Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2024 May 15;10(10):e31286. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31286

Delineating the mechanistic relevance of the TP53 gene and its mutational impact on gene expression and patients’ survival in bladder cancer

Dipankor Chatterjee a, Shabiha Afroj Heeamoni a, Tamanna Sultana a, Sadia Islam Mou a, Munshi Akid Mostofa b, Md Akmal Hossain a, Md Ismail Hosen a, Md Omar Faruk a,
PMCID: PMC11129003  PMID: 38803860

Abstract

Bladder carcinoma (BLCA) is a widespread urological malignancy causing significant global mortality, often hindered by delayed diagnosis and limited treatments. BLCA frequently exhibits TP53 mutations, playing a pivotal role in its pathogenesis and underscoring the potential of targeting TP53 as a therapeutic approach for this prevalent urological malignancy. Tumor tissues from 50 bladder cancer patients were used for mutational analysis in TP53's mutation-rich exons (5, 7, & 8). The gene expression of the TP53 gene, along with a TP53-target gene B‐cell translocation gene 2 (BTG2) was also assessed in the cDNA samples from the same BLCA tissues and 15 urine controls of healthy people. The analysis revealed 22 % of patients with somatic hotspot mutations, 18 % with pathogenic missense mutations, and 12 % with intronic variants. Patients with somatic mutations exhibited the worst prognosis, supported by survival analysis from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) BLCA data. Interestingly, H296Y missense mutation correlated with higher TP53 expression and improved survival, while intronic SNPs were linked to worse outcomes. Additionally, upregulated BTG2 expression in mutated patients was observed which was correlated with poor prognosis, emphasizing the role of TP53 mutations in bladder cancer progression. The multivariate analysis highlighted the predictive power of TP53 mutations, with a high frequency of high-grade tumors (78.57 %) in mutated patients, underscoring their role in cancer progression. In conclusion, this study emphasizes the crucial role of TP53 mutations in bladder cancer patients from Bangladesh.

Keywords: Bladder carcinoma, Tumor suppressor, Somatic mutation, Overall survival, Diagnosis

Highlights

  • 46 % of the Bangladeshi bladder cancer cohort carried TP53 mutations.

  • TP53-mutated patients showed altered target gene expression in BLCA.

  • TP53-mutated BLCA patients are associated with poor survival.

  • TCGA bladder cancer dataset analysis validated each observation.

1. Introduction

The fatality rate from bladder carcinoma, which is the tenth most common cancer worldwide, is 0.84 % per 100,000 persons in Bangladesh [1]. Each year, around 573000 new cases are diagnosed globally, leading to 213000 fatalities [2]. When aberrant cells in the bladder begin to proliferate uncontrolled and form a tumor, bladder cancer results. These tumors can encroach on the bladder wall and then spread via the bloodstream or lymphatic system to other regions of the body. The most prevalent form of bladder cancer is transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), sometimes referred to as urothelial carcinoma. Smoking, exposure to certain chemicals, such as those used in the dye, rubber, and leather industries, and a family history of the illness are risk factors for bladder cancer. Bladder cancer is more likely to affect males than women, and the risk rises with age.

Early detection of bladder cancer is crucial for successful treatment, and various tests and techniques are employed for this purpose. Cystoscopy involves using a specialized tube to examine the urethra and bladder. Biopsy or Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor (TURBT) can be performed during cystoscopy to extract a cell sample for diagnosis and treatment. Urine cytology involves examining cells in a urine sample to detect cancer cells. Imaging tests like retrograde pyelogram and CT urogram provide detailed views of the urinary tract to identify potential cancerous regions. Early detection through these methods significantly improves the chances of successful treatment outcomes for bladder cancer [3].

In the pursuit of understanding this hallmark of cancer, extensive research has unveiled a trio of pivotal suppressive genes that play a pivotal role in inhibiting cellular growth and proliferation. These genes, namely Tumor protein p53 (TP53), Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), and retinoblastoma (RB), serve as guardians of orderly cell division, ensuring that it occurs in a highly regulated manner in non-cancerous cells [4,5]. TP53 has emerged as a pivotal tumor suppressor across various cancer types, managing a multifaceted role in navigating complex cellular progression. TP53 mutations are prevalent in bladder cancer, with nearly half of the muscle-invasive cases showing these mutations, compromising TP53 function in 76 % of cases. These mutations, along with TP53-associated pathways, drive bladder cancer progression, impacting prognosis and guiding therapeutic approaches [[6], [7], [8]]. About 7 % of bladder cancer cases have been linked to heritable genetic predispositions [9].

TP53 controls the regulated expression of many genes, including BTG2 which is another tumor suppressor gene, and any disruption in their regulation leads to cancer development. The BTG2 gene plays a crucial role in cancer by acting as a tumor suppressor. It regulates the cell cycle, induces programmed cell death (apoptosis), repairs DNA damage, and promotes cellular senescence, all of which help prevent uncontrolled cell proliferation and tumor growth. In a recent study, a compelling revelation emerged regarding BTG2, which was initially recognized as a gene under the influence of the tumor suppressor protein p53 [10]. This intricate interplay between p53 and BTG2 sheds light on the molecular response to DNA damage and the regulatory mechanisms that govern gene expression. It highlights the significance of p53 not only as a guardian of genomic integrity but also as a key modulator of genes like BTG2, which can play critical roles in cellular processes and responses to stress. However, in a study, it was found that BTG2, typically a tumor suppressor gene, paradoxically promotes bladder cancer cell migration [11].

Mutant TP53 further fuels mechanisms underlying cancer initiation and progression, contributing to unfavorable disease outcomes [12,13]. Indeed, research has underscored the capacity of mutant TP53 to accelerate the proliferation of metastatic tumor cells and enhance their metastatic potential [14]. Moreover, TP53 status has implications for chemotherapy responses and drug sensitivity in bladder cancer [15,16].

This novel study aimed to explore the complex correlation between TP53 gene mutations and the progression of bladder cancer by examining their influence on TP53 and the TP53-target gene BTG2 expression. The study also sought to investigate the association of these mutations with the survival of bladder cancer patients within a cohort residing in Bangladesh.

2. Method and materials

This extensive study was designed with the primary aim of uncovering somatic mutations within the three most mutation-prone exon regions of TP53 while simultaneously understanding the intricate complexities of TP53 gene expression in individuals identified with bladder cancer. Beyond this, this research endeavor was dedicated to unraveling the modified mechanisms governing TP53 in the context of bladder cancer, catalyzed by the acquisition of somatic TP53 mutations. To observe this complicacy, the expression patterns of TP53's target genes BTG2 were scrutinized, thereby providing a comprehensive outcome of the repercussions stemming from TP53 mutations and the subsequent alterations in gene expression within the realm of bladder cancer patients.

The workflow of this research is visualized in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Graphical representation of laboratory experiments and bioinformatics validation.

2.1. Study Subjects and sample processing

The study enrolled a cohort of 50 bladder cancer patients, regardless of gender or grade, who provided their written consent. These patients were under the care of the Urology department at the National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital in Mohakhali. Urine samples were procured the day before the surgical procedures. Immediately following the surgical procedures, tumor samples were carefully collected within specialized RNA Protect tissue tubes at the Urology department of the National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital in Mohakhali (Ethical approval reference: NICRH/Ethics/2021/181). These samples were then transported to the laboratory within an ice box, preserving a constant temperature range of 4-8 °C. Upon arrival at the laboratory, the tumor samples, securely nestled within RNA Protect tubes, were stored in the container of a −80 °C refrigerator, ensuring their optimum condition and readiness for future utilization in the research endeavors.

This study also included urine samples from 15 healthy individuals as control to compare expression data with tumor. The urine sample was initially collected in a 50 ml Falcon tube and transported to the laboratory at room temperature. Subsequently, the samples underwent centrifugation at 3000 rcf for 30 min at 25 °C using the Sigma 3-18k centrifuge. The resulting supernatant was discarded. The urine pellet received urine conditioning buffer from the Zymo Research Quick-DNA Tm Mini Kit, and phosphate buffer saline to retain the integrity of nucleic acid. The tube containing the pellet was vortexed until complete dissolution, followed by immediate storage at −20 °C for subsequent experiments.

2.2. Genomic DNA extraction

The extraction process was carried out utilizing the Qiagen Puregene Core Kit A, which came equipped with pre-prepared and ready-to-use reagents for convenience. Tumor tissue, initially stored at −80 °C, was thawed on ice, and 30 mg was transferred to a mortar for pulverization with liquid nitrogen. The resulting tissue paste was mixed with 900 μL of cell lysis solution, transferred to a microcentrifuge tube, and incubated at 55 °C overnight. Subsequent steps involved the addition of tissue Proteinase K, RNase, and Tissue protein precipitation solution, followed by centrifugation. The supernatant was mixed with isopropanol, centrifuged, and the DNA pellet air-dried before being rehydrated with DNA hydration solution. After incubation at 65 °C, DNA concentration and purity were assessed using Nanodrop OneC Micro volume UV–Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, US), and the DNA was stored at −80 °C for future use. The overall DNA extraction procedure from tumor tissue is graphically shown in Supplementary Fig. 1A.

2.3. Assessment of mutational status in the TP53 gene

In order to detect mutations within the TP53 exon regions, amplifying these specific regions through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed. Using primer blast (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/) from NCBI, primer pairs were created for the TP53 gene's GenBank reference sequence (NG_017013.2) that enabled the amplification of the target sequences around exons 5, 7, and 8 in 50 patients. The primer sequences are stored in Supplementary Table 1. UCSC in Silico PCR (https://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgPcr) has been utilized to validate the selected primer's accuracy. Amplification was performed on the Biometra TAdvance PCR system. The conditions for PCR amplification for required regions are mentioned in Supplementary Table 1. To confirm the specificity and accuracy of the PCR amplification, agarose gel electrophoresis was employed. Following the electrophoresis run, the gel was visualized using a gel documentation machine. The observed DNA bands were then compared to the DNA ladder to confirm the size of the amplicons. PCR products were purified and the Sanger sequencing was performed using state-of-the-art technology, specifically capillary gel electrophoresis, facilitated by the AB135000 genetic analyzer. Upon the successful sequencing of all the PCR product samples, the ensuing data analysis was conducted with the sophisticated Geneious Prime software V2023, available at https://www.geneious.com/prime/. In this comprehensive analysis, the sequences were meticulously aligned with a reference sequence sourced from the esteemed NCBI nucleotide reference sequence database.

2.4. RNA extraction from tumor tissue and urine pellet

RNA was extracted from 50 bladder patient tumor tissues using the Pure Link RNA extraction mini kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States). The RNA extraction process from tumor tissue involved thawing the tissue on ice, transferring approximately 30 mg to a mortar, and grinding it into a paste with liquid nitrogen. Subsequently, a lysis buffer with 2-mercaptoethanol was added, and after an overnight incubation at 4 °C, the sample underwent centrifugation. The RNA-containing supernatant was collected, and ethanol was added to the tissue homogenate. The mixture was processed through a spin cartridge, with wash buffers I and II applied in subsequent steps. After centrifugation to dry the membrane, RNase-free water was added for RNA elution. The eluted RNA was then stored at −80 °C for future use. The detailed process involved various centrifugation and wash steps to ensure the extraction of high-quality RNA from the tumor tissue. The RNA extraction procedure from tumor tissue was presented graphically in Supplementary Fig. 1B.

For extraction of RNA from healthy control urine centrifugation was performed following the collection of urine and supernatant was discarded to collect the urine pellet. The RNA extraction process began with the addition of 1 ml triazole reagent to a 250 ml pellet sample, followed by pipetting for homogenization and a 5-min incubation. Chloroform (0.2 ml) was then added, and after thorough mixing, the solution was incubated for an additional 2–3 min. Centrifugation at 12000g for 15 min at 4 °C separated the aqueous phase, which was transferred to a new tube. Isopropanol (0.5 ml) was added, and the solution was incubated for 10 min at 4 °C before centrifugation. After discarding the supernatant, the RNA pellet underwent resuspension in 1 ml of 75 % ethanol, followed by vortexing and centrifugation. This ethanol wash step was repeated once. The RNA pellet was air-dried for 5 min, resuspended in 20–50 μL RNase-free water with 0.1 Mm EDTA, and incubated at 55–60 °C for 10–15 min. Finally, the RNA was stored at −80 °C.

The quality and quantity of the extracted RNA were evaluated using the NanoDrop OneC Micro volume UV–Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, US). The RNA extraction procedure from the urine pellet was presented graphically in Supplementary Fig. 1C.

2.5. Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and data analysis

To generate cDNA from tumor and urine-derived RNA, the ProtoScript® II First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit was used, sourced from New England Biolabs in Ipswich, Massachusetts, United States. the TB Green qPCR Master Mix, forward and reverse primers, and template cDNA were combined to create a 10 μL reaction mixture and RT-qPCR was done using The CFX96 Real-Time system. The qPCR amplification conditions are provided in Supplementary Table 1.

In qPCR, genes of interest were amplified, TP53, and BTG2, along with a reference gene, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The RT-qPCR primers are given in Supplementary Table 1. The qPCR analysis was conducted with triplicates for each sample. Each qPCR plate included both target and housekeeping genes and the resulting data were subjected to analysis. To analyze gene expression, the ΔCT method was employed [17]. This involved obtaining CT values for TP53, BTG2, and GAPDH, and then calculating ΔCT by subtracting the CT value of GAPDH from the CT value of TP53 and BTG2. Mathematically, ΔCT can be represented as follows:

ΔCT = CT of TP53 or BTG2 - CT of GAPDH (Mean values were used for CT calculations).

2.6. Statistical data analysis

Statistical analysis was thoroughly carried out using the versatile R programming language. Within the R environment, Kaplan-Meier curves, executing the Log-rank test, and conducting Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed. In this analysis, statistical significance was attributed to P-values less than 0.05, signifying the rigor of the findings. The parameter under scrutiny was overall survival (OS), defined as the duration from diagnosis to the ultimate follow-up or demise. To assess disparities in survival curves, the log-rank test was adeptly applied. Furthermore, R programming facilitated the creation of compelling graphical representations of the data, ensuring clarity and effective communication of research findings.

2.7. Computational analysis for validation

TCGA bladder carcinoma (BLCA) data was used for mutation, expression, and survival analyses to validate the outcome of experimental analyses. Swiss model was used to predict the 3D model of TP53 mutated proteins using PDB ID: 8F2H and the Galaxy refine tool was employed for structure refinement [18,19]. PROCHECK validation tools to observe the quality of predicted models [20]. Subsequently, PyMol software and TM-align server were exploited to observe structural deviation of TP53-mutated models from wild TP53 structure [21,22]. Furthermore, various prediction tools, including SIFT, PON-P2, I-Mutant, and MUpro were utilized for functional and stability observations of mutated TP53 [[23], [24], [25], [26]]. Clinvar and Cosmic databases were exploited to examine the clinical significance of these somatic mutations [27,28].

3. Result

In this study, transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURB-T) surgery was performed on 50 bladder cancer patients. Each patient's clinical data as well as tumor tissue samples were obtained throughout the operation. The TP53 mutation-prone exons (5,7, & 8) underwent a mutational study using Sanger sequencing on the tumor DNA. The survival rates of patients and general pathophysiological conditions were then connected with the existence of these genetic anomalies. The expression levels of the TP53 and TP53-target gene BTG2 were measured using real-time quantitative PCR in the patients to investigate the mutational impact in bladder cancer patients. The experiment also included the correlation with immune cell infiltration.

3.1. Clinicopathological features of bladder cancer patients and healthy controls

This study comprised 50 bladder cancer patients, consisting of 37 males (74 %) and 13 females (26 %). The demographic characteristics of the study participants are summarized in Table 1. For male patients, the average age was 57.51 years [±11.72 standard deviation (SD)], with a median of 60 years (interquartile range: 17). In contrast, female patients had an average age of 57.27 years (±12.09 SD) and a median of 57 years (IQR: 18). In terms of body mass index (BMI), male patients had an average BMI of 21.83 kg/m2 (±2.80 SD) and a median BMI of 21.71 kg/m2 (IQR: 2.38). On the other hand, female patients exhibited an average BMI of 21.94 kg/m2 (±2.55 SD) and a median BMI of 21.71 kg/m2 (IQR: ±2.22).

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of Bladder cancer patients and healthy controls.

Demographic characteristics of Bladder cancer patients.
Bladder Cancer Patients Age (Years)
BMI
Mean (±SD) Median (IQR) Mean (±SD) Median (IQR)
Male 57.51 (±11.72) 60 (17) 21.83 (±2.80) 21.71 (±2.38)
Female 57.27 (±12.09) 57 (18) 21.94 (±2.55) 21.71 (±2.22)
Characteristics Condition No. of patients
Cigeratte or betel leaf habit Yes 38
No 12
Cancer status Recurrent 31
Primary 19
Cancer Subtype NMIBC 48
MIBC 2
Cancer grade High grade 17
Low grade 6
N/A 24
Hematuria Yes 45
No 5
Demographic characteristics of Healthy individuals.
Healthy Controls Age (Years)
BMI
Mean (±SD) Median (IQR) Mean (±SD) Median (IQR)
Male 52.79(±10.57) 52(13) 24.99 (±3.73) 23.83 (±5.02)
Female 52.6(±10.57) 52 (5) 26.64 (±3.05) 26.64 (±2.15)

This study also included 15 healthy controls with 12 male and 3 female. The demographic characteristics of the study participants are summarized in Table 1. For male controls, the average age was 52.79 years, with a median of 52 years. In contrast, female controls had an average age of 52.6 years and a median of 52 years. In terms of body mass index (BMI), male controls had an average BMI of 24.99 kg/m2 and a median BMI of 23.83 kg/m2. On the other hand, female controls exhibited an average BMI of 26.64 kg/m2 and a median BMI of 26.64 kg/m2.

3.2. PCR amplification of exon 5,7, & 8 of TP53 gene

After optimizing the accurate condition using gradient PCR, most mutation-prone exons 5, 7, and 8 of TP53 were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and the reaction produced 304, 332, and 250bp products for exons 5, 7, and 8, respectively (Fig. 2). The PCR products underwent purification using the ExoSAP reagent with 100 % efficiency, after which the purified samples were subjected to sequencing using Sanger's dideoxy chain termination method.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Electrophoresis of PCR amplification product of TP53 (A) exon 5 (304bp), (B) exon 7 (332 bp), and (C) exon 8 (250 bp) on agarose gels. A 100bp DNA ladder was utilized to determine the size of the DNA bands. Numbers correspond to the sample numbers, while NTC denotes to Non-Template Sequence.

3.3. Mutational data analysis

The Sanger sequencing data was processed using the Geneious Prime software, aligning it with the reference sequence of the TP53 exon 5, 7, and 8 regions sourced from NCBI. Chromatogram observation of the mutations was visualized in Supplementary Fig. 2.

Mutation analysis of exons 5, 7, and 8 of the TP53 gene revealed the presence of a total of 10 mutations including, somatic hotspot mutations, missense pathogenic mutations, and intronic variants. These 10 mutations were presented in 23 patients from a total of 50 patients giving a mutation frequency of 46 % (Fig. 3A). Mutations were presented in males in a higher proportion compared to females (Fig. 3B). Among, 10 mutations, 7 somatic mutations were discovered in 3 exons (2 in exon 5, 2 in exon 7, and 3 in exon 8) which presented in 11 bladder cancer patients giving a Somatic hotspot mutation frequency of 22 %. Moreover, one missense pathogenic mutation in exon 8 was found in 9 patients with a frequency of 18 %. Two intronic variants were found downstream of exon 7 according to hg38 in 6 patients (12 %) (Fig. 3C). Considering only pathogenic mutations, including somatic and missense mutations gave a mutation frequency of about 40 %. The details about these mutations are given below in Table 2. A graphical representation of mutational data observation is depicted in Fig. 4.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Frequency of TP53 mutations in bladder cancer. (A) A pie chart representing the overall proportion of mutations in Bangladeshi bladder cancer patients. (B) A bar plot showing higher mutational frequency in males compared to females. (C) A bar plot representing the frequencies of different types of mutations found from the mutational analysis of exons 5, 7, and 8 of TP53 in the Bangladeshi bladder cancer population.

Table 2.

The mutation position, type, and frequency in exons 5, 7, and 8 in the TP53 gene.

Exon Genomic Changes Mutation Variant
Frequency Count Global Maf Total Grand
Type Total
5 chr17: g.7675216C > G K132 N Somatic 4 % 2 in 50 6 % 46 %
chr17: g.7675143C > A V157F Somatic 2 % 1 in 50
7 chr17: g.7674229C > T G245D Somatic 4 % 2 in 50 20 %
chr17: g.7674252C > G M237I Somatic 2 % 1 in 50
Chr17: 7674109 C > T (rs12947788) Intronic 12 % 6 in 50 0.178
Chr17:7674089 T > G (rs12951053) Intronic 4 % 2 in 50 0.178
8 chr17:7673774 T > A R2833S Somatic 6 % 3 in 50 24 %
chr17: g.7673788G > T P278T Somatic 2 % 1 in 50
chr17: g.7673734G > A H296Y Missense 18 % 9 in 50
chr17: g.7673802C > T R273H somatic 2 % 1 in 50

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Graphical representation of bladder cancer patients carrying mutations along with the frequency. This figure provided details about different mutations in patients denoted by different colors along with the frequency of mutations of each exon (left bar plot portion).

3.4. Mutational impact upon the expression of TP53

A total of 46 cDNA, prepared from RNA samples of 46 bladder cancer patients and 15 cDNA prepared from RNA of 15 urine-healthy control, was available for gene expression analysis. To remove any biases from the expression study, control samples were chosen according to the confounding variables of tumor patients' data. There was an equal proportion of males and females in both the control and patient cohorts. There were also no significant differences in age between the two cohorts. This ensured an unbiased expression analysis without concern about any effects from confounding variables (Supplementary Fig. 3).

As TP53 is frequently mutated in tumor tissue compared to non-cancerous cells, the tumor-specific expression pattern was observed for TP53 and TP53-target gene BTG2 by taking urine cDNA as control. For this analysis, the ΔCt method was applied which means the expression ΔCt value of TP53 and BTG2 genes were normalized by housekeeping reference gene GAPDH. For expression analysis, the ΔCt value represents the inverse of the expression which means a high ΔCt value denotes a low expression value.

Expression analysis between the control and tumor patients showed a statistically significant decrease in the expression of TP53 in the tumor compared to control samples as tumor samples tend to have a high ΔCt value (Fig. 5A). However, no changes in the expression pattern were observed between somatic mutated and non-mutated or wild-type samples indicating the somatic mutations were not affecting the expression of TP53 itself (Fig. 5B), and this scenario was expected as the obtained mutations were inactivating mutations and affecting the TP53 activity.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Boxplot representation of TP53 expression pattern between (A) Control and bladder cancer patients where an independent T-test was performed giving a p-value <0.05. (B) Expression analysis was conducted between control, somatic-mutant, and non-mutant patients. An Anova test was performed between these three groups giving a p-value <0.05 which indicated a significant difference in means among these groups. No significant difference was observed between mutant and non-mutant groups (p-value >0.05).

3.5. Impact of somatic mutations on the expression TP53-target gene BTG2

To observe how the somatic mutations affect the downstream mechanisms that allow cancer progression, the expression pattern of TP53-target gene BTG2 in control, TP53-somatic mutant, and TP53-nonmutant was observed. The analysis revealed that BTG2 mean expression was lower in tumor tissue compared to control although the result was not significant (p = 0.64) (Fig. 6A). However, in the mutant patients, there was a tendency for high expression of BTG2 compared to wild-type patients (Mutant ΔCt-median < Wild ΔCt-median) (Fig. 6B). A previously performed study showed that endogenous expression of BTG2 is associated with poor bladder cancer patient survival and silencing this gene inhibits cell proliferation [11].

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Boxplot representation of BTG2 expression compared between (A) tumor-control, and (B) wildtype-mutant patients. Mean BTG2 expression was lower in patients compared to control (p-value >0.05) while there tends to be a high expression of BTG2 in the mutant group compared to wild-type patients.

Further evidence was observed where BTG2 expression increased (lower ΔCt value) and TP53 expression slightly decreased in high-grade patients (Fig. 7) compared to low-grade patients. This increased expression of BTG2 in high-grade patients supported the significance of BTG2 in cancer and this also explained the relevance of somatic mutations in cancer progression as the somatic mutant group showed increased BTG2 expression.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Expression pattern of (A) BTG2 and (B) TP53 in high and low-grade patients. Wilcoxon rank test was performed for individual analysis. A high mean expression of BTG2 was noticed in high-grade patients with a contrast to lower expression of TP53 in high-grade patients.

3.6. Impact of H296Y and intronic mutations on cancer

A missense mutation, H296Y, was found within the Bangladeshi bladder cancer population, and there is no report regarding the functional consequences of this mutation. To comprehend, how this mutation was influencing bladder cancer progression the samples were subtyped into two groups, the H296Y-mutant group and the wild-type group, and subsequently, expression analysis was performed between these two groups for TP53 and BTG2. Interestingly, it was observed that the patients carrying this mutation had a tendency to express TP53 and BTG2 in higher amounts and as these two genes are tumor suppressors, expressing in high amounts will lead to protection against bladder cancer progression (Fig. 8). Therefore, this mutation, H296Y, may have a protective role against cancer advancement although further study is required to support this observation.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

The expression pattern of (A) TP53, and (B) BTG2 between H296Y-mutant and wild-type bladder cancer patients. Both TP53 and BTG2 upregulated in mutant patients. Wilcoxon test was used to observe the significance of the data (p-value <0.05).

In addition, two more intronic variants, rs12947788, and rs12951053, were found in this population which were already reported in the Ensembl database, but these mutations have no impact on regulating the expression of TP53. There was no significant difference in TP53 expression between wild-type and patients carrying the intronic variants (Supplementary Fig. 4).

3.7. Associations of TP53-mutations with bladder cancer patient's survival

To observe how the somatic mutations were impacting the survivability of a patient, survival analysis was performed using available 32 bladder cancer survival data. The analysis of survival data for patients with TP53 somatic mutations revealed a poor prognosis compared to patients with wild-type TP53 although the analysis was not statistically significant due to the low number of patient samples (Fig. 9A). This finding was further validated by categorizing TCGA BLCA (bladder carcinoma) data into somatic mutant and wildtype groups based on the observed mutations in this study, which consistently demonstrated a worse prognosis for TP53-somatic mutant TCGA patients (Fig. 9B). It was also observed that lower expression of TP53 in bladder cancer was also associated with poor prognosis in Bangladeshi bladder cancer patients with time. This observation was further confirmed through TCGA survival data analysis, which indicated that patients with lower TP53 expression had a worse prognosis (Supplementary Fig. 5).

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Survival analysis for bladder cancer patients using the Kaplan-Meier method. Observation of mutational association with (A) Bangladeshi bladder cancer patients, and (B) TCGA bladder cancer data. For both cases, the mutant group showed a poor prognosis compared to the wild-type (p-value >0.05).

Correspondingly, an association of TP53-target gene BTG2 gene expression with patient survival was also observed and patients with highly expressing BTG2 showed the worst prognosis for both the Bangladeshi population and TCGA BLCA data (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Association of TP53 gene expression with the survival status of (A) Bangladeshi bladder cancer patients and (B) TCGA BLCA data. For both cases, patients expressing lower TP53 were associated with worse prognosis with time.

Survival analysis was also performed for H296Y-mutant and wildtype patients and better survival was observed for the H296Y-mutant group, supporting the previous observation for its protective role in patients’ survival although p-value >0.05 (Supplementary Fig. 6).

Furthermore, survival analysis was performed to determine the strength of intronic variants (rs12951053 and rs12947788) in influencing the survivability of bladder cancer patients and was observed to be associated with the worst prognosis of bladder cancer patients (Supplementary Fig. 7A). This was found consistent with the assessment of the regulatory effect of these variants utilizing the RegulomeDB web tool where it was found that these variants affect the binding of transcription factors (Supplementary Fig. 7B). Therefore, these intronic variants may have potential implications in bladder cancer progression, and for this further extensive study is required with a large sample size.

3.8. Significance of somatic mutations in cancer progression

TP53 and BTG2 are two hubs of a large transcription factor network and any disruption in the function of TP53 ultimately results in an imbalance of such a large network that results in cancer progression (Supplementary Fig. 8A) and somatic mutations were found to be affecting the function of TP53.

To further evaluate the influence of somatic mutations on cancer progression, the study calculated the occurrence of high- and low-grade patients in both somatic-mutant and wild-type categories. The findings indicated that among mutant patients, the majority belonged to the high-grade category. Moreover, the frequency of high-grade patients with mutations was higher than those without any somatic mutations (Supplementary Fig. 8B).

3.9. Multivariate analysis of TP53 somatic mutations

A multivariate analysis was performed considering the various confounding factors, including age, gender, smoking, and mutation, to observe the risk assessment capability of the somatic mutations by correlating with the survival status of bladder cancer patients. For this, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed using the survival package, and a forest plot was used to visualize the result of the analysis in R programming language. The analysis revealed that among all the variables mutation had the highest hazard ratio (1.84) although the p-value was greater than 0.05 which can be compensated by increasing the sample size (Supplementary Fig. 9A). This implied that mutation was the best risk assessment tool among all the variables for bladder cancer patients. To validate this result, TCGA BLCA data was utilized for the same purpose, and a similar trend was observed where the mutation had the highest hazard ratio, signifying the importance of these mutations in predicting the risk of bladder cancer patients (Supplementary Fig. 9B).

3.10. Immunological assessment of TP53 somatic mutations

In addition, an immunological assessment of the TP53-somatic mutations was performed using TCGA BLCA data where the data was subtyped into two categories, wild-type and somatic mutant group. For this analysis immune scores for each TCGA BLCA patient were collected from ESTIMATE (https://bioinformatics.mdanderson.org/estimate/) webserver. This immune score represents the abundance of immune cell infiltration in tumors. By comparing the immune scores between the two subtypes, it revealed that the mutant patients tend to have higher immune score compared to the wild type and this implied that the tumor tissue in mutant patients are more abundant with immune cells compared to other patients although the result is not significant (Supplementary Fig. 10A). As a result, these mutant patients may be more susceptible to immune therapy compared to wild-type. Therefore, these somatic mutations can be used in subtyping the bladder cancer population in Bangladesh for a population-specific immune therapy purpose.

3.11. Differential expression and enrichment analysis between somatic mutant and wildtype TCGA patients

Enrichment analysis was performed utilizing the TCGA BLCA data between 9 observed mutated patients containing mutation from the study and 21 wild-type patients bearing no observed mutations. Initially, differential expression analysis was conducted between these two groups using the cBioPortal web tool, and 265 genes were found that were upregulated in the mutated patient based on specific parameter settings (log fold change > ±1 and adjusted p-value <0.05). These upregulated genes were then subjected to enrichment analysis using the enrichR package in the R programming language. The analysis revealed the enrichment of various immunological hallmark pathways, including inflammatory response, IL-2/STAT5 Signaling, complement, and TNF alpha/beta signaling pathways. The mutated patients are also enriched in biological processes that promote cancer progression, including, epithelial cell proliferation, regulation of cell adhesion, positive regulation of the cellular process, and many other pathways (Supplementary Fig. 10B). Hence, these somatic mutations could potentially drive the advancement of cancer to more advanced stages, while the prevalence of immunological pathways suggests a promising therapeutic approach through immunotherapy for patients with these mutations.

3.12. Impact of mutations in TP53 protein structure, function, and stability

For validating the influence of mutations on protein structure, function, and stability was assessed using computational tools. The TP53 protein structure was predicted for each coding mutation along with the wild-type TP53 using the Swiss model and refined using the GalaxyRefine tool. All the predicted models were evaluated by Ramachandran plot and all models have more than 90 % residues in the favored regions. Then, the RMSD and TM align score was calculated for each mutated model. All showed a score deviation from 0 for RMSD and 1 for TM-align score, depicting the alteration in the structure from wild-type. Furthermore, functional analysis was performed using SIFT, and PON-P2, where all the somatic mutations disclosed pathogenic characteristics and the missense H296Y mutation showed a non-pathogenic behavior. This aligns with the observation where H296Y mutated patients showed better survival and somatic mutant patients had poor prognoses. Clinvar assessment also supported these observations which dictates the clinical relevance of the mutations. I-Mutant and MUpro servers were used to observe the effect of mutations on protein stability and all somatic mutations decreased the TP53 protein's stability whereas H296Y increased the protein's stability (Table 3). This explained the protective role of H296Y. All the somatic mutations were also observed in the cosmic database and found to be affecting multiple regulatory pathways including the MAPK signaling pathway, Androgen Receptor Signaling Pathway, cell cycle, apoptosis, and many others. A graphical representation of mutational protein structures was visualized in Supplementary Fig. 11.

Table 3.

Mutational impact on TP53 protein's structure, function, and structure observed by bioinformatic tools.

Mutation Structural Analysis
Functional Analysis
Stability Asessment
Clinvar classification
RMSD TM_Align SIFT PON-P2 I-Mutant Mupro
R273H 0.212 0.99898 Deleterious Pathogenic Decrease Decrease Pathogenic
P278T 0.192 0.99895 Deleterious Pathogenic Decrease Decrease Pathogenic
K132 N 0.187 0.99884 Deleterious Pathogenic Decrease Decrease Pathogenic
R283S 0.171 0.99922 Deleterious Pathogenic Decrease Decrease Uncertain significance
V157F 0.175 0.99916 Deleterious Pathogenic Decrease Decrease Pathogenic
G245D 0.166 0.999 Deleterious Pathogenic Decrease Decrease Pathogenic
M237I 0.153 0.99929 Deleterious Pathogenic Decrease Decrease Pathogenic
H296Y 0.19 0.99889 Tolerated Non-Pathogenic Increase Increase Likely Benign

4. Discussion

The diagnosis of bladder cancer requires several recurring invasive procedures, such as cystoscopy. Researchers are therefore developing other means, noninvasive and cost-effective, for diagnosing bladder cancer because of the disease's high somatic mutation load. In the majority of cases, the TP53 function is deactivated due to mutations in the TP53 gene that frequently occur in bladder cancer [29]. TP53 mutations, very common in bladder cancer, mainly occur in muscle-invasive cases. A result of the deactivation of TP53 function in the majority is the driving of disease progression, affecting prognosis and therapy. These mutations initiate and advance cancer, with an increase in metastasis and changing responses to chemotherapy [16]. Somatic mutations, such as TP53, give diagnostic markers simple enough to be detected by standard genetic techniques and may revolutionize bladder cancer diagnostics and treatment.

This novel study solely focused on investigating TP53 mutations alongside gene expression and clinical prognosis to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying cancer progression in the Bangladeshi bladder cancer population. This integrated approach helps researchers and clinicians identify specific genetic alterations, their impact on gene expression patterns, and how these factors collectively influence the clinical outcomes and prognoses of patients with bladder cancers. Such studies are pivotal for developing targeted therapies and personalized treatment strategies, ultimately improving patient care and outcomes in the field of oncology.

The most mutation-prone exons (5, 7, & 8) of TP53 were considered for Sanger sequencing and mutation analysis in Bangladeshi bladder cancer patients. TP53 is a regulator of a large transcription network system and therefore, any disturbance in the function of TP53 may lead to abnormal expression dynamics of many cancer-associated genes, including BTG2. For that, the expression dynamicity of TP53 and BTG2 was observed to comprehend the impact of TP53 mutations. The mutation analysis revealed an overall 46 % mutation frequency (23 patients out of 50), which included somatic, missense, and intronic variants which were found to be consistent with other reports [30]. Among them, 11 patients carried 7 somatic mutations (22 %) and 9 patients carried a missense mutation (H296Y). TP53 expression was lower in cancer patients compared to healthy control but, no significant difference in somatic mutated and wild-type patients. Survival analysis showed that these somatic mutations were associated with the worst prognosis and this result was found consistent with TCGA BLCA survival analysis. The identified somatic mutations primarily occur in the DNA binding domain of the TP53 protein.

These mutations do not directly impact the expression of TP53 itself. Instead, they modulate the binding of TP53 to its specific binding sites within the DNA of TP53 target genes. To ensure this, TP53-target gene BTG2 expression was observed which is down-regulated in tumor tissue compared to control, but the mutated samples tend to have high expression of BTG2. This scenario was also found to be consistent with a previously performed study where the authors showed BTG2 silencing leads to inhibition of cellular growth, proliferation, and migration in bladder cancer cell lines, although the exact mechanism is unknown [11]. The survival analysis also supported this statement by revealing the worst prognosis with high expression of BTG2. As TP53-mutated patients showed the worst prognosis with Bangladeshi bladder cancer patients' survival and led to increased expression of BTG2, it can therefore be said that these somatic mutations are supportive of cancer progression by hampering downstream mechanisms that promote tumor formation, and these observations were also found consistent with previous studies [31].

When TP53 is inactivated or mutated in bladder cancer, it can lead to uncontrolled cell growth and the formation of tumors that are more difficult to treat. In these cases, cancer cells are less responsive to therapies such as chemotherapy and radiation, making it challenging to manage the disease effectively. Patients with bladder cancer and TP53 inactivation typically have a worse prognosis compared to those with intact TP53 function. The inactivation of TP53 is associated with higher tumor grade, muscle invasion, and metastasis, all of which contribute to poor survival rates in affected individuals [32].

The precise consequences of the H296Y missense mutation remain undocumented. To shed light on its implications, this study conducted essential observations, offering partial insights into the nature of this mutation. Strikingly, survival analysis of patients carrying the H296Y mutation revealed an overall improved prognosis. Additionally, these patients exhibited elevated expression levels of both TP53 and BTG2 compared to their wild-type counterparts. This increase supports the notion of impeding cancer progression, given that both TP53 and BTG2 are tumor suppressor genes.

Two intronic variants (rs12947788 & rs12951053) were discovered in 6 bladder cancer patients and the RegulomDB server revealed these introns have regulatory effects and can hamper transcription factor binding and distort motifs. The negative effects of these introns were also supported by the association with poor survival of Bangladeshi bladder cancer patients. Previous studies reported a risk association between rs12947788 and colorectal and pancreatic cancers. Therefore, it is required to signify the importance of this variant in bladder cancer [33]. It is also proposed that rs12951053 along with other TP53 somatic mutations associated with genomic instability in breast and esophageal cancer [34]. So, whether this hypothesis extends to bladder cancer or not also needs to be examined.

Following this, the multivariate analysis demonstrated the superior predictive ability of mutations when compared to other potential confounding factors. Additionally, the heightened prevalence of high-grade patients within the somatic mutant groups provided collective evidence supporting the significant impact of TP53 mutations on the progression to more advanced stages of cancer. In addition, another attempt was made to justify the poor clinical implication of these mutations in bladder cancer patients by performing an enrichment analysis between mutated and non-mutated patients utilizing TCGA bladder cancer data which disclosed that immunological pathways along with critical cancerous biological processes were enriched in mutated patients and this was found consistent with the higher immune scores for mutated patients. Consequently, this result proposed that the patients can be subtyped based on TP53 mutations and immune therapy could be notably effective for patients with TP53 mutations. Alterations in structure, functions, and stability due to the coding mutation of TP53 were analyzed through computational analyses and these analyses revealed potential adverse effects on structure, functions, and stability, except for the H296Y missense mutation, which was determined to be non-pathogenic and even enhanced the protein's stability. These findings align with the earlier observations for the H296Y mutation. Even though potential supportive observations were found in this research work, further study will be performed by increasing the sample size with increased survival data, which is a major limitation of this study, upon recruiting enough bladder cancer patient population.

Some regulators control the activity of TP53, including MDM2. This protein regulates the TP53 pathway through several mechanisms, including direct interaction with P53, export of P53 out of the nucleus, and promote P53 degradation [35]. MDM2 is often over-expressed in cancer and this hampers the activity of TP53 [36]. The observed mutations were mostly present in the DNA binding domain and so the transcriptional activity of TP53 was hampered as the downstream gene BTG2 where dysregulated expression was observed. Even if MDM2 does decrease the activity of TP53, the presence of these mutations may act additively in hampering the transcriptional activity of TP53 that altogether promotes cancer progression. Also, there are MDM2 effect-independent P53 pathways as well where these mutations may exert their effect much more strongly [37]. Therefore, this study independently signified the impact of the mutation on the activity of TP53.

The unique nature of this study was attributing the mutations of the TP53 gene, the gene expression patterns, and clinical outcomes specifically in Bangladeshi patients with bladder cancer. Through this focused work, the research pinpointed this population's mutation profiles and their role in individual prognosis. This knowledge gave first-hand data which were analyzed to deliver personalized treatment options depending upon the unique genetic traits of Bangladeshi bladder cancer patients. Through specific targeted research and followed by absolute confirmation and comparison of Bangladeshi data to global data, this study is an advanced initiative to understand bladder cancer genetics and personalized medicine in the Bangladeshi context.

In conclusion, this study explored an important landscape of cancer biology by examining the mutational impact on the tumor suppressor gene, TP53, and identified potential mutations that were associated with the survival of bladder cancer patients in Bangladesh following other bladder cancer reports. The study rigorously analyzed the data including mutation and expression considering TCGA BLCA data as validation material. Altogether, these mutations prevalent in the Bangladeshi bladder cancer population may serve as prominent drivers, significantly impacting TP53 function and mechanisms. Therefore, this study will lay a foundation for further large-scale molecular studies and provide support to shape a therapeutic model for early diagnosis and treatment strategy for the bladder cancer population in Bangladesh.

Data availability

All Data have been provided with the manuscript.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Dipankor Chatterjee: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. Shabiha Afroj Heeamoni: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Validation. Tamanna Sultana: Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Visualization. Sadia Islam Mou: Data curation, Investigation, Validation, Visualization. Munshi Akid Mostofa: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Visualization. Md Akmal Hossain: Data curation, Resources, Validation. Md Ismail Hosen: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Md Omar Faruk: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This research received partial funding from the Centre for Advanced Studies and Research in Biological Science (CASRBC) and Biotechnology Research Centre at the University of Dhaka, Bangladesh, with Dr. Md. Omar Faruk being the grant recipient. We extend our appreciation to the BLCA patients at the National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital, Bangladesh, for their generous sharing of valuable information, which significantly contributed to the successful culmination of this study.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31286.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are the Supplementary data to this article:

Supplementary Table 1

Primer sequences for conventional and RT-qPCR experiments, thermocycler program for TP53 exon 5, 7, and 8 amplifications, the cycle conditions for real-time PCR.

mmc1.xlsx (12.1KB, xlsx)

Supplementary Fig. 1.

Supplementary Fig. 1

Graphical representation of the steps carried out to extract (A) DNA from tumor tissue, (B) RNA from tumor tissue, and (C) RNA from urine pallet.

Supplementary Fig. 2.

Supplementary Fig. 2

Illustrates chromatograms from selected samples in the study, highlighting the mutations in exon 5 (A: K132 N, AAG > AAT), in exon 8 (B: P278L, CCG > CTG; C: R283S, AGA > AGT; D: H296Y, CAC > TAC), and in exon 7 (E: G245D, GGC > GAC; F: M237I, ATG > ATC; G: rs12947788, CCC > TCC; H: rs12951053, TCC > GCC).

Supplementary Fig. 3.

Supplementary Fig. 3

Distribution of (A) gender and (B) age between control and patient cohorts. Gender was equally distributed in both cancer and control groups with no significant difference (p-value >0.05).

Supplementary Fig. 4.

Supplementary Fig. 4

Boxplot representation of the expression of the TP53 gene between control, intronic variants, and wild-type bladder cancer patients. ANOVA test was performed between these 3 groups (p-value <0.05) and the independent T-test showed no major difference in expression between wild-type and intronic mutant groups (p-value <0.05).

Supplementary Fig. 5.

Supplementary Fig. 5

Association of TP53 gene expression with the survival status of (A) Bangladeshi bladder cancer patients and (B) TCGA BLCA data. For both cases, patients expressing lower TP53 were associated with worse prognosis with time.

Supplementary Fig. 6.

Supplementary Fig. 6

Association of H296 mutation with the survival of Bangladeshi bladder cancer patients. H296Y mutant group showed better survival compared to wild-type patients (p-value >0.05).

Supplementary Fig. 7.

Supplementary Fig. 7

(A) Association of intronic variants with patients' survival showing an association of mutant group with poor prognosis. (B) Regulatory effect of intronic variants.

Supplementary Fig. 8.

Supplementary Fig. 8

(A) Transcription factor network of TP53 and BTG2. Both TP53 and BTG2 independently forms a large network transcription factor. (B) Frequency of high and low grades in mutant and wild-type bladder cancer patients. Mutant group contained highest frequency of high-grade patients compared to the wild-type group.

Supplementary Fig. 9.

Supplementary Fig. 9

Forest plot representing the risk-assessing power of different variables using (A) Bangladeshi bladder cancer population and (B) TCGA BTCA data. The analyses showed the highest risk assessment power of mutations compared to other variables (p-value >0.05).

Supplementary Fig. 10.

Supplementary Fig. 10

(A) Immunological assessment between TP53-somatic mutant and wild-type patients using TCGA data. Higher immune cell infiltration level was found in mutant group. (B) Enrichment analysis between wild-type and mutated patients using TCGA BLCA data. Immunological pathways along with other cancer progressive pathways were enriched in mutant patients.

Supplementary Fig. 11.

Supplementary Fig. 11

3D model structure visualization of all TP53 coding mutations.

References

  • 1.Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA. Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhang Y., Rumgay H., Li M., Yu H., Pan H., Ni J. The global landscape of bladder cancer incidence and mortality in 2020 and projections to 2040. J. Glob. Health. 2023;13:4109. doi: 10.7189/JOGH.13.04109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chang S.S., Bochner B.H., Chou R., Dreicer R., Kamat A.M., Lerner S.P., Lotan Y., Meeks J.J., Michalski J.M., Morgan T.M., Quale D.Z., Rosenberg J.E., Zietman A.L., Holzbeierlein J.M. Bladder cancer: diagnosis and treatment. Am. Fam. Physician. 2017;96:507–514. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cooper G.M. 2000. Tumor Suppressor Genes.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9894/ [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Engeland K. Cell cycle regulation: p53-p21-RB signaling. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29:946. doi: 10.1038/S41418-022-00988-Z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Weinstein J.N., Akbani R., Broom B.M., Wang W., Verhaak R.G.W., McConkey D., Lerner S., Morgan M., Creighton C.J., Smith C., Cherniack A.D., Kim J., Pedamallu C.S., Noble M.S., Al-Ahmadie H.A., Reuter V.E., Rosenberg J.E., Bajorin D.F., Bochner B.H., Solit D.B., Koppie T., Robinson B., Gordenin D.A., Fargo D., Klimczak L.J., Roberts S.A., Au J., Laird P.W., Hinoue T., Schultz N., Ramirez R., Hansel D., Hoadley K.A., Kim W.Y., Damrauer J.S., Baylin S.B., Mungall A.J., Robertson A.G., Chu A., Kwiatkowski D.J., Sougnez C., Cibulskis K., Lichtenstein L., Sivachenko A., Stewart C., Lawrence M.S., Getz G., Lander E., Gabrie S.B., Donehower L., Carter S.L., Saksena G., Schumacher S.E., Freeman S.S., Jung J., Bhatt A.S., Pugh T., Beroukhim R., Meyerson M., Ally A., Balasundaram M., Butterfield Y.S.N., Dhalla N., Hirst C., Holt R.A., Jones S.J.M., Lee D., Li H.I., Marra M.A., Mayo M., Moore R.A., Schein J.E., Sipahimalani P., Tam A., Thiessen N., Wong T., Wye N., Bowlby R., Chuah E., Guin R., Shen H., Bootwalla M.S., Triche T., Lai P.H., Van Den Berg D.J., Weisenberger D.J., Balu S., Bodenheimer T., Hoyle A.P., Jefferys S.R., Meng S., Mose L.E., Simons J.V., Soloway M.G., Wu J., Parker J.S., Hayes D.N., Roach J., Buda E., Jones C.D., Mieczkowski P.A., Tan D., Veluvolu U., Waring S., Auman J.T., Perou C.M., Wilkerson M.D., Santoso N., Parfenov M., Ren X., Pantazi A., Hadjipanayis A., Seidman J., Kucherlapati R., Lee S., Yang L., Park P.J., Xu A.W., Protopopov A., Zhang J., Bristow C., Mahadeshwar H.S., Seth S., Song X., Tang J., Zeng D., Chin L., Guo C., Casasent T.D., Liu W., Ju Z., Motter T., Peng B., Ryan M., Su X., Yang J.Y., Lorenzi P.L., Yao H., Zhang N., Zhang J., Mills G.B., Cho J., DiCara D., Frazer S., Gehlenborg N., Heiman D.I., Lin P., Liu Y., Stojanov P., Voet D., Zhang H., Zou L., Bernard B., Kreisberg D., Reynolds S., Rovira H., Shmulevich I., Gao J., Jacobsen A., Aksoy B.A., Antipin Y., Ciriello G., Dresdner G., Gross B., Lee W., Reva B., Shen R., Sinha R., Sumer S.O., Weinhold N., Ladanyi M., Sander C., Benz C., Carlin D., Haussler D., Ng S., Paull E., Stuart J., Zhu J., Liu Y., Zhang W., Taylor B.S., Lichtenberg T.M., Zmuda E., Barr T., Black A.D., George M., Hanf B., Helsel C., McAllister C., Ramirez N.C., Tabler T.R., Weaver S., Wise L., Bowen J., Gastier-Foster J.M., Jian W., Tello S., Ittman M., Castro P., McClenden W.D., Gibbs R., Saller C., Tarvin K., DiPiero J.M., Owens J., Bollag R., Li Q., Weinberger P., Czerwinski C., Huelsenbeck-Dill L., Iacocca M., Petrelli N., Rabeno B., Swanson P., Shelton T., Curley E., Gardner J., Mallery D., Penny R., Van Bang N., Hanh P.T., Kohl B., Van Le X., Phu B.D., Thorp R., Tien N.V., Vinh L.Q., Sandusky G., Burks E., Christ K., Gee J., Holway A., Moinzadeh A., Sorcini A., Sullivan T., Garcia-Grossman I.R., Regazzi A.M., Boice L., Rathmell W.K., Thorne L., Bastacky S., Davies B., Dhir R., Gingrich J., Hrebinko R., Maranchie J., Nelson J., Parwani A., Bshara W., Gaudioso C., Morrison C., Alexopoulou V., Bartlett J., Engel J., Kodeeswaran S., Antic T., O'Donnell P.H., Smith N.D., Steinberg G.D., Egea S., Gomez-Fernandez C., Herbert L., Jorda M., Soloway M., Beaver A., Carter S., Kapur P., Lewis C., Lotan Y., Bondaruk J., Czerniak B., Skinner E., Aldape K., Jensen M.A., Kahn A.B., Pihl T.D., Pot D.A., Srinivasan D., Wan Y., Ferguson M.L., Zenklusen J.C., Davidsen T., Demchok J.A., Shaw K.R.M., Sheth M., Tarnuzzer R., Wang Z., Yang L., Hutter C., Ozenberger B.A., Sofia H.J., Eley G. Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma. Nature. 2014;507:315. doi: 10.1038/NATURE12965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rentsch C.A., Müller D.C., Ruiz C., Bubendorf L. Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma: a step closer to clinical translation? Eur. Urol. 2017;72:960–961. doi: 10.1016/J.EURURO.2017.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lang G.A., Iwakuma T., Suh Y.A., Liu G., Rao V.A., Parant J.M., Valentin-Vega Y.A., Terzian T., Caldwell L.C., Strong L.C., El-Naggar A.K., Lozano G. Gain of function of a p53 hot spot mutation in a mouse model of Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Cell. 2004;119:861–872. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Al-Zalabani A.H., Stewart K.F.J., Wesselius A., Schols A.M.W.J., Zeegers M.P. Modifiable risk factors for the prevention of bladder cancer: a systematic review of meta-analyses. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2016;31:811–851. doi: 10.1007/S10654-016-0138-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rouault J.P., Falette N., Guehenneux F., Guillot C., Rimokh R., Wang Q., Berthet C., Moyret-Lalle C., Savatier P., Pain B., Shaw P., Berger R., Samarut J., Magaud J.P., Ozturk M., Samarut C., Puisieux A. Identification of BTG2, an antiproliferative p53-dependent component of the DNA damage cellular response pathway. Nat. Genet. 1996;14:482–486. doi: 10.1038/ng1296-482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wagener N., Bulkescher J., MacHer-Goeppinger S., Karapanagiotou-Schenkel I., Hatiboglu G., Abdel-Rahim M., Abol-Enein H., Ghoneim M.A., Bastian P.J., Müller S.C., Haferkamp A., Hohenfellner M., Hoppe-Seyler F., Hoppe-Seyler K. Endogenous BTG2 expression stimulates migration of bladder cancer cells and correlates with poor clinical prognosis for bladder cancer patients. Br. J. Cancer. 2013;108:973. doi: 10.1038/BJC.2012.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim M.P., Zhang Y., Lozano G. Mutant p53: multiple mechanisms define biologic activity in cancer. Front. Oncol. 2015;5 doi: 10.3389/FONC.2015.00249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Smith G., Carey F.A., Beattie J., Wilkie M.J.V., Lightfoot T.J., Coxhead J., Garner R.C., Steele R.J.C., Wolf C.R. Mutations in APC, Kirsten-ras, and p53--alternative genetic pathways to colorectal cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002;99:9433–9438. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.122612899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Morton J.P., Timpson P., Karim S.A., Ridgway R.A., Athineos D., Doyle B., Jamieson N.B., Oien K.A., Lowy A.M., Brunton V.G., Frame M.C., Evans T.R.J., Sansom O.J. Mutant p53 drives metastasis and overcomes growth arrest/senescence in pancreatic cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010;107:246–251. doi: 10.1073/PNAS.0908428107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pfister C., Flaman J.M., Dunet F., Grise P., Frebourg T. p53 mutations in bladder tumors inactivate the transactivation of the p21 and Bax genes, and have a predictive value for the clinical outcome after bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy. J. Urol. 1999;162:69–73. doi: 10.1097/00005392-199907000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pandey S., Bourn J., Cekanova M. Mutations of p53 decrease sensitivity to the anthracycline treatments in bladder cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2018;9:28514–28531. doi: 10.18632/ONCOTARGET.25530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rao X., Huang X., Zhou Z., Lin X. An improvement of the 2^(–delta delta CT) method for quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction data analysis. Biostat. Bioinforma. Biomath. 2013;3 71./pmc/articles/PMC4280562/ [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Waterhouse A., Bertoni M., Bienert S., Studer G., Tauriello G., Gumienny R., Heer F.T., De Beer T.A.P., Rempfer C., Bordoli L., Lepore R., Schwede T. SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W296–W303. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Heo L., Park H., Seok C. GalaxyRefine: protein structure refinement driven by side-chain repacking. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Laskowski R.A., MacArthur M.W., Moss D.S., Thornton J.M. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1993;26:283–291. doi: 10.1107/s0021889892009944. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang Y., Skolnick J. TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:2302–2309. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Patel H., Grüning B.A., Günther S., Merfort I. PyWATER: a PyMOL plug-in to find conserved water molecules in proteins by clustering. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2978–2980. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Capriotti E., Fariselli P., Casadio R. I-Mutant2.0: predicting stability changes upon mutation from the protein sequence or structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W306–W310. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cheng J., Randall A., Baldi P. Prediction of protein stability changes for single-site mutations using support vector machines. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinforma. 2005;62:1125–1132. doi: 10.1002/prot.20810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sim N.L., Kumar P., Hu J., Henikoff S., Schneider G., Ng P.C. SIFT web server: predicting effects of amino acid substitutions on proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40 doi: 10.1093/NAR/GKS539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Niroula A., Urolagin S., Vihinen M. PON-P2: prediction method for fast and reliable identification of harmful variants. PLoS One. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0117380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Landrum M.J., Lee J.M., Riley G.R., Jang W., Rubinstein W.S., Church D.M., Maglott D.R. ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D980. doi: 10.1093/NAR/GKT1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sondka Z., Dhir N.B., Carvalho-Silva D., Jupe S., Madhumita, McLaren K., Starkey M., Ward S., Wilding J., Ahmed M., Argasinska J., Beare D., Chawla M.S., Duke S., Fasanella I., Neogi A.G., Haller S., Hetenyi B., Hodges L., Holmes A., Lyne R., Maurel T., Nair S., Pedro H., Sangrador-Vegas A., Schuilenburg H., Sheard Z., Yong S.Y., Teague J. COSMIC: a curated database of somatic variants and clinical data for cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52:D1210–D1217. doi: 10.1093/NAR/GKAD986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wen L., Britton C.J., Garje R., Darbro B.W., Packiam V.T. The emerging role of somatic tumor sequencing in the treatment of urothelial cancer. Asian J. Urol. 2021;8:391. doi: 10.1016/J.AJUR.2021.06.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wu G., Wang F., Li K., Li S., Zhao C., Fan C., Wang J. Significance of TP53 mutation in bladder cancer disease progression and drug selection. PeerJ. 2019:2019. doi: 10.7717/PEERJ.8261/SUPP-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hao Z., Li R., Wang Y., Li S., Hong Z., Han Z. Landscape of myeloid-derived suppressor cell in tumor immunotherapy. Biomark. Res. 2021;91(9):1–28. doi: 10.1186/S40364-021-00333-5. 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rivlin N., Brosh R., Oren M., Rotter V. vol. 2. 2011. pp. 466–474. (Mutations in the P53 Tumor Suppressor Gene: Important Milestones at the Various Steps of Tumorigenesis). 10.1177/1947601911408889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vymetalkova V., Soucek P., Kunicka T., Jiraskova K., Brynychova V., Pardini B., Novosadova V., Polivkova Z., Kubackova K., Kozevnikovova R., Ambrus M., Vodickova L., Naccarati A., Vodicka P. Genotype and haplotype analyses of TP53 gene in breast cancer patients: association with risk and clinical outcomes. PLoS One. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0134463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hao X.D., Yang Y., Song X., Zhao X.K., Wang L.D., He J.D., Kong Q.P., Tang N.L.S., Zhang Y.P. Correlation of telomere length shortening with TP53 somatic mutations, polymorphisms and allelic loss in breast tumors and esophageal cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2013;29:226–236. doi: 10.3892/OR.2012.2098/HTML. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nag S., Qin J., Srivenugopal K.S., Wang M., Zhang R. The MDM2-p53 pathway revisited. J. Biomed. Res. 2013;27:254. doi: 10.7555/JBR.27.20130030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Inoue K., Fry E.A., Frazier D.P. Transcription factors that interact with p53 and Mdm2. Int. J. Cancer. 2016;138:1577. doi: 10.1002/IJC.29663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bohlman S., Manfredi J.J. p53-Independent effects of Mdm2, subcell. Biochem. 2014;85:235. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9211-0_13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1

Primer sequences for conventional and RT-qPCR experiments, thermocycler program for TP53 exon 5, 7, and 8 amplifications, the cycle conditions for real-time PCR.

mmc1.xlsx (12.1KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

All Data have been provided with the manuscript.


Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES