Skip to main content

This is a preprint.

It has not yet been peer reviewed by a journal.

The National Library of Medicine is running a pilot to include preprints that result from research funded by NIH in PMC and PubMed.

medRxiv logoLink to medRxiv
[Preprint]. 2024 Apr 30:2024.04.26.24306153. [Version 1] doi: 10.1101/2024.04.26.24306153

MyoVision-US: an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Software for Automated Analysis of Skeletal Muscle Ultrasonography

Zoe Calulo Rivera, Felipe González-Seguel, Arimitsu Horikawa-Strakovsky, Catherine Granger, Aarti Sarwal, Sanjay Dhar, George Ntoumenopoulos, Jin Chen, V K Cody Bumgardner, Selina M Parry, Kirby P Mayer, Yuan Wen
PMCID: PMC11092729  PMID: 38746458

Abstract

Introduction/Aims

Muscle ultrasound has high utility in clinical practice and research; however, the main challenges are the training and time required for manual analysis to achieve objective quantification of morphometry. This study aimed to develop and validate a software tool powered by artificial intelligence (AI) by measuring its consistency and predictability of expert manual analysis quantifying lower limb muscle ultrasound images across healthy, acute, and chronic illness subjects.

Methods

Quadriceps complex (QC [rectus femoris and vastus intermedius]) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscle ultrasound images of healthy, intensive care unit, and/or lung cancer subjects were captured with portable devices. Automated analyses of muscle morphometry were performed using a custom-built deep-learning model (MyoVision-US), while manual analyses were performed by experts. Consistency between manual and automated analyses was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), while predictability of MyoVision -US was calculated using adjusted linear regression (adj.R 2 ).

Results

Manual analysis took approximately 24 hours to analyze all 180 images, while MyoVision - US took 247 seconds, saving roughly 99.8%. Consistency between the manual and automated analyses by ICC was good to excellent for all QC (ICC:0.85–0.99) and TA (ICC:0.93–0.99) measurements, even for critically ill (ICC:0.91–0.98) and lung cancer (ICC:0.85–0.99) images. The predictability of MyoVision-US was moderate to strong for QC (adj.R 2 :0.56–0.94) and TA parameters (adj.R 2 :0.81–0.97).

Discussion

The application of AI automating lower limb muscle ultrasound analyses showed excellent consistency and strong predictability compared with human analysis. Future work needs to explore AI-powered models for the evaluation of other skeletal muscle groups.

Full Text Availability

The license terms selected by the author(s) for this preprint version do not permit archiving in PMC. The full text is available from the preprint server.


Articles from medRxiv are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints

RESOURCES