Abstract
Heavy metal (HM) pollution threatens human and ecosystem health. Current methods for remediating water contaminated with HMs are expensive and have limited effect. Therefore, bioremediation is being investigated as an environmentally and economically viable alternative. Freshwater protists Euglena gracilis and Euglena mutabilis were investigated for their tolerance to cadmium (Cd). A greater increase in cell numbers under Cd stress was noted for E. mutabilis but only E. gracilis showed an increase in Cd tolerance following pre-treatment with elevated concentrations of S or N. To gain insight regarding the nature of the increased tolerance RNA-sequencing was carried out on E. gracilis. This revealed transcript level changes among pretreated cells, and additional differences among cells exposed to CdCl2. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis reflected changes in S and N metabolism, transmembrane transport, stress response, and physiological processes related to metal binding. Identifying these changes enhances our understanding of how these organisms adapt to HM polluted environments and allows us to target development of future pre-treatments to enhance the use of E. gracilis in bioremediation relating to heavy metals.
Subject terms: Microbiology, Molecular biology, Environmental sciences
Introduction
Mining runoff and tailing ponds directly pollute nearby water sources and soil, while aerosolized particles extend the perimeter of pollution to further waterbodies and soil1. This contamination has devastating impacts on both ecosystem and human health1,2. Cd is one of the most toxic heavy metals (HMs)3, with prolonged exposure resulting in decreased chlorophyll content in microalgae4–6 and reduced photosynthesis and mitochondrial function in plants7,8.
Current methods to remediate areas that are polluted by HMs include chemical precipitation, filtration systems, resin-based ion exchange, flotations, coagulation, and the use of activated carbons9. Although these methods are the current industry standard, they are expensive, require a substantial amount of energy and are largely ineffective10. On average, these methods remove less than 100 mg/L of HMs from water, and there is considerable variation depending on the landscape of the waterbody10,11. Due to these drawbacks, research has focused on removing HMs using bioremediation. Bioremediation is the process of using living organisms to remove contaminants and pollutants from the environment12. While there are various plant and fungal species that have shown a natural tolerance and ability to absorb Cd, Euglena gracilis has emerged as a novel and more effective tool for the bioremediation of HMs including Cd13.
E. gracilis is a single-celled, freshwater protist that can grow under photoautotrophic, heterotrophic and mixotrophic conditions13,14. Unlike most organisms, E. gracilis can survive in a variety of harsh environments, notably those that are acidic (pH 2.5–7) and contain high concentrations of HMs. One example of this type of environment is mine runoffs, where E. gracilis can be naturally found14,15. E. gracilis is capable of absorbing HMs including Cu, Pb, Hg, and Cd, and has demonstrated greater absorption capabilities than other bioremediation organisms13,15,16. For example, Ballota hirsuta, a common plant in mining regions, demonstrated an absorption capacity of approximately 1.7 × 10−2 mg/g for Ni and 1.2 × 10−2 mg/g for Cu. In contrast, E. gracilis has been shown to absorb 50.1 mg/g of Ni and 1.55 × 10−2 mg/g of Cu under similar conditions17,18. When grown anaerobically, E. gracilis cells displayed higher Cd biosorption capabilities and have been shown to become Cd resistant after several generations of growth exposed to Cd19. Recent metabolomic analysis identified metal-binding compounds produced by E. gracilis that are enriched in S and N20,21. More specifically, five out of six Hg binding compounds identified were found to contain N and classified as polyphenols and lignin monomers, which exhibit metal-binding properties 20,21. Interestingly, these compounds were also identified in the related E. mutabilis21.
E. mutabilis is an extremophilic Euglenoid often found in highly toxic environments including acid mine drainage22. It is often associated with other microorganisms to form biofilms, and it is believed that these microbial interactions strengthen E. mutabilis’ ability to tolerate extreme environments23. An E. mutabilis culture obtained with a naturally associated yeast from northern Canada had HM tolerance 10–100 times higher than previously reported algae23. More recently, the Cd tolerance of an E. mutabilis fungal-algal–bacterial (FAB) consortium (CPCC 657) was investigated to identify the significance of the microbial partnerships24. While investigating the role of the associated organisms in culture, an Acidiphilium acidophilum bacteria and a Talaromyces sp. fungus, it was discovered that suppressing their growth through antibiotic and antimycotic agents resulted in decreased Cd tolerance of E. mutabilis compared to when the culture was left intact24. The high tolerance of both these Euglena sp. to heavy metals added to the interest in investigating this organism for potential in bioremediation.
Pre-growth (treatment) of plants has also resulted in increased Cd tolerance. Notably, S treatment has been used to enhance Cd tolerance in Brassica chinensis25. The rationale for these studies was that S assimilation is linked to an increase in thiol-containing compounds such as phytochelatins and glutathione (GSH) which contribute to Cd tolerance, and stabilizes the ascorbate (AsA)-GSH cycle which helped maintain the balance of reactive oxygen species (ROS)21. N containing compounds have also been linked to increased Cd tolerance in plants26. Doubling the N supply to wheat (20 mM NO3−) reduced oxidative stress and growth inhibition caused by Cd26. The increased N was also able to mitigate the reduction of both chlorophyll and carotenoids, allowing photosynthesis to continue26. Under anaerobic conditions, the combination of decreased oxygen with increased cysteine and sulfide levels (Greenblatt and Schiff medium containing 1.5 mM of sulfate) led to lower Cd toxicity with an IC50 = 104 + /− 35 μM CdCl220. Similar to the anaerobic growth experiments, exposing aerobic cultures of E. gracilis to low concentrations of HgCl2 for at least 60 generations resulted in permanent metabolic adaptations that enhanced its ability to accumulate CdCl227. Unlike E. gracilis, the impact of a pretreatment on the Cd tolerance of the FAB consortium within E. mutabilis had not been investigated in past work24.
The innate HM tolerance and metal-binding properties of E. gracilis and E. mutabilis allow them to survive in toxic environments such as acid mine drainage and are essential for their potential use as bioremediation tools. Additionally, previous work successfully enhanced the HM tolerance of Euglena by manipulating its growth conditions. This information, combined with the discovery of S and N rich polyphenols and lignin monomers, lead to the hypothesis that pre-treatment with elevated levels of S and N could increase the tolerance of E. gracilis and E. mutabilis to Cd.
While there have been many studies of E. gracilis and HM tolerance, limited research suggests that the HM tolerance of E. mutabilis is greater than E. gracilis15. In this study we assessed the tolerance of E. gracilis (CPCC 95), a commercial axenic culture, and E. mutabilis (CPCC 657), an environmental FAB consortium, to CdCl2 following pre-treatments with elevated S and N. We assessed growth and cell viability of both Euglena species to determine the impact of Cd. The data indicate E. mutabilis cultures are more tolerant of Cd and that the presence of other organism in the consortium may influence the impact of elevated S and N. In contrast, E. gracilis Cd tolerance is increased by S and N pretreatment, and this allowed us to identify functional genes associated with altered transcript levels in response to pre-treatments and Cd exposure using RNA sequencing. The findings of this research improve our understanding of Cd tolerance in E. gracilis and E. mutabilis, they also provide insight regarding the mechanisms behind HM tolerance in E. gracilis. The knowledge gained could enhance the ability to use Euglena sp. as tools for bioremediation.
Results
Growth of Euglena gracilis and Euglena mutabilis in pre-treatment media
The impact of elevated S and N on Cd tolerance was assessed by growing cultures of E. gracilis and E. mutabilis in Modified Acid Medium (MAM) at a pH of 4.328,29, with increased concentrations of MgSO4·7H2O (13.85 g/L) or the addition of NH4NO3 (5.85 g/L). Growth assays and microscopy were used to assess the impact of elevated S and N on cell morphology. The 10 times level was selected because this was the greatest concentration that could be used without having a substantial impact on cell morphology especially in the case of N (Fig. S1).
Cell counts of E. gracilis grown in MAM (Control) and MAM with elevated S (S-treatment) and N (N-treatment) were reported every 4 days for 44 days, while E. mutabilis were reported every 7 days for 42 days (Fig. 1). The difference in sampling intervals were selected to be consistent with previous research using these organisms which suggested that E. mutabilis grows slower than E. gracilis15,27,30, however our findings contradict these reports. A linear regression performed on the growth curves of Control, S-treated and N-treated E. gracilis, generated growth rates (slope) of 6.2 × 103 cells/mL per day (R2 = 0.9411; F = 1.79 × 10−7), 5.9 × 103 cells/mL per day (R2 = 0.9546; F = 4.82 × 10−8), and 4.4 × 103 cells/mL per day (R2 = 0.9617; F = 2.05 × 10−8), respectively. In contrast, the growth rates of Control, S-treated and N-treated E. mutabilis, are 2.6-fold (16.1 × 103 cells/mL per day; R2 = 0.9755; F = 3.22 × 10−5), 3.1-fold (18.4 × 103 cells/mL per day; R2 = 0.9555; F = 1.44 × 10−4), and 3.0-fold (13.12 × 103 cells/mL per day; R2 = 0.9530; F = 1.65 × 10−4) higher, respectively. A one-way ANOVA comparing growth between pretreatments also identified significant differences in cell counts. These differences are observed in E. gracilis and E. mubtabilis when comparing cell counts in S-treated and N-treated cultures to the cell counts in the Control cultures.
Figure 1.
Growth of Euglena pretreatment. Growth of E. gracilis (a) and E. mutabilis (b) is unaffected by elevated S but decreased with elevated N. 20,000 cells of E. gracilis and E. mutabilis were inoculated into their treatments and grown for 44 and 42 days, respectively, with E. gracilis cells counted and transferred into fresh media every 4 days and E. mutabilis cells counted and transferred every 7 days. A one-way ANOVA was used to calculate statistical difference in cell counts of the S (MAM + MgSO4·7H2O) or N (MAM + NH3NO3) pretreatment compared to control growth (MAM). The results of the one-way ANOVA for E. gracilis cultures are as follows: F-value = 17.37, p-value = 7.7 × 10−9. The results of a one-way ANOVA for E. mutabilis cultures are as follows: F-value = 46.64, p-value = 1.8 × 10−8. Differences between control cells and cells in the S pretreatment are denoted by an asterixis (*; p = < 0.05), while differences between control cells and cells in the N treatment are denoted by a dagger (☨; p = < 0.05). Error bars represent standard deviation in viable cell counts between biological replicates (n = 7).
Euglena gracilis and Euglena mutabilis cell viability after exposure to 25 CdCl2
Following the pretreatment of Control, S-treatment and N-treatment E. gracilis and E. mutabilis cultures, the tolerance of E. gracilis and E. mutabilis cultures to Cd were assessed. Pretreated E. gracilis cells were exposed to either control (MAM only) or Cd (MAM + 25 μM CdCl2) conditions with cell counts every 4 days for 20 days, while pretreated E. mutabilis cells were exposed to control and Cd conditions with cell counts every 7 days for 21 days (Fig. 2). The concentration of CdCl2 was selected following preliminary tests which showed that 25 μM CdCl2 elicited inhibitory growth responses from E. gracilis without causing extensive cell death (Fig. S2). Preliminary testing also indicated that an 8-day period of exposure to Cd not only elicited a detectable response as observed in the number of viable cells present but provided an adequate number of cells for RNA isolations and RNA-sequencing across all treatment conditions (Fig. 2a; Fig. S2).
Figure 2.
Assessment of Cd tolerance of Euglena gracilis and Euglena mutabiilis. E gracilis exhibits increased Cd tolerance following S-treatment and N-treatment during two separate time course exposure to 25 μM CdCl2 with separate biological replicates(a,b) In contrast, the Cd tolerance of E. mutabilis did not appear to increase following S-treatment and N-treatment (c). An 8-day time course for E. gracilis (b) revealed the viable cell counts remained high enough to provide sufficient biomass for RNA isolation. Bars on the graph represent the number of viable cells in each culture (cells/mL). Asterixis indicate significant difference in cell counts (* = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001) as determined by a one-way ANOVA test across seven biological replicates for E. gracilis (Fig. 2b: Day 4 F-value = 1.73; Day 4 p-value = 0.2057; Day 8 F-value = 29.13; Day 8 p-value = 2.27 × 10−5) and three biological replicates for E. mutabilis. Error bars represent the standard deviation between viable cell counts of the biological replicates.
Pre-treating E. gracilis cultures with elevated concentrations of S and N prior to CdCl2 exposure resulted in higher cell counts, after 8 days, relative to non-pretreated cultures (Fig. 2a,b). In contrast, pretreated E. mutabilis cultures did not show a consistent or statistically significant difference in viable cells relative to non-pretreated cells after 21 days of CdCl2 exposure (Fig. 2b). The lack of differences in response seen for E. mutabilis could be a result of interactions between members of the FAB consortium or due to metabolism of the bacteria, fungus, or both. Neither the potential interactions, nor the effects of individual organisms in the consortium were assessed. Although E. mutabilis cultures exhibited a varied response following CdCl2 exposure, they also showed higher cell counts than the E. gracilis cultures after 14 and 21 days. Control E. mutabilis cultures contained 3.5 times the cells in the presence of CdCl2, 1.9 times with the S-treatment cultures, and 1.8 times the number of viable cells with the N-treatment cultures, relative to the 20-day E. gracilis cultures (Fig. 2a,c). This indicated that only E. gracilis responded to pre-treatment but that E. mutabilis was the more Cd tolerant culture.
The impact of pre-treatment on E. gracilis prompted an investigation, using RNA-sequencing, to determine which genes were responding to cadmium exposure, and if there are differences in gene transcript levels in the S-treatment and N-treatment cultures compared to the Control cultures. The time course was repeated for a shortened 8 days and at this point there was a significant difference in cell counts between the pretreated and non-pretreated cultures and there was enough biomass for reliable RNA isolation (Fig. 2b). Cultures from an 8-day time course were used for RNA isolation.
Trypan Blue Solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Mississauga) was used for cell viability assessments in the E. gracilis and E. mutabilis cultures (Table 1). While there were fewer E. gracilis cells present in the cultures exposed to CdCl2, the fraction of dead cells was higher in the E. mutabilis cultures. Assessing the differences in cell growth and cell viability between species indicated that only E. gracilis had increased CdCl2 tolerance following pre-treatment with S or N. This data further supported the selection of E. gracilis to investigate the impact of S and N pre-treatment on gene expression change and the selection of the 8-day time point to ensure a statistical difference in growth of pre-treated cultures and sufficient biomass for RNA isolation.
Table 1.
Comparison between the average number of E. gracilis and E. mutabilis cells in each treatment on the final day of 25 μM CdCl2 exposure, 20 and 21 days, respectively, and the frequency of dead cells in each treatment.
| Euglena gracilis (day 20) | Euglena mutabilis (day 21) | Euglena gracilis (day 8) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Total cell count (cells/mL) | Frequency of dead cells (%) | Total cell count (cells/mL) | Frequency of dead cells (%) | Total cell count (cells/mL) | Frequency of dead cells (%) |
| Control | 44,646 | 2.27 | 184,957 | 17.59 | 241,963 | 1.35 |
| S-Pretreated | 66,666 | 0 | 183,221 | 31.92 | 306,785 | 0 |
| N-Pretreated | 56,250 | 0 | 172,749 | 40.54 | 313,451 | 0.28 |
RNA-seq, differential gene expression, and gene ontology term analysis
RNA-sequencing was carried out on E. gracilis cultures grown in six conditions: Control cultures, S-treatment cultures, and N-treatment cultures each with and without exposure to 25 μM CdCl2. For each growth condition six biological replicates were sequenced for a total of 36 samples with an average of 23.3 million raw paired end (PE) reads per library (Table S1). Following the removal of adapter and poor-quality sequences there was an average of 19.5 million trimmed PE reads per library. A de novo transcriptome was assembled using a combined total of 117.3 million trimmed PE reads. Once completed, the transfrag assembly represented 838,537 transcripts with an N50 value of 892 and these transcripts were from 459,533 Euglena gracilis genes. BUSCO analysis comparing E. gracilis transfrag assembly to the eukaryota Orthodb v10 orthologs showed 82.8% of orthologs within the database were found in the E. gracilis de novo assembly. An average of 23.2 million trimmed paired-end reads were aligned to the de novo transcriptome assembly across all libraries (Table S2).
Differential gene expression (DGE) analysis of control (MAM only), S-pretreated, and N-pretreated E. gracilis cultures exposed to 25 μM CdCl2 identified 185, 136, and 311 unique transcripts, respectively (Fig. 3a)31. DGE analysis identified only 10 transcripts that were shared among the control and pretreatment cultures, and 22 shared transcripts between S and N pretreated cultures. Comparisons between Control cultures that have not been exposed to CdCl2 and those that have revealed a greater number of up regulated transcripts than down regulated transcripts (Fig. 3b). In contrast, when comparing Control cultures exposed to CdCl2 with S-treatment cultures exposed to CdCl2 (Fig. 3c) there were more down regulated transcripts. While comparisons between Control cultures exposed to CdCl2 and N-treatment cultures exposed to CdCl2 exhibit similar numbers of up and down regulated transcripts (Fig. 3d).
Figure 3.
Distinct gene sets have altered transcript levels in cultures with different pretreatments. (a) Venn diagram of Differentially expressed genes between non-pretreated Euglena gracilis cultures (green), N pretreated Euglena gracilis cultures (blue) and S pretreated Euglena gracilis cultures (red) in the presence of CdCl2. (b) volcano plots comparing the -log10 adjusted p-value (y-axis) to the log2 fold change (x- axis) between non-pretreated cultures with and without CdCl2, (c) Volcano plots comparing the -log10 adjusted p-value (y-axis) to the log2 fold change (x- axis) between S pretreated cultures vs non-pretreated cultures with CdCl2and d) Volcano plots comparing the -log10 adjusted p-value (y-axis) to the log2 fold change (x- axis) between N pretreated cultures vs non-pretreated cultures with CdCl2. Red dots indicate genes that are differentially expressed (log2 fold change of > 2 or < -2) and are statistically significant (p < 0.05), while black dots indicate genes whose expression was not significantly different.
To identify the potential genes encoding proteins that were associated with these transcript level changes, a blastx search was conducted using the NCBI non-redundant protein and SWISS-Prot databases, as well as the Ensembl databases for Arabidopsis thaliana, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Synechocystis sp., Homo sapiens, and Trypanosoma brucei. There is no complete and annotated genome for E. gracilis, therefore to identify potential functions of proteins encoded by transcripts we used well-annotated databases. The blastx results of the DGE analysis identified four main classes of genes encoding proteins that showed transcript level changes: transmembrane transport, stress response, metabolism, and metal binding31.
S-treatment and N-treatment cultures revealed differences in transcript expression related to respiration, including NADH dehydrogenase and NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase. These transcripts exhibited decreased expression in S-treatment cultures without CdCl2 exposure compared to control cultures that were not exposed to CdCl2, and in N-treatment cultures that were not exposed to CdCl2 compared to N-treatment cultures that were. Conversely, transcript expression related to respiration were increased in all N-treatment cultures, either subsequently exposed to CdCl2 or not, compared to Control cultures without CdCl2 exposure. S-treatment and N-treatment cultures exposed to CdCl2 revealed decreased ABC-transporter protein expression compared to Control cultures exposed to CdCl2. Additionally, Control cultures exposed CdCl2 showed elevated levels of transcripts for genes encoding chemotaxis proteins. The chemotaxis protein transcripts showed decreased expression in S-treatment and N-treatment cultures exposed CdCl2, while transcripts encoding genes for heat shock proteins were increased in these treatments. These findings illustrate transcript level differences as a result of the S-treatment and N-treatment of E. gracilis prior to CdCl2 exposure. Proteins related to metabolism also vary based on pretreatment. S-treated cultures exposed to CdCl2 exhibited a decrease in transcript levels for genes encoding cystathionine gamma lyase and cystathionine beta synthase, while N-treated cultures exposed to CdCl2 exhibited a decrease in transcript levels for genes encoding threonine dehydratase and an increase in transcript levels for genes encoding 2-isopropylmalate synthase. N-treated cultures also revealed transcript level changes for genes encoding proteins related to metal binding. This included an increase in calmodulin and serine/threonine kinase, and a decrease in phospholipid transporting ATPase and L-ascorbate peroxidase.
Further analysis of gene ontology (GO) terms using the PANTHER classification system revealed enrichment of GO terms which were consistent with DGE analysis results including cysteine metabolic process, ABC-type transporter activity, iron-S cluster binding, and metal ion binding (Table 2). Several GO-terms of interest were identified using data from the model microalgae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, parasitic kinetoplastid Trypanosoma brucei, and the model organism Arabidopsis thaliana (Table S3). Moreover, significantly enriched GO terms emerge when evaluating cultures that have been exposed to Cd which may signify their role in Cd tolerance.
Table 2.
Select results for GO term results on non-pretreated, S pretreated and N pretreated Euglena gracilis cultures after exposure to 25 μM CdCl2.
| Annotation Set | Fold-Enrichment | p-value | Database | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GO-Term non-pretreated exposed to CdCl2 versus S-pretreated exposed to CdCl2 |
Cysteine metabolic process (GO:0,006,534) | Biological process | > 100 | 9.79 E−6 | Trypanosoma brucei |
| Non-pretreated exposed to CdCl2 versus N-pretreated exposed to CdCl2 | ABC-type transporter activity (GO:0,140,359) | Molecular function | 40.65 | 6.28E −5 | Chlamydomonas reinhardtii |
| N-pretreated exposed to CdCl2 versus N-pretreated not exposed to CdCl2 | Iron-sulfur cluster binding (GO:0,051,536) | Molecular function | 23.88 | 2.46E−4 | Chlamydomonas reinhardtii |
| Metal ion binding (GO:0,046,872) | Molecular function | 4.25 | 3.53E−4 | Chlamydomonas reinhardtii |
RT-qPCR
RT-qPCR was carried out on RNA isolated from E. gracilis cells under the following treatment conditions: Control without CdCl2 exposure, Control with 25 μM CdCl2 exposure, S-treated without CdCl2 exposure, S-treated with 25 μM CdCl2 exposure, N-treated without CdCl2 exposure, and N-treated with 25 μM CdCl2 exposure. Transcripts were selected for RT-qPCR based on relevant biological functions of predicted proteins, or degree of transcript level change as indicated by DGE. The RT-qPCR results indicate that the transcripts TRINITY_109159, hsp90, and threonine dehydratase showed similar trends in expression level changes when compared to the results obtained with RNA-sequencing (Fig. 4). RNA-sequencing results for TRINITY_109159 indicate an increase in S-treated cultures that were exposed to CdCl2, but a decrease in S-treated cultures not exposed to CdCl2. This is an identification of a novel gene transcript since it has no sequence similarity in any database. RT-qPCR results also supported the detection of increased transcript levels in S-treated cultures that were exposed to CdCl2 relative to control (MAM only) cultures, and S-treated cultures that were not exposed to CdCl2. Notably, RNA-sequencing indicated an increase in the transcript for the hsp90 gene in S-treated cultures that were exposed to CdCl2 when compared to S-treated cultures that were not exposed to CdCl2. The RT-qPCR results further showed an increase in the transcript level for the hsp90 gene in S-treated cultures exposed to CdCl2, although DGE analysis did not indicate the same level of increase. Finally, DGE analysis identified a decrease in the level of transcripts for a gene encoding threonine dehydratase in N-treated cultures that were exposed to CdCl2, a decrease was also noted for this gene in the RT-qPCR. The RT-qPCR analyses generally supported the RNA-sequencing results and uncovered differential expression of genes that did not meet the minimum threshold requirements of RNA sequencing DGE analysis.
Figure 4.
RT-qPCR supports trends in expression noted in RNA-sequencing. Transcript levels, determined by RT-qPCR of: (a) TRINITY_109159 compared in non-pretreated and S pretreated E. gracilis cultures exposed to CdCl2, (b) transcript TRINITY_109159 compared in S pretreated cultures in the presence and absence of CdCl2, (c) transcript encoding a potential hsp90 protein compared in S pretreated cultures in the presence and absence of CdCl2, and (d) transcript encoding threonine dehydratase compared in N pretreated E. gracilis cultures in the presence and absence of CdCl2. RT-qPCR was performed using 3 technical replicates using the housekeeping genes ef1 and actin for normalization. The method was used to determine relative expression using either the pretreated culture without CdCl2, or the non-pretreated culture exposed to 25 μM CdCl2 as the reference. Error bars represent the standard deviation between the biological replicates (n = 4 except for hsp90 where n = 3), while a star (*) denotes statistical significance using a t-test (F-value = 0.52, p-value = 0.017).
Discussion
The tolerance of Euglena species to CdCl2 and the impact of pre-treatment in elevated S and N levels were investigated. The initial experiments assessed the overall impact of a pretreatment with 5, 10 and 20 times the amount of S (MgSO4·7H2O) or N (NH4NO3) compared to control media on the growth and impact on cell morphology for E. gracilis. From these results we selected the 10 times level since it was the highest concentration that did not have an impact on cell morphology. In the comparison analyses 10 times the amount of S (60 mM MgSO4·7H2O) or N (76 mM NH4NO3) were used and the growth was assessed over a period of 44 days for E. gracilis and 42 days for E. mutabilis (Fig. 1). At several time points in the assay, growth of S-treatment E. gracilis cultures was significantly greater than in control conditions. These findings are consistent with previous work indicating that E. gracilis is capable of taking up sulfate from its environment 32. Conversely, growth of E. gracilis in the N-treatment cultures was significantly decreased over 44 days compared to the control. Although ammonium is the optimal source of N for E. gracilis33,34 it is unable to use nitrate, nitrite, or urea as a source of N despite still being able to grow in the presence of nitrate33–35. Growth in the presence of nitrate at high concentrations could result in reduced growth. There was little or no influence of the S-treatment or N-treatment on the growth of the E. mutabilis consortium.
Following the S-treatment and N-treatment, E. gracilis and E. mutabilis cultures were exposed to 25 μM CdCl2 and the impact on growth was assessed (Fig. 2). The significant increases in the number of viable E. gracilis cells exposed to CdCl2 in the S-treated and N-treated cultures compared to the Control cultures exposed to CdCl2 suggest that these treatments enhance Cd tolerance (Fig. 2b). This result resembles the induced higher tolerance to Cd in E. gracilis upon pretreatment with Hg27. The enhanced tolerance was also noted through the viability assays in which S-treatment and N-treatment led to fewer dead cells compared to the Control cultures (Table 1), and the minimal number of dead E. gracilis cells after 20 days exposed to Cd also reaffirm its innate tolerance4,19. In contrast, the number of viable E. mutabilis cells upon challenge with CdCl2 following either S-treatment or N-treatment, were decreased compared to Control cultures (Fig. 2c). The increased tolerance of E. mutabilis cultures to 25 CdCl2 μM was revealed by the presence of higher cell counts at days 14 and 21 relative to the comparably grown E. gracilis cultures. In addition to exhibiting a greater number of viable cells, E. mutabilis also exhibits a greater number of dead cells under each treatment. It has been reported that E. mutabilis has a greater tolerance to Cd than E. gracilis15, however the mechanisms that permit this increased tolerance over E. gracilis are unknown. It is uncommon that E. mutabilis cultures obtained from nature are axenic and the isolates obtained with co-cultured organisms cannot be made axenic23. It is possible that the presence of the associate bacteria and fungi in the E. mutabilis co-culture contribute to Cd tolerance and moderate nutritional impacts of Euglena. Recent work with this consortium revealed that suppressing the growth of the association organisms significantly reduced E. mutabilis’ tolerance to Cd24. Despite the mechanisms for Cd tolerance remaining unknown, our study indicates that Cd tolerance of E. mutabilis is not enhanced by pre-treatment with S and N, unlike E. gracilis. To elucidate the molecular changes in Euglena as a result of S-treatment and N-treatment and subsequent Cd exposure, we proceeded with RNA-sequencing analysis on E. gracilis.
DGE analysis following RNA-sequencing was used to identify genes whose transcript levels are altered in response to the S-treatment and N-treatment as well as to CdCl2 exposure (Fig. 3; Table 2). RT-qPCR was used as an alternative approach to assess DGE. There was variation in RT-qPCR results among the four biological replicates (Fig. 4). Challenges with RT-qPCR using E. gracilis have been noted by others36,37. A common issue is the difficulty in designing primers due to the lack of an annotated reference genome and sufficient databases. Here the RNA sequencing data was used in primer design however, it is possible that primers designed to be highly specific may still amplify other previously unidentified gene family members, and this would skew the detection of transcript level changes from a given family member. Therefore, the level of a target transcripts identified using RNA-sequencing may not be properly assessed using RT-qPCR. Despite this potential issue, RT-PCR results generally supported the trends of expression seen in the RNA-sequencing data. This work provides a comprehensive analysis of E. gracilis genes related to Cd tolerance and provides insight for future gene-specific analyses related to metal tolerance and stress.
Our results indicate that Cd tolerance within E. gracilis is a dynamic process with various genes being expressed with each pretreatment and under CdCl2 exposure. Blastx searches following DGE analysis were used to identify which protein coding genes had altered transcript levels for each treatment condition31, genes were selected for additional analysis based on identified functions associated with heavy metal tolerance. These included genes encoding proteins related to respiration, transmembrane transport, stress response, metabolism, and metal binding. The discussion of genes encoding proteins related to respiration and transmembrane transport are located in the supplementary material (Table S4). The following discussion focuses on the impact of both pretreatments and Cd exposure on stress response, metabolism and metal binding.
Our results identified transcript level changes for genes encoding chemotaxis proteins and heatshock proteins. In metal tolerant bacteria, chemotactic responses are altered by the differential expression of chemotaxis proteins upon exposure to Cd38,39. In Control cultures exposed to CdCl2, there was an increase in transcript levels for a gene encoding a potential chemotaxis protein. The transcript level from this chemotaxis related gene was decreased in S-treated and N-treated cultures, even though Cd tolerance was increased. This may indicate that the S-treatment and N-treatment enhance other tolerance mechanisms and suppress potential tolerance effects related to chemotaxis.
In plants, small heat shock proteins work to protect photosynthesis and electron transport during a variety of stressors, including heavy metal exposure40. In E. gracilis, proteomic analyses revealed increased expression of hsp90, hsp70, hsp55, and hsp40 upon exposure to Cd41,42. Consistent with this, our results showed an increase in transcript levels for genes encoding hsp90 and hsp70 related proteins in control and S-treated cultures, although hsp70 was decreased in N-treated cultures that were and were not exposed to Cd. This may suggest that growth in elevated N environments causes stress in E. gracilis. Interestingly, previous research showed that pre-exposure of E. gracilis to low concentrations of Hg over many generations resulted in increased Cd tolerance and accumulation27 suggesting that E. gracilis may have a generalized stress response that is activated by previous stress exposure and maintained during Cd exposure. It is possible that priming of a stress response increases Cd tolerance.
Transcript analyses of S-treated and N-treated cultures exposed to CdCl2 identified transcript level changes for genes related to cysteine metabolic processes and amide biosynthesis, respectively. These transcript level changes were only found when the S-treated and N-treated cultures were subsequently exposed to CdCl2, suggesting that the treatments primed E. gracilis for subsequent metabolic responses to stress exposure. Previous metabolomic analyses of E. gracilis identified increased levels of the S metabolites sulfate, cysteine, and glutathione upon Hg exposure20. It has also been suggested that monothiol compounds, rather than phytochelatins, contribute to E. gracilis’ tolerance to Cr6+43. These data suggest a broad range of S based compounds may act as chelators for metals like Cd thereby contributing to the tolerance of E. gracilis. The compounds may also be involved in other tolerance-related processes since glutathione can act to mitigate the oxidative stress induced by Cd44. Our results showed that S with subsequent CdCl2 exposure led to increased transcript levels of cystathionine beta-synthase and cystathionine gamma-lyase, which could increase cysteine synthesis and subsequently the synthesis of metabolites like glutathione. These results are indicative that S-treatment of E. gracilis modified and increased cysteine metabolism and could have downstream impacts on the synthesis of glutathione and related metal binding molecules.
Genes related to amide biosynthesis were enriched in E. gracilis following Hg exposure20, however these biosynthesis genes were not enriched in N-treated cultures. Instead, DGE analysis indicated the downregulation of threonine dehydratase, a key enzyme in branched chain amino acid synthesis, and the upregulation of 2-isopropylmalate synthase, which is involved in leucine biosynthesis and pyruvate metabolism. Threonine dehydratase was also downregulated in the fungus Psxillud involutus in response to CdCl2 exposure45. This suggests a general response of reducing branched chain amino acid synthesis through this pathway under Cd stress. Increased 2-isopropylmalate synthase may compensate for this reduction in branched chain amino acids by increasing leucine production. This, in turn, might alter the TCA cycle by redirecting some pyruvate metabolism. Others have noted that Cd stress can impact amino acid metabolism to suppress the TCA cycle46 and past metabolomic studies showed that various stresses alter E. gracilis metabolic processes including the synthesis of amino acids47. The data presented here supports a model in which N-treatment enhances a shift from the use of threonine dehydratase as the primary catalyst for branched chain amino acid biosynthesis, to utilizing isopropylmalate-synthase. Determining which metabolic impacts of this directly support Cd tolerance requires future investigation.
GO-term analysis revealed that the N-treatment of E. gracilis and subsequent CdCl2 exposure also enhanced expression of genes involved in “metal cluster binding” and “metal ion binding”. Through DGE we identified decreased expression of L-ascorbate peroxidase and increased expression of calmodulin, which have both been related to metal stress response by playing a key role in mitigating the oxidative stress response in plants48,49. Down regulation in E. gracilis suggests that the N-treatment suppressed this oxidative stress response. The metal stress induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) must therefore be handled in a different way in E. gracilis. In contrast, the elevation of calmodulin is supported by proteomics analyses of E. gracilis cultures exposed to heavy metals42, suggesting its involvement in E. gracilis enhanced Cd tolerance. Calmodulin has been hypothesized to bind Cd as well as Ca due to their chemical similarities50. Inhibiting calmodulin caused a decrease in intracellular Cd and a decrease in glutathione and phytochelatin levels in the algae Ulva compressa51. The enhanced expression of calmodulin in E. gracilis following N-treatment could be contributing to the enhanced resistance to Cd. This could occur if calmodulin binds Cd and decreased its concentration in the cytoplasm or if, by binding Cd, calmodulin’s influence on metabolism is altered. Together these data suggest that increased metal binding in response to Cd stress in E. gracilis may reflect a more complex response than just binding and sequestering the Cd.
The ability to increase Cd tolerance in E. gracilis by nutrient shifts is a major finding of the presented work and helps elucidate possible mechanisms by which E. gracilis can tolerate Cd (Fig. 5). Data from the comparative RNA-seq analyses enabled us to determine that while the stress of the S-treatment and N-treatment may have triggered a response, the data support the increased resistance being influenced by nutrient specific means. The S-treatment enhanced Cd tolerance by increasing production of glutathione and other compounds that bind Cd and may sequester it. The N-treatment altered branched chain amino acid biosynthesis, leading to increased Cd binding by proteins in E. gracilis that do not just sequester the Cd, but may also alter biochemical pathways otherwise involving these binding proteins. The data presented substantially increases the understanding of Cd tolerance by Euglena sp. and identifies specific molecular processes involved in E. gracilis Cd tolerance. These findings may aid in developing new bioremediation treatment approaches using E. gracilis.
Figure 5.

Conceptual model of the transcriptomic responses of S (a) and N (b) pretreated Euglena gracilis cultures after exposure to CdCl2. With both pre-treatments, transcript levels were altered for genes involved in transmembrane transport, stress response, metabolic processes, and metal binding. Specifically, genes for distinct ABC and other transporters had altered expression, as did heat shock proteins and potential Cd exporter genes. With the S pre-treatment, GO-terms related to cysteine metabolic processes were enriched after CdCl2 exposure. With the N pretreated cultures, the exposure to CdCl2 caused a decrease in potential ROS generation and a shift from amine biosynthesis, specifically a decrease in transcript levels for a potential gene encoding threonine dehydratase and an increase in transcript levels for a gene encoding 2-isopropylmalate synthase. Red arrows indicate whether the transcript for the gene-encoding protein was increased or decreased. This model was adapted from Mangel et al. and edited to include the data of the presented research23.
Methods
Cultivation of E. gracilis and E. mutabilis
Samples of E. gracilis and E. mutabilis were collected by the Canadian Phycological Culture Centre (CPCC) located at the University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. The strain of E. gracilis (CPCC 95) was axenic, while the strain of E. mutabilis (CPCC 657) contained fungal and bacterial organisms24. Both cultures were grown photoautotrophically shaking at 80 RPM, at a temperature of 22 ± 0.5 °C, and a light regime of 12 h:12 h LD cycle (2691 μMol/m2/h) in an environmental chamber (Conviron CMP5090). Stock cultures were grown in Modified Acid Medium (MAM) developed by Olaveson and Stokes (1989): 0.5 g/L of (NH4)2SO4, and MgSO4·7H2O, 0.3 g/L of KH2PO4, 0.01 g/L of CaCl2·2H2O, 0.03 g/L of NaCl, 0.01 g/L of Na2EDTA·2H2O, 0.00498 g/L of FeSO4·7H2O with 0.00000843 g/L of H2SO4. The media also included a trace metal solution which when added resulted in final concentrations in MAM of: 2.86 µg/L of H3BO3, 1.81 µg/L of MnCl2·4H2O, 0.22 µg/L of ZnSO4·7H2O, 0.39 µg/L of Na2MoO4·2H2O, 0.079 µg/L of CuSO4·5H2O and 0.0494 µg/L of Co(NO3)2·6H2O. Since Euglena exhibits the highest growth rates in acidic environments28 and growth between pH 3.0–5.5 is a common practice that has no negative impacts on Euglena’s ability to tolerate HMs, the pH of MAM was adjusted to 4.313,29,52–54 using HCl prior to autoclaving. The pH was not measured while E. gracilis and E. mutabilis were growing in MAM during experimentation. During that time period no precipitate was observed in the media. After the media was autoclaved, a vitamin stock was added to give a final concentration of 10 µg/L of Vitamin B12, 0.001 µg/L of Biotin and 0.002 g/L of Thiamine HCl in the media. Since MgSO4·7H2O is an ingredient in MAM its concentration was adjusted to create the S-treatment. The media was modified to include a total of 13.85 g/L of MgSO4·7H2O to create an environment with 10 times the amount of S (60 mM). Previous research suggests that the optimal N source for E. gracilis is ammonium33,35. For that reason, 5.85 g/L of NH4NO3 was added to the media to create an environment with 10 times the amount of N (76 mM) for the N-treatment. Preliminary experimentation indicated that increased S and N exposure did not negatively impact E. gracilis growth overtime (Fig. S1).
Pre-treatment and CdCl2 exposure with E. gracilis and E. mutabilis
To begin the pre-treatment cycle, stock cultures of E. gracilis and E. mutabilis were grown and used to initiate the S-treated and N-treated cultures and Control cultures each of which were prepared in triplicate. E. gracilis cells were inoculated into their pre-treatment medium at a concentration of 20,000 cells/mL with cell counts performed using a hemocytometer (Hausser Scientific) every 96 h to monitor cell growth for a period of 44 days. Culture growth was promoted by collecting the entire volume of culture by centrifugation and resuspending the cells in fresh pre-treatment media prepared using the same recipe as outlined above at a pH of 4.3. This process was performed every 96 h after cell counts were measured. Similarly, 20,000 cells/mL of E. mutabilis cells were inoculated into pre-treatment medium and grown for 42 days with cell counts performed using a hemocytometer every 7 days. On the same day that the cell counts were completed, the remaining cells were centrifuged and resuspended into fresh MAM with either the Control treatment, the S-treatment or the N-treatment at a pH of 4.3. The different growth assays for the two species were a result of the observed slower growth of E. mutabilis relative to E. gracilis17,28,30.
Following the completion of the pre-treatment cycle, cells were inoculated into MAM, or MAM with 25 μM CdCl2. For E. gracilis, seven replicates of each culture type were prepared to be used for RNA-Seq analysis and four more replicates were prepared to be used for future RT-qPCR analysis. The concentration of cells inoculated into each condition was 200,000 cells/mL. For E. gracilis, cell counts were performed using a hemocytometer every 96 h for up to 8 days, at each time point cell viability was also assessed using Trypan Blue Solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Mississauga) staining. Once the cell counts were completed, they were used to normalize cultures to the biological replicate with the lowest concentration of cells and cells were resuspended in fresh media of the appropriate condition. For E. mutabilis, all culture types were prepared in triplicate and cell counts, and viability staining were carried out in a similar manner, but the time points were every 7 days for up to 21 days. Cells were observed and counted at 10× magnification using a Zeiss AXIO microscope. At each timepoint, cell counts were used to normalize cultures to the biological replicate with the lowest concentration of cells and cells were resuspended in fresh media similar to the methods used for E. gracilis. After the final day in CdCl2 the total culture volume was centrifuged, supernatant was removed, and cell pellets were frozen with liquid N2 and stored at -80℃ ahead of RNA isolations.
Statistical analysis
Differences in viable Euglena cell counts were identified through a one-way ANOVA (⍺ = 0.05), and if differences were identified (p < 0.05) a Tukey–Kramer post-hoc analysis was carried out to elucidate the differences amongst the groups. Differences in transcript expression using RT-qPCR were assessed using a Student’s t-test (⍺ = 0.05).
RNA isolation and DNase1 treatment
Cells from CPCC 95 E. gracilis were removed from − 80 °C and resuspended in 2 mL of TRIzol™ Reagent (Invitrogen™). Samples were transferred to MP Biomedical Lysing Matrix C tubes and lysed using a MP Biomedical Fast Prep-24. The RNA was precipitated using 250 L of 0.8 M disodium citrate/1.2 M NaCl and 250 µL isopropanol. DNA was removed from the samples using a Dnase1 treatment before the RNA was precipitated again using the same RNA precipitation solution that was mentioned above and isopropanol. The quality of each sample was assessed by visualizing RNA following electrophoretic separation on a 1.5% BPTE agarose gel following glyoxal denaturation. Dnase-treated RNA and a ssRNA ladder were loaded on the gels (New England BioLabs, Whitby, Canada).
cDNA library preparation and RNA-sequencing
22 L aliquots of selected Dnase-treated RNA samples were sent to the Centre for Applied Genomics (TCAG) at the Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, Canada) where they underwent further quality assessment, cDNA library preparation and RNA-sequencing. The quality of each RNA sample was assessed using a BioAnalyzer (Agilent Technologies). The quality of the biological replicates was determined based on the RNA Integrity Number (RIN) and the DV200% with an emphasis being placed on the DV200%. Selected RNA samples underwent Poly(A) enrichment using oligo dT-beads and the subsequent cDNA libraries were prepared using the NEBNext Ultra Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England BioLabs). Once prepped, the 36 barcoded libraries were pooled and sequenced on two lanes of the NovaSeq (Illumina Inc) system producing paired-end (PE) reads that were 150 bp long.
Sequence quality assessment, trimming
Fastq files for the 36 sequenced libraries were downloaded using the TCAG data portal command line tool. Sequence quality was assessed using FastQC (v0.11.9)55. The generated html files were reviewed to assess Phred scores across all the generated reads for each file. Once the minimum quality was assessed, sequences were trimmed using Trimmomatic (v0.39) with the following specifications: Illuminaclip:TruSeq3-PE-2.fa:2:30:10 sliding window:4:5 leading:5 tailing:5 minlen:2556. The trimmed sequences were used in the formation of a single de novo transcriptome assembly of E. gracilis using Trinity (v2.12.0) set to ‘strand-specific mode (RF)’57. The completeness of the assembly was assessed using BUSCO (v5.2.2) and the ‘eukaryota_odb9’ dataset58. Trimmed sequences were aligned to the assembled transcriptome using Bowtie2 (v2.4.2) with the ‘SS_lib_type RF’ feature59. Finally, RSEM (v1.3.3) was used to estimate the transfrag abundance for each library based on the settings used by Li & Dewey60.
Differential gene expression and GO-term analysis
DeSeq2 (v1.30.0) was implemented using the SarTools (v1.7.4.0) program to assess the changes in transcript levels61,62. Individual 1 on 1 comparisons were completed to assess genes that were differentially expressed based on the pre-treatment of the cultures, and their exposure to CdCl2 (Table S1). The analysis was also used to assess the changes in transcript levels of the pretreated Euglena gracilis cultures compared to non-pretreated Euglena gracilis cells. The statistical model “treatment” was used for the comparison with a false discovery rate of (FDR) < 0.05. DeSeq2 was run with the settings: cooksCutoff = True, independentFiltering = True, alpha = 0.05 to set the threshold for significance, pAdjustMethod = BH (Benjamini/Hochberg p-value adjustment method), typeTrans = rlog, and locfunc = median to estimate size factors. The genes that were identified to have transcript level changes according to DESeq2 were characterized using NCBI blast 2.11.0 + blastx to search the NCBI protein databases as well as SWISS-PROT databases (accessed January 2022) using an E-value of 1E-5 to identify genes encoding proteins with similar sequences. The Arabidopsis thaliana20,63,64, Chlamydomonas reinhardtii20, Synechocystis sp.20, Homo sapiens20,63,64 and Trypanosoma brucei63,65 databases on Ensembl 90 were searched using blastx to characterize genes that were further analyzed for gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis (accessed February 2022). These databases were used since there is not a well annotated genome sequence for E. gracilis. Using these databases allowed for a comprehensive search for gene similarities and functional identities using well annotated databases covering a variety of species, some of which share similarities to Euglena sp. The genes listed were run in the PANTHER gene ontology database (http://pantherdb.org/index.jsp) on the default settings to test for statistical over-representation of the identified GO terms.
RT-qPCR
For RT-qPCR, cDNA was synthesized from 10 to 15 g of Dnase treated RNA using the TaqMan Gold RT-PCR Kit (Applied Biosystems, Connecticut MA, USA). cDNA samples were stored at − 20 °C until they were used for RT-qPCR. Based on the DGE results, select genes were analyzed using RT-qPCR with the Applied Biosystems Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). Primers were designed from the partial sequences of the transcripts using Sigma Oligo Architect to ensure minimal to no dimers, and an optimal amplicon size and annealing temperature. Each reaction contained 4 L of dH2O, 2 L of each primer at a concentration of 5 uM, 10 L of Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix and 2 L of cDNA template. RT-qPCR was carried out in a QuantStudio 3 (Applied Biosystems) with the following conditions: hold stage [50 °C for 2 min then 95 °C for 10 min], PCR stage 40 cycles of [95 °C for 15 s, X°C for 1 min], and melt curve stage [95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min, 95 °C for 15 s] with X°C referring to the annealing temperature of the specific primer pair (Table S3). Each RT-qPCR run was performed in triplicate. For RT-qPCR the housekeeping genes that were used were a gene encoding actin and a gene encoding elongation factor 1 (ef1). Both housekeeping genes were used as a control for normalization. This analysis was carried out using four biological replicates except in the case of analysis for the transcription encoding hsp90, which used only three biological replicates.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
The funding for this research was to BJS from the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada.
Author contributions
BJS obtained funding for the research. BJS and MED contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by VK and EK. Bioinformatics was conducted by VK in consultation with MED. The first draft of this manuscript was written by VK and EK, and all other authors edited and commented on subsequent versions of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the NCBI SRA (sequence read archive) repository, PRJNA1024496 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1024496).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-61964-w.
References
- 1.Khademi H, Abbaspour A, Martínez-Martínez S, Gabarrón M, Shahrokh V, Faz A, et al. Provenance and environmental risk of windblown materials from mine tailing ponds, Murcia, Spain. Environ. Pollut. 2018;241:432–440. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ackil Z, Chen Z. Environmental management in North American mining sector. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016;63:167–179. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5651-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Genchi G, Sinicropi MS, Lauriam G, Carocci A, Catalano A. The effects of cadmium toxicity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:3782. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lamas-Einicker M, Soares MJ, Soares MS, Oliveira MM. Effects of cadmium on Euglena gracilis membrane lipids. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 1996;29:941–948. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jamers A, Blust R, De Coen W, Griffin JL, Jones OAH. An omics based assessment of cadmium toxicity in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Aquat. Toxicol. 2013;126:355–364. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2012.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Trevors JT, Stratton GW, Gadd GM. Cadmium transport, resistance, and toxicity in bacteria, algae, and fungi. Can. J. Microbiol. 1986;32:447–464. doi: 10.1139/m86-085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Song X, Yue X, Chen W, Jiang H, Han Y, Li X. Detection of cadmium risk to the photosynthetic performance of hybrid Pennisetum. Front. Plant. Sci. 2019;10:798. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang H, Zhao S, Liu RL, Zhou W, Jin JY. Changes of photosynthetic activities of maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings in response to cadmium stress. Photosynthetica. 2009;47:277–283. doi: 10.1007/s11099-009-0043-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fu F, Wang Q. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2011;92:407–418. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Volesky B. Detoxification of metal-bearing effluents: Biosorption for the next century. Hydrometallurgy. 2001;59:203–216. doi: 10.1016/S0304-386X(00)00160-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Obreque-Contreras J, Pérez-Flores D, Gutiérrez P, Chávez-Crooker P. Acid mine drainage in Chile: An opportunity to apply bioremediation technology. Hydrol. Curr. Res. 2015;6:1000215. doi: 10.4172/2157-7587.1000215. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Boopathy R. Factors limiting bioremediation technologies. Bioresour. Technol. 2000;74:63–67. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00144-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Khatiwada B, Sunna A, Nevalainen H. Molecular tools and applications of Euglena gracilis: From biorefineries to bioremediation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2020;117:3952–3967. doi: 10.1002/bit.27516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gissibl A, Sun A, Care A, Nevalainen H, Sunna A. Bioproducts from Euglena gracilis: Synthesis and applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019;7:108. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Olaveson MM, Nalewajko C. Effects of acidity on the growth of two Euglena species. Hydrobiologia. 2000;433:39–56. doi: 10.1023/A:1004006401516. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Devars S, Avilés C, Cervantes C, Moreno-Sánchez R. Mercury uptake and removal by Euglena gracilis. Arch. Microbiol. 2000;174:175–180. doi: 10.1007/s002030000193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Winters C, Guéguen C, Noble A. Equilibrium and kinetic studies of Cu(II) and Ni(II) sorption on living Euglena gracilis. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017;29:1391–1398. doi: 10.1007/s10811-016-1040-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gabarrón M, Faz A, Martínez-Martínez S, Acosta JA. Change in metals and arsenic distribution in soil and their bioavailability beside old tailing ponds. J. Environ. Manag. 2018;212:292–300. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Santiago-Martinez MG, Lira-Silva E, Encalada E, Pineda E, Gallardo-Pérez JC, Zepeda-Rodriguez A, et al. Cadmium removal by Euglena gracilis is enhanced under anaerobic growth conditions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015;288:104–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.02.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mangal V, Donaldson ME, Lewis A, Saville BJ, Guéguen C. Identifying Euglena gracilis metabolic and transcriptomic adaptations in response to mercury stress. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022;10:836732. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.836732. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mangal V, Stock NL, Guéguen C. Molecular characterization of phytoplankton dissolved organic matter (DOM) and sulfur components using high resolution Orbitrap mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016;408:1891–1900. doi: 10.1007/s00216-015-9295-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Casiot C, Bruneel O, Personné JC, Leblanc M, Elbaz-Poulichet F. Arsenic oxidation and bioaccumulation by the acidophilic protozoan, Euglena mutabilis, in acid mine drainage (Carnoulès, France) Sci. Total Environ. 2004;320:259–267. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nakatsu C, Hutchinson TC. Extreme metal and acid tolerance of Euglena mutabilis and an associated yeast from Smoking Hills, Northwest Territories, and their apparent mutualism. Microb. Ecol. 1988;16:213–231. doi: 10.1007/BF02018915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kaszecki E, Palberg D, Grant M, Griffin S, Dhanjal C, Capperauld M, et al. Euglena mutabilis exists in a FAB consortium with microbes that enhance cadmium tolerance. Int. Microbiol. 2024 doi: 10.1007/s10123-023-00474-7(2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liang T, Ding H, Wang G, Kang J, Pang H, Lv J. Sulfur decreases cadmium translocation and enhances cadmium tolerance by promoting sulfur assimilation and glutathione metabolism in Brassica chinensis L. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016;124:129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yotsova E, Dobrikova A, Stefanov M, Misheva S, Bardáčová M, Matušíková I, et al. Effects of cadmium on two wheat cultivars depending on different nitrogen supply. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020;155:789–799. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.06.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Avilés C, Loza-Tavera H, Terry N, Moreno-Sánchez R. Mercury pre-treatment selects an enhanced cadmium-accumulating phenotype in Euglena gracilis. Arch. Microbiol. 2003;180:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s00203-003-0547-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Olaveson MM, Stokes PM. Responses of the acidophilic alga Euglena mutabilis (Euglenophyceae) to carbon enrichment at pH 3. J. Phychol. 1989;25:259–239. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Canadian Phycological Culture Centre. Modified acid medium (MAM). https://uwaterloo.ca/canadian-phycological-culture-centre/cultures/culture-media/modified-acid-medium (2017).
- 30.Hargreaves JW, Whitton BA. Effect of pH on growth of acid stream algae. Brit. Phycol. J. 1976;11:215–223. doi: 10.1080/00071617600650491. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kennedy, V., Kaszecki, E., Donaldson, M.E. & Saville, B.J.S. Blastx results for the manuscript “The impact of elevated sulfur and nitrogen levels on cadmium tolerance in Euglena species” by Kennedy et al 2024. ResearchGate. 10.13140/RG.2.2.22636.95364 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 32.García-García JD, Olin-Sandoval V, Saavedra E, Girard L, Hernández G, Moreno- Sánchez R. Sulfate uptake in photosynthetic Euglena gracilis. Mechanisms of regulation and contribution to cysteine homeostasis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2012;1820:1567–1575. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Richter PR, Liu Y, An Y, Li X, Nasir A, Strauch SM, et al. Amino acids as possible alternative nitrogen source for growth of Euglena gracilis Z in life support systems. Life. Sci. Space. Res. 2015;4:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.lssr.2014.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Takemure K, Endo R, Shibuya T, Kitaya Y. Growth performances and changes of macronutrient ion concentrations in the culture medium when Euglena gracilis was cultured with nitrified digestate. Envrion. Technol. 2017;38:2273–2279. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2016.1256438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Oda Y, Miyatake K, Kitaoak S. Inability of Euglena gracilis z to utilize nitrate, nitrite and urea as the nitrogen source. Bull. Univ. Osaka Prefect. Ser. B. 1979;31:43–48. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sugimoto R, Ishibashi-Ohgo N, Atsuji K, Miwa Y, Iwata O, Nakashima A, et al. Euglena extract suppresses adipocytedifferentiation in human adipose-derived stem cells. Plos One. 2018;13:e0192404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Krüger J, Richter P, Stoltze J, Strauch SM, Krüger M, Daiker V, et al. Changes of gene expression in Euglena gracilis obtained during the 29th DLR parabolic flight campaign. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:14260. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50611-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Berleman JE, Bauer CE. Involvement of a Che-like signal transduction cascade in regulating cyst cell development in Rhodospirillum centenum. Mol. Microbiol. 2005;56:1457–1466. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04646.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yung MC, Ma J, Salemi MR, Phinney BS, Bowman GR, Jiao Y. Shotgun proteomic analysis unveils survival and detoxification strategies by Caulobacter crescentus during exposure to uranium, chromium, and cadmium. J. Proteome. R. 2014;13:1833–1847. doi: 10.1021/pr400880s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Heckathorn SA, Mueller JK, Laguidice S, Zhu B, Barrett T, Blair B, et al. Chloroplast small heat shock proteins protect photosynthesis during heavy metal stress. Am. J. Bot. 2004;91:1312–1318. doi: 10.3732/ajb.91.9.1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Barque JP, Abahamid A, Chacun H, Bonaly J. Different heat-shock proteins are constitutively overexpressed in cadmium and pentachlorophenol adapted Euglena gracilis cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1996;223:7–11. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1996.0837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Khatiwada B, Hasan MT, Sun A, Kamath KS, Mirzaei M, Sunna A, et al. Proteomic response of Euglena gracilis to heavy metal exposure—identification of key proteins involved in heavy metal tolerance and accumulation. Algal. Res. 2020;45:101764. doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2019.101764. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tripathi S, Poluri KM. Heavy metal detoxification mechanisms by microalgae: insights from transcriptomics analysis. Environ. Pollut. 2021;285:117443. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhang H, Forman HJ, Choi J. γ-glutamyl transpeptidase in glutathione biosynthesis. Meth. Enzymol. 2005;401:468–483. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)01028-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jacob C, Courbot M, Martin F, Brun A, Chalot M. Transcriptomic responses to cadmium in the ectomycorrhizal fungus Paxillus involutus. FEBBS. Lett. 2004;576:423–427. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ding N, Wang L, Kang Y, Luo K, Zeng D, Man YB, et al. The comparison of transcriptomic response of green microalga Chlorella sorokiniana exposure to environmentally relevant concentration of cadmium (II) and 4-n-nonylphenol. Environ. Geochem. Health. 2020;42:2881–2894. doi: 10.1007/s10653-020-00526-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.He J, Liu C, Du M, Zhou X, Hu Z, Lei A, et al. Metabolic responses of a model green microalga Euglena gracilis to different environmental stresses. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021;9:662655. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.662655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Merakli N, Bulduk İ, Memon A. Cu-induced genes expression in the accumulator plant Brassica nigra L. Trakya. Uni. J. Nat. Sci. 2022;23:15–27. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kolahi M, MohajelKazemi E, Yazdi M, Goldson-Barnaby A. Oxidative stress induced by cadmium in lettuce (Lactuca sativa Linn.): Oxidative stress indicators and prediction of their genes. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020;146:71–89. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.10.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Choong G, Liu Y, Templeton DM. Interplay of calcium and cadmium in mediating cadmium toxicity. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2014;211:54–65. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2014.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.González A, Laporte D, Moenne A. Cadmium accumulation involves synthesis of glutathione and phytochelatins, and activation of CDPK, CaMK, CBLPK, and MAPK signaling pathways in Ulva compressa. Front. Plant. Sci. 2021;12:669096. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.669096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Navarro L, Torres-Márquez ME, González-Moreno S, Devars S, Hernández R, Moreno-Sánchez R. Comparison of physiological changes in Euglena gracilis during exposure to heavy metals of heterotrophic and autotrophic cells. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1997;116:265–272. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kim JY, Kim KY, Kim SM, Choi YE. Use of rare earth element (REE)-contaminated acidic water as Euglena gracilis growth stimulator: a strategy for bioremediation and simultaneous increase in biodiesel productivity. Chem. Eng. J. 2022;445:136814. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2022.136814. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Nguyen NH, Nguyen QT, Dang DH, Emery RJN. Phytohormones enhance heavy metal responses in Euglena gracilis: Evidence from uptake of Ni, Pb and Cd and linkages to hormonomic and metabolomic dynamics. Environ. Poll. 2023;320:121094. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Andrews, S. FastQC: A quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (2017).
- 56.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013;29:644–652. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Waterhouse RM, Seppey M, Simão FA, Manni M, Ioannidis P, Klioutchnikov G, et al. BUSCO applications from quality assessments to gene prediction and phylogenomics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018;35:543–548. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Li B, Dewey CN. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC. Bioinform. 2011;12:323. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome. Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Varet H, Brillet-Guéguen L, Coppée JY, Dillies MA. SARTools: A DESeq2- and EdgeR-Based R pipeline for comprehensive differential analysis of RNA-Seq data. Plos One. 2016;11:e0157022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ebenezer TE, Zoltner M, Burrell A, Nenarokova A, Vanclová AMGN, Prasad B, et al. Transcriptome, proteome and draft genome of Euglena gracilis. BMC. Biol. 2019;17:11. doi: 10.1186/s12915-019-0626-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Hammond M, Nenarokova A, Butenko A, Zoltner M, Dobáková EL, Field MC, et al. A uniquely complex mitochondrial proteome from Euglena gracilis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2020;37:2173–2191. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Vesteg M, Hadariová L, Horváth A, Estranõ CE, Schwartzbach SD, Krajčovič J. Comparative molecular cell biology of phototrophic euglenids and parasitic trypanosomatids sheds light on the ancestor of Euglenozoa. Biol. Rev. 2019;94:1701–1721. doi: 10.1111/brv.12523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Mera R, Torres E, Abalde J. Sulphate, more than a nutrient, protects the microalga Chlamydomonas moewusii from cadmium toxicity. Aquat. Toxicol. 2014;148:92–103. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2013.12.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.He J, Li H, Luo J, Ma C, Li S, Qu L, et al. A transcriptomic network underlies microstructural and physiological responses to cadmium in Populus × canescens. Plant. Physiol. 2013;162:424–439. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.215681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Gain G, de Luna FV, Cordoba J, Perez E, Degand H, Morsomme P, et al. Trophic state alters the mechanism whereby energetic coupling between photosynthesis and respiration occurs in Euglena gracilis. New Phytol. 2021;232:1603–1617. doi: 10.1111/nph.17677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Song W-Y, Park J, Eisenach C, Maeshima M, Lee Y, Martinoia E. ABC transporters and heavy metals. In: Geisler M, editor. Plant ABC transporters. Springer; 2014. pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Liu L, Zhou L, Hu S, Zhou S, Deng Y, Dong M, et al. Down-regulation of ABCG2 and ABCB4 transporters in the placenta of rats exposed to cadmium. Oncotarget. 2016;7:38154–38163. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the NCBI SRA (sequence read archive) repository, PRJNA1024496 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1024496).




