Skip to main content
Cancer Medicine logoLink to Cancer Medicine
. 2024 May 27;13(10):e7303. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7303

The role of programmed cell death in osteosarcoma: From pathogenesis to therapy

Suqing Liu 1,2, Chengtao Liu 3, Yian Wang 2, Jiewen Chen 2, Yujin He 2, Kaibo Hu 4, Ting Li 4, Junmei Yang 4, Jie Peng 1,4,5,, Liang Hao 1,
PMCID: PMC11129166  PMID: 38800967

Abstract

Osteosarcoma (OS) is a prevalent bone solid malignancy that primarily affects adolescents, particularly boys aged 14–19. This aggressive form of cancer often leads to deadly lung cancer due to its high migration ability. Experimental evidence suggests that programmed cell death (PCD) plays a crucial role in the development of osteosarcoma. Various forms of PCD, including apoptosis, ferroptosis, autophagy, necroptosis, and pyroptosis, contribute significantly to the progression of osteosarcoma. Additionally, different signaling pathways such as STAT3/c‐Myc signal pathway, JNK signl pathway, PI3k/AKT/mTOR signal pathway, WNT/β‐catenin signal pathway, and RhoA signal pathway can influence the development of osteosarcoma by regulating PCD in osteosarcoma cell. Therefore, targeting PCD and the associated signaling pathways could offer a promising therapeutic approach for treating osteosarcoma.

Keywords: osteosarcoma, pathogenesis, programmed cell death, therapy

1. INTRODUCTION

Osteosarcoma is a primary solid malignancy especially occur in bone and rarely in the soft tissue such as skin, ligament, and muscle. It is derived from the mesenchymal cells (MSCs). 1 This sarcoma is most easily acquired by adolescents between 10 and 25 years old, and the proportion of adolescent patients is about 70% in all osteosarcoma patients. In addition, it also affects people about 60–75 years old. 2 Osteosarcoma has a high rate of metastasis and recurrence, making it a difficult sarcoma to manage and difficult to treat with a low clinical survival rate. The metastasis rate of osteosarcoma is more than 85%. 3 , 4 The occurrence location of osteosarcoma is relatively random. It can originate from the metaphyseal portion of any bone, but the femur and tibia are more common sites. Additionally, the knee joint is the most common site for osteosarcoma, accounting for over 50% of all cases, 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 and in later stages, osteosarcoma is highly migratory and can migrate to either the closely site of primary site or distant organs such as lung, cerebral tissue, and liver. In addition, the lung parenchyma is the most common site for metastasis. The symptoms of osteosarcoma are some common symptom, mainly local pain, swelling, and spontaneous fractures, but the symptoms worsen over time and progress to intolerable pain that it resistant to painkillers. As the cancer cells metastasize and affect other organs, systemic deterioration such as weight loss, anemia, and cachexia will occur. The diagnosis of osteosarcoma can be diagnosed by X‐ray, CT, etc., but biopsy is the most important diagnostic method. 9 , 10

The pathophysiology mechanism of osteosarcoma is complexed, but the rapid bone growth during adolescents has a deep relationship with the osteosarcoma. In addition, a small number of osteosarcomas are caused by radiation exposure, exposure to alkylating agents and genetic mutation. 1 , 11 Many recent experiments and articles on the mechanisms of osteosarcoma production have found that programmed cell death (PCD), such as apoptosis, pyroptosis, necroptosis, ferroptosis, autophagy, and cuproptosis, is also important to produce osteosarcoma. 4 , 12 , 13

The mode of cell death can be separated into two parts: the accidental cell death and PCD. 14 PCD is a kind of cell death which is regulated by many genes and factors, such as PI3K/AKT signal pathway, Wnt/nt/way, and PI3K/AKT signal paRhoA signal pathway. Its effect on the human body is twofold; it can contribute to the normal functioning of the organism, and at the same time, it can cause damage to the organism. 15 Various forms of programmed cell death (PCD) exert distinct roles in osteosarcoma development. In the context of apoptosis, the majority of osteosarcoma patients exhibit dysfunctional apoptotic pathways, disrupting the balance between cell proliferation and death. This imbalance contributes to tumor initiation and metastasis. 16 Pyroptosis is an inflammatory cell death mediated by Gasdermin (GSDM) and has an important role in preventing tumor production. However, evidence suggests that pyroptosis have a dual role in osteosarcoma development. It can both promote the onset of osteosarcoma and inhibit its progression, depending on different signaling pathways. 17 , 18 Ferroptosis is a non‐conventional type of PCD that results from the accumulation of ROS and is iron‐dependent, 19 and it has been clinically demonstrated that a variety of ferroptosis inducers such as RSL3 and erastin can promote the production of ferroptosis and thereby destroy tumor cells. 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 Autophagy is a process by which cells degrade damaged structures and reuse the broken‐down material. 24 Autophagy is closely related to osteosarcoma. Autophagy can resist chemotherapy and promote cell proliferation and survival, so the regulation of autophagy can also be considered as a new target for the treatment of osteosarcoma. In addition, autophagy also has dual role to osteosarcoma; it can both promote and inhibit the development of osteosarcoma depending on different mechanism. 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 Necroptosis is induced by TNFR1/RIP1, 3/MLKL signal pathway, which damage cell structure. 29 The long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) has been proved to have high connection with osteosarcoma. 30 The cuproptosis is a copper ion‐dependent cell death. Although his specific relationship to osteosarcoma has not been studied, numerous experiments have found a strong link between cuproptosis‐related genes or cuproptosis‐related lncRNA and osteosarcoma.

The therapeutic approaches for osteosarcoma are diverse, encompassing conventional methods like chemotherapy and radiotherapy, which are standard treatments in cancer therapy. However, in the 21st century, advancements in molecular technologies have led to the development of targeted drugs that focus on signaling pathways involved in programmed cell death (PCD). These targeted therapies offer promising avenues for treating osteosarcoma by specifically targeting the molecular mechanisms underlying tumor growth and progression. For example, arsenic trioxide (ATO) can activate the p38, JNK, and AMPK to induce apoptosis which can treat osteosarcoma. Proteasome inhibitor can also be used to increase ATO function. 31 What's more, drug targeted on mitochondria can activate immunogenic pyroptosis to clear osteosarcoma. 32 In addition, some immune checkpoint treatment can also be used. 33 So, the PCD and its signal pathway can be a new target for osteosarcoma treatment.

2. MECHANISMS OF CELL DEATH IN OSTEOSARCOMA

Programmed cell death has been an active topic for decades and continues to be continually supplemented and improved. It is closely related to the development of osteosarcoma. Below, we will introduce the various roles of programmed cell death in osteosarcoma.

2.1. Apoptosis

Apoptosis is the main pathway of regulated cell death, and it is achieved through two apoptotic pathways: the extrinsic pathway and the intrinsic pathway, also known as cell death receptor pathway and mitochondrial apoptotic pathway, respectively. 34

Extrinsic apoptosis can be brought on by substances that damage DNA, such as DOX, CIS, and ETOP. 35 Additionally, this pathway requires death ligands to bind to their corresponding death receptors, triggering the assembly of the death‐inducing signaling complex (DISC). For instance, Fas or other death receptor‐associated death domain protein can interact with Caspase‐8 and Caspase‐10, subsequently activating them. This activation leads to the stimulation of executioner caspases including Caspase‐3/7/6. 34

Numerous triggers, including oxidative stress and hypoxia, initiate the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. 36 Intracellular stimuli can trigger the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (PTP), resulting in the rupture of the outer mitochondrial membrane (MOM), a process known as mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP). This event enables the release of various pro‐apoptotic proteins from the mitochondrial intermembrane space into the cytoplasm. 12 Although the mechanism is not fully understood, current study confirms that MOMP causes the release of cytochrome c (CytC) to aid in the formation of apoptosome, which is then used for the activation of Caspase‐3 and Caspase‐7. 37

This apoptosis pathway is regulated by a multitude of pro‐apoptotic and anti‐apoptotic proteins. Among them, the B‐cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl‐2) family is one of the proteins that is particularly important for apoptosis, comprising three subfamilies: anti‐apoptotic, pore‐forming proteins, and Bcl‐2 homology 3 (BH3)‐only proteins. While pore‐forming proteins and BH3‐only proteins exhibit pro‐apoptotic properties, anti‐apoptotic members, such as Bcl‐2, B‐cell lymphoma‐extra‐large (Bcl‐XL), B‐cell lymphoma‐w (Bcl‐W), and myeloid cell leukemia 1 (Mcl‐1), impede the formation and activation of the apoptosome. 12 In summary, the activation of pro‐apoptotic protein and the inhibition of anti‐apoptotic protein promote apoptosis, contributing to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying osteosarcoma. 38

In osteosarcoma, dysregulated expressions of Bcl‐2 family members have been discovered, which also means that apoptosis is a promising therapeutic target. According to the study, this dysregulation was correlated with the prognosis of osteosarcoma patients, with those exhibiting high levels of Bcl‐2 expression had a poorer prognosis and stronger tumor metastasis compared to patients with low levels of Bcl‐2 expression. Trieb's study showed that in all osteosarcoma research patients 46% patients express more Bcl‐2 than normal and 35% patient have a clearly overexpression level of Bcl‐2. 39 Another study demonstrated that anti‐apoptotic Bcl‐XL was overexpressed in high metastatic osteosarcoma cell line (M8) in comparison with low metastatic osteosarcoma cell lines (Saos‐2, MG63, and U2OS), along with other anti‐apoptotic members. 40 But surprisingly, only combined inhibition of Bcl‐XL and Mcl‐1 produced significantly higher antitumor effects, rather than in combination with Bcl‐2 inhibitors. 41 Several novel treatments have surfaced in recent years. Mcl‐1 inhibitors have been developed and proven to be effective in many types of tumors when used alone or in conjunction with venetoclax, but it is still unknown if they are also effective in treating osteosarcoma. Venetoclax can inhibit the Bcl‐2 and disrupting the survival signals of cancer cell. Therefore, further research is necessary to successfully target the Bcl‐2 family for the treatment of osteosarcoma OS 42 (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Core molecular mechanism of PCD in osteosarcoma. Vps34, a mammalian class III PI3K, forms a complex with Vps15 and Beclin 1 that contributes to autophagosome assembly. Phosphorylated PI3K‐1 phosphorylates AKT, which activates mTOR, which inhibits autophagosome assembly. Rapamycin and ATO (arsenic trioxide) reduce the inhibitory effect of mTOR and induce autophagy. The downregulation of miR‐143 and the upregulation of ATG2B and LC3‐II contribute to autophagy, which exhibits both inhibitory and promotive effects on tumorigenesis. Autophagy plays a dual role in tumor development, acting both as a suppressor and as a promoter. Pyroptosis is mainly suppressed by hypoxia, which reduces mitochondrial ROS production and consequently diminishes focal cell death generation. Hypoxia can also inhibit the function of T cells, and GSDME and granzyme A produced by T cells can promote the generation of pyroptosis. MiRNAs can inhibit pyroptosis. In necroptosis, TRA/GO can inhibit Caspase‐8, thereby contacting the inhibition of RIP3 complex by Caspase‐8 and promoting necroptosis. LncRNA and TNF‐a can also control necrotic apoptosis generation. Cuproptosis can influence the development of osteosarcoma but the detail function and mechanisms are unclear. This figure has been created at https://app.biorender.com (accessed on 16 July 2023).

2.2. Ferroptosis

Ferroptosis is a novel type of PCD that differs from other cell death modalities in terms of morphological, biological, and genetic levels. 19 It is driven by fatal lipid peroxidation that is iron‐dependent and brought on by abnormalities in cellular metabolism and redox homeostasis. 43 The most important feature of this is an imbalance of lipid hydroperoxides and ferrous ion (Fe2+), which is caused by excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to oxidative stress. 44 More and more studies have demonstrated that ferroptosis plays an important role in regulating the onset and progression of orthopedic diseases, including osteosarcoma. Therefore, figuring out the ferroptosis regulatory target may lead to new opportunities for treating osteosarcoma. For example, the traditional ferroptosis inducer such as RSL3 and ferrostatin‐1 can be used to treat some cancer. 23

Unlimited lipid peroxidation is a sign of ferroptosis. 43 The process initiates with the release of a bisallylic hydrogen atom from the polyunsaturated fatty acyl (PUFA) component of the phospholipid bilayer, generating a carbon‐centered radical. Subsequently, this radical reacts with oxygen to form a peroxy radical. 45 Free‐radical‐mediated reactions have the potential to compromise the integrity of the cell membrane and expose the contents of the cell to the extracellular environment if the free radicals are not converted to lipid hydroperoxide and reduced to the matching alcohol in a timely manner. 46 Cell death occurs in the end. As a result, membranes containing a high PUFA content are prone to peroxide, which means that ferroptosis is more likely to occur. In addition, meta‐analysis of the antitumor function of n‐3 PUFA has proved that the n‐3 PUFA administration can inhibit the function of IL‐6 and TNF, which can promote the tumor growth and metastasis. It is true that high dose of TNF can kill cancer but at the low level it will promote tumor development. 47

GPX4‐regulated ferroptosis is a classical ferroptosis inhibition system. In osteosarcoma, high expression of GPX4 allows it to avoid ferroptosis, increasing its chances of surviving. In the presence of glutathione (GSH), GPX4 can reduce lipid peroxides to corresponding lipid alcohols, thereby negatively regulating ferroptosis. 48 , 49 Cysteine is imported into the cytosol via the System XC‐ (consisting of transmembrane protein complex SLC7A11 and SLC3A2) in this metabolic pathway, where it is converted into cysteine to create GSH. 50 Therefore, depletion of either GPX4, System XC‐, and the GSH levels can result in ROS overproduction and accumulation of lipid peroxides, ultimately leading to ferroptosis. 51 So, one of the ways to induce ferroptosis is to block the function of the System XC‐, which can be achieved by erastin. This also provides insights for the treatment of osteosarcoma. However, several innovative treatments have been developed as conventional adjuvant chemotherapy techniques have reached a bottleneck for osteosarcoma. Studies have shown that bavachin can downregulate the expression of SLC7A11 and GPX4 while upregulating the expression of transferrin receptors like p53 in osteosarcoma. 52 Among these, p53 controls SLC7A11 upstream, which has an inhibiting effect. What's more, the tirapazamine (TPZ) can also downregulate the expression level of SLC7A11 and GPX4 and increase the level of MDA and Fe2+ which can lead to osteosarcoma cell produce more ROS inducing ferroptosis. 53 Therefore, the combination of various effects can initiate tumor cell ferroptosis to treat osteosarcoma.

Although the understanding of the mechanism of ferroptosis has advanced significantly, it is still unclear how cells ultimately die. In summary, negative regulation of ferroptosis protects cells from the cytotoxic effects of lipid peroxides, while positive regulation of ferroptosis can be used to kill osteosarcoma cells. Thus, novel ferroptosis activators have become a hot research field in biology. In other words, further in‐depth study of the mechanism of ferroptosis and the trial of ferroptosis targeted drugs will help continued development of osteosarcoma treatments.

2.3. Autophagy

Autophagy is a normal PCD, which is activated at the situation when cells are under the stressful conditions, such as cellular disruption, oxidative stress, and chromosomes damage. It can induce decomposition of cell structure and reuse it to generate new cellular component. 54 As caspase‐independent PCD, autophagy realize it function by lysosomes, so, the chromosome aggregation and organelle swelling seen in other kinds of PCDs does not occur in autophagy 55 In terms of the relationship between autophagy and osteosarcoma, autophagy has a dual role. It can protect osteosarcoma cell and allow them to survive, but it can also inhibit the transformation of tumor cells or kill it through other kind PCD, which can inhibit tumor development and metastasis. 56 , 57 When tumor cells are deprived of nutrients and oxygen, autophagy promotes the breakdown of own broken and old structures, and then, the cell utilizes the decomposition, which can prevent apoptosis of tumor cells. Furthermore, in certain circumstances, autophagy can also facilitate the metastasis of osteosarcoma cells. So, the role of autophagy in osteosarcoma need to analysis individually. 58 , 59 Meanwhile, the effect of autophagy is different for different lineages of osteosarcoma cells, for example, gemcitabine (GCB)‐induced autophagy promotes cell death in the CCH‐OS‐D osteosarcoma cell line but inhibits cell death in the LM7 osteosarcoma cell line. The CCH‐OS‐D and LM7 cell lines are human osteosarcoma cell line. 60 In osteosarcoma development, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway can inhibit autophagy. So, this signal pathway can be used as a target in the treatment of osteosarcoma. For example, rapamycin and ATO can decrease the inhibitory effect of PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway on autophagy for the treatment of osteosarcoma. 61 , 62 Some tumor suppressors such as RB1, TSSC3, and WIF1 which lose function in osteosarcoma play a role in the autophagy. 63 , 64 For the development of drug resistance in osteosarcoma, some heat shock protein, such as HSP90AA1, is also related to autophagy. 65 , 66 , 67 MicroRNA is also important in the formation of drug resistance of osteosarcoma, for example the miR‐143 can inhibit autophagy but the expression of miR‐143 decreases in osteosarcoma and expression of ATG2B and LC3‐II increases, which can promote autophagy to generate chemoresistance in tumors. 68 , 69 , 70

2.4. Pyroptosis

Pyroptosis is mediated by pore‐forming proteins, which can form a pore on cell membrane and lead to the damage of cell membrane. 71 , 72 , 73 It is kind of pro‐inflammatory cell death which is mediated by Caspase‐1. The activating Caspase‐1 can cleavage the pore‐forming proteins, and the cleavage pore‐forming protein can form membrane pore. 12 , 74 Hypoxia is an important characteristic for osteosarcoma. 74 Hypoxia helps osteosarcoma cell evade the immune system and survive. In addition, the hypoxia can also induce the expression of hypoxia‐inducible factor (HIF), HMGB1, and toll‐like receptor 4, which can induce the metastasis of osteosarcoma. But the role of TLR4 is still unclear, asit may either promote or inhibit the metastasis. 17 , 75 , 76 , 77 In the presence of hypoxia, many of the signaling pathways or molecules involved in pyroptosis are activated thereby causing the generation of cellular pyroptosis. 78 , 79 For example, the damage to the mitochondrial structure reduces ROS production, which leads to cellular hypoxia and thus promotes cellular pyroptosis. 80 In addition, the hypoxia and pyroptosis can enhance HMGB1 expression, which can activate ERK1/2 signaling pathway promoting tumor cell proliferation. Thus, in a sense, cellular pyroptosis can promote cancer progression. 81 Experimental evidence that pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDK1) and lysyl oxidase (LOX) genes associated with hypoxia is associated with tumor metastasis and survival, while decorin (DCN) can inhibit tumor. 17 , 79 , 82 What's more, the hypoxia will also inhibit the function of CD8+ T cell. CD8+ T cell contains magnanimous granzyme A, which can be sent to target cell to cause pyroptosis. So, inhibition of CD8+ T cell function can inhibit pyroptosis. 73 , 74 , 83 , 84 Caspase‐1 inhibits cancer cell migration, 85 and GSDMA can regulate the pyroptosis to inhibit cancer cell development. 86 Long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) influences on cellular pathways of pyroptosis through regulation of gene expression and thus has influence on tumor. For example, FOXD2‐AS1 is a proto‐oncogene, which can induce cancer. In addition, the AC090559.1 contributes to CASP1, GSDMA expression and thus promotes pyroptosis to inhibit osteosarcoma development. 87 In addition, microRNAs have also been associated with osteosarcoma cell pyroptosis. For example, miRNA‐181a can inhibit NLRP3‐dependent cellular pyroptosis, so low expression of miRNA‐181a contributes to the occurrence of cellular pyroptosis and thus suppresses tumor growth. 88 Many chemotherapeutic and non‐chemotherapeutic drugs can also be used to fight cancer by inducing cellular pyroptosis, such as decitabine and azacitidine induced GSDME to promote the production of cellular pyroptosis to treat cancer. 89 , 90 In addition to the chemotherapeutic drugs like decitabine and azacitidine, the non‐chemotherapeutic drug dioscin induces the formation of pore on the cell membrane of osteosarcoma cells and, thereby promoting apoptosis in osteosarcoma treatment. 91 However, overproduction of pyroptosis can be detrimental to the body. Excessive cellular pyroptosis can lead to overproduction of pro‐inflammatory factors, which can cause tissue damage. 91

2.5. Necroptosis

Necroptosis is a type of PCD that relies on three core proteins, receptor‐interacting protein kinase 1(RIPK1), receptor‐interacting protein 3 (RIP3), and mixed lineage kinase‐like protein (MLKL), to cause organelle swelling and alter the permeability of the cell membrane. 92 Like other PCDs, necrotic apoptosis has a crucial role in the development of osteosarcoma. RIP1 plays a crucial role in necroptosis, TRA/GO reduces cIAP and Caspase‐8, the reduction of cIAP contributes to the formation of intracellular platform complexes, whereas the decrease in Caspase‐8 activity facilitates the formation of RIP1/RIP3/MLKL complexes, which promotes necroptosis and kills osteosarcoma cells. 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 Like pyroptosis, necroptosis‐associated lncRNAs and miRNAs are importantly linked to the development of osteosarcoma. lncRNAs can regulate target mRNAs, thereby promoting necroptosis in cancer cells. 97 Some necroptosis‐associated lncRNAs are also associated with cancer. Necrotic apoptosis‐related lncRNAs can also affect OS by influencing immunity. 92 Shikonin (SHK) can promote the RIP1 and RIP3‐dependent necroptosis to treat osteosarcoma. 98 , 99 As one of the most common kinds of necroptosis, the TNF‐mediated necroptosis is induced by the binding between TNF‐α and cell membrane, which can activate the downstream signal pathway leading to the formation of membrane complex and this can lead to necroptosis. 100 , 101 Some studies have shown that the herbs extraction emodin can treat cancer by activating TNF‐a induced necroptosis. 102 Some NRlncRNA, such as AL391121.1, can influence the function of CD40 which is important cancer immunity. 103 In the immune response to osteosarcoma, some immune cell such as macrophage can stimulate the three core necroptosis proteins to induce necroptosis, which is beneficial for cancer treatment. 104 , 105 For immune checkpoint, it is true that many immune checkpoints can protect tumor cell from immune system. Some studies showed that in low‐risk group of NRlncRNA, the immune checkpoint expression level is high. 103

2.6. Cuproptosis

Cuproptosis, as a novel mode of programmed cell death, also has a very important role in the generation and development of osteosarcoma. A hallmark of copper death is that excess copper can interact with lipoylated proteins to affect the TCA cycle leading to cell death. 106 Copper death has an important role in tumors such as melanoma, clear cell renal cell carcinoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma. 107 , 108 , 109 Experimental evidence suggests that mitochondria‐dependent malignancies can be treated by copper death. Although there are fewer studies related to cuproptosis and OS, it has been experimentally demonstrated that cuproptosis can promote cancer generation by promoting certain genes that induce cancer production, for example, TGF‐beta, Wnt/beta‐catenin, and p53 signaling. 110 Research has shown that the NGX6 can inhibit the Wnt/nt/wn that the NGX6 can to inhibit cancer cell metastasis. It has been demonstrated that high‐risk cuproptosis‐related Lncs (CRLncs) can downregulate immune cell function, which increases the risk of osteosarcoma, while low‐risk CRLncs decrease the risk of osteosarcoma. 111 Different cuproptosis‐related genes (CRGs) have different effects on osteosarcoma, for example, FDX1 expression contributes to tumor cell survival and drug resistance, and FDX1 can also promote the osteosarcoma cell metastasis but not related to the cancer cell proliferation and the overexpression of FDX1 can also inhibit the tumor immune microenvironment (TIM). 110 , 111 TOMM20 contributes to colon cancer cell invasion suppressing the activity of immune cells such as CD8 T cells and CD4 T cells, aiding cancer cells in evading the immune system. Additionally, overexpression of TOMM20 can contribute to the development of drug resistance in tumor cells against immune‐based therapies, thus impacting tumor treatment. 112 , 113 , 114 NDUFB9 expression contributes to the inhibition of cancer cell proliferation and metastasis. In the osteosarcoma tissue, FDX1, TOMM20, and NDUFB9 are all overexpress to promote the development of osteosarcoma. Besides these few genes associated with poor prognosis, there are also some genes associated with better prognosis but also bad, such as MFN2 and ATP6V1E1. The expression level of MFN2 is increased in osteosarcoma, and it can inhibit the immune system in osteosarcoma TIM. The level of ATP6V1E1 mRNA is downregulated in osteosarcoma, and the ATP6V1E1 mRNA expression dysregulation leads to immune imbalance in osteosarcoma. 115 , 116

3. MODULATION OF CELL DEATH IN OSTEOSARCOMA

With the development of molecular biology, we have discovered that various signaling pathways are intimately involved in cell development, particularly in relation to programmed cell death in cancer cells. Therefore, we have summarized several common signaling pathways.

3.1. PI3K/Akt signal pathway

Many experiments have shown that the alteration of the function of PI3K/AKT signal pathway is related to the proliferation, metastasis, and metabolism of osteosarcoma. The PI3K/Akt pathway is downstream of RTKs and G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs). PI3K is heterodimeric and consists of a catalytic subunit p110 and a regulatory subunit p85.

According to the structure and function of phosphatidylinositide 3‐kinases (PI3K), it can be divided into three subclasses, namely classes I, II, and III, among which class I is the most widely studied. 117 The activated PI3K can phosphorylate PIP2 to become PIP3, which acts as a second messenger and continues to phosphorylate downstream target proteins PDK1 and serine/threonine(AKT), leading to the activation of AKT. Activated AKT has diverse effects on a variety of downstream substrates, such as inhibition of FOXO, promotion of DNA repair, and inhibition of DNA replication to inhibit cancer. The key downstream substrate of AKT is the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), consisting of TSC1, TSC2, and TBC1D7; mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) has two forms, mTORC1 and mTORC2. The principle is that TSC2 can hydrolyze GTP in RHEB protein to convert to GDP and thus inactivate RHEB protein, which function is to activate MTORC1. However, AKT can phosphorylate TSC2, inhibiting the activity of TSC2 and activating mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway. 118 MTOR has two complex forms, namely MTORC1 and MTORC2. mTOR can be activated by AKT in many conditions, such the increase of AMP/ATP ratio which will cause energy deficit, anoxia, and TSC increase. When acidic environment is enhanced, the synthesis of mTORC1 can be promoted. The PIK3CA gene, part of the PI3K family, encodes the p110a catalytic subunit. PIK3CA mutations, common in Class I, disrupt signaling pathways, contributing to osteosarcoma. The SNP rs7646409 in PIK3CA intron triggers p110a overexpression, activating Akt signaling, suppressing osteosarcoma apoptosis, and promoting proliferation. 119 About autophagy in osteosarcoma, the function of PI3K/Akt/mTOR signal pathway is complex. mTORC1 inhibits autophagy by phosphorylating ULK1 and Atg13 and weakening their binding. 120 mTORC1 also phosphorylates ATG14L, inhibiting lipid kinase activity and providing an alternative autophagy inhibition pathway. Transcription factor EB (TFEB) regulates autophagy gene expression. mTORC1 can inactivate TFEB transcriptional regulation by phosphorylating Ser142 and Ser211 of TFEB. The involvement of mTORC2 in autophagy regulation is not fully understood. However, it has been suggested that mTORC2 might play a role in activating mTORC1 to modulate autophagy. 121 Some studies have found that there is upregulation of PI3K/Akt and downregulation of PTEN in osteosarcoma (OS). PTEN acts as an upstream inhibitory signal of PI3K. Experimental evidence shows that promoting PTEN expression with honokiol can reduce excessive autophagy in osteosarcoma cells. Additionally, MiR‐1224–5p can inhibit PLK1 expression, thereby suppressing the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway and inducing autophagy. Ginsenoside can also inhibit the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, induce cell autophagy, and apoptosis, thereby suppressing the development of osteosarcoma. 122 The PI3K signaling pathway can be also activated by nutrient and growth factor, thereby inhibiting cellular autophagy, and promoting the proliferation and growth of osteosarcoma cells. However, cellular autophagy has a dual role in cancer development, with excessive autophagy promoting cancer cell death. In MG‐63 cells, a human osteosarcoma cell line, honokiol promotes the expression of the LC3 protein, thus inducing autophagy in osteosarcoma cells and leading to their death. 123 Furthermore, research has shown that honokiol and diallyl disulfide (DADs) can also promote cancer cell autophagy by inhibiting the p53/PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, thereby achieving therapeutic effects. 124 In addition, the DADs can also upregulated the Caspase‐3 and Bax, which can induce cell apoptosis and kill osteosarcoma. 125 Wei et al. found that Rab‐interacting lysosomal protein (RILP) overexpressed in OS 143B and U2OS cells phosphorylates growth factor receptor binding protein‐10 Grb10 promotes autophagy by inhibiting PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway 126 (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Core signal pathway in osteosarcoma. RhoA signal pathway: RhoA‐GDP complex binds to GTP in response to GEF and is immobilized at the cell membrane by PTM, and the GTP‐bound RhoA complex is active in promoting ROCK1/2 production and controlling cell death. PI3K/AKT signal pathway: The growth factor receptor contributes to the conversion of PIP1 to PIP3, which activates AKT, which inhibits FOXO and TSC1/2. Inhibition of FOXO reduces apoptosis, and inhibition of TSC1/2 contributes to the deregulation of the inhibitory effect of TSC1/2 on mTORC thereby promoting the action of motor, which inhibits autophagy production. JNK signal pathway: ROS can activate JNK and ERK to promote c‐Jun and c‐Fox binding to AP‐1 to regulate gene transcription. At the same time, JNK can activate STAT and Bcl‐2 to increase the viability of cancer cells and contribute to the development of chemoresistance. Wnt signal pathway: In the off state of wnt pathway, axin, APC, GSK3β, and CK1 form a destruction complex that phosphorylates β‐catenin and prevents it from entering the nucleus to participate in transcription. When wnt binds to the receptor Fzd, it hydrolyzes axin and protects β‐catenin from degradation, so that it can enter the nucleus to participate in transcription. This figure has been created at https://app.biorender.com (accessed on July 16, 2023).

3.2. WNT/β‐catenin signal pathway

WNT genes are found to be in most animals and play a considerable role in regulating cell homeostasis and tumorigenesis. 105 The complete WNT signaling pathway is divided into two parts: upstream signaling and downstream signaling. Upstream signals mainly refer to WNT proteins as ligands to activate disheveled proteins (Dsh or Dvl) of target cells. The role of PORCN is to interact WNT and Wntless (WLS) molecules to produce palmitoylation reactions. Subsequently, WLS transport palmitoylated WNT proteins to the plasma membrane for secretion. In addition, the dysregulation of WNT/β‐catenin leads to proliferation and metastasis of osteosarcoma. 127 It is the β‐catenin‐dependent signaling pathway that mainly causes osteosarcoma. The key to the open or closed state of the canonical pathway is the high or low level of β‐catenin protein expression. 128 β‐catenin has a core of 12 repeat protein segments, which bind to enhance cell–cell adhesion junctions, consisting of C‐terminal and N‐terminal domains. The C‐terminus facilitates β‐catenin mediated transcription, while its the N‐terminus undergoes phosphorylation for degradation of β‐catenin. In the absence of WNT ligands, the pathway remains inactive. The key component is the scaffold protein axin. Adenomatous polyposis coli protein (APC) interacts with glycogen synthase kinase‐3 (GSK‐3) and casein kinase 1 (CK1) to form the β‐catenin destruction complex. Binding of the destruction complex to the N‐terminal domain of β‐catenin leads to its phosphorylation and subsequent degradation leading to the suppression of the WNT signaling pathway. 108 In many study about osteosarcoma found that the expression level of axin in WNT/β‐catenin pathway are downregulate. The deletion of Axin 1 and disorder of APC can cause the WNT/β‐catenin signal pathway out of control and cause osteosarcoma development. 129 The impact of β‐catenin on osteosarcoma development is complex, as evidenced by conflicting research findings. Some studies have shown low expression of β‐catenin in osteosarcoma, while others have demonstrated high expression. Therefore, we believe that the role of different WNT/β‐catenin pathways in osteosarcoma development depends on the specific downstream signaling factors and the particular subtype of osteosarcoma cells. 128 KLF5 is a transcription factor that positively influences the WNT/β‐catenin signaling pathway. It enhances the expression of β‐catenin and interacts with it to promote its translocation into the nucleus. There, it binds to downstream transcription factors of the T‐cell factor/lymphocyte enhancer factor (TCF/LEF) family, leading to increased expression of cyclin D1. This process can be inhibited by ML264, which acts as a suppressor of KLF5. Studies have shown that ML264 exhibits significant therapeutic effects in osteosarcoma. 130 WNT promotes the aggregation of β‐catenin, but the GSK‐3β/APC/Axin complex can also phosphorylate β‐catenin, thereby promoting its degradation. Therefore, GSK‐3β can inhibit the WNT/β‐catenin signaling pathway, leading to apoptosis and inhibition of proliferation in osteosarcoma cells. 131 Additionally, downregulation of β‐catenin simultaneously inhibits the expression of Runx2, a pro‐apoptotic gene highly expressed in osteosarcoma cells. Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) can reduce the expression of Runx2 by inhibiting the action of β‐catenin, thereby promoting apoptosis and inhibiting proliferation in osteosarcoma cells. 128 Lnc‐MAP6‐1:3 inhibits β‐catenin expression along with its downstream targets TEF1, c‐Myc, and cyclin D, leading to reduced cellular proliferation and increased apoptosis. 132 In addition to apoptosis, the WNT/β‐catenin pathway also plays a significant role in osteosarcoma autophagy regulation. Treatment with XAV939, a Wnt/β‐catenin signaling inhibitor, resulted in elevated expression of the autophagy‐related gene Beclin 1 in MG63 cells. This led to decreased gemcitabine‐induced apoptosis and enhanced drug resistance. 127

3.3. STAT3 signal pathway

The signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) pathway plays a critical role in numerous biological processes, including embryonic development, immune response, and cell migration. Activation of this pathway is swiftly triggered by molecules such as IL‐6 and growth factors like EGF and PDGF. Upon activation, STAT3 forms dimers and binds to DNA promoters, thereby regulating the transcription of target genes. Among the STAT family members, STAT3 stands out as an oncogene, frequently activated in various cancer types, particularly osteosarcoma. 133

Research indicates that both transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) and cellular‐Myc (c‐Myc) are highly expressed in the malignant tumors. 134 Interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) binds to their receptors IL‐6 receptor, resulting in the release IL‐6 family cytokines receptor‐associated Janus kinases (JAKs). It leads to the phosphorylation and dimerization of STAT3. STAT3 is the proto‐oncogene and cellular targets participating in the development of the osteosarcoma. 133 Upon activation, STAT3 translocases into the nucleus, where binds to consensus response elements in the promoters of target genes, regulating their transcription. These genes include those involved in cell proliferation and survival, such as c‐Myc, Bcl‐2, survivin, and cyclins. It will upregulate the expressions of these genes to promote the formation, proliferation, invasion, and transfer of human osteoma cells. The nuclear transcription factor c‐Myc is a nuclear phosphoro‐protein that plays a crucial role in the cell cycle, apoptosis, protein synthesis, and cell transformation. It is a protein closely associated with the development of cancer. In cell cycle, it can induce the activity of cyclin D‐CDK2 to accelerate the cell cycle from G1 to S phase. What's more, the other cell cycle related protein such as cyclin D1 and D2, cyclin E, cycle B1, and CDK4 can also infected by c‐Myc which can influence cell cycle. Besides, c‐Myc can also influence other signal pathway such as NF‐κB and HIF to influence cell cycle. In osteosarcoma tissue, overexpression of c‐Myc promotes cancer cell proliferation. 135 , 136 c‐Myc has a dual role in apoptosis. On one hand, it induces the expression of ARF, which binds to mouse double minute 2 (Mdm2) and increases the level of p53, leading to apoptosis and cancer cell death. However, dysregulation of c‐Myc can also inhibit apoptosis, thereby promoting osteosarcoma growth. 137

Research indicates that targeting the STAT3 signaling pathway is a promising approach for osteosarcoma treatment, particularly in addressing programmed cell death and other forms of programmed cell death. Diosmetin is proved to be used to treat human osteosarcoma cells. 134 , 138 , 139 Diosmetin can cause the cell cycle arrest that occur in the G2/M phase. In addition, the G2/M phase regulation point is the key point for signal transmission inside and outside the cell, integration, and collection to the nucleus to regulate cell proliferation in cell cycle regulation. 134 , 140 , 141 The theory of treatment is that it can inhibit STAT3 phosphorylation and dimerization as well as reduce c‐Myc expression to influence the cell cycle. It will promote the apoptosis and inhibit proliferation of human osteosarcoma cells through inhibiting the STAT3/c‐Myc signaling pathway. Research has found that LRP8 have a high expression level in osteosarcoma and activates STAT3 which can promote the expression of PD‐L1 in osteosarcoma. However, PD‐L1 can inhibit T cells, preventing T cell‐induced apoptosis in osteosarcoma. Experimental evidence has shown that reducing the level of LRP8 can promote apoptosis in osteosarcoma and inhibit the unlimited proliferation of osteosarcoma cells. 142 The sporoderm‐broken spores of Ganoderma lucidum (BSGWE) can also downregulate the phosphorylation of STAT3 to decrease the expression of PD‐L1, which can promote the apoptosis in osteosarcoma. 143

3.4. RhoA signal pathway

The Ras homolog (Rho) family of small GTPase plays a crucial role in cell cycle, cell morphology, and cell migration. 144 These proteins undergo conformational changes between active and inactive states depending on their binding to GTP/GDP. GTPase‐activating proteins (GAPs) facilitate the hydrolysis of GTP to GDP thereby inactivating Rho, while guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) promote the binding of GTP to activate Rho. 145 , 146 At the carboxyl terminus of human Rho, there are a post‐translational modification region (PTM), which can help Rho insert on the cell membrane to induce its signal pathway and get it function. 147 Rho‐kinase (ROCK) is a kind of serine/threonine kinase, which is an important downstream factor of Rho. 148 The ROCK have two main kinds one is ROCK1 which is important in the mitochondrial dynamics and cell differentiation, the other is ROCK2, which is important in cell death and inflammation. 149

The RhoA‐ROCK‐LIMK2 signal pathway is important for the osteosarcoma migration and related to PCD. Programmed death ligand‐2 (PD‐L2) is an upstream signaling molecule of the RhoA signal pathway. It is known as a co‐stimulatory molecule that can bind to the PD‐1 receptor to inhibit the activity of T cells, thus playing an important role in tumor migration and progression. Because there is experimental evidence showing that in metastatic osteosarcoma, such as osteosarcoma metastasized to the lungs, the expression level of PD‐L2 is much higher than in non‐metastatic primary osteosarcoma. 59 Experimental evidence has shown low expression of PD‐L2 can lead to decreased expression of beclin‐1, thereby inhibiting the RhoA‐ROCK‐LIMK2 pathway. 59 This means that PD‐L2 can activate RhoA‐ROCK‐LIMK2 signal pathway. The dependence lies on the repulsive guidance molecule BMP co‐receptor B (RGMb). RGMb, acting as a secondary receptor for PD‐L2, forms a BMP‐BMPR‐RGMb‐neogenin (BBRN) super complex. Through this super complex, PD‐L2 regulates downstream signaling pathways such as RhoA‐ROCK‐LIMK2. 150 Numerous studies have shown that PD‐L2 is expressed in many patients with osteosarcoma and that there is a strong association between PD‐L2 and migration and invasion of osteosarcoma. 59 Autophagy exhibits a dual role in cancer cell migration and invasion—it can either promote or inhibit these processes. RhoA‐ROCK‐LIMK2 signaling pathway is associated with autophagy in tumor cells. It was demonstrated that PD‐L2 acted as an upstream factor of RhoA‐ROCK‐LIMK2 and inhibited the RhoA‐ROCK‐LIMK2 signaling pathway when PD‐L2 expression was downregulated, which helped to inhibit osteosarcoma cell autophagy and this can inhibit the metastasis of osteosarcoma. In addition, PD‐L2 can also induce autophagy through beclin‐1, as another upstream signal of the RhoA‐ROCK‐LIMK2 signaling pathway, beclin‐1 can also control cellular autophagy by regulating RhoA‐ROCK‐LIMK2 signaling pathway and also influence the tumor metastasis. 59 , 151 , 152 , 153

In addition to cellular autophagy, RhoA‐ROCK has a crucial role in apoptosis. The RhoA‐ROCK signaling pathway regulates control of integrin‐mediated interactions between cells and cellular matrix thereby regulating cell adhesion. 154 TRIM59 stabilizes PDCD10, which also acts as an upstream signal of the Rho‐ROCK signaling pathway and inhibits it, thereby promoting metastasis and inhibiting apoptosis. 155 Some experiments had shown that using of lipophilic statin drugs can induce apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells, thereby inhibiting the development of osteosarcoma. Statin drugs induce apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells by altering the localization of RhoA, causing its relocation from the cell membrane to the cytoplasm and leading to RhoA isoprenylation. This process triggers apoptosis. Furthermore, statin‐induced apoptosis is attributed to the inhibition of survival signals. By inhibiting RhoA‐GTPase activity, statin drugs block the p42/p44‐MAPKs survival pathway, accelerating apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells. 156 , 157

3.5. JNK signaling pathway

As one of the three well‐known mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK), the c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase (JNK) signal pathway is important for the converting extracellular stimuli into intracellular signals. 158 , 159 The JNK kinase family have JNK1, JNK2, and JNK3, and the JNK1 and 2 are the most important JNK kinase family. The upstream molecules of JNK protein mainly include growth factors and pro‐inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF‐a and IL‐1, which can activate JNK protein. Additionally, certain environmental factors such as UV radiation and toxins can also exogenously activate JNK protein. 160 In addition, JNK 1 increase the transcription factor function by phosphorylating the composition of activator protein‐1 (AP‐1), such as c‐Jun, ATF2, and c‐Myc. 161 , 162

The JNK signaling pathway, as a factor closely related to cell survival, growth, and value‐added, is also closely related to tumor development. The JNK signaling pathway can affect tumor microenvironment generation by regulating TGF‐β to promote tumor development. 163 , 164 JNK can also play a role in immune escape from and tumor cell through the JNK‐STAT3 pathway. 165 It can protect the cancer cell from apoptosis and increase the chemoresistance by decreasing the ROS level, which can prevent tumor from death. 166 What's more, it can promote cancer cell proliferation by regulating the expression level of miRNA‐92a and glucose‐regulated protein 78 (GRP78). It can also upregulate the expression of early growth response gene‐1 (Egr‐1) to increase cancer cell proliferation. 167 The JNK can inhibit apoptosis by activating autophagy. 168 The two main JNK kinase family members JNK1 and JNK2 have different role in cell survival. JNK1 can help cancer survival while JNK2 can cause cell death through apoptosis. 165 JNK1 promotes TBP production and thus tumor development and inhibits apoptosis through JNK1/STAT3 signaling. 169 But in contrast, JNK1 can mediate TNF‐α‐induced apoptosis. 170 For autophagy, JNK regulates autophagy by affecting autophagy‐related genes and induces autophagy through Bcl‐2 phosphorylation, which contributes to cancer cell survival. 171

In the development of osteosarcoma, activated JNK protein, together with c‐Jun, c‐FOS, acts on core‐binding factor 1, leading to the transformation of osteoblasts into cancer cells. Therefore, dysregulation of the JNK signaling pathway may be a key factor in the cause of osteosarcoma. Additionally, activation of MMP family proteins, downstream proteins of JNK, can promote the migration of osteosarcoma cells. 172 , 173 But under some situation, the different way to activate JNK/c‐Jun signal pathway can also promote the apoptosis and autophagy in osteosarcoma. Therefore, targeting the JNK signaling pathway can be used to intervene in the pathogenesis and progression of osteosarcoma for therapeutic purposes. Experimental evidence has shown that the JNK inhibitor SP600125 significantly reduces the transcriptional impact of AP‐1, thereby decreasing the migration of osteosarcoma cells 163 Metformin increases the ROS‐mediated JNK/c‐Jun signal pathway to induce apoptosis in osteosarcoma. The accumulation of ROS induces a JNK/c‐Tun cascade reaction, which leads to the generation of cell apoptosis and autophagy. Therefore, metformin induces a significant ROS production, thus exerting a resistance effect against osteosarcoma. 174 The curcuminoid HO‐3867 can activate apoptosis in osteosarcoma through JNK signal pathway. 175 A small molecule TGF‐βRI/ALK5 inhibitor (RepSox) promotes apoptosis to inhibit osteosarcoma cell proliferation, and it acts by inhibiting TGF‐βR and thus affecting the JNK and Smad3 signaling pathway. 176 As the flavonoid monomer, cardamonin (CAR) can stimulate JNK signal pathway which can phosphorylate BH3 protein or use P53 signal pathway to promote cell apoptosis to inhibit osteosarcoma development. 177 As a kind of flavanol, fisetin can increase the expression of ZAK which can activate JNK/ERK signal pathway by promoting the c‐Jun and c‐Fos binding to AP‐1 to cause apoptosis of osteosarcoma cell. 178 The c‐Jun and ‐Fos are the downstream factor of JNK and ERK. The IRE1‐ASK1‐JNK is also essential for the osteosarcoma development. The production from bacillus subtilis named surfactin can cause stress on ER, which can activate IRE1‐ASK1‐JNK signal pathway and lead to apoptosis of osteosarcoma cell. 179

4. NEW TREATMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH PROGRAMMED CELL DEATH

The standard treatment approach for localized osteosarcoma involves a chemotherapy regimen called MAP, comprising high‐dose methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin, administered before and after surgical resection. In cases of relapsed or metastatic osteosarcoma, metastasectomy surgery may enhance patient survival outcomes. For osteosarcoma that are unresectable or exhibit high recurrence rates, chemotherapy with gemcitabine and docetaxel or etoposide and ifosfamide is often considered, although survival rates remain modest. 180 Currently, post‐chemotherapy surgical resection remains an integral part of osteosarcoma treatment, typically utilizing wide margin surgery, with a surgical failure rate of less than 5% post‐chemotherapy. 181 Surgical resection is classified into three levels: R0 to R2. R0 involves complete removal of cancer cells with no residual tumor at the margins, known as negative margins. R1–R2 indicate varying degrees of residual tumor. Studies have shown that for surface osteosarcoma, both R0 and R1 resections are effective in preventing recurrence by ensuring negative margins. However, there is not a precise standard for negative margins. Research suggests that by carefully reducing the distance between resection and tumor margins, limb function can be preserved while maintaining a low recurrence risk. They found that when the negative margin is less than 1 mm or precisely at the margin under a microscope, it is acceptable. 182

Although past treatment methods have shown relatively good results, new treatment methods for osteosarcoma, especially those targeting programmed cell death, need to be developed to improve prognosis and minimize patient burden. As an important regulatory mechanism to modulate the development of osteosarcoma, PCD could be a novel target for the treatment of osteosarcoma, thereby reducing its aggressiveness and migration. GSK343, a methionine inhibitor, was shown to induce apoptosis by expressing cleaved Caspase‐3 and poly ADP‐ribose polymerase (PARP) in a human osteosarcoma cell line: Saos2 cell line, which can kill osteosarcoma cell. 183 For cellular autophagy, GSK343 inhibits P62 expression and promotes LC3‐II production thereby promoting cellular autophagy, and excessive cellular autophagy can kill tumor cells. 183 GSK343 inhibits the expression of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), a polycomb group proteins (PcG), in osteosarcoma cells and EZH2 is highly expressed in osteosarcoma cells. EZH2 is a novel target for effective osteosarcoma treatment. 184 , 185 In the JNK signal pathway, RepSox can regulate the TGF‐βR function to influence the JNK signal pathway to induce osteosarcoma cell apoptosis and CAR can help JNK signal pathway phosphorylate BH3 protein to induce apoptosis. 176 , 177 What's more, the surfactin can induce apoptosis through IRE1‐ASK1‐JNK signal pathway. 179 The metformin can induce ROS/JNK mediated apoptosis of osteosarcoma cell. 174 The Rho signaling pathway, which influences cell migration, adhesion, and proliferation, represents a significant therapeutic target for curtailing osteosarcoma cell migration. 186 Zoledronic acid has the capability to impede the prenylation of Rho, which is crucial for Rho's transmission of extracellular signals, by inhibiting geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGPP) and farnesyl diphosphate (FPP). 187 The zoledronic acid have been proved to play an important role in inhibition of osteosarcoma cell migration to lung. 188 As PD‐L1/2 is upregulated in osteosarcoma, PD‐L1/2 can bind to PD‐1 and thus inhibit the PCD of osteosarcoma cells. Clinical studies have demonstrated that pembrolizumab prevents PD‐L1/2 from binding to PD‐1 and thus promotes the PCD of osteosarcoma cells, thus achieving therapeutic effects. 189 As a reactive oxygen species‐dependent PCD, the iron death‐associated signaling pathway may also serve as a therapeutic target for osteosarcoma. The bavachin can increase expression of transferrin receptor such as DMT1 or P53 and inhibit the secretion of STAT3. P53 can inhibit SLC7A11, so, the bavachin can inhibit STAT3/P53/SLC7A11 axis to induce ferroptosis in osteosarcoma cell. 52 JAK2/STAT3 signal pathway is an important for cellular apoptosis, migration, and proliferation, and it can be a new target on the treatment of osteosarcoma. 190 As a natural isoquinoline alkaloid, liensinine can cause ROS accumulation to inhibit JAK2/STAT3 signal pathway, which can help cell proliferation and inhibit apoptosis. The liensinine can also increase the expression of Bax, Caspase‐3, and RARP, and decrease the expression of Bcl‐2 and cyclin D1. This can also induce the apoptosis in osteosarcoma cell. 190 Pterostilbene can downregulate JAK2/STAT3 signal pathway to induce apoptosis of osteosarcoma cell. As a protein signaling pathway that affects cellular proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, tumor microenvironment angiogenesis, and tumor cell metastasis, STAT3/c‐Myc is also critical in the treatment of osteosarcoma. 134 For example, diosmetin and toosendanin can inhibit phosphorylation and dimerization of STAT3, which can inhibit the expression of c‐Myc. The decrease in c‐Myc can inhibit osteosarcoma cell proliferation and increase apoptosis. 134 Cepharanthine (CEP) can inhibit some gene such as c‐Myc and Bcl‐xL which are the target gene of STAT3 to play its antitumor function 191 (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

The potential therapy methods in osteosarcoma.

Therapy method Typical molecule or drug Target site Mechanism Disadvantage Advantage References
Inhibition of EZH2 mediated by GSK343 GSK343 Casp‐3, PARP, P62, LCH‐II

1. It can induce casp‐3 and PARP expression to induce apoptosis.

2. It can inhibit p62 expression and promote LC3‐II production to induce autophagy

Role in solid tumors is unclear.

Lack of clinical trials

Significantly promotes death in human osteosarcoma 183, 192
Therapy on JNK signal pathway Surfactin, metformin, RepSox, and CAR

Surfactin: IRE1‐ASK1‐JNK

Metformin: ROS/JNK

RepSox: TGF‐βR

CAR: BH3 protein

They can induce apoptosis through different JNK signal pathway.

Lack of clinical trials

Mechanism of growth inhibition of human osteosarcoma is unclear

Strong inhibitory effect on osteosarcoma cell proliferation 174, 176, 179, 193
Therapy on Rho signal pathway Zoledronic acid FPP and GGPP It can inhibit the Rho signal pathway through inhibition of FPP and GGPP Lack of clinical trials and only have experiments performed in osteosarcoma cell lines. Effectively inhibit migration of osteosarcoma to the lungs 194
Immunotherapy Pembrolizumab PD‐1 and PD‐L1/PD‐L2 binding It can inhibit binding of PD‐1 and PD‐L1/PD‐L2 binding, which can inhibit PCD of OS cell

The detail mechanism is unclear.

Have some side effects such as nausea, anemia, and anorexia

Clinical studies are available to demonstrate feasibility
STAT3/P53/SLC7A11 Bavachin Transferrin receptor, STAT It can increase p53 secretion and decrease STAT3 secretion to inhibit STAT3/p53/SLC7A11 axis to cause ferroptosis in OS cell P53 have a dual role in ferroptosis, and its mechanism is unclear. Has been shown to have good anticancer properties 52
JAK2/STAT3 signal pathway Liensinine, Pterostilbene JAK2/STAT3 They can inhibit JAK2/STAT3 signal pathway to induce apoptosis The detailed mechanism of action is unknown

Less toxic

Some experience in clinical use

190
STAT3/c‐Myc signal pathway Diosmetin, toosendanin, Cepharanthine c‐Myc They can inhibit expression of c‐Myc in STAT3/c‐Myc to induce apoptosis in OS cell Antitumor characteristics in osteosarcoma are unclear Fewer adverse reactions 134, 191, 195

5. CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK

PCD is an important mechanism for normal physiological activity of cells such as cellular proliferation, migration, growth, and differentiation. In this review, we introduce different roles of PCD in the osteosarcoma development and the function of different signal pathway. For example, the apoptosis and ferroptosis can cause the death of osteosarcoma cell, and some drug can block System XC‐ to induce ferroptosis to inhibit the development of osteosarcoma. The autophagy has a dual role in osteosarcoma. Autophagy can either protect or destroy osteosarcoma, protection or destruction depending on the environment. In osteosarcoma, hypoxia can lead to pyroptosis, which can kill osteosarcoma cells. For necroptosis in osteosarcoma, the formation of the RIP1/RIP3/MLKL complex can induce necroptosis in osteosarcoma cells. Cuproptosis and osteosarcoma are related but specific roles and mechanisms still need to be studied.

The different signal pathways regulate different types of PCD. The activation of mTOR can inhibit autophagy and promote cell proliferation, and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signal pathway contributes to angiogenesis in the tumor microenvironment. The WNT signal pathway is transmitted by beta‐catenin. Beta‐catenin phosphorylates TSC and thus induces autophagy. As a molecule that regulates cellular activity, c‐Myc inhibits apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells, while the STAT3/c‐Myc signaling pathway contributes to the expansion and development of osteosarcoma cells. The RhoA‐ROCK‐LIMK2 signaling pathway contributes to osteosarcoma cell migration and is implicated in cellular autophagy and apoptosis. The JNK signal pathway can decrease the level of ROS, which can protect the osteosarcoma cells from apoptosis, and the JNK pathway can promote osteosarcoma cell proliferation.

To sum up, since different PCDs and their associated signaling pathways are critically linked to the growth and death of osteosarcoma cells, a variety of drugs targeting PCD, and its signal pathway may be used to treat osteosarcoma in the future. For example, there are experiments on cuproptosis that have found that in a prognostic model of osteosarcoma, four drugs, AUY922, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and Z.lle.CHO, can inhibit the development of osteosarcoma. 111 In addition, diosmetin have been shown that it can be used to treat human osteosarcoma through STAT3/c‐Myc signal pathway. Bavachin can change the morphology of mitochondria to induce the ferroptosis in cancer cell which can treat osteosarcoma. Cisplatin is a common chemotherapeutic agent for osteosarcoma treatment but tends to inhibit iron death leading to resistance. So, promoting iron death could be a new approach to counteract tumor resistance to cisplatin. In summary, many of the signal pathway related to osteosarcoma can be the target of treatment of osteosarcoma. However, there are still many challenges to achieve this, but we believe that in‐depth experimental and clinical research will further promote the development of PCD as an important target for the treatment of osteosarcoma in the future.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Suqing Liu: Visualization (equal); writing – original draft (equal). Chengtao Liu: Visualization (equal); writing – original draft (equal). Yian Wang: Validation (equal); visualization (equal). Jiewen Chen: Formal analysis (equal); methodology (equal). Yujin He: Data curation (equal). Kaibo Hu: Investigation (equal). Ting Li: Project administration (equal). Junmei Yang: Writing – review and editing (equal). Jie Peng: Conceptualization (equal); data curation (equal); project administration (equal); supervision (equal); validation (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Liang Hao: Data curation (equal); project administration (equal); supervision (equal); writing – review and editing (equal).

FUNDING INFORMATION

This study was supported by the Distinguished Youth Fund Project of Jiangxi Natural Science Foundation (Grant number [20212ACB216011]), the Key Project of the Science and Technology Research Program of the Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education (Grant numbers [GJJ190014]), the National College Students' Innovative Entrepreneurial Training Plan Program (Grant numbers [202110403003] and [202210403001]), and the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program for College Students in Jiangxi Province (Grant number [S202210403002] and [S202310403034]).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

All figures were created at BioRender.com.

Liu S, Liu C, Wang Y, et al. The role of programmed cell death in osteosarcoma: From pathogenesis to therapy. Cancer Med. 2024;13:e7303. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7303

Suqing Liu and Chengtao Liu have contributed equally to this study.

Contributor Information

Jie Peng, Email: jie_peng0459@163.com.

Liang Hao, Email: haoliangteam2024@163.com.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Ritter J, Bielack SS. Osteosarcoma. Ann Oncol. 2010;21.Suppl 7:vii320‐vii325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kansara M, Teng MW, Smyth MJ, Thomas DM. Translational biology of osteosarcoma. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(11):722‐735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Cersosimo F, Lonardi S, Bernardini G, et al. Tumor‐associated macrophages in osteosarcoma: from mechanisms to therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(15):5207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Li J, Yang Z, Li Y, et al. Cell apoptosis, autophagy and necroptosis in osteosarcoma treatment. Oncotarget. 2016;7(28):44763‐44778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Ferguson JL, Turner SP. Bone cancer: diagnosis and treatment principles. Am Fam Physician. 2018;98(4):205‐213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Isakoff MS, Bielack SS, Meltzer P, Gorlick R. Osteosarcoma: current treatment and a collaborative pathway to success. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(27):3029‐3035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Bielack SS, Kempf‐Bielack B, Delling G, et al. Prognostic factors in high‐grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk: an analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(3):776‐790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Salunke AA, Chen Y, Tan JH, Chen X, Khin LW, Puhaindran ME. Does a pathological fracture affect the prognosis in patients with osteosarcoma of the extremities? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Bone Joint J. 2014;96‐b(10):1396‐1403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Steffner RJ, Jang ES. Staging of bone and soft‐tissue sarcomas. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018;26(13):e269‐e278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Aran V, Devalle S, Meohas W, et al. Osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma: clinical aspects, biomarker discovery and liquid biopsy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021;162:103340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Birdi HK, Jirovec A, Cortés‐Kaplan S, et al. Immunotherapy for sarcomas: new frontiers and unveiled opportunities. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(2):e001580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Lai HT, Naumova N, Marchais A, Gaspar N, Geoerger B, Brenner C. Insight into the interplay between mitochondria‐regulated cell death and energetic metabolism in osteosarcoma. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:948097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Liu X, du S, Wang S, Ye K. Ferroptosis in osteosarcoma: a promising future. Front Oncol. 2022;12:1031779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Aaronson SA, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25(3):486‐541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Moujalled D, Strasser A, Liddell JR. Molecular mechanisms of cell death in neurological diseases. Cell Death Differ. 2021;28(7):2029‐2044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Cai X, Yin W, Tang C, Lu Y, He Y. Molecular mechanism of microRNAs regulating apoptosis in osteosarcoma. Mol Biol Rep. 2022;49(7):6945‐6956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hu L, Wu X, Chen D, et al. The hypoxia‐related signature predicts prognosis, pyroptosis and drug sensitivity of osteosarcoma. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:814722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Song K, Ma J, Gao Y, et al. Knocking down Siglec‐15 in osteosarcoma cells inhibits proliferation while promoting apoptosis and pyroptosis by targeting the Siglec‐15/STAT3/Bcl‐2 pathway. Adv Med Sci. 2022;67(2):187‐195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Dixon SJ, Lemberg KM, Lamprecht MR, et al. Ferroptosis: an iron‐dependent form of nonapoptotic cell death. Cell. 2012;149(5):1060‐1072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Codenotti S, Poli M, Asperti M, Zizioli D, Marampon F, Fanzani A. Cell growth potential drives ferroptosis susceptibility in rhabdomyosarcoma and myoblast cell lines. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144(9):1717‐1730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Dächert J, Ehrenfeld V, Habermann K, Dolgikh N, Fulda S. Targeting ferroptosis in rhabdomyosarcoma cells. Int J Cancer. 2020;146(2):510‐520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Schott C, Graab U, Cuvelier N, Hahn H, Fulda S. Oncogenic RAS mutants confer resistance of RMS13 rhabdomyosarcoma cells to oxidative stress‐induced ferroptotic cell death. Front Oncol. 2015;5:131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Zhao J, Zhao Y, Ma X, Zhang B, Feng H. Targeting ferroptosis in osteosarcoma. J Bone Oncol. 2021;30:100380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Glick D, Barth S, Macleod KF. Autophagy: cellular and molecular mechanisms. J Pathol. 2010;221(1):3‐12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Camuzard O, Santucci‐Darmanin S, Carle GF, Pierrefite‐Carle V. Role of autophagy in osteosarcoma. J Bone Oncol. 2019;16:100235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Jamali Z, Taheri‐Anganeh M, Shabaninejad Z, et al. Autophagy regulation by microRNAs: novel insights into osteosarcoma therapy. IUBMB Life. 2020;72(7):1306‐1321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ando T, Ichikawa J, Fujimaki T, Taniguchi N, Takayama Y, Haro H. Gemcitabine and rapamycin exhibit additive effect against osteosarcoma by targeting autophagy and apoptosis. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(11):3097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Ning B, Liu Y, Huang T, Wei Y. Autophagy and its role in osteosarcoma. Cancer Med. 2023;12(5):5676‐5687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Yang ZG, Wang RX, Ren HZ, He F, Ma YJ, Yu SB. Research progress of necroptosis on bone related diseases. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2021;34(7):687‐690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Zheng Y, Xu J, Lin J, Lin Y. A novel necroptosis‐related lncRNA signature for osteosarcoma. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022;2022:8003525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 31. Chiu HW, Tseng YC, Hsu YH, et al. Arsenic trioxide induces programmed cell death through stimulation of ER stress and inhibition of the ubiquitin‐proteasome system in human sarcoma cells. Cancer Lett. 2015;356(2 Pt B):762‐772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Jin J, Yuan P, Yu W, et al. Mitochondria‐targeting polymer micelle of dichloroacetate induced pyroptosis to enhance osteosarcoma immunotherapy. ACS Nano. 2022;16(7):10327‐10340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wen Y, Tang F, Tu C, Hornicek F, Duan Z, Min L. Immune checkpoints in osteosarcoma: recent advances and therapeutic potential. Cancer Lett. 2022;547:215887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Carneiro BA, El‐Deiry WS. Targeting apoptosis in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17(7):395‐417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Müller M, Wilder S, Bannasch D, et al. p53 activates the CD95 (APO‐1/Fas) gene in response to DNA damage by anticancer drugs. J Exp Med. 1998;188(11):2033‐2045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Danial NN, Korsmeyer SJ. Cell death: critical control points. Cell. 2004;116(2):205‐219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Chipuk JE, Bouchier‐Hayes L, Green DR. Mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization during apoptosis: the innocent bystander scenario. Cell Death Differ. 2006;13(8):1396‐1402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Singh R, Letai A, Sarosiek K. Regulation of apoptosis in health and disease: the balancing act of BCL‐2 family proteins. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20(3):175‐193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Trieb K, Sulzbacher I, Kubista B. Bcl‐2 correlates with localization but not outcome in human osteosarcoma. Oncol Lett. 2013;6(2):559‐561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Wang ZX, Yang JS, Pan X, et al. Functional and biological analysis of Bcl‐xL expression in human osteosarcoma. Bone. 2010;47(2):445‐454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Kehr S, Haydn T, Bierbrauer A, Irmer B, Vogler M, Fulda S. Targeting BCL‐2 proteins in pediatric cancer: dual inhibition of BCL‐X(L) and MCL‐1 leads to rapid induction of intrinsic apoptosis. Cancer Lett. 2020;482:19‐32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Cao C, Pei Y, Yu H, Qi H. Dual targeting Bcl‐2 and Bcl‐xL augments osteosarcoma response to doxorubicin. J Chemother. 2024;36(2):156‐166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Jiang X, Stockwell BR, Conrad M. Ferroptosis: mechanisms, biology and role in disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22(4):266‐282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Galadari S, Rahman A, Pallichankandy S, Thayyullathil F. Reactive oxygen species and cancer paradox: to promote or to suppress? Free Radic Biol Med. 2017;104:144‐164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Conrad M, Pratt DA. The chemical basis of ferroptosis. Nat Chem Biol. 2019;15(12):1137‐1147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Yan HF, Zou T, Tuo QZ, et al. Ferroptosis: mechanisms and links with diseases. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6(1):49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Guo Y, Ma B, Li X, et al. n‐3 PUFA can reduce IL‐6 and TNF levels in patients with cancer. Br J Nutr. 2023;129(1):54‐65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Kennedy L, Sandhu JK, Harper ME, Cuperlovic‐Culf M. Role of glutathione in cancer: from mechanisms to therapies. Biomolecules. 2020;10(10):1429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Yang WS, SriRamaratnam R, Welsch ME, et al. Regulation of ferroptotic cancer cell death by GPX4. Cell. 2014;156(1–2):317‐331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Gao L, Hua W, Tian L, et al. Molecular mechanism of ferroptosis in orthopedic diseases. Cells. 2022;11(19):2979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Lachaier E, Louandre C, Godin C, et al. Sorafenib induces ferroptosis in human cancer cell lines originating from different solid tumors. Anticancer Res. 2014;34(11):6417‐6422. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Luo Y, Gao X, Zou L, Lei M, Feng J, Hu Z. Bavachin induces ferroptosis through the STAT3/P53/SLC7A11 axis in osteosarcoma cells. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2021;2021:1783485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Shi Y, Gong M, Deng Z, et al. Tirapazamine suppress osteosarcoma cells in part through SLC7A11 mediated ferroptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2021;567:118‐124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Todde V, Veenhuis M, van der Klei IJ. Autophagy: principles and significance in health and disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1792(1):3‐13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Karch J, Schips TG, Maliken BD, et al. Autophagic cell death is dependent on lysosomal membrane permeability through Bax and Bak. elife. 2017;6:e30543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Eskelinen EL. The dual role of autophagy in cancer. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2011;11(4):294‐300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Yang ZJ, Chee CE, Huang S, Sinicrope FA. The role of autophagy in cancer: therapeutic implications. Mol Cancer Ther. 2011;10(9):1533‐1541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Aunan JR, Cho WC, Søreide K. The biology of aging and cancer: a brief overview of shared and divergent molecular hallmarks. Aging Dis. 2017;8(5):628‐642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Ren T, Zheng B, Huang Y, et al. Osteosarcoma cell intrinsic PD‐L2 signals promote invasion and metastasis via the RhoA‐ROCK‐LIMK2 and autophagy pathways. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(4):261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Nehme G, Gordon N. Autophagy in osteosarcoma. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1258:167‐175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Xie ZG, Xie Y, Dong QR. Inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin leads to autophagy activation and cell death of MG63 osteosarcoma cells. Oncol Lett. 2013;6(5):1465‐1469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Chiu HW, Lin W, Ho SY, Wang YJ. Synergistic effects of arsenic trioxide and radiation in osteosarcoma cells through the induction of both autophagy and apoptosis. Radiat Res. 2011;175(5):547‐560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Liu EY, Ryan KM. Autophagy and cancer—issues we need to digest. J Cell Sci. 2012;125(Pt 10):2349‐2358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Maiuri MC, Tasdemir E, Criollo A, et al. Control of autophagy by oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Cell Death Differ. 2009;16(1):87‐93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Huang J, Ni J, Liu K, et al. HMGB1 promotes drug resistance in osteosarcoma. Cancer Res. 2012;72(1):230‐238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Xiao X, Wang W, Li Y, et al. HSP90AA1‐mediated autophagy promotes drug resistance in osteosarcoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37(1):201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Kim M, Jung JY, Choi S, et al. GFRA1 promotes cisplatin‐induced chemoresistance in osteosarcoma by inducing autophagy. Autophagy. 2017;13(1):149‐168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Chen R, Wang G, Zheng Y, Hua Y, Cai Z. Drug resistance‐related microRNAs in osteosarcoma: translating basic evidence into therapeutic strategies. J Cell Mol Med. 2019;23(4):2280‐2292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Zhou J, Wu S, Chen Y, et al. microRNA‐143 is associated with the survival of ALDH1+CD133+ osteosarcoma cells and the chemoresistance of osteosarcoma. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2015;240(7):867‐875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Meng Y, Gao R, Ma J, et al. MicroRNA‐140‐5p regulates osteosarcoma chemoresistance by targeting HMGN5 and autophagy. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Shi J, Zhao Y, Wang K, et al. Cleavage of GSDMD by inflammatory caspases determines pyroptotic cell death. Nature. 2015;526(7575):660‐665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Xia X, Wang X, Cheng Z, et al. The role of pyroptosis in cancer: pro‐cancer or pro‐“host”? Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(9):650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Xia S, et al. Gasdermin E suppresses tumour growth by activating anti‐tumour immunity. Nature. 2020;579(7799):415‐420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Sborgi L, Rühl S, Mulvihill E, et al. GSDMD membrane pore formation constitutes the mechanism of pyroptotic cell death. EMBO J. 2016;35(16):1766‐1778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Yang L, Xie M, Yang M, et al. PKM2 regulates the Warburg effect and promotes HMGB1 release in sepsis. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Liu Y, Yan W, Tohme S, et al. Hypoxia induced HMGB1 and mitochondrial DNA interactions mediate tumor growth in hepatocellular carcinoma through Toll‐like receptor 9. J Hepatol. 2015;63(1):114‐121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Wu G, Xu G, Chen DW, et al. Hypoxia exacerbates inflammatory acute lung injury via the toll‐like receptor 4 signaling pathway. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Yu LM, Zhang WH, Han XX, et al. Hypoxia‐induced ROS contribute to myoblast pyroptosis during obstructive sleep apnea via the NF‐κB/HIF‐1α signaling pathway. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:4596368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Jiao Y, Zhao H, Chen G, et al. Pyroptosis of MCF7 cells induced by the secreted factors of hUCMSCs. Stem Cells Int. 2018;2018:5912194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Jiang Y, Liu H, Yu H, et al. Circular RNA Calm4 regulates hypoxia‐induced pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells pyroptosis via the Circ‐Calm4/miR‐124‐3p/PDCD6 axis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2021;41(5):1675‐1693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Tan G, Huang C, Chen J, Zhi F. HMGB1 released from GSDME‐mediated pyroptotic epithelial cells participates in the tumorigenesis of colitis‐associated colorectal cancer through the ERK1/2 pathway. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13(1):149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Sainio AO, Järveläinen HT. Decorin‐mediated oncosuppression—a potential future adjuvant therapy for human epithelial cancers. Br J Pharmacol. 2019;176(1):5‐15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Lang X, Green MD, Wang W, et al. Radiotherapy and immunotherapy promote tumoral lipid oxidation and ferroptosis via synergistic repression of SLC7A11. Cancer Discov. 2019;9(12):1673‐1685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Tang R, Xu J, Zhang B, et al. Ferroptosis, necroptosis, and pyroptosis in anticancer immunity. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13(1):110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Huang T, Zhang P, Li W, et al. G9A promotes tumor cell growth and invasion by silencing CASP1 in non‐small‐cell lung cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8(4):e2726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Saeki N, Kuwahara Y, Sasaki H, Satoh H, Shiroishi T. Gasdermin (Gsdm) localizing to mouse chromosome 11 is predominantly expressed in upper gastrointestinal tract but significantly suppressed in human gastric cancer cells. Mamm Genome. 2000;11(9):718‐724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Zhang J, Deng J, Ding R, et al. Identification of pyroptosis‐related genes and long non‐coding RNAs signatures in osteosarcoma. Cancer Cell Int. 2022;22(1):322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Tian BG, Hua Z, Wang ZJ, Li J. Knockdown of microRNA‐181a inhibits osteosarcoma cells growth and invasion through triggering NLRP3‐dependent pyroptosis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(15):7922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Diesch J, le Pannérer MM, Winkler R, et al. Inhibition of CBP synergizes with the RNA‐dependent mechanisms of Azacitidine by limiting protein synthesis. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):6060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Ma J, Ge Z. Comparison between decitabine and Azacitidine for patients with acute myeloid leukemia and higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:701690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Wang H, Zhou X, Li C, et al. The emerging role of pyroptosis in pediatric cancers: from mechanism to therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2022;15(1):140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Liu B, Feng C, Liu Z, Tu C, Li Z. A novel necroptosis‐related lncRNAs signature effectively predicts the prognosis for osteosarcoma and is associated with immunity. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:944158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Silke J, Rickard JA, Gerlic M. The diverse role of RIP kinases in necroptosis and inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2015;16(7):689‐697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Koike A, Hanatani M, Fujimori K. Pan‐caspase inhibitors induce necroptosis via ROS‐mediated activation of mixed lineage kinase domain‐like protein and p38 in classically activated macrophages. Exp Cell Res. 2019;380(2):171‐179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Shi G, Jia P, Chen H, Bao L, Feng F, Tang H. Necroptosis occurs in osteoblasts during tumor necrosis factor‐α stimulation and caspase‐8 inhibition. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2018;52(1):e7844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Xiao H, Jensen PE, Chen X. Elimination of osteosarcoma by necroptosis with graphene oxide‐associated anti‐HER2 antibodies. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(18):4360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Jiang N, Zhang X, Gu X, Li X, Shang L. Progress in understanding the role of lncRNA in programmed cell death. Cell Death Dis. 2021;7(1):30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Li S, Zhang T, Xu W, et al. Sarcoma‐targeting peptide‐decorated polypeptide nanogel intracellularly delivers Shikonin for upregulated osteosarcoma necroptosis and diminished pulmonary metastasis. Theranostics. 2018;8(5):1361‐1375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Li S, Zhang T, Xu W, et al. Erratum: sarcoma‐targeting peptide‐decorated polypeptide nanogel intracellularly delivers Shikonin for upregulated osteosarcoma necroptosis and diminished pulmonary metastasis: erratum. Theranostics. 2020;10(12):5530‐5531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Dondelinger Y, Jouan‐Lanhouet S, Divert T, et al. NF‐κB‐independent role of IKKα/IKKβ in preventing RIPK1 kinase‐dependent apoptotic and necroptotic cell death during TNF signaling. Mol Cell. 2015;60(1):63‐76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Fulda S. Regulation of necroptosis signaling and cell death by reactive oxygen species. Biol Chem. 2016;397(7):657‐660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Zhou J, Li G, Han G, et al. Emodin induced necroptosis in the glioma cell line U251 via the TNF‐α/RIP1/RIP3 pathway. Investig New Drugs. 2020;38(1):50‐59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Wang G, Zhang X, Feng W, Wang J. Prediction of prognosis and immunotherapy of osteosarcoma based on necroptosis‐related lncRNAs. Front Genet. 2022;13:917935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Shi J, Li J, Su W, Zhao S, Li H, Lei L. Loss of periodontal ligament fibroblasts by RIPK3‐MLKL‐mediated necroptosis in the progress of chronic periodontitis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):2902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Wang X, Avsec D, Obreza A, Yousefi S, Mlinarič‐Raščan I, Simon HU. A putative serine protease is required to initiate the RIPK3‐MLKL‐mediated necroptotic death pathway in neutrophils. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:614928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Tsvetkov P, Coy S, Petrova B, et al. Copper induces cell death by targeting lipoylated TCA cycle proteins. Science. 2022;375(6586):1254‐1261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Zhang G, Sun J, Zhang X. A novel Cuproptosis‐related LncRNA signature to predict prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):11325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Zhang Z, Zeng X, Wu Y, Liu Y, Zhang X, Song Z. Cuproptosis‐related risk score predicts prognosis and characterizes the tumor microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Immunol. 2022;13:925618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Zhou B, Guo L, Zhang B, et al. Disulfiram combined with copper induces immunosuppression via PD‐L1 stabilization in hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Cancer Res. 2019;9(11):2442‐2455. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Hu H, Yin Y, Jiang B, Feng Z, Cai T, Wu S. Cuproptosis signature and PLCD3 predicts immune infiltration and drug responses in osteosarcoma. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1156455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Yang M, Zheng H, Xu K, et al. A novel signature to guide osteosarcoma prognosis and immune microenvironment: Cuproptosis‐related lncRNA. Front Immunol. 2022;13:919231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Liu D, Yin X, Guan X, Li K. Bioinformatic analysis and machine learning to identify the diagnostic biomarkers and immune infiltration in adenomyosis. Front Genet. 2022;13:1082709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Gu JZ, Lin X, Wells DE. The human B22 subunit of the NADH‐ubiquinone oxidoreductase maps to the region of chromosome 8 involved in branchio‐oto‐renal syndrome. Genomics. 1996;35(1):6‐10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Wang D, Jiang Y, Wang T, Wang Z, Zou F. Identification of a novel autophagy‐related prognostic signature and small molecule drugs for glioblastoma by bioinformatics. BMC Med Genet. 2022;15(1):111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Feng J, Wang J, Xu Y, et al. Construction and validation of a novel cuproptosis‐mitochondrion prognostic model related with tumor immunity in osteosarcoma. PLoS One. 2023;18(7):e0288180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Yao Y, Chen H, Lou M, Chen T. Cuproptosis‐related gene FDX1 as a prognostic biomarker for kidney renal clear cell carcinoma correlates with immune checkpoints and immune cell infiltration. Front Genet. 2023;14:1071694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Peng Y, Wang Y, Zhou C, Mei W, Zeng C. PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and its role in cancer therapeutics: are we making headway? Front Oncol. 2022;12:819128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Hoxhaj G, Manning BD. The PI3K‐AKT network at the interface of oncogenic signalling and cancer metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020;20(2):74‐88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. He ML, Wu Y, Zhao JM, Wang Z, Chen YB. PIK3CA and AKT gene polymorphisms in susceptibility to osteosarcoma in a Chinese population. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(9):5117‐5122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Wang S, Li B, Qiao H, et al. Autophagy‐related gene Atg5 is essential for astrocyte differentiation in the developing mouse cortex. EMBO Rep. 2014;15(10):1053‐1061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Kim YC, Guan KL. mTOR: a pharmacologic target for autophagy regulation. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(1):25‐32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Sadrkhanloo M, Paskeh MDA, Hashemi M, et al. New emerging targets in osteosarcoma therapy: PTEN and PI3K/Akt crosstalk in carcinogenesis. Pathol Res Pract. 2023;251:154902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Li Z, Dong H, Li M, et al. Honokiol induces autophagy and apoptosis of osteosarcoma through PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Mol Med Rep. 2018;17(2):2719‐2723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Lin CJ, Chen TL, Tseng YY, et al. Honokiol induces autophagic cell death in malignant glioma through reactive oxygen species‐mediated regulation of the p53/PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2016;304:59‐69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Yue Z, Guan X, Chao R, et al. Diallyl disulfide induces apoptosis and autophagy in human osteosarcoma MG‐63 cells through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway. Molecules. 2019;24(14):2665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Wei Z, Xia K, Zheng D, Gong C, Guo W. RILP inhibits tumor progression in osteosarcoma via Grb10‐mediated inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Mol Med. 2023;29(1):133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Tao H, Chen F, Liu H, Hu Y, Wang Y, Li H. Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathway activation reverses gemcitabine resistance by attenuating Beclin1‐mediated autophagy in the MG63 human osteosarcoma cell line. Mol Med Rep. 2017;16(2):1701‐1706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Liang GH, Liu N, He MT, et al. Transcriptional regulation of Runx2 by HSP90 controls osteosarcoma apoptosis via the AKT/GSK‐3β/β‐catenin signaling. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119(1):948‐959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Cleton‐Jansen AM, Anninga JK, Briaire‐de Bruijn IH, et al. Profiling of high‐grade central osteosarcoma and its putative progenitor cells identifies tumourigenic pathways. Br J Cancer. 2009;101(11):1909‐1918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Huang H, Han Y, Chen Z, et al. ML264 inhibits osteosarcoma growth and metastasis via inhibition of JAK2/STAT3 and WNT/β‐catenin signalling pathways. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24(10):5652‐5664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Li S, Li JJ. Zoledronic acid modulates human osteosarcoma cells proliferation via GSK‐3β activation. Neoplasma. 2019;66(5):766‐775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Lin H, Wu T, Peng L, et al. Lnc‐MAP6‐1:3 knockdown inhibits osteosarcoma progression by modulating Bax/Bcl‐2 and Wnt/β‐catenin pathways. Int J Med Sci. 2020;17(15):2248‐2256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Liu Y, Liao S, Bennett S, et al. STAT3 and its targeting inhibitors in osteosarcoma. Cell Prolif. 2021;54(2):e12974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Ning R, Chen G, Fang R, Zhang Y, Zhao W, Qian F. Diosmetin inhibits cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis through STAT3/c‐Myc signaling pathway in human osteosarcoma cells. Biol Res. 2021;54(1):40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Thompson EB. The many roles of c‐Myc in apoptosis. Annu Rev Physiol. 1998;60:575‐600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Chen BJ, Wu YL, Tanaka Y, Zhang W. Small molecules targeting c‐Myc oncogene: promising anti‐cancer therapeutics. Int J Biol Sci. 2014;10(10):1084‐1096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Sciarrillo R, Wojtuszkiewicz A, Assaraf YG, et al. The role of alternative splicing in cancer: from oncogenesis to drug resistance. Drug Resist Updat. 2020;53:100728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Ma A, Zhang R. Diosmetin inhibits cell proliferation, induces cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in liver cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:3537‐3546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Adamante G, de Almeida AS, Rigo FK, et al. Diosmetin as a novel transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 antagonist with antinociceptive activity in mice. Life Sci. 2019;216:215‐226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Kumar S, Prajapati KS, Shuaib M, Kushwaha PP, Tuli HS, Singh AK. Five‐decade update on chemopreventive and other pharmacological potential of Kurarinone: a natural flavanone. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:737137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Kleinsimon S, Longmuss E, Rolff J, et al. GADD45A and CDKN1A are involved in apoptosis and cell cycle modulatory effects of viscumTT with further inactivation of the STAT3 pathway. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):5750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Zheng S, Wei Y, Jiang Y, Hao Y. LRP8 activates STAT3 to induce PD‐L1 expression in osteosarcoma. Tumori. 2021;107(3):238‐246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. He J, Zhang W, di T, et al. Water extract of sporoderm‐broken spores of Ganoderma lucidum enhanced pd‐l1 antibody efficiency through downregulation and relieved complications of pd‐l1 monoclonal antibody. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;131:110541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Phuyal S, Farhan H. Multifaceted Rho GTPase signaling at the endomembranes. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019;7:127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Garcia‐Mata R, Boulter E, Burridge K. The ‘invisible hand’: regulation of RHO GTPases by RHOGDIs. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2011;12(8):493‐504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Ghafouri‐Fard S, Noroozi R, Abak A, Taheri M, Salimi A. Emerging role of lncRNAs in the regulation of Rho GTPase pathway. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;140:111731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Takai Y, Sasaki T, Matozaki T. Small GTP‐binding proteins. Physiol Rev. 2001;81(1):153‐208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Gur S, Kadowitz PJ, Hellstrom WJ. RhoA/Rho‐kinase as a therapeutic target for the male urogenital tract. J Sex Med. 2011;8(3):675‐687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Matoba K, Takeda Y, Nagai Y, et al. The physiology, pathology, and therapeutic interventions for ROCK isoforms in diabetic kidney disease. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:585633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Xiao Y, Yu S, Zhu B, et al. RGMb is a novel binding partner for PD‐L2 and its engagement with PD‐L2 promotes respiratory tolerance. J Exp Med. 2014;211(5):943‐959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Zhao GS, Gao ZR, Zhang Q, et al. TSSC3 promotes autophagy via inactivating the Src‐mediated PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway to suppress tumorigenesis and metastasis in osteosarcoma, and predicts a favorable prognosis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37(1):188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Bao X, Zhao L, Guan H, Li F. Inhibition of LCMR1 and ATG12 by demethylation‐activated miR‐570‐3p is involved in the anti‐metastasis effects of metformin on human osteosarcoma. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(6):611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Zhang F, Yan T, Guo W, et al. Novel oncogene COPS3 interacts with Beclin1 and Raf‐1 to regulate metastasis of osteosarcoma through autophagy. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37(1):135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Eino D, Tsukada Y, Naito H, et al. LPA4‐mediated vascular network formation increases the efficacy of anti‐PD‐1 therapy against brain tumors. Cancer Res. 2018;78(23):6607‐6620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Tan P, Ye Y, He L, et al. TRIM59 promotes breast cancer motility by suppressing p62‐selective autophagic degradation of PDCD10. PLoS Biol. 2018;16(11):e3000051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Fromigué O, Haÿ E, Modrowski D, et al. RhoA GTPase inactivation by statins induces osteosarcoma cell apoptosis by inhibiting p42/p44‐MAPKs‐Bcl‐2 signaling independently of BMP‐2 and cell differentiation. Cell Death Differ. 2006;13(11):1845‐1856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Kamel WA, Sugihara E, Nobusue H, et al. Simvastatin‐induced apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells: a key role of RhoA‐AMPK/p38 MAPK signaling in antitumor activity. Mol Cancer Ther. 2017;16(1):182‐192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Sreekanth GP, Yenchitsomanus PT, Limjindaporn T. Role of mitogen‐activated protein kinase signaling in the pathogenesis of dengue virus infection. Cell Signal. 2018;48:64‐68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Gkouveris I, Nikitakis NG. Role of JNK signaling in oral cancer: a mini review. Tumour Biol. 2017;39(6):1010428317711659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Davis RJ. Signal transduction by the JNK group of MAP kinases. Cell. 2000;103(2):239‐252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Kumar A, Singh UK, Kini SG, et al. JNK pathway signaling: a novel and smarter therapeutic targets for various biological diseases. Future Med Chem. 2015;7(15):2065‐2086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Spigolon G, Cavaccini A, Trusel M, Tonini R, Fisone G. cJun N‐terminal kinase (JNK) mediates cortico‐striatal signaling in a model of Parkinson's disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2018;110:37‐46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Li YS, Deng ZH, Zeng C, Lei GH. JNK pathway in osteosarcoma: pathogenesis and therapeutics. J Recept Signal Transduct Res. 2016;36(5):465‐470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Hammouda MB, Ford AE, Liu Y, Zhang JY. The JNK signaling pathway in inflammatory skin disorders and cancer. Cells. 2020;9(4):857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Wu Q, Wu W, Fu B, Shi L, Wang X, Kuca K. JNK signaling in cancer cell survival. Med Res Rev. 2019;39(6):2082‐2104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Granato M, Santarelli R, Lotti LV, et al. JNK and macroautophagy activation by bortezomib has a pro‐survival effect in primary effusion lymphoma cells. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e75965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Peng B, Chai Y, Li Y, Liu X, Zhang J. CIP2A overexpression induces autoimmune response and enhances JNK signaling pathway in human lung cancer. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Yin H, Yang X, Gu W, et al. HMGB1‐mediated autophagy attenuates gemcitabine‐induced apoptosis in bladder cancer cells involving JNK and ERK activation. Oncotarget. 2017;8(42):71642‐71656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Wu Q, Wang X, Wan D, Li J, Yuan Z. Crosstalk of JNK1‐STAT3 is critical for RAW264.7 cell survival. Cell Signal. 2014;26(12):2951‐2960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Liu J, Minemoto Y, Lin A. c‐Jun N‐terminal protein kinase 1 (JNK1), but not JNK2, is essential for tumor necrosis factor alpha‐induced c‐Jun kinase activation and apoptosis. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24(24):10844‐10856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Zhou YY, Li Y, Jiang WQ, Zhou LF. MAPK/JNK signalling: a potential autophagy regulation pathway. Biosci Rep. 2015;35(3):e00199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Chen HJ, Lin CM, Lee CY, et al. Kaempferol suppresses cell metastasis via inhibition of the ERK‐p38‐JNK and AP‐1 signaling pathways in U‐2 OS human osteosarcoma cells. Oncol Rep. 2013;30(2):925‐932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Pan W, Wang H, Jianwei R, Ye Z. MicroRNA‐27a promotes proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting MAP2K4 in human osteosarcoma cells. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2014;33(2):402‐412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Li B, Zhou P, Xu K, et al. Metformin induces cell cycle arrest, apoptosis and autophagy through ROS/JNK signaling pathway in human osteosarcoma. Int J Biol Sci. 2020;16(1):74‐84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Lu PW, Chou CH, Yang JS, et al. HO‐3867 induces apoptosis via the JNK signaling pathway in human osteosarcoma cells. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(6):1257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. He D, Gao J, Zheng L, et al. TGF‐β inhibitor RepSox suppresses osteosarcoma via the JNK/Smad3 signaling pathway. Int J Oncol. 2021;59(5):84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Zhang L, Yang C, Huang Y, et al. Cardamonin inhibits the growth of human osteosarcoma cells through activating P38 and JNK signaling pathway. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;134:111155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Fu CY, Chen MC, Tseng YS, et al. Fisetin activates Hippo pathway and JNK/ERK/AP‐1 signaling to inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis of human osteosarcoma cells via ZAK overexpression. Environ Toxicol. 2019;34(8):902‐911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179. Wang GS, Chen JY, Chen WC, et al. Surfactin induces ER stress‐mediated apoptosis via IRE1‐ASK1‐JNK signaling in human osteosarcoma. Environ Toxicol. 2022;37(3):574‐584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180. Gill J, Gorlick R. Advancing therapy for osteosarcoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021;18(10):609‐624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181. Eaton BR, Schwarz R, Vatner R, et al. Osteosarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021;68(Suppl 2):e28352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182. Lee SJ, Lans J, Cook SD, et al. Surface osteosarcoma: predictors of outcomes. J Surg Oncol. 2021;124(4):646‐654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183. Xiong X, Zhang J, Li A, et al. GSK343 induces programmed cell death through the inhibition of EZH2 and FBP1 in osteosarcoma cells. Cancer Biol Ther. 2020;21(3):213‐222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184. Varambally S, Dhanasekaran SM, Zhou M, et al. The polycomb group protein EZH2 is involved in progression of prostate cancer. Nature. 2002;419(6907):624‐629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185. Lv YF, Yan GN, Meng G, Zhang X, Guo QN. Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 silencing inhibits tumor growth and lung metastasis in osteosarcoma. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186. Bruzzese F, Pucci B, Milone MR, et al. Panobinostat synergizes with zoledronic acid in prostate cancer and multiple myeloma models by increasing ROS and modulating mevalonate and p38‐MAPK pathways. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4(10):e878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187. Cheng HL, Lin CW, Yang JS, Hsieh MJ, Yang SF, Lu KH. Zoledronate blocks geranylgeranylation not farnesylation to suppress human osteosarcoma U2OS cells metastasis by EMT via rho a activation and FAK‐inhibited JNK and p38 pathways. Oncotarget. 2016;7(9):9742‐9758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188. Odri G, Kim PP, Lamoureux F, et al. Zoledronic acid inhibits pulmonary metastasis dissemination in a preclinical model of Ewing's sarcoma via inhibition of cell migration. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189. Le Cesne A, Marec‐Berard P, Blay JY, et al. Programmed cell death 1 (PD‐1) targeting in patients with advanced osteosarcomas: results from the PEMBROSARC study. Eur J Cancer. 2019;119:151‐157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190. Jia F, Liu Y, Dou X, Du C, Mao T, Liu X. Liensinine inhibits osteosarcoma growth by ROS‐mediated suppression of the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022:8245614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191. Chen Z, Huang C, Yang YL, et al. Inhibition of the STAT3 signaling pathway is involved in the antitumor activity of cepharanthine in SaOS2 cells. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2012;33(1):101‐108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192. Xiong X, Zhang J, Liang W, et al. Fuse‐binding protein 1 is a target of the EZH2 inhibitor GSK343, in osteosarcoma cells. Int J Oncol. 2016;49(2):623‐628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193. Hidalgo L, Somovilla‐Crespo B, Garcia‐Rodriguez P, Morales‐Molina A, Rodriguez‐Milla MA, Garcia‐Castro J. Switchable CAR T cell strategy against osteosarcoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2023;72(8):2623‐2633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194. Xu Y, Qi J, Sun W, Zhong W, Wu H. Therapeutic effects of zoledronic acid‐loaded hyaluronic acid/polyethylene glycol/nano‐hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on osteosarcoma. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:897641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195. Zhang T, Li J, Yin F, et al. Toosendanin demonstrates promising antitumor efficacy in osteosarcoma by targeting STAT3. Oncogene. 2017;36(47):6627‐6639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.


Articles from Cancer Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES