Correction: Jacobs et al. Breast Cancer Research (2024) 26:69.
10.1186/s13058-024-01823-8.
Following the publication of the original article, there were several errors, as follows:
In the abstract, Results section, “95% CI” should be included in the sixth sentence. It should read: “Molecular Response scores were significantly associated with both PFS (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09-0.90, P = 0.033) and best response (P = 0.037).”
On page 4, left-hand column: The word “samples,” after the word “two,” was mistakenly removed during typesetting. The correct statement should have been “ … the percent ctDNA change between the two timepoints based on the mean variant allele frequency (VAF) between two samples (mean VAF2/mean VAF1) -1 ? 100%.”
On page 7, left-hand column, a statement of “0.09-0.90, P = 0.033 using Wilcox test” was duplicated and has been removed.
The original article has been corrected.
Footnotes
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1186/s13058-024-01823-8.
Publisher‘s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.