Abstract
Low levels of microRNA (miR) 21 may explain the higher osteocyte apoptosis with Cx43-deficient and aged female mice. However, miR21 exerts a sex-divergent role in osteocytes, regulating bone mass and architecture through non-cell autonomous effects on osteoblasts and osteoclasts, via sex-specific regulation of osteocyte cytokine production. miR21 deficiency improves bone strength in females, and, to a higher extent, in male miR21-deficient mice. To understand the molecular basis for the effects of miR21 deletion, mRNA was isolated from miR21fl/fl (controls) or miR21-deficient (by deletion in cells expressing Cre recombinase under the control of the 8 kb fragment of the DMP1 promoter: miR21ΔOt mice). miR21 was 50% lower in miR21ΔOt whole calvaria bone compared to control mice of the corresponding sex. RNAseq was performed in 4 samples/sex and genotype. There were 152 genes with <.05 P-value and >1 absolute log2 fold change in the male data analysis, and expression of most genes was higher in the miR21fl/fl group. Two of the genes, Actn3 and Myh4, had a false discovery rate < 0.1. Gene enrichment analysis of significant genes on both KEGG pathways and gene ontology (GO) gene sets shows that the significant genes were enriched in muscle contraction. Some muscle-related genes like Actn3 were included in multiple significant pathways. For females, only 65 genes had P-value <.05 and >1 absolute log2 fold change. Yet, no significant KEGG or GO pathways, including ≥5 significant genes, were seen, and no overlap of significant genes was found between male and female samples. Therefore, deletion of miR21 has a stronger effect on male transcriptome in calvaria, compared to females. Further, no enrichment of any pathway was detected in female samples. Thus, either there are no differences between 2 groups in female or the effect size is small, and a larger sample size is needed to uncover miR21-dependent differences.
Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract.

Introduction
MicroRNAs (miRs) are 18-22-nucleotide long noncoding RNAs that negatively regulate gene expression.1 Changes in miR levels have been associated with phenotypic changes with aging and diseases, including osteoporosis.2 Among the most commonly studied miRs, miR21, a pro-survival and oncogenic miR, has been shown to directly regulate osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation and function.3 In addition, we have shown that miR21 is reduced with Cx43 deficiency and aging in female mice, and that its deletion from osteocytic cells results in a sex-dimorphic effect on the skeleton.4-6
In particular, we showed that expression of the 8kbDMP1-Cre leads to significant decrease in miR21 levels in calvaria bones from miR21ΔOt female and male mice.5 These miR21-deficient mice exhibit a skeletal phenotype that depends on the sex of the animals, with lower osteoblast- and osteoclast-related measurements in females and higher in males, resulting in no change in bone mass in females and higher bone mass in the males. In addition, femoral bone mechanical strength was higher in both sexes, albeit the changes were more pronounced in male mice. Thus, our published studies suggest that miR21 regulation in osteocytes alters bone metabolism and geometry through paracrine actions on osteoblasts and osteoclasts. At the same time, removal of osteocytic miR21 enhances bone mechanical properties in a sex-independent manner. Changes depending on the sex of the animals were also observed on the levels of circulating chemokines and on the activation of intracellular kinases. However, the transcriptional changes leading to the sex-specific effects were not reported.
We now report that deletion of miR21 in cells expressing the 8 kb fragment of the DMP1 promoter results in transcriptional changes in calvaria bones, and that these changes differ between female and male mice. Thus, deletion of the miR has a more profound effect on cells from male mice, and, although there are some significant changes in samples from female mice, they are not enriched in any of the reported pathways.
Materials and methods
Mice
The mouse strain engineered with loxP cassettes on both sides of the mmu-miR-21 genomic locus (named miR21fl/f) was bred with mice harboring DMP1-8 kb-Cre in order to obtain miR21f/f; DMP1-8 kb-Cre mice (named miR21ΔOt) lacking the miR21 gene preferentially in osteocytes (Figure 1), as previously reported by us.4,5 Mice were maintained in a C57BL/6 background, and miR21fl/fl littermates were used as controls. Male and female mice were euthanized at 16 wk of age. All animal procedures were approved by the Indiana University School of Medicine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were carried out in accordance with institutional guidelines. Five same sex mice were housed in each cage, with water and food at libitum.
Figure 1.

Generation of male and female miR21-deficient mice (miR21ΔOt). Scheme illustrating generation of mouse model with osteocyte-targeted miR21 deletion. Cre, cre recombinase; DMP1, dentin matrix protein 1.
mRNA isolation and RNAseq
mRNA was isolated from calvaria bones of 4-mo-old male and female mice expressing (miR21fl/fl controls) or with reduced miR21 levels (miR21ΔOt experimental mice). Four samples/sex and genotype were submitted for RNA sequencing, each corresponding to an individual mouse. Bones were removed from the mice, cleaned of soft tissue using sterile gauze, cut into small pieces, and grinded using a Polytron in the presence of Trizol (Invitrogen), without removing the sutures,5 followed by purification using QIAseq® FastSelectTM RNA Removal Kit. The 260/280 ratio ranged from 1.67 to 1.98 for all samples.
RNAseq reads were aligned to GRCm38 using HISAT and read counts for each gene were extracted with featureCounts. RNAseq reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic version 0.36 with the parameters “2:20:5 LEADING:3 TRAILING:3 SLIDINGWINDOW:4:15 MINLEN:17” to remove adapter sequences and perform quality trimming.7 The resulting reads were mapped against GRCm38 using HISAT2 version 2.1.0 with default parameters.8 HISAT uses Bowtie2, which is based on the Burrows–Wheeler transform algorithm, for sequence alignment and allows for mapping across exon junctions.9 Read counts for each gene were created using featureCounts10 from the Subread package version 1.5.3 with the parameters “-O -M --primary --largestOverlap -s 2 -B” and GENCODE m21 as the annotation.11
Statistical analyses
For data analyses, first, principal component analysis was performed to check data quality and detect outliers. DESeq2 was employed to detect differentially expressed genes.12 Within DESeq2, read counts data were normalized with median of ratios, and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected after independent filtering. Gene set enrichment analyses based on significant genes were performed on both Gene Ontology (GO)13 and KEGG14 pathways using R package clusterProfiler.15
Results
Calvaria bones isolated from 4-mo-old mice were used for these studies, based on our previous studies in which we showed differences in gene expression with miR-21 deficiency in male and female mice,5 and demonstrated the effects of miR-21 deletion ex vivo on osteocytic lacuna occupancy, in the mRNA levels of FoxO3, p27, and GADD153, and in PTEN protein levels.4 Samples from 4 mice/genotype and sex were initially processed. The read counts of genes extracted with featureCounts are included in Table S1. During quality control, sample 173 (female miR21ΔOt) was removed from the analysis as an extreme outlier (Figure S1). The sex of the animals was confirmed by the expression of Uty, Eif2s3y, and Ddx3y genes, all encoded in the Y chromosome only in samples from male mice (Figure S2). On the other hand, only samples from female mice expressed Xist, a gene expressed cells with 2 X chromosomes involved in X chromosome inactivation.
The remaining samples were used to detect DEGs between groups. There were 152 genes with P-value less than .05 and absolute log2 fold change larger than 1 in the analysis of male data (Figure 2A). Most of these genes were expressed at a higher level in the miR21fl/fl group. With the 152 significant genes, the 8 male samples could be hierarchically clustered into miR21fl/fl and miR21ΔOt groups (Figure 3A, Table S2). Two of the genes, Actn3 and Myh4, had a false discovery rate less than 0.1 (Table S2). Gene set enrichment analysis of significant genes on both KEGG pathways and GO gene sets shows that the significant genes were enriched in muscle contraction. Some muscle-related genes like Actn3 were included in multiple significant pathways (Figure 4).
Figure 2.

Genes differentially expressed in calvaria bones of miR21fl/fl and miR21ΔOt mice. (A) Male mice. (B) Female mice. Positive Log2 fold change indicates higher expression level in miR21ΔOt mice. P-value of .05 and absolute log2 fold change of 1 are used as cutoff in the volcano plot. Two of the genes, Actn3 (α-actinin-3) and Myh4 (myosin-4), had a false discovery rate less than 0.1 in male mice.
Figure 3.
Heatmap of significantly differentially expressed genes between miR21fl/fl and miR21ΔOt mice. (A) Male mice. (B) Female mice. Significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were defined as genes with P-value less than .05 and absolute log2 fold change larger than 1. About 152 DEGs were detected in male mice, while 65 DEGs were detected in female mice. For both male and female mice, the mice can be hierarchically clustered into 2 groups: miR21fl/fl and miR21ΔOt based on these DEGs.
Figure 4.

Net plot of DEGs in top significant pathways in male mice. (A) KEGG pathways (B) GO pathways. The dark yellow dots indicate the pathway, and the size of the dot is associated with the number of DEGs in the pathway. The small dots in the figure are DEGs. The log2 fold change of DEGs is illustrated in different shades. The log2 fold change of the DEGs in this figure are all negative, which indicates they have lower gene express in miR21ΔOt mice.
In addition to the expected osteocyte-specific genes (Figure S3A), we detected the expression of genes purportedly expressed in other cell types (Figure S3B–H). However, it should be noted that most of these genes have been reported to be expressed by osteocytic cells and/or primary osteocytes,16 raising the possibility that they originate from the bone cells themselves, and not from contaminated cells. Our study also showed that the osteoblastic gene Kera (encoding for keratocan) and the skeletal muscle Myh7 (encoding for myosin heavy chain β) only increased in miR21-deficient females. On the other hand, the expression of the genes enriched in muscle Actc1 (encoding for actin alpha cardiac muscle 1) and Actn3 (encoding for alpha actinin 3) was significantly lower only in male miR21-deficient animals compared to littermate controls, whereas the difference in Tcap (encoding for Titin-Cap) did not reach significance (P = .055). Altogether, this evidence gives further support to the sex-dependent effects of miR21 deletion. However, we cannot determine whether these changes are a direct consequence of the absence of miR21, are dependent on other genes directly affected by miR21, or are due to changes in the population of cells that express different levels of the genes.
For females, only 65 genes had P-value less than .05 and absolute log2 fold change larger than 1 (Figure 2B). The remaining 7 female samples can be clustered into miR21fl/fl and miR21ΔOt groups by the 64 genes (Figure 3B, Table S2). However, we did not see any significant KEGG or GO pathways including 5 or more significant genes.
After combining male and female data together and adjusting the gender difference, we found 150 significant genes (Table S3). However, these samples cannot be hierarchically clustered into miR21fl/fl and miR21ΔOt groups with the 150 genes. No KEGG or GO pathways were significantly enriched with significant genes.
Although there are some overlap significant genes between male and combined data and between female and combined (All) data, we did not find any overlap of significant genes between male and female data (Figure S4), which indicates that the effect of miR21 was sex specific. Thus, few genes had similar changes by miR21 in both male and female mice.
Discussion
miRs are widely expressed regulators of gene transcription, with known functions in the regulation of differentiation and activity of bone cells.17 Among those miRs reported to influence bone cells, miR21 is the most abundant. Originally described as an oncogene, miR21 inhibits cell apoptosis, induces pro-survival autophagy, and is involved in metabolic reprograming, enhancing tumor progression.18 In bone, miR21 has been shown to regulate both bone formation and bone resorption arms of bone remodeling.19 We previously showed that deletion of miR21 from cells expressing an 8 kb fragment of the DMP1 promoter (mainly osteocytes) results in a sex-dependent phenotype, with reduced osteoblasts and osteoclasts in females (with no change in bone mass) and increased osteoblasts and osteoclasts in males (resulting in increased bone mass).5 Further we showed that basal levels of miR21, as well as levels in miR21ΔOt mice, are lower in calvaria bones from males compared to female mice.6 These differences are associated with divergent changes in gene expression in bones and levels of circulating chemokines. Long bone strength was higher in miR21-deficient male and female mice compared to the respective controls, although the differences were higher for male mice. These results suggest that also at the bone structural/material level, the consequences of miR21 deletion are sex-dimorphic.
In order to assess the basis of the differential effect of miR21 deficiency at the transcriptomics level, we performed RNAseq analyses of calvaria bone preparations. We chose to use these bones because we found that miR21 levels were similarly decreased in male and female miR21ΔOt mice, whereas gene expression levels differentially changed in calvaria bones depending on the sex of the animals.5 miRs are considered primarily translational repressors, but they can also induce mRNA degradation, thereby leading to the reduced expression of target genes.20 It should then be expected that deletion of miR21 would lead to increased expression of target genes. However, we found that the expression of some genes in miR21ΔOt mice was higher than that in miR21fl/fl controls. Future studies would be needed to determine whether miR21 directly affects the expression of those genes, or whether the differences in expression are due to changes in the cell population in the calvaria bone in the presence and absence of miR21 expression. Further, the potential role of sex steroids on the modulation of gene expression in males vs females remains to be investigated.
Among the genes found to be differentially expressed with and without miR21 deletion, Actn3 and Myh4 were the only ones with a false discovery rate lower than 0.1. These 2 genes are associated with skeletal muscle function.21,22 Both Actn3 and Myh4 have been shown to be expressed in high levels in skeletal muscle cells, a tissue not to be expected to be present in calvaria bone preparations. Yet, our pathway analyses showed that the genes differentially regulated in male mice samples were mostly associated with muscle function, suggesting that they might also be expressed in bone cells and, in particular, in osteocytes. Consistent with this, expression of Actn3 and Myh4 in bone preparations has been reported by Peter Croucher’s group.16 Similarly, a study by Ivo Kalajzic’s group showed expression of numerous genes related to muscle function, development, and differentiation in calvaria bones.23 Yet, the function of these so-called skeletal muscle genes on bone cells remains to be determined.
Our study shows that between 66 and 153 genes are expressed at significantly different levels between miR21fl/fl and miR21ΔOt mice (Tables S1–S3). Since miR-21 is often detected in proliferating cells and has been described as an oncogene,24 it is possible that its function in terminally differentiated osteocytes is not that evident, and that a higher number of genes could be altered at earlier stages of the craniofacial development. Future studies will be needed to determine whether, indeed, deletion of miR-21 in proliferating osteoblast precursors, for example, has a more profound effect in the phenotype of the mice.
miR-21 share the same seed sequence as miR-590-5p and both promote osteoblastogenesis by targeting osteoblast precursors, raising the possibility that miR-590 might compensate for the absence of miR-21. However, no evidence has been reported on the action of miR-590 in mature osteoblasts and osteocytes, with the exception of regulation of Smad7 in human osteosarcoma MG63 cells.25 On the other hand, we found a study in which miR-21 was deleted in cancer-derived cells, which lead to the concomitant changes in other miRs, including miR-4485-3p and miR-194-3p, without any changes in miR-590-3p or miR-590-5p levels, suggesting there is not compensation.26 Future studies are needed to determine whether there is a cross-regulation between the 2 microRNAs in osteocytic cells.
In summary, our study suggests that, even though miR21 levels in calvaria bones are lower in male than in female control mice,5 deletion of miR21 has a stronger effect on male transcriptome. These results are consistent with a positive effect on bone mass and remodeling, and a higher increase in bone strength in miR21ΔOt compared to miR21fl/fl male mice. On the other hand, although there are some genes significantly changing in females, they are not enriched in any pathways. Either there are no difference between the 2 groups in female, or the effect size is small, necessitating a larger sample size to detect genotype-dependent differences in the transcriptome.
Author contributions
Gang Peng (Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing), Padmini Deosthale (Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—review & editing), Roquelina Pianeta (Formal analysis, Writing—review & editing), Hannah M. Messermith (Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing—review & editing), and Lilian I. Plotkin (Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing)
Funding
This work was partially supported by the grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) R21AG078861 and the Veterans Administration (VA) Office 1I0 1BX005154 to L.I.P.
Conflicts of interest
None declared.
Data availability
All data are provided in the manuscript and the Supplementary Information.
Supplementary Material
Contributor Information
Gang Peng, Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States; Indiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Padmini Deosthale, Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Roquelina Pianeta, Indiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Hannah M Messersmith, Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Lilian I Plotkin, Indiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States; Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States; Roudebush Veterans Administration Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
References
- 1. He X, Eberhart JK, Postlethwait JH. MicroRNAs and micromanaging the skeleton in disease, development and evolution. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13(4):606–618. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00696.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Philippe S, Delay M, Macian N, Morel V, Pickering ME. Common miRNAs of osteoporosis and fibromyalgia: a review. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(17)):13513. 10.3390/ijms241713513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. van Wijnen AJ, van de Peppel J, van Leeuwen JP, et al. MicroRNA functions in osteogenesis and dysfunctions in osteoporosis. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2013;11(2):72–82Epub April 23, 2013. 10.1007/s11914-013-0143-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Davis HM, Pacheco-Costa R, Atkinson EG, et al. Disruption of the Cx43/miR21 pathway leads to osteocyte apoptosis and increased osteoclastogenesis with aging. Aging Cell. 2017;16(3):551–563. 10.1111/acel.12586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Davis HM, Deosthale PJ, Pacheco-Costa R, et al. Osteocytic miR21 deficiency improves bone strength independent of sex despite having sex divergent effects on osteocyte viability and bone turnover. FEBS J. 2020;287(5):941–963Epub September 19, 2019. 10.1111/febs.15066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Essex AL, Deosthale P, Huot JR, et al. miR21 deletion in osteocytes has direct and indirect effects on skeletal muscle in a sex-dimorphic manner in mice. Biol Sex Differ. 2022;13(1):56.Epub 20221001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–2120, Epub 20140401. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C, Bennett C, Salzberg SL. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(8):907–915, Epub 20190802. 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9(4):357–359, Epub 20120304. 10.1038/nmeth.1923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(7):923–930, Epub 20131113. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Harrow J, Frankish A, Gonzalez JM, et al. GENCODE: the reference human genome annotation for the ENCODE project. Genome Res. 2012;22(9):1760–1774. 10.1101/gr.135350.111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Gene Ontology Consortium . The gene ontology resource: enriching a GOld mine. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D325–D334. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27–30. 10.1093/nar/28.1.27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Wu X, Dong H, Luo L, et al. A novel statistic for genome-wide interaction analysis. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(9):e1001131. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Youlten SE, Kemp JP, Logan JG, et al. Osteocyte transcriptome mapping identifies a molecular landscape controlling skeletal homeostasis and susceptibility to skeletal disease. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2444.Epub May 7, 2021. 10.1038/s41467-021-22517-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Plotkin LI, Davis HM. MicroRNA regulation in osteocytes. Curr Mol Biol Rep. 2018;4(4):191–197. 10.1007/s40610-018-0102-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Williams JN, Irwin M, Li Y, et al. Osteocyte-derived CaMKK2 regulates osteoclasts and bone mass in a sex-dependent manner through secreted Calpastatin. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(5):4718. 10.3390/ijms24054718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Subramaniam R, Vijakumaran U, Shanmuganantha L, Law JX, Alias E, Ng MH. The role and mechanism of MicroRNA 21 in osteogenesis: an update. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(14):11330. https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/14/11330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Kapinas K, Delany AM. MicroRNA biogenesis and regulation of bone remodeling. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(3):220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Lek M, North KN. Are biological sensors modulated by their structural scaffolds? The role of the structural muscle proteins alpha-actinin-2 and alpha-actinin-3 as modulators of biological sensors. FEBS Lett. 2010;584(14):2974–2980Epub 20100531. 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.05.059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Lagou A, Schaub L, Ait-Lounis A, Denes BJ, Kiliaridis S, Antonarakis GS. Myosin heavy-chain messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expression and fibre cross-sectional area in masseter, digastric, gastrocnemius and soleus muscles of young and adult rats. Biology (Basel). 2023;12(6):842. 10.3390/biology12060842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Paic F, Igwe JC, Nori R, et al. Identification of differentially expressed genes between osteoblasts and osteocytes. Bone. 2009;45(4):682–692. 10.1016/j.bone.2009.06.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Bautista-Sanchez D, Arriaga-Canon C, Pedroza-Torres A, et al. The promising role of miR-21 as a cancer biomarker and its importance in RNA-based therapeutics. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2020;20:409–420Epub 20200313. 10.1016/j.omtn.2020.03.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Vishal M, Vimalraj S, Ajeetha R, et al. MicroRNA-590-5p stabilizes Runx2 by targeting Smad7 during osteoblast differentiation. J Cell Physiol. 2017;232(2):371–380Epub 20160615. 10.1002/jcp.25434 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Muller S, Wedler A, Breuer J, et al. Synthetic circular miR-21 RNA decoys enhance tumor suppressor expression and impair tumor growth in mice. NAR. Cancer. 2020;2(3):zcaa014.Epub 20200731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data are provided in the manuscript and the Supplementary Information.

