Skip to main content
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine logoLink to Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
. 2024 May 13;28(1):279. doi: 10.3892/etm.2024.12567

Evaluation of genetic polymorphisms in TNF‑α‑308G/A rs1800629 associated with susceptibility and severity of rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

Yun-Lu Wang 1,2,*, Xi-Yong Li 2,*, Lun Liu 1,2, Song-Feng Li 2, Peng-Fei Han 3,✉, Xiao-Dong Li 1,✉
PMCID: PMC11117118  PMID: 38800041

Abstract

To investigate the association of gene polymorphisms of TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 with the susceptibility and severity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), literature from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and CNKI databases was searched. Two authors screened the literature independently, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, five genetic models were established: The allelic model (A vs. G), dominant model (GA + AA vs. GG), recessive model (AA vs. GG + GA), co-dominant model (AA vs. GG) and super-dominant model (GG + AA vs. GA). Stata 17.0 software was used for the meta-analysis. A total of 34 eligible studies with 12,611 subjects were included, including 6,030 cases in the RA group and 6,581 controls. Meta-analysis calculations revealed that the genetic polymorphisms of TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 were not significantly associated with susceptibility to RA, with an odds ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each genetic model [A vs. G: 0.937 (0.762-1.152); GA + AA vs. GG: 0.918 (0.733-1.148); AA vs. GG + GA: 1.131 (0.709-1.802); AA vs. GG: 1.097 (0.664-1.813); and GG + AA vs. GA: 1.108 (0.894-1.373)]. For the association between TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 gene polymorphisms and the severity of RA, the results of subgroup analysis calculations showed that TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 gene polymorphisms were associated with the severity of RA in European populations, with the gene model and 95% CI [GA + AA vs. GG: 0.503 (0.297-0.853); and GG + AA vs. GA: 2.268 (1.434-3.590)]. When assessing the confidence in the positive results of the present study through the false-positive report probability, the positive results were observed to be reliable. No significant association was observed between genetic polymorphisms in TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 and susceptibility to RA. However, a significant association exists with the severity of RA in European populations.

Keywords: TNF-α-308G/A, gene polymorphisms, RA, meta-analysis

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common, chronic autoimmune joint disease characterized by synovial inflammation, pannus formation and joint damage as major pathological features. The global incidence of RA is 0.5-1% (1). RA is characterized by chronic systemic inflammation, which mainly affects the joint synovial tissue, eventually leading to joint destruction, functional disability and even death, severely affecting the quality of life of patients (2). The etiology and pathogenesis of RA remain largely unknown. Currently, it is considered by most scholars that this is the result of the combined effects of genetics, environment, infection and other factors, leading to an imbalance in immune regulation and the induction of a series of joint tissue inflammations (3). It has been hypothesized that TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 is closely related to the pathogenesis and severity of RA (4,5), while other studies consider that there is no relationship between the two (6,7). Different studies produced different results (4-7), which may be related to the sample size, quality and whether the frequency of the control genotype conformed to the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) (8). Therefore, the current meta-analysis of the two aspects of susceptibility and severity of TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 and RA was conducted to obtain reliable theoretical support and research results and provide evidence-based medical evidence for in-depth research on genetic susceptibility.

Materials and methods

Search policy

The PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), EMBASE (https://www.embase.com), Web of Science (https://www.webofscience.com/wos) and CNKI (https://www.cnki.net/) databases were employed. The key words searched were: ‘rheumatoid arthritis’, ‘TNF-α’ and ‘polymorphism’. The search strategy was as follows: (polymorphism or variant or variation or mutation or SNP or genome-wide association study or genetic association study or genotype or allele) AND (rheumatoid arthritis) OR (RA) AND (Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha) OR (Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha) OR (Cachectin) OR (Cachectin-Tumor Necrosis Factor) OR (Tumor Necrosis Factor Ligand Superfamily Member 2) OR (Tumor Necrosis Factor) OR (TNFalpha) OR (TNF-alpha) OR (TNF-α). The search period ranged from the establishment of each database until May 2023.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria were as follows: i) The study participants were patients with RA, and there were clear diagnostic criteria; ii) the type of study was a case-control study or a cohort study; iii) the research content was the relationship between TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 gene polymorphisms and the susceptibility or severity of RA; iv) the study included complete genotype and allele frequency data and inclusion or availability to calculate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI); v) the control group conformed to HWE.

The exclusion criteria were as follows: i) Duplicate publications; ii) no health control studies; iii) studies with incomplete data or an inability to calculate OR and 95% CI; and iv) animal experimental literature.

Data extraction

Two authors independently screened and extracted the data; in cases of disagreement, a third author decided. Missing data were supplemented as much as possible by contacting the authors of the studies. The data extracted included: i) First author and year of publication; ii) country, geographic region, sex composition, mean age and diagnostic criteria of the study subjects; iii) sample size, allele and genotype frequency of the RA and control groups; and iv) whether they conformed to the HWE.

Literature quality evaluation criteria

The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) evaluated the quality of the literature. The NOS scale includes three dimensions with a total of eight items: Four items for study object selection, one item for intergroup comparability and three items for outcome measurement. In addition to the comparability item, the highest score was two points, and the other items could reach up to one point, with a score range of 0 to 9 points. The higher the overall score, the higher the quality of the study. The NOS score is divided into three grades: Low, medium and high quality, namely <5 points, 5-7 points and ≥8 points (9).

Statistical methods

The present study was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (10). The meta-analysis was performed using Stata 17.0 (StataCorp LP). Using OR and its 95% CI to assess the strength of the association between TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 gene polymorphisms and the risk and severity of RA, P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane's Q test and I2 values, and pooled analyses were performed using a random-effects model when I2≤50% between study groups. When heterogeneity could not be completely eliminated, a random-effects model was also used. The following five genetic models were used for comparison: Allele, dominant, recessive, co-dominant and super-dominant models. Subgroup analysis was carried out for further research. The subgroups were divided into: Asian, South American, European, North American and African groups according to the source of the patient. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by excluding literature on a case-by-case basis to observe the effect of each study on the overall effect size or by using Stata 17.0 to assess the robustness of the results. Funnel plots were only used to visualize publication bias for the number of included studies ≥10. Publication bias was detected using Egger's test, and no publication bias was considered when P>0.05(11).

Results

Search results

According to the search strategy, 1,862 relevant studies were retrieved from the databases, duplicate publications were removed, and 34 studies were screened in combination with the aforementioned inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study of TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to RA included 6,030 cases in the RA group and 6,581 cases in the control group. TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 gene polymorphisms and the severity of RA included 483 cases in the RA group and 545 cases in the control group. The selection process and results of the included studies are demonstrated in Fig. 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flow diagram of study identification and selection.

Basic information included in the literature

The basic characteristics of the included studies and the NOS score results are presented in Table I. The specific sample size, genotype and allele frequency included in the study of TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 polymorphisms and susceptibility to RA are shown in Table II. Of the studies included in the meta-analysis, 16 were conducted in the Asian population, four in the South American population, 10 in the European population, three in the North American population and one in the African population. The specific sample size, genotype and allele frequency included in the study of TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 polymorphisms and the severity of RA are presented in Table III. Of the studies included in the meta-analysis, one was conducted in North Americans, three in Asians and two in Europeans.

Table I.

Basic characteristics of the included studies and NOS scores.

  Cases Controls  
First author/year Country Ethnicity Sex N Age Diagnosis Matching N Age HWE Healthy NOS score (Refs.)
Al-rayes et al, 2011 Saudi Arabia Asia M&F 106 49.0±12.9 ACR Age and Sex 126 48.0±11.5 Y Y 8 (12)
Aranda et al, 2014 Argentina South America M&F 223 56.0±60.6 ACR Age and Sex 111 NA Y Y 7 (13)
Ates et al, 2008 Turkey Europe M&F 98 50.8±12.0 ACR Age and Sex 122 57.0±6.0 Y Y 8 (14)
Boechat et al, 2013 Brazil South America M&F 131 48.5±12.4 ACR Age and Sex 192 49.2±12.1 Y Y 8 (5)
Brinkman et al, 1997 Netherlands Europe M&F 283 NA ACR Sex 116 NA Y Y 7 (15)
Carreón et al, 2005 Mexico North America M&F 133 NA ACR Sex 162 NA Y Y 7 (16)
Chen et al, 2007 China Asia M&F 367 51.8±13.8 ACR Age and Sex 271 46.2±3.9 Y Y 8 (17)
Correa et al, 2005 Colombia South America M&F 165 46.0±12.7 ACR Age and Sex 430 49.0±15.0 Y Y 8 (18)
Cuenca et al, 2003 Chile South America M&F 92 51.1±11.7 ACR Age and Sex 42 36.3±16.5 Y Y 8 (19)
Danis et al, 1994 Britain Europe M&F 34 NA ARA Sex 57 NA Y Y 7 (20)
Das et al, 2019 India Asia M&F 126 45.96±12.0 ACR and EULAR Age and Sex 160 24.63±10.0 Y Y 8 (21)
Emonts et al, 2011 Netherlands Europe M&F 375 59.3±13.7 ACR Age and Sex 461 39.1±8.5 Y Y 8 (22)
Fugger et al, 1989 Denmark Europe M&F 24 NA ARA Sex 131 NA Y Y 7 (23)
Guo et al, 2012 China Asia M&F 452 47.12±15.36 ACR Age and Sex 356 47.65±13.25 Y Y 8 (24)
Hussein et al, 2011 Saudi Arabia Asia F 172 47.39±9.3 ACR Age and Sex 160 49.35±8.7 Y Y 6 (25)
Jahid et al, 2017 India Asia M&F 187 37.6±9.1 ACR Age and Sex 214 38.4±10.1 Y Y 8 (4)
Li et al, 2014 China Asia M&F 256 50.26±12.86 ACR and EULAR Age and Sex 331 48.08±13.92 Y Y 8 (26)
Li et al, 2015 China Asia M&F 112 49.66±12.02 ACR Age and Sex 129 47.92±8.27 Y Y 8 (27)
Lv et al, 2011 China Asia M&F 98 40.3±4.8 ACR Age and Sex 100 NA Y Y 7 (28)
Manolova et al, 2014 Bulgaria Europe M&F 108 55.0±11.2 ACR Age and Sex 177 47.5±14.0 Y Y 8 (29)
Nemec et al, 2008 Czech Republic Europe M&F 130 NA ACR Sex 150 NA Y Y 7 (30)
Pawlik et al, 2005 Poland Europe M&F 91 51.7±147.4 ACR Age and Sex 105 48.9±154.5 Y Y 8 (31)
Pérez et al, 2017 Mexico North America M&F 80 47.21±13.3 ACR Age and Sex 80 48.8±9.86 Y Y 8 (32)
Rezaieyazdi et al, 2007 Iran Asia M&F 34 47.3±13.8 ACR Age and Sex 30 NA Y Y 7 (33)
Sandoval et al, 2017 Mexico North America M&F 499 51.0±12.6 ACR-EULAR Age and Sex 492 50.0±7.8 Y Y 8 (7)
Shafia et al, 2016 India Asia M&F 150 NA ACR Sex 200 NA Y Y 7 (34)
Snezhana et al, 2009 Republic of Macedonia Europe M&F 84 NA ACR Sex 301 NA Y Y 7 (35)
Sun et al, 2013 China Asia M&F 519 54.72±15.27 ACR Age and Sex 520 54.17±10.50 Y Y 8 (6)
Vinasco et al, 1997 Spain Europe M&F 60 NA ACR Sex 102 NA Y Y 7 (36)
Wang et al, 2015 China Asia M&F 113 45.0±10.0 ACR Age and Sex 126 NA Y Y 7 (37)
Wang et al, 2022 China Asia M&F 144 51.0±66.7 ACR Age and Sex 122 42.0±50.2 Y Y 8 (38)
Yen et al, 2013 China Asia M&F 97 NA ACR Sex 97 NA Y Y 7 (39)
You et al, 2013 China Asia M&F 452 47.08+15.36 ACR-EULAR Age and Sex 373 47.35+14.37 Y Y 8 (40)
Zaghlol et al, 2018 Egypt Africa M&F 35 45.63±13.93 ACR-EULAR Age and Sex 35 40.51±12.63 Y Y 8 (41)

M, Male; F, Female; NA, not available; ACR, American College of Rheumatology, ARA, American Rheumatism Association, EULAR, European League Against Rheumatism; HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; Y, Yes.

Table II.

Sample size, genotype and allele frequency in rheumatoid arthritis and control groups in susceptibility studies.

  Number of samples Genotypes of cases Alleles of cases   Genotypes of controls Alleles of controls  
First author/Year Country Ethnicity Cases Controls Total G/G G/A A/A G A Minor allele frequency G/G G/A A/A G A Minor allele frequency (Refs.)
Al-rayes et al, 2011 Saudi Arabia Asia 106 126 232 68 35 3 171 41 0.239766082 63 48 15 174 78 0.448275862 (12)
Aranda et al, 2014 Argentina South America 223 111 334 174 45 4 393 53 0.134860051 86 24 1 196 26 0.132653061 (13)
Ates et al, 2008 Turkey Europe 98 122 220 73 25 0 171 25 0.14619883 101 21 0 223 21 0.094170404 (14)
Boechat et al, 2013 Brazil South America 131 192 323 109 22 0 240 22 0.091666667 159 33 0 351 33 0.094017094 (5)
Brinkman et al, 1997 Netherlands Europe 283 116 399 195 77 11 467 99 0.211991435 66 45 5 177 55 0.310734463 (15)
Carreón et al, 2005 Mexico North America 133 162 295 113 17 3 243 23 0.094650206 148 14 0 310 14 0.04516129 (16)
Chen et al, 2007 China Asia 367 271 638 338 29 0 705 29 0.041134752 232 36 3 500 42 0.084 (17)
Correa et al, 2005 Colombia South America 165 430 595 109 52 4 270 60 0.222222222 338 87 5 763 97 0.127129751 (18)
Cuenca et al, 2003 Chile South America 92 42 134 71 20 1 162 22 0.135802469 38 4 0 80 4 0.05 (19)
Danis et al, 1994 Britain Europe 34 57 91 17 13 4 47 21 0.446808511 44 13 0 101 13 0.128712871 (20)
Das et al, 2019 India Asia 126 160 286 68 58 0 194 58 0.298969072 120 40 0 280 40 0.142857143 (21)
Emonts et al, 2011 Netherlands Europe 375 461 836 248 119 8 615 135 0.219512195 300 147 14 747 175 0.234270415 (22)
Fugger et al, 1989 Denmark Europe 24 131 155 15 6 3 36 12 0.333333333 63 60 8 186 76 0.408602151 (23)
Guo et al, 2012 China Asia 452 356 808 422 30 0 874 30 0.034324943 307 49 0 663 49 0.073906486 (24)
Hussein et al, 2011 Saudi Arabia Asia 172 160 332 134 36 2 304 40 0.131578947 150 10 0 310 10 0.032258065 (25)
Jahid et al, 2017 India Asia 187 214 401 108 69 10 285 89 0.312280702 147 62 5 356 72 0.202247191 (4)
Li et al, 2014 China Asia 256 331 587 246 10 0 502 10 0.019920319 290 40 1 620 42 0.067741935 (26)
Li et al, 2015 China Asia 112 129 241 104 8 0 216 8 0.037037037 104 23 2 231 27 0.116883117 (27)
Lv et al, 2011 China Asia 98 100 198 94 4 0 192 4 0.020833333 86 14 0 186 14 0.075268817 (28)
Manolova et al, 2014 Bulgaria Europe 108 177 285 83 24 1 190 26 0.136842105 135 40 2 310 44 0.141935484 (29)
Nemec et al, 2008 Czech Republic Europe 130 150 280 93 36 1 222 38 0.171171171 121 29 0 271 29 0.10701107 (30)
Pawlik et al, 2005 Poland Europe 91 105 196 74 17 0 165 17 0.103030303 77 25 3 179 31 0.173184358 (31)
Pérez et al, 2017 Mexico North America 80 80 160 66 14 0 146 14 0.095890411 68 12 0 148 12 0.081081081 (32)
Rezaieyazdi et al, 2007 Iran Asia 34 30 64 29 5 0 63 5 0.079365079 29 1 0 59 1 0.016949153 (33)
Sandoval et al, 2017 Mexico North America 499 492 991 457 39 3 953 45 0.047219307 447 43 2 937 47 0.050160085 (7)
Shafia et al, 2016 India Asia 150 200 350 129 21 0 279 21 0.075268817 166 34 0 366 34 0.092896175 (34)
Snezhana et al, 2009 Republic of Macedonia Europe 84 301 385 67 15 2 149 19 0.127516779 231 66 4 528 74 0.140151515 (35)
Sun et al, 2013 China Asia 519 520 1039 456 63 0 975 63 0.064615385 446 70 4 962 78 0.081081081 (6)
Vinasco et al, 1997 Spain Europe 60 102 162 43 14 3 100 20 0.2 84 16 2 184 20 0.108695652 (36)
Wang et al, 2015 China Asia 113 126 239 90 23 0 203 23 0.113300493 104 22 0 230 22 0.095652174 (37)
Wang et al, 2022 China Asia 144 122 266 135 9 0 279 9 0.032258065 114 8 0 236 8 0.033898305 (38)
Yen et al, 2013 China Asia 97 97 194 94 3 0 191 3 0.015706806 72 23 2 167 27 0.161676647 (39)
You et al, 2013 China Asia 452 373 825 422 30 0 874 30 0.034324943 323 50 0 696 50 0.07183908 (40)
Zaghlol 2018 Egypt Africa 35 35 70 30 3 2 63 7 0.111111111 19 16 0 54 16 0.296296296 (41)

Table III.

Sample size, genotype and allele frequency in RA and control groups in the severity study.

  Number of samples Genotypes of Severe RA Alleles of Severe RA   Genotypes of non-severe RA Alleles of non-severe RA  
First author/Year Country Ethnicity Severe RA Non-severe RA Total G/G G/A A/A G A Minor allele frequency G/G G/A A/A G A Minor allele frequency (Refs.)
Carreón et al, 2005 Mexico North America 46 87 133 35 8 3 78 14 0.179487179 78 9 0 165 9 0.054545455 (16)
Das et al, 2019 India Asia 112 14 126 59 53 0 171 53 0.30994152 9 5 0 23 5 0.217391304 (21)
Emonts et al, 2011 Netherlands Europe 120 250 370 89 26 5 204 36 0.176470588 156 91 3 403 97 0.240694789 (22)
Hussein et al, 2011 Saudi Arabia Asia 60 112 172 52 8 0 112 8 0.071428571 82 28 2 192 32 0.166666667 (25)
Lv et al, 2011 China Asia 31 67 98 30 1 0 61 1 0.016393443 64 3 0 131 3 0.022900763 (28)
Nemec et al, 2008 Czech Republic Europe 114 15 129 85 28 1 198 30 0.151515152 7 8 0 22 8 0.363636364 (30)

RA, rheumatoid arthritis.

Results of the meta-analysis. TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 polymorphisms and susceptibility to RA

A total of 34 studies were included in the present analysis. Significant study heterogeneity was observed in allele, dominant and super-dominant models (I2≥50%, P<0.05); therefore, random-effect models were used for analysis. Other genetic models were less heterogeneous and were also analyzed using random-effect models (I2<50%, P>0.05). No significant association between TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to RA was observed in the five gene models (P>0.05). After subgroup analysis, no clear association was observed among the different geographic regions. Detailed data is listed in Table IV.

Table IV.

Summary of associations between TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 gene polymorphisms and rheumatoid arthritis.

  Test of association Tests for heterogeneity Egger's test
Genetic model Population Number of studies OR (95% CI) P-value Ph I2 (%) PE
A vs. G Overall 34 0.937 (0.762-1.152) 0.539 <0.001 79.1 0.769
  Asia 16 0.720 (0.494-1.050) 0.088 <0.001 85.2  
  South America 4 1.357 (0.916-2.010) 0.128 0.107 50.8  
  Europe 10 1.100 (0.837-1.447) 0.494 0.002 65.0  
  North America 3 1.261 (0.770-2.064) 0.357 0.148 47.6  
  Africa 1 0.375 (0.144-0.979) 0.045 - -  
GA + AA vs. GG Overall 34 0.918 (0.733-1.148) 0.452 <0.001 78.7 0.695
  Asia 16 0.731 (0.490-1.091) 0.125 <0.001 85.0  
  South America 4 1.383 (0.881-2.171) 0.159 0.078 56.0  
  Europe 10 1.060 (0.786-1.430) 0.704 0.005 62.2  
  North America 3 1.174 (0.762-1.809) 0.466 0.249 28.0  
  Africa 1 0.198 (0.062-0.629) 0.006 - -  
AA vs. GG + GA Overall 34 1.131 (0.709-1.802) 0.605 0.132 25.4 0.849
  Asia 16 0.457 (0.148-1.413) 0.174 0.054 49.5  
  South America 4 1.993 (0.682-5.823) 0.207 0.973 0.0  
  Europe 10 1.198 (0.686-2.092) 0.526 0.364 8.5  
  North America 3 2.379 (0.512-11.044) 0.269 0.317 0.1  
  Africa 1 5.299 (0.245-114.465) 0.288 - -  
AA vs. GG Overall 34 1.097 (0.664-1.813) 0.718 0.062 33.3 0.853
  Asia 16 0.426 (0.123-1.473) 0.178 0.020 57.8  
  South America 4 2.241 (0.765-6.568) 0.141 0.964 0.0  
  Europe 10 1.148 (0.628-2.098) 0.654 0.299 16.1  
  North America 3 2.458 (0.489-12.357) 0.275 0.301 6.4  
  Africa 1 3.197 (0.146-70.190) 0.461 - -  
GG + AA vs. GA Overall 34 1.108 (0.894-1.373) 0.348 <0.001 75.7 0.467
  Asia 16 1.314 (0.898-1.923) 0.159 <0.001 83.1  
  South America 4 0.750 (0.482-1.167) 0.202 0.094 53.1  
  Europe 10 0.997 (0.759-1.310) 0.982 0.027 52.1  
  North America 3 0.946 (0.666-1.345) 0.758 0.431 0.0  
  Africa 1 8.982 (2.311-34.910) 0.002 - -  

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 polymorphisms and severity of RA. A total of six studies were included in the meta-analysis. Significant study heterogeneity was observed in allele models, dominant gene models and super-dominant models (I2≥50%, P<0.05); therefore, random-effect models were used for analysis. Recessive and co-dominant models were also analyzed using random-effect models. In the overall calculation, TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 polymorphisms were not statistically significantly associated with the severity of RA. After subgroup analysis by geographic region, TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 polymorphisms were significantly associated with RA severity in European populations, GA + AA vs. GG: (OR=0.503, 95% CI: 0.297-0.853 and P=0.011); GG + AA vs. GA: (OR=2.268, 95% CI: 1.434-3.590 and P<0.001). No other models were statistically significant. Forest plots of the dominant gene models and super-dominant models are illustrated in Figs. 2 and 3, and detailed data are revealed in Table V.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The forest plots of dominant gene models in TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 polymorphisms and severity of rheumatoid arthritis. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The forest plots of super-dominant gene models in TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 polymorphisms and severity of rheumatoid arthritis. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Table V.

Summary of associations between TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 gene polymorphisms and rheumatoid arthritis.

  Test of association Tests for heterogeneity Egger's test
Genetic model Population Number of studies OR (95% CI) P-value Ph I2 (%) PE
A vs. G Overall 6 0.870 (0.464-1.629) 0.663 0.008 68.1 0.756
  North America 1 3.291 (1.365-7.930) 0.008 - -  
  Asia 3 0.730 (0.307-1.737) 0.477 0.192 39.4  
  Europe 2 0.638 (0.396-1.029) 0.066 0.261 20.8  
GA + AA vs. GG Overall 6 0.764 (0.394-1.482) 0.426 0.016 64.0 0.640
  North America 1 2.724 (1.036-7.164) 0.042 - -  
  Asia 3 0.745 (0.288-1.928) 0.543 0.184 40.9  
  Europe 2 0.503 (0.297-0.853) 0.011 0.280 14.4  
AA vs. GG + GA Overall 6 2.129 (0.483-9.386) 0.318 0.237 29.3 0.557
  North America 1 14.080 (0.711-278.718) 0.083 - -  
  Asia 3 0.365 (0.017-7.733) 0.518 - -  
  Europe 2 2.009 (0.307-13.144) 0.467 0.232 30.1  
AA vs. GG Overall 6 1.721 (0.336-8.825) 0.515 0.177 39.1 0.601
  North America 1 15.479 (0.779-307.680) 0.072 - -  
  Asia 3 0.314 (0.015-6.676) 0.458 - -  
  Europe 2 1.402 (0.160-12.305) 0.760 0.189 42.0  
GG + AA vs. GA Overall 6 1.490 (0.838-2.651) 0.174 0.071 50.8 0.472
  North America 1 0.548 (0.196-1.533) 0.252 - -  
  Asia 3 1.300 (0.545-3.103) 0.554 0.232 31.5  
  Europe 2 2.268 (1.434-3.590) <0.001 0.391 0  

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses. Heterogeneity between the studies was observed in the current meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the sources of heterogeneity. For the study of TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 polymorphism and RA susceptibility, subgroup analysis by geographical region showed no significant statistical significance in the overall and subgroup results of the five gene models. For the study of TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 polymorphisms and RA severity, the overall results of the five gene models were not statistically significant, but TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 polymorphisms were observed to be significantly associated with the severity of RA in the European population after subgroup analysis; therefore, geographical regions may be the source of heterogeneity in TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 polymorphisms and RA severity studies. In both studies, sensitivity analyses were performed using the two methods. First, a sensitivity analysis was conducted by eliminating them individually. The results showed no significant change in the OR or 95% CI values for the overall outcome after the sequential removal of each study. Second, Stata 17.0 software performed a sensitivity analysis of the results of the meta-analysis. The results revealed that none of the 34 studies on RA susceptibility affected the stability of the results (Fig. 4). Similarly, none of the six studies on the severity of RA affected the stability of the results (Fig. 5). The results of sensitivity analysis indicated that the present meta-analysis was reliable.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Sensitivity analysis of TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 gene polymorphisms and rheumatoid arthritis susceptibility. CI, confidence interval.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Sensitivity analysis of TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 gene polymorphisms and rheumatoid arthritis severity. CI, confidence interval.

Analysis of publication bias. In the study of TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 polymorphisms and susceptibility to RA, the funnel plot method was used to test for publication bias. A publication bias funnel plot, which is visually asymmetric, is illustrated in Fig. 6, and there may be bias. After the Egger method test, P>0.05 in all genetic models indicated that there was no publication bias in the present study, and the detailed data are presented in Table IV. For the study of TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 polymorphisms and RA severity, no publication bias funnel was used for publication bias because the number of studies was <10. Publication bias was assessed using Egger's test. According to the results of the Egger test, P>0.05 in all genetic models indicated that there was no publication bias in the present study. Detailed data is listed in Table V.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Publication bias funnel plot for TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 gene polymorphisms and rheumatoid arthritis susceptibility. CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

Positive result confidence test. Based on the OR value and 95% CI of the aforementioned results, the false-positive report probability (FPRP) values of the dominant and super-dominant models were calculated under a series of prior probability conditions, and the results are shown in Table VI. An FPRP value of <0.2 was used as the standard to judge the reliability of the correlation (42). Confidence assessment determined that the statistically significant association in this meta-analysis was reliable for TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629.

Table VI.

False-positive report probability values for meta-analysis results.

  Prior probability
Positive result Subgroup Genetic model OR (95% CI) I2 (%) P-value Power 0.25 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001
TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 and Europe GA + AA vs. GG 0.503 (0.297-0.853) 14.4 0.011 0.148 0.179a 0.396 0.878 0.986 0.999
RA severity Europe GG + AA vs. GA 2.268 (1.434-3.590) 0 <0.001 0.039 0.035a 0.099a 0.547 0.924 0.992

aindicates statistically significant values. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; RA, rheumatoid arthritis.

Discussion

RA is a typical chronic inflammatory disease, and genetic factors are extremely important in the pathogenesis of RA. Individuals with predisposing genes are exposed to specific environments that cause immune regulation in the body, thereby triggering the entire inflammatory process. During this process, the oxidative stress that occurs in the body accelerates the inflammatory process, aggravates immune system disorders and promotes the occurrence of diseases (43). In addition, RA is a heterogeneous disease, and genetic and environmental factors influence its incidence in different ethnic groups. According to the current results, genetic heterogeneity is manifested by different susceptibility gene loci in different races, and even if individual sites are the same, allele frequency and genetic contribution are different (44).

The TNF-α gene, located in a highly polymorphic region, human chromosome 6 short arm 6p21.3, is a pro-inflammatory cytokine produced primarily by macrophages and monocytes and is involved in normal inflammatory and immune responses (45). TNF-α has two different receptors (TNFR1 and TNFR2). TNF-α binds to cell surface TNFR1 and TNFR2, respectively, to regulate apoptosis, proliferation and differentiation. Most cell surfaces express TNFR1; however, TNFR2 expression is limited to immune cells (46). TNF-α has numerous biological effects, such as activation, proliferative and differentiation of immune cells; inducing apoptosis in certain non-tumor cells and most tumor cells; playing an important role in antitumor, immune defense and inflammatory response; and is an important biological mediator for maintaining the immune balance of the body (47). TNF can be detected in the synovial fluid of patients with RA; therefore, it is important to investigate whether there is an association between TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 gene polymorphisms and RA susceptibility and severity. The results of Jahid et al (4) demonstrated that TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 was strongly associated with the onset of RA in the Indian population. Li et al (26) showed that TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 gene polymorphisms were significantly associated with the occurrence of RA in the Han Chinese population. By contrast, the results of Sun et al (6) demonstrated that TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 gene polymorphisms are not associated with the pathogenesis of RA. In addition, Boechat et al (5) reported through a controlled study of 131 patients with RA and 192 healthy volunteers that TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 gene polymorphisms in the Brazilian population were not associated with the occurrence of RA but were related to the severity of the disease. Nemec et al (30) reported that patients with RA and the GG genotype of the promoter polymorphism of the TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 had a more severe disease course. In addition, they observed that the G allele of the TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 promoter polymorphism in this cohort was associated with decreased functional ability in patients with RA. In a previous meta-analysis, Song et al (48) included 19 studies suggesting that TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 gene polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to RA. This meta-analysis excluded the literature that the genotype frequency of the control group did not conform to HWE, included a total of 34 relevant literature, analyzed by five gene models, and finally reported that TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 gene polymorphisms were associated with the severity of RA in the European population in the dominant model and the super-dominant model, and the results were reliable after FPRP testing.

The present meta-analysis had certain limitations. First, the current study included 34 articles, but the sample size of certain single nucleotide polymorphism analyses was small, and most of them were single-center studies. More high-quality, multicenter and large-sample studies are required for further analysis and verification. Second, a few studies did not provide long-term follow-up data, making it difficult to assess the durability and stability of the results. Thirdly, in the subgroup analyses, the sample sizes were insufficient for a few ethnic groups, resulting in a slight lack of diversity in the results. Fourth, only the relationship between TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 gene polymorphisms and the susceptibility and severity of RA was studied, and further research on other related genes is necessary to fully elucidate the pathogenesis of RA. Fifth, meta-analysis is a descriptive secondary analysis that builds on existing research; therefore, the heterogeneity of the selected literature, study design of variables, different judgment criteria and statistical methods may affect the results of the meta-analysis.

In summary, it was observed that TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 gene polymorphisms were not associated with susceptibility to RA. However, TNF-α-308G/A rs1800629 gene polymorphisms were significantly associated with the severity of RA in the European population, and FPRP testing suggested reliable results.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding Statement

Funding: No funding was received.

Availability of data and materials

The data generated in the present study are included in the figures and/or tables of this article.

Authors' contributions

YLW and XYL participated in the design of the present study, and both performed statistical analyses. LL and SFL conducted the study and collected important background information. PFH and XDL drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Data authentication is not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures involving human participants performed in the present study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent was not required.

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Barton A, Burmester GR, Emery P, Firestein GS, Kavanaugh A, McInnes IB, Solomon DH, Strand V, Yamamoto K. Rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4(18001) doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2018.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rosa-Gonçalves D, Bernardes M, Costa L. Quality of life and functional capacity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis-cross-sectional study. Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed) 2018;14:360–366. doi: 10.1016/j.reuma.2017.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Giannini D, Antonucci M, Petrelli F, Bilia S, Alunno A, Puxeddu I. One year in review 2020: Pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2020;38:387–397. doi: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/3uj1ng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jahid M, Rehan-Ul-Haq Jha PK, Chawla D, Avasthi RS, Ahmed RS. Tumor necrosis factor-α-308 polymorphism in North Indian rheumatoid arthritis patients and association with mRNA and serum TNF-α. Clin Rheumatol. 2017;36:2209–2216. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3774-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Boechat AL, Boechat Nde O, Ogusku MM, Alencar MR, Abensur Tda C, Cardoso Neto J, Amorim Lde S, de Oliveira LM, Sadahiro A, Dos-Santos MC. The influence of a TNF gene polymorphism on the severity of rheumatoid arthritis in the Brazilian Amazon. Cytokine. 2013;61:406–412. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2012.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sun R, Huang Y, Zhang H, Liu R. MMP-2, TNF-α and NLRP1 polymorphisms in Chinese patients with ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis. Mol Biol Rep. 2013;40:6303–6308. doi: 10.1007/s11033-013-2743-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cadena-Sandoval D, Alemán-Ávila I, Barbosa-Cobos RE, Becerril-Mendoza LT, Fragoso JM, Ramírez-Bello J. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and TNFR1 polymorphisms are not risk factors for rheumatoid arthritis in a Mexican population. Mol Biol Rep. 2018;45:227–232. doi: 10.1007/s11033-018-4155-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zheng G, Zhang W, Xu J, Yuan A, Li Q, Gastwirth JL. Genetic risks and genetic model specification. J Theor Biol. 2016;403:68–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25:603–605. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;134:178–189. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–634. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Al-Rayes H, Al-Swailem R, Albelawi M, Arfin M, Al-Asmari A, Tariq M. TNF-α and TNF-β gene polymorphism in Saudi rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;4:55–63. doi: 10.4137/CMAMD.S6941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Aranda F, Perés Wingeyer SD, Schneeberger E, Valerio M, Saint Martin E, Dal Pra F, Correa Mde L, Citera G, Martínez L, Mannucci P, et al. The-308 G/A polymorphism in the tumor necrosis factor-α gene is not associated with development and progression of rheumatoid arthritis in Argentinean patients. Int J Rheum Dis. 2016;19:476–481. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ates O, Hatemi G, Hamuryudan V, Topal-Sarikaya A. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-10 gene promoter polymorphisms in Turkish rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clin Rheumatol. 2008;27:1243–1248. doi: 10.1007/s10067-008-0893-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brinkman BM, Huizinga TW, Kurban SS, van der Velde EA, Schreuder GM, Hazes JM, Breedveld FC, Verweij CL. Tumour necrosis factor alpha gene polymorphisms in rheumatoid arthritis: Association with susceptibility to, or severity of, disease? Br J Rheumatol. 1997;36:516–521. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/36.5.516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rodríguez-Carreón AA, Zúñiga J, Hernández-Pacheco G, Rodríguez-Pérez JM, Pérez-Hernández N, Montes de Oca JV, Cardiel MH, Granados J, Vargas-Alarcón G. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha-308 promoter polymorphism contributes independently to HLA alleles in the severity of rheumatoid arthritis in Mexicans. J Autoimmun. 2005;24:63–68. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2004.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen R, Fang M, Cai Q, Duan S, Lv K, Cheng N, Ren D, Shen J, He D, He L, Sun S. Tumor necrosis factor alpha-308 polymorphism is associated with rheumatoid arthritis in Han population of Eastern China. Rheumatol Int. 2007;28:121–126. doi: 10.1007/s00296-007-0409-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Correa PA, Gomez LM, Cadena J, Anaya JM. Autoimmunity and tuberculosis. Opposite association with TNF polymorphism. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:219–224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cuenca J, Cuchacovich M, Pérez C, Ferreira L, Aguirre A, Schiattino I, Soto L, Cruzat A, Salazar-Onfray F, Aguillón JC. The-308 polymorphism in the tumour necrosis factor (TNF) gene promoter region and ex vivo lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF expression and cytotoxic activity in Chilean patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003;42:308–313. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Danis VA, Millington M, Hyland V, Lawford R, Huang Q, Grennan D. Increased frequency of the uncommon allele of a tumour necrosis factor alpha gene polymorphism in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Dis Markers. 1995;12:127–133. doi: 10.1155/1994/756247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Das S, Baruah C, Saikia AK, Tiwari D, Bose S. Genetic and expression changes in TNF-α as a risk factor for rheumatoid arthritis pathogenesis in northeast India. J Genet. 2019;98(3) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Emonts M, Hazes MJMW, Houwing-Duistermaat JJ, van der Gaast-de Jongh CE, de Vogel L, Han HKH, Wouters JMGW, Laman JD, Dolhain RJEM. Polymorphisms in genes controlling inflammation and tissue repair in rheumatoid arthritis: A case control study. BMC Med Genet. 2011;12(36) doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-12-36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fugger L, Morling N, Ryder LP, Georgsen J, Jakobsen BK, Svejgaard A, Andersen V, Oxholm P, Karup Pedersen F, Friis J, et al. NcoI restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF alpha) region in four autoimmune diseases. Tissue Antigens. 1989;34:17–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.1989.tb01712.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Guo X, You C, Wang L, Ma K, Zhou Y, Shi X, Li F, Gao L. Correlation analysis of gene polymorphisms of TNF-α and its receptors with rheumatoid arthritis susceptibility and related serological markers. Acad J Second Mil Med Univ. 2012;32:155–159. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hussein YM, Mohamed RH, Pasha HF, El-Shahawy EE, Alzahrani SS. Association of tumor necrosis factor alpha and its receptor polymorphisms with rheumatoid arthritis in female patients. Cell Immunol. 2011;271:192–196. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2011.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Li F, Gao J, Sokolove J, Xu J, Zheng J, Zhu K, Pan Z. Polymorphisms in the TNF-α, TNFR1 gene and risk of rheumatoid arthritis in Chinese Han population. Int J Immunogenet. 2014;41:499–502. doi: 10.1111/iji.12148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Li F, Xie X, Chen J, Gao J, Lu F. Association of TNF-α gene polymorphisms with the risk of rheumatoid arthritis in Han Chinese population from Hunan. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2015;40:945–954. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2015.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lv HZ, Lin T, Zhu XY, Zhang JT, Lu J. Association of TNF-α single nucleotide polymorphisms in human rheumatoid arthritis of Han nationality in northern China. Cell Mol Immunol. 2011;27:906–908. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Manolova I, Ivanova M, Stoilov R, Rashkov R, Stanilova S. Association of single nucleotide polymorphism at position-308 of the tumor necrosis factor-alpha gene with ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2014;28:1108–1114. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2014.972147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Nemec P, Pavkova-Goldbergova M, Stouracova M, Vasku A, Soucek M, Gatterova J. Polymorphism in the tumor necrosis factor-alpha gene promoter is associated with severity of rheumatoid arthritis in the Czech population. Clin Rheumatol. 2008;27:59–65. doi: 10.1007/s10067-007-0653-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pawlik A, Florczak M, Ostanek L, Brzosko M, Brzosko I, Szklarz BG. TNF-alpha-308 promoter polymorphism in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2005;34:22–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Domínguez-Pérez RA, Loyola-Rodriguez JP, Abud-Mendoza C, Alpuche-Solis AG, Ayala-Herrera JL, Martínez-Martínez RE. Association of cytokines polymorphisms with chronic peridontitis and rheumatoid arthritis in a Mexican population. Acta Odontol Scand. 2017;75:243–248. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2017.1280846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rezaieyazdi Z, Afshari JT, Sandooghi M, Mohajer F. Tumour necrosis factor a-308 promoter polymorphism in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2007;28:189–191. doi: 10.1007/s00296-007-0444-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shafia S, Sofi FA, Dilafroze Rasool R, Rasool R, Javeed S, Shah ZA. The association between TNFα gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis in an ethnic Kashmiri population: Relationship with disease activity and severity markers. Int J Rheum Dis. 2016;19:362–369. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Trajkov D, Mishevska-Perchinkova S, Karadzova-Stojanoska A, Petlichkovski A, Strezova A, Spiroski M. Association of 22 cytokine gene polymorphisms with rheumatoid arthritis in population of ethnic Macedonians. Clin Rheumatol. 2009;28:1291–1300. doi: 10.1007/s10067-009-1238-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Vinasco J, Beraún Y, Nieto A, Fraile A, Mataran L, Pareja E, Martín J. Polymorphism at the TNF loci in rheumatoid arthritis. Tissue Antigens. 1997;49:74–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.1997.tb02715.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang P, He YL, Zeng YQ, Wang LM, Hu LH. Association between TNF-α gene polymorphisms and rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Hematol. 2015;28:97–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang Z, Kong L, Zhang H, Sun F, Guo Z, Zhang R, Dou Y. Tumor necrosis factor alpha-308G/A gene polymorphisms combined with neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts the efficacy and safety of Anti-TNF-α therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and psoriasis arthritis. Front Pharmacol. 2022;12(811719) doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.811719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yen JH, Chen CJ, Tsai WC, Lin CH, Ou TT, Wu CC, Liu HW. Tumor necrosis factor promoter polymorphisms in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Taiwan. J Rheumatol. 2001;28:1788–1792. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.You CG, Li XJ, Li YM, Wang LP, Li FF, Guo XL, Gao LN. Association analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms of proinflammatory cytokine and their receptors genes with rheumatoid arthritis in northwest Chinese Han population. Cytokine. 2013;61:133–138. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2012.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zaghlol HM, Abdelshafy S, Mohamed RA, Abdelaleem EA. Tumour necrosis factor gene polymorphisms in Egyptian patients with rheumatoid arthritis and their relation to disease activity and severity. Cent Eur J Immunol. 2019;44:277–284. doi: 10.5114/ceji.2019.89602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wacholder S, Chanock S, Garcia-Closas M, El Ghormli L, Rothman N. Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: An approach for molecular epidemiology studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:434–442. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Buch MH, Eyre S, McGonagle D. Persistent inflammatory and non-inflammatory mechanisms in refractory rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021;17:17–33. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-00541-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Klein K, Gay S. Epigenetics in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2015;27:76–82. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zelová H, Hošek J. TNF-α signalling and inflammation: Interactions between old acquaintances. Inflamm Res. 2013;62:641–651. doi: 10.1007/s00011-013-0633-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Idriss HT, Naismith JH. TNF alpha and the TNF receptor superfamily: Structure-function relationship(s) Microsc Res Tech. 2000;50:184–195. doi: 10.1002/1097-0029(20000801)50:3<184::AID-JEMT2>3.0.CO;2-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Balkwill F. TNF-alpha in promotion and progression of cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006;25:409–416. doi: 10.1007/s10555-006-9005-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Song GG, Bae SC, Kim JH, Lee YH. Association between TNF-α promoter-308 A/G polymorphism and rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis. Rheumatol Int. 2014;34:465–471. doi: 10.1007/s00296-013-2919-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data generated in the present study are included in the figures and/or tables of this article.


Articles from Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES