Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2024 May 17;19(5):e0303333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303333

Effectiveness of the ALT/AST ratio for predicting insulin resistance in a Korean population: A large-scale, cross-sectional cohort study

Seul Ki Han 1,2,#, Myung Jae Seo 2,3,#, Taesic Lee 2,3,4, Moon Young Kim 1,2,*
Editor: Anna Di Sessa5
PMCID: PMC11101110  PMID: 38758828

Abstract

Insulin resistance is a common pathophysiology in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Thus, screening for the risk of insulin resistance is important to prevent disease progression. We evaluated the alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST) ratio to predict insulin resistance in the general population, regardless of comorbidities. Datasets from the 2015, 2019, and 2020 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys were used, and the following four indices were implemented to indicate insulin resistance: fasting serum glucose, insulin, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and β-cell function. We analyzed the degree of association between the liver enzyme profile and insulin resistance indices using Pearson’s correlation coefficient and determined the associations using linear or logistic regression analysis. Accordingly, ALT levels in both sexes were positively and consistently correlated with the four aforementioned insulin resistance indices in stratification analyses based on diabetes, dyslipidemia, alcohol consumption, and obesity status. In multivariate linear regression, when comparing with ALT levels, the ALT/AST ratio exhibited superior predictive performance for fasting serum glucose and HOMA-β in Korean men and improved outcomes for all insulin resistance indices in Korean women. In this analysis that included a large community-based population, the ALT/AST ratio was a more useful predictive marker than the HOMA-IR. Regarding the predicted presence or absence of insulin resistance, the ALT/AST ratio could better predict HOMA-IR than the ALT level alone in Koreans. A simple, precise marker that represents the ALT/AST ratio could be a practical method to screen for insulin resistance in the general population, regardless of diabetes mellitus, alcohol intake, and sex.

Introduction

With the increase in the prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and non-alcoholic liver disease (NAFLD), early detection of insulin resistance (IR) without specific symptoms is crucial. IR is a well-known risk factor for critical cardiovascular diseases (CVD). In individuals without DM, IR represented by homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), is an independent risk factor for stroke and coronary vascular disease [13]. Even in those with normal body weight and IR, the risk of incident DM and CVD events increases compared to the reference category [4]. According to a previous report, the estimated liver fat content significantly increased during follow-up in individuals with normal body weight and IR [4]. Similarly, reduced glucose metabolism has been reported in patients with NAFLD but without DM [5].

Therefore, a simple IR screening method is required. Sustained liver damage caused by IR leads to steatohepatitis and elevated liver enzyme levels. Considering the poor prognosis associated with elevated liver enzymes in NAFLD [6, 7], the liver enzyme profile can be used as a screening factor to detect IR, metabolic syndrome, or NAFLD. However, no screening methods or effective markers, including liver enzymes, have been suggested for the detection of IR in the general population by using public health checkup data. We aimed to determine indicators that could help detect IR using public health examination data.

Materials and methods

Dataset and participants

This study analyzed data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) to confirm the association between the liver enzyme profile and IR. All the participants in the 2011–2019 KNHANES signed an informed consent form. The individual approval of the Institutional Review Board of Wonju Severance Christian Hospital was waived because the KNHANES data are publicly available and all participants in these surveys are fully anonymized and unidentified (IRB number: CR323312). The dataset was compiled from the official KNHANES website (https://knhanes.kdca.go.kr/knhanes/eng/index.do). This study contained detailed information about socioeconomic status; anthropometric measures; biochemical profiles, including fasting blood and urine; and nutrition patterns. Data on serum insulin, fasting blood glucose (Glc), and liver enzyme profile, such as ALT and AST levels, were obtained. Therefore, the 2015, 2019, and 2020 KNHANES sets, including laboratory indices for liver enzymes and IR, were analyzed in this study.

Study participants aged 20 years or older were selected. We excluded participants who tested positive for serological markers of viral hepatitis or were diagnosed with liver cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma. Participants with complete lifestyle, medical, and laboratory data were included. A non-negligible number of outliers for ALT and AST levels and their ratios were observed (S1 Fig). An outlier value was defined as the mean ± three standard deviations (SD) of the liver enzyme levels. Therefore, participants showing outlier values for ALT level, AST level, or ALT/AST ratio were excluded. Finally, we selected 11,547 participants (men: 5,001, women: 6,546) to determine the association between the ALT/AST ratio and IR.

Covariates

Hypertension was defined based on the seventh report of the Joint National Committee as follows: systolic blood pressure (BP) equal to or higher than 140 mmHg or diastolic BP equal to or higher than 90 mmHg; previous diagnosis of hypertension; or administration of antihypertensive medications [8]. DM was defined as a fasting Glc level ≥126 mg/dL; previous diagnosis of DM; or administration of anti-glycemic drugs. Regarding dyslipidemia status, the KNHANES contains both questionnaire- and laboratory-based data. However, several participants had missing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values. Therefore, we depended only on questionnaire-based information and defined dyslipidemia based on the administration of antilipidemic medications.

Several criteria for regular alcohol consumption have been reported [9, 10]. Lee et al. [9] defined routine alcohol consumption as that of more than 140 g/week in men and more than 70 g/week in women. In another study by Kang et al. [10], participants who consumed more than 210 g/week (men) or more than 140 g/week (women) of alcohol were categorized into the regular alcohol consumption group. Considering these studies and the distribution of the number of alcohol consumption groups, the regular alcohol consumption group was determined based on a sex-specific cut-off (men and women consuming more than 140 g/week and more than 70 g/week, respectively).

Several studies have used obesity status as a covariate [10, 11]. One study defined obesity by body mass index (BMI) [10] and another determined obesity by waist circumference (WC) [11], both of which are highly correlated [12, 13]. Recently, several terms, including the obesity paradox, normal-weight obesity, and central obesity, have been introduced, triggering the need for alternative BMI indices for evaluating body composition and obesity. Thus, we included both BMI and WC as covariates [14, 15]. Based on the Korea Society for the Study of Obesity Guideline [16], the obesity group was characterized as follows: general obesity when BMI was equal to more than 25 and central obesity when the WC was equal to or more than 90 cm in men and 85 cm in women.

Homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and HOMA for β-cell (HOMA-β) were calculated using the following equations: HOMA-IR is calculated by multiplying serum insulin by fasting blood glucose, then dividing by the constant 405; HOMA-β is calculated by multiplying the constant 360 by serum insulin, then dividing by the value of fasting blood glucose minus 63 [17].

Statistics

We implemented a one-way analysis of variance to test for the linear differential characteristics of the covariates according to the tertile groups for the ALT/AST ratio. The mean values of each tertile group for the ALT/AST ratio were defined as representative values for the three groups in the form of continuous variables. For categorical variables, the chi-square test was used to analyze the differences among tertiles for ALT/AST ratio. A comparative analysis of the two continuous variables (serum ALT vs. Glc) was conducted using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC). A univariate (Model 1) or multivariate linear (Models 2–4) regression (LiR) models were implemented to determine the association between liver enzyme profile (i.e., ALT, AST, and ALT/AST ratio) and IR index (i.e., Glc, insulin, HOMA-IR, and HOMA-β). We set the liver enzyme profiles and each IR index as the dependent and independent variables, respectively. Three different multivariate models (Models 2–4) were used to determine the independent relationship between liver enzyme profile and IR indices according to four combinations of confounders: Model 2 (age), Model 3 (age, DM, dyslipidemia, and alcohol consumption), and Model 4 (age, DM, dyslipidemia, alcohol, BMI, and WC).

Classification performance was evaluated based on the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC). All statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.1.2). We set a two-tailed p-value less than 0.05 as the significance level.

Results

General characteristics

Table 1 presents the sex-specific medical laboratory characteristics according to tertiles for the ALT/AST ratio. The ALT/AST ratios were sorted in ascending order and categorized into three groups (T1, T2, and T3) based on tertiles. With an increase in the ALT/AST ratio in Korean men, the following characteristics showed a higher trend: ALT level, AST level, younger age, hypertension, DM, dyslipidemia, alcohol consumption, BMI, WC, insulin levels, Glc levels, HOMA-IR, and HOMA-β (Table 1). In Korean women, most features, except for age, exhibited a similar higher trend related to increasing ALT/AST ratio as Korean men. The age of Korean women was positively correlated with the ALT/AST ratio (Table 1).

Table 1. Sex-specific general characteristics according to the tertile of alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase ratio.

Korean men Korean women
T1 T2 T3 P for trend T1 T2 T3 P for trend
N 1639 1690 1672 2136 2199 2211
ALT, mg/dL 15.9 ± 0.14 22.8 ± 0.19 35.9 ± 0.19 <0.001 12.6 ± 0.08 17.3 ± 0.1 26.1 ± 0.1 <0.001
AST, mg/dL 24.9 ± 0.2 24.6 ± 0.2 26.4 ± 0.2 <0.001 22.2 ± 0.13 22.2 ± 0.13 23.7 ± 0.12 <0.001
ALT/AST ratio 0.644 ± 0.0029 0.923 ± 0.0018 1.352 ± 0.0018 <0.001 0.57 ± 0.002 0.779 ± 0.0012 1.098 ± 0.0012 <0.001
Age, years 64.1 ± 0.28 60 ± 0.27 55.3 ± 0.27 <0.001 60.3 ± 0.28 59.8 ± 0.24 58.4 ± 0.24 <0.001
HTN, n 763 (46.6) 780 (46.2) 799 (47.8) 0.614 765 (35.8) 877 (39.9) 987 (44.6) <0.001
DM, n 273 (16.7) 329 (19.5) 390 (23.3) <0.001 212 (9.9) 248 (11.3) 444 (20.1) <0.001
ALM, n 212 (12.9) 262 (15.5) 339 (20.3) <0.001 334 (15.6) 453 (20.6) 594 (26.9) <0.001
Alcohol consumption, n 1131 (69.0) 1179 (69.8) 1260 (75.4) <0.001 2002 (93.7) 2031 (92.4) 2080 (94.1) 0.054
BMI, kg/m2 23.2 ± 0.07 24.4 ± 0.07 25.8 ± 0.07 <0.001 22.8 ± 0.06 23.7 ± 0.07 25.1 ± 0.07 <0.001
Obesity based on BMI, n 414 (25.3) 658 (38.9) 973 (58.2) <0.001 468 (21.9) 647 (29.4) 1042 (47.1) <0.001
WC, cm 85.2 ± 0.21 88.3 ± 0.19 91.6 ± 0.2 <0.001 79.5 ± 0.19 81.8 ± 0.19 85.3 ± 0.19 <0.001
Obesity based on WC, n 468 (28.6) 672 (39.8) 957 (57.2) <0.001 556 (26.0) 756 (34.4) 1109 (50.2) <0.001
Insulin, uIU/mL 6.2 ± 0.1 7.7 ± 0.11 10.5 ± 0.11 <0.001 6.6 ± 0.09 7.5 ± 0.09 10.1 ± 0.09 <0.001
Glc, mg/dL 104 ± 0.56 106.8 ± 0.62 111.3 ± 0.63 <0.001 97.1 ± 0.38 99.8 ± 0.4 107.3 ± 0.4 <0.001
HOMA-IR 1.7 ± 0.03 2.1 ± 0.03 3 ± 0.03 <0.001 1.6 ± 0.03 1.9 ± 0.03 2.8 ± 0.03 <0.001
HOMA-β 60 ± 1.44 72 ± 1.23 92.5 ± 1.24 <0.001 72.6 ± 1.69 78.9 ± 1.51 94.7 ± 1.51 <0.001

All data in the KNHANES are presented as mean ± standard error for continuous variables and as frequency and percentage (%) for categorical variables. The ALT/AST ratios were sorted in ascending order and categorized into three groups (T1, T2, and T3) based on tertiles. Abbreviations: KNHANES, Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; HTN, hypertension; DM, diabetes mellitus; ALM, anti-lipidemic medication; BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; Glc, fasting blood glucose; HOMA-IR, Homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance; HOMA-β, HOMA for β cell.

Correlational analyses of the liver enzyme profile with IR indices

Comparative analyses were conducted based on PCC to evaluate the degree of association between liver enzyme profile and IR indices. In Korean men, serum ALT level was positively correlated with the four IR indices, including Glc, insulin, HOMA-IR, and HOMA-β. These positive relationships persisted after selecting participants diagnosed with DM or dyslipidemia; who consumed alcohol; or those with general or abdominal obesity (Fig 1A). In Korean men, serum AST levels were correlated with most IR indices, except for Glc in patients with DM and HOMA-β in patients with DM or dyslipidemia (Fig 1A). In Korean men, the ALT/AST ratio was significantly associated with the four IR indices in all participants and all stratification analyses (Fig 1A). In Korean women, the positive association of the ALT/AST ratio with several IR indices was most remarkable concerning the liver enzyme profile (ALT, AST, and ALT/AST ratio, Fig 1B).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Association between the liver enzyme profile and IR indices in (A) Korean men and (B) Korean women. *, **, and *** denote p-value < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively, calculated by Pearson’s correlation method. Pearson’s correlation was used to identify the association of liver profiles, including ALT, AST, and their ratio, with the four IR indices. Correlation analysis was repeated six times with different combinations of participants (those with diabetes, dyslipidemia, alcohol consumption, general obesity, and abdominal obesity). Abbreviations: IR, insulin resistance; PCC, Pearson’s correlation coefficient; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; Glc, fasting blood glucose; HOMA-IR, Homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance; HOMA-β, HOMA for β-cells.

Comparative analysis of the association of the liver enzyme profile (ALT/AST ratio vs. ALT level) with IR indices

Four LiR models, including univariate and three multivariate models with different combinations of covariates, were implemented to identify associational trends (i.e., beta coefficients) between the liver enzyme profile and IR indices and their significance (p-value). In Korean men model 1 (univariate model), the ALT/AST ratio showed higher beta-coefficients and matched statistics for Glc and HOMA-β than for ALT level (Fig 2). In model 2, the beta coefficients and matched significant powers of the ALT/AST ratio were higher for all four IR indices than for ALT level (Fig 2). In model 4 including age, DM, dyslipidemia, alcohol consumption, BMI, and WC as covariates, the beta coefficients and matched significant powers of the ALT/AST ratio were higher than that of ALT level only for the IR indices of Glc and HOMA-β (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Comparative analysis of the degree of association of ALT and ALT/AST ratio with IR indices in Korean men.

Fig 2

The association between the liver enzyme profile and IR index was calculated using four linear regression models, including different combinations of covariates. Model 1 was a univariate model with the liver enzyme profile and IR indices as the dependent and independent variables, respectively. Model 2 included age as the covariate. Model 3 included age, DM, dyslipidemia, and alcohol consumption as confounders. Model 4 included age, DM, dyslipidemia, alcohol consumption, BMI, and WC as confounding factors. Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; HTN, hypertension; DM, diabetes mellitus; BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; Glc, fasting blood glucose; HOMA-IR, Homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance; HOMA-β, HOMA for β cell.

In Korean women, all models demonstrated that the associational trends of the ALT/AST ratio (i.e., beta coefficients) and matched significant powers (i.e.,–log[p-value]) were higher than that of ALT level for all four IR indices (Fig 3). To minimize the effect of the scale of variables on the beta coefficient, which quantifies the association between two variables, both the dependent and independent variables were transformed into z-scores.

Fig 3. Comparative analysis of the degree of association of ALT and ALT/AST ratio with IR indices in Korean women.

Fig 3

The association between the liver enzyme profile and IR index was calculated using four linear regression models including different combinations of covariates. Model 1 was a univariate model setting the liver enzyme profile and IR indices as the dependent and independent variables, respectively. Model 2 included age as the covariate. Model 3 included age, DM, dyslipidemia, and alcohol consumption as confounders. Model 4 included age, DM, dyslipidemia, alcohol consumption, BMI, and WC as confounding factors. Abbreviation: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; HTN, hypertension; DM, diabetes mellitus; BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; Glc, fasting blood glucose; HOMA-IR, Homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance; HOMA-β, HOMA for β cell.

Comparative analysis of the classification performances of the liver enzyme profile (ALT/AST ratio vs. ALT level) for IR status

To transform the four continuous IR levels into binomial features (i.e., presence or absence of IR status), we operationally defined participants meeting the following criteria as having IR: Glc level higher than 126 mg/dL, serum insulin higher than or equal to the mean plus one SD of serum insulin, HOMA-IR higher than or equal to the mean plus one SD of HOMA-IR, and HOMA-β higher than or equal to the mean plus one SD of β-cell function (Fig 4). We then evaluated the classification performance of the ALT/AST ratio or ALT level for the four binomial IR statuses based on true and false positive rates and their combinatory index, referred to as AUC. The performance of the ALT/AST ratio in classifying IR status was comparable to that of the ALT level (Fig 4). In Korean men, the best performance was achieved when classifying IR status defined by serum insulin using serum ALT levels (Fig 4). In Korean women, the best AUC value was obtained when predicting IR status based on HOMA-IR using the ALT/AST ratio (Fig 4). In Korean men, adults (age: 40–60 years), older participants (aged more than 60 years), and those consuming alcohol showed similar performance of ALT level and ALT/AST ratio for predicting IR status as all Korean men. Moreover, among Korean women, adults (aged 40–60 years) and the alcohol consumption groups exhibited higher AUC levels than all participants. Moreover, these groups performed better for most IR states using the ALT/AST ratio than the individual ALT levels.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Classification performance of ALT and ALT/AST ratio for IR status in (A) Korean men and (B) Korean women. Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; IR, insulin resistance; AUC, area under curve of receiver operating characteristic; Glc, fasting blood glucose; HOMA-IR, Homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance; HOMA-β, HOMA for β cell; M+SD; mean plus one standard deviation.

Discussion

Using nationwide Korean datasets, we demonstrated the relationship between ALT level and the ALT/AST ratio with four IR indices. A positive association between the liver enzyme profile and IR was common in both Korean men and women. Moreover, the association between the hepatic steatosis indices and IR remained independently significant after adjusting for various clinical variables. Stratification analyses in various settings revealed that the ALT/AST ratio was more reflective of IR status than the ALT level.

The definitive criteria of normal serum ALT level vary according to sex, race, region, age, and even institution [1820]. However, serum ALT levels increase linearly with liver-related mortality even at relatively low serum levels [21]. In previous studies that included large numbers of healthy individuals, elevated serum aminotransferase levels, even those within the normal range, were associated with liver-related mortality and metabolic syndrome [2224]. Considering that some patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis present with normal serum ALT levels [25, 26], lower ALT levels should be monitored for the risk of progression of liver disease and other metabolic disorders.

Generally, increased AST or ALT levels are considered liver injury markers. However, some studies have reported that amino acid transferases may be associated with glucose metabolism and metabolic syndromes [27, 28]. Through the action of ALT, glutamate can transfer its amino acid group to pyruvate, forming alpha-ketoglutarate and alanine [29]. Glutamate likely stimulates glucagon release from the pancreas and increases the transamination of pyruvate to alanine, which strongly promotes gluconeogenesis in obese individuals. The hypothesis that the glutamate-glutamine cycle is related to DM and glucose intolerance has been suggested in clinical and preclinical studies [30, 31]. This concept of metabolism raises new questions regarding the role of elevated aminotransferase levels in metabolic syndrome. Additionally, our results support the hypothesis that elevated aminotransferase levels are related to glucose metabolism, especially in relation to HOMA-IR.

HOMA-IR indicates the presence of IR and is a predictor of diabetes. However, to calculate the HOMA-IR, additional blood sampling and fasting time are required. Therefore, more effective screening methods are required. The ALT/AST ratio as a tool for predicting IR has been suggested previously [32]. Kawamoto et al. also reported that the ALT/AST ratio was the best surrogate marker for IR compared to other markers, such as serum triglyceride, gamma-glutamyltransferase, ALT, or AST levels alone [33]. This finding is supported by another study results [34]. Recently, a relationship between the ALT/AST ratio and diabetes and prediabetes stages has also been reported in China [35]. The current study is the first to include more than 10,000 Korean participants. Moreover, the predictive power was better in middle-aged women and individuals who consumed alcohol (Fig 4). Based on these results, in the group corresponding to T2 or T3, the prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and HOMA-IR significantly increased. This means that metabolic syndrome management is required in the T2 and T3 groups.

Men and women differed substantially regarding IR, body composition energy balance, and metabolic composition [3639]. A previous study reported age- and sex-specific differences in HOMA-IR levels, with increased levels in women [40]. Moreover, fat distribution in the visceral, hepatic, peripheral, or subcutaneous adipose tissue was presumed to contribute to this phenomenon [38, 41]. In our study, the predictive value of the ALT/AST ratio compared to HOMA-IR was superior in women than in men. Presumably, corrected AST levels, muscle mass, and alcohol intake may have influenced the results.

In patients with DM, the relationship between the ALT/AST ratio and IR was weaker than that in the other comorbidity groups. These patients were likely to take oral antidiabetic drugs to improve their IR. Metformin, which is recommended as a primary medication for type 2 DM, is known to improve IR [4244]. Therefore, the predictive value of ALT/AST markers in patients with diabetes tended to be low in our analysis.

Our study has several strengths. First, it included a large Korean population. A recent study validated the association between ALT/AST ratio and IR in a female Japanese population of approximately 460 individuals, whereas our study demonstrated an association between liver enzyme levels and IR in more than 10000 Korean men and women, which may be more generalizable [45]. Second, various analyses, including stratification and predictive value analyses, confirmed an independent relationship between ALT/AST ratio and IR. Although the earlier research result is similar to ours in comparing the relevance of various IR indices to the ALT/AST ratio [45], our series of analyses allowed us to explore this relationship from a broader perspective and revealed the novel finding that ALT/AST has better predictive power than the ALT level.

This study had some limitations. First, we collected only serum aminotransferase levels without any radiological data. Whereas the detection of steatosis could have supported our study hypothesis, radiological data were not included in the analysis. Second, aminotransferase is a sensitive marker of liver dysfunction; however, its specificity is low because it can be elevated under other conditions. We intended to strengthen the specificity by estimating the ALT/AST ratio. Third, this was a cross-sectional study. Follow-up studies on clinical outcomes, such as the development of metabolic syndrome or type 2 DM, are needed to reinforce its prognostic significance. Further studies on the exact mechanisms and related gene expressions are required. Finally, owing to the retrospective, cross-sectional nature of the study, there were some limitations. For example, in diagnosing diabetes, it is accurate to measure fasting blood glucose once and then examine the two results. However, the KNHANES only includes a single-point fasting glucose level; therefore, DM was defined based on a single-point glucose level. As many confounding factors are implicated in the pathogenetic relationship with the liver, the evaluation of multi-pathogenetic interactions would take time.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that liver transaminases, especially the ALT/AST ratio, could be considered a biomarker of liver damage and a phenotype of metabolic syndrome. This study suggests a practical method to screen for IR in a large general population, including healthy individuals, regardless of sex and alcoholism.

Supporting information

S1 Fig

Distributions of ALT, AST, ALT/AST in Korean Men (A) and women.

(DOCX)

pone.0303333.s001.docx (96.8KB, docx)
S1 File

(ZIP)

pone.0303333.s002.zip (588.4KB, zip)

Data Availability

The KNHANES is publicly available at https://knhanes.kdca.go.kr/-knhanes/eng/index.do.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Pan Y, Jing J., Chen W., Zheng H., Jia Q., Mi D, et al. Post-glucose load measures of insulin resistance and prognosis of nondiabetic patients with ischemic stroke. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004990 , PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5523645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Howard G., Wagenknecht LE., Kernan WN., Cushman M., Thacker EL., Judd SE., et al. Racial differences in the association of insulin resistance with stroke risk: the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study. Stroke. 2014;45: 2257–2262. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005306 , PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4430474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bonora E., Kiechl S., Willeit J., Oberhollenzer F., Egger G., Meigs JB., et al. Insulin resistance as estimated by homeostasis model assessment predicts incident symptomatic cardiovascular disease in Caucasian subjects from the general population: the Bruneck study. Diabetes Care. 2007;30: 318–324. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0919 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dapito DH, Mencin A., Gwak GY., Pradere JP., Jang MK., Mederacke I., et al. Promotion of hepatocellular carcinoma by the intestinal microbiota and TLR4. Cancer Cell. 2012;21: 504–516. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Marchesini G., Brizi M., Bianchi G., Tomassetti S., Bugianesi E., Lenzi M., et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a feature of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes. 2001;50: 1844–1850. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.8.1844 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ekstedt M., Franzén LE., Mathiesen UL., Thorelius L., Holmqvist M., Bodemar G., et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with NAFLD and elevated liver enzymes. Hepatology. 2006;44: 865–873. doi: 10.1002/hep.21327 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shin HS., Jun BG., Yi SW. Impact of diabetes, obesity, and dyslipidemia on the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver diseases. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2022;28: 773–789. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2021.0383 , PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9597232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chobanian AV., Bakris GL., Black HR., Cushman WC., Green LA., Izzo JL Jr., et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42: 1206–1252. Epub 20031201. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lee YH., Jung KS., Kim SU., Yoon HJ., Yun YJ., Lee BW., et al. Sarcopaenia is associated with NAFLD independently of obesity and insulin resistance: nationwide surveys (KNHANES 2008–2011). J Hepatol. 2015;63: 486–493. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.02.051 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kang S., Moon MK., Kim W., Koo BK. Association between muscle strength and advanced fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a Korean nationwide survey. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020;11: 1232–1241. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12598 , PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7567158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lee JH., Lee HS., Lee BK., Kwon YJ., Lee JW. Relationship between muscle mass and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Biology (Basel). 2021;10. doi: 10.3390/biology10020122 , PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7915258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lean ME., Han TS., Morrison CE. Waist circumference as a measure for indicating need for weight management. BMJ. 1995;311: 158–161. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6998.158 , PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2550221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Heim N., Snijder MB., Heymans MW., Deeg DJ., Seidell JC., Visser M. Exploring cut-off values for large waist circumference in older adults: a new methodological approach. J Nutr Health Aging. 2010;14: 272–277. doi: 10.1007/s12603-010-0060-7 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Amundson DE., Djurkovic S., Matwiyoff GN. The obesity paradox. Crit Care Clin. 2010;26: 583–596. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2010.06.004 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Oliveros E., Somers VK., Sochor O., Goel K., Lopez-Jimenez F. The concept of normal weight obesity. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;56: 426–433. Epub 20131005. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2013.10.003 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kim BY., Kang SM., Kang JH., Kang SY., Kim KK., Kim KB., et al. 2020 Korean society for the study of obesity guidelines for the management of obesity in Korea. J Obes Metab Syndr 2021;30: 81–92. doi: 10.7570/jomes21022 , PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8277596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Matthews DR., Hosker JP., Rudenski AS., Naylor BA., Treacher DF., Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28: 412–419. doi: 10.1007/BF00280883 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Piton A., Poynard T., Imbert-Bismut F., Khalil L., Delattre J., Pelissier E., et al. Factors associated with serum alanine transaminase activity in healthy subjects: consequences for the definition of normal values, for selection of blood donors, and for patients with chronic hepatitis C. MULTIVIRC Group. Hepatology. 1998;27: 1213–1219. doi: 10.1002/hep.510270505 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Siest G., Schiele F., Galteau MM., Panek E., Steinmetz J., Fagnani F., et al. Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase activities in plasma: statistical distributions, individual variations, and reference values. Clin Chem. 1975;21: 1077–1087. [Epub 1975/07/01]. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/21.8.1077 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kim BK., Han KH., Ahn SH. "Normal" range of alanine aminotransferase levels for Asian population. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26: 219–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06603.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shim JJ., Kim JW., Oh CH., Lee YR., Lee JS., Park SY., et al. Serum alanine aminotransferase level and liver-related mortality in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A large national cohort study. Liver Int. 2018;38: 1751–1759. doi: 10.1111/liv.13705 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kim HC., Nam CM., Jee SH., Han KH., Oh DK., Suh I Normal serum aminotransferase concentration and risk of mortality from liver diseases: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2004;328: 983. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38050.593634.63 , PubMed Central PMCID: PMC404493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fu S., Lin Y., Luo L., Ye P. The relationship of serum alanine aminotransferase normal-range levels to arterial stiffness and metabolic syndrome in non-drinkers and drinkers: a Chinese community-based analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2017;17: 49. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0607-8 , PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5387349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kim HC., Choi KS., Jang YH., Shin HW., Kim DJ. Normal serum aminotransferase levels and the metabolic syndrome: Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. Yonsei Med J. 2006;47: 542–550. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2006.47.4.542 , PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2687736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yilmaz Y., Kurt R., Kalayci C. Apoptosis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis with normal aminotransferase values: zooming in on cytokeratin 18 fragments. Biomark Med. 2010;4: 743–745. doi: 10.2217/bmm.10.65 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mofrad P, Contos MJ, Haque M, Sargeant C, Fisher RA, Luketic VA, et al. Clinical and histologic spectrum of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease associated with normal ALT values. Hepatology. 2003;37(6):1286–92. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50229 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gomez-Samano MA, Cuevas-Ramos D, Mehta R, Brau-Figueroa H, Meza-Arana CE, Gulias-Herrero A. Association of Alanine Aminotransferase Levels (ALT) with the Hepatic Insulin Resistance Index (HIRI): a cross-sectional study. BMC Endocr Disord. 2012;12:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6823-12-16 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3515498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mofrad P., Contos MJ., Haque M., Sargeant C., Fisher RA., Luketic VA, et al. Clinical and histologic spectrum of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease associated with normal ALT values. Hepatology. 2003;37: 1286–1292. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50229 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sookoian S., Pirola CJ. Alanine and aspartate aminotransferase and glutamine-cycling pathway: their roles in pathogenesis of metabolic syndrome. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18: 3775–3781. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i29.3775 , PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3413046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cheng S., Rhee EP., Larson MG., Lewis GD., McCabe EL., Shen D., et al. Metabolite profiling identifies pathways associated with metabolic risk in humans. Circulation. 2012;125: 2222–2231. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.067827 , PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3376658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chang Y., Jeong SW., Jang JY. Recent updates on pharmacologic therapy in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2024;30: 129–133. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2023.0356 , PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10776293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sorbi D., Boynton J., Lindor KD. The ratio of aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase: potential value in differentiating nonalcoholic steatohepatitis from alcoholic liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94: 1018–1022. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01006.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kawamoto R., Kohara K., Kusunoki T., Tabara Y., Abe M., Miki T. Alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase ratio is the best surrogate marker for insulin resistance in non-obese Japanese adults. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012;11: 117. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-11-117 , PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3499385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Visaria A., Pai S., Cheung M., Ahlawat S. Association between aspartate aminotransferase-to-alanine aminotransferase ratio and insulin resistance among US adults. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;34: 316–323. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002215 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sheng X., Che H., Ji Q., Yang F., Lv J., Wang Y., et al. The relationship between liver enzymes and insulin resistance in Type 2 diabetes patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Horm Metab Res. 2018;50: 397–402. doi: 10.1055/a-0603-7899 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gayoso-Diz P., Otero-González A., Rodriguez-Alvarez MX., Gude F., García F., De Francisco A., et al. Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) cut-off values and the metabolic syndrome in a general adult population: effect of gender and age: EPIRCE cross-sectional study. BMC Endocr Disord. 2013;13: 47. doi: 10.1186/1472-6823-13-47 , PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4016563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Regitz-Zagrosek V., Lehmkuhl E., Weickert MO. Gender differences in the metabolic syndrome and their role for cardiovascular disease. Clin Res Cardiol. 2006;95: 136–147. doi: 10.1007/s00392-006-0351-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Geer EB., Shen W. Gender differences in insulin resistance, body composition, and energy balance. Gend Med. 2009;6;Suppl 1: 60–75. doi: 10.1016/j.genm.2009.02.002 , PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2908522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Aldhoon-Hainerová I., Zamrazilová H., Dušátková L., Sedláčková B., Hlavatý P., Hill M., et al. Glucose homeostasis and insulin resistance: prevalence, gender differences and predictors in adolescents. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2014;6: 100. doi: 10.1186/1758-5996-6-100 , PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4240882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gayoso-Diz P., Otero-Gonzalez A., Rodriguez-Alvarez MX., Gude F., Cadarso-Suarez C., García F., et al. Insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) levels in a general adult population: curves percentile by gender and age. The EPIRCE study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;94: 146–155. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.07.015 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ju DY., Choe YG., Cho YK., Shin DS., Yoo SH., Yim SH., et al. The influence of waist circumference on insulin resistance and nona lcoholic fatty liver disease in apparently healthy Korean adults. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2013;19: 140–147. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2013.19.2.140 , PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3701846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Giannarelli R., Aragona M., Coppelli A., Del Prato S. Reducing insulin resistance with metformin: the evidence today. Diabetes Metab. 2003;29: 6S28–6S35. doi: 10.1016/s1262-3636(03)72785-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Malin SK., Gerber R., Chipkin SR., Braun B. Independent and combined effects of exercise training and metformin on insulin sensitivity in individuals with prediabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012;35: 131–136. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0925 , PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3241331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Caldwell S. NASH Therapy: omega 3 supplementation, vitamin E, insulin sensitizers and statin drugs. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2017;23: 103–108. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2017.0103 , PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5497667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Minato-Inokawa S, Tsuboi-Kaji A, Honda M, Takeuchi M, Kitaoka K, Kurata M, et al. Associations of alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase with insulin resistance and β-cell function in women. Sci Rep. 2023;13: 7853. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35001-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Anna Di Sessa

22 Jan 2024

PONE-D-23-35138ALT/AST ratio: the useful predictive marker for insulin resistancePLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kim,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Before considering the paper for potential publication, authors are recommended to timely and carefully address all the reviewers' comments.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 07 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Anna Di Sessa, PhD, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

1. When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Did you know that depositing data in a repository is associated with up to a 25% citation advantage (https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230416)? If you’ve not already done so, consider depositing your raw data in a repository to ensure your work is read, appreciated and cited by the largest possible audience. You’ll also earn an Accessible Data icon on your published paper if you deposit your data in any participating repository (https://plos.org/open-science/open-data/#accessible-data).

3. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: The KNHANES is publicly available at https://knhanes.kdca.go.kr/-knhanes/eng/index.do.

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

4. Please amend your authorship list in your manuscript file to include author Dr. Myung Jae Seo.

5. Please amend either the abstract on the online submission form (via Edit Submission) or the abstract in the manuscript so that they are identical.

6. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information. 

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Partly

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: N/A

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Title: "ALT/AST ratio: the useful predictive marker for insulin resistance".

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Keywords : Keywords should include AST and ALT, ALT/AST

Abstract: Why are there 2 different abstracts?

Abstract- Background: In one of the abstracts (Alanine aninotransferase/Aspartate aminotransferase ratio for analysis.), the abbreviation ALT/AST was not written.

Abstract- Results: Only the findings should be included in the results section. Comments should be avoided. Findings should be presented clearly and statistically in the form of group comparisons.

1. Introduction:

a- Why is NAFLD described as dominant rather than insulin resistance and homo-IR? NAFLD relationship is not written in the conclusion section. If NAFLD is an primary issue, this should be stated in the study title.

b- Introduction and conclusion sections are unrelated.

c- alanine aminotransaminase protein (ALT). protein ??

2. Methods

a- 2.1.Dataset and Participants. The patient population should be clearly differentiated. This section should be summarized. If NAFLD is present, it should be stated whether USG scanning was performed or not.

b- Diabetes mellitus was defined as serum fasting glucose level ≥126 mg/dL; previous diagnosis; anti-glycemic drugs. Has this been confirmed 2 times ?

c- (high- and low-density lipoprotein (HDL and LDL) cholesterol.) HDL- kolesterol ? LDL-kolesterol ?

3.Results:

a- ALT-to-AST ratio. ALT/ALT. please make a standard abbreviation

b- Please write the long version of the abbreviations in table 1 in the description.

c- What are the criteria for T1-2-3 groups

d- What are the r and p values for the ALT/AST correlation with HOMA-IR? ?

4. Dissuscion: Findings should be discussed clearly.

Reviewer #2: 1-İn the Method/data set and participants

Last sentence ^^ Finally, we selected a population of 11,547 individuals (men: 5,001, women: 6,546) to determine the association between ALT/AST ratio and NAFLD.

However, to determine the association of ALT/AST ratio with NAFLD, there must be a definite indication of the presence of NAFLD in the participants, such as abdominal ultrasonography or liver biopsy, and the association must be analysed accordingly. Otherwise, such a result cannot be reported.

2-While the relationship with diabetes, dyslipidaemia and obesity is defined in Figure 1, was the relationship with the healthy control group analysed?

2-İn the Table 1: ALT/AST ratio analysed according to tertile groups; the definition of tertile groups should be better explained.

3-İn the Table 1: ALT/AST ratio analysed according to tertile groups; tertile groups should be better explained. 3-Table 2: ALT/AST ratio analysed by tertile groups; tertile groups need to be better explained. This situation prevents the evaluation of the relationship between ALT/AST ratio and insulin resistance independently of liver diseases.

4- There are many studies investigating the relationship between ALT/AST ratio and insulin resistance in obese, healthy individuals, NAFLD, etc. in the literature. At this point, I recommend hypothesising by carefully reading the literature in the selection of method material.

Reviewer #3: This work is important and well-structured and the results support the authors ‘conclusions. Statistical procedures seemed steady. Only, the following minor comments should be considered.

1. The type of study is better to be mentioned in the title.

2. Please clarify statistical analysis section in more detail. For example, method of controlling confounders in this study.

3. Authors need to add the strengths of this study before the paragraph explaining study limitations.

4. Please check the concordance of the tenses used throughout the text.

5. Please define all nonstandard abbreviations used in the text and abstract.

Reviewer #4: In this work the authors present a statistical study on predicting insulin resistance with the AST/ALT. However, the presented work is very similar with “Associations of alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase with insulin resistance and β-cell function in women”, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35001-1. Unless the authors can demonstrate that their work is significantly different from the published work, I do not recommend the paper to be published.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: renamed_221ba.docx

pone.0303333.s003.docx (13.6KB, docx)
PLoS One. 2024 May 17;19(5):e0303333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303333.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


7 Mar 2024

Professor Emily Chenette

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS ONE

Dear Professor Emily Chenette.

Manuscript Number: PONE-D-23-35138

Manuscript Title: Effectiveness of ALT/AST ratio for predicting insulin resistance in Korean population: Large-scale, cross sectional cohort study

On behalf of all the authors, I would like to express our sincere gratitude for giving your thorough consideration and scrutiny to the manuscript entitled “Effectiveness of ALT/AST ratio for predicting insulin resistance in Korean population: Large-scale, cross sectional cohort study”. As the reviewer pointed out, we revised the text and changed the title. The accurate and keen comments made by the Reviewers have allowed us to embrace the critical issues in this paper. We did our best to attain the scientific and literary standard required by the Reviewers and we have revised the manuscript according to the Reviewers’ suggestions. The revised manuscript is the result of our hard work and we sincerely hope that our revision will be considered positively during further review. We are aware of the importance of the scrutinizing efforts made by the Reviewers on the scientific and clinical merit of our manuscript. The changes in the revised manuscript have been highlighted (in red). Specific responses to Editor’s and Reviewers’ comments are included below.

Answers to comments of Reviewer #1:

1. Abstract: Why are there 2 different abstracts? Abstract- Background: In one of the abstracts (Alanine aminotransferase/Aspartate aminotransferase ratio for analysis.), the abbreviation ALT/AST was not written.

Author’s response: Thank you for your kind review. As your recommendation, the terminology for the ratio of liver values has been renamed ALT/AST to improve terminology consistency in the abstract.

Abstract)

Background: Insulin resistance (IR) is common pathophysiology in type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, thus, screening the risk for IR becomes important to prevent disease progression. We evaluated the alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST) ratio to predict IR in the general population, regardless of comorbidity.

2. Abstract- Results: Only the findings should be included in the results section. Comments should be avoided. Findings should be presented clearly and statistically in the form of group comparisons.

Author’s response: Thank you for your kind review. As you pointed out, we've concisely and clearly presented the ambiguity. In particular, we presented the statistical methods for each result and presented only objective findings.

Abstract)

Results: Based on the PCC, ALT in both men and women were positively correlated to four IR indices, including Glc, insulin, HOMA-IR, and HOMA-β, which were consistently observed in stratification analyses based on diabetes, dyslipidemia, alcohol consumption, and obesity. In multivariate linear regression, when comparing ALT levels, ALT/AST ratio exhibited better predictive performance for Glc and HOMA-β in Korean men and provided improved outcomes for all IR indices in Korean women.

3. Introduction: a. Why is NAFLD described as dominant rather than insulin resistance and homo-IR? NAFLD relationship is not written in the conclusion section. If NAFLD is an primary issue, this should be stated in the study title. b. Introduction and conclusion sections are unrelated.

Author’s response: We are not focusing on the presence or absence of fatty liver, but rather analyzing the ALT/AST ratio, which is one of the factors that reflects fatty liver. We've reviewed the introduction and conclusion sections again, and as you commented, we've come to recognize that there are elements that can cause confusion. We minimized the content on NAFLD and enhanced the content of the IR for its relevance to chronic disease (DM and CVD) and as a predictor of metabolic disorders (MetS and NAFLD) as follows.

1st paragraph in Introduction

Since the prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and Non-alcoholic liver disease (NAFLD) is increasing, it is important to early detect the presence of insulin resistance (IR) without specific symptom. IR is well known risk factor for critical cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes. In peoples without DM, IR represented by HOMA-IR was independent risk factor for stroke and coronary vascular disease.[1-3] Even in normal body weight peoples with insulin resistance, risk of incident DM and CVD events increased compared with a reference category.[4] NAFLD, DM and metabolic syndrome shares IR as the underlying pathophysiology [5-10]. Thus, detection of IR is helpful in predicting the risk or progression of metabolic syndrome.[11, 12] According to the previous reported study, estimated liver fat content significantly increased during follow up in IR, ordinary body weight people.[4] Likewise, NAFLD without DM patients was reported that they had reduced glucose disposal metabolism likely DM patients.[13]

4. Introduction: c. alanine aminotransaminase protein (ALT). protein ?

Author’s response: Sorry for the confusion. We deleted the “protein” term.

5. Dataset and Participants. The patient population should be clearly differentiated. This section should be summarized. If NAFLD is present, it should be stated whether USG scanning was performed or not.

Author’s response: We are sorry that the mistakes we made in writing our paper may have prevented researchers from understanding the hypotheses of this study. We did not study the association between IR and NAFLD, but rather the relationship between IR and liver levels, a key marker of fatty liver. The KNHANES we analyzed did not include radiologic data such as US or Computed tomography. As you pointed out, the mention of NAFLD in Dataset and Participants was revised into liver profiles.

1st paragraph in Dataset and Participants

This study analyzed the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) to confirm the association between liver profiles and IR.

6. Diabetes mellitus was defined as serum fasting glucose level ≥126 mg/dL; previous diagnosis; anti-glycemic drugs. Has this been confirmed 2 times?

Author’s response: Thank you for your professional comment. In diagnosing diabetes, if the suspect is asymptomatic, it is accurate to measure fasting blood glucose once and then look at the two results to make a diagnosis. However, KNHANES only includes a single-point fasting glucose level, and we categorized diabetics based on a single-point result. We addressed the aforementioned contents as a limitation in the discussion section.

8th paragraph in Discussion

Last, deu to the design of retrospective, cross-sectional study, minor weak points occurred. For example, in diagnosing diabetes, if the suspect is asymptomatic, it is accurate to measure fasting blood glucose once and then look at the two results to make a diagnosis. However, KNHANES only includes a single-point fasting glucose level, therefore DM was defined based on a single-point result.

7. (high- and low-density lipoprotein (HDL and LDL) cholesterol.) HDL- cholesterol? LDL-cholesterol?

Author’s response: To minimize the confusion, we modified it into “high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)”.

8. Results: ALT-to-AST ratio. ALT/ALT. please make a standard abbreviation.

Author’s response: We double-checked the paper in detail and corrected all "ALT to AST ratio" terms to "ALT/AST".

9. Please write the long version of the abbreviations in table 1 in the description.

Author’s response: We changed the title of Table 1 to a title using the long version of the abbreviation.

Table 1 in Manuscript

10. What are the criteria for T1-2-3 groups.

Author’s response: ALT/AST was sorted in ascending order, then divided subjects into tertile groups. We describe in detail in the table footnote how we categorized the tertiles in Table 1.

Table 1 in Manuscript

11. What are the r and p values for the ALT/AST correlation with HOMA-IR?

Author’s response: We apologize for the lack of detail and the difficulty in understanding. Our Figure 1 in the main text indicates the correlation of ALT/AST with HOMA-IR and its components. The “r” was calculated by Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and its matched p-value was illustrated with star mark. We added a more detailed explanation to the Figure 1 as shown below.

Legend of Figure 1

12. Discussion: Findings should be discussed clearly.

Author’s response: We appreciate the comment that can improve this study. Based on your comments, in the first paragraph of the Discussion section, we summarize the main findings of our study. In subsequent paragraphs, we interpret our findings in relation to those of other studies as follows.

1st paragraph in Discussion section

Using the Korean nationwide datasets, we demonstrated the relationships of ALT and ALT/AST ratio with four IR indices. The positive association between liver profile and IR was common in both Korean men and women population. Moreover, the link between hepatic steatosis indices and IR remained independently significant after adjusting for various clinical variables. Through stratification analyses in various settings, it was observed that overall, the ALT/AST ratio was more reflective of IR status than ALT.

4th paragraph in Discussion section

HOMA-IR means the presence of insulin resistance and is one of predictor for diabetes. However, to calculate HOMA-IR, additional sampling for blood and fasting time are required. Therefore, an effective approach is needed to for screening method. There are some studies that the ALT/AST ratio could be a tool for prediction insulin resistance [38]. Kawamoto R, etc. also reported the ALT/AST ratio was the best surrogate marker for insulin resistance compared to other marker such as TG, GGT, ALT or AST alone [39]. This was also supported by the other studies [40]. Recently, the relationship between ALT/AST ratio and diabetes, pre-diabetes stage was also reported in china [41]. This study is the first report to include more than 10,000 subjects in Korea. Moreover, the predictive power was better in middle-aged women and people who with alcohol consumption (Fig 4). Based this results, in the group corresponding to T2 or T3, the prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and HOMA-IR significantly were increased. It means the management for metabolic syndrome is required in T2, T3 group.

Answers to comments of Reviewer #2:

1. 1-İn the Method/data set and participants. Finally, we selected a population of 11,547 individuals (men: 5,001, women: 6,546) to determine the association between ALT/AST ratio and NAFLD. However, to determine the association of ALT/AST ratio with NAFLD, there must be a definite indication of the presence of NAFLD in the participants, such as abdominal ultrasonography or liver biopsy, and the association must be analysed accordingly. Otherwise, such a result cannot be reported.

Author’s response: We appreciate the Reviewer’s constructive comments. There was a mistake for finishing and trimming the last sentence. We focus the insulin resistance for general population, not for NAFLD. We correct the wrong sentence as follows.

2nd paragraph in Dataset and Participants

Finally, we selected a population of 11,547 subjects (men: 5,001, women: 6,546) to identify the association between the ALT/AST ratio and IR.

2. While the relationship with diabetes, dyslipidaemia and obesity is defined in Figure 1, was the relationship with the healthy control group analysed?

Author’s response: We apologize for the difficulty in understanding the lack of detail. The Figure 1 does not indicate the relationship between IR and the binomial distribution of disease status, but the association between each liver profile and IR. Moreover, the associational analysis was iterated using different combinations of subjects. We added the detailed figure legend as follows.

Figure 1.

3. İn the Table 1: ALT/AST ratio analysed according to tertile groups; the definition of tertile groups should be better explained. Table 1: ALT/AST ratio analysed by tertile groups; tertile groups need to be better explained. This situation prevents the evaluation of the relationship between ALT/AST ratio and insulin resistance independently of liver diseases.

Author’s response: Thank you for the helpful comments that improve this paper. Per your comment, we've added more detailed footnote to Table 1.

Table 1 in Manuscript

4. There are many studies investigating the relationship between ALT/AST ratio and insulin resistance in obese, healthy individuals, NAFLD, etc. in the literature. At this point, I recommend hypothesising by carefully reading the literature in the selection of method material.

Author’s response: Thank you for kindly recommendation about this report. The results of studies from individual laboratory or specific local populations may be somewhat biased and not generalizable. To overcome these limitations, it is necessary to validate similar theories in different populations. To highlight the strength and novelty of our study, we revised this manuscript title as “Effectiveness of ALT/AST ratio for predicting insulin resistance in Korean population: Large-scale, cross sectional cohort study”, considering your comments. There are similar results for ALT/AST ratio as metabolic markers. We included the large number of patients, and this would be the first published paper in Korean people.  

Answers to comments of Reviewer #3:

1. The type of study is better to be mentioned in the title.

Author’s response: I appreciate your kind comment. We revised the title of manuscript according your comment. We modified this manuscript title as “Effectiveness of ALT/AST ratio for predicting insulin resistance in Korean population: Large-scale, cross sectional cohort study”, considering your comments.

2. Please clarify statistical analysis section in more detail. For example, method of controlling confounders in this study.

Author’s response: Based on your comment, we have added a detailed description of multivariate analysis to the statistics section of the main text as follows.

1st paragraph in Statistics

A univariate (Model 1) or multivariate linear (Model 2 – 4) regression (LiR) models were implemented to identify the association between liver profiles (i.e., ALT, AST, and ALT/AST ratio) and index for IR (i.e., Glc, insulin, HOMA-IR, HOMA-β). In detail, we set the liver profiles and each index for IR as dependent and independent variables, respectively. Then, three different multivariate models (Model 2 – 4) were utilized to identify the independent relationship between liver profiles and IR indices according to four combinations of confounders, such as model 2 (age), model 3 (age, DM, dyslipidemia, and alcohol consumption), model 4 (age, DM, dyslipidemia, alcohol, BMI, and WC).

3. Authors need to add the strengths of this study before the paragraph explaining study limitations.

Author’s response: Thank you for your thoughtful comment. We add the strengths of our study in the discussion section.

7th paragraph in Discussion

Our study had several strengths. First, this study includes the large population number in Korea. A recent study validated the association between ALT/AST and IR in a Japanese female population of approximately 460 people. However, our study demonstrated an association between liver levels and IR in more than 10,000 Korean men and women, which may be more generalizable [51]. Second, various analyses, including stratification analysis and predictive value, confirmed the independent relationship between ALT/AST and IR. While the prior research is similar to ours in comparing the relevance of various IR indices to ALT/AST [51], our series of analysis allows us to explore this relationship from a broader perspective and reveals a novel finding that ALT/AST has better predictive power than ALT.

4. Please check the concordance of the tenses used throughout the text.

Author’s response: We double-checked the manuscript to ensure consistency in the tenses.

5. Please define all nonstandard abbreviations used in the text and abstract.

Author’s response: We've made improvemen

Attachment

Submitted filename: Answer_to_Reviewer_comment-20240304.docx

pone.0303333.s004.docx (361.5KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Anna Di Sessa

11 Mar 2024

PONE-D-23-35138R1Effectiveness of ALT/AST ratio for predicting insulin resistance in Korean population: Large-scale, cross-sectional cohort studyPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kim,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 25 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.Prior to publication, there are some minor issues that need to be addressed, as specified below.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Anna Di Sessa, PhD, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Authors have well-addressed the previous issues raised by reviewers. However, prior to be considered for publication, there are still some minor concerns:

- introduction: this section contains some repeated sentences (e.g.lines 68, 69,73). Overall, it needs to be rephrased to improve clarity.

- secondly instead of second (line 319)

- lastly instead of last (line 332)

- discussion: line 332-335, this sentence should be rephrased in a clearer manner using a scientific language. More, potential prognostic implications should be added.

- conclusion: our findings suggest ... instead of we suggest; a practical message for clinicians should be added.

- English language should be polished throughout the manuscript.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 May 17;19(5):e0303333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303333.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


8 Apr 2024

We would like to thank your kind consideration about our manuscript. We used to many words to convey our idea. So we changed the repeated sentences and words according to your recommendation, and we also received the English correction service.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Answer_to_Reviewer_comment-20240304.docx

pone.0303333.s005.docx (361.5KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Anna Di Sessa

24 Apr 2024

Effectiveness of the ALT/AST ratio for predicting insulin resistance in a Korean population: A large-scale, cross-sectional cohort study

PONE-D-23-35138R2

Dear Dr. Kim,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Anna Di Sessa, PhD, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Anna Di Sessa

7 May 2024

PONE-D-23-35138R2

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kim,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Anna Di Sessa

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig

    Distributions of ALT, AST, ALT/AST in Korean Men (A) and women.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0303333.s001.docx (96.8KB, docx)
    S1 File

    (ZIP)

    pone.0303333.s002.zip (588.4KB, zip)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: renamed_221ba.docx

    pone.0303333.s003.docx (13.6KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Answer_to_Reviewer_comment-20240304.docx

    pone.0303333.s004.docx (361.5KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Answer_to_Reviewer_comment-20240304.docx

    pone.0303333.s005.docx (361.5KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    The KNHANES is publicly available at https://knhanes.kdca.go.kr/-knhanes/eng/index.do.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES