Abstract
Perchlorate (ClO4−) is a ground water pollutant that is challenging to remediate. We report a strategy to use Fe(II) tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine (TPA) complexes featuring appended aniline hydrogen bonds (H-bonds) to promote ClO4− reduction. These complexes facilitate oxygen atom transfer from ClO4− to PPh3 and also C–H oxygenation reactions of organic substrates. Catalytic reactions using 15 mol% afforded excellent yields for oxygenation of anthracene and cyclic alkyl aromatics, and this methodology tolerates aryl halides as well as heterocycles containing either O, S, or N.
Graphical Abstract

INTRODUCTION
An unfortunate consequence of the widespread use of perchlorates (ClO4−) in pyrotechnics, rocket fuels, and munitions is groundwater contamination near point sources of generation.1–8 Although commonly considered as an inert anion, ClO4− presents a high health risk because it competes with I−, disrupting normal thyroid function.3 Distinct from I− is the oxidizing strength of ClO4−; thus, if sequestered, ClO4− represents a strong oxidant that might have repurposed use in chemical synthesis.
The main challenge for any chemical reaction employing ClO4− as a reagent is to overcome its kinetic inertness. Select synthetic and biological systems overcome this inertness by forming thermodynamically strong M–O bonds (M= Mo, Re).9–20 One prominent homogeneous catalyst used for ClO4− reduction was reported by Abu-Omar using an oxazoline-ligated Re(V)-oxo catalyst (Figure 1a).9–11 Another important example is a Mo(VI)O2 precatalyst reported by Mösch-Zanetti and co-workers (Figure 1a).12–13 In both cases, phosphine or thioether substrates, which form strong O=PPh3 or O=SR2 bonds, are used as terminal O-atom acceptors. Similar catalyst designs have been employed with heterogenous systems using Pd/C supports for ClO4− reduction in aqueous media using H2 (Figure 1a).14–18
Figure 1.
a) Transition metal-based ClO4− reduction systems. b) ClO4− reduction using an H-bond appended ligand. c) Current approach featuring secondary sphere H-bond promoted ClO4− reduction/C–H oxygenation.
An alternative strategy to drive the challenging deoxygenation reaction is to use secondary sphere interactions to stabilize the resulting M–O bond, a design principle that is exploited by Mo-dependent perchlorate reductase enzymes.19–24 The H-bonding network helps direct the ClO4− anion to the Mo-center and plays key roles to influence the stability as well as reactivity of the oxygenated intermediates.20–21 Adapting this biological principle to synthetic systems, the Fout group developed an iron catalyst featuring a tripodal azafulvene-amine ligand that promotes deoxygenation/reduction chemistry (Figure 1b).25–26 They identified an H-bond stabilized Fe(III)–OH intermediate that is formed from the reduction of ClO4−.
Direct O-atom transfer from ClO4− to an Fe(II) center should form a putative Fe(IV)=O species. One ligand class that is featured prominently within the Fe(IV)=O literature is tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine (TPA), where FeIV(O)(TPA) complexes are often prepared using oxidants such as PhIO, H2O2, CH3CO3H, tBuOOH, etc.27–35 The oxygenation of aliphatic and aromatic C–H bonds is precedented by both heme and non-heme based Fe(IV)=O complexes.34–64 Aliphatic substrates are proposed to engage in hydrogen atom transfer (HAT)/radical rebound pathways.29–51, 53–64 Alternatively, aromatic C–H hydroxylation reactions are proposed to proceed via an electrophilic aromatic substitution pathway.52 Harnessing intramolecular secondary sphere H-bond donors on a non-heme Fe-system presents a promising strategy to afford C–H activation reactivity using ClO4− as the oxidant.
Despite the accessibility of Fe(IV)=O intermediates, Fe–TPA complexes are reported to be unreactive to ClO4−– structural characterization can even include ClO4− counterion(s).65–68 However, the Fout group’s work represents an attractive approach demonstrating that secondary sphere groups can be used to facilitate oxyanion reduction.25–26, 69–70 In addition to ClO4− reactivity, secondary sphere H-bonds donors have been shown to influence the stability of high-valent iron oxos.71–75 Our group is investigating the extent to which a metal’s secondary coordination sphere can be used for targeted reaction engineering by tuning the electronics, geometry, and cooperative metal-substrate-acid binding modes.76–78 We reasoned that an H-bond appended TPA system would provide thermodynamic stabilization of an F̵–O bond, ultimately driving the ClO4− reduction sequence. A related strategy was previously used by our group to capture O2 and stabilize otherwise unstable peroxo adducts with Zn and Cu.77–78 Based on the C–H oxygenation reactivity from related Fe-TPA complexes, we propose that O-atom transfer reactivity from ClO4− to Fe might be coupled with an oxygenation step of organic substrates (Figure 1c).79–80
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
We targeted an FeOTf2 complex coordinated to the tetradentate tripodal ligand tris(6-phenylamino-2-pyridylmethyl)amine (LH, Figure 2). Dropwise addition of 1.01 equiv LH to Fe(OTf)2 in MeCN followed by stirring for 48 h at room temperature afforded a pale-yellow powder in 87–95% yield. The 1H NMR spectrum indicated a mixture of products (I and II) (two sets of paramagnetic resonances). Modifying the procedure (faster rate of addition of LH) provided a single species (I; high spin, S = 2, μeff = 5.02 ± 0.15) (one of the two sets of resonances above) containing C3-symmetric paramagnetic resonances in the 1H NMR spectrum. Crystals obtained from this reaction (THF/pentane) were subjected to a single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD) experiment. The solid-state structure revealed LH coordinated to Fe with OTf− (axial) and THF (equatorial) molecules completing the octahedral coordination environment (Figure 2). The structural metrics of from the SCXRD data revealed an average Naniline–Oaxial bond distance of 3.022 Å, which is consistent with moderate-strength H-bonding interactions.81
Figure 2.
Synthesis of Fe(OTf)2LH complex. Molecular structures (50% probability) of I (THF adduct shown from crystals grown from THF/pentane), II, and III are shown (non-participating hydrogen atoms, counterions, and co-crystallized solvent molecules excluded for clarity).
Although a single compound could not be obtained from the mixture of products above, crystals of complex II were obtained by vapor diffusion of pentane into a THF solution and subjected to an SCXRD experiment. The solid-state structure revealed a distinct composition: an amidine ligand, likely formed by nucleophilic addition of the pendent aniline to a coordinated MeCN ligand (Figure 2). Reactions of amines with coordinated nitrile ligands are precedented,82–85 and formation of II is likely facilitated by: a) close proximity of the aniline to coordinated MeCN, and b) formation of a stable 6-membered chelate ring upon addition.
Despite the distinct solid-state structures of I and II, we found that I can convert to II in solution, and that both undergo ligand substitution reactions (see SI, figure S32 and S33). Heating an MeCN solution of a mixture of compound I/II to 80 °C increased resonances attributed to II. In a separate set of reactions, heating a solution containing 2.0 equiv NBu4Cl with a mixture of compound I/II to 80 °C cleanly afforded a single product. We assign the terminal product as FeCl2LH (III), based on spectroscopic comparisons to an authentic sample prepared by the reaction of FeCl2 and LH (Figure 2). These results indicate that, although mixtures of I/II are obtained during metalation in MeCN solvent, they both are competent precursors for ligand substitution reactions, and for clarity we denote their formulation throughout the manuscript as I*.86
To evaluate the extent to which appended H-bond donor groups influence ClO4− binding affinity for Fe(II), we examined the UV-Vis spectra of I* with 1.0 equiv [NBu4][ClO4] in MeCN at room temperature (Figure 3a). We observed an immediate change upon addition of ClO4−: a band at 645 nm (after 5 min) that transformed into a new band at 605 nm over 18 h.87 These observations differed when performing analogous control reactions using Fe-TPA variants devoid of secondary sphere H-bonding groups: Fe(OTf)2(6-Me3TPA) (IV, high spin) and Fe(OTf)2TPA (V, low spin). Neither complex displayed any changes to the UV-Vis spectra upon addition of 1.0 equiv of ClO4− (Figure 3b and SI, figures S36 and S38). Importantly, even introduction of a large excess (100 equiv) of [NBu4][ClO4] did not change the UV-Vis spectrum of IV (see SI, figure S37).88 These data demonstrate a clear difference between ligand variants and suggest that the appended HN-Ph groups facilitate ClO4− reactivity in a manner that is not solely due to increased binding affinity.
Figure 3.
UV-Vis studies of: Top, a) I* with [NBu4][ClO4] and (Ph3C)2. Bottom, b) IV and V with [NBu4][ClO4] independently.
The atypical UV-Vis result prompted us to examine the feasibility of ClO4− reduction in analogy to prior reports.9–13, 25–26 The UV-Vis experiment above was repeated with three variations. First, introduction of 4.0 equiv of an O-atom acceptor (PPh3) caused only slight changes to the UV-Vis spectrum when added 18 h after [NBu4][ClO4] and did not bleach the absorbance when added after 5 min. However, its addition prior to [NBu4][ClO4] afforded a distinct UV-Vis spectrum (see SI, figures S43–S45) and O=PPh3 in 38% yield.89 Second, introduction of a weak H-atom donor, 9,10-dihydroanthracene (DHA, 1a; BDE= 78 kcal/mol)46 (see SI, figures S41–S42) did not change the UV-Vis spectrum when added after 5 min or 18 h. Based on precedented reactivity of related high valent iron-oxos with DHA and PPh3,46, 90 we propose that neither of the compounds observed by UV-Vis spectroscopy correspond to a stable iron-oxo.
However, addition of Gomberg’s dimer ((Ph3C)2, a source of •CPh3) resulted in complete consumption of the 605 or 645 nm peak (Figure 3a and S40). When (Ph3C)2 was added prior to [NBu4][ClO4], no band at 645 nm was observed (see SI, figure S39). These observations demonstrate that the stable product formed upon introducing ClO4− reacts with •OH acceptors such as (Ph3C)2, and is thus consistent with an Fe(III)OH. By analogy to prior reports with O2 derived non-heme Fe(III)OH complexes,75, 91 we propose that the Fe(III)OH forms from a putative Fe(IV)=O.92
Following HAT to an Fe(IV)=O, the resulting Fe(III)–OH species can undergo •OH rebound to a carbon-based radical.93–94 We assessed this reactivity mode using (Ph3C)2 in presence of 1a, To target a catalytic system, we introduced AgOTf to sequester the formed Cl− (byproduct of exhaustive deoxygenation) and facilitate turnover. Addition of 1.0 equiv 1a (as a HAT source) and 1.0 equiv Ph3C• (via 0.5 equiv (Ph3C)2) to a mixture of 1.0 equiv [NBu4][ClO4], 1.0 equiv AgOTf, and 25 mol% I* afforded Ph3COH in 57% yield after heating to 80 °C for 24 h (Figure 4a). In addition to Ph3COH, we also observed the formation of two other oxidized products: anthracene (2a, 16%) and anthraquinone (2b, 37%).95 We found that both products were also formed in the absence of (Ph3C)2, albeit in lower yields (Figure 4b). Although these results may implicate •OH rebound reactivity with the product of HAT from 1a, we found that 2b was also generated when 2a was used directly as a substrate. Under identical reaction conditions, 2b formed from 2a in 40% yield (Figure 4c). These results prompted us to examine C–H oxygenation reactivity of anthracene.
Figure 4.
Initial C–H oxygenation experiments: a) with (Ph3C)2 in presence of 1a, b) with only 1a, c) with 2a.
Catalytic oxidation of anthracene to anthraquinone was optimized by varying loading, solvent, additives, temperature, and time (Table 1 and SI, table S2). Increasing the amount of [NBu4][ClO4] relative to I* and keeping other parameters the same increased the yield from 40% to 51% over 18 h at 12.5 mol% catalyst loading (Table 1, entry 1). The TON was calculated based on the mmol of [NBu4][ClO4] (TONClO4) and O-atoms (TONO) consumed (by 2a to form 2b) over mmol of catalyst used.96 Changing the solvent to propionitrile (EtCN) enabled higher reaction temperatures (120 °C) which further improved the yield (74%; TONClO4 = 1.48; entry 2).97 Activity was maintained at lower catalyst loadings, with 2.5 mol% I* affording a TONClO4 of 2.47 (entry 3).
Table 1.
Optimization of C–H oxidation of anthracenea
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| entry | catalyst (mol%) | solvent | temp (°C) | yield (%)b | TONClO4 (TONO) |
| 1 | I* (12.5) | MeCN | 80 | 51±1 | 1.01±0.02 (4.1±0.1) |
| 2 | I* (12.5) | EtCN | 120 | 74±3 | 1.48±0.02 (5.9±0.2) |
| 3 | I* (2.5) | EtCN | 120 | 25±2 | 2.47±0.21 (9.9±0.8) |
| 4 | VI (2.5) | EtCN | 120 | 42±2 | 4.17±0.15 (16.7±0.6) |
| 5 | VII (2.5) | EtCN | 120 | 11±2 | 1.10±0.17 (4.4±0.7) |
| 6 | IV (2.5) | EtCN | 120 | 5±1 | 0.50±0.10 (2.0±0.4) |
| 7 | V (2.5) | EtCN | 120 | 17±2 | 1.67±0.15 (6.7±0.6) |
| 8 | VI (7.5) | EtCN | 120 | 82±2 | 2.72±0.05 (10.9±0.2) |
| 9c | I* (12.5) | MeCN | 80 | 16±1 | 0.31±0.02 (1.3±0.1) |
| 10c,e | - | MeCN | 80 | nd | - |
| 11c,d,e | I* (12.5) | MeCN | 80 | nd | - |
Reaction conditions: [NBu4][ClO4] (0.08 mmol, 1.0 equiv), 2a (0.5 equiv), catalyst (mol%), AgOTf (0.5 equiv), solvent (1 mL).
1H NMR yield using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as internal standard.
without AgOTf.
without [NBu4][ClO4].
reaction was run for 24 h. TON was calculated by dividing the mmol of [NBu4][ClO4] consumed (TONClO4) and O-atoms (TONO) transferred (to form 2b) by mmol of I*used. Averages with associated standard deviations for yields and TONs are based on triplicate measurements.
We note that anthraquinone formation is precedented with Mn(IV)-oxo or hydroxo complexes to form H2O in addition to the ketone products.98–99 Addition of 5.0 equiv Me3SiCl after 18 h in conditions analogous to entry 1 indicated formation of ~3.0 equiv of (Me3Si)2O with respect to 2b (see SI, figure S72). This result implicates the generation of ~3.0 equiv of H2O during the reaction. As an alternative technique, we directly quantified ClO4− by ion-selective electrode (ISE) conductivity measurements (see SI, tables S4–S7 and figure S73). This analysis was performed after repeating the experiment in entry 1, followed by solvent removal in vacuo, then reconstitution in H2O. This procedure facilitated the measurement of dissolved ClO4− and afforded a value of ~0.025 mmol of [ClO4−] consumed (0.08 mmol added). This value corresponds to an overall loss of ~2.5 equiv with respect to I* (~10 TON with respect to O-atoms transferred). The TON exceeds that observed from the 1H NMR calculations (4.1). This result is consistent with the formation of ~3.0 equiv of H2O in addition to 2b. To simplify the TON analysis (quantification of [ClO4−] and O-atoms consumed with respect to I*), we report the TON by only taking account of the O-atoms transferred to anthraquinone from [NBu4][ClO4], measured using NMR spectroscopy.96
Given that many FeIV(O)(TPA) complexes form bis-μ-oxo dimeric structures that are less active for O-atom transfer reactivity than the monomers,100 we hypothesized that catalytic activity could be improved by modifying the ligand architecture with sterically encumbering groups. We prepared electronically distinct, yet sterically analogous compounds VI and VII featuring two new ligand variants containing 3,5-substituents at the aniline unit: LtBu (electron-rich) and LCF3 (electron-deficient) (Figure 5). Both complexes are high spin (S = 2); (μeff = 5.27 ± 0.13) (VI) and (μeff= 5.20 ± 0.20) (VII) and show similar spectroscopic data to I. To evaluate the redox properties of each TPA variant, we performed electrochemical analysis experiments in 0.1 M NBu4Cl in dimethylformamide, conditions that form the corresponding FeCl2LR complexes in-situ.101 Complexes I, VI, and VII all exhibit reversible FeII/III redox couples at a similar potential (E1/2 = –0.560 V vs Fc). The <10 mV difference in redox potentials between the three variants demonstrates that changes in ClO4− reactivity are unlikely to be attributed to differences in their reducing ability.
Figure 5.
Synthesis of Fe(OTf)2LR complexes and stacked cyclic voltammograms of in-situ generated FeCl2LR complexes derived from I, VI, and VII. Molecular structure (50% probability) of VI shown (co-crystallized solvent molecules and non-participating hydrogen atoms excluded for clarity).
The solid-state structures of VI and VII are pseudo-octahedral and contain two coordinated OTf− ligands (Figure 5 and SI, figure S103). SCXRD data show an average Naniline–Oaxial bond distance of 3.08 Å for complex VI and 3.044 Å for complex VII which is comparable to 3.022 Å (I) and similarly fall in the region of intermediate strength H-bond distances. These observations, along with the cyclic voltammetry results indicate that differences in ClO4− reactivity are most likely derived from the secondary sphere aniline groups, rather than redox tuning at Fe. Complexes VI and VII similarly exhibit 1H NMR spectra consistent with C3 symmetry, while the 19F NMR spectrum exhibited no free OTf− signals. However, 1H and 19F NMR recorded at −40 °C (VI) showed increased numbers of paramagnetic signals consistent with rapid OTf− exchange on the NMR timescale. This process was reversible when warmed to room temperature (see SI, figures S34–S35). In addition to these aniline TPA derivatives, we also evaluated two complexes devoid of secondary H-bond donors: TPA ligands containing either –CH3 (IV) or –H (V) in place of the –HNAr units.
Following their preparation, we directly compared catalytic reactivity across the series. Complex VI, containing tBu groups, provided the highest yield (43%; TONClO4 = 4.17, entry 4).102 In contrast, complex VII with CF3-substituents, afforded a lower yield (11%, entry 5). Control complexes (IV and V) similarly showed low catalytic activity, providing 5% and 17% yields of 2b, respectively (entries 6, 7). We found that a catalyst loading of 7.5 mol% provided an optimal yield of 82% with a TONClO4 of 2.72 (entry 8). The role of AgOTf additive was apparent: in its absence, the yield reduced to 16% (entry 9).103 Finally, control experiments indicated no detection of the desired product in the absence of either I* or [NBu4][ClO4] (entries 10, 11).
After optimizing the conditions (Table 1, entry 8), we next explored the substrate scope on a 0.1 mmol scale (Figure 6). Alkylaromatic substrates with C–H bond BDEs in the range of 68–86 kcal/mol, anthracene (BDE = 111 kcal/mol), and its chloro-derivative were examined.46, 104–105 Anthracene converted to anthraquinone (2b) in an excellent 92% isolated yield. The methodology was compatible with a halide functionality as shown by 2-chloroanthracene, which furnished 86% of the corresponding anthraquinone derivative (2c). Benzylic systems composed of relatively weak C–H bonds were next evaluated. DHA furnished a mixture of anthracene and anthraquinone in 7% and 58% yields respectively. When anthrone was used as a substrate, a potential intermediate en route to anthraquinone, 2b formed in almost quantitative yield (97%).
Figure 6.
Scope of C–H substrates. a1H NMR yield using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as internal standard. bI (25 mol%) used as catalyst. c0.04 mmol PhCH(OH)Ph used as a substrate.
Heterocyclic benzylic substrates were tolerated, forming products derived from xanthene (2d) (75.2 kcal/mol), thioxanthene (2e) (74.6 kcal/mol), N-substituted (methyl, 2f) (80 kcal/mol) and (phenyl, 2g) dihydroacridines in the range of 61–98% yields. The 5-membered carbocyclic substrate fluorene (~82.2 kcal/mol) gave only trace amounts of the fluorenone product (2h, 7%). This result could be attributed to the comparatively higher BDE of the fluorenyl C–H bond, compared to DHA. However, 1,4-dihydronaphthalene, a substrate with a similar BDE (83 kcal/mol) to fluorene, generated naphthalene (2i) in an excellent 95% yield but did not afford 1,4-naphthaquinone. Acyclic substrates, diphenylmethane (82 kcal/mol) formed benzophenone (2j) only in trace amounts (<2%), whereas ethylbenzene (~85.4 kcal/mol) did not yield the respective ketone product, acetophenone (2k), at all. The trace or non-formation of products in case of fluorene, diphenylmethane, and ethylbenzene provide support that these reactions are not strictly governed by BDE values.
We performed isotope labelling experiments using H218O as a mechanistic probe. We introduced 5.0 equiv of H218O prior to addition of [NBu4][ClO4] and I* and then subjected the sample to the reaction conditions analogous to entry 1 (Table 1). Ex-situ analysis by GC-MS showed 18O-incorporation in anthraquinone as a mixture of [M], [M+2], and [M+4] products (see SI, figures S75–S81). This observation is consistent with either: 1) 18O exchange at Fe prior to oxygenation, or 2) addition of H2O or OH− to the oxidized anthracene. Note that (1) has been previously reported with related Fe(IV)=O species,52, 106 and (2) has been implicated in the direct oxidation of anthracene by ClO2.107
Based on the above observations, we propose these reactions proceed analogous to prior reports with related systems (see SI, figure S82).37, 46, 52, 99 Alkylaromatics often undergo a HAT-initiated mechanism,37, 46 while anthracene may undergo either an electrophilic attack or outer-sphere oxidation by an Fe(IV)=O species.52, 99 Based on the distinct reaction outcomes when using fluorene, diphenylmethane, and 1,4-dihydronaphthalene, which all feature similar BDE values, we propose that the H-atom transfer step does not govern the reaction success. Instead, the oxygenation step(s) determines the net reaction. This conclusion was supported by separate reactions when diphenylmethanol was used as a substrate: benzophenone formed in 87% yield (see SI, figure S98); however, this product was only formed in trace amounts when diphenylmethane was treated as a substrate.
CONCLUSION
In summary, we have reported a secondary sphere H-bond assisted ClO4− reduction protocol coupled with C–H oxidation. This system employs appended aniline (–NH) H-bond donors that are proposed to function by stabilizing the product of O-atom transfer. This catalytic system exhibits radical rebound chemistry via sequential HAT/OAT reactions to afford C–H oxidized products. Ongoing work aims to identify the product of O-atom transfer formed from ClO4− in addition to improving the C–H oxygenation scope as well as elucidating the underlying mechanistic details.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank Dr. Fengrui Qu for SCXRD data collection and assistance in solving X-ray data, Prof. Corinna Schindler for discussion regarding AgCl characterization, and Dr. Leila Foroughi and Prof. Adam Matzger for assistance with PXRD.
Funding Sources
This work was supported by the NIGMS of the NIH under Award 1R35GM136360-01. N.K.S. is a Camille Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar.
Footnotes
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
Accession Codes
CCDC 2314264–2314268 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif, or by emailing data_request@ccdc.cam.ac.uk, or by contacting The CambridgeCrystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033.
Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website.
Full experimental procedures and characterization data, including UV-Vis, NMR, IR spectra, and MS (PDF).
REFERENCES
- (1).Motzer WE Perchlorate: Problems, Detection, and Solutions. Environ. Forensics 2001, 2, 301–311. [Google Scholar]
- (2).Choe JK; Mehnert MH; Guest JS; Strathmann TJ; Werth CJ Comparative Assessment of the Environmental Sustainability of Existing and Emerging Perchlorate Treatment Technologies for Drinking Water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 4644–4652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Srinivasan A; Viraraghavan T Perchlorate: Health Effects and Technologies for Its Removal from Water Resources. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2009, 6, 1418–1442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Yamauchi K, Perchlorate. In Handbook of Hormones, Elsevier, Inc., 2016; pp 596–597. [Google Scholar]
- (5).Brandhuber P; Clark S; Morley K A review of perchlorate occurrence in public drinking water systems. Journal AWWA 2009, 101, 63–73. [Google Scholar]
- (6).Greer MA; Goodman G; Pleus RC; Greer SE Health effects assessment for environmental perchlorate contamination: the dose response for inhibition of thyroidal radioiodine uptake in humans. Environmental Health Perspectives 2002, 110, 927–937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Llorente-Esteban A; Manville RW; Reyna-Neyra A; Abbott GW; Amzel LM; Carrasco N Allosteric regulation of mammalian Na+/I− symporter activity by perchlorate. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 2020, 27, 533–539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Blount BC; Alwis KU; Jain RB; Solomon BL; Morrow JC; Jackson WA Perchlorate, Nitrate, and Iodide Intake through Tap Water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 9564–9570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Abu-Omar MM; McPherson LD; Arias J; Béreau VM Clean and Efficient Catalytic Reduction of Perchlorate. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4310–4313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Abu-Omar MM Effective and Catalytic Reduction of Perchlorate by Atom Transfer–Reaction Kinetics and Mechanisms. Comments Inorg. Chem. 2003, 24, 15–37. [Google Scholar]
- (11).McPherson LD; Drees M; Khan SI; Strassner T; Abu-Omar MM Multielectron Atom Transfer Reactions of Perchlorate and Other Substrates Catalyzed by Rhenium Oxazoline and Thiazoline Complexes: Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms, and Density Functional Theory Calculations. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 4036–4050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Ehweiner MA; Wiedemaier F; Lajin B; Schachner JA; Belaj F; Goessler W; Mösch-Zanetti NC Nature-Inspired Homogeneous Catalytic Perchlorate Reduction Using Molybdenum Complexes. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 11754–11761. [Google Scholar]
- (13).Bondi R; Ehweiner MA; Belaj F; Mösch-Zanetti NC Perchlorate reduction catalyzed by dioxidomolybdenum(VI) complexes: Effect of ligand substituents. J. Catal. 2022, 416, 344–351. [Google Scholar]
- (14).Liu J; Choe JK; Wang Y; Shapley JR; Werth CJ; Strathmann TJ Bioinspired Complex-Nanoparticle Hybrid Catalyst System for Aqueous Perchlorate Reduction: Rhenium Speciation and Its Influence on Catalyst Activity. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 511–522. [Google Scholar]
- (15).Liu J; Chen X; Wang Y; Strathmann TJ; Werth CJ Mechanism and Mitigation of the Decomposition of an Oxorhenium Complex-Based Heterogeneous Catalyst for Perchlorate Reduction in Water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 12932–12940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Liu J; Wu D; Su X; Han M; Kimura SY; Gray DL; Shapley JR; Abu-Omar MM; Werth CJ; Strathmann TJ Configuration Control in the Synthesis of Homo- and Heteroleptic Bis(oxazolinylphenolato/thiazolinylphenolato) Chelate Ligand Complexes of Oxorhenium(V): Isomer Effect on Ancillary Ligand Exchange Dynamics and Implications for Perchlorate Reduction Catalysis. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 2597–2611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Ren C; Yang P; Sun J; Bi EY; Gao J; Palmer J; Zhu M; Wu Y; Liu J A Bioinspired Molybdenum Catalyst for Aqueous Perchlorate Reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 7891–7896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Ren C; Liu J Bioinspired Catalytic Reduction of Aqueous Perchlorate by One Single-Metal Site with High Stability against Oxidative Deactivation. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 6715–6725. [Google Scholar]
- (19).Oosterkamp Margreet J.; Mehboob F; Schraa G; Plugge Caroline M.; Stams Alfons J. M. Nitrate and (per)chlorate reduction pathways in (per)chlorate-reducing bacteria. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2011, 39, 230–235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Youngblut MD; Tsai CL; Clark IC; Carlson HK; Maglaqui AP; Gau-Pan PS; Redford SA; Wong A; Tainer JA; Coates JD Perchlorate Reductase Is Distinguished by Active Site Aromatic Gate Residues. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 9190–202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Sun S-Q; Chen S-L How does Mo-dependent perchlorate reductase work in the decomposition of oxyanions? Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 5683–5691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Youngblut MD; Wang O; Barnum TP; Coates JD (Per)chlorate in Biology on Earth and Beyond. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 70, 435–457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Bender KS; Shang C; Chakraborty R; Belchik SM; Coates JD; Achenbach LA Identification, Characterization, and Classification of Genes Encoding Perchlorate Reductase. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 5090–5096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Coates JD; Achenbach LA Microbial perchlorate reduction: rocket-fuelled metabolism. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 569–580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Ford CL; Park YJ; Matson EM; Gordon Z; Fout AR A bioinspired iron catalyst for nitrate and perchlorate reduction. Science 2016, 354, 741–743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Drummond MJ; Miller TJ; Ford CL; Fout AR Catalytic Perchlorate Reduction Using Iron: Mechanistic Insights and Improved Catalyst Turnover. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 3175–3182. [Google Scholar]
- (27).Que L Jr. The Road to Non-Heme Oxoferryls and Beyond. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 493–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (28).Lange SJ; Miyake H; Que L Evidence for a Nonheme Fe(IV)O Species in the Intramolecular Hydroxylation of a Phenyl Moiety. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 6330–6331. [Google Scholar]
- (29).McDonald AR; Que L High-valent nonheme iron-oxo complexes: Synthesis, structure, and spectroscopy. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2013, 257, 414–428. [Google Scholar]
- (30).Miyake H; Chen K; Lange SJ; Que L “Intermolecular” Trapping of a Nonheme Fe(IV)O Intermediate. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 3534–3538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).Kaizer J; Costas M; Que L Jr. A Dramatic Push Effect on the Homolysis of FeIII(OOR) Intermediates To Form Non-Heme FeIVO Complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3671–3673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (32).Lim MH; Rohde J-U; Stubna A; Bukowski MR; Costas M; Ho RYN; Münck E; Nam W; Que L An FeIV=O complex of a tetradentate tripodal nonheme ligand. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 3665–3670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (33).Rohde J-U; In J-H; Lim MH; Brennessel WW; Bukowski MR; Stubna A; Münck E; Nam W; Que L Crystallographic and Spectroscopic Characterization of a Nonheme Fe(IV)=O Complex. Science 2003, 299, 1037–1039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (34).Britovsek GJP; England J; White AJP Non-heme Iron(II) Complexes Containing Tripodal Tetradentate Nitrogen Ligands and Their Application in Alkane Oxidation Catalysis. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 8125–8134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (35).Bukowski MR; Comba P; Lienke A; Limberg C; Lopez de Laorden C; Mas-Ballesté R; Merz M; Que L Jr. Catalytic Epoxidation and 1,2-Dihydroxylation of Olefins with Bispidine–Iron(II)/H2O2 Systems. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3446–3449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (36).Guo M; Corona T; Ray K; Nam W Heme and Nonheme High-Valent Iron and Manganese Oxo Cores in Biological and Abiological Oxidation Reactions. ACS Cent. Sci. 2019, 5, 13–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (37).Nam W High-Valent Iron(IV)–Oxo Complexes of Heme and Non-Heme Ligands in Oxygenation Reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 522–531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (38).Nam W; Lee Y-M; Fukuzumi S Hydrogen Atom Transfer Reactions of Mononuclear Nonheme Metal–Oxygen Intermediates. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 2014–2022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (39).Jeong YJ; Kang Y; Han A-R; Lee Y-M; Kotani H; Fukuzumi S; Nam W Hydrogen Atom Abstraction and Hydride Transfer Reactions by Iron(IV)–Oxo Porphyrins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7321–7324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (40).Kaizer J; Klinker EJ; Oh NY; Rohde J-U; Song WJ; Stubna A; Kim J; Münck E; Nam W; Que L Nonheme FeIVO Complexes That Can Oxidize the C–H Bonds of Cyclohexane at Room Temperature. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 472–473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (41).Bigi JP; Harman WH; Lassalle-Kaiser B; Robles DM; Stich TA; Yano J; Britt RD; Chang CJ A High-Spin Iron(IV)–Oxo Complex Supported by a Trigonal Nonheme Pyrrolide Platform. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1536–1542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (42).Shaik S; Hirao H; Kumar D Reactivity of High-Valent Iron–Oxo Species in Enzymes and Synthetic Reagents: A Tale of Many States. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 532–542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (43).Groves JT High-valent iron in chemical and biological oxidations. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2006, 100, 434–447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (44).Comba P; Maurer M; Vadivelu P Oxidation of Cyclohexane by High-Valent Iron Bispidine Complexes: Tetradentate versus Pentadentate Ligands. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 10389–10396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (45).Gunay A; Theopold KH C–H Bond Activations by Metal Oxo Compounds. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 1060–1081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (46).Xue X-S; Ji P; Zhou B; Cheng J-P The Essential Role of Bond Energetics in C–H Activation/Functionalization. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 8622–8648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (47).Warm K; Paskin A; Kuhlmann U; Bill E; Swart M; Haumann M; Dau H; Hildebrandt P; Ray K A Pseudotetrahedral Terminal Oxoiron(IV) Complex: Mechanistic Promiscuity in C–H Bond Oxidation Reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 6752–6756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (48).Fukuzumi S; Cho K-B; Lee Y-M; Hong S; Nam W Mechanistic dichotomies in redox reactions of mononuclear metal–oxygen intermediates. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 8988–9027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (49).Liu Y; You T; Wang H-X; Tang Z; Zhou C-Y; Che C-M Iron- and cobalt-catalyzed C(sp3)–H bond functionalization reactions and their application in organic synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 5310–5358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (50).Sacramento JJD; Goldberg DP Factors Affecting Hydrogen Atom Transfer Reactivity of Metal–Oxo Porphyrinoid Complexes. Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 2641–2652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (51).Cho K-B; Hirao H; Shaik S; Nam W To rebound or dissociate? This is the mechanistic question in C–H hydroxylation by heme and nonheme metal–oxo complexes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 1197–1210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (52).de Visser SP; Oh K; Han A-R; Nam W Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study on Aromatic Hydroxylation by Mononuclear Nonheme Iron(IV)−Oxo Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 4632–4641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (53).Olivo G; Cussó O; Costas M Biologically Inspired C–H and C=C Oxidations with Hydrogen Peroxide Catalyzed by Iron Coordination Complexes. Chem. Asian J. 2016, 11, 3148–3158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (54).Lee JL; Ross DL; Barman SK; Ziller JW; Borovik AS C–H Bond Cleavage by Bioinspired Nonheme Metal Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 13759–13783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (55).Gandeepan P; Müller T; Zell D; Cera G; Warratz S; Ackermann L 3d Transition Metals for C–H Activation. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 2192–2452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (56).Larson VA; Battistella B; Ray K; Lehnert N; Nam W Iron and manganese oxo complexes, oxo wall and beyond. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2020, 4, 404–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (57).Huang X; Groves JT Beyond ferryl-mediated hydroxylation: 40 years of the rebound mechanism and C–H activation. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 22, 185–207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (58).Chen Z; Yin G The reactivity of the active metal oxo and hydroxo intermediates and their implications in oxidations. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 1083–1100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (59).Nam W; Lee Y-M; Fukuzumi S Tuning Reactivity and Mechanism in Oxidation Reactions by Mononuclear Nonheme Iron(IV)-Oxo Complexes. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 1146–1154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (60).Hohenberger J; Ray K; Meyer K The biology and chemistry of high-valent iron–oxo and iron–nitrido complexes. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (61).Warren JJ; Tronic TA; Mayer JM Thermochemistry of Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Reagents and its Implications. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6961–7001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (62).Krebs C; Galonić Fujimori D; Walsh CT; Bollinger JM Jr. Non-Heme Fe(IV)–Oxo Intermediates. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 484–492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (63).Biswas AN; Puri M; Meier KK; Oloo WN; Rohde GT; Bominaar EL; Münck E; Que L Jr. Modeling TauD-J: A High-Spin Nonheme Oxoiron(IV) Complex with High Reactivity toward C–H Bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 2428–2431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (64).Puri M; Que L Jr. Toward the Synthesis of More Reactive S = 2 Non-Heme Oxoiron(IV) Complexes. Acc. Chem. Res. 2015, 48, 2443–2452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (65).Zang Y; Kim J; Dong Y; Wilkinson EC; Appelman EH; Que L Models for Nonheme Iron Intermediates: Structural Basis for Tuning the Spin States of Fe(TPA) Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 4197–4205. [Google Scholar]
- (66).Chen K; Que L Stereospecific Alkane Hydroxylation by Non-Heme Iron Catalysts: Mechanistic Evidence for an Fe(V)O Active Species. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6327–6337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (67).Singh O; Tyagi N; Olmstead MM; Ghosh K The design of synthetic superoxide dismutase mimetics: seven-coordinate water soluble manganese(II) and iron(II) complexes and their superoxide dismutase-like activity studies. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 14186–14191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (68).Annaraj J; Kim S; Seo MS; Lee Y-M; Kim Y; Kim S-J; Choi YS; Jang HG; Nam W An iron(II) complex with a N3S2 thioether ligand in the generation of an iron(IV)-oxo complex and its reactivity in olefin epoxidation. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2009, 362, 1031–1034. [Google Scholar]
- (69).Gullett KL; Ford CL; Garvey IJ; Miller TJ; Leahy CA; Awaitey LN; Hofmann DM; Woods TJ; Fout AR Formation of Red Elemental Selenium from Seleniferous Oxyanions: Deoxygenation by a Homogeneous Iron Catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 20868–20873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (70).Park YJ; Peñas-Defrutos MN; Drummond MJ; Gordon Z; Kelly OR; Garvey IJ; Gullett KL; García-Melchor M; Fout AR Secondary Coordination Sphere Influences the Formation of Fe(III)-O or Fe(III)-OH in Nitrite Reduction: A Synthetic and Computational Study. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 61, 8182–8192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (71).Oswald VF; Lee JL; Biswas S; Weitz AC; Mittra K; Fan R; Li J; Zhao J; Hu MY; Alp EE; Bominaar EL; Guo Y; Green MT; Hendrich MP; Borovik AS Effects of Noncovalent Interactions on High-Spin Fe(IV)–Oxido Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 11804–11817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (72).Mukherjee J; Lucas RL; Zart MK; Powell DR; Day VW; Borovik AS Synthesis, Structure, and Physical Properties for a Series of Monomeric Iron(III) Hydroxo Complexes with Varying Hydrogen-Bond Networks. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 5780–5786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (73).Lacy DC; Gupta R; Stone KL; Greaves J; Ziller JW; Hendrich MP; Borovik AS Formation, Structure, and EPR Detection of a High Spin Fe(IV)—Oxo Species Derived from Either an Fe(III)—Oxo or Fe(III)—OH Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 12188–12190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (74).Borovik AS Bioinspired Hydrogen Bond Motifs in Ligand Design: The Role of Noncovalent Interactions in Metal Ion Mediated Activation of Dioxygen. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 54–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (75).MacBeth CE; Golombek AP; Young VG; Yang C; Kuczera K; Hendrich MP; Borovik AS O2 Activation by Nonheme Iron Complexes: A Monomeric Fe(III)-Oxo Complex Derived From O2. Science 2000, 289, 938–941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (76).Wilson JR; Zeller M; Szymczak NK Hydrogen-bonded Nickel(I) complexes. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 753–756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (77).Dahl EW; Dong HT; Szymczak NK Phenylamino derivatives of tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine: hydrogen-bonded peroxodicopper complexes. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 892–895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (78).Dahl EW; Kiernicki JJ; Zeller M; Szymczak NK Hydrogen Bonds Dictate O2 Capture and Release within a Zinc Tripod. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 10075–10079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (79).Photocatalytic O-atom transfer from ClO4- to hydrocarbons has been previously reported using Mn(III)tetraphenylporphyrin. See: Suslick, K. S. A., Francis V.; Cook, B. R. Photocatalytic oxidation of hydrocarbons by (5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrinato)manganese(II) perchlorate and periodate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 2818–2819. [Google Scholar]
- (80).Another photocatalytic O-atom transfer approach from ClO4- to hydrocarbons was reported using Porphyrin-Iron(IV) Diperchlorates. See: Pan, Z.; Wang, Q.; Sheng, X.; Horner, J. H.; Newcomb, M. Highly Reactive Porphyrin−Iron−Oxo Derivatives Produced by Photolyses of Metastable Porphyrin−Iron(IV) Diperchlorates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 2621–2628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (81).Steiner T The Hydrogen Bond in the Solid State. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 48–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (82).Kukushkin VY; Pombeiro AJL Additions to Metal-Activated Organonitriles. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 1771–1802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (83).Michelin RA; Mozzon M; Bertani R Reactions of transition metal-coordinated nitriles. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1996, 147, 299–338. [Google Scholar]
- (84).Rousselet G; Capdevielle P; Maumy M Copper(I)-induced addition of amines to unactivated nitriles: The first general one-step synthesis of alkyl amidines. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 6395–6398. [Google Scholar]
- (85).Podjed N; Modec B Amidines from cyclic amines and nitriles in the presence of zinc(II): other nitriles in place of acetonitrile. New J. Chem. 2022, 46, 23225–23238. [Google Scholar]
- (86).Purity of complex I in I* lies in the range of 92% to >99%, see SI for details.
- (87).For comparison of these two species to the product of PhIO reacting with I*, see SI, figures 51–52.
- (88).Complex IV was selected for this experiment because it exhibits the same spin state as complex I.
- (89).The conversion improved to 3.4 equiv (84% yield) when heated to 80 °C for 24 h. Control experiments in the absence of either I* or [NBu4][ClO4] (or both) yielded a maximum of 0.2 equiv PPh3O (<5% yield) implying minimal background oxidation of the substrate. All the PPh3 to PPh3O transformation reactions were run for 24 h and analyzed by GC-FID experiments (see SI for details).
- (90).Li M; Li H; Ling C; Shang H; Wang H; Zhao S; Liang C; Mao C; Guo F; Zhou B; Ai Z; Zhang L Highly selective synthesis of surface Fe(IV)=O with nanoscale zero-valent iron and chlorite for efficient oxygen transfer reactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2023, 120, e2304562120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (91).Yadav V; Gordon JB; Siegler MA; Goldberg DP Dioxygen-Derived Nonheme Mononuclear FeIII(OH) Complex and Its Reactivity with Carbon Radicals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 10148–10153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (92).Analysis of ESI-MS after the reaction between I* and [NBu4][ClO4] indicated a mixture of Fe–Cl and Fe–O species (see SI for details).
- (93).Zaragoza JPT; Yosca TH; Siegler MA; Moënne-Loccoz P; Green MT; Goldberg DP Direct Observation of Oxygen Rebound with an Iron-Hydroxide Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 13640–13643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (94).Drummond MJ; Ford CL; Gray DL; Popescu CV; Fout AR Radical Rebound Hydroxylation Versus H-Atom Transfer in Non-Heme Iron(III)-Hydroxo Complexes: Reactivity and Structural Differentiation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 6639–6650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (95).Independent reaction between I* and (Ph3C)2 did not yield the alcohol product (see SI for details).
- (96).This analysis only takes into account O-atoms transferred to 2b; however, because other oxygen-containing products are also observed, vide infra, these TON represent lower limits.
- (97).Other manipulations, including alterations in time and temperature, various additive and perchlorate salt screenings, changing their loadings either gave low yields or no product at all (see SI, Table S1).
- (98).Lee Y; Tripodi GL; Jeong D; Lee S; Roithova J; Cho J Aliphatic and Aromatic C–H Bond Oxidation by High-Valent Manganese(IV)-Hydroxo Species. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 20752–20762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (99).Sharma N; Jung J; Lee Y-M; Seo MS; Nam W; Fukuzumi S Multi-Electron Oxidation of Anthracene Derivatives by Nonheme Manganese(IV)-Oxo Complexes. Chem. Eur. J. 2017, 23, 7125–7131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (100).Kojima T; Leising RA; Yan S; Que L Jr. Alkane functionalization at nonheme iron centers. Stoichiometric transfer of metal-bound ligands to alkane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 11328–11335. [Google Scholar]
- (101).See SI Figure S15 and S16 for validation of formation of FeCl2 complexes in-situ.
- (102).We note that VI also reacted with [NBu4][ClO4] analogously to complex I* by UV-Vis analysis (see SI, figures 46, 53–54). The product after ClO4- addition showed similar reactivity with (Ph3C)2 and PPh3 after 5 min or 18 h (see SI, figures 47–50).
- (103).The solid residue formed in the catalytic reactions was found to be AgCl from PXRD analysis (see SI for details).
- (104).Barckholtz C; Barckholtz TA; Hadad CM C–H and N−H Bond Dissociation Energies of Small Aromatic Hydrocarbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 491–500. [Google Scholar]
- (105).Luo Y-R Comprehensive handbook of chemical bond energies. CRC press: Boca Raton, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- (106).Lee KA; Nam W Determination of Reactive Intermediates in Iron Porphyrin Complex-Catalyzed Oxygenations of Hydrocarbons Using Isotopically Labeled Water: Mechanistic Insights. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1916–1922. [Google Scholar]
- (107).Sun Y; Niu W-K; Hu X-J; Ma X-H; Sun Y-J; Wen Y Oxidative degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in contaminated industrial soil using chlorine dioxide. Chem.Eng. J. 2020, 394, 124857. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






