Skip to main content
Thieme Open Access logoLink to Thieme Open Access
. 2024 May 17;56(Suppl 1):E402–E403. doi: 10.1055/a-2299-2189

Endoscopic hand suturing with clips for a large defect after endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Zhenkun Wu 1, Yong Liu 1, Shibo Song 1, Wenyu Li 1, Hoiloi Ng 1, Shun He 1, Guiqi Wang 1,
PMCID: PMC11101271  PMID: 38759962

Few studies have focused on endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (g-GISTs) ≥35 mm 1 , which could be attributed to the difficulty of endoscopic resection and closure of the defect, although multiple closure techniques have been developed for post-EFTR defects 2 3 4 . Recently, endoscopic hand-suturing (EHS) has been proved safe and effective for gastrointestinal superficial defects 5 , and can be expected to be similarly efficacious for closing large defects after EFTR. Here, we describe a successful case of full-thickness closure using EHS with clips (EHS-Clips) for a large g-GIST defect.

A 72-year-old man who underwent gastroscopy was diagnosed with a submucosal tumor approximately 4.0 × 3.5 cm in size at the fundus ( Fig. 1 ). Endoscopic ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced computerized tomography suggested a g-GIST ( Fig. 2 ). After comprehensive multidisciplinary discussions and thorough communication with the patient, the lesion was removed en bloc through EFTR, leaving a large full-thickness defect ( Fig. 3 ). The defect was completely sutured via EHS, and this was followed by the application of clips for additional mucosal closure, to enhance the reliability of closure and ensure patient safety ( Fig. 4 , Fig. 5 , Video 1 ). The abdominal gas accumulation was released through abdominal puncture. The resection time and suture time were 33 minutes and 60 minutes respectively. On postoperative day 5, a follow-up endoscopy confirmed continued closure, allowing discharge of the patient. No adverse events occurred during or after the operation. Histologically, complete resection of a very low risk g-GIST had been obtained.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Gastroscopy in a 72-year-old man showed a gastric submucosal tumor at the fundus, approximately 4.0 × 3.5 cm in size.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Contrast-enhanced computerized tomography suggested a gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (g-GIST) (yellow arrow).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Defect after endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) of a g-GIST at the fundus. The yellow dash-dotted lines outline the defect; the white dotted lines indicate the diaphragm.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

The defect after closure by endoscopic hand-suturing (EHS). Dotted line and arrow, suture direction; arrow, resected tumor.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Additional clips, applied for reliable closure and patient safety.

Download video file (116.5MB, mp4)

Complete closure of a large defect after endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) of a gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (g-GIST), using endoscopic hand-suturing followed by clipping (EHS-Clips) for additional mucosal closure, to enhance reliability of closure and ensure patient safety.

Video 1

To our knowledge, this EHS-Clips case is the first such report of complete closure of a large full-thickness defect. Notably, the suturing process should ensure the protection of adjacent organs and tissues from injury. Therefore, the EHS-Clips approach can be considered as an optional closure method for full-thickness defect after EFTR in selected patients. Further accumulation of clinical experience is needed.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AO_2AZ

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Endoscopy E-Videos https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos .

E-Videos is an open access online section of the journal Endoscopy , reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high-quality video and are published with a Creative Commons CC-BY license. Endoscopy E-Videos qualify for HINARI discounts and waivers and eligibility is automatically checked during the submission process. We grant 100% waivers to articles whose corresponding authors are based in Group A countries and 50% waivers to those who are based in Group B countries as classified by Research4Life (see: https://www.research4life.org/access/eligibility/ ). This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos .

References

  • 1.Deprez PH, Moons LMG, OʼToole D et al. Endoscopic management of subepithelial lesions including neuroendocrine neoplasms: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2022;54:412–429. doi: 10.1055/a-1751-5742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tada N, Kobara H, Nishiyama N et al. Current status of endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric subepithelial tumors: a literature review over two decades. Digestion. 2023;104:415–429. doi: 10.1159/000530679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sun H, Cao T, Zhang F et al. Gastric defect closure after endoscopic full-thickness resection: the closing while dissecting technique. Surg Endosc. 2023;37:234–240. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09457-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cai Q, Fu H, Zhang L et al. Twin-grasper assisted mucosal inverted closure achieves complete healing of large perforations after gastric endoscopic full-thickness resection. Dig Endosc. 2023;35:736–744. doi: 10.1111/den.14507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Song S, Dou L, Liu Y et al. A strategy combining endoscopic hand-suturing with clips for closure of rectal defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection with or without myectomy (with video) Gastrointest Endosc. 2024;99:614–624.e2.3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Endoscopy are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES