Abstract
Background
Increasing concerns about climate change and global petroleum supply draw attention to the urgent need for the development of alternative methods to produce fuels. Consequently, the scientific community must devise novel ways to obtain fuels that are both sustainable and eco-friendly. Bacterial alkanes have numerous potential applications in the industry sector. One significant application is biofuel production, where bacterial alkanes can serve as a sustainable eco-friendly alternative to fossil fuels. This study represents the first report on the production of alkanes by endophytic bacteria.
Results
In this study, three Bacillus species, namely Bacillus atrophaeus Camph.1 (OR343176.1), Bacillus spizizenii Camph.2 (OR343177.1), and Bacillus aerophilus Camph.3 (OR343178.1), were isolated from the leaves of C. camphora. The isolates were then screened to determine their ability to produce alkanes in different culture media including nutrient broth (NB), Luria–Bertani (LB) broth, and tryptic soy broth (TSB). Depending on the bacterial isolate and the culture media used, different profiles of alkanes ranging from C8 to C31 were detected.
Conclusions
The endophytic B. atrophaeus Camph.1 (OR343176.1), B. spizizenii Camph.2 (OR343177.1), and B. aerophilus Camph.3 (OR343178.1), associated with C. camphora leaves, represent new eco-friendly approaches for biofuel production, aiming towards a sustainable future. Further research is needed to optimize the fermentation process and scale up alkane production by these bacterial isolates.
Keywords: Endophyte, Bacillus, Cinnamomum camphora, Alkane, Biofuel, Production
Background
Fossil fuels have been used for decades to produce liquid fuels such as diesel, gasoline, and kerosene. However, it is predicted that petroleum reserves will be depleted within 40 years [1]. This has raised concerns about the global petroleum supply, and environmental issues such as global warming and climate change. As a result, there is growing interest in exploring alternative fuel sources [2]. Consequently, a significant focus has been on developing alternative biosynthesis methods for sustainable and eco-friendly biofuel.
Alkanes are hydrocarbons that are essential for biofuel production. They are the key building blocks of renewable biodiesel. Alkanes offer a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels, aligning with global efforts to reduce climate change and improve environmental sustainability [3]. The stable chemical structure of alkanes also helps biofuels retain their quality and performance in long-term storage. This stability is critical for meeting the requirements of individual consumers as well as commercial and industrial sectors [4]. The traditional commercial production of alkanes constantly increases production costs, non-renewable energy consumption, and gaseous pollutants [5]. The microbial biosynthesis of alkanes can be a promising sustainable alternative for chemical production [6]. Incorporating microorganisms into the global future of green energy can achieve a distributed and sustainable supply chain that is safe, reliable, and responsive to ever-changing global demand [7, 8].
The biosynthesis of alkanes by bacteria has attracted significant attention in recent years due to its potential for biofuel production [9]. Bacterial alkanes possess desirable properties, including high energy content and low freezing points compared to other biofuel sources, making them well-suited for specific applications in the aviation or automotive industries [10].
Cinnamomum camphora (L.) J. Presl., popularly known as the camphor tree, is a member of the Lauraceae family. It is native to China, Korea, and Japan and is extensively cultivated in Asia, Africa, North America, and Australia [11]. Every part of the plant contains volatile organic compounds that have medicinal properties [12]. Previous studies have shown that it is possible to utilize endophytes that inhabit plant tissues to synthesize compounds similar to those produced naturally by the host plants [13]. This approach avoids the risk of over-harvesting or the negative effects of climate change on plants, which can affect the production of these compounds [14]. Although alkane biosynthesis has been recognized in various microorganisms, including cyanobacteria, genetically modified bacteria, yeasts, and fungi, no studies have reported the production of alkanes by endophytic bacteria [15]. Therefore, this study aims to isolate endophytic bacteria from C. camphora leaves and screen the production of alkanes by the isolates in different culture media. The study is an attempt to find renewable sources for bio-alkanes that may be promising for sustainable biofuel production.
Materials and methods
Plant material
Leaves from healthy trees of C. camphora were collected from Aswan City, Egypt (24° 5′ 20.1768'' N, 32° 53′ 59.3880'' E) and brought directly to the Aswan University bacteriology laboratory for the isolation of endophytic bacteria.
Isolation and identification of endophytic bacteria
The surfaces of the leaves were sterilized using 5% NaClO, 70% CH3CH2OH, and autoclaved distilled water, respectively [16]. In a 9 mL sterile saline solution, 1 g of the leaves was mashed well. One milliliter of the resulting suspension was then inoculated in trypticase soy and nutrient agar plates. Plates were incubated for 72 h at 37 ℃. Three isolates coded as Camph.1, Camph.2, and Camph.3 were subjected to molecular identification by partially sequencing their 16S rRNA genes. The amplification primers 27F and 1492R were used [17]. The separation of PCR products was performed using 1% (w/v) agarose gel. The sequencing of the obtained bands was commercially performed at SolGent Co., Korea. The sequence similarity and identity percentages were determined using the NCBI website (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). An accession number was gained for each isolate after submitting its 16S rRNA gene partial sequence into the NCBI database. The phylogenetic relationship among the present isolates and the other close members of NCBI was constructed using neighbor-joining analysis in MEGA X 10.1.7 software [18].
Determination of bacterial growth curves
The growth curves of the bacterial isolates grown in nutrient broth (NB), Luria–Bertani (LB) broth, and tryptic soy broth (TSB) were determined using the turbidimetric method [19]. In 250 mL conical flasks, 50 mL of each medium was prepared and autoclaved. The flasks were inoculated with 100 µL of each bacterial inoculum (1.5 × 108 CFU/mL, OD600 = 0.1). The flasks were incubated at 37 °C under shaking (150 rpm). The optical density was read at 600 nm at intervals of 10 h until the stationary phase was reached. The flasks without bacterial inoculums served as controls. The experiment was conducted three times.
Fermentation conditions
The freshly prepared inoculum (100 µL of 1 × 107 CFU/mL) of each bacterial isolate was inoculated in 500 mL flasks containing 100 mL of three different broth culture media: NB, LB, and TSB. The flasks were incubated for 48 h at 37 °C and 150 rpm. Flasks containing media without bacterial inoculum were used as controls. Triplicates were made for all fermentations.
Extraction and GC/MS analysis of alkanes
Hexane was added to the bacterial cultures in a ratio of 1:1 (v/v) and homogenized well. The solvent layers were then separated and concentrated using a rotary evaporator at 40 °C and 130 rpm under pressure. Each extract (1 mg) was redissolved in 10 mL of hexane. The GC/MS system used in this study was the Agilent Technologies 7890A GC/5977A MSD supplied with a TR-5MS GC column (30 m, 0.25 mm ID, and 0.25 μm film). The sample (1 μL) was injected into the column, and the oven temperature was initially set at 30 °C for 1 min. The temperature was then increased at a rate of 10 °C/min until reaching 200 °C, where it was held for an additional 1 min. The carrier gas, helium, was used at a flow rate of 20 mL/min. The retention times of the sample peaks were compared with NIST11.L standard reference compounds. The alkane standard mixture (C7-C40, Millipore Sigma™ Supelco™) was used to quantify the alkanes in the samples.
Effect of carbon sources on alkane production
In conical flasks, the basal medium consisted of the following components per liter: KH2PO4 (1.3 g), MgSO4.7H2O (0.2 g), NaCl (5 g), (NH4)2SO4 (1 g), and yeast extract (5 g) was supplemented with different carbon sources including glucose, sucrose, and sugar cane molasses, each at a concentration of 10 g/L. Flasks were then inoculated with 100 µL of a freshly prepared inoculum containing 1 × 107 CFU/mL. Flasks were incubated for 48 h at 37 °C and 150 rpm. Flasks containing media without bacterial inoculum were used as controls. Triplicates were prepared for all fermentations. Alkanes were extracted and analyzed using the method described above.
Results and discussion
The use of biofuels has become crucial in addressing the worldwide concerns of the energy crisis and climate change. Microbial alkanes provide a renewable, eco-friendly, and promising source for the sustainable production of biofuels [20]. Unlike fossil fuels, biofuels derived from microbial alkanes not only decrease carbon emissions but also mitigate the effects of global warming [21]. The low toxicity and biodegradability of bacterial alkanes make them eco-friendly alternatives to synthetic alkanes, serving various applications [22].
Isolation and identification of endophytic bacteria
In this study, three endophytic bacteria were isolated from the leaves of C. camphora and coded as Camph.1, Camph.2, and Camph.3. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, the isolates Camph.1, Camph.2, and Camph.3 were found to be quite similar to Bacillus atrophaeus (NR024689.1), Bacillus spizizenii (NR112686.1), and Bacillus aerophilus (NR042339.1), respectively (Fig. 1). The NCBI accession numbers of the isolates Camph.1, Camph.2, and Camph.3 are OR343176.1, OR343177.1, and OR343178.1, respectively. It was observed that the genus Bacillus was dominant among endophytes, this may be attributed to the ability of Bacillus spp. to form spores and tolerate extreme temperatures in the Aswan region. This finding agreed with previous studies which reported the isolation of Bacillus spp. from different plants grown in Aswan [23–25].
Fig.1.
The phylogenetic relationship among the isolates Camph.1, Camph.2, Camph.3, and the closely related species from the NCBI database using the neighbor-joining method in MEGA X10.1.7 software
Determination of bacterial growth curves
From a commercial perspective, the growth of microorganisms is a significant challenge in the industrial production of valuable chemicals [26]. Therefore, the growth curve for each bacterial isolate was determined in each culture medium. It was observed that the exponential phase of the three isolates began after 20 h of incubation and extended until 50 h. The stationary phase continued for 20 h, after which the growth rate declined (Fig. 2). Generally, the growth rate was higher in LB followed by TSB. The NB, on the other hand, had the lowest growth rate for all isolates (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
The bacterial growth curves for B. atrophaeus Camph.1 (a), B. spizizenii Camph.2 (b), and B. aerophilus Camph.3 (c), in NB, LB, and TSB media. The bars represent the standard errors of the means
GC/MS analysis of alkanes
The production of alkanes was detected by GC/MS analysis after growing the bacterial isolates in three different culture media: NB, LB, and TSB. It was interesting to note that the alkane profiles vary depending on the growth medium and the bacterial strain. For B. atrophaeus Camph.1, the major number of alkanes was detected in the LB medium, where fourteen alkanes were evaluated, including Heptane-2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl, Decane-2,4,6-trimethyl, Octadecane-1-iodo, Tetradecane, Tridecane-3-methyl, 10-Methylnonadecane, Hexacosane, Tetracosane, Eicosane-2-methyl, Undecane-2,9-dimethyl, Heptadecane-9-octyl, Heptadecane-2-methyl, Nonadecane-2-methyl, and 2-methyloctacosane. TSB medium contained ten alkanes, which were Nonane-2,2,3-trimethyl, Octane-2-methyl, Tetradecane-4-ethyl, Decane-3-methyl, Heptadecane-2-methyl, Pentacosane, Octadecane, Hexacosane, Cyclobutane-1,2-diethyl, and Eicosane. NA medium contained seven alkanes, which included Heptane-2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl, Decane-2,4,6-trimethyl, Hexadecane-3-methyl, Hexacosane, Octadecane-1-iodo, 1,3,5,7,9-Pentaethyl-1,9-dibutoxypentasiloxane, and Hentriacontane.
Fourteen alkanes were produced by B. spizizenii Camph.2 in LB medium (Table 5). In comparison, eleven alkanes were detected in both NB and TSB (Tables 4 and 6) and (Fig. 4). LB medium included Heptane-2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl, Undecane-3,9-dimethyl, Decane-3,8-dimethyl, Tridecane-1-iodo, Hexadecane-2,6,11,15-tetramethyl, Pentacosane, Octadecane, Decane-3-methyl, Hexadecane, Hentriacontane, Eicosane, Heneicosane, Heptacosane, and 2-Bromo dodecane (Table 5). NB medium contained Nonane-2,2,3-trimethyl, Dodecane, Eicosane, Hexadecane, 2,2-Dimethyleicosane, Octacosane, Heptadecane-2-methyl, Hexadecane-8-hexyl-8-pentyl, 5-Ethyl-5-methylnonadecane, Cyclobutane-1,2-diethyl-trans, and Octane-2,5,6-trimethyl (Table 4). On the other hand, TSB medium included Heptane-2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl, Undecane-4,7-dimethyl, Hexadecane, Heneicosane, Hexacosane, Hentriacontane, Heptadecane-2-methyl, Heptadecane-9-octyl, Octacosane, Octadecane-1-iodo, and Pentadecane-2-methyl and (Table 6).
Table 5.
Bio-alkanes produced by B. spizizenii Camph.2 in LB medium
| Alkane name | Structure | Formula | Molecular weight | Retention time | Peak area | mg alkane/L culture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heptane, 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl- |  |
C12H26 | 170 | 4.420 | 1,516,557 | 3.802 |
| Undecane, 3,9-dimethyl- |  |
C13H28 | 184 | 7.373 | 1,186,604 | 2.975 |
| Decane, 3,8-dimethyl- |  |
C12H26 | 170 | 7.733 | 952,014 | 2.387 |
| Tridecane, 1-iodo- |  |
C13H27I | 310 | 9.089 | 4,977,726 | 12.479 |
| Hexadecane, 2,6,11,15-tetramethyl |  |
C20H42 | 282 | 9.170 | 913,946 | 2.291 |
| Pentacosane |  |
C25H52 | 352 | 9.496 | 4,801,726 | 12.038 |
| Octadecane |  |
C18H38 | 254 | 9.685 | 1,243,122 | 3.116 |
| Decane, 3-methyl- |  |
C11H24 | 156 | 9.810 | 1,196,272 | 2.999 |
| Hexadecane |  |
C16H34 | 226 | 10.062 | 1,118,006 | 2.803 |
| Hentriacontane |  |
C31H64 | 436 | 11.378 | 5,539,119 | 13.886 |
| Eicosane |  |
C20H42 | 282 | 11.939 | 4,466,188 | 11.196 |
| Heneicosane |  |
C21H44 | 296 | 12.029 | 938,724 | 2.353 |
| Heptacosane |  |
C27H56 | 380 | 14.531 | 2,948,890 | 7.393 |
| 2-Bromo dodecane |  |
C12H25Br | 248 | 15.235 | 2,428,083 | 6.087 |
Table 4.
Bio-alkanes produced by B. spizizenii Camph.2 in NB medium
| Alkane name | Structure | Formula | Molecular weight | Retention time | Peak area | mg alkane/L culture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nonane, 2,2,3-trimethyl- |  |
C12H26 | 170 | 4.420 | 1,262,471 | 3.354 |
| Dodecane |  |
C12H26 | 170 | 9.089 | 3,648,878 | 9.694 |
| Eicosane |  |
C20H42 | 282 | 9.495 | 3,475,442 | 9.233 |
| Hexadecane |  |
C16H34 | 226 | 10.062 | 1,079,883 | 2.869 |
| 2,2-Dimethyleicosane |  |
C22H46 | 310 | 11.206 | 855,681 | 2.273 |
| Octacosane |  |
C28H58 | 394 | 11.378 | 4,149,590 | 11.024 |
| Heptadecane, 2-methyl- |  |
C18H38 | 254 | 11.939 | 3,373,007 | 8.961 |
| Hexadecane, 8-hexyl-8-pentyl- |  |
C27H56 | 380 | 12.059 | 789,803 | 2.098 |
| 5-Ethyl-5-methylnonadecane |  |
C22H46 | 310 | 14.531 | 2,794,080 | 7.423 |
| Cyclobutane, 1,2-diethyl-, trans- |  |
C8H16 | 112 | 14.571 | 1,681,555 | 4.467 |
| Octane, 2,5,6-trimethyl- |  |
C11H24 | 156 | 19.091 | 594,154 | 1.579 |
Table 6.
Bio-alkanes produced by B. spizizenii Camph.2 in TSB medium
| Alkane name | Structure | Formula | Molecular weight | Retention time | Peak area | mg alkane/L culture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heptane, 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl- |  |
C12H26 | 170 | 4.426 | 1,354,335 | 8.360 |
| Undecane, 4,7-dimethyl- |  |
C13H28 | 184 | 5.215 | 662,187 | 4.088 |
| Hexadecane |  |
C16H34 | 226 | 7.373 | 672,525 | 4.152 |
| Heneicosane |  |
C21H44 | 296 | 9.089 | 2,137,083 | 13.192 |
| Hexacosane |  |
C26H54 | 366 | 9.495 | 2,272,655 | 14.029 |
| Hentriacontane |  |
C31H64 | 436 | 9.593 | 606,217 | 3.742 |
| Heptadecane, 2-methyl- |  |
C18H38 | 254 | 9.684 | 527,376 | 3.256 |
| Heptadecane, 9-octyl- |  |
C25H52 | 352 | 11.378 | 2,465,248 | 15.218 |
| Octacosane |  |
C28H58 | 394 | 11.939 | 1,812,518 | 11.189 |
| Octadecane, 1-iodo- |  |
C18H37I | 380 | 14.531 | 1,227,028 | 7.575 |
| Pentadecane, 2-methyl- |  |
C16H34 | 226 | 15.235 | 1,170,809 | 7.228 |
Fig. 4.
The heatmap displays the amounts of bio-alkanes (mg alkane/L culture) produced by B. spizizenii Camph.2 in NB, LB, and TSB media
On the other hand, B. aerophilus Camph.3 produced eleven alkanes when grown in NB medium: Heptane-2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl, Decane-3,8-dimethyl, Eicosane, Hexacosane, Pentadecane, Tetracosane, Hexadecane, Heptadecane, Heneicosane, Hentriacontane, and Octacosane (Table 7 and Fig. 5). Fourteen alkanes were produced in both LB and TSB media: Heptane, 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl, 1-Iodo-2-methylnonane, Hexadecane, Tetradecane-2,6,10-trimethyl, 10-Methylnonadecane, Octacosane, Pentacosane, Heptacosane, Heptadecane, Heptadecane-2-methyl, Hentriacontane, Octadecane, Pentadecane-2-methyl, and Hexacosane (Table 8 and Fig. 4) and Heptane-2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl, Nonane-4,5-dimethyl, Heptadecane-2-methyl, Eicosane, Dodecane-2,6,11-trimethyl, Heptacosane-1-chloro, Dodecane, Tetracosane, Hexadecane, Pentadecane, Hexacosane, Octacosane, Decane-3-methyl, and Decane-4-methylene (Table 9 and Fig. 5), respectively.
Table 7.
Bio-alkanes produced by B. aerophilus Camph.3 in NB medium
| Alkane name | Structure | Formula | Molecular weight | Retention time | Peak area | mg alkane/L culture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heptane, 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl- |  |
C12H26 | 170 | 4.432 | 1,397,729 | 7.257 |
| Decane, 3,8-dimethyl- |  |
C12H26 | 170 | 5.216 | 586,155 | 3.043 |
| Eicosane |  |
C20H42 | 282 | 7.379 | 796,408 | 4.135 |
| Hexacosane |  |
C26H54 | 366 | 7.733 | 574,953 | 2.985 |
| Pentadecane |  |
C15H32 | 212 | 9.089 | 2,274,449 | 11.808 |
| Tetracosane |  |
C24H50 | 338 | 9.496 | 2,011,445 | 10.443 |
| Hexadecane |  |
C16H34 | 226 | 10.062 | 673,346 | 3.496 |
| Heptadecane |  |
C17H36 | 240 | 11.207 | 588,982 | 3.058 |
| Heneicosane |  |
C21H44 | 296 | 11.378 | 2,036,079 | 10.571 |
| Hentriacontane |  |
C31H64 | 436 | 11.939 | 1,319,359 | 6.850 |
| Octacosane |  |
C28H58 | 394 | 14.531 | 2,611,310 | 13.557 |
Fig. 5.
The heatmap displays the amounts of bio-alkanes (mg alkane/L culture) produced by B. aerophilus Camph.3 in NB, LB, and TSB media
Table 8.
Bio-alkanes produced by B. aerophilus Camph.3 in LB medium
| Alkane name | Structure | Formula | Molecular weight | Retention time | Peak area | mg alkane/L culture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heptane, 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl- |  |
C12H26 | 170 | 4.432 | 1,226,975 | 6.634 |
| 1-Iodo-2-methylnonane |  |
C10H21I | 268 | 5.215 | 588,941 | 3.184 |
| Hexadecane |  |
C16H34 | 226 | 7.378 | 776,012 | 4.196 |
| Tetradecane, 2,6,10-trimethyl- |  |
C17H36 | 240 | 7.739 | 603,654 | 3.264 |
| 10-Methylnonadecane |  |
C20H42 | 282 | 9.089 | 2,740,948 | 14.820 |
| Octacosane |  |
C28H58 | 394 | 9.495 | 2,074,784 | 11.218 |
| Pentacosane |  |
C25H52 | 352 | 9.587 | 552,547 | 2.988 |
| Heptacosane |  |
C27H56 | 380 | 9.684 | 515,221 | 2.786 |
| Heptadecane |  |
C17H36 | 240 | 11.201 | 840,206 | 4.543 |
| Heptadecane, 2-methyl- |  |
C18H38 | 254 | 11.378 | 1,796,476 | 9.714 |
| Hentriacontane |  |
C31H64 | 436 | 11.939 | 1,656,367 | 8.956 |
| Octadecane |  |
C18H38 | 254 | 12.545 | 842,691 | 4.556 |
| Pentadecane, 2-methyl- |  |
C16H34 | 226 | 14.531 | 1,946,339 | 10.524 |
| Hexacosane |  |
C26H54 | 366 | 15.235 | 1,156,936 | 6.256 |
Table 9.
Bio-alkanes produced by B. aerophilus Camph.3 in TSB medium
| Alkane name | Structure | Formula | Molecular weight | Retention time | Peak area | mg alkane/L culture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heptane, 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl- |  |
C12H26 | 170 | 4.426 | 1,284,688 | 5.810 |
| Nonane, 4,5-dimethyl |  |
C11H24 | 156 | 5.216 | 566,578 | 2.562 |
| Heptadecane, 2-methyl- |  |
C18H38 | 254 | 7.379 | 1,050,595 | 4.751 |
| Eicosane |  |
C20H42 | 282 | 7.733 | 836,152 | 3.782 |
| Dodecane, 2,6,11-trimethyl- |  |
C15H32 | 212 | 9.089 | 2,872,460 | 12.991 |
| Heptacosane, 1-chloro- |  |
C27H55Cl | 414 | 9.170 | 489,970 | 2.216 |
| Dodecane |  |
C12H26 | 170 | 9.496 | 2,518,180 | 11.388 |
| Tetracosane |  |
C24H50 | 338 | 9.593 | 657,646 | 2.974 |
| Hexadecane |  |
C16H34 | 226 | 10.062 | 780,927 | 3.532 |
| Pentadecane |  |
C15H32 | 212 | 11.201 | 752,401 | 3.403 |
| Hexacosane |  |
C26H54 | 366 | 11.378 | 2,293,290 | 10.371 |
| Octacosane |  |
C28H58 | 394 | 11.939 | 1,562,255 | 7.065 |
| Decane, 3-methyl- |  |
C11H24 | 156 | 14.537 | 1,654,373 | 7.482 |
| Decane, 4-methylene- |  |
C11H22 | 154 | 14.577 | 967,388 | 4.375 |
Interestingly, the profiles of alkanes released by the three bacterial isolates in the three tested culture media differed. For all isolates, the highest number of alkanes was detected in the LB medium (Fig. 3, 45). This finding aligns with previous studies that have reported a significant effect of medium composition on the profiles of volatile organic compounds released by microorganisms [27].
Fig. 3.
The heatmap displays the amounts of bio-alkanes (mg alkane/L culture) produced by B. atrophaeus Camph.1 in NB, LB, and TSB media
Effect of carbon sources on alkane production
Interestingly, various alkanes were produced by the three bacterial isolates using glucose, sucrose, and sugar cane molasses as carbon sources. This is consistent with previous studies that reported significant differences in hydrocarbon profiles produced by microorganisms based on carbon sources [28]. B. atrophaeus Camph.1 produced fifteen different alkanes using glucose as a carbon source which are Tetradecane, 2,2-dimethy (3.8 mg/L), Undecane, 2-methyl (2.38 mg/L), Eicosane (12.47 mg/L), Decane, 3,8-dimethyl (2.29 mg/L), Heptadecane, 4-methyl (12.03 mg/L), Hentriacontane (3.2 mg/L), Octadecane, 2-methyl (3.1 mg/L), Heneicosane (2.9 mg/L), Hexadecane (2.8 mg/L), Hexacosane (13.8 mg/L), Hexadecane, 2,6,10,14-tetramethyl (2.6 mg/L), Octacosane (7.39 mg/L), Pentacosane (6.08 mg/L), 2-methyloctacosane (2.15 mg/L), and Heneicosane, 3-methyl (2.85 mg/L). On the other hand, the GC/MS analysis revealed a total of twelve alkanes produced by B. atrophaeus Camph.1 when grown in a medium supplemented with sucrose, which were Heptane, 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl (8.36 mg/L), Undecane, 3,7-dimethyl (4.08 mg/L), Decane, 2,9-dimethyl (4.15 mg/L), Decane, 2-methyl (13.19 mg/L), Heptadecane, 8-methyl (14.02 mg/L), Nonadecane, 3-methyl (3.74 mg/L), Hentriacontane (3.25 mg/L), Hexadecane (3.49 mg/L), Heneicosane (15.21 mg/L), 2-methyloctacosane (11.18 mg/L), Octacosane (7.57 mg/L), and Octadecane, 1-iodo (7.22 mg/L). Ten alkanes were detected in a medium supplemented with sugar cane molasses including Decane, 2,2,3-trimethyl (3.35 mg/L), Octadecane (2.76 mg/L), Heptadecane, 2-methyl (9.69 mg/L), Dodecane (9.23 mg/L), Eicosane (2.46 mg/L), Hexadecane (2.86 mg/L), Hexacosane (11.02 mg/L), Nonane, 4,5-dimethyl (2.19 mg/L), Heneicosane (8.96 mg/L), and 2,2-Dimethyleicosane (1.57 mg/L).
For B. spizizenii Camph.2, thirteen alkanes were produced in a glucose-based medium, which are Heptane, 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl (6.63 mg/L), Undecane, 4,7-dimethyl (3.18 mg/L), Hexadecane (4.19 mg/L), Decane, 2-methyl (3.26 mg/L), Tridecane, 1-iodo (14.82 mg/L), Heptadecane, 8-methyl (11.21 mg/L), 10-Methylnonadecane (2.98 mg/L), Pentadecane (4.54 mg/L), Octacosane (9.71 mg/L), Hentriacontane (8.95 mg/L), Octadecane (4.55 mg/L), Hexadecane, 2-methyl (10.52 mg/L), and Pentadecane, 3-methyl (6.25 mg/L). Ten alkanes were detected in a sucrose-based medium, including Heptane, 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl (7.25 mg/L), Decane, 3,6-dimethyl (3.04 mg/L), Octane, 2,4,6-trimethyl (4.13 mg/L), Pentacosane (2.98 mg/L), Heneicosane (11.80 mg/L), Tridecane, 1-iodo (10.44 mg/L), Hexadecane (3.49 mg/L), Eicosane (3.05 mg/L), Hexacosane (6.85 mg/L), and 2-methyloctacosane (13.55 mg/L). On the other hand, 2,2,7,7-Tetramethyloctane (5.81 mg/L), Decane, 3-methyl (2.56 mg/L), Undecane, 3-methyl (4.75 mg/L), Octadecane, 2-methyl (12.99 mg/L), Hexacosane (11.38 mg/L), Eicosane (2.97 mg/L), Heptadecane (3.53 mg/L), 2-Bromo dodecane (10.37 mg/L), Triacontane (7.06 mg/L), Heneicosane (7.48 mg/L), were produced in sugar cane molasses-based medium by B. spizizenii Camph.2.
Seven alkanes including Heptane, 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl (17.92 mg/L), Decane, 3,6-dimethyl (6.01 mg/L), Heptacosane (6.05 mg/L), Tetracosane (11.25 mg/L), Pentacosane (8.02 mg/L), Heptadecane, 2-methyl (9.11 mg/L), and Eicosane (5.75 mg/L) were produced in glucose-based medium by B. aerophilus Camph.3. Moreover, Decane, 2,2,3-trimethyl (11.32 mg/L), Undecane, 5-methyl (4.37 mg/L), Eicosane (5.98 mg/L), Nonane, 4,5-dimethyl (5.78 mg/L), Heptadecane, 8-methyl (17.89 mg/L), Octacosane (13.33 mg/L), Octadecane (11.47 mg/L), and Octane, 2-methyl (11.01 mg/L) were detected in sucrose-based medium. Sugar cane molasses-based medium achieved the production of twelve alkanes by B. aerophilus Camph.3 which are Heptane, 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl (6.98 mg/L), Hexacosane (3.36 mg/L), Nonane, 4,5-dimethyl (4.09 mg/L), Decane, 3-methyl (3.38 mg/L), Heneicosane (14.51 mg/L), 10-Methylnonadecane (2.88 mg/L), Docosane (14.53 mg/L), Octadecane (3.77 mg/L), Octadecane, 1-iodo (13.61 mg/L), Hentriacontane (2.78 mg/L), 2-methyloctacosane (11.65 mg/L), and Heptadecane, 9-octyl (5.96 mg/L).
As stated above, the chain length of alkanes produced by the present isolates ranged from C8 to C31 (Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9). Previous studies have reported that bacterial alkanes typically have chain lengths ranging from C10 to C36, although this can vary depending on the bacterial strain and environmental conditions [29]. The biosynthesis of n-alkanes by various bacteria including Desulfovibrio sp., Clostridium sp., Pseudomonas fluorescens, Vibrio furnissii M1, and Engineered Escherichia coli has been reported [30–33]. Although endophytic bacteria were known within the biotechnology field for their ability to produce a great variety of sustainable safe, eco-friendly products, there are no reports about their ability to produce alkanes [34]. Therefore, this study is the first documentation of alkane production by endophytic bacteria.
Table 1.
Bio-alkanes produced by B. atrophaeus Camph.1 in NB medium
| Alkane name | Structure | Formula | Molecular weight | Retention time | Peak area | mg alkane/L culture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heptane, 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl- |  |
C12H26 | 170 | 4.432 | 1,863,723 | 17.923 |
| Decane, 2,4,6-trimethyl- |  |
C13H28 | 184 | 5.215 | 625,432 | 6.015 |
| Hexadecane, 3-methyl- |  |
C17H36 | 240 | 7.378 | 629,978 | 6.058 |
| Hexacosane |  |
C26H54 | 366 | 9.089 | 1,170,008 | 11.252 |
| Octadecane, 1-iodo- |  |
C18H37I | 380 | 9.495 | 834,492 | 8.025 |
| 1,3,5,7,9-Pentaethyl-1,9-dibutoxypentasiloxane |  |
C18H48O6Si5 | 500 | 10.789 | 722,371 | 6.947 |
| Hentriacontane |  |
C31H64 | 436 | 11.378 | 947,253 | 9.110 |
Table 2.
Bio-alkanes produced by B. atrophaeus Camph.1 in LB medium
| Alkane name | Structure | Formula | Molecular weight | Retention time | Peak area | mg alkane/L culture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heptane, 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl- |  |
C12H26 | 170 | 4.426 | 1,316,286 | 6.984 |
| Decane, 2,4,6-trimethyl- |  |
C13H28 | 184 | 5.215 | 634,388 | 3.366 |
| Octadecane, 1-iodo- |  |
C18H37I | 380 | 7.378 | 772,529 | 4.099 |
| Tetradecane |  |
C14H30 | 198 | 7.733 | 638,078 | 3.386 |
| Tridecane, 3-methyl- |  |
C14H30 | 198 | 9.089 | 2,736,279 | 14.519 |
| 10-Methylnonadecane |  |
C20H42 | 282 | 11.378 | 2,565,585 | 13.613 |
| Hexacosane |  |
C26H54 | 366 | 9.495 | 2,738,304 | 14.530 |
| Tetracosane |  |
C24H50 | 338 | 9.587 | 710,911 | 3.772 |
| Eicosane, 2-methyl- |  |
C21H44 | 296 | 9.684 | 624,411 | 3.313 |
| Undecane, 2,9-dimethyl- |  |
C13H28 | 184 | 11.487 | 524,687 | 2.784 |
| Heptadecane, 9-octyl- |  |
C25H52 | 352 | 11.939 | 2,196,338 | 11.654 |
| Heptadecane, 2-methyl- |  |
C18H38 | 254 | 9.169 | 543,692 | 2.885 |
| Nonadecane, 2-methyl- |  |
C20H42 | 282 | 14.531 | 1,124,351 | 5.966 |
| 2-methyloctacosane |  |
C29H60 | 408 | 15.240 | 1,008,527 | 5.351 |
Table 3.
Bio-alkanes produced by B. atrophaeus Camph.1 in TSB medium
| Alkane name | Structure | Formula | Molecular weight | Retention time | Peak area | mg alkane/L culture |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nonane, 2,2,3-trimethyl- |  |
C12H26 | 170 | 4.426 | 1,709,131 | 11.321 |
| Octane, 2-methyl- |  |
C9H20 | 128 | 5.215 | 661,119 | 4.379 |
| Tetradecane, 4-ethyl- |  |
C16H34 | 226 | 7.378 | 903,832 | 5.987 |
| Decane, 3-methyl- |  |
C11H24 | 156 | 7.739 | 873,751 | 5.787 |
| Heptadecane, 2-methyl- |  |
C18H38 | 254 | 9.089 | 2,701,569 | 17.894 |
| Pentacosane |  |
C25H52 | 352 | 9.495 | 2,013,320 | 13.336 |
| Octadecane |  |
C18H38 | 254 | 11.378 | 1,731,725 | 11.470 |
| Hexacosane |  |
C26H54 | 366 | 11.939 | 1,224,642 | 8.112 |
| Cyclobutane, 1,2-diethyl- |  |
C8H16 | 112 | 14.531 | 1,615,566 | 10.701 |
| Eicosane |  |
C20H42 | 282 | 15.240 | 1,662,776 | 11.014 |
The alkanes are preferred as clean fuels, because they burn cleanly and easily, releasing a lot of heat and light energy [35]. In the present study, the three studied endophytic bacteria produced a variety of alkanes as mentioned above. Many of these alkanes are used in biofuel production. Octane and decane are the main constituents of gasoline. Octane is used in internal combustion engines. Nonane, decane, undecane, tetradecane, pentadecane, and hexadecane make up the majority of diesel, kerosene, and aviation fuel. Heptadecane, octadecane, ecosane, pentacosane, hexacosane, heptacosane, octacosane, and heneicosane are the main components of lubricating oil [36].
Conclusion
Using microorganisms is a fantastic new starting point for sustainable biofuel production. The study's findings, which were not reported previously, identified three species of bacteria as effective and environmentally benign sources for the production of different alkanes. Three endophytic bacteria were isolated from the leaves of C. camphora and were molecularly identified as Bacillus atrophaeus Camph.1 (OR343176.1), Bacillus spizizenii Camph.2 (OR343177.1), and Bacillus aerophilus Camph.3 (OR343178.1). These isolates showed great potential in producing various alkanes when grown in NB, LB, and TSB media. Numerous of the produced alkanes, such as octane, nonane, decane, undecane, tetradecane, pentadecane, and hexadecane are used in biofuel production, such as gasoline, diesel, kerosene, and aviation fuel. Therefore, these endophytic bacteria may be promising and sustainable sources for alkane biofuel production.
Acknowledgements
We sincerely thank the Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Aswan University, for supporting and providing the requirements of scientific research.
Author contributions
N.Sh.A.H. study design, material preparation, isolation of bacteria and experiments, data collection and analysis, and wrote the main manuscript and E. A. El-R. GC/MS analysis and reviewed the manuscript. Both authors approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). No funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this research.
Availability of data and materials
The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available in the [NCBI] repository [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/OR343176.1/], [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/OR343177.1/], and [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/OR343178.1/].
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Mokhtar M, Sukmono A, Setiapraja H, Ma’ruf M, Yubaidah S, et al. Towards nationwide implementation of 40% biodiesel blend fuel in Indonesia: a comprehensive road test and laboratory evaluation. Biofuel Res J. 2023;10(3):1876–1889. doi: 10.18331/BRJ2023.10.3.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Valavanidis A. Global warming and climate change. Fossil fuels and anthropogenic activities have warmed the earth’s atmosphere, oceans, and land. Hoboken, New Jersey, United States: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) aligned with John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2022.
- 3.Dong A. A brief note on alkanes and its applications. J Phys Chem Biophys. 2021;11(4):e300. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fu WJ, Chi Z, Ma ZC, Zhou HX, Liu GL, Lee CF, Chi ZM. Hydrocarbons, the advanced biofuels produced by different organisms, the evidence that alkanes in petroleum can be renewable. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99:7481–7494. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6840-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Monteiro RRC, da Silva SSO, Cavalcante CL, de Luna FMT, Bolivar JM, Vieira RS, Fernandez-Lafuente R. Biosynthesis of alkanes/alkenes from fatty acids or derivatives (triacylglycerols or fatty aldehydes) Biotechnol Adv. 2022;61:108045. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.108045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brown S, Loh J, Aves SJ, Howard TP. Alkane biosynthesis in bacteria. In: Sousa D, Stams A, editors. Biogenesis of hydrocarbons. handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology. Cham: Springer; 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Patil PB, Sarkar D, Sarkar A. Chapter 1—clean energy production by microorganisms: a sustainable approach. In: Samuel J, Kumar A, Singh J, editors. Relationship between microbes and the environment for sustainable ecosystem services. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2023. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schirmer A, Rude MA, Li X, Popova E, del Cardayre SB. Microbial biosynthesis of alkanes. Science. 2010;329(5991):559–562. doi: 10.1126/science.1187936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shakeel T, Fatma Z, Yazdani SS. In vivo quantification of alkanes in Escherichia coli. Bio-protocol. 2020;10(8):e3593. doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.3593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lehtinen T, Virtanen H, Santala S, Santala V. Production of alkanes from CO2 by engineered bacteria. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018;11:228. doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1229-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chien CT, Lin T. Effects of moisture content and temperature on the storage and germination of Cinnamomum camphora seeds. Seed Sci Technol. 1999;27(1):315–320. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Usmani QI, Jahan N, sofiya. Kafur (C. camphora L.)–an updated review of its ethnopharmacology phytochemistry and pharmacology. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2022;14(10):10–17. 10.22159/ijpps.2022v14i10.45766.
- 13.Gouda S, Das G, Sen SK, Shin HS, Patra JK. Endophytes: a treasure house of bioactive compounds of medicinal importance. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1538. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sharma H, Rai AK, Dahiya D, Chettri R, Nigam PS. Exploring endophytes for in vitro synthesis of bioactive compounds similar to metabolites produced in vivo by host plants. AIMS Microbiol. 2021;7(2):175–199. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2021012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Geng J, Liao P, Tan GYA, Zhu F-Y, Pradhan N. Opportunities and challenges for n-alkane and n-alkene biosynthesis: a sustainable microbial biorefinery. Biofuel Res J. 2023;40(2023):1974–1988. doi: 10.18331/BRJ2023.10.4.4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sahu PK, Tilgam J, Mishra S, Hamid S, Gupta A, Verma SK, Kharwar RN. Surface sterilization for isolation of endophytes: ensuring what (not) to grow. J Basic Microbiol. 2022;62:647–668. doi: 10.1002/jobm.202100462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Frank JA, Reich CI, Sharma S, Weisbaum JS, Wilson BA, Olsen GJ. Critical evaluation of two primers commonly used for amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:2461–2470. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02272-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(6):1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sinha A, Priya R, Nimisha M, Osborne WJ. Impact of endophytic ralstonia sp. from aloe vera gel and its antimicrobial activity. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2015;8(1):259–262. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Andrew C, Adisa A. 2020 Environmental sustainability of biofuels: a review. Proc R Soc A 476 (2243) 10.1098/rspa.2020.0351 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 21.Cherwoo L, Gupta I, Flora G, Verma R, Kapil M, et al. Biofuels an alternative to traditional fossil fuels: a comprehensive review. Sustain Energy Technol Assess. 2023;60:103503. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2023.103503. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rahman Z, Nawab J, Sung BH, Kim SC. A critical analysis of bio-hydrocarbon production in bacteria: current challenges and future directions. Energies. 2018;11(10):2663. doi: 10.3390/en11102663. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hagaggi NShA, Mohamed AAA. Plant–bacterial endophyte secondary metabolite matching: a case study. Arch Microbiol. 2020;202:2679–2687. doi: 10.1007/s00203-020-01989-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Abdel Baset FM, Hagaggi NShA, Hezayen FF, Abdul- Raouf UM. Endophytic bacterial communities colonizing the medicinal plant Calotropis procera: as resources of hydrolases. Nov Res Microbiol J. 2020;4(6):1045–1056. doi: 10.21608/nrmj.2020.130852. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hagaggi NShA, Abdul-Raouf UM. Phytotoxic interference of culture filtrates of endophytic bacteria associated with Nerium oleander leaf against seed germination of the invasive noxious weed Cenchrus echinatus. Curr Microbiol. 2023;80:67. doi: 10.1007/s00284-022-03166-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gonzalez JM, Aranda B. Microbial growth under limiting conditions-future perspectives. Microorganisms. 2023;11(7):1641. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11071641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zareian M, Silcock P, Bremer P. Effect of medium compositions on microbially mediated volatile organic compounds release profile. J Appl Microbiol. 2018;125(3):813–827. doi: 10.1111/jam.13908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Achimón F, Brito VD, Pizzolitto RP, Zygadlo JA. Effect of carbon sources on the production of volatile organic compounds by Fusarium verticillioides. J Fungi. 2022;8(2):158. doi: 10.3390/jof8020158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ladygina N, Dedyukhina EG, Vainshtein MB. A review on microbial synthesis of hydrocarbons. Process Biochem. 2006;41:1001–1014. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.12.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bagaeva TV, Zinurova EE. Comparative characterization of extracellular and intracellular hydrocarbons of Clostridium pasteurianum. Biochemistry (Mosc) 2004;69(4):427–428. doi: 10.1023/b:biry.0000026199.58194.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nikolaev YA, Panikov NS, Lukin SM, Osipov GA. Saturated C21–C33 hydrocarbons are involved in the self-regulation of pseudomonas fluorescens adhesion to a glass surface. Microbiology. 2001;70(2):174–181. doi: 10.1023/A:1010481127377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Park MO. New pathway for long-chain n-alkane synthesis via 1-alcohol in Vibrio furnissii M1. J Bacteriol. 2005;187(4):1426–1429. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.4.1426-1429.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liu Q, Wu K, Cheng Y, et al. Engineering an iterative polyketide pathway in Escherichia coli results in single-form alkene and alkane overproduction. Metab Eng. 2015;28:82–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2014.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tshikhudo PP, Ntushelo K, Mudau FN. Sustainable applications of endophytic bacteria and their physiological/biochemical roles on medicinal and herbal plants: review. Microorganisms. 2023;11(2):453. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mascal M, Dutta S. Synthesis of highly-branched alkanes for renewable gasoline. Fuel Process Technol. 2020;197:106192. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.106192. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kang MK, Nielsen J. Biobased production of alkanes and alkenes through metabolic engineering of microorganisms. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;44:613–622. doi: 10.1007/s10295-016-1814-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available in the [NCBI] repository [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/OR343176.1/], [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/OR343177.1/], and [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/OR343178.1/].