Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia logoLink to Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
. 2024 Apr 12;68(5):496–499. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_209_24

Is research reporting intraoperative hypotension apt enough?

Habib M R Karim 1,, Vikash Bansal 1
PMCID: PMC11100658  PMID: 38764962

Intraoperative hypotension (IOH) needs urgent attention as it significantly affects organ perfusion and patient outcomes.[1] Depending on its severity and duration, it might result in major organ dysfunction, ischaemia, and failure, even leading to case fatality.[2,3,4,5] Despite being so crucial, there is no uniform definition or universally accepted threshold to define IOH.[2] A systematic review by Bijker JB et al.[6] identified 140 definitions of IOH provided in over 100 studies from January 2000 to April 2006. Frequently used definitions include systolic blood pressure (SBP) <80 mmHg, a decrease in SBP of >20% below baseline, and a combination of definitions consisting of an absolute SBP of <100 mmHg and/or a 30% decrease below baseline.[6] In adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia, the most common definitions of IOH are SBP <90 mmHg or mean blood pressure (MBP) <60 mmHg.[5] The scenario is the same even for obstetric anaesthesia. The systemic literature review by Klöhr S et al.[7] found 15 different definitions of hypotension in caesarean sections. The two most frequent definitions were a decrease below 80% baseline and the combined definition of SBP below 100 mmHg or a decrease below 80% baseline.[7] Such variabilities lead to a significant impact on the reported outcomes. Depending on which definition for IOH is used, the incidence varies between 5% and 99%.[2] Even the target thresholds for management get impacted, and the literature indicates a range of SBP thresholds ranging from 55 to 110 mmHg, MBP from 40 to 85 mmHg, and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from 35 to 60 mmHg.[2]

The variation is not only limited to the type of blood pressure value (SBP, DBP, or MBP), what value (absolute or percentage fall), and how much falls (20% or 30%) but is also noted for the timing of the baseline value reporting. We screened the original articles published in the Indian Journal of Anaesthesia in 2023. The research papers focusing on hypotension and its management as one of the key objectives were taken; 13 articles were found [Table 1].[8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] The variation was evident because five considered MBP alone, three SBP alone, and two considered both SBP and MBP. Three were unclear about it. Similarly, six articles considered the absolute value of MBP or SBP for defining IOH. The combined use of percentage fall from baseline and absolute cut-off value of MBP and/or SBP was also noted in three.

Table 1.

Studies published in the Indian Journal of Anaesthesia during 2023 reporting intraoperative hypotension as an objective

Authors (Year) Study groups/No. of participants Primary objective/outcome Hypotension defined Baseline point
Amin SR et al.[8] (2023) Addicts and non-addicts, 30 each, received bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB with 20 mL bupivacaine (0.25%) before induction of general anaesthesia. The primary outcome was comparing the 24-h postoperative quality of recovery (QoR-15) score. 20% from baseline, but it is unclear which BP measurement is used. 30 min before the procedure.
Roy R et al.[9] (2023) The modified 4-in-1 block was compared with the combined IPACK + ACB group. Seventy patients were randomised into two groups: the modified 4-in-1 block group (group M) and the combined IPACK + ACB group (group I). Pain score was compared at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively Unclear/Not Defined First reading on the operating table
Padhy S et al.[10] (2023) A single cohort of 96 patients aged >65 years and above undergoing definitive surgery for gastrointestinal malignancy RER for predicting the postoperative complications following geriatric oncosurgery Decrease in MBP by >20% of baseline Unclear/Not Defined
Jain N et al.[11] (2023) Eighty adults undergoing thyroidectomy; BSCPB with 20 mL 0.25% ropivacaine with adjuvants such as either dexmedetomidine 50 μg or dexamethasone 4 mg. Postoperative pain and the duration of analgesia were measured by the time to the first rescue analgesia. Unclear/Not Defined First reading on the operating table
Sultan WA et al.[12] (2023) Atracurium versus titrated continuous intravenous infusion of DEX at 0.2–0.7 μg/kg/h. Lidocaine 2% spraying around the vocal cords was done in both groups. Sixty-two patients were randomised into two equal groups. Facilitation and toleration of the endotracheal tube and quality of wake-up test during spinal correction surgery. MBP <60 mmHg First reading on the operating table
Lal J et al.[13] (2023) The IVC collapsibility index (IVCCI) and caval aorta index were calculated in a single cohort. This prospective, blinded, observational study was conducted on 75 adult patients who required spinal anaesthesia. The incidence and predictors of spinal anaesthesia-associated hypotension. Decrease SBP by >20% of the baseline value or an absolute SBP of <90 mmHg or MBP <60 mmHg. First reading on the operating table.
Nabil F et al.[14] (2023) One hundred ten patients with severe preeclampsia divided into two groups- receive either preoperative nebulisation of lignocaine 2% in a dose of 4.5 mg/kg (not exceeding 400 mg) or nebulisation of an equivalent volume of 0.9% NaCl in the saline group. Changes in SBP after tracheal intubation. Absolute SBP <100 mmHg In the preoperative area.
Dhas MM et al.[15] (2023) Two groups received clonidine 2 μg/kg or enalaprilat 1.25 mg diluted in normal saline as an intravenous infusion given over 10 min before induction of anaesthesia. Seventy-one patients were randomised into two equal groups. The changes in basic hemodynamic parameters in response to the infusion of the study drugs during GA Absolute MBP ≤60 mmHg or two consecutive SBP or DBP values ≤20% of the baseline. In the preoperative area.
Singh S et al.[16] (2023) Two groups- 20 each, TEA and ESPB. In the ESPB group, a unilateral or bilateral catheter was inserted in the erector spinae space, and an infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine was started. In the TEA group, the thoracic epidural catheter was inserted, and 0.125% bupivacaine infusion was started. The primary endpoint was total morphine consumption after administration of ESPB and TEA. Decrease in MBP by a fall of 20 mmHg from baseline. Before the procedure in the ward.
Tyagi A et al.[17] (2023) Adult women with pre-defined risk factors for uterine atony vs those without such factors, 39 in each group. Oxytocin- 1 IU in low-risk patients and 3 IU in high-riskpatients. Adequate uterine tone at 3 min of oxytocin bolus was designated ‘success', while inadequate tone constituted ‘failure’. Decrease in SBP to >20% below baseline or absolute SBP <90 mmHg First reading on the operating table
Grover N et al.[18] (2023) Ninety patients were divided into three groups; nebulisation was done with fentanyl 1 μg/kg (group A), dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg (group B), and magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) (40 mg/kg) (group C) Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MBP), and HR were recorded before nebulisation (T0), postnebulisation (T1) and 2, 5 and 10 min after intubation (T2, T3, T4). Fall in SBP >30% from the baseline for>60 s In the preoperative room, 30 min before shifting the patient to the operation theatre
Emara MM et al.[19] (2023) Forty patients undergoing living donor liver transplants. The intervention was an escalated protocol of NE boluses starting at 20 μg. The primary outcome was the incidence of PRS MBP dropped by >10% of the basal reading. The basal reading was taken immediately before portal vein de-clamping
Lodhi M et al.[20] (2023) Eighty patients were divided into two groups; one group received an intraoperative infusion of ketamine 0.5 mg/kg/h; another received fentanyl 0.5 μg/kg/h, and intravenous dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg/h in both groups. Hemodynamic, sedation, and pain MBP value <60 mmHg. First reading on the operating table

ACB - adductor canal block, BP - blood pressure, BSCPB - bilateral superficial cervical plexus block, DBP - diastolic blood pressure, DEX - dexmedetomidine, ESPB - erector spinae plane block, GA- general anaesthesia, HR - heart rate, IPACK - infiltrating popliteal artery and the capsule of the knee, IU - international unit, IVC - inferior vena cava, IVCCI- inferior vena cava collapsibility index, MBP - mean blood pressure, MgSO4 - magnesium sulphate, NaCl - sodium chloride, NE - nor-epinephrine, PRS - post reperfusion syndrome, QoR - quality of recovery, RER - respiratory exchange ratio, SBP - systolic blood pressure, TEA - thoracic epidural analgesia

While each component of blood pressure reading has advantages and limitations, MBP is less affected while monitoring non-invasively using resonance technique and even invasively even with damping effects.[21] In the analysis of organ-specific outflow pressure, the primary indicator of end-organ perfusion is MBP.[2] Perioperative Quality Initiative statement on blood pressure that may be considered safe for patients under anaesthesia is that ‘myocardial and renal injury is predicted by both absolute thresholds (MBP <65 mmHg) and relative thresholds (>30% drop from baseline)’. Therefore, either can be used to define hypotension and initiate management.[22,23]

Nevertheless, the duration of hypotension is also crucial. In non-cardiac surgery, Sun et al.[24] found that acute kidney injury is linked to intraoperative MBP <55–60 mmHg for ≥11–20 min. Salmasi et al.[25] found that postoperative heart and kidney injury risk in non-cardiac surgery increases with a reduction in intraoperative MBP <50–60 mmHg for 1–30 min or 20%–50% of the preoperative value for ≥5 min.

In a recent retrospective multi-centre cohort study including 316,717 non-cardiac surgical patients, an MBP of <55 mmHg was associated with an increased rate of postoperative delirium.[26] Applying personalised SBP targets, as opposed to standard blood pressure (BP) management, dramatically reduced the incidence of postoperative organ dysfunction as found in multi-centre INPRESS trials.[27] The baseline reading timing is also crucial as it can impact the definition of hypotension, especially when the percentage fall from the baseline is considered while defining IOH. In clinical practice, BP measurements taken just before induction of general anaesthesia are often used as a surrogate for the patient's baseline. However, a prospective observational study comparing ambulatory and perioperative BP in 370 patients showed that pre-induction MBP values do not reflect mean daytime MBP values.[28] Thus, pre-induction MBP values should not serve as a surrogate for the individual normal daytime MBP.[3] Blood pressure and heart rate in the preoperative area and operation theatre are significantly affected by preoperative anxiety.[29] Anxiety is frequently noted in the preoperative period, even after pre-anaesthesia evaluation and counselling.[30] Such anxieties can be because of multiple factors such as fear of needles, waking up and pain during surgery, and inadequate information about surgery and anaesthesia, leading to preoperative anxiety.[31] Our analysis found that the timing for the baseline value for BP was also variable. The first reading of the operating table was the most common, that is, 6 (46.15%). The researcher also took the ward and preoperative area values; one study did not report it.

To conclude, the practice and research reporting have remained diverse in defining IOH. Although it might be difficult to put one BP above another, MAP can be chosen to define hypotension in most cases. A personalised approach might be the best approach. However, it might not always be feasible. Nonetheless, a fall of 20% from the baseline might be the nearest resemble of a personalised approach rather than an absolute value, especially in chronic hypertensive patients. The first reading on the operating table or preoperative area might be affected by anxiety or pre-medication; thus, taking the average ward BP reading as a baseline might be better in admitted patients.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Guarracino F, Bertini P. Perioperative hypotension: Causes and remedies. J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2022;2:17.. doi: 10.1186/s44158-022-00045-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kouz K, Hoppe P, Briesenick L, Saugel B. Intraoperative hypotension: Pathophysiology, clinical relevance, and therapeutic approaches. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64:90–6. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_939_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.D’Amico F, Fominskiy EV, Turi S, Pruna A, Fresilli S, Triulzi M, et al. Intraoperative hypotension and postoperative outcomes: A meta-analysis of randomised trials. Br J Anaesth. 2023;131:823–31. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.08.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Alghanem SM, Massad IM, Almustafa MM, Al-Shwiat LH, El-Masri MK, Samarah OQ, et al. Relationship between intra-operative hypotension and post-operative complications in traumatic hip surgery. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64:18–23. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_397_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Weinberg L, Li SY, Louis M, Karp J, Poci N, Carp BS, et al. Reported definitions of intraoperative hypotension in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery under general anaesthesia: A review. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022;22:69.. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01605-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bijker JB, van Klei WA, Kappen TH, van Wolfswinkel L, Moons KG, Kalkman CJ. Incidence of intraoperative hypotension as a function of the chosen definition: Literature definitions applied to a retrospective cohort using automated data collection. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:213–20.. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000270724.40897.8e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Klöhr S, Roth R, Hofmann T, Rossaint R, Heesen M. Definitions of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: literature search and application to parturients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54:909–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02239.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Amin SR, Abdelfatah FA. Impact of erector spinae plane block on the quality of recovery after lumbar spine decompression surgery: A comparative study between addicts and nonaddicts. Indian J Anaesth. 2023;67:173–9. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_19_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Roy R, Agarwal G, Latwal BS, Patel A, Mohta A. A comparative randomized controlled study of modified 4 in 1 block versus IPACK plus adductor canal block for postoperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty. Indian J Anaesth. 2023;67:296–301. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_530_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Padhy S, Gurajala I, Durga P, Kar AK, Doppalapudi M, Pranay P. Evaluation of respiratory exchange ratio (RER) for predicting postoperative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing oncological resection for gastrointestinal malignancies – A prospective cohort study. Indian J Anaesth. 2023;67:283–9. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_609_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jain N, Rathee R, Jain K, Garg DK, Patodi V, Khare A. Post-operative analgesic efficacy of 0.25% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine versus dexamethasone as an adjuvant in bilateral superficial cervical plexus block for thyroidectomy under general anaesthesia-A comparative randomised clinical study. Indian J Anaesth. 2023;67:269–76. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_272_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sultan WA, Afify NA. The effect of dexmedetomidine on wake-up test quality when muscle relaxants are not used: A randomised control trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2023;67:382–7. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_684_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lal J, Jain M, Rahul, Singh AK, Bansal T, Vashisth S. Efficacy of inferior vena cava collapsibility index and caval aorta index in predicting the incidence of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia- A prospective, blinded, observational study. Indian J Anaesth. 2023;67:523–9. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_890_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nabil F, Gharib AA, Gadelrab NA, Osman HM. Preoperative lignocaine nebulisation for attenuation of the pressor response of laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in patients with severe preeclampsia undergoing caesarean section delivery: A randomised doubleblind controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2023;67:515–22. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_898_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dhas MM, Gayathri B, Kuppusamy A, Mani K, Pattu H. Assessment of haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation and prone positioning following clonidine and enalaprilat in lumbar spine surgeries: A double blind randomised controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2023;67:633–7. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_731_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Singh S, Avinash R, Jaiswal S, Kumari A. Comparison of safety and efficacy of thoracic epidural block and erector spinae plane block for analgesia in patients with multiple rib fractures: A pilot single-blinded, randomised controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2023;67:614–9. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_844_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tyagi A, Deep S, Salhotra R, Malhotra R, Singla A. Minimum effective dose of oxytocin bolus during the caesarean section for patients at high vs low risk of uterine atony: A non-randomized, dual-arm, dose-finding prospective trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2023;67:690–6. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_760_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Grover N, Taneja R, Rashid Y, Shrivastava N. Nebulised fentanyl, dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulphate for attenuation of haemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: A double-blinded, randomised comparative study. Indian J Anaesth. 2023;67:730–5. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_397_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Emara MM, Elsedeiq M, Abdelkhalek M, Yassen AM, Elmorshedi MA. Norepinephrine boluses for the prevention of post-reperfusion syndrome in living donor liver transplantation: A prospective, open-label, single-arm feasibility trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2023;67:991–8. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_539_23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lodhi M, Sulakshana S, Singh AP, Gupta BK. A comparative study of clinical effects and recovery characteristics of intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion with ketamine versus fentanyl as adjuvants in general anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2023;67:S126–32. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_294_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lam S, Liu H, Jian Z, Settels J, Bohringer C. Intraoperative invasive blood pressure monitoring and the potential pitfalls of invasively measured systolic blood pressure. Cureus. 2021;13:e17610.. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kappen T, Beattie WS. Perioperative hypotension 2021: A contrarian view. Br J Anaesth. 2021;127:167–70. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sessler DI, Bloomstone JA, Aronson S, Berry C, Gan TJ, Kellum JA, et al. Perioperative Quality Initiative consensus statement on intraoperative blood pressure, risk and outcomes for elective surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122:563–74. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sun LY, Wijeysundera DN, Tait GA, Beattie WS. Association of intraoperative hypotension with acute kidney injury after elective noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2015;123:515–23. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Salmasi V, Maheshwari K, Yang D, Mascha EJ, Singh A, Sessler DI, et al. Relationship between intraoperative hypotension, defined by either reduction from baselineor absolute thresholds, and acute kidney and myocardial injury after oncardiac surgery: A retrospective cohort analysis. Anesthesiology. 2017;126:27–65. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wachtendorf LJ, Azimaraghi O, Santer P, Linhardt FC, Blank M, Suleiman A, et al. Association between intraoperative arterial hypotension and postoperative delirium after noncardiac surgery: A retrospective multicenter cohort study. Anesth Analg. 2022;134:822–33. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Futier E, Lefrant JY, Guinot PG, Godet T, Lorne E, Cuvillon P, et al. Effect of individualized vs standard blood pressure management strategies on postoperative organ dysfunction among high-risk patients undergoing major surgery: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318:1346–57. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Saugel B, Reese PC, Sessler DI, Burfeindt C, Nicklas JY, Pinnschmidt HO, et al. Automated ambulatory blood pressure measurements and intraoperative hypotension in patients having noncardiac surgery with general anesthesia: A prospective observational study. Anesthesiology. 2019;131:74–83. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tadesse M, Ahmed S, Regassa T, Girma T, Hailu S, Mohammed A, et al. Effect of preoperative anxiety on postoperative pain on patients undergoing elective surgery: Prospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2021;73:103190.. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kharod U, Panchal NN, Varma J, Sutaria K. Effect of pre-operative communication using anaesthesia information sheet on pre-operative anxiety of patients undergoing elective surgery-A randomised controlled study. Indian J Anaesth. 2022;66:559–72. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_32_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jiwanmall M, Jiwanmall SA, Williams A, Kamakshi S, Sugirtharaj L, Poornima K, et al. Preoperative anxiety in adult patients undergoing day care surgery: Prevalence and associated factors. Indian J Psychol Med. 2020;42:87–92. doi: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_180_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Anaesthesia are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES