Abstract
The Spence Shale Member of the Langston Formation in northern Utah and southern Idaho preserves generally non-biomineralized fossil assemblages referred to as the Spence Shale Lagerstätte. The biota of this Lagerstätte is dominated by panarthropods, both biomineralized and soft-bodied examples, but also preserves diverse infaunal organisms, including species of scalidophorans, echinoderms, lobopodians, stalked filter feeders, and various problematic taxa. To date, however, only a single annelid fossil, originally assigned to Canadia sp., has been described from the Spence Shale. This lone specimen and another recently collected specimen were analyzed in this study using scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry. The previous occurrence is reassigned to Burgessochaeta cf. B. setigera Walcott, 1911. The new fossil, however, is identified as a novel polychaete taxon, Shaihuludia shurikeni gen. et sp. nov., characterized by the presence of fused, bladed chaetae and a wide body. The occurrence of Burgessochaeta is the first outside the Burgess Shale and its vicinity, whereas Shaihuludia shurikeni gen. et sp. nov. adds to the diversity of annelids in the middle Cambrian and highlights the diversity of the Spence Shale Lagerstätte.
Keywords: Exceptional preservation, worms, Burgess Shale-type preservation, Great Basin, Laurentia
Introduction
The Cambrian (Wuliuan Stage, Miaolingian; ca. 507.5–506 Ma) Spence Shale Lagerstätte (Spence Shale hereafter) of northeastern Utah and southeastern Idaho preserves one of the most diverse Burgess Shale-type biotas in Laurentia (Kimmig et al. 2019a; Whitaker and Kimmig 2020; Kimmig 2021). Its fauna comprises over 90 species, of which about one-third are soft-bodied (Robison et al. 2015; Kimmig et al. 2019a; Whitaker and Kimmig 2020; Whitaker et al. 2022). The soft-bodied remains are dominated by arthropods, but also include algae, cyanobacteria, deuterostomes (hemichordates; Vetulicolia), scalidophorans, and sponges. Vermiform fossils are relatively common in the Spence Shale and can be found in all outcrops, except those that record the deepest water environments (Kimmig et al. 2019a; Whitaker and Kimmig 2020; Whitaker et al. 2022). Among the identifiable worm fossils, scalidophorans are the most diverse and are represented by the palaeoscolecid Utahscolex ratcliffei, as well as the well-known priapulid Ottoia prolifica, and two species of Selkirkia, S. spencei and S. cf. S. columbia (Kimmig et al. 2019a; Whitaker et al. 2020; Foster et al. 2022). Other vermiform fossils include the lobopodian Acinocricus stichus (Conway Morris and Robison 1988; Caron and Aria 2020) and the possible halkieriid Armilimax pauljamisoni (Kimmig and Selden 2021). Annelids, however, have proven to be extraordinarily rare. To date, only one specimen, originally assigned to Canadia sp. (Robison 1969), has been described.
Annelids are an extremely diverse phylum (~21,000 described species) and have conquered a variety of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine environments (Read 2019). However, their whole-body fossil record is sparse. Their soft-bodied nature typically results in rapid decay (e.g., Briggs and Kear 1993), restricting most of their fossil occurrences to Lagerstätten-type deposits (Parry, Vinther, et al. 2015; 2019). The oldest accepted whole-body annelids appear in the early Cambrian (Series 2; Stage 3) of China and Greenland (Conway Morris and Peel 2008; Han et al. 2019; Parry et al. 2019), and are present from this point forward in the Lagerstätten of the Cambrian (Liu, Ou, et al. 2015b). They reach a peak known-diversity within the Period by the middle Cambrian, with six species from the Burgess Shale alone (Conway Morris 1979; Nanglu and Caron 2018; Parry et al. 2019). Most annelid taxa known from the Cambrian belong to the annelid stem group (Parry et al. 2016, Han et al. 2019). These organisms typically show homonymous segmentation with a single pair of head appendages and in some cases with a median antenna (Nanglu and Caron 2018; Parry et al. 2019). Crown group taxa include only the early Cambrian palaeoannelid Dannychaeta tucolus (Chen et al. 2020), as well as slightly older putative sipunculans (Huang et al. 2004). The latter are recovered nested within annelids in all recent analyses of annelid phylogeny using molecular sequences (Struck et al. 2007; Weigert and Bleidorn 2016). Outside of the Burgess Shale, middle Cambrian annelids are rare within Laurentian deposits. Here, we document and describe Shaihuludia shurikeni gen. et sp. nov., a new stem annelid from the Spence Shale, and re-assess the taxonomic placement of Spence Shale specimen UU 1021, formerly Canadia sp. Additionally, we discuss the variable preservation of both specimens and other vermiform fauna of the Spence Shale.
Geological context
The Spence Shale is the middle member of the Langston Formation, conformably overlying the Naomi Peak Limestone Member and overlain by the High Creek Limestone Member (Kimmig et al. 2019a). It is regionally extensive and crops out in northeastern Utah and southeastern Idaho at multiple exposures in the Wellsville Mountains, the Bear River Range, the Wasatch Range, and the Malad Range (Figure 1). The Spence Shale includes the upper Mexicella mexicana and lower Glossopleura walcotti trilobite biozones and has been interpreted to represent deposition in the middle to outer detrital belt of a (presently) westward-oriented carbonate platform (Robison 1991; Liddell et al. 1997; Kimmig et al. 2019a).
Figure 1.

Geographic and geologic setting of the Spence Shale. (A) Map of the western United States showing the location of the Spence Shale (asterisk) (B) Geological map (based on the USGS state maps for Google Earth Pro) of northern Utah showing the main localities of the Spence Shale, including the two that yielded the annelids in italics. AC, Antimony Canyon; BF, Blacksmith Fork; HC, Hansen Canyon; HCR, High Creek; MH, Miners Hollow. (C) Thin section image showing the boundary between a carbonate mudstone (base) and an overlying siliciclastic mudstone (top) typical of the Spence Shale at the Miners Hollow locality. In the image, the carbonate mudstone is gray in color while the overlying siliciclastic mudstone is dark brown. A several millimeter-long recrystallized shell, likely of a brachiopod, is present in the carbonate mudstone and is oriented vertically thereby leading to the observed distortion of the bedding. (D) Thin section image of typical peloid packstone from the Spence Shale of the High Creek area. This sample from the upper part of the unit shows characteristic peloids (slightly darker than the rest of the image, circular to oval) in a matrix and groundmass of mostly carbonate mud (grayish areas) and some carbonate cement (whitish areas). Both the grains as well as the matrix and cements are partly recrystallized. Note that the peloids are of significantly different sizes; it is therefore likely that they originated from different types (?) or sizes of organisms. Some recrystallized shell fragments are present, too (left upper corner). Scale bars: (C, D) 1mm.
The specimens described herein come from two localities:
KUMIP 585569 was collected ~1 meter from the top of the Spence Shale at the High Creek locality, north of Logan, UT, in the Bear River Range (Figure 1). In the High Creek area, the upper 5 meters of the Spence Shale expose carbonate facies belts as well as transitional siliciclastic-carbonate facies (siliciclastic mud-rich, carbonate mudstones) of a Cambrian carbonate ramp system. However, the proximal facies of this ramp, which likely consisted of packstones to grainstones (see Burchette and Wright 1992), is absent in these outcrops. The facies change up-section. Strata at the bottom of the succession are rich in marls and siliciclastic mud-rich carbonate mudstones and contain some laminae of intercalated packstones; toward the top, however, packstone becomes the dominant to exclusive lithology. The grain types also change upward: bioclasts, some brachiopod shells and muscovite flakes float in the matrix in the lower part of the succession, and peloids and echinoderms, as well as shell debris from brachiopods, compose the grain assemblage in the upper portion of the unit. All facies show significant burrowing, mostly indistinct, millimeter- to submillimeter in diameter, and hard to recognize. However, the upper packstones have burrows that are several millimeters in diameter and are partly filled with carbonate mud and grains or with carbonate cement. The succession is interpreted as having been deposited in a ramp-like setting with minor relief, based on the absence of synsedimentary deformation features such as slumps. The succession, as a whole, reflects a decrease in water depth going from wackestones with intercalated packstone laminae, interpreted as middle ramp deposits at the base to peloidal packstones with biogenes and bioclasts at the top, likely representing upper ramp sediments. The progressive decrease in carbonate mud throughout the succession reflects an increase in depositional energy up-section. Based on the preserved fossil remains, there seems to be an increase in fossil abundance up-section, too, indicating an increase of biodiversity towards shallower water environments. KUMIP 585569 was recovered from an interval of siliciclastic mud-rich carbonate mudstones.
Specimen UU 1021 was collected from the float of carbonate cycle 3 of the Miners Hollow locality (Robison 1969), north of Brigham City, UT, in the Wellsville Mountains (Figure 1). The Spence Shale at Miners Hollow consists of an alternation of fine-grained siliciclastic and carbonate lithologies and belongs to the Langston Formation (Liddell et al. 1997). The lithologies exposed vary between mud-rich siliciclastic and mud-rich carbonates and represent the mid-to-deep shelf of a carbonate ramp system (see Burchette and Wright 1992), similar to the High Creek locality. Following our own and Liddell et al.’s (1997) stratigraphic sections, the successions consist of mostly carbonate mudstones with varying abundances of siliciclastic mud, and some intercalated carbonate beds (Figure 1). Nevertheless, the succession contains large amounts of carbonate in its basal part with some distinct siliciclastic mudstone units, a central section composed predominantly of siliciclastic mudstones, and an upper section characterized by intercalated carbonates and siliciclastic mudstones. All samples show well-developed, fine- and coarse-grained laminae, the latter often only millimetric in thickness. The sediment is always bioturbated to some degree, and thoroughly burrowed in places. The basal few meters consist of carbonate-rich siliciclastic mudstones that show very well-preserved shells oriented parallel to bedding and no intercalation of coarse-grained laminae. On top of that, coarse-grained laminae become common and are present in every thin section consisting of both bioclasts of sub-millimeter size and shell fragments. This succession is overlain by mud- to packstones with storm beds that are several millimeters thick, consisting mostly of fragments of carbonate shells and echinoderms. The succession is interpreted to record an overall shallowing of the depositional environment from a deep shelf characterized by siliciclastic mudstones to limestones both rich in carbonate mud and in places, grains. Deposition seems to have occurred in cycles likely governed by sea-level fluctuations (Liddell et al. 1997). The environment was well oxygenated as inferred from the intact shells throughout the succession, and frequent burrowing. Deposition of the sediments must have been above storm-wave base for much of the succession; only in the basal meters is it unclear if storm waves reached the ocean floor. UU 1021 was preserved in an interval of siliciclastic mudstones.
Material and methods
Studied Material
KUMIP 585569 was collected as part of a broader study of the Spence Shale fauna by Rhiannon J. LaVine and Julien Kimmig in 2021 at the High Creek locality of the Spence Shale in northern Utah (Figure 1). This locality is less well-known than the localities in the Wellsville Mountains that have produced most of the soft-bodied fossils of the Spence Shale biota (Kimmig et al. 2019a; Whitaker and Kimmig 2020). UU 1020 was collected by Lloyd Gunther from the talus slope of the Spence Shale Member at the well-known Miners Hollow locality, and probably came from the lower 50 feet of the exposure (Robison 1969). The specimens were photographed under non-polarized light using a GIGAmacro Magnify2 robotic imaging system. High-resolution composite images of the whole specimens were created by stitching together z-stacked photographs of their parts using GIGAmacro Flow. Affinity Photo was used for basic photo manipulation (color, contrast, and brightness) of those composite images.
Thin sections
Samples for thin sections were taken at c. 1 m intervals along the Spence Shale exposures at High Creek and Miners Hollow. Ultrathin (<20 μm) polished thin sections of the shale, and about 40 μm-thick limestone thin sections were prepared by TPS Enterprises LLC. Thin sections were analyzed and photographed using a Zeiss Axioscope 5 microscope with an Axiocam 202 mono camera.
Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analyses.
The specimens were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with integrated energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS). SEM-EDS analyses were conducted using a Zeiss Sigma 500 VP variable pressure SEM with dual, co-planar Bruker XFlash EDS detectors (30 mm2), located at the X-ray Microanalysis Laboratory at the University of Missouri. Using the Fibics Incorporated ATLAS interface, large-area secondary and backscattered electron mosaics were compiled for both specimens, one of which (KUMIP) included both part and counterpart imaging. Secondary electron images (topography) were collected using a low-vacuum-specific VPGSE4 detector (variable pressure secondary electron imaging, VPSE), and backscattered images (composition) using a high-definition 5-segment backscatter detector (high-definition backscatter electron imaging, HDBSE). All imaging analyses were conducted with the following operating conditions: 15 mm ± 1 mm working distance (minor differences due to variation in sample thickness or surface topography), 20 keV beam accelerating voltage, 40 nA beam current, 25 Pa chamber pressure (low vacuum), 60 μm aperture for imaging, and 120 μm aperture for EDS analysis to improve X-ray count rate. EDS analyses were conducted with both detectors active (in tandem), aiding in the avoidance of topographic shadowing artifacts and improving X-ray count rate (> 150 kilocounts per second, combined, on average).
Institutional abbreviations
KUMIP: Division of Invertebrate Paleontology, Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA; UU: Department of Geology & Geophysics of the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.
Nomenclatural acts.
This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered in ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:
Systematic palaeontology
Phylum Annelida Lamarck (1809) Stem group Annelida Genus Shaihuludia nov.
LSID.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:
Type species
Shaihuludia shurikeni sp. nov. (Figures 2–4)
Figure 2.

Shaihuludia shurikeni gen. et sp. nov. from the High Creek locality, Spence Shale member of the Langston Formation (Wuliuan; Miaolingian). (A) Holotype part KUMIP 585569 complete specimen immersed in dilute ethanol under non-polarized light. (B) Interpretive drawing of A with uncertain soft tissue extent denoted with a dotted line. (C) Enlargement of boxed inset in A, showing preserved chaetae and soft-tissue. (D) SEM-EDS elemental maps of the area in A the chaetae and soft-tissue show enhanced levels of Fe, O, and some C, while the host matrix shows enhanced levels of Al, K, Mn, Na, and Si. Scale bars: (A, B) 5mm, (C, D) 2mm.
Figure 4.

Reconstruction of Shaihuludia shurikeni gen. et sp. nov. from the Spence Shale of Utah. Artistic reconstruction of an adult specimen by R. LaVine.
LSID.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:
Holotype
KUMIP 585569, part and counterpart of dorso-ventrally preserved almost complete specimen. (Figures 2, 3)
Figure 3.

Shaihuludia shurikeni gen. et sp. nov. from the High Creek locality, Spence Shale member of the Langston Formation (Wuliuan; Miaolingian). (A) Holotype counterpart KUMIP 585569 complete specimen immersed in dilute ethanol under non-polarized light. (B) SEM-micrograph of the counterpart of KUMIP 585569 (C) Enlargement of boxed inset in B, showing preserved chaetae with longitudinal striations and soft-tissue. (D) SEM-EDS elemental maps of the area in B the chaetae and soft-tissue show enhanced levels of Fe and O, while the host matrix shows enhanced levels of Al, K, Mg, Na, and Si. (E) Enlargement of boxed inset in B, showing the longitudinal striations of the chaetae. (F) SEM-EDS elemental maps of the area in D the chaetae and soft-tissue show enhanced levels of Fe and O, while the host matrix shows enhanced levels of Al, K, Mn, Na, and Si. Scale bars: (A, B) 5mm, (C, D, E, F) 2mm.
Diagnosis of genus and species by monotypy
Soft-bodied annelid with flattened fans of fused blade-like chaetae covering the dorsum along the midline.
Derivation of name
Shai-Hulud: the indigenous name for the sandworms on the planet Arrakis in the Dune novels written by Frank Herbert; shuriken: the Japanese word for throwing star, for the overall shape of the blade-like chaetae.
Description
The preserved specimen is about 33 mm long, 15 mm at its widest point. It is mostly complete, but due to preservation it is unclear whether the anterior and posterior parts of the specimen have been completely preserved. The specimen preserves four complete flattened circular fans of blade-like chaetae, and two partial ones. The fans vary in size from 9 mm to 10 mm in diameter. Several of the sclerites have longitudinal striations (Figure 3(C)). The fans overlay each other partially, appear to have covered the entire dorsum, and are centered along the midline of the specimen, and are bilaterally symmetrical in dorsal view, best seen in the posterior most fan (Figure 3(B)). The individual blades are the thinnest at the pointed base, and then widen until about two-thirds up the blade, where they reach their widest point (2 to 3 mm), they then thin out to a terminal point again. Each fan consists of about 6 to 8 individual blades. The soft-parts of the specimen are completely replaced by iron-oxides and no anatomical details are identifiable. The body of the animal extends about 4 mm from under the chaetae on both sides and about 11 mm at the preserved terminal end.
Occurrence
KUMIP 585569 was collected ~1m from the top of the Spence Shale Member at High Creek, Langston Formation, Cambrian, Miaolingian, Wuliuan, Glossopleura walcotti Biozone, ~ 25 km north of Logan, Cache County, Utah, USA, Sec. 3 T13N, R02E; 41.8964, −111.7118.
Remarks
Flattened dorsal chaetae are known from the middle Cambrian polychaete Canadia spinosa (Conway Morris 1979; Butterfield 1990; Eibye Jacobsen 2004) and the cosmopolitan early to middle Cambrian, possibly Ordovician, genus Wiwaxia (Butterfield 1990; Conway Morris 1985, Eibye Jacobsen 2004; Kimmig et al. 2019b). Similarities between these chaetae in both taxa as well in extant Chrysopetalidae led to several hypotheses surrounding their relevance to annelid origins (see review in Eibye Jacobsen 2004), but these taxa are now referred to the annelid and mollusc stem groups, respectively. Both taxa differ in several respects from Shaihuludia shurikeni. Notably, the paleae (scale like chaetae) in Canadia are situated on a notopodial ridge normal to the body axis, with differentiation along the notopodial row (i.e., the presence of the shorter, thinner, more capillary like chaetae on both the adaxial and abaxial margin of the chaetal row, the “imperfect chaetae” sensu Conway Morris 1979). In S. shurikeni there is no such clear differentiation, and the sclerites appear to arise from a common point of origin, indicating that they are not situated on a notopodial row but are instead in a fascicle/bundle. In Wiwaxia the sclerites also occur in transverse rows (Conway Morris 1979, Eibye Jacobsen 2004) and arise from common points of origin in fascicles/bundles (Zhang et al. 2015). The sclerites in S. shurikeni do not have a stalk in the root-blade transition zone, a feature typical of Wiwaxia (Butterfield 1990; Zhang et al. 2015).
The dorsal preservation of the specimen does not show any evidence of ventral chaetae on parapodia, as is the case in Canadia, though the absence of their preservation does not necessarily mean that they were absent in vivo. However, it cannot completely be discounted that S. shurikeni was a Wiwaxia-like animal with a single pair of dorsal chaetal rows without evidence for ventral chaetae/parapodia/notopodial chaetal rows. However, it is less likely than it being an annelid, as it is missing the stalk and Wiwaxia, which has been interpreted as a polychaete in the past (e.g., Butterfield 1990), is a kind of dome-like animal with numerous flat and erected sclerites.
The specimens are not of cnidarian origin, as they lack the evidence of deformation/pliability, as well as the consistency in number and arrangements of divisions that would be expected in medusae. An eldoniid origin, or Ediacaran-like discoidal fossil affinity is also unlikely, as no ridges, or circular structures are preserved; typical features of such fossils (Liu, Kenchington, et al. 2015, Burzynski et al. 2017, Lieberman et al. 2017, McMahon et al. 2017, Sappenfield et al. 2017; Young and Hagadorn 2020; Whitaker et al. 2022). Additionally, several of the sclerites have longitudinal striations (Figure 3(C)).
A non-metazoan origin of the specimens, for example whorled algae or similar, is also unlikely, but could remain a viable possibility if better preserved specimens are discovered. At present, however, a comparison to the structure and preservation of fossil cyanobacteria and macroalgae (e.g., Javaux et al. 2007; LoDuca et al. 2017; Demoulin et al. 2019) has not yielded any potential forms that would be comparable to the sclerites of S. shurikeni.
It is also unlikely that the specimens represent abiotic mineral crystals or their subsequent replacements (Cloud 1973). Rosettes of various minerals can develop parallel to bedding in shales (Nuelle and Shelton 1986; Zorz 2022), such as sulfates (barite, celestine, gypsum), carbonates (aragonite, calcite), phosphates (vivianite, wavellite), and sulfides (marcasite, pyrite). However, none of the chemical compositions of these minerals are consistent with the Fe-Mn-O chemistry determined for the specimens (Figure 2(D)). Furthermore, the features observed in the specimens display lower symmetry and a lack of well-developed euhedral crystal faces, unlike what should be observed if they were crystals or pseudomorphic replacements of them. Shaihuludia shurikeni also differs in shape from colonies of the Mn- and Fe-oxidizing bacterium Metallogenium personatum to which the Precambrian Eoastrion simplex has been linked (Barghoorn and Tyler 1965; Hofmann 1971; Lieberman et al. 2017).
If the studied specimens instead represent casts formed by the complex dissolution and infilling of precursor abiotic minerals, they should not have preserved finer structural details observed in these specimens (Figures 2, 3). For these reasons, we interpret the specimens to be biological in origin.
Genus Burgessochaeta Conway Morris (1979)
Type species
Burgessochaeta setigera Walcott (1911) from the Cambrian (Wuliuan Stage), Burgess Shale, British Columbia, Canada.
Diagnosis
Slender body.
Pair of elongate tentacles probably arising from prostomium. Trunk with up to at least 24 segments. Trunk surface smooth, with few details. Equant parapodial rami, paired palps and simple chaetae with bifid tips. Segment 1 ramus slightly smaller than on following segments. Biramous parapodia on all segments, all rami similar with uniform development along entire body. Parapodial rami conical, without branchiae or cirri. Palps are clearly differentiated from the body segments, are not in close association with parapodia. Neuro- and notochaetae with bidentate to furcate tips. Inter-ramal spacing moderate. Straight gut with anal opening on pygidium. (following Eibye-Jacobsen 2004 and Parry, Edgecombe, et al. 2015)
Burgessochaeta cf. B. setigera (Walcott 1911) (Figure 5)
Figure 5.

Burgessochaeta cf. B. setigera (Walcott 1911) from the Miners Hollow locality, Spence Shale member of the Langston Formation (Wuliuan; Miaolingian). (A) UU 1021 complete specimen immersed in dilute ethanol under non-polarized light. (B) Enlargement of boxed inset in A, showing preserved chaetae and soft-tissue. (C) SEM micrograph of B showing preserved chaetae and soft-tissue. (D) SEM-EDS elemental maps of the area in B the chaetae and soft-tissue show enhanced levels of Fe and S, while the host matrix shows slightly enhanced levels of Al, K, Mg, Mn, Na, and Si. Scale bars: (A) 5mm, (B, C, D) 2mm.
1969 Canadia sp. Robison: 1170, pl. 138, fig. 3.
1979 Polychaete gen. et sp. undetermined Conway Morris: 261, figs. 130–131.
1991 Polychaete gen. et sp. undetermined Robison: 85, fig. 6.4.
Description
The specimen is 29 mm long, has a flattened inter-parapodial trunk width of about 2 mm, and a maximum width of 6 mm including the parapodia. At least 21 segments can be recognized, each about 2 mm long, based on the presence of lateral pairs of relatively large parapodia. Each parapodium has a distal bundle of up to six chaetae. The chaetae are black, needle-shaped, non-jointed, and range up to 2 mm in length. Details of the prostomium are not preserved. (modified from Robison 1969)
Material
UU 1021, almost complete specimen (Figure 5).
Occurrence
UU 1021 was collected from the talus slope of the Spence Shale Member at Miners Hollow, and probably came from the lower 50 feet (~15 m) of the member (Robison 1969), Langston Formation, Cambrian, Miaolingian, Wuliuan, Glossopleura walcotti Biozone, near Calls Fort, Wellsville Mountains, Box Elder County, Utah, USA, SE 1/4 Sec. 14, T10N., R02W; 41.6023, −112.0334.
Remarks
This specimen was originally assigned to Canadia sp. by Robison (1969) based on the “large chaetose parapodia and general body outline”, but while he refrained from assigning a species based on the preservation quality of the specimen, he mentioned that “the needle-like chaetae of the Spence specimen” resemble those of B. setigera. Our investigation of the specimen, including light microscopy, SEM, and SEM-EDS analyses, support the assignment of UU 1021 to Burgessochaeta cf. B. setigera based on the shape, placement and number of the chaetae and the overall body shape, but as the anterior part of the specimen is missing, the species assignment remains tentative. When compared to B. setigeria specimens from the Burgess Shale (e.g., Conway Morris 1979; Eibye-Jacobsen 2004), the Spence specimens’ chaetae and inter-parapodial trunk are average in size, and do not support the Canadia sp. assignment (Robison 1969). Additionally, the specimen is missing the any dorsal scales/sclerites. The specimen was mislabeled as KUMIP 204389 in Robison (1991).
Discussion
Preservation
Spence Shale soft-bodied fossils have a preservation mode comparable to preservation types from other BST deposits, showing early taphonomic precipitation of phosphate and pyrite, maturation of carbonaceous remains to kerogen, later metamorphic alteration of phosphate to monazite, and other effects of modern weathering (e.g., oxidation of pyrite) (Whitaker et al. 2022). In the case of the herein-described annelids, however, both specimens lack a distinctive carbon signature in SEM-EDS analyses (Figures 2(D), 3(C), 5(D)). Additionally, no discernible carbonaceous film via backscattered or secondary electron imaging can be observed (Figure 5(C). Using EDS, Whitaker et al. (2020) detected an elevated carbon signal associated with a Spence Shale palaeoscolecid worm fossil but here too observed no discernible carbonaceous film via backscattered or secondary electron imaging. The absence of detectable carbonaceous films or local enrichments of carbon in these new annelid fossils suggest that the elevated carbon signal in the EDS analyses arose from interstitial carbonaceous materials between sediment grains, as has previously been suggested for fossils from the Marjum Formation (Broce and Schiffbauer 2017). We suggest that the absence of a distinct carbonaceous film within these fossils may be a result of late-stage burial (after some decay), as it is not representative of soft-tissue preservation in the Spence Shale in general (Whitaker et al. 2022). Further support to this hypothesis is provided by a distinct C signature within a variety of taxa from the Spence Shale (Whitaker et al. 2022). However, organic carbon removal could have continued through diagenesis as well.
The holotype of Shaihuludia shurikeni (KUMIP 585569) is poorly preserved, with no visible preservation of the gut and no discernible soft-tissue features (Figures 2(A), 3(A)), as stated, and is interpreted to have died within the uppermost oxic-to-suboxic layers of sediment, allowing for efficient microbial decay of the organic carbon by oxygenic microbes or sulfate-reducing bacteria that consumed tissues and aided the precipitation of pyrite. If it had been exposed upon death, scavengers would have likely removed any potential for preservation of soft tissues. It is unlikely that the specimen was transported far or disturbed much between its death and prior to burial, given the well-preserved aligned chaetae. Both the soft tissue and the chaetae are preserved as iron oxide- and/or oxyhydroxide-weathering products of pyrite, also evidenced by the rusty red-orange coloration of the fossil. In contrast, the host matrix shows enhanced levels of Al, K, Mg, Mn, Na, and Si.
The Burgessochaeta cf. B. setigera specimen (UU 1021) is better preserved than the holotype of Shaihuludia shurikeni, as the soft tissue is clearly identifiable, and a partial gut tract is visible (Figure 5(A)). Decay experiments of the extant priapulid Priapulus caudatus showed that labile, non-cuticular features, such as the gut, begin decaying immediately following death, and are lost in under a week of decay (Sansom 2016). But Priapulus in contrast to Burgessochaeta has a very thin cuticle and a large internal cavity filled with a fluid. Burgessochaeta however, has bunches of decay-resistant chaetae and a compartmentalized body. Suggesting, that Burgessochaeta, if buried and not disturbed by bioturbators would have retained its original appearance for a relatively long time. However, the missing anterior part of the specimen and only partially preserved gut tract suggest that enhanced early decay was likely, unless they were retained on the unknown counterpart. Like the holotype of Shaihuludia shurikeni, the soft-tissue and the chaetae are preserved as iron oxide- and/or oxyhydroxide-weathering products of pyrite, which is also fairly common in other deposits, e.g., the Chengjiang Lagerstätte (Han et al. 2019). While the fossil appears to have a carbonaceous film preserved (Figure 5(A)), it may be too thin and electron-transparent for BSE imaging if indeed present, but might result in the slight optical contrast observed (Supplement Figure 4). In contrast, the host matrix shows enhanced levels of Al, K, Mg, Mn, Na, and Si.
The Spence Shale worm fauna
The Spence Shale preserves the most diverse worm fauna in the Great Basin (Lieberman 2003; Robison et al. 2015; Leibach et al. 2021) and the richest in specimen count outside of the Weeks Formation (Lerosey-Aubril et al. 2018; Leibach et al. 2021). It is also one of the most species- and specimen-rich worm faunas in Laurentia, with exception of the Burgess Shale (Nanglu et al. 2020), and within the Cambrian in general (e.g., García-Bellido et al. 2013; Nanglu et al. 2020; Yang et al. 2021a).
The first vermiform organisms described from the Spence Shale were six worm tubes, belonging to the priapulid worm Selkirkia (Resser 1939) which secreted a conical tube (Wang et al. 2021; Yang et al. 2021b). These were also the first soft-bodied organisms mentioned from the Great Basin and were the only known vermiform organisms from the Spence Shale until Robison (1969) described two ‘annelids’ from it. The first specimen was UU 1021, which he assigned to Canadia sp. and was later referred to polychaete gen. et sp. undetermined by Conway Morris (1979). The other specimen Robison described is the holotype of the palaeoscolecid Utahscolex ratcliffei (Whitaker et al. 2020), leaving UU 1021 as the only known polychaete from the Spence Shale. Conway Morris and Robison (1986) later also identified the priapulid Ottoia prolifica from the Spence Shale. In addition to the described specimens, there are dozens of unidentified ‘worms’ from the Spence Shale in the KUMIP collections (Broce and Schiffbauer 2017; Whitaker and Kimmig 2020). These worms likely represent scalidophorans, though some may be decomposed annelids or other clades, similar to the interpretations for other deposits (e.g., Kimmig and Pratt 2015).
Our reinvestigation of UU 1021 demonstrates that it represents the first specimen of Burgessochaeta outside of the Burgess Shale vicinity and confirms Robison’s (1969) suspicion that it might be B. setigera. Additionally, the find of Shaihuludia shurikeni indicates that the annelid fauna of the Spence Shale was likely more diverse than previously thought, and the underrepresentation of annelid specimens is likely due to the lack of systematic excavation of the Spence Shale (Whitaker and Kimmig 2020). This is supported by the lack of specimens from the High Creek locality in museum collections. Because of the overall appearance of Shaihuludia shurikeni, it might have been that similar specimens were mistaken for stellate groups of minerals by collectors in the past (Cloud 1973; Retallack 2015) and left behind in the field.
The scalidophorans, especially Selkirkia, and unidentified ‘worms’ have been found in all Spence Shale localities apart of the deeper water shales of Oneida Narrows and Two-Mile Canyon (Kimmig et al. 2019a; Whitaker and Kimmig 2020; Foster et al. 2022), suggesting that they conquered several environments along the shelf, as the outcrops have been interpreted as ranging from shallow water carbonates to deeper shelf deposits (Kimmig et al. 2019a). This diversity of depositional environments, as well as the abundance of specimens in the outcrops, and the quality of preservation of many of the worm fossils also support that most specimens were buried in situ or close to their original life-space.
While not an annelid or scalidophoran, the possible halkieriid Armilimax pauljamisoni (Kimmig and Selden 2021), which has slug-like body partially covered by a prominent shell, is also part of the vermiform fauna and likely co-existed with the scalidophorans and Burgessochaeta, as all can be found in the lower part (cycle 3 of Liddell et al. 1997) of Miners Hollow.
Additionally, Margaretia dorus, which has been interpreted as the tubes of the enteropneust Oesia disjuncta (Nanglu et al. 2016), is fairly common in the Spence Shale localities of the Wellsville Mountains (Kimmig et al. 2019a; Whitaker and Kimmig 2020; Foster et al. 2022) and suggests that these vermiform hemichordates also inhabited the middle shelf areas of the Spence biota.
Conclusions
The new annelids add to a diverse and thriving worm fauna of the Spence Shale and show that there is likely still a lot to be discovered from this important window into Cambrian biodiversity. However, recognizing these annelids might be difficult, as the described specimens show post-mortem decomposition and diagenetic alteration, which can make their taxonomic identification challenging, especially in the field. This might be part of the reason behind the scarcity of annelid remains in the Spence Shale, but it also mirrors the biotic compositions observed from most Cambrian Lagerstätten of the Great Basin, with the exception of the abundant single annelid taxon in the Weeks Formation (Lerosey-Aubril et al. 2018). In addition to their taxonomic diversity, the annelids further show that the Spence Shale had a diverse benthic fauna and was likely one of the most diverse ecosystems in the Cambrian.
Supplementary Material
Supplement Figure 1. Shaihuludia shurikeni gen. et sp. nov. from the High Creek locality, Spence Shale member of the Langston Formation (Wuliuan; Miaolingian). (A) SEM-micrograph of the holotype part KUMIP 585569. (B) SEM-micrograph of boxed inset in A, showing the longitudinal striations of the chaetae. (C) SEM-EDS elemental maps of Fe, Mn, and Si, overlaying B, showing Mn is restricted to the matrix. (D) SEM-EDS elemental maps of the chaetae and soft-tissue show enhanced levels of Fe and O, while the host matrix shows enhanced levels of Al, K, Mg, Mn, Na, and Si. Scale bars: (A) 5mm, (B, C, D) 2mm.
Supplement Figure 2. Shaihuludia shurikeni gen. et sp. nov. from the High Creek locality, Spence Shale member of the Langston Formation (Wuliuan; Miaolingian). (A) SEM-EDS elemental maps of Fe, Mn, and Si, overlaying Figure 2(C), showing Mn is restricted to the matrix. (B) Additional SEM-EDS elemental maps of the chaetae and soft-tissue show levels of Ba, Ca, and Mg. Scale bars: (A, B) 2mm.
Supplement Figure 3. Shaihuludia shurikeni gen. et sp. nov. from the High Creek locality, Spence Shale member of the Langston Formation (Wuliuan; Miaolingian). (A) SEM-EDS elemental maps of Fe, Mn, and Si, overlaying Figure 3(C), showing Mn is restricted to the matrix. (B) Additional SEM-EDS elemental maps of the chaetae and soft-tissue in Figure 3(C) show levels of Ba, Ca, and Mn. (C) SEM-EDS elemental maps of Fe, Mn, and Si, overlaying Figure 3(E), showing Mn is restricted to the matrix. Additional SEM-EDS elemental maps of the area in B the chaetae and soft-tissue show enhanced levels of Fe and O, while the host matrix shows enhanced levels of Al, K, Mg, Na, and Si. (D) Additional SEM-EDS elemental maps of the chaetae and soft-tissue in Figure 3(E) show levels of Ba, Ca, and Mg. Scale bars: (A, B, C, D) 2mm.
Supplement Figure 4. Burgessochaeta cf. B. setigera (Walcott 1911) from the Miners Hollow locality, Spence Shale member of the Langston Formation (Wuliuan; Miaolingian). SEM-micrograph of UU 1021.
Acknowledgements
We thank Lloyd Gunther for donating specimen UU 1021 to the Department of Geology & Geophysics of the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA, and we thank Quintin Sahratian (UU) for facilitating the loan of the specimen. We thank Natalia Lopez Carranza (KUMIP) for accessioning specimen KUMIP 585569. We thank Paul G. Jamison for assistance in the field. We thank Xianfeng Yang (Yunnan), James W. Hagadorn (Denver), and Graham Young (Manitoba) for comments on the High Creek annelid. Julien Kimmig thanks the USDA Forest Service for research and collecting permits. Paul Jamison (Utah State University) is thanked for showing us the locality. John Christian, Herwig Pelckmans, and David Von Bargen provided helpful feedback about mineralogy. We especially thank Luke A. Parry (University College London) for discussion of the manuscript and helpful feedback on the affinities of Shaihuludia shurikeni. We thank Jean Vannier, Bruce S. Lieberman, and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments. Gareth Dyke is thanked for handling the manuscript.
Funding:
Rhiannon J. LaVine was supported by a National Institutes of Health Institutional Research and Academic Career Development Award. Julien Kimmig was supported by a Western Interior Paleontological Society Karl Hirsch Memorial Grant. James D. Schiffbauer is supported by NSF CAREER 1652351, and the University of Missouri X-ray Microanalysis Core by NSF IF 1636643.
Footnotes
Disclosure statement: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Data archiving statement
This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered with Zoobank:
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:
References
- Barghoorn ES, Tyler SA. 1965. Microorganisms from the Gunflint chert. Science. 147:563–577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Briggs DEG, Kear AJ. 1993. Decay and preservation of polychaetes; taphonomic thresholds in soft-bodied organisms. Paleobiology. 19:107–135. [Google Scholar]
- Broce JS, Schiffbauer JD. 2017. Taphonomic analysis of Cambrian vermiform fossils of Utah and Nevada, and implications for the chemistry of Burgess Shale-type preservation of vermiform fossils. Palaios. 32:600–619. [Google Scholar]
- Burchette TP, Wright VP. 1992. Carbonate ramp depositional systems. Sediment Geol. 79:3–57. [Google Scholar]
- Burzynski G, Narbonne GM, Alexander Dececchi T, Dalrymple RW. 2017. The ins and outs of Ediacaran discs. Precambrian Res. 300:246–260. [Google Scholar]
- Butterfield NJ. 1990. A reassessment of the enigmatic Burgess Shale fossil Wiwaxia corrugata (Matthew) and its relationship to the polychaete Canadia spinosa Walcott. Paleobiology. 16:287–303. [Google Scholar]
- Caron J–B, Aria C 2020. The Collins’ monster, a spinous suspension–feeding lobopodian from the Cambrian Burgess Shale of British Columbia. Palaeontology. 63:979–994. [Google Scholar]
- Chen H, Parry LA, Vinther J, Zhai D, Hou X, Ma X. 2020. A Cambrian crown annelid reconciles phylogenomics and the fossil record. Nature. 583:249–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cloud P 1973. Pseudofossils: a plea for caution. Geology. 1:123–127. [Google Scholar]
- Conway Morris S 1979. Middle Cambrian polychaetes from the Burgess Shale of British Columbia. Philosophical Trans Royal Soc London B. 285:227–274. [Google Scholar]
- Conway Morris S, Peel JS. 2008. The earliest annelids: lower Cambrian polychaetes from the Sirius Passet Lagerstätte, Peary Land, North Greenland. Acta Palaeontol Pol. 53:135–146. [Google Scholar]
- Conway Morris S, Robison RA. 1986. Middle Cambrian priapulids and other soft-bodied fossils from Utah and Spain. University of Kansas, Paleontological Contributions. 117:1–22. [Google Scholar]
- Conway Morris S, Robison RA. 1988. More soft-bodied animals and algae from the Middle Cambrian of Utah and British Columbia. University of Kansas, Paleontological Contributions. 122:1–48. [Google Scholar]
- Demoulin CF, Lara YJ, Cornet L, Francois C, Baurain D, Wilmotte A, Javaux EJ. 2019. Cyanobacteria Evolution: Insight from the Fossil Record. Free Radical Biol Med. 140:206–223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eibye-Jacobsen D 2004. A reevaluation of Wiwaxia and the polychaetes of the Burgess Shale. Lethaia 37:317–335. [Google Scholar]
- Foster JR, Sroka SR, Howells TF, Cothren HR, Dehler CM, Hagadorn JW. 2022. New Cambrian vermiform organisms from Burgess Shale-type deposits of the western United States. Bull Geosci. 97:269–288. [Google Scholar]
- García-Bellido DC, Paterson JR, Edgecombe GD. 2013. Cambrian palaeoscolecids (Cycloneuralia) from Gondwana and reappraisal of species assigned to Palaeoscolex. Gondwana Res. 24:780–795. [Google Scholar]
- Han J, Conway Morris S, Hoyal Cuthill JF, Shu D. 2019. Sclerite-bearing annelids from the lower Cambrian of South China. Sci Rep. 9:4955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hofmann HJ. 1971. Precambrian fossils, pseudofossils, and problematica in Canada. Bull Geol Surv Canada. 189:1–146. [Google Scholar]
- Huang D-Y, Chen JY, Vannier J, Salz Salinas JI. 2004. Early Cambrian sipunculan worms from southwest China. Proc R Soc Lond B. 271:1671–1676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Javaux EJ. 2007. The early eukaryotic fossil record. In: Jékely G, editor. Eukaryotic Membranes and Cytoskeleton. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 607. New York: Springer; 1–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kimmig J 2021. Burgess Shale Fauna. In: Elias S, Alderton D, editors. Encyclopedia of Geology, 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier; p. 576–582. [Google Scholar]
- Kimmig J, Pratt BR. 2015. Soft-bodied biota from the middle Cambrian (Drumian) Rockslide Formation, Mackenzie Mountains, northwestern Canada. J Paleontol. 89:51–71. [Google Scholar]
- Kimmig J, Selden PA. 2021. A new shell-bearing organism from the Cambrian Spence Shale of Utah. Palaeoworld. 30:220–228. [Google Scholar]
- Kimmig J, Strotz LC, Kimmig SR, Egenhoff SO, Lieberman BS. 2019a. The Spence Shale Lagerstätte: an important window into Cambrian biodiversity. J Geol Soc. 176:609–619. [Google Scholar]
- Kimmig J, Couto H, Leibach WW, Lieberman BS. 2019b. Soft-bodied fossils from the upper Valongo Formation (Middle Ordovician: Dapingian-Darriwilian) of northern Portugal. Sci Nat. 106:27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lamarck J–B. 1809. Philosophie zoologique, ou Exposition des considérations relatives à l’histoire naturelle des animaux. Paris: Dentu; p. 475. [Google Scholar]
- Leibach WW, Lerosey-Aubril R, Whitaker AF, Schiffbauer JD, Kimmig J. 2021. First palaeoscolecid from the Cambrian (Drumian, Miaolingian) Marjum Formation of western Utah, USA. Acta Palaeontol Pol. 66:663–678. [Google Scholar]
- Lerosey-Aubril R, Gaines RR, Hegna TA, Ortega-Hernández J, Van Roy P, Kier C, Bonino E. 2018. The Weeks Formation Konservat- Lagerstätte and the evolutionary transition of Cambrian marine life. J Geol Soc. 175:705–715. [Google Scholar]
- Liddell WD, Wright SH, Brett CE. 1997. Sequence stratigraphy and paleoecology of the Middle Cambrian Spence Shale in northern Utah and southern Idaho. Brigham Young Univ Geol Stud. 42:59–78. [Google Scholar]
- Lieberman BS. 2003. A new soft-bodied fauna: The Pioche Formation of Nevada. J Paleontol. 77:674–690. [Google Scholar]
- Lieberman BS, Kurkewicz R, Shinogle H, Kimmig J, MacGabhann BA. 2017. Disc-shaped fossils resembling porpitids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) from the early Cambrian (Series 2: Stage 4) of western U.S.A. PeerJ. 5:e3312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu AG, Kenchington CG, Mitchell EG. 2015. Remarkable insights into the paleoecology of the Avalonian Ediacaran macrobiota. Gondwana Res. 27:1355–1380. [Google Scholar]
- Liu J, Ou Q, Han J, Li J, Wu Y, Jiao G, He T. 2015. Lower Cambrian polychaete from China sheds light on early annelid evolution. Sci Nat. 102:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LoDuca ST, Bykova N, Wu M, Xiao S, Zhao Y. 2017. Seaweed morphology and ecology during the great animal diversification events of the early Paleozoic: A tale of two floras. Geobiology 15:588–616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McMahon S, Tarhan L, Briggs DEG. 2017. Decay of the sea anemone Metridium (Actiniaria): Implications for the preservation of soft-bodied diploblast-grade animals. Palaios. 32:388–395. [Google Scholar]
- Nanglu K, Caron JB. 2018. A new Burgess Shale polychaete and the origin of the annelid head revisited. Curr Biol. 28:319–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nanglu K, Caron JB, Gaines RR. 2020. The Burgess Shale paleocommunity with new insights from Marble Canyon, British Columbia. Paleobiology. 46:58–81. [Google Scholar]
- Nanglu K, Caron JB, Conway Morris S, Cameron CB. 2016. Cambrian suspension-feeding tubicolous hemichordates. BMC Biol. 14:56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nuelle LM, Shelton KL. 1986. Geologic and geochemical evidence of possible bedded barite deposits in Devonian rocks of the Valley and Ridge Province, Appalachian Mountains. Econ Geol. 81:1408–1430. [Google Scholar]
- Parry L, Tanner A, Vinther J. 2015. The origin of annelids. Palaeontology. 57:1091–1103. [Google Scholar]
- Parry L, Vinther J, Edgecombe GD. 2015. Cambrian stem-group annelids and a metameric origin of the annelid head. Biol Lett. 11: 20150763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parry LA, Edgecombe GD, Eibye - Jacobsen D, Vinther J. 2016. The impact of fossil data on annelid phylogeny inferred from discrete morphological characters. Proc R Soc Lond B. 283:20161378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parry LA, Eriksson M, Vinther J. 2019. The Annelid Fossil Record. In: Purschke G, Böggemann M, Westheide W, editors. Handbook of Zoology. Annelida. Volume 1: Annelida Basal Groups and Pleistoannelida, Sedentaria I. Berlin: DeGruyter; p. 69–88. [Google Scholar]
- Read GB. 2019. A History of Annelida Research. In: Purschke G, Böggemann M, Westheide W, editors. Handbook of Zoology. Annelida. Volume 1: Annelida Basal Groups and Pleistoannelida, Sedentaria I. Berlin: DeGruyter; p. 3–36. [Google Scholar]
- Resser CE. 1939. The Spence Shale and its fauna. Smithson Misc Collect. 97:1–29. [Google Scholar]
- Retallack GJ. 2015. Reassessment of the Silurian problematicum Rutgersella as another post-Ediacaran vendobiont. Alcheringa. 39:573–588. [Google Scholar]
- Robison RA. 1969. Annelids from the middle Cambrian Spence Shale of Utah. J Paleontol. 43:1169–1173. [Google Scholar]
- Robison RA. 1991. Middle Cambrian biotic diversity: examples from four Utah Lagerstätten. In: Simonetta A, Conway Morris S, editors. The early evolution of Metazoa and the significance of problematic taxa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 77–98. [Google Scholar]
- Robison RA, Babcock LE, Gunther VG. 2015. Exceptional Cambrian Fossils from Utah: A Window into the Age of Trilobites. Utah Geological Survey, Salt Lake City, Miscellaneous Publication. 15–1:1–97. [Google Scholar]
- Sansom RS. 2016. Preservation and phylogeny of Cambrian ecdysozoans tested by experimental decay of Priapulus. Sci Rep. 6:32817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sappenfield AD, Tarhan LG, Droser ML. 2017. Earth’s oldest jellyfish strandings: A unique taphonomic window or just another day at the beach? Geol Mag. 154:859–574. [Google Scholar]
- Walcott CD. 1911. Cambrian Geology and Paleontology II. Middle Cambrian annelids. Smithson Misc Collect. 57:109–145. [Google Scholar]
- Wang D, Vannier J, Aria C, Sun J, Han J. 2021. Tube-dwelling in early animals exemplified by Cambrian scalidophoran worms. BMC Biol. 19:243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitaker AF, Kimmig J. 2020. Anthropologically introduced biases in natural history collections, with a case study on the invertebrate paleontology collections from the middle Cambrian Spence Shale Lagerstätte. Palaeontol Electron. 23:a58. [Google Scholar]
- Whitaker AF, Jamison PG, Schiffbauer JD, Kimmig J. 2020. Re-description of the Spence Shale palaeoscolecids in light of new morphological features with comments on palaeoscolecid taxonomy and taphonomy. Pal Z. 94:661–674. [Google Scholar]
- Whitaker AF, Schiffbauer JD, Briggs DEG, Leibach WW, Kimmig J. 2022. Preservation and diagenesis of soft-bodied fossils and the occurrence of phosphate-associated rare earth elements in the Cambrian (Wuliuan) Spence Shale Lagerstätte. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 592:110909. [Google Scholar]
- Yang X-F, Kimmig J, Zhai D-Y, Liu Y, Kimmig SR, Peng S. 2021a. A juvenile-rich palaeocommunity of the lower Cambrian Chengjiang sheds light on palaeo-boom or palaeo-bust environments. Nat Ecol Evol. 5:1082–1090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang X-Y, Vannier J, Yang J, Wang D, Zhang XG. 2021b. Priapulid worms from the Cambrian of China shed light on reproduction in early animals. Geosci Front., 12:101234. [Google Scholar]
- Young GA, Hagadorn JW. 2020. Evolving preservation and facies distribution of fossil jellyfish: a slowly closing taphonomic window. Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana. 59:185–203. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Z, Smith MR, Shu D. 2015. New reconstruction of the Wiwaxia scleritome, with data from Chengjiang juveniles. Sci Rep. 5:14810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zorz M 2022. Pyrite suns from Randolph County, Illinois. Rocks & Minerals. 97:330–347. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplement Figure 1. Shaihuludia shurikeni gen. et sp. nov. from the High Creek locality, Spence Shale member of the Langston Formation (Wuliuan; Miaolingian). (A) SEM-micrograph of the holotype part KUMIP 585569. (B) SEM-micrograph of boxed inset in A, showing the longitudinal striations of the chaetae. (C) SEM-EDS elemental maps of Fe, Mn, and Si, overlaying B, showing Mn is restricted to the matrix. (D) SEM-EDS elemental maps of the chaetae and soft-tissue show enhanced levels of Fe and O, while the host matrix shows enhanced levels of Al, K, Mg, Mn, Na, and Si. Scale bars: (A) 5mm, (B, C, D) 2mm.
Supplement Figure 2. Shaihuludia shurikeni gen. et sp. nov. from the High Creek locality, Spence Shale member of the Langston Formation (Wuliuan; Miaolingian). (A) SEM-EDS elemental maps of Fe, Mn, and Si, overlaying Figure 2(C), showing Mn is restricted to the matrix. (B) Additional SEM-EDS elemental maps of the chaetae and soft-tissue show levels of Ba, Ca, and Mg. Scale bars: (A, B) 2mm.
Supplement Figure 3. Shaihuludia shurikeni gen. et sp. nov. from the High Creek locality, Spence Shale member of the Langston Formation (Wuliuan; Miaolingian). (A) SEM-EDS elemental maps of Fe, Mn, and Si, overlaying Figure 3(C), showing Mn is restricted to the matrix. (B) Additional SEM-EDS elemental maps of the chaetae and soft-tissue in Figure 3(C) show levels of Ba, Ca, and Mn. (C) SEM-EDS elemental maps of Fe, Mn, and Si, overlaying Figure 3(E), showing Mn is restricted to the matrix. Additional SEM-EDS elemental maps of the area in B the chaetae and soft-tissue show enhanced levels of Fe and O, while the host matrix shows enhanced levels of Al, K, Mg, Na, and Si. (D) Additional SEM-EDS elemental maps of the chaetae and soft-tissue in Figure 3(E) show levels of Ba, Ca, and Mg. Scale bars: (A, B, C, D) 2mm.
Supplement Figure 4. Burgessochaeta cf. B. setigera (Walcott 1911) from the Miners Hollow locality, Spence Shale member of the Langston Formation (Wuliuan; Miaolingian). SEM-micrograph of UU 1021.
Data Availability Statement
This published work and the nomenclatural acts it contains have been registered with Zoobank:
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:
