Abstract
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and Alzheimer’s disease are the most common forms of early-onset dementia. Dominantly inherited mutations in MAPT, the microtubule-associated protein tau gene, cause FTD and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP-17). Individuals with FTDP-17 develop abundant filamentous tau inclusions in brain cells. Here we used electron cryo-microscopy to determine the structures of tau filaments from the brains of individuals with MAPT mutations V337M and R406W. Both mutations gave rise to tau filaments with the Alzheimer fold, which consisted of paired helical filaments in all V337M and R406W cases and of straight filaments in two V337M cases. We also identified a new assembly of the Alzheimer fold into triple tau filaments in a V337M case. Filaments assembled from recombinant tau(297–391) with mutation V337M had the Alzheimer fold and showed an increased rate of assembly.
In the adult human brain, six tau isoforms are expressed from a single gene by alternative mRNA splicing (1). They differ by the presence or absence of one or two inserts in the N-terminal half and an insert in the C-terminal half. The latter encodes a repeat of 31 amino acids, giving rise to three isoforms with four repeats (4R). The other three isoforms have three repeats (3R). Together with adjoining sequences, these repeats constitute the microtubule-binding domains of tau (2). Some of the repeats also form the cores of assembled tau in neurodegenerative diseases, suggesting that physiological function and pathological assembly are mutually exclusive. Most MAPT mutations are in exons 9–12, which encode R1-R4, with some mutations being present in exon 13, which encodes the sequence from the end of R4 to the C-terminus of tau. Only two of the sixty-five known MAPT mutations are found near the N-terminus of tau (3). Mutations in MAPT lead to the formation of filamentous inclusions that are made of either 3R, 4R or 3R+4R tau (4). Mutations that cause the relative overproduction of wild-type 3R or 4R tau result in the deposition of 3R tau with the Pick fold (5) or 4R tau with the argyrophilic grain disease (AGD) fold (6). In cases of sporadic and familial tauopathies, filaments of TMEM106B also form in an age-related manner (7–9).
Structures of 3R+4R tau-containing filaments from cases with MAPT mutations have not been reported. In sporadic diseases, filaments made of 3R+4R tau have the Alzheimer (10) or the chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) (11) fold. The Alzheimer tau fold is also found in familial British and Danish dementias, cases of prion protein amyloidoses and primary age-related tauopathy (PART) (6,12). The CTE tau fold is also typical of subacute sclerosing panencephalitis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/parkinsonism dementia complex and vacuolar tauopathy (13–15). Recombinant tau(297–391) forms filaments with either fold, depending on the in vitro assembly conditions (16).
Dominantly inherited mutations V337M (17–21) in exon 12 and R406W (22–28) in exon 13 of MAPT give rise to FTD with inclusions that are also made of all six tau isoforms (18,24). Mutation V337M, which is located inside the ordered cores of tau filaments (4), causes behavioural-variant FTD and cognitive impairment in the fifth or sixth decade (17,20,29); it has been reported that tau inclusions are abundant in cerebral cortex, but not in hippocampus (17). Mutation R406W, which is located outside the ordered cores of tau filaments, is associated with an Alzheimer’s disease (AD)-like amnestic phenotype that is characterised by initial memory impairment (30,31); abundant tau inclusions are present in both cerebral cortex and hippocampus (22). Here, we show that tau filaments from the brains of individuals with mutations V337M and R406W in MAPT adopt the Alzheimer fold.
RESULTS
Structures of tau filaments from three cases of Seattle family A with mutation V337M in MAPT
We used electron cryo-microscopy (cryo-EM) to determine the atomic structures of tau filaments from the frontal cortex of three previously described individuals of Seattle family A with mutation V337M in MAPT (Figures 1 and 2) (17,20). By immunohistochemistry, abundant tau inclusions were present in the frontal cortex (Extended Data Figure 1A) (17,18). Unlike previous reports (17), we detected hippocampal tau inclusions (Extended Data Figure 1B).
By cryo-EM, we observed the presence of the Alzheimer tau fold in all three cases (Figure 1 and 2) (10). Paired helical filaments (PHFs) and straight filaments (SFs) were found in cases 1 and 3, while only PHFs were in evidence in case 2. The structures of PHFs and SFs were determined to 2.7–3.3 Å resolution and were compared to the previously determined structures of PHFs and SFs from AD (10).
PHFs from the cases with mutation V337M were nearly identical to those of PHFs assembled from wild-type tau in AD. The structures of V337M SFs and AD SFs, which comprise two asymmetrically packed protofilaments A and B with the Alzheimer tau fold, had also similar cross-sections perpendicular to the helical axis. However, unlike SFs of AD, the backbone traces of the protofilaments differed from each other along the helical axis in V337M SFs. In protofilament A, strand β4 of the Alzheimer fold, which comprises residues 336–341, was shifted along the helical axis by about 3 Å compared to protofilament B, which adopted a typical Alzheimer fold (Figure 2d). Since β4 contains the V337M mutation site, this shift may have resulted from the presence of the mutant residue. The side chain of methionine is bulkier than that of valine, but it is also more flexible.
Cryo-EM density maps and the atomic models showed that both wild-type and mutant residues could fit into the density at position 337 (Figure 2a). Analysis of the sarkosyl-insoluble fractions by mass spectrometry also showed peptides with either M337 or V337, consistent with the presence of both wild-type and mutant alleles in disease filaments (Extended Data Figure 2). By immunoblotting of sarkosyl-insoluble tau, strong bands of 60, 64 and 68 kDa, as well as a weaker band of 72 kDa, were observed, indicating the presence of all six tau isoforms in a hyperphosphorylated state (Figure 1b).
Sarkosyl-insoluble tau from case 3 with mutation V337M contained a new filament with three-fold symmetry that we named ‘triple filament’ (TF). We determined the structure of TFs to 2.3 Å resolution (Figures 1a, 2e). Unlike PHFs and SFs, which are made of two protofilaments, TFs consist of three identical protofilaments, related by C3 symmetry, with each protofilament extending from G273/304-E380. Even at 2.3 Å resolution, the side chain density at the mutation site appeared ambiguous and could accommodate either M337 or V337. A comparison of V337M TF and PHF protofilaments showed that they have similar cross-sections perpendicular to the helical axis, but that they differ by a 3 Å shift of the β4 strand of the TF along the helical axis (Figure 2f). This shift is like that between V337M SF protofilaments A and B. It is probably essential for TF formation, since the N-terminal residues of β4 contribute to the interface between protofilaments, which differ from those of PHFs and SFs. At the interface of TF protofilaments, Q336 from one protofilament intercalates between S324 and N327 of the opposite protofilament and hydrogen bonds with G326. In return, N327 of the opposite protofilament hydrogen bonds with G334 (Figure 2e). There is a large cavity along the three-fold symmetry axis of the filament, which contains a potentially negatively charged density that is coordinated by residue K331 from each protofilament. It thus appears that like SFs, whose interface contains a non-proteinaceous density between K317 and K321 from both protofilaments, TF assembly may also require external cofactors.
In addition to tau filaments with the Alzheimer fold, TMEM106B filaments were present in case 1 with the V337M mutation (Figure 1a). This individual died aged 78. The sarkosyl-insoluble fractions from the frontal cortex of cases 2 and 3, who died aged 63 and 58, were devoid of TMEM106B filaments.
Mutation V337M increases the rate of assembly of recombinant tau(297–391)
We performed in vitro assembly reactions with recombinant proteins to determine if the V337M mutation in tau(297–391) influences the rate of filament assembly when compared to wild-type tau(297–391). With V337M tau(297–391), thioflavin T (ThT) fluorescence started to increase after 90 min and reached a plateau at 180 min. With wild-type tau(297–391), ThT fluorescence began to rise after 200 min and plateaued at 300 min (Figure 3a). We then proceeded to determine the cryo-EM structures of recombinant V337M tau(297–391) filaments, which revealed the presence of a majority of PHFs and a minority of quadruple helical filaments (QHFs) (Figure 3b,c). The latter, which have been described before (16), are made of two stacked PHFs held together by electrostatic interactions. The cryo-EM density at residue 337 is consistent with a methionine residue (Figure 3c). These tau filaments exhibited a cross-over length of 580 Å, whereas PHFs from human brains have cross-over lengths of 700–800 Å. Compared to V337M PHFs from human brains, the recombinant V337M PHFs differed by a slight rotation of the β-helix region with respect to the rest of the ordered core (Figure 3d).
Structures of tau filaments from two cases with mutation R406W in MAPT
We used two previously unreported cases with mutation R406W in MAPT, case 1 from a US family (temporal cortex, parietal cortex and hippocampus) and case 2 from a UK family (frontal cortex, temporal cortex, parietal cortex and hippocampus). By immunohistochemistry, tau inclusions were not only present in nerve cells and their processes, but also in glial cells, chiefly astrocytes (Extended Data Figures 3–5). In the hippocampus from case 1, many extracellular tau inclusions were present, consistent with the long duration of disease. Overall, neuronal inclusions were more abundant than glial cell inclusions, which ranged from astrocytic plaques to tufted astrocytes, with many intermediates. In some brain regions from R406W case 2, reminiscent of CTE, subpial tau pathology consisting of thorn-shaped astrocytes was also present at the depths of sulci.
We determined the cryo-EM structures of tau filaments from temporal cortex, parietal cortex and hippocampus of case 1, and from frontal, temporal and parietal cortices of case 2 (Figures 4 and 5). PHFs were present in all samples, but we did not observe SFs or TFs. CTE Type I filaments were evident in temporal and parietal cortex from R406W case 2, consistent with the clinicopathological information. The structures of PHFs were determined to resolutions of 3.0–4.2 Å and found to be identical to those of AD PHFs. The ordered core of the R406W tau protofilament extended from G273/304-E380.
By immunoblotting of sarkosyl-insoluble tau, we observed strong bands of 60, 64 and 68 kDa, as well as a weaker band of 72 kDa, consistent with the presence of all six tau isoforms in a hyperphosphorylated state (Figure 4b). By mass spectrometry of the sarkosyl-insoluble fractions, we detected only mutant W406 peptides, except in parietal cortex from case 2, where R406 and W406 peptides were found (Extended Data Figure 6). In addition to filaments with the Alzheimer and CTE folds, we also observed TMEM106B filaments in the sarkosyl-insoluble fractions from brain regions of both individuals, who died aged 78 and 66, respectively.
DISCUSSION
We show that mutations V337M and R406W in MAPT give rise to the Alzheimer fold. V337 lies inside the ordered core of the Alzheimer fold, whereas R406 lies outside it. Small variations among the observed structures of filaments with the V337M mutation revealed the presence of an adaptable region around the mutation site that explains the accommodation of the mutant methionine without disruption of the overall fold.
By mass spectrometry, we found both wild-type and mutant tau in the core of filaments extracted from the frontal cortex of three individuals with mutation V337M, indicating that the Alzheimer tau fold can accommodate V337 and M337. Tau filaments extracted from the parietal cortex of patient 1 with mutation R406W also contained both wild-type and mutant proteins, while filaments from cerebral cortex and hippocampus of patient 2 appeared to have only mutant tau in the filaments. The former finding is in line with a study that reported the presence of wild-type and mutant forms of tau in the filaments from cases with mutation R406W (32).
Our results are consistent with positron-emission tomography (PET) scanning using [18F] flortaucipir that showed binding to tau inclusions in patients with MAPT mutations V337M and R406W (21,27,33,34). [18F] Flortaucipir retention has also been shown to be associated with the tau pathology of AD (35) and some prion protein amyloidoses (36). Like patients with AD, R406W mutation carriers had elevated levels of tau in cerebrospinal fluid, as measured by the antibody MTBR-tau243 (37).
The observation that cases of FTDP-17 can have the same tau filament fold as cases of AD further illustrates the fact that even though specific tau folds characterise distinct diseases, the same fold can result in clinically different conditions. Mutations in MAPT do not give rise to familial AD. We showed previously that other cases of FTDP-17 adopted the Pick (5) or the AGD (6) fold, depending on the relative overexpression of 3R or 4R tau.
Mutations V337M and R406W in MAPT led to the formation of extensive neuronal tau pathology in the form of intracellular inclusions that were reactive with antibodies RD3 and RD4, which are specific for 3R and 4R tau, respectively. In agreement with previous work (18,24), immunoblotting of sarkosyl-insoluble fractions showed a pattern of tau bands typical of all six isoforms in a hyperphosphorylated state.
In case 1 with mutation R406W, many extracellular tau inclusions (ghost tangles) were present in the hippocampus, reflecting the long duration of disease. A tangle becomes extracellular after the neuron that contained it has died. Whereas intracellular inclusions are made of full-length tau, ghost tangles progressively lose their fuzzy coat and consist mainly of the ordered filament core (R3, R4 and 10–12 amino acids after R4). These sequences are common to 3R and 4R tau isoforms.
Extracellular tau inclusions can be abundant in cases with Alzheimer and CTE tau folds (38,39) and their insolubility has been attributed to extensive cross-links (40). They are much less frequent in cases with the folds of 3R and 4R tauopathies, indicating a link between filaments made of all six tau isoforms and the formation of ghost tangles.
There were also astrocytic tau inclusions in the cases with mutation R406W, suggesting that both nerve cell and glial cell inclusions contained the Alzheimer fold. Previously, shared tau folds between nerve cells and glial cells were reported for Pick’s disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration and globular glial tauopathy (5,6,41).
It remains to be determined how mutations V337M and R406W in MAPT cause FTDP-17. Previous studies showed that they lead to small reductions in the ability of recombinant tau to interact with microtubules (42,43). This partial loss of function may be necessary for the assembly into filaments. It has been shown that mutations V337M and R406W do not significantly influence the heparin-induced assembly of full-length tau (44). However, the structures of heparin-induced tau filaments differ from those of AD (45). By contrast, recombinant tau(297–391) gives rise to PHFs (16). Since mutation V337M is inside the tau filament core, we assembled V337M tau(297–391); PHFs and QHFs formed, with a marked increase in the rate of filament assembly compared to wild-type tau(297–391). These findings suggest that mutation V337M has a direct effect on tau filament assembly and demonstrate the usefulness of V337M tau(297–391) for increasing filament formation in experimental studies.
METHODS
Cases with MAPT mutation V337M (Seattle family A)
We used frontal cortex from three previously described cases of Seattle family A with mutation V337M in MAPT. They were: Case III-1 and case IV-4 (17), as well as case IV-60 (20). We also used hippocampus from cases III-1 and IV-4. All three individuals developed a variety of symptoms, some psychiatric, consistent with a diagnosis of behavioural-variant FTD. Case 1 (III-1, UWA 63) was a female who died aged 78. At age 52 she became uncooperative, hostile, suspicious and withdrawn. She also developed progressive memory loss. Case 2 (IV-4, UWA 271) was a female who died aged 63, following an 11-year history of FTD. She was the daughter of case 1 and presented with antisocial and impulsive behaviours, which were followed by apathy, loss of language and dementia. Case 3 (IV-60, UWA 578) was a male who died at age 58 following a 16-year history of FTD. He lost his job because of poor performance and was vague, restless and behaved inappropriately. Early on, he had mild memory problems and deficient executive function. His condition slowly progressed to dementia requiring hospitalisation.
Case with MAPT mutation R406W (US family)
We used temporal and parietal cortex, as well as hippocampus from a female with mutation R406W in MAPT who died aged 78, after a 29-year history of personality changes and cognitive impairment. The clinical diagnosis was AD. Genetic or neuropathological information on the parents was not available, but the mother had been diagnosed with AD. Besides the proband, she had four other children (three females and one male), who all developed cognitive impairment in mid-life. They were diagnosed with AD (three females) or FTDP-17 (male). The symptoms of the proband were dominated by progressive dementia and personality changes characterised by an anxiety disorder.
Case with MAPT mutation R406W (UK family)
We used frontal, temporal and parietal cortices from a male with mutation R406W in MAPT who died aged 66 after a 9-year history of FTD. Both parents died without known FTD before the age of 61. At least one sibling developed FTD. The initial symptoms were episodic memory impairment with subsequent executive dysfunction and personality changes characterised by impulsivity and inappropriate behaviour. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed severe bilateral frontal lobe and medial temporal lobe atrophy that was more severe on the left side. This individual worked as an electrician until the age of 55 and had a history of alcohol abuse. In his youth, he had played soccer for several years.
DNA sequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted from blood with informed consent. Standard amplification reactions were done with 50 ng genomic DNA, followed by DNA sequencing of exons 1 and 9–13 of MAPT with adjoining intronic sequences, as described (46).
Filament extraction from human brains
Sarkosyl-insoluble material was extracted from frontal cortex of cases 1–3 with mutation V337M and frontal, temporal and parietal cortices of two cases with mutation R406W in MAPT, as described (47). Hippocampus from case 2 was also used. Tissues were homogenised in 20 vol (w/v) buffer A (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 0.8 M NaCl, 10% sucrose and 1 mM EGTA), brought to 2% sarkosyl and incubated at 37° C for 30 min. The samples were centrifuged at 7,000 g for 10 min, followed by spinning of the supernatants at 100,000 g for 60 min. The pellets were resuspended in buffer A (1 ml/g tissue) and centrifuged at 9,500 g for 10 min. The supernatants were diluted 3-fold in buffer B (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.15 M NaCl, 10% sucrose and 0.2% sarkosyl), followed by a 60 min spin at 100,000 g. For cryo-EM, the pellets were resuspended in 100 μl/g buffer C (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl).
Immunoblotting and histology
For immunoblotting, samples were resolved on 4–12% Bis-Tris gels (NuPage) and the primary antibody [BR134 (48), 1:1,000] was diluted in PBS plus 0.1% Tween 20 and 5% non-fat dry milk. Histology and immunohistochemistry were carried out as described (46). Some sections (8 μm) were counterstained with haematoxylin. The primary antibodies were AT8 (Thermo-Fisher; 1:1,000 or 1:300), RD3 (Sigma-Millipore, 1:3,000) RD4 (Sigma-Millipore 1:100) and anti-4R (Cosmo Bio 1:400).
Expression and purification of recombinant tau(297–391) with and without mutation V337M
Tau(297–391) with the V337M mutation was made using in vivo assembly (49). Reverse and forward primers were designed to share 15 nucleotides of homologous region and 15–30 nucleotides for annealing to the template. Expression of tau(297–391) was carried out in E. coli BL21(DE3)-gold cells (Agilent Technologies), as described (50). One plate of cells was resuspended in 1 L 2xTY (tryptone yeast) supplemented with 2.5 mM MgSO4 and 100 mg/L ampicillin and cells were grown to an optical density of 0.8 at 600 nm. They were induced by the addition of 1 mM IPTG for 4 h at 37° C, collected by centrifugation (4,000g for 30 min at 4° C) and flash frozen. The pellets were resuspended in washing buffer at room temperature (50 mM MES, pH 6.5, 10 mM EDTA, 10 mM DTT, 0.1 mM PMSF) and cells were lysed by sonication (90% amplitude using a Sonics VCX-750 Vibracell Ultra Sonic Processor for 4 min, 3s on/6s off) at 4° C. The lysed cells were centrifuged at 20,000g for 35 min at 4° C, filtered through 0.45 μm cut-off filters and loaded onto a HiTrap CaptoS 5-ml column at 4° C (GE Healthcare). The column was washed with 10 vol. of buffer, followed by elution through a gradient of washing buffer containing 0–1M NaCl. Fractions of 3.5 ml were collected and analysed by SDS-PAGE (4–20% Tris-glycine gels). Protein-containing fractions were pooled and precipitated using 0.3 g/ml ammonium sulphate and left on a rocker for 30 min at 4° C. The solution was then centrifuged at 20,000g for 35 min at 4° C and resuspended in 2 ml of 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, containing 10 mM DTT, and loaded onto a 16/600 75-pg size-exclusion column. Fractions were analysed by SDS-PAGE and protein-containing fractions pooled and concentrated at 4° C to 20 mg/ml using molecular weight concentrators with a cut-off filter of 3kDa. Purified protein samples were flash-frozen in 50–100 μl aliquots. Protein concentrations were determined using a NanoDrop2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Filament assembly of recombinant tau(297–391) with and without mutation V337M
Prior to assembly, proteins and buffers were filtered through sterile 0.22 μM Eppendorf filters. A solution of 6 mg/ml wild-type tau(297–391) or V337M tau(297–391) was prepared at room temperature in 50 mM KPOH, pH 7.2, 10 mM DTT and 2 μM Thioflavin T (ThT). An additional set of reactions was prepared without ThT for cryo-EM analysis. Thirty μl aliquots were dispensed in a 384-well plate (company) that was sealed and placed in a Fluostar Omega (BMG Labtech) plate reader. Assembly was carried out using orbital shaking (200 rpm) at 37° C for 12 h.
Mass spectrometry
Sarkosyl-insoluble pellets were resuspended in 200 ml hexafluoroisopropanol. Following a 3 min sonication at 50% amplitude (QSonica), they were incubated at 37° C for 2 h and centrifuged at 100,000 g for 15 min, before being dried by vacuum centrifugation. Protein samples resuspended in 4M urea, 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (ambic) were reduced with 5mM DTT at 37°C for 40 min and alkylated with 10 mM chloroacetamide for 30 min. For V337M samples, they were digested with LysC (Promega) for 4 h, followed by trypsin after dilution of urea to 1.5 M. For R406W samples, urea was diluted to 1.0 M and incubated with AspN (Promega) overnight at 30°C. Digestion was stopped by the addition of formic acid to a final concentration of 0.5%, followed by a centrifugation at 16,000 g for 5 min. The supernatants were desalted and fractionated using home-made C18 stage tips (3M Empore) packed with poros oligo R3 (Thermo Scientific) resin. Bound peptides were eluted stepwise with increasing MeCN in 10 mM ambic and partially dried in a SpeedVac (Savant). Samples were analysed by LC-MS/MS using a Q Exactive Plus hybrid quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled online to a fully automated Ultimate 3,000 RSLC nano System (Thermo Scientific). LC-MS/MS data were searched against the human reviewed database (UniProt, downloaded 2023), using the Mascot search engine (Matrix Science, v.2.80. Scaffold (version 4, Proteome Software Inc.) was used to validate MS/MS-based peptide and protein identifications.
Electron cryo-microscopy
Cryo-EM grids (Quantifoil 1.2/1.3, 300 mesh) were glow-discharged for 1 min using an Edwards (S150B) sputter coater. Three μl of the sarkosyl-insoluble fractions or recombinant Tau assemblies were applied to the glow-discharged grids, followed by blotting with filter paper and plunge freezing into liquid ethane using a Vitrobot Mark IV (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 4° C and 100% humidity. Cryo-EM images were acquired on a Titan Krios G2 or G4 microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific) operated at 300 kV and equipped with a Falcon-4 or a Falcon-4i direct electron detector. Images were recorded for 2s in electron event representation format (51), with a total dose of 40 electrons per A2 and a pixel size of 0.824 Å (Falcon-4) or 0.727 Å (Falcon-4i). See Extended Data Table 1 and Extended Data Figure 7,8 for further details.
Data processing
Datasets were processed in RELION using standard helical reconstruction (52,53). Movie frames were gain-corrected, aligned and dose-weighted using RELION’s own motion correction programme (54). Contrast transfer function (CTF) was estimated using CTFFIND4.1 (55). Filaments were picked manually and segments were extracted with a box size of 1,024 pixels, prior to downsizing to 256 pixels. Reference-free 2D classification was carried out and selected class averages were re-extracted using a box size of 400 pixels. Initial models were generated de novo from 2D class average images using relion_helix_inimodel2d (56). Three-dimensional refinements were performed in RELION-4.0 and the helical twist and rise refined using local searches. Bayesian polishing and CTF refinement were used to further improve resolutions (57). The final maps were sharpened using post-processing procedures in RELION-4.0 and resolution estimates were calculated based on the Fourier shell correlation (FSC) between two independently refined half-maps at 0.143 (Extended Data Figure 8) (58). We used relion_helix_toolbox to impose helical symmetry on the post-processing maps.
Model building and refinement
Atomic models were built manually using Coot (59), based on published structures (PHF, PDB:5O3L; SF, PDB:5O3T) (10). Model refinements were performed using ISOLDE (60), Servalcat (61) and REFMAC5 (62,63). Models were validated with MolProbity (64). Figures were prepared with ChimeraX (65) and PyMOL (66).
Extended Data
Extended Data Table 1:
V337M case3 | R406W case2 | in vitro | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Data collection | ||||||
Microscope | Titan Krios | Titan Krios | Titan Krios | |||
Voltage (kV) | 300 | 300 | 300 | |||
Detector | Falcon4 | Falcon4 | Falcon4i | |||
Magnification | 96,000 | 96,000 | ||||
Electron exposure (e-/Å2) | 40 | 40 | 40 | |||
Defocus range (μm) | −1.0 to −2.0 | −1.0 to −2.0 | −1.0 to −2.0 | |||
Pixel size (Å) | 0.824 | 0.824 | 0.727 | |||
Data processing | PHF | SF | TF | PHF | CTE Type I | PHF |
Box size (pixel) | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 400 | 384 |
Symmetry imposed | C1 | C1 | C3 | C1 | C1 | C1 |
Initial particle images (no) | 510,657 | 144,450 | 124,071 | |||
Final particle images (no) | 330,371 | 75,617 | 104,579 | 134,218 | 10,232 | 37,720 |
Map resolution (Å) FSC threshold 0.143 | 2.8 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 2.8 |
Helical rise (Å) | 2.37 | 4.76 | 4.76 | 2.37 | 2.37 | 2.37 |
Helical twist (°) | 179.4 | −1.07 | −0.88 | 179.4 | 179.4 | 179.2 |
Refinement | ||||||
Model resolution (Å) FSC threshold 0.5 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 5.0 | 2.9 |
Map sharpening B factor (Å2) | −56 | −83 | −43 | −70 | −42 | |
Ligands | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Protein | 208.8 | 276.3 | 200.3 | 237.2 | 180.2 | |
Bond angles (°) | 1.390 | 1.347 | 1.393 | 1.485 | 1.305 | |
Poor rotamers (%) | 1.49 | 5.97 | 4.48 | 4.48 | 0 | |
Disallowed (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
EMDB | EMD-19846 | EMD-19849 | EMD-19852 | EMD-19854 | EMD-19855 | |
PDB | 9EO7 | 9EO9 | 9EOE | 9EOG | 9EOH |
Acknowledgements
We thank the patients’ families for donating brain tissues, T. Darling, I. Clayson and J. Grimmett for help with high-performance computing and the EM facility of the Medical Research Council (MRC) Laboratory of Molecular Biology for help with cryo-EM data acquisition. We are grateful to R. Richardson, N. Maynard, M. Jacobsen and B. Glazier for help with histology and immunohistochemistry. This work was supported by the MRC, as part of U.K. Research and Innovation (MC_UP_A025_1013 to S.H.W.S. and MC_1051284291 to M.G.). It was also supported by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (P30-AG010133, R01-AG080001 and RF1-AG071177, to B.G.) and the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine (to B.G.). The Queen Square Brain Bank is supported by the Rita Lila Weston Institute for Neurological Studies.
Footnotes
Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests.
Data availability
Cryo-EM maps have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) with accession numbers: EMD-19846; EMD-19849; EMD-19852; EMD-19854; EMD-19855. Corresponding refined atomic models have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) under the following accession numbers: 9EO7; 9EO9; 9EOE; 9EOG; 9EOH. Please address requests for materials to the corresponding authors.
REFERENCES
- 1.Goedert M., Spillantini M.G., Jakes R., Rutherford D. & Crowther R.A. Multiple isoforms of human microtubule-associated protein tau: Sequences and localization in neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 3, 519–524 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang Y. & Mandelkow E. Tau in physiology and pathology. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 17, 5–21 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Goedert M., Crowther R.A., Scheres S.H.W. & Spillantini M.G. Tau and neurodegeneration. Cytoskeleton 81, 95–102 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Scheres S.H.W., Ryskeldi-Falcon B. & Goedert M. Molecular pathology of neurodegenerative diseases by cryo-EM of amyloids. Nature 621, 701–710 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schweighauser M. et al. Mutation DK281 in MAPT causes Pick’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 146, 211–226 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shi Y. et al. Structure-based classification of tauopathies. Nature 4598, 359–363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schweighauser M. et al. Age-dependent formation of TMEM106B amyloid filaments in human brains. Nature 605, 310–314 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chang A. et al. Homotypic fibrillization of TMEM106B across diverse neurodegenerative diseases. Cell 185, 1346–1355 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hoq M.R. et al. Cross-b helical filaments of tau and TMEM106B in gray and white matter of multiple system tauopathy with presenile dementia. Acta Neuropathol. 145, 707–710 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fitzpatrick A.W.P. et al. Cryo-EM structures of tau filaments from Alzheimer’s disease. Nature 547, 185–190 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Falcon B. et al. Novel tau filament fold in chronic traumatic encephalopathy encloses hydrophobic molecules. Nature 568, 420–423 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hallinan G.I. et al. Structure of tau filaments in prion protein amyloidoses. Acta Neuropathol. 142, 227–241 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Qi C. et al. Identical tau filaments in subacute sclerosing panencephalitis and chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 11, 74 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Qi C. et al. Tau filaments from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/parkinsonism-dementia complex adopt the CTE fold. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2306767120 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Qi C. et al. Tau filaments with the chronic traumatic encephalopathy fold in a case of vacuolar tauopathy with VCP mutation D395G. BioRxiv 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lövestam S. et al. Assembly of recombinant tau into filaments identical to those of Alzheimer’s disease and chronic traumatic encephalopathy. eLife 11, e76494 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sumi S.M., Bird T.D., Nochlin D. & Raskind M.A. Familial presenile dementia with psychosis associated with cortical neurofibrillary tangles and degeneration of the amygdala. Neurology 42, 120–127 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Spillantini M.G., Crowther R.A. & Goedert M. Comparison of the neurofibrillary pathology in Alzheimer’s disease and familial presenile dementia with tangles. Acta Neuropathol. 92, 42–48 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Spillantini M.G., Bird T.D. & Ghetti B. Frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17: A new group of tauopathies. Brain Pathol. 8, 387–402 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Poorkaj P. et al. Tau is a candidate gene for chromosome 17 frontotemporal dementia. Ann. Neurol. 43, 815–825 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Spina S. et al. Frontotemporal dementia with the V337M MAPT mutation. Neurology 88, 758–766 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Reed L.A. et al. Autosomal dominant dementia with widespread neurofibrillary tangles. Ann. Neurol. 42, 564–572 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hutton M. et al. Association of missense and 5’-splice-site mutations in tau with the inherited dementia FTDP-17. Nature 393, 702–705 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Van Swieten J.C. et al. Phenotypic variation in hereditary frontotemporal dementia with tau mutations. Ann. Neurol. 46, 617–626 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Saito Y. et al. Early-onset, rapidly progressive familial tauopathy with R406W mutation. Neurology 58, 811–813 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lindquist S.G. et al. Alzheimer disease-like clinical phenotype in a family with FTDP-17 caused by MAPT R406W mutation. Eur. J. Neurol. 15, 377–385 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Smith R. et al. 18F-AV-1451 tau PET imaging correlates strongly with tau neuropathology in MAPT mutation carriers. Brain 139, 2372–2379 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ygland E. et al. Slow progressive dementia caused by MAPT R406W mutations: longitudinal report on a new kindred and systematic review. Alzheimer’s Res. & Ther. 10, 2 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bird T.D. et al. Chromosome 17 and hereditary dementia: Linkage studies in three non-Alzheimer families and kindreds with late-onset FAD. Neurology 48, 949–954 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ostojic J. et al. The tau R406W mutation causes progressive dementia with bitemporal atrophy. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 17, 298–301 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chu S.A. et al. Brain volumetric deficits in MAPT mutation carriers: a multisite study. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol., 8, 95–110 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Miyasaka T. et al. Molecular analysis of mutant and wild-type tau deposited in the brain affected by the FTDP-17 R406W mutation. Am. J. Pathol. 158, 373–379 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jones D.T. et al. In vivo 18F-AV-1451 tau PET signal in MAPT mutation carriers by expected tau isoforms. Neurology 90, e947–e954 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wolters E.E. et al. [18F] Flortaucipir PET across various MAPT mutations in presymptomatic and symptomatic carriers. Neurology 97, e1017–e1030 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lowe V.J. et al. Tau-positron emission tomography correlates with neuropathology findings. Alzheimer’s Dement. 16, 561–571 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Risacher S.L. et al. Detection of tau in Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker disease (PRNP F198S) by [18F] flortaucipir PET. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 6, 114 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Horie K. et al. CSF MTBR-tau243 is a specific biomarker of tau tangle pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Nature Med. 29, 1954–1963 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Moloney C.M., Lowe V.J. & Murray M.E. Visualization of neurofibrillary tangle maturity in Alzheimer’s disease: A clinicopathologic perspective for biomarker research. Alzheimer’s Dement. 17, 1554–1574 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Cherry J.D. et al. Tau isoforms are differentially expressed across the hippocampus in chronic traumatic encephalopathy and Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 9, 86 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cras P., Smith M.A., Richey P.L., Siedlak S.L., Mulvihill P. & Perry G. Extracellular neurofibrillary tangles reflect neuronal loss and provide further evidence of extensive protein cross-linking in Alzheimer disease. Acta Neuropathol. 89, 291–295 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhang W. et al. Novel tau filament fold in corticobasal degeneration. Nature 580, 283–287 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hasegawa M., Smith M.J. & Goedert M. Tau proteins with FTDP-17 mutations have a reduced ability to promote microtubule assembly. FEBS Lett. 437, 207–210 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.De Ture M. et al. Missense tau mutations identified in FTDP-17 have a small effect on tau-microtubule interactions. Brain Res. 853, 5–14 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Goedert M., Jakes R. & Crowther R.A. Effects of frontotemporal dementia FTDP-17 mutations on heparin-induced assembly of tau filaments. FEBS Lett. 450, 306–311 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhang W. et al. Heparin-induced tau filaments are polymorphic and differ from those in Alzheimer’s and Pick’s diseases. eLife 8, e43584 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Spina S. et al. The tauopathy associated with mutation +3 in intron 10 of Tau: Characterization of the MSTD family. Brain 131, 72–89 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tarutani A., Arai T., Murayama S., Hisanaga S.I. & Hasegawa M. Potent prion-like behaviours of pathogenic α-synuclein and evaluation of inactivation methods. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 6, 29 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Goedert M., Spillantini M.G., Jakes R., Rutherford D. & Crowther R.A. Multiple isoforms of human microtubule-associated protein tau: Sequences and localization in neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron 3, 519–526 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.García-Nafría J., Watson J.F. & Greger I.H. IVA cloning: a single-tube universal cloning system exploiting bacterial in vivo assembly. Sci. Adv. 6, 27459 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Studier F.W. Protein production by auto-induction in high density shaking cultures. Prot. Expr. Purif. 41, 207–234 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Guo H. et al. Electron-event representation data enable efficient cryo-EM file storage with full preservation of spatial and temporal resolution. IUCrJ 7, 860–869 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.He S. & Scheres S.H.W. Helical reconstruction in RELION. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 163–176 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kimanius D., Long K.L., Sharov G., Nakane T. & Scheres S.H.W. New tools for automated cryo-EM single-particle analysis in RELION-4.0. Biochem. J. 478, 4169–4185 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zivanov J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Rohou A. & Grigorieff N. CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Scheres S.H.W. Amyloid structure determination in RELION3.1. Acta Crystallogr. D, 76, 94–101 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zivanov J. et al. A Bayesian approach to single-particle electron-tomography in RELION-4.0. eLife 11, e83724 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Scheres S.H.W. & Chen S. Prevention of overfitting in cryo-EM structure determination. Nature Meth. 9, 8453–8454 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Emsley P., Lohkamp B. Scott W.G. & Cowtan K. (2010) Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Croll T.I. ISOLDE: A physically realistic environment for model building into low-resolution electron density map. Acta Crystallogr. D 74, 519–530 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yamashita K., Palmer C.M., Burnley T. & Murshudov G.N. Cryo-EM single particle structure refinement and map calculation using Servalcat. Acta Crystallogr. D 77, 1282–1291 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Murshudov G.N., Vagin A.A. & Dodson E.J. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D 53, 240–255 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Murshudov G.N. et al. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. D 67, 255–267 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Chen V.B. et al. MolProbity: All-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 2–21 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Pettersen E.F. et al. Chimera X: Structure visualization for researchers, editors and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Schrödinger L & DeLano W. PyMol, available at: http://www.pymol.org/pymol (2020).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Cryo-EM maps have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) with accession numbers: EMD-19846; EMD-19849; EMD-19852; EMD-19854; EMD-19855. Corresponding refined atomic models have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) under the following accession numbers: 9EO7; 9EO9; 9EOE; 9EOG; 9EOH. Please address requests for materials to the corresponding authors.