Abstract
Indirect blood pressure measurements using high definition oscillometric (HDO) and Doppler devices were compared in 50 anaesthetised client-owned cats presented for various surgical procedures. Sites of cuff placement for Doppler were identified as forelimb and hindlimb and for HDO as forelimb and tail. Oscillometric and Doppler readings were obtained in 90.05% and 100% of attempts, respectively. Both devices enabled precise measurement of systolic arterial pressure (SAP), although the Doppler device gave higher precision. In the low pressure group (SAP<100 mmHg; n=30), 66.7% biases were within 10 mmHg of discrepancy, but in groups of normal (100 mmHg≤SAP≤150 mmHg; n=120) and high measurements (SAP>150 mmHg; n=62), 86.7% and 75.0% of discrepancy, respectively, were lower than 10 mmHg. Frequency of discrepancy at the range of 15 mmHg showed similar differences between pressure groups. There were significantly higher discrepancies when the cuff was positioned on the tail rather than on the leg. The SAP value obtained by HDO can be calculated from the Doppler measurement from SAP (HDO)=0.8515×SAP (Doppler)+19.221 mmHg. Compared to Doppler, HDO overestimated low pressure and underestimated high pressure values.
Contributor Information
Aleksandra Domanjko Petrič, Clinic for Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia aleksandra.domanjko@vf.uni-lj.si.
Zrimšek Petra, Clinic for Reproduction and Horses, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Sredenšek Jerneja, Clinic for Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Seliškar Alenka, Clinic for Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
References
- Binns S.H.,Sisson D.D.,Buoscio D.A., et al.Doppler ultrasonographic, oscillometric sphygmomanometric, and photoplethysmographic techniques for noninvasive blood pressure measurement in anesthetized cats.J Vet Intern Med. 1995;9:405-414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jepson R.E.,Hartley V.H.,Mendl M., et al.A comparison of CAT Doppler and oscillometric Memoprint machine for non-invasive blood pressure measurement in conscious cats.J Feline Med Surg. 2005;7:147-152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bodey A.R.,Young L.E.,Bartram D.H.,Diamond M.J.,Michell A.R..A comparison of direct and indirect (oscillometric) measurements of arterial blood pressure in anaesthetised dogs, using tail and limb cuffs.Res Vet Science. 1994;57:265-269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gains M.J.,Grodecky K.M.,Jacobs R.M.,Dyson D.,Foster R.A..Comparison of Direct and Indirect Blood Pressure Measurements in Anesthetised Dogs.Can J Vet Res. 1995;59:238-240 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stepien R.L.,Rapoport G.S.,Henik R.A.,Wenholy L.,Thomas C.B..Comparative Diagnostic Test Characteristics of Oscillometric and Doppler Ultrasonographic Methods in the Detection of Systolic Hypertension in Dogs.J Vet Intern Med. 2003;17:65-72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sawyer D.C.,Guikema A.H.,Siegel E.M..Evaluation of a new oscillometric blood pressure monitor in isoflurane-anesthetised dogs. 2004;1:27-39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haberman C.E.,Kang C.W.,Morgan J.D.,Brown S.A..Evaluation of oscillometric and Doppler ultrasonic methods of indirect blood pressure estimation in conscious dogs.Can J Vet Res. 2006;70:211-217 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deflandre C.J.A.,Hellebrekers L.J..Clinical evaluation of the Surgivet V60046, a non invasive blood pressure monitor in anaesthetized dogs.Vet Anaesth Analg. 2008;35:13-21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Branson K.R.,Wagner-Mann C.C.,Mann F.A..Evaluation of an oscillometric blood pressure monitor on anesthetized cats and the effect of cuff placement and fur on accuracy.Vet Surg. 1997;26:347-353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pedersen K.M.,Butler M.A.,Ersboll A.K.,Pedersen H.D..Evaluation of an oscillometric blood pressure monitor for use in anesthetized cats.J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002;1:646-650 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caulkett N.A.,Cantwell S.L.,Houston D.M..A comparison of indirect blood pressure monitoring techniques in the anesthetized cat.Vet Surg. 1998;27:370-377 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sander C.,Hörauf A.,Reusch C..Indirect blood pressure measurement in cats with diabetes mellitus, chronic nephropathy and hypetrophic cardiomyopathy.Tierarztl Prax K Klientiere Heimtiere. 1998;26:110-118 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Egner B..Blood pressure measurement: Technology and Avoidance of Measurement Error.Kleintier Konkret – J Small Anim Practitioner. 2006;4:18-23 [Google Scholar]
- Bland J.M.,Altman D.G..Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.The Lancet. 1986;1 (8476): 307-310 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bland J.M.,Altman D.G..Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method of measurements is misleading.The Lancet. 1995;346:1085-1087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petrie A.,Watson P.Statistics for veterinary and animal science. Petrie A., Watson P., ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1999:168-181. [Google Scholar]
- TwormeyP.How do we really compare methods in the clinical laboratory?, Statistics workshop & clinics, Euro Med Lab, 2005, Glasgow: May 8–12th [Google Scholar]
- Jones R.G.,Payne R.B.Clinical Investigation and Statistics in Laboratory Medicine. Jones R.G., Payne R.B., ed. London: ACB Venture Publications; 1997:27-65. [Google Scholar]
- Grandy J.L.,Dunlop C.I.,Hodgson D.S., et al.Evaluation of the Doppler ultrasonic method for measuring systolic arterial blood pressure in cats.Am J Vet Res. 1992;53:1166-1169 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mark J.B.,Slaughter T.F.,Reves J.G.Anaesthesia. 5thMiller R.D., ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2000:1117-1206. [Google Scholar]