1
|
B-R
|
1. In patients with reduced LV function and persistent (or high burden) AF, a trial of rhythm control should be recommended to evaluate whether AF is contributing to the reduced LV function.1–6
|
2a
|
B-R
|
2. In patients with symptomatic AF, rhythm control can be useful to improve symptoms.7–11
|
2a
|
B-R
|
3. In patients with a recent diagnosis of AF (<1 year), rhythm control can be useful to reduce hospitalizations, stroke, and mortality.12–14
|
2a
|
B-R
|
4. In patients with AF and HF, rhythm control can be useful for improving symptoms and improving outcomes, such as mortality and hospitalizations for HF and ischemia.15–19
|
2a
|
B-NR
|
5. In patients with AF, rhythm-control strategies can be useful to reduce the likelihood of AF progression.20–27
|
2b
|
C-LD
|
6. In patients with AF where symptoms associated with AF are uncertain, a trial of rhythm control (eg, cardioversion or pharmacological therapy) may be useful to determine what if any symptoms are attributable to AF.28–32
|
2b
|
B-NR
|
7. In patients with AF, rhythm-control strategies may be useful to reduce the likelihood of development of dementia or worsening cardiac structural abnormalities.33–45
|