Abstract
Species of the family Polycephalomycetaceae grow on insects or entomopathogenic fungi and are distributed from tropical to subtropical regions. This study proposed four new species of hyperparasitic fungi from China based on six molecular markers (ITS, SSU, LSU, TEF-1α, RPB1 and RPB2) phylogenetic analyses and morphological characteristics. The four new species, i.e. Pleurocordycepslitangensis, Polycephalomycesjinghongensis, Po.multiperitheciatae and Po.myrmecophilus, were described and illustrated. Pl.litangensis, exhibiting a hyperparasitic lifestyle on Ophiocordycepssinensis, differed from Pleurocordyceps other species in producing subulate β-phialides and ovoid or elliptic α-conidia. Po.jinghongensis was distinct from Polycephalomyces other species, being parasitic on Ophiocordyceps sp., as producing oval or long oval-shaped α-conidia and columns of β-conidia. Po.multiperitheciatae differed from Polycephalomyces other species as having synnemata with fertile head, linear β-conidia and parasitic on Ophiocordycepsmultiperitheciata. Po.myrmecophilus was distinct from Polycephalomyces other species, being parasitic on the fungus Ophiocordycepsacroasca, as producing round or ovoid α-conidia and elliptical β-conidia without synnemata from the colonies. These four species were clearly distinguished from other species in the family Polycephalomycetaceae by phylogenetic and morphological characteristics. The morphological features were discussed and compared to relevant species in the present paper.
Key words: entomogenous fungi, hyperparasite, micromorphology, phylogenetic analyses, taxonomy
Introduction
The new family Polycephalomycetaceae was established within clavicipitoid fungi to accommodate Perennicordyceps, Pleurocordyceps and Polycephalomyces based on morphology and phylogenetic analyses (Xiao et al. 2023). The genus Polycephalomyces Kobayasi was determined to be a monotypic anamorph genus for the species Polycephalomycesformosus Kobayasi (Kobayasi 1941). In the later taxonomic treatment of this genus, Seifert (1985) accepted four species, i.e. Po.formosus, Po.ramosus (Peck) Mains, Po.cylindrosporus Samson & H.C. Evans and Po.tomentosus (Schrader) Seifert. Polycephalomycesditmarii Van Vooren & Audibert has been described as the asexual morph of Ophiocordycepsditmarii (Quél.) G.H. Sung, J.M. Sung, Hywel-Jones & Spatafora (Van Vooren and Audibert 2005). Paecilomycessinensis C.T. Chen, S.R. Xiao & Z.Y. Shi was recombined into Polycephalomycessinensis (Q.T. Chen, S.R. Xiao & Z.Y. Shi) W.J. Wang, X.L. Wang, Y. Li, S.R. Xiao & Y.J. Yao (Wang et al. 2012). The taxon has had a long history of being recognised as incertae sedis in Hypocreales (Kepler et al. 2013; Matočec et al. 2014). Matočec et al. (2014) established the genus Perennicordyceps and separated it from Polycephalomyces to accommodate Perennicordycepscuboidea, Pe.paracuboidea, Pe.prolifica and Pe.ryogamiensis. Perennicordyceps was characterised by acremonium-like and hirsutella-like asexual morphs and perithecia (Xiao et al. 2023). Pleurocordyceps was established by combining the species originally assigned to the Polycephalomyces. Pl.sinensis was designated as the type species of the genus Pleurocordyceps (Wang et al. 2021).
Species of Polycephalomycetaceae grow on insects or other fungi, particularly Ophiocordyceps species and are distributed from tropical to subtropical regions (Bischof et al. 2003; Wang et al. 2012, 2015a, b; Matočec et al. 2014; Crous et al. 2017; Xiao et al. 2018; Poinar and Vega 2020). Several species of Polycephalomycetaceae have also been reported as hyperparasitic fungi, involving species of Cordyceps, Elaphomyces, Hirsutella, Myxomycetes and Ophiocordyceps (Seifert 1985; Bischof et al. 2003; Wang et al. 2012, 2015a, b).
South-western China is an area of high fungal biodiversity (Hyde et al. 2018). The rich biodiversity uncovered suggested that further collections could result in the discovery of numerous new taxa (Hyde et al. 2020a, b). In this study, the four novel species presented herein were collected from Yunnan Province and Sichuan Province in China. Morphological observations and phylogenetic analyses showed that these four species were novel and distinct from all other previously-described species in the family Polycephalomycetaceae. The four new species were discovered to be hyperparasites of Ophiocordyceps species. Pl.litangensis, Po.jinghongensis, Po.multiperitheciatae and Po.myrmecophilus were hyperparasitic on O.sinensis, Ophiocordyceps sp., O.multiperitheciata and O.acroasca, respectively. At present, relatively little is known about the mechanisms responsible for hyperparasitism in species of the family Polycephalomycetaceae and our findings provide ideal material for these studies. These findings have expanded the diversity of fungal species in the family Polycephalomycetaceae, providing taxonomic data to support species resource conservation and rational exploitation and utilisation of resources.
Materials and methods
Specimens and isolates
Fungal specimens parasitising Ophiocordyceps sp. were collected from different regions of south-western China, including Sichuan Province (Litang County) and Yunnan Province (Jinghong City, Yuanyang County, Pu'er City). The specimens were found in moist soils. Geographic information (longitude, latitude and altitude) of collection were recorded in the field, then specimens were collected in sterilised plastic containers and transported to the laboratory. The micro-morphological characters (Synnemata) were examined using an Olympus SZ61 stereomicroscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). To obtain axenic culture, the stromata was divided into 2–4 segments with sterilised blades. Each segment was immersed in hydrogen peroxide 30% (H2O2) for 5 min and then rinsed five times in sterile water. After drying on sterilised filter paper, these segments were inoculated on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) plates. The conidial masses at the apex of the stipes were picked with an inoculating needle and immersed in 5 ml of sterilised water for blending. The homogenates were then spread on PDA plates containing 0.1 g/l streptomycin and 0.05 g/l tetracycline. The plates were maintained in a culture room at 25 °C. After purification, the cultures were stored at 4 °C (Wang et al. 2015a). Dry specimens were deposited in the Yunnan Herbal Herbarium (YHH) of Yunnan University. The cultures were stored in Yunnan Fungal Culture Collection (YFCC) of Yunnan University.
Morphological studies
Cultures on potato extract agar (PDA) were incubated for 21 days at 25 °C and photographed using a Canon 750 D camera (Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan). For asexual morphological descriptions, microscope slide cultures were prepared by placing a small amount of mycelium on 5 mm diameter PDA medium blocks that were overlaid by a cover slip (Wang et al. 2015a; Tang et al. 2023b). The observations, measurements and photographs of the phialides and conidia were made using a light microscope (Olympus BX53).
DNA extraction, PCR and sequencing
DNA templates were obtained from cultures using the CTAB method, following that described in Liu et al. (2001). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to amplify genetic markers using the following primer pairs: ITS4/ITS5 for ITS (internal transcribed spacer gene region) (White et al. 1990), NS1/NS4 for SSU (small subunit ribosomal RNA gene region) (White et al. 1990), LR0R/LR5 for LSU (large subunit rRNA gene region) (Hopple 1994) 2218R/983F for TEF-1α (translation elongation factor 1-alpha gene region) (Rehner and Buckley 2005), CRPB1/RPB1Croph for RPB1 (RNA polymerase II largest subunit gene region) (Castlebury et al. 2004; Araújo et al. 2018), fRPB2-7cR/fRPB2-5F for RPB2 (RNA polymerase II second largest subunit) (Liu et al. 1999). A total of 25 µl PCR matrix contained PCR 2.5 µl Buffer (Transgen Biotech, Beijing, China), 17.25 µl sterile water, 4 µl dNTP, 1 µl each forward and reverse primer, 0.25 µl Taq DNA polymerase (Transgen Biotech, Beijing, China) and 1 µl DNA template. The matrix and reactions conditions were prepared and performed according to the methods described in previous studies (Xiao et al. 2023).
Phylogenetic analysis
In order to construct a phylogeny of the major lineages in the family Polycephalomycetaceae, most of the DNA sequences used in this work were derived from previous phylogenetic studies (Xiao et al. 2023). Phylogenetic analyses were based on sequences of six molecular markers (ITS, SSU, LSU, TEF-1α, RPB1 and RPB2), all of which were downloaded from NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Then the nucleotide sequences were combined with those generated in our study (Table 1). Sequences were aligned using ClustalX v.2.0 (Larkin et al. 2007), adjusted manually and then concatenated in BioEdit v.7.1.1 (Hall 1999). Poorly-aligned regions were removed and adjusted manually using MEGA6 (v.6.0) (Tamura et al. 2013). ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017) was used to select the best-fitting likelihood model for the Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses and the Bayesian inference (BI) analyses were carried out for the fungi datasets. For ML analyses, tree searches were performed in IQ-tree (v.2.1.3) (Nguyen et al. 2015), based on the best-fit model GTR+F+I+I+R3 with 5000 ultrafast bootstraps (Hoang et al. 2017) in a single run. The BI search was according to the best-fit model GTR+F+I+G4, resorting to MrBayes (v.3.2.2) for BI analysis (Ronquist et al. 2012). The phylogenetic trees constructed using the ML and the BI analyses were largely congruent and strongly supported in most branches (Fig. 1). The final phylogenetic tree was visualised with its Maximum-Likelihood bootstrap proportions (ML-BS) and Bayesian posterior probability (BI-BPP) performed using FigTree v.1.4.2 and edited via Adobe Illustrator CS6.
Table 1.
Sources of selected isolates and GenBank accession number for ITS and five genes of three genera within Polycephalomycetaceae were used in this study.
Figure 1.
Phylogenetic tree of Polycephalomycetaceae, based on the concatenation of ITS, SSU, LSU, TEF-1α, RPB1 and RPB2 sequence data. The tree was generated from an alignment of 6,384 sites and 113 taxa. The phylogeny was inferred using the IQ-tree. The Maximum likelihood bootstrap values greater than 75% (on the left) and the Bayesian posterior probabilities over 0.75 (on the right) were indicated above the nodes. The new species were indicated in back bold font.
Results
Phylogenetic tree
Sequences of 113 samples were used for phylogenetic analysis. Tolypocladiumophioglossoides (NBRC 106330) and T.ophioglossoides (NBRC 100998) were designated as the outgroup taxa (Xiao et al. 2023). The total length of the concatenated dataset of six genes across the 113 samples was 6384 bp, including 859 bp for ITS, 1548 bp for SSU, 930 bp for LSU, 1037 bp for TEF-1α, 797 bp for RPB1 and 1213 bp for RPB2. The phylogenetic relationships show three major clades within the family Polycephalomycetaceae (Fig. 1), consisting of the clade Pleurocordyceps (16 species; BS = 100%, BPP = 1.00), the clade Perennicordyceps (6 species; BS = 100%, BPP = 1.00) and the clade Polycephalomyces (6 species; BS = 100%, BPP = 1.00). Pleurocordycepsnutansis, Pleurocordycepssinensis (MFLU 21-0268, GZU 20-0865) are adjacent clades. Similarly, Pleurocordycepsramosus like and Pleurocordycepsyunnanensis are contiguous branches. In addition, Pleurocordycepskanzashianus is included in the clade Pleurocordycepsnipponica. Cordycepspleuricapitata strains also formed a monophyletic clade (BS = 100%, BPP = 1.00). The four species collected and described in this work are clustered in the clade Pleurocordyceps (Pl.litangensis) and the clade Polycephalomyces (Po.jinghongensis, Po.multiperitheciatae and Po.myrmecophilus), respectively.
Taxonomy
. Pleurocordyceps litangensis
Hong Yu bis, Z.H. Liu & D.X. Tang sp. nov.
982CA96F-8B9B-5C9F-8EC0-C88D811E3621
851497
Figure 2.
Morphological features of Pleurocordycepslitangensis (Holotype: YHH 2306055) a overview of Pleurocordycepslitangensis and its host b synnemata on the insects c, d colony obverse and reverse e–h, k α-phialides i α-conidia j β-conidia and β-phialides. Scale Bars: 2 cm (a–d); 20 μm (e–j); 10 μm (k); 5 μm (g–i).
Etymology.
litangensis = Litang County, the epithet referred to the nature study trail in Litang County, the locality where the type specimen was collected.
Diagnosis.
Pleurocordycepslitangensis and Pl.sinensis have the same host (O.sinensis) and β-Conidia, but the phialides (lanceolate or narrowly lageniform vs. spear point or subulate), α-conidia (Ovoid vs. Ovoid or ellipticare) are different.
Holotype.
China, Sichuan Province, Ganzi Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Litang County, parasitic on Ophiocordycepssinensis (Ophiocordycipitaceae), on insects buried in soil, with erect stromata, 30°43′00″N, 100°52′00″E, alt. 4750 m, 10 June 2023, Hong Yu bis (YHH 2306055).
Sexual morph.
Undetermined.
Asexual morph.
Synnemata arising from the stromata of O.sinensis, solitary or alternating; clavate or spatulate, branched and unbranched, straight or sinuous. Terminal portion of a synnemata covered by a viscous mass, khaki. Colonies on PDA growing slowly, attaining a diameter of 1.4–1.6 cm in 3 weeks at 25 °C, filiform, dark yellow and reverse dry yellow. Phialides existing in two types: α- and β-phialides. Both types of phialides often reproduce new phialides at their own apices and yield catenulate β-conidia, collarettes not flared, periclinal thickening not visible. α-phialides acropleurogenous solitary on hyphae; spear point, tapering gradually from the base to the apex, 11.2–12.8 μm long, 1.9–2.6 μm wide at the base and 0.7–0.9 μm wide at the apex. β-phialides terminal on solitary on hyphae; subulate, tapering abruptly from the base to the apex, 9.9–27.8 μm long, 1.6–2.5 μm wide at the base and 0.6–1.4 μm wide at the apex. α-conidia ovoid or elliptic and occurring on the final portion of synnemata, 3.2–6.1 × 1.8–3.9 μm; β-conidia fusiform, and produce on the surface mycelium of colony, multiple, usually in chains on a phialide, 3.5–6.1 × 1.4–2.5 μm.
Host.
Parasitic on Ophiocordycepssinensis (Ophiocordycipitaceae).
Distribution.
China, Sichuan Province.
Material examined.
China, Sichuan Province, Ganzi Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Litang County, parasitic on Ophiocordycepssinensis (Ophiocordycipitaceae), on insects buried in soil, with erect stromata, 30°43′00″N, 100°52′00″E, alt. 4750 m, 10 June 2023, Tao Sun. Paratypes: YHH 2306058; other collections: YHH 2306059; Culture ex-type: YFCC 06109293; Other living cultures: YFCC 06109294, YFCC 06109295, YFCC 06109296.
Notes.
Four strains, Pleurocordyceps sp. NBRC109990, Pl. sp. NBRC109987, Pl. sp. NBRC110224, Pl. sp. NBRC109988, were aggregated Pl.litangensis into one branch (Fig. 1 BS = 100%, BPP = 1.00). Pl.litangensis was distinct from other species of Pleurocordyceps by α-phialides spear point, β-phialides subulate, α-conidia ovoid or elliptic (Table 2). Thus, Pl.litangensis was introduced as a new species under the genus Pleurocordyceps.
Table 2.
Morphological comparison of asexual morph species of Pleurocordyceps.
| Species | Host | Synnemata | Phialides | Conidia | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pl.agarica | Ophiocordyceps sp. or melolonthid larvae | Solitary, unbranched, agaricshaped; conidial mass pileus-like, light yellow to pale brown | α-phialides lanceolate; β-phialides narrowly lageniform or subulate | α-conidia globose to subglobose; β-conidia fusiform, catenate or clump together | Wang et al. (2015b) |
| Pl.aurantiacus | Coleoptera larvae or O.barnesii | Emerging after 30 days, solitary or not solitary, branched or unbranched, showing 1–2 radiating ring like distributions | α-phialides, narrowly lageniform. β-phialides, lanceolate or narrowly lageniform | α-conidia, globose to subglobose. β-conidia, fusiform | Xiao et al. (2018) |
| Pl.lanceolatus | Lepidoptera larvae | Lanceolate to corniform, solitary to crowded, stipitate, usually unbranched, rarely branched on the PDA, yellow to yellowish on the fresh specimen, covered with conidial masses, white on the PDA | α-phialides directly from hyphae, solitary, usually unbranched, subulate, at the base, tapering into a long neck; β-phialides branched into 2 or 3 phial ides, narrowly lageniform to lanceolate | α-conidia spherical, forming slimy conidial masses along the Synnemata; β-conidia fusiform | Xiao et al. (2023) |
| Pl.marginaliradians | Cossidae larva | Emerging after 14 days, single or branched into 2 or 3 branched, showing 1–2 radiating ring like distributions | α-phialides, elongate lageniform; β-phialides, narrow slender to narrow lageniform | α-conidia globose, catenate, one-celled, pale yellow slimy in mass. β-conidia fusiform, one-celled | Xiao et al. (2018) |
| Pl.parvicapitata | Perennicordycepselaphomyceticola | Absent | Phialides, cylindrical at the base, tapering into a long neck | globose to subglobose | Xiao et al. (2023) |
| Pl.sinensis | Lepidoptera larvae or Ophiocordycepssinensis | Solitary, crowded, branched or unbranched, conidial mass yellow or yellow-orange | Lanceolate or narrowly lageniform | α-conidia, ovoid; β-conidia, fusiform | Chen et al. (1984); Wang et al. (2012) |
| Pl.vitellina | Ophiocordycepsnigrella | Absent | α-phialides, hyaline, smooth, elongated lageniform, crowed, gathered in the middle of colony. β-phialides, hyaline, smooth, directly growing from hyphae, with or without metula at the base, solitary, lanceolate, ovate at the base, tapering into a short neck | α-conidia spherical, one-celled, smooth-walled. β-conidia fusiform, catenulate | Xiao et al. (2023) |
| Pl.yunnanensis | Hemiptera adults or Ophiocordycepsnutans | Solitary, caespitose or crowded, branched or unbranched; conidial mass white to yellow–brown | α-phialides cylindrical to subulate; β-phialides narrowly lageniform or subulate | α-conidia subglobose, ellipsoidal; β-conidia fusiform, catenate or clump together | Wang et al. (2015a) |
| Pl.nutansis | Ophiocordycepsnutans | Cylindrical, clavate, capitate, stipitate, crowded, simple, white to yellowish | Two types, both of the types observed on the same synnemata. α-phialides, gathered at the apex of the synnemata, arranged in a parallel palisade-like layer around the apex of the fertile head, hyaline, usually branched into 2–6 phialides, narrowly slender lanceolate; β-phialides , solitary, scattered along the stipe, lanceolate, ovate at the base, tapering into a long neck | α-conidia, spherical, forming slimy conidial masses on the fertile head; β-conidia fusiform, produced along stipe of the synnemata | Xiao et al. (2023) |
| Pl.heilongtanensis | Ophiocordyceps sp. | Scattered on the surface of host, cylindrical, stipitate, unbranched, white, with or without fertile head | α-phialides, hyaline, smooth, elongated lageniform, caespitose, palisade-like, crowed, gathered in the top of synnemata, mostly branched into 2–4 phialides. β-phialides hyaline, smooth, solitary, branched into 2 or 3 phial ides, with or without metula at the base, directly growing from hyphae | α-conidia, subglobose to ovoid,in yellowish slimy mass. β-conidia fusiform, one-celled | Xiao et al. (2023) |
| Pl.lianzhouensis | Lepidoptera larva or Ophiocordycepscrinalis | Unbranched or dichotomously branched, conidial mass not seen | In whorls or intercalary and terminal, terminally awl-shaped | Ellipsoidal, oblong to cylindrical | Wang et al. (2014) |
| Pl.litangensis | Ophiocordycepssinensis | Absent | α-phialides acropleurogenous solitary on hyphae; spear point. β-phialides terminal on solitary on hyphae; subulate | α-conidia ovoid or elliptical; β-conidia fusiform | This study |
. Polycephalomyces jinghongensis
Hong Yu bis, Z.H. Liu & D.X. Tang sp. nov.
0FA1388C-4371-5409-8EBA-A9F4CABEE4D1
851498
Figure 3.
Morphological features of Polycephalomycesjinghongensis (Holotype: YHH 2209031) a overview of Polycephalomycesjinghongensis and its host b synnemata on the insect c, d colony obverse and reverse e–g β-phialides h β-conidia i, k, l α-phialides j α-conidia. Scale Bars: 2 cm (a, c, d); 0.5 cm (b); 20 μm (e–h, j); 10 μm (i, k. l).
Etymology.
jinghongensis = Jinghong City, the epithet referred to the nature study trail in Jinghong City, the locality where the type specimen was collected.
Diagnosis.
Polycephalomycesjinghongensis are similar to that of Po.multiperitheciatae regarding the production of α-conidia oval, but Po.jinghongensis differ by synnemata caespitose, white to orange-yellow colour, producing cylindrical β-conidia, parasitic on Ophiocordyceps sp.
Holotype.
China, Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture, Jinghong City, parasitic on Ophiocordyceps sp. (Ophiocordycipitaceae), on insects buried in soil, with erect synnemata, 23°47′9″N, 102°51′41″E, alt. 2053 m, 25 September 2022, Hong Yu bis (YHH 2206047).
Sexual morph.
Undetermined.
Asexual morph.
Synnemata arising from the stromata of Ophiocordyceps sp., 0.8–1.6 cm long 0.1–0.3 cm thick, caespitose, unbranched or branched, white to orange-yellow colour. Colonies on PDA growing slowly, attaining a diameter of 1.3–1.7 cm in 3 weeks at 25 °C, clustered, white and reverse dry yellow. Synnemata emerging after 14 days, tufted, branched and 0.6–10 mm long, showing radiating distributions. Phialides existing in two types: α- and β-phialides. Both types of phialides often reproduce new phialides at their own apices or sides, collarettes not flared, periclinal thickening not visible. α-phialides verticillate and acropleurogenous on conidiophores and solitary on hyphae; lanceolate, tapering gradually from the base to the apex, 4.5–19.5 μm long, 1.4–2.5 μm wide at the base and 0.8–1.6 μm wide at the apex. β-phialides acropleurogenous in whorls of 2–3 or intercalary and terminal on conidiophores and solitary on hyphae; diamond-shaped; tapering abruptly from the base to the apex, 10.4–17.5 μm long, 1.1–2.7 μm wide at the base, and 0.4–1.1 μm wide at the apex. α-conidia oval or long oval shape and occurring in the conidial mass on the agar or on the final portion of synnemata, 1.1–3.4 × 0.8–1.9 μm; β-conidia columns and produced on the surface mycelium of colony, multiple, usually formed as spore balls at the phialidic apex, 2.3–3.1 × 1.2–1.3 μm.
Host.
Parasitic on Ophiocordyceps sp. (Ophiocordycipitaceae).
Distribution.
China, Yunnan Province.
Material examined.
China, Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture, Jinghong City, parasitic on Ophiocordyceps sp. (Ophiocordycipitaceae), on insects buried in soil, with erect synnemata, 23°47′9″N, 102°51′41″E, alt. 2053 m, 25 September 2022, D.X. Tang. Paratypes: YHH 2206010; other collections: YHH 2207049; YHH 2206053. Culture ex-type: YFCC 02959283; Other cultures: YFCC 02959284, YFCC 02959285, YFCC 02959286.
Notes.
Polycephalomycesjinghongensis was sister to Po.multiperitheciatae (Fig. 1: BS = 100%, BPP = 1.00). However, Po.multiperitheciatae differs by 6/556 bp in ITS, 3/898 bp in SSU, 2/829 bp in LSU, 23/913 bp in TEF-1α, 4/679 bp in RPB2 from Po.jinghongensis. Po.jinghongensis was distinct from other species of Polycephalomyces by the white to orange-yellow colour of the caespitose synnemata (Table 3). Thus, Po.jinghongensis was introduced as a new species under the genus Polycephalomyces.
Table 3.
Morphology of asexual morph species of the genus Polycephalomyces.
| Species | Host | Synnemata | Phialides | Conidia | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Po.albiramus | Gryllotalpa sp. (Orthoptera, Gryllotalpidae) | Stipitate, gathered, branched, white to pale yellow, numerous, cylindrical and tapering at the apex, without fertile head | Phialides narrowly subulate, awl-shaped | Conidia cylindrical to obovoid or subglobose | Xiao et al. (2023) |
| Po.baltica | Nymph or short-winged female bark louse (Psocoptera: Troctopsocidae) | Synnemata, simple, roundish | Phialides, light colored, micronematous, flask-shaped | Conidia globose, catenulate | Poinar and Vega (2020) |
| Po.cylindrosporus | Coleoptera, Formicidae and Pentatomidae | Synnemata cylindrical to capitate, stipitate, slender, branched | Phialides on verticils and/or acropleurogenously forming loosely arranged flared hymenia | Conidia one-type, cylindrical to bacilliform | Matočec et al. (2014) |
| Po.ditmarii | Paravespulavulgaris (Wasp) | Synnemata 2 to 3 distinct branches, yellowish to white, darkening at the base; surmounted by a small subsurface capitulum, dotted with numerous small blisters of orange-yellow colour | Phialides elongate, cylindrical, attenuating at the apex | globose to subglobose | Van Vooren and Audibert (2005) |
| Po.formosus (Type) | Coleoptera larvae or Ophiocordycepsbarnesii | Synnemata 2 long, gathered, branched, with cylindrical stipe, with fertile head, spherical, white | cylindrical, tapering gradually | Conidia one-type, ellipsoid or ovoid | Kobayasi (1941) |
| In culture (PDA) | Synnemata 2–3 branches,arising as several radiating rings on the colony | Phialides terminal parts of Synnemata, cylindrical to subulate at the base; | Conidia of one type, one-celled, smooth-walled, ellipsoid to ovoid, arising in a conidial mass on the agar or on the terminal portions of synnemata | Wang et al. (2021) | |
| In slide culture | Phialides monothetic and solitary or acropleurogenous in the whorls of 1–4, narrowly lageniform or subulate | Conidia obovoid to oblong ellipsoidal or cylindrical, forming irregular spore balls near the apex of phialides | Wang et al. (2021) | ||
| Po.ramosus | Lepidoptera larvae or Hirsutellaguignardii | Synnemata solitary, crowded or caespitose, unbranched or branched, conidial mass yellow to orange-yellow | α-phialides cylindrical to narrowly lageniform; β-phialides narrowly lageniform or subulate | α-conidia, ovoid; β-conidia, fusiform | Seifert (1985); Bischof et al. (2003) |
| Po.paludosus | Lepidoptera larva | Capitate, cinnamon brown, branched, the branches at right angles | Subulate, phialides occurring scattered on the branches below the heads, ventricose, occasionally stellate above | Conidia produced singly, hyaline, obovoid, covered by agglutinated mucus | Mains (1948) |
| Po.tomentosus | Myxomycetes | Fructification a synnemata | Conidia three-type, globose or ellipsoidal or cylindrical | Seifert (1985) | |
| Po.jinghongensis | Ophiocordyceps sp. (Ophiocordycipitaceae) | Synnemata caespitose, unbranched or branched, white to orange-yellow colour | α-phialides verticillate and acropleurogenous on conidiophores,and solitary on hyphae; lanceolate. β-phialides acropleurogenous in whorls of 2–3 or intercalary and terminal on conidiophores and solitary on hyphae; diamond-shaped. | α-conidia oval or long oval shape, β-conidia cylindrical | This study |
| Po.multiperitheciatae | Ophiocordycepsmultiperitheciata | Synnemata white to pale yellow, numerous, branched, with fertile head | α-phialides verticillate and acropleurogenous on conidiophores, and solitary on hyphae; spear point. β-phialides acropleurogenous in whorls of 2–3 or intercalary and terminal on conidiophores and solitary on hyphae; subulate. | α-conidia oval β-conidia linear | This study |
| Po.myrmecophilus | Ophiocordycepsacroasca and Ophiocordyceps sp. | Absent | α-phialides verticillate and acropleurogenous on conidiophores, and solitary on hyphae; lanceolate, β-phialides acropleurogenous in whorls of 2–3 or intercalary and terminal on conidiophores and solitary on hyphae; sickle shape. | α-conidia round or ovoid; β-conidia, elliptical | This study |
. Polycephalomyces multiperitheciatae
Hong Yu bis, Z.H. Liu & D.X. Tang sp. nov.
799A5657-2B7C-5256-858B-AA094FBD291D
851499
Figure 4.
Morphological features of Polycephalomycesmultiperitheciatae (Holotype: YHH 2206047) a overview of Polycephalomycesmultiperitheciatae and its host b Synnemata on the insect c, d colony obverse and reverse g, j α-phialides e, f, h, i β-phialides k α-conidia l β-conidia. Scale Bars: 2 cm (a, c, d); 0.6 cm (b); 20 μm (e–i, k); 50 μm (j); 10 μm (l).
Etymology.
The species name referred to the host species, Ophiocordycepsmultiperitheciata.
Diagnosis.
Polycephalomycesmultiperitheciatae are similar to that of Po.jinghongensis regarding the production of α-conidia oval, but Po.jinghongensis differ by being parasitic on O.multiperitheciata, synnemata clustered, white, β-conidia, linear.
Holotype.
China, Yunnan Province, Honghe Hani and Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Yuanyang County, parasitic on Ophiocordycepsmultiperitheciata (Ophiocordycipitaceae), on insects buried in soil, with erect stromata, 22°1′51″N, 100°52′42″E, alt. 703 m, 25 September 2022, Hong Yu bis (YHH 2206031).
Sexual morph.
Undetermined.
Asexual morph.
Synnemata arising from the stromata of Ophiocordycepsmultiperitheciata, 0.8–1.8 cm long 0.2–0.5 cm thick, clustered, white to pale yellow, numerous, branched, with fertile head. Colonies on PDA growing slowly, attaining a diameter of 1.8–2.1 cm in 3 weeks at 25 °C, clustered, white and reverse dry yellow. Synnemata emerging after 15 days, solitary, branched and 0.8–2.1 cm long, showing radiating distributions. Phialides existing in two types: α- and β-phialides. Both types of phialides often reproduce new conidia at their own apices or sides, collarettes not flared, periclinal thickening not visible. α-phialides verticillate and acropleurogenous on conidiophores and solitary on hyphae; spear point, tapering gradually from the base to the apex, 10.5–18.7 μm long, 1.1–1.9 μm wide at the base and 0.4–0.6 μm wide at the apex. β-phialides acropleurogenous in whorls of 2–3 or intercalary and terminal on conidiophores and solitary on hyphae; subulate, tapering abruptly from the base to the apex, 11.3–28.8 μm long, 1.2–2.5 μm wide at the base and 0.5–1.1 μm wide at the apex. α-conidia,oval and occurring in the conidial mass on the agar or on the final portion of synnemata, 0.6–1.1 × 0.3–0.6 μm; β-conidia, linear and produced on the surface mycelium of colony, multiple, usually formed as spore balls at the phialidic apex, 0.8–1.3 × 0.3–0.7 μm.
Host.
Parasitic on Ophiocordycepsmultiperitheciata (Ophiocordycipitaceae).
Distribution.
China, Yunnan Province.
Material examined.
China, Yunnan Province, Honghe Hani and Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Yuanyang County, parasitic on Ophiocordycepsmultiperitheciata (Ophiocordycipitaceae), on insects buried in soil, with erect stromata, 22°1′51″N, 100°52′42″E, alt. 703 m, 25 September 2022, D.X. Tang. Paratypes: YHH 2209032; other collections: YHH 2209033; YHH 2209034. Culture ex-type: YFCC 06149287; Other cultures: YFCC 06149288, YFCC 06149289, YFCC 06149290, YFCC 06149291, YFCC 06149292.
Notes.
Polycephalomycesmultiperitheciatae is sister to Po.jinghongensis (Fig. 1: BS = 100%, BPP = 1.00). Po.multiperitheciatae is distinct from other species of Polycephalomyces, parasitising Ophiocordycepsmultiperitheciata synnemata clustered, with fertile head, β-conidia, linear (Table 3). Thus, Po.multiperitheciatae was introduced as a new species under the genus Polycephalomyces.
. Polycephalomyces myrmecophilus
Hong Yu bis, Z.H. Liu & D.X. Tang sp. nov.
E26D633A-6463-540C-AA06-BFF183F4C7BA
851500
Figure 5.
Morphological features of Polycephalomycesmyrmecophilus (Holotype: YHH 2009001) a overview of Polycephalomycesmyrmecophilus and its host b, c colony obverse and reverse d α-phialides f–h β-phialides e α-conidia i β-conidia. Scale Bars: 2 cm (a–c); 20 μm (d–h); 10 μm (i).
Etymology.
myrmecophilus = myrmecophilous, the epithet referred to the species parasitising myrmecophilous Ophiocordyceps species.
Diagnosis.
Polycephalomycesmyrmecophilus are similar to that of Po.ramosus regarding the production of two types of conidia, but Po.myrmecophilus differ by α-conidia round or ovoid, β-conidia elliptical.
Holotype.
China, Yunnan Province, Pu’er City, The Sun River National Forest Park, parasitic on Ophiocordycepsacroasca (Ophiocordycipitaceae), on insects underside of leaves, with erect stromata, 30°34′34″N, 101°6′24″E, alt. 1095 m, 28 September 2020, Hong Yu bis (YHH 2009001);
Sexual morph.
Undetermined.
Asexual morph.
Synnemata arising from the Ophiocordycepsacroasca or Colobopsis sp. corpses, tomentose, white. Colonies on PDA growing slowly, attaining a diameter of 1.7–2.1 cm in 3 weeks at 25 °C, villous, cinerous, and reverse black yellow. Phialides existing in two types: α- and β-phialides. Both types of phialides often reproduce new phialides at their own apices, collarettes not flared, periclinal thickening not visible. α-phialides verticillate and acropleurogenous on conidiophores and solitary on hyphae; lanceolate, tapering gradually from the base to the apex, 6.1–14.5 μm long, 1.4–2.3 μm wide at the base and 0.8–1.8 μm wide at the apex. β-phialides acropleurogenous in whorls of 2–3 or intercalary and terminal on conidiophores and solitary on hyphae; sickle-shaped, tapering abruptly from the base to the apex, 9.8–17.6 μm long, 0.9–1.6 μm wide at the base and 0.4–1.1 μm wide at the apex. α-conidia round or ovoid, and occurring in the conidial mass on the agar or on the final portion of synnemata, 0.4–0.9 × 0.3–0.9 μm; β-conidia elliptical and produced on the surface mycelium of colony, single or multiple, usually in the form of spore balls at the phialidic apex, 0.6–1.3 × 0.3–0.8 μm.
Host.
Parasitic on Ophiocordycepsacroasca and Ophiocordyceps sp.
Distribution.
China, Yunnan Province.
Material examined.
China, Yunnan Province, Pu’er City, The Sun River National Forest Park, parasitic on Ophiocordycepsacroasca (Ophiocordycipitaceae), on insects underside of leaves, with erect stromata, 30°34′34″N, 101°6′24″E, alt. 1095 m, 28 September 2020, D.X. Tang. Paratype: YHH 2006020. Culture ex-type: YFCC 09289443; Other cultures: YFCC 09289444.
Notes.
Polycephalomycesmyrmecophilus was sister to Cordycepspleuricapitata (Fig. 1: BS = 100%, BPP = 1.00). Po.myrmecophilus was distinct from other species of Polycephalomyces, being parasitic on Ophiocordycepsacroasca and Ophiocordyceps sp. and producing β-phialides sickle-shaped, α-conidia round or ovoid, β-conidia elliptical (Table 3). Thus, Po.myrmecophilus was introduced as a new species under the genus of Polycephalomyces.
Discussion
Our taxonomic investigations revealed four new species of the family Polycephalomycetaceae, Pl.litangensis, Po.jinghongensis, Po.multiperitheciatae and Po.myrmecophilus. Morphological observations suggested that four species have sufficient morphological differences to justify their segregation into four species. A new species, Pl.litangensis, was described in the genus Pleurocordyceps. Pleurocordycepslitangensis was similar to Pl.agaricus, Pl.aurantiacus, Pl.lanceolatus, Pl.marginaliradians, Pl.sinensis, Pl.vitellina, Pl.yunnanensis, Pl.nutansis and Pl.heilongtanensis, by producing two types of conidia, while Pl.Parvicapitata and Pl.lianzhouensis had only one type of conidia. Pl.litangensis was distinct from other species of Pleurocordyceps, with having α-phialides spear point, β-phialides subulate, α-conidia ovoid or elliptic. Moreover, Pl.litangensis and Pl.sinensis both had the same host (O.sinensis) and β-Conidia, but their phialides, α-conidia size and shape were different (Table 2). Herein, we described three new species, namely, Po.jinghongensis, Po.multiperitheciatae and Po.myrmecophilus, enriching the species diversity in the genus Polycephalomyces. Six additional species are included in this genus (Table 1): Polycephalomycesbaltica (Poinar and Vega 2020), Po.cylindrosporus (Matočec et al. 2014), Po.ditmarii (Van Vooren and Audibert, 2005), Po.paludosus (Mains 1948), Po.ramosus (Seifert 1985; Bischof et al. 2003) and Po.tomentosus (Seifert 1985). These species either lacked molecular data or their updated strain descriptions did not match those of the protologue (Wang et al. 2021). These three new species were similar to Po.ramosus, producing two types of conidia, while Po.baltica, Po.cylindrosporus, Po.ditmarii, Po.paludosus and Po.albiramus (Xiao et al. 2023) had only one type of conidia. Po.jinghongensis was distinct from Po.ramosus, being parasitic on Ophiocordyceps sp. producing longer α-conidia oval or long oval shape and β-conidia columns. Po.multiperitheciatae differed from Po.ramosus, being parasitic on O.multiperitheciata, having synnemata with fertile head and β-conidia linear. Po.myrmecophilus was distinguished from Po.ramosus, being parasitic on the fungus O.acroasca, producing synnemata, α-conidia round or ovoid, and β-conidia elliptical, without producing synnemata from the colonies, whereas Po.ramosus was parasitic on Lepidoptera larvae or Hirsutellaguignardii, with α-conidia ovoid and β-conidia fusiform (Table 3).
Some species of the family Polycephalomycetaceae have been reported from more than one host, indicating their non-host specific nature (Bischof et al. 2003; Wang et al. 2012, 2015a, b; Matočec et al. 2014; Crous et al. 2017; Xiao et al. 2018). Pl.lianzhouensis (Wang et al. 2014) was found to parasitise insects along with the species of the genus Ophiocordyceps. The field investigation and studies showed that Pl.litangensis also parasitised O.sinensis, a phenomenon known as hyperparasitism. Most species of the genus Polycephalomyces parasitise insects in the orders Coleoptera and Hemiptera, and we have already discovered that Po.jinghongensis, Po.multiperitheciatae and Po.myrmecophilus are hyperparasitic on the species of Ophiocordyceps, expanding the diversity of hosts in Polycephalomyces. In subsequent studies, we should delve deeper into the ecological habits and hyperparasitic phenomena of the family Polycephalomycetaceae, explore the evolutionary relationship between hyperparasitic species and entomophytic fungi and promote their development and utilisation.
Xiao et al. (2023) introduced Pl.nutansis as a new species under the genus Pleurocordyceps. However, Pl.sinensis and Pl.nutansis were found to be grouped together in the phylogenetic tree, which may be the reason and they are sister taxa to each other. Similarly, molecular phylogenetic analysis has shown that Pl.nipponica and Pl.kanzashianus are clustered together. Nevertheless, Wang et al. (2021) pointed out that they were distinct species, based on their sexual morphology characteristics. In addition, Wang et al. (2021) noted the description of the spore type of Pl.lianzhouensis was not clear and future research should strengthen the observation of its asexual morphology to determine its more accurate classification position. Cordycepspleuricapitata has formed a monophyletic branch in the genus Polycephalomyces. Xiao et al. (2023) noted the paratype of C.pleuricapitata lacks molecular data and the two strains (NBRC 100745, NBRC 100746) named C.pleuricapitata for which there are molecular data lack morphological information. Hence, it was not possible to clarify the precise position of C.pleuricapitata and its classification at this time. These classifications issues require further research. Phylogeny based on our concatenated data also supported that our four new species belonged to the family Polycephalomycetaceae and were distinct from each other (Fig. 1). Four strains, namely, Pleurocordyceps sp. NBRC109990, Pleurocordyceps sp. NBRC109987, Pleurocordyceps sp. NBRC110224 and Pleurocordyceps sp. NBRC109988 and Pl.litangensis were aggregated into one branch. However, the four strains had only LSU sequences in the NCBI database and were classified as undefined species in Pleurocordyceps incertae sedis. Future research will require additional morphological and phylogenetic work to clarify their taxonomic status.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31760011). We thank all those who have provided assistance for this work. Participation and sponsorship of the Yunnan University Professional Degree Graduate Practice Innovation Fund Program (ZC-22222937).
Citation
Liu Z, Tang D, Lu Y, Zhu J, Luo L, Sun T, Yu H (2024) Morphology and phylogeny of four new species within Polycephalomycetaceae (Hypocreales) parasitising Ophiocordyceps species. MycoKeys 105: 179–202. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.105.119893
Funding Statement
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.31760011). Participation and sponsorship of the Yunnan University Professional Degree Graduate Practice Innovation Fund Program (ZC-22222937).
Additional information
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Ethical statement
No ethical statement was reported.
Funding
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.31760011). Participation and sponsorship of the Yunnan University Professional Degree Graduate Practice Innovation Fund Program (ZC-22222937).
Author contributions
Zuoheng Liu: Mainly responsible for article conception, writing and editing and also mainly responsible for species identification (contributed equally to this work); Dexiang Tang: Mainly responsible for article conception writing and editing, morphological analysis and phylogenetic analysis(contributed equally to this work); Yingling Lu: Mainly responsible for article conception, and also responsible for experimental guidance and design; Responsible for the language polishing and format modification.Juye Zhu: Collecting the information of specimens and GenBank entry number required for research. Lijun Luo; Tao Sun: Responsible for picture editing and processing. Hong Yu: Investigation, responsible for the review and modification of the article, and conducting project administration and supervision.
Author ORCIDs
Zuoheng Liu https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4118-3694
Dexiang Tang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7662-224X
Yingling Lu https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8119-1975
Juye Zhu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4184-5646
Lijun Luo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1709-0781
Data availability
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.
References
- Araújo JPM, Evans HC, Kepler R, Hughes DP. (2018) Zombie-ant fungi across continents: 15 new species and new combinations within Ophiocordyceps I. Myrmecophiloushirsutelloid species. Studies in Mycology 90(1): 119–160. 10.1016/j.simyco.2017.12.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ban S, Sakane T, Nakagiri A. (2015) Three new species of Ophiocordyceps and overview of anamorph types in the genus and the family Ophiocordyceptaceae. Mycological Progress 14(1): 1017. 10.1007/s11557-014-1017-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bischof JF, Sullivan RF, Hywel-Jones NL, White JF. (2003) Resurrection of Blistumtomentosum and its exclusion from Polycephalomyces (Hyphomycetes, Deuteromycota) based on 28S rDNA sequence data. Mycotaxon 86: 433–444. 10.1007/s00572-003-0226-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Castlebury LA, Rossman AY, Sung GH, Hyten AS, Spatafora JW. (2004) Multigene phylogeny reveals new lineage for Stachybotryschartarum, the indoor air fungus. Mycological Research 108(8): 864–872. 10.1017/S0953756204000607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen QT, Xiao SR, Shi ZY. (1984) Paecilomycessinensis sp. nov. and its connection with Cordycepssinensis. Acta Mycologica Sinica 3(1): 24–28. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:87314004 [Google Scholar]
- Chaverri P, Bischof JF, Evans HC, Hodge KT. (2005) Regiocrella, a new entmopathogenic genus with a pycnidial anamorph and its phylogenetic placement in the Clavicipitaceae. Mycologia 97(6): 1225–1237. https://doi: 10.3852/mycologia.97.6.1225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crous PW, Wingfeld MJ, Burgess TI, Carnegie AJ, Hardy GESJ, Smith D, Summerel BA, Cano-Lira JF, Guarro J, Houbraken J, Lombard L, Martín MP, Sandoval-Denis M, Alexandrova AV, Barnes CW, Baseia IG, Bezerra JDP, Guarnaccia V, May TW, Hernández-Restrepo M, Stchigel AM, Miller AN, Ordoñez ME, Abreu VP, Accioly T, Agnello C, Agustin Colmán A, Albuquerque CC, Alfredo DS, Alvarado P, Araújo-Magalhães GR, Arauzo S, Atkinson T, Barili A, Barreto RW, Bezerra JL, Cabral TS, Camello Rodríguez F, Cruz RHSF, Daniëls PP, da Silva BDB, de Almeida DAC, de Carvalho Júnior AA, Decock CA, Delgat L, Denman S, Dimitrov RA, Edwards J, Fedosova AG, Ferreira RJ, Firmino AL, Flores JA, García D, Gené J, Góis JS, Gomes AAM, Gonçalves CM, Gouliamova DE, Groenewald M, Guéorguiev BV, Guevara-Suarez M, Gusmão LFP, Hosaka K, Hubka V, Huhndorf SM, Jadan M, Jurjević Ž, Kraak B, Kučera V, Kumar TKA, Kušan I, Lacerda SR, Lamlertthon S, Lisboa WS, Loizides M, Luangsa-ard JJ, Lysková P, Mac Cormack WP, Macedo DM, Machado AR, Malysheva EF, Marinho P, Matočec N, Meijer M, Mešić A, Mongkolsamrit S, Moreira KA, Morozova OV, Nair KU, Nakamura N, Noisripoom W, Olariaga I, Oliveira RJV, Paiva LM, Pawar P, Pereira OL, Peterson SW, Prieto M. (2017) Fungal Planet description sheets: 625–715. Persoonia 39: 270–467. 10.3767/persoonia.2017.39.11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hall TA. (1999) BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41(41): 95–98. 10.1021/bk-1999-0734.ch008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. (2017) UFBoot2: Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35(2): 518–522. 10.1093/molbev/msx281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hyde KD, Norphanphoun C, Chen J, Dissanayake AJ, Doilom M, Hongsanan S, Jayawardena RS, Jeewon R, Perera RH, Thongbai B, Wanasinghe DN, Wisitrassameewong K, Tibpromma S, Stadler M. (2018) Thailand’s amazing diversity: up to 96% of fungi in northern Thailand may be novel. Fungal Diversity 93: 215–239. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13225-018-0415-7 [Google Scholar]
- Hopple JS. (1994) Phylogenetic investigations in the genus Coprinus based on morphological and molecular characters. Ph.D. Dissertation, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
- Hyde KD, Norphanphoun C, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Bhat DJ, Jones EBG, Bundhun D, Chen YJ, Bao DF, Boonmee S, Calabon MS, Chaiwan N, Chethana KWT, Dai DQ, Dayarathne MC, Devadatha B, Dissanayake AJ, Dissanayake LS, Doilom M, Dong W, Fan XL, Goonasekara ID, Hongsanan S, Huang SK, Jayawardena RS, Jeewon R, Karunarathna A, Konta S, Kumar V, Lin CG, Liu JK, Liu NG, Luangsa-ard J, Lumyong S, Luo ZL, Marasinghe DS, McKenzie EHC, Niego AGT, Niranjan M, Perera RH, Phukhamsakda C, Rathnayaka AR, Samarakoon MC, Samarakoon SMBC, Sarma SIC, Shang QJ, Stadler M, Tibpromma S, Wanasinghe DN, Wei DP, Wijayawardene NN, Xiao YP, Yang J, Zeng XY, Zhang SN, Xiang MM. (2020a) Refined families of Sordariomycetes. Mycosphere 11(1): 305–1059. 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hyde KD, Dong Y, Phookamsak R, Jeewon R, Bhat JD, Jones EBG, Liu NG, Abeywickrama PD, Mapook A, Wei DP, Perera RH, Manawasinghe IS, Pem D, Bundhun D, Karunarathna A, Ekanayaka AH, Bao DF, Li JF, Samarakoon MC, Napalai C, Li GJ, Phutthacharoen K, Zhang SN, Senanayake IC, Goonasekara ID, Thambugala KM, Phukhamsakda C, Tennakoon DS, Jiang HB, Yang J, Zeng M, Huanraluek N, Liu JK, Wijesinghe SN, Tian Q, Tibpromma S, Brahmanage RS, Boonmee S, Huang SK, Thiyagaraja Vi Lu YZ, Jayawardena RS, Dong W, Yang EF, Singh SK, Singh SM, Rana S, Lad SS, Anand G, Bandarupalli D, Niranjan M, Sarma VV, Liimatainen K, Aguirre-Hudson B, Niskanen T, Overall A, Alvarenga RLM, Gibertoni TB, Pfiegler WP, Horváth E, Imre A, Alves AL, da Silva Santos AC, Tiago PV, Bulgakov TS, Wanasinghe DN, Bahkali AH, Doilom M, Elgorban AM, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Rajeshkumar KC, Haelewaters D, Mortimer PE, Zhao Q, Lumyong S, Xu JC, Sheng J. (2020b) Fungal diversity notes 1151–1276: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 100(1): 5–277. 10.1007/s13225-020-00439-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. (2017) ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14(6): 587–589. 10.1038/nmeth.4285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kepler R, Ban S, Nakagiri A, Bischof J, Hywel-Jones N, Owensby CA, Spatafora JW. (2013) The phylogenetic placement of hypocrealean insect pathogens in the genus Polycephalomyces: An application of One Fungus One Name. Fungal Biology 117(9): 611–622. 10.1016/j.funbio.2013.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kobayasi Y. (1941) The genus Cordyceps and its allies. Science Reports of the Tokyo Bunrika Daigaku 5: 53–260. [Google Scholar]
- Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG. (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 23(21): 2947–2948. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu YJ, Whelen S, Hall BD. (1999) Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit. Molecular biology and Evolution 16: 1799–1808. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu ZY, Liang ZQ, Whalley AJS, Yao YJ, Liu AY. (2001) Cordycepsbrittlebankisoides, a new pathogen of grubs and its anamorph, Metarhiziumanisopliae var. majus. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 78(3): 178–182. 10.1006/jipa.2001.5039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mains EB. (1948) Entomogenous fungi. Mycologia 40(4): 402–416. 10.1080/00275514.1944.12017718 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Matočec N, Kušan I, Ozimec R. (2014) The genus Polycephalomyces (Hypocreales) in the frame of monitoring Veternica cave (Croatia) with a new segregate genus Perennicordyceps. Ascomycete. Org : Revue Internationale pour la Taxinomie des Ascomycota 6(5): 125–133. [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. (2015) IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32(1): 268–274. 10.1093/molbev/msu300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nikoh N, Fukatsu T. (2000) Interkingdom host jumping underground: Phylogenetic analysis of entomoparasitic fungi of the genus Cordyceps. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17(4): 629–638. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poinar G, Vega FE. (2020) Entomopathogenic fungi (Hypocreales: Ophiocordycipitaceae) infecting bark lice (Psocoptera) in Dominican and Baltic amber. Mycology 11(1): 71–77. 10.1080/21501203.2019.1706657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rehner SA, Buckley E. (2005) A beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-α sequences: Evidence for cryptic diversifcation and links to Cordycepsteleomorphs. Mycologia 97(1): 84–98. 10.3852/mycologia.97.1.84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3): 539–542. 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schoch CL, Seifert KA, Huhndorf S, Robert V, Spouge JL, Levesque CA, Chen W, Bolchacova E, Voigt K, Crous PW, Miller AN, Wingfield MJ, Aime MC, An K-D, Bai F-Y, Barreto RW, Begerow D, Bergeron M-J, Blackwell M, Boekhout T, Bogale M, Boonyuen N, Burgaz AR, Buyck B, Cai L, Cai Q, Cardinali G, Chaverri P, Coppins BJ, Crespo A, Cubas P, Cummings C, Damm U, de Beer ZW, de Hoog GS, Del-Prado R, Dentinger B, Diéguez-Uribeondo J, Divakar PK, Douglas B, Dueñas M, Duong TA, Eberhardt U, Edwards JE, Elshahed MS, Fliegerova K, Furtado M, García MA, Ge Z-W, Griffith GW, Griffiths K, Groenewald JZ, Groenewald M, Grube M, Gryzenhout M, Guo L-D, Hagen F, Hambleton S, Hamelin RC, Hansen K, Harrold P, Heller G, Herrera C, Hirayama K, Hirooka Y, Ho H-M, Hoffmann K, Hofstetter V, Högnabba F, Hollingsworth PM, Hong S-B, Hosaka K, Houbraken J, Hughes K, Huhtinen S, Hyde KD, James T, Johnson EM, Johnson JE, Johnston PR, Jones EBG, Kelly LJ, Kirk PM, Knapp DG, Kõljalg U, Kovács GM, Kurtzman CP, Landvik S, Leavitt SD, Liggenstoffer AS, Liimatainen K, Lombard L, Luangsa-ard JJ, Lumbsch HT, Maganti H, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Martin MP, May TW, McTaggart AR, Methven AS, Meyer W, Moncalvo J-M, Mongkolsamrit S, Nagy LG, Nilsson RH, Niskanen T, Nyilasi I, Okada G, Okane I, Olariaga I, Otte J, Papp T, Park D, Petkovits T, Pino-Bodas R, Quaedvlieg W, Raja HA, Redecker D, Rintoul TL, Ruibal C, Sarmiento-Ramírez JM, Schmitt I, Schüßler A, Shearer C, Sotome K, Stefani FOP, Stenroos S, Stielow B, Stockinger H, Suetrong S, Suh S-O, Sung G-H, Suzuki M, Tanaka K, Tedersoo L, Telleria MT, Tretter E, Untereiner WA, Urbina H, Vágvölgyi C, Vialle A, Vu TD, Walther G, Wang Q-M, Wang Y, Weir BS, Weiß M, White MM, Xu J, Yahr R, Yang ZL, Yurkov A, Zamora J-C, Zhang N, Zhuang W-Y, Schindel D. (2012) Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109(16): 6241–6246. 10.1073/pnas.1117018109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seifert KA. (1985) A monograph of Stilbella and some allied Hyphomycetes. Studies in Mycology 27: 1–235. 10.2307/3807446 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. (2013) MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(12): 2725–2729. 10.1093/molbev/mst197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang DX, Huang O, Zou WQ, Wang YB, Wang Y, Dong QY, Sun T, Yang G, Yu H. (2023b) Six new species of zombie-ant fungi from Yunnan in China. IMA Fungus 14(1): 1–9. 10.1186/s43008-023-00114-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Vooren N, Audibert C. (2005) Révision du complexe Cordycepssphecocephala 1re partie: Les guêpes végétales. Bulletin Mensuel de la Societe Linneenne de Lyon 74(7): 221–254. 10.3406/linly.2005.13604 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang WJ, Wang XL, Li Y, Xiao SR, Kepler RM, Yao YJ. (2012) Molecular and morphological studies of Paecilomycessinensis reveal a new clade in clavicipitaceous fungi and its new systematic position. Systematics and Biodiversity 10(2): 221–232. 10.1080/14772000.2012.690784 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang L, Li HH, Chen YQ, Zhang WM, Qu LH. (2014) Polycephalomyceslianzhouensis sp. nov., a new species, co-occurs with Ophiocordycepscrinalis. Mycological Progress 13(4): 1089–1096. 10.1007/s11557-014-0996-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang YB, Yu H, Dai YD, Chen ZH, Zeng WB, Yuan F, Liang ZQ. (2015a) Polycephalomycesyunnanensis (Hypocreales), a new species of Polycephalomyces parasitizing Ophiocordycepsnutans and stink bugs (hemipteran adults). Phytotaxa 208(1): 34–44. 10.11646/phytotaxa.208.1.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang YB, Yu H, Dai YD, Wu CK, Zeng WB, Yuan F, Liang ZQ. (2015b) Polycephalomycesagaricus, a new hyperparasite of Ophiocordyceps sp. infecting melolonthid larvae in southwestern China. Mycological Progress 14(9): 1–9. 10.1007/s11557-015-1090-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang YB, Wang Y, Fan Q, Duan DE, Zhang GD, Dai RQ, Dai YD, Zeng WB, Chen ZH, Li DD, Tang DX, Xu ZH, Sun T, Nguyen TT, Tran NL, Dao VM, Zhang LD, Liu YJ, Zhang XM, Yang DR, Sanjuan T, Liu XZ, Yang ZL, Yu H. (2020) Multigene phylogeny of the family Cordycipitaceae (Hypocreales): New taxa and the new systematic position of the Chinese cordycipitoid fungus Paecilomyceshepiali. Fungal Diversity 103(1): 1–46. 10.1007/s13225-020-00457-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang YH, Sayaka B, Wang WJ, Li Y, Wang K, Kirk PM, Bushley KE, Dong CH, Hawksworth DL, Yao YJ. (2021) Pleurocordyceps gen. nov. for a clade of fungi previously included in Polycephalomyces based on molecular phylogeny and morphology. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 59(5): 1065–1080. 10.1111/jse.12705 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wei DP, Gentekaki E, Wanasinghe DN, Tang SM, Hyde KD. (2022) Diversity, molecular dating and ancestral characters state reconstruction of entomopathogenic fungi in Hypocreales. Mycosphere : Journal of Fungal Biology 13(2): 281–351. 10.5943/mycosphere/si/1f/8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW. (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocols: a Guide to methods and applications 18: 315–322. 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xiao YP, Wen TC, Hongsanan S, Jeewon R, Luangsa-ard JJ, Brooks S, Wanasinghe DN, Long FY, Hyde KD. (2018) Multigene phylogenetics of Polycephalomyces (Ophiocordycipitaceae, Hypocreales), with two new species from Thailand. Scientific Reports 8(1): 18087. 10.1038/s41598-018-36792-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiao YP, Hongsanan S, Hyde KD, Brooks S, Xie N, Long FY, Wen TC. (2019) Two new entomopathogenic species of Ophiocordyceps in Thailand. MycoKeys 47: 53–74. 10.3897/mycokeys.47.29898 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xiao YP, Wang YB, Hyde KD, Eleni G, Sun JZ, Yang Y, Meng J, Yu H, Wen TC. (2023) Polycephalomycetaceae, a new family of clavicipitoid fungi segregates from Ophiocordycipitaceae. Fungal Diversity 120(2): 1–76. 10.1007/s13225-023-00517-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang JI, Stadler M, Chuang WY, Wu S, Ariyawansa HA. (2020) In vitro inferred interactions of selected entomopathogenic fungi from Taiwan and eggs of Meloidogynegraminicola. Mycological Progress 19(1): 97–109. 10.1007/s11557-019-01546-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhong X, Li SS, Peng QY, Zhang JS, Kan XT, Zhang J, Kan X, Liu X. (2016) A Polycephalomyces hyperparasite of Ophiocordycepssinensis leads to shortened duration of production and reduced numbers of host ascospores. Fungal Ecology 21: 24–31. 10.1016/j.funeco.2016.03.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang WM, Wang L, Tao MH, Chen YQ, Qu LH. (2007) Two species of Cordyceps simultaneously parasitic on a larva of Lepidoptera. Mycosystema 26: 7–21. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text.





