Abstract
Charge, spin and Cooper-pair density waves have now been widely detected in exotic superconductors. Understanding how these density waves emerge — and become suppressed by external parameters — is a key research direction in condensed matter physics. Here we study the temperature and magnetic-field evolution of charge density waves in the rare spin-triplet superconductor candidate UTe2 using scanning tunneling microscopy/spectroscopy. We reveal that charge modulations composed of three different wave vectors gradually weaken in a spatially inhomogeneous manner, while persisting to surprisingly high temperatures of 10–12 K. We also reveal an unexpected decoupling of the three-component charge density wave state. Our observations match closely to the temperature scale potentially related to short-range magnetic correlations, providing a possible connection between density waves observed by surface probes and intrinsic bulk features. Importantly, charge density wave modulations become suppressed with magnetic field both below and above superconducting Tc in a comparable manner. Our work points towards an intimate connection between hidden magnetic correlations and the origin of the unusual charge density waves in UTe2.
Subject terms: Condensed-matter physics, Superconducting properties and materials, Electronic properties and materials
Understanding the physics of charge density waves in emerging superconductors may reveal insights into unconventional superconductivity mechanisms. Here, the authors study the temperature and magnetic-field dependence of charge-density-wave suppression in the unconventional superconductor UTe2.
Introduction
Unconventional superconductivity often occurs in close proximity to other symmetry-breaking phases. In the canonical example of cuprate superconductors, superconductivity is found to co-exist with electronic nematic phase, which breaks the rotation symmetry of the system, and the periodic modulations, or waves, of the charge density and the superfluid density throughout much of the phase diagram1. The Cooper pair density waves (PDWs), either as the primary drivers or as secondary states accompanying charge density waves (CDWs), have now been seen in a range of unconventional superconductors, including cuprate high-temperature superconductors2–4, Fe-based superconductors5,6 and kagome superconductors7–9.
Out of the array of density wave superconductors, heavy fermion superconductor UTe2 is an intriguing example of a system that also shows strong evidence for spin-triplet superconductivity in proximity to an underlying magnetic instability10,11 and strong fluctuations12–15. Unconventional pairing is supported by the very small Knight shift change across the bulk superconducting transition temperature Tc10,16, large and highly anisotropic critical magnetic fields10, peculiar phase diagram with multiple superconducting regimes17 and the non-zero polar Kerr effect below Tc12 signaling time-reversal symmetry breaking despite the absence of long-range magnetic order10. Within this superconducting state, the system is also reported to host intertwined Cooper pair and charge density wave modulations18,19, further highlighting the unusual nature of this superconductor. Revealing how these phases emerge as the temperature is lowered, or how they are suppressed by perturbations such as magnetic field or chemical doping can provide an essential insight into their nature. In particular, understanding the CDW transition and how large the CDW onset temperature is, can be crucial for unveiling the nature of the PDW and whether it is a primary PDW.
Here we use spectroscopic imaging scanning tunneling microscopy (SI-STM) to discover an unusual nature of the CDW in UTe2. By investigating the evolution of charge modulations in UTe2 as a function of temperature and magnetic field, we find that the CDW phase emerges substantially above the superconducting transition, at about 10-12 K. SI-STM spatial mapping reveals that the CDW phase is suppressed by forming short-range CDW regions that shrink in size as the CDW approaches global suppression by increasing the temperature. The arrangement of CDW puddles is reproducible with repeated thermal or field cycles, pointing towards the role of local disorder. Interestingly, based on the temperature and energy-dependence, we discover one of the density wave vectors along the mirror symmetry direction is distinct compared to the other two. This reveals an unexpected decoupling of the three-component CDW state. Importantly, the onset temperature of charge modulations observed here closely matches the temperature scale in transport measurements believed to be associated with magnetic correlations, providing a possible connection relating the density waves observed by surface sensitive experiments and bulk measurements. Importantly, we discover that magnetic field gradually suppresses the charge density wave even at temperatures several times higher than the superconducting Tc. Such primary CDWs tunable by magnetic field are very rare. Given UTe2 as a spin-triplet superconductor, our work suggests that spin-triplet superconductivity in UTe2 emerges from an unusual charge density wave state connected to “hidden” magnetic correlations as its origin.
Results
We study bulk single crystals of UTe2 with bulk superconducting TSC ≈ 1.6 K10 (Methods). We cleave the crystals in ultra-high-vacuum at liquid nitrogen temperature, and immediately insert them into the microscope head. The crystal structure of UTe2 is orthorhombic and UTe2 crystals tends to cleave along the [0 − 11] direction20. Typical STM topographs of the (0 − 11) plane show a chain-like surface, with two rows of Te atoms oriented along the [100] direction (Fig. 1a), similarly to what has been observed in other STM studies18–20. In addition to the atomic Bragg peaks QBragg and Te chain Bragg peaks Qchain (Fig. 1b), Fourier transforms (FTs) of differential conductance dI/dV maps show three other pairs of peaks (Fig. 1c, d). These peaks are non-dispersive with energy (Fig. 1e–g) and correspond to an emergent charge density wave (CDW) intertwined with a PDW at the same wave vectors18,19.
Fig. 1. Characterization of the UTe2 surface and the non-dispersive charge modulation peaks.
a Atomically-resolved scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) topograph of UTe2 (0 − 11) surface with bright rows of Te atoms positioned along the crystal a-axis. Inset in (a) shows the zoomed-in topograph over the small white square. b Fourier transform (FT) of the STM topograph in (a). Te Bragg peaks (QBragg) and the unidirectional chain peaks (Qchain) are circled. c Fourier filtered single-layer dI/dV map on the same UTe2 (0–11) surface showing the characteristic charge density wave (CDW) pattern, and (d) its associated FT. Three different CDW peaks q1CDW, q2CDW, and q3CDW are circled in the FT in (d) in blue, red and green, respectively. e–g FT linecuts, starting from the center of the FT through each of the three CDW peaks, as a function of energy. It can be seen that the position of the three CDW peaks is not dependent on energy. STM setup condition: Vsample = −20 mV, Iset = 100 pA (a); Vsample = 20 mV, Iset = 40 pA, Vexc = 3 mV (c); Vsample = −20 mV, Iset = 40 pA, Vexc = 3 mV (e–g).
Previous STM experiments primarily focused on studying these density waves in the superconducting state, and reported their existence up to at least 4.2 K18,19. Consistent with these, CDW peaks in our data are also clearly detectable at 4.2 K (Fig. 1d). We proceed to investigate how the CDW state disappears, first exploring the effect of increasing the temperature. We measure and compare dI/dV maps as a function of temperature over an identical area of the sample, acquired under the same experimental conditions (Fig. 2a–d). To quantitatively evaluate the evolution of the CDW phase, we extract FT linecuts from the center of the FT through each of the three CDW peaks at every temperature measured (Fig. 2a–c). It can be seen that peaks get progressively suppressed with temperature. At maximum temperature used in this experiment sequence of 7.4 K, which is about five times higher than the superconducting TSC, the peaks are still easily discernable above the background. By plotting the heights of the peaks as a function of temperature, normalized by the FT background signal (Fig. 2d), we estimate the CDW onset temperature TCDW to be about 10 K. This is further confirmed by the data on the second sample, where we can see that CDW peaks are largely suppressed at 10 K, with only q2CDW still visible (Fig. 2e–m), which we will discuss in more detail in subsequent paragraphs.
Fig. 2. Temperature dependence of the charge density wave modulations.
a–c Fourier transform (FT) linecuts of the dI/dV map acquired at 40 mV, starting from the center of the FT, through the three CDW peaks: (a) q1CDW, (b) q2CDW, and (c) q3CDW on sample 1. Suppression of the CDW peaks is apparent with increasing temperature. Insets in (a–c) show the relevant portion of the FT, with the corresponding wave vector that is plotted circled. d Plot of the background-subtracted height (FT amplitude) of the Gaussian fits to each peak in the temperature-dependent linecuts in (a–c). Blue, red and green lines represent linear visual guides for each of the three CDW peak amplitude dispersions, which seem to approach zero amplitude at about 10 K. e, f FT of dI/dV map acquired at 50 mV on sample 2 at (e) 4.8 K and (f) 10 K (same scale used for both). The positions of three CDW peaks are circled. g–i FT linecuts, starting from the center of the FT through each of the three CDW peaks, as a function of energy at 4.8 K. j Linear fit of FT peak height of q2CDW as a function of temperature extracted from (e, f). k–m FT linecuts, starting from the center of the FT through each of the three CDW peaks, as a function of energy at 10 K. q1CDW and q3CDW cannot be resolved at 10 K, while q2CDW still shows up with weakened magnitude. Scale bar is the same for (g–i, k–m). STM setup condition: Vsample = −50 mV, Iset = 300 pA, Vexc = 10 mV (e–m).
Spatial information can provide another important clue on the nature of the CDW suppression. We start by noting that FT of the dI/dV maps acquired at about 5 K show diffuse CDW peaks that span several reciprocal-space pixels even after Lawler-Fujita drift-correction algorithm (insets in Fig. 2a–c and e, inset in Fig. 3b), which generally points towards a spatially inhomogeneous order parameter. To visualize this, we Fourier-filter an integrated dI/dV map, using a process that removes all wave vectors except a narrow window around each CDW peak that is exactly 9 pixels in diameter (Fig. 3b). Nanoscale regions with periodic electronic ripples, which correspond to the CDW modulations, and regions where those modulations appear absent can be clearly observed (Fig. 3b), further supporting the notion of an inhomogeneous electronic order approaching the transition.
Fig. 3. Spatial inhomogeneity and local decoupling of the CDW modulations.
a STM topograph and (b) filtered integrated dI/dV map (adding 4 layers acquired at 35 mV, 40 mV, 45 mV and 50 mV) over the (0−11) surface of UTe2. Fourier filtering is done by removing all wave vectors except 9 pixel diameter centered at each q1CDW, q2CDW and q3CDW. Inset in (b) is the relevant portion of the Fourier transform of the integrated dI/dV map, with CDW peaks circled in blue, red and green. c Cross-correlation coefficients between the three CDW amplitude maps shown in (g–i). d–f Fourier filtered maps extracted from (a) by selectively keeping only a narrow circular FT window centered at (d) q1CDW, (e) q2CDW and (f) q3CDW. Two arrows in (d) point to apparent dislocations that routinely appear in the areas of low CDW amplitude. g–i CDW amplitude maps extracted from corresponding images in (d–f), showing the local height of each CDW wave vector. Black squares in (d–i) mark the same position on the sample with strong (solid line) and weak (dashed line) modulations. STM setup conditions: Vsample = 50 mV, Iset = 300 pA, Vexc = 10 mV.
To gain further insight, we examine Fourier-filtered dI/dV maps of each individual CDW peak separately: q1CDW (Fig. 3d), q2CDW (Fig. 3e) and q3CDW (Fig. 3f). In the filtering process, we again select a small FT window that encompasses each individual CDW peak. We note that the overall distribution of regions where CDW is strong vs weak in our data appears comparable regardless of small variations of the filtering window size (more details on the validity of the window size can be found in Supplementary Fig. 1). To quantify its local strength, we plot the intensity of each CDW peak |qiCDW | (where i = 1, 2 or 3) as a function of position to create CDW amplitude maps (Fig. 3g–i). Our first observation is that all amplitude maps show a high level of spatial inhomogeneity, with local regions showing strong modulations dispersed within the larger matrix in which the modulations are substantially weaker. The amplitude maps of the two wave vectors related by the mirror symmetry along the y-axis, q1CDW and q3CDW, exhibit a remarkable similarity with a very high cross-correlation coefficient α ≈ 0.7 (Fig. 3c). Similar cross-correlation coefficients are observed between maps obtained using different sizes of the Fourier filter window (Supplementary Fig. 1). Cross-correlation between the amplitude map of the remaining wave vector, |q2CDW | , and |q1CDW | (or |q3CDW | ) is also significant, although somewhat lower (Fig. 3c), suggesting a slightly different morphology of domains. This can be visualized by examining the maps in real space, where we can for example find regions of high |q2CDW | , but low |q1CDW| and |q3CDW | (black squares in Fig. 3d–i). This observation suggests a surprising local decoupling of individual density waves, where q2CDW becomes decoupled from mirror-symmetric q1CDW and q3CDW. This decoupling is further supported by examining the FTs of dI/dV maps at 10 K – q2CDW wave vector is still present while the other two, which were prominent at 4.8 K, are now completely suppressed (Fig. 2e–m).
To evaluate the spatial evolution of the CDW order towards TCDW, we turn to the temperature dependence of the CDW amplitude maps (Fig. 4). For ease of comparison, we apply the Lawler-Fujita drift correction algorithm21 to all dI/dV maps, which enables us to align data acquired at different temperatures with atomic precision. This process also allows us to systematically apply an identical q-space Fourier filter across all maps examined. For simplicity, we first focus on the q1CDW peak. Visual comparison of the data sequence from 4.9 K to 6.5 K (Fig. 4a–c) reveals that nanoscale regions where CDW is the most prominent at 4.9 K remain generally the same at the higher temperature. However, amplitude within these nanoscale regions has decreased leading to the appearance that they have shrunk (Fig. 4d–f), consistent with the global suppression of CDW in Fig. 2. Cooling the system back down to the starting temperature of 4.9 K yields the CDW amplitude maps that are virtually indistinguishable from those before the thermal cycle (Fig. 4h). Multiple consecutive thermal cycles paint the same picture of static CDW patches that get suppressed with temperature and expand again upon cooling down (Fig. 4h). The striking similarity of the locations of CDW patches at different temperature is confirmed by the high cross-correlation coefficient (Fig. 4g).
Fig. 4. Temperature dependence of the CDW spatial inhomogeneity and robustness to thermal cycles.
a–c Fourier filtered dI/dV maps showing the temperature dependence of the inhomogeneity of q1CDW, and (d–f) associated amplitude maps. g Radially-averaged cross-correlation coefficient α between pairs of different amplitude maps: α(4.9 K, 6.5 K) (red, top curve), α(4.9 K, 7.5 K) (brown, middle curve), and α(4.9 K, 4.9 K”) (blue, bottom curve). Here, 4.9 K” indicates the second cooling to 4.9 K after warming up to 6.5 K. h Thermal cycling sequence of amplitude maps associated with q1CDW taken at the same STM setup conditions. The scale bar in all images is 3 nm. STM setup condition: Vsample = 40 mV, Vexc = 100 mV, Iset = 160 pA.
Complementary to temperature dependence, we study if CDW can be suppressed by magnetic field. Previous experiments revealed an intriguing suppression of the CDW in the superconducting state coinciding with the suppression of superconductivity, suggesting an intimate connection between the two18. Here we apply magnetic field at 4.8 K, well above the superconducting transition of UTe2. The field is applied at 3 degrees with respect to the direction perpendicular to the sample surface (Fig. 5a, b). We find that the height of CDW peaks slowly decreases with applied magnetic field (Fig. 5c–f). For example, q1CDW lowers by about 35% from 0 T to 11 T, but remains well above the background (Fig. 5c, e). This suggests a critical field substantially higher than 11 T. The trend is remarkably consistent with the CDW evolution in the superconducting state18, although we are in the temperature regime that is three times higher than superconducting TSC. To gain spatial information, we extract CDW amplitude maps as a function of magnetic field similarly to our analysis in Figs. 3 and 4. This analysis leads us to two main conclusions. First, CDW patches are again suppressed by the shrinkage of local regions (Fig. 5g, h). Second, CDW puddles revert back to the original morphology after the field is removed (Fig. 5g, h).
Fig. 5. CDW suppression by magnetic field in the normal state of UTe2 and field sensitivity of spatial inhomogeneity.
a Schematic of the magnetic field direction applied at 3 degrees with respect to the direction perpendicular to the sample surface imaged by STM. This small misalignment is due to accidental sample tilt during the gluing process, and it is determined from the background slope in raw STM topographs. b STM topograph of the region of the sample where the data were taken. c, d Fourier transform (FT) linecuts from the center of the dI/dV map FT through (c) q1CDW and (d) q3CDW peaks as a function of magnetic field. Sensitivity of the peak heights to large magnetic fields is observed. (e, f) Peak heights extracted from (c, d) plotted as a function of magnetic field. g Fourier filtered dI/dV maps including only the q1CDW peak (encompassing a 9 pixel diameter around the peak center), and (h) associated amplitude maps. i Approximate temperature vs magnetic field schematic phase diagram of density waves in UTe2. Here, “3Q CDW” refers to the charge density wave phase which includes all 3 directions: q1CDW, q2CDW, and q3CDW. “PDW” refers to the pair density wave phase. STM setup condition: Vsample = −50 mV, Iset = 300 pA, Vexc = 10 mV. Data were taken at 4.8 K.
Discussion
Our work reveals how intertwined density waves in a rare spin-triplet superconductor UTe2 get suppressed with temperature, by first forming short-range nanoscale regions with charge modulations embedded within areas where modulations can no longer be observed. Interestingly, we find that the three CDW wave vectors locally decouple. Based on the energy-dependence and the temperature-suppression, we conclude that q2CDW along the mirror symmetry axis is distinct compared to the other two wave vectors. This in turn suggests a superposition of at least two independent density waves: unidirectional, or “smectic”, density wave associated with q2CDW and a bi-directional combination of mirror-symmetric q1CDW and q3CDW. It is possible that q1CDW and q3CDW would also behave as individual smectic density waves given the different magnetic field dependence reported in ref. 18, although as we discover in Fig. 3, they appear to be spatially intertwined. We note that vortex-like discontinuities seen between regions with strong modulations in Fourier filtered data, also recently reported in ref. 22 (examples of two such features rotated by π with respect to each other are denoted by arrows in Fig. 3d) can dramatically change depending on the size of the filtering window as CDW peaks become less prominent. Moreover, these features routinely appear in the Fourier-filtered data of spatially inhomogeneous orders in other systems (Supplementary Fig. 2). Lastly, as these discontinuities always appear in regions with near-zero amplitude of the order parameter, which is generally below the FT noise threshold, we disregard them in our analysis.
Our experiments also reveal a remarkable repeatability of the morphology of nanoscale CDW regions by magnetic field or temperature cycling. In many materials, atomic-scale crystal imperfections are often responsible for electronic inhomogeneity23–25. Future experiments should explore to what extent accidental impurities or defects could account for the fragmentation or pinning of the charge modulations. This would be especially important to determine given the variation in the properties of nominally stoichiometric crystals of UTe2, where chemical inhomogeneity could be the natural culprit but defects responsible for this are yet to be identified.
Magnetic field and temperature suppression of the density waves provides narrow constraints on their origin. One possibility could come from a primary PDW. PDWs have now been observed in various materials as periodic modulations of the superconducting gap magnitude and coherence peak heights2,3,5,7,19; these density waves naturally get suppressed with temperature as superconductivity is destroyed, possibly leaving a CDW slightly above the superconducting transition. We however find that the CDW persists to a temperature that is almost an order of magnitude higher than the superconducting TSC, which would be surprising for a “remnant” CDW phase. The possibility of a primary PDW in UTe2, which melts into a CDW above Tsc, was largely supported by the critical magnetic field of the CDW comparable to that of the superconducting critical fields18. In our experiments, we find that similarly high magnetic fields are necessary and can be used to suppress CDW well above Tsc (Fig. 5), thus making the immediate connection to superconductivity less obvious. So while a secondary PDW state can still emerge in the superconducting phase, our experiments point towards an unusual primary CDW phase forming well outside the superconducting state.
In general, magnetic field tunable CDWs reported in literature are extremely rare. Prominent examples include field-tunable CDWs in high-temperature superconductor YBa2Cu3O7-x26 and moiré graphene27, but both of these are phenomenologically different from that in UTe2. In YBa2Cu3O7-x, CDW can only be modified by magnetic field in the superconducting state26, signaling a direct competition between the two; in contrast in UTe2, CDW is suppressed seemingly unrelated if the material is superconducting or not. In moiré graphene, CDW tunability can be directly tied to the gradual crossing of a Landau level through the Fermi level27, a physical regime entirely different from UTe2. This points towards a different mechanism of the CDW in UTe2, distinct from the select few other field-tunable CDWs in quantum materials.
Our SI-STM data, which reveal a new 10–12 K temperature scale associated with density waves, provide a fresh clue. Both thermal expansion coefficient data28 and resistivity measurements29 reveal features in their data near the same temperature. In particular, a recent pressure study demonstrates that this resistivity feature coincides with the eventual stabilization of the long-range magnetic order; as such, it is attributed to a magnetic energy scale indicative of magnetic fluctuations or a short-range magnetic order29. This could provide a plausible link between surface detection of density waves and bulk experiments. This connection, combined with magnetic-field sensitivity of the charge modulations in both superconducting18 and non-superconducting states (Fig. 5), could point towards the origin of charge modulations in an underlying spin mechanism, without long-range magnetic ordering, which should be tested more directly in future spin-sensitive experiments.
Methods
Bulk single crystals of UTe2 are grown by the chemical vapor transport method using iodine as the transport agent, with elements of U and Te (atomic ratio 2:3) sealed in an evacuated quartz tube, together with iodine. More details can be found in ref. 10. UTe2 crystals are transported from NIST to BC in a sealed glass vile filled with inert gas to prevent air degradation. The vile is opened in an argon glove box at BC, where the sample is glued to an STM sample holder, and a cleave bar is then attached to the sample using silver epoxy. We transfer the prepared sample from the glove box to an ultra-high vacuum load lock within seconds, and cold-cleave it before putting it into the microscope. STM data were acquired using a customized Unisoku USM1300. Spectroscopic measurements were performed using a standard lock-in technique with 910 Hz frequency. The STM tips used were home-made chemically etched tungsten tips. For the ease of comparison of data acquired at different temperatures and to standardize the Fourier filter windows applied in the analysis, we apply the Lawler–Fujita drift-correction algorithm21 to our data. This process shifts and aligns the atomic Bragg peaks to be confined to the same individual pixels. Identification of commercial equipment does not imply endorsement by NIST.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Johnpierre Paglione for useful discussions. I.Z. gratefully acknowledges the support from DOE Early Career Award DE-SC0020130 for STM measurements. Z.W. acknowledges the support of U.S. Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences Grant No. DE-FG02-99ER45747 and the Cottrell SEED Award No. 27856 from Research Corporation for Science Advancement. Sample synthesis and characterization were supported by the National Science Foundation under the Division of Materials Research Grant NSF-DMR 2105191.
Author contributions
A.L. and H.L. performed the STM experiments and analyzed the data with the help from M.X. and S.C. C.E.F. synthesized and characterized the samples under the supervision of N.P.B. Z.W. provided theoretical input on the interpretation of STM data. A.L, H.L., N.P.B., Z.W. and I.Z. wrote the paper with the input from all the authors. I.Z. supervised the project.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Yukio Hasegawa and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Code availability
The computer code used for data analysis is available upon request from the corresponding authors.
Data availability
The STM data generated in this study have been deposited in the Zenodo database under accession code 11176886.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Alexander LaFleur, Hong Li.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-024-48844-7.
References
- 1.Fradkin E, Kivelson SA, Tranquada JM. Colloquium: Theory of intertwined orders in high temperature superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2015;87:457–482. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.457. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hamidian MH, et al. Detection of a Cooper-pair density wave in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x. Nature. 2016;532:343–347. doi: 10.1038/nature17411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ruan W, et al. Visualization of the periodic modulation of Cooper pairing in a cuprate superconductor. Nat. Phys. 2018;14:1178–1182. doi: 10.1038/s41567-018-0276-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Edkins SD, et al. Magnetic field–induced pair density wave state in the cuprate vortex halo. Science. 2019;364:976–980. doi: 10.1126/science.aat1773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhao H, et al. Smectic pair-density-wave order in EuRbFe4As4. Nature. 2023;618:940–945. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06103-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Liu Y, et al. Pair density wave state in a monolayer high-Tc iron-based superconductor. Nature. 2023;618:934–939. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06072-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chen H, et al. Roton pair density wave in a strong-coupling kagome superconductor. Nature. 2021;599:222–228. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03983-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhao H, et al. Cascade of correlated electron states in the kagome superconductor CsV3Sb5. Nature. 2021;599:216–221. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03946-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Li H, et al. Small fermi pockets intertwined with charge stripes and pair density wave order in a Kagome superconductor. Phys. Rev. X. 2023;13:031030. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ran S, et al. Nearly ferromagnetic spin-triplet superconductivity. Science. 2019;365:684–687. doi: 10.1126/science.aav8645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Aoki D, et al. Unconventional superconductivity in UTe2. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2022;34:243002. doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/ac5863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hayes IM, et al. Multicomponent superconducting order parameter in UTe2. Science. 2021;373:797–801. doi: 10.1126/science.abb0272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sundar S, et al. Coexistence of ferromagnetic fluctuations and superconductivity in the actinide superconductor UTe2. Phys. Rev. B. 2019;100:140502. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.140502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Duan C, et al. Resonance from antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations for superconductivity in UTe2. Nature. 2021;600:636–640. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04151-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Thomas SM, et al. Evidence for a pressure-induced antiferromagnetic quantum critical point in intermediate-valence UTe2. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:1–8. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc8709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nakamine G, et al. Superconducting properties of heavy fermion UTe2 revealed by 125 Te-nuclear magnetic resonance. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2019;88:113703. doi: 10.7566/JPSJ.88.113703. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ran S, et al. Extreme magnetic field-boosted superconductivity. Nat. Phys. 2019;15:1250–1254. doi: 10.1038/s41567-019-0670-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Aishwarya A, et al. Magnetic-field-sensitive charge density waves in the superconductor UTe2. Nature. 2023;618:928–933. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06005-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gu Q, et al. Detection of a pair density wave state in UTe2. Nature. 2023;618:921–927. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05919-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jiao L, et al. Chiral superconductivity in heavy-fermion metal UTe2. Nature. 2020;579:523–527. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2122-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lawler MJ, et al. Intra-unit-cell electronic nematicity of the high-Tc copper-oxide pseudogap states. Nature. 2010;466:347–351. doi: 10.1038/nature09169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Aishwarya, A. et al. Visualizing the melting of the charge density wave in UTe2 by generation of pairs of topological defects with opposite winding. Nat. Phys.10.48550/arXiv.2306.09423 (2024).
- 23.Zeljkovic I, et al. Imaging the impact of single oxygen atoms on superconducting Bi2+ySr2-yCaCu2O8+x. Science. 2012;337:320–323. doi: 10.1126/science.1218648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zeljkovic I, Hoffman JE. Interplay of chemical disorder and electronic inhomogeneity in unconventional superconductors. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013;15:13462–13478. doi: 10.1039/c3cp51387d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhao H, et al. Imaging antiferromagnetic domain fluctuations and the effect of atomic scale disorder in a doped spin-orbit Mott insulator. Sci. Adv. 2021;7:abi6468. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abi6468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gerber S, et al. Three-dimensional charge density wave order in YBa2Cu3O6.67 at high magnetic fields. Science (1979) 2015;350:949–952. doi: 10.1126/science.aac6257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kometter CR, et al. Hofstadter states and re-entrant charge order in a semiconductor moiré lattice. Nat. Phys. 2023;19:1861–1867. doi: 10.1038/s41567-023-02195-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Thomas SM, et al. Spatially inhomogeneous superconductivity in UTe2. Phys. Rev. B. 2021;104:224501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.224501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kim, H. et al. Tuning a magnetic energy scale with pressure in UTe2. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.00180 (2023).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The computer code used for data analysis is available upon request from the corresponding authors.
The STM data generated in this study have been deposited in the Zenodo database under accession code 11176886.