Abstract
Escherichia coli formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (Fpg), MutY DNA glycosylase, endonuclease VIII, and endonuclease III are oxidative base excision repair DNA glycosylases that remove oxidized bases from DNA, or an incorrect base paired with an oxidized base in the case of MutY. Since genes encoding other base excision repair proteins have been shown to be part of adaptive responses in E. coli, we wanted to determine whether the oxidative DNA glycosylase genes are induced in response to conditions that cause the type of damage their encoded proteins remove. The genes fpg, mutY, nei, and nth encode Fpg, MutY, endonuclease VIII, and endonuclease III, respectively. Multiprobe RNase protection assays were used to examine the transcript levels of these genes under conditions that induce the SoxRS, OxyR, and SOS regulons after a shift from anaerobic to aerobic growth and at different stages along the growth curve. Transcript levels for all four genes decreased as cells progressed from log-phase growth to stationary phase and increased after cells were shifted from anaerobic to aerobic growth. None of the genes were induced by hydrogen peroxide, paraquat, X rays, or conditions that induce the SOS response.
In Escherichia coli, as in other prokaryotes and eukaryotes, a form of DNA repair called base excision repair removes oxidatively damaged bases from DNA (for reviews see references 14 and 60). Oxidatively damaged bases result from attack by oxygen free radicals generated during normal oxidative metabolism and by exposure to exogenous agents such as X rays and redox-generating chemicals. Base excision repair proteins called DNA glycosylases hydrolyze the N-glycosylic bond between the damaged or incorrect base and the sugar, leaving an abasic site or a strand break, depending on the type of glycosylase, which is then acted on by other proteins to complete the repair process.
Formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (Fpg) and MutY DNA glycosylase work together to protect cells from the mutagenic effects of the common oxidative damage 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG) (41). Fpg removes 8-oxoG from 8-oxoG-C pairs, giving the repair DNA polymerase a chance to put in G (10, 58). If 8-oxoG is not removed before DNA replication occurs, it can mispair with A. MutY removes A in 8-oxoG-A mispairs (41, 42). Failure of this process results in a GC → TA transversion. The DNA glycosylases endonuclease III (endo III) and endo VIII have overlapping substrate specificities and recognize and remove a wide range of oxidized pyrimidines. Some of these oxidized pyrimidines, such as thymine glycol, act as blocks to DNA polymerase and are lethal to cells (34, 44); oxidized cytosines such as uracil glycol, 5-hydroxyuracil, and 5-hydroxycytosine pair with A and are premutagenic, leading to GC→AT transitions (32, 48, 49).
Using reverse transcription-PCR, we have previously shown that all four oxidative DNA glycosylase genes are transcribed as part of operons (18, 19) and have determined transcription initiation and termination sites by RNase protection and primer extension. fpg is the terminal gene in an operon with the gene order radC, rpmB, rpmG, and fpg (19). RadC has been suggested to play a role in growth medium-dependent, recA-dependent repair of DNA single-strand breaks after X-irradiation and in postreplication repair after UV irradiation (17). rpmB and rpmG encode the ribosomal proteins L28 and L33, respectively (36). This operon has transcription initiation sites upstream of radC, in the radC coding region, and immediately upstream of fpg. There is a strong attenuator in the rpmG-fpg intergenic region and three transcription termination sites downstream of fpg. There is an additional site in the radC-rpmB intergenic region that corresponds either to a transcription initiation site or to an RNase E or RNase III cleavage site. mutY (MutY) is the first gene in an operon with the gene order mutY, yggX, mltC, and nupG (19). yggX encodes a protein of unknown function; mltC encodes membrane-bound lytic transglycosylase C, which has been shown to have peptidoglycan hydrolase activity (15); and nupG encodes a high-affinity nucleoside transport protein (64). This operon has transcription initiation sites upstream of mutY, in the mutY coding region, and immediately upstream of nupG. There also appear to be attenuators in the yggX-mltC and mltC-nupG intergenic regions. nth (endo III) is the terminal gene in an operon with seven open reading frames that encode proteins of unknown function (18). The six open reading frames immediately upstream of nth show homology to the genes rnfA, rnfB, rnfC, rnfD, rnfG, and rnfE from Rhodobacter capsulatus. The rnf genes are required for nitrogen fixation in R. capsulatus and have been predicted to make up a membrane complex involved in electron transport to nitrogenase (53). The nth operon has transcription initiation sites upstream of the first and second open reading frames and a single transcript termination site downstream of nth. nei (endo VIII) is the terminal gene in an operon with four open reading frames that encode proteins of unknown function (18). This operon has two confirmed transcription initiation sites upstream of the first open reading frame and two transcript termination sites downstream of nei.
When cells are exposed to low doses of a toxic agent, they often become less sensitive to the effects of subsequent higher doses. Adaptive responses were first observed in bacteria and have since been observed in yeast, plants, and mammals (11). Two regulons, the SoxRS regulon and the OxyR regulon, enable E. coli to adapt to oxidative stress (1, 13, 47). The SoxRS regulon is turned on in response to O2·− and induces the expression of proteins specific for removing O2·− from the cell and minimizing the damaging effects of O2·− (1, 47). The OxyR regulon is turned on in response to H2O2 and induces proteins specific for removing H2O2 from the cell and minimizing the damaging effects of the presence of H2O2 (9, 45).
There have been few studies on the regulation of the oxidative DNA glycosylases in E. coli. It has been shown that cells exhibit increased Fpg enzyme activity when shifted from anaerobic to aerobic growth conditions and when exposed to the O2·−-generating compound paraquat (31, 35). This response still occurs in mutants defective in SoxR and SoxS, demonstrating that fpg (Fpg) is not part of the SoxRS regulon (31, 35). It has also been shown that, under anaerobic growth conditions, Fpg enzyme activity increases in strains deficient in the global regulators Fur, Fnr, and ArcA (35). Possible Fur, Fnr, and ArcA binding sites have been identified in the fpg promoter region, suggesting that these proteins may play a negative regulatory role in fpg regulation. There have been no reported studies on MutY regulation. There is not observed increase in endo VIII enzyme levels after the administration of H2O2, paraquat, or agents that induce the SOS response or in oxyR or soxR mutants constitutive for the H2O2- and O2·−-inducible responses, respectively (40). There have been no reported studies on endo III regulation.
In this study we wanted to determine whether fpg, mutY, nth, and nei are induced as part of an adaptive response to oxidative stress in E. coli. We also investigated whether these genes are part of the stationary-phase regulon, which controls the induction of several genes involved in protection against oxidative stress (33, 39), and whether they are induced after a shift from anaerobic to aerobic growth. Our results indicate that fpg, mutY, nth, and nei transcript levels decrease as cells progress from log-phase growth to stationary phase and increase after cells are shifted from anaerobic growth to aerobic growth. These genes do not appear to be induced by H2O2, paraquat, or X rays, nor are they induced as part of the SOS response.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains.
E. coli GC4468 [DE(argF-lac)169 λ− IN(rrnD-rrnE)1 rpsL179(strR)], KL16 (λ− relA1 spoT1 thi-1), and KL16-99 (KL16 recA1) were obtained from the Yale University E. coli Genetic Stock Center. Strain DJ901 (GC4468 ΔsoxRS901) was kindly supplied by Bruce Demple, Harvard School of Public Health. Strain GC122 (GC4468 rpoS13::Tn10) was kindly supplied by Herb Schellhorn, McMaster University. Strains QC1732 (GC4468 Δfur::kan), QC2085 (GC4468 Δarc::tet), and QC2086 (GC4468 Δfnr zdc-235::Tn9) were kindly supplied by Danièle Touati, University of Paris. Strain BW402 (KL16 nth-1::kan) was kindly supplied by Bernard Weiss, Emory University. Strain CSH11 (KL16 mutY::mini-tet) was kindly supplied by Jeffrey Miller, University of California, Los Angeles. Strains SW2-8 (KL16 nei::cm), SW2-F (KL16 fpg::amp), and SW2-F8 (KL16 fpg::amp nei::cm) were made in this laboratory as previously described (3). Strains UC574 (arg56 nad113 ara81) and UC1247 (UC574 oxyR::kan) were kindly provided by Carmen Pueyo, University of Cordoba.
Growth conditions and RNA isolation.
E. coli cultures (1 ml) were grown overnight in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth with shaking at 250 rpm. The overnight cultures were diluted 1/100 in fresh LB broth and were grown until they reached the desired optical density at 600 nm (OD600). Anaerobic cultures were grown in a Forma Scientific anaerobic chamber with 10% hydrogen, 5% carbon dioxide, and 85% nitrogen. LB broth was equilibrated in the anaerobic chamber for 2 days before use, and the colonies used in overnight cultures were streaked and grown in the anaerobic chamber. Aliquots of cells were taken at different times after exposure to chemical agents or the desired growth conditions (see figure legends), and the cells were spun down and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. The cell pellets were stored at −70°C until the RNA was isolated. Cells were grown overnight in the presence of the appropriate antibiotic, with the exception of QC1732, QC2085, and QC2086, which were plated in the presence of the appropriate antibiotic but which were grown in LB broth without selection. Total RNA was isolated with a Qiagen RNeasy kit according to the manufacturer's recommendations. After elution from the RNeasy column, the RNA was treated with DNase, extracted twice with acid pH phenol, and extracted once with chloroform-isoamyl alcohol. The RNA was precipitated with ammonium acetate and ethanol, washed in 75% ethanol, and resuspended in RNase-free water.
RPAs.
RNase protection assays (RPAs) were performed with an Ambion RPA II kit. RNA antisense probes were transcribed with a template containing a T7 phase promoter. The antisense probe template was prepared by PCR with genomic DNA as the template and primer sets with the T7 phage promoter incorporated into the downstream primer. PCR was performed with 50-μl reaction mixtures containing Stratagene Pfu DNA polymerase and Idaho Technologies 1× buffer with 3 mM MgCl2 and 200 μM concentrations of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate on an Idaho Technologies Air Thermo-Cycler. PCR products were analyzed on a 1% agarose gel; then, the products were cut out, eluted in water, dried under vacuum with centrifugation, and resuspended in 20 μl of water. The template was transcribed with 5 U of Ambion T7 RNA polymerase in a reaction mixture containing Ambion 1× transcription buffer, 1 μl of template, 500 μM ATP, 500 μM CTP, 500 μM GTP, 12.5 μM [α-32P]UTP (800 Ci/mmol; 40 mCi/ml), and water in a final reaction volume of 5 μl. The reaction mixture was incubated at 37°C for 45 min and then run on a 5% polyacrylamide gel to purify the probe. The sizes of the RNA probes were staggered so they could be distinguished from each other in multiprobe RPAs (Fig. 1). E. coli RNA (10 μg) was hybridized overnight with the labeled RNA probes (25,000 cpm of each probe used in the assay) at 47°C in hybridization buffer. Unhybridized probe was digested with 0.5 U of RNase A and 20 U of RNase T1 in digestion buffer, the RNases were inactivated, and the remaining RNA was precipitated. The pellet was resuspended in formamide gel loading buffer, and the sample was run on a 5% polyacrylamide gel. The intensity of the protected products was quantitated by phosphorimager analysis, and the results are reported as counts normalized for the number of U residues in the protected product.
FIG. 1.
Full-length antisense RNA probes and protected products from multiprobe RPAs. Lane 1, full-length probes (to the left of lane 1 are the name of the gene corresponding to each probe and size of each probe); lanes 2 and 3, protected products after overnight hybridization of 10 μg (lane 2) and 20 μg (lane 3) of E. coli RNA with 25,000 cpm of each full-length probe and then digestion with RNase A-RNase T1; lanes 4 to 11, protected products resulting from hybridization of 25,000 cpm of each individual probe with 20 μg of RNA. To the right are the name of the gene corresponding to each product, the size, and the number of U residues in each protected product.
RESULTS
Multiprobe RPAs were performed to measure the transcript levels of fpg, mutY, nth, nei, and the appropriate control genes, under various conditions.
The RNA antisense probes for the genes of interest were designed to be different lengths so the protected products could be resolved when run on a 5% polyacrylamide gel. Each probe was designed to anneal starting at the A of the AUG start site for each RNA transcript, and the lengths of the full-length probes are shown in Fig. 1. Each probe (25,000 cpm) was hybridized overnight with 10 μg of E. coli RNA, and the unhybridized probe was digested with RNase A-RNase T1. The RNA antisense probes have 16 bases that will not hybridize to the transcript, so the protected product is 16 bases shorter than the full-length probe. The probes were transcribed in reactions with [α-32P]UTP, so the amounts of protected product were normalized for the number of U residues before the levels of transcript for different genes were compared to each other. Figure 1 shows the number of U residues in each protected product.
Transcript levels of the oxidative DNA repair glycosylase genes decrease as cells progress from logarithmic to stationary phase.
Aliquots of E. coli GC4468 were removed when cell cultures reached OD600s of 0.2, 0.4, 1.0, 1.65, and 1.78. On the growth curve for GC4468, OD600 readings of 0.2 and 0.4 are found during logarithmic growth; an OD reading of 1.0 is reached in late log or early stationary phase, and OD600 readings of 1.65 and 1.78 occur during stationary phase. The transcript levels for fpg, mutY, nth, nei, and katE were measured at the different OD readings. katE encodes hydroperoxidase II and is part of the stationary-phase regulon which is under the control of the alternative sigma factor ςS encoded by rpoS (46, 52). Genes that are part of this regulon are upregulated as cells enter stationary phase. As expected, the katE transcript level increased at an OD of 1.0 and reached a maximal level of 38-fold induction at an OD of 1.65 (Fig. 2). The transcript levels for fpg, mutY, and nth were highest at an OD of 0.2 and decreased at subsequent times. Transcript levels for nei remained approximately level up to an OD of 1.0 but decreased when cells entered stationary phase. The decreases in transcript levels from the initial to the final measurement for fpg, mutY, nth, and nei were 6-, 10.4-, 10.3-, and 4.4-fold, respectively. At an OD of 0.2, and normalized for the number of U residues, the levels of mutY and nth transcripts were the highest and were approximately the same; the levels of fpg and nei transcripts were 4- and 3.3-fold lower, respectively. RNA probes for uvrA, nfo, and katG were also included in the experiment (they are positive controls for other conditions). The uvrA transcript level remained approximately the same until late log phase before increasing a total of 2.3-fold in stationary phase. The nfo transcript level remained approximately the same until late log phase before increasing a total of 1.4-fold in stationary phase. A twofold increase in katG transcripts was observed up to an OD of 1.65 before the level started to decrease. To determine if there was any effect of ςS on fpg, mutY, nth, and nei transcript levels, samples were taken at OD readings of 0.2 and 1.78 from cultures of isogenic wild-type and rpoS mutant cells. The transcript levels for fpg, mutY, nth, and nei at both stages of growth in the wild-type and mutant strains were approximately the same; however, katE levels, which increased 38-fold in wild-type cells, decreased 1.9-fold in the rpoS mutant (not shown). These results indicate that the decrease in transcripts seen for fpg, mutY, nth, and nei is not the result of repression by a regulated ςS gene.
FIG. 2.
Levels of transcript for each gene at OD600s of 0.2, 0.4, 1.0, 1.65, and 1.78. (A) Representative multiprobe RPA for the growth phase experiment. Shown are levels of transcript for each gene at the tested OD600s. The gene corresponding to each protected product is listed on the right. Overnight cultures of E. coli were diluted to an OD600 of 0.02 in fresh LB growth medium, and then samples were taken at the listed OD600s. Cells were immediately spun down and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. The isolated RNA (10 μg) was hybridized overnight with 25,000 cpm of each probe and was then digested with RNase A-RNase T1. The samples were then run on a 5% polyacrylamide gel. (B) Multiprobe RPA results were quantitated on a phosphorimager and are reported as counts normalized for the number of U residues in each protected product. The following values are means ± standard errors of the means (n = 3), reported from lowest to highest OD: fpg, 266 ± 28.0, 187 ± 21.8, 123 ± 7.58, 60.5 ± 5.59, and 44.0 ± 1.86 counts; mutY, 945 ± 73.8, 726 ± 65.5, 380 ± 18.1, 176 ± 19.3, and 90.7 ± 13.1 counts; nth, 1,060 ± 85.6, 829 ± 107, 533 ± 43.1, 250 ± 25.0, and 103 ± 11.3 counts; nei, 325 ± 19.5, 275 ± 26.2, 327 ± 25.2, 209 ± 28.5, and 73.2 ± 7.71 counts; uvrA, 823 ± 50.9, 682 ± 59.2, 941 ± 91.4, 1,660 ± 213, and 1,870 ± 191 counts; nfo, 659 ± 35.6, 597 ± 36.8, 585 ± 51.3, 899 ± 36.5, and 876 ± 55.5 counts; katE, 490 ± 24.0, 486 ± 4.90, 4,240 ± 413, 18,900 ± 1,910, and 17,600 ± 1,300 counts; katG, 1,560 ± 120, 1,860 ± 66.3, 2,220 ± 96.1, 3,070 ± 71.8, and 2,600 ± 59.1 counts.
fpg is the only gene of the four with a promoter controlling only its own transcription, and we wanted to determine whether the sixfold decrease in the fpg transcript seen in stationary phase was due to a decrease in transcription from its own promoter or to upstream regulatory events. RPAs were performed using a probe that anneals to the fpg promoter region and RNA from log-phase and stationary-phase cells. The RPA with the fpg probe resulted in products of 239, 109, and 94 bp (Fig. 3, lanes 2 and 3). The 239-bp product corresponds to transcript readthrough from the upstream genes (19) and was 13.3-fold more abundant in early log phase than in stationary phase. The 94-bp product corresponds to the transcript terminating at an attenuator between the upstream genes and fpg (19) and was present in equal amounts in early log phase and stationary phase, indicating that the amount of attenuation at this site did not shift. The 109-bp product corresponds to a transcript originating at the fpg promoter (19) and was present in a 1.4-fold-greater amount in early log phase than in stationary phase. It appears that the decrease in the fpg transcript is due only in a small part to decreased transcription from the fpg promoter and is primarily due to a decrease in transcript readthrough from the upstream genes.
FIG. 3.
Measurement of fpg transcript originating from the fpg promoter and from upstream. (A) Features of the fpg operon. Arrows, mapped transcription initiation sites; ATN (attenuator), mapped termination site that also allows transcript readthrough; T, termination sites; ?, either transcription initiation site or RNase E or RNase III cleavage site; thick line 239, approximate annealing location of the probe used in the RPA; thin lines, products obtained from the RPA (sizes are indicated). The probe is 239 nucleotides long and anneals from 90 bp 3′ to the fpg start codon to 52 bp 5′ to the rpmG stop codon. (B) Lane 1, full-length probe; lanes 2 and 3, results obtained with RNA from cells at OD600 0.2 (lane 2) and 1.78 (lane 3); lanes 4 and 5, results obtained with RNA from anaerobically grown cells (lane 4) and cells 20 min after a shift to aerobic growth (lane 5). Numbers beside panels are in base pairs.
Transcript levels of nth are increased in fpg and fpg nei mutants during logarithmic growth.
Transcript levels for the oxidative DNA glycosylase genes in the wild type and fpg, mutY, nth, nei, and fpg nei mutants were compared (Fig. 4). All cells were harvested at an OD of 0.5. Levels of fpg transcript were relatively equal in the strains tested with the exception of the fpg and fpg nei mutants, where no transcripts above background levels were observed. The fpg, nei, and fpg nei mutants were all made by insertion-deletion mutations (3), and the mutY mutant was made by an insertion in the promoter region. Levels of the mutY transcript in the fpg, nth, nei, and fpg nei mutants were slightly elevated compared to that in the wild type. In the mutY mutant no transcripts above background level were observed. Levels of nth transcripts in wild-type and nei and mutY mutant backgrounds were similar. However, the levels of the nth transcript in the nth mutants were approximately 2.5-fold greater than that in the wild type. This increase is presumably due to an increase in message stability from the kanamycin resistance gene inserted into nth (63). Interestingly, in the fpg and fpg nei mutants, transcript levels of nth were increased 2.4-fold and 2.0-fold, respectively. Levels of nei transcript were relatively equal in wild-type and nth, fpg, and mutY mutant backgrounds. In nei and fpg nei mutants, no nei transcript was detected above background levels. No differences in the levels of any transcripts between mutant and wild-type cells were found when the cells were harvested at an OD600 of 0.2 or 1.7 (data not shown).
FIG. 4.
Levels of transcript for each gene in various base excision repair mutant backgrounds. Overnight cultures of each strain were diluted to an OD600 of 0.02 in fresh LB growth medium and grown to an OD600 of 0.5. Cells were immediately spun down and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. The isolated RNA (10 μg) was hybridized overnight with 25,000 cpm of each probe and was then digested with RNase A-RNase T1. Samples were then run on a 5% polyacrylamide gel. Multiprobe RPA results were quantitated on a phosphorimager and are reported as counts normalized for the number of U residues in each protected product. The following values are means ± standard errors of the means (n = 3), reported in the following order: wild type and nth, nei, fpg, mutY, and fpg nei mutants. fpg probe, 646 ± 334, 596 ± 154, 484 ± 127, 17.0 ± 18.1, 828 ± 259, and 9.00 ± 14.6 counts; mutY probe, 1,069 ± 71.2, 1,583 ± 150, 1,812 ± 72.6, 1,589 ± 69.5, 65.0 ± 45.2, and 1,569 ± 67.0 counts; nth probe, 805 ± 134, 891 ± 271, 2,031 ± 113, 1,950 ± 132, 831 ± 129, and 1,632 ± 13.9 counts; nei probe, 614 ± 135, 89.0 ± 47.1, 711 ± 16.2, 678 ± 13.9, 446 ± 87.0, and 10.0 ± 9.29 counts.
Transcript levels of the oxidative DNA repair glycosylase genes increase after a shift from anaerobic to aerobic growth.
Cultures of E. coli GC4468 were grown anaerobically overnight, diluted 1/50 (OD600 of ∼0.01) in fresh LB medium, and then again grown anaerobically until an OD600 of ∼0.125 was reached and the first sample was taken. The cell cultures were then shifted to a rotary shaker in a 37°C warm room, and samples were taken 5, 20, and 60 min after the shift to aerobic conditions. Transcript levels for fpg, mutY, nth, and nei more than doubled at 5 min after the shift from anaerobic to aerobic growth (Fig. 5). fpg and nei transcript levels increased 4.2- and 3.3-fold, respectively, at 20 min after the shift and started to decline by 60 min. mutY and nth transcript levels continued to increase after the shift from anaerobic to aerobic growth for total increases of 3.8- and 5.6-fold, respectively. Transcript levels of uvrA, nfo, and katE all increased two- to threefold by 20 min before starting to decline (not shown). Interestingly, the level of the katG transcript was very high before the shift to aerobic growth (24.6-fold higher than that of the uvrA transcript, which was 1.9-fold lower than that of the katG transcript in early aerobic growth) (data not shown). The level of the katG transcript increased 2.3-fold 5 min after the shift to aerobic growth before decreasing a total of 22-fold by 60 min.
FIG. 5.
Levels of transcript for each gene in anaerobically grown cells and cells 5, 20, and 60 min after a shift to aerobic growth. Anaerobically grown overnight cultures of E. coli were diluted to an OD600 of 0.01 in fresh LB broth and then were again grown anaerobically until an OD600 of 0.125 was reached and the first sample was taken. The cell cultures were then shifted to a rotary shaker, and samples were taken 5, 20, and 60 min after the shift. Cells were immediately spun down and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. Multiprobe RPA results were quantitated on a phosphorimager and are reported as counts normalized for the number of U residues in each protected product. The following values are means ± standard errors of the means (n = 3, reported in the following order: anaerobic growth and 5, 20, and 60 min of aerobic growth. fpg, 43.9 ± 7.10, 122 ± 16.5, 185 ± 10.7, and 146 ± 3.73 counts; mutY, 145 ± 21.7, 386 ± 36.1, 513 ± 23.1, and 546 ± 27.7 counts; nth, 150 ± 19.1, 457 ± 40.5, 651 ± 61.6, and 844 ± 32.6 counts; nei, 92.6 ± 10.5, 202 ± 8.93, 309 ± 8.87, and 271 ± 4.20 counts.
In order to determine whether the 4.2-fold increase in fpg transcript seen after a shift from anaerobic to aerobic growth was due to a increase in transcription from its own promoter or to upstream regulatory events, RPAs were performed using the probe that anneals to the fpg promoter region and RNA from anaerobically grown cells and cells 20 min after the shift to aerobic growth (Fig. 3, lanes 4 and 5). The 239-bp product corresponding to transcript readthrough from the upstream genes was 4.4-fold less abundant in the anaerobically grown cells than in the cells 20 min after the shift to aerobic growth. The 94-bp product corresponding to the attenuated product was present in equal amounts. The 109-bp product corresponding to the transcript originating at the fpg promoter was present in a twofold-lesser amount in the anaerobically grown cells than in the cells 20 min after the shift. It appears that part of the increase in fpg transcript after a shift from anaerobic to aerobic growth is due to upregulation at its own promoter.
A previous study showed that Fpg activity increased in anaerobically grown cells that were mutant for arcA (aerobic respiration control), fur (ferric uptake regulation), and fnr (fumarate nitrate reductase) (35). ArcA and Fnr are involved in anaerobic activation and repression of numerous genes (25, 54, 56), and Fur represses transcription of genes involved in iron uptake (2). We examined transcript levels for fpg, mutY, nth, and nei in anaerobically grown isogenic wild-type cells and arcA, fur, and fnr mutants. Transcript levels were measured 2, 3, 4, and 6 h after a dilution from an overnight culture. No increase in transcript levels over those of the wild type was seen with any of the mutants at any of the time points, suggesting that ArcA, Fur, and Fnr are not acting as transcriptional repressors for these genes during anaerobic growth (data not shown).
Transcription of the oxidative DNA repair glycosylase genes is not induced by agents that produce the damage that gene products repair.
A variety of agents known to produce damage that gene products repair were examined, along with the appropriate control genes, to determine whether they induce fpg, mutY, nth, or nei. None of the following agents yielded more than a slight (less than twofold) increase in transcript levels for fpg, mutY, nth, or nei: 10 μM H2O2, 300 μM paraquat, 100 Gy of X rays, and 50 μg of nalidixic acid/ml (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Effect of agents that produce DNA damagea
Treatment | Gene | Mean level (counts) ± SEM (n = 3) at:
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pretreatment | 5 min | 20 min | 60 min | ||
10 μM H2O2 | katG | 928 ± 99.3 | 19,100 ± 455 | 2,960 ± 525 | 1,980 ± 176 |
fpg | 214 ± 4.44 | 150 ± 13.3 | 178 ± 46.0 | 99.5 ± 5.74 | |
mutY | 414 ± 18.7 | 347 ± 43.9 | 289 ± 51.5 | 248 ± 37.4 | |
nth | 378 ± 26.3 | 265 ± 34.9 | 188 ± 31.6 | 221 ± 42.4 | |
nei | 170 ± 6.35 | 122 ± 17.1 | 211 ± 46.4 | 200 ± 15.1 | |
100 Gy of X rays | uvrA | 535 ± 53.5 | 1,790 ± 303 | 4,770 ± 600 | |
katG | 1,420 ± 114 | 28,200 ± 2,060 | 5,240 ± 583 | ||
fpg | 252 ± 50.1 | 192 ± 30.5 | 449 ± 32.4 | ||
mutY | 742 ± 49.1 | 678 ± 74.8 | 577 ± 25.2 | ||
nth | 921 ± 43.1 | 513 ± 88.5 | 444 ± 38.5 | ||
nei | 269 ± 36.1 | 245 ± 34.5 | 339 ± 35.3 | ||
300 μM paraquat | nfo | 862 ± 47.1 | 8,500 ± 1,200 | 10,400 ± 977 | 7,010 ± 255 |
fpg | 172 ± 14.6 | 308 ± 37.6 | 184 ± 20.4 | 74.2 ± 11.5 | |
mutY | 393 ± 31.6 | 423 ± 52.8 | 316 ± 38.3 | 198 ± 12.0 | |
nth | 572 ± 42.4 | 484 ± 47.4 | 424 ± 64.5 | 362 ± 45.7 | |
nei | 261 ± 8.73 | 319 ± 34.1 | 330 ± 33.3 | 214 ± 10.7 | |
50 μg of nalidixic acid/ml | uvrA | 2,030 ± 197 | 10,000 ± 943 | 10,900 ± 865 | 5,520 ± 245 |
fpg | 402 ± 23.0 | 540 ± 23.8 | 366 ± 19.3 | 311 ± 23.2 | |
mutY | 982 ± 63.2 | 337 ± 19.0 | 592 ± 22.7 | 439 ± 143 | |
nth | 1,210 ± 53.6 | 658 ± 53.3 | 714 ± 51.0 | 195 ± 47.7 | |
nei | 782 ± 66.3 | 373 ± 29.0 | 496 ± 43.7 | 345 ± 9.52 |
Cells were treated as indicated and irradiated in 2-ml aliquots in a 35- by 10-mm culture dish with stirring. The X rays were produced by a Philips XRG3000 X- ray generator. Samples were taken just before treatment and 5, 20, and 60 min after treatment. Cells were immediately spun down and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. Multiprobe RPA results were quantitated on a phosphorimager and are reported as counts normalized for the number of U residues in each protected product.
H2O2 can undergo a Fenton-like reaction in the presence of Fe2+, generating OH·, a powerful oxidant (24). Since iron can localize along the phosphodiester backbone of nucleic acids, DNA is a target of OH·. katG encodes hydroperoxidase I and is part of the oxyR regulon, which is turned on in the presence of H2O2 (9). The level of katG transcript increased 20.5-fold 5 min after treatment of cells with 10 μM H2O2 and then decreased at 20 and 60 min (Table 1). There was no increase in the transcript levels of fpg, mutY, nth, or nei. The experiment was also performed with an oxyR mutant, and the pattern of transcript levels across the times was the same with the exception that the katG transcript only increased a total of 2.7-fold (data not shown).
Treatment of cells with ionizing radiation also generates OH· (62). When cells were treated with 100 Gy of X rays, katG transcript levels increased 19.8-fold 5 min after treatment and uvrA transcript levels increased 8.9-fold 20 min after treatment (Table 1). The level of fpg transcript showed a small increase at 20 min (1.8-fold); the levels of mutY, nth, and nei transcripts did not increase.
Paraquat is a redox cycling drug that generates O2·− (29). The O2·− radical does not react directly with DNA (4, 6, 37, 50); however it can be dismutased to H2O2, which can lead to OH· formation as described above. It can also damage iron-sulfur proteins, leading to release of iron into the cytosol, where it catalyzes the oxidation of DNA in conjunction with H2O2 (30, 38). nfo encodes the base excision repair protein endo IV and is part of the SoxRS regulon, which is induced in response to O2·−-generating agents such as paraquat (8). The level of nfo transcript increased 9.9-fold at 5 min after treatment of the cells with 300 μM paraquat and reached a maximum of 12-fold induction at 20 min (Table 1). The level of fpg transcript increased 1.8-fold at 5 min before decreasing, the nei transcript level increased 1.3-fold at 20 min before decreasing, and mutY and nth transcript levels did not increase. Under the same conditions, the levels of nfo transcript did not increase when a soxRS mutant strain was treated with paraquat (data not shown).
The SOS response is turned on in response to treatment of cells with UV irradiation, chemicals such as nalidixic acid, and ionizing radiation and requires the activity of RecA (55). Transcript levels in cells treated with 50 μg of nalidixic acid/ml were measured. uvrA encodes the nucleotide excision repair protein UvrA and is induced as part of the SOS response (59). The level of uvrA transcript increased a maximum of 5.4-fold 20 min after treatment of cells with nalidixic acid and was lower at 60 min (Table 1). The fpg transcript level increased 1.3-fold 5 min after treatment, and the amounts of mutY, nth, and nei transcripts decreased. The experiment was also performed with a recA mutant, and the pattern of transcript levels at the different times was the same with the exception that the uvrA transcript only increased 1.5-fold (data not shown).
E. coli cells were also grown to stationary phase (OD600 of 1.7) and treated with 10 μM H2O2, 300 μM paraquat, or 100 Gy of X rays. No more than a 1.2-fold increase was seen in fpg, mutY, nth, and nei transcript levels with any of the conditions at 5, 20, and 60 min after treatment (data not shown).
DISCUSSION
We have used multiprobe RPAs to measure the transcript levels of fpg, mutY, nth, nei, and the appropriate control genes under various conditions. Transcript levels decreased 5- to 10-fold for the four genes of interest as cells progressed from log-phase growth to stationary phase (Fig. 2) and increased about 4-fold after cells were shifted from anaerobic to aerobic growth (Fig. 5).
Of the four genes, only fpg has its own promoter in addition to upstream promoters, thus allowing for the possibility of regulation of fpg without the upstream genes. However, during the progression from log phase to stationary phase the decrease in fpg transcript levels was primarily due to a decrease in transcript readthrough from upstream (Fig. 3). Since the decrease in the oxidative DNA glycosylase transcripts in stationary phase was not rpoS related, it is not known whether the decrease is due to repression by another regulator or to a general decrease in transcription of non-stationary-phase-specific genes. For example, Rsd (regulator of sigma D) was identified as an RNA polymerase ς70-associated protein found in stationary-phase E. coli that has an inhibitory activity on ς70 transcription in vitro (27). The intracellular levels of Rsd start to increase during the transition from growth to stationary phase (27). Thus Rsd may be involved in the replacement of RNA polymerase sigma subunit ς70 with ςS during the transition from exponential growth to stationary phase (28). The transcription initiation sites for the four operons containing the oxidative DNA glycosylase genes are all preceded by predicted ς70 promoters (18, 19). If indeed ς70 is sequestered by Rsd as cells transition from exponential growth to stationary phase, then ς70-regulated genes, as ours appear to be, will be downregulated.
The transcript levels of fpg, mutY, and nei in the single-mutant backgrounds and in the fpg nei double mutant were similar to wild-type levels in early log and mid-log phase and in stationary phase. However, nth transcript levels increased severalfold in fpg and fpg nei mutants in cells grown to mid-log phase (Fig. 5) but not in cells in early log phase or in stationary phase. This is consistent with observations that cell extracts prepared from mid-log-phase fpg nei mutants show a 5- to 10-fold increase in cleavage, relative to wild-type extracts, of oligonucleotides containing either thymine glycol, 5-hydroxycytosine, or 5-hydroxyuracil lesions, whereas extracts of fpg nth mutants do not (Z. Hatahet, personal communication). Thymine glycol, 5-hydroxycytosine, and 5-hydroxyuracil are substrates for endo III (60). The increase in nth transcript level in an fpg mutant background, taken together with the increase in cleavage of substrates for endo III, suggests that in fpg mutants there is an increase in endo III activity, presumably resulting from either an increase in nth expression or an increase in mRNA stability.
Why might the transcript levels for the oxidative DNA glycosylase genes be high in exponential phase and low in stationary phase? If the changes in transcript levels are specific for the glycosylases, rather than an indirect consequence, it might be that the levels of these glycosylases are at their highest during early log phase because, in exponentially growing E. coli, both O2·− and H2O2 are generated by the auto-oxidation of components of the respiratory chain (21, 23). There is a 10-fold increase in the rate of H2O2 generation during the exponential phase of aerobic growth (21). The increased concentration of H2O2 could be associated with oxidative DNA damage since there is a 1.9- to 3.4-fold-higher spontaneous mutation frequency in exponentially growing wild-type E. coli cells than in stationary-phase cells (20). Since cells are experiencing more oxidative stress during exponential growth, it may make sense to have higher levels of enzymes that repair oxidative DNA damage present during this time. In possible disagreement with this, it has been calculated that the rate of production of the common oxidative damage 8-oxoG in the DNA of starved cells is threefold greater than in the DNA of growing cells (7). It has been shown that the mismatch repair protein MutL becomes limiting for mismatch repair during stationary phase, and it has been speculated that this could allow cells to regulate their potential to evolve (22). In fact, E. coli cultures grown to stationary phase give rise to mutants with the ability to prevail under limiting conditions (65). It is possible that the decrease in mismatch repair during stationary phase contributes to the generation of mutants with a growth advantage in stationary phase, and since the levels of the oxidative DNA glycosylases decrease in stationary phase, a decrease in base excision repair may play a role here as well. Creation of a hypermutable state due to lower levels of DNA repair may help to generate populations of cells that are better able to survive the environmental challenges they experience. Alternatively, until cells begin dividing again there may be no reason to have these repair systems fully functioning. Mismatch repair and base excision repair systems are responsible for repair of premutagenic lesions (43, 60, 61), and premutagenic lesions cannot become mutagenic without DNA replication.
When cells were shifted from anaerobic to aerobic growth, the transcript levels of the oxidative DNA glycosylases increased (Fig. 4), possibly in response to the resumption of aerobic respiration, which generates free radicals, placing the cells under oxidative stress. Alternatively, the increase in transcript levels may be due to an increased growth rate rather than to oxidative stress since the highest transcript levels for the four genes were seen in early log phase when cells are dividing rapidly. The fpg promoter appeared to play a greater role in the transcript increase seen in the shift from anaerobic to aerobic growth than in the transcript decrease seen during progression into stationary phase (Fig. 3). It has previously been shown that Fpg activity increases in anaerobically grown cells that are mutant for arcA, fur, and fnr and that there are possible consensus sequences for the products of these genes in the fpg promoter region (35). These results suggested that ArcA, Fur, and Fnr act as repressors of Fpg during anaerobic growth. However, we failed to see an increase in levels of the fpg transcript in arcA, fur, and fnr mutants at any time during anaerobic growth. Since, in the previously reported results, enzyme activity was examined, it is possible that the increases in enzyme activity occurred at a posttranscriptional level. There was also no increase in mutY, nth, or nei transcripts in these mutants, suggesting that ArcA, Fur, and Fnr do not play a role in the transcriptional regulation of the oxidative DNA glycosylase genes during anaerobic growth.
fpg, mutY, nth, and nei were not induced by H2O2, paraquat, X rays, or nalidixic acid. Although the single oxidative DNA glycosylase mutants are not sensitive to the cytotoxic effects of oxidizing agents and ionizing radiation (5, 12), they are mutators (3, 26, 41) due to the formation of spontaneous oxidative DNA lesions of the type formed by oxidizing agents. Also, nth nei double mutants, defective in both pyrimidine-specific DNA glycosylases, are hypersensitive to hydrogen peroxide (51, 60) and ionizing radiation (26). Thus, it was unexpected that transcription of the oxidative DNA glycosylase genes was not induced in response to these agents. A previous study reported 2.4- and 4.4-fold responses in Fpg activity in cells about 30 min after treatment (35) for 3 h with 100 and 500 μM paraquat, respectively (31, 35). We saw a 1.8-fold increase in fpg transcript levels 5 min after treatment with 300 μM paraquat, but the transcript levels returned to the pretreatment level by 20 min after treatment. Although a 1.8-fold increase in transcript levels could account for a 4-fold increase in enzyme activity, it seems unlikely since Fpg activity did not begin to increase until 30 min after treatment with paraquat. It is possible that the reported increase in Fpg enzyme activity is due to a posttranscriptional event.
It is interesting that the transcription of the oxidative DNA glycosylases does not appear to be upregulated by the treatments that produce the damage the enzymes recognize. This is especially true since the enzymes responsible for the next step in the pathway, the apurinic endonucleases exonuclease III (xth) and endo IV (nfo), are significantly upregulated by the KatF and SoxRS pathways, respectively (16, 57). It should be noted that exonuclease III and endo IV directly recognize a number of cytotoxic lesions produced by oxidizing agents (60). It is possible that the levels of endogenous base damage are so significant that high constitutive levels of the oxidative DNA glycosylases are necessary for genome maintenance and that the increased levels of damage produced by treatment with oxidizing agents are low compared to the high level of background lesions.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R37 CA33657 awarded by the National Cancer Institute. Christine M. Gifford was supported by Environmental Pathology training grant T32 07122 awarded by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
We are grateful to Zafer Hatahet for communicating the results of his unpublished experiments.
REFERENCES
- 1.Amabile-Cuevas C F, Demple B. Molecular characterization of the soxRS genes of Escherichia coli: two genes control a superoxide stress regulon. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19:4479–4484. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.16.4479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bagg A, Neilands J B. Ferric uptake regulation protein acts as a repressor, employing iron (II) as a cofactor to bind the operator of an iron transport operon in Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. 1987;26:5471–5477. doi: 10.1021/bi00391a039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Blaisdell J O, Hatahet Z, Wallace S S. A novel role for Escherichia coli endonuclease VIII in prevention of spontaneous G→T transversions. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:6396–6402. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.20.6396-6402.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Blakely W F, Fuciarelli A F, Wegher B J, Dizdaroglu M. Hydrogen peroxide-induced base damage in deoxyribonucleic acid. Radiat Res. 1990;121:338–343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Boiteux S, Huisman O. Isolation of a formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (fpg) mutant of Escherichia coli K12. Mol Gen Genet. 1989;215:300–305. doi: 10.1007/BF00339732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brawn K, Fridovich I. DNA strand scission by enzymically generated oxygen radicals. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1981;206:414–419. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(81)90108-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bridges B A, Sekiguchi M, Tajiri T. Effect of mutY and mutM/fpg-1 mutations on starvation-associated mutation in Escherichia coli: implications for the role of 7,8-dihydro- 8-oxoguanine. Mol Gen Genet. 1996;251:352–357. doi: 10.1007/BF02172526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chan E, Weiss B. Endonuclease IV of Escherichia coli is induced by paraquat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1987;84:3189–3193. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.10.3189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Christman M F, Morgan R W, Jacobson F S, Ames B N. Positive control of a regulon for defenses against oxidative stress and some heat-shock proteins in Salmonella typhimurium. Cell. 1985;41:753–762. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(85)80056-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chung M H, Kasai H, Jones D S, Inoue H, Ishikawa H, Ohtsuka E, Nishimura S. An endonuclease activity of Escherichia coli that specifically removes 8-hydroxyguanine residues from DNA. Mutat Res. 1991;254:1–12. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(91)90035-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Crawford D R, Davies K J. Adaptive response and oxidative stress. Environ Health Perspect. 1994;102(Suppl. 10):25–28. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94102s1025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cunningham R P, Weiss B. Endonuclease III (nth) mutants of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1985;82:474–478. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.2.474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Demple B, Halbrook J. Inducible repair of oxidative DNA damage in Escherichia coli. Nature. 1983;304:466–468. doi: 10.1038/304466a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Demple B, Harrison L. Repair of oxidative damage to DNA: enzymology and biology. Annu Rev Biochem. 1994;63:915–948. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.63.070194.004411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dijkstra A J, Keck W. Identification of new members of the lytic transglycosylase family in Haemophilus influenzae and Escherichia coli. Microb Drug Resist. 1996;2:141–145. doi: 10.1089/mdr.1996.2.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Eisenstark A, Calcutt M J, Becker-Hapak M, Ivanova A. Role of Escherichia coli rpoS and associated genes in defense against oxidative damage. Free Radic Biol Med. 1996;21:975–993. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(96)00154-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Felzenszwalb I, Sargentini N J, Smith K C. Characterization of a new radiation-sensitive mutant, Escherichia coli K-12 radC102. Radiat Res. 1984;97:615–625. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gifford C M, Wallace S S. The genes encoding endonuclease VIII and endonuclease III in Escherichia coli are transcribed as the terminal genes in operons. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:762–769. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.3.762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gifford C M, Wallace S S. The genes encoding formamidopyrimidine and MutY DNA glycosylates in Escherichia coli are transcribed as part of complex operons. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:4223–4236. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.14.4223-4236.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gonzalez-Flecha B, Demple B. Homeostatic regulation of intracellular hydrogen peroxide concentration in aerobically growing Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:382–388. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.2.382-388.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gonzalez-Flecha B, Demple B. Metabolic sources of hydrogen peroxide in aerobically growing Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:13681–13687. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.23.13681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Harris R S, Feng G, Ross K J, Sidhu R, Thulin C, Longerich S, Szigety S K, Winkler M E, Rosenberg S M. Mismatch repair protein MutL becomes limiting during stationary-phase mutation. Genes Dev. 1997;11:2426–2437. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.18.2426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Imlay J A, Fridovich I. Assay of metabolic superoxide production in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:6957–6965. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Imlay J A, Linn S. DNA damage and oxygen radical toxicity. Science. 1988;240:1302–1309. doi: 10.1126/science.3287616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Iuchi S, Lin E C. Adaptation of Escherichia coli to respiratory conditions: regulation of gene expression. Cell. 1991;66:5–7. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90130-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jiang D, Hatahet Z, Blaisdell J O, Melamede R J, Wallace S S. Escherichia coli endonuclease VIII: cloning, sequencing, and overexpression of the nei structural gene and characterization of nei and nei nth mutants. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:3773–3782. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.11.3773-3782.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jishage M, Ishihama A. A stationary phase protein in Escherichia coli with binding activity to the major sigma subunit of RNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:4953–4958. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.9.4953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jishage M, Ishihama A. Transcriptional organization and in vivo role of the Escherichia coli rsd gene, encoding the regulator of RNA polymerase sigma D. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:3768–3776. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.12.3768-3776.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kappus H, Sies H. Toxic drug effects associated with oxygen metabolism: redox cycling and lipid peroxidation. Experientia. 1981;37:1233–1241. doi: 10.1007/BF01948335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Keyer K, Imlay J A. Superoxide accelerates DNA damage by elevating free-iron levels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:13635–13640. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kim H S, Park Y W, Kasai H, Nishimura S, Park C W, Choi K H, Chung M H. Induction of E. coli oh8Gua endonuclease by oxidative stress: its significance in aerobic life. Mutat Res. 1996;363:115–123. doi: 10.1016/0921-8777(96)00006-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kreutzer D A, Essigmann J M. Oxidized, deaminated cytosines are a source of C→T transitions in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:3578–3582. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lange R, Hengge-Aronis R. Identification of a central regulator of stationary-phase gene expression in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 1991;5:49–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb01825.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Laspia M F, Wallace S S. Excision repair of thymine glycols, urea residues, and apurinic sites in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1988;170:3359–3366. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.8.3359-3366.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lee H S, Lee Y S, Kim H S, Choi J Y, Hassan H M, Chung M H. Mechanism of regulation of 8-hydroxyguanine endonuclease by oxidative stress: roles of FNR, ArcA, and Fur. Free Radic Biol Med. 1998;24:1193–1201. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(97)00427-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lee J S, An G, Friesen J D, Isono K. Cloning and the nucleotide sequence of the genes for Escherichia coli ribosomal proteins L28 (rpmB) and L33 (rpmG) Mol Gen Genet. 1981;184:218–223. doi: 10.1007/BF00272908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lesko S A, Lorentzen R J, Ts'o P O. Role of superoxide in deoxyribonucleic acid strand scission. Biochemistry. 1980;19:3023–3028. doi: 10.1021/bi00554a029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Liochev S I, Fridovich I. The role of O2·− in the production of HO·in vitro and in vivo. Free Radic Biol Med. 1994;16:29–33. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(94)90239-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.McCann M P, Kidwell J P, Matin A. The putative sigma factor KatF has a central role in development of starvation-mediated general resistance in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:4188–4194. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.13.4188-4194.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Melamede R J, Hatahet Z, Kow Y W, Ide H, Wallace S S. Isolation and characterization of endonuclease VIII from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry. 1994;33:1255–1264. doi: 10.1021/bi00171a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Michaels M L, Cruz C, Grollman A P, Miller J H. Evidence that MutY and MutM combine to prevent mutations by an oxidatively damaged form of guanine in DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:7022–7025. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.15.7022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Michaels M L, Tchou J, Grollman A P, Miller J H. A repair system for 8-oxo-7,8-dihydrodeoxyguanine. Biochemistry. 1992;31:10964–10968. doi: 10.1021/bi00160a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Modrich P. Mechanisms and biological effects of mismatch repair. Annu Rev Genet. 1991;25:229–253. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.25.120191.001305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Moran E, Wallace S S. The role of specific DNA base damages in the X-ray-induced inactivation of bacteriophage PM2. Mutat Res. 1985;146:229–241. doi: 10.1016/0167-8817(85)90063-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Morgan R W, Christman M F, Jacobson F S, Storz G, Ames B N. Hydrogen peroxide-inducible proteins in Salmonella typhimurium overlap with heat shock and other stress proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83:8059–8063. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.21.8059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mulvey M R, Switala J, Borys A, Loewen P C. Regulation of transcription of katE and katF in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1990;172:6713–6720. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.12.6713-6720.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Nunoshiba T, Hidalgo E, Amabile-Cuevas C F, Demple B. Two-stage control of an oxidative stress regulon: the Escherichia coli SoxR protein triggers redox-inducible expression of the soxS regulatory gene. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:6054–6060. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.19.6054-6060.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Purmal A A, Kow Y W, Wallace S S. Major oxidative products of cytosine, 5-hydroxycytosine and 5-hydroxyuracil exhibit sequence context-dependent mispairing in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:72–78. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.1.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Purmal A A, Lampman G W, Bond J P, Hatahet Z, Wallace S S. Enzymatic processing of uracil glycol, a major oxidative product of DNA cytosine. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:10026–10035. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.16.10026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rowley D A, Halliwell B. DNA damage by superoxide-generating systems in relation to the mechanism of action of the anti-tumour antibiotic adriamycin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1983;761:86–93. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(83)90365-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Saito Y, Uraki F, Nakajima S, Asaeda A, Ono K, Kubo K, Yamamoto K. Characterization of endonuclease III (nth) and endonuclease VIII (nei) mutants of Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:3783–3785. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.11.3783-3785.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Schellhorn H E, Hassan H M. Transcriptional regulation of katE in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1988;170:4286–4292. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.9.4286-4292.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Schmehl M, Jahn A, Meyer zu Vilsendorf A, Hennecke S, Masepohl B, Schuppler M, Marxer M, Oelze J, Klipp W. Identification of a new class of nitrogen fixation genes in Rhodobacter capsulatus: a putative membrane complex involved in electron transport to nitrogenase. Mol Gen Genet. 1993;241:602–615. doi: 10.1007/BF00279903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sharrocks A D, Green J, Guest J R. FNR activates and represses transcription in vitro. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1991;245:219–226. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1991.0113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Shinagawa H. SOS response as an adaptive response to DNA damage in prokaryotes. EXS. 1996;77:221–235. doi: 10.1007/978-3-0348-9088-5_14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Spiro S, Guest J R. FNR and its role in oxygen-regulated gene expression in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1990;6:399–428. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1990.tb04109.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Storz G, Imlay J A. Oxidative stress. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999;2:188–194. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5274(99)80033-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Tchou J, Kasai H, Shibutani S, Chung M H, Laval J, Grollman A P, Nishimura S. 8-Oxoguanine (8-hydroxyguanine) DNA glycosylase and its substrate specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:4690–4694. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.11.4690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.van Houten B. Nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli. Microbiol Rev. 1990;54:18–51. doi: 10.1128/mr.54.1.18-51.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wallace S S. Oxidative damage to DNA and its repair. In: Scandalios J, editor. Oxidative stress and the molecular biology of antioxidant defenses. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1997. pp. 49–90. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Wang D, Kreutzer D A, Essigmann J M. Mutagenicity and repair of oxidative DNA damage: insights from studies using defined lesions. Mutat Res. 1998;400:99–115. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(98)00066-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ward J F. DNA damage produced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells: identities, mechanisms of formation, and repairability. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1988;35:95–125. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60611-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Weiss B, Cunningham R P. Genetic mapping of nth, a gene affecting endonuclease III (thymine glycol-DNA glycosylase) in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1985;162:607–610. doi: 10.1128/jb.162.2.607-610.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Westh-Hansen S E, Jensen N, Munch-Petersen A. Studies on the sequence and structure of the Escherichia coli K-12 nupG gene, encoding a nucleoside-transport system. Eur J Biochem. 1987;168:385–391. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1987.tb13431.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Zambrano M M, Kolter R. GASPing for life in stationary phase. Cell. 1996;86:181–184. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80089-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]