Skip to main content
Annals of Intensive Care logoLink to Annals of Intensive Care
letter
. 2024 May 26;14:82. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01289-z

Challenges in investigating “Gut barrier dysfunction and bacterial translocation in ICU-acquired bacteremia”

Luping Wang 1,#, Xiaoxiao Xia 1,#, Qin Wu 1, Hao Yang 1,
PMCID: PMC11128412  PMID: 38796824

Dear editor

We read with great interest the recent article by Varkila et al. titled “Gut barrier dysfunction and the risk of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired bacteremia - a case-control study” published in Annals of Intensive Care [1]. The authors investigated the relationship between gut barrier dysfunction and ICU-acquired bacteremia through a retrospective case-control study. While we appreciate their efforts to explore this important topic, several issues in the study design and interpretation of results warrant further discussion.

First, the authors used enterococcal bacteremia as a surrogate for bacterial translocation from the gut, with coagulase-negative staphylococcal (CoNS) bacteremia as a control representing non-gut origin infections. However, this assumption may be oversimplified. Enterococci can also contaminate catheters and cause bacteremia, while CoNS may occasionally colonize the gut. Completely attributing enterococcal bacteremia to gut translocation and CoNS bacteremia to catheter infection could bias the results.

Second, the biomarkers used in this study (intestinal fatty-acid binding protein (I-FABP), trefoil factor-3 (TFF3), and citrulline) may not accurately reflect gut barrier function. The authors observed unexpected positive correlations between citrulline and I-FABP/TFF3, suggesting these markers’ levels could be confounded by factors like renal dysfunction and critical illness severity [2]. Incorporating additional markers of gut permeability, mucus integrity, and mucosal immunity might provide a more comprehensive assessment of gut barrier dysfunction.

Third, the study only included ICU-acquired bacteremia occurring after 48 h of ICU stay, with a median enrollment time of 7 days post-ICU admission. This delayed timing may underestimate the risk of bacterial translocation during the acute phase of critical illness. Future studies should consider enrolling patients earlier and evaluating gut barrier function longitudinally.

Furthermore, blood cultures alone may not capture all bacterial translocation events, as the process can be transient and intermittent. Complementary approaches, such as detecting bacterial DNA in blood, analyzing the gut and blood microbiome, and assessing specific immune responses to translocated bacteria, could provide additional evidence of translocation [3].

Lastly, the retrospective case-control design has inherent limitations in controlling for confounding factors. Despite matching for age, renal dysfunction, and ICU length of stay, residual confounding might still exist. Stratified analyses, where the matching was broken, could be particularly prone to confounding. A prospective cohort study with comprehensive data collection and adjustment would be valuable to validate these findings.

In conclusion, while Varkila et al.‘s study provides valuable insights, further research is needed to elucidate the complex relationship between gut barrier dysfunction and ICU-acquired infections. A multi-faceted approach integrating clinical, microbiological, and immunological parameters may help to better characterize bacterial translocation and its clinical significance in critical illness.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ICU

Intensive care unit

CoNS

Coagulase-negative staphylococcal

I-FABP

Intestinal fatty-acid binding protein

TFF3

Trefoil factor-3

Author contributions

LW and HY conceptualized the study. LPW and XX wrote the manuscript. QW and HY substantively revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The work was supported by grants from the China National Key Research and Development Program (No. 2020AAA0105005).

Data availability

Not applicable.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Luping Wang and Xiaoxiao Xia contributed equally to this work.

References

  • 1.Varkila MRJ, Verboom DM, Derde LPG, van der Poll T, Bonten MJM, Cremer OL, et al. Gut barrier dysfunction and the risk of ICU-acquired bacteremia- a case–control study. Ann Intensiv Care. 2024;14(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01280-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Piton G, Manzon C, Cypriani B, Carbonnel F, Capellier G. Acute intestinal failure in critically ill patients: is plasma citrulline the right marker? Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(6):911–7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2172-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gatt M, Reddy BS, MacFie J. Review article: bacterial translocation in the critically ill–evidence and methods of prevention. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25(7):741–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03174.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Annals of Intensive Care are provided here courtesy of Springer-Verlag

RESOURCES