ABSTRACT
The increasing resistance of clinically relevant microbes against current commercially available antimicrobials underpins the urgent need for alternative and novel treatment strategies. Cationic lipidated oligomers (CLOs) are innovative alternatives to antimicrobial peptides and have reported antimicrobial potential. An understanding of their antimicrobial mechanism of action is required to rationally design future treatment strategies for CLOs, either in monotherapy or synergistic combinations. In the present study, metabolomics was used to investigate the potential metabolic pathways involved in the mechanisms of antibacterial activity of one CLO, C12-o-(BG-D)-10, which we have previously shown to be effective against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ATCC 43300. The metabolomes of MRSA ATCC 43300 at 1, 3, and 6 h following treatment with C12-o-(BG-D)-10 (48 µg/mL, i.e., 3× MIC) were compared to those of the untreated controls. Our findings reveal that the studied CLO, C12-o-(BG-D)-10, disorganized the bacterial membrane as the first step toward its antimicrobial effect, as evidenced by marked perturbations in the bacterial membrane lipids and peptidoglycan biosynthesis observed at early time points, i.e., 1 and 3 h. Central carbon metabolism and the biosynthesis of DNA, RNA, and arginine were also vigorously perturbed, mainly at early time points. Moreover, bacterial cells were under osmotic and oxidative stress across all time points, as evident by perturbations of trehalose biosynthesis and pentose phosphate shunt. Overall, this metabolomics study has, for the first time, revealed that the antimicrobial action of C12-o-(BG-D)-10 may potentially stem from the dysregulation of multiple metabolic pathways.
IMPORTANCE
Antimicrobial resistance poses a significant challenge to healthcare systems worldwide. Novel anti-infective therapeutics are urgently needed to combat drug-resistant microorganisms. Cationic lipidated oligomers (CLOs) show promise as new antibacterial agents against Gram-positive pathogens like methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Understanding their molecular mechanism(s) of antimicrobial action may help design synergistic CLO treatments along with monotherapy. Here, we describe the first metabolomics study to investigate the killing mechanism(s) of CLOs against MRSA. The results of our study indicate that the CLO, C12-o-(BG-D)-10, had a notable impact on the biosynthesis and organization of the bacterial cell envelope. C12-o-(BG-D)-10 also inhibits arginine, histidine, central carbon metabolism, and trehalose production, adding to its antibacterial characteristics. This work illuminates the unique mechanism of action of C12-o-(BG-D)-10 and opens an avenue to design innovative antibacterial oligomers/polymers for future clinical applications.
KEYWORDS: antimicrobial resistance, peptidoglycan biosynthesis, cationic lipidated oligomers, antimicrobial peptides, antimicrobial polymer, metabolomics, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
INTRODUCTION
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a pressing global health challenge, posing significant threats to the successful treatment of infections and patient outcomes (1). Common mechanisms through which microbes develop resistance to antimicrobials include reduced drug uptake, drug target modification, and modification of drug and drug efflux; these may emerge due to genetic mutations or horizontal gene transfer (2). The emergence of AMR is largely attributed to the inappropriate and excessive use of various antibacterial agents, both within the healthcare sector and the agricultural industry (3). The dwindling arsenal of effective treatment options poses a substantial challenge, jeopardizing our ability to combat infections successfully. As a direct consequence, mortality rates are rising, as once-treatable infections become increasingly difficult to treat. Beyond the immediate health impacts, AMR causes a substantial economic burden through heightened healthcare costs, including due to prolonged hospital stays, higher likelihood of readmission, and increased expenditure on additional treatments (4). Recognizing AMR as a critical issue, global health organizations, such as the Infectious Diseases Society of America in 2009, the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2017, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US-CDC) of the United States in 2019, have emphasized the need for multifaceted strategies, including prudent antimicrobial use, surveillance, and the development of novel drugs. They also issued lists of critical pathogens on which to focus the research and development of new antimicrobials (5–8).
While conventional antimicrobials are currently used for treating infections, the rapid increase in AMR suggests the need for alternative treatments (9). Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have been investigated and have been demonstrated to be very effective in the killing of microbes (10–12). However, AMPs have limitations, such as instability, toxicity, and high production costs (13, 14). Recently, synthetic analogs of AMPs, i.e., antimicrobial polymers that mimic the structural features (cationic and hydrophobic moieties) of naturally occurring AMPs, have been designed and shown to overcome AMP limitations in in vitro studies and in vivo mouse models (15). This class of molecules has several advantages, such as broad-spectrum antimicrobial activities, a low tendency for resistance development, and a rapid bactericidal effect (11, 16–22). Furthermore, antimicrobial polymers offer extra advantages compared to AMPs in terms of stability, durability, and ease of large-scale production (17). These antimicrobial polymers have a broad range of mechanisms of action from membrane disruption to intracellular target inhibition, depending on the structural features (17). However, the full mechanism(s) of action of antimicrobial polymers remains unclear in the literature as detailed structure-property relationships are difficult to elucidate.
Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive bacterial species categorized as a high-priority pathogen by the WHO and a serious threat by the US-CDC (23, 24). S. aureus is part of the normal flora of humans and usually does not cause infection while on the skin. However, when the skin barrier is damaged, S. aureus may enter the underlying tissue or bloodstream and cause a wide variety of infections (25). Currently, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is one of the main nosocomial pathogens and is prevalent in hospital settings (26). In 2019, 473,000 deaths were associated with MRSA infections globally (27). In Australia, MRSA infections were associated with increased inpatient mortality, as well as greater expense and longer hospital length of stay compared with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (28).
In recent work, our group has shown that cationic lipidated oligomers (CLOs) demonstrate structure-dependent antimicrobial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and fungi (29). Interestingly, while these CLOs have been designed with the same structural features (with cationic residues and lipid tail) as the clinically used AMP colistin (30), they appear to have wider applicability. The synthesized CLOs have repeating cationic residues (e.g., tertiary amine, primary amine [mimicking lysine], guanidine [mimicking arginine], or imidazole [mimicking histidine]), which help these CLOs to electrostatically bind to the negatively charged bacterial membranes (17). The lipid tail in each of the CLOs helps to disrupt bacterial membranes more effectively (16). One CLO in particular, i.e., C12-o-(BG-D)-10, with 10 cationic guanidine residues and a C12 hydrocarbon lipid tail, exhibited marked antimicrobial activity against MRSA (29). These guanidine groups have been reported to form multidentate hydrogen bonds with sulfate and phosphate heads on the bacterial anionic membranes, leading to efficient bacterial membrane integration (17, 31, 32). However, their precise mechanism(s) of antimicrobial action remains largely unknown to date.
Metabolomics has emerged as a critical tool for the elucidation of the mechanisms of action of AMPs such as polymyxins (33, 34). In this study, we shine a light on the mechanism(s) of bacterial killing by the antimicrobial CLO, C12-o-(BG-D)-10, against MRSA strain ATCC 43300 using untargeted metabolomics.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The antibacterial activity of C12-o-(BG-D)-10 was previously assessed against S. aureus ATCC 43300 and demonstrated an appreciable activity with an MIC of 8–16 µg/mL (29). Additionally, C12-o-(BG-D)-10 exhibited an interesting mechanism of action when comparing dose-dependent membrane disruption (via fluorescence propidium iodide [PI] assay) and growth inhibition (Fig. S1). Specifically, C12-o-(BG-D)-10 exhibited only minor interaction with the bacterial membrane, with only ~30% membrane damage observed (relative to a melittin control) at the highest concentration tested. These results suggested that there could be potentially a secondary mechanism contributing to the observed antimicrobial activity for C12-o-(BG-D)-10 (29). To interrogate this complex mode of action, a metabolomics study was performed using an initial inoculum of 108 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL with samples at 1, 3, and 6 h. The 48 µg/mL (3× MIC) C12-o-(BG-D)-10 concentration provided maximal bacterial killing at 1 h with ~1.5 log10CFU/mL decrease compared to the control (Fig. S2a). Metabolomics results of different perturbed metabolic pathways of MRSA are discussed below.
Multivariate and univariate analysis
A total of 1,578 putative metabolites were identified under all treatment conditions. Out of these, 33% were not mapped to known metabolic pathways and 67% were mapped to known metabolic pathways according to common databases, e.g., PseudoCyc, MetaCyc, and LipidMaps databases. Most of the acquired metabolites belonged to lipid (18%), peptide (18%), and amino acid (17%) metabolism, while the minority of metabolites belonged to carbohydrate (6%), nucleotide (4%), secondary metabolites (2%), energy (1%), and glycan (0.5%) metabolite classes. The same databases were then used to designate metabolic classes or map the unmapped metabolites. Univariate data analysis was performed using two-sample t-tests (log2 fold change [FC] ≥ 0.59 or ≤−0.59, corresponding to a metabolite-level change of approximately 1.5-fold; false discovery rate [FDR] adjusted P-value ≤ 0.05) to determine significantly perturbed metabolites across all time points (1, 3, and 6 h) (Table S1). This analysis identified ~476 significantly perturbed metabolites (295, 241, and 185 at 1, 3, and 6 h, respectively) (Fig. S3). Across all time points, there were 53 overlapping metabolites with 155, 72, and 57 unique metabolites at 1, 3, and 6 h, respectively (Fig. S3). The majority of these metabolites were diminished in response to treatment with C12-o-(BG-D)-10. The heatmap showed that the intensities of metabolites varied after treatment with C12-o-(BG-D)-10 across all time points, especially at 1 h (Fig. S4). The reproducibility for all sample groups was acceptable across all time points (1, 3, and 6 h), where the median relative standard deviations (RSDs) across all time points were 14%–16% for untreated (control) groups, 17%–22% for treated samples, and 12% for the quality control (QC) group, consistent with some baseline variability in the dynamics of ordinary bacterial metabolism with and without C12-o-(BG-D)-10 treatment (Table 1). The well-separated treatment and control groups in the principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that C12-o-(BG-D)-10 treatment altered the metabolomic profile of MRSA across all time points (Fig. S5). The classification of the significantly impacted metabolites across all time points revealed that the lipids, peptides, amino acids, and carbohydrate (including glycans) metabolites were largely impacted, while the nucleotide metabolites and energy metabolites were less significantly perturbed across all the time points (Fig. S6).
TABLE 1.
Median RSDs of all the metabolites of MRSA before and after treatment with C12-o-(BG-D)-10 across all the time points, i.e., 1, 3, and 6 h
| Median RSD % | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 h | 3 h | 6 h | QC | |
| Control (untreated) | 14 | 16 | 16 | 12 |
| Treatment C12-o-(BG-D)-10 | 22 | 22 | 17 | |
Pathway enrichment analysis for the significantly perturbed metabolites
C12-o-(BG-D)-10 treatment induced extensive perturbations in the metabolomic profile of MRSA ATCC 43300 across all time points. Consequently, therefore, we mapped and analyzed the significantly impacted metabolic features across all time points (i.e., 1, 3, and 6 h). The mapping of the significantly perturbed features of MRSA revealed that glycerophospholipids and fatty acids (FAs) metabolism, peptidoglycan and teichoic acid biosynthesis, DNA and RNA biosynthesis/nucleotide biosynthesis, central carbon metabolism, arginine biosynthesis, histidine metabolism, and pantothenate and co-enzyme A (CoA) biosynthesis were among the most significantly perturbed pathways (Table S2).
Glycerophospholipid and fatty acid metabolism
Following C12-o-(BG-D)-10 treatment, lipids were significantly perturbed, particularly the glycerophospholipids and fatty acid classes compared to other classes, i.e., glycerolipids, sphingolipids, and sterol lipids. Among glycerophospholipids, long chain glycerophosphoglycerols, including PG(25:0), PG(19:0), and PG(14:0), were largely perturbed at 1 h (Fig. 1a). The abundance of a highly important metabolite involved in the synthesis of bacterial membrane lipids and known precursor of teichoic acid in the Gram-positive bacterial cell wall, CDP-glycerol, was significantly decreased (log2FC = −3.01) at 1 h (Fig. 1a) (35). The levels of two more well-known metabolites involved in bacterial membrane lipids biosynthesis, sn-glycerol 3-phosphate and sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, were substantially decreased at 1 h post-C12-o-(BG-D)-10 treatment (log2FC = −6.69 and −4.73, respectively) (Fig. 1a) (36–38). Also, di-trans,poly-cis-undecaprenyl phosphate (also known as lipid-P, bactoprenol, and C55-P) was significantly perturbed (log2FC = 3.9) at 1 h; lipid-P is involved in transporting peptidoglycan subunits from the cytoplasmic face of the cell membrane through the periplasmic space to the extracellular surface and plays a role in the synthesis of teichoic acid of the bacterial cell envelope (35, 39–42). Significant perturbations were also evident in the level of choline phosphate (log2FC = −3.0), which has a crucial role in the biosynthesis of wall teichoic acid in bacteria (43). The abundance of (R)-3-hydroxybutanoate, an essential precursor involved in the synthesis of the bacterial membrane, was significantly decreased at 1 h (log2FC = −2.6) (Fig. 1a) (44).
Fig 1.
Significantly impacted lipids in MRSA ATCC 43300 following treatment with C12-o-(BG-D)10 at 1 h (a), 3 h (b), and 6 h (c). Putative lipid names are assigned based on accurate mass (≥1.0-log2-FC; P < 0.05). PE, phosphoethanolamines; PG, glycerophosphoglycerols; PS, glycerophosphoserines; PC, glycerophosphocholines; PA, glycerophosphates; PI, glycerophosphoinositols; PGP, glycerophosphoglycerophosphates; LysoPE, lysophosphatidylethanolamines; LysoPA, lysophosphatidic acid; LysoPC, lysophosphatidylcholines; and FA, fatty acids.
At 3 h, the impact of the C12-o-(BG-D)-10 on the glycerophospholipid levels continued, as manifested by significant decreases of sn-glycerol 3-phosphate (log2FC = −2.02) and sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (log2FC = −2.4), albeit less than at 1 h (Fig. 1b). CDP-glycerol was not detected in the later time points, i.e., 3 and 6 h. Choline phosphate (log2FC = −3.7) was further significantly reduced. Notably, abundance of glycerophospholipids and fatty acids, including PG(25:0), PG(30:0), FA (17:0), FA (20:0), FA (20:1), FA methyl(14:0), FA methyl(18:0), and LysoPC(18:1), was significantly increased (≥1-log2FC, P < 0.05) except for FA oxo(19:0) (≥−1-log2FC, P < 0.05). Importantly, the abundance of N-butyryl-L-homoserine lactone, a quorum-sensing signaling molecule, was markedly decreased (log2FC = −1.00) in response to C12-o-(BG-D)-10 treatment (Fig. 1b) (45).
At 6 h, the level of sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine decreased moderately (log2FC = −0.68), while sn-glycerol 3-phosphate was completely diminished and was not detected. The level of choline phosphate (log2FC = −1.8) was reduced. Most fatty acids and phosphatidylglycerol phosphate levels were further increased, including PG (30:0), FA hydroxy (4:0), FA hydroxy (8:0), LysoPC (18:1), and PGP (36:5) (≥1-log2FC, P < 0.05). The level of (R)-3-hydroxybutanoate was further significantly decreased at 6 h (log2FC = −1.06). Also, the levels of [FA (21:2)] octadecenoic acid and FA methyl (18:0) were reduced (≥−1-log2FC, P < 0.05) (Fig. 1c).
Given that a higher number of significant perturbations of the lipid bilayer was observed at 1 h compared to 3 and 6 h, this suggests that C12-o-(BG-D)-10 disrupts the lipid bacterial membrane as the first step of the bacterial killing mechanism.
Amino-sugar and sugar-nucleotide metabolism, peptidoglycan and teichoic acid biosynthesis
Sugar nucleotides and amino sugars are the building blocks of peptidoglycans, involved in the synthesis of bacterial cell walls and teichoic acid in Gram-positive bacteria (46). After C12-o-(BG-D)-10 treatment, sugar nucleotides and amino sugar metabolism showed substantial alterations, indicating downregulation of peptidoglycan biosynthesis across all time points (1, 3, and 6 h). At 1 h, the treated bacterial cells displayed significant perturbations of metabolites involved in the early stages of peptidoglycan and teichoic acid formation. In contrast, modest disturbances were observed at 6 h (Fig. 2a).
Fig 2.
(a) Diagrammatic representation of all significantly impacted (increased: blue, decreased: red) amino-sugar and sugar-nucleotide metabolites in MRSA ATCC 43300 following treatment with C12-o-(BG-D)-10. (b) Significantly impacted amino-sugar and sugar-nucleotides in MRSA ATCC 43300 following treatment with C12-o-(BG-D)-10 at 1 h (red), 3 h (green), and 6 h (blue). Putative metabolite names are assigned based on accurate mass (≥1.0-log2-FC; P < 0.05).
At 1 h after C12-o-(BG-D)-10 treatment, the levels of seven crucial precursors involved in the biosynthesis of bacterial cell walls exhibited a significant decline. These included N-acetyl-D-glucosaminate (GlcNAc), N-acetylmuramate (MurNAc), N-acetyl-D-glucosamine 6-phosphate (GlcNAc-6P), 1,6-anhydro-N-acetylmuramate (anhMurNAc), UDP-N-acetylmuramate (UDP-MurNAc), and UDP-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) (≥−2-log2FC, P < 0.05) (Fig. 2b). Likewise, the precursors of the downstream pathway, peptidoglycan, including D-alanyl-D-alanine, UDP-N-acetylmuramoyl-L-alanine (UDP-MurNAc-L-Ala), UDP-MurAc(oyl-L-Ala-D-gamma-Glu-L-Lys-D-Ala-D-Ala), UDP-N-acetyl-2-amino-2-deoxy-D-glucuronate, and L-alanine were also markedly reduced (≥−1-log2-FC, P < 0.05). Interestingly, C12-o-(BG-D)-10 caused a significant impact on the crucial elements of wall teichoic acid. Notably, it decreased the levels of key constituents namely MurNAc and GlcNAc, which also play integral roles in amino sugar metabolism, as well as the level of CDP-ribitol, a pivotal molecule of wall teichoic acid biogenesis (≥−1.0-log2FC, P < 0.05) (47). The level of choline involved in the synthesis of crucial intermediates of teichoic acid was also significantly reduced (log2FC = −3.32) (48). UDP-glucose, a nucleotide sugar that serves as a key intracellular intermediary in the biosynthesis of the bacterial cell envelope, was significantly lowered (log2FC = −2.1) at 1 h (Fig. 2b) (49).
At 3 h, further perturbations in the building blocks of peptidoglycan were observed, where the levels of amino and nucleotide sugar intermediates involved in the generation of peptidoglycan building blocks were significantly reduced. These included D-glucosamine 6-phosphate, N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, and GlcNAc, which were reduced (≥−2-log2FC, P < 0.05) (Fig. 2b). Additionally, the level of UDP-MurNAc-L-Ala and UDP-MurNAc(oyl-L-Ala-D-gamma-Glu-L-Lys-D-Ala-D-Ala) was increased (≥1-log2FC, P < 0.05), while the level of D-glucosamine and L-alanine was decreased (≥−1-log2FC, P < 0.05). The level of D-ribitol 5-phosphate was significantly increased (log2FC = 1.7), which has a crucial role in the synthesis of wall teichoic acid in the bacterial cell envelope (Fig. 2b) (40).
Contrary to the pronounced effects observed at earlier time points, 1 and 3 h, C12-o-(BG-D)-10 treatment caused a minor effect on sugar nucleotides and amino sugars and its downstream pathways (peptidoglycan and wall teichoic acid) at 6 h. Notably, there was a significant increase in the levels of UDP-glucose, N-acetylneuraminate, UDP-MurNAc(oyl-L-Ala-D-gamma-Glu-L-Lys-D-Ala-D-Ala), D-ribitol 5-phosphate, and L-alanine (≥1-log2FC, P < 0.05) (Fig. 2b).
Similar to the response patterns of glycerophospholipids and fatty acids, the amino and nucleotide sugars and metabolites involved in the biogenesis of peptidoglycan were more frequently perturbed at 1 h than at later time points.
Histidine metabolism
The histidine metabolic pathway plays a crucial role in fundamental regulatory processes in bacteria, including amino acids, purines, and thiamine biosynthesis (50). The main metabolic intermediate generated by the histidine pathway is 5′-phosphoribosyl-4-carboxamide-5-aminoimidazole (AICAR). This intermediate is at the crossroads between purine-histidine cross talk (51). Therefore, the histidine pathway has been extensively investigated as a promising therapeutic target for novel antibiotics to treat infections caused by Staphylococcus (50, 52). Treatment with C12-o-(BG-D)-10 led to perturbation in several essential metabolites within the histidine biosynthetic pathway, notably including intermediates like L-glutamine and L-glutamate, both recognized as indicators of bacterial stress response (Fig. 3a) (53).
Fig 3.
(a) Diagrammatic representation of all significantly impacted (increased: blue, decreased: red) histidine metabolites in MRSA ATCC 43300 following treatment with C12-o-(BG-D)-10. (b) Significantly impacted histidine metabolites in MRSA ATCC 43300 following treatment with C12-o-(BG-D)-10 at 1 h (red), 3 h (green), and 6 h (blue). Putative metabolite names are assigned based on accurate mass (≥1.0-log2-FC; P < 0.05).
At 1 h post-C12-o-(BG-D)-10 treatment, 10 essential intermediates of histidine metabolism were significantly perturbed. Specifically, 4-imidazolone-5-acetate, N-carbamyl-L-glutamate, hydantoin-5-propionate, L-glutamine, and hercynine displayed more significant alteration (≥−2-log2FC, P < 0.05) compared to 4-imidazolone-5-propanoate, N-formyl-L-glutamate, N-formimino-L-glutamate, L-aspartate, and 2-oxoglutarate (≥−1-log2FC, P < 0.05) (Fig. 3b).
At 3 h, alterations were more pronounced than at 1 h. This was evident in decreased abundance of L-glutamate, L-glutamine, N-formimino L-glutamate, and 4-imidazolone-5-propanoate (≥−1-log2FC, P < 0.05), accompanied by an increased level of 4-oxoglutaramate (log2FC = 3.1). Importantly, the level of 5-phosphoribosyl-N-formylglycinamide (FGAR) (log2FC = 2.4) significantly increased, a key element in AICAR synthesis (Fig. 3b).
At 6 h, further significant perturbations were observed in the histidine biosynthetic pathway. FGAR, N-formimino-L-glutamate, and L-histidinal levels increased (≥1-log2FC, P < 0.05), while the levels of hercynine, N-formyl-L-methionine, and N-carbamoyl-L-aspartate decreased (≥−1-log2FC, P < 0.05) (Fig. 3b). These time-sensitive changes underscore a dynamic response of the histidine pathway to the treatment.
Nucleotide (purine and pyrimidine) metabolism
C12-o-(BG-D)-10 treatment induced a marked dysregulation in the histidine interconnected pathway and nucleotide (purine and pyrimidine) metabolism, both are crucial for DNA and RNA formation (Fig. 4a) (54). This impact was more pronounced at 1 and 3 h compared to the later time point, 6 h (Fig. 4b).
Fig 4.
(a) Diagrammatic representation of all significantly impacted (increased: blue, decreased: red) pyrimidine and purine metabolites in MRSA ATCC 43300 following treatment with C12-o-(BG-D)-10. (b) Significantly impacted nucleotide and peptide metabolites in MRSA ATCC 43300 following treatment with C12-o-(BG-D)-10 at 1 h (red), 3 h (green), and 6 h (blue). Putative metabolite names are assigned based on accurate mass (≥1.0-log2-FC; P < 0.05).
At 1 h, a marked decline in the levels of 14 nucleotides was observed following C12-o-(BG-D)-10 treatment, including ATP, UTP, AMP, and dAMP (≥−1.5-log2FC, P < 0.05), which ultimately impacted DNA and RNA synthesis (Fig. 4b) (55, 56). Among nucleotide bases, adenine (log2FC = −1.2) was significantly reduced (Fig. 4b). An important observation at 1 h was that the level of 3,5 cyclic AMP required for cyclic di-AMP synthesis was profoundly reduced (log2FC = −2.7) (Fig. 4b). Cyclic di-AMP is an essential regulator for several bacterial biochemical processes, including metabolic pathways governing bacterial growth (fatty acid, carbohydrates, and nucleotide metabolism), virulence, biofilm formation, and cell cycle progression (57). It is also involved in bacterial cell survival mechanisms (58). The level of 5,6-dihydrothymine was reduced (log2FC = −1.6). Furthermore, the level of N-carbamoyl-L-aspartate, another key intermediate in the metabolism of purines and pyrimidines, was also decreased (log2FC = −1.91) (Fig. 4b) (59).
At 3 h, significant perturbations were observed in the levels of two pivotal intermediates of purine and pyrimidine metabolism. Specifically, the level of 5,6-dihydrothymine (log2FC = −1.2) exhibited a decrease, while the level of 5-phosphoribosyl-N-formylglycinamide (log2FC = 2.4) showed an increase (59, 60). Moreover, the levels of N-carbamoyl-L-aspartate and N-formiminoglycine, thymine, and guanine demonstrated increases (≥1.0-log2FC, P < 0.05) (Fig. 4b). However, the level of ATP, which is the major source of energy in the bacteria, experienced a further significant reduction (log2FC = −1.9) (61).
At 6 h, a notable increase was observed in the level of 5′-phosphoribosyl-N-formylglycinamide (log2FC = 3.7). Conversely, the N-carbamoyl-L-aspartate level experienced a further decline (log2FC = −2.2), while the level of N-formiminoglycine increased (log2FC = 2.6) (Fig. 4b). Orotate (log2FC = −1.9), an essential metabolite in the biosynthesis of pyrimidine, was significantly decreased at 6 h (Fig. 4b) (62). Among nucleotide bases, the level of guanine (log2FC = 1.4) was significantly increased (Fig. 4b).
Central carbon metabolism
Central carbon metabolism, which includes glycolysis, pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), and tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA), is required for bacteria to generate energy in the form of ATP. This process provides precursors for all the biosynthetic reactions that are required for cell survival (63, 64). This makes central carbon metabolism, i.e., carbon uptake and carbon utilization, an attractive antimicrobial target because these processes are typically essential for microbial survival (65–67). Innate immunity, which frequently deprives bacteria of iron, amino acids, and other essential nutrients, serves as an example of the efficacy of this strategy (68–70). C12-o-(BG-D)-10 treatment caused perturbations in all three pathways of central carbon metabolism more significant at 1 h compared to later time points (Fig. 5a).
Fig 5.
(a) Diagrammatic representation of all significantly impacted (increased: blue, decreased: red) central carbon metabolism metabolites in MRSA ATCC 43300 following treatment with C12-o-(BG-D)-10. (b) Significantly impacted central carbon metabolism metabolites in MRSA ATCC 43300 following treatment with C12-o-(BG-D)-10 at 1 h (red), 3 h (green), and 6 h (blue). Putative metabolite names are assigned based on accurate mass (≥1.0-log2-FC; P < 0.05).
At 1 h, 18 important intermediates of central carbon metabolism, interlinking glycolysis, TCA, and PPP were significantly perturbed (Fig. 5b). This included, glycerone phosphate, phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), succinyl-CoA, D-ribose 5-phosphate, 3-phospho-D-glycerate, L-cysteine, D-glucose, and sedoheptulose-7-phosphate, 2-oxoglutarate, L-alanine, succinate, L-aspartate, citrate, D-gluconic acid, and O-phospho-L-serine (≥−1-log2FC, P < 0.05) (Fig. 5b).
The effect of C12-o-(BG-D)-10 continued at 3 h, when D-glucose, D-gluconic acid, L-glutamate, L-alanine, succinate, PEP, (S)-malate, 3-phospho-D-glycerate, and succinyl-CoA (≥−1-log2FC, P < 0.05) were significantly perturbed. O-phospho-L-serine and glycerone phosphate (≥1-log2FC, P < 0.05) were also perturbed (Fig. 5b).
At 6 h, most of the metabolites of the central carbon metabolism were diminished and were not detected except for L-alanine, which was further significantly perturbed (log2FC = 1.15) (Fig. 5b).
Taken together, the crucial central carbon metabolism was largely and significantly perturbed at 1 and 3 h, while only minor perturbations were observed at 6 h.
Arginine metabolism
The disruption of arginine (one of the most versatile and inter-convertible) metabolism has recently emerged as a powerful approach to control and subvert bacterial pathogenesis (71). C12-o-(BG-D)-10 treatment significantly impacted arginine metabolism, particularly at 1 and 3 h, with minimal changes observed after 6 h of treatment. (Fig. 6a).
Fig 6.
(a) Diagrammatic representation of all significantly impacted (increased: blue, decreased: red) arginine metabolism and interrelated TCA cycle metabolites in MRSA ATCC 43300 following treatment with C12-o-(BG-D)-10. (b) Significantly impacted metabolites in the arginine biosynthesis and metabolism in MRSA ATCC 43300 following treatment with C12-o-(BG-D)-10 at 1 h (red), 3 h (green), and 6 h (blue). Putative metabolite names are assigned based on accurate mass (≥1.0-log2-FC; P < 0.05).
After 1 h of treatment, nine metabolites of arginine biosynthesis, including L-aspartate, L-glutamine, L-citrulline, L-ornithine, N-acetyl-L-glutamate, N-(L-arginino) succinate, N-acetyl-L-glutamate 5-semialdehyde, 2-oxoglutarate, and N-acetylornithine, were significantly perturbed (≥−1-log2-FC, P < 0.05) (Fig. 6b).
At 3 h, the inhibitory impact of C12-o-(BG-D)-10 on arginine biosynthesis continued, although at an intensity wherein the levels of six important intermediates, including L-glutamine, L-ornithine, L-citrulline, N-(L-arginino) succinate, N-acetyl-L-citrulline, and N-acetylornithine, were significantly reduced (≥−1-log2-FC, P < 0.05) (Fig. 6b).
By 6 h, the level of N-acetyl-L-glutamate was increased (log2FC = 1.0), signifying a bacterial stress response. The levels of L-citrulline, N-acetylornithine, and N-acetyl-L-citrulline were decreased (≥−1-log2FC, P < 0.05) (Fig. 6b).
Coenzyme A biosynthesis
Pantothenic acid, also known as vitamin B5, is essentially required by bacteria to synthesize coenzyme A (CoA). CoA, in turn, is crucial for the generation of fatty acids, carbohydrates, proteins, and even some intermediates within the TCA cycle (72). C12-o-(BG-D)-10 treatment resulted in marked disruption in the pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis (Fig. S7a).
At 1 h, C12-o-(BG-D)-10 treatment caused significant perturbations in the levels of five metabolites related to the pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis pathways (Fig. S7b). In particular, the levels of L-cysteine, CoA, L-aspartate, and 5,6-dihydrouracil significantly decreased (≥−1.0-log2FC, P < 0.05) (Fig. S7b). In contrast, uracil level increased (log2FC = 1.04). At 3 h, there was a notable decrease (≥−2-log2FC, P < 0.05) in the N-((R)-pantothenoyl)-L-cysteine and (R)−2,3-dihydroxy-3-methylbutanoate. Additionally, the level of pantothenate decreased (log2FC = −1.5), whereas 3-methyl-2-oxobutanoic acid increased (log2FC = 1.4) (Fig. S7b). The effect of C12-o-(BG-D)-10 persisted at 6 h, when the levels of pantetheine and pantothenate increased (≥1-log2FC, P < 0.05), while N-((R)-pantothenoyl)-L-cysteine demonstrated decreases (log2FC = −2.6) (Fig. S7b).
Homeostasis and stress metabolism
C12-o-(BG-D)-10 treatment induced a significant perturbation in the metabolites responsible for bacterial homeostasis. D-glucose-6-phosphate, a substrate for trehalose-6-phosphate and UDP-glucose synthesis, experienced marked perturbations across all time points: at 1 h (log2FC = −1.8), 3 h (log2FC = −0.7), and 6 h (log2FC = 1.1) (Fig. S8) (73, 74). Trehalose, in its dephosphorylated form, serves as a recognized osmoprotectant in bacteria during osmotic stress (75). Significant alteration in the level of trehalose-6-phosphate at 3 h (log2FC = −1.71) indicated that the C12-o-(BG-D)-10 treatment induced osmotic stress. Choline, a precursor to glycine betaine, which acts as a potent osmoprotectant underwent significant reduction at 1 h (log2FC = −3.3) (76). However, choline was not detected at the later time points. Likewise, PPP intermediates involved in the maintenance of redox homeostasis in the cell were markedly perturbed, which was indicated by a significant decrease in the levels of ribose-5-phosphate, NADP+, and CMP (≥−1.5-log2FC, P < 0.05) at 1 h (Fig. S8) (77). However, these PPP intermediates were not detected at later time points.
Conclusion
MRSA is a serious threat to global health and contributes to nearly half a million annual deaths. As further resistance emerges against current antimicrobials in clinical use, there is an urgent need for new treatment options. Our group has synthesized CLOs modeled on the structure of antimicrobial peptides. C12-o-(BG-D)-10 was previously found to inhibit the growth of MRSA in vitro; however, this activity was only partially attributable to membrane disruption as evident via fluorescence assay. The full mechanism(s) of its antimicrobial activity was not fully understood. This is the first study to investigate the mechanism(s) of antimicrobial action of a CLO, i.e., C12-o-(BG-D)-10 using metabolomics. C12-o-(BG-D)-10 antimicrobial action commences with disrupting the bacterial cell envelope. Early at 1 h, significant perturbations were observed in cell membrane lipids and glycerophospholipids, along with sugar nucleotides and amino-sugar metabolites linked to peptidoglycan and teichoic acid biosynthesis. The polymer also affected RNA and DNA biosynthesis and led to pronounced perturbations in histidine metabolism (linked to the synthesis of purines and pyrimidines), energy metabolism (i.e., arginine and TCA cycle), pantothenate biosynthesis, and CoA biogenesis (essentially required by cells for survival and normal growth). C12-o-(BG-D)-10 also perturbed central carbon metabolism and the stress pathway in the bacteria more prominently at the initial time points, i.e., 1 and 3 h. These insights on the mechanisms of action of C12-o-(BG-D)-10 will enable the rational design of antimicrobial combinations of clinically available antimicrobials with C12-o-(BG-D)-10 in future in vitro and in vivo studies in an approach to achieve synergistic and effective bacterial killing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
CLO and antibiotic stock solution, media, and bacterial isolates
C12-o-(BG-D)-10 was synthesized by Cu(0)-mediated reversible deactivation radical polymerization using the protocol by Grace et al. (29). The CLO stock solutions were prepared by dissolving the CLO in DMSO first, diluting with MilliQ water (to 20% DMSO), and then vortexing until clear. DMSO was filtered through 0.22 µm sterile nylon filters before use. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus ATCC 43300 was used in the study. All susceptibility and time-kill studies were performed in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB; containing 20–25 mg/L Ca2+ and 10–12.5 mg/L Mg2+; BD, Sparks, MD, USA). Viable counting was performed on cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton agar (CAMHA; containing 25 mg/L Ca2+ and 12.5 mg/L Mg2+; BD, Sparks, MD, USA).
Antibacterial killing kinetics of CLO
A static concentration time-kill assay of C12-o-(BG-D)-10 against MRSA ATCC 43300 was performed (Fig. S2). Before the time-kill assay, MRSA ATCC 43300 was sub-cultured on a CAMHA plate and then incubated at 37°C for ~18–24 h. Three colonies were transferred from the CAMHA plate to inoculate 10 mL of sterile CAMHB in a 50 mL Falcon tube and incubated overnight in a shaking water bath (37°C, 150 rpm, ~16 h). The optical density of the bacterial suspension was measured using a spectrophotometer, and the suspension was appropriately diluted to achieve the targeted initial inoculum of ∼106 CFU/mL (Fig. S2b). The inoculated tubes were dosed with C12-o-(BG-D)-10 (in 20% DMSO) to achieve concentrations of 8, 16, and 64 µg/mL. The DMSO concentrations in the tubes were ≤0.125%. One culture tube was drug-free as a control. At 0, 1.5, 5, 24, 48, and 72 h, 1 mL samples were collected from each tube, centrifuged, and washed twice with 0.9% normal saline. The samples were then serially diluted in saline plates and plated onto CAMHA plates. After 24-h incubation at 37°C, the CFU were counted, and the time-kill curves were graphed as log10 CFU/mL vs time (hours).
Metabolomics sample preparation
An untargeted metabolomics study was carried out to explore the mechanism(s) of action of C12-o-(BG-D)-10 against MRSA ATCC 43300 using a concentration of 48 µg/mL (i.e., 3× MIC). Samples were taken and analyzed at the 1-, 3-, and 6-h time points in four biological replicates. An overnight culture was prepared by inoculating a single colony into 100 mL CAMHB in 250 mL conical flasks (Pyrex) and incubating the suspension in a shaker at 37°C and 180 rpm for ~16 h. After overnight incubation, log-phase cells were prepared in fresh MHB and then incubated for 2 h at 37°C at 180 rpm to the log phase with a starting bacterial inoculum of 108 CFU/mL. Then, C12-o-(BG-D)-10 was added to obtain the desired concentration of 48 µg/mL (3× MIC), in parallel to a CLO-free control for each replicate. The flasks were then incubated at 37°C with shaking at 180 rpm. At each time point (0, 1, 3, and 6 h), 15 mL samples were transferred to 50 mL Falcon tubes for quenching, and the optical density reading at 600 nm (OD600) was then measured and normalized to the pre-treatment level of approximately ~0.5 with fresh CAMHB. Samples were then centrifuged at 3,220 × g and 4°C for 10 min, and the supernatants were removed. The pellets were stored at −80°C until metabolite extraction. The experiment was performed in four biological replicates to reduce the bias from inherent random variation.
Metabolomics metabolite extraction
The bacterial pellets were washed twice in 1 mL of 0.9% saline and then centrifuged at 3,220 × g and 4°C for 5 min to remove residual extracellular metabolites and medium components. The washed pellets were resuspended in a cold extraction solvent (chloroform-methanol-water at 1:3:1, vol/vol) containing 1 µM each of the internal standards 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)-dimethylammonio]−1-propanesulfonate, N-cyclohexyl-3-aminopropanesulfonic acid, piperazine-N, N-bis (2-ethanesulfonic acid), and Tris. The samples were then frozen in liquid nitrogen, thawed on ice, and vortexed to release the intracellular metabolites (three times). Next, the samples were transferred to 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged at 14,000 g at 4°C for 10 min to remove any particulate matter. Finally, 200 µL of the supernatant was transferred into injection vials for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis. An equal volume of each sample was combined and used as a QC sample.
To ensure that our metabolite extraction specifically targeted live-stressed bacterial cells, we performed a series of optimization steps, including a high inoculum time-kill assay, as illustrated in Fig. S2a. By this method, we determined that there was at least 106.5 (i.e., 3 million) CFU/mL present in the samples, which equates to >45 million viable CFU per harvested sample. Furthermore, it is crucial to highlight that the mechanism of action of the polymer, as previously tested and confirmed in this study, demonstrates a membrane-damaging effect. This characteristic supports the assertion that the percentage of dead but intact cells in the pelleted samples is expected to be low.
LC-MS analysis of metabolites
Both hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) and reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry were employed to ensure the detection of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic metabolites. Samples were analyzed on a Dionex U3000 high-performance liquid chromatography system in tandem with a Q-Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher) in both positive and negative ion modes with a resolution at 35,000. The HILIC method was described previously in detail (78). Briefly, samples maintained at 4°C were eluted through a ZIC-pHILIC column (5 µm, polymeric, 150 × 4.6 mm; SeQuant, Merck) by mobile phase A (20 mM ammonium carbonate) and mobile phase B (acetonitrile). The gradient started with 80% mobile phase B at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min and was followed by a linear gradient to 50% mobile phase B over 15 min. The Ascentis Express C8 column (5 cm × 2.1 mm, 2.7 µm) (catalog no. 53,831-U; Sigma-Aldrich) was applied in the RPLC method. The samples were controlled at 4°C and eluted by mobile phase A (40% of isopropanol and 60% of Milli-Q water with 8 mM ammonium formate and 2 mM formic acid) and mobile phase B (98% of isopropanol and 2% of Milli-Q water with 8 mM ammonium formate and 2 mM formic acid). The linear gradient started from 100% mobile phase A to a final composition of 35% mobile phase A and 65% mobile phase B over 24 min at 0.2 mL/min. All samples were analyzed within a single LC-MS batch to avoid variations. The pooled quality control samples, internal standards, and total ion chromatograms were assessed to evaluate the chromatographic peaks, signal reproducibility, and stability of the analytes. To assist in the identification of metabolites, a mixture of ∼500 metabolite standards was analyzed within the same batch.
Data processing, bioinformatics, and statistical analyses
IDEOM (Identification and Evaluation of Metabolites) was used to convert raw data obtained by LC-MS to annotated and hyperlinked metabolites (79). ProteoWizard, a freely available software library for LC-MS data analysis, was first used to extract mzXML files from LC-MS raw sheets. These files were then processed using XCMS, a graphical user interface, for peak picking and generating peakML files (80). Using MZmatch.R tool, peaks were aligned and filtered with minimum detectible intensity of 100,000 and RSD of <0.5 and peak shape (coda dw) of >0.8. Using the same MZmatch, the missing peaks were also retrieved and annotated. Common sources of noise (contaminant signals, peak shoulders, and irreproducible peaks) were removed using the IDEOM interface. The gain and loss of protons were corrected in positive and negative electrospray ionization mode and then a data-dependent mass recalibration (2 ppm) step for putative metabolites was performed. Metabolites confirmed with authentic standards were assigned with MSI level 1 identification. Putative metabolites (with MSI level 2 identification) were identified by comparing their accurate masses and retention times with the standards in the databases including KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomics), LipidMaps, MetaCyc, and preferably EcoCyc. Peak height intensities were used for the quantification of the metabolites. Statistical analysis was performed using MetaboAnalyst 5.0 (81), a freely available online statistical tool. Briefly, putative metabolites (with median RSD ≤ 20% and confidence interval ≥ 5) were extracted from IDEOM and tabled per time point, then uploaded on MetaboAnalyst 5.0. Data were filtered using the interquartile range, normalized by the median, log2 transformed, and autoscaled. Fold change was calculated relative to the control from the corresponding time point. Univariate analysis was performed using two-sample t-tests (log2FC ≥ 0.59 or ≤−0.59, corresponding to a metabolite level change of approximately 1.5-fold; FDR adjusted P-value ≤ 0.05) to determine significantly perturbed metabolites for each time point. Multivariate analysis was performed and included the generation of heat maps and PCA plots. Finally, the KEGG IDs of metabolites were uploaded to KEGG Mapper (82), and pathways were constructed. The individual value plots for the significantly perturbed metabolites after treatment with C12-o-(BG-D)-10 across all the time points can be found in the supplemental material (Fig. S9 to S14).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Australian Research Council (DP200102829), the Monash Institute of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences (MIPS), and the National Health and Medical Research Council (GNT1159579).
J.F.Q. is grateful for an ARC Future Fellowship (FT170100144).
Contributor Information
Cornelia B. Landersdorfer, Email: cornelia.landersdorfer@monash.edu.
Matthew F. Traxler, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
DATA AVAILABILITY
The entirety of our raw data is available on Metabolomics Workbench under Study No. ST003053.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00093-24.
Supplemental figures and Table S2.
Metabolite IDs.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Hay SI, Rao PC, Dolecek C, Day NPJ, Stergachis A, Lopez AD, Murray CJL. 2018. Measuring and mapping the global burden of antimicrobial resistance. BMC Med 16:78. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1073-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Reygaert WC. 2018. An overview of the antimicrobial resistance mechanisms of bacteria. AIMS Microbiol 4:482–501. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Dadgostar P. 2019. Antimicrobial resistance: implications and costs. Infect Drug Resist 12:3903–3910. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S234610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Poudel AN, Zhu S, Cooper N, Little P, Tarrant C, Hickman M, Yao G. 2023. The economic burden of antibiotic resistance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 18:e0285170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Peterson LR. 2009. Bad bugs, no drugs: no ESCAPE revisited. Clin Infect Dis 49:992–993. doi: 10.1086/605539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Asokan GV, Ramadhan T, Ahmed E, Sanad H. 2019. WHO global priority pathogens list: a bibliometric analysis of Medline-PubMed for knowledge mobilization to infection prevention and control practices in Bahrain. Oman Med J 34:184–193. doi: 10.5001/omj.2019.37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Centers for Disease Control Prevention (CDC) . 2019. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. US Department of Health and Human Services, Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Butler MS, Henderson IR, Capon RJ, Blaskovich MAT. 2023. Antibiotics in the clinical pipeline as of December 2022. J Antibiot 76:431–473. doi: 10.1038/s41429-023-00629-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Lewis K. 2020. At the crossroads of bioenergetics and antibiotic discovery. Biochemistry (Mosc) 85:1469–1483. doi: 10.1134/S0006297920120019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Erdem Büyükkiraz M, Kesmen Z. 2022. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs): a promising class of antimicrobial compounds. J Appl Microbiol 132:1573–1596. doi: 10.1111/jam.15314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ergene C, Yasuhara K, Palermo EF. 2018. Biomimetic antimicrobial polymers: recent advances in molecular design. Polym Chem 9:2407–2427. doi: 10.1039/C8PY00012C [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Carmona-Ribeiro AM, Araújo PM. 2021. Antimicrobial polymer−based assemblies: a review. Int J Mol Sci 22:5424. doi: 10.3390/ijms22115424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Zhu Y, Hao W, Wang X, Ouyang J, Deng X, Yu H, Wang Y. 2022. Antimicrobial peptides, conventional antibiotics, and their synergistic utility for the treatment of drug‐resistant infections. Med Res Rev 42:1377–1422. doi: 10.1002/med.21879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Qin H, Zuo W, Ge L, Siu SWI, Wang L, Chen X, Ma C, Chen T, Zhou M, Cao Z, Kwok HF. 2023. Discovery and analysis of a novel antimicrobial peptide B1AW from the skin secretion of Amolops wuyiensis and improving the membrane-binding affinity through the construction of the lysine-introduced analogue. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 21:2960–2972. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.05.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Zhou W, Shi G, Zhao P, Zhang G, Yang P, Li B, Li B, Wan X, Zheng Y. 2023. Dynamic helical cationic polyacetylenes for fast and highly efficient killing of bacteria. Acta Biomater 161:134–143. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.02.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Si Z, Zheng W, Prananty D, Li J, Koh CH, Kang E-T, Pethe K, Chan-Park MB. 2022. Polymers as advanced antibacterial and antibiofilm agents for direct and combination therapies. Chem Sci 13:345–364. doi: 10.1039/d1sc05835e [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Pham P, Oliver S, Boyer C. 2023. Design of antimicrobial polymers. Macromol Chem Phys 224:2200226. doi: 10.1002/macp.202200226 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Camacho-Cruz L, Velazco-Medel MA, Cruz-Gómez A, Bucio E. 2020. Antimicrobial polymers, p 1–42. In Advanced antimicrobial materials and applications. Springer. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Thoma LM, Boles BR, Kuroda K. 2014. Cationic methacrylate polymers as topical antimicrobial agents against Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization. Biomacromolecules 15:2933–2943. doi: 10.1021/bm500557d [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Lam SJ, O’Brien-Simpson NM, Pantarat N, Sulistio A, Wong EHH, Chen Y-Y, Lenzo JC, Holden JA, Blencowe A, Reynolds EC, Qiao GG. 2016. Combating multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria with structurally nanoengineered antimicrobial peptide polymers. Nat Microbiol 1:16162. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Nederberg F, Zhang Y, Tan JPK, Xu K, Wang H, Yang C, Gao S, Guo XD, Fukushima K, Li L, Hedrick JL, Yang Y-Y. 2011. Biodegradable nanostructures with selective lysis of microbial membranes. Nat Chem 3:409–414. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Mizutani M, Palermo EF, Thoma LM, Satoh K, Kamigaito M, Kuroda K. 2012. Design and synthesis of self-degradable antibacterial polymers by simultaneous chain-and step-growth radical copolymerization. Biomacromolecules 13:1554–1563. doi: 10.1021/bm300254s [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Beyer P, Paulin S. 2020. Priority pathogens and the antibiotic pipeline: an update. Bull World Health Organ 98:151. doi: 10.2471/BLT.20.251751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kadri SS. 2020. Key takeaways from the US CDC’s 2019 antibiotic resistance threats report for frontline providers. Crit Care Med 48:939–945. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004371 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Rasigade J-P, Vandenesch F. 2014. Staphylococcus aureus: a pathogen with still unresolved issues. Infect Genet Evol 21:510–514. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.08.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Ferri M, Ranucci E, Romagnoli P, Giaccone V. 2017. Antimicrobial resistance: a global emerging threat to public health systems. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 57:2857–2876. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2015.1077192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Murray CJL, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, Swetschinski L, Robles Aguilar G, Gray A, Han C, Bisignano C, Rao P, Wool E, et al. 2022. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. The Lancet 399:629–655. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Miyakis S, Brentnall S, Masso M, Reynolds G, Byrne MK, Newton P, Crawford S, Fish J, Nicholas B, Hill T, van Oijen AM, Wollongong Antimicrobial Resistance Research Alliance (WARRA) and One Health Understanding Through Bacterial Resistance to Antibiotics Knowledge (OUTBREAK) Consortium . 2022. Key predictors and burden of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in comparison with meticillin-susceptible S. aureus infection in an Australian hospital setting. J Hosp Infect 129:41–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Grace JL, Amado M, Reid JC, Elliott AG, Landersdorfer CB, Truong NP, Kempe K, Cooper MA, Davis TP, Montembault V, Pascual S, Fontaine L, Velkov T, Quinn JF, Whittaker MR. 2019. An optimised Cu(0)-RDRP approach for the synthesis of lipidated oligomeric vinyl azlactone: toward a versatile antimicrobial materials screening platform. J Mater Chem B 7:6796–6809. doi: 10.1039/c9tb01624d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. El-Sayed Ahmed MAE-G, Zhong L-L, Shen C, Yang Y, Doi Y, Tian G-B. 2020. Colistin and its role in the era of antibiotic resistance: an extended review (2000–2019). Emerg Microbes Infect 9:868–885. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1754133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Chan DI, Prenner EJ, Vogel HJ. 2006. Tryptophan-and arginine-rich antimicrobial peptides: structures and mechanisms of action. Biochim Biophys Acta 1758:1184–1202. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Cutrona KJ, Kaufman BA, Figueroa DM, Elmore DE. 2015. Role of arginine and lysine in the antimicrobial mechanism of histone-derived antimicrobial peptides. FEBS Lett 589:3915–3920. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.11.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Hussein M, Han M-L, Zhu Y, Zhou Q, Lin Y-W, Hancock REW, Hoyer D, Creek DJ, Li J, Velkov T. 2019. Metabolomics study of the synergistic killing of polymyxin B in combination with amikacin against polymyxin-susceptible and-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e01587-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01587-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Han M-L, Zhu Y, Creek DJ, Lin Y-W, Gutu AD, Hertzog P, Purcell T, Shen H-H, Moskowitz SM, Velkov T, Li J. 2019. Comparative metabolomics and transcriptomics reveal multiple pathways associated with polymyxin killing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. mSystems 4:e00149-18. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00149-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Martinez OE. 2022. Structural and biochemical insights into bacterial cell wall glycopolymer display. University of California, Los Angeles. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Cronan JE, Rock CO. 2008. Biosynthesis of membrane lipids. EcoSal Plus 3. doi: 10.1128/ecosalplus.3.6.4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Ogawa T, Tanaka A, Kawamoto J, Kurihara T. 2018. Purification and characterization of 1-acyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase with a substrate preference for polyunsaturated fatty acyl donors from the eicosapentaenoic acid-producing bacterium Shewanella livingstonensis Ac10. J Biochem 164:33–39. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvy025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Joondan N, Jhaumeer-Laulloo S, Caumul P. 2014. A study of the antibacterial activity of l-phenylalanine and l-tyrosine esters in relation to their CMCs and their interactions with 1, 2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine, DPPC as model membrane. Microbiol Res 169:675–685. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2014.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Workman SD, Worrall LJ, Strynadka NCJ. 2018. Crystal structure of an intramembranal phosphatase central to bacterial cell-wall peptidoglycan biosynthesis and lipid recycling. Nat Commun 9:1159. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03547-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Brown S, Santa Maria JP, Walker S. 2013. Wall teichoic acids of Gram-positive bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 67:313–336. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Sewell EW, Brown ED. 2014. Taking aim at wall teichoic acid synthesis: new biology and new leads for antibiotics. J Antibiot 67:43–51. doi: 10.1038/ja.2013.100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Bouhss A, Trunkfield AE, Bugg TDH, Mengin-Lecreulx D. 2008. The biosynthesis of peptidoglycan lipid-linked intermediates. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32:208–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00089.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Baddiley J. 1970. Structure, biosynthesis, and function of teichoic acids. Acc Chem Res 3:98–105. doi: 10.1021/ar50027a003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Mierziak J, Burgberger M, Wojtasik W. 2021. 3-hydroxybutyrate as a metabolite and a signal molecule regulating processes of living organisms. Biomolecules 11:402. doi: 10.3390/biom11030402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Chen Y, Chen T, Yin J. 2023. Impact of N-butyryl-l-homoserine lactone–mediated quorum sensing on acidogenic fermentation under saline conditions: insights into volatile fatty acids production and microbial community. Bioresour Technol 368:128354. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Pasquina-Lemonche L, Burns J, Turner RD, Kumar S, Tank R, Mullin N, Wilson JS, Chakrabarti B, Bullough PA, Foster SJ, Hobbs JK. 2020. The architecture of the Gram-positive bacterial cell wall. Nature 582:294–297. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2236-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. van Dalen R, Peschel A, van Sorge NM. 2020. Wall teichoic acid in Staphylococcus aureus host interaction. Trends Microbiol 28:985–998. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2020.05.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Bärland N, Rueff A-S, Cebrero G, Hutter CAJ, Seeger MA, Veening J-W, Perez C. 2022. Mechanistic basis of choline import involved in teichoic acids and lipopolysaccharide modification. Sci Adv 8:eabm1122. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abm1122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Ralevic V. 2008. UDP-glucose, p 1–4. In Enna SJ, Bylund DB (ed), xPharm: the comprehensive pharmacology reference. Elsevier, New York. [Google Scholar]
- 50. Henriksen ST, Liu J, Estiu G, Oltvai ZN, Wiest O. 2010. Identification of novel bacterial histidine biosynthesis inhibitors using docking, ensemble rescoring, and whole-cell assays. Bioorg Med Chem 18:5148–5156. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.05.060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Rébora K, Laloo B, Daignan-Fornier B. 2005. Revisiting purine-histidine cross-pathway regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a central role for a small molecule. Genetics 170:61–70. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.039396 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Winkler ME, Ramos-Montañez S. 2009. Biosynthesis of histidine. EcoSal Plus 3. doi: 10.1128/ecosalplus.3.6.1.9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Mascher T, Helmann JD, Unden G. 2006. Stimulus perception in bacterial signal-transducing histidine kinases. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 70:910–938. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00020-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Moffatt BA, Ashihara H. 2002. Purine and pyrimidine nucleotide synthesis and metabolism. Arabidopsis Book 1:e0018. doi: 10.1199/tab.0018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Yang JH, Wright SN, Hamblin M, McCloskey D, Alcantar MA, Schrübbers L, Lopatkin AJ, Satish S, Nili A, Palsson BO, Walker GC, Collins JJ. 2019. A white-box machine learning approach for revealing antibiotic mechanisms of action. Cell 177:1649–1661. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Lopatkin AJ, Yang JH. 2021. Digital insights into nucleotide metabolism and antibiotic treatment failure. Front Digit Health 3:583468. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.583468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Jenal U, Reinders A, Lori C. 2017. Cyclic di-GMP: second messenger extraordinaire. Nat Rev Microbiol 15:271–284. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Matange N. 2015. Revisiting bacterial cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases: cyclic AMP hydrolysis and beyond. FEMS Microbiol Lett 362:fnv183. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnv183 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Berens RL, Krug EC, Marr JJ. 1995. Purine and pyrimidine metabolism, p 89–117. In Biochemistry and molecular biology of parasites. Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
- 60. Nagy PL, McCorkle GM, Zalkin H. 1993. purU, a source of formate for purT-dependent phosphoribosyl-N-formylglycinamide synthesis. J Bacteriol 175:7066–7073. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.21.7066-7073.1993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Mempin R, Tran H, Chen C, Gong H, Kim Ho K, Lu S. 2013. Release of extracellular ATP by bacteria during growth. BMC Microbiol 13:1–13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Löffler M, Carrey EA, Zameitat E. 2015. Orotic acid, more than just an intermediate of pyrimidine de novo synthesis. J Genet Genomics 42:207–219. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2015.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Murima P, McKinney JD, Pethe K. 2014. Targeting bacterial central metabolism for drug development. Chem Biol 21:1423–1432. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.08.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Wu Z, Liang X, Li M, Ma M, Zheng Q, Li D, An T, Wang G. 2023. Advances in the optimization of central carbon metabolism in metabolic engineering. Microb Cell Fact 22:76. doi: 10.1186/s12934-023-02090-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Fang FC, Frawley ER, Tapscott T, Vázquez-Torres A. 2016. Bacterial stress responses during host infection. Cell Host Microbe 20:133–143. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.07.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Tong M, Brown ED. 2023. Food for thought: opportunities to target carbon metabolism in antibacterial drug discovery. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1524:51–64. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Keller M, Han X, Dörr T. 2022. Disrupting central carbon metabolism increases antibiotic susceptibility in Vibrio cholerae. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2022.12.22.521713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 68. Pernas L. 2021. Cellular metabolism in the defense against microbes. J Cell Sci 134:jcs252023. doi: 10.1242/jcs.252023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Zhang YJ, Rubin EJ. 2013. Feast or famine: the host–pathogen battle over amino acids. Cell Microbiol 15:1079–1087. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Hennigar SR, McClung JP. 2016. Nutritional immunity: starving pathogens of trace minerals. Am J Lifestyle Med 10:170–173. doi: 10.1177/1559827616629117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Xiong L, Teng JLL, Botelho MG, Lo RC, Lau SKP, Woo PCY. 2016. Arginine metabolism in bacterial pathogenesis and cancer therapy. Int J Mol Sci 17:363. doi: 10.3390/ijms17030363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Leonardi R, Jackowski S. 2007. Biosynthesis of pantothenic acid and coenzyme A. EcoSal Plus 2. doi: 10.1128/ecosalplus.3.6.3.4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Kolbe A, Tiessen A, Schluepmann H, Paul M, Ulrich S, Geigenberger P. 2005. Trehalose 6-phosphate regulates starch synthesis via posttranslational redox activation of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:11118–11123. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503410102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Ruhal R, Kataria R, Choudhury B. 2013. Trends in bacterial trehalose metabolism and significant nodes of metabolic pathway in the direction of trehalose accumulation. Microb Biotechnol 6:493–502. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Iturriaga G, Suárez R, Nova-Franco B. 2009. Trehalose metabolism: from osmoprotection to signaling. Int J Mol Sci 10:3793–3810. doi: 10.3390/ijms10093793 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Wargo MJ. 2013. Homeostasis and catabolism of choline and glycine betaine: lessons from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:2112–2120. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03565-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Stincone A, Prigione A, Cramer T, Wamelink MMC, Campbell K, Cheung E, Olin-Sandoval V, Grüning N-M, Krüger A, Tauqeer Alam M, Keller MA, Breitenbach M, Brindle KM, Rabinowitz JD, Ralser M. 2015. The return of metabolism: biochemistry and physiology of the pentose phosphate pathway. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 90:927–963. doi: 10.1111/brv.12140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Maifiah MHM, Creek DJ, Nation RL, Forrest A, Tsuji BT, Velkov T, Li J. 2017. Untargeted metabolomics analysis reveals key pathways responsible for the synergistic killing of colistin and doripenem combination against Acinetobacter baumannii. Sci Rep 7:45527. doi: 10.1038/srep45527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Creek DJ, Jankevics A, Burgess KEV, Breitling R, Barrett MP. 2012. IDEOM: an excel interface for analysis of LC–MS-based metabolomics data. Bioinformatics 28:1048–1049. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Scheltema RA, Jankevics A, Jansen RC, Swertz MA, Breitling R. 2011. PeakML/mzMatch: a file format, Java library, R library, and tool-chain for mass spectrometry data analysis. Anal Chem 83:2786–2793. doi: 10.1021/ac2000994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Pang Z, Chong J, Zhou G, de Lima Morais DA, Chang L, Barrette M, Gauthier C, Jacques P-É, Li S, Xia J. 2021. MetaboAnalyst 5.0: narrowing the gap between raw spectra and functional insights. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W388–W396. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Kanehisa M, Sato Y. 2020. KEGG Mapper for Inferring cellular functions from protein sequences. Protein Sci 29:28–35. doi: 10.1002/pro.3711 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplemental figures and Table S2.
Metabolite IDs.
Data Availability Statement
The entirety of our raw data is available on Metabolomics Workbench under Study No. ST003053.






