Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2024 May 10;18(5):e0011841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011841

Epidemiological observations and management challenges in extrapedal mycetoma: A three-decade review of 420 cases

Abubakr Abdalla Mohammed Alhaj 1, Eiman Siddig Ahmed 1, Abeer Hassan 1, Ahmed Hassan Fahal 1,*
Editor: Pascal Del Giudice2
PMCID: PMC11111073  PMID: 38728359

Abstract

Mycetoma is a serious, destructive, disfiguring chronic granulomatous inflammatory disease affecting the subcutaneous tissues that spread to involve the skin, deep tissues and bone. The disease predominately affects the limbs, and extrapedal mycetoma is rarely reported. The reported extrapedal ones are characterised by high morbidity and mortality. This communication reports on 420 patients with extrapedal mycetoma seen and managed at the Mycetoma Research Centre (MRC), University of Khartoum, between January 1991 and December 2021. In this descriptive, cross-sectional, hospital-based study, the electronic records of all mycetoma-confirmed patients seen during the study period were carefully and meticulously reviewed. The confirmed patients with extrapedal mycetoma were included in this study. The study included 420 patients with extrapedal mycetoma, 298 (70.7%) had eumycetoma, and 122 (29.3%) had actinomycetoma. There were 343 male patients (81.7%) and 77 (18.3%) females, with a male-to-female ratio of 4:1. Their ages ranged between 1.5 and 95 years, with a median of 28 years. Most of the patients were students and farmers. The majority of patients were from El Gezira, North Kordofan, and the White Nile States. Mycetoma was painful in 21%, and a family history of mycetoma was recorded in 11.5% of patients. The buttocks (37.9%) and head and neck (16.9%) were affected most. Less frequently affected sites were the trunk and back (12%) each, abdominal and chest walls (4.5%) each and loin (1%). The prominent clinical presentation findings were multiple sinuses discharging grains (55%), massive swellings (46%), and lymphadenopathy (11.5%). Less commonly observed clinical findings were local hyperhidrosis (5.3%) and dilated tortuous veins close to mycetoma lesions (0.5%). The study showed that 204 patients (48.6%) had clinical improvement in terms of decreased lesion size and healing of sinuses following medical therapy. Sixty-six patients (15.7%) had no noticeable improvement. The lesion continued progressing despite treatment in 44 patients (10.5%). In the study, 118 patients were on regular follow-up, and in this group, a cure was documented in 25 patients (21.1%) with eumycetoma and 23 (19.4%) with actinomycetoma. Post-operative recurrence among eumycetoma patients was 40%, with a 1% mortality rate. The treatment outcome was unsatisfactory, characterised by a low cure rate, high recurrence (40%) and follow-up dropout (57%) rates. This emphasises the importance of early case detection and management, objective health education programmes and thorough patient counselling to urge people to seek treatment early and reduce dropouts.

Author summary

This communication reports on 420 patients with extrapedal mycetoma seen at the Mycetoma Research Centre, Khartoum, Sudan, from January 1991 to December 2021. Males were predominantly affected. Their ages ranged between 1.5 and 95 years; most were students and farmers. The majority of patients were from El Gezira, North Kordofan and White Nile States. Family history of mycetoma was recorded in only a few. The buttock was affected most, followed by the head, neck, back, chest, and abdominal wall. The prominent clinical presentation findings were massive lesions with multiple sinuses discharging grains and lymphadenopathy. Eumycetoma was the most encountered type. The treatment outcome was unsatisfactory, characterised by a low cure rate and high recurrence and follow-up dropout rates. This emphasises the importance of early case detection and management, health education programmes, and patient counselling to encourage them to seek treatment early and reduce poor treatment outcomes and dropouts.

Introduction

Mycetoma, a forgotten, neglected disease, is prevalent in tropical and subtropical areas but has been documented globally [1,2]. It is a deep implantation infection due to subcutaneous inoculation of the causative microorganisms, normally inhabited in the soil and environment in the endemic areas, via trivial trauma, notably thorn pricks [3,4,5]. Mycetoma is classified as actinomycetoma or eumycetoma according to its causative microorganisms. Actinomycetoma is caused by filamentous bacteria (actinomycetes), and the frequent ones are Nocardia asteroides, Nocardia brasiliensis, Streptomyces somaliensis, and Actinomadura madurae [6,7,8]. The eumycetoma is a mycetoma type caused by different fungi, and the most common are Madurella mycetomatis and Falciformispora spp. [9,10,11].

Mycetoma is seen in all age groups, but it usually affects young adults between 20 and 40 years old, and 64% of patients are under 30 years old at presentation [12]. Children account for 30% of the reported cases [13]. Males are predominantly affected by mycetoma, with a male-to-female ratio of 3.7:1 [1,2,14]. In most reported series, farmers, manual workers, and students are most often affected [2,15].

Although eumycetoma and actinomycetoma are caused by diverse causative microorganisms, yet, they present with almost similar clinical manifestations, and the cause is an enigma [1,2]. The disease initially manifests as a painless subcutaneous mass, gradually increasing in size, then multiple sinuses and discharge of purulent or seropurulent discharge containing grains appear [1,2,1618].

Mycetoma was reported in different body sites but was more frequent in the exposed parts subjected to local trauma [3,19]. Thus, the foot (76%) and hand (8%) were reported most [1,2]. However, in endemic regions, no part is immune. Extrapedal mycetoma is not a common disease presentation [2025]. Its demographic features and clinical presentation are unknown, and the management outcome is unclear. Still, there is great difficulty in establishing the diagnosis of mycetoma, and the situation becomes more difficult when it affects extrapedal sites [26,27]. The risk factors for extrapedal mycetoma are unknown, which is essential in designing a prevention or control programme. Although extrapedal mycetoma confers more morbidity and mortality, it has not been given sufficient attention. Furthermore, there is no recent comprehensive report on extrapedal mycetoma in Sudan, which has the highest disease burden globally. With this background, this study set out to determine the demographic characteristics features of affected patients, the infection risk factors, if any and patients’ management outcomes.

Patients and methods

Ethics statement

The study’s ethical clearance was obtained from the Soba University Hospital Institutional Review Board, University of Khartoum, No. (SUH/IRB/2022/34).

This descriptive, cross-sectional hospital-based study was conducted at the Mycetoma Research Centre (MRC), University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan. The study included 420 patients with confirmed extrapedal mycetoma seen in the period from January 1991 to December 2021. In this study, extrapedal mycetoma is defined as mycetoma in any body part except the upper and lower limbs.

The diagnosis of mycetoma was confirmed by careful interview, meticulous clinical examinations, and specific investigations, including fine needle aspiration for cytology (FNAC), histopathological examination of surgical biopsies, grains culture and molecular techniques to identify the microorganism to the species level. Various imaging techniques were used, including lesional ultrasound examination, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography (CT). No consents were obtained as these tests were part of the routine workup of patients at the MRC.

The data were collected from the patients’ electronic medical records into a specially designed data collection sheet for analysis. All patients were anonymised.

Data analysis

The data were cleaned, coded, and managed by the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (SPSS Statistics 27). Appropriate descriptive statistical tests were used, and that included the measures of frequency (frequency, per cent), measures of central tendency (mean, median and mode), and measures of dispersion or variation (variance, SD, standard error, range, and coefficient of variation). The results were summarised as percentages for categorical variables, mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), and median for continuous variables.

Results

The studied patients’ demographic characteristics

There were 420 patients with confirmed extrapedal mycetoma, constituting 4.3% of the total mycetoma patients seen at the MRC during the study period. There were 343 male patients (81.7%) and 77 (18.3%) females. Male to female ratio is 4.4:1. The patients’ ages ranged between 1.5 and 95 years, with a median of 28 years (31.1 ± 0.7 standard error). Most patients at presentation were young adults in their third and fourth decade of life, 142 (33.8%) and 105 (25%), respectively, followed by adolescents (17.9%), Table 1.

Table 1. The study population demographic characteristics.

No. %
Sex Male 343 81.60%
Female 77 18.40%
Age group 01–09 05 1.20%
10–19 75 17.90%
20–29 142 33.80%
30–39 105 25.00%
40–49 39 9.30%
50–59 29 6.90%
60–69 17 4.00%
> = 70 08 1.90%
Occupation Student 88 20.9%
Farmer 86 20.47%
Worker 60 14.2%
Housewife 44 10.47%
Unemployed 22 5.23%
Driver 19 4.52%
Shepherd 10 2.38%
Seller 05 1.19%
Other 74 17.61%
Missing 12 2.85%

By occupation, 88 patients (20.9%) were students, and 86 (20.5%) were farmers. Only ten patients (2.38%) were shepherds. 10.47% of this study’s patients were housewives, Table 1.

The study showed that 128 patients (30.4%) were from El Gezira State, 51 patients (12.1%) were from North Kordofan State, and 48 patients (11.4%) were from White Nile State. Six patients (1.42%) were from neighbouring countries, South Sudan and Chad, with three patients each. (Fig 1). Most patients with eumycetoma were from El Gezira (27%), White Nile (9.6%), and Sennar (8.8%) states, Fig 1.

Fig 1. Distribution of extrapedal eumycetoma and actinomycetoma patients across the different states as seen at the Mycetoma Research Centre from 1991–2021, Sudan.

Fig 1

Created by ArcGIS, version 3. https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=7ae5637c804b4b6e80abb85d0ca2c26c.

Clinical presentation

The disease duration at presentation ranged between one month and 50 years. In 270 patients (64.28%), its duration ranged between one and four years. Only 77 (18.3%) had the disease for less than one year, Table 2.

Table 2. The clinical presentation of the study population.

No. %
Disease
Duration
<1 77 18.3%
1–4 117 27.8%
5–9 102 24.2%
10–14 51 12.1%
15–20 27 6.4%
20–25 26 6.1%
>25 17 04%
Missing 03 0.71%
Course Sudden 01 0.23%
Gradual 216 51.4%
Progressive 176 41.9%
Missing 27 6.42%
Discharged grains colour Black 207 49.2%
White 22 5.2%
Yellow 37 8.8%
Red 04 0.95%
None 71 16.9%
Unidentified 05 01.1%
Missing 74 17.6%
Sinus discharge
Pus Yes 33 7.85%
No 387 92.1%
Blood Yes 16 03.8%
No 404 96.2%
Purulent Yes 04 0.95%
No 416 99.04%
Seropurulent Yes 08 01.9%
No 412 98.1%
No discharge Yes 46 11%
No 374 89%
Pain Yes 90 21%
No 288 68.5%
Sometime 29 06.9%
Missing 13 03.09%
Trauma history Yes 102 25.00%
No 238 58.30%
Not Sure 68 16.70%
Medical problem No 356 94.40%
Yes 21 5.60%
Previous surgery
& number
No 125 29.8%
Yes 285 67.9%
1–2 239 56.9%
3–4 29 6.9%
5–6 05 03%
7–8 03 0.1%
10 01 0.2%
Anaesthesia General 125 48.10%
Local 59 22.70%
Spinal 40 15.40%
Combined types 36 13.80%
Previous treatment No 374 91.20%
Yes 36 8.80%
Recurrence Yes 219 54.80%
No 181 45.30%
Family history Yes 38 11.50%
No 292 88.50%

The majority of patients, 275 (65.47%), had grain discharge, and that was black in 207 patients (75.2%), yellow in 37 (13.45%), white in 22 (8%), and red in four (1.45%). Sixty-one patients (14.5%) had a history of a sinus discharge, 33 (7.85%) had pus, and 16 (3.8%) had blood discharge, Table 2.

One hundred and two patients (24.2%) had recalled a history of local trauma at the mycetoma, and 68 patients were unsure (16.1%). Different types of traumas were mentioned, including thorns, pricks, stones, cuts, injections, falls and football game trauma. Most of the traumas were considered minor. Mycetoma lesion was painful in 90 patients (21%), and 29 (6.9%) had pain occasionally, Table 2.

Concurrent medical conditions, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, Hepatitis B (HBV), tuberculosis, renal transplant, and skin dermatitis, were recorded in 5.6% of patients. A family history of mycetoma was present in 11.5%. Ten patients gave a history of mycetoma in a first-degree relative, while seven patients had second-degree relatives. There is no significant statistical difference between the two mycetoma types regarding the family history, p>0.01.

In this study, 285 patients (67.85%) had previous mycetoma surgical excisions done elsewhere prior to presentation to MRC. The operations numbers ranged from one (44%) to ten (0.2%). The surgery was performed under general, spinal, and local anaesthesia, Table 2.

The obtained data showed that 54.8% of them had recurrent disease, and only 36 patients (8.8%) had previous medical treatment for mycetoma elsewhere, Table 2.

There were 169 patients (40.23%) with buttock mycetoma, and the bilateral sides were affected in 15 (3.57%). Spread to the perianal region and perineum were documented in 14 patients (3.33%). There was also an associated inguinal lesion in eight patients with massive gluteal eumycetoma, Fig 2.

Fig 2. The anatomical distribution of mycetoma lesions among the study population.

Fig 2

The head was the second most common site for extrapedal mycetoma seen in 71 patients (16.9%). The occiput and the forehead were the most affected head regions. The infection was confined to the scalp in 22 patients, but at the occiput, it was deeply spreading.

The back was affected in 52 patients (12.38%), mostly in the lower back 24 (5.71%). The perineum and perianal area were involved in 18 patients (4.3%). Both chest and abdominal walls were equally affected, 4.5% each. The lower anterior abdominal wall was the commonest affected area in the abdominal wall Fig 2

Less commonly affected sites were the ear seen in two young males and ended with devastating complications, including hearing loss, facial nerve palsy, and ultimately death in one patient. Eye mycetoma was documented in eight patients. Two patients with eye actinomycetoma had eye destruction, and one had eye enucleation. Few patients had mycetoma in the loin, groin and genitalia, Fig 2.

In this study, 15 patients (3.57%) had multiple trunk or head lesions with associated upper or lower limb lesions. There was no evidence of direct extension from the limbs. The foot was the most affected site associated with other extra pedal mycetoma.

This study revealed that 185 patients (44.04%) had a massive mycetoma lesion (more than 10 cm in diameter) at presentation, only 45 patients (10.71%) had a small lesion (less than 5 cm in diameter), and 125 patients (29.76%) had moderate lesions (5 and 10 cm in diameter). Forty-eight (11.90%) patients presented postoperatively, where surgery was done elsewhere with no clinically apparent lesion at presentation. In some patients, the lesions were detected by ultrasound examination only, Table 3.

Table 3. The clinical examination findings among the study population.

No. %
Lesion Size Small 45 10.71
Medium 125 29.76
Massive 185 44.04
No mass detected (Post-operative) 48 11.42
Missing 17 04.04
Consistency Soft 30 07.14
Firm 260 61.90
Hard 08 01.90
Cystic 03 0.71
Missing 121 28.80
Sinuses No 98 23.33
Yes 306 72.85
Missing 16 3.80
Number of sinuses One 21 05.00
Multiple 131 31.19
Missing 268 63.80
Sinuses activity Active 59 14.04
Healed 93 22.14
Non-active 12 02.85
Active & healed 81 19.28
Active & non-active 04 0.95
Non-active–healed 08 1.90
All 04 0.95
Missing 261 62.1
Grains None 190 54.40
Black 137 39.30
White 07 2.00
Yellow 11 3.20
Red 01 0.30
Unidentified 03 0.90
Missing 71 16.90
Discharge Pus 56 13.33
Blood 07 1.66
Purulent 04 0.95
Seropurulent 23 5.47
No discharge 210 50
Missing 39 9.28
Lymph nodes No 301 71.66
Yes 39 9.28
Missing 80 19.04
Varicose veins No 314 74.76
Yes 02 0.47
Missing 104 24.76
Local sweating Yes 17 0.40
No 303 72.14
Missing 100 23.80

Lesion sinuses were seen in 306 patients (72.85%). They were multiple in 31.19% and single in 05.00%. At presentation, 156 patients (37.1%) had sinuses discharging grains, healed sinuses seen in 93 patients (22.14%), and non-active sinuses in 12 patients (03.85%), Table 3 and Figs 3 and 4.

Fig 3. Showing massive head and neck actinomycetoma.

Fig 3

Fig 4. Showing perineal eumycetoma extending locally and to the scrotum.

Fig 4

Regional lymphadenopathy was detected in 39 patients (9.28%). Most of the affected lymph node groups were inguinal from the gluteal, abdominal wall, genitalia and back lesions, cervical groups from head mycetoma and axillary groups from chest wall mycetoma. Dilated tortuous veins proximal to the mycetoma lesion were observed in two patients (0.47%) with massive and medium-sized lesions; one had bilateral gluteal actinomycetoma, and the other had lower back eumycetoma. Local hyperhidrosis was noted in 17 patients (0.40%).

Diagnosis

Various diagnostic tools were used to establish the diagnosis of mycetoma among the study group. This was done according to the MRC management guidelines [28]. However, for various reasons, not all the investigations were done for every patient. In this study, 133 patients (31.7%) had an X-ray examination, which was normal in 68 (16.1%). The detected radiological changes are due to the disease local spread to the bones, and that included soft tissue masses seen in 52 patients (39.1%), periosteal reactions in 20 patients (15.0%), and bone destruction in 13 patients (9.8%). Ultrasound examination of mycetoma lesion was done for 194 patients (46.6%) and showed evidence of eumycetoma in 76.7% and actinomycetoma in 15.5%. MRI and CT were done for 69 and 41 patients, respectively, to determine the deep tissue invasion.

Fine needle aspiration and cytology (FNAC) was performed in 203 patients (48.30%) and yielded evidence of Madurella mycetomatis in 155 patients (36.9%). In this study, 193 had surgical biopsies and histopathological examinations, which identified causative organisms in 161 patients (82.8%). Of these, two rare microorganisms were identified: Scedosporium boydii and Aspergillus species, and they are pale-grain eumycetoma causative organisms and the diagnosis was further confirmed by culture and sequencing techniques. The histopathological findings were nonspecific in 14 patients (7.3%), and that included tissue granuloma or inflammatory process with no identifiable grains. In ten patients, grain cultures revealed M. mycetomatis (n = 8) and Streptomyces somaliensis (n = 2).

The final diagnosis in this series was eumycetoma, confirmed in 297 patients (70.7%), and the common organism was M. mycetomatis, detected in 237 patients (79.79%). Actinomycetoma was diagnosed in 122 patients (29.3%), and the common causative organisms were Streptomyces somaliensis detected in 50 patients (16.7%), Actinomadura madurae in seven patients (2.3%), and Actinomadura pelletieri in six patients (2%). Rare cases included one patient with maxillary sinus had aspergilloma, and another one had back eumycetoma due to Scedosporium boydii infection.

Complications

Several complications were detected among the studied patients. Secondary bacterial infection was seen in 18 patients. Staphylococcus aureus and Proteus species were the most common isolated organisms, which was more common among eumycetoma patients (94.4%). The disease was progressive in a patient with the middle ear and mastoid cavity eumycetoma, not responding to treatment and ended in hearing loss and facial nerve paralysis. A patient with a massive vulval actinomycetoma caused by A. pelletieri had urethral stricture, bladder outlet obstruction, and acute urine retention. Two patients with back eumycetoma that progressed into paraplegia, and one of them died. Other complications included eye loss, blindness, and deafness in a massive progressive cranial actinomycetoma. The eye was surgically removed in one patient with an advanced eye eumycetoma. Spastic quadriplegia had complicated neck mycetoma in one patient. Two patients had faecal incontinence due to gluteal eumycetoma.

Mycetoma treatment

Mycetoma treatment depends on the causative microorganism, disease type, site, and extension. Regarding eumycetoma, various antifungal agents combined with wide local excision and repetitive tissue debridement were used. In the past, the antifungals used were griseofulvin and ketoconazole; both have been stopped. Currently, oral itraconazole is used at 400 mg/day.

During this study, actinomycetoma was treated by numerous antibiotic combinations, including streptomycin sulphate and dapsone, streptomycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and rifampicin. However, most recently, Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole were prescribed because of their strong safety profile. Amikacin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combination is used for severe cases.

Follow-up and management outcomes

Only 343 patients (81.6%) were followed at the Mycetoma Clinic; 118 (28%) had regular follow-ups, and 77(18.4%) had no follow-ups after their initial presentations. At present, only 49 patients continue follow-up care (11.7%).

The study showed that 204 patients (48.6%) had clinical improvement in terms of decreased lesion size and healing of sinuses following medical therapy. Sixty-six patients (15.7%) had no noticeable improvement. The lesion continued progressing despite treatment in 44 patients (10.5%).

In the study, 118 patients were on regular follow-up, and a cure was documented in 25 patients (21.1%) with eumycetoma and 23 (19.4%) with actinomycetoma. Post-operative recurrence among eumycetoma patients was 40%, with a 1% mortality rate. Table 4.

Table 4. The patients’ treatment outcomes distribution according to the mycetoma type among patients with regular follow-up.

Site Diagnosis
Eumycetoma Actinomycetoma Total
Cured Not cured Cured Not Cured
Abdominal Wall 0 1 1 2 4
Back 4 6 3 2 15
Back & Gluteal 0 1 0 0 1
Chest 1 2 1 0 4
Ear 0 1 0 0 1
Eye 0 0 2 0 2
Eye lid 1 0 0 0 1
Gluteal 15 22 2 3 42
Gluteal, Perineum & Scrotal 0 1 0 0 1
Gluteal, inguinal 1 0 0 0 1
Head 2 7 10 7 26
Neck 0 0 1 2 2
Inguinal 1 0 1 1 3
Multiple 0 3 0 1 4
Jew 0 0 1 0 1
Perineum 0 3 1 2 5
Scrotum 0 1 0 0 1
Testis 0 1 0 0 1
Total 25 50 23 20 118

Surgical treatment, cure, and post-operative recurrence

Eighty-five patients had surgical excisions, 73 (85%) had one surgical excision, 70 patients had eumycetoma, 24 (34.2%) were cured, and three patients had actinomycetoma, and one was cured. Twelve patients (15%) had multiple surgical excisions due to recurrence. Ten patients (11.7%) had two surgical operations, and two had three surgeries. Seven patients in this group were cured.

Four patients underwent colostomy to divert the faecal matter from the perianal mycetoma lesions, and that included transverse and permanent colostomy. Of these, one had actinomycetoma, while the other three had eumycetoma.

This study documented postoperative recurrence in 34 patients (40%). Furthermore, one actinomycetoma patient had developed recurrence on two occasions after stopping medical treatment.

Seven patients developed postoperative wound infection; all had eumycetoma, and the commonly isolated organisms were Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Proteus species.

Mortality among the studied population

In this study, four (1.16%) died during the follow-up period. Three of them were male patients, and they had mycetoma in the head in two patients, one in the ear and one in the back. Of the two patients with head lesions, one had actinomycetoma, and one had eumycetoma. The eumycetoma in the ear was due to M. mycetomatis, while the back eumycetoma was due to Scedosporium boydii.

Discussion

The medical literature indicates that extra-pedal mycetoma poses a significant medical challenge, characterised by relentless disease progression, high morbidity, severe complications, and a risk of mortality [2025]. Most reported extrapedal cases presented with prolonged disease duration before seeking medical attention. Hence, patients presented with advanced disease and noticeable disfigurement [2025]. Treatment outcomes are consistently suboptimal, characterised by high mortality and morbidity [2025]. Based on these serious findings, this study set out to study the extrapedal mycetoma patients treated at the MRC over the past three decades, constituting the largest reported series.

This study reported on 420 patients with confirmed extrapedal mycetoma, constituting 4.3% of the total mycetoma patients seen at the MRC during the study period, which is less frequent than that of the previously reported series [17, 2931]. A report from the main mycological diagnostic centres in Mexico on 3,933 mycetoma patients, mainly actinomycetoma (96.5%) seen in 54 years, revealed that extrapedal mycetoma accounted for 22% [29]. Bonifaz and associates from Mexico reported on 482 patients, mainly actinomycetoma (92%), and the extrapedal accounted for 19.6% [17]. From Senegal, 193 mycetoma patients were reported, eumycetoma was more frequent, and extrapedal mycetoma accounted for 6.7% [31]. The high incidence of extrapedal cases in the Mexican series remains ambiguous. However, in some of these studies, the definition of extrapedal mycetoma was different as it included any site except the foot. Yet, the habits of the affected individuals could offer a partial explanation, given that a majority were engaged in farming. Additionally, these reports indicate a higher prevalence of extrapedal mycetoma among actinomycetoma patients; the cause remains uncertain. However, the prevalence of actinomycetoma in that region may contribute to this pattern.

The results obtained in this study on the patients’ demographic characteristics are comparable to various previous reports [17,28,29,30]. Males were affected most and were four times more likely to develop extrapedal mycetoma. This male predominance is similar to previous reports from Sudan and globally [2,17,29,30]. The causes are unclear; however, some hormonal and genetic factors and outdoor activities may justify this male predominance [4,3234].

Extrapedal mycetoma was more prevalent among young adults, consistent with many reports in the literature [1,2]. The majority of affected patients were in the age group 20–39 years, predominantly students and farmers who constitute a substantial portion of the labour force and serve as the economic backbone. This situation imposes significant adverse socio-economic consequences on these individuals, their families, and the communities in mycetoma endemic regions. The high incidence of infection among teenagers and young adults can be linked to their engagement in farming activities and frequent barefoot playing, exposing them to agents that cause mycetoma in these endemic areas [1,2,4,17,29].

Family history of mycetoma was recorded only in 11% of the reported patients, which is similar to previous studies [1,2]. Hence, it can be extrapolated that in mycetoma, many predisposing factors can contribute to its causation, such as local household environmental and personal behavioural factors and genetic and immunological factors [4,34].

The duration of mycetoma was less than one year in only 18.5% of patients; consequently, most patients presented with massive lesions with multiple sinuses discharging grains at presentation. The buttock, perineum, head, and back were reported most, and they are in contact with the soil when sitting or lying down. This may validate the hypothesis that mycetoma occurs due to traumatic inoculation of causative organisms [1,2,4,17]. That should be taken into consideration when designing preventive and control programmes.

Regional lymphadenopathy in mycetoma is not an unusual finding that usually occurs due to secondary infection, local immune-complex reactions, or true mycetoma lymphatic spread [35]. In this study, the lymphadenopathy was more frequent with gluteal, buttocks, and inguinal eumycetoma, and direct lymphatic spread is the explanation. Similarly, this study showed axillary lymphadenopathy in a few patients with chest wall mycetoma, in line with Bonifaz’s report on two patients with a lymphatic spread from the back to the axillary region [17]. This study recorded lung spread from gluteal mycetoma, which was probably a blood-borne spread [36].

Although most of the reported patients in this series had massive lesions, proximal varicose veins were rare (0.5%). In comparison, they were reported in (6%) of patients with lower limb mycetoma [37]. It is thought that dilated veins proximal to the mycetoma lesions result from the swift venous return associated with the increased arterial blood flow to the chronic inflammatory granuloma mycetoma lesion. In this series, venous varicosity in the inguinal and suprapubic area was reported in a patient with posterior abdominal wall actinomycetoma, resulting in complete iliac and femoral venous system blockage.

Although mycetoma usually presents with a mass and multiple sinuses discharging grains, abdominal wall mycetoma has a different clinical presentation. In this series, three patients with Streptomyces somaliensis caused actinomycetoma presented clinically as abdominal, renal, and retroperitoneal masses and a desmoid tumour. The diagnosis was surgical and histopathological surprises.

One of the important issues in managing mycetoma patients is the high dropout rate among patients. Follow-up dropout among extrapedal mycetoma patients (57%) is slightly higher than in pedal mycetoma patients [38]. The reasons are multifactorial. Most importantly, patients had massive lesions and needed more prolonged treatment, and surgical excisions at these extrapedal sites were difficult and incomplete, hence the high recurrence rate and, thus, the patient’s dissatisfaction and dropout. Additionally, most of these patients are of low socio-economic and health education levels and live in remote rural areas without transportation, and it was difficult for them to attend the follow-up. Patients with perineal, inguinal, gluteal, and genital mycetoma are always reluctant to present for medical advice, treatment and follow-up due to shyness and social stigma.

Surgical recurrence in mycetoma is typical, leading to significant morbidity and disability. This study revealed a higher recurrence rate in extrapedal patients (40%) than that reported for pedal mycetoma (27–32%) [1,2]. This may be due to the inadequate surgical excision in this group of patients. In mycetoma, a bloodless field using a tourniquet is vital for adequate excision with a clear margin without disturbing the mycetoma granuloma capsule [39]. This is not applicable in extrapedal mycetoma; hence, there is a higher risk of surgical recurrence. Furthermore, the disease’s biological characteristics, the host tissue reactions, and the patients’ later presentation due to socio-economic and health education factors can contribute to this high recurrence rate [1,2].

In general, recovery from mycetoma is difficult, especially for eumycetoma patients. The cure rate amongst the study population was markedly low. The eumycetoma group of patients in this study had a relatively low cure rate comparable to other studies [1,2,38].

This study has some limitations; first, it is a descriptive retrospective, and the missing data on the follow-up and dropout among the patients make the evaluation of disease outcomes, especially recurrence and mortality, inaccurate.

In conclusion, this study highlighted the characteristics and outcomes of extrapedal mycetoma patients managed at MRC. There is no clear risk factor for extrapedal mycetoma from the data obtained in this study. The management outcome was unsatisfactory, with a low cure rate, high recurrence, and follow-up dropout rates. Mycetoma endemic areas need systematic and objective health education programmes to encourage early reporting and treatment and, consequently, lessen the medical and socio-economic impacts of mycetoma on patients, families, communities, and the health system at large [40]. To improve treatment outcomes, more efficient and safer drugs are needed to treat eumycetoma, as the current treatment needs more extended time. Patients with mycetoma in the head, ear, eye, oral cavity, face and perineum may need specialised surgical intervention and follow-up [41]. Hence, liaison between the treating clinician and the speciality of concern is essential to provide the best possible treatment and to track patients during management and follow-up to assess the outcome better.

Supporting information

S1 Data. Patients characteristics raw data.

(XLS)

pntd.0011841.s001.xls (455KB, xls)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Fahal AH. Mycetoma: a thorn in the flesh. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2004; 98(1):3–11. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(03)00009-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fahal A, Mahgoub ES, El Hassan AM, Abdel-Rahman ME. Mycetoma in the Sudan: an update from the Mycetoma Research Centre, University of Khartoum, Sudan. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015. Mar 27; 9(3). doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zijlstra EE, van de Sande WWJ, Welsh O, Mahgoub ES, Goodfellow M, Fahal AH. Mycetoma: a unique neglected tropical disease. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016; 16:100–112. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00359-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fahal AH, Bakhiet SM. Mycetoma and the environment. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023. Nov 16;17(11):e0011736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011736 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.van de Sande WW. Global burden of human mycetoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013; 7(11). doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Emery D, Denning DW. The global distribution of actinomycetoma and eumycetoma. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14(9): e0008397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fahal AH. Mycetoma. Review article, Khartoum Med J. 2011; 4(1): 514–523. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fahal AH, Hassan MA. Mycetoma. Br J Surg. 1992; 79(11): 1138–1141. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800791107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Oladele RO, Ly F, Sow D, Akinkugbe AO, Ocansey BK, Fahal AH, et al. Mycetoma in West Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2021. Apr 14;115(4):328–336. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/trab032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fahal AH. Mycetoma, Clinicopathological Monograph. Khartoum: Khartoum University Press. 2006, 34–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.van Belkum A, Fahal A, van de Sande WW. Mycetoma caused by Madurella mycetomatis: a completely neglected medico-social dilemma. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;764:179–89. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4726-9_15 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fahal AH. Mycetoma. In Mora-Montes HM, Leila M, Lopes-Bezerra L, editors. Current Progress in Medical Mycology. Springer Nature; 2017. p 355–380. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fahal AH, Sabaa AH. Mycetoma in children in Sudan. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2010;104(2):117–21. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2009.07.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fahal AH, Suliman SH, Hay R. Mycetoma: The Spectrum of Clinical Presentation. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2018; 3(3):97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Doğan A, Ali AM, Ali MA, Abdullahi İM. Mycetoma case series in Somalia. Trop Doct. 2023. Sep 16:494755231201664. doi: 10.1177/00494755231201664 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Agarwal P, Jagati A, Rathod SP, Kalra K, Patel S, Chaudhari M. Clinical Features of Mycetoma and the Appropriate Treatment Options. Res Rep Trop Med 2021; 12: 173–179. doi: 10.2147/RRTM.S282266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bonifaz A, Tirado-Sánchez A, Calderón L, Saúl A, Araiza J, Hernández M, et al. Mycetoma: Experience of 482 Cases in a Single Center in Mexico. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(8): e3102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kwizera R, Bongomin F, Meya DB, Denning DW, Fahal AH, Lukande R. Mycetoma in Uganda: A neglected tropical disease. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2020;14(4): e0008240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Develoux M, Vetter JM, Audoin J, Treguer J. 63 cases of mycetoma in the Niger Republic (etiological study based on histopathology). Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales. 1985; 78: 574–584. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fahal AH, Yagi HI, EL Hassan AM. Mycetoma induced palatal deficiency and pharyngeal plexus dysfunction. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1996; 90: 676–677. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(96)90430-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fahal AH, Sharfi AR, Sheikh HE, EL Hassan AM. Mycetoma: Uncommon complication. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1996; 89: 550–552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mohamed EW, Mohamed ENA, Yousif BM, Fahal AH. Tongue Actinomycetoma due to Actinomadura madurae: A rare clinical presentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 70(11):e622–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fahal AH, Arbab MAR, EL Hassan AM. Aggressive Clinical Presentation of Mycetoma due to Actinomadura Pelletierii. Khartoum Med J. 2012; 5(1): 699–702. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fahal AH, Sharfy ARA. Vulval mycetoma: a rare cause of bladder outlet obstruction. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1998; 92: 652–653. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(98)90798-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ezaldeen EA, Ahmed ES, Fahal AH. Massive complicated secondary inguinal mycetoma: a case series. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2021. Apr 14;115(4):420–425. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/traa181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ahmed AA, van de Sande WW, Fahal A, Bakker-Woudenberg I, Verbrugh H, van Belkum A. Management of mycetoma: major challenge in tropical mycoses with limited international recognition. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2007; 20(2):146–51. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e32803d38fe . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ahmed AA, van de Sande W, Fahal AH. Mycetoma laboratory diagnosis: Review article. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017; 11(8). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.https://www.mycetoma.edu.sd/publications/the-guidelines
  • 29.López-Martínez R, Méndez-Tovar LJ, Bonifaz A, Arenas R, Mayorga J, Welsh O, et al. Update on the epidemiology of mycetoma in Mexico. A review of 3933 cases. Gac Med Mex. 2013. Sep-Oct;149(5):586–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.López Martínez R, Méndez Tovar LJ, Lavalle P, Welsh O, Saúl A, Macotela Ruíz E. Epidemiology of mycetoma in Mexico: study of 2105 cases. Gac Med Mex. 1992. Jul-Aug;128(4):477–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Diadie S, Ndiaye M, Diop K, Diongue K, Diouf J, Sarr M, et al. Extrapedal mycetomas in Senegal: epidemiological, clinical and etiological study of 82 cases diagnosed from 2000 to 2020. Med Trop Sante Int. 2022. Feb 11;2(1):mtsi.v2i1.2022.210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.van de Sande WW, Fahal A, Tavakol M, van Belkum A. Polymorphisms in catechol-O-methyltransferase and cytochrome p450 subfamily 19 genes predispose towards Madurella mycetomatis-induced mycetoma susceptibility. Med Mycol. 2010. Nov;48(7):959–68. doi: 10.3109/13693781003636680 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.van de Sande WW, Fahal A, Verbrugh H, van Belkum A. Polymorphisms in genes involved in innate immunity predispose toward mycetoma susceptibility. J Immunol. 2007. Sep 1;179(5):3065–74. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.5.3065 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ali RS, Newport MJ, Bakhiet SM, Ibrahim ME, Fahal AH. Host genetic susceptibility to mycetoma. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020. Apr 30;14(4): e0008053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008053 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.El Hassan AM, Mahgoub ES. Lymph node involvement in mycetoma. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1972;66(1):165–9. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(72)90065-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Siddig EE, Mhmoud NA, Fahal AH. Identification of M. mycetomatis fungus in pleural fluid and sputum of a patient with aggressive gluteal eumycetoma with pulmonary spread. Khartoum Med J 2015; 8(3): 1164–1167. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fahal AH, EL Sheik H, El Hassan AM. Venous Varicosity in Mycetoma. Sudan Med J. 2011; 47(1): 20–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zein HA, Fahal AH, Mahgoub ES, El Hassan TA, Abdel-Rahman ME. Predictors of cure, amputation and follow-up dropout among patients with mycetoma seen at the Mycetoma Research Centre, University of Khartoum, Sudan. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2012. Nov;106(11):639–44. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2012.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mohamed ESW, Bakhiet SM, El Nour M, Suliman SH, El Amin HM, Fahal AH. Surgery in mycetoma-endemic villages: unique experience. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2021. Apr 14;115(4):320–323. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/traa194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bakhiet SM, Fahal AH, Musa AM, Mohamed ESW, Omer RF, Ahmed ES, et al. A holistic approach to the mycetoma management. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018. May 10;12(5):e0006391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006391 eCollection 2018 May. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Saad ESA, Fahal AH. Broncho-pleuro-cutaneous fistula and pneumothorax: Rare challenging complications of chest wall eumycetoma. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017. Sep 28;11(9): e0005737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005737 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011841.r001

Decision Letter 0

Pascal Del Giudice, Joshua Nosanchuk

16 Feb 2024

Dear Prof. Fahal,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Epidemiological Observations and Management Challenges in Extrapedal Mycetoma: A Three-Decade Review of 420 Cases" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Pascal Del Giudice, MD

Guest Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Joshua Nosanchuk

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: For the methods of my answers are yes

Reviewer #2: In the study entitled “Epidemiological Observations and Management Challenges in Extrapedal Mycetoma:

A Three-Decade Review of 420 Cases”, authors present their clinical observations in 420 extra pedal mycetoma patients that attended MRC between January 1991 and December 2021. This descriptive clinical study comprehensively described the clinical characteristics of both Eumycetoma and Actinomycetoma cases and compared the treatment outcomes (Clinical improvements) with each of these character istics. A study like this strongly warrants a publication.

Some minor comments:

Page 7 -Line 141 : The statistical methods need to be elaborated for the reader to understand the data analysis in detail.

Page 11 - Lines 215 - 217: For those patients where family history is evident, it will be interesting to see if the type of mycetoma is the same between case and the familial contact.

Reviewer #3: Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated? Yes

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives? Yes

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested? Yes

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested? Yes

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions? Yes

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met? Not really

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: for the results all my answers are yes

Reviewer #2: -Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

Yes

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

Yes

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Yes

Reviewer #3: yes

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: Yes the conclusions are supported by the data presented. the limitations are clearly described ie the lack of regular follow-up for a majority of patient ts but this is always observed with mycetoma pateints living for from main hospitals.

The authors discuss these data and th main recommandations are early detection and treatment of mycetoma, especially extra-pedal mycetoma, the necessity of new drugs for eumycetoma and the neccessity of specialised surgery for some extra-pedal localisatioons

Reviewer #2: -Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

Yes

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

Yes

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

Yes

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Yes

Reviewer #3: yes

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: This series need minor modifications, the mycetoma research center of Khartoum, is a reference center and present always

main data, results and recommandation about mycetoma

Reviewer #2: Accept

Reviewer #3: Yes I recommended. minor revision

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: This is a series of 420 extrapedal mycetoma presented by the mycetoma research center of Khartoum. It is the most important series ever presented on extrapedal mycetoma, few data exists about this aspect of mycetoma. But the main question is: what these authors call an extrpedal mycetoma ? They have to give a definition in the text. For Senegalese authors (ref 31) extrapedal mycetoma is every mycetoma localized outside the foot including upper and lower limps. It explains the difference of percentage of extrapedal localizations between Senegal (39%) and Sudan (4,3%). In Mexico (ref 17), extrapedal mycetoma represent 35,75% of cases, percentage quite similar to the Senegalese results.

Osseous localizations ( 20 periostal reaction, 13 bone destructions) were found in 33 of the cases in the presented series. Would it be possible to have more details about these 33 patients, especially the exact localization. It is said that osseous involvement seems to be rare outside the foot and the hands.

line 301: FNAC is a very interesting method diagnosis...but it is impossible to identify Madurella mycetomatis as only PCR can identify species of Madurella...you can only answer Madurella sp...same remark for histopathology of grains.

line 305: two rare organims were identified: Scedosporium boydi and Aspergillus sp...by culture ?

Reviewer #2: In the study entitled “Epidemiological Observations and Management Challenges in Extrapedal Mycetoma:

A Three-Decade Review of 420 Cases”, authors present their clinical observations in 420 extra pedal mycetoma patients that attended MRC between January 1991 and December 2021. This descriptive clinical study comprehensively described the clinical characteristics of both Eumycetoma and Actinomycetoma cases and compared the treatment outcomes (Clinical improvements) with each of these character istics. A study like this strongly warrants a publication.

Some minor comments:

Page 7 -Line 141 : The statistical methods need to be elaborated for the reader to understand the data analysis in detail.

Page 11 - Lines 215 - 217: For those patients where family history is evident, it will be interesting to see if the type of mycetoma is the same between case and the familial contact.

Reviewer #3: document attached.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Dr Sundeep Chaitanya Vedithi

Reviewer #3: Yes: Afia Zafar

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

References

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article's retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Mycetoma extrapedal 2024.docx

pntd.0011841.s002.docx (15.2KB, docx)
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011841.r003

Decision Letter 1

Pascal Del Giudice, Joshua Nosanchuk

10 Apr 2024

Dear Prof. Fahal,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Epidemiological Observations and Management Challenges in Extrapedal Mycetoma: A Three-Decade Review of 420 Cases' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Pascal Del Giudice, MD

Guest Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Joshua Nosanchuk

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

<style type="text/css">p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; line-height: 16.0px; font: 14.0px Arial; color: #323333; -webkit-text-stroke: #323333}span.s1 {font-kerning: none

</style>

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011841.r004

Acceptance letter

Pascal Del Giudice, Joshua Nosanchuk

30 Apr 2024

Dear Prof. Fahal,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Epidemiological Observations and Management Challenges in Extrapedal Mycetoma: A Three-Decade Review of 420 Cases," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data. Patients characteristics raw data.

    (XLS)

    pntd.0011841.s001.xls (455KB, xls)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Mycetoma extrapedal 2024.docx

    pntd.0011841.s002.docx (15.2KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pntd.0011841.s003.docx (22.2KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES