Abstract
Objectives:
This paper, the second in a series of three on ‘feline leprosy’, provides a detailed description of disease referable to Mycobacterium lepraemurium, the most common cause of feline leprosy worldwide.
Methods:
Cases were sourced retrospectively and prospectively for this observational study, describing clinical, geographical and molecular microbiological data for cats definitively diagnosed with M lepraemurium infection.
Results:
A total of 145 cases of feline leprosy were scrutinised; 114 ‘new’ cases were sourced from the Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory records, veterinary pathology laboratories or veterinarians, and 31 cases were derived from six published studies. Sixty-five cats were definitively diagnosed with M lepraemurium infection. Typically, cats were 1–3 years of age when first infected, with a male gender predilection. Affected cats were generally systemically well. All had outdoor access. Lesions tended to consist of one or more cutaneous/subcutaneous nodules, typically located on the head and/or forelimbs, possibly reflecting the most likely locations for a rodent bite as the site of inoculation for organisms. Nodules had the propensity to ulcerate at some stage in the clinical course. The cytological and histological picture varied from tuberculoid, with relatively low bacterial numbers, to lepromatous with moderate to high bacterial numbers. Treatment was varied, although most cats underwent surgical resection of lesions with adjunctive medical therapy, most often using a combination of oral clarithromycin and rifampicin. Prognosis for recovery was generally good, and in two cases there was spontaneous remission without the requirement for medical intervention. Untreated cats continued to enjoy an acceptable quality of life despite persistence of the disease, which extended locally but had no apparent tendency to disseminate to internal organs.
Conclusions and relevance:
M lepraemurium causes high bacterial index (lepromatous) or low bacterial index (tuberculoid) feline leprosy. The infection typically causes nodules of the skin and/or subcutis (which tend towards ulceration) on the head and/or forelimbs. The disease usually has an indolent clinical course and infected cats have a generally favourable response to therapeutic interventions, with rare cases undergoing spontaneous resolution. Genomic analysis may yield clues as to the environmental niche and culture requirements of this elusive organism. Prospective treatment trials and/or additional drug susceptibility testing in specialised systems would further inform treatment recommendations.
Introduction
Initial reports of ‘feline leprosy’ were likely dominated by Mycobacterium lepraemurium infections, and cat-to-cat inoculation studies fulfilled ‘Koch’s postulates’ for disease causation. Lesions had a propensity to be sited on the head and/or forelimbs, and were nodular in nature involving the skin and subcutis, with a tendency to ulcerate as the disease progressed. The histological appearance varied from tuberculoid disease, comprising a mixture of lymphocytes and macrophages, usually associated with relatively small numbers of acid-fast bacilli (AFB), to lepromatous, comprising predominantly epithelioid macrophages or giant cells associated with numerous, generally intracellular, AFB. There was a tendency for tuberculous lesions to develop central caseous necrosis, which grossly was correlated with an ulcerated appearance.
Many different approaches to treatment have been tried over the years, with the anti-leprosy agent clofazamine perhaps having the best efficacy in vivo, while rifampicin has documented efficacy in vitro. M lepraemurium is extremely difficult to grow in the laboratory, although a few specialised laboratories in Japan1,2 and Belgium 3 have managed to propagate this organism in vitro, permitting limited susceptibility testing and other studies.
This paper, the second in a series of three, concerns patients with skin lesions proven to be caused by M lepraemurium and represents the largest collection of such cases reported to date. Feline leprosy case series published prior to the turn of the century could not determine if a mixture of different aetiological agents, including M lepraemurium, but also other mycobacterial patho gens such as Myco bacterium visibile, Candidatus ‘Myco bacterium tarwinense’ and the novel species Candidatus ‘Myco bac terium lepraefelis’, were involved in these cutaneous feline mycobacterial infections.
Materials and methods
Case recruitment, demographics, data retrieval, cytological and histological assessment, molecular microbiological methods, genetic analysis, mycobacterial culture and statistical analysis were essentially the same as described in the first paper in this series, and interested readers are referred to that publication for information. 4 different primers were used to partially sequence the sodA gene of M lepraemurium: ‘AvsodAF’ 5’-ACATCTCGGGGCAGATCA-AC-3’ (forward) and ‘AvsodAR’ 5’-GTAGTCCGCCTTGACGTTCT-3’ (reverse).
Results
Clinical data
A total of 145 cases of feline leprosy were analysed; 114 were sourced from the Victorian Infectious diseases Reference Laboratory (VIdRL) records, veterinary pathology laboratories or veterinarians, with an additional 31 cases derived from six published studies.5–10 Of this total, 65 had M lepraemurium infection, comprising 42 ‘new’ cases and 23 cases recorded previously in the literature (Table 1).
Table 1.
Detailed case data for 65 cats infected with Mycobacterium lepraemurium
Case | Age at diagnosis (years) | Gender | Breed | Location | Lifestyle | Bacterial index | Clinical details | Retroviral status | Treatment | Outcome | Reference or source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | MN | DSH | Williamstown, VIC, Australia | NR | High | Nodule on right upper lip | NR | Surgical resection, medical treatment (details NR) | NR | This study |
2 | 1.5 | MN | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | This study |
3 | 1 | M | DSH | Glenfield, New Zealand | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | This study |
4 | 2 | MN | Burmese | Paddington, NSW, Australia; lived previously in New Zealand | Moved to Sydney from New Zealand within 6 months prior to presentation; had caught rats in New Zealand | High | Lesion on right lateral forelimb | NR | Surgical resection; CLFZ and CLM for 10–11 weeks | Resolved (4 year follow-up) | This study |
5 | 1 | MN | DSH | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | This study |
6 | NR | MN | NR | Albany, WA, Australia | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | This study |
7 | 1.5 | MN | NR | TAS, Australia | NR | NR | Lesion on commissure of lip | NR | NR | NR | This study |
8 | 0.75 | FN | DSH | New Zealand | NR | High | NR | NR | NR | NR | This study |
9 | NR | NR | NR | Whangarei, New Zealand | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | This study |
10 | 1 | MN | DSH | Auckland, New Zealand | Previously lived in sand dunes, Omaha Beach, New Zealand | NR | Excoriated lesions over rump and in axillae | NR | Surgery | Resolved | This study |
11 | 2 | MN | DSH | Auckland, New Zealand | NR | NR | Multiple cutaneous masses on lateral aspect of left tarsus, lateral aspect of nail bed, and deep SC tissues of right shoulder | NR | NR | NR | This study |
12 | 3 | MN | DSH | Wellsford, New Zealand | History of cat fights | NR | Two non-healing wounds after fighting – left metacarpal region and left upper lip | NR | Surgery, CLM, ENFLX | Resolved | This study |
13 | 1 | FN | DLH | Rotorua, New Zealand | NR | High | Small cystic mass on right forelimb | NR | Surgery | Resolved | This study |
14 | 1.5 | FN | DSH | Launceston, TAS, Australia | Farm mouser | NR | Ulcerated lesion on left lip over upper canine; lesion on upper right gum | NR | Surgery | Resolved | This study |
15 | 3.5 | MN | DSH | Christchurch, New Zealand | Hunts and lives along a river bank | High | Lesions on right forelimb and dorsal carpus | NR | Surgery, RIF, CLM | Resolved | This study |
16 | 2 | FN | DSH | Christchurch, New Zealand | Prolific hunter and lives close to a stream | Low | Ulcerated lesion below left lower eyelid; rim of lesion thickened with large central ulcerated area | NR | Surgery | Resolved | This study |
17 | 4.5 | MN | DSH | Tauranga, New Zealand | Indoor/ outdoor rural; no history of fights | High | Large nodular lesion on forelimb | NR | ENFLX and DOXY, 5 months – no change. RIF and CLM, 3 months – no change | Euthanased after 1 year once lesion started to enlarge | This study |
18 | 3 | MN | DSH | New Lynn, Auckland, New Zealand | NR | NR | NR | FIV –ve | NR | NR | This study |
19 | 2 | MN | NR | Kawerau, New Zealand | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | This study |
20 | 2.5 | MN | DSH | Opotiki, New Zealand | Rural area; indoor/outdoor, hunter | High | Single hard lesion on chin | FIV –ve FeLV –ve | RIF, CLM | LTFU | This study |
21 | 4 | FN | DSH | North Shore, Auckland, New Zealand | Suburban | High | Smooth domed lesion on face | FIV –ve FeLV –ve | Surgery, DOXY before and after | Resolved | This study |
22 | 0.75 | M | Manx cross | Glenfield, New | NR | NR | Multiple raised nodules on both forelimbs | NR | NR | NR | This study |
23 | 2 | MN | DSH | Wanganui, New Zealand | NR | Low | Periorbital lesion | NR | No treatment | Spontaneously resolved within a few weeks | This study |
24 | 3 | MN | DSH | Wanganui, New Zealand | NR | High | Multiple lesions on distal limb | NR | No treatment | Spontaneously resolved within a few weeks | This study |
25 | 0.75 | M | DSH | Milford, New Zealand | NR | NR | Ulcerated skin mass on left flank | NR | NR | NR | This study |
26 | 1.3 | FN | DSH | New Plymouth, New Zealand | Indoor/ outdoor | NR | Skin nodule on hindlimb; enlarged draining popliteal lymph node | NR | Surgical removal and 2 weeks of ENFLX | Resolved | This study |
27 | 14 | MN | DSH | Launceston, TAS, Australia | NR | Low | Multiple disseminated nodules | FIV +ve | RIF and CLM, 2–3 months | Resolved | This study |
28 | 14 | NR | Ragdoll | New Zealand | NR | NR | Keratitis | NR | NR | NR | This study |
29 | 1.5 | FN | DSH | Whangarei, Northland, New Zealand | Farm cat, hunts and fights | NR | Anterior aspect of forelimb; inguinal lymph node | NR | Surgery, DOXY, 1 month | Resolved (2 year follow-up) | This study |
30 | 2 | FN | DSH | Havelock North, New Zealand | Rural | Low | Ulcerated mass on right carpus; eight smaller masses on left side of body | FIV –ve FeLV –ve | Surgery, DOXY, 1 month | NR | This study |
31 | 1.5 | MN | DSH | New Norfolk, TAS, Australia | Rural | High | (Prior to skin lesions, received corticosteroids for eosinophilic granuloma.) Disseminated cutaneous nodules | NR | RIF and CFZ | Resolved | This study |
32 | 3.5 | MN | Persian | Gladesville, NSW, Australia | NR | High | Ulcerated lesions on right forelimb digit pad and dew claw region; lesions on cranial antebrachium and lateral shoulder. Prescapular lymph node enlarged | NR | RIF and CLM | NR | This study |
33 | 10 | MN | DSH | Snug, TAS, Australia | Mainly outdoor | High | NR | NR | CLM, 1 month | NR | This study |
34 | 1.5 | MN | DSH | Vineyard, NSW, Australia | Outdoor, hunter | Low | Ulcerated lesions on lip and chin | FIV –ve FeLV –ve | RIF, CLM, 6 months | Resolved | This study |
35 | 3 | MN | Maine Coon | Old Beach, TAS, Australia | Hunter | High | Ulcerated lesion on right upper lip | NR | CLM, RIF, 6 months | Resolved | This study |
36 | 1.5 | MN | DSH | Dural, NSW, Australia | Outdoor, hunter | NR | Two lesions on right forelimb and one on lateral upper right eyelid | NR | No response to cefovecin, or DOXY. CLM and surgical resection, followed by RIF | NR | This study |
37 | NR | FN | DSH | Kingston, TAS, Australia | Semi-rural | NR | Oral cavity, face and limbs covered in multiple raised, alopecic, erythematous, well demarcated dermal masses (approximately 30 lesions) | FIV –ve FeLV –ve | RIF, CLM | Apparent cure, but lesions returned after diagnosis of renal disease | This study |
38 | 5 | FN | British Shorthair | Balmoral, New Zealand | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | This study |
39 | 2 | FN | Ragdoll | Auckland, New Zealand | Suburban; hunts in adjacent bush reserve | NR | Five nodular lesions, 3–6 mm in diameter. Four were ulcerated. One was medial to the left pinna. Two lesions were on the caudal mandibular area. One lesion was axillary, another was inguinal | NR | DOXY, MOXIFLX | Resolving. Still undergoing treatment at time of writing | This study |
40 | 0.6 | FN | DSH | Auckland, New Zealand | Previously feral | NR | Lesions on face | FIV –ve | DOXY, MOXIFLX | Resolving. Still undergoing treatment at time of writing | This study |
41 | 0.6 | FN | DSH | Auckland, New Zealand | Previously feral | NR | Lesions on face | FIV –ve | DOXY, MOXIFLX | Resolving. Still undergoing treatment at time of writing | This study |
42 | 2 | MN | Bellerive, TAS, Australia | NR | Nodules range from 3–15 mm in diameter, affecting head, feet, legs and trunk | NR | CLM, RIF | Still undergoing treatment at time of writing | This study | ||
43 | 1.5 | ME | DSH | Narraweena, NSW, Australia | Suburban | Low | Left and right axillae and antebrachium, progressing to generalised skin with ulceration | FIV –ve | Surgery, CLFZ, CLM, RIF | No response, euthanased | Case 1 5 |
44 | 3 | MN | DSH | Winston Hills, NSW, Australia | Suburban | Low | ‘Localised’ | NR | Extensive surgery, DOXY | LTFU | Case 3 5 |
45 | 3 | M? | DSH | New Zealand | NR | High | ‘Tumour’ | NR | NR | NR | Case 5
5
Case 3 11 |
46 | 8 | F? | NR | New Zealand | NR | High | Domed forehead | NR | NR | NR | Case 6
5
Case 4 9 |
47 | 1 | F? | DSH | New Zealand | NR | Low | Lesion on left shoulder | NR | NR | NR | Case 7
5
Case 5 9 |
48 | 2 | M? | DSH | New Zealand | NR | Low | Generalised skin lesions | NR | NR | NR | Case 8
5
Case 7 9 |
49 | 2.5 | MN | DSH | British Columbia, Canada | NR | Low* | Ulcerated mass on scrotum | NR | NR | NR | Case 14 6 |
50 | 2 | MN | Siamese | British Columbia, Canada | NR | Low* | Two nodules on skin | NR | NR | NR | Case 16 6 |
51 | NR | ME | DSH | New Zealand | NR | Low* | Three masses – flank, hindlimb, chest wall | NR | NR | NR | Case 12 6 |
52 | 1.5 | MN | DSH | British Columbia, Canada | NR | Low* | Lesion on right carpus | NR | NR | NR | Case 1A 6 |
53 | 1 | FN | NR | British Columbia, Canada | NR | Low* | Chronic ulcerated mass on leg, second small mass | NR | NR | NR | Case 7A 6 |
54 | 7 | MN | DLH | British Columbia, Canada | NR | High* | Lesion on lower eyelid | NR | NR | NR | Case 18 6 |
55 | 3 | NR | NR | British Columbia, Canada | NR | High* | Two masses (location not specified) | NR | NR | NR | Case 20 6 |
56 | 3 | FN | NR | British Columbia, Canada | NR | High* | Large mass on forelimb, several other nodules | NR | NR | NR | Case 23 6 |
57 | 2 | FN | DSH | Kythira, Greece | Hunter | High | Ulcerated nodules on commissures of mouth; enlarged lymph nodes | FIV –ve FeLV –ve | 2 months MARBFLX, no response. Surgery plus 14 weeks of CLFZ and CLM | Resolved | Courtin et al 7 |
58 | 3 | ME | DSH | Nimes, France | Outdoors | High | Four lesions on back and abdomen | NR | Marginal excision | Resolved | Case 2 8 |
59 | 2 | ME | DSH | Marseille, France | Outdoors | High | Five lesions on forelimb, hindlimb, back, popliteal lymph node | NR | NR | NR | Case 3 8 |
60 | 2 | ME | DSH | Nimes, France | Outdoors | High | Multiple lesions on face, forelimb, paw pads, scrotum | NR | RIF, ENFLX, DOXY | Resolved | Case 4 8 |
61 | 1 | FE | DSH | Nimes, France | Outdoors | Low* | Lesion on face | NR | Marginal excision, DOXY | Resolved | Case 5 8 |
62 | 1 | MN | DSH | Nimes, France | Outdoors | High | Lesion on head | NR | Marginal excision, DOXY | Resolved | Case 7 8 |
63 | 2 | MN | DSH | Aix-en- Provence region, France | Outdoors | Low* | Lesion on forelimb | NR | Marginal excision, amoxicillin, cefalexin | Resolved | Case 8 8 |
64 | 3 | M | DSH | New Caledonia | Outdoors | Low* | Multiple lesions on forelimb, lymph nodes | NR | CLFZ, cefovecin | Resolved | Case 9 8 |
65 | 2 | MN | DSH | Marseille, France | Outdoors | Low | Lesion on caudoventral abdominal skin | NR | Marginal excision, cephalexin | Resolved | Case 10 8 |
F = entire female; FN = female spayed; M = entire male; MN = male castrated; NR = not recorded; ? = neuter status unknown; DSH = domestic shorthair; DMH = domestic mediumhair; DLH = domestic longhair; VIC = Victoria; QLD = Queensland; NSW = New South Wales; TAS = Tasmania; WA = Western Australia; BI = bacterial index; FIV = feline immunodeficiency virus; FeLV = feline leukaemia virus; +ve = positive; –ve = negative; CLFZ = clofazamine; RIF = rifampicin; CLM = clarithromycin; DOXY = doxycycline; ENFLX = enrofloxacin; MARBFLX = marbofloxacin; MOXIFLX = moxifloxacin; PRDFLX = pradofloxacin; SC = subcutaneous
Although not directly stated, bacterial numbers were presumed from the pathological description of ‘tuberculoid’ as likely being low bacterial index (BI), with ‘lepromatous’ likely being high BI by definition
Cats were generally young, with a median age of 2 years, although older cats (up to 14 years) were occasionally infected. The preponderance of young cats was striking, with the great majority of affected cats being less than 4 years of age. Where gender was recorded, 43/62 (69%) M lepraemurium infections were in male cats, which is substantially more than would be expected based on the age/gender pyramid for Australian cats. 12 Where breed was recorded, 44/54 were domestic shorthair, 2/54 were domestic longhair, two were Ragdoll, and there was one each of Burmese, Manx cross, Maine Coon, Siamese, Persian and British Shorthair; the crossbreed to pedigree ratio was similar to that of the Australian feline population. 12
Geographical location data were recorded for 63 cats; 16 from Australia, 31 from New Zealand (Figure 1), seven from Canada, seven Zealand (Figure 1), seven from Canada, seven from France, one from the Greek Island of Kythira and one from New Caledonia. M lepraemurium infection was documented to have a wider geographical distribution than any of the other species responsible for feline leprosy, and was the only causative species of this condition in the Australian island state of Tasmania. Although they could be encountered in almost any geographical location, M lepraemurium infections appeared to be overrepresented in coastal cities and rural areas.
Figure 1.
Geographical distribution of feline infections caused by M lepraemurium in the Australasian region, where accurate location data was known. Note the prominence of cases in coastal areas
Where lifestyle was recorded, all cats had unsupervised outdoor access and many were known hunters and/or fighters. Feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) status was only recorded in nine cats, with just one cat being antibody-positive. None of the nine cats tested for feline leukaemia virus were seropositive.
Where clinical features and clinical course were well documented, 34/49 (69%) cats had a few lesions, with only 4/49 cases having generalised nodular skin disease; the remainder had multiple lesions at disparate anatomical sites. Lesions were mainly on the head (21/49 [43%] cases) and forelimbs (23/49 [47%]) (Figures 2 and 3). No cats with this aetiology underwent necropsy examination. Of the 40 cases where cytology or histology was available for review, a high bacterial index (BI) was observed in 23/40 cases (58%), while the remainder had a low BI. In many cases where a low BI was recorded, the lesions were ulcerated; however, ulceration was also occasionally observed as a clinical feature of high BI lesions.
Figure 2.
(a–c) Representative photographs of M lepraemurium infection in cats, chosen to illustrate the occurrence of lesions on the head
Figure 3.
(a,b) Representative photographs of M lepraemurium infection in cats, chosen to illustrate the occurrence of lesions on the forelimbs
Treatment and outcome data
Treatment protocols used in cats in this study varied widely and often were influenced by owner finances and commitment, and also the patient’s temperament.
Where it was possible to implement medical therapy, protocols included several months of treatment with one or more of the following drugs: rifampicin, clarithromycin, clofazimine, a fluoroquinolone (enrofloxacin, marbofloxacin, moxifloxacin or pradofloxacin) and doxycycline. A combination of rifampicin and clarithromycin was used most commonly, mainly due to favourable cost and drug availability. Many cats were treated with surgical resection alone (often with incomplete margins due to the anatomical location of the lesions; eg, eyelids, distal limbs) or, more commonly, a combination of surgical resection and adjunctive medical therapy.
The outcome was generally favourable for cats with M lepraemurium infections, with resolution in 24/27 cases (89%) where sufficient follow-up was available to make an assessment, even with multiple or generalised lesions. disease burden did not appear to influence outcome for this infection, nor did the BI of the lesions. Two cats were euthanased due to progressive or persistent cutaneous lesions, rather than evidence of systemic disease (cases 17 and 43). Spontaneous resolution was observed in two cats infected with M lepraemurium (cases 23 and 24).
A summary of data concerning age, gender, anatomical distribution of lesions and outcome for cats infected by M lepraemurium is provided in Table 2.
Table 2.
Summary data concerning age, gender, anatomical distribution of lesions and outcome for cats infected by M lepraemurium
Anatomical location of lesions |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Median age at diagnosis (years) | Male | High BI | Head | Forelimbs | Hindlimbs | Body | Tail/perineum | Disseminated skin | Subjective outcome – resolved |
2 (n = 61) | 69% (43/62) | 58% (23/40) | 43% (21/49) | 47% (23/49) | 14% (7/49) | 12% (6/49) | 4% (2/49) | 8% (4/49) | 89% (24/27) |
BI = bacterial index
Microbiological and molecular data
Fresh tissue, and fixed cytological and paraffin-embedded samples from 37 cases underwent dNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing (see supplementary material). Known acquired mutations in the rpoB gene conferring rifampicin resistance in other mycobacterial species13–15 were not found in any of the isolates in this study (data not shown).
Mycobacterial dNA derived from fresh biopsy tissue from case 36 underwent draft genome sequencing during the course of the study. The methods and results of these investigations will be published separately (C o’Brien et al, manuscript in preparation).
Discussion
This study greatly extends the body of knowledge concerning M lepraemurium infections in cats.
Anatomical predilection
This organism has a predilection to involve structures about the head and/or forelimbs, but generally without involvement of ocular tissues or periocular skin. This would be consistent with the theory that this organism is likely a pathogen inoculated into a feline predator via the bite of a rodent suffering from systemic mycobacteriosis. 16 This is in contrast to Candidatus ‘M tarwinense’ infections, where lesions often involve the ocular tissues (conjunctiva, cornea, eyelids, nictitating membrane), and nasal and periocular skin and subcutis as a result, perhaps, of inoculation via inter-cat aggression or selfinoculation during grooming.
Signalment
The age range of affected cats is wide (<1 to 14 years); however, the vast majority of cases occurred in young adult cats (<4 years old), presumably because cats of this age group are more likely to roam, explore and exploit territory for hunting. Additionally, older cats may acquire resistance to the organism after asymptomatic exposure at a younger age. Similar factors may also influence the male predilection, as this group, even if castrated, generally roam over a larger area and are more aggressive than female cats. The breakdown of domestic crossbreeds vs pedigree cats is in accord with their ratio in the overall Australian cat population, without any suggestion of immunocompromise in certain pedigree cats playing a role in predisposing to infection.
There were too few cats subjected to retroviral testing to draw any firm conclusions, but with only 1/9 cats tested being FIV-positive, it appears unlikely that acquired immunodeficiency is an underlying predisposition, especially considering the young age and apparent good health of the majority of cats. Indeed, the epidemiology suggests a localised disease of a low-grade pathogen in an immunocompetent patient, with a mycobacterial species somewhat adapted to mammalian hosts, but much more likely to produce systemic disease in rodents than in Felidae.
Clinical course
The clinical course of M lepraemurium in the majority of cats could be perhaps described as indolent, with no suggestion of internal organ involvement in any case based on clinical criteria. Occasional cases have widespread, generalised cutaneous nodules, suggestive of haematogenous spread of the organism. The authors have also observed a limited number of cases in which there has been what appears to be sporotrichoid spread (ie, via the lymphatics from the primary focus of infection).
Organism biology
This biological behaviour is consistent with an environmental saprophyte adapted to a rodent host. The pathogen is less adept at living in a feline patient, and infected cats thus represent an incidental ‘dead end’ host.
Analysis of five gene targets in M lepraemurium demonstrated that all clinical isolates were remarkably clonal at the five loci examined. If this homogeneity was carried over the entire genome, the variation in clinical severity from cat to cat would most likely reflect the number of organisms inoculated and/or variability in the innate and acquired immunological response of the feline host. The apparent genetic homogeneity of M lepraemurium is reminiscent of two other fastidious mycobacterial species – the unnamed agent of the canine leproid granuloma syndrome, which appears to be clonal over an extensive worldwide geographical range, and Candidatus ‘M tarwinense’, which appears to be clonal, but over a far more restricted region. 17
Treatment and outcome
As is typical of an observational study, treatment regimens were not consistent. However, cats tended to respond favourably, especially to surgical excision and long-term use of a combination of two or more antimicrobials usually effective against slow-growing mycobacteria (see box above).
Risk of contagion
To date, there has been no instance of direct spread from cat to cat. Although it is theoretically possible to effect this using infectious material in a contrived experimental setting, in the authors’ view the risk of contagion from cats is slight. It is fascinating that, to date, M lepraemurium infections have not been recorded in dogs, ferrets or native wildlife.
Key Points
M lepraemurium, a fastidious mycobacterium related to M avium, is capable of causing both high BI (lepromatous) or low BI (tuberculoid) ‘feline leprosy’. It is likely that infections follow an altercation with rodents that inoculate infectious propagules into the dermis or subcutis of the feline patient.
Lesions generally consist of nodules (which tend towards ulceration) present on the head and/or forelimbs, with or without local lymph node involvement.
Cases tend to have an indolent clinical course and a generally favourable response to therapeutic interventions.
The best management approach consists of complete surgical resection of easily accessible lesions, and/or debulking of lesions in difficult anatomical locations, with adjunctive medical therapy using two or more antimicrobial agents with known activity against slow-growing mycobacteria.
The inability of the organism to grow using both traditional and unconventional mycobacteriological media remains a mystery, although it is hoped that detailed examination of the draft genome will yield some clues.
Acknowledgments
Thanks go to the staff of the Mycobacterium Reference Laboratory, VIdRL, especially Caroline Lavender, for technical assistance, and the many veterinarians and veterinary pathologists who contributed case material and other assistance to this study, especially Laura Brandt, Bronwyn Smits, Catherine Harvey, Rob Fairley, Richard McCoy and Sergio Sanchez Picado of Gribbles Pathology, and Adrienne French, Catherine Williamson, dawn Seddon, Geoff orbell and Cathy Harvey of New Zealand Veterinary Pathology.
Footnotes
Date accepted: 7 March 2017
Supplementary material: Table S1: Multilocus sequence data concerning M lepraemurium.
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: Carolyn o’Brien was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award scholarship. Richard Malik was supported by the Valentine Charlton Bequest administered by the Centre for Veterinary Education, The University of Sydney.
References
- 1. Nakamura M. Quantitative multiplication of Mycobacterium lepraemurium in a cell-free liquid medium (NC-5). J Gen Microbiol 1974; 82: 385–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ogawa T. Some observations on cultures of Mycobacterium lepraemurium. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis 1976: 537. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Pattyn SR, Portaels F. In vitro cultivation and characterization of Mycobacterium lepraemurium. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis 1980; 48: 7–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. o’Brien CR, Malik R, Globan M, et al. Feline leprosy due to Candidatus ‘Mycobacterium tarwinense’: further clinical and molecular characterisation of 15 previously reported cases and an additional 27 cases. J Feline Med Surg 2017; 19: 498–512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Malik R, Hughes MS, James G, et al. Feline leprosy: two different clinical syndromes. J Feline Med Surg 2002; 4: 43–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. davies JL, Sibley JA, Myers S, et al. Histological and genotypical characterization of feline cutaneous mycobacteriosis: a retrospective study of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. Vet Dermatol 2006; 17: 155–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Courtin F, Huerre M, Fyfe J, et al. A case of feline leprosy caused by Mycobacterium lepraemurium originating from the island of Kythira (Greece): diagnosis and treatment. J Feline Med Surg 2007; 9: 238–241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Laprie C, duboy J, Malik R, et al. Feline cutaneous mycobacteriosis: a review of clinical, pathological and molecular characterization of one case of Mycobacterium microti skin infection and nine cases of feline leprosy syndrome from France and New Caledonia. Vet Dermatol 2013; 24: 561–569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Hughes MS, Ball NW, Beck LA, et al. Determination of the etiology of presumptive feline leprosy by 16S rRNA gene analysis. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35: 2464–2471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Fyfe JA, McCowan C, O’Brien CR, et al. Molecular characterization of a novel fastidious mycobacterium causing lepromatous lesions of the skin, subcutis, cornea, and conjunctiva of cats living in Victoria, Australia. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46: 618–626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hughes MS, James G, Taylor MJ, et al. PCR studies of feline leprosy cases. J Feline Med Surg 2004; 6: 235–243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Toribio J-AL, Norris JM, White JD, et al. Demographics and husbandry of pet cats living in Sydney, Australia: results of crosssectional survey of pet ownership. J Feline Med Surg 2009; 11: 449–461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Zhang L, Namisato M, Matsuoka M. A mutation at codon 516 in the rpoB gene of Mycobacterium leprae confers resistance to rifampin. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis 2004; 72: 468–472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Williams d, Spring L, Collins L, et al. Contribution of rpoB mutations to development of rifamycin cross-resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998; 42: 1853–1857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Sapkota BR, Ranjit C, Neupane Kd, et al. Development and evaluation of a novel multiple-primer PCR amplification refractory mutation system for the rapid detection of mutations conferring rifampicin resistance in codon 425 of the rpoB gene of Mycobacterium leprae. J Med Microbiol 2008; 57: 179–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Malik R, Norris J, White J, et al. ‘Wound cat’. J Feline Med Surg 2006; 8: 135–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Malik R, Smits B, Reppas G, et al. Ulcerated and nonulcerated nontuberculous cutaneous mycobacterial granulomas in cats and dogs. Vet Dermatol 2013; 24: 146–e33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Mendoza-Aguilar M, Almaguer-Villagrán L, Jiménez-Arellanes A, et al. The use of the microplate alamar blue assay (MABA) to assess the susceptibility of Mycobacterium lepraemurium to anti-leprosy and other drugs. J Infect Chemother 2012; 18: 652–661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Bennett SL. Photosensitisation induced by clofazimine in a cat. Aust Vet J 2007; 85: 375–380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]