Abstract
Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) recognizes bacterial, viral and self DNA and play an important role in immunity and inflammation. However, the role of TLR9 in obesity is less well-studied. Here, we generate B-cell-specific Tlr9-deficient (Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre+/-, KO) B6 mice and model obesity using a high-fat diet. Compared with control mice, B-cell-specific-Tlr9-deficient mice exhibited increased fat tissue inflammation, weight gain, and impaired glucose and insulin tolerance. Furthermore, the frequencies of IL-10-producing-B cells and marginal zone B cells were reduced, and those of follicular and germinal center B cells were increased. This was associated with increased frequencies of IFNγ-producing-T cells and increased follicular helper cells. In addition, gut microbiota from the KO mice induced a pro-inflammatory state leading to immunological and metabolic dysregulation when transferred to germ-free mice. Using 16 S rRNA gene sequencing, we identify altered gut microbial communities including reduced Lachnospiraceae, which may play a role in altered metabolism in KO mice. We identify an important network involving Tlr9, Irf4 and Il-10 interconnecting metabolic homeostasis, with the function of B and T cells, and gut microbiota in obesity.
Subject terms: Toll-like receptors, Adaptive immunity
Although the function of Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) in immunity and inflammation is well-established, its role in obesity is less well-studied. In this study, the authors demonstrate that TLR9 deficiency in B cells is associated with obesity in mice and results in altered frequencies of T and B lymphocyte subsets and gut microbiome dysbiosis.
Introduction
Obesity has become a major public health burden. There are currently over 1.9 billion people, worldwide who are overweight or obese, leading to a sharp rise in related health complications1, including cardiovascular disease, liver disease and cancer2,3. Obesity leads to chronic inflammation that involves both innate and adaptive immunity4–10.
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that play a central role in the development and function of the immune system11. Innate immune cells including B cells express various PRRs that recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) derived from various microbes and induce inflammatory immune responses12,13. TLR9 recognizes unmethylated CpG DNA from bacteria and initiates type I interferon (IFN) responses by immune cells14. TLR9 is expressed on a large range of immune cells, including B cells15–17, T cells18,19, macrophages19,20, dendritic cells17,21 and NK cells22,23 but is particularly highly expressed in B cells and dendritic cells. TLR9 may play an important role in development of type 2 diabetes (T2D), as the expression of TLR9 is associated with immune cell infiltration in adipose tissue24. These include positive associations between TLR9 and memory B cells, and negative associations between TLR9 and naïve B cells25. TLR9 ligands are important for B cell activation and antibody responses to microbial antigens, vaccination, and metabolic diseases26–30. C57BL/6 mice with total body knockout of TLR9 exhibited higher body weight and fat content on a high-fat diet and the underlying mechanism may be associated with a significant increase in M1 macrophages and Th1 cells31.
TLR9 signaling can modulate the composition and function of gut microbiota32–34. B cells also shape the composition of gut microbiota directly through production of antimicrobial peptides and other factors that help to control the growth of specific bacterial species in the gut35,36. Recent studies suggest that TLR9 plays an important role in obesity, which is related to tissue inflammation and insulin resistance37,38. Crosstalk between B cells and gut microbiota governs immunity and metabolism in the gut, which could lead to metabolic syndrome including obesity and insulin resistance39,40. However, the role that TLR9 plays in B cells in the context of obesity, and how TLR9 in B cells affects adaptive immunity and gut microbiota in obesity is unclear. Using total body Tlr9 knock-out mice in our previous study, we observed that TLR9 plays a role in glucose tolerance regardless of the genetic background41. Furthermore, in the NOD mouse model of type 1 diabetes, Tlr9 deficiency in B cells promoted immune tolerance through IL-1042. Here, to investigate the intrinsic role of B cell-TLR9 in obesity, we generate C57BL/6 (B6) mice with B cell-specific deficiency of Tlr9 (Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre+/- B6) and use a high fat diet-induced obesity (HFDIO) model system to study the effect of B cell-specific deficiency of Tlr9 on local and systemic immunity and the effect on gut microbiota. Our study also provides insight into the impact of TLR9 in B cells on obesity, associated with immunological, metabolic, and gut microbiological abnormalities.
Results
B cell-specific Tlr9 deficiency leads to obesity
To investigate the role of B cell-TLR9 in obesity, we generated B cell-specific Tlr9-deficient C57BL/6 mice (Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre+/-B6), and studied both Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre+/- B6 mice (designated as KO group) and Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre-/- B6 littermate controls (designated as Ctr group). It is noteworthy that Cd19Cre is a knockin mutant, and homozygous Cd19Cre (Cd19Cre+/+) mice have impaired B cell development; however, B cell development in Cd19Cre heterozygous (Cd19Cre+/-) mice was comparable to Tlr9fl/fl mice, wild type for Cd19Cre (Fig. S1). We further confirmed the phenotype of heterozygotes on both normal and high fat diets. To verify if Cd19Cre+/- B6 control mice express the same phenotype as the Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre-/- B6 control mice, we fed three groups of mice - Tlr9fl/fl B6 (Ctrflox), Cd19Cre+/- B6 (CtrCre), and Tlr9fl/fl Cd19Cre+/- B6 (KO) with a high-fat diet for 6 weeks (Fig. S2). We observed no significant difference in body weight between the two control groups, Ctrflox and CtrCre, while the KO group had significantly higher body weight compared to mice in Ctrflox and CtrCre (Fig. S2A). Additionally, we found no significant differences in intraperitoneal glucose tolerance tests (IPGTT) between the two control groups. Thus, Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre+/- B6 (KO) mice and Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre-/- B6 (Ctrflox) control mice were used in the following experiments. We investigated male mice which were fed with a high fat diet at 6-weeks of age for 12 weeks (Fig. 1A), monitoring body weight weekly and observed that the KO group gained significantly more weight than their control counterparts (Fig. 1B, C). The KO group also had higher epidydimal fat-pad and liver weights (Fig. 1D, E), and there was more fat accumulation in the liver (Fig. 1F, G). However, food intake was not significantly different between the two groups (Fig. 1H). Next, we measured the fasting glucose and insulin levels and performed glucose and insulin tolerance tests in the two groups of mice. We observed a higher fasting glucose level (Fig. 1I) in the KO group, and the KO group had impaired glucose tolerance (Fig. 1J), measured as a higher area under the curve (AUC) of the IPGTT, compared with the Ctr mice (Fig. 1K). The KO group also had higher fasting serum insulin (Fig. 1L), and reduced insulin sensitivity as shown by higher glucose levels in response to insulin injection (Fig. 1M), as well as higher AUC in the ITT (Fig. 1N). These data suggested that TLR9 in B cells plays a protective role in obesity development, as B cells without TLR9 accelerated obesity and related metabolic abnormalities.
Tlr9 deficiency in B cells alters the phenotype of different immune cells
To investigate the intrinsic role of Tlr9 in B cell development and differentiation, we evaluated B cells and other types of immune cells in central and peripheral lymphoid tissues. In the bone marrow (BM), we found elevated pro/pre-B cells (CD24+, CD43-, IgD-, IgM-), early mature B cells (CD24+CD43-IgD+IgM+) and late mature B cells (CD24+CD43-IgD+IgM-), but reduced immature B cells (CD24+CD43-IgD-IgM+) in the KO group (Fig. 2A and Fig. S3A). The peripheral B cell subsets were also altered, as shown by a significant decrease in CD1d+CD5+ B cells, which are known to contain IL-10-producing B regulatory cells43,44, in spleen (SPL), mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) and Peyer’s patches (PP), from KO group compared with Ctr group (Fig. 2B and Fig. S3B). Next, we assessed IL-10-producing B cells in different lymphoid tissues and found that they were significantly decreased in the PP of KO group when compared with the Ctr group (Fig. 2C and Fig. S3C). Phenotypic analysis also revealed a significant decrease in marginal zone (MZ) B cells (CD21+CD23-) in SPL of the KO group compared with the Ctr group (Fig. 2D and Fig. S3D); whereas follicular (FO) B cells (CD21midCD23+) were also significantly increased in SPL of the KO group compared with the Ctr group (Fig. 2E) but the total number of splenic FO B cells was decreased (Fig. S3E). In addition, increased germinal center (GC) B cells (IgDlowGL7+CD95+) were found in SPL, MLNs, and PPs (Fig. 2F and Fig. S3F). Taken together, our data suggest that Tlr9 deficiency in B cells modulated the differentiation of BM B cells and altered the proportion and the cell number of different B cell subsets in the peripheral lymphoid tissues.
In addition to the impact on B cells, we discovered that Tlr9-deficient B cells also affected T cells. The proportion and total T cell number (TCRβ+) were increased in most, if not all, the lymphoid tissues examined in KO group compared with the Ctr group (Fig. 2G and Fig. S3G). CD4+ T cells were significantly increased in the lymphoid tissue examined in KO group compared with the Ctrl group (Fig. 2H and Fig. S3H), whereas the proportion of CD8+ T cells was significantly decreased (Fig. 2I), but the total number of the CD8+ T cells was increased in the KO group compared with the Ctrl group (Fig. S3I). Furthermore, there were more CD4+ and CD8+ memory T cells (CD44+CD62L-) in the KO group (Fig. 2J, K and Fig. S3J, K). Interestingly, phenotypic analysis revealed a significant increase in T follicular helper (TFH) cells (CXCR5+PD-1+CD4+) and T peripheral helper (TPH) cells (CXCR5- PD-1+CD4+) in the KO group compared with the Ctr group (Fig. 2L, M and Fig. S3L, M), both of which are closely related to B cell differentiation and function45–47. There was a similar pattern in various subsets of immune cells, especially the B cell phenotype, in normal food-fed KO mice compared to the Ctr group (Fig. S4 and Fig. S5). Our results demonstrated that Tlr9 deficiency in B cells not only affected the differentiation of B cells but also affected T cells, which may in turn influence B cells.
Tlr9 deficiency in B cells alters both B and T cell responses and functions
To determine the effect of TLR9 on B and T cell function, we stimulated splenocytes from KO and Ctr mice with either anti-IgM together with anti-CD40 (B cell stimulation), or anti-CD3 together with anti-CD28 (T cell stimulation). We found that B cells deficient in Tlr9 showed impaired proliferative responses to B cell receptor and costimulatory molecule stimulation (Fig. 3A). Interestingly, the proliferative T cell response to TCR and costimulatory molecule stimulation was significantly enhanced in the KO group compared to their control counterparts (Fig. 3B). Next, we assessed the proliferative responses of splenocytes to different innate immune stimuli, including Pam3Csk4, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and CpG (TLR2, TLR4, and TLR9 agonists, respectively). B cells express high levels of TLRs, and we found that the splenocytes from the KO mice showed impaired responses to the innate immune stimuli, LPS and CpG, but normal responses to the TLR2 agonist Pam3Csk4 (Fig. 3C–E). Assessing concomitant changes in cytokine secretion, we observed significantly lower IL-10 in the culture supernatants following anti-IgM and anti-CD40 stimulation of B cells from KO mice compared with Ctr mice (Fig. 3F). However, in line with higher proliferative responses to T cell stimulation, the culture supernatants from KO mice had significantly higher levels of IFN-γ and IL-17a (Fig. 3G, H) in response to T cell stimulation, suggesting that the enhanced function of T cells may contribute to a pro-inflammatory environment.
To verify the specific function of B cells, we purified splenic B cells from KO and Ctr mice and stimulated the B cells using the same agonists. Supporting the results using total splenocytes, we found impaired B cell responses to both adaptive (anti-IgM and anti-CD40) and innate immune (CpG and Pam3Csk4) stimuli using purified B cells from KO mice (Fig. 3I–K). However, the B cell response to LPS was the opposite to the response using total splenocytes (Fig. 3C), where we observed stronger responses by B cells from KO mice (Fig. 3L). Collectively, these studies outline a critical role of TLR9 in B cells, which affect B cell function (reduced proliferation, and altered cytokine production) accompanied by enhanced T cell function toward an inflammatory milieu.
Tlr9 deficiency in B cells results in increased inflammatory T cells in lymphoid tissues and white adipose tissues (WAT)
As our data in the mice on normal diet suggested that B cells, in the absence of Tlr9, promoted inflammatory T cells after T cell stimulation, we next investigated the cytokine profiles of the immune cells from different lymphoid tissues of the HFD-fed mice. We found that the IFN-γ-producing CD4+ T cells, IL-17a-producing CD4+ T cells and IFN-γ-producing CD8+ T cells were higher in MLNs and PPs from KO mice, compared with the Ctr mice (Fig. 4A–C and Fig.S6A–C). The pro-inflammatory cytokine-producing T cells were more striking in PPs, suggesting an inflammatory environment in the intestine.
We then assessed the immune cells from WAT tissue. Supporting our data presented earlier, all the immune cells examined in the WAT from KO mice had a significantly higher proportion and number of IFN-γ-producing CD4+ T-cells, B cells and macrophages, compared to the controls (Fig. 4D–F, Fig. S6D–F). A higher percentage of the macrophages from WAT of KO mice also produced TNF-α (Fig. 4G and Fig. S6G). To further verify that the increased obesity found in KO mice after HFD diet was associated with inflammation in adipocytes, we examined inflammatory markers in the adipose tissue, liver and muscle by qPCR. We tested various inflammatory markers, and among them found significant increases in Tnf-α, inflammatory chemokines Ccl2, Ccl5, and Slamf7 in the adipose tissue from KO mice compared to the adipose tissue from the Ctr mice (Fig. 4H–K). However, no significant differences in the inflammatory markers were found in liver and muscle from the two groups.
Tlr9 deficiency in B cells alters the mucosal immunoglobulin levels and gut microbiota communities
One of the major functions of B cells is to produce immunoglobulins (Ig), which specifically recognize and bind to antigens from pathogens, microbial molecules and sometimes host self-antigens. Immunoglobulins, especially IgA, play an important role in maintaining a healthy balance between the host and the gut commensal bacteria48,49. To investigate whether B cell-specific deletion of Tlr9 altered intestinal antibodies, we measured immunoglobulins in small and large intestinal gut flush. We found that the levels of IgM in small intestine were significantly decreased in the KO group compared to the Ctr group (Fig. 5A), whereas IgM in the large intestine was significantly increased (Fig. 5B). Similarly, IgG in small intestine of the KO group was also significantly reduced compared to the Ctr group (Fig. 5C). Unlike the large intestinal IgM, IgG levels in the large intestine were comparable between the two groups of mice (Fig. 5D). IgA, the major antibody in mucosal sites, was significantly increased in the small intestine but there were no differences in large intestine (Fig. 5E, F). Our flow cytometry results from PP indicated that both GC B cells and TFH cells were increased in KO mice compared to controls, which likely contributed to the increase in IgA. Next, we assessed Ig levels in the serum samples of the same mice. IgM in serum was also higher in the KO group compared to the Ctr group (Fig. 5G), whereas no differences were found in serum IgG and IgA (Fig. 5H, I). Thus, the IgM response was systemic whereas IgG and IgA responses were compartmentalized in the intestine.
As mucosal antibodies play an important role in the homeostasis of gut microbiota, we asked whether Tlr9 deficiency in B cells would alter the composition of gut microbiota. We isolated bacterial DNA and performed 16 S rRNA sequencing of fecal samples from KO and Ctr mice before and after high fat diet. Although we did not find significant differences in alpha diversity and richness between the two groups of mice (Fig. 5J, K), the structure of gut microbiota in the KO mice was significantly different from the control mice as seen in the principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot of Bray-Curtis distance [P < 0.001 with permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) test] in both normal and high-fat diet conditions (Fig. 5L). The ratio of the relative abundance of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes (F/B) has been reported to be significantly associated with obesity50,51. The F/B ratio in the gut microbiota of the KO mice was lower than that of Ctr mice under normal diet conditions as there were more Bacteroidetes in KO mice (Fig. 5M). However, the F/B ratio was significantly increased after high-fat diet (Fig. 5N). This may suggest that the gut microbiota of the KO mice are more susceptible to environmental stress, such as a high-fat diet. To identify the key members of the gut microbiota that may contribute to the metabolic phenotype in the KO mice, we used co-abundance analysis to identify potentially functional bacterial groups. The microbiota structure of the mice on normal diet (ND) and high-fat diet (HFD) was analyzed separately to prevent any possible influence of Simpson’s paradox. The microbial co-abundance network was built to visualize the possible interactions among the 125 Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) that shared at least 20% of the samples. The ASVs were further clustered into 32 co-abundant groups (CAGs) by the SparCC method and PERMANOVA analysis52. From the spatial topological map, we observed a highly significant negative correlation (purple lines) between CAG18 and CAG6 within the ecological community of the mouse gut microbiota with high-fat diet (Fig. 5O). However, this negative correlation was not observed under normal diet conditions (Fig. S7A). The CAGs with significant differences between the two groups on HFD were highlighted in orange (10/22, 45.45%; Fig. 5P). Whereas there were fewer number of CAGs that were significantly different between the two groups in the normal diet (9/28, 32%; Fig. S7B). Further, analysis revealed that there were 10 ASVs in each CAG6 and CAG18. Among the 10 ASVs in CAG18, 8 belonged to Lachnospiraceae. Interestingly, we found that CAG18 was significantly decreased in the KO group (Fig. 5Q), whereas CAG6, exhibiting a significant negative correlation with CAG18, was significantly enriched in the KO group (Fig. 5R). The decrease in strains comprising CAG18 or the increase in strains comprising CAG6 were likely to be the bacterial communities contributing to the metabolic phenotype seen in the KO mice. In the CAGs analysis, the complete matrix for HFD is available in Supplement Data 1, and the complete matrix for ND is available in Supplement data 2. Taken together, our data provide important insights into Tlr9 deficiency in B cells in the context of altered gut microbiota in obesity. Thus, we have shown that lack of TLR9 in B cells not only affected systemic B and T cell phenotypes and function but there were also altered gut mucosal antibody profiles and gut microbiota composition, which are closely associated with obesity.
Altered gut microbiota from Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre+/- mice can transfer immunological and metabolic phenotypes to germ-free (GF) mice
To verify whether the altered gut microbiota contributed to the increased body weight, impaired metabolic function, and heightened inflammation seen in the KO mice, we performed fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) experiments (Fig. 6A). The respective pooled stool samples from KO and Ctr mice (18–22-week-old, 12–16 weeks post HFD) were used to colonize GF wild type B6 mice (https://www.jax.org/strain/000664, rederived to GF by Dr. Flavell, Yale) by oral gavage (at 4 weeks of age). Colonized ex-GF mice were maintained on standard diet and their IPGTT was assessed on day 10 after FMT. We found that the gut microbiota from KO donors induced impaired glucose tolerance in the recipient mice (Fig. 6B). The AUC of the IPGTT was also greater in KO group (Fig. 6C). Moreover, the gut microbiota from KO donors modulated B and T cells in the recipient mice (Fig. 6D–K and Fig. S8A–H). The proportion and the number of Breg (CD5+CD1d+ B cells) were decreased in MLNs (Fig. 6D and Fig. S8A). Interestingly, the GC B cells (IgDlowCD95+GL7+ B cells) were also markedly decreased in PPs (Fig. 6E and Fig. S8B). We found an increase in total T cells (Fig. 6F and Fig. S8C). The proportion and number of both TFH (CXCR5+PD-1+CD4+) cells and TPH (CXCR5-PD-1+CD4+) cells were significantly higher in mucosa-associated MLNs and PPs but not in SPL (Fig. 6G, H and Fig. S8D, E). IL-10-producing B cells were significantly decreased in the PPs of the GF mice that received fecal microbiota from KO donor mice compared to the Ctr donor mice (Fig. 6I and Fig. S8F). In line with the phenotype of KO donor mice (Fig. 4A, B), the IFN-γ and IL-17a-producing CD4+ T cells were significantly increased in the PPs of ex-GF recipient mice (Fig. 6J, K and Fig. S8G, H). To assess whether changes observed from the short-term FMT transfer approach would remain beyond 14 days, we repeated the experiment with a longer observation period of 5 weeks after FMT (Fig. 6L). Supporting the results from the short-term FMT experiments, the body weights of ex-GF mice that received FMT from KO donor mice were significantly higher than the control counterparts (Fig. 6M, N). Also, in line with the results from the short-term FMT experiment, the gut microbiota from KO donors induced impaired glucose tolerance 4 weeks after FMT in the ex-GF mice (Fig. 6O), and significant higher AUC values (Fig. 6P). Unlike the results from the short-term FMT experiment, the phenotypes of B and T cells in the lymphoid tissues examined were comparable between the 2 groups (data not shown). To verify the direct effect of different gut microbiota from KO group and Ctr group on the immune cells, we performed in vitro co-culture experiments. We cocultured spleen cells from wild type B6 mice with stool bacteria from the KO and Ctr mice overnight and assessed the phenotypes of T cells. Similar to the T cell phenotypes found in the KO mice ex vivo (Fig. 2G–M), the splenic T cells from wild type B6 mice showed a significant increase, in vitro, in the proportion of T cells (Fig. 6Q), TFH cells (Fig. 6R) and TPH cells (Fig. 6S), when stimulated with the gut microbiota from KO mice, compared with the gut microbiota from Ctr mice. Moreover, the gut microbiota from KO mice promoted immune cells producing more IFN-γ (Fig. 6T) but reduced IL-10 production (Fig. 6U).
Our data suggest that not only can the gut microbiota from the Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre+/- B6 mice transfer glucose metabolic dysfunction to the GF mice, in a period as short as 10 days or as long as 4 weeks after FMT, but this transfer also had both indirect and direct effect on the immune cells.
Tlr9 Deficiency in B cells leads to metabolic disturbances in immune cells and the gut microbiome
As we had shown that Tlr9 deficiency in B cells altered host metabolism and immune cells, to further identify the role of immune cells in host metabolism, we adoptively transferred splenic lymphocytes from KO and Ctr donor mice to 4-week-old SPF Rag1-/- B6 mice (107/mouse), followed by administering HFD when the recipient mice were 6 weeks old (Fig. 7A). As expected, body weight was much higher in the recipient SPF Rag1-/- B6 mice that received immune cells from KO donors (Fig. 7B, C). Moreover, those recipient SPF Rag1-/- B6 mice had higher fasting glucose levels (Fig. 7D), impaired glucose tolerance (Fig. 7E), higher AUC values in the IPGTT (Fig. 7F). Those mice were also insulin resistant (Fig. 7G) with higher AUC values in the ITT (Fig. 7H) compared to the mice infused with the immune cells from the Ctr donors.
Based on the impact of Tlr9 deficiency in B cells on metabolic function and the gut microbiota impact on both immune system and metabolism from different experiments, we further investigated whether specific gut bacteria were responsible for the metabolic changes. We performed a set of experiments with criss-cross experimental design, using different combination of gut bacteria and immune cells to germ-free Rag1-/- B6 recipient mice. This involved intravenously infusing splenic immune cells from KO donor mice together with orally-gavaged gut bacteria from KO or Ctr donor mice, comparing these with infusions of immune cells from Ctr donor mice and together with orally-gavaged gut bacteria from KO or Ctr donor mice. The mice were observed for 4 weeks (Fig. 7I). IPGTT showed that the germ-free Rag1-/- B6 recipient mice, which were transferred with spleen cells from KO donors had more impaired glucose tolerance compared with the recipient mice transferred with spleen cells from Ctr donor mice (Fig. 7J). Furthermore, the recipient mice that were transferred with spleen cells from KO donors, together with the gut bacteria from the KO donors had more impaired glucose tolerance than the recipient mice that received spleen cells from KO donors but bacteria from Ctr donors (Fig. 7J). The AUC of IPGTT also indicated that the highest AUC was seen in the germ-free Rag1-/- B6 recipients of both immune cells and gut bacteria from the KO donors (Fig. 7K). Thus, our results suggest that B cell dysfunction and altered gut microbiota are both required to cause the metabolic changes, and Tlr9 deficiency in B cells appears to have a stronger effect on the metabolic dysfunction in the host, and the altered gut microbiota enhanced the metabolic changes.
Tlr9 regulates B cell function through Irf4 and Il-10
To determine the molecular mechanism by which the Tlr9-deficient B cells altered the immune system, we performed total RNAseq with purified splenic B cells from Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre+/- and Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre-/- B6 mice. The principal component analysis showed highly significant separation of the two groups of B cells, indicating that the transcriptomes of the two groups of the B cells were very different (Fig. 8A). The volcano plot and the heatmap showed that more genes had decreased rather than increased expression in B cells from KO mice compared with Ctr mice (Fig. 8B, C). Interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) was one of the highly decreased expressed genes. The transcription factor IRF4 plays a critical role in the regulation of the immune system53,54. It regulates inflammation by modulating the production of cytokines and chemokines, as well as regulating the differentiation and function of immune cells involved in inflammation55–57. IRF4 also regulates IL-10, which was significantly decreased in our KO mice compared to the controls (Fig. 2C, Fig S3C and Fig. 3F). The analysis of selected GO (Gene Ontology) parent heatmaps showed that there were several pathways regulating cytokine production involved in inflammatory responses (Fig. 8D). The GSEA (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis) also showed that the interferon signaling pathway was significantly involved in this process (Fig. 8E). Thus, these results suggested a link between Tlr9 and Irf4. We further confirmed the expression of Irf4 and Il-10 transcripts by qRT-PCR using purified B cells (Fig. 8F, G). Moreover, we confirmed the low levels of IRF4+ B cells from different lymphoid tissues of KO mice, by flow cytometric analysis (Fig. 8H). To establish the link between Tlr9 and Irf4, we treated purified splenic B cells from control mice with TLR9 antagonist (ODN2088) and a control for ODN2088 in in vitro culture overnight. The cells were collected for qPCR and flow cytometric analysis. The mRNA levels of Tlr9, Irf4 and Il-10 were all significantly decreased after treatment with TLR9 antagonist (Fig. 8I–K), as was the protein level of IRF4 in B cells (Fig. 8L). In addition, we assessed secreted IL-10 in the culture supernatants. In line with the qPCR results, the secreted IL-10 in the culture supernatant was also significantly lower after TLR9 antagonist treatment (Fig. 8M). To verify the role of IRF4 in IL-10 seen in KO mice, we treated the splenocytes from KO and Ctr mice with dexamethasone, a hormone that inhibits IRF458,59. When splenocytes from KO and Ctr mice were treated with 10 μM dexamethasone separately in vitro, IRF4 was significantly suppressed in all the cells (Fig. 8N) confirming that dexamethasone indeed blocked IRF4. Moreover, dexamethasone abolished the differences found in KO mice, including decreased IL-10 producing Bregs and increased IFNγ-producing CD4+ T cells (Fig. 8O, P). To further verify the results using dexamethasone, we treated the splenocytes from KO and Ctr mice with IRF4-specific siRNA in vitro, and we found similar results as seen with dexamethasone treatment (Fig. 8Q–S). Thus, our data support a link between IRF4 and IL-10 in KO mice. Our in vitro experiments demonstrate that specific deletion of TLR9 in B cells affects the expression of IRF4 to some extent, thereby influencing the expression of IL-10. The experimental results agreed with the features that we observed in the animals, in vivo and ex-vivo. Our results also supported the notion that Tlr9 regulated Il-10 through Irf4, which could lead to inflammation in the host, together with the altered gut microbiota. Taken together, our data indicate that TLR9 in B cells plays an important role in metabolic dysregulation and obesity.
Discussion
Recent studies suggest that TLR9 plays an important role in obesity and related inflammation and insulin resistance in humans and animals31,37,38. TLR9 modulates the ratio of M1/M2 macrophages, thereby impacting hepatic lipid metabolism in humans60. TLR9 regulates inflammatory responses in both mouse and human adipose tissue and influences lipid metabolism61. B cells express high levels of TLR962,63; however, the role of TLR9 in B cells in the development of obesity has not previously been clear. To investigate the intrinsic role of TLR9 in B cells in obesity development, we generated a C57BL/6 mouse strain with B lymphocyte specifically deficient in Tlr9 (Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre+/- B6, KO). The Cre gene was knocked into the exon 2 of cd19 gene and whereas homozygous Cd19Cre (Cd19Cre+/+) mice had impaired B cell development, for this study, we used Cd19Cre heterozygous (Cd19Cre+/-) mice in which B cell development was comparable to wild type (Cd19Cre-/-) mice17,64. We found that, in the absence of Tlr9 specifically in B cells, B6 mice were prone to development of obesity with high fat diet, without an increase in food intake. The obesity was accompanied by impaired glucose and insulin tolerance, together with high levels of fasting insulin in the circulation and fatty liver. Second, in the absence of Tlr9 specifically in B cells, the KO mice had a reduced number of CD1d+CD5+ Breg cells and reduced IL-10-producing B cells in the peripheral lymphoid tissues but increased germinal center B cells. Moreover, B cell-specific deficiency in Tlr9 also altered different subsets of T cells, including increased T memory cells, T follicular helper (TFH) and T peripheral helper (TPH) cells, most of which were IFNγ-producing cells. The proinflammatory immune cells contributed to the metabolic dysfunction in the KO mice and immunodeficient Rag1-/- mice following adoptive transfer of immune cells from KO mice. Third, B cell-specific deficiency in Tlr9 altered the composition of the gut microbiota of the KO mice, which also contributed to metabolic dysregulation in both the KO mice themselves, as well as the germ-free recipients of fecal microbiota transfer from the KO donor mice. Co-abundant groups (CAG) 6 and 18 were particularly interesting in that CAG18, containing a high abundance of Lachnospiraceae, was significantly reduced in the Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre+/- B6 (KO) mice, in addition to the altered Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio. Last, we identified a molecular link between Tlr9 and Irf4, which regulated IL-10 production. Taken together, our in vivo, ex-vivo and in vitro results supported the notion that this pathway contributed to the features found in mice with B cell specific deficiency in Tlr9.
The absence of Tlr9 in B cells resulted in reduced IL-10 at the transcription and protein levels in B cells. IL-10, an anti-inflammatory cytokine produced by a variety of immune cells, including T cells, B cells, and macrophages65–67 plays a critical role in regulating immune responses by suppressing the activity of pro-inflammatory cytokines and promoting the differentiation of regulatory T cells68–72. IL-10 is also known to be particularly important in regulation of intestinal inflammation and in maintaining gut homeostasis73–75. It is not clear if the reduced IL-10 contributed to the alterations in the gut microbiota seen in our KO mice.
In addition to the changes we observed in different B cell subsets, Tlr9 deficiency in B cells also altered T cell subsets, including TFH cells and TPH cells, both of which are closely related to the differentiation and function of B cells. Tlr9 deficiency in B cells promoted IFN-γ- and IL-17a-producing CD4+ T cells. Furthermore, while splenic B cells from KO mice showed significantly impaired responses to adaptive stimuli, the T cell responses to adaptive stimuli were enhanced. For the innate pathways, B cells from the KO mice showed expected impaired responses to CpG, a ligand of TLR9. It is interesting that B cells from the KO mice had reduced responses to the TLR2 ligand, Pam3Csk4, but enhanced response to the TLR4 ligand, LPS. Interestingly, the KO mice had a higher abundance of Bacteroidetes, the major LPS-producing bacterial phylum. The observations that B cell-specific Tlr9 deficiency reduced some B cell functions but enhanced LPS responses as well as enhancing pro-inflammatory T cell function suggest that TLR9 in B cells contributes more to the regulatory arm of the immune system. Inflammation significantly contributes to impaired insulin action, which promotes the progression of metabolic syndrome76–78. In our study, we found that proinflammatory responses were greater in immune cells from both lymphoid and WAT tissues in mice with Tlr9-deficient B cells compared to control mice, indicating that inflammation contributes to this process.
Increasing evidence suggests that gut microbiota play an important role in obesity and T2D79–81. In this study, we found that gut microbiota link Tlr9 deletion in B cells to obesity and impaired metabolic responses. We incorporated ecological theory into the microbiota data analysis and, through network topology analysis of co-abundance groups (CAGs), we observed a dynamic imbalance between the decrease of CAG18, represented by Lachnospiraceae, and CAG6. These were significantly correlated with the phenotypic changes in the KO mice. The interaction between the immune system and the gut microbiota is complex and bidirectional, and the immune system can have significant impact on the gut microbiota, and vice versa82,83. The B cell changes, including altered cytokine responses and intestinal antibody responses, could alter the homeostasis of the gut microbiome84,85. Our study showed that IgM was altered in both the small and large intestine, as well as in the serum. IgM is the first antibody produced during an immune response and is particularly effective at activating the complement system, a group of proteins that work together to destroy pathogens86. Recent research implied that IgM may play a role in regulating the gut microbiota and protecting against gut infections86,87. In addition, some studies have suggested that IgM may contribute to maintaining the diversity and stability of the gut microbiota88. It is conceivable that our IgM findings may be related to these functions.
In our study, the composition of gut microbiota was altered due to Tlr9 deficiency in B cells, and these changes were accompanied by increased proinflammatory responses in the PP. Both immunological and metabolic changes in our KO mice could be transferred in FMT experiments using germ-free wild type B6 mice or germ-free Rag1-/- B6 mice as recipients, which indicated a strong role for microbiota in modulating the immunological and metabolic changes. However, co-transfer of splenic immune cells from the KO mice, together with microbiota from control mice, did not fully recapitulate the phenotypes observed in the KO donor mice. We found that the metabolic and immunological phenotypes could only be fully recapitulated if the microbiota and the splenic immune cells were both from the KO donor mice.
At the molecular level, RNA sequencing analysis of purified B cells from Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre+/- B6 and Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre-/- B6 mice revealed that Tlr9 via Irf4 regulates Il-10. When we suppressed the IRF4 signaling in vitro using dexamethasone or siRNA, the phenotype of reduced IL-10 and increased IFNγ seen in Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre+/- B6 mice was abolished. Our results provide evidence that the reduction in IL-10 secretion and increased IFNγ in Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre+/- B6 mice is associated with IRF4. IRF4 plays an important role in the regulation of immune responses and is particularly involved in the transcriptional regulation of interferons89,90. IRF4 is primarily expressed in immune cells, and is important for the development and function of various immune cells, including T helper 2 (Th2) cells, TFH cells, plasma cells, and memory B cells91–93. These are involved in the regulation of immune responses to infection and inflammation91,92,94,95 and IRF4 and IL-10 interact to regulate immune responses96. Our in vitro experiments confirmed that B cells without Tlr9, or wild type B cells treated with TLR9 antagonist, led to significantly decreased expression of Irf4 and Il-10, which suggests that Tlr9 is required for upregulation of Irf4 and Il-10.
Overall, our study using the mice with Tlr9-deficiency in B cells has delineated cross-talk among TLR9, adaptive immunity and gut microbiota, leading to an enhanced inflammatory milieu and susceptibility to obesity and associated metabolic changes. Obesity is a systemic metabolic disorder with diverse etiological factors and our study provides insight in the role of TLR9 in B cells in obesity. Thus, targeting TLR9 in B cells may have therapeutic potential for prevention and/or treatment of obesity and obesity-associated disorders.
Methods
Mice
C57BL/6 breeders were originally purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (#000664). Tlr9fl/fl C57BL/6 breeder mice were kindly provided by Dr. Mark Shlomchik64 (University of Pittsburgh). Cd19Cre+/+C57BL/6 breeders were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (RRID: IMSR_JAX:006785). Tlr9fl/fl and Cd19Cre+/+ B6 mice were bred to generate Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre+/-, which were then intercrossed to obtain B cell–specific Tlr9-deficient (Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre+/-) and control (Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre-/-) B6 mice. Germ-free (GF) C57BL/6 breeders97 were kindly provided by Dr. Richard Flavell (Yale University) and bred in the Yale gnotobiotic mouse facility. Rag1-/- GF C57BL/6 breeders (rederived to GF at Yale from the #002216, the Jackson Laboratory) were kindly provided by Dr. Noah Palm (Yale University) and maintained in the Yale gnotobiotic mouse facility. Mice from different litters were randomly assigned to experimental groups. Tlr9-deficient (Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre+/-) and control (Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre-/-) B6 mice were housed in individually-ventilated cages in the SPF facility. GF mice were maintained in sterile isolators and verified monthly for GF status by PCR. All the mice used in this study were maintained under strict SPF or GF conditions with 71.7 F (22°C) temperature, 68 RH (relative humidity) and 12-h-dark/light cycle at the Yale School of Medicine, and all the protocols used for animal experimentation were approved by Yale Animal Care and Use Committee of Yale University.
Diet
Mice were fed with normal diet (ND, 6 kcal% fat, Teklab Global, 2018SC) from weaning. Mice in the obesity study were fed with high fat diet (HFD, 60 kcal% fat, Research Diet, D12492) from 6- to 18-22 weeks old. Body weight was measured weekly. HFD food consumption was assessed by measuring the differences of the food weight between the food provided in the hopper of a clean cage and the remaining food in the hopper as well as the obvious food in the bedding during 24 h.
Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT)
Mice were allowed to fast for 12 h overnight, followed by intraperitoneal injection of glucose (1 g/kg for the mice with normal diet or 2 g/kg for the mice with high fat diet). Blood glucose concentration, from tail vein, was measured using a FreeStyle Precision Neo glucometer (Abbott) at 0 (prior to glucose injection), and 15, 30, 60 and 90 min after glucose injection.
Insulin tolerance test (ITT)
Mice were fasted for 4 h, followed by intraperitoneal injection of insulin solution (0.75 U/kg, Humulin R, Lilly). Blood glucose concentration, from the tail vein, was measured using a FreeStyle Precision Neo glucometer (Abbott) at 0 (prior to insulin injection), and 15, 30, 60 and 90 min after insulin injection.
Liver tissue collection and histology
Mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation under anesthesia according to American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC) guideline and approved by Yale Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee (IACUC). The livers were dissected, weighed, and fixed in 10% paraformaldehyde for 24 h at 4 °C, prior to embedding with paraffin. Paraffin-embedded livers were sectioned at a thickness of 5 μm and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) to assess morphology.
Immune cell extraction from spleen and lymphoid tissues
Bone marrow (BM), spleen (SPL), mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) and Peyer’s patches (PP), were dissected and collected into test tubes containing 3-5 ml sterile PBS. All the tissues were homogenized by gently grinding the tissue with the frosted end of glass slides followed by filtering through a nylon filter (150μm) to remove debris. Red blood cells in splenocytes were lysed by hypotonic shock.
Immune cell extraction from adipose tissue
Ex-vivo epididymal fat tissue were cut into 1 mm small pieces and digested in collagenase I (1 mg/ml in completed RPMI, 10 ml/mice), followed by incubated at 37 °C with shaking (250 times/min) for 1 h. After stopping the digestion by adding 10 ml medium, the digested tissue was spun down at 800 g for 5 min. The cell pellet was resuspended in 2 ml ACK buffer and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. After adding 5 ml medium, the adipocytes were filtered through 100 μm nylon mesh followed by centrifugation (800 g) for 5 min. The resuspended cells were then analyzed using flow cytometry.
Cell staining and flow cytometry
Single immune cell suspension (~106) from BM, SPL, MLNs, PP and white adipose tissue (WAT), were first incubated with Fc blocking antibody (2.4G2) for 15 min before staining for other surface markers. For intracellular cytokine staining, cells were incubated with 50 ng/ml phosphomolybdic acid (Sigma), 500 ng/ml of ionomycin (Sigma) and 1 μl of Golgi plug (BD Bioscience) at 37 °C for 4 h, followed by cell surface staining. After fixation with fixation buffer (Invitrogen) for 20 min (RT) and permeabilization (Invitrogen), cells were stained with antibodies against different cytokines. All the cells were also stained with Zombie Dye (Biolegend) to exclude the dead cells. The stained cells were analyzed on a BD LSR II flow cytometer. (Flow cytometry Antibody list: Supplement table1).
Cell purification
Splenic B cells were purified using the EasySep Mouse B Cell Isolation Kit (STEMCELL Technologies) after depleting T cells by anti-Thy1(M5/49.4.1; BioXCell). Total spleen cells were incubated with 2.5μg/ml Thy1 and 1:20 complement (PEL-FREEZ BIOLOGICALS INC) at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 1 h. After washing with MoJo buffer (500 ml PBS + 10 ml FBS + 1 ml 0.5 mM EDTA) twice, the cells were purified using the B cell isolation kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purity of the cells was routinely >90%, confirmed by flow cytometry.
Cell proliferation assay
Total spleen cells or purified B cells were stimulated with anti-CD40 (FGK4.5, BioXcell), with anti-IgM, or anti-CD3 (2C11 BioXcell) and anti-CD28 (37.51, BioXcell), or CpG (Invivogen), LPS (Invivogen) and Pam3Csk4 (Invivogen) at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 3 days. The proliferative response was detected by 3H-thymidine incorporation and read on a β-counter. The cell proliferation was presented as counts per minute (cpm).
Immunoglobulin (Ig) detection
Serum and gut contents were collected from 18-22-week-old HFD-treated Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre+/- B6 and Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre-/- B6 mice. The small intestine and colon were flushed with 5 ml sterile PBS and centrifuged at 800 g for 5 min. Serum samples were centrifuged 1300 g for 8 min. Immunoglobulins (IgM, IgG and IgA) were assessed in gut flush and serum samples by ELISA (Southern Biotech).
Fecal microbial DNA extraction and bacterial 16 S rRNA gene sequencing
Fecal pellets were collected from each mouse before and after 12 to 16 weeks of HFD. Bacterial DNA extraction and 16 S rRNA gene sequencing were performed as described previously98. The results were quality-filtered using QIIME 2. The alpha diversity indices were compared with Kruskal-Wallis tests and the p values were adjusted for multiple comparison with Benjamini-Hochberg method99. The structure of the gut microbiota was compared using beta diversity with Bray-Curtis dissimilarity metric, visualized by principal-coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots. The statistical significance was assessed by permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) via q2-diversity with 9,999 permutations and p values were adjusted with Benjamini-Hochberg correction method99. Taxonomic assignment for Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASVs) was performed via the q2-feature-classifier100 using the Greengenes Expert Database101.
Microbial Co-abundant group (CAG) network analysis
CAG network analysis was used to identify the key responsive phylotypes. The correlations between the ASVs, which were shared among at least 20% of the samples, were calculated by using the SparCC method (bootstrap value, 100)52. Next, on the basis of SparCC correlation coefficient matrix, SparCC distance matrix (1-SparCC correlation coefficient) was calculated for the 125 shared ASVs, followed by clustering into 32 CAGs through Ward’s hierarchical clustering method and PERMANOVA with 999 permutations. A cluster tree was constructed and PERMANOVA was applied sequentially along the tree from top to bottom to identify the nodes with no significant difference as a single CAG (p > 0.001). The CAG network was then visualized in Gephi software.
Fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) in germ-free C57BL/6 mice
Fecal pellets were collected from 18-22-week-old HFD-treated Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre+/- B6 and Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre-/- B6 mice and pooled. Pellets were homogenized and centrifuged at 800 g for 5 min. Bacterial colony forming units (CFU) were measured by optical density (OD) with a known concentration of an E. coli strain as reference. Four-week-old germ-free (GF) C57BL/6 mice were colonized with fecal bacteria by oral gavage twice, 3 days apart (1 ×108 CFU/mouse) and kept in Sealed Positive Pressure (SPP) cages.
Adoptive immune cell transfer and fecal microbiota transfer (FMT) in germ-free Rag1-/- C57BL/6 mice
Total splenocytes from 18-22-week-old HFD-treated Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre+/- B6 and Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre-/- B6 mice were adoptively transferred (i.v.) to 4-week-old germ-free Rag1-/- mice (1 ×107/mouse), followed by fecal bacterial oral gavage as described above. In the experiment using SPF Rag1-/- mice as recipients, the 4-week-old SPF Rag1-/- mice were adoptively transferred (i.v.) with total splenic cells (1 ×107/mouse) only, without fecal bacterial transfer as SPF Rag1-/- mice carry endogenous gut microbiota.
B cell RNA sequencing and analysis
RNA was extracted from purified splenic B cells from 18-22-week-old HFD-treated Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre+/- B6 and Tlr9fl/fl/Cd19Cre-/- B6 mice with RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and quantified by NanoDrop (ThermoFisher). RNA-sequencing (poly A) was performed at the Yale Center for Genome Analysis using NovaSeq with HiSeq paired-end, 100 bp. The raw fastq files were processed using fastp tool (version 0.20.0). With a default setting, sequencing reads with low-quality bases were trimmed or filtered. Alignment was performed for cleaned reads using STAR (version 2.7.9) and mouse reference genome (gencode version GRCm38.p6 with vM25 gene annotation). Expression quantification was performed for alignment results using featureCounts (version 2.0.0). As genes with low expression levels were most likely to be noise, they were excluded before downstream analysis, and we defined low expression filtering as expressed genes that should have ≥ 6 read counts in at least 20% of samples. The filtered read counts matrix was then normalized by transcripts per million (TPM) method. Detection of differentially expressed genes was performed using R package DESeq2 (version 1.30.1). The Benjamini-Hochberg procedure was used for multiple test correction, and FDR ≤ 0.05 as a threshold for detection of differentially expressed genes.
Cell culture
Purified B cells (2 × 106) from 6-8-week-old wild type B6 mice were stimulated with 2 μg/ml TLR9 antagonist (ODN2088, Invivogen), ODN 2088 control (Invivogen) or 10μM dexamethasone at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 12 h.
Quantitative Real-Time PCR
RNA was extracted from different tissues, using RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen), prior to cDNA synthesis, using SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis Kit with random hexamers (Invitrogen). Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qPCR) was performed with a qPCR cycler (iQ5; Bio-Rad). The relative gene expression was determined by the 2−ΔΔCT method and normalized with GAPDH reference gene. (Primer list: Supplementary table 2).
siRNA delivery in vitro
IRF-4-specific siRNA (Horizon, USA) assay was performed following the Dharmacon™ Accell™ siRNA delivery protocol. Briefly, splenocytes (5×105/well) from KO and control mice were cultured in a 96-well plate in Accell siRNA Delivery Media (B-005000-500, Horizon, USA) for 48 h in the presence of 1 μM IRF4-specific siRNA at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Controls included untreated cells and cells treated with non-targeting siRNA. The cells were harvested after 48 h and analyzed using flow cytometry post staining with appropriate immune markers.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software v9.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, US). Differences between groups were analyzed with either a two-tailed Student’s t test (if the data were normally distributed), a two-tailed Mann-Whitney test (if the data were not normally distributed), multiple t tests with Bonferroni correction, one-way ANOVA or a two-way ANOVA. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Source data
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Juan Carlos Roman, for taking care of the animals used in the study. This work was supported by The International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship Program of The Office of China Postdoctoral Council (No. 2021044) to X.Y., the National Institutes of Health (H.D. 097808, D.K. 126809, D.K. 130318, Diabetes Action Research and Education Foundation to L.W.); Diabetes Research Connection to Y.H. and L.W.; a JDRF Postdoctoral Research Fellowship (3-PDF-2016-197-A-N, 2016-2019) and a Medical Research Council Career Development Award (MR/T010525/1) to J.A.P., a Medical Research Council grant (MR/K021141/1 to F.S.W.). All the authors approved the final version of the manuscript and the submission.
Author contributions
L.W. conceived the study, L.W., P.W., and X.Y. designed the study. P.W. researched most of the initial findings and X.Y. researched the critical experiments and data analysis. S.S., J.H., L.Y.Z., and J.P. researched some of the data. X.Y. and J.P. contributed to the data analysis of gut microbiota. J.G. and H.Z. analyzed the RNAseq results. P.W., X.Y., and L.W. wrote the manuscript. J.A.P. and F.S.W. revised the manuscript. QW was the consultant of the study.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Elizabeth Leadbetter and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
All data generated and analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper. The 16 S rRNA gene sequencing data generated in this study have been deposited in SRA database under accession code PRJNA1093493. Total B cell RNA sequencing data generated in this study have been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE263396. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Pai Wang, Xin Yang.
Contributor Information
Quan Wang, Email: wquan@jlu.edu.cn.
Li Wen, Email: li.wen@yale.edu.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-024-48611-8.
References
- 1.Saltiel AR, Olefsky JM. Inflammatory mechanisms linking obesity and metabolic disease. J. Clin. Invest. 2017;127:1–4. doi: 10.1172/JCI92035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Duan M, et al. Characteristics of gut microbiota in people with obesity. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0255446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Petrelli F, et al. Association of obesity with survival outcomes in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw. Open. 2021;4:e213520. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Singer-Englar T, Barlow G, Mathur R. Obesity, diabetes, and the gut microbiome: an updated review. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019;13:3–15. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2019.1543023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fang X, Henao-Mejia J, Henrickson SE. Obesity and immune status in children. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2020;32:805–815. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wada J, Makino H. Innate immunity in diabetes and diabetic nephropathy. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2016;12:13–26. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2015.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.McLaughlin T, Ackerman SE, Shen L, Engleman E. Role of innate and adaptive immunity in obesity-associated metabolic disease. J. Clin. Invest. 2017;127:5–13. doi: 10.1172/JCI88876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shao Y, et al. Vascular endothelial cells and innate immunity. Arterioscler Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2020;40:e138–e152. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.120.314330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhen Y, Shu W, Hou X, Wang Y. Innate immune system orchestrates metabolic homeostasis and dysfunction in visceral adipose tissue during obesity. Front Immunol. 2021;12:702835. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.702835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Arivazhagan L, et al. An eclectic cast of cellular actors orchestrates innate immune responses in the mechanisms driving obesity and metabolic perturbation. Circ. Res. 2020;126:1565–1589. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.315900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Aluri, J., Cooper, M. A. & Schuettpelz, L. G. Toll-like receptor signaling in the establishment and function of the immune system. Cells10, 1374 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 12.Vijay K. Toll-like receptors in immunity and inflammatory diseases: past, present, and future. Int Immunopharmacol. 2018;59:391–412. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2018.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kawasaki T, Kawai T. Toll-like receptor signaling pathways. Front Immunol. 2014;5:461. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hemmi H, et al. A Toll-like receptor recognizes bacterial DNA. Nature. 2000;408:740–745. doi: 10.1038/35047123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cancro MP. Age-associated B cells. Annu Rev. Immunol. 2020;38:315–340. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-092419-031130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dasgupta S, Bandyopadhyay M. Regulatory B cells in infection, inflammation, and autoimmunity. Cell Immunol. 2020;352:104076. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2020.104076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tilstra JS, et al. B cell-intrinsic TLR9 expression is protective in murine lupus. J. Clin. Invest. 2020;130:3172–3187. doi: 10.1172/JCI132328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Reilley MJ, et al. TLR9 activation cooperates with T cell checkpoint blockade to regress poorly immunogenic melanoma. J. Immunother. Cancer. 2019;7:323. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0811-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Carrasco A, et al. Immunological differences between lymphocytic and collagenous colitis. J. Crohns Colitis. 2016;10:1055–1066. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Luo X, et al. Macrophage toll-like receptor 9 contributes to chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain in male mice. J. Neurosci. 2019;39:6848–6864. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3257-18.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lougaris V, et al. Bruton tyrosine kinase mediates TLR9-dependent human dendritic cell activation. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014;133:1644–1650.e1644. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.12.1085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Moretta L, et al. Effector and regulatory events during natural killer-dendritic cell interactions. Immunol. Rev. 2006;214:219–228. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2006.00450.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Brennan TV, et al. Heparan sulfate mimetic PG545-mediated antilymphoma effects require TLR9-dependent NK cell activation. J. Clin. Invest. 2016;126:207–219. doi: 10.1172/JCI76566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kochumon S, et al. Expression of Steroid Receptor RNA Activator 1 (SRA1) in the Adipose Tissue Is Associated with TLRs and IRFs in Diabesity. Cells. 2022;11:4007. doi: 10.3390/cells11244007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhou J, Zhang X, Ji L, Jiang G. Identification of potential biomarkers of type 2 diabetes mellitus-related immune infiltration using weighted gene coexpression network analysis. Biomed. Res. Int. 2022;2022:9920744. doi: 10.1155/2022/9920744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shen CF, et al. Innate immune responses of vaccinees determine early neutralizing antibody production after ChAdOx1nCoV-19 vaccination. Front Immunol. 2022;13:807454. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.807454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kugler-Umana O, et al. IgD. Aging Cell. 2022;21:e13705. doi: 10.1111/acel.13705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Suthers AN, Sarantopoulos S. TLR7/TLR9- and B cell receptor-signaling crosstalk: promotion of potentially dangerous B cells. Front Immunol. 2017;8:775. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Schleimann MH, et al. TLR9 agonist MGN1703 enhances B cell differentiation and function in lymph nodes. EBioMedicine. 2019;45:328–340. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sindhava VJ, et al. A TLR9-dependent checkpoint governs B cell responses to DNA-containing antigens. J. Clin. Invest. 2017;127:1651–1663. doi: 10.1172/JCI89931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hong CP, et al. TLR9 regulates adipose tissue inflammation and obesity-related metabolic disorders. Obes. (Silver Spring) 2015;23:2199–2206. doi: 10.1002/oby.21215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ding P, et al. Toll-like receptor 9 deficiency induces osteoclastic bone loss via gut microbiota-associated systemic chronic inflammation. Bone Res. 2022;10:42. doi: 10.1038/s41413-022-00210-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Burgueno JF, Abreu MT. Epithelial Toll-like receptors and their role in gut homeostasis and disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020;17:263–278. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0261-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Otte JM, Cario E, Podolsky DK. Mechanisms of cross hyporesponsiveness to Toll-like receptor bacterial ligands in intestinal epithelial cells. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:1054–1070. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Slack E, Balmer ML, Macpherson AJ. B cells as a critical node in the microbiota-host immune system network. Immunol. Rev. 2014;260:50–66. doi: 10.1111/imr.12179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lindner C, et al. Diversification of memory B cells drives the continuous adaptation of secretory antibodies to gut microbiota. Nat. Immunol. 2015;16:880–888. doi: 10.1038/ni.3213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nishimoto S, et al. Obesity-induced DNA released from adipocytes stimulates chronic adipose tissue inflammation and insulin resistance. Sci. Adv. 2016;2:e1501332. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ghosh AR, et al. Adipose recruitment and activation of plasmacytoid dendritic cells fuel metaflammation. Diabetes. 2016;65:3440–3452. doi: 10.2337/db16-0331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shulzhenko N, et al. Crosstalk between B lymphocytes, microbiota and the intestinal epithelium governs immunity versus metabolism in the gut. Nat. Med. 2011;17:1585–1593. doi: 10.1038/nm.2505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zeng MY, et al. Gut microbiota-induced immunoglobulin G controls systemic infection by symbiotic bacteria and pathogens. Immunity. 2016;44:647–658. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Liu M, et al. Toll-like receptor 9 negatively regulates pancreatic islet beta cell growth and function in a mouse model of type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2018;61:2333–2343. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4705-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sha S, et al. TLR9 deficiency in B cells promotes immune tolerance via Interleukin-10 in a Type 1 Diabetes Mouse Model. Diabetes. 2021;70:504–515. doi: 10.2337/db20-0373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lykken JM, Candando KM, Tedder TF. Regulatory B10 cell development and function. Int Immunol. 2015;27:471–477. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxv046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mauri C, Bosma A. Immune regulatory function of B cells. Annu Rev. Immunol. 2012;30:221–241. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-020711-074934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Olatunde AC, Hale JS, Lamb TJ. Cytokine-skewed Tfh cells: functional consequences for B cell help. Trends Immunol. 2021;42:536–550. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2021.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Eisenbarth SC, et al. CD4(+) T cells that help B cells - a proposal for uniform nomenclature. Trends Immunol. 2021;42:658–669. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2021.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rao DA, et al. Pathologically expanded peripheral T helper cell subset drives B cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Nature. 2017;542:110–114. doi: 10.1038/nature20810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yang Y, Palm NW. Immunoglobulin A and the microbiome. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2020;56:89–96. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2020.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bertrand Y, Sanchez-Montalvo A, Hox V, Froidure A, Pilette C. IgA-producing B cells in lung homeostasis and disease. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1117749. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1117749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Turnbaugh PJ, et al. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature. 2006;444:1027–1031. doi: 10.1038/nature05414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Schwiertz A, et al. Microbiota and SCFA in lean and overweight healthy subjects. Obes. (Silver Spring) 2010;18:190–195. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Friedman J, Alm EJ. Inferring correlation networks from genomic survey data. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8:e1002687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Shaffer AL, Emre NC, Romesser PB, Staudt LM. IRF4: immunity. malignancy! therapy? Clin. Cancer Res. 2009;15:2954–2961. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ottens K, Satterthwaite AB. IRF4 has a unique role in early B cell development and acts prior to CD21 expression to control marginal zone B cell numbers. Front Immunol. 2021;12:779085. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.779085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.De Silva NS, Simonetti G, Heise N, Klein U. The diverse roles of IRF4 in late germinal center B-cell differentiation. Immunol. Rev. 2012;247:73–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01113.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yao T, et al. Obese skeletal muscle-expressed interferon regulatory factor 4 transcriptionally regulates mitochondrial branched-chain aminotransferase reprogramming metabolome. Diabetes. 2022;71:2256–2271. doi: 10.2337/db22-0260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Krishnamoorthy V, et al. The IRF4 gene regulatory module functions as a read-write integrator to dynamically coordinate T helper cell fate. Immunity. 2017;47:481–497.e487. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lupancu TJ, et al. Epigenetic and transcriptional regulation of CCL17 production by glucocorticoids in arthritis. iScience. 2023;26:108079. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kim SB, et al. Anthriscus sylvestris root extract reduces allergic lung inflammation by regulating interferon regulatory factor 4-mediated Th2 cell activation. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019;232:165–175. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2018.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mridha AR, et al. TLR9 is up-regulated in human and murine NASH: pivotal role in inflammatory recruitment and cell survival. Clin. Sci. 2017;131:2145–2159. doi: 10.1042/CS20160838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Thomalla M, et al. Evidence of an anti-inflammatory toll-like receptor 9 (TLR 9) pathway in adipocytes. J. Endocrinol. 2019;240:325–343. doi: 10.1530/JOE-18-0326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Bhattacharjee RN, Akira S. Modifying toll-like receptor 9 signaling for therapeutic use. Mini Rev. Med Chem. 2006;6:287–291. doi: 10.2174/138955706776073411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Fillatreau S, Manfroi B, Dorner T. Toll-like receptor signalling in B cells during systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2021;17:98–108. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-00544-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Cosgrove HA, et al. B cell-intrinsic TLR7 expression drives severe lupus in TLR9-deficient mice. JCI Insight. 2023;8:e172219. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.172219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Conti P, et al. IL-10, an inflammatory/inhibitory cytokine, but not always. Immunol. Lett. 2003;86:123–129. doi: 10.1016/S0165-2478(03)00002-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Saraiva M, O’Garra A. The regulation of IL-10 production by immune cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2010;10:170–181. doi: 10.1038/nri2711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Saraiva, M., Vieira, P. & O’Garra, A. Biology and therapeutic potential of interleukin-10. J. Exp. Med.217, e20190418 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 68.Wei H, Li B, Sun A, Guo F. Interleukin-10 Family Cytokines Immunobiology and Structure. Adv. Exp. Med Biol. 2019;1172:79–96. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-9367-9_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Rosser EC, Mauri C. Regulatory B cells: origin, phenotype, and function. Immunity. 2015;42:607–612. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Rutz S, Ouyang W. Regulation of interleukin-10 expression. Adv. Exp. Med Biol. 2016;941:89–116. doi: 10.1007/978-94-024-0921-5_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Xie MM, Dent AL. Unexpected help: follicular regulatory T cells in the germinal center. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1536. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Chien CH, Chiang BL. Regulatory T cells induced by B cells: a novel subpopulation of regulatory T cells. J. Biomed. Sci. 2017;24:86. doi: 10.1186/s12929-017-0391-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Wei HX, Wang B, Li B. IL-10 and IL-22 in mucosal immunity: driving protection and pathology. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1315. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Neumann C, Scheffold A, Rutz S. Functions and regulation of T cell-derived interleukin-10. Semin Immunol. 2019;44:101344. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2019.101344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Kole A, Maloy KJ. Control of intestinal inflammation by interleukin-10. Curr. Top. Microbiol Immunol. 2014;380:19–38. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-43492-5_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Emanuela F, et al. Inflammation as a link between obesity and metabolic syndrome. J. Nutr. Metab. 2012;2012:476380. doi: 10.1155/2012/476380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Boulange CL, Neves AL, Chilloux J, Nicholson JK, Dumas ME. Impact of the gut microbiota on inflammation, obesity, and metabolic disease. Genome Med. 2016;8:42. doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0303-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Cani PD, et al. Metabolic endotoxemia initiates obesity and insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2007;56:1761–1772. doi: 10.2337/db06-1491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Zhao L. The gut microbiota and obesity: from correlation to causality. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013;11:639–647. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Patterson E, et al. Gut microbiota, obesity and diabetes. Postgrad. Med J. 2016;92:286–300. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Zhao L, et al. Gut bacteria selectively promoted by dietary fibers alleviate type 2 diabetes. Science. 2018;359:1151–1156. doi: 10.1126/science.aao5774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Kayama H, Okumura R, Takeda K. Interaction Between the Microbiota, Epithelia, and Immune Cells in the Intestine. Annu Rev. Immunol. 2020;38:23–48. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-070119-115104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Schluter J, et al. The gut microbiota is associated with immune cell dynamics in humans. Nature. 2020;588:303–307. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2971-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Moreira H, et al. Unraveling the role of Breg cells in digestive tract cancer and infectious immunity. Front Immunol. 2022;13:981847. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.981847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Luck H, et al. Gut-associated IgA(+) immune cells regulate obesity-related insulin resistance. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:3650. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11370-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Michaud E, Mastrandrea C, Rochereau N, Paul S. Human Secretory IgM: An Elusive Player in Mucosal Immunity. Trends Immunol. 2020;41:141–156. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2019.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Pearson JA, et al. IgM-associated gut bacteria in obesity and type 2 diabetes in C57BL/6 mice and humans. Diabetologia. 2022;65:1398–1411. doi: 10.1007/s00125-022-05711-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Sterlin D, Fadlallah J, Slack E, Gorochov G. The antibody/microbiota interface in health and disease. Mucosal Immunol. 2020;13:3–11. doi: 10.1038/s41385-019-0192-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Nam S, Lim JS. Essential role of interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) in immune cell development. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2016;39:1548–1555. doi: 10.1007/s12272-016-0854-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Xu WD, Pan HF, Ye DQ, Xu Y. Targeting IRF4 in autoimmune diseases. Autoimmun. Rev. 2012;11:918–924. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Lu R, Medina KL, Lancki DW, Singh H. IRF-4,8 orchestrate the pre-B-to-B transition in lymphocyte development. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1703–1708. doi: 10.1101/gad.1104803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Huber M, Lohoff M. IRF4 at the crossroads of effector T-cell fate decision. Eur. J. Immunol. 2014;44:1886–1895. doi: 10.1002/eji.201344279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Biswas PS, et al. Dual regulation of IRF4 function in T and B cells is required for the coordination of T-B cell interactions and the prevention of autoimmunity. J. Exp. Med. 2012;209:581–596. doi: 10.1084/jem.20111195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Lu R. Interferon regulatory factor 4 and 8 in B-cell development. Trends Immunol. 2008;29:487–492. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2008.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Bollig N, et al. Transcription factor IRF4 determines germinal center formation through follicular T-helper cell differentiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:8664–8669. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205834109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Cerqueira C, Manfroi B, Fillatreau S. IL-10-producing regulatory B cells and plasmocytes: Molecular mechanisms and disease relevance. Semin Immunol. 2019;44:101323. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2019.101323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Palm NW, et al. Immunoglobulin A coating identifies colitogenic bacteria in inflammatory bowel disease. Cell. 2014;158:1000–1010. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Peng J, et al. Long term effect of gut microbiota transfer on diabetes development. J. Autoimmun. 2014;53:85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2014.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate - a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B. 1995;57:289–300. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Bokulich NA, et al. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2’s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome. 2018;6:90. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0470-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.McDonald D, et al. An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J. 2012;6:610–618. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated and analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper. The 16 S rRNA gene sequencing data generated in this study have been deposited in SRA database under accession code PRJNA1093493. Total B cell RNA sequencing data generated in this study have been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE263396. Source data are provided with this paper.