ratios (HRs) of Mortality for Pancreatic Cancer.

Pancreas Adenosquamous vs. adenocarcinoma
Adenosquamous vs. squamous
Univariate, HR (95% CI) Multivariable, HR (95% CI) Univariate, HR (95% CI) Multivariable, HR (95% CI)
Adenosquamous histology 0.97 (0.91 - 1.03)a 1.25 (1.18 - 1.34) 0.77 (0.68 - 0.86) 1.16 (1.02 - 1.31)
Age (per 10 years) 1.116 (1.110 - 1.122) 1.084 (1.079 - 1.091) 1.13 (1.08 - 1.19) 1.11 (1.06 - 1.17)
Sex
  Female 0.98 (0.97 - 0.99) 0.96 (0.95 - 0.97) 0.96 (0.86 - 1.07)a 1.01 (0.91 - 1.12)
Race
  Black 1.05 (1.03 - 1.07) 1.05 (1.03 - 1.07) 1.18 (1.00 - 1.39) 1.16 (0.98 - 1.38)a
  Other 0.97 (0.95 - 0.99) 0.94 (0.92 - 0.96) 0.88 (0.73 - 1.08)a 0.95 (0.78 - 1.16)a
Detection stage
  Regional 1.06 (1.03 - 1.08) 1.32 (1.29 - 1.36) 1.07 (0.86 - 1.34)a 1.43 (1.14 - 1.79)
  Distant 2.16 (2.11 - 2.21) 2.16 (2.11 - 2.21) 2.40 (1.94 - 2.98) 2.03 (1.63 - 2.54)
  Unstaged 1.54 (1.49 - 1.60) 1.15 (1.11 - 1.19) 1.67 (1.21 - 2.30) 0.91 (0.65 - 1.27)a
Grade differentiation
  Moderate 1.06 (1.03 - 1.10) 1.26 (1.22 - 1.30) 0.72 (0.42 - 1.23)a 1.01 (0.58 - 1.73)a
  Poor 1.48 (1.43 - 1.53) 1.57 (1.52 - 1.62) 0.91 (0.55 - 1.53) 1.11 (0.65 - 1.87)a
  Unknown 1.60 (1.55 - 1.64) 1.25 (1.21 - 1.29) 1.41 (0.85 - 2.35) 1.17 (0.70 - 1.98)a
Surgery (yes) 0.36 (0.35 - 0.37) 0.43 (0.42 - 0.44) 0.32 (0.28 - 0.37) 0.36 (0.31 - 0.43)
Chemotherapy (yes) 0.56 (0.55 - 0.57) 0.525 (0.518 - 0.532) 0.55 (0.50 - 0.62) 0.52 (0.46 - 0.58)
Radiotherapy (yes) 0.61 (0.60 - 0.62) 0.93 (0.91 - 0.94) 0.66 (0.57 - 0.76) 0.88 (0.76 - 1.10)a

P < 0.05 relative to reference unless noted by aP ≥ 0.05. Reference categories: sex (Male), race (White), detection stage (Localized), grade differentiation (Well), surgery (no), radiotherapy (no), and chemotherapy (no). CI: confidence interval.

Oral cavity cancer

As a collective group, ASCs comprised 0.4% of all oral cavity cancers and 3.7% of all ASCs (Table 7, Fig. 1). These cancers had about the same average age of onset at about 63 - 64 years across all three histologies (Table 7). ASC tumors were similar to AC tumors with a male prevalence in the mid-50% range, whereas for SCC tumors, 72.6% of cases were in male patients. ASC tumors were most often detected as localized disease 53.2% of the time, compared to 38.8% and 30.6% of AC and SCC tumors, respectively. AC tumors had higher rates of poor differentiation at 34.7% than either SCC or ASC tumors (23.9% vs. 25.3%, respectively), though ASC tumors had a very high rate of unknown grade differentiation at 43.9%. ASC tumors were treated with surgery 84.0% of the time, similar to AC at 78.0%, vs. 55.4% of time for the SCC, while SCC tumors were more likely treated with chemotherapy (35.5% vs. about 14% for AC and ASC), with similar rates of radiotherapy in the 50-60% range for all histologies. Ten-year survival rates were about 15% higher for ASC tumors than either AC or SCC tumors (Table 7). This translated into overall better HR for mortality for ASC vs. AC, though not statistically significant after multivariable adjustment at 0.88 (0.76 - 1.02), and for ASC vs. SCC 0.75 (0.66 - 0.86) (Table 8).

Table 7. Demographics and Clinical Characteristics for Oral Cavity Cancer by Histology.

Oral cavity All Adenocarcinoma Squamous Adenosquamous P value
N (%) 249,224 (100.0) 3,863 (1.6) 199,190 (79.9) 888 (0.4)
Age (years) (%)
  0 - 14 677 (0.3) 9 (0.2) 58 (< 1) 4 (0.5) < 0.001
  15 - 29 3,502 (1.4) 65 (1.7) 1,174 (0.6) 15 (1.7)
  30 - 49 34,002 (3.6) 557 (14.4) 24,397 (12.2) 114 (12.8)
  50 - 69 134,349 (53.9) 1,750 (45.3) 111,842 (56.1) 419 (47.2)
  70 - 89 76,694 (30.8) 1,482 (38.4) 61,719 (31.0) 336 (37.8)
  Mean (SD) 62.4 (13.4) 63.8 (14.5) 63.1 (31.0) 63.7 (14.5) < 0.001
  Median 63 65 63 66
Sex (%)
  Male 173,732 (69.7) 2,240 (58.0) 144,537 (72.6) 472 (53.2) < 0.001
  Female 75,492 (30.3) 1,623 (42.0) 54,653 (27.4) 416 (46.8)
Race (%)
  White 209,572 (84.1) 3,195 (82.7) 170,640 (85.7) 731 (82.3) < 0.001
  Black 20,512 (8.2) 390 (10.1) 15,952 (8.0) 84 (9.5)
  Other 19,140 (7.7) 278 (7.2) 12,598 (6.3) 73 (8.2)
Detection stage (%)
  Localized 81,048 (32.5) 1,499 (38.8) 60,949 (30.6) 472 (53.2) < 0.001
  Regional 118,479 (47.5) 1,290 (33.4) 100,544 (50.5) 275 (31.0)
  Distant 35,025 (14.1) 790 (20.5) 27,525 (13.8) 113 (12.7)
  Unstaged 14,672 (5.9) 284 (7.4) 10,172 (5.1) 28 (3.2)
Grade differentiation (%)
  Well 32,962 (13.2) 389 (10.1) 27,681 (13.9) 88 (9.9) < 0.001
  Moderate 78,898 (31.7) 942 (24.4) 70,941 (35.6) 185 (20.8)
  Poor 61,523 (24.7) 1,340 (34.7) 47,510 (23.9) 225 (25.3)
  Unknown 75,841 (30.4) 1,192 (30.9) 53,058 (26.6) 390 (43.9)
Surgery (%)
  Yes 143,820 (57.7) 3,013 (78.0) 110,288 (55.4) 746 (84.0) < 0.001
  No 105,404 (42.3) 850 (22.0) 88,902 (44.6) 142 (16.0)
Chemotherapy (%)
  Yes 82,274 (33.0) 568 (14.7) 70,643 (35.5) 118 (13.3) < 0.001
  No 166,950 (67.0) 3,295 (85.3) 128,547 (64.5) 770 (86.7)
Radiotherapy (%)
  Yes 144,488 (58.0) 1,989 (51.5) 118,348 (59.4) 461 (51.9) < 0.001
  No 104,736 (42.0) 1,874 (48.5) 80,842 (40.6) 427 (48.1)
Incidence rate (95% CI) -
  All 111.1 (110.7 - 111.6) 1.63 (1.57 - 1.69) 87.2 (86.7 - 87.6) 0.44 (0.41 - 0.47)
  Male 167.2 (166.3 - 168.0) 2.10 (2.00 - 2.20) 136.3 (135.5 - 137.1) 0.49 (0.44 - 0.54)
  Female 62.8 (62.3 - 63.3) 1.26 (1.19 - 1.33) 44.4 (44.0 - 44.8) 0.39 (0.35 - 0.43)
CSS (95% CI) -
  1-year 85.9 (85.7 - 86.1) 87.1 (85.6 - 88.4) 85.0 (84.8 - 85.2) 89.5 (86.7 - 91.8)
  2-year 77.5 (77.3 - 77.7) 78.7 (76.9 - 80.4) 75.8 (75.6 - 76.1) 85.3 (82.0 - 88.0)
  5-year 68.5 (68.3 - 68.8) 66.8 (64.6 - 68.8) 66.7 (66.4 - 66.9) 78.5 (74.6 - 81.8)
  10-year 62.1 (61.8 - 62.4) 61.0 (58.6 - 63.2) 60.1 (59.8 - 60.5) 74.3 (69.8 - 78.1)
  Median (months) - - - -
RS (95% CI) -
  1-year 82.7 (82.5 - 82.9) 85.0 (83.4 - 86.4) 81.6 (81.4 - 81.8) 87.4 (84.4 - 89.8)
  2-year 72.6 (72.3 - 72.8) 74.6 (72.7 - 76.4) 70.7 (70.4 - 73.3) 81.4 (77.9 - 84.4)
  5-year 58.8 (58.5 - 59.1) 87.8 (56.0 - 60.3) 56.6 (56.3 - 56.9) 70.0 (65.8 - 73.8)
  10-year 45.1 (44.8 - 45.4) 76.0 (43.2 - 47.9) 42.4 (42.0 - 42.7) 59.1 (54.2 - 63.6)
  Median (months) 96.5 93.0 85.6 -

P < 0.05 for all comparisons between adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinoma comparisons. Incidence rates were expressed per 100,000. CSS: cause-specific survival; RS: relative survival; CI: confidence interval; SD: standard deviation.

Table 8. Univariate and Multivariable Cox-Proportional Hazard Ratios (HRs) of Mortality for Oral Cavity Cancer.

Oral cavity Adenosquamous vs. adenocarcinoma
Adenosquamous vs. squamous
Univariate, HR (95% CI) Multivariable, HR (95% CI) Univariate, HR (95% CI) Multivariable, HR (95% CI)
Adenosquamous histology 0.70 (0.60 - 0.81) 0.88 (0.76 - 1.02)a 0.60 (0.52 - 0.68) 0.75 (0.66 - 0.86)
Age (per 10 years) 1.28 (1.23 - 1.33) 1.24 (1.19 - 1.29) 1.20 (1.19 - 1.21) 1.24 (1.23 - 1.25)
Sex
  Female 0.59 (0.53 - 0.65) 0.79 (0.71 - 0.88) 1.07 (1.05 - 1.08) 1.10 (1.08 - 1.11)
Race
  Black 0.98 (0.83 - 1.16) 1.18 (1.00 - 1.40) 1.99 (1.95 - 2.04) 1.72 (1.68 - 1.76)
  Other 0.81 (0.66 - 1.00) 0.79 (0.64 - 0.97) 1.11 (1.08 - 1.15) 1.06 (1.03 - 1.09)
Detection stage
  Regional 4.03 (3.48 - 4.67) 2.70 (2.31 - 3.15) 2.16 (2.11 - 2.20) 2.25 (2.20 - 2.30)
  Distant 9.57 (8.22 - 11.1) 5.02 (4.23 - 5.95) 4.45 (4.34 - 4.55) 4.50 (4.39 - 4.62)
  Unstaged 3.40 (2.70 - 4.29) 1.99 (1.56 - 2.54) 2.51 (2.42 - 2.59) 1.93 (1.86 - 2.00)
Grade differentiation
  Moderate 2.55 (1.85 - 3.51) 2.21 (1.60 - 3.05) 1.67 (1.63 - 1.71) 1.34 (1.31 - 1.38)
  Poor 8.89 (6.56 - 12.1) 4.71 (3.45 - 6.45) 1.64 (1.59 - 1.68) 1.16 (1.13 - 1.19)
  Unknown 4.15 (3.04 - 5.66) 2.61 (1.91 - 3.58) 1.37 (1.33 - 1.41) 0.94 (0.92 - 0.97)
Surgery (yes) 0.26 (0.24 - 0.29) 0.38 (0.34 - 0.44) 0.484 (0.477 - 0.492) 0.52 (0.51 - 0.53)
Chemotherapy (yes) 3.00 (2.67 - 3.37) 1.04 (0.91 - 1.19)a 1.18 (1.16 - 1.20) 0.68 (0.67 - 0.69)
Radiotherapy (yes) 1.85 (1.66 - 2.05) 0.96 (0.86 - 1.08) 1.37 (1.35 - 1.39) 0.85 (0.83 - 0.86)

P < 0.05 relative to reference unless noted by aP ≥ 0.05. Reference categories: sex (Male), race (White), detection stage (Localized), grade differentiation (Well), surgery (no), radiotherapy (no), and chemotherapy (no). CI: confidence interval.

Biliary tract cancer

As a collective group, ASCs comprised 0.3% of all biliary tract cancers and 3.1% of all ASCs (Table 9, Fig. 1). These cancers had about the same average age of onset at about 68 - 69 years old across all three histologies (Table 9). ASC tumors were more similar to SCC tumors with a female rate at about 65%, whereas for AC tumors, 56.2% of cases were in female patients. ASC tumors were most often detected as regional disease 44.7% of the time, compared to 39.4% and 34.2% of AC and SCC tumors, respectively, with higher rates of poor differentiation at 43.8% compared to 36.9% and 39.8%. ASC tumors were treated with surgery 76.9% of the time, which was much higher than AC at 51.3% or SCC at 42.4%. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy use rates were statistically identical across all histologies. Median survival for ASC patients was about 8 months, compared to about 11 months for AC patients and 4 months for SCC patients (Table 9). This translated into overall worse morality HR for ASC compared to AC at 1.56 (1.43 - 1.71), but equivalent to SCC 0.93 (0.80 - 1.09) (Table 10).

Table 9. Demographics and Clinical Characteristics for Biliary Tract Cancer by Histology.

Biliary All Adenocarcinoma Squamous Adenosquamous P value
N (%) 218,928 (100.0) 41,976 (19.2) 450 (0.2) 749 (0.3)
Age (years) (%)
  0 - 14 1,392 (0.6) 1 (< 1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0.23
  15 - 29 1,064 (0.5) 90 (0.2) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
  30 - 49 15,632 (7.1) 2,556 (6.1) 35 (7.8) 46 (6.1)
  50 - 69 111,391 (50.9) 16,888 (40.2) 184 (40.9) 333 (44.5)
  70 - 89 89,449 (40.9) 22,441 (53.5) 231 (51.3) 370 (49.4)
  Mean (SD) 65.9 (12.9) 69.3 (11.8) 68.3 (11.8) 68.5 (11.4) 0.041
  Median 66 71 70 69
Sex (%)
  Male 139,293 (63.6) 18,403 (43.8) 164 (36.4) 258 (34.4) < 0.001
  Female 79,635 (36.4) 23,573 (56.2) 286 (63.6) 491 (65.6)
Race (%)
  White 160,585 (73.4) 33,504 (79.8) 335 (74.4) 600 (80.1) 0.039
  Black 22,737 (10.4) 3,531 (8.4) 51 (11.3) 70 (9.3)
  Other 35,606 (16.3) 4,941 (11.8) 64 (14.2) 79 (10.5)
Detection stage (%)
  Localized 73,131 (33.4) 7,489 (17.8) 44 (9.8) 100 (13.4) < 0.001
  Regional 65,390 (29.9) 16,530 (39.4) 154 (34.2) 335 (44.7)
  Distant 51,708 (23.6) 14,588 (34.8) 225 (50.0) 299 (39.9)
  Unstaged 28,699 (13.1) 3,369 (8.0) 27 (6.0) 15 (2.0)
Grade differentiation (%)
  Well 18,412 (8.4) 3,876 (9.2) 21 (4.7) 14 (1.9) < 0.001
  Moderate 35,006 (16.0) 12,125 (28.9) 115 (25.6) 188 (25.1)
  Poor 28,836 (13.2) 10,489 (25.0) 135 (30.0) 328 (43.8)
  Unknown 136,674 (62.4) 15,486 (36.9) 179 (39.8) 219 (29.2)
Surgery (%)
  Yes 64,309 (29.4) 21,527 (51.3) 191 (42.4) 576 (76.9) < 0.001
  No 154,619 (70.6) 20,449 (48.7) 259 (57.6) 173 (23.1)
Chemotherapy (%)
  Yes 73,858 (33.7) 14,544 (34.6) 149 (33.1) 284 (37.9) 0.14
  No 145,070 (66.3) 27,432 (65.4) 301 (66.9) 465 (62.1)
Radiotherapy (%)
  Yes 24,015 (11.0) 6,488 (15.5) 67 (14.9) 126 (16.8) 0.56
  No 194,913 (89.0) 35,488 (84.5) 383 (85.1) 623 (83.2)
Incidence Rate (95% CI) -
  All 111.6 (111.1 - 112.1) 19.5 (19.3 - 19.7) 0.19 (0.17 - 0.22) 0.32 (0.29 - 0.35)
  Male 156.1 (155.2 - 156.9) 19.7 (19.4 - 20.0) 0.17 (0.14 - 0.20) 0.24 (0.21 - 0.28)
  Female 73.4 (72.9 - 74.0) 19.4 (19.1 - 19.7) 0.22 (0.19 - 0.25) 0.38 (0.34 - 0.42)
CSS (95% CI) -
  1-year 47.7 (47.5 - 48.0) 47.7 (47.1 - 48.3) 19.8 (15.1 - 24.9) 33.1 (28.7 - 37.7)
  2-year 34.3 (34.1 - 34.6) 31.8 (31.2 - 32.4) 10.2 (6.7 - 14.5) 18.4 (14.8 - 22.4)
  5-year 21.7 (21.5 - 22.0) 20.0 (19.5 - 20.6) 7.4 (4.4 - 11.4) 13.1 (9.8 - 16.8)
  10-year 17.1 (16.9 - 17.3) 16.6 (16.1 - 17.2) 7.4 (4.4 - 11.4) 12.6 (9.3 - 16.3)
  Median (months) 10.7 10.9 4.2 7.9
RS (95% CI) -
  1-year 43.9 (43.7 - 44.1) 44.5 (43.9 - 45.1) 18.0 (13.7 - 22.8) 31.9 (27.6 - 36.3)
  2-year 29.9 (29.7 - 30.1) 28.3 (27.7 - 28.8) 8.1 (5.1 - 11.8) 16.8 (13.4 - 20.6)
  5-year 16.7 (16.5 - 16.9) 15.6 (15.1 - 16.1) 5.8 (3.4 - 9.3) 9.9 (7.1 - 13.1)
  10-year 11.0 (10.8 - 11.2) 10.2 (9.8 - 10.7) 5.8 (3.4 - 9.3) 7.7 (5.1 - 10.9)
  Median (months) 8.9 9.6 3.9 7.4

P < 0.05 for all comparisons between adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinoma comparisons. Incidence rates were expressed per 100,000. CSS: cause-specific survival; RS: relative survival; CI: confidence interval; SD: standard deviation.

Table 10. Univariate and Multivariable Cox-Proportional Hazard Ratios (HRs) of Mortality for Biliary Tract Cancer.

Biliary Adenosquamous vs. adenocarcinoma
Adenosquamous vs. squamous
Univariate, HR (95% CI) Multivariable, HR (95% CI) Univariate, HR (95% CI) Multivariable, HR (95% CI)
Adenosquamous histology 1.40 (1.28 - 1.52) 1.56 (1.43 - 1.71) 0.74 (0.64 - 0.85) 0.93 (0.80 - 1.09)a
Age (per 10 years) 1.10 (1.08 - 1.11) 1.08 (1.07 - 1.09) 1.12 (1.06 - 1.20) 1.10 (1.03 - 1.17)
Sex
  Female 1.06 (1.04 - 1.09) 1.06 (1.04 - 1.09) 0.98 (0.84 - 1.13)a 1.04 (0.90 - 1.21)a
Race
  Black 1.05 (1.01 - 1.10) 1.06 (1.01 - 1.11) 1.22 (0.98 - 1.53)a 1.05 (0.84 - 1.32)a
  Other 0.94 (0.90 - 0.98) 0.96 (0.92 - 1.00)a 0.97 (0.79 - 1.21)a 0.91 (0.73 - 1.13)a
Detection stage
  Regional 1.36 (1.31 - 1.42) 1.61 (1.55 - 1.68) 1.48 (1.17 - 1.88) 1.92 (1.50 - 2.45)
  Distant 3.56 (3.42 - 3.70) 3.06 (2.93 - 3.19) 2.59 (2.04 - 3.28) 2.99 (2.31 - 3.86)
  Unstaged 2.50 (2.37 - 2.64) 1.41 (1.33 - 1.49) 2.19 (1.41 - 3.40) 1.86 (1.19 - 2.91)
Grade differentiation
  Moderate 1.28 (1.22 - 1.35) 1.26 (1.20 - 1.32) 0.96 (0.63 - 1.47)a 0.88 (0.57 - 1.35)a
  Poor 2.11 (2.00 - 2.22) 1.87 (1.78 - 1.97) 1.26 (0.83 - 1.91)a 1.16 (0.76 - 1.77)a
  Unknown 2.82 (2.68 - 2.96) 1.42 (1.35 - 1.50) 1.62 (1.07 - 2.47) 1.06 (0.69 - 1.64)a
Surgery (yes) 0.33 (0.32 - 0.34) 0.385 (0.372 - 0.398) 0.42 (0.37 - 0.49) 0.48 (0.40 - 0.58)
Chemotherapy (yes) 0.95 (0.93 - 0.98) 0.66 (0.65 - 0.68)a 0.72 (0.62 - 0.83) 0.57 (0.49 - 0.67)
Radiotherapy (yes) 0.82 (0.79 - 0.84) 1.01 (0.98 - 1.05) 0.60 (0.50 - 0.72) 0.76 (0.63 - 0.93)

P < 0.05 relative to reference unless noted by aP ≥ 0.05. Reference categories: sex (Male), race (White), detection stage (Localized), grade differentiation (Well), surgery (no), radiotherapy (no), and chemotherapy (no). CI: confidence interval.

Esophageal cancer

ASC histology constituted 0.7% of all esophageal cancers and 2.8% of all ASCs (Table 11, Fig. 1). The age of presentation was similar among ASC, AC, and SCC (about 66 - 67 years old). Sex distribution towards males was similar for ASC and AC at 82.3% and 86.1% respectively, but lower for SCC at 65.1% (Table 11). ASC tumors were most likely to present as distant disease (41.4%), compared to 38.0% for AC and 28.3% for SCC. Additionally, ASC tumors presented with higher rates of poor grade differentiation than either AC or SCC (60.0%, vs. 37.3% and 33.8%, respectively). ASC patients had similar surgery rates at 33.1% compared to AC at 32.9%. SCC tumors had higher rates of radiotherapy use at 63.2%, compared to about 55% for the other two histologies. Median survival for ASC and SCC patients was similar at 8 - 10 months, compared to about 14 months for AC patients (Table 11). After multivariable analysis, ASC patients had worse mortality HR at 1.30 (1.19 - 1.42) compared to AC patients, and similarly to SCC patients at 1.21 (1.10 - 1.32) (Table 12).

Table 11. Demographics and Clinical Characteristics for Esophageal Cancer by Histology.

Esophagus All Adenocarcinoma Squamous Adenosquamous P value
N (%) 92,290 (100.0) 44,971 (48.7) 35,215 (38.2) 683 (0.7)
Age (years) (%)
  0 - 14 3 (< 1) 0 (0.0) 2 (< 1) 0 (0.0) < 0.001
  15 - 29 143 (0.2) 94 (0.2) 20 (0.1) 0 (0.0)
  30 - 49 5,857 (6.3) 3,128 (7.0) 1,966 (5.6) 52 (7.6)
  50 - 69 46,353 (50.2) 22,659 (50.4) 18,032 (51.2) 375 (54.9)
  70 - 89 39,934 (43.3) 19,090 (42.4) 15,195 (43.1) 256 (37.5)
  Mean (SD) 67.1 (11.3) 66.8 (11.5) 67.2 (10.8) 65.8 (10.7) < 0.001
  Median 67 67 67 66
Sex (%)
  Male 71,029 (77.0) 38,740 (86.1) 22,933 (65.1) 562 (82.3) < 0.001
  Female 21,261 (23.0) 6,231 (13.9) 12,282 (34.9) 121 (17.7)
Race (%)
  White 76,729 (83.1) 42,643 (94.8) 23,426 (66.5) 585 (85.7) < 0.001
  Black 10,225 (11.1) 1,164 (2.6) 8,181 (23.2) 58 (8.5)
  Other 5,336 (5.8) 1,164 (2.6) 3,608 (10.2) 40 (5.9)
Detection stage (%)
  Localized 20,381 (22.1) 10,255 (22.8) 8,130 (23.1) 89 (13.0) < 0.001
  Regional 27,306 (29.6) 13,250 (29.5) 11,191 (31.8) 249 (36.5)
  Distant 31,335 (34.0) 17,074 (38.0) 9,966 (28.3) 283 (41.4)
  Unstaged 13,268 (14.4) 4,392 (9.8) 5,928 (16.8) 62 (9.1)
Grade differentiation (%)
  Well 4,118 (4.5) 2,174 (4.8) 1,725 (4.9) 7 (1.0) < 0.001
  Moderate 25,982 (28.2) 13,110 (29.2) 12,152 (34.5) 79 (11.6)
  Poor 34,171 (37.0) 16,792 (37.3) 11,893 (33.8) 410 (60.0)
  Unknown 28,019 (30.4) 12,895 (28.7) 9,445 (26.8) 187 (27.4)
Surgery (%)
  Yes 24,022 (26.0) 14,778 (32.9) 6,648 (18.9) 226 (33.1) < 0.001
  No 68,268 (74.0) 30,193 (67.1) 28,567 (81.1) 457 (66.9)
Chemotherapy (%)
  Yes 49,701 (53.9) 26,358 (58.6) 17,993 (51.1) 392 (57.4) < 0.001
  No 42,589 (46.1) 18,613 (41.4) 17,222 (48.9) 291 (42.6)
Radiotherapy (%)
  Yes 50,446 (54.7) 23,192 (51.6) 22,270 (63.2) 378 (55.3) < 0.001
  No 41,844 (45.3) 21,779 (41.4) 12,945 (36.8) 305 (44.7)
Incidence rate (95% CI) -
  All 42.9 (42.6 - 43.2) 22.8 (22.6 - 23.1) 13.8 (13.7 - 14.0) 0.29 (0.27 - 0.32)
  Male 73.9 (73.3 - 74.5) 43.6 (43.1 - 44.0) 19.6 (19.3 - 19.9) 0.54 (0.49 - 0.59)
  Female 17.6 (17.3 - 17.8) 5.9 (5.7 - 6.1) 9.1 (8.9 - 9.3) 0.09 (0.07 - 0.11)
CSS (95% CI) -
  1-year 49.4 (49.0 - 49.8) 54.2 (53.7 - 54.8) 44.4 (43.7 - 45.2) 40.1 (35.2 - 44.8)
  2-year 32.8 (32.4 - 33.2) 36.5 (36.0 - 37.1) 29.0 (28.3 - 29.7) 21.4 (17.4 - 25.7)
  5-year 21.1 (20.7 - 21.5) 23.3 (22.8 - 23.8) 19.0 (18.4 - 19.6) 13.7 (10.3 - 17.7)
  10-year 17.2 (16.9 - 17.6) 19.3 (18.8 - 19.8) 14.9 (14.3 - 15.6) 9.6 (6.6 - 13.3)
  Median (months) 11.8 14.0 9.9 9.2
RS (95% CI) -
  1-year 46.0 (45.6 - 46.4) 50.8 (50.3 - 51.4) 41.1 (40.3 - 41.8) 36.4 (31.8 - 40.9)
  2-year 29.2 (28.8 - 29.6) 32.8 (32.3 - 33.4) 25.4 (24.8 - 26.1) 18.1 (14.6 - 22.0)
  5-year 16.5 (16.1 - 16.8) 18.6 (18.2 - 19.1) 14.2 (13.7 - 14.8) 10.6 (7.8 - 13.9)
  10-year 10.5 (10.2 - 10.8) 12.5 (12.0 - 12.9) 8.1 (7.6 - 8.6) 6.4 (4.1 - 9.3)
  Median (months) 10.5 12.4 8.9 8.5

P < 0.05 for all comparisons between adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinoma comparisons. Incidence rates were expressed per 100,000. CSS: cause-specific survival; RS: relative survival; CI: confidence interval; SD: standard deviation.

Table 12. Univariate and Multivariable Cox-Proportional Hazard Ratios (HRs) of Mortality for Esophageal Cancer.

Esophagus Adenosquamous vs. adenocarcinoma
Adenosquamous vs. squamous
Univariate, HR (95% CI) Multivariable, HR (95% CI) Univariate, HR (95% CI) Multivariable, HR (95% CI)
Adenosquamous histology 1.47 (1.35 - 1.60) 1.30 (1.19 - 1.42) 1.16 (1.07 - 1.27) 1.21 (1.10 - 1.32)
Age (per 10 years) 1.10 (1.09 - 1.11) 1.08 (1.07 - 1.09) 1.05 (1.04 - 1.07) 1.02 (1.01 - 1.03)
Sex
  Female 1.04 (1.01 - 1.08) 0.97 (0.93 - 1.00) 0.84 (0.81 - 0.86) 0.86 (0.84 - 0.89)
Race
  Black 1.16 (1.08 - 1.24) 1.05 (0.98 - 1.13)a 1.21 (1.17 - 1.24) 1.13 (1.09 - 1.16)
  Other 0.99 (0.93 - 1.07)a 0.88 (0.82 - 0.95) 1.02 (0.98 - 1.06)a 0.97 (0.93 - 1.10)a
Detection stage
  Regional 1.92 (1.85 - 1.99) 2.22 (2.13 - 2.30) 1.21 (1.16 - 1.25) 1.44 (1.39 - 1.50)
  Distant 4.59 (4.43 - 4.75) 3.84 (3.69 - 4.00) 2.36 (2.28 - 2.45) 2.34 (2.26 - 2.43)
  Unstaged 2.95 (2.82 - 3.10) 1.86 (1.77 - 1.95) 1.60 (1.54 - 1.67) 1.26 (1.21 - 1.32)
Grade differentiation
  Moderate 1.54 (1.45 - 1.64) 1.27 (1.19 - 1.35) 1.17 (1.10 - 1.24) 1.16 (1.09 - 1.24)
  Poor 2.23 (2.10 - 2.37) 1.68 (1.58 - 1.79) 1.33 (1.25 - 1.41) 1.24 (1.17 - 1.32)
  Unknown 1.62 (1.52 - 1.73) 1.18 (1.10 - 1.25) 1.16 (1.09 - 1.24) 1.03 (0.96 - 1.10)a
Surgery (yes) 0.294 (0.286 - 0.302) 0.39 (0.37 - 0.40) 0.51 (0.49 - 0.53) 0.47 (0.45 - 0.49)
Chemotherapy (yes) 0.98 (0.96 - 1.01) 0.56 (0.54 - 0.58) 0.61 (0.60 - 0.63) 0.53 (0.51 - 0.55)
Radiotherapy (yes) 0.96 (0.94 - 0.98) 1.03 (1.00 - 1.06) 0.72 (0.70 - 0.74) 0.80 (0.78 - 0.83)

P < 0.05 relative to reference unless noted by aP ≥ 0.05. Reference categories: sex (Male), race (White), detection stage (Localized), grade differentiation (Well), surgery (no), radiotherapy (no), and chemotherapy (no). CI: confidence interval.

Colorectal cancer

ASC histology constituted 0.1% of all colorectal cancers and 2.1% of all ASCs (Table 13, Fig. 1). ASC patients had a mean age of presentation of 64.6 years, while AC patients were older at 67.5 years, and SCC patients were younger at 62.9 years (Table 13). There was a female bias at 52.1% for ASC, increased to 66.7% for SCC, but decreased to 47.4% for AC tumors. ASC tumors were most likely to present as distant disease (42.3%), compared to 22.3% for AC and 17.8% for SCC. Additionally, ASC tumors presented with much higher rates of poor grade differentiation than either AC or SCC (61.5%, vs. 17.1% and 32.0%, respectively). Therapeutic modality use for ASC patients was similar to AC patients, apart from increased chemotherapy for ASC patients (46.5% vs. 36.5%). Median survival for ASC patients was about 17 - 20 months, while median survival was not reached in either the AC or SCC groups (Table 13). After multivariable analysis, ASC patients had worse mortality HR at 1.44 (1.28 - 1.63) compared to AC patients, and similarly to SCC patients at 1.26 (1.08 - 1.47) (Table 14).

Table 13. Demographics and Clinical Characteristics for Colorectal Cancer by Histology.

Colorectal All Adenocarcinoma Squamous Adenosquamous P value
N (%) 976,218 (100.0) 654,583 (67.1) 4,099 (0.4) 499 (0.1)
Age (years) (%)
  0 - 14 388 (< 1) 18 (< 1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) < 0.001
  15 - 29 6,306 (0.6%) 2,517 (0.4) 14 (0.3) 7 (1.4)
  30 - 49 91,261 (9.3) 59,034 (9.0) 567 (13.8) 69 (13.8)
  50 - 69 417,273 (42.7) 276,839 (42.3) 2,237 (54.6) 217 (43.5)
  70 - 89 460,990 (47.2) 316,175 (48.3) 1,281 (31.3) 206 (41.3)
  Mean (SD) 67.1 (13.2) 67.5 (12.8) 62.9 (12.6) 64.6 (14.2) < 0.001
  Median 68 69 63 66
Sex (%)
  Male 508,045 (52.0) 344,212 (52.6) 1,367 (33.3) 239 (47.9) < 0.001
  Female 468,173 (48.0) 310,371 (47.4) 2,732 (66.7) 260 (52.1)
Race (%)
  White 797,944 (81.7) 535,324 (81.8) 3,535 (86.2) 416 (83.4) < 0.001
  Black 96,336 (9.9) 62,425 (9.5) 451 (11.0) 55 (11.0)
  Other 81,938 (8.4) 56,834 (8.7) 113 (2.8) 28 (5.6)
Detection stage (%)
  Localized 382,652 (39.2) 211,323 (32.3) 1,563 (38.1) 68 (13.6) < 0.001
  Regional 349,452 (35.8) 272,190 (41.6) 1,172 (28.6) 208 (41.7)
  Distant 197,244 (20.2) 145,939 (22.3) 731 (17.8) 211 (42.3)
  Unstaged 46,870 (4.8) 25,131 (3.8) 633 (15.4) 12 (2.4)
Grade differentiation (%)
  Well 100,493 (10.3) 50,960 (7.8) 205 (5.0) 8 (1.6) < 0.001
  Moderate 530,921 (54.4) 402,646 (61.5) 1,138 (27.8) 100 (20.0)
  Poor 156,586 (16.0) 111,890 (17.1) 1,310 (32.0) 307 (61.5)
  Unknown 188,218 (19.3) 89,087 (13.6) 1,446 (35.3) 84 (16.8)
Surgery (%)
  Yes 832,886 (85.3) 560,355 (85.6) 1,293 (31.5) 414 (83.0) < 0.001
  No 143,332 (14.7) 94,228 (14.4) 2,806 (68.5) 85 (17.0)
Chemotherapy (%)
  Yes 309,619 (31.7) 238,979 (36.5) 2,536 (61.9) 232 (46.5) < 0.001
  No 666,599 (68.3) 415,604 (63.5) 1,563 (38.1) 267 (53.5)
Radiotherapy (%)
  Yes 117,214 (12.0) 91,656 (14.0) 2,611 (63.7) 101 (20.2) < 0.001
  No 859,004 (88.0) 562,927 (86.0) 1,488 (36.3) 398 (79.8)
Incidence rate (95% CI) -
  All 427 (426 - 428) 279 (278 - 280) 2.1 (2.0 - 2.2) 0.20 (0.18 - 0.22)
  Male 492 (491 - 494) 328 (326 - 329) 1.5 (1.4 - 1.6) 0.22 (0.18 - 0.25)
  Female 373 (372 - 374) 240 (239 - 241) 2.6 (2.5 - 2.7) 0.19 (0.16 - 0.22)
CSS (95% CI) -
  1-year 84.6 (84.5 - 84.7) 84.2 (84.1 - 84.3) 81.2 (79.7 - 82.6) 61.3 (55.3 - 66.8)
  2-year 77.1 (76.9 - 77.2) 75.6 (75.5 - 75.8) 72.0 (70.2 - 73.7) 47.2 (41.1 - 53.1)
  5-year 65.3 (65.2 - 65.4) 61.7 (61.6 - 61.9) 63.9 (61.9 - 65.8) 35.7 (29.8 - 41.6)
  10-year 58.8 (58.6 - 58.9) 54.3 (54.1 - 54.5) 59.7 (57.6 - 61.8) 32.9 (27.0 - 38.9)
  Median (months) - - - 20.3
RS (95% CI) -
  1-year 81.0 (80.9 - 81.1) 80.5 (80.4 - 80.7) 77.7 (76.1 - 79.2) 58.7 (52.7 - 64.1)
  2-year 71.9 (71.8 - 72.0) 70.4 (70.3 - 70.6) 67.3 (65.5 - 69.0) 44.4 (38.5 - 50.1)
  5-year 55.8 (55.6 - 55.9) 52.4 (52.2 - 52.6) 55.8 (53.8 - 57.7) 32.0 (26.6 - 37.7)
  10-year 41.4 (41.2 - 41.5) 37.5 (37.3 - 37.6) 46.1 (43.9 - 48.2) 26.4 (21.0 - 32.0)
  Median (months) 80.3 67.3 94.5 17.0

P < 0.05 for all comparisons between adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinoma comparisons. Incidence rates were expressed per 100,000. CSS: cause-specific survival; RS: relative survival; CI: confidence interval; SD: standard deviation.

Table 14. Univariate and Multivariable Cox-Proportional Hazard Ratios (HRs) of Mortality for Colorectal Cancer.

Colorectal Adenosquamous vs. adenocarcinoma
Adenosquamous vs. squamous
Univariate, HR (95% CI) Multivariable, HR (95% CI) Univariate, HR (95% CI) Multivariable, HR (95% CI)
Adenosquamous histology 2.15 (1.91 - 2.42) 1.44 (1.28 - 1.63) 2.20 (1.93 - 2.50) 1.26 (1.08 - 1.47)
Age (per 10 years) 1.109 (1.105 - 1.112) 1.204 (1.201 - 1.209) 1.21 (1.16 - 1.26) 1.18 (1.13 - 1.23)
Sex
  Female 0.94 (0.93 - 0.95) 0.935 (0.928 - 0.943) 0.69 (0.63 - 0.76) 0.74 (0.67 - 0.82)
Race
  Black 1.24 (1.22 - 1.25) 1.17 (1.16 - 1.19) 1.26 (1.09 - 1.46) 1.18 (1.02 - 1.37)
  Other 0.90 (0.89 - 0.92) 0.92 (0.91 - 0.93) 1.19 (0.90 - 1.58)a 0.86 (0.65 - 1.14)a
Detection stage
  Regional 2.26 (2.23 - 2.29) 2.51 (2.48 - 2.54) 2.07 (1.80 - 2.38) 2.19 (1.90 - 2.53)
  Distant 12.0 (11.0 - 12.2) 12.0 (11.9 - 12.2) 7.41 (6.46 - 8.50) 7.17 (6.20 - 8.28)
  Unstaged 5.10 (5.00 - 5.21) 2.89 (2.83 - 2.96) 2.20 (1.85 - 2.61) 1.72 (1.44 - 2.06)
Grade differentiation
  Moderate 1.17 (1.15 - 1.19) 1.04 (1.02 - 1.06) 1.31 (1.01 - 1.71) 1.26 (0.96 - 1.64)a
  Poor 1.92 (1.89 - 1.96) 1.48 (1.46 - 1.51) 1.73 (1.33 - 2.24) 1.40 (1.08 - 1.83)
  Unknown 2.43 (2.38 - 2.48) 1.17 (1.15 - 1.20) 1.39 (1.07 - 1.81) 1.09 (0.84 - 1.43)a
Surgery (yes) 0.203 (0.201 - 0.205) 0.410 (0.405 - 0.414) 0.92 (0.83 - 1.02)a 0.72 (0.64 - 0.82)
Chemotherapy (yes) 1.41 (1.40 - 1.42) 0.75 (0.74 - 0.76) 0.59 (0.53 - 0.65) 0.64 (0.56 - 0.72)
Radiotherapy (yes) 1.08 (1.06 - 1.09) 1.12 (1.10 - 1.13) 0.48 (0.43 - 0.53) 0.68 (0.60 - 0.77)

P < 0.05 relative to reference unless noted by aP ≥ 0.05. Reference categories: sex (Male), race (White), detection stage (Localized), grade differentiation (Well), surgery (no), radiotherapy (no), and chemotherapy (no). CI: confidence interval.

Gastric cancer

ASC histology constituted 0.3% of all gastric cancers and 2.0% of all ASCs (Table 15, Fig. 1). ASC patients had an earlier mean age of presentation of 65.6 years old, compared to 68.5 years old for AC patients and 67.3 years old for SCC patients (Table 15). There was a strong male bias at 72.2% for ASC, compared to 66.5% for AC and 70.9% for SCC tumors. ASC tumors were most likely to present as distant disease at 43.0%, compared to 37.6% for AC and 41.4% for SCC. Similarly, ASC tumors presented with much higher rates of poor grade differentiation than either AC or SCC (63.9%, vs. 47.8% and 41.5%, respectively). Therapeutic modality use for ASC patients was similar to AC patients (surgery 54.9% vs. 48.6%, respectively), compared to 26.2% for SCC patients. ASC patients had the highest rates of chemotherapy use at 50.9%, compared to 41.0% for AC and 44.0% for SCC. Radiotherapy use was similar for ASC and SCC patients (33.4% vs. 38.7%). Median survival for ASC patients was about 9 - 10 months, compared to 14 - 17 months for AC patients and 7 - 8 months for SCC patients (Table 15). After multivariable analysis, ASC patients had worse mortality HR at 1.24 (1.11 - 1.38) compared to AC patients, but equivalent to SCC patients at 1.11 (0.96 - 1.27) (Table 16).

Table 15. Demographics and Clinical Characteristics for Gastric Cancer by Histology.

Gastric All Adenocarcinoma Squamous Adenosquamous P value
N (%) 163,791 (100.0) 103,143 (63.0) 1,306 (0.8) 479 (0.3)
Age (years) (%)
  0 - 14 45 (< 1) 3 (< 1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) < 0.001
  15 - 29 1,149 (0.7) 493 (0.5) 4 (0.3) 2 (0.4)
  30 - 49 16,632 (10.2) 8,103 (7.9) 76 (5.8) 39 (8.1)
  50 - 69 66,842 (40.8) 41,002 (39.8) 632 (48.4) 257 (53.7)
  70 - 89 79,123 (48.3) 53,542 (51.9) 594 (45.5) 181 (37.8)
  Mean (SD) 67.2 (13.4) 68.5 (12.7) 67.3 (11.7) 65.6 (11.6) < 0.001
  Median 69 70 68 66
Sex (%)
  Male 100,682 (61.5) 68,577 (66.5) 926 (70.9) 346 (72.2) < 0.001
  Female 63,109 (38.5) 34,566 (33.5) 380 (29.1) 133 (27.8)
Race (%)
  White 118,825 (72.5) 74,681 (72.4) 951 (72.8) 371 (77.5) < 0.001
  Black 19,550 (11.9) 11,583 (11.2) 236 (18.1) 61 (12.7)
  Other 25,416 (15.5) 16,879 (16.4) 119 (9.1) 47 (9.8)
Detection Stage (%)
  Localized 41,461 (25.3) 22,366 (21.7) 227 (17.4) 59 (12.3) < 0.001
  Regional 45,864 (28.0) 32,103 (31.1) 337 (25.8) 186 (38.8)
  Distant 58,576 (35.8) 38,774 (37.6) 541 (41.4) 206 (43.0)
  Unstaged 17,890 (10.9) 9,900 (9.6) 201 (15.4) 28 (5.8)
Grade Differentiation (%)
  Well 9,547 (5.8) 4,779 (4.6) 64 (4.9) 3 (0.6) < 0.001
  Moderate 30,480 (18.6) 25,698 (24.9) 330 (25.3) 63 (13.2)
  Poor 75,552 (46.1) 49,344 (47.8) 542 (41.5) 306 (63.9)
  Unknown 48,212 (29.4) 23,322 (22.6) 370 (28.3) 107 (22.3)
Surgery (%)
  Yes 81,339 (49.7) 50,124 (48.6) 342 (26.2) 263 (54.9) < 0.001
  No 82,452 (50.3) 53,019 (51.4) 964 (73.8) 216 (45.1)
Chemotherapy (%)
  Yes 63,961 (39.1) 42,283 (41.0) 575 (44.0) 244 (50.9) < 0.001
  No 99,830 (60.9) 60,860 (59.0) 731 (56.0) 235 (49.1)
Radiotherapy (%)
  Yes 31,035 (18.9) 22,608 (21.9) 505 (38.7) 160 (33.4) < 0.001
  No 132,756 (81.1) 80,535 (78.1) 801 (61.3) 319 (66.6)
Incidence Rate (95% CI) -
  All 73.7 (73.3 - 74.1) 43.6 (43.3 - 43.9) 0.57 (0.54 - 0.61) 0.19 (0.17 - 0.21)
  Male 99.9 (99.2 - 100.7) 65.2 (64.7 - 65.8) 0.90 (0.83 - 0.97) 0.29 (0.26 - 0.34)
  Female 53.1 (52.6 - 53.5) 26.4 (26.1 - 26.7) 0.30 (0.27 - 0.34) 0.10 (0.08 - 0.12)
CSS (95% CI) -
  1-year 56.8 (56.5 - 57.1) 53.3 (52.9 - 53.7) 38.2 (34.6 - 41.8) 44.3 (38.2 - 50.3)
  2-year 43.1 (42.7 - 43.4) 37.7 (37.3 - 38.1) 24.9 (21.7 - 28.2) 23.7 (18.6 - 29.2)
  5-year 32.5 (32.1 - 32.8) 26.0 (25.7 - 26.4) 18.4 (15.4 - 21.6) 16.9 (12.5 - 22.0)
  10-year 28.5 (28.2 - 28.8) 22.3 (21.9 - 22.7) 17.1 (14.1 - 20.4) 14.0 (9.7 - 19.0)
  Median (Months) 16.6 13.7 7.7 10.3
RS (95% CI) -
  1-year 53.5 (53.2 - 53.8) 49.9 (49.5 - 50.3) 35.3 (31.9 - 38.7) 41.4 (35.5 - 47.2)
  2-year 39.1 (38.8 - 39.4) 33.9 (33.5 - 34.3) 22.8 (19.8 - 25.9) 21.7 (16.9 - 26.8)
  5-year 26.5 (26.2 - 26.8) 20.7 (20.3 - 21.0) 14.6 (12.0 - 17.5) 14.7 (10.7 - 19.4)
  10-year 19.0 (18.8 - 19.3) 13.9 (13.6 - 14.3) 10.9 (8.5 - 13.6) 9.5 (6.1 - 13.9)
  Median (Months) 14.0 12.0 6.8 9.4

P < 0.05 for all comparisons between adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinoma comparisons. Incidence rates were expressed per 100,000. CSS: cause-specific survival; RS: relative survival; CI: confidence interval; SD: standard deviation.

Table 16. Univariate and Multivariable Cox-Proportional Hazard Ratios (HRs) of Mortality for Gastric Cancer.

Gastric Adenosquamous vs. adenocarcinoma
Adenosquamous vs. squamous
Univariate, HR (95% CI) Multivariable, HR (95% CI) Univariate, HR (95% CI) Multivariable, HR (95% CI)
Adenosquamous histology 1.29 (1.16 - 1.44) 1.24 (1.11 - 1.38) 0.98 (0.87 - 1.12)a 1.11 (0.96 - 1.27)a
Age (per 10 years) 1.05 (1.04 - 1.06) 1.07 (1.06 - 1.08) 1.09 (1.04 - 1.15) 1.09 (1.03 - 1.14)
Sex
  Female 0.97 (0.95 - 0.98) 0.95 (0.93 - 0.96) 0.89 (0.78 - 1.01)a 0.88 (0.77 - 1.00)a
Race
  Black 0.97 (0.95 - 0.99) 0.98 (0.96 - 1.01)a 1.43 (1.22 - 1.66) 1.32 (1.13 - 1.54)
  Other 0.74 (0.73 - 0.76) 0.82 (0.81 - 0.84) 1.09 (0.89 - 1.33)a 0.97 (0.79 - 1.19)a
Detection stage
  Regional 2.33 (2.27 - 2.39) 2.81 (2.74 - 2.89) 1.40 (1.16 - 1.70) 1.68 (1.37 - 2.05)
  Distant 6.10 (5.95 - 6.26) 4.91 (4.77 - 5.05) 3.32 (2.76 - 4.00) 3.09 (2.52 - 3.77)
  Unstaged 3.85 (3.72 - 3.98) 2.07 (2.00 - 2.15) 2.12 (1.68 - 2.68) 1.51 (1.18 - 1.92)
Grade differentiation
  Moderate 1.48 (1.41 - 1.55) 1.20 (1.15 - 1.26) 1.55 (1.10 - 2.17) 1.33 (0.94 - 1.87)a
  Poor 2.08 (1.99 - 2.17) 1.60 (1.53 - 1.67) 2.07 (1.49 - 2.86) 1.72 (1.23 - 2.40)
  Unknown 2.10 (2.01 - 2.20) 1.26 (1.21 - 1.32) 1.67 (1.19 - 2.34) 1.21 (0.86 - 1.70)a
Surgery (yes) 0.298 (0.293 - 0.303) 0.367 (0.360 - 0.375) 0.45 (0.40 - 0.51) 0.50 (0.42 - 0.58)
Chemotherapy (yes) 1.05 (1.03 - 1.07) 0.59 (0.57 - 0.60) 0.72 (0.64 - 0.81) 0.56 (0.49 - 0.64)
Radiotherapy (yes) 0.89 (0.87 - 0.91) 0.98 (0.96 - 0.99) 0.71 (0.63 - 0.80) 0.87 (0.76 - 0.99)

P < 0.05 relative to reference unless noted by aP ≥ 0.05. Reference categories: sex (Male), race (White), detection stage (Localized), grade differentiation (Well), surgery (no), radiotherapy (no), and chemotherapy (no). CI: confidence interval.

Discussion

This study is the most comprehensive comparative analysis of ASCs to site-matching parent nonvariant ACs and SCC histologies. Because these cancers comprise less than 0.3% of all malignancies, the literature on this histology is extremely spare. There is a pressing need to better understand the underlying tumor biology, as several reports have suggested that the incidence of these malignancies is rising [18, 19]. Gathered primarily from limited series, the prevailing understanding of ASC clinical behavior is that patients with these malignancies have more aggressive disease progression compared to site-matched ACs or SCCs [20, 21]. However, outside of a systematic examination of a population-level registry, the epidemiological factors that may be contributing to this perception cannot be well characterized.

From this analysis, we demonstrate site-specific variabilities in the behaviors of ASCs. Among the gastrointestinal tract malignancies, esophageal, gastric, and biliary tumors have slightly earlier ages of onset than either parent histology (about 1 - 3 years), identical for pancreatic cancer, and averaged between the histologies for colorectal cancer (median age AC 69 years old, SCC 63 years old, ASC 66 years old). With respect to stage at detection, ASCs of the lung, pancreas, oral cavity, and biliary tract tended to present with less distant disease, whereas uterine/cervical, esophageal, colorectal, and gastric cancers presented more often with distant disease than ACs or SCCs. The notable outlier was colorectal cancers, where ASCs presented with distant disease 42.3% of the time, nearly double that of the other histologies (AC 22.3%, SCC 17.8%). Except for oral cavity cancers, the grade differentiation was poor, nearly twice as often for ASCs at all other sites compared to ACs and SCCs. Taken all together, the unadjusted mortality HRs for ASCs compared to ACs were higher for uterine/cervical, biliary tract, esophageal, colorectal, and gastric cancers (about 1.3 - 2.2), equivalent for pancreatic cancer, and lower for lung and oral cavity cancers (about 0.7 - 0.9). Compared to SCCs, unadjusted mortality HRs were higher for esophageal and colorectal cancers (about 1.2 - 2.2), equivalent for uterine/cervical and gastric cancers, and lower for lung, pancreatic, oral cavity, and biliary tract cancers (about 0.7 - 0.8). However, after multivariable adjustment for sex, race, detection stage, grade differentiation, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, except for oral cavity cancers, ASCs in all other sites had higher mortality HRs than ACs or SCCs (apart from biliary tract and gastric SCCs, which were equivalent). This finding implies that apart from oral cavity cancers, ASC histology may be an independent predictor of poorer prognosis compared to conventional ACs and SCCs.

The etiology of ASCs is poorly understood. Leading ideas include a predominant adenocarcinoma histology that undergoes a subsequent metaplasia, or in other cases, an underlying squamous metaplasia that experiences a malignant transformation secondary to persistent chronic inflammation [22-26]. Alternatively, these cancers may arise from pluripotent cancer stems cells capable of inducing malignant transformation of both histologies or transdifferentiation [6]. This theory is particularly intriguing, because if these cancers are more likely to be propagated by semi-quiescent cancer stem cells, which are well recognized to be chemotherapy and radiotherapy resistant, it might explain the higher rates of dedifferentiation and worsened outcomes compared to conventional histologies [27, 28].

This study does have several limitations. Despite this project using a well-validated population level database with quality assurance metrics [10], the research is retrospective in nature, and therefore is prone to selection bias. In order to obtain sufficient numbers of ASC cases for meaningful descriptive and comparative analyses across all major disease sites, the entire span of SEER database is required, which requires us to limit our treatment variables to binary values. Unfortunately, this approach does not allow for consideration of the effects of advances in therapeutic efficacy over the 45 years of data captured by SEER. Additionally, stage and grade classifications have subtle differences across different anatomical sites and have also evolved with temporal updates of tumor classification algorithms. Therefore, out of necessity to make consistent comparisons across all sites and over the evolution of formalized staging systems, this study is required to use very broad definitions out of necessity. However, despite these drawbacks, this project would not be possible outside of a population-level registry given the extreme rarity of ASCs. By providing a standardized and systemic characterization of the clinicoepidemiological features of ASCs against nonvariant ACs and SCCs across all major sites, this study provides the comprehensive groundwork for future comparative studies that will be required to further delineate the tumor biology of this rare and poorly understood pathology. Such research will be necessary in order to implement effective and tailored treatment interventions for patients diagnosed with these cancers.

Supplementary Material

Suppl 1

Exclusion criteria and counts of all cases, ACs, SCCs, and ASCs from SEER (1975 - 2020).

wjon-15-432-s001.docx (11.6KB, docx)
Suppl 2

Variables in analysis. Categorization reflects final variable composition.

wjon-15-432-s002.docx (13.1KB, docx)
Suppl 3

Breakdown of ASC cases in SEER (1975 - 2020), both analyzed and not analyzed.

wjon-15-432-s003.docx (15.6KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

None to declare.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) grant P30CA016056 involving the use of Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center’s Pathology Network, Genomic, and Biomedical Research Informatics Shared Resources. KT was supported by US National Institutes of Health grants R37CA248018, R01CA-250412, R01CA251545, R01EB029596, as well as US Department of Defense BCRP grants W81XWH-19-1-0674 and W81XWH-19-1-0111.

Conflict of Interest

None to declare.

Informed Consent

Data release from the SEER database does not require informed patient consent.

Author Contributions

MGKB and VORS designed the study. MGKB conducted the SEER analysis. MGKB compiled the figures, and MGKB and CJR composed the tables. MGKB and VORS wrote the original draft, and all authors reviewed and edited the draft. KT supervised the project. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article. Access to the SEER database is available via signed user agreements (https://seer.cancer.gov/data/access.html).

Abbreviations

AC

adenocarcinoma (conventional/nonvariant)

ASC

adenosquamous carcinoma

CI

confidence interval

CSS

cause-specific survival

HR

hazard ratio

RS

relative survival

SD

standard deviation

SCC

squamous cell carcinoma (conventional/nonvariant)

SEER

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results

References

  • 1.Lokuhetty D, White VA, Watanabe R, Cree IA, World Health O, World Health Organization and International Agency for Research on Cancer. Digestive system tumours. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Travis WD, Brambilla E, Burke A, Marx A, Nicholson AG. International Agency for Research on Cancer. WHO classification of tumours of the lung, pleura, thymus and heart. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Simone CG, Zuluaga Toro T, Chan E, Feely MM, Trevino JG, George TJ Jr. Characteristics and outcomes of adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas. Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2013;6(3):75–79. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organization. International classification of diseases for oncology (ICD-O) World Health Organization; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sapuppo E, Brunetti O, Tessitore D, Brandi G, Di Giovanni N, Fadda G, Luchini C. et al. Rare histotypes of epithelial biliary tract tumors: A literature review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2023;181:103892. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hoshimoto S, Aiura K, Shito M, Kakefuda T, Sugiura H. Adenosquamous carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: a case report and literature review. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13:287. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0709-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Maki RG. Trials and tribulations in rare cancer clinical research. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(8):865–867. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.02137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gallicchio L, Daee DL, Rotunno M, Barajas R, Fagan S, Carrick DM, Divi RL. et al. Epidemiologic research of rare cancers: trends, resources, and challenges. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021;30(7):1305–1311. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Che WQ, Li YJ, Tsang CK, Wang YJ, Chen Z, Wang XY, Xu AD. et al. How to use the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) data: research design and methodology. Mil Med Res. 2023;10(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40779-023-00488-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Duggan MA, Anderson WF, Altekruse S, Penberthy L, Sherman ME. The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program and pathology: toward strengthening the critical relationship. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40(12):e94–e102. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Benesch MGK, O'Brien SBL. Epidemiology of undifferentiated carcinomas. Cancers (Basel) 2022;14(23):5819. doi: 10.3390/cancers14235819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Benesch MGK, Mathieson A. Epidemiology of mucinous adenocarcinomas. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12(11):3193. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Benesch MGK, Mathieson A. Epidemiology of signet ring cell adenocarcinomas. Cancers (Basel) 2020;12(6):1544. doi: 10.3390/cancers12061544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Benesch MGK, Nelson ED, O'Brien SBL. Malignant transformation of long-standing ileal Crohn's disease likely favors signet ring cell adenocarcinoma histology. World J Oncol. 2023;14(6):447–456. doi: 10.14740/wjon1605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Benesch MGK, Mathieson A, O'Brien SBL. Effects of tumor localization, age, and stage on the outcomes of gastric and colorectal signet ring cell adenocarcinomas. Cancers (Basel) 2023;15(3):714. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Benesch MGK, Nelson ED, O'Brien SBL. Location has prognostic impact on the outcome of colorectal mucinous adenocarcinomas. Cancers (Basel) 2023;16(1):147. doi: 10.3390/cancers16010147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Surveillance E, and End Results (SEER) Program ( www.seer.cancer.gov) SEER*Stat Database: Incidence - SEER Research Data, 18 Registries, Nov 2021 Sub (1975-2020). National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, released April 2023, based on the November 2022 submission (Accessed January 2, 2024)
  • 18.Huang Z, Wang J, Zhang R, He A, Luo S, Wu R, Xiong J. et al. Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma: a population level analysis of epidemiological trends and prognosis. Cancer Med. 2023;12(8):9926–9936. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cheng C, Luo Z, Xiong W, Shi Z, Tan H. Epidemiology and survival outcomes in adenosquamous carcinoma: a population-based study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022;37(7):1581–1592. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04198-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Qian H, Ji X, Liu C, Dang Y, Li X, Zhang G. Clinical characteristics, prognosis, and nomogram for esophageal cancer based on adenosquamous carcinoma: a SEER database analysis. Front Oncol. 2021;11:603349. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.603349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cheung R. Analysis of SEER adenosquamous carcinoma data to identify cause specific survival predictors and socioeconomic disparities. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(1):347–352. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2016.17.1.347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Qin BD, Jiao XD, Yuan LY, Liu K, Zang YS. Adenosquamous carcinoma of the bile duct: a population-based study. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:439–446. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S144850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Iemura A, Yano H, Mizoguchi A, Kojiro M. A cholangiocellular carcinoma nude mouse strain showing histologic alteration from adenocarcinoma to squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer. 1992;70(2):415–422. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920715)70:2&#x0003c;415::aid-cncr2820700208&#x0003e;3.0.co;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Okamura K, Hayakawa H, Kuze M, Takahashi H, Kosaka A, Mizumoto R, Katsuta K. Triple carcinomas of the biliary tract associated with congenital choledochal dilatation and pancreaticobiliary maljunction. J Gastroenterol. 2000;35(6):465–471. doi: 10.1007/s005350070093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ochiai T, Yamamoto J, Kosuge T, Shimada K, Takayama T, Yamasaki S, Ozaki H. et al. Adenosquamous carcinoma with different morphologic and histologic components arising from the intrahepatic bile duct: report of a case. Hepatogastroenterology. 1996;43(9):663–666. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kardon DE, Thompson LD, Przygodzki RM, Heffess CS. Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas: a clinicopathologic series of 25 cases. Mod Pathol. 2001;14(5):443–451. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3880332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Li Y, Wang Z, Ajani JA, Song S. Drug resistance and cancer stem cells. Cell Commun Signal. 2021;19(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12964-020-00627-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Arnold CR, Mangesius J, Skvortsova II, Ganswindt U. The role of cancer stem cells in radiation resistance. Front Oncol. 2020;10:164. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Suppl 1

Exclusion criteria and counts of all cases, ACs, SCCs, and ASCs from SEER (1975 - 2020).

wjon-15-432-s001.docx (11.6KB, docx)
Suppl 2

Variables in analysis. Categorization reflects final variable composition.

wjon-15-432-s002.docx (13.1KB, docx)
Suppl 3

Breakdown of ASC cases in SEER (1975 - 2020), both analyzed and not analyzed.

wjon-15-432-s003.docx (15.6KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article. Access to the SEER database is available via signed user agreements (https://seer.cancer.gov/data/access.html).


Articles from World Journal of Oncology are provided here courtesy of Elmer Press

RESOURCES