Skip to main content
Oncoimmunology logoLink to Oncoimmunology
. 2024 May 27;13(1):2360275. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2024.2360275

Clinically relevant GABARAP deficiency abrogates bortezomib-induced immunogenic cell death in multiple myeloma

Liwei Zhao a,b, Zhe Shen a,b, Guido Kroemer a,b,c,, Oliver Kepp a,b,
PMCID: PMC11135808  PMID: 38812570

ABSTRACT

Recently, it was revealed that the high-risk, poor-prognosis downregulation of GABA type A receptor-associated protein (GABARAP) causes a defect in both autophagy and surface exposure of calreticulin (CALR) in multiple myeloma (MM) cells responding to bortezomib. Hence, GABARAP-defective MM cells fail to undergo immunogenic cell death.

KEYWORDS: Immunotherapy, danger associated molecular pattern, autophagy, phagocytosis

Main text

Immunogenic cell death (ICD) elicited by antineoplastic drugs relies on an increase in the adjuvanticity and antigenicity of cancer cells which together ignite adaptive anticancer immune responses.1,2 ICD inducers can impact the immunopeptidome while triggering premortem stress circuitries that promote the release and surface exposure of a specific set of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 subunit 1 (eIF2α) serves as the main integrator of ICD-related cellular stress pathways, orchestrating the onset of autophagy as well as endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, which in turn facilitate the liberation of ATP and the translocation of calreticulin (CALR) from the ER to the plasma membrane, respectively.3 Extracellular ATP can ligate purinergic receptor P2Y2 (P2RY2) expressed on dendritic cells (DCs), thus attracting DCs to the tumor bed, while surface exposed CALR acts as an ‘eat-me’ signal that interacts with CD91 on the membrane of DCs, thus causing DC-mediated phagocytosis of portions of the cancer cell. Other DAMPs that participate to the dialogue between DCs and cancer cells succumbing to ICD include ligands released from malignant cells acting on pathogen recognition receptors expressed on DCs, as this has been described for annexin A1 acting on formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1) and high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) acting on toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) to trigger DC chemotaxis and maturation, respectively. Moreover, in the course of ICD, malignant cells produce type I interferon (IFN) which further promotes inflammatory cytokine release to attract T cells into the tumor microenvironment. Altogether, ICD promotes the DC-mediated processing and presentation of tumor antigen, eventually leading to the activation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) that can induce the IFN-γ-mediated lysis of residual cancer cells, while establishing immune memory, thus preventing tumor recurrence and facilitating durable therapeutic efficacy.1,4

Over the past decade, it has become evident that several distinct pharmacological classes of anticancer agents can induce ICD. Thus, chemotherapeutics such as anthracyclines and oxaliplatin, as well as the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, have been described to induce ICD. Moreover, certain targeted agents, cardiac glycosides, as well as the antibiotic bleomycin, showed ICD-inducing properties, contrasting with other standard-of-care cytotoxicants such as cisplatin that fail to elicit anticancer immunity.2–9

In the past the mechanisms of especially anthracycline-induced ICD have been deciphered in their molecular details, as this applies to the ER stress-dependent vesicular transport of CALR to the plasma membrane and the autophagy-mediated lysosomal liberation of ATP. Moreover, several strategies to ameliorate the immunostimulatory effects of ICD have been proposed. Those include, but are not limited to, the induction of autophagy by IGF-1 receptor inhibitors, chalcones, short-term fasting or caloric restriction mimetics, thereby boosting ATP release and enhancing anticancer immunosurveillance.10–14

In a recent article, Annamaria Gulla and colleagues showed that the loss of GABA type A receptor-associated protein (GABARAP) expression, which is often found in high-risk multiple myeloma (MM) patients, leads to a malfunction in autophagy and also disrupts surface exposure of calreticulin (CALR) via Golgi-mediated vesicular transport during bortezomib-induced ICD.15 Consequently, GABARAP deficiency diminishes DC-mediated phagocytosis of MM cells, in turn limiting antigen processing and hampering immunosurveillance by T lymphocytes. Accordingly, MM patients with low levels of GABARAP exhibit decreased tumor immune cell infiltration and dismal prognosis. In GABARAP-deficient MM cells cultured in vitro, the autophagy inducer rapamycin restored Golgi morphology while facilitating CALR exposure. In summary, combination of bortezomib with rapamycin might constitute a promising approach to overcome ICD resistance in MM patients lacking GABARAP (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

(a) Induction of autophagy in cells with defective GABARAP expression restores Golgi-mediated calreticulin exposure in multiple myeloma. The absence of GABA type a receptor-associated protein (GABARAP) in high-risk multiple myeloma impairs autophagy and interferes with bortezomib-induced immunogenic cell death (ICD) by disrupting calreticulin (CALR) relocation, reducing dendritic cell phagocytosis and limiting anti-tumor T cell responses (A). Rapamycin restores autophagy, facilitates Golgi vesicular transport and reinstates CALR exposure, thus enhancing ICD in GABARAP-deficient cells treated with bortezomib (b). Combining bortezomib with rapamycin may overcome ICD resistance in MM patients with defective GABARAP expression.

The exact mechanism of autophagy-mediated Golgi restoration and CALR exposure remains elusive and future experiments should focus on elucidating the molecular mechanisms of this intriguing crosstalk. Furthermore, clinical studies must evaluate the feasibility to combine bortezomib or other ICD inducers with rapamycin or other autophagy enhancers including rapalogs to stimulate anticancer immunosurveillance.

Acknowledgments

OK receives funding from Institut National du Cancer (INCa) and the Association pour la recherche sur le cancer (ARC); GK is supported by the Ligue contre le Cancer (équipe labellisée); Agence National de la Recherche (ANR-22-CE14-0066 VIVORUSH, ANR-23-CE44-0030 COPPERMAC, ANR-23-R4HC-0006 Ener-LIGHT); Association pour la recherche sur le cancer (ARC); Cancéropôle Ile-de-France; Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM); a donation by Elior; European Joint Programme on Rare Diseases (EJPRD) Wilsonmed; European Research Council Advanced Investigator Award (ERC-2021-ADG, Grant No. 101052444; project acronym: ICD-Cancer, project title: Immunogenic cell death (ICD) in the cancer-immune dialogue); The ERA4 Health Cardinoff Grant Ener-LIGHT; European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programmes Oncobiome (grant agreement number: 825410, Project Acronym: ONCOBIOME, Project title: Gut OncoMicrobiome Signatures [GOMS] associated with cancer incidence, prognosis and prediction of treatment response, Prevalung (grant agreement number 101095604, Project Acronym: PREVALUNG EU, project title: Biomarkers affecting the transition from cardiovascular disease to lung cancer: towards stratified interception), Neutrocure (grant agreement number 861878 : Project Acronym: Neutrocure; project title: Development of “smart” amplifiers of reactive oxygen species specific to aberrant polymorphonuclear neutrophils for treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, cancer and myeloablation); National support managed by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche under the France 2030 programme (reference number 21-ESRE-0028, ESR/Equipex+ Onco-Pheno-Screen); Hevolution Network on Senescence in Aging; Institut National du Cancer (INCa); Institut Universitaire de France; LabEx Immuno-Oncology ANR-18-IDEX-0001; a Cancer Research ASPIRE Award from the Mark Foundation; PAIR-Obésité INCa_1873, the RHUs Immunolife and LUCA-pi (both dedicated to France Relance 2030); Seerave Foundation; SIRIC Cancer Research and Personalized Medicine (CARPEM). This study contributes to the IdEx Université de Paris Cité ANR-18-IDEX-0001. Views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union, the European Research Council or any other granting authority. Neither the European Union nor any other granting authority can be held responsible for them. The figure was generated with BioRender.com.

Disclosure statement

GK and OK have been holding research contracts with Daiichi Sankyo, Eleor, Kaleido, Lytix Pharma, PharmaMar, Osasuna Therapeutics, Samsara Therapeutics, Sanofi, Sutro, Tollys, and Vascage. GK is on the Board of Directors of the Bristol Myers Squibb Foundation France. GK is a scientific co-founder of everImmune, Osasuna Therapeutics, Samsara Therapeutics and Therafast Bio. GK is in the scientific advisory boards of Hevolution, Institut Servier, Longevity Vision Funds and Rejuveron Life Sciences. GK is the inventor of patents covering therapeutic targeting of aging, cancer, cystic fibrosis and metabolic disorders. GK’s wife, Laurence Zitvogel, has held research contracts with Glaxo Smyth Kline, Incyte, Lytix, Kaleido, Innovate Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, Pilege, Merus, Transgene, 9 m, Tusk and Roche, was on the on the Board of Directors of Transgene, is a cofounder of everImmune, and holds patents covering the treatment of cancer and the therapeutic manipulation of the microbiota. GK’s brother, Romano Kroemer, was an employee of Sanofi and now consults for Boehringer-Ingelheim. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Author contributions

LZ and ZS summarized data, designed display items and edited the manuscript. OK and GK wrote the manuscript.

Data availability statement

All data that led to the conclusions in this manuscript have been referenced and all sources have been described.

References

  • 1.Kroemer G, Galassi C, Zitvogel L, Galluzzi L.. Immunogenic cell stress and death. Nat Immunol. 2022;23(4):487–3. doi: 10.1038/s41590-022-01132-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Galluzzi L, Guilbaud E, Schmidt D, Kroemer G, Marincola FM. Targeting immunogenic cell stress and death for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2024; doi: 10.1038/s41573-024-00920-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bezu L, Sauvat A, Humeau J, Gomes-da-Silva LC, Iribarren K, Forveille S, Garcia P, Zhao L, Liu P, Zitvogel L, et al. eIf2α phosphorylation is pathognomonic for immunogenic cell death. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25(8):1375–1393. doi: 10.1038/s41418-017-0044-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Thibaudin M, Ghiringhelli F. Chemoimmunotherapy triggers immune responses targeting microsatellite stable colorectal cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2023;12(1):2257098. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2023.2257098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gulla A, Morelli E, Samur MK, Botta C, Hideshima T, Bianchi G, Fulciniti M, Malvestiti S, Prabhala RH, Talluri S. et al. Bortezomib induces anti–multiple myeloma immune response mediated by cGAS/STING pathway activation. Blood Cancer Discovery. 2021;2(5):468–483. doi: 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-21-0047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Liu P, Chen J, Zhao L, Hollebecque A, Kepp O, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. PD-1 blockade synergizes with oxaliplatin-based, but not cisplatin-based, chemotherapy of gastric cancer. Oncoimmunol. 2022;11(1):2093518. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2022.2093518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Spisek R, Charalambous A, Mazumder A, Vesole DH, Jagannath S, Dhodapkar MV. Bortezomib enhances dendritic cell (DC)–mediated induction of immunity to human myeloma via exposure of cell surface heat shock protein 90 on dying tumor cells: therapeutic implications. Blood. 2007;109(11):4839–4845. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-10-054221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mattarollo SR, Loi S, Duret H, Ma Y, Zitvogel L, Smyth MJ. Pivotal role of innate and adaptive immunity in anthracycline chemotherapy of established tumors. Cancer Res. 2011;71(14):4809–4820. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dhodapkar MV. The immune system in multiple myeloma and precursor states: Lessons and implications for immunotherapy and interception. American J Hematol. 2023;98(S2):S4–S12. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liu P, Zhao L, Zitvogel L, Kepp O, Kroemer G. Immunogenic cell death (ICD) enhancers—drugs that enhance the perception of ICD by dendritic cells. Immunol Rev. 2024;321(1):7–19. doi: 10.1111/imr.13269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Turbitt WJ, Demark-Wahnefried W, Peterson CM, Norian LA. Targeting glucose metabolism to enhance immunotherapy: emerging evidence on intermittent fasting and calorie restriction mimetics. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1402. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Li Y, Wang LX, Yang G, Hao F, Urba WJ, Hu HM. Efficient cross-presentation depends on autophagy in tumor cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68(17):6889–6895. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Irianto T, Gaipl US, Ruckert M. Immune modulation during anti-cancer radio(immuno)therapy. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2024;382:239–277. doi: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2023.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pan H, Liu P, Kroemer G, Kepp O. Preconditioning with immunogenic cell death-inducing treatments for subsequent immunotherapy. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2024;382:279–294. doi: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2023.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gulla A, Morelli E, Johnstone M, Turi M, Samur MK, Botta C, Cifric S, Folino P, Vinaixa D, Barello F, et al. Loss of GABARAP mediates resistance to immunogenic chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Blood J. 2024. doi: 10.1182/blood.2023022777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data that led to the conclusions in this manuscript have been referenced and all sources have been described.


Articles from Oncoimmunology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES