Skip to main content
Interventional Neuroradiology logoLink to Interventional Neuroradiology
. 2022 Jul 29;30(2):189–194. doi: 10.1177/15910199221113900

Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity-diffusion-weighted imaging mismatch and functional outcome after endovascular reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke

Keisuke Tokunaga 1,, So Tokunaga 1, Kenta Hara 1, Masahiro Yasaka 2, Yasushi Okada 2, Takanari Kitazono 3, Tomoyuki Tsumoto 1
PMCID: PMC11095359  PMID: 35903941

Abstract

Background

Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity (FVH) outside of the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesion, termed FVH-DWI mismatch, may represent penumbral tissue with good collateral status.

Methods

Consecutive patients who underwent endovascular reperfusion therapy (EVT) for acute internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA)-M1 occlusion were enrolled. FVH-DWI mismatch score was defined as the number of cortical Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score areas (I and M1 to M6) that involved FVH but no DWI lesion (0 to 7 points). The outcome measure was set as good functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2, at 90 days after onset.

Results

Of 196 consecutive patients who underwent EVT for acute ICA or MCA-M1 occlusion, 32 without brain MRI before EVT were excluded, and the remaining 164 were analyzed. The median FVH-DWI mismatch score was 2 (interquartile range, 0 to 4). At 90 days after EVT, 2 patients were lost-to follow-up, and 73 had good functional outcome. The frequency of good functional outcome at 90 days after EVT increased significantly with increasing FVH-DWI mismatch score (P for trend <0.001). FVH-DWI mismatch score was independently associated with good functional outcome at 90 days after onset (adjusted odds ratio per 1 point,1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.15–1.89).

Conclusions

Patients with large FVH-DWI mismatch had good functional outcome after EVT for acute ICA or MCA-M1 occlusion.

Keywords: endovascular reperfusion therapy, ischemic stroke, magnetic resonance imaging

Introduction

Patients with acute ischemic stroke often exhibit fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) vascular hyperintensity (FVH) on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).14 FVH represents retrograde slow blood flow through leptomeningeal collaterals distal to large-artery occlusion3,5,6 and is associated with good collateral status.79 On the other hand, the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesion represents infarct core. Therefore, FVH outside of the DWI lesion, termed FVH-DWI mismatch, 10 may represent penumbral tissue with good collateral status. We hypothesized that FVH-DWI mismatch is a predictor of functional outcome after endovascular reperfusion therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke. To test this hypothesis, the association between FVH-DWI mismatch and functional outcome at 90 days after EVT for acute internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA)-M1 occlusion was assessed in the present observational study.

Material and methods

Study population

Consecutive patients who underwent EVT for acute ICA or MCA-M1 occlusion at our hospital between July 2013 and February 2020 were enrolled. Acute ischemic stroke was diagnosed based on rapidly developing clinical signs of focal (or global) disturbance of cerebral function with no apparent cause other than that of vascular origin that was confirmed using brain MRI unless contraindicated or unavailable. The indication for EVT was based on recommendations provided in guidelines for mechanical thrombectomy in Japan.1114 Patients without brain MRI before EVT were excluded. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

FVH-DWI mismatch score

Brain MRI was performed using one of the following three MRI systems: a 1.5-T MRI system (Signa Infinity, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL) with FLAIR imaging (repetition time, 8002 ms; echo time, 120.65 ms; field of view, 504 × 220 mm; matrix size, 224 × 256; slice thickness, 5 mm; and interslice gap, 1.5 mm) and DWI (repetition time, 7075 ms; echo time, 104.9 ms; field of view, 504 × 220 mm; matrix size, 128 × 128; slice thickness, 5 mm; interslice gap, 1.5 mm; and b-value, 1000 s/mm); a 1.5-T MRI system (Magnetom Symphony, Siemens, Munich, Germany) with FLAIR imaging (repetition time, 8000 ms; echo time, 95 ms; field of view, 504 × 220 mm; matrix size, 216 × 256; slice thickness, 5 mm; and interslice gap, 1.5 mm) and DWI (repetition time, 3.300 ms; echo time, 92 ms; field of view, 504 × 220 mm; matrix size, 128 × 128; slice thickness, 5 mm; interslice gap, 1.5 mm; and b-value, 1000 s/mm); and a 1.5-T MRI system (Achieva 1.5 T, Philips, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) with FLAIR imaging (repetition time, 10.000 ms; echo time, 140 ms; field of view, 527 × 230 mm; matrix size, 231 × 288; slice thickness, 5 mm; and interslice gap, 1.5 mm) and DWI (repetition time, 3500 ms; echo time, 75 ms; field of view, 527 × 230 mm; matrix size, 128 × 109; slice thickness, 5 mm; interslice gap, 1.5 mm; and b-value, 1.000 s/mm). FVH was defined as focal, tubular, or serpentine hyperintensity that corresponded to a typical arterial course on FLAIR imaging. 3 FVH-DWI mismatch score was defined as the number of cortical Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) 15 areas (I and M1 to M6) that involved FVH but no DWI lesion (0 to 7 points). An example of FVH-DWI mismatch score rating is shown in Figure 1. Images were independently interpreted by 2 readers blinded to functional outcome at 90 days after EVT (K.T. and S.T.). Interrater reliability of FVH-DWI mismatch score assessed using the kappa statistic was excellent (κ = 0.82). Discrepancies were resolved by consensus.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Example of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) vascular hyperintensity (FVH)-diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) mismatch score rating in a patient with acute left middle cerebral artery-m1 occlusion. a. Axial FLAIR imaging with FVH in all cortical Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) areas (I and M1 to M6). b. Axial DWI with no lesion in any cortical ASPECTS area. In this case, FVH-DWI mismatch score was 7.

Endovascular reperfusion therapy

Procedures were performed via the femoral artery route under local anesthesia using biplane angiographic systems. EVT methods including mechanical thrombectomy with a stent retriever and/or an aspiration catheter, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, stenting, and intraarterial thrombolysis were performed, as appropriate. Activated clotting time was checked hourly and was maintained between 250 and 300 s by intravenous injection of heparin.

Baseline characteristics

Data regarding FVH-DWI mismatch score, age, sex, premorbid modified Rankin Scale score, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, previous stroke, atrial fibrillation, initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, DWI-ASPECTS, 16 intravenous thrombolysis, onset-to-door time, onset-to-puncture time, onset-to-reperfusion time, and reperfusion success were obtained from our single-center prospective database. Hypertension was diagnosed based on a systolic blood pressure of ≥140 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure of ≥90 mmHg in the chronic stage or previous medical records. Dyslipidemia was diagnosed based on a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of ≥140 mg/dL, a high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of <40 mg/dL, or a triglyceride level of ≥150 mg/dL on admission or previous medical records. Diabetes mellitus was diagnosed according to the diagnostic criteria of the Japan Diabetes Society 17 or based on previous medical records. Reperfusion success was defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia grade of 2b to 3.

Outcome measure

The outcome measure was set as good functional outcome at 90 days after EVT. Good functional outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2. Follow-up to assess the outcome measure was performed at 90 days after EVT by an outpatient visit or a telephone survey for patients with too severe after effects to attend the outpatient clinic.

Statistical analysis

Baseline characteristics between patients dichotomized by the median FVH-DWI mismatch score were compared using the t-test, the chi-squared test, or the Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. The association between FVH-DWI mismatch score and good functional outcome at 90 days after EVT was assessed using the Cochran-Armitage test for trend and crude and adjusted logistic regression models. FVH-DWI mismatch score, age, sex, and variables with statistical significance in univariate analysis were entered into the adjusted model. All reported P values were two-sided. A P value of <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP software (version 12.2.0, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Of 196 consecutive patients who underwent EVT for acute ICA or MCA-M1 occlusion, 32 without brain MRI before EVT were excluded, and the remaining 164 were analyzed. The median FVH-DWI mismatch score was 2 (interquartile range, 0 to 4). Baseline characteristics between patients dichotomized by the median FVH-DWI mismatch score are shown in Table 1. Significant differences were identified in terms of initial NIHSS score (P <0.001), DWI-ASPECTS (P <0.001), and reperfusion success (P = 0.046). In addition, baseline characteristics between patients dichotomized by the presence or absence of FVH-DWI mismatch are shown in Supplemental table 1.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics between patients dichotomized by the median FVH-DWI mismatch score.

Baseline characteristic Total (n = 164) FVH-DWI mismatch score P value
≤2 (n = 88) >2 (n = 76)
Age, y 76 ± 13 77 ± 12 74 ± 14 0.087
Male sex 81 (49) 41 (47) 40 (53) 0.440
Premorbid mRS score 0 [0–2] 0 [0–2] 0 [0–2] 0.054
Hypertension 110 (67) 54 (61) 56 (74) 0.094
Dyslipidemia 69 (42) 34 (39) 35 (46) 0.337
Diabetes mellitus 40 (24) 18 (20) 22 (29) 0.207
Previous stroke 31 (19) 15 (17) 16 (21) 0.513
Atrial fibrillation 82 (50) 47 (53) 34 (45) 0.268
Initial NIHSS score 17 [12–23] 20 [14–25] 14 [10–22] <0.001
DWI-ASPECTS 7 [4–9] 5 [3–7] 8 [7–9] <0.001
Intravenous thrombolysis 56 (34) 27 (31) 29 (38) 0.314
Onset-to-door time, min 161 [58–393] 159 [69–476] 170 [56–381] 0.773
Onset-to-puncture time, min 226 [152–505] 208 [152–550] 256 [151–426] 0.804
Onset-to-reperfusion time, min 305 [215–590] 285 [205–628] 335 [222–599] 0.315
Reperfusion success 146 (89) 75 (85) 72 (95) 0.046

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, n (%), or median [interquartile range].

ASPECTS indicates Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score; DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging; FVH, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity; mRS, modified Rankin Scale; and NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

At 90 days after EVT, 2 patients were lost-to follow-up, and 73 had good functional outcome. The frequency of good functional outcome at 90 days after EVT according to FVH-DWI mismatch score is shown in Figure 2. The frequency of good functional outcome at 90 days after EVT increased significantly with increasing FVH-DWI mismatch score (P for trend <0.001). Odds ratios for good functional outcome at 90 days after EVT in logistic regression models are shown in Table 2. FVH-DWI mismatch score was independently associated with good functional outcome at 90 days after onset (adjusted odds ratio per 1 point, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.15–1.89).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Frequency of good functional outcome at 90 days after endovascular reperfusion therapy (EVT) according to fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity (FVH)-diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) mismatch score.

Table 2.

Odds ratios for good functional outcome at 90 days after endovascular reperfusion therapy in logistic regression models.

Variable Crude Adjusted*
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
FVH-DWI mismatch score (per 1 point) 1.53 1.30–1.82 1.46 1.15–1.89
Age (per decade) 0.32 0.21–0.47 0.32 0.19–0.51
Male sex 2.76 1.46–5.28 1.67 0.68–4.15
Initial NIHSS score (per 1 point) 0.89 0.85–0.94 0.93 0.87–0.98
DWI-ASPECTS (per 1 point) 1.28 1.13–1.47 1.10 0.89–1.37
Reperfusion success 15.78 3.09–288.39 10.45 1.69–204.60

*Adjusted for FVH-DWI mismatch score, age, sex, initial NIHSS score, DWI-ASPECTS, and reperfusion success.

ASPECTS indicates Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score; CI, confidence interval; DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging; FVH, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; and OR, odds ratio.

Discussion

To test the hypothesis that FVH-DWI mismatch is a predictor of functional outcome after EVT for acute ischemic stroke, the association between FVH-DWI mismatch and functional outcome at 90 days after EVT for acute ICA or MCA-M1 occlusion was assessed in the present observational study. The present results clearly showed a positive association between large FVH-DWI mismatch and good functional outcome after EVT.

Numerous previous studies assessed the prognostic value of FVH in patients with acute ischemic stroke.1824 However, results of these studies lack consensus, which can be attributed to differences in study populations, outcome measures, and classifications of FVH. Of classifications of FVH, FVH-DWI mismatch was reported to have a good prognostic value especially in patients who underwent EVT for acute ischemic stroke.2224 To the best of our knowledge, only one previous study treated FVH-DWI mismatch as a quantified variable. 22 Our method for quantifying FVH-DWI mismatch was more simple than the method used in this study but could show a positive association between large FVH-DWI mismatch and good functional outcome after EVT.

FVH represents retrograde slow blood flow through leptomeningeal collaterals distal to large-artery occlusion3,5,6 and is associated with good collateral status.79 For instance, a previous study showed a positive association between extended FVH and good collateral status on cerebral angiography defined as American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology grade 25 3 to 4 in patients who underwent EVT for acute MCA-M1 occlusion. 9 On the other hand, the DWI lesion represents infarct core. Therefore, FVH-DWI mismatch may represent penumbral tissue with good collateral status. It seems reasonable that large FVH-DWI mismatch would be associated with good functional outcome after EVT for acute ischemic stroke because good collateral flow limits infarct growth and extends the therapeutic time window for EVT. 26 FVH-DWI mismatch may be useful for identifying good responders to EVT.

The present study has some limitations. First, the sample size was small (n = 164), as in previous similar studies.2224 Second, 32 of 196 consecutive patients (16%) who underwent EVT for acute ICA or MCA-M1 occlusion were excluded due to lack of brain MRI before EVT. Third, the present findings might be specific to our techniques and machines because of the single-center study design. Fourth, both a small spotty lesion and a large diffuse lesion in an ASPECTS area are regarded as 1 point regardless of the size in the ASPECTS grading system. Finally, the present findings cannot be generalized to all patients who undergo EVT for acute ischemic stroke because the present study targeted those who underwent EVT for acute ICA or MCA-M1 occlusion.

Conclusions

Patients with large FVH-DWI mismatch had good functional outcome after EVT for acute ICA or MCA-M1 occlusion. The present findings indicate that FVH-DWI mismatch is a predictor of functional outcome after EVT for acute ischemic stroke.

Supplemental Material

sj-docx-1-ine-10.1177_15910199221113900 - Supplemental material for Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity-diffusion-weighted imaging mismatch and functional outcome after endovascular reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-ine-10.1177_15910199221113900 for Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity-diffusion-weighted imaging mismatch and functional outcome after endovascular reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke by Keisuke Tokunaga, So Tokunaga, Kenta Hara, Masahiro Yasaka, Yasushi Okada, Takanari Kitazono and Tomoyuki Tsumoto in Interventional Neuroradiology

Footnotes

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval: Study procedures were reviewed and approved by the institutional review board of Kyushu Medical Center.

Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Supplemental material: Supplemental material for this article is available online.

ORCID iD: Keisuke Tokunagahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0701-3635

References

  • 1.Cosnard G, Duprez T, Grandin C, et al. Fast FLAIR sequence for detecting major vascular abnormalities during the hyperacute phase of stroke: a comparison with MR angiography. Neuroradiology 1999; 41: 342–346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kamran S, Bates V, Bakshi R, et al. Significance of hyperintense vessels on FLAIR MRI in acute stroke. Neurology 2000; 55: 265–269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Azizyan A, Sanossian N, Mogensen MA, et al. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensities: an important imaging marker for cerebrovascular disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32: 1771–1775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cheng B, Ebinger M, Kufner A, et al. Hyperintense vessels on acute stroke fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging: associations with clinical and other MRI findings. Stroke 2012; 43: 2957–2961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sanossian N, Saver JL, Alger JR, et al. Angiography reveals that fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensities are due to slow flow, not thrombus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30: 564–568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Liu W, Xu G, Yue X, et al. Hyperintense vessels on FLAIR: a useful non-invasive method for assessing intracerebral collaterals. Eur J Radiol 2011; 80: 786–791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Liu W, Yin Q, Yao L, et al. Decreased hyperintense vessels on FLAIR images after endovascular recanalization of symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 1595–1600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Huang X, Liu W, Zhu W, et al. Distal hyperintense vessels on FLAIR: a prognostic indicator of acute ischemic stroke. Eur Neurol 2012; 68: 214–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nave AH, Kufner A, Bucke P, et al. Hyperintense vessels, collateralization, and functional outcome in patients with stroke receiving endovascular treatment. Stroke 2018; 49: 675–681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Legrand L, Tisserand M, Turc G, et al. Do FLAIR vascular hyperintensities beyond the DWI lesion represent the ischemic penumbra? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015; 36: 269–274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Guideline Committee of the Japan Stroke Society the Japan Neurosurgical Society and the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy. Guidelines for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Japan, March 2014. Jpn J Stroke 2014; 36: 297–309. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Guideline Committee of the Japan Stroke Society the Japan Neurosurgical Society and the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy. Guidelines for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Japan, the Second Edition, March 2015. Jpn J Stroke 2015; 37: 259–279. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Guideline Committee of the Japan Stroke Society the Japan Neurosurgical Society and the Japanese Society for Neuroendovascular Therapy. Guidelines for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Japan, the Third Edition, March 2018. Jpn J Stroke 2018; 40: 285–309. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yamagami H, Hayakawa M, Inoue M, et al. Guidelines for mechanical thrombectomy in Japan, the fourth edition, March 2020: a guideline from the Japan stroke society, the Japan neurosurgical society, and the Japanese society for neuroendovascular therapy. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2021; 61: 163–192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Barber PA, Demchuk AM, Zhang J, et al. Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. ASPECTS study group. Alberta stroke programme early CT score. Lancet 2000; 355: 1670–1674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Barber PA, Hill MD, Eliasziw M, et al. Imaging of the brain in acute ischaemic stroke: comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76: 1528–1533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Committee of the Japan Diabetes Society on the Diagnostic Criteria of Diabetes Mellitus, Seino Y, Nanjo K, et al. Report of the committee on the classification and diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Investig 2010; 1: 212–228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schellinger PD, Chalela JA, Kang DW, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of early MR imaging vessel signs in hyperacute stroke patients imaged <3 h and treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 618–624. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lee KY, Latour LL, Luby M, et al. Distal hyperintense vessels on FLAIR: an MRI marker for collateral circulation in acute stroke? Neurology 2009; 72: 1134–1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ebinger M, Kufner A, Galinovic I, et al. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images and stroke outcome after thrombolysis. Stroke 2012; 43: 539–542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Perez de la Ossa N, Hernandez-Perez M, Domenech S, et al. Hyperintensity of distal vessels on FLAIR is associated with slow progression of the infarction in acute ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2012; 34: 376–384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Liu D, Scalzo F, Rao NM, et al. Fluid-Attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity topography, novel imaging marker for revascularization in middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 2016; 47: 2763–2769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Legrand L, Turc G, Edjlali M, et al. Benefit from revascularization after thrombectomy according to FLAIR vascular hyperintensities-DWI mismatch. Eur Radiol 2019; 29: 5567–5576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jiang L, Peng M, Geng W, et al. FLAIR hyperintensities-DWI mismatch in acute stroke: associations with DWI volume and functional outcome. Brain Imaging Behav 2020; 14: 1230–1237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Roberts H, et al. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2003; 34: e109–e137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bang OY, Goyal M, Liebeskind DS. Collateral circulation in ischemic stroke: assessment tools and therapeutic strategies. Stroke 2015; 46: 3302–3309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

sj-docx-1-ine-10.1177_15910199221113900 - Supplemental material for Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity-diffusion-weighted imaging mismatch and functional outcome after endovascular reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-ine-10.1177_15910199221113900 for Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity-diffusion-weighted imaging mismatch and functional outcome after endovascular reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke by Keisuke Tokunaga, So Tokunaga, Kenta Hara, Masahiro Yasaka, Yasushi Okada, Takanari Kitazono and Tomoyuki Tsumoto in Interventional Neuroradiology


Articles from Interventional Neuroradiology are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES