Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2000 May;182(9):2476–2480. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.9.2476-2480.2000

Distribution of Twelve Linear Extrachromosomal DNAs in Natural Isolates of Lyme Disease Spirochetes

Nanette Palmer 1,, Claire Fraser 2, Sherwood Casjens 1,*
PMCID: PMC111310  PMID: 10762248

Abstract

We have analyzed a panel of independent North American isolates of the Lyme disease agent spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu stricto), for the presence of linear plasmids with sequence similarities to the 12 linear plasmids present in the B. burgdorferi type strain, isolate B31. The frequency of similarities to probes from each of the 12 B31 plasmids varied from 13 to 100% in the strain panel examined, and these similarities usually reside on plasmids similar in size to the cognate B31 plasmid. Sequences similar to 5 of the 12 B31 plasmids were found in all of the isolates examined, and >66% of the panel members hybridized to probes from 4 other plasmids. Sequences similar to most of the B. burgdorferi B31 plasmid-derived DNA probes used were also found on linear plasmids in the related Eurasian Lyme agents Borrelia garinii and Borrelia afzelii; however, some of these plasmids had uniform but substantially different sizes from their B. burgdorferi counterparts.


The spirochetes that cause Lyme disease, members of the Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu lato) group of species, are known to harbor numerous extrachromosomal DNA elements. For ease of discussion we will refer to these elements as plasmids, although some may be present in all natural isolates, and some may carry essential genes, so they should perhaps more correctly be called “mini-chromosomes” (2). All natural isolates examined carry multiple linear plasmids in the 5 to 110 kbp size range and multiple circular plasmids in the 9 to 70 kbp range. Different isolates have similar but nonidentical linear plasmid band patterns in electrophoresis gels (e.g., those seen in references 3, 4, 5, and 33). Circular plasmid contents are more difficult to display, but in the isolates that have been analyzed, multiple, related plasmid types are always present (e.g., those seen in references 9, 22, 27, 31, and 36). A number of studies have shown that plasmid loss correlates with loss of infectivity in mice (15, 25, 34), so it is of interest to understand whether these plasmids have uniform structures in the wild and to understand the distribution of these plasmids among natural isolates.

Only one Borrelia isolate, B. burgdorferi B31, has been the subject of a comprehensive study that unequivocally identified all of its plasmids. The analyzed culture of this strain, B31 MI, carries 12 linear and 9 circular plasmids, and the nucleotide sequence of each is known (8, 12). Over 90% of the genes on the characterized Lyme agent plasmids have no known homologs outside of the Borrelia genus (8), and a number of these genes encode outer surface proteins that are antigenic during infection of mammals (10, 13, 17, 21, 23, 29, 32, 35). We report here an analysis of plasmids that are related to the 12 known linear B31 plasmids in a panel of Lyme disease borreliae.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The B. burgdorferi strains used were previously described (7); Borrelia garinii and Borrelia afzelii strains and sources are listed (see Table 4). Contour-clamped homogeneous electric field (CHEF) electrophoresis and Southern analysis (28) were performed as previously described (6, 9). Southern probes were prepared with [32P]dCTP (Amersham) and Pharmacia ReadyToGo random priming kits. The DNA templates for random priming were either whole Escherichia coli plasmid DNA clones (cloned DNA fragments in plasmid pUC18 [12]) or DNA inserts from such plasmids amplified by PCR using opposing primers outside of the DNA insertion site. DNA transfer, hybridization, and wash conditions were as previously described (6), except that membranes were washed with two final 15-min posthybridization washes of 0.1× SSC–0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate) at 54°C for high-stringency analysis of B. burgdorferi (sensu stricto) strains; for other Borrelia species the washes were done at 24°C to maximize hybridization there. All membranes were only probed once.

TABLE 4.

B. garinii and B. afzelii linear plasmid hybridization targetsa

Strain [passage no.] (location) Source Results of hybridization with strain B31 plasmid probes
lp17 (CL47) lp25 (DE21) lp28-1 (DD60) lp28-2 (EI58) lp28-3 (CQ68) lp28-4 (CV69) lp36 (CQ33) lp38 (DH46) lp54 (CM64) lp56 (EK58)
B. garinii
 153 [11] (FR) R. Marconi 22, (34) (37) 34, 48 35, (54) 48 22 54 34
 FujiP2 (JA) R. Johnson 23, (28) 25 28 (54) 29, (23) 22 30 54, (20) 23, 31
 G1 (GE) T. Schwan 21, (30) (30) (54) (21) (22) (54) (20)
 G25 [8] (SW) R. Marconi 21, (30) 30 (54) 21 (22) 54 20
 IP89 (RU) R. Johnson 22 (30) 29 ND (29) 22 30 56 31
 IP90 (RU) T. Schwan 23, (35, 37, 42) (36.5) 42 35, 54 34 23 23 54
 IR210 (RU) I. Schwartz 22, 30, (38) (30, 38) (54) 36 21 36, 38, (22) 54 20, 37
 Las (AU) I. Schwartz 22, (35) (54) 21 (22) 54 20
 NBS23a (SW) I. Schwartz 23 (38) (54) (40) 22 53
 NBS23b (SW) I. Schwartz 23 54 (32) 22 (53)
 PBi (GE) T. Schwan 22, 31 30 54 (25) 21 (22) 54 20
 VSBP [10] (ST) R. Marconi (21, 30) 27.5 (54) 36.5 (21) 36, (22) 55 (20)
B. afzelii
 AO1 (NL) R. Marconi 26 56 (54) ND (56)
 EMC1 (SW) R. Marconi 25, (34) 26, 29 (54) 34 (25) 54, (24) (25)
 HT10 (JA) R. Marconi 23, (34) 30 25 (54) 34, (25) (25) 54, (26) (25)
 IP21 (RU) R. Marconi 25, (28) 28 (54) 32, (25) (25) 53, (28) (25)
 PGau (GE) T. Schwan 25 27 29 (54) (34) (25) 54, (24)
 PKo [5] (GE) R. Marconi 26 27 27 (54) (34) (26) 54, (24) (32)
 UM01 (SW) R. Marconi 25, (30) 27 30 (54) (25) (25.5) 54, (24, 30) (25)
 UO1 (SW) R. Marconi 23, (34, 37, 41) 24 (37) 42 35, 54 34 23.5 24 54
a

All cultures were low passage, exact passage number is given where it is known, and country where the strain was isolated is given in parentheses (AU, Austria; FR, France; GE, Germany; JA, Japan; NL, The Netherlands; RU, Russia; SW, Sweden; ST, Switzerland). Values are sizes (in kilobase pairs) of linear plasmids that hybridized to the probes (listed in Table 1) given at the top of each column; values in parentheses indicate less intense hybridization. ND, not determined; —, no hybridization. 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

B31-like linear plasmids in North American B. burgdorferi (sensu stricto) isolates.

We first screened linear plasmid DNA clones from the genome sequencing project (8, 12) to identify ones whose insert DNAs hybridized uniquely or nearly so to only one of the strain B31 linear plasmids when used as probes in Southern analyses; substantially more than half of the plasmids tested were found to be unsuitable. Table 1 indicates where each of the chosen 31 DNA probes lies on the linear plasmids. These DNAs were then used as probes in Southern analyses (28) of CHEF electrophoresis gels of whole cellular DNAs from a panel of 15 geographically diverse North American isolates of B. burgdorferi (sensu stricto) (data not shown). Table 2 presents the results of probing this panel with the above probes, and Table 3 summarizes the findings (the B31 linear plasmids are named according to their approximate DNA content in kilobase pairs [8, 12]).

TABLE 1.

DNA probes used in this study

Borrelia plasmid source DNA probea Locationb ORFs in probeb
lp5 CB63c 3413–5195 T05–T06
lp17 CL47 63–2418 D01–D04
D11d 6949–7679 D11
lp21 CZ32 6788–8697 63-bp repeat region
DF29c 16772–18682 U10–U12
lp25 DE21 13151–14265 E20–E21
CG18 19568–21587 E29
lp28-1 DD60 5149–6980 F11–F13
EN57c 24797–26510 vlsE cassettes
lp28-2 DK44 1–442 G01
EI58 6700–8688 G09–G10
lp28-3 CT53c 3659–4392 H08–H09
CQ68 12620–14584 H18–H20
lp28-4 EE50 2526–3627 I06–I07
CV69 4726–6439 I11–I14
EL95 17047–19017 I27–I29
lp36 DK60 2334–4214 K02–K04
FI78 7569–9698 K12–K15
CQ33c 12657–15072 K19–K22
GI88 26201–26513 K41
EH86 31975–33745 K49–K50
lp38 BA19c 22–1483 J001
DH08 3958–6033 J07–J08
CQ63 13730–16123 J20–J22
DH46 21666–23409 J28–J30
FA84 26057–28222 J34–J36
CT79c 35768–37561 J48–J50
lp54 CM64 427–2449 A01–A04
A24/25d ∼15800–17300 A24–A25 (dbpAB)
lp56 BL05 3022–3666 Q05–Q06
EK58 42201–44134 Q67–Q69
a

DNA clone numbers from genome sequencing project (8, 12). 

b

Base pair location and open reading frame (ORF) nomenclature are as in Fraser et al. (12) and Casjens et al. (8). 

c

Showed some weak hybridization to other plasmids when probing B31 MI DNA. 

d

Uncloned PCR product made with whole B. burgdorferi B31 MI DNA as template. 

TABLE 2.

Similar sequences among linear plasmids of independent isolates of B. burgdorferia

Strain (origin) Hybridization of strain B31 probes to independently isolated strains
p5
lp17
lp21
lp25
lp28-1
lp28-2
lp28-3
lp28-4
lp36
lp38
lp54
lp56
CB63 CL47 D11 CZ32 DF29 DE21 CG18 DD60 EN57 DK44 EI58 CT53 CQ68 EE50 CV69 EL95 DK60 FI78 CQ33 GI88 EH86 BA19 DH08 CQ63 DH46 FA84 CT79 CM64 A24/25 BL05 EK58
19678 (NY) (24) (24) (30) 30, (27) (29) (29) 28, (37) 28 29 (28) (28) 36 35, (31) 35 35 38 38 38 38 38 38 54
21645 (WI) (17) (24) (25) 29 (29) 28 28 29 29 (29) 25 (25) (54) 54
21721 (WI) (24) 26 (21, 37) 27 (28, 30) 30 30 30 29 26 (26) 36 36 36 36 36 36, (28) (54) 54
27579 (CT) (15) 30 21 (28, 29) (29) (31) 30 29 29 28 28 28 28 29, (30) 38 38 38 38 38 38 (54) 54
27982 (PA) 17, (22) (17, 22) (24) (24, 48) 26 (25, 29) (29) (29) (28) 28, (30) 29 (29) 29 (17, 24) 25 (25, 30) (36) (54)
27985 (CT) 24 (24, 54) 28 28 (37, 45, 54) 29 (29) 28, 36 28 28 28 28 36 29, 36 36 36 38 38 38 38 38 (54) 54 55 55
28534 (MD) (17) 23, (28) (26) (26, 29) 27 28 28 29 29 29 (25) 25 25, 29 25, 29 54 54
29592 (CT) 22 22 24 24 (29) 30, (36) 29 29 30, (24) 30 29 29 30 23 30 30 30, (25) 37 37 37 37 37 37, (29) (54) 54
29805 (CT) 33 (17) (24) (24) 33, (29) 29 30, (35) 30 29 28 30 (29) 34, (30) 30 38 38 38 38 38 38, (30) (54) 54
30757 (CT) (17) 24 24 24 (24) 25, 28 28, (45, 54) 29 (29) 28, 36 28 27 27 27 36 36 36 36, (28) 36 54 54 55 55
CA-3-87 (CA) 24 (28) 33, (27) (28) 28 28 29 38 38 38 54 54
WI91-23 (WI) 5 15 (16) 23 25 27 27 (27, 28) 27 27 27 27 28 (29) 29 29, (27) 29, (28) 38 38 38 (38) 38 38 (54)
N40 (NY) (5) 22 22 23 24 26 29 29, (27) 29 (24, 29) 28 28 30 23 30 29 30 37 37 37 37 37 37, (27, 28) (54) 54
HB19 (CT) 24 24 24 26, (37) 24, 27 27, 29 28, (54) 27 28 28 29 (29) 29 29, (28) 30 38 38 38 38 38 38 54 54
B31 (NY) 5, (20) 17 17 20 20 24 24, (54) 28 28, (36, 54) 29 29 28, (36) 28 27 27 27 36 36 28, 36 36 36 38 38 38 38 38 38, (29) 54 54 55 55
a

The United States state from which each of the strains was isolated is indicated in parentheses next to the strain name. Probes were picked from E. coli pUC18 plasmid clones used in the genone sequencing project (6, 12). Values in table are sizes in kilobase pairs for plasmids that hybridize to the indicated DNA probes (accurate to about ±0.5, ±1.5, and ±3 kbp for 5 to 10, 10 to 30, and 30 to 60 kbp ranges, respectively). —, no hybridization was seen. Values in parentheses indicate relatively weak hybridization. 

TABLE 3.

Summary of B31 counterpart linear plasmids present in natural isolates of B. burgdorferia

Strain (origin) Hybridization of DNA probes to B. burgdorferi isolates
lp5 lp17 lp21 lp25 lp28-1 lp28-2 lp28-3 lp28-4 lp36 lp38 lp54 lp56
19678 (NY) −− −− ++ ++ ++ ++ +++ +−+++ ++++++ −+ −−
21645 (WI) −+ −− +− −+ ++ ++ +++ −−++ −−−−−− ++ −−
21721 (WI) −− −− +− + Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 + ++ +++ −−++ ++++++ ++ −−
27579 (CT) +− −− + + ++ ++ +++ ++++ ++++++ ++ −−
27982 (PA) ++ −− ++ ++ ++ ++ +++ +++ −−−−−+ −+ −−
27985 (CT) −− −− ++ ++ ++ ++ +++ +−+++ ++++−+ ++ ++
28534 (MD) −+ −− −− ++ ++ ++ +++ ++++ −−−−−− ++ −−
29592 (CT) ++ −− ++ ++ ++ ++ +++ Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 +++ ++++++ ++ −−
29805 (CT) Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 + −− ++ + ++ ++ +++ +−−++ ++++++ ++ −−
30757 (CT) −+ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ +++ +++++ −−−−−− ++ ++
CA-3-87 (CA) −− −− + Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 −+ −− ++ −++ −−+++ −−−−−− ++ −−
WI91-23 (WI) + ++ −− ++ −+ ++ ++ +++ ++++ ++++++ −+ −−
N40 (NY) + ++ −− ++ Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 + ++ +− +++ Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 +++ ++++++ ++ −−
HB19 (CT) −− −− ++ ++ ++ ++ +++ ++++ ++++++ ++ −−
B31 MI (NY) + ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ ++ +++ +++++ ++++++ ++ ++
a

Strain names are followed by the name of the United States state (in parentheses) in which they were isolated. Each of the remaining columns represents a different DNA probe from Table 1, going from left to right across each plasmid map (orientation as in references 8 and 12). −, no hybridization; +, hybridization occurred with a plasmid similar in size (<15% different) to the B31 plasmid from which the probe was derived (hybridization to other plasmids may also have occurred); + and Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 , hybridization to only a plasmid(s) >15% different in size from the B31 plasmid from which the probe was derived; Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019 , hybridization in that strain only to a plasmid(s) of a size >10% different from the plasmid(s) with which other probes from that B31 plasmid react. 

These data allow a number of conclusions to be drawn. (i) Of the 465 probe-strain combinations tested, 322 (69%) showed clear high-stringency hybridization to apparently linear plasmids in members of the strain panel. Only 16 probe-strain combinations (3.4%) showed clear hybridization to the chromosome as well as to a plasmid, and two reacted only with the chromosome. (ii) When their hybridization targets are present, probes from strain B31 linear plasmids nearly always hybridize with linear plasmids of similar, but often not identical, size in other isolates; only 47 of the 322 reactive probe-strain combinations (15%) hybridized only to a linear plasmid not within 15% of the size of the cognate B31 plasmid. (iii) In most cases (for example, see lp38), all probes from a given B31 MI plasmid hybridize to the same plasmid (identically sized DNAs) within individual reactive panel members. It appears that ongoing exchange of DNA sequences among linear plasmids of different size is not extremely rapid, although it does occur. (iv) In 47 of 322 reactive probe-strain combinations (15%), multiple linear plasmids clearly hybridized to the probe, indicating the presence of probe-like sequences on two or more linear plasmids in those isolates. This suggests that the paralogies on plasmids in these strains are at least partly different from those in the B31 plasmids (8). (v) B31 plasmid lp36 is unusual in that probes derived from it often hybridize to targets of substantially different size from the B31 MI 36-kbp plasmid. Although similarity to at least one of the five B31 lp36 probes used is present in all of the 15 isolates, in 10 of the 15 isolates tested they are present on linear plasmids in the 23 to 30 kbp size range, and five isolates carry them on a 35- to 38-kbp plasmid. (vi) Plasmids apparently cognate to a number of the B31 MI linear plasmids are present in all or nearly all members of our strain panel. Five of the B31 plasmids, lp28-1, lp28-3, lp28-4, lp36, and lp54, appear to have similarly sized counterparts in all 15 members of the panel (the lp36 counterparts are more variable in size than the other four [above]); lp25 and lp28-2 have counterparts in 14 of the 15 isolates; and lp17 and lp38 have counterparts in 10 of the isolates. Plasmids cognate to the lp5, lp21, and lp56 probes are less common, being present in 3, 2, and 3 of the 15 isolates, respectively. Our definition of cognate or corresponding plasmid simply means a plasmid that hybridizes to the B31 plasmid probe; it does not imply that the plasmids must have completely similar structures.

The presence of corresponding plasmids in most natural isolates tested strongly suggests that they are important in the natural life of B. burgdorferi. Our methods could underestimate the plasmids present for the following reasons: some linear plasmids tend to be lost quite rapidly with passage in culture (15, 25, 34), our rather stringent hybridization conditions would cause us to miss divergent but orthologous sequences, and a probe's target could be missing from an otherwise cognate plasmid. We attempted to minimize the first problem by using low-passage cultures; 14 of the 15 cultures used had been passaged fewer than 12 times since isolation. In only a few of the tested strains did ethidium bromide-stained electrophoresis gels show a clear linear plasmid band that did not hybridize to the probes used; these were ∼5-kbp apparently linear plasmids in isolates 21579, 21721, 28534, and CA-3-82, which did not react with the B31 lp5 probe. DNAs that were <7 kbp were not analyzed with the other probes, so it is not known if these plasmids are related to other probes used in this study. The above data do not imply that no additional types of linear plasmids are present in B. burgdorferi, but it does suggest that there may not be a large number of other, as yet unknown, common linear plasmid types.

Linear plasmids in non-burgdorferi Lyme agent spirochetes.

We also analyzed a geographically diverse panel of 12 B. garinii and 8 B. afzelii isolates with a subset of the probes listed in Table 1. The results of these experiments are given in Table 4. A majority (73%) of the B. garinii and B. afzelii probe-strain combinations showed some sequence similarity to B31 on apparently linear plasmids. In some cases, the plasmids may be quite similar in the three species. For example, B31 plasmid lp54 clone CM64 hybridizes to 53- to 56-kbp plasmids in all three species. This agrees with the observations that the ospAB and P27 genes have been found on a plasmid of this size in members of these species that have been analyzed (5, 18, 23, 24). The hybridization target of lp17 probe CL47 is universally present on 21- to 28-kbp plasmids in B. garinii and B. afzelii, but is present in less than half of the B. burgdorferi isolates we examined. In other cases, the sizes of the plasmids harboring the hybridization targets in the other species are either variable (e.g., lp28-4 and lp28-2) or are systematically very different from B. burgdorferi. For example, the lp28-3 target is present on a 54-kbp plasmid in all of the B. garinii and B. afzelii isolates tested, the lp36 target is usually present on a 21- to 23-kbp plasmid in B. garinii but is rarely present in B. afzelii, and the lp38 probe DH46 target is usually present on a 22-kbp plasmid in B. garinii and a 25-kbp plasmid in B. afzelii. A large fraction of B31 plasmid sequences have similar sequences on plasmids in these other species; however, there are substantial differences in plasmid structure among the three species.

Plasmid lp56 appears to have formed by the relatively recent integration of a member of the 32-kbp circular plasmid (cp32) family into a 20- to 25-kbp linear plasmid (8). The probe from the non-cp32-like portion of lp56 hybridized only to ∼55-kbp linear plasmids in our panel of B. burgdorferi isolates, suggesting that the putative linear progenitor of lp56 is not common in this species. However, most B. garinii and B. afzelii isolates carry ∼20- and ∼25-kbp linear plasmids, respectively, that do hybridize with the EK58 probe. It thus appears possible that the linear progenitor of B. burgdorferi lp56 (without the integrated cp32) could be one of these more common 20- or 25-kbp B. garinii or B. afzelii plasmids.

Conclusions.

This is the first study to systematically analyze the linear plasmid contents of Borrelia isolates from the perspective gained from knowledge of the complete plasmid content of B. burgdorferi B31 MI. We find that at least one of the sequences tested from 5 of the 12 B31 linear plasmids are present in all 15 of the B. burgdorferi (sensu stricto) isolates examined, and at least one of the sequences from two additional plasmids was present in 14 of 15 isolates. Two B31 linear plasmids had relatives in 10 of the 15 isolates, and only three plasmids appear to have cognates in fewer than 25% of the isolates examined. Previous, single-probe studies on B31 lp17, lp28-1, lp25, lp38, and lp54 generally agree with the above conclusions (1, 3, 5, 14, 16, 1921, 24, 33). Circular plasmids similar to B31 cp9, cp26, and multiple cp32s have also been found to be present in nearly all isolates that have been carefully examined (9, 10, 11, 15, 22, 26, 27, 30, 31). In summary, the B31 linear plasmid sequences are usually present in other B. burgdorferi isolates, and when present they are highly likely to be located on a plasmid of similar size. Thus, there appears to be a substantial uniformity of linear plasmid sequence content among various independent B. burgdorferi isolates. Most probes from the B31 linear plasmids also hybridized with linear plasmids from B. garinii and B. afzelii, but in a number of cases they have substantially different sizes from the cognate B31 plasmid. Such systematic differences suggest that there may not be free exchange of these plasmids between species.

How similar are the overall structures of corresponding plasmids of similar size in different isolates? In general, we do not yet know the answer to this question; however, the lp54 plasmids from the four natural Lyme agent isolates examined have similar gene orders and restriction maps (18; R. van Vugt and S. Casjens, unpublished observations), and the circular cp9's and cp26's have been shown to each have similar structures in different isolates (11, 12, 31). We have found that multiple probes from individual B31 linear plasmids nearly always hybridize to the same plasmid in other isolates, suggesting that other plasmids may also have generally conserved genetic structures. Curiously, in spite of this evidence of uniformity, examination of linear plasmid sequences has shown considerable evidence of recent, rather massive genetic instability on the strain B31 linear plasmids in the form of many past duplicative rearrangements (8). In addition, observations made here that unique B31 linear plasmid-derived probes sometimes hybridize to multiple plasmids or to plasmids of different sizes in other strains supports the idea that the genetic information on these plasmids is not completely constant (unlike the B. burgdorferi chromosome, which appears to be very stable with the exception of the extreme right few kilobase pairs [5, 8]). How can the apparent overall uniformity in plasmid size observed here exist in the face of evidence for apparently frequent plasmid rearrangement events? A more detailed analysis of plasmids present in other strains will be required to resolve this paradox.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank William Roberts and Mark Hansen for the dpbAB DNA probe; Tom Schwan, Richard Marconi, Russell Johnson, Tom Anderson, and Ira Schwartz for Borrelia strains; and Wai Mun Huang and Brian Stevenson for productive discussions.

The work was supported by a grant from the G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Charitable Foundation.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Anderson J F, Flavell R A, Magnarelli L A, Barthold S W, Kantor F S, Wallich R, Persing D H, Mathiesen D, Fikrig E. Novel Borrelia burgdorferi isolates from Ixodes scapularis and Ixodes dentatusticks feeding on humans. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:524–529. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.3.524-529.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Barbour A G. Linear DNA of Borreliaspecies and antigenic variation. Trends Microbiol. 1993;1:236–239. doi: 10.1016/0966-842x(93)90139-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barbour A G. Plasmid analysis of Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme disease agent. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26:475–478. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.3.475-478.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Busch U, Teufel C H, Boehmer R, Wilske B, Preac-Mursic V. Molecular characterization of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato strains by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis. 1995;16:744–747. doi: 10.1002/elps.11501601122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Casjens S, Delange M, Ley III H L, Rosa P, Huang W M. Linear chromosomes of Lyme disease agent spirochetes: genetic diversity and conservation of gene order. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:2769–2780. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.10.2769-2780.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Casjens S, Huang W M. Linear chromosomal physical and genetic map of Borrelia burgdorferi, the Lyme disease agent. Mol Microbiol. 1993;8:967–980. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01641.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Casjens S, Murphy M, DeLange M, Sampson L, van Vugt R, Huang W M. Telomeres of the linear chromosomes of Lyme disease spirochaetes: nucleotide sequence and possible exchange with linear plasmid telomeres. Mol Microbiol. 1997;26:581–596. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.6051963.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Casjens S, Palmer N, van Vugt R, Huang W M, Stevenson B, Rosa P, Lathigra R, Sutton G, Peterson J, Dodson R, Haft D, Hickey E, Gwinn M, White O, Fraser C. A bacterial genome in flux: the twelve linear and nine circular extrachromosomal DNAs of an infectious isolate of the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. Mol Microbiol. 2000;35:490–516. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01698.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Casjens S, van Vugt R, Tilly K, Rosa P A, Stevenson B. Homology throughout the multiple 32-kilobase circular plasmids present in Lyme disease spirochetes. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:217–227. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.1.217-227.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Champion C I, Blanco D R, Skare J T, Haake D A, Giladi M, Foley D, Miller J N, Lovett M A. A 9.0-kilobase-pair circular plasmid of Borrelia burgdorferiencodes an exported protein: evidence for expression only during infection. Infect Immun. 1994;62:2653–2661. doi: 10.1128/iai.62.7.2653-2661.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dunn J J, Buchstein S R, Butler L L, Fisenne S, Polin D S, Lade B N, Luft B J. Complete nucleotide sequence of a circular plasmid from the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:2706–2717. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.9.2706-2717.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fraser C M, Casjens S, Huang W M, Sutton G G, Clayton R, Lathigra R, White O, Ketchum K A, Dodson R, Hickey E K, Gwinn M, Dougherty B, Tomb J F, Fleischmann R D, Richardson D, Peterson J, Kerlavage A R, Quackenbush J, Salzberg S, Hanson M, van Vugt R, Palmer N, Adams M D, Gocayne J, Venter J C. Genomic sequence of a Lyme disease spirochaete, Borrelia burgdorferi. Nature. 1997;390:580–586. doi: 10.1038/37551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fuchs R, Jauris S, Lottspeich F, Preac-Mursic V, Wilske B, Soutschek E. Molecular analysis and expression of a Borrelia burgdorferi gene encoding a 22 kDa protein (pC) in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 1992;6:503–509. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01495.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hinnebusch J, Barbour A G. Linear plasmids of Borrelia burgdorferihave a telomeric structure and sequence similar to those of a eukaryotic virus. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:7233–7239. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.22.7233-7239.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hyde F W, Johnson R C. Characterization of a circular plasmid from Borrelia burgdorferi, etiologic agent of Lyme disease. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26:2203–2205. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.10.2203-2205.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kawabata H, Myouga F, Inagaki Y, Murai N, Watanabe H. Genetic and immunological analyses of VIs (VMP-like sequences) of Borrelia burgdorferi. Microb Pathog. 1998;24:155–166. doi: 10.1006/mpat.1997.0183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lam T T, Nguyen T P, Montgomery R R, Kantor F S, Fikrig E, Flavell R A. Outer surface proteins E and F of Borrelia burgdorferi, the agent of Lyme disease. Infect Immun. 1994;62:290–298. doi: 10.1128/iai.62.1.290-298.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Marconi R T, Casjens S, Munderloh U G, Samuels D S. Analysis of linear plasmid dimers in Borrelia burgdorferisensu lato isolates: implications concerning the potential mechanism of linear plasmid replication. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:3357–3361. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.11.3357-3361.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Marconi R T, Samuels D S, Landry R K, Garon C F. Analysis of the distribution and molecular heterogeneity of the ospDgene among the Lyme disease spirochetes: evidence for lateral gene exchange. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:4572–4582. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.15.4572-4582.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mathiesen D A, Oliver J H, Jr, Kolbert C P, Tullson E D, Johnson B J, Campbell G L, Mitchell P D, Reed K D, Telford III S R, Anderson J F, Lane R S, Persing D H. Genetic heterogeneity of Borrelia burgdorferiin the United States. J Infect Dis. 1997;175:98–107. doi: 10.1093/infdis/175.1.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Norris S J, Carter C J, Howell J K, Barbour A G. Low-passage-associated proteins of Borrelia burgdorferiB31: characterization and molecular cloning of OspD, a surface-exposed, plasmid-encoded lipoprotein. Infect Immun. 1992;60:4662–4672. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.11.4662-4672.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Porcella S F, Popova T G, Akins D R, Li M, Radolf J D, Norgard M V. Borrelia burgdorferisupercoiled plasmids encode multicopy tandem open reading frames and a lipoprotein gene family. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:3293–3307. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.11.3293-3307.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Reindl M, Redl B, Stoffler G. Isolation and analysis of a linear plasmid-located gene of Borrelia burgdorferi B29 encoding a 27 kDa surface lipoprotein (P27) and its overexpression in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 1993;8:1115–1124. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01656.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Samuels D S, Marconi R T, Garon C F. Variation in the size of the ospA-containing linear plasmid, but not the linear chromosome, among the three Borreliaspecies associated with Lyme disease. J Gen Microbiol. 1993;139:2445–2449. doi: 10.1099/00221287-139-10-2445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schwan T G, Burgdorfer W, Garon C F. Changes in infectivity and plasmid profile of the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi, as a result of in vitrocultivation. Infect Immun. 1988;56:1831–1836. doi: 10.1128/iai.56.8.1831-1836.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Simpson W J, Garon C F, Schwan T G. Analysis of supercoiled circular plasmids in infectious and non-infectious Borrelia burgdorferi. Microb Pathog. 1990;8:109–118. doi: 10.1016/0882-4010(90)90075-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Simpson W J, Garon C F, Schwan T G. Borrelia burgdorfericontains repeated DNA sequences that are species specific and plasmid associated. Infect Immun. 1990;58:847–853. doi: 10.1128/iai.58.4.847-853.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Southern E. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol. 1975;98:503–517. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(75)80083-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stevenson B, Bono J L, Schwan T G, Rosa P. Borrelia burgdorferiErp proteins are immunogenic in mammals infected by tick bite, and their synthesis is inducible in cultured bacteria. Infect Immun. 1998;66:2648–2654. doi: 10.1128/iai.66.6.2648-2654.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Theisen M. Molecular cloning and characterization of nlpH, encoding a novel, surface-exposed, polymorphic, plasmid-encoded 33-kilodalton lipoprotein of Borrelia afzelii. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:6435–6442. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.22.6435-6442.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tilly K, Casjens S, Stevenson B, Bono J L, Samuels D S, Hogan D, Rosa P. The Borrelia burgdorferi circular plasmid cp26: conservation of plasmid structure and targeted inactivation of the ospCgene. Mol Microbiol. 1997;25:361–373. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4711838.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wallich R, Brenner C, Kramer M D, Simon M M. Molecular cloning and immunological characterization of a novel linear-plasmid-encoded gene, pG, of Borrelia burgdorferiexpressed only in vivo. Infect Immun. 1995;63:3327–3335. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.9.3327-3335.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xu Y, Johnson R C. Analysis and comparison of plasmid profiles of Borrelia burgdorferisensu lato strains. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:2679–2685. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.10.2679-2685.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Xu Y, Kodner C, Coleman L, Johnson R C. Correlation of plasmids with infectivity of Borrelia burgdorferisensu stricto type strain B31. Infect Immun. 1996;64:3870–3876. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.9.3870-3876.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhang J R, Hardham J M, Barbour A G, Norris S J. Antigenic variation in Lyme disease borreliaeby promiscuous recombination of VMP-like sequence cassettes. Cell. 1997;89:275–285. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80206-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zuckert W R, Meyer J. Circular and linear plasmids of Lyme disease spirochetes have extensive homology: characterization of a repeated DNA element. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:2287–2298. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.8.2287-2298.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES