Abstract
Background:
Being aware of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period is often overlooked but remains a significant contributor to unintended pregnancies and may lead to maternal and neonatal comorbidities. Exploring the extent of awareness and associated factors could help tailor more interventions toward reducing the rates of short-interval unplanned pregnancies.
Objective:
This study explores the extent to which Ghanaian women are aware of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period and its associated factors.
Design:
A cross-sectional study was conducted using the 2017 Ghana Maternal Health Survey. The women participants were sampled using a two-stage cluster sampling design.
Methods:
We analyzed the 2017 Ghana Maternal Health Survey data of 8815 women who had given birth and received both antenatal care and postnatal checks after delivery in health facilities (private and public) and responded to questions on being aware of short interpregnancy intervals. A multivariable survey logistic regression was used for the analysis.
Results:
Of the 8815 women, approximately 62% of women who received both antenatal care and postnatal examinations before discharge reported being aware of short interpregnancy intervals. Postnatal examination before discharge but not antenatal care was associated with a higher awareness of short interpregnancy intervals. Women who received a postnatal examination were more aware of short interpregnancy intervals than their counterparts (adjusted odds ratio = 1.29, 95% confidence interval: 1.03–1.61). Also, awareness of short interpregnancy intervals increased with age, education, knowledge of the fertile period, contraceptive use, and delivery via cesarean section.
Conclusion:
Over a decade following the initiation of Ghana’s free maternal health policy, there remains a significant gap in the awareness of short interpregnancy intervals, even among women who received both antenatal pregnancy care and postnatal examinations before discharge. The unawareness of the short interpregnancy interval observed in approximately 38% of women raises concerns about the effectiveness of counseling or education provided during antenatal care and immediate post-partum care regarding birth spacing, contraceptive use, the timing of resumption of sexual activity, and the extent to which women adhere to such guidance.
Keywords: adherence, awareness, childbirth, counseling, knowledge, unintended pregnancy
Plain Language Summary
A study found more women were unaware of pregnancy soon after birth before menses
Unplanned pregnancies may lead to worsened health conditions for mothers and newborn infants. One possible way this unplanned pregnancy could happen is through unknowingly becoming pregnant soon after birth before menstruation resumes. However, the more we know about pregnancy soon after birth before menstruation resumes, the better we can introduce measures to reduce it. This study examines how well Ghanaian women are aware of the possibility of becoming pregnant soon after birth before menstruation resumes and factors that may influence the awareness. This study analyzed 2017 data collected from women who received pre-delivery care and post-delivery checks before discharge from a health facility. The study findings revealed that 38% of the 8815 women who received both pre-delivery care and post-delivery checks were unaware of pregnancy soon after birth before menstruation resumed. Factors such as post-delivery checks, contraceptive use, delivery through cesarean section, women aged 30 years and over with secondary education and higher, and having knowledge of the periods more appropriate for a woman to be pregnant were more aware of pregnancy soon after birth before menstruation resumed. We proposed that effective counseling and adherence from women who are not planning to get pregnant soon after birth could help reduce the rate of pregnancy soon after birth before menstruation resumes. These unplanned pregnancies can also be avoided by educating women about birth spacing, contraceptive use, and the timing of resumption of sexual activity.
Introduction
Women may become pregnant shortly after giving birth, before the return of menstruation, and may not be aware of it. Such unintended pregnancies, also known as unplanned pregnancies, 1 can have significant physical, psychological, and mental impacts on the well-being of women. 2 These short interpregnancy interval pregnancies can lead to various challenges, including economic burdens related to birth spacing, 3 exacerbation of the health issues faced by women already at risk of underlying diseases or comorbidities (such as pre-diabetes or sickle cell disease), 4 low birth weight,5,6 early neonatal death, 6 limitations in the availability of delivery spaces at healthcare facilities, 7 perinatal death, 8 and pregnancy outcomes (preterm birth and stillbirth). 6
On a global scale, 121 million unintended pregnancies were reported yearly between 2015 and 2019,9,10 with sub-Saharan African countries alone experiencing around 14 million unintended pregnancies each year. 11 However, more concerning is the contribution of the high prevalence of immediate post-partum unintended pregnancies (10%–55%) to the overall unintended pregnancies.12,13 In Ghana, the limited delivery space and labor ward beds in most district hospitals 14 pose a major worry to women at their reproductive age, especially pregnant women. 15 Regardless, there is a high prevalence (40%) of unintended pregnancies in Ghana, 1 with the prevalence of pregnancy shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period reported to be in the range of 36%–80%.16,17 Despite these scary statistics, most published studies focused on assessing the prevalence and predictors of interpregnancy16,17 while neglecting the influence of awareness in reducing the rates of interpregnancy. While unintended pregnancies typically occur during women’s active menstrual cycles, 18 it is worth noting that conceiving shortly after giving birth, before the resumption of menstruation, is indeed possible 19 as ovulation may occur sooner in some women than expected. It has been found that first-time ovulation after child delivery occurred in most women between 45 and 94 days, but some women experience it earlier than the stipulated days.19,20 This potentially predisposes such women to the risk of becoming pregnant soon after childbirth. 19
According to the World Health Organization guidelines, receiving postnatal examinations or checks shortly after giving birth, particularly within the first 24 h, offers new mothers the opportunity to address essential matters. 21 These discussions may encompass the timing of postnatal visits, adopting healthy eating habits, personal hygiene, managing birth spacing, infant feeding practices, breast care, and when it is safe to resume sexual relations or intercourse after childbirth. 21 These conversations are crucial as they can significantly minimize the risk of unintended pregnancies. 22 An earlier study conducted in Tanzania revealed that mothers who experienced unintended pregnancies tend to access fewer postnatal services compared to their counterparts. 22 Furthermore, multiple studies have underscored the impact of inadequate and delayed initiation of antenatal care on the occurrence of unplanned pregnancies.23 –25 These studies emphasized the significance of both postnatal care before discharge and antenatal care in mitigating the incidence of unintended pregnancies and their associated consequences.
In 2008, Ghana implemented the free maternal care policy, granting women, particularly pregnant women, free access to a wide range of maternal health services, including postnatal and antenatal care.26,27 However, despite the introduction of this policy, there is limited knowledge regarding the impact of postnatal and antenatal care services on women’s awareness of becoming pregnant shortly after birth and how to prevent such occurrences. Thus, the first crucial step in addressing this issue is to raise awareness of the factors associated with unintended pregnancies. 28
While various socio-demographic factors, such as age, education, and place of residence, have been found to predict short-interval pregnancies,17,29 their influence on being aware of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period remains unclear. Moreover, mass media exposure (e.g. television (TV) watching) has been shown to positively impact reproductive behaviors, including contraceptive use, in another jurisdiction, 30 a trend observed in Ghana as well. 31 While the former findings in Ghana are valuable, they are over two decades old. Re-examining current media exposure and its impact on understanding unintended pregnancies and reproductive behaviors could offer valuable insights for program development.
Given that the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period remains a significant contributor to unintended pregnancies and potential maternal and neonatal complications, it is crucial to grasp the level of awareness regarding this phenomenon. Understanding the extent of awareness and the associated factors of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period could help tailor more interventions toward increasing women’s knowledge in the areas of sexuality and reproductive health. This, in turn, could enhance the effectiveness of and adherence to counseling and education provided during antenatal and immediate post-partum care, ultimately reducing the rate of short-interval unplanned pregnancies. The specific objective of this study is to explore the extent of being aware of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period and its associated factors among Ghanaian women of reproductive age.
Materials and methods
Data source, design, and sampling procedure
This is a secondary analysis of publicly available Ghana Maternal Health Demographic Survey data collected between June 15, 2017 and October 12, 2017.32,33 This survey was executed by the Ghana Statistical Service and the Ghana Health Service with the primary aim of obtaining information on maternal health issues, maternal mortality, and specific causes of mortality faced by Ghanaian women. 32 The data were collected at the national level and captured comprehensive information from women in their reproductive ages (15–49 years) within 10 administrative regions of Ghana.32,33 Eligibility to be interviewed required a woman to be between the ages 15 and 49 and either a permanent resident of a selected household or a visitor who spent the night in a selected household before the survey.32,33 Data were collected from 25,062 women who resided in 26,324 households, with a response rate of 99%.32,33 A stratified two-stage cluster sampling design was used to sample the women participants from 900 clusters.32,33 The first stage focused on cluster selection (enumeration areas) from a national sampling frame, and then the second stage involved household selection within clusters. 34 Also, the study was exempted from ethics review since it is a secondary analysis of publicly available and anonymized data. The STROBE checklist was used as a guide for preparing the article and reporting study findings. Figure 1 provides a detailed description of the criteria used to obtain the sub-sample of the Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) 2017 among women of reproductive age in Ghana who had antenatal care for pregnancy, postnatal checks before discharge in public and private health facilities, and responded to the outcome of interest variable.
Figure 1.
Restriction criteria for obtaining a sub-sample of Demographic and Health Survey 2017 in this study.
aSamples excluded from the analysis.
ANC: antenatal care.
Measures
Primary outcome variable
The primary outcome of interest was being aware of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period. This variable was assessed on a dichotomous scale where participants were asked to respond yes/no to the question, “After the birth of a child, can a woman become pregnant before her menstrual period has returned?” 33
Primary exposure variables
The primary exposure variables for this study were postnatal checks or examinations before discharge and antenatal pregnancy care. Participants in this survey were asked whether they had ever accessed antenatal care services during and after pregnancy and whether they had been offered any postnatal checks or examinations before discharge after birth. Both variables were measured in binary response format (yes versus no).
Other factors and covariates
In addition, factors including maternal age (assessed as 15–19, 20–24, 25–29, and 30+ years), education level (no education, primary, middle/junior high school, secondary and above secondary), 4 and watching TV programs tailored to maternal health (yes versus no)30,34 are among other factors reported in the literature as potential variables that may help elucidate the knowledge gap in our primary outcome of interest. Other potential confounding variables considered in the current study are place of residence (rural/urban), marital status (married, cohabitating, and never married/single), place of delivery (private versus public), and number of children (one, two, and three or more). Furthermore, participants were asked to answer “yes/no” to a question on knowledge of the fertile period and health insurance coverage, respectively. Thus, “From one menstrual period to the next, are there certain days when a woman is more likely to become pregnant?” and “Are you covered by any health insurance?” 33 Contraceptive use and delivery type (vaginal birth/cesarean section) were assessed based on “yes/no” answers to the following questions “Was the respondent delivered by cesarean, that is, did they cut your belly open to take the baby out?” and “Are you or your partner currently doing something or using any method to delay or avoid getting pregnant?” respectively. 33 Those who responded “no” to the delivery type were referred to as “vaginal birth.”
Statistical analysis
The population characteristics were explored using descriptive statistics. The outcomes from the descriptive analysis were reported as proportions. In addition, a multivariate logistic regression analysis using SAS 9.4 SurveyLogistic procedure was performed. 35 This method provides an excellent opportunity to control the effect of the study’s complex survey design. This complexity includes the clustering effect in the current study data. 35 An unadjusted model was fitted one at a time between the primary variable of interest and each independent variable. This was carried out following the model-building strategies outlined by Hosmer et al., 36 where an unadjusted association with p-value <0.25 qualifies the independent variable as a candidate for the multivariate analysis. 36 Manual backward elimination was adopted to select the most important explanatory variables (p < 0.05) for the study’s final model. Possible interaction effects and potential confounding variables were assessed.37,38
Results
Demographic characteristics of women by awareness of pregnancy soon after childbirth
A total sub-sample comprising 8815 women who had given birth in either a private or public health facility participated in the survey and responded to questions related to antenatal care for pregnancy, postnatal examinations before discharge, and being aware of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period, as presented in Table 1. Notably, 62.0% of women who had received antenatal care and postnatal examinations before discharge demonstrated an awareness of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period, while 38.0% of women were not aware. In addition, 53.9% of the female participants were over 30 years old, and more than half (53.5%) had given birth to three or more children. The majority (72.0%) of the women had completed at least primary education, with over half residing in urban areas. Furthermore, 63.8% of the participants were married, and a significant proportion (87.1%) knew about their fertile period. Moreover, more than three-quarters (92.1%) of the women reported having health insurance coverage, with 89.5% delivering in public health facilities. Approximately, 72.0% of the respondents indicated watching TV programs related to maternal health. Being aware of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after birth before the resumption of the menstrual period was higher among women who delivered via cesarean section (67.9%) than those who delivered through vaginal birth (60.9%). Among women who initiated contraceptive use, 64.9% were aware of short-interval pregnancy, and 35.1% were not aware. Furthermore, an analysis of age and knowledge of the fertile period revealed that being knowledgeable about the fertile period increases with age (age 15–19 years: 81.9%; age 20–24 years: 84.0%; age 25–29 years: 88.5%, and age 30+ years: 88.0%; Figure 2). Also, awareness of short interpregnancy interval was high among women who received postnatal checks (61.0% versus 58.8%) and antenatal care (64.1% versus 61.3%) from private health facility compared to the public health facility (Figure 3).
Table 1.
Descriptive statistics and p-values from the unadjusted regression model (N = 8815).
| Variables | Total (%) | Awareness of pregnancy soon after childbirth | p-values* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (%) | No (%) | |||
| Postnatal checks before discharge | 0.005 | |||
| No | 449 (5.1) | 247 (55.0) | 202 (45.0) | |
| Yes | 8366 (94.9) | 5205 (62.2) | 3161 (37.8) | |
| Antenatal care | 0.238 | |||
| No | 44 (0.5) | 23 (52.3) | 21 (47.7) | |
| Yes | 8771 (99.5) | 5429 (61.9) | 3342 (38.1) | |
| Age (years) | <0.001 | |||
| 15–19 | 375 (4.3) | 165 (44.0) | 210 (56.0) | |
| 20–24 | 1534 (17.4) | 866 (56.5) | 668 (43.5) | |
| 25–29 | 2152 (24.4) | 1330 (61.8) | 822 (38.2) | |
| 30+ | 4754 (53.9) | 3091 (65.0) | 1663 (35.0) | |
| Education | <0.001 | |||
| No education | 2470 (28.0) | 1352 (54.7) | 1118 (45.3) | |
| Primary | 1469 (16.7) | 880 (59.9) | 589 (40.1) | |
| Middle/junior high school | 3066 (34.8) | 1989 (64.9) | 1077 (35.1) | |
| Secondary and above | 1810 (20.5) | 1231 (68.0) | 579 (32.0) | |
| Place of residence | <0.001 | |||
| Rural | 4376 (49.6) | 2579 (58.9) | 1797 (41.1) | |
| Urban | 4439 (50.4) | 2873 (64.7) | 1566 (35.3) | |
| Number of children | 0.002 | |||
| One | 2221 (25.2) | 1300 (58.5) | 921 (41.5) | |
| Two | 1880 (21.3) | 1177 (62.6) | 703 (37.4) | |
| Three or more | 4714 (53.5) | 2975 (63.1) | 1739 (36.9) | |
| Marital status | <0.001 | |||
| Never/single | 1163 (13.2) | 723 (62.2) | 440 (37.8) | |
| Cohabiting | 2031 (23.0) | 1343 (66.1) | 688 (33.9) | |
| Married | 5621 (63.8) | 3386 (60.2) | 2235 (39.8) | |
| Knowledge of the fertile period | <0.001 | |||
| No | 1134 (12.9) | 510 (45.0) | 624 (55.0) | |
| Yes | 7681 (87.1) | 4942 (64.3) | 2739 (35.7) | |
| Health insurance coverage | 0.765 | |||
| No | 698 (7.9) | 428 (61.3) | 270 (38.7) | |
| Yes | 8117 (92.1) | 5024 (61.9) | 3093 (38.1) | |
| Place of birth delivery | 0.106 | |||
| Private | 927 (10.5) | 599 (64.6) | 328 (35.4) | |
| Public | 7888 (89.5) | 4853 (61.5) | 3035 (38.5) | |
| Watch television | <0.001 | |||
| No | 2449 (27.8) | 1382 (56.4) | 1067 (43.6) | |
| Yes | 6366 (72.2) | 4070 (63.9) | 2296 (36.1) | |
| Delivery type | <0.001 | |||
| Vaginal birth | 7618 (86.4) | 4639 (60.9) | 2979 (39.1) | |
| Cesarean section | 1197 (13.6) | 813 (67.9) | 384 (32.1) | |
| Contraceptive use | <0.001 | |||
| No | 4883 (60.9) | 2936 (60.1) | 1947 (39.9) | |
| Yes | 3132 (39.1) | 2032 (64.9) | 1100 (35.1) | |
p-value from the unadjusted regression model.
Figure 2.
Knowledge of fertile period by age.
Figure 3.

Women who received postnatal checks and antenatal care in public and private health facilities and their awareness of short interpregnancy interval.
In Table 1, our unadjusted results revealed significant associations between factors such as postnatal examinations before discharge, age, education, place of residence, number of children, marital status, knowledge of the fertile period, delivery type, contraceptive use, TV watching, and being aware of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period (p < 0.05). Conversely, factors including antenatal care, health insurance coverage, and the place of birth delivery did not exhibit a significant association with the outcome.
Adjusted associations between predictor variables and outcome
The final adjusted model, as presented in Table 2, indicates that women who received a postnatal examination before discharge were 1.29 times more likely to be aware of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period compared to those who did not (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03–1.61). Furthermore, a dose-response relationship was observed between age and the awareness of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period. The likelihood of being aware of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period increased with age, as evidenced by the following findings: for women aged 20–24 years (AOR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.30–2.17), for those aged 25–29 years (AOR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.67–2.79), and for those aged 30 years and above (AOR = 2.89, 95% CI: 2.16–3.54). Moreover, there was a positive association between educational level and women’s awareness of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period. When compared to the reference group (no education), those with primary education (AOR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.07–1.43), middle school or junior high school education (AOR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.21–1.56), and those with secondary education or higher (AOR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.29–1.73) were respectively more likely of being aware of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period. In addition, women who possessed knowledge about their fertile period were 2.02 times (AOR = 2.02, 95% CI: 1.75–2.32) more likely to be aware of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period than those who were not aware of their fertile period. Furthermore, women who watched TV were 1.18 times (AOR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.05–1.32) more likely to be aware of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after birth before the resumption of the menstrual period than those who did not. Women who delivered through cesarean section were 1.19 times more likely to be aware of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after birth before the resumption of the menstrual period than those who delivered via vaginal birth (AOR = 1.19; 95% CI: 1.03–1.37). Furthermore, women who initiated contraceptive use were 1.15 times more likely to be aware of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after birth before the resumption of the menstrual period than those who did not initiate contraceptive use (AOR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.05–1.27).
Table 2.
Adjusted associations between predictor variables and awareness of the possibility of pregnancy soon after childbirth.
| Variables | Adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) | Overall p-value |
|---|---|---|
| Postnatal checks before discharge | 0.024 | |
| No (ref) | 1.00 | |
| Yes | 1.29 (1.03–1.61) | |
| Age (years) | <0.001 | |
| 15–19 (ref) | 1.00 | |
| 20–24 | 1.68 (1.30–2.17) | |
| 25–29 | 2.15 (1.67–2.79) | |
| 30+ | 2.89 (2.16–3.54) | |
| Education | <0.001 | |
| No education (ref) | 1.00 | |
| Primary | 1.24 (1.07–1.43) | |
| Middle/junior high school | 1.38 (1.21–1.56) | |
| Secondary/above secondary | 1.49 (1.29–1.73) | |
| Knowledge of the fertile period | <0.001 | |
| No (ref) | 1.00 | |
| Yes | 2.02 (1.75–2.32) | |
| Watch television | 0.004 | |
| No (ref) | 1.00 | |
| Yes | 1.18 (1.05–1.32) | |
| Marital status | <0.001 | |
| Never (ref) | 1.00 | |
| Cohabiting | 1.10 (0.93–1.29) | |
| Married | 0.80 (0.69–0.93) | |
| Delivery type | 0.021 | |
| Vaginal birth (ref) | 1.00 | |
| Cesarean section | 1.19 (1.03–1.37) | |
| Contraceptive use | 0.005 | |
| No (ref) | 1.00 | |
| Yes | 1.15 (1.05–1.27) |
Discussion
We examined the awareness of the possibility of becoming pregnant soon after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period and its association with maternal healthcare services and demographic factors among Ghanaian women. Despite the decade-long implementation (2008–2017) of Ghana’s free maternal health policy, which guarantees pregnant women free access to both antenatal care before delivery and postnatal examinations before discharge,26,27 a substantial proportion, approximately 38% of mothers who received both antenatal care and postnatal examination before discharge, remains unaware of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period. This finding is particularly significant and demands urgent attention, especially considering that only 51.0% of women in the study reported receiving both antenatal care and postnatal checks before discharge, leaving approximately 34.0% without these essential maternal health services and 15.0% who delivered at home without postnatal checks. This concern becomes even more pressing when the study’s finding is extrapolated to the broader population of women of reproductive age in Ghana. According to a 2016 UNICEF report, 39 more than seven million women in Ghana were in their reproductive age, underscoring the critical need for increased awareness, given the established associations between both antenatal care and postnatal examination with unintended pregnancies.22 –25 This further reiterates the gaps in postnatal checks in Ghana, highlighted by Owen et al., 40 which includes postnatal counseling being more group focused rather than individualist, staff unfamiliarity with schedules for standard postnatal visits, discrepancies in information purported to have been provided during postnatal counseling sessions, and the patient’s ability to recall the information provided. 40
More so, we identified a dose-response relationship between age and awareness of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period. Essentially, an increase in maternal age is associated with a heightened awareness of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period. Notably, mothers aged 15–19 years demonstrated less awareness of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period compared to their older counterparts. The diminished awareness among this younger age group may be attributed, in part, to a lack of knowledge about pregnancy. In Ghana, adolescents often rely on experiential guidance regarding pregnancy-related matters, and the likelihood of awareness may hinge on whether their mentors are informed or perceive the need to share such experiences. This aligns with Ameyaw’s observation, which linked the high prevalence of unplanned pregnancies among Ghanaian adolescents, particularly those aged 15–19 years, to knowledge gaps in contraceptives and a limited understanding of reproductive anatomy. 41 An analysis of the study data on age and knowledge of the fertile period further supports the limited knowledge about pregnancy among women aged 15–19 years. The findings indicate that knowledge of the fertile period increases with age and vice versa. Govender, Naidoo, and Taylor’s study on South African women similarly found that irrespective of adolescents having had repeated pregnancies, they were not “necessarily better informed about pregnancy, sexual and reproductive health.” 42 Adequate knowledge of the fertile period empowers women of reproductive age to plan their pregnancies. 43 Consistent with previous research, the current study revealed that awareness of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period is twice as high in women with knowledge of their fertile period compared to those without. 44 Berger et al. 44 noted that an increase in knowledge about the fertile period reduces high rates of unintended pregnancy.
The impact of education in this research domain cannot be understated, as previous studies have underscored its pivotal role in mitigating the prevalence of unintended pregnancies.45,46 For instance, Oulman et al. 45 discovered that women with a high school education or lower had 1.71 times higher odds of unintended pregnancy compared to those with higher educational levels. Our study observed a positive association between women’s higher educational attainment and their awareness of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period. The low awareness of the possibility of pregnancy shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period among women with no education may be attributed to a lack of or insufficient knowledge about pregnancy,47,48 leading to diminished expectations of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after delivery. There are sexual and reproductive health education policies in Ghana, such as the Adolescent Reproductive Health Policy, which supports sexual and reproductive health education and has been integrated into some subjects and co-curricular activities at the junior and senior high education levels. 49 However, Awusabo-Asare et al. 49 noted that topics taught under the core curricula are limited and only provide these students with basic knowledge of sexual and reproductive health education.
Whether women would have shorter or longer interpregnancy intervals may depend on the mode of delivery. 50 Agulu et al.’s 50 study among Ghanaian women revealed that women who had cesarean delivery were more likely to space their children than those who delivered via spontaneous vaginal birth. This further supports our finding that women who delivered through cesarean section were more aware of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after birth before the resumption of the menstrual period than those who delivered via vaginal birth. The higher awareness of women who delivered through cesarean section could be attributed in part to their vulnerability to short interpregnancy intervals-related complications such as uterine rupture. 51 Moreover, previous studies have linked the mode of delivery to contraceptive use, 52 which is also found to be associated with short interpregnancy intervals.53,54 Nakiwunga et al. 52 noted that women who had cesarean delivery were more likely to initiate contraceptive use than their vaginal delivery counterparts. Also, lower probabilities of short interpregnancy intervals were found to be associated with both initiation of immediate postpartum and interval long-acting reversible contraception. 54 The former and latter findings were further reiterated by Taylor et al., 55 who found that women with short interpregnancy interval felt they were not better informed about birth spacing and had poor knowledge of more effective contraceptive methods. These results are consistent with the present study findings that women who initiated contraceptive use were more likely to be aware of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after birth before the resumption of the menstrual period than their counters who did not initiate contraceptive use.
Our findings also revealed that the awareness of short interpregnancy intervals was high among women who received postnatal checks and antenatal care from private health facilities compared to public health facilities. This is very concerning, given that approximately 89.5% of women in this study gave birth in a public health facility, while only 10.5% delivered in a private health facility.
The reproductive health behaviors of women can be significantly influenced by their TV watching habits. 30 A study conducted by Rahman et al. 30 on Bangladeshi women and TV watching indicated that women who watch TV were more likely to use contraceptives, attend at least four antenatal care visits, and seek assistance from skilled birth attendants. In addition, Wolde et al. 56 discovered a significant association between women who watch TV at least once a week and knowledge about the fertile period. In line with these findings,30,56 our study revealed that women who watch TV were 1.18 times more likely to be aware of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period than those who do not. This underscores the importance of comprehensive reproductive health information in mass media. A well-executed media campaign on reproductive health holds promises to increase awareness and motivate efforts to reduce unplanned pregnancies.
Strengths and limitations
To our knowledge, this epidemiological study represents the first attempt to investigate awareness of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth before the resumption of the menstrual period, an often overlooked yet significant contributor to unintended pregnancies among Ghanaian women. A notable strength is the utilization of a large, nationally representative dataset encompassing women from all 10 administrative regions of Ghana. The study employed rigorous statistical methods and considered various explanatory variables that could directly or indirectly impact the primary outcome of interest. However, some limitations should be acknowledged. The study did not account for breastfeeding as a factor that might delay ovulation, 57 primarily due to data constraints. Furthermore, the cross-sectional nature of the study precludes the establishment of causality. Even though the data used for the study analysis provided information about whether women had antenatal care and postnatal checks in a public or private facility, information on knowledge of the specific facilities was not collected. This study may not be generalizable, for example, to women who delivered at home and have no records of postnatal checks, but largely, it can be extrapolated to women who access antenatal care and postnatal checks in health facilities in Ghana and elsewhere who have a similar system and demographics like Ghana and provide the basis for more tailored intervention to target women who may face some barriers for delivering in a health facility. This study used secondary or existing data and included all participants who met the study’s inclusion criteria; for that matter, no sample size calculation was carried out.
Conclusion
Over a decade following the initiation of Ghana’s free maternal health policy, there remains a significant gap in the awareness of the possibility of becoming pregnant shortly after childbirth, particularly before the return of menstruation, even among women who have accessed the free maternal care services, including antenatal care for pregnancy and postnatal examinations before discharge. This deficiency, observed in approximately 38% of women, raises concerns about the effectiveness of counseling or education provided during antenatal care and immediate post-partum care regarding birth spacing, contraceptive use, the timing of resuming sexual activity, and the extent to which women adhere to such guidance. Although more women delivered in public than private health facilities, the awareness of short interpregnancy intervals was high among women who received postnatal checks and antenatal care from private compared to public health facilities. The study findings underscore the urgency of tailored interventions to enhance the knowledge of adolescents and women who received antenatal care postnatal checks from public health facilities about the awareness of various aspects of sexuality and reproductive health, encompassing fertility and the risk of unintended pregnancy. This entails incorporating specific education on potential changes in ovulation patterns after childbirth, emphasizing the importance of being aware that extended ovulation intervals after the first childbirth do not guarantee the same in subsequent deliveries. Moreover, given the low awareness of the possibility of becoming pregnant after childbirth before menstruation among women with no formal education, community-based comprehensive sex education programs are crucial to empower women in making informed decisions about pregnancy.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-whe-10.1177_17455057241255655 for Knowledge about unintended pregnancy shortly after childbirth: An issue of ineffective counseling or adherence? by Samuel Kwaku Essien, Batholomew Chireh and John Kwasi Essien in Women’s Health
Acknowledgments
This research used data from the DHS Program, and the authors would like to acknowledge them for making the data publicly available.
Footnotes
ORCID iD: Samuel Kwaku Essien
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9121-3025
Supplemental material: Supplemental material for this article is available online.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate: The DHS survey received approval from the ICF Institutional Review Board. The Ghana Health Service and the Ghana Statistical Service approved and implemented the survey for and on behalf of the Government of Ghana. Written informed consent statements were agreed to by all adult participants before the interview, and in the case of minors, written informed consent from the parent/guardians was obtained for each child at the beginning of the questionnaire.
Consent for publication: Not applicable
Author contribution(s): Samuel Kwaku Essien: Conceptualization; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing.
Batholomew Chireh: Conceptualization; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing.
John Kwasi Essien: Conceptualization; Formal analysis; Investigation; Methodology; Writing—original draft.
Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Availability of data and materials: These publicly available data are accessible from the Demographic and Health Survey program at https://dhsprogram.com/data/dataset_admin/.
References
- 1. Nyarko SH. Unintended pregnancy among pregnant women in Ghana: prevalence and predictors. J Pregnancy 2019; 2019: 2920491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Herd P, Higgins J, Sicinski K, et al. The implications of unintended pregnancies for mental health in later life. Am J Public Health 2016; 106(3): 421–429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hall KS, Kusunoki Y, Gatny H, et al. Social discrimination, stress, and risk of unintended pregnancy among young women. J Adolesc Health 2015; 56(3): 330–337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Gariepy A, Lundsberg LS, Vilardo N, et al. Pregnancy context and women’s health-related quality of life. Contraception 2017; 95(5): 491–499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bener A, Saleh NM, Salameh KM, et al. The impact of the interpregnancy interval on birth weight and other pregnancy outcomes. Rev Bras Saúde Matern Infant 2012; 12: 233–241. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Wendt A, Gibbs CM, Peters S, et al. Impact of increasing inter-pregnancy interval on maternal and infant health. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2012; 26: 239–258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Yazdkhasti M, Pourreza A, Pirak A, et al. Unintended pregnancy and its adverse social and economic consequences on health system: a narrative review article. Iran J Public Health 2015; 44(1): 12–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Mahande MJ, Obure J. Effect of interpregnancy interval on adverse pregnancy outcomes in northern Tanzania: a registry-based retrospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016; 16(1): 140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, et al. Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990–2019. Lancet Glob Health 2020; 8(9): e1152–e1161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Sedgh G, Bearak J, Singh S, et al. Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends. Lancet 2016; 388: 258–267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hubacher D, Mavranezouli I, McGinn E. Unintended pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: magnitude of the problem and potential role of contraceptive implants to alleviate it. Contraception 2008; 78(1): 73–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Gemmill A, Lindberg LD. Short interpregnancy intervals in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122(1): 64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Mwalwanda CS, Black KI. Immediate post-partum initiation of intrauterine contraception and implants: a review of the safety and guidelines for use. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 53(4): 331–337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Sumankuuro J, Crockett J, Wang S. Perceived barriers to maternal and newborn health services delivery: a qualitative study of health workers and community members in low and middle-income settings. BMJ Open 2018; 8(11): e021223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Srivastava A, Avan BI, Rajbangshi P, et al. Determinants of women’s satisfaction with maternal health care: a literature review from developing countries. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15(1): 97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Nti CA, Gadegbeku C, Sarah NA, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of birth spacing among Ghanaian mothers: implications for maternal and child nutritional status. World Appl Sci J 2014; 31(11): 1971–1978. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Alhassan AR, Anyinzaam-Adolipore JN, Abdulai K. Short birth interval in Ghana: maternal socioeconomic predictors and child survival. Pop Med 2022; 4: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Trussell J, Raymond EG, Cleland K. Emergency contraception: a last chance to prevent unintended pregnancy. Contemp Read Law Soc Justice 2014; 6(2): 7–38. [Google Scholar]
- 19. McNeilly AS, Glasier AF, Howie PW, et al. Fertility after childbirth: pregnancy associated with breast feeding. Clin Endocrinol 1983; 19(2): 167–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Jackson E, Glasier A. Return of ovulation and menses in postpartum nonlactating women: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117(3): 657–662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Department of Making Pregnancy Safer, World Health Organization. Counseling for maternal and newborn health care: a handbook for building skills. World Health Organization, https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/44016/9789241547628_eng.pdf?sequence=1 (2010, accessed 19 November 2023). [Google Scholar]
- 22. Kanté AM, Chung CE, Larsen AM, et al. Factors associated with compliance with the recommended frequency of postnatal care services in three rural districts of Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15: 341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Dibaba Y, Fantahun M, Hindin MJ. The effects of pregnancy intention on the use of antenatal care services: systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Health 2013; 10: 50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Carlander A, Hultstrand JN, Reuterwall I, et al. Unplanned pregnancy and the association with maternal health and pregnancy outcomes: a Swedish cohort study. PLoS ONE 2023; 18(5): e0286052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Gipson JD, Koenig MA, Hindin MJ. The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: a review of the literature. Stud Fam Plann 2008; 39(1): 18–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Azaare J, Akweongo P, Aryeetey GC, et al. Impact of free maternal health care policy on maternal health care utilization and perinatal mortality in Ghana: protocol design for historical cohort study. Reprod Health 2020; 17(1): 169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Dalinjong PA, Wang AY, Homer CS. The implementation of the free maternal health policy in rural Northern Ghana: synthesised results and lessons learnt. BMC Res Notes 2018; 11: 341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Klima CS. Unintended pregnancy: consequences and solutions for a worldwide problem. J Nurse Midwifery 1998; 43(6): 483–491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Yadav B, Pandey S. Study of knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding birth spacing and methods available for spacing in rural Haryana, India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2018; 7(4): 1389–1394. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Rahman M, Curtis SL, Chakraborty N, et al. Women’s television watching and pregnancy among women: an analysis of the Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15(1): 1–8.25591791 [Google Scholar]
- 31. Olaleye DO, Bankole A. The impact of mass media family planning promotion on contraceptive behavior of women in Ghana. Popul Res Policy Rev 1994; 13: 161–177. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Ghana Statistical Service (GSS), Ghana Health Service (GHS), and ICF. Ghana maternal health survey 2017: key indicators report. Accra, Ghana, http://www2.statsghana.gov.gh/docfiles/PR95.pdf (2018, accessed 19 November 2023).
- 33. Ghana Statistical Service (GSS), Ghana Health Service (GHS), and ICF. Ghana maternal health survey 2017. Accra, Ghana: GSS, GHS, and ICF, https://www.dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR340/FR340.pdf (2018, accessed 18 November 2023).
- 34. Aboagye RG, Seidu AA, Ahinkorah BO, et al. Association between frequency of mass media exposure and maternal health care service utilization among women in sub-Saharan Africa: implications for tailored health communication and education. PLoS ONE 2022. Sep 29; 17(9): e0275202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Agnelli R. Examples of logistic modeling with the SURVEYLOGISTIC procedure. In: Proceedings of the SAS global forum 2014 conference, SAS global forum, Washington, DC, 23–26 March 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Hosmer DW, Jr, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 37. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL, et al. Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 38. Dohoo IR, Martin SW, Stryhn H. Methods in epidemiologic research. Charlottetown, PE, Canada: VER Incorporated, 2012, pp. 401–426. [Google Scholar]
- 39. UNICEF. Progress for every child in the SDG era country profile, https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/cp/progress/country_profile_gha.pdf (2016, accessed 7 November 2023).
- 40. Owen MD, Colburn E, Tetteh C, et al. Postnatal care education in health facilities in Accra, Ghana: perspectives of mothers and providers. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20: 664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Ameyaw EK. Prevalence and correlates of unintended pregnancy in Ghana: analysis of 2014 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol 2018; 4: 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Govender D, Naidoo S, Taylor M. Knowledge, attitudes and peer influences related to pregnancy, sexual and reproductive health among adolescents using maternal health services in Ugu, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. BMC Public Health 2019; 19(1): 928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Harper J, Boivin J, O’Neill HC, et al. The need to improve fertility awareness. Reprod Biomed Soc Online 2017; 4: 18–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Berger A, Manlove J, Wildsmith E, et al. What young adults know–and don’t know–about women’s fertility patterns: implications for reducing unintended pregnancies. Child Trends Research Brief, 2012, pp. 1–6, https://cms.childtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Child_Trends-2012_09_21_RB_FertilityPatterns.pdf
- 45. Oulman E, Kim TH, Yunis K, et al. Prevalence and predictors of unintended pregnancy among women: an analysis of the Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015; 15(1): 260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Asadi Sarvestani K, Ahmadi A, Enayat H, et al. Level and factors related to unintended pregnancy with a brief review of new population policies in Iran. Iran J Public Health 2017; 46(7): 973–981. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Wulandaria RD, Laksonob AD. Education as predictor of the knowledge of pregnancy danger signs in Rural Indonesia. Education 2020; 13(1): 10. [Google Scholar]
- 48. Nithya R, Dorairajan G, Chinnakali P. Do pregnant women know about danger signs of pregnancy and childbirth? A study of the level of knowledge and its associated factors from a tertiary care hospital in Southern India. Int J Adv Med Health Res 2017; 4(1): 11–17. [Google Scholar]
- 49. Awusabo-Asare K, Stillman M, Keogh S, et al. From paper to practice: sexuality education policies and their implementation in Ghana. New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 50. Agulu GG, Dzotsi EK, Issah K, et al. Assessing the relationship between short birth-to-pregnancy interval and the maternal and perinatal outcomes among multiparous women in Northern Ghana. ESI Prepr 2024; 25: 242–265. [Google Scholar]
- 51. Hutcheon JA, Nelson HD, Stidd R, et al. Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse maternal outcomes in high-resource settings: an updated systematic review. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2019; 33(1): O48–O59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Nakiwunga N, Kakaire O, Ndikuno CK, et al. Contraceptive uptake and associated factors among women in the immediate postpartum period at Kawempe Hospital. BMC Womens Health 2022; 22(1): 1–1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Mamo H, Dagnaw A, Sharew NT, et al. Prevalence of short interpregnancy interval and its associated factors among pregnant women in Debre Berhan town, Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 2021; 16(8): e0255613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Rodriguez MI, Skye M, Ramanadhan S, et al. Examining the association between short interpregnancy interval births and the type and timing of postpartum long-acting reversible contraception. Contraception 2022; 112: 61–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Taylor RA, Yang JM, Cheney K, et al. Short interpregnancy interval: circumstance or choice? BMJ Sex Reprod Health 2022; 48(2): 110–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Wolde M, Kassie A, Shitu K, et al. Knowledge of fertile period and its determinants among women of childbearing age in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis based on 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey. Front Public Health 2022; 10: 828967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Chao S. The effect of lactation on ovulation and fertility. Clin Perinatol 1987; 14(1): 39–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-whe-10.1177_17455057241255655 for Knowledge about unintended pregnancy shortly after childbirth: An issue of ineffective counseling or adherence? by Samuel Kwaku Essien, Batholomew Chireh and John Kwasi Essien in Women’s Health


