Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2023 Feb 5;40(1):123–127. doi: 10.1007/s10453-023-09780-z

Automatic real-time monitoring of fungal spores: the case of Alternaria spp.

Sophie Erb 1,2,, Alexis Berne 2, Nina Burgdorfer 1, Bernard Clot 1, Marie-José Graber 1, Gian Lieberherr 1, Christine Sallin 1, Fiona Tummon 1, Benoît Crouzy 1
PMCID: PMC11096102  PMID: 38766603

Abstract

We present the first implementation of the monitoring of airborne fungal spores in real-time using digital holography. To obtain observations of Alternaria spp. spores representative of their airborne stage, we collected events measured in the air during crop harvesting in a contaminated potato field, using a Swisens Poleno device. The classification algorithm used by MeteoSwiss for operational pollen monitoring was extended by training the system using this additional dataset. The quality of the retrieved concentrations is evaluated by comparison with parallel measurements made with a manual Hirst-type trap. Correlations between the two measurements are high, especially over the main dispersion period of Alternaria spp., demonstrating the potential for automatic real-time monitoring of fungal spores.

Keywords: Alternaria, Fungal spores, Automatic monitoring, Machine learning, Real-time


The automation of operational pollen monitoring networks has been taking place over the past few years (Buters et al., 2022; Crouzy et al., 2016; Tešendić et al., 2022). Recent instruments deliver airborne pollen concentrations in real-time at high-temporal resolutions, better corresponding to the active dynamics of meteorology that influence particle dispersion. This is resulting in a paradigm change in terms of development of modelling frameworks and value for end-users. In particular, this enables the integration of measurements directly into numerical weather models (Maya-Manzano et al., 2021), which in turn deliver forecasts of airborne pollen concentrations at a spatial resolution on the order of one kilometre. Traditional aerobiological monitoring networks have been based on the Hirst method (Hirst, 1952): manual microscope counting of particles collected on a tape by impaction (Oteros et al., 2013). In many networks, limited human resources do not allow for the routine counting of fungal spores. However, the impact of fungal spores on human health (Hernandez-Ramirez et al., 2021; Pulimood et al., 2007) and agriculture (Fones et al., 2020; Logrieco et al., 2009; Haverkort et al., 2008) is massive. Delivering accurate information on airborne spore concentrations would therefore allow improved prevention and treatment of respiratory allergies and a more targeted use of fungicides in agriculture, which in turn would reduce costs and environmental impacts.

In 2019, the Swiss Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss started deploying the first national automatic pollen monitoring network based on the Swisens Poleno (Sauvageat et al., 2020). Operational particle identification and counting is performed using reconstructed images taken in flight using digital holography (see Fig. 1 and Berg and Videen (2011)). In the Swisens Poleno, each particle sufficiently large (i.e. larger than 5μm since one pixel on the image corresponds to 0.595 μm in the physical domain) to be resolved by digital holography is imaged by two orthogonal cameras. A two-stage classifier is then used to identify each particle. In the first stage, pollen is distinguished from other particles (e.g. dust, fibres, biological debris). In the second stage, a convolutional neural network is applied to discriminate between different allergenic pollen taxa. Extending the scope of the device to the identification of other types of (bio-)aerosol is feasible under two conditions: first, the particles of interest need to fall within a suitable size range, and second, correctly labelled reference images must be available for training the classifier.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

a Microscopic image of Alternaria spores (600x magnification), b Holographic images of a single Alternaria spore taken in flight with the Swisens Poleno

Pathogens of the genus Alternaria are responsible for several crop diseases, commonly referred to as early blight, which affect a wide range of crops (e.g. potatoes, tomatoes, carrots). Alternaria species present various degrees of plant-host specificity. Yet, most of them share common morphological traits (bottle shape, relatively large size > 15 μm, with some exceptions as described in Woudenberg et al. (2013)) suggesting a potential for genus-level identification with operational monitoring devices. Specifically, as far as the size is concerned (20–60 μm for A. alternata), most Alternaria spp. spores are large enough to be imaged by some automatic instruments, as for instance in our case, the Swisens Poleno (see Fig. 1).

Extending the potential of the classifier (Sauvageat et al., 2020) to the genus Alternaria requires a clean dataset of spores measured by the Swisens Poleno. To this end, we identified an event with extremely high Alternaria concentrations (see Fig. 2a, 26.07.2021) using routine Hirst-based measurements (Oteros et al., 2013) taken at MeteoSwiss in Payerne, Switzerland. Using concurrent meteorological observations of wind direction and speed data, we were able to link this event with the harvest of a neighbouring potato field infested with Alternaria (most probably A. solani based on the spores’ morphology and the type of crop). Since the collection of airborne particles occurs on a clock-controlled rotating drum (2 mm/h), we can associate the position of the particle on the band to the time at which it impacted (Fig. 2a). Considering that the Swisens Poleno devices are collocated with the Hirst measurements (as described in Tummon et al. (2021)), the peaks in the total number of particles measured by the Swisens Poleno could be matched with the Hirst measurements of Alternaria spores (see Fig. 2b). We isolated the corresponding peak events in the Swisens Poleno data and cleaned them by manually selecting the events presenting correct holographic images, i.e. all events where Alternaria could be identified on at least one of the two images by the person cleaning the data. We obtained a dataset of 2767 particle events with a morphology (size and shape) compatible with Alternaria. Figure 1.B shows an example of such an event (consisting of two holographic images taken at 90 one from another). We added a class for Alternaria and straightforwardly retrained the neural network originally developed by Sauvageat et al. (2020).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

a Hirst slide with peak particle concentrations appearing as dark vertical lines, b The corresponding total number of particles measured by the Swisens Poleno, run in parallel to the Hirst impactor on the roof of the MeteoSwiss station, Payerne, Switzerland

To validate the newly updated classifier, we ran it on a period from 3 March to 21 September 2021. This was made possible by the fact that raw data produced by the Swisens Poleno (reconstructed images) is systematically archived at MeteoSwiss. As described in Sauvageat et al. (2020), we used thresholds on the outputs of the neural network to limit false-positive detection. In the absence of established guidelines for fungal spores, we used a value of 0.8 as threshold since this provides good results for operational pollen monitoring. Absolute scaling with the automatic system was obtained using the procedure described in Crouzy et al. (2016). The scaling factor was computed over the dispersion period of Alternaria (Fig. 3b) to limit the effect of false-positive detection. The scaling factor used for the automatic raw particle count is 0.115, resulting from the higher sampling of the Swisens Poleno compared to the Hirst impactor. Manual counting of Alternaria spores is labour intensive, and round-the-year counting of spores is not feasible. We therefore selected 3 days per month (lowest, highest and medium concentration) based on the Poleno time series (21 days in total) representing various Alternaria concentrations for which Hirst slides had to be analysed. The resulting concentrations were compared with those from the newly trained classifier (Fig. 3a). Nevertheless, an arbitrary choice of 21 days for comparison hardly qualifies as a comprehensive validation. We therefore performed additional continuous counts for a period of 30 days (Fig. 3b). These results show that for the days with higher concentrations, the Swisens Poleno tends to underestimate concentrations, possibly suggesting that saturation of the device occurs. Hence, we checked the total particle counts of the Poleno on days with high peaks of particles and identified 2 days (27 July and 12 August) which presented saturation. Those days were excluded when computing correlations and the scaling factor for comparing the two time series’. In more recent versions of the instrument, this issue has been corrected by the introduction of adaptive sampling rates. To quantify the correlation between the manual and automatic time series’, we used Spearman’s rank correlation due to the non-normal distribution of the data and the increased robustness of this metric to outliers. As a complement, Pearson’s correlation (disregarding the two saturated days) is also computed. Altogether, considering the differences between manual and automatic systems, from the sampling (impaction vs. Sigma 2 inlet) to the identification method (optical microscope counting vs. digital holography), we observe a solid agreement between the two methods. Notice that the Spearman value is lower (ρ=0.76) over the extended period (Fig. 3a) than over the continuous period (ρ=0.91) (Fig. 3b), suggesting the potential for improvement of avoiding false-positives. Finally, even though we trained the model on a single dataset potentially specific to a unique Alternaria species, we obtained reasonable results for the whole genus as compared to the Hirst method observations obtained in Payerne. Nonetheless, we expect to improve Alternaria recognition using a more general training dataset extended to other Alternaria species.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

a Comparison between manual (Hirst) and automatic (Swisens Poleno) spores’ measurements for 21 days sampled from March to September 2021. Dates were chosen a priori based on the concentration time series of the Swisens Poleno only (light blue line). Three days per month were sampled, each representing the lowest and highest values as well as a medium value. b Comparison between manual and automatic fungal spores concentration measurements for a month between 20 July and 20 August 2021

This first proof-of-concept study paves the way for the monitoring of fungal spores with the aim of supporting the future development of adapted agricultural methods with targeted use of fungicides. In this regard, future work, notably the improvement of the training data, is planned to develop operational monitoring of Alternaria. The availability of such operational monitoring data at high-temporal (10 min) resolution will serve to improve our understanding of the role of fungal spores in triggering allergic reactions and to improve both diagnosis and treatment thereof. Moreover, it will allow the determination of critical exposure thresholds for the allergic response of sensitised individuals. Finally, we expect that the same approach, i.e. use environmental data as reference for machine learning model training, could be used to start monitoring other bioaerosol particles based on peak emissions. It has the advantage, over data based on cultured colonies, to limit the presence of aggregates and immature spores.

Author Contributions

SE conducted the study, NB contributed to the neural network architecture, MJG and CS provided the manual Hirst counts, AB, BCl, GL and FT contributed to writing, and BCr supervised the study and contributed significantly to writing.

Funding

Open access funding provided by EPFL Lausanne. This work was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (IZCOZ0_198117).

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Berg MJ, Videen G. Digital holographic imaging of aerosol particles in flight. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer. 2011;112(11):1776–1783. doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2011.01.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Buters J, Clot B, Galán C, Gehrig R, Gilge S, Hentges F, O’Connor D, Sikoparija B, Skjoth C, Tummon F, et al. Automatic detection of airborne pollen: An overview. Aerobiologia. 2022;2:1–25. [Google Scholar]
  3. Crouzy B, Stella M, Konzelmann T, Calpini B, Clot B. All-optical automatic pollen identification: Towards an operational system. Atmospheric Environment. 2016;140:202–212. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fones HN, Bebber DP, Chaloner TM, Kay WT, Steinberg G, Gurr SJ. Threats to global food security from emerging fungal and oomycete crop pathogens. Nature Food. 2020;1(6):332–342. doi: 10.1038/s43016-020-0075-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Haverkort A, Boonekamp P, Hutten R, Jacobsen E, Lotz L, Kessel G, Visser R, Van der Vossen E. Societal costs of late blight in potato and prospects of durable resistance through cisgenic modification. Potato Research. 2008;51(1):47–57. doi: 10.1007/s11540-008-9089-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hernandez-Ramirez G, Barber D, Tome-Amat J, Garrido-Arandia M, Diaz-Perales A. Alternaria as an inducer of allergic sensitization. Journal of Fungi. 2021;7(10):838. doi: 10.3390/jof7100838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hirst J. An automatic volumetric spore trap. Annals of Applied Biology. 1952;39(2):257–265. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1952.tb00904.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Logrieco A, Moretti A, Solfrizzo M. Alternaria toxins and plant diseases: an overview of origin, occurrence and risks. World Mycotoxin Journal. 2009;2(2):129–140. doi: 10.3920/WMJ2009.1145. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Maya-Manzano JM, Smith M, Markey E, Hourihane-Clancy J, Sodeau J, ConnorÓ DJ. Recent developments in monitoring and modelling airborne pollen, a review. Grana. 2021;60(1):1–19. doi: 10.1080/00173134.2020.1769176. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Oteros J, Galán C, Alcázar P, Domínguez-Vilches E. Quality control in bio-monitoring networks, Spanish aerobiology network. Science of the Total Environment. 2013;443:559–565. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pulimood TB, Corden JM, Bryden C, Sharples L, Nasser SM. Epidemic asthma and the role of the fungal mold Alternaria alternate. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2007;120(3):610–617. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.04.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sauvageat E, Zeder Y, Auderset K, Calpini B, Clot B, Crouzy B, Konzelmann T, Lieberherr G, Tummon F, Vasilatou K. Real-time pollen monitoring using digital holography. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 2020;13(3):1539–1550. doi: 10.5194/amt-13-1539-2020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tešendić, D., Boberić Krstićev, D., Matavulj, P., Brdar, S., Panić, M., Minić, V., & Šikoparija, B. (2022). Realforall: Real-time system for automatic detection of airborne pollen. Enterprise Information Systems,16(5), 1793391.
  14. Tummon F, Adamov S, Clot B, Crouzy B, Gysel-Beer M, Kawashima S, Lieberherr G, Manzano J, Markey E, Moallemi A, et al. A first evaluation of multiple automatic pollen monitors run in parallel. Aerobiologia. 2021;2:1–16. [Google Scholar]
  15. Woudenberg J, Groenewald J, Binder M, Crous P. Alternaria redefined. Studies in Mycology. 2013;75(1):171–212. doi: 10.3114/sim0015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Aerobiologia are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES