Abstract
The microorganisms living in the human oral cavity, collectively known as the oral microbiota, play a critical role in not only oral health, but systemic and overall health. The Baker Lab leverages emerging technologies in bioinformatics and molecular biology to answer fundamental questions regarding the ecology, physiology, and pathogenesis of the oral microbiota. We use a microbial ‘omics approach, which has included pioneering the use of nanopore sequencing on saliva and oral bacterial RNA. The resulting work discovered novel bacterial species and biosynthetic pathways which impact the ecology of the oral microbiota and its relationship to human disease. This article will briefly define the oral microbiota. It will also summarize how bioinformatics and ‘omics-based research have revolutionized oral health research. The article will then provide a broad summary of our past, present and future research and educational programs.
What is the oral microbiota/microbiome, how is it studied, and why does it matter?
The oral microbiota is the collection of microorganisms that live in the human oral cavity, and includes bacteria, viruses, archaea, and microeukaryotes such as fungi (Baker et al., 2023). These microbes have a major impact on human health, with extremely prevalent and costly oral diseases such as dental caries, periodontal disease, and oral cancers having mainly microbial etiologies (Baker et al., 2023). Prior to the mid-2000s, microbiological research at large, including that of the oral microbiota, was limited to the species of microorganisms that could be physically isolated, cultured (i.e., grown), and studied in a laboratory (Baker, 2023). Much of the study of microbial pathogens employed Koch’s Postulates, in which causative microbial agents of disease were identified by isolation from diseased sites, grown in pure culture, and subsequently able to cause disease when introduced into healthy model organisms (Falkow, 2004). In the context of oral microbiology, these classical approaches enabled the discovery of several oral pathogens associated with oral diseases. Two prominent examples were the association of Streptococcus mutans with dental caries and the association of Porphyromonas gingivalis with periodontal disease (Edwardsson, 1968, Kagan, 1980). Organisms associated generally with good oral health, such as Streptococcus gordonii, were also identified and studied during this period (Nyvad & Kilian, 1990). Since one does not know a priori what organisms are present in an environment, or how to isolate and cultivate them, only a minority of the microorganisms residing in the oral cavity were identified and studied indepth using traditional microbiological techniques.
The development of culture-independent analysis methods, such as high throughput sequencing and modern mass spectrometry, allowed detection and analysis of all microorganisms present in a sample, not just the ones that could be isolated and grown in a lab. This revealed that the species isolated and cultured to that point in time, using classic microbiological methods, represented a small percentage of the diversity present in most environments, including the oral microbiota (Venter et al., 2004, Ley et al., 2005, Gill et al., 2006). In the approximately 20 years since the emergence of this technology, there has been an explosive growth of microbiome research, which has provided an ever more complete picture of which microorganisms are present or abundant in human oral microbiotas associated with good oral health, or with microbiotas associated with oral diseases such as caries, periodontal disease, and oral cancer (Baker et al., 2023). In addition to its relationship with oral diseases, a growing body of evidence is also linking the oral microbiota to a myriad of systemic diseases. These include cardiovascular disease, diabetes, colorectal cancer, obesity, Rheumatoid arthritis, Alzheimer’s disease and others (Hajishengallis & Chavakis, 2021, Baker et al., 2023). The oral microbiota is now known to contain over 700 species, and the health-associated microbiota defends the mouth against pathogenic organisms (Chen et al., 2010, He et al., 2010, Baker et al., 2023). As an increasing amount is known about which species are present in various environments and conditions, there is a growing need to move past this type of research and understand the mechanisms underpinning how the microbiome is affecting the health of the human host (Nascimento et al., 2017, Burne, 2018).
What is ‘omics research?
‘Omics research is the informal term for the collective research approaches that end in the suffix, ‘omics,’ and each aim to characterize and quantify entire pools of molecules or interactions in a given setting. Examples that are particularly relevant to oral microbiome research are: genomics, analysis of genomes; metagenomics, simultaneous analysis of multiple genomes in a community; transcriptomics, analysis of RNA of a given species; metatranscriptomics, analysis of the RNA of a community of organisms: metabolomics, analysis of metabolites (i.e., small molecules); proteomics, analysis of proteins; lipidomics, analysis of lipids; pangenomics, analysis of gene families across multiple organisms; and phylogenomics, analysis of the evolutionary relationship between organisms. The Baker Lab has experience leveraging diverse ‘omics methods across several research projects and collaborations. Examples include: (1) genomics to assemble complete genomes of novel species and strains from the oral microbiome (Baker & Edlund, 2020, Baker, 2021, Baker, 2022), (2) metagenomics to discover new species and observe disparities in the oral microbiome, and the biosynthetic pathways it encodes, associated with dental caries and periodontal disease (Aleti et al., 2019, Baker & Edlund, 2021, Baker et al., 2021, Baker, 2022), (3) proteomics to map the S. mutans acid and oxidative stress responses and discover new functions of a transcriptional regulator (Tinder et al., 2022), (4) pangenomics to explore gene families across various bacterial species and strains to predict metabolic repertoires and ecological roles (Baker, 2021, Baker et al., 2021, Baker, 2022), (5) phylogenomics to determine the evolutionary lineage of novel bacteria (Baker, 2021, Baker et al., 2021, Baker, 2022), and (6) lipidomics to discover how bacteria modify their cell membranes in response to stress, in an effort persist and cause disease (project in progress).
Nanopore sequencing: leveraging an emerging technology
As stated above, the development of culture-independent analysis of microbiomes was enabled by so-called next-generation sequencing (Bennett, 2004, Margulies et al., 2005, Bentley et al., 2008, McKernan et al., 2009). Illumina was the most broadly used sequencing platform of the 2010s, and revolutionized the life sciences by reducing the cost of sequencing by orders of magnitude, providing exceptionally accurate sequencing data, and increasing throughput. However, the latest generation of emerging sequencing technologies (i.e., “third generation sequencing”) is in the process of disrupting biomedical research once more (Athanasopoulou et al., 2021). One technology that has gained considerable traction in the last several years is nanopore sequencing (Oxford Nanopore Technologies Inc. (ONT)) (Jain et al., 2015). While Illumina sequencing-by-synthesis technology generates sequences that are generally 150 or 300 base pairs of DNA in length, ONT sequencing theoretically has no upper limit on the length of output sequence, with single reads of more than 1 million base pairs of DNA routinely reported (Jain et al., 2015). Because most genomes contain repeat regions spanning much longer than 300 base pairs, the puzzle that is a given genome cannot typically be completed with Illumina short-read sequencing alone (i.e., because all these short reads match up nonspecifically to all their cognate sequences in the repeat regions of the chromosome). The long reads produced by ONT sequencing much more easily span the repeat regions of genomes enabling significantly easier assembly of complete chromosomes. However, until recently ONT technology was plagued with a considerably higher error rate than competing technologies, limiting its applicability (Amarasinghe et al., 2020). This error rate decreased in recent years, with a crucial inflection point being reached in 2022, when studies illustrated that the contemporary ONT instrumentation and software could produce genome assemblies with an error rate on par with those produced by Illumina sequencing (Sereika et al., 2022).
The Baker Lab was an early adapter of ONT technology, and in 2022 published the first protocols to obtain multiple complete bacterial genomes simultaneously directly from saliva using ONT sequencing (Baker, 2022). Several of the genomes completed using these methods were the first complete genome for their given species (Candidatus Saccharibacteria HMT-870, Candidatus Saccharibacteria HMT-348, Actinomyces graevenitzii) (Baker, 2021, Baker, 2022, Baker, 2022). Particularly intriguing were the genomes from the enigmatic Saccharibacteria family, which are essentially tiny (even by bacterial standards) parasitic bacteria that depend on larger host bacteria to survive (He et al., 2015). The novel complete genomes from our study illustrated that the G6 group of Saccharibacteria likely has a different lifestyle, and possibly host and host dependencies than the more well-understood G1 group of Saccharibacteria (Baker, 2021). These differences likely extend to ecological and pathogenic roles as well, as Saccharibacteria appear to have a relationship to inflammation and periodontal disease (albeit poorly understood at this stage) (Chipashvili et al., 2021). The ability to obtain complete genomes directly from complex samples, such as saliva, will revolutionize microbiology research, as it was previously only possible to obtain complete genomes of species that were isolated and cultivated in the lab in a pure culture (i.e., only incomplete, draft genomes could be obtained from metagenomes using earlier sequencing technologies) (Athanasopoulou et al., 2021). Obtaining genomes that are both complete and accurate is of importance because they then allow accurate identification and quantification of the species of interest in microbiome samples, and enable accurate prediction of the metabolic capabilities (and therefore ecological and pathogenic roles) of the species (Venter et al., 2004, Naito et al., 2016). This data can further guide wet-lab research and help scientists design experiments, isolate, cultivate and study species that were previously intractable (Cross et al., 2019). In addition to genomics and metagenomics using ONT, The Baker Lab pioneered use of the ONT sequencing platform for RNA sequencing of oral bacteria (Baker et al., 2022). RNA sequencing via ONT has several advantages as well. Because ONT can sequence native DNA and RNA molecules (unlike most sequencing methods, which must first reverse transcribe the RNA to cDNA, and/or amplify the DNA or RNA with PCR), ONT sequencing can detect base modifications, such as methylation, as well as noncanonical bases such as inosine (Garalde et al., 2018, Tourancheau et al., 2021, Begik et al., 2022, Nguyen et al., 2022). The ability to detect DNA and RNA modifications on a genome wide or transcriptome wide scale is a major advance and is likely to produce entirely new fields of microbiology research. Furthermore, the long RNA reads enable the detection of co-transcribed genes and novel RNA isoforms on a transcriptome wide scale (Garalde et al., 2018, Grunberger et al., 2022).
Lipidomics of bacteria, and unsaturated fatty acid production in Streptcococci
A special current emphasis of research in The Baker Lab is using lipidomics to better understand the ways in which bacteria modify their cell membranes to adapt to their environment, and in some cases, cause disease. All cells, and many viruses, have membranes, which are composed of lipid bilayers. The chemical properties of most membrane lipids render them notoriously difficult to study. As a result, lipidomics is perhaps the least utilized major ‘omics discipline, and a relative deficiency exists in understanding the consequences of the lipidome in various contexts, despite certainty in its biological importance. Bacterial cells all have at least one membrane, while Gram negative organisms have two. Bacteria produce a diversity of lipids to the extent that many bacterial species can, in fact, be identified be their lipid profile alone (Abel et al., 1963).
The Lactobacillales order of bacteria contains some of the most important pathogens and commensal organisms of the human microbiota. This includes the genera Streptococcus, Enterococcus, and Lactobacillus. Previous research has shown that a diversity of Lactobacillales increase the proportion of unsaturated fatty acids in their cell membranes in response to various environmental stresses including acid stress and oxidative stress (Fozo et al., 2004). In the case of the caries pathogen, S. mutans, this shift to a membrane containing a greater percentage of unsaturated fatty acids was required to withstand further acid or oxidative stress, and crucially, cause disease in a rat model of dental caries (Fozo & Quivey, 2004, Fozo & Quivey, 2004, Fozo et al., 2007). Our current research project on this topic seeks to address several questions and knowledge gaps raised by these observations: (1) although it is known how S. mutans and other Lactobacillales produce unsaturated fatty acids, it is not known how this system is regulated and controlled (i.e., how it is turned on when needed), (2) it is not known how the unsaturated fatty acids are protective, and (3) although a similar response appears to occur in all tested Lactobacillales, it is not known if it is protective and/or required for virulence in organisms other than S. mutans or other disease contexts. This is a particularly important question, as Lactobacillales contains other devasting pathogens such as Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus faecium, all responsible for significant human morbidity and mortality. The bacterial lipid biosynthesis pathway is quite different at the molecular level than its eukaryotic counterpart, therefore it presents attractive targets for the development of novel antibiotics (Radka & Rock, 2022). Indeed, one of the few novel classes of antibiotics discovered and utilized in the past 30 years, triclosan, targeted the reductase step in bacterial fatty acid biosynthesis (distinct from the steps involved in unsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis) (Radka & Rock, 2022). Beyond this specific study and application, the impact of the bacterial lipidome on bacterial physiology and pathogenesis more broadly is an understudied field, with advancements in mass spectrometry technologies opening the door to lipidomics studies with a level of resolution not possible previously.
RESISFORCE: partnering Norway, Brazil, India, Canada and the U.S. to further excellence in education, research and innovation in the study of biofilms and antibiotic research.
Resistance of pathogenic microbes to antibiotics is a growing worldwide concern, with global deaths due to antibiotic resistance predicted to overtake global deaths due to cancer and become the number one cause of death worldwide by 2050 (Brown et al., 2017). Our RESISFORCE project, funded by the Research Council of Norway, partners research labs from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, University of Oslo, TATA Consultancy Services (based in Delhi, India), University of Campinas (Piracicaba, Brazil), McGill University (Montreal, Canada), University of Illinois at Chicago, Forsyth Institute and Oregon Health & Science University to engage diverse trainees, clinicians and scientists in educational outreach regarding the accelerating antibiotic resistance crisis and antibiotic stewardship. The Baker Lab has been an active partner in this project since 2019, and has cofacilitated RESISFORCE outreach symposia at dental conferences in Brussels, Belgium (CED-IADR 2021) and Marseille, France (PER-IADR 2022), as well as intensive symposia and hands-on workshops for trainees at the University of Oslo (2023) and University of Campinas (2019, 2022). Our team has also produced a massive online open course (MOOC), titled “Exploring the Landscape of Antibiotic Resistance in Microbiomes,” available on FutureLearn. This free online course enables interested clinicians, researchers, students and members of the public, to discover how antibiotic resistance has emerged as one of the most urgent public health threats, explore how the study of antibiotic resistance genes helps us understand antibiotic resistance and get hands-on experience examining data using the ResistoXplorer online tool (www.resistoxplorer.no—itself produced as a collaboration initiated through the RESISFORCE project (Dhariwal et al., 2021)). RESISFORCE has also sponsored several international researcher exchanges between labs participating on the project, provided networking opportunities, and fostered fruitful research collaborations between the participating labs (Junges et al., 2018, Junges et al., 2019, Junges et al., 2019, Ricomini Filho et al., 2019, Salvadori et al., 2019, Dhariwal et al., 2021, Bajalan et al., 2022, Dornelas-Figueira et al., 2023, Junges et al., 2023). Since dentists account for approximately 10% of all antibiotic prescriptions, and antibiotic resistance and stewardship are frequently neglected topics in dental school curriculum, the unique dentistry-focused international outreach of this program is expected to be particularly impactful (Ramanathan et al., 2023).
The Baker Lab will also be hosting our four-day annual RESISFORCE symposium at OHSU on Sept. 9 – 15, 2024. This symposium will include a day of formal presentations by faculty from the RESISFORCE project, OHSU faculty in related fields, and regional leaders in microbiology and antibiotic resistance research (Sept. 13, 2024). The symposium will also feature three days of interactive workshops for dental/graduate student and postdoctoral-level trainees (Sept. 10 – 12, 2024). The workshops will include group problem-based learning sessions and presentations, working with other trainees from Brazil, Norway, U.S. and Canada, as well as a hands-on bioinformatics workshop. The symposium will be a tremendous opportunity to learn about current research in antibiotic resistance and oral health, and to network and interact on an international level with oral health researchers.
Perspective.
Personalized medicine, enabling significant improvements to oral health and overall health, is on the horizon. However, an incomplete understanding of the complex oral microbiota, and its impact, continues to obstruct progress toward actionable diagnostic metrics, as well as novel therapeutic and preventative strategies. Fortunately, emerging technologies are enabling discovery in these fields at an unprecedented pace, scale and level of resolution. It is an exciting time to be at the intersection of oral health research and microbiome research.
Acknowledgements
Research in the laboratory of the author is currently supported by NIH/NIDCR R00-029228 and Forskingsradet (The Research Council of Norway) INTPART-322375.
References
- Abel K, Deschmertzing H & Peterson JI (1963) Classification of Microorganisms by Analysis of Chemical Composition. I. Feasibility of Utilizing Gas Chromatography. J Bacteriol 85: 1039–1044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aleti G, Baker JL, Tang X, et al. (2019) Identification of the Bacterial Biosynthetic Gene Clusters of the Oral Microbiome Illuminates the Unexplored Social Language of Bacteria during Health and Disease. MBio 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amarasinghe SL, Su S, Dong X, Zappia L, Ritchie ME & Gouil Q (2020) Opportunities and challenges in long-read sequencing data analysis. Genome Biol 21: 30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Athanasopoulou K, Boti MA, Adamopoulos PG, Skourou PC & Scorilas A (2021) Third-Generation Sequencing: The Spearhead towards the Radical Transformation of Modern Genomics. Life (Basel) 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bajalan A, Bui T, Salvadori G, et al. (2022) Awareness regarding antimicrobial resistance and confidence to prescribe antibiotics in dentistry: a cross-continental student survey. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 11: 158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker JL (2021) Complete Genomes of Clade G6 Saccharibacteria Suggest a Divergent Ecological Niche and Lifestyle. mSphere 6: e0053021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker JL (2021) Complete Genome Sequence of Strain JB001, a Member of Saccharibacteria Clade G6 (“Candidatus Nanogingivalaceae”). Microbiol Resour Announc 10: e0051721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker JL (2022) Using Nanopore Sequencing to Obtain Complete Bacterial Genomes from Saliva Samples. mSystems 7: e0049122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker JL (2022) Complete Genome Sequence of “Candidatus Nanosynbacter” Strain HMT-348_TM7c-JB, a Member of Saccharibacteria Clade G1. Microbiol Resour Announc e0002322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker JL (2023) Illuminating the oral microbiome and its host interactions: recent advancements in omics and bioinformatics technologies in the context of oral microbiome research. FEMS Microbiol Rev 47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker JL & Edlund A (2020) Composite Long- and Short-Read Sequencing Delivers a Complete Genome Sequence of B04Sm5, a Reutericyclin- and Mutanocyclin-Producing Strain of Streptococcus mutans. Microbiol Resour Announc 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker JL & Edlund A (2021) Identification of Oral Bacterial Biosynthetic Gene Clusters Associated with Caries. Methods Mol Biol 2327: 161–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker JL, Tang X, LaBonte S, Uranga C & Edlund A (2022) mucG, mucH, and mucI Modulate Production of Mutanocyclin and Reutericyclins in Streptococcus mutans B04Sm5. J Bacteriol 204: e0004222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker JL, Mark Welch JL, Kauffman KM, McLean JS & He X (2023) The oral microbiome: diversity, biogeography and human health. Nat Rev Microbiol. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker JL, Morton JT, Dinis M, Alvarez R, Tran NC, Knight R & Edlund A (2021) Deep metagenomics examines the oral microbiome during dental caries, revealing novel taxa and co-occurrences with host molecules. Genome Res 31: 64–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Begik O, Mattick JS & Novoa EM (2022) Exploring the epitranscriptome by native RNA sequencing. RNA 28: 1430–1439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bennett S (2004) Solexa Ltd. Pharmacogenomics 5: 433–438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bentley DR & Balasubramanian S & Swerdlow HP, et al. (2008) Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry. Nature 456: 53–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown L, Langelier C, Reid MJ, Rutishauser RL & Strnad L (2017) Antimicrobial Resistance: A Call to Action! Clin Infect Dis 64: 106–107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burne RA (2018) Getting to Know “The Known Unknowns”: Heterogeneity in the Oral Microbiome. Adv Dent Res 29: 66–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen T, Yu WH, Izard J, Baranova OV, Lakshmanan A & Dewhirst FE (2010) The Human Oral Microbiome Database: a web accessible resource for investigating oral microbe taxonomic and genomic information. Database (Oxford) 2010: baq013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chipashvili O, Utter DR, Bedree JK, et al. (2021) Episymbiotic Saccharibacteria suppresses gingival inflammation and bone loss in mice through host bacterial modulation. Cell Host Microbe 29: 1649–1662 e1647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cross KL, Campbell JH, Balachandran M, et al. (2019) Targeted isolation and cultivation of uncultivated bacteria by reverse genomics. Nat Biotechnol 37: 1314–1321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dhariwal A, Junges R, Chen T & Petersen FC (2021) ResistoXplorer: a web-based tool for visual, statistical and exploratory data analysis of resistome data. NAR Genom Bioinform 3: lqab018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dornelas-Figueira LM, Ricomini Filho AP, Junges R, Amdal HA, Cury A & Petersen FC (2023) In Vitro Impact of Fluconazole on Oral Microbial Communities, Bacterial Growth, and Biofilm Formation. Antibiotics (Basel) 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edwardsson S (1968) Characteristics of caries-inducing human streptococci resembling Streptococcus mutans. Arch Oral Biol 13: 637–646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Falkow S (2004) Molecular Koch’s postulates applied to bacterial pathogenicity--a personal recollection 15 years later. Nat Rev Microbiol 2: 67–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fozo EM & Quivey RG Jr. (2004) Shifts in the membrane fatty acid profile of Streptococcus mutans enhance survival in acidic environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 929–936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fozo EM & Quivey RG Jr. (2004) The fabM gene product of Streptococcus mutans is responsible for the synthesis of monounsaturated fatty acids and is necessary for survival at low pH. J Bacteriol 186: 4152–4158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fozo EM, Kajfasz JK & Quivey RG Jr. (2004) Low pH-induced membrane fatty acid alterations in oral bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 238: 291–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fozo EM, Scott-Anne K, Koo H & Quivey RG Jr. (2007) Role of unsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis in virulence of Streptococcus mutans. Infect Immun 75: 1537–1539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garalde DR, Snell EA, Jachimowicz D, et al. (2018) Highly parallel direct RNA sequencing on an array of nanopores. Nat Methods 15: 201–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gill SR, Pop M, Deboy RT, Eckburg PB, Turnbaugh PJ, Samuel BS, Gordon JI, Relman DA, Fraser-Liggett CM & Nelson KE (2006) Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science 312: 1355–1359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grunberger F, Ferreira-Cerca S & Grohmann D (2022) Nanopore sequencing of RNA and cDNA molecules in Escherichia coli. RNA 28: 400–417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hajishengallis G & Chavakis T (2021) Local and systemic mechanisms linking periodontal disease and inflammatory comorbidities. Nat Rev Immunol 21: 426–440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He X, Tian Y, Guo L, Lux R, Zusman DR & Shi W (2010) Oral-derived bacterial flora defends its domain by recognizing and killing intruders--a molecular analysis using Escherichia coli as a model intestinal bacterium. Microb Ecol 60: 655–664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He X, McLean JS, Edlund A, et al. (2015) Cultivation of a human-associated TM7 phylotype reveals a reduced genome and epibiotic parasitic lifestyle. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112: 244–249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jain M, Fiddes IT, Miga KH, Olsen HE, Paten B & Akeson M (2015) Improved data analysis for the MinION nanopore sequencer. Nat Methods 12: 351–356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Junges R, Maienschein-Cline M, Morrison DA & Petersen FC (2019) Complete Genome Sequence of Streptococcus pneumoniae Serotype 19F Strain EF3030. Microbiol Resour Announc 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Junges R, Salvadori G, Chen T, Morrison DA & Petersen FC (2018) Hidden Gems in the Transcriptome Maps of Competent Streptococci. Front Mol Biosci 5: 116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Junges R, Sturod K, Salvadori G, Amdal HA, Chen T & Petersen FC (2019) Characterization of a Signaling System in Streptococcus mitis That Mediates Interspecies Communication with Streptococcus pneumoniae. Appl Environ Microbiol 85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Junges R, Khan R, Tovpeko Y, Amdal HA, Petersen FC & Morrison DA (2023) Markerless Genome Editing in Competent Streptococci. Methods Mol Biol 2588: 201–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kagan JM (1980) Local immunity to Bacteroides gingivalis in periodontal disease. J Dent Res 59: 1750–1756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ley RE, Backhed F, Turnbaugh P, Lozupone CA, Knight RD & Gordon JI (2005) Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 11070–11075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, et al. (2005) Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437: 376–380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McKernan KJ, Peckham HE, Costa GL, et al. (2009) Sequence and structural variation in a human genome uncovered by short-read, massively parallel ligation sequencing using two-base encoding. Genome Res 19: 1527–1541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Naito M, Ogura Y, Itoh T, Shoji M, Okamoto M, Hayashi T & Nakayama K (2016) The complete genome sequencing of Prevotella intermedia strain OMA14 and a subsequent fine-scale, intra-species genomic comparison reveal an unusual amplification of conjugative and mobile transposons and identify a novel Prevotella-lineage-specific repeat. DNA Res 23: 11–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nascimento MM, Zaura E, Mira A, Takahashi N & Ten Cate JM (2017) Second Era of OMICS in Caries Research: Moving Past the Phase of Disillusionment. J Dent Res 96: 733–740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen TA, Heng JWJ, Kaewsapsak P, et al. (2022) Direct identification of A-to-I editing sites with nanopore native RNA sequencing. Nat Methods 19: 833–844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nyvad B & Kilian M (1990) Comparison of the initial streptococcal microflora on dental enamel in caries-active and in caries-inactive individuals. Caries Res 24: 267–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Radka CD & Rock CO (2022) Mining Fatty Acid Biosynthesis for New Antimicrobials. Annu Rev Microbiol 76: 281–304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramanathan S, Yan CH, Hubbard C, et al. (2023) Changes in antibiotic prescribing by dentists in the United States, 2012–2019. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ricomini Filho AP, Khan R, Amdal HA & Petersen FC (2019) Conserved Pheromone Production, Response and Degradation by Streptococcus mutans. Front Microbiol 10: 2140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salvadori G, Junges R, Morrison DA & Petersen FC (2019) Competence in Streptococcus pneumoniae and Close Commensal Relatives: Mechanisms and Implications. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 9: 94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sereika M, Kirkegaard RH, Karst SM, Michaelsen TY, Sorensen EA, Wollenberg RD & Albertsen M (2022) Oxford Nanopore R10.4 long-read sequencing enables the generation of near-finished bacterial genomes from pure cultures and metagenomes without short-read or reference polishing. Nat Methods 19: 823–826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tinder EL, Faustoferri RC, Buckley AA, Quivey RG Jr. & Baker JL (2022) Analysis of the Streptococcus mutans Proteome during Acid and Oxidative Stress Reveals Modules of Protein Coexpression and an Expanded Role for the TreR Transcriptional Regulator. mSystems 7: e0127221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tourancheau A, Mead EA, Zhang XS & Fang G (2021) Discovering multiple types of DNA methylation from bacteria and microbiome using nanopore sequencing. Nat Methods 18: 491–498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Venter JC, Remington K, Heidelberg JF, et al. (2004) Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science 304: 66–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]